Report of LAWASIA Fact-Finding Mission to Pakistan 17-21 July 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of LAWASIA Fact-Finding Mission to Pakistan 17-21 July 2008 Report of LAWASIA Fact-finding Mission to Pakistan 17-21 July 2008 LAWASIA Secretariat GPO Box 980 BRISBANE QLD AUSTRALIA 4001 tel: +61 7 3222 5888 fax: +61 7 3222 5850 email: [email protected] website: www.lawasia.asn.au LAWASIA FACT-FINDING MISSION TO PAKISTAN 17-21 JULY 2008 Contents 1. Executive summary p. 3 2. Terms of reference p. 4 3. Members of the LAWASIA Fact-finding Mission P. 4 4. Acknowledgements p. 4-5 5. Persons interviewed pp. 6-7 6. Timeline pp. 6-10 7. The current controversy pp. 10-11 8. Undercurrents pp. 11-12 9. Mission conclusions/recommendations pp. 12-14 Annexures • Proclamation of Emergency, issued November 3, 2007 pp. 16-17 • Provisional Constitution Order No 1 of 2007 pp. 18-20 • Oath of Office (Judges) Order, 2007, November 3, 2007 pp. 21-22 • Text of Murree Declaration p. 23 • Text of proposed constitutional amendments pp. 24-43 • Resolution of Pakistan Bar Council of 22 June 2008 pp. 44-47 2 LAWASIA FACT-FINDING MISSION TO PAKISTAN 17-21 JULY 2008 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The observations and conclusions of the fact-finding mission to Pakistan can be summarised as follows: (a) The independence of the judiciary and how that relates to integrity of the Constitution of Pakistan have been underlying matters of considerable concern to the legal community of Pakistan in particular since October 1999 which saw a military takeover of government; (b) These matters relate directly to the rule of law and have impacted on democratic government in Pakistan; (c) The actions of President Musharraf in March 2007 in declaring Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry “non-functional” and the subsequent action taken against the Chief Justice and other members of the judiciary after a proclamation of a state of emergency on 3 November would seem to offer justification for these concerns; (d) The delay in restoring the judiciary to the position of 2 November 2007 according to the government’s undertaking in the Murree Declaration would seem to have exacerbated the situation. It has, however, further strengthened the resolve of the lawyers’ movement in support of a full restoration of judiciary and against further constitutional amendment other than a return to the constitutional position of 12 October 1999; (e) the proposed constitutional amendments include measures that can be viewed as attempts to curtail and limit the powers and independence of judiciary and do not appear to be necessary to resolve the issue of the restoration of the judiciary to the position of 2 November 2007; (f) the resolve of the deposed judges to maintain an independent judiciary, coupled with the support of the lawyers’ movement for their actions merit continued international attention in general but particularly deserve the practical support of the international legal community. 3 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE 2.1 It was resolved by the LAWASIA Executive Committee that LAWASIA should send a fact- finding mission to Pakistan, with the intent of developing an understanding of issues related to the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and the independence of lawyers and the bar, following the change of government in February 2008. 2.2 The formal terms of reference are as follows: 1. to meet with a wide range of key personnel in Pakistan’s legal community and seek their reactions to the current situation as it pertains to rule of law, independence of the judiciary and the independence of lawyers and the bar; 2. to understand issues that confront the legal profession in the aftermath of the last 14 months where its strike action in support of an independent judiciary was a pivotal factor in rule of law outcomes in Pakistan; 3. to gain an impression of the future of the legal community and justice system under the new government; 4. to consider, based on its findings, how LAWASIA can best support and promote the interests of the Pakistan Bar Council and the legal community as a whole, and how it can best assist in supporting the rule of law and an independent judiciary and profession in Pakistan. 