Guest editorial Philosophy A Grizzly outcome December X,1995 Volume 32, No. 46 James J. Whalen Eligibility panel Dave Dickenson says the devil is in wants study of leads Montana to 4 the details on 6 Association’s ama- 7 Division I-AA foot- restructuring teurism views ball victory

...... I......

Official Publication of the National Collegiate Athletic Association TheNCAA News Restructurinn committee Football recruiting supports Prososal No. 7-2 publicity approaches Amendment-to-amendment the components that are currently in place: the acade- mic-enhancement, basketball, conference grant, grants the saturation Doint addresses revenue distribution in-aid, special-assistance and sports-sponsorship funds, plus supplemental and reserve funds intended for dis- The Oversight Committee on the NCAA Membership tribution to the membership. Under the proposal, the BY RONALD D. HOYT ball, fans an off-season “fix.” Structure has agreed to support 1996 NCAA Convention formula for allocating such funds would be as it existed STAFF WRITER The ~~cw-a&incr C-VPI= Proposal No. 7-2, an amendment-to-amendment speci- at the time of the adoption of the legislation. There seems to be lit- -4% age that fying Division I revenue-distribution formulas that would The oversight committee will ask the NCAA Presidents tle doubt that 1 years ago be constitutionally protected in a new NCAA member- Commission and Council at their pre-Convention meet- football is k. merely consist- ;.*= .;&i+-Jf-‘.$>, ship structure. ings in tillaS to join it in supporting No. 7-2. king among r .5-G> _ ed of a list of The action may be important because some Divisions The committee also reaffirmed its previous position American 7 l&L=‘-..- who signed with I-AA and I-AAA members have indicated that they would that Proposal Nos. 74, f-f and 7-8 should be referred to have difficulty supporting the proposed membership the new governance system’s nansition teams for further restructuring plan without the passage of No. 7-2. consideration. “I believe this is another example of how the oversight Those proposed amendments-to-amendments would tures infor- committee has consistently set aside divisional and sub permit alternates to attend meetings of the proposed college stadiums divisional boundaries to seek compromises to complex Executive Committee, the Division I Board of Directors are filled to issues,” said Joseph N. Crowley, chair of the committee and the Division I Management Council. and president of the University of Nevada. The oversight committee believes that when an indi- ’ The oversight committee agreed to support the pm vidual is not able to attend such meetings in person, he , schools under con- 1 posal in a December 15 conference call that was con- or she may be able to participate by other means, such gridiron. ducted to review relevant legislation. as through the use of a telephone or computer. The com- College football poses a Proposal No. 7-2 specifies that revenue distribution mittee believes these other means are preferable to per- problem, howev- poorly the among Division I members would be achieved by using mitting alternates to attend meetings. er, for the avid Special9 publications result recruit per- fan: It is played from a frenzy over recruiting. formed on on only a dozen the Xl‘ or Proposals address clearinghouse’s or so dates each calendar year. ACT; and so on. Also, a rating of Many fans need something to some sort usually is attached to fill the void between bowl games each publicized recruit, resulting certification role for official visits and spring practice, and for in rankings of the nation’s or a many of them, nothing does the region’s top players. Thi\ ic tlu: lclrt of six arttiles on lq&tkrn thnt has ken sub- Conference members believe that institutions can obtain job the way recruiting does. Has this attcnrion to recruiting mittdf~ the 90th annunl NCG4ACwrruentimm January 610 irl such information in a timely manner and should be Questions abound about a gotten out of hand? Some people Llallac. This installmentfeatur~ the 26 fnq~o.~lr of the recruit- empowered to make decisions ahour whether a prospect school’s next recruiting class: think so, including some of the ing pmping and a& p@osaLr in thu amateuri~m/awur/tc/ can visit The NC&4 Division I Steering Committee, how- W111it be a good one? Will it have reporters and editors of major-- hen.tfi& deregulation package. ever, opposes the proposal. size? Speed? Which studcnt-ath- rnarkel newspapers that publish The steering committee is suggesting that the question letes have risky academic back- the information. The question of whether Lhe Nt3A Initial-Eligibility be studied during rhe coming year. As a result Division I grounds? Will the next class turn “A necessary evil” Clearinghouse should continue to certify prospective stu- members will have the option of approving a resolution around the program? Is it in rhe dent-athletes’ eligibility for official vi& to Division I cam- that would direct the Special Committee to Oversee Im- top five nationally? “It would be safe to say it is an puses is among several issues that will be addressed in the plementation of the NCAA Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse Many of those questions are area that we’ve wrestled with,” recruiting grouping of legislation at the 1996 Convention. and the NCAA Academic Requirements and Recruiting answered by newspapers, sports- said Jeff Miller, assistant sports The Pacific-10 Conference is proposing that the clear- Commiaees to study whether it is “necessary or desirable” talk radio stations and, most of editor in charge of college cover- inghouse be relieved of the responsibility for certifying for the clearinghouse to certify eligibility for o5cial visits. all, recruiting services that pro- age at the Dallas Morning News. that prospects have achieved the rest scores, grade-point Approval of the resolution could result in proposed leg- duce publications seemingly for “We probably describe it as a averages and core courses required for an official visit in islation for the 1997 Convention. the sole purpose of giving col- spans that have an early National Letter of Intent signing lege football, as well as basket- See Recruiting, page 9 l period See Legislation, page IO l Impressive group of student-athletes named Today’s Top VI II

A standout group of student-athletes ~ including the 1995 NCAA Woman of the Year, individual champions in golf and swimming and diving, foot- ball standoutc for bowl-bound teams, and a two-time basketball scoring champion ~ has been selected ;is this year’s Today’s Top VIII by the NCXA I Ionors Committee. The Today’s Top VIII honors dis- tinguished student-athletes from the Ainsworth Coetzee Graham Hun-son Lobo Myers Santini Thompson preceding calendar year for athletics ability and achievement, academic Ainsworth of Kenyon College and ketball players Emilie Hanson of ham of the University of Nebraska, College. achievement, character, and leader- Jenny Thompson of Stanford Uni- Central College (Iowa) and Rebecca Lincoln, and Gregory J. Myers of The Today’s Top VIII will be recog- ship. versity and diver Cheril Santini of Lobe of the University of Connect- Colorado State University; and golfer Those chosen are swimmers Carla Southern Methodist University; bas- icut; football players Aaron G. Gra- Charlaine Coetzee of Longwood See TopVIII, page 20 l Pane 2 TheNCAANews December 25, I995

...... Schedule of key dates for January and February NCAA News Dll@E~T A weekly summary of major activities within the Association

JANUARY RECRUITING Man’s Division I baskehdi i-3 I: Quiet period, except for 20 days between November 16. 1995. and March IS. 1996. selected at the discretion of the Institution and designated in writ- ing in the ofice of the director of athletics: Evaluation period.** Women’s Division I basketball* I-3 I : Quiet period, except 20 days between October 8. 1995. and February 29. 1996. selected at the dlscre- tion of the institution and designated in writing in the offIce of the director of athletics: Evaluation period.= Men’s Division ii basketball The period between the prospect’s initial and final high- school or two-year college contests: Evaluation period. Women’s Division II basketball* The period between the prospect’s initial and final high- school or two-year college contests: Evaluation period. Division I football December I, 1995, through February 3,I996. is a con- tact period, except for the periods noted below. Seven in-person, off-campus contacts per prospective studenc- athlete shall be permitted during this period, with not more than one permitted in any one calendar week (Sunday through Saturday) or partial calendar week December 24, 1995~January I, I996 ...... Dead period. January 7 and January I I, I996 ___.______Quiet period. January 8 through January IO. I996 ______Dead period. Division ii footbaii I-3 I ______...... Conuct period.

Hitting the hole - Mike Erhurdt of the University of Montana tries to get past Marshall University’s Melvin Cunningham (No. 25) during the NCAA LXvision I-AA Football Championship. Andy Larson kicked afield goal with 39 secondsremaining, lifting Montunu to a 22-20 victory. It was t&first championship and first trip to the title gamefor Montana, which finished the season 13-2. Seechampionship story, page 7.

