Laura Moffatt MP Comments for the Overview and Scrutiny Committee Meeting 24 February 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Laura Moffatt MP Comments for the Overview and Scrutiny Committee Meeting 24 February 2009 1. I have attended as many of the review stakeholder meetings as I possibly could, including when the panel was present. 2. I would like to congratulate all those involved in what was an extremely well run review. 3. The appointment of the Chair, Sir Graeme Catto, a leading clinician, Professor of Medicine at the University of Aberdeen and currently the President of the General Medical Council was welcomed by all political parties not least because of his significant experience as a senior NHS consultant. 4. The review remit was access to acute (hospital) and non-acute (community) health services, in this area. 5. The final report now clearly represents a strong and collective professional view on how we should be delivering healthcare in Crawley and the surrounding area. 6. It certainly listened to local opinion on all aspects of healthcare. The question is, did the review process listen and respond? 7. We all want to see a new hospital in Crawley and I continue to press that case in the longer term as our population expands, but there are huge improvements in this report which we also want to see now. 8. Poor primary care services made us reliant on one hospital for all our needs. Things are so much different now. If you ask senior doctors, nurses and therapists what they want to see and how they believe services need to be organised then surely you ,must listen to what they say? 9. The organisation of health services has changed dramatically over the years in response to improved and increasingly complex treatments. That has meant changes to the way services are organised. 10. It is difficult for the Department of Health to predict need over the next 25 years with new technologies coming on line all the time. It is even more difficult to do that accurately at a local level. 11. I have always tried to do the right thing for Crawley. I refuse to make promises just to get votes. 12. The hard facts are that Crawley is the most reviewed reconfiguration of services in the country. I have made sure of that. 13. With a government that’s put three times as much money into the NHS it’s clear this has never been about money. It was always about improving the health of Crawley people. 14. The undoubted improvements in care at the East Surrey Hospital have certainly helped. 15. The recent ‘Wellbeing’ launch was all about health improvement and I am pleased that both West Sussex County Council and Crawley Borough Council have supported that. 16. The report should have the full support of all local health providers who are completely signed up to delivering on all the recommendations. I shall certainly be watching to make sure we in Crawley get what has been promised. 17. Three key areas which I have been pressing hard for on behalf of Crawley people are; - increase the number of beds at the Crawley hospital site, - the restoration of or replacement of the shuttle bus service and - significant improvement in access to our cancer services. 18. I will be directly asking people in Crawley what they think of these proposals. 19. The review is promising for Crawley in all these areas and, along with the many other improvements to local services it contains, represents a real step forward for healthcare in Crawley. 20. Delivery is the key. 21. I will continue to fight for better health services in Crawley – including the placing of a Midwife Led Maternity Unit at Crawley Hospital. 22. Right here, right now, a new hospital building in Crawley wouldn’t save a single extra life. These changes will. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
“The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
[Show full text]
Living Former Members of the House of Commons
BRIEFING PAPER Number 05324, 7 January 2019 Living former Members Compiled by of the House of Sarah Priddy Commons Living former Members MPs are listed with any titles at the time they ceased to be an MP and the party they belonged to at the time. The list does not include MPs who now sit in the House of Lords. A list of members of the House of Lords who were Members of the House of Commons can be found on the Parliament website under House of Lords FAQs. Further information More detailed information on MPs who served between 1979 and 2010, including ministerial posts and party allegiance, covering their time in the UK Parliament and other legislatures, can be found in the Commons Library Briefing on Members 1979-2010. Association of Former Members of Parliament The PoliticsHome website has contact details for the Association of Former Members of Parliament. Parliament: facts and figures • Browse all briefings in the series This series of publications contains data on various subjects relating to Parliament and Government. Topics include legislation, MPs, select committees, debates, divisions and Parliamentary procedure. Feedback Any comments, corrections or suggestions for new lists should be sent to the Parliament and Constitution Centre. Suggestions for new lists welcomed. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Living former Members of the House of Commons Note: Does not include MPs who are now sit in the House of Lords Name Full Title Party* List Name Mr
[Show full text]
Local Election Report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page I
Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page i The great local vote swindle Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page ii Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page 1 The great local vote swindle The local government elections on 4 May 2006 Electoral Reform Society Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page 2 Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page 3 Contents 04 Executive summary 07 General introduction 13 London introduction 25 London borough by borough 57 The political parties and the London result 62 How STV could improve London borough elections 71 Metropolitan boroughs 77 Unitary and share districts 83 Mayoral elections 91 Women’s representation 97 Constituency projection of the 2006 local elections 107 Conclusion Local election report 14/06/2006 16:45 Page 4 Executive summary The May 2006 local election results provided cold with 8,506 votes elected 12 (subject to resolving a comfort for any of the national parties, and more returning officer error). This can lead to artificial importantly for people who believe in strong local polarisation of local politics. democracy. Although turnout was higher than in pSome councils see a large number of seats most recent sets of local elections, it was still changing hands on a small change in votes, as in disappointingly low. The electoral system produced a Richmond and Tamworth. situation in many parts of England in which council pSome ward elections are decided on ridiculously representation and control were an extremely small shares of those voting – 24.9 per cent of the distorted reflection of the votes cast by local people.