3. MEMBERS OF THE LAWASIA FACT-FINDING MISSION 3.1 The members of the mission were: Mr Mah Weng Kwai, president of LAWASIA and former president of the Malaysian Bar Council; Mr Prashant Kumar, ExCo member of LAWASIA and honourary joint treasurer of the Bar Association of India; Mr Christopher Leong, LAWASIA member and Council member of the Malaysian Bar Council; Ms Janet Neville, CEO/Secretary-general of LAWASIA. 4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4.1 LAWASIA acknowledges with gratitude the support and interest of the Malaysian Bar 4 Council in facilitating the attendance of Mr Leong as a member of the mission; 4.2 The mission notes with deep appreciation the invaluable support, advice and practical assistance provided by the Pakistan Bar Council; 4.3 It records its gratitude to the Lahore High Court Bar Association, the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan, the Honourable Minister for Law, Justice and Human Rights, the Office of the Attorney-General of Pakistan, the Sindh High Court Bar Association and the Sindh Bar Council for arranging receptions for the mission; 4.4 It acknowledges with particular thanks the generosity, hospitality, wide-ranging assistance and encouragement provided by LAWASIA member, Mr Mohammad Akram Sheikh, in planning and reception of the mission; 4.5 It thanks the Chief Minister of Punjab, the Hon Mian Shabhaz Sharif, the Hon Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry and the Hon Chief Justice Sabihuddin Ahmad not only for their willingness to spend time with the mission but also for their kind hospitality; 4.6 Above all, LAWASIA records its sincere appreciation to the many in Pakistan who willingly and openly shared information, views and experiences with the mission. 5. PERSONS INTERVIEWED 5.1 The mission was able, at meetings and receptions arranged, to speak to many judges, lawyers and others. The listing below is indicative, not exhaustive: • Hon Senator Farooq Naek, Minister of Law, Justice and Human Rights; • Hon Mian Shabhaz Sharif, Chief Minister, Punjab; • Hon Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, deposed Chief Justice of Pakistan; • Hon Chief Justice Sabihuddin Ahmad, deposed Chief Justice of Sindh High Court; • Justice (ret’d) Rasheed A Razvi, chairman, Executive Committee, Pakistan Bar Council, president of Sindh Court Bar Association; • Justice (ret’d) Tariq Mahmood, member legal team for Chief Justice Chaudhry; • Mr Hamid Khan, member, Pakistan Bar Council, member, legal team for Chief Justice Chaudhry; • Members of the Pakistan Bar Council, including, Mr Muhammad Arshed, secretary, Senator Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan Khosa, Mr Aaqil Lodhi, Mr H Syed Rehman; • President, Mr Aitzaz Ahsan, office-bearers and members of the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan; • President, Mr Anwar Kamal, office-bearers and members of the Lahore High Court 5 Bar Association; • President, Mr Syed Muhammad Shah, office-bearers and members of the Lahore Bar Association; • Mr Ashtar Ausaf Ali, former Advocate-General, Punjab; • Ms Naheda Mahboob Ellahi, Deputy Attorney-General for Pakistan; • Mr Syed Mohammad Farooq Shah, Secretary to the Attorney-General’s Office; • Dr Danishwar Malik, Prosecutor-General, National Accountability Bureau; • Mr Muhammad Bilal, senior advocate, former member of Pakistan Bar Council and former LAWASIA Councillor for Pakistan; • Mr Muneer Malik, former president, Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan and Sindh High Court Bar Association, member, legal team for Chief Justice Chaudhry; • Mr Mohammed Akram Sheikh, LAWASIA member, former president, Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan; • In