FEBRUARY RECRUITING Man’s Division I basketbail 1989-90 and the transfer class of 1989-90 and made recommendations intended to improve i-29: Quiet period, except for 20 days between the NCAA Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse’s November 16, 1995. and March 15. 1996. selected at enrollment data for the fall 1995 term, and to the discretion of the institution and designated in writ- update the average time to graduate and the ability to provide consistenr and timely certifi- ing in the office of the director of athletics: Evaluation Clarification guidelines graduation rates of student-athletes who have cation rulings and to control increasing use of period? exhausted athletics eligibility. the initial-eligibility waiver process. Woman’s Division I basketball* not yet available from OCR Institutions are encouraged to use an NCAA Chairs of the NCAA Academic Requiremen@ I-29: Quiet period, except 20 days between October The Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. computerized form for completing and sub- Committee, Council Subcommittee on Initial- 8, 1995, and February 29.1996. selected at the discre- Department of Education has not yet released mitting the form. Eligibility Waivers and Special Committee to tion of the Institution and designated in writing in the guidelines to clarify OCR’s three-part Title IX office of the director I ti a hletics: Evaluation period.* Also, member institutions were advised that Oversee Implementation of the NCAA Tnitial- Men’s Division II bask&bail compliance test. on December 1, the Secretary of Education Eligibility Clearinghouse met November 29-30 The period between the prospect’s initial and final OCR earlier had indicated that the clarifica- issued final regulations to implement the in Iowa City, Iowa. high-school or two-year college contests: Evaluation tion guidelines would be available by the end Student-Right-to-Know-Act. The education The session was billed as a “summit meeting” period. of the year. The agency continues to state that department soon is expected to issue a corre- for addressing problems that the clearinghouse Woman’s Division ii basketball* they will be released soon. sponding reporting form. has encountered in processing certifications and The period between the prospect’s initial and final For more information, see the November 6 high-school or two-year college contests: Evaluation Staffcontact: Maria K DeJulio. for planning for future demands on the clear- period. issue of The NCA News. inghouse as new initial-eligibility standards are Divirlon I football Staff contacts: Doris A. Dixon and Janet M. implemented. The chairs, however, also devot- I -3 ______...... Contan period. Justus. ed considerable attention to recent dramatic 4 ...... Quiet period. growth in use of the waiver process. 5-8 ______...... Dead period. Special committee divides work In its review of a variety of issues, the chairs 9-29...... _....__...... Quiet period. Division ii football among four subcommittees concluded that many of the problems in the I-5 (8 a.m.) . . . .._...______...... Contact period. The Special Committee to Study NCAA initial+ligibility certification process have result- 5 (8 a.m.)-7 (8 a.m.) ______...... Dead perlod. Grad-rate disclosure forms Marketing, Licensing and Promotional Activities ed from institutions’ misunderstanding of the 7 (8 a.m.)-29 ______...... Contact period. agreed at its first meeting December 5 to divide clearinghouse’s mission. mailed to Division I institutions its work among four subcommittees. For more intbrmation, see the December 18 *See pages I 22- I23 of tic I 995-96 NCAA Manuof for The 1996 NCAA graduation-rates disclosure The committee, chaired by Robert Lawless, issue of The NCAA News. exceptians. Also, see pages 126 127 fir dead periods in form was mailed December 13 to the compliance- president of Texas Tech University, appointed StaEcontact Daniel ‘IY Dutcher. ather Dlvlsbns I ond II spot& form designee at every Division I institution. **An authorized ofl

Jim Smith, men’s basketball coach al .\i. John’s University (Minnesota), camed hi\ Coach finds his 500th career victory December 9 in an 8G 51 triumph over Macalester College. family with team Smith began his tenure in 1964 and has registered 21 winning seasons. IJniversity of North Carolina, Ashcvillc, wo- Phil KahIer, in his 22nd season of men’s baskrtball coach Ray Ingram celebrated coaching basketball, captured his 500th ‘l‘hanksgiving with his players - a gathering win when his women’s basketball tcarn at that W;ISthe closcs~ thing lo “family” that Ingram St. John Fisher College beat Gourher has cxperirnccd in many yrars. College. Kahler managed just three victo- Thirly-one years ago, Inkmini’s parents ran rirs in his first scasrm with rlie progrmi. away from hornc, Icaving rhe I :%year*ld to fend Since then, the Cardinals have tiillied no lor himself. Sleeping on the streets and stealing frwrr than 18 virtories in a season, money, food and clothing when ncc-cssary, including nillr consecutive appearances Ingram’s life appeared to be hcadcd straighf ti)r in the NCAA Division 111Women ’s disaster. Bask&all (:llarrlI-‘iollsllil~. He sprn~ his high-school years living at the Queens Collcgc (North (:arolill;l) local YMCA. A group of concerned coaches, men’s basketball coach Dale Layer teachers and counselors rcc ogni~d a Ixighr stu- rarnrd career victory No. 100 when his dent and a gifted athlrtc, and pushed him 10 Koyals drleated Elon College. Hc took excel despite the depressing circumstancrs Itlat over the program in 1!188, and also serves hc faced. as the school’s athletics director. “I used to get my breakfast off people’s door- Sheryl &msa, wc~~nen’~ volleyball roach at State University of New York al Bing- steps,” Ingram told reporter Keith Jarrett of‘thr lime to chat - Liz HujJkd, u junior point guard on the Stetson Unt Asheville Citizen-Times, recalling the times hamton, recorded her 100th career win when home food dclivcries were made in the varsity women’s ba.&etball team, visits with Angeline Calendar during a get- this year. She rcccntly completed her early morning hours. “I would go into better togetherbetween Stetson student-athletes and the De Lund (Florida) Act Cor- fourth season there. neighborhoods and get doughnuts and milk, poration. Act 15a human-service corporation thut provides mental hecdth,sub University of Missouri, Rolla, men’s basketball coach Dale Martin postrd his and that would be my breakfast....1 would come stunce &use and criminal-justice services. down in the morning, go steal my breakfast and 1OOLhvictory November 18 when the p to school.” Miners defeated Lyon College, 90-75. At Olnry High School in Philadelphia, In- Joe McKeown, who led the WO~TWII’S gram compiled good grades in the classroom “I think a person like Scan can have an im- wheeling in big truck, little mucks, golf carts baskrthall program at c;eorge Washing&on and developed considerable talents on thr bas- pact early in the kids’ lives,” said C. M. Newton, just about anything moblle and heavy ~ to University inro the “Sweet 16” of last ketball Court. He later attended Hofstra Univrr- athletics director at Kentucky. “Part of our res- break the ice forming on the tarp. year’s Division 1 WcJ~lle~l’S Raskelball sity, where one day in 1971 his mother showed ponsibility is to give bark to the community Andjust in case something out of the ordi- Championship, rcgistcred his 2OOlh (.a- up at his dorm room, apologizing for her XV- and to help with the critical problem of via- nary happened, a stnall army of Salem employ- reer vie-toly December 2 in a win over m-year absence. lence.” ees spent Friday night and early Saturday on College of the Holy Cross. “To this day I don’t know if I did the right “This lock-in will help rhc university develop call. Gary Fi6eld, women’s basketball coach thing or not, hut I couldn’t forgivr her,” he said. more of a community rrlationship and assist Mr. Winter was rasy on Salem. A forecastrd at the University of Southern Mainr, “I just can’t see a 35year-old woman leaving a Athletes in Service to America in getting to know snowstorm turned out to bejusr steady, plain, recorded his 200th career victory against 13year-old boy and then coming back years Iat- the students better,” site coordinator Sterling ordinary min. only 38 losses when the Huskies dcfcatcd cr saying, ‘I war11 IO be your mother.’ That was Ward said. “The lock-in also will aid kids in “I was up and down all night, peeping out the Rhode Island GolIege Deccmbcr 2. His the last time I saw my mother.” building relationships with other kids, help kids window, trying to get a feel for what was going rrcord ranked him second among active Today, family is a word Ingram simply labels get along with each other and get them more td.happen,” said Scott Sampson, the general su- NCAA Division III coaches at the start of “foreign.” At Thanksgiving, he says he was involved” perintendent of the stadium, who tried to get the season. thankful for his team and for the handful of some well-deserved shuteye while Janney held Boston IJnivcrsity men’s ice hockey people he calls friends. Battling wintry elements down the fort. coach Jack Parker won his 500th contest “I’m than&l for the lessons I’ve learned and At 2 a.m., the crew took to the field to begin November 21 in a 7-I defeat of Cornell for the people who helped me learn them and Eddie Janney and his crew were ready for any absorbing water that wa beginning to form pud- University. He began his career at Boston who didn’t let me take the easy way out,” he surprise that 01’ Man Winter might drop on the dles on the tarp. Seven hours later when the tarp U. in 1973 and has captured two national said.” town of Salem, Virginia. was pulled back, the field appeared as if it had championships. Parker bccamc the ninrb Janncy, building superintendent at the Salem been Codted with Teflon - showing no signs of collegiate hockey coat h Lo reach the 500- Civic Center, and four cTew members spent most the weather. victory milestone. Kentucky locking ‘em in of the night of December 8 in a maintenance “It’s absolutely phenomenal what they did Janice Quinn, in her ninth season as The University of Kentucky and the Winbum shop at the city’s football stadium ~ where the when it looked like there was no hope,” R. women’s basketball coach at New York Academy are teaming up to “lock in” 200 young- Amos Alonzo Stagg Bowl would be played a few Wayne Burrow, NCAA assistant director of University, became the program’s all-time sters for a 12-hour overnight program designed hours later to determine the NCAA’s Division championships, told the Roanoke (Virginia) most-victorious coach with win No. 160, to teach conflict-resolutions skills, encourage III football champion. Times & World News “It’s a real tribute to the against City College of New York. She sur- staying in school and demonstrate how to play Janncy pulled the night shift with four guys whole crew, and to the city.” passed Esther Foley. an active role in stopping societal violence. ‘I’hc hc didn’t even know. As it turned out, the most noticeable down- Herb Magee, men’s bask&all [ oarh al lock-in will begin December 16. The plan was well designed. If snow fell, it pour was produrcd by the University of Wiscon- Philadelphia College of Textiles and The university’s khletes in Service to America would he allowed to accumulate to scveml inch- sin, La Crosse, which soaked Rowan Collcgr of Science, won the 600th game of his 2% program is enlisting the help of former baskct- es and then would be bulldozed away to the New Jersey, 36-7. year career. The victory (anir in a 71-67 ball standout Sean Woocb to scTve as guest spra- sidelines. If 01’ Man Winter threw in some freez- defeat of Eastern College in the season ker. ing rain, Janney and the crew would begin opener.

