Lepidoptera in the Unpublished Field Notes of Howard George Lacey, Naturalist (1856-1929)1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lepidoptera in the Unpublished Field Notes of Howard George Lacey, Naturalist (1856-1929)1 VOLUME 25, NUMBER 1 29 JOLLY, G. M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52: 225~47. KELLER , E. L. JR., R. H. T. MATTONI, AND M. S. B. SEIGEl1. 1966. Preferential return of artificially displaced butterflies. Anim. Bchav. 14: 197-200. SOUTHWOOD, T. n. E. 1966. Ecological Methods. Metheuu & Co., London. TURNER, J. R. G. 1963. A quantitative study of a W elsh colony of the large heath butterfly, Coenonympha ttlllia Muller (Lepidoptera). Proc. H. Ent. Soc. Lond. 38: 101-112. LEPIDOPTERA IN THE UNPUBLISHED FIELD NOTES OF HOWARD GEORGE LACEY, NATURALIST (1856-1929)1 Roy O.~ AND C. A. KENDALL 135 Vaughan Place, San Antonio, Texas Howard George Lacey was born 15 April 1856 at Wareham, Dorset, England. His elementary education was received at Charterhousc, Hampshire; h e studied at Frankfurt, Germany and later received a B.A. degree from Cains College, Cambridge. Although educated for the min­ istry, he soon gave up this career for that of naturalist. At the age of 26 hc came to the United States, arriving in New York 17 June 1882, and proceeded to Kerrville, Texas where he arrived 30 June. Here he bought a ranch in the hill country about seven miles southwest of Kerrville on Turtle Creek (Figure 1) where he spent the next thilty-seven years rais­ ing livcstock and studying the natural history of the area. Lacey was a member of the Bournemouth Scientific Society, San An­ tonio Scientific Society, National Geographic Society, American Audubon Union, and American Ornithologists' Union. He collaborated with the Smithsonian Institution, U. S. Department of Agriculture, and other in­ stitutions for the advancement of natural science. So far as can be determined, he published no scientific papers. In­ stead, he chose to collect biological specimens which were sent to various contemporary taxonomists and natural history museums. Many of his field collections and observations were recorded in a ledger which is the basis for this account. His ledger is now in the Witte Memorial Museum Library, San Antonio, Texas placed there by his sister Miss Beatrice Lacey. 1 Contribution No. 198, Burcau of Entomology, Division of Plant Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville. 2 Research Associate, Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Division of Plant In­ dustry, Florida Department of Agriculture and ConslImer Services. 30 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Fig. 1. A, Kerr and surrounding Texas counties; B, location of Howard C. Lacey's ranch in relation to Kerrville, Texas. VOLUME 25, NUMBER 1 31 Some of the botanical and biological specimens named in his honor are: Quercus laceyi Small, Strymon laceyi Barnes & McDunnough, Grap­ tolitha laceyi Barnes & McDunnough, Logoa laceyi Barnes & McDun­ nough, Peromyscus boylei laceyi Attwater, and Reithrodontomys laceyi Attwater. Only the last two were mentioned in his field notes. Laccy's primary interests were birds and mammals of which he made numerous records. Later he became interested in Lepidoptera. The first and last recorded notes pertaining to Lepidoptera were 28 October 1882 and 23 April 1919 respectively. On 10 April 1898 he wrote: "Saw indigo bird and caught a few butterflies for Dr. Barnes. Ilntend to study the buttcrflies of the neighborhood from this date." His collecting was not limited to butterflics. Many moths wcre col­ lected, apparently at lantern light. Although most of the specimens were sent to taxonomists and institutions, he also accumulated a personal col­ lection. On 16 May 1902 he wrote: "\'\1. C. Dodge came over from Kerr­ ville to see the butterflies." Preparatory to moving back to England (8 Aug. 1919), Lacey left his local Lepidoptera collection with C. Stanley Coppock, an intimate friend, who had also come from England and scttled at Kerrville a few years after Lacey. In 1925, Mrs. Ellen S. Quillin, then director of Witte Memorial Museum, attempted to obtain the collection for the Museum. Still later, his field notes were acquired. Excerpts from correspondence between Mrs. Quillin and Miss Beatrice Lacey, sister of Howard, disclose what happened. On 2.5 March 1934 Miss Lacey wrote: "I have been thinking things over since my last letter to :\1r. Coppock. ... I feel Howard would like me to give his notes and diary to the Witte Memorial MUSEum if you say they will be of use, and will be taken care of. It hurts to part with them, but I would rather feel they are of use when I have passed over and Howard would like them to be of use I feel