CER 88: Evaluation and Treatment of Cryptorchidism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CER 88: Evaluation and Treatment of Cryptorchidism Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 88 Evaluation and Treatment of Cryptorchidism Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 88 Evaluation and Treatment of Cryptorchidism Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-2007-10065-I Prepared by: Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center Nashville, TN Investigators: David F. Penson, M.D., M.P.H. Shanthi Krishnaswami, M.B.B.S., M.P.H. Astride Jules, M.D., M.P.H. Jeffrey C. Seroogy, B.S. Melissa L. McPheeters, Ph.D., M.P.H. AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC001-EF December 2012 This report is based on research conducted by the Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2007-10065-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The information in this report is intended to help health care decisionmakers—patients and clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers, among others—make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information, i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances presented by individual patients. This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied. This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special permission. Citation of the source is appreciated. Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this report. For assistance contact [email protected]. None of the investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report. Suggested citation: Penson DF, Krishnaswami S, Jules A, Seroogy JC, McPheeters ML. Evaluation and Treatment of Cryptorchidism. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 88. (Prepared by the Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007- 10065-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC001-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. December 2012. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm. ii Preface The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), through its Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs), sponsors the development of systematic reviews to assist public- and private-sector organizations in their efforts to improve the quality of health care in the United States. These reviews provide comprehensive, science-based information on common, costly medical conditions, and new health care technologies and strategies. Systematic reviews are the building blocks underlying evidence-based practice; they focus attention on the strength and limits of evidence from research studies about the effectiveness and safety of a clinical intervention. In the context of developing recommendations for practice, systematic reviews can help clarify whether assertions about the value of the intervention are based on strong evidence from clinical studies. For more information about AHRQ EPC systematic reviews, see www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reference/purpose.cfm. AHRQ expects that these systematic reviews will be helpful to health plans, providers, purchasers, government programs, and the health care system as a whole. Transparency and stakeholder input are essential to the Effective Health Care Program. Please visit the Web site (www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov) to see draft research questions and reports or to join an email list to learn about new program products and opportunities for input. Comparative Effectiveness Reviews will be updated regularly. We welcome comments on this systematic review. They may be sent by mail to the Task Order Officer named below at: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, or by email to [email protected]. Carolyn M. Clancy, M.D. Jean Slutsky, P.A., M.S.P.H. Director Director, Center for Outcomes and Evidence Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Stephanie Chang, M.D., M.P.H. Shilpa H. Amin, M.D., M.Bsc., FAAFP Director, EPC Program Task Order Officer Center for Outcomes and Evidence Center for Outcomes and Evidence Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality iii Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to this project. Ms. Sharana Jones served as project coordinator, shepherding, planning, and implementing tasks. Ms. Sanura Latham assisted with locating studies and creating tables. Ms. Tracy Shields and Ms. Rachel Walden, library scientists on the project, lent their keen searching skills to the review. Key Informants Laurence S. Baskin, M.D. Paul J. Kokorowski, M.D., M.P.H. Professor, Department of Urology and Fellow, Pediatric Urology Pediatrics Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Department Chief, Pediatric Urology Medical School University of California San Francisco Boston, MA Children's Medical Center San Francisco, CA Thomas F. Kolon, M.D. Associate Professor, Urology Victoria K. Cortessis, Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania School of Assistant Professor of Research, Department Medicine of Preventive Medicine Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Keck School of Medicine Philadelphia, PA University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA Jacob Rajfer, M.D. Professor, Division of Urology, Department Steven G. Docimo, M.D. of Surgery Vice Chairman and Professor of Urology University of