New Mexico judge rejects call to lift injunction The NCAA News [ISSN 0027-6I701 A New Mexico state disrrictjudge has rcjcctcd a motion by the NCAA to ruled that the class did not qualify, leaving Thomas one-half crrdit short of lift a preliminary i@nction that is permit&g a University of New Mexico meeting core-curriculum requirements. Published weekly, except biweekly in basketball player to competr despite failing to meet NCAA initial-eligibility Paul Bardacke, the NCAA’s attorney in the case, presented a form listing the summer, by the National Co- requirementi. classes considered to be core-curriculum subjects at Austin High School in llegiate Athletic Association, 620 I State District Judge Daniel Schneider, who originally issued rhe prelimi- El Paso, Texas, which Thomas attended. The disputed class, Introductory College Boulevard, Overland Park. Kansas 662 I I-2422. Phone 9 I 3/339- nary injunction November 3, declined December 11 to lift the order after re- Physical Science, was not listed on the form. 1906. Subscription tate: $24 annual- viewing an NG%A ;imJmey’S claim that evidence had been withheld from the Bardacke told Judge Schneider that New Mexico officials IJbvdined Ihe ty prepaid; $ I5 annualty prepaid for court by attorneys fcJr the student and the University of New Mexico. form a week before the November hearing that rcsultcd in thr preliminary junior college and high-school facul- injuncrion. He charged that the form intentionally was withheld from the The student, Kenny Thomas, sued to play at New Mexico after an unsuc- ty members and students; $ I2 annu- cessful appeal to the Association of an NC4A Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse NGL4 and the court. ally prepaid for students and faculty ruling that he lacked the rcquircd numbrr of core courses to qualify for TOII~- Attorneys for the university and Thomas denied that they had withheld at NCAA member institutions; $74 petition under initial-eligibility requirements. evidence. annualty for foreign subscriptions. In testimony Deccmbcr 2, Thomas said he was assured that a science class Schneider said in response to the motion that he considered the font] to For first-class upgrade. forward an he took at Austin High School in El Paso, ‘Iexas, was a core course. The clear- be important evidence, hut that it was not enough by itself to convince him additionaJ $50 (except foreign or- inghouse, which did nor receive a transcript for Thorrlas until August 8, 19Y5, to lift the injunction. ders). No refunds on subscriptions. Second-class postage paid at Shaw- nee Mission, Kansas. Address cor- No NCAA News next week; will resume with January 8 issue rections requested. Postmaster send address changes to NCAA Publish- ing, 6201 College Boulward, Over- In acknowledgment of NC;AA members’ observance of year-end holidays, NCAA Convention issur. (Copies of that issue - featuring a preview of the land Park, Kansas 662 I I-2422. The NCAA News will not publish an issur during the last week of December. 90th annual Convention - also will he made available in Dallas to delegates The next issue of thr News will he datcdJanuav 8. It will be the annual and others attending the 1996 meetings. Page 4 The NCAA News December 25, I995 W Comment Team shows that sportsmanship is alive TheNCAANews BY BETSY ALDEN a bonus trip to Canada thrown in for Unanimously, our players chose to con- Editopin-chief The Comment section SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNNERSllY good measure. tinue play. This action took courage, integri- David Pickle I of The NCAA News is I am referred to as the eternal optimist. The first half of the game was lopsided ty and class. They knew who the “better” Managing editor offered as a page of One of my favorite songs is “The Cockeyed in Eastern Michigan’s favor, to say the least. team was, yet I believe that our men’s bas- Jack L. Copeland opinion. The views do Optimist” from “South Pacific.” The half-time score was 5825. As the play- ketball coaches and team truly showed Assistant editor Vlkkl K. Watson not necessarily repre- I am prompted to write by a recent inci- ers were about to take the floor to start the themselves at their best I also believe that Editorial and sent a consensus of the dent during a game played by San Fran- second half, African-American students at Eastern Michigan University would agree advertising assistant NCAA membership. cisco State Univer- Eastern Michigan took over the court to with this assessment- Ronald D. Moa sity’s men’s protest a recent police action on their cam- There are so many times that we all see basketball team at pus. Their concerns had nothing to do with examples of poor conduct. This situation Eastern Michigan athletics, but they believed the athletics brought out the best in everyone, and after University. While the arena was the appropriate place 10 vent the game, the Eastern Michigan players sin- incident was widely their fiustions and anger over the action. cerely thanked our playerj for the gutsy and reported in the Our coaching staff decided to remove the classy way in which they handled the situ- 0 Guest editorial newspapers, the team from the situation, and Eastern ation. They were truly impressed by our most important piece Michigan’s team headed back to the lock- players. of news from that er room. The Eastern Michigan officials Sports in this country has the opportu- game was left out proceeded to deal with the situation in an nity to bring out the best in us and our stu- With restructuring, Our men’s basket- A#kL?Tl effective manner. After a 45-minute wait, dents. We may have to look a little harder ball team, an NCX4 our head coach approached the players and for those special moments because the news devil is in the details Division 11 nonschol- explained the options regarding the event: media oftentimes chooses to focus on the arship program, tmveled to Eastern Accept Eastern Michigan’s forfeiture of the negative, rather than the positive, in sport. BY JAMES J.WHALEN Michigan, an NCAA Division I scholar- game and secure a much-needed win Seek and ye shall find. ITHACA COLLEGE ship program, to competc. It was the “big against an NCXA Division I institution or A few weeks ago, as a member of the road hip” for our players, who were eager finish the game with an overwhelming Betsy Alden is director of athletics at San Knight Commission on Intercollegiate to see a new part of the country and enjoy defeat Francisco State Uniuerxi~. Athletics, I voted for the Commission’s endorsement of the restructuring plan cur- rently under consideration Women’s basketball program is appreciated by the NC&4 despite my own mixed feelings relative to the I was appalled to rrdd Ken Burger’s com- 0 Letters sage to high schools to better prepare speed with which the plan ments about women’s basketball in the student-athletes for college. However, was developed and the con- December 11 issue of The NCAA News. Director of Athletics whether a student will receive an athlet- sequent potential for flaws Conbary to Mr. Burger’s claim, our ath- Lincoln Memorial University ics grant from a Division I institution may letics director watches - and enjoys - rank as a moderate issue on a school’s borne of haste. women’s basketball games at our universi- Look at the complete picture priority list when compared with other Indeed, during the past ty. He and I often travel to see the team high-school concerns such as student year, as a member of the play. The issue of academic standards and behavior, increasing dropout rates and NCAA Committee on Review It is refreshing to see an outstanding stiffening the requirements to allow first- safety issues. and Planning, I had strongly wh4zhl group of women, led by one of the best year students to participate on collegiate Since today’s high schools are inundat- ed with issues that imprdr academic encouraged the committee’s coaches in the nation, play an entertaining athletics teams continues to be the buzz brand of basketball. It is equally pleasing conversation. progress, an athletics grant might be a small repeated messages to the NCAA Council and to see these women walk across the gradu- The argument lies not in whether stan- concession for changing the academic emi- the Presidents Commission to not feel rushed ation platform in a timely manner. dardized test scores should be used as a part ronment. The potential to attend college by deadlines and to take whatever steps nec- Likewise, we have an established tradi- of the formula but rather in knowing the on an athletics scholarship affects only a essary not only to develop a framework but to tion in all of our women’s sports. We are point at which test scores become so chal- small proportion of students. anticipate and examine several key issues proud of the tradition, spectator involve- lenging that the primary goal of athletics The eager pursuit of elevating gradua- ment and level of competitiveness exhibit- opportunities is adversely aflected. tion rates by concentrating on standardized that would underpin a successful restructur- ed by our women. First, there are those who advocate that test scores reduces athletics opportunities ing effort. Scott D. Miller graduation rates increase by raising the for a number of potential student-athletes Now, as we approach the annual NC4A President entrance requirements through standard- who would benefit from a college degree, Convention and a vote on restructuring legis Lincoln Memorial University ized test scores. There has been a positive especially African-American and econom- lation that could lead to the most significant correlation between standardized test ically disadvantaged studenti who might otherwise not have the opportunity to fur- changes in Association history, I want to urge Should speak for himself requirements and graduation rates of stu- dent-athletes. However, this correlation may ther their education. both support of the enabling legislation and, In reference to Ken Burger’s quote in be due, in pa$ to factors such as more full- The achievement of-higher graduation more important, thorough discussion of the December 11 issue of The NCXA News, time academic counselors, tutoring pro- rates has calmed the once-widespread some of the issues that must be resolved prior I for one do not appreciate a sports editor grams and work limitations placed on stu- belief that student-athletes are not acade- to actual implementation in August 1997. whom I have never met speaking for me. dent-athletes. These and other intervening rnically prepared for college work. How- I have long been an advocate of reform This athletics director, behind open or factors may have an equivalent impact on ever, if standardized test-score require- “closed” doors, does not agree with his graduation rates and should be examined men6 are continuously adjusted, the results and believe that the restructuring plan holds opinion on women’s basketball. in relation to standardized test require- may adversely affect their value and de- the promise of encouraging continuing We are proud of our women’s athletics ments as a part of the mix that has in- crease the number of capable student-ath- reform in a way that our present circum- program at Lincoln Memorial University fluenced graduation rdm of collegiate stu- letes and diminish the diversity of the stances cannot. Like many of my colleagues, I and especially the winning addition of our dent-athletes. group. am impressed by and applaud the enormous women’s basketball teams. Second, there arc rhose who believe C. Bonnie Everhart KirkIan& Washington amount of thoughtful and dedicated work Jack Bondurant that raising test scores sends a strong mes- that has produced the legislation before us. Outstanding people have made an extraordi- 0 Opinions nary effort to come to consensus in articulat- ing ways in which our Association might be governed more effectively and function more Holtz: Playoff a good idea, but a I6-team format is not efficiently. On balance, I think it is a good plan. I Lou Holtz, head football coach I think there would be a tremendous amount of interest. But you hope, however, that we all fully understand Univemity of Notre Dame never want to do anything that would disturb die bowl structure.” that the plan is not complete: We are being New York Da& News asked to vote on the framework, and to “I always.felt a championship should be determined on the Sporting goods sales field, but there is no way the University of Notre Dame could be accept in good faith, that the details will be involved in a playoff system in the month of December. We’re Mark May, spokesman taken care of. As we all know, the fact of the very involved in final exams and there is no way. Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association matter is that more often than not, the devil “My feeling is that after the bowls, there’s usually going to be Se&e Post-lntelligencer is indeed in the details. two teams that are going to be head and shoulders above the rest “There are more women playing sports now than ever before, Throughout the development of the I don’t think it ought to be done according to popularity. Notre and that’s mainly because they are being given the opportunity. Women have always had the ability to play, and probably in many restructuring plan, members of the Division Dame isn’t going to win any popularity contests unless certain religious denominations have an overwhelming amount of the cases always had the desire. It’s just in the last 15 to 20 years, they vote. have finally been given the opportunity, and they are respond- See Restructuring, page 5 l “If it was done by computer and they took the two best reams, ing in droves.” December 25, I995 The NCAA News Pane 5 NO comment: Staff told to avoid disruptiveTitle IX remarks