sure. I ask you to accept them in his name and mine with all good wishes." Mrs. Quillin's reply of 11 April 1934 stated in part: "I received your letter this morning in which you are transferring to us as a gift the life­ time notes of your brother. I certainly believe you are doing the right thing and that Mr. Lacey would approve were he here, because when Mr. Lacey visited this Museum, at that time only two school rooms thrown together to make a Museum, the last time he was in Texas [192.5] and the Attwater collection had just been added, he expressed his regret that the butterfly and moth collection he had made could not go with the Attwatcr collection. It seems that when he left his collection with one 32 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY of the Coppock children [1919J bugs got into some of it and other specimens were sold off. He said that the selling was with his consent inasmuch as he had then given up Texas ever getting a Museum in which to place them. That summer [1925J after he left I tried to locate the collection and found that it was held for sale. Mr. Lacey had given me only his verbal wish and I, therefore, could not push the matter. "We have had made a typewritten copy [300 pages] of Mr. Lacey's notes which I bound last week so that scientists of note might use them for reference without in any way fingering or tearing the originals. The original books will be taken to be bound this afternoon and from then on will be placed under lock and key in my own office." Lacey's field notes are a veritable data bank on the local flora and fauna. Most of his collecting was done at or near his ranch. Each time he ventured far from the ranch an entry was made in his field notes. For those museUlns having specimens collected by Lacey with dates, but without locations, the following may be of help. Dates are inclusive. 28 February-27 October 1888, trip to England and return. 8 May 1893-10 April 1894, trip to England and return. 3-23 November 1896, hunting trip on Nueces River and Frio Divide. [Apparently Uvalde County Texas.] 15-26 July 1898, fishing trip to Paint Creek. [This creek empties into thc South Llano River. Most of it lies in northeast Edwards County Texas.] 25-26 June 1899, to San Antonio [Bexar County Texas]. 27-[28] June 1899, went to the Medina [River] and back the next day. [Apparently in Bandera County Texas.] 26 July-5 August 1899, went to the Llano [River] fishing and had a very jolly trip. I got no new butterflies but took several very dark speci­ mens of T. damon [Callophrys gryneus castalis.] [Apparently Kimble County Texas]. 15 November-14 December 1899, our usual hunt on the Frio [River] . [Uvalde County Texas.] 7-19 July 1900, fishing on Llano River. As there were no flowers out I got only a few [butter] flies. On July 17th when we started home the South Llano was up about five feet. [Probably Kimble County Texas.] 25-30 July 1901, got back to town after a short trip to the Llano [River] with Carr and company. We camped a few miles above London. Elada [Texola elada] was about the only butterfly about. [London is in north­ east Kimble County Texas.] VOLUME 25, NUMBER 1 33 27 August 1901-29 March 1902, trip to England and return. Got back to the ranch little before sundown. 1.3-27 July 1902, fishing trip to Llano [River] camped near head of South Llano River. [Edwards County Texas.] 10-31 July 1904, fishing on Llano River. Few [butter] flies as bloom was very scarce. [Probably Kimble County Texas.] 17 July-2 August 1907 (19-31 July in camp) on fishing trip to the San Diego River in Mexico via San Antonio and Del Rio, Texas. 15-31 July 1909, fishing trip to Devils River. [Val Verde County Texas.] 23 November-6 December 1916, hunting trip to Paint Creek [Ed­ wards County Texas]. 16 July 1919, sold my ranch and stock. After selling the ranch, I put in a day or two loafing around Kerrville and then spent a week on Paint Creek swimming near the spring. Eagles, I think, used the nest on the bluff above thc springs and the herons seem to have increased in num­ bers; ninc nests in the big tree. [Apparently this was one of Lacey's fa­ vorite spots.] 8 August 1919 he left Kerrville, Kerr County, Texas for his native home in England. Still fascinated by the wonderful Hill Country of the Ed­ wards Plateau and drawn by the devoted fellowship of old friends, he returned to Kerrville in summer of 192.5 for a short but last visit, health failing. He died 5 March 1929 at the home of his sister, Yliss Beatrice Lacey, 50 Wellington Road, Bournemouth, England. In the following list of Lepidoptera mentioned in Lacey's field notes, arrangement generally follows dos Pass os (1964) for the skippers and butterflies, and McDunnough (1938) for the moths.