addition to the president, Mr Rasheed A Razvi, office-bearers and members of the Sindh High Court Bar Association; • Vice chairman, Mr Muzafar Ali Laghari, office bearers and members of Sindh Bar Council; • Mr Haleem Siddiqui, chairman, Executive Committee, Sindh Bar Council; • Ms Noor Naz Agha, president, Pakistan Women Lawyers Association; • Mr Mahmood -ul-Hassan, president, Karachi Bar Association; • Justice (ret’d) Khalid ur Rehman, former Chief Justice of Punjab; • Mr Sahibzada Anwar Hamid, vice president, Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan; • Mr Mohsin Nadeem, president, Lahore Tax Bar Association; • Justice (ret’d) Mansoor Hussain Sial, former judge, Supreme Court of Pakistan; • Mr Muhammad Amir Jawaid, secretary, Supreme Court Bar Association, Pakistan; • Mr Raja Nias Ahmed Rathore, former president, High Court Bar Association, Rawalpindi; • Justice (ret’d) Abdul Waheed Siddique, former judge, Federal Shariah Court. 6. TIMELINE The events leading up to LAWASIA mission: (a) Following a military takeover of the government of Pakistan led by General Pervez Musharraf on 12 October 1999, on 25 January 2000, judges of all Pakistan courts were required to take an oath of office under the Oath of Office (Judges) Order, 2000. 6 This obliged them to discharge their duties and perform their functions in accordance with the Proclamation of Emergency of 14 October 1999 and the Provisional Constitutional Order; (b) The then Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Saiduzzaman Siddiqui, five other Supreme Court judges and a number of provincial high court judges refused to take the oath and ceased to hold office; (c) A bench of 12 judges of the Supreme Court, headed by then Chief Justice Irshad Hassan Khan, dealt with a number of petitions against the military takeover and for the restoration of the Assemblies (national and provincial houses of parliament) and on 12 May 2000, announced their judgment which had the effect of justifying the military takeover and giving power to a military ruler to amend the Constitution. The judgment also indicated that the cases of the former Chief Justice and the judges of the High Court who did not take the oath could not be re-opened, according to a doctrine of past and closed transaction1; (d) Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry was among the judges who took their oath under Oath of Office (Judges) Order, 2000.
Recommended publications
  • Volume VIII, Issue-3, March 2018
    Volume VIII, Issue-3, March 2018 March in History Nation celebrates Pakistan Day 2018 with military parade, gun salutes March 15, 1955: The biggest contingents of armoured and mech - post-independence irrigation anised infantry held a march-past. project, Kotri Barrage is Pakistan Army tanks, including the inaugurated. Al Khalid and Al Zarrar, presented March 23 , 1956: 1956 Constitution gun salutes to the president. Radar is promulgates on Pakistan Day. systems and other weapons Major General Iskander Mirza equipped with military tech - sworn in as first President of nology were also rolled out. Pakistan. The NASR missile, the Sha - heen missile, the Ghauri mis - March 23, 1956: Constituent sile system, and the Babur assembly adopts name of Islamic cruise missile were also fea - Republic of Pakistan and first constitution. The nation is celebrating Pakistan A large number of diplomats from tured in the parade. Day 2018 across the country with several countries attended the March 8, 1957: President Various aeroplanes traditional zeal and fervour. ceremony. The guest of honour at Iskandar Mirza lays the belonging to Army Avi - foundation-stone of the State Bank the ceremony was Sri Lankan Pres - Pakistan Day commemorates the ation and Pakistan Air of Pakistan building in Karachi. ident Maithripala Sirisena. passing of the Lahore Resolution Force demonstrated aer - obatic feats for the March 23, 1960: Foundation of on March 23, 1940, when the All- Contingents of Pakistan Minar-i-Pakistan is laid. India Muslim League demanded a Army, Pakistan Air Force, and audience. Combat separate nation for the Muslims of Pakistan Navy held a march-past and attack helicopters, March 14, 1972: New education the British Indian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Judicial Reforms
    REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL REFORMS LAW, PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS & HUMAN RIGHTS DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB . CONTENTS Sr. No. Contents Page 1. Preface 2. Contents 3. Executive Summary 4. Introduction 5. Legal Education 6. Improving Legal Education Standard 7. Recruitment/Promotion of Judicial Officers 8. Training of Judicial Officer 9. Continued Legal Education Provincial Judicial Academy 10. Alternate Dispute Resolution Process 11. Administrative Measures 12. Investigation 13. Disposal of Backlog 14. Coordination between Bench & Bar 15. Law Commission 16. Recommendations at a glance. ANNEXURES Annex ‘A’ Regulations providing for pre-service & in-service training of judicial officers. Annex ‘B’ Provincial Judicial Academy Act 2007. Annex ‘C’ Proposed amendments in the Provincial Judicial Academy Act. Annex ‘D’ Proposed draft of Order XA to be added in CPC. Annex ‘E’ Draft instructions on Standard of Conduct of Arbitrators/Mediators” proposal to the High court Annex ‘F’ “Allocation Questionnaire Form” Proposed specimen to be filed in newly constituted suits/cases/or cases pending before coming into force of Order X.A Annex ‘G’ “Allocation Questionnaire Form” (To be filled in Family Matters) Annex ‘H’ “Allocation Questionnaire Form” (To be filed in Appeals). Annex ‘J’ Letter requesting High Court to ensure compliance of its instruction regarding expeditious disposal etc. 2 PREFACE The electorate in Pakistan has returned those political parties and political personalities to the corridors of power, who spoke of independence of judiciary and of strengthening the administration of justice so as to provide justice and relief to the citizens. Only vibrant and effective justice system can ensure enjoyment of fundamental rights by the common man.
    [Show full text]
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    Litigation & Dispute Resolution Second Edition Contributing Editor: Michael Madden Published by Global Legal Group CONTENTS Preface Michael Madden, Winston & Strawn London Austria Christian Eder, Christoph Hauser & Alexandra Wolff, Fiebinger Polak Leon Attorneys-at-Law 1 Belgium Koen Van den Broeck & Thales Mertens, Allen & Overy LLP 9 British Virgin Islands Scott Cruickshank & David Harby, Lennox Paton 14 Bulgaria Assen Georgiev, CMS Cameron McKenna LLP – Bulgaria Branch 25 Canada Caroline Abela, Krista Chaytor & Marie-Andrée Vermette, WeirFoulds LLP 35 Cayman Islands Ian Huskisson, Anna Peccarino & Charmaine Richter, Travers Thorp Alberga 44 Cyprus Anastasios A. Antoniou & Louiza Petrou, Anastasios Antoniou LLC 51 England & Wales Michael Madden & Justin McClelland, Winston & Strawn London 59 Estonia Pirkka-Marja Põldvere & Marko Pikani, Aivar Pilv Law Offi ce 75 Finland Markus Kokko & Niki J. Welling, Attorneys at Law Borenius Ltd 86 France Philippe Cavalieros, Winston & Strawn LLP, Paris 92 Germany Dr. Stefan Rützel & Dr. Andrea Leufgen, Gleiss Lutz 99 Guernsey Christian Hay & Michael Adkins, Collas Crill 107 India Siddharth Thacker, Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe 114 Indonesia Alexandra Gerungan, Lia Alizia & Christian F. Sinatra, Makarim & Taira S. 123 Ireland Seán Barton & Heather Mahon, McCann FitzGerald 131 Isle of Man Charles Coleman & Chris Webb, Gough Law 142 Italy Ferdinando Emanuele & Milo Molfa, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP 149 Jersey Kathryn Purkis & Dan Boxall, Collas Crill 158 Korea Kap-you (Kevin) Kim, John P. Bang & David MacArthur, Bae, Kim & Lee LLC 167 Malaysia Claudia Cheah Pek Yee & Leong Wai Hong, Skrine 176 Mexico Miguel Angel