Athletics department stat-f members at Cali- 1995 newsletter. tars also tend to have higher numberj of female “The Women’s Sports Foundation knows the fornia State University, Fresno, have been direa- “Gender Equity Through Physical Fducation” or minority coaches on staff. importance of educated journalism,” President ed not to make “disruptive” comments to the also is intended to help educators and admin- “If we truly are going to solve this problem, Wendy Hilliard said. “...We encourage more. news media regarding Title IX. istrators deliver presentations on gender equi- we as athletics administrators must review our journalists to report women’s sports both fairly The Associated Press reported that interim ty and Title IX issues. own hiring guidelines and develop practices and accurately, and to support the coverage of athletics director Benjamin Quillian sent each that afford us a greater opportunity to recruit issues female athletes face in today’s compcti- staff member a letter November 15 outlining rhe and hire minority and female coaches. We must tive world.” action. Fresno State President John D. Welty said pursue new avenues and develop creative ways The foundation says it responds to 100,000 hc approved the concept, adding that the letter to work within the hiring systems in our schools. inquiries each year, many involving media co\ was checked by an atrorney. And WC need to mentor and encourage quali- erdge of women’s athletics. Some coaches of men’s SJ’O~S were critical of The association also recently released its fied female and minority teachers who have an &pies of “Images (L Words” may bc obtained the 1972 federal antidiscrimination legislation Parents and Educators Title IX Team - KIT interest and talent in coaching.” by calling Rachel Zuk or Lynnore Lawton at earlier this year in a news series on Title TX in Project Workshop Kit. This resource tool is Baize encourages administrators to extend 5 1s/542-4700. the Fresno Bee. But Quillian said his action was designed to foster the development of pdrentS time devoted to the hiring process, build time In addition, the foundation announced rhar prompted by a radio talk show in which the on- and educator in helping athlerics organizations into the hiring schedule to network and post job the deadline for submitting articles on women’s air host criticized gender equity, citing unnamed work together toward reaching gender equity. openings in a wide variety of publications and athletics for its annual journalism awards is sources at the instirution to support his opin- with several organizations. She said applicants February 29,1996. To qualift, articles must have n n n n ions. should be given at least two to three weeks to been published between February l&1995, and At least one coach has argued that Quillian’s The October/November 1995 issue of Ath- compile and return application materials. February 15, 1996. Applications may be oh- concept amounts to a gag order. letic Management magazine features an article Also, she says, time should be allotted for tained by calling 800/227-39X8. “It does apparently what he wants it to do - titled “Hiring for Diversity” that outlines ways unforeseen conflicts in scheduling. She urges we can’t talk,” the unidentified coach is quoted in which athletics administrators may work administrators to be flexible to allow for special as saying in the Bee. “If something’s wrong, we toward achieving gender equity in coaching. needs of female Or minority candidates. The NCu once again will host two seminars can’t say it’s wrong.“ Author Sheila Baize, director of interscho- on Title IX next April. The first will be con- Quillian defended the action, saying the goal la&s in the Tucson (Arizona) Unified School ducted April 1 J-12 at the Fairmont Hotel in San is not to stifle freedom of speech hut to help pre- District, says the number of females and minori- The University of Notre Dame has given its Francisco. The second will be held at Boston’s vent his department from becoming publicly ties in coaching positions remains “alarmingly women’s soccer team an honor previously rem Park Plaza Hotel April 29-30. divided on the issue. low,” thus suggesting to administrators that served only for the Fighting Irish football pro- Both seminars are free to anyone in the “The intention was to caution not only the changes in their hiring practices are warranted. gram. membership. Limited numbers of seats are be- head coaches in particular, hut all the staff to Citing 1994 statistics compiled by the Women’s After Notre Dame captured this year’s NCAA ing made available to the publir. The seminars avoid making statements that could become dis- Sports Foundation, Baize says less than one per- Division I Women’s Soccer Championship, the are designed to educate the membership on ruptive to the operation of the athletics depart- cent of all coaches of boys’ teams and less than university illuminated a large numeral ‘1’ atop how to comply with Title IX. ment,” Quillian said. “When (hose expressions 46 percent of all coaches of girls’ teams are Grace Hall dormitory. The green lights are shin- For more information, contact Janet M. became disruptive...the university has the legal female. Also, the statistics indicate less than five ing in South Bend, Indiana, and the No. 1 will -Justus, NCAA director of education resources, right to take disciplinary action. I just want them percent of coaches are from racial minorities, remain lit until next season. or Kaily C. Sola, NC;AA, at 6201 College Boulc- to know that.” and African-American females represent less vard, Overland Park, Kansas 6621 l-2422, or call than two percent of all coaches and less than 913/339-1906. n n n n one percent of athletics administrators. The Women’s Spor& Foundation is targeting The National Association for Girls and Wo- “At the root of the problem is the fati that we the news media and how it pOI’trdyS women - Gnnpiled by finald D. Mott rn&n in Sport (NAGWS) has published a manu- tend to hire people like ourselves,” Baize writes. photo~phically in athletics. al that addresses the “subtle sexism and “White males predominantly hold the positions The foundation developed “Images &Words: Title Ix Ti&r ic u monthly f&turn in Th NC&4 inequities that influence participation in phys- that make them responsible for hiring athletics Guidelines for Female Athletes, Media, Public News. Niws and infommhun rtpwding Title IX and ical activity” and that provides strategies for coaches; therefore, more white males are Relations, Advertising, and Marketing Commun- gender-equity isszu_rcan be sent to The NC&4 News, change, NAGWS President Sue M. Durrant offered jobs as coaches. Schools that already ities” to encourage gender-neutml coverage of Attn.: Title IX Ticker, 6201 College Bouixuard, wrote in the association’s November-December have female or minority athletics administra- girls and women in sport and fitness. ovmland Purk, Kanws 6621 l-2422.

