DOCSLIB.ORG

If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. SEPTEMBER 1987 '0 ~, , 108851 u.s. Department of Justice Nationallns!itute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. POints of view or opinions stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to leproduce this copYTIghted material has been granted by Unite.d- States Courts-.Admirus.t.:};at-ive O£~ ____ .____ ~_~_._ .. ~ .. ___ ~ ___ to the National Cnmmal Jusllce Reference Service (NCJRS) Further reproductIOn outside of the NCJRS system reqUires permis­ Sion of the copyright owner. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 'I UNITED STAlES COURT DIRECTORY Issued by: The Administrative Office of the United States Courts Washington, D.C. 20544 Contents: Personnel Division Office of the Chief (202-633-6115) Printing & Distribution: Administrative Services Division Printing & Distribution Facility (301-763-1865) The information in this Directory is current as of August 1, 1987. TABLE OF CONTENTS Supreme Court ................................................................................. 1 United States Courts of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit ................................................................... 2 First Circuit ................................................................................ " 4 Second Circuit. 5 Third Circuit. .. 8 Fourth Circuit. .. 10 Fifth Circuit ................................................................................. 12 Sixth Circuit ............................................................................... ,. 15 Seventh Circuit . .. ......................... 18 Eight Circuit . .. 20 Ninth Circuit. .. 23 Tenth Circuit. .. 28 Eleventh Circuit .................... , . .. 30 Federal Circuit ............................................................................... 32 Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals ......................................................... " 34 United States Claims Court. .. 37 United States Court of International Trade. .. 39 Special Court, Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 ............................................ 41 Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. .. 42 United States Court of Military Appeals .................................. .. 43 United States Tax Court . .. 44 United States District Courts Alabama Northern . .. 47 Middle .................................................................................... 49 Southern . .. 50 Alaska ....................................................................................... 52 Arizona ...................................................................................... 54 Arkansas Eastern ..................................................... , .............................. 57 Western ................................................................................... 59 California Northern . .. 61 Eastern .................................................................................... 65 Central .................................................................................... 69 Southern ............................................ '" .................. , ................ 75 Colorado .................................................................................... 77 Connecticut . • . .. 80 Delaware .................................................................................... 82 District of Columbia . .. 84 Florida Northern . .. 87 Middle ........................ '. .. 89 Southern ...... .. 92 Georgia Northern . .. 95 Middle .......... , . .. 98 Southern .................................................................................. 100 Guam ....................................................................................... 102 Hawaii ...................................................................................... 103 Idaho ......................... '" ........................................................... 105 Illinois Northern .................................................................................. 107 Central .................................................................................... 111 Southern .................................................................................. 113 Indiana Northern ............................................ , ..................................... 115 Southern .................................................................................. 117 Iowa Northern ...................................................................... " .......... 119 Southern .................................................................................. 120 Kansas ...................................................................................... 122 Kentucky Eastern .................................................................................... 125 Western ................................................................................... 127 Louisiana Eastern .................................................................................... 129 Middle .....................,' '.' ............................................................ 132 Western ................................................................................... 134 Maine .................... , .................................................................. 137 Maryland. .. ............. 139 Massachusetts ................................................................................ 142 Michigan Eastern .................................................................................... 145 Western ................................................................................... 149 Minnesota ................................................................................... 151 ii ---------------------------------------------------==--------------~~-. Mississippi Northern .................................................................................. 