[Show full text]
Word Version
Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Crawley in West Sussex Report to The Electoral Commission July 2002 THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2002 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 302 2 THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? 5 SUMMARY 7 1 INTRODUCTION 11 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 13 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 17 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 19 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 21 6 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 27 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Crawley is inserted inside the back cover of this report. THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 3 4 THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
[Show full text]
The UK General Election of 5 May 2005 Report and Analysis
The UK general election of 5 May 2005 Report and analysis 55 MayMay Contents Introduction 3 1 The National Result 4 1.1 Government by a small minority – the worst election ever 4 1.2 A very low turnout 6 1.3 Unfair representation of parties 6 1.4 Wasted votes 7 1.5 Electoral system bias 8 2 The Constituencies 8 2.1 Minority mandates 10 2.2 Marginality and turnout 10 2.3 Split votes and tactical votes 10 2.4 Marginals and ultra-marginals 12 3 The Nations of the United Kingdom 14 3.1 England 14 3.2 Northern Ireland: Helping the extremes to victory 14 3.3 Scotland 15 3.4 Wales 15 4 Unfair local Representation 17 5 Gender and Ethnic Representation 19 5.1 Women: party representation 19 5.2 Women: regional variations 20 5.3 Ethnic minority representation 20 6 The Electoral Reform Debate 22 6.1 Party manifesto commitments 22 6.2 Views of candidates 22 6.3 The electoral reform campaign before the election 24 6.4 The electoral reform debate in Parliament and the media since 5 May 24 1 Contents Continued 6.6 The government’s review of electoral systems 27 6.7 House of Lords reform 28 6.8 Scotland – The Arbuthnott Commission 29 6.9 Wales 30 7 Ballot integrity and Security 31 8 Boundaries and Bias 33 8.1 The current boundary review 33 8.2 The net effect of the boundary changes 35 8.3 Why is there still so much bias even after the boundary review? 35 8.4 The real reasons for electoral bias 37 8.5 The solution 38 9 The 2005 General Election Under Alternative Electoral Systems 40 9.1 A ‘health warning’ 40 9.2 National list PR 40 9.3 Regional list PR/ large top-up AMS 41 9.4 Alternative Vote (AV) 41 9.5 Alternative Vote with small top-up (AV+) 43 9.6 Single Transferable Vote 44 9.7 Summary 44 10 The Local Elections of May 2005 46 10.1 County councils 46 10.2 Unitary authorities 47 10.3 Mayoral elections 47 Conclusion 49 Appendix A Boundary change estimates 53 Appendix B Alternative electoral system estimates 57 2 Introduction This report is a revised and much expanded version of our preliminary report ‘Worst Election Ever’ which was published a week after the general election.