California at Los Angeles Program Director, Pediatric Urology Los Angeles, CA Fellowship, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, PA iv Technical Expert Panel Laurence S. Baskin, M.D. Paul J. Kokorowski, M.D., M.P.H. Professor, Department of Urology and Fellow, Pediatric Urology Pediatrics Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Department Chief, Pediatric Urology Medical School University of California San Francisco Boston, MA Children's Medical Center San Francisco, CA Thomas F. Kolon, M.D. Associate Professor, Urology Victoria K. Cortessis, Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania School of Assistant Professor of Research, Department Medicine of Preventive Medicine Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Keck School of Medicine Philadelphia, PA University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA Jose L. Gonzalez, M.D., J.D., M.S.Ed., C.P.E. State of Texas, Medicaid Medical Director Galveston, TX Peer Reviewers Doug A. Husmann, M.D. Paul J. Kokorowski, M.D., M.P.H. Chair, Department of Urology Fellow, Pediatric Urology Mayo Clinic Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Rochester, MN Medical School Boston, MA John M. Hutson, M.D. Professor, University of Melbourne Thomas F. Kolon, M.D. Chairman, Pediatric Surgery Associate Professor, Urology Melbourne, Australia University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Chester Koh, M.D. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Pediatric Urology Director, Robotic Surgery Philadelphia, PA Program Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles Caleb Nelson, M.D., M.P.H. Saban Research Institute Assistant Professor, Surgery and Pediatrics Los Angeles, CA Co-Director, Kidney Stone Center Harvard University Boston, MA v Evaluation and Treatment of Cryptorchidism Structured Abstract Objectives. We assessed the effectiveness of imaging for identifying and correctly locating testicles, the use of hormonal stimulation for treatment planning and hormones for achieving testicular descent, and choices among surgical treatments, including surgical approach (open vs. laparoscopic). Data sources. We searched MEDLINE® via PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Embase, as well as reference lists of included studies. Review methods. We included studies published in English from January 1980 to February 2012. We included studies of prepubescent males with cryptorchidism. For treatment planning studies, we included all designs except case reports. Imaging studies needed to have confirmatory surgical data. For treatment studies, we required an appropriate comparison arm. We excluded studies of disorders of sexual development or ambiguous genitalia. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality (risk of bias) for each study and the overall strength of the evidence, with discrepancies adjudicated by a third reviewer. Results. We identified 60 unique studies meeting our review criteria; eight were of good, eight were of fair, and 44 were of poor quality. The accuracy of imaging to identify the presence or absence of testicles was 21 to 76 percent for ultrasonography (US), 42 to 92 percent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 60 percent for computed tomography (CT) scan, and 100 percent for magnetic resonance
Recommended publications
  • Background Briefing Document from the Consortium of Sponsors for The
    BRIEFING BOOK FOR Pediatric Advisory Committee (PAC) Prepared by Alan Rogol, M.D., Ph.D. Prepared for Consortium of Sponsors Meeting Date: April 8th, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................4 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND FOR THE MEETING .............................6 1.1. INDICATION AND USAGE .......................................................................................6 2. SPONSOR CONSORTIUM PARTICIPANTS ............................................................6 2.1. TIMELINE FOR SPONSOR ENGAGEMENT FOR PEDIATRIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PAC): ............................................................................6 3. BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE .........................................................................7 3.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................7 3.2. PHYSICAL CHANGES OF PUBERTY ......................................................................7 3.2.1. Boys ..............................................................................................................................7 3.2.2. Growth and Pubertal Development ..............................................................................8 3.3. AGE AT ONSET OF PUBERTY.................................................................................9 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Labelling -.:: GEOCITIES.Ws