Hernandez-Romo Valencia & Miguel Angel Hernandez-Romo, Bufete Hernández Romo 186 Nigeria Matthias Dawodu, Olaoye Olalere & Debo Ogunmuyiwa, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    Litigation & Dispute Resolution Second Edition Contributing Editor: Michael Madden Published by Global Legal Group CONTENTS Preface Michael Madden, Winston & Strawn London Austria Christian Eder, Christoph Hauser & Alexandra Wolff, Fiebinger Polak Leon Attorneys-at-Law 1 Belgium Koen Van den Broeck & Thales Mertens, Allen & Overy LLP 9 British Virgin Islands Scott Cruickshank & David Harby, Lennox Paton 14 Bulgaria Assen Georgiev, CMS Cameron McKenna LLP – Bulgaria Branch 25 Canada Caroline Abela, Krista Chaytor & Marie-Andrée Vermette, WeirFoulds LLP 35 Cayman Islands Ian Huskisson, Anna Peccarino & Charmaine Richter, Travers Thorp Alberga 44 Cyprus Anastasios A. Antoniou & Louiza Petrou, Anastasios Antoniou LLC 51 England & Wales Michael Madden & Justin McClelland, Winston & Strawn London 59 Estonia Pirkka-Marja Põldvere & Marko Pikani, Aivar Pilv Law Offi ce 75 Finland Markus Kokko & Niki J. Welling, Attorneys at Law Borenius Ltd 86 France Philippe Cavalieros, Winston & Strawn LLP, Paris 92 Germany Dr. Stefan Rützel & Dr. Andrea Leufgen, Gleiss Lutz 99 Guernsey Christian Hay & Michael Adkins, Collas Crill 107 India Siddharth Thacker, Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe 114 Indonesia Alexandra Gerungan, Lia Alizia & Christian F. Sinatra, Makarim & Taira S. 123 Ireland Seán Barton & Heather Mahon, McCann FitzGerald 131 Isle of Man Charles Coleman & Chris Webb, Gough Law 142 Italy Ferdinando Emanuele & Milo Molfa, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP 149 Jersey Kathryn Purkis & Dan Boxall, Collas Crill 158 Korea Kap-you (Kevin) Kim, John P. Bang & David MacArthur, Bae, Kim & Lee LLC 167 Malaysia Claudia Cheah Pek Yee & Leong Wai Hong, Skrine 176 Mexico Miguel Angel Hernandez-Romo Valencia & Miguel Angel Hernandez-Romo, Bufete Hernández Romo 186 Nigeria Matthias Dawodu, Olaoye Olalere & Debo Ogunmuyiwa, S.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTITUTION PETITION NO.35 of 2016 (Under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973)
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, HCJ Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial Mr. Justice Faisal Arab CONSTITUTION PETITION NO.35 OF 2016 (Under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973) Muhammad Hanif Abbasi ... … Petitioner VERSUS Imran Khan Niazi and others … ... Respondents . For the Petitioner : Mr. Muhammad Akram Sheikh, Sr. ASC (Assisted by Ms. Maryam Rauf and Ms. Umber Bashir, Advocates) Mr. Tariq Kamal Qazi, Advocate (With permission of the Court) Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, AOR For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Naeem Bukhari, ASC (Assisted by Mr. Kashif Nawaz Siddiqui, Advocate) Ch. Akhtar Ali, AOR For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Anwar Mansoor Khan, Sr. ASC (Assisted by Barrister Umaima Anwar, Advocate) Mr. Faisal Farid Hussain, ASC Mr. Fawad Hussain Chaudhry, ASC Ch. Akhtar Ali, AOR For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Muhammad Waqar Rana, Additional Attorney General for Pakistan Mr. M. S. Khattak, AOR For Election Commission : Raja M. Ibrahim Satti, Sr. ASC of Pakistan Raja M. Rizwan Ibrahim Satti, ASC Mr. M. Arshad, D.G. (Law), ECP Malik Mujtaba Ahmed, Addl.D.G.(Law) ECP On Court’s notice : Mr. Ashtar Ausaf Ali, Attorney General for Pakistan Dates of Hearing : 3.5.2017, 4.5.2017, 8.5.2017, 9.5.2017, 10.5.2017, 11.5.2017, 23.5.2017, 24.5.2017, 25.5.2017, 30.5.2017,31.5.2017 Const.P.35 of 2016 2 1.6.2017, 13.6.2017, 14.6.2017, 11.7.2017, 13.7.2017, 25.7.2017, 31.7.2017, 1.8.2017, 2.8.2017, 3.8.2017, 12.9.2017, 26.9.2017, 28.9.2017, 3.10.2017, 4.10.2017, 5.10.2017, 10.10.2017, 11.10.2017, 12.10.2017, 17.10.2017, 18.10.2017, 19.10.2017, 23.10.2017, 24.10.2017, 25.10.2017, 7.11.2017, 8.11.2017, 9.11.2017 and 14.11.2017 .