154 Southern .................................................................................. 156 Missouri Eastern .................................................................................... 158 Western ................................................................................... 160 Montana ..................................................................................... 163 Nebraska .................................................................................... 165 Nevada ...................................................................................... 167 New Hampshire .............................................................................. 169 New Jersey ... , ................ , ................................... , .................. " ...... 170 New Mexico .................................................................................. 173 New York Northern ............................................... , .................................. 175 Southern .................................................................................. 177 Eastern .... , ........................................ , ... _.......................... " ...... 182 Western . .. ......................... 185 North Carolina Eastern .................................................................................... 187 Middle ............ " ........................... , .......................................... 189 Western ............. " ................. , ........... , .................................... , .190 North Dakota ................................................................................ 192 Northern Mariana Islands ...................................................................... 194 Ohio Northern ............................................................. "..................... 195 Southern ............... , ........... , ...................................................... 199 Oklahoma Northern ................... , ....................... , ...................................... 202 Eastern .................................................................................... 204 Western ................................................................................... 206 Oregon ...................................................................................... 208 Pennsylvania Eastern .................................................................................... 211 Middle .................................................................................... 214 Western ................................................................................. , .216 Puerto Rico ....................................................... , ............ , ............. 219 Rhode Island ................................................................................. 221 South Carolina ............................................................................... 222 South Dakota ................................................................................ 224 .' iii Tennessee Eastern .................................................................................... 226 Middle .................................................................................... 228 Western .................................................. " ................................ 230 Texas Northern .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NYCLA's 92Nd Annual Dinner: Honoring Law Schools Public Service Professionals Honored at NYCLA
    November 2006 Visit us at www.nycla.org Volume 2 / Number 9 NYCLA’s 92nd Annual Dinner: Honoring Law Schools INSIDE LABOR RELATIONS AND by Allison Slotnick his 1976 book, The Twenty-Fifth Amend- ber of the New York bar for “unselfish ser- EMPLOYMENT LAW ment, Mr. Feerick received a Pulitzer Prize vice to the profession and the community.” COMMITTEE’S PUBLIC NYCLA’s 92nd Annual Dinner at the Wal- nomination. He is a past recipient of the Law Mr. Bartlett, a graduate of Harvard Law FORUM: dorf Astoria on December 12 will celebrate and and Society Award from the New York School, specializes in general litigation in recognize law schools. The event’s Dinner Lawyers for the Public Interest, the 1999 Cit- federal and state courts. He is a former INJURIES AND Chair is John D. Feerick and the William Nel- izen Achievement Award from the New York Chair of the New York State Board of Law CLAIMS OF WORLD son Cromwell Awardee is Richard J. Bartlett. State League of Women Voters, NYCLA’s Examiners and has served as Dean of the Al- The event’s keynote speaker is Hon. Joseph M. William Nelson Cromwell Award, the Associ- bany Law School of Union University. Mr. TRADE CENTER’S McLaughlin, Judge for the Second Circuit ation Medal of the City Bar Association and Bartlett was the minority whip in his last FIRST RESPONDERS Court of Appeals. the New York State Bar Association’s Gold year in the New York State Assembly and Medal, its highest award. also served as a New York State Supreme NOVEMBER 20 John D.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E 688 HON. BILL RICHARDSON HON. STENY H. HOYER HON. THOMAS J. MANTON