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • INSECTA: LEPIDOPTERA) DE GUATEMALA CON UNA RESEÑA HISTÓRICA Towards a Synthesis of the Papilionoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) from Guatemala with a Historical Sketch
    ZOOLOGÍA-TAXONOMÍA www.unal.edu.co/icn/publicaciones/caldasia.htm Caldasia 31(2):407-440. 2009 HACIA UNA SÍNTESIS DE LOS PAPILIONOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTERA) DE GUATEMALA CON UNA RESEÑA HISTÓRICA Towards a synthesis of the Papilionoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) from Guatemala with a historical sketch JOSÉ LUIS SALINAS-GUTIÉRREZ El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR). Unidad Chetumal. Av. Centenario km. 5.5, A. P. 424, C. P. 77900. Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México, México. [email protected] CLAUDIO MÉNDEZ Escuela de Biología, Universidad de San Carlos, Ciudad Universitaria, Campus Central USAC, Zona 12. Guatemala, Guatemala. [email protected] MERCEDES BARRIOS Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (CECON), Universidad de San Carlos, Avenida La Reforma 0-53, Zona 10, Guatemala, Guatemala. [email protected] CARMEN POZO El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR). Unidad Chetumal. Av. Centenario km. 5.5, A. P. 424, C. P. 77900. Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México, México. [email protected] JORGE LLORENTE-BOUSQUETS Museo de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM. Apartado Postal 70-399, México D.F. 04510; México. [email protected]. Autor responsable. RESUMEN La riqueza biológica de Mesoamérica es enorme. Dentro de esta gran área geográfi ca se encuentran algunos de los ecosistemas más diversos del planeta (selvas tropicales), así como varios de los principales centros de endemismo en el mundo (bosques nublados). Países como Guatemala, en esta gran área biogeográfi ca, tiene grandes zonas de bosque húmedo tropical y bosque mesófi lo, por esta razón es muy importante para analizar la diversidad en la región. Lamentablemente, la fauna de mariposas de Guatemala es poco conocida y por lo tanto, es necesario llevar a cabo un estudio y análisis de la composición y la diversidad de las mariposas (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) en Guatemala.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Comal County, Texas, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • (Lepidoptera) of the Tuxtlas Mts., Veracruz, Mexico, Revisited: Species-Richness and Habitat Disturbance
    29(1-2):105-133,Journal of Research 1990(91) on the Lepidoptera 29(1-2):105-133, 1990(91) 105 The Butterflies (Lepidoptera) of the Tuxtlas Mts., Veracruz, Mexico, Revisited: Species-Richness and Habitat Disturbance. Robert A. Raguso Dept. of Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.* Jorge Llorente-Bousquets Museo de Zoologia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apartado Postal 70-399 Mexico D.F., CP 04510 Abstract. Checklists of the butterflies (Lepidoptera) collected in two rainforest study sites in the Tuxtlas Mts., Veracruz, Mexico are presented. A total of 182 species of butterflies were recorded at Laguna Encantada, near San Andres Tuxtla, and 212 species were recorded from the nearby Estacion de Biologia Tropical “Los Tuxtlas” (EBITROLOTU). We collected 33 species not included in G. Ross’ (1975–77) faunistic treatment of the region, 12 of which are new species records for the Tuxtlas. We present a list of the skipper butterflies (Hesperioidea) of the Tuxtlas, including a state record for the giant skipper, Agathymus rethon. At both study sites, we observed seasonal patterns in species abundance during periods of reduced precipitation. Our data indicate an apparent increase in butterfly species-richness in the Tuxtlas over the last 25 years. This increase reflects more efficient sampling due to advances in lepidopteran ecology and improved collecting methods, as well as the effects of habitat disturbance. A comparison between the butterfly faunas of the two rainforest sites revealed that a higher percentage of weedy, cosmopolitan species were present at Laguna Encantada, the smaller, more disturbed site. We anticipate further changes in butterfly species-richness and faunal composition as the mosaic of habitats in the Tuxtlas continue to be modified.