Restructuring Membership will have to distinguish between federation and isolation in forming new structure for the Association

> Continued from page 4 ability to use that resource. It is imprac- question will work. Several people intend to act with mist. We must com- on a divisional, as well as associa- tical IO think that the proposed Presi- have predicted that the presidential mit ourselves to however much time tional, basis. III Task Force to Review the NCAA dents Council can Or should fully re- duties a$ proposed will not difTer great- it will take to do the job right at all lcv- See it through to the finish Membership Structure, among oth- place all other intra-associational ly in time demand from those now els of responsibility. If we CaflnCJt ers, have emphasized the importance dialogue. associated with the Presidents Com- embrace this principle, the plan will Most of us probably have partici- of retaining a number of committees Staffing, and its costs, is another mission. Since the Commission to date fail. pated in the development of new, with Association-wide responsihili- key concern. Especially in today’s has never had the hiring and firing To one degree or another, all of multifaceted and highly complex ties that would continue to have com- economically constrained environ- responsibility for the executive direc- these issues reflect the consequences programs or policies. Those who mon, rather than division-restricted, ment, we would be more than impru- tor, nor control of the budget, plan- of further federation as the principal have done so know that in order to membership. While some progress dent to mount a major new program ning and litigation for the Asso&tion tool of restructuring. For many pears, effect change, you have to allow for has been made in that particular dis without examining carefully the that it now will have in the new struc- first as a chartrr member of the Presi- anxiety and hope for a certain tolcr- cussion, there currently is no specif- staffing and budget implications. It ture, that supposition seems somewhat dents Commission and then in sev- ante for ambiguity among the prin- ic provision for a common commit- has been suggested that in fact NCAA unrealistic. eral other capacities, I voiced my con- cipal players. tee structure in the plan. staff will be reduced as a result of I have worked hard for greater cerns relative to increasing federation You also know that there comes a On this point, let me be blunt: It is restructuring, but no details have presidential control in intercollegiate and what I believed to be the eco- point in the process when you sense one thing to federate and quite an* been forthcoming. Federation in the athletics. It is not yet entirely clear to nomic, I-ather than educational, im- conclusion, and it becomes easy to ther to isolate. Without absolute assu- form of separate meetings for each me just how practicable the restruc- petus for the slow but steady fiactur- gloss over those last few details, espe- rance of some shared means by division’s management and presi- turing proposal is in this regard. My ing of the NCAA along division lines cially when you’re working on dead- which to monitor, assess and protect dents groups could imply a federat- concerns are only fueled by the most As I think back over all of the dis line. Put another way, we’ve all seen the core values and common bonds et1 approach to staffing that may re- recent list of amendrnen&tr3amend- cussions and decisions that have led what usually happens to a winning that make us an association, I believe quire more, rather than less, staff ments that includes provisions for the NCAA to this restructuring thres team that stops paying attention in we jeopardize the fundamental mis support. Division I constituent bodies to send hold, among those most &king is the the fourth quarter, overconfident in sion and function - the “C,” if you Additionally, without the common Executive Committee alternates to fact that the NCAA Student-Athlete its anticipation of the outcome. will - of the NCAA. sessions now cential to our program, meetings that elected representatives Advisory Committee voted unanimou- In this particular endeavor, the staff members themselves will have are unable to attend. sly to sustain a common multidivision only clock running is our own. Hard- Beyond symbolism to reexamine means by which to en- It seems we are already anticipat- committee, recognizing common working leadership has produced a Beyond even the symbolic and sure adequate communication with ing problems beyond those associ- goals and concerns, and perhaps he- shared vision. Now it is up to the philosophical issues composing this each other on major issues, as well as ated with occasional exceptional ah- lieving that student-athletes stand to NCAA membership to go to Dallas question lie the real and practical ele- day-today business. The sta0ing plan sence. And for all the provisions and gain more by standing together. It is prepared to help rhe transition team ments of communication across the needs to be efficient and effective. promises about the diverse and tru- at least ironic, if not fully incongm- clearly identitj, the concerns, expec- divisions. Absent a substanrial inte- ly representative nature of the new ous, that we, the educators, seem to tations and resolutions that will cre- Presidential commitment grative element, we stand to lose the governing council and related bod- increasingly consider working tog&- ate a shared ~ and reasonably de- tiou3 perspectives, information and Another question that has been ies, that same list of amendments er a hindrance while student-athletes tailed - view. We tnust have both informed debates that come with a largely left unanswered is that of speaks to how to override or set aside deem it invaluable. in order to succeed. membership of diverse experience whether college and university presi- legislative actions those entities may Irony or incongmity notwithstand- and perspective that are not limited dents really can and will make the time take. ing, however, the federation train is JumesJ. ES&n is president of Ithaca to any single division. There is an to assume what amounts to full gov- long out of the station. Now, as we College. He is a member of the Knight Plan fails without trust exceptional resource in the sheer erning responsibility for the NCa I hook up the new, powerful, stream- Commission on Intercollegiate Athlettis number of NCAA member represen- would submit that it is difficult, if not I said before that we were in part lined locomotive of restructuring, we andtheNC4ACinnmit&eonReuiewand tatives who have working knowledge impossible, to begin to answer this being asked to vote in good faith, must make doubly sure that the train Planning. He is a formerchair of the of more than one division, and we question without knowing, for exam- which implies trust. It will be mean- gets intercollegiate athletics where .!lkinn III su.bunnm.ilteeof the t+-ehhb should not unnecessarily limit our ple, how the committee and staffing ingless to vote with trust if we do not we ultimately want and need it to go Commission. I \ -

The NCAA News December 25, I995 F LUTION . rifle ! field tl71 rea l ns individual berths

he individual events at rhis year’s Nar- munity is united in hoping that rhc debate of ional Collegiate Men’s and Women’s Ri- team vs. individual will be rendered moot for at - TI fle Championships could include only least three years at the 1996 NCAA Convention. shooters who qualify for the team champion- If adopted, 1996 Convention Proposal No. 88 p ship. would establish a three-year moratorium on any y - .,* ’ Stranger yet, under certain circumstances, reduction in the size of championships fields for there may bc no qualifiers for the individual all NCAA men’s and women’s National Cotle- championships at all. giate championships. and would be effective im- These possibilities have resulted fr-om a com- mediately. Since the rifle championships are in m8 - 1 bination of factors: the NCAA Exccutivc Corn- March, the field of 56 would be restored this year. mittee’s reduction ofthe overall field for these If that dors not happen. many options for 3 team-individual charnpiorlsllips from 56 to 4X massaging the numbers to save the individual ,B and the NCAA Men’s and Women’s Rifle Corn- championships remain - alrhough all would mittee’s decision not to adjust its qualifying detract from the team cvcnt. Had current qualifying proceduresand field restrictions beenin ~&LX?at th.e199~5 process. ‘To grasp the pluses and minuses of any of championships, WestVirginia ~Jniucrrsity‘s Ryan Meagher (above) - who owned the The reduction came as a result of.the cham- whoseoptions, it is necessary to understiuld the No. 1 qualafiing scorein smallbore - would not have qual@d for the champion- pionships study completed by the Executive current selection process. <:ommittee in 1!)!)2, which determined thar Qualifying procedure ship.sbecause I& way not on WestVirginia ’s air T-$?Qteam. championships fields should hettcr reflea spon- sorship numbers. Rifle is sponsored by 55 of In the “team” component, each sponsoring the Association’s roughly 900 active members. institution must qualify separately for each rifle The rifle committee’s stance reflects it3 feel- (air and smallbore); however, the team cham- By MartySBry mg that the team portion of the event takes pre- pionship is won by aggregate score. wri cedence over the individual in a sport in which The individual championships, which do not those two components are scored separately. figure in the team standings but include many “The sense of the committee and most of the of the “team” shooters, are held on the day be- schools who had input with the committee is fore the team competition. Shooters must qual- that rifle is primarily a team sport, not an indivi- ify for each discipline separately, but unlike dual sport,” said James M. Skidmore, chair of team competition, there is no aggregate-score the committee and assistant director of athlet- champion in individual championships ~ only ics at Jacksonville State University. “At the cham- individual-event champions. pionships, there is the overwhelming sense of The teams with the top eight qualimng scores a team sport.” in each rifle are selected firjt Usually, six or sev- en institutions qualify for both events, but not Proposal could stall problem always. Since there are four shooters pet tcarn Some coaches wonder whether a compromise could have been reached, but the shooting com- See Rifle, page I7 l Committee wants amateurism philosophy clarified

t‘tlC N(:AA b$$jitip’

The NCAA Division I-AA Food,att Madison’s game at Appalachian Stale The subcommittee tcvicwed the 2. Ordered that Cawley’s per diem cooperation of the institution regard- Committee has reprimanded Mike University November 25. alleged misconduct during a Novem- and nansportation allowance be with ing this situation. Since the game, Cawtey, a student-athlete from James Cawley taunted the Appalachian her 29 telephone conference. Based held. both Cawley and the James Madison Madison University, for unsports- State head coach and team and berat- on the findings of that hearing, the The committee noted that it under- head football coach, Alex Wood, have manlike conduct at the 1995 NCAA ed an official after the game. Cawley committee took the following ac- stands the frustration that individuals written to the commitlee to apologize Division I-AA Football Charnpion- also publicly criticized the officiating tions: have after a losing effort but Cawley’s for Cawtey’s behavior. ship. crew in a press conference and his 1. Ordered that a public reprimand actions were not acceptable behavior. James Madison did not appeal the The incident took place in James comments were published. be issued regarding CdWtey’S conduct. The committee acknowledged the decision of the committee. December 25, I995 The NCAA News Page 7 Nebraska has Texas seeing red in I final Rally lifts Cornhuskers to their first Division I women’s volleyball crown