    [Show full text]
  • Pld 2017 Sc 70)
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa Mr. Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed Mr. Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan Constitution Petition No. 29 of 2016 (Panama Papers Scandal) Imran Ahmad Khan Niazi Petitioner versus Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister of Pakistan / Member National Assembly, Prime Minister’s House, Islamabad and nine others Respondents For the petitioner: Syed Naeem Bokhari, ASC Mr. Sikandar Bashir Mohmad, ASC Mr. Fawad Hussain Ch., ASC Mr. Faisal Fareed Hussain, ASC Ch. Akhtar Ali, AOR with the petitioner in person Assisted by: Mr. Yousaf Anjum, Advocate Mr. Kashif Siddiqui, Advocate Mr. Imad Khan, Advocate Mr. Akbar Hussain, Advocate Barrister Maleeka Bokhari, Advocate Ms. Iman Shahid, Advocate, For respondent No. 1: Mr. Makhdoom Ali Khan, Sr. ASC Mr. Khurram M. Hashmi, ASC Mr. Feisal Naqvi, ASC Assisted by: Mr. Saad Hashmi, Advocate Mr. Sarmad Hani, Advocate Mr. Mustafa Mirza, Advocate For the National Mr. Qamar Zaman Chaudhry, Accountability Bureau Chairman, National Accountability (respondent No. 2): Bureau in person Mr. Waqas Qadeer Dar, Prosecutor- Constitution Petition No. 29 of 2016, 2 Constitution Petition No. 30 of 2016 & Constitution Petition No. 03 of 2017 General Accountability Mr. Arshad Qayyum, Special Prosecutor Accountability Syed Ali Imran, Special Prosecutor Accountability Mr. Farid-ul-Hasan Ch., Special Prosecutor Accountability For the Federation of Mr. Ashtar Ausaf Ali, Attorney-General Pakistan for Pakistan (respondents No. 3 & Mr. Nayyar Abbas Rizvi, Additional 4): Attorney-General for Pakistan Mr. Gulfam Hameed, Deputy Solicitor, Ministry of Law & Justice Assisted by: Barrister Asad Rahim Khan Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2: Military Courts
    THE NAP TRACKER PART 2: MILitaRY MILITARY COURTS COURTS NAP POINT 2: Special trial courts under the supervision of Army. The 2.1 Introduction duration of these courts would be two years. The second point in the NAP, and our sec- ond theme, is the establishment of the military courts to try terrorists under Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) 1997 in Pakistan. In the first phase, nine military courts were established, three in Khyber Pukh- tunkhwa (KP), three in Punjab, two in Sindh and one in Baluchistan.1 At the mo- ment 11 military courts are functional in Pakistan, with the last two instated in Karachi, Sindh, on August 26, 2015 by Chief of Army Staff (COAS).2 The Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control presented a report in National Assembly in January, 2016. According to that report 148 cases have been transferred to these special courts.3 The report also confirms 11 courts. Military courts have been given legal cover through a constitutional amendment which was opposed by major political parties because of victimization in the past. An All Parties’ Conference (APC) was called to create a consensus, which was reached after a discussion and assurances that politicians, traders, media etc. will not be tried in military courts.4 Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif stated that the courts will only try hardcore terror- ists. “Special courts are part of the National Action Plan and are meant to provide an extraordinary solution for an extraordinary problem. All institutions would have to carefully scrutinize cases to be sent for prosecution in the special military tribunals.”5 The Federal Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar has mirrored the PM’s statements, stating that only terrorists will be tried in military courts.6 He also tried to dissi- 1 Staff Reporter.