    Council Directive 89/622/EC concerning the labelling of tobacco products, as amended TAR AND NICOTINE CONTENTS OF THE CIGARETTES SOLD ON THE EUROPEAN MARKET AUSTRIA Brand Tar Yield Nicotine Yield Mg. Mg. List 1 A3 14.0 0.8 A3 Filter 11.0 0.6 Belvedere 11.0 0.8 Camel Filters 14.0 1.1 Camel Filters 100 13.0 1.1 Camel Lights 8.0 0.7 Casablanca 6.0 0.6 Casablanca Ultra 2.0 0.2 Corso 4.0 0.4 Da Capo 9.0 0.4 Dames 9.0 0.6 Dames Filter Box 9.0 0.6 Ernte 23 13.0 0.8 Falk 5.0 0.4 Flirt 14.0 0.9 Flirt Filter 11.0 0.6 Golden Smart 12.0 0.8 HB 13.0 0.9 HB 100 14.0 1.0 Hobby 11.0 0.8 Hobby Box 11.0 0.8 Hobby Extra 11.0 0.8 Johnny Filter 11.0 0.9 Jonny 14.0 1.0 Kent 10.0 0.8 Kim 8.0 0.6 Kim Superlights 4.0 0.4 Lord Extra 8.0 0.6 Lucky Strike 13.0 1.0 Lucky Strike Lights 9.0 0.7 Marlboro 13.0 0.9 Marlboro 100 14.0 1.0 Marlboro Lights 7.0 0.6 Malboro Medium 9.0 0.7 Maverick 11.0 0.8 Memphis Classic 11.0 0.8 Memphis Blue 12.0 0.8 Memphis International 13.0 1.0 Memphis International 100 14.0 1.0 Memphis Lights 7.0 0.6 Memphis Lights 100 9.0 0.7 Memphis Medium 9.0 0.6 Memphis Menthol 7.0 0.5 Men 11.0 0.9 Men Light 5.0 0.5 Milde Sorte 8.0 0.5 Milde Sorte 1 1.0 0.1 Milde Sorte 100 9.0 0.5 Milde Sorte Super 6.0 0.3 Milde Sorte Ultra 4.0 0.4 Parisienne Mild 8.0 0.7 Parisienne Super 11.0 0.9 Peter Stuyvesant 12.0 0.8 Philip Morris Super Lights 4.0 0.4 Ronson 13.0 1.1 Smart Export 10.0 0.8 Treff 14.0 0.9 Trend 5.0 0.2 Trussardi Light 100 6.0 0.5 United E 12.0 0.9 Winston 13.0 0.9 York 9.0 0.7 List 2 Auslese de luxe 1.0 0.1 Benson & Hedges 12.0 1.0 Camel 15.0 1.0
    [Show full text]
  • “If We Could Change Ourselves, the Tendencies
    10/10/17 GENDERED INEQUALITY: DECONSTRUCTING BARRIERS TO ENABLE SENSITIVE SYSTEMIC “IF WE COULD CHANGE OURSELVES, PRACTICE WITH DIVERSE PEOPLE AND THE TENDENCIES IN THE WORLD RELATIONSHIPS WOULD ALSO CHANGE.” ANNE PROUTY - MAHATMA GANDHI OCTOBER 2017 AUSTRALIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FAMILY THERAPY ANNUAL CONFERENCE ADELAIDE, AUSTRALIA GLOBAL “GENDER” (Binary) Gender Inequities DEADLY CUTTING EDGE * MISERABLE TO PROMOTE SOCIAL JUSTICE * REAL ADVOCATE FOR CLIENTS SEX AND GENDER 2007 “YogyAkArtA Principles”: 28 Principles oF the THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION HAS RECOGNISED ApplicAtion oF International HumAn Rights LAw in SEX AND GENDER GLOBALLY AS CORE SOCIAL RelAtion to SexuaL Orientation DETERMINANTS OF PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH and Gender Identity 64 AND WELL-BEING 44 • LGBTI are 11% of Australians as of 20146 • www.YogyAkArtAprinciples.org • GENDER Keynote/YogyAkArtA principles_en.pdF • 1.7% oF AustrAliAns Are estimated to be Intersex (AustraliAn HumAn Rights Commission) • 2% oF people globAlly estimAted to be non-binAry gender • 34% oF LGBTI AustrAliAns hide their identity when accessing services 1 10/10/17 ApproAches to IDENTITY SociAl Justice MultiPLe CulturaL Communities • WHO DEFINES WHOM? Human Diversity within Communities/Contexts • EACH PERSON’S EXPERIENCE? Human Diversity Across LifesPans • BY INTERACTING WITH EACH OTHER? • INTERACTING BY PROXY AND VIA COMMUNITIES? INTERSECTIONALITY INTERSECTIONALITY - IDENTITIES INTERSECTIONALITY - IDENTITIES SEX &/OR GENDER ID ETHNIC ID SEX &/OR GENDER ID ETHNIC ID SEXUAL ORIENTATION SPIRITUAL
    [Show full text]
  • EAU Pocket Guidelines on Male Hypogonadism 2013
    GUIDELINES ON MALE HYPOGONADISM G.R. Dohle (chair), S. Arver, C. Bettocchi, S. Kliesch, M. Punab, W. de Ronde Introduction Male hypogonadism is a clinical syndrome caused by andro- gen deficiency. It may adversely affect multiple organ func- tions and quality of life. Androgens play a crucial role in the development and maintenance of male reproductive and sexual functions. Low levels of circulating androgens can cause disturbances in male sexual development, resulting in congenital abnormalities of the male reproductive tract. Later in life, this may cause reduced fertility, sexual dysfunc- tion, decreased muscle formation and bone mineralisation, disturbances of fat metabolism, and cognitive dysfunction. Testosterone levels decrease as a process of ageing: signs and symptoms caused by this decline can be considered a normal part of ageing. However, low testosterone levels are also associated with several chronic diseases, and sympto- matic patients may benefit from testosterone treatment. Androgen deficiency increases with age; an annual decline in circulating testosterone of 0.4-2.0% has been reported. In middle-aged men, the incidence was found to be 6%. It is more prevalent in older men, in men with obesity, those with co-morbidities, and in men with a poor health status. Aetiology and forms Male hypogonadism can be classified in 4 forms: 1. Primary forms caused by testicular insufficiency. 2. Secondary forms caused by hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction. 164 Male Hypogonadism 3. Late onset hypogonadism. 4. Male hypogonadism due to androgen receptor insensitivity. The main causes of these different forms of hypogonadism are highlighted in Table 1. The type of hypogonadism has to be differentiated, as this has implications for patient evaluation and treatment and enables identification of patients with associated health problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Note on Human Rights Violations Against Intersex People Table of Contents 1 Introduction