Nebraska volleyball coach Terry son) Weston and forced her into a lot Pcuit told his seniors three years ago of errors,” he said. “Their other five that they would win a championship. had career matches, though. (Lisa) His prophecy came true as the R&ma did well after we overloaded Cornhuskers downed Texas, 1 l-l 5, on Weston. They had to prove that 15-2, 15-7, 16-14, to win their first their left side could score, and they Division I Women’s Volleyball Cham- did exe eprionally well.” pionship December 16 at Massachu~ Nchraska had entered last year’s sctts. tournamrnt as the top-ranked team, The championship match was the hut was ousted by Penn State in the first contested between non-Calif- regional finals. This year’s squad swept omia teams since 1988, when Texas past UCIA in the Central regional defeated Hawaii. It was Nebraska’s final, then bested Michigan State in third trip to the championship match, the national semifinals behind Wes- hut the Comhuskers had been swept ton’s 30 kills. The 1O-1 5,15-8,15-8, Y- in each of their two previous appear- 15,15-8 marathon vic~ry marked only ances. the second time the Cornhuskers were Nebraska (32-l) lost the first game taken to five games this season. of this match, too, but rallied behind “In the opening game, we could seniors Billie Winsett and Allison have played a concerto, we were so Weston to capture the final three tight,” Petit said of the semiftnal against games. Weston, American Volleyball the Spartans. “But they hung in there Coaches Association Division I copla- and won it” yer of the year, and Winsett were two Michigan State (343), making only of five Cornhuskers to register dou- its second tournament appearance ble figures in kills. Wlnsett’s 25 kills ‘and first trip to the semifinals, had reg- were a career high, as were junior istered a five-game victory over previ- Kate Cmich’s 25. Jen McFadden ad- OUSly unbeaten Hawaii in the Moun- ded a season-high 16 and Lisa Keits tain regional final. ma conbibuted another 16. Texas’ trek to the final included a Nebraska’s total of I01 kills in the win over Florida in the East regional match wasbst 11 shy of a tournament final at Gainesville, Florida, followed record. The Cornhuskers finished the by a semifinal triumph over defend- tournament with 365 kills, seven off ing champion and top-ranked Stan- the record set by Long Beach State in ford (29-3), 1513,0-15,X-17,15-6,15 1991. 12. Demetria Sante had 25 kills against Nebraska recorded101 kilLr against Texas,just 11 short of a tournament record. Lisa Reitsmu (above) “I’m very happy for both the play- Stanford, and Sonya Barnes and An- had 16 kills. ers and former players,” Pettit said. gie Breitenfield combined for anoth- team along with teammates Winset?, ChristyJohnson .._1 2 7 .OOO 2 13 0 sonyd Ban1rs 11 3 27 296 I 10 1 “llwy took risks I wouldn’t take. It was cr 25. Katr Cmlch ______._...25 4 42 500 0 21 0 Carrie Rurrh . ..2 0 8 .250 0 13 0 easy to set goals, but this team spent Stanford, which had won the cham- Crnich and setter Christy Johnson. St&r Maser _____..______0 0 0 .OOO 0 0 0 Susan Chrisman _._____.0 0 1 .(wO 1 5 0 every waking moment to win rhis pionship two of the last three years, Folkl was selected from Stanford and tJsaR&ma _____...... __16 1 31 4~4 0 10 0 Katie Auain ...!a 4 26 ,192 1 14 0 championship.” scored 97 kills ag-Ynst the Longhorns, Sante was chosen from Texas. AllisonMariaHrdlxck Weston __.____.._____._.180 16 0 500 .Ol)o040 01 2210 0 Angie Brritrnfirld .I5 H 44 .lr,!) I 14 2 Texas coach Mick Haley was gun- including 22 by Kristin Folkl, but were Fiona Ncpo.. ______0 0 0 000 1 5 0 Jane Winkel_.....___.__.___3 0 9 .333 0 5 0 ning for his 500th career win in the outblocked, 16-8. Gary Wendell, who CHAMPIONSHIP Tmrny Ju~rgen~.....O 0 0 UOU 0 0 0 JenMcFaddcn _____._..16 4 29 ,414 0 1 0 Nebr.lska _.______.__ 11 15 15 16 title match, but Nebraska was too deep shared AVCA player-of-the-year hon- Tootals ___ _..___..__....101 35 223 296 4 92 0 Shame1 Cornelius in handing the Longhorns their sev- ors with Weston, had 16 kills and 17 Tcrxa ,...... 15 2 7 14 lhib 1 1 3 .xlo 0 0 0 enth defeat in 35 matches. digs. Nebraska KETA Pct.UDGBS Texas K ETA Pct.SADGBS lakisha Bledsor .._...1 3 13 .OlMI 0 0 0 ‘We did an outstandingjob on (Alli- Weston headed the all-tournament Billie Win&t .._....__25 H 64 266 0 10 0 DrrneniaSance 20 7 66 .197 1 10 1 Totals .___...... _...... 62 26 197 183 5 71 4 Larson’s last-minute field goal lifts Montana to I-AA title

Entering lhe Division I-AA tide game Decem Montana defense had not tumcd in such a stel- Pennington finished 23 of 40 for 246 yards. bcr 16, Montana quarterback Dave Dickenson lar performance throughout the game. The Herd’s leading receiver was Jermaine had thrown 576 passes this season. Because hc The Grizzlies held Marshall’s Chris Parker, WIggins, who caught five passes for 81 yards. is so good at it, Grizzlies kicker Andy Larson had who came into the game with 1,739 rushing het=n called on to attemptjust 12 field goals. ydrcis and 16 touchdow IS this season, to 94 yards CHAMPIONSHIP But it was Larson who proved to be the dif- on 23 attempa. They also turned in a momen- Montana 3 7 2 10-22 ference on his team’s final offensive play of the tum-shifting goal-line stand early in the fourth Ma&all _._._._.__._._.____. 0 3 7 10-20 season. quarter and forced Thundering Herd freshman First Quarter He kicked a 2.5ydrci field god with 39 seconds quarterback Chad Pennington to ground the Montana ~ Andy Lxson 4X 6&l goal (b:O!l) left to give Montana a 22-20 victory over Mar- ball in the end zone for a third-quarter safety. shall before a championship-record crowd of Stiff defense on the y;irt of both teams turned Second Quarter Manhall ~ Tml Oprnlander 39 field goal (1254) 32,106 on the .l‘hundering Herd’s home field a game that was expected to be a shootout into Montana ~ Marl Wrlls 24 pars from Dave Dickrnson in Huntington, West Virginia. a battle for field position. (Lasm kick) (59) It was the first championship and tirst trip to Montana, which had averaged 43 points per the title game for Montana, which finished the game, opened the scoring midway through the Third Quarter Marshall - Chris Parker 10 run (Oprnlander luck) (9:%) season 1.3-2.Marshall (12-3), which won the title first quarter on Larson’s 48yard field goal. After Montana ~ Safety,Chad Pcnnin@onIntentional ground- three years ago, finished second for the third Herd kicker Tim Openlander countered with a ing in end zcmr (5:54) time since 1!187. 39-yarder of his own early in the second quar- The game-winner was Larson’s second field ter, Dickenson hit Matt Wells with a 24yard scor- Fourth Quartet gryal of the day, but he still did not expect IO be ing St&e to give the G&lies a modest lcT3 lead Montana - Wells 1 pass from Dickrnson (Larson kick) (12’30) at the half called into action at the season’s most crucial Marshall ~ Openlander 21 field goal (loZO5) juncture. , Parker, who had just 35 yards at the inter- Marshall - Parker 26 nx~ (Openlandrr kick) (4:45) “They snapped the ball just as I started to mission, began to make more of an impact in Montana - Lxson 25 field ,&Xl1 (:39) think about it,” he said. “I’m glad they snapped Marshall applied the &fmive prtwure the second half He scored Marshall’s fint touch- Montana Mar&all down on a lo-yard run in the third qUdIter, and it when they did.” to lash Bmnnen on this t&zv. but it was Fint Downs ______._._._...... ~.21 17 his 2Qard scoring run with 4:45 left in the game The kick culminated a determined 72-yard Montana that held the ?hu&ering Rushing Yardage .._._.._._.___.._._...... 49 112 erased a 19-13 Montana lead and set the stage drive in which Dickenson finally turned the Herd’s o&n.se in checkmost of th game. PassinK yardilge.. ______.______...... 281 2% tables on a swarming Marshall defense that for Dickenson’s and Larson’s heroics. R&urn Yardage ______.____._._._.__._...... 23 0 sacked him 10 times during the game and fan rcl Dickenson finished the game 29 of 48 for 281 Passes (Camp.-An-lnt) ____.__.___._.._._._...... 29&l 23-41-l Punrc (NorAvg.) ____.._._._.__._._...... R’LR.1 537 0 yards and two touchdowns. His primary target him to improvise on many other plays. He com- 8-yard line to set up Larson’s kick. Fumbles (No.Lost) .._._.._.__.___.__...... ______0-O 4-l pleted six of seven passes for 69 yards on the But a mere three points on the final drive wa$ Joe Douglass, who had eight catches for 102 Penalties (No.-Yards) ____.______.______...... _...... 4-18 12-109 drive before scr.imbling 11 yar& to the Marshall would not have been nearly enough if the yards. Anendancr-32,106. -“!&IL..