    E 688 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks March 24, 1995 A TRIPLE-A DIAMOND IN THE ``It had some validity because it is based theme of ``it's about time'' and still one of ROUGH on kind of a model, but it does not apply to the best entertainment values in town, a be- any single city.'' mused McKernan said. And that is one reason the city is embark- It was the first price hike in eight years. HON. BILL RICHARDSON ing this year on its own SWAG that will In about four weeks, the minor league boys OF NEW MEXICO measure the impact of the Dukes all by of summer will strut their stuff in what IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES themselves, Theuson said. promises to be an excellent and perhaps Friday, March 24, 1995 There is one given: the Dukes provide one record-setting year. of the most affordable family entertainment Oh yeah, and the bottom line looks good Mr. RICHARDSON. Mr. Speaker, as the offerings anywhere, and it doesn't happen ac- again for the successful business that is the chaos of major league baseball's labor dispute cidentally. Dukes. continues to unfold, the spirit of baseball is ``McKernan deliberately does keep the ``We do all right . we survive in spite of alive and well in minor league baseball and prices down so that it can appeal to the fam- ourselves,'' McKernan said. ily. He really does understand what he is the 1994 Pacific Coast league champion Albu- f querque Dukes are ready for the new season.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court
    Case 1:13-cv-06802-WHP Document 567 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE DIAL CORPORATION, et al., Civil Action No. 13-cv-06802-WHP Individually and on behalf of Similarly Situated Companies, Plaintiffs, v. NEWS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. DECLARATION OF STEVEN F. BENZ IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT Case 1:13-cv-06802-WHP Document 567 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of 17 I, Steven F. Benz, declare as follows: 1. I submit this declaration in support of preliminary approval of the settlement reached on behalf of the certified Class and Defendants News Corporation, News America, Inc., News America Marketing In-Store Services L.L.C., and News America Marketing FSI L.L.C. (collectively, “Defendants”). 2. I am a partner with the law firm of Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C. (“Kellogg Huber”), which is Co-Lead Counsel for the Class of plaintiffs certified by the Court on June 18, 2015. I am a member of good standing of the District of Columbia, Iowa, Maryland and Minnesota bars, and am admitted to practice before this Court pro hac vice. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth in this declaration. I became involved in this case at its inception in 2011 and am closely familiar with all aspects of this case since that time. 3. Both Kellogg Huber and I personally have significant experience with antitrust litigation and class actions, including settlements thereof. Copies of my firm’s resume and my personal profile are annexed to this declaration as Exhibit A.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Law School Reporter, Vol. 9, No. 3, November, 1991
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu NYLS Publications Student Newspapers 11-1991 The ewN York Law School Reporter, vol. 9, no. 3, November, 1991 New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/newspapers Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Communications Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation New York Law School, "The eN w York Law School Reporter, vol. 9, no. 3, November, 1991" (1991). Student Newspapers. 27. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/newspapers/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the NYLS Publications at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Newspapers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. Media Sexual Law Randolph Iannacone Harassment Project reviews Hospital Newsletter Responsibility for at NYLS? Medical Malpractice See Page 3 AfterPage8 The New York Law School Volume IX, Issue 3 "On the Cutting Edge of Credibility" November 18, 1991 Hon. Nicholas Tsoucalas, New York Law School, '51 Hon. Yorka Linakis, New York Law School, '43 Hon. Stanley Ostrau, New York Law School, '51 Professor Zuhayr Moghrabi, New York Law School, '67 At the Alumni Association's reception honoring "Alumni Serving in the Judiciary (\ The REPORTER November 18, 1991 Issue 2, Volume 20 Corrections , In This Issue .... and Our cover photograph includes four New York Law School alumni who were among those90who attended the Alumni Credits 1 Association's reception honoring "Alumni Serving in the Judiciary" Often when one aims for greatness, great­ Please Note Corrections ness is achieved. Yet more often, the runner may 2 stumble.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Law School Magazine, Vol. 37, No. 2 Office Ofa M Rketing and Communications
    Masthead Logo digitalcommons.nyls.edu NYLS Publications New York Law School Alumni Magazine 3-2019 New York Law School Magazine, Vol. 37, No. 2 Office ofa M rketing and Communications Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/alum_mag Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the Law Commons Office of Marketing and Communications 185 West Broadway MAGAZINE • 2019 • VOL. 37, NO. 2 New York, NY 10013-2921 SEEKG N FRIDAY, MAY 3 2019 JUST C E ALUMNI How NYLS Trains 21st-Century Prosecutors CELEBRATION MARK YOUR CALENDARS! The 2019 Alumni Celebration is shaping up to be an extraordinary occasion for the entire NYLS community—and we’ll honor classes ending in 4 and 9. You won’t want to miss it! Do you want to make sure your class is well represented at the celebration? www.nyls.edu/celebration Email [email protected] to join your class committee. WE ARE NEW YORK’S LAW SCHOOL SINCE 1891 NO. 8 OF 30 NO. 23 among SPOTLIGHT “Top Schools for Legal international law programs Technology” by preLaw in the 2019 U.S. News & WE ARE NEW YORK’S LAW SCHOOL ON magazine. World Report rankings. RECENT NO. 30 among part-time programs in the ONE OF 50 2019 U.S. News & World PROGRESS HONOREES—and one Report rankings. of 10 law schools in the nation—recognized by the Council on Legal Education AND A TOP SCHOOL Opportunity, Inc. for outstanding commitment to for Alternative Dispute diversity as a legal educator. Resolution, Business RECOGNITION Law, Criminal Law, Family Law, Human Rights Law, Intellectual Property Law, Public Interest Law, Tax Law, Technology Law, and Trial Advocacy—plus, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroscience and Sentencing