    [Show full text]
  • Const.P. 29 2016 28072016.Pdf
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) PRESENT: MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN C. M. A. NO. 4978 OF 2017 IN CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 29 OF 2016 ETC. (Report by JIT). AND C. M. A. NO. 2939 OF 2017 IN CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 29 OF 2016 ETC. Imran Ahmed Khan and others. …Applicant(s) Versus Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister of Pakistan. …Respondent(s) AND CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 29 OF 2016. (Under Article 184 of the Constitution) Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi. …Petitioner(s) Versus Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister of Pakistan, etc. …Respondent(s) AND CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 30 OF 2016. (Under Article 184 of the Constitution) Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed. …Petitioner(s) Versus Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Law, Justice and Parliamentary Division, etc. …Respondent(s) AND CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 03 OF 2017. (Under Article 184 of the Constitution) Siraj-ul-Haq, Ameer Jamat-e-Islami, Pakistan. …Petitioner(s) Versus Federation of Pakistan through Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and others. …Respondent(s) ……………… Const. Ps. No. 29-30/2016 & 03/2017. 2 IN ATTENDANCE. (in Const. P. 29/2016). For the petitioner(s): Syed Naeem Bokhari, ASC Mr. Sikandar Bashir Mohmand, ASC Mr. Fawad Hussain Ch., ASC Mr. Faisal Fareed Hussain, ASC. Ch. Akhtar Ali, AOR. Assisted by : Barrister Maleeka Bokhari. Shahid Naseem Gondal, Adv. Kashif Nawaz Siddiqui, Adv. M. Imad Khan, Adv. For respdt. No. 1: Khawaja Harris Ahmed, Sr. ASC. Assisted by: M. Amjad Pervaiz, ASC Saad Hashmi, Adv. Adnan Khawaja, Adv. For respdt. No.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction)
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. Justice Mushir Alam Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa Suo Moto Case No. 7/2017 (Suo Moto action regarding Islamabad-Rawalpindi Sit-in / Dharna) In Attendance: Attorney Generals for Pakistan, Mr. Ashtar Ausaf Ali and Mr. Anwar Mansoor Khan. Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Sohail Mehmood. Advocate General, Islamabad, Mr. Abdul Rauf. Additional Advocate Generals, Punjab, Mr. Razzaq A. Mirza and Barrister Qasim Chauhan. Secretary, D.G. Law and A.D.G. Law of the Election Commission of Pakistan, Mr. Babar Yaqoob Fateh, Mr. M. Arshad and Malik Mujtaba respectively. Chairman, Head Legal, D.G. (Operation and Broadcast Media) and D.G. (Operation Distribution) of PEMRA, Mr. Saleem Baig, Mr. Ali Zeeshan Gondal, Mr. Sohail Asif and Mr. Muhammad Farooq respectively. Director and Joint Director of I.B., Mr. Malik Aziz-ur-Rehman and Mr. Anwar-ul-Haq Khawar respectively. Director (Legal) and Deputy Director (Legal), Ministry of Defence, Brigadier Falak Naz and Lieutenant Commander Shafiq ur Rehman respectively. Deputy Secretary Interior, Mr. Nasir Khan. Assistant Director (Legal), Mr. Shafiq-ur-Rehman. IGP and SP, Islamabad, Mr. Khalid Khattak and Mr. Liaqat Hayat Niazi respectively. Dates of Hearing: 21st November, 2017, 23rd November, 2017, 30th November, 2017, 3rd January, 2018, 16th February, 2018, 19th March, 2018, 15th April, 2018, 11th October, 2018, 16th November, 2018 and 22nd November, 2018. JUDGMENT SMC. No. 7/2017 2 Qazi Faez Isa, J. Background 1. Muslim candidates contesting elections have to submit a declaration in a prescribed written form affirming that Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) is the last prophet sent by Almighty Allah.