    Background Note on Human Rights Violations against Intersex People Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 2 2 Understanding intersex ................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Situating the rights of intersex people......................................................................... 4 2.2 Promoting the rights of intersex people....................................................................... 7 3 Forced and coercive medical interventions......................................................................... 8 4 Violence and infanticide ............................................................................................... 20 5 Stigma and discrimination in healthcare .......................................................................... 22 6 Legal recognition, including registration at birth ............................................................... 26 7 Discrimination and stigmatization .................................................................................. 29 8 Access to justice and remedies ....................................................................................... 32 9 Addressing root causes of human rights violations ............................................................ 35 10 Conclusions and way forward..................................................................................... 37 10.1 Conclusions
    [Show full text]
  • A MRI Diagnosis of Congenital Urogenital Anomalies in 27 Years
    Journal of Advances in Radiology and Medical Imaging Volume 4 | Issue 1 ISSN: 2456-5504 Case Report Open Access A MRI Diagnosis of Congenital Urogenital Anomalies in 27 Years Old Man D’Amato D*, Ranalli T, Tatulli D, Bocchinfuso F, Manenti G, Valente F and Bizzaglia M Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy *Corresponding author: D’Amato D, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Viale Oxford 181, Rome, Italy, Tel: +393207034690, E-mail: [email protected] Citation: D’Amato D, Ranalli T, Tatulli D, Bocchinfuso F, Manenti G, et al. (2019) A MRI Diagnosis of Congenital Urogenital Anomalies in 27 Years Old Man. J Adv Radiol Med Image 4(1): 102 Received Date: April 04, 2019 Accepted Date: August 26, 2019 Published Date: August 28, 2019 Abstract Congenital anorchia is an uncommon clinical condition. Etiology and pathogenetic mechanisms are often unknown. Although some patients with anorchia present with ambiguous external genitalia or micropenis, most have a normal phenotype. XY Disorders of Sex Development classifications are numerous and success rate in establishing a precise diagnosis is far lower than in XX karyotype. We report the case of a young man, with 46 XY karyotype showing various uro-genital abnormalities. A definitive diagnosis was not established due to the complex clinical presentation. Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging techniques were useful tools in the definition of uro-genital anomalies and gonadal development in this complex scenario. Keywords: Anorchia; Cryptorchidism; Urogenital Anomalies; DSD; MRI List of abbreviations: MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; US: Ultrasonography; DSD: Disorders of Sex Development, FSH: Follicle- Stimulating Hormone; HCG: Human Chorionic Gonadotropin; LH: Luteinizing Hormone; AMH Antimüllerian Hormone; LHRH LH- Releasing Hormone; SD: Standard Deviation Introduction The disorders of sexual differentiation constitute a challenging area for both diagnostic and therapeutic impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical, Hormonal and Genetic Characteristics of Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome in 39 Chinese Patients Qingxu Liu, Xiaoqin Yin and Pin Li*
    Liu et al. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology (2020) 18:34 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00593-0 RESEARCH Open Access Clinical, hormonal and genetic characteristics of androgen insensitivity syndrome in 39 Chinese patients Qingxu Liu, Xiaoqin Yin and Pin Li* Abstract Background: Abnormal androgen receptor (AR) genes can cause androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), and AIS can be classified into complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS), partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS) and mild AIS. We investigated the characteristics of clinical manifestations, serum sex hormone levels and AR gene mutations of 39 AIS patients, which provided deeper insight into this disease. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 39 patients with 46, XY disorders of sex development (46, XY DSD) who were diagnosed with AIS at the Department of Endocrinology of Shanghai Children’s Hospital from 2014 to 2019. We analysed clinical data from the patients including hormone levels and AR gene sequences. Furthermore, we screened the AR gene sequences of the 39 AIS patients to identify probable mutations. Results: The 39 AIS patients came from 37 different families; 19 of the patients presented CAIS, and 20 of them presented PAIS. The CAIS patients exhibited a higher cryptorchidism rate than the PAIS (100 and 55%, P = 0.001). There were no significant difference between the CAIS and PAIS groups regarding the levels of inhibin B (INHB), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), basal luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone (T), or basal dihydrotestosterone (DHT), the T:DHT ratio, DHT levels after human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) stimulation or T levels after HCG stimulation. However, the hormone levels of AMH (P = 0.010), peak LH (P = 0.033), basal FSH (P = 0.009) and peak FSH (P = 0.033) showed significant differences between the CAIS group and the PAIS group.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on Paediatric Urology S