Page 8 The NCAA News December 25, I995 Postgraduate scholarship winners announced

Postgraduate scholarships of $5,000 each 3.700 grade-point average in human performance and cx- have been awarded by the NCAA to 29 football ercisc rcicnce) - ‘I’hr starting quarterback tar the Per)- wins. Bnmprd helped guide Youn~town Statr to Division players at member institutions. I-AA rhamplonships in 1995 sod 1994. A team captain, The NCAA annually awards 154 postgradu- Brungard also is a frequent speaker at banquets and corn- ate scholarships to student-athletes who have mencement crrernorlirs and for various yomh and adult excelled academically and athletically and who groups. He is active in the Fellowship ot (:hr,st,an Athlctcs are in their Iast year of intercollegiate athletics and has supervised huddles. worked AI youth damps and roached numerous rpona. Brun@rd plans to pursue teach- competition. log and co.lchirig in the immediate future before drcid- In addition to the 29 football honorees, the ing o,, a LOUI’J~ of postgradu’c study. NCAA awards grants to 28 basketball players PatrickCIuistc~pherJeEers (Ilniversity of Virg,n,a. 3.1X8 (14 each for men and women) and to 97 stu- grade-point average in psychology) - A stamng w,de r+ dent-athletes participating in spor~~ other than crivcr for the Cavaliers, Jetirn has caught more than 100 passes during his career and has xored 15 touchdowns. football and basketball (34 for men and 63 for Brungurd He is foutth is srhool history in touchdown reccprions and women) in which rhe NCAA conducts champi- yarch gained (1,698) and seventh in receptions. I lr 15a l!w1 onships. Atlantic Coast Conference all-academic selectioo and a rem Of the 29 football scholarships, 10 are award- 1994 second-team CTE Academic All-America honoree and in school history. He rushed for at least 100 yards in seven tipient of a 1995 NACDA Foundation l’ostgraduare Srhc+ a two-time member of the Pacific-10 Conference all-acade- ed IO Division I student-athletes, 10 are award- games this searon and reached that mark in 15 of the final lanhip, awarded for academic arh,rvcment as a result of mic team. In May, Hague was awarded Southern Califor- 19 games in which he played. A 1994 second-tram GTE Jeffers’ panicipauon in this year’s Pigskin Classic. Jeff&s ed in Divisions II and III, and the remaining nia’s Order of the Palm, the highest senior recognition Academic Al-America honoree, Campbell plans to at-tend plans to attend law school after pursuing a rarccr ,n pre nine are awarded at large. award at the school. A lYY5 National Football Foundation medid school next fall. fessional football. To qualiQ for an NCAA postgraduate schol- and College Iiall 01 Fame Postgraduate Scholarship recip Medley O’Reefe Gatewood (Williams (:ollrge. 3.530 George Wti Base (University of California, 1.00sAn- arship, a student-athlete must have an overall ient, Hog-ue currently is enrolled in Southern California’s grade-point average in studio an) - Carewood became a geles. 3.613 grade-point avenge in cconomio) ~ l&se has master of business administration program and plans m at- dominant center at Williams drspirc not playinK football be- grade-point avenge of 3.000 (4.000 scale) or its recorded more than 100 career tackles from his position tend law school. fore enrolltng in college. A three-year statter, Gatewood WI the Bruin defensive line, and his 15 wcklrs for losres cquivalcnt and must have pcrformcd with dis- WJliam Phillip Jones (Rrrman University, 3.9lJO grade- earned all-star recognition from the New England Small in l!JrJ5 is rixth on the 5&001’s all-time s,ogl~~s~asoo list. tinction as a member of the varsity team in the point average in mathematics) -Jones rank5 as one 01 the College Athletic Conference io 1995. He also is a two-year Ilr wa> r~urrrd a Burger King Scholar-Athlete of the Week sport in which the student-athlete was nomi- mop quarterbacks in Furman hinory, having secured a spot letter-winner in wrestling at Williamb, placing i,, the top 10 earlier this year and was awardrd IJCln’s,Jark,c R. R&to- nated. The student-athlete must also intend to among all-time Paladin lradcnr in total offense and revrr- in three toumamentb thib year. Gatrwood is involved in son Memo,~ial Award for acadrm,c ach,cvcmc,,t for the al other offensive categories desp,te missing e,ght games ,n many campus and community sr,vicrs, including a “Best continue academic work beyond the baccalau- second stra,ghr yrar. In additior~, Rare wab srlrctrd as one 1Y94 due to injury. The 1995 team captain completed near- Budd,es” program and “Aim High,” an outreach program of UCLA’s reprrsrntativrs for the Pacifir~lO Confercore rrate degree as a full-time graduate student. ly 60 percent ot his passe5 and threw for morr than 20 io St. Louis for at-risk children. He plans to attend medical Student-Athlete Forum. A two-omt l’ac,lic-10 all-aradrmic In addition, the student-athlete must have be- touchdowns through the first six games of the season. He school in 1996 or 1997. choice, Kase plans to pursue a ,,raster’s degree in business haved, both on and off the field, in a manner is a four-time member of the Southern Conference honor Scoti RonaId Hawig (Ilnivmiry of Wisconsin. Whitewa- administration. roll and will graduate this month summa uun laude. He is ter, 3.920 grade-point average in accounting and finance) - that has brought credit to the student-athlete, James Peter Lpmy (Rice Univrrsiry. 3 772 grade-point av- the reLipieot of Furman’b Alfred S. Reid Memorial Award, Hawig is a three-yrar starter at center for W%consin-White- erage in economics and managenal stud,rr) - 1 ,uny is a the institutjon and intercollegiate athletics. given to the senior male who most exhibits Ieaderxhip, watrr and has not missed a 8-r or a snap during that time. four-year letter-winner and rtaning drlen+r back who Following is a complete list of the 199596 rcholarship and service to the university. He plans to earn He was the Warlrawks’ ltighest~grxting lineman in each of logged nearly 1IO career tackles. He wab bpecial-trams play- NCAA postgraduate scholarship winners for a postgmduate degnze in business adminisuation. the past two seasons. A two-time all-Wisconsin State Uni- er of the week at Rice five times during the past two sea- football: Gregory Jay Myers (Colorado State University, 3.710 versity Conference selection, Hawig was narnrd WSUC line- sons and was the recipient of Rice’s Joe Davis Award as the grade-point average in biological science) - A two-time man of the year in 1994. He plans to pursue a master of tax most improved dcfenr,ve playrr ol l!J!J5 rpnng prdctice. Football Writers Association of America all-American de- degree beginning in 1997, in addition to taking the CMA and Lamy became a statter this year and registered 13 tackles Division I fensive back, Myers also is the first player to earn all- CPA exams. in the Owls’ opener against Louisiana Stare IJniversiry, Eric Leif@mAbrams (Stanford Univerrity, 3.430 grade- Western Athletic Conference honors for four consecutive Thomas P. King [Augustana College (Illinois), 3.970 then 18 more the next week against the U.S. Militiuy Acadr- point average in psychology) ~ Abrams holds Cardinal years. He is the 1995 winner of the Jim Thorpe Award, giv- grade-point average in premedirine] - A ream captain. my. He plans to pursue a master’s degree in business a& records in career pointi and career point5 after touch- en to the nation’s best defensive hack. and was a finalist for King has started more than 25 games at quarterback and ministration. downs. A nominee for the Lou Groza Award, presented to that award in 1994. Myerr helped the 1995 Rams to an X-3 completed more than 125 passes for nearly 2,000 yards. He Ryan Glenn Padgen (Northwestern University, 3.350 the nation‘s top placekicker, Abrams also is a two-rime all- record and a benh in the Plymouth Holiday Bowl. An has thrown 23 touchdown passes and has rushed for an grade-point average in psychology) - Padgett has staned Pacific-10 Conference scholar and a three-time member of NCZ Today’s Top VIII award recipient, Myers also is a additional 19 touchdowns. He is a two-time allCollege the last 29 games as an offensive guard and was a major the Stanford athlrtics director’s honor roll. In 1993, Abrarns GTE Academic All-America honorer and a two-time all- Conference of Illinois and Wisconsin srlrction and is factor in Northwestern’s drive to a 10-l season and a Rose received Stanford’s “Blocks” award. presented to the most WAC: scholar. He also is a 1995 recipient of a National Foot- fourth in the Augustana record book.5 in passing yardage. Bowl berth in 19?J5.The Wildcat5 have averaged nearly 200 outstanding male athlete in the freshman class. He also was ball Foundation and College Hall of Fame Postgraduate Ring also is a threrdme letter-winner in txack and field and yar& per game rushing in each of the last two years. l’ad- named Stantord’s top frrshman athlete in 1992. He plans Scholarship. Myen is president of Colorado State’s Studrrrt- was