[Show full text]
Politics in Action Making Change Happen
Politics in Action Making Change Happen Executive Council Statement to the 2002 Annual Delegate Meeting ContentsContents Foreword by Bill Connor, General Secretary Page 3 Introduction Page 4 General Election Report 2001: The Usdaw Campaign Page 5 Local Government Elections: 2 May 2002 Page 8 ● Postal Vote Application Form Page 10 ● Local Elections 2002 Page 11 The Protect Christmas Day Campaign Page 12 ● Model Letter to MPs Page 13 ● MPs Supporting Early Day Motion 167 to Protect Chistmas Day Page 14 ● Petition Page 15 Protect Christmas Day and New Year’s Day in Scotland Campaign Page 16 ● Petition Page 17 Workplace Visits Page 18 Campaigning Against the Exclusion of Part-Time Workers from Benefits Page 20 ● Form – People Excluded from Benefits by Earning Less than the Lower Earnings Limit Page 21 Helping to Make Labour Party Policy Page 22 ● Order Form – Labour Party Policy Papers Page 23 Recruiting Labour Party Members Page 24 ● Application Form – To Join the Labour Party Page 25 ● Application Form – For Constituency Labour Party Affiliation Fees Page 26 Conclusion Page 27 1 Politics In Action – Making Change Happen At the Labour Party Conference 2001, Usdaw received the prestigious ‘Best Practice Award’ for the best General Election Campaign of any trade union in 2001. 2 Politics In Action – Making Change Happen ForewordForeword byby BillBill Connor,Connor, GeneralGeneral SecretarySecretary 2001 has been a good year for Labour and a good year for Usdaw’s political profile. The Labour Party have been elected for a full second term in office, for the first time ever, and with hardly any seats lost from the historic landslide in 1997.
[Show full text]
The London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Government
THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT Whose party? Whose interests? Childcare policy, electoral imperative and organisational reform within the US Democrats, Australian Labor Party and Britain’s New Labour KATHLEEN A. HENEHAN A thesis submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy LONDON AUGUST 2014 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 91,853 words. 2 ABSTRACT The US Democrats, Australian Labor Party and British Labour Party adopted the issue of childcare assistance for middle-income families as both a campaign and as a legislative issue decades apart from one and other, despite similar rates of female employment. The varied timing of parties’ policy adoption is also uncorrelated with labour shortages, union density and female trade union membership. However, it is correlated with two politically-charged factors: first, each party adopted childcare policy as their rate of ‘organised female labour mobilisation’ (union density interacted with female trade union membership) reached its country-level peak; second, each party adopted the issue within the broader context of post-industrial electoral change, when shifts in both class and gender-based party-voter linkages dictated that the centre-left could no longer win elections by focusing largely on a male, blue-collar base.
[Show full text]
Politicians' Expenses
Politicians’ expenses - who claimed what? Douglas Carswell Lembit Öpik Jacqui Smith Derek Conway Mike O’Brien Conservative Harwich Liberal Democrat Labour Redditch Old Bexley & Sidcup Labour North Warwickshire Montgomeryshire Carswell spearheaded the cam- The former home secretary claimed £555.74 Conway, who was expelled from The health minister, claimed for paign to remove Michael Martin Paid electricians from for a 32in widescreen full HD LCD television, the Conservative party over the ready meals, 20 mini-doughnuts, as Speaker for his handling of the his Welsh constituency to £244.90 for DVD player, £611 on a new double “misuse” of public money to jumbo wedges, sponge pudding, expenses’ scandal. He claimed travel 418 miles to fix electrical bed from John Lewis, £269 for a Barton double employ his sons, claimed £59 rice puddings, lollies, choc ices £2,960.21 for food in 2008-09. A problems at his London flat. Work- bedstead and £342 for a natural mattress. for plumbing, which included a and a banoffi pie. Tesco receipt included 25 bottles men from the same firm also visited She also claimed £136 for coal and £70.50 for toilet handle being “greased”. of mineral water (24 sparking, one Öpik’s home to replace light switches repairs to an Indesit washer. still) and golden syrup. and for other work. Total Peter Bottomley Paddy Tipping Dominic Grieve Jack Straw Conservative Worthing West Labour Sherwood Conservative Beaconsfield Labour Blackburn Bottomley has £25,000 worth of A member of the Commons standards The shadow justice secretary The justice secretary conceded he had made an “kidnap for ransom” cover included and privileges committee, he had a £50 was one of several MPs to error over five years covering his council tax in his insurance policy claim for “dog minding” turned down.
[Show full text]
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
Monday Volume 495 29 June 2009 No. 101 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 29 June 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; Tel: 0044 (0) 208876344; e-mail: [email protected] HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT.HON.GORDON BROWN,MP,JUNE 2007) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt. Hon. Gordon Brown, MP LEADER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS,LORD PRIVY SEAL AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN AND EQUALITY—The Rt. Hon. Harriet Harman, QC, MP FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE,SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,INNOVATION AND SKILLS AND LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL—The Rt. Hon. The Lord Mandelson CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt. Hon. Alistair Darling, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon. David Miliband, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE AND LORD CHANCELLOR—The Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt. Hon. Alan Johnson, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon. Hilary Benn, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT—The Rt. Hon. Douglas Alexander, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT—The Rt. Hon. John Denham, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR CHILDREN,SCHOOLS AND FAMILIES—The Rt.