    Guidelines on Paediatric Urology S. Tekgül (Chair), H.S. Dogan, E. Erdem (Guidelines Associate), P. Hoebeke, R. Ko˘cvara, J.M. Nijman (Vice-chair), C. Radmayr, M.S. Silay (Guidelines Associate), R. Stein, S. Undre (Guidelines Associate) European Society for Paediatric Urology © European Association of Urology 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 Aim 7 1.2 Publication history 7 2. METHODS 8 3. THE GUIDELINE 8 3A PHIMOSIS 8 3A.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 8 3A.2 Classification systems 8 3A.3 Diagnostic evaluation 8 3A.4 Disease management 8 3A.5 Follow-up 9 3A.6 Conclusions and recommendations on phimosis 9 3B CRYPTORCHIDISM 9 3B.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 9 3B.2 Classification systems 9 3B.3 Diagnostic evaluation 10 3B.4 Disease management 10 3B.4.1 Medical therapy 10 3B.4.2 Surgery 10 3B.5 Follow-up 11 3B.6 Recommendations for cryptorchidism 11 3C HYDROCELE 12 3C.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 12 3C.2 Diagnostic evaluation 12 3C.3 Disease management 12 3C.4 Recommendations for the management of hydrocele 12 3D ACUTE SCROTUM IN CHILDREN 13 3D.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 13 3D.2 Diagnostic evaluation 13 3D.3 Disease management 14 3D.3.1 Epididymitis 14 3D.3.2 Testicular torsion 14 3D.3.3 Surgical treatment 14 3D.4 Follow-up 14 3D.4.1 Fertility 14 3D.4.2 Subfertility 14 3D.4.3 Androgen levels 15 3D.4.4 Testicular cancer 15 3D.5 Recommendations for the treatment of acute scrotum in children 15 3E HYPOSPADIAS 15 3E.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology
    [Show full text]
  • Testicular Prosthesis in Paediatric Urology: Current Concepts and Available Alternatives
    Review Article Testicular Prosthesis in Paediatric Urology: Current Concepts and Available Alternatives Nitin Sharma, M. Bajpai and Shasanka Shekhar Panda Department of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, India Abstract: Prosthesis is an artificial material used as a replacement for its natural counterpart. Use of testicular prosthesis in pediatric urology is limited and indications are well defined. In this review we tried to find out and summarize the current indications and available options in pediatric urology for these prosthesis. Keywords: Testicular prosthesis, Orchidometer, Anorchia Prosthesis is an artificial material used as a replacement for c). Torsion its natural counterpart. Use of testicular prosthesis in pediatric d). Dysplasia urology is limited and indications are well defined. In this e). Dysgenesis review we tried to find out and summarize the current f). Intersex disorders requiring male genitoplasty indications and available options in pediatric urology for these B). Assessment of the size of prosthesis required: prosthesis. An extensive PubMed, Medline and Google scholar search was done to see the available literature and This entirely depends upon the age at placement of the current practice. For the purpose of simplicity the subsequent prosthesis and the scrotal development. The assessment of discussion is under following heads: the volume of testis is done using an instrument called as Orchidometer/ Orchiometer. The orchidometer was introduced Indications for the first time by Swiss pediatric endocrinologist Prof. Assessment of size required Andrea Prader1 of university of Zurich in 1966. It consists of Timing a string of twelve numbered wooden or plastic beads (some Procedure time referred as Prader's balls, medical worry beads or Complications endocrine rosary) of increasing size from one to twenty-five Evolution and currently available options milliliters (Fig 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Penile Anomalies in Adolescence
    Review Special Issue: Penile Anomalies in Children TheScientificWorldJOURNAL (2011) 11, 614–623 TSW Urology ISSN 1537-744X; DOI 10.1100/tsw.2011.38 Penile Anomalies in Adolescence Dan Wood* and Christopher Woodhouse Adolescent Urology Department, University College London Hospitals E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Received August 13, 2010; Revised January 9, 2011; Accepted January 11, 2011; Published March 7, 2011 This article considers the impact and outcomes of both treatment and underlying condition of penile anomalies in adolescent males. Major congenital anomalies (such as exstrophy/epispadias) are discussed, including the psychological outcomes, common problems (such as corporal asymmetry, chordee, and scarring) in this group, and surgical assessment for potential surgical candidates. The emergence of new surgical techniques continues to improve outcomes and potentially raises patient expectations. The importance of balanced discussion in conditions such as micropenis, including multidisciplinary support for patients, is important in order to achieve appropriate treatment decisions. Topical treatments may be of value, but in extreme cases, phalloplasty is a valuable option for patients to consider. In buried penis, the importance of careful assessment and, for the majority, a delay in surgery until puberty has completed is emphasised. In hypospadias patients, the variety of surgical procedures has complicated assessment of outcomes. It appears that true surgical success may be difficult to measure as many men who have had earlier operations are not reassessed in either puberty or adult life. There is also a brief discussion of acquired penile anomalies, including causation and treatment of lymphoedema, penile fracture/trauma, and priapism.