    Fordham Law Review Volume 85 Issue 2 Article 7 2016 Neuroscience and Sentencing Nancy Gertner Harvard Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, and the Law and Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Nancy Gertner, Neuroscience and Sentencing, 85 Fordham L. Rev. 533 (2016). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol85/iss2/7 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEUROSCIENCE AND SENTENCING Nancy Gertner* INTRODUCTION This symposium comes at a propitious time for me. I am reviewing the sentences I was obliged to give to hundreds of men—mostly African American men—over the course of a seventeen-year federal judicial career.1 As I have written elsewhere, I believe that 80 percent of the sentences that I imposed were unfair, unjust, and disproportionate.2 Everything that I thought was important—that neuroscientists, for example, have found to be salient in affecting behavior—was irrelevant to the analysis I was supposed to conduct. My goal—for which this symposium plays an important part—is to reevaluate those sentences now under a more rational and humane system, this time at least informed by the insights of science. The question is how to do that: How can neuroscience contribute to the enterprise and what are the pitfalls? This Article represents a few of my preliminary conclusions, but my retrospective analysis is not complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalise Shares Optimism & Lewis Shares Enthusiasm with SCIA
    20thAnniversary March 2017, ISSUE 1, VOLUME 21 Scalise shares optimism & Lewis shares New LUMCON director enthusiasm with SCIA membership highlights events By Jordon Legendre, Staff Writer, The Courier the changes that will come under his The No. 3 Republican in the U.S. House administration. of Representatives shared his optimism “The Department of the Interior is about the incoming presidential adminis- the federal agency that controls all the tration with local business leaders.. oil and gas activity,” Scalise said. “Every Rep. Steve Scalise, R-Metairie, said the year I bring members of Congress down change should have a positive impact on to south Louisiana, we go tour rigs in the Louisiana businesses. He made his remarks deep waters of the Gulf. One of the mem- during the monthly South Central Indus- bers who came last year was (Zinke). trial Association meeting in Houma. He spent some time out here, and he is “Things are getting ready to real busy in Wash- become the sec- LUMCON Director Craig McClain ington,” Scalise retary of the in- said. “The new Con- terior. I’m really By Jordon Legendre, Staff Writer, The Courier gress got sworn in excited.” The Louisiana Universities Marine many weeks ago, Scalise said re- Consortium is expanding its efforts but it seems like pealing the Af- to increase society’s awareness of months because fordable Care the environmental, economic and there’s been a lot Act, common- cultural value of Louisiana’s coastal that’s already been U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise Mark Lewis ly known as and marine environments, the done.” Obamacare, is organization’s executive director said With many of SCIA’s members involved another goal he expects Congress quickly Tuesday during the South Central in the oil and gas industry, Scalise, the Industrial Association’s monthly meeting in Houma.
    [Show full text]
  • District Clerk
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ,.p.l I r r " 28 2 5 1.0 :: 11111 . _ 11111 . 3 2 I IIIII~~ n~M1. 11111 - . 3 6 Ik\ 11111 . BOO 4 0 Ii'-2. 001,I~. • 0 I• I :ij'",li IIIII~~ 111111.8 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 150mm ->-----~-..... 6" UNI,TED STATES COURT. DIRECTORY Sf March 1, 1986 U.S. DepFrtment of Justice Natlonallnstitute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originallng it. Points of view or opinions staled in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this ~l:lted material has been granted by • • Publlc DOmaln Lnllted States Court Directory to the National Criminal JUstice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ " ) sion of the epp.y.ri:ght owner. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 I 053 03 • UNITED STATES COURT DIRECTORY Issued by: The Administrative Office of the United States Courts Washington, D.C. 20544 Contents: Personnel Division Office of the Chief (633-6115) Printing & Distribution: Administrative Services Division Printing & Distribution Facility (763-1865) • • The information in this Directory is current as of March I, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS Supreme Court ...................................................................................................................... • United
    [Show full text]
  • History of the U.S. Attorneys
    Bicentennial Celebration of the United States Attorneys 1789 - 1989 "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor– indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." QUOTED FROM STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND, BERGER V. UNITED STATES, 295 U. S. 88 (1935) Note: The information in this document was compiled from historical records maintained by the Offices of the United States Attorneys and by the Department of Justice. Every effort has been made to prepare accurate information. In some instances, this document mentions officials without the “United States Attorney” title, who nevertheless served under federal appointment to enforce the laws of the United States in federal territories prior to statehood and the creation of a federal judicial district. INTRODUCTION In this, the Bicentennial Year of the United States Constitution, the people of America find cause to celebrate the principles formulated at the inception of the nation Alexis de Tocqueville called, “The Great Experiment.” The experiment has worked, and the survival of the Constitution is proof of that.