[Show full text]
Getting a Fair Deal for British Muslims Time to Make a Difference
Time to Make a Difference Getting a Fair Deal for British Muslims Time to Make a Difference ext year, the Government is going to pass The new laws will simply reinforce present N legislation, in line with European law, to inequalities in British law and society. Currently, protect people from religious discrimination in Muslims do not benefit from the Race Relations employment. This is good news because it Act 1976 or the more recent Race Relations protects Muslims and others against unfair (Amendment) Act 2000, which requires certain dismissal or discriminatory practices in the public bodies, like the police, to: workplace. However, it leaves Muslims open to religious discrimination in other areas of life. prohibit direct and indirect discrimination Under British law, Muslims will not get protection in the performance of their public duties from religious discrimination in the areas of: take positive steps to eliminate discrimination and promote equality social security and health care education Whilst some faith communities in Britain, like public provisions Sikhs and Jews, rightfully enjoy the above e.g., housing protection and provisions of law, Muslims are social advantages unjustly denied access to them. This is because e.g., housing benefit, student case law under the above Acts currently defines maintenance grants and loans, etc. ‘racial group’ in a way that includes single ethnic religious groups like Jews or Sikhs but excludes Muslims. In a democracy such as ours, where you could make sure that your elected it is simply unacceptable that Muslims should Member of Parliament would enjoy any less protection from discrimination represent your interests as a Muslim.
[Show full text]
The Power Gap an Index of Everyday Power in Britain
the power gap an index of everyday power in Britain DANIEL LEIGHTON Open access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Demos wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Demos licence found at the back of this publication. Its main conditions are: · Demos and the author(s) are credited · This summary and the address www.demos.co.uk are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full · The work is not resold · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Demos You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence. Demos gratefully acknowledges the work of Creative Commons in inspiring our approach to copyright. To find out more go to www.creativecommons.org 2 contents Acknowledgements 4 Summary 5 Introduction 10 1 Defining power and powerlessness 14 2 Measuring power as capability 27 3 The Power Map 37 4 The power scores 42 5 Power Map constituency rankings 54 Appendix 65 Notes 73 References 76 3 acknowledgements There are a number of people and organisations that contributed to this research project and report. I would like to thank the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation for their generous generous funding of this project.
[Show full text]
(6652): Women Members of Parliament
Research Briefing Number 6652 Women Members of Parliament By Richard Kelly 5 July 2021 1 Women MPs by date of first election This briefing paper provides a list of all the women who have ever been elected to the House of Commons, since the passage of the Parliament (Qualification of Women) Act 1918, which allowed women to stand as parliamentary candidates from 1918. One of the earliest women MPs, Susan Lawrence (first elected in December 1923), “objected to being called ‘a woman MP’. ‘Why don’t you call Churchill a man MP?’ she was apt to demand”.1 Following the 2019 General Election, of the 650 seats in the House of Commons, 220 were held by women MPs. At that time, it was the highest number of women MPs ever to sit at the same time in the House of Commons.2 Since the General Election, Dame Cheryl Gillan has died and Tracy Brabin stood down, following her election as the first Mayor West Yorkshire. But four new women MPs have been elected at by-elections: • Jill Mortimer, Hartlepool, on 6 May 2021; • Anum Qaisar-Javed, Airdrie and Shotts, on 13 May 2021; 1 Pamela Brookes, Women at Westminster, 1967, p51 2 At the 2017 General Election, 208 women were elected – a record number, at that time. During the 2017 Parliament, women MPs were elected at all five by-elections (see the Library Briefing, By-elections since the 2017 General Election). They replaced three men and two women, so by the end of the Parliament, the number of women MPs had increased to 211 commonslibrary.parliament.uk Women Members of Parliament • Sarah Green, Chesham and Amersham, on 17 June 2021; and • Kim Leadbeater, Batley and Spen, on 1 July 2021.
[Show full text]