    [Show full text]
  • Countering Violent Extremism in Peshawar Pakistan Licona Bryan
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses CAHSS Theses and Dissertations and Dissertations 1-1-2018 Countering Violent Extremism in Peshawar Pakistan Licona Bryan This document is a product of extensive research conducted at the Nova Southeastern University College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences. For more information on research and degree programs at the NSU College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, please click here. Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd Part of the International Relations Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, and the Sociology Commons Share Feedback About This Item This Dissertation is brought to you by the CAHSS Theses and Dissertations at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Countering Violent Extremism in Peshawar Pakistan by Bryan Licona A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences of Nova Southeastern University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Nova Southeastern University 2018 Copyright © by Bryan Licona September 2018 Nova Southeastern University College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences This dissertation was submitted by _Bryan Licona under the direction of the chair of the dissertation committee listed below. It wasEmitted to the College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences and approved in partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Conflict Analysis and Resolution at Nova Southeastern University. Approved: /,/,,/,==:I , i -.-`.-i.-i..`, -.--I---- Date of Defense E]- %:::inD.Bema,Ph.D.-i:i_ fl; ¢thf L-, Neil Katz, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankh
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel Civil Petitions No.2243-L and 2986-L of 2019 (Against the Order dated 18.06.2019 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in W.Ps. No. 9726 & 9729 of 2019) Khawaja Salman Rafique ….(in C.P. 2243/19) Khawaja Saad Rafique ….(in C.P. 2986/19) Petitioner(s) Versus National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman, etc Respondent(s) For the Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ashtar Ausaf Ali, ASC Mr.M. Azam Nazir Tarar, ASC Mr.Muhammad Amjad Pervaiz, ASC assisted by Muhammad Adil Chattha For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Jehanzeb Khan Bharwana, Addl. P.G. Mr. Naeem Tariq, Spl Prosecutor (NAB) Mr. Zawar Manzoor Waraich, Dy. Dir, (NAB) Date of Hearing : 17.03.2020 Maqbool Baqar, J-, “A state which dwarfs its men, in order that they may be more docile instruments in its hands even for beneficial purposes--- will find that with small men no great thing can really be accomplished” - John Stuart Mill C.P. No. 2243-L & 2986-L of 2019 2 The prosecution case, as set out in the Reference, is that it was in pursuance of various complaints received from “Members of Public at Large” that an investigation was authorized by the Competent Authority on 6.11.2018. 2. It is alleged that the petitioners, Khawaja Saad Rafique and Khawaja Salman Rafique, the accused Nos. 2 and 3, in connivance with accused No.1, 4 and 5, namely Nadeem Zia Pirzada, Umar Zia and Farhan Ali, and Qaiser Amin Butt (“QAB”), the accused turned approver, launched a housing scheme through a private limited company, namely Paragon City Private Limited, (the Company), by the name of Paragon City, and started collecting money towards booking of plots therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report-2016
    1 Annual Report 2016 i Report: Annual Report 2016 Edited and reviewed by: Benazir Jatoi Layout and design: Shahzad Ashraf Reporting period: July 2015 to June 2016 Published by: Aurat Publication and Information Service Foundation ii Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations................................................................................ vii Introduction ....................................................................................................................... XI Board of Governors.......................................................................................................... xiii Executive Council............................................................................................................. xiv Institutional Structure ...................................................................................................... xv Audit Report.................................................................................................................... xvii List of Operational Projects (July 2013–June 2014)....................................................... xxi 1. Law and Policy Reform............................................................................................... 2 1.1 Unanimous passage of ‘Protectionof Women against Violence Act 2016’.................... 2 1.2 AF and CSO delegation met Minister for Women Development Department ............... 5 1.3 Study circles with parliamentarians organized.............................................................. 6
    [Show full text]