    [Show full text]
  • Invisibility Amplified: a Report on the Impact of COVID-19 on Intersex Community in Asia” Authored by Prashant Singh and Hiker Chiu
    1 Invisibility Amplified Prashant Singh A Report on the impact of COVID-19 on intersex community in Asia Insights from Intersex Asia's COVID-19 Urgent Fund 2020 This report is a part of a global study on the situation of intersex people and their families in times of COVID-19, initiated by OII Europe and conducted by the International Intersex Community in different regions of the world. The global report will be published in 2021. Authored by: Prashant Singh, Coordinator, Intersex Asia Hiker Chiu, Executive Director, Intersex Asia Questionnaire developed by: Irene Kuzemko, OII Europe Proofreading: Dan Christian Ghattas, Irene Kuzemko Proofreading of the questionnaire: HiKer Chiu, Esan Regmi, Jeff Cagandahan, Gopi Shankar Madurai, Asa Senja Quantitative analyses of findings: Prashant Singh, Irene Kuzemko Please reference as follows: Intersex Asia (2021) Prashant Singh, “Invisibility Amplified: A Report on the impact of COVID-19 on intersex community in Asia” Authored by Prashant Singh and Hiker Chiu Available from: www.intersexasia.org Table of Contents Introduction 1 Methodology 2 Limits of the Survey 5 Findings from COVID-19 Survey 6 Intersectional Realities and Aggravated Challenges 6 Areas of life affected due to the Covid-19 pandemic 7 Access to Healthcare 9 Mental Health and Wellbeing 12 Role of Local Organisations 15 Housing 16 Finance 17 Travel and Well Being 23 Education 25 Safety 26 Internet Access 28 Conclusion and way forward 29 Introduction The Covid-19 pandemic is continuing to severely impact people around the world socially and economically since early 2020. Intersex people in Asia, as a marginalized community, faced even worse impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Studie "Leben Und Gesundheit in Vorpommern" (SHIP1
    Studie "Leben und Gesundheit in Vorpommern" (SHIP1) Datenhandbuch - Variablen mit Wertebezeichnung Dieses Dokument beinhaltet die Variablen der Studie SHIP1, erhoben in den Jahren 2002 bis 2006 von 3300 Probanden. Die Variablen sind nach ihren Untersuchungsmodulen aufgelistet. Die linke Spalte enthält den Variablennamen, die mittlere das Label und die rechte die kategoriellen Wertelabel. Bitte beachten Sie, dass dies ein im Bearbeitungsprozess befindliches Dokument ist in dem Übersetzungen fehlen können. deutsch Version: 10.03.2021 Inhaltsverzeichnis Ablaufdaten 5 Allgemeine Ablaufdaten.........................................5 Berechnete Dauern und Wartezeiten..................................8 Wetterdaten................................................ 10 Persönliches Interview 12 Allgemeines................................................ 12 Operationale Daten persönliches Interview.............................. 12 Soziodemiographie und Beruf..................................... 12 Inanspruchnahme medizinischer Hilfe................................ 19 Blutdruck und Herz-Kreislauferkrankungen............................. 23 Angina pectoris.............................................. 24 Herzinfarkt................................................ 26 Schlaganfall................................................ 27 Herzmuskelschwäche.......................................... 27 Claudicatio (Schaufensterkrankheit).................................. 28 Unruhige Beine.............................................. 29 Diabetes.................................................
    [Show full text]