    [Show full text]
  • Members by Circuit (As of January 3, 2017)
    Federal Judges Association - Members by Circuit (as of January 3, 2017) 1st Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Bruce M. Selya Jeffrey R. Howard Kermit Victor Lipez Ojetta Rogeriee Thompson Sandra L. Lynch United States District Court District of Maine D. Brock Hornby George Z. Singal John A. Woodcock, Jr. Jon David LeVy Nancy Torresen United States District Court District of Massachusetts Allison Dale Burroughs Denise Jefferson Casper Douglas P. Woodlock F. Dennis Saylor George A. O'Toole, Jr. Indira Talwani Leo T. Sorokin Mark G. Mastroianni Mark L. Wolf Michael A. Ponsor Patti B. Saris Richard G. Stearns Timothy S. Hillman William G. Young United States District Court District of New Hampshire Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Joseph N. LaPlante Landya B. McCafferty Paul J. Barbadoro SteVen J. McAuliffe United States District Court District of Puerto Rico Daniel R. Dominguez Francisco Augusto Besosa Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr. Jay A. Garcia-Gregory Juan M. Perez-Gimenez Pedro A. Delgado Hernandez United States District Court District of Rhode Island Ernest C. Torres John J. McConnell, Jr. Mary M. Lisi William E. Smith 2nd Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Barrington D. Parker, Jr. Christopher F. Droney Dennis Jacobs Denny Chin Gerard E. Lynch Guido Calabresi John Walker, Jr. Jon O. Newman Jose A. Cabranes Peter W. Hall Pierre N. LeVal Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Reena Raggi Robert A. Katzmann Robert D. Sack United States District Court District of Connecticut Alan H. NeVas, Sr. Alfred V. Covello Alvin W. Thompson Dominic J. Squatrito Ellen B.
    [Show full text]
  • Suit up for the Future High School
    2014 Suit Up for the Future High School Summer Legal Institute and Intern Program Awarding Winning Diversity Pipeline Program 2013 ABA PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AWARD RECIPIENT Strengthening diversity in the legal profession A partnership of the Louisiana State Bar Association, Just the Beginning Foundation, and Louisiana Bar Foundation A Diversity Pipeline Program New Orleans, Louisiana 2 | P a g e Suit Up for the Future - 2014 Table of Contents ABOUT Us ………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….3 WHO IS THE LSBA? ..............................................................................................................................3 WHO IS THE JTBF? .....................................................................................................................4 WHO IS THE LBF? .................................................................................................................................5 2014 LEGAL SCHOLARS……………………………………………………………………………………..…….........6 WEEK ONE .....................................................................................................................................................7-8 Law School Summer School: Louisiana State Bar Center WEEK TWO....................................................................................................................................................9 Oral Argument Preparation: Field Placement Days WEEK THREE ............................................................................................................................................10-12
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Diana Murphy United States Circuit Judge Minneapolis, Minnesota United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
    THE PANEL No: 18-1299 In re: Terry Lee Hinds, Petitioner *** Hon. Diana Murphy United States Circuit Judge Minneapolis, Minnesota United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Bachelor's University of Minnesota, B.A., 1954 Law University of Minnesota Law School, J.D., 1974 Diana E. Murphy is a federal judge on senior status with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. She was nominated by President Bill Clinton in 1994 to the Eighth Circuit. Murphy was first nominated to the federal bench in 1979 by Jimmy Carter to serve with the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Early life and education Born in Faribault, Minnesota, Murphy earned her B.A. from the University of Minnesota in 1954 and her J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1974. [1] Professional career • 1994-present: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit • 2016-present: Senior judge • 1994-2016: Judge • 1999-2004: Chair, U.S. Sentencing Commission • 1979-1994: Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota • 1978-1980: Judge, Fourth Judicial District of Minnesota • 1976-1978: Judge, Hennepin County municipal court • 1974-1976: Private practice, Minneapolis, Minn. Hon. Roger L. Wollman United States Circuit Judge Sioux Falls, South Dakota United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Bachelor's Tabor College, B.A., 1957 Graduate Harvard Law School, L.L.M., 1964 Law University of South Dakota School of Law, J.D., 1962 Roger Leland Wollman is a federal judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
    [Show full text]