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Museum
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA REPORT OF THE PROVINCIAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOR THE YEAR 1920 PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. VICTORIA, B.C.: Printed by WILLIAM H. CoLLIN, Printer to tbe King's Most Excellent Majesty. 1921. \ To His H onou1· WALTER CAMERON NICHOL, Lieutenant-Governor of the P1·ovince of B?"itish Goluml,ia. MAY IT PLEASE Yot:R Hoxocn: The undersigned respectfully submits herewith the Annual Report of the Provincial l\fuseum of Katural History for the year 1920. J.D. MAcLEAN, Provincial Secretm·y. Provincial ;':;ecretnry's Office, Victo1·ia, Ji'ebntary, 1921 . • PROVINCLU, MUSEU:\1 OJ;' ~ATt:ItAr. HISTORY, YrC'.rORIA, B.C., Februm·y ~4-th, 1!)21. Tlhe Honoumblc J. D. MacLean, M.D., P1·ovincial .SccTetary, Victo1·ia, B.C. Sm,-I have the honour, as Director of the Provincial Museum of Natural History, to lay before you the Report for the year ending December ~1st, 1920, covering the activities of the Museum. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, F . KERMODE, Director . • TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE. Objects . • . 7 Admission . 7 Visitors . .. 7 Activities . 7 A~cessions . 8 Bounties ........................... ~ . 9 Mammals- Notes on the Occurrence of a Humpback Whale having Hind Legs .................... 10 Distribution of Shrews and Shrew-mice in British Columbia .......................... 11 Distribution of Bats in British Columbia . 14 Ornithology- Notes on the Occurrence of Sabine's Gull (Icma sabinei) ............................ 19 Notes on the Occurrence of the Iceland Gull (Lams leucopterus) ..................... 20 Notes on the Occurrence of the C~inese ·starling (AcTidothercs cristatellus) ........... 20 • Botany ................................................................................ 21 Entomology ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Time-Calibrated Phylogeny of the Butterfly Tribe Melitaeini
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title A time-calibrated phylogeny of the butterfly tribe Melitaeini. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1h20r22z Journal Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 79(1) ISSN 1055-7903 Authors Long, Elizabeth C Thomson, Robert C Shapiro, Arthur M Publication Date 2014-10-01 DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.010 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 69–81 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A time-calibrated phylogeny of the butterfly tribe Melitaeini ⇑ Elizabeth C. Long a, , Robert C. Thomson b, Arthur M. Shapiro a a Center for Population Biology and Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA b Department of Biology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA article info abstract Article history: The butterfly tribe Melitaeini [Nymphalidae] contains numerous species that have been the subjects of a Received 10 March 2014 wide range of biological studies. Despite numerous taxonomic revisions, many of the evolutionary Revised 22 May 2014 relationships within the tribe remain unresolved. Utilizing mitochondrial and nuclear gene regions, we Accepted 11 June 2014 produced a time-calibrated phylogenetic hypothesis for 222 exemplars comprising at least 178 different Available online 18 June 2014 species and 21 of the 22 described genera, making this the most complete phylogeny of the tribe to date. Our results suggest that four well-supported clades corresponding to the subtribes Euphydryina, Keywords: Chlosynina, Melitaeina, and Phyciodina exist within the tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • BUTTERFLIES in Thewest Indies of the Caribbean
    PO Box 9021, Wilmington, DE 19809, USA E-mail: [email protected]@focusonnature.com Phone: Toll-free in USA 1-888-721-3555 oror 302/529-1876302/529-1876 BUTTERFLIES and MOTHS in the West Indies of the Caribbean in Antigua and Barbuda the Bahamas Barbados the Cayman Islands Cuba Dominica the Dominican Republic Guadeloupe Jamaica Montserrat Puerto Rico Saint Lucia Saint Vincent the Virgin Islands and the ABC islands of Aruba, Bonaire, and Curacao Butterflies in the Caribbean exclusively in Trinidad & Tobago are not in this list. Focus On Nature Tours in the Caribbean have been in: January, February, March, April, May, July, and December. Upper right photo: a HISPANIOLAN KING, Anetia jaegeri, photographed during the FONT tour in the Dominican Republic in February 2012. The genus is nearly entirely in West Indian islands, the species is nearly restricted to Hispaniola. This list of Butterflies of the West Indies compiled by Armas Hill Among the butterfly groupings in this list, links to: Swallowtails: family PAPILIONIDAE with the genera: Battus, Papilio, Parides Whites, Yellows, Sulphurs: family PIERIDAE Mimic-whites: subfamily DISMORPHIINAE with the genus: Dismorphia Subfamily PIERINAE withwith thethe genera:genera: Ascia,Ascia, Ganyra,Ganyra, Glutophrissa,Glutophrissa, MeleteMelete Subfamily COLIADINAE with the genera: Abaeis, Anteos, Aphrissa, Eurema, Kricogonia, Nathalis, Phoebis, Pyrisitia, Zerene Gossamer Wings: family LYCAENIDAE Hairstreaks: subfamily THECLINAE with the genera: Allosmaitia, Calycopis, Chlorostrymon, Cyanophrys,
    [Show full text]
  • Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, Microsites and Traits of Noctuidae and Butterflies
    Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 35 Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Ken G.M. Bond and Tom Gittings Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science University College Cork Citation: Bond, K.G.M. and Gittings, T. (2008) Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies. Irish Wildlife Manual s, No. 35. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photo: Merveille du Jour ( Dichonia aprilina ) © Veronica French Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2008 ISSN 1393 – 6670 Database of Irish Lepidoptera ____________________________ CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................2 The concept of the database.....................................................................................................................2 The structure of the database...................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]