a yard on Augus’J.na’s basketball team in his fresh- gert is a two-time Big ‘l‘en Conference all-academic selec- ,o pursue a degree in sports psychology upon graduation. Athlete Advisory Comminee and a member of the NCAA man and rophomore years. He will auend medical school tion and was a finalist for the 1994 Anson Mount Scholar- Bret James GUessen (U.S. Air Force Academy, 3.460 Student Welfare and Equity Subcommittee on Finanr,al next fall. Athlete Award. Padgea played immediately as a freshman grade-point average in history) - As a guard on the GK Aid. Christopher John Palmer [St. John’s University (Minne- and became a 5tatler later that year. Hc has hrcn a ctancr Force offensive linr. Cillessen conuibuted to the Falconr’ S&z&ore L. Valenzisi (Nonhwestern Univmity, 3.340 sota), 3.935 grade-point average in biology] ~ A prolific a~ two different positions during hi> tcnurc. Hr pl.ur, to rankir~~ a5 one of the nation’r top txshmg trams and Lheir grade-point avenge in journalism) - Valenzisi is North- wide receiver and kick returner, Palmer raught more thar! X-4 rrcorrl and hrnh in the Weiser Lock Copper Bowl. western’s fourth all-time leading scorer and third all-time 30 touchdowns during hi, career and scored more than attend medical school upon cornplction of hi& football ra- (:~llrssen broke the school record for strrnflh in&x set by leading firld~goal kicker. He was a key figure in North- 200 po,nrs. Hc hrlprd Sr John‘s reach rhe Division Ill rerr. lormrr all-Amrricm Chad HerminX%. A lY!J4 ht)(-lrdm .111- we.tem’~ quick %,:ltt this w~son h&w a Irg qmy wielmed semifinals in 1993 and 19Y4. Palmer has 115 career rcrrp Douglas Lee Popovich (UnivrrGty <,f %,I DicXo. 3.Xx0 Wr*trr,t AthI& (:~mlrrcnc c 5rlrrt,on, (:illessen also is a h,m tar rhe remainder of the campaign. He has &vice tions for more tllilo 2.400 yard> ;rml l1.1* ad&d 111011tlrarl’ Xrallc-point avcr’agc in Ocean ,t,,dic\) ~ <>lll. Of Sdn thrrc~umc ~1I-WAC scholar-athlrtr. Ah a freshma,,. Cillrt kicked f&r 6&l goal, in a ~;,tnr and has bootr-d three or 600 yards on l!J kick returns. An all-American in 1994, he D,rgo‘s Iradmg tacklrrs. Popovlrh IS a sm,ung tree salrry WII received Air Force’\ Ou~st.~,tdtng Fourth-(:]a55 (:ad~t mow field goals 111d pamr 5,x tlmcs Hr was a l!J!)4 Loll also was a 1994 first-tram GTE Academic Al-Amrrica ho,,- and a team captain. He had more than 100 ucklrs and in- :warcl hr ac.,de,,,ic. ~IIIIICIK~ .tntl n,,l~taty rxcrllcnrr He (:rr~, Award semdinalis~ and a I!(94 second-team all-Big oree and a two-time all~Mi,~,,rrot.~ I,,tcrcollrXurc Athlrt,~. trrrcpred four passrs during his c arcer. Larlir, this year, intrnd5 to ol,tai,, a ~mdudtr dcprcc ,,I philosophy ‘ret) (:onfrrcnrr relerdon. A rwwrimr all-Big Ten scholar- Conference choice. Palmer planb to attend rhc LJmvcrr~~y hr rrturm=d a iumhle 4X yards for a touchdown I’opovich i\ a Bttrgcr Kirlg.~holar-Athlete 01 the Week rcc~p~~w .inrl Joseph E. Cummings (I Iniversiry of Wy,xninX. 3.X10 athlrtr. ValrnG plans 10 pursue a postgraduate dr~rer in of Mirrnr~ota Medical School in 1!J!J6. a IJivisio,, I-AA ,,ational player of thr wurrk t,onorc,~. A arack-pomt average in English) ~ A f&r-yea,’ >ta,ter :,I lournalism. Vincent J. Penningroth (Wanburg (:ollrgc. :I 1A!J glade- 1994 first-tram CTE Academic AKAmrrica ho,,o,ee, linrbarkr, and drfrurive end, Cu,nrrti,tX~ 1ogXcd more David Michael Walker (Stanford UniverGty. Y.fi40 grade- pomt avrragr in rompurcr science) ~ A rhrre-time all- l’opovich intends to pursue a yraduatr dr~cc in rnvirorl- Iha,, ItJO unassisted tarklrh during his c.trccr. (:rrmmings point average in poolitical science) - A starlmg drfensivr Iowa Intercollegiate Athletic Conference defensive rod, mental studies and oceanic rrsourcr rnanagm~cnt at the was voted cocaptain Ior the l!l!J5 rearon afier rarning hon- back and special-teams playrr. Walkrr has recorded 12X ca- Penningroth also was rrcoXnirrd as an all-American i,, I lniversiry of Oregon, beginning next fall. or;&lr ,,i~ntum all-Wc5tc1.11 Arhlrtir (:onferrnrc rrrogni- ret’r racklrs. tops among Stanford defensive hacks. He has 1994 by Footbzall New> and the Cot& SpOW InfOrmaliOn Timothy Lee Schafer (Alhion (Zollrge, 3 4!Jl g,xL~po,nt um 111lYY4. 1 Ir IS a l!J!J4 srroncl~rram GTE Academic All- played m rvely gamr during his career and in 1994 wu vat- Director3 of America. He has registered 225 career wck- Gmrnt a honorer xx-l two-time WAC all~academic choice. c-d Stanford’s most om5tanding junior player. He is a two- k-3, imlUdillg nearly 60 for losses and 2X quarterback racks. avenge in malhemaucr and cccondanj rtluratron) - Scha- Earher th,s year, Cummings was rccognirrd its a BurXc,‘ t,m~ Pacific-10 Conference scholar-athlete and winner of He was named mo5t valuable player in the IIAC this year. frr was a three-year statlrr at defensive back. btil,tiflX the King Srhola,-Athlete of the Week. He planb to attrnd law the l!J!J4 Arthur Ashe Scholar-Athlrtr Prirr for rxrllrncr A 1994 first-tram GTF. Acadcmir All-Amenra honoree. last 31 games for the Britons. He has seven career intrr- school at rhe llnivrrsity of Montana in lYY6. in athletics and academics. A three-time member of the Pcnnmgroth also IS a 1YY4 IIAC: all-academic choice. He reptions and helped Alhion tie a national record of 39 in- rrrcrpnonc ,n a smgle 5~~011. Srhafrr was a mcmhcr ot David Clark Dickenson (IJn,vers,ry of Montana, 3.X40 Stanford honor roll, Walker plan> to attend law school upon plans to obtain a master’s degree in computer science at gratlc-pomt average in biology) ~ A rwo-time &BiX Sky graduation. Iowa State Univeniry beginning next fall. Albion‘s 1994 D,v,slon 111 champ,onchip team tic was a Conference quarterback, Dirkrnson directed the Grizzlier Bick‘uhn slinger [CentGal College (Iowa), 3.490 gmdr- second-tram all-Michigan Intercollrg,atc Athlct,r Assor,a- point average in infonrration systems] -A finalist lor the lion selection in 1994 as well as Atb,on’c tram captam. to three consrcutivr Division I-AA playoti appearances. Divisions II and Ill 1995 Cagliardi Trophy. given to the Division III football Following gmduarion, Schafer intends to acquire a leach- culminatinX in a 22-20 champmnship-game victory over Pedro R Amas [Wheaton Callegr (Illinois), 3.880 grade- player of the year, Sanger completed his career as one of ing position in mathematics at the secondary lcvrl hrforc Marshall IJmvc,s,ry this year. He is a two-time al-American point average in English] ~ Armra is Wheaton’s all-time Central’s most outstanding linebackers. He recorded more pursuing a postgraduate deXnze i,, spoorts ;Id,rlir,i,tratiorl. and has been named Big Sky player of the week seven times leading t-usher with more than 3,000 yard5 gained on the than 100 unassisted la&es and 16 tackles for losses this Matthew James Siskosky (Yale University, 3910 grade- during his career. He hold.5 school record, torparringyards ground. He has scored more than 30 rushing touchdowns year. He holds school records tor tackles in a game (24) point average in biology) - Siskosky was a tour-year mcm- in a J,-dme (512) and touchdown passes in a game (six). He and IS second in career points with more than 200. The and a season (124). A 1994 Football Digest and College her of the Yale football team, earning Irtters as a sopho- also is a two-time Rig Sky most valuable player. Dickenson school record-holder for most rushing yards in a game (313), Sports Information Directors of America all-American, more and juniorwhile simultaneously working as a scrrdent was recognized as a GTE Academic All-America honoree Amm posted three lOU-yard rushing games in Wheaton’s Sanger helped lead Central to Iowa Intercollegiate Athletic aid in the school’s athletics/training sports medicme pm in 1993 and lr994 and is a three-time member ofthe Fhg Sky first five contests this year and helped guide the Crusaders Conference championships in 1992 and 1994 and two &academic team. He plans to auend medical school at the to the quanetinals of the Division III Football Champion- gram. He became a starter a5 a junior and logged more Division III playoff berths. He also is a two-time IIAC University of Washington. begtnning in 1997. ship. A two-time GTE Academic All-America honoree, Arm- than 50 career tackles. He also actively pursued a student champion in the discus throw. Sanger will pursue a post- job on the sports medicine staff in order to further his AaronG!ddeat=mdmm (University of Nebraska, Lincoln. za plans to pursue a master’s degree in English. beginning graduate degree in management informational systems be- 3.331) grade-point average in animal science) -Graham is in 1996. knowledge of sports medicine and orthopedics. He plans ginning next fall. to attend medical school next fall. the center of a Nebraska offensive line that has helped prc+ Brian k0n Bunen (University of Central Arkansas, Gregory John Schneider (Amherst College, 3.670 grade- Stephen David Tudor (University of the South. 3.360 duce one of the most prolific offenses in the counuy. He 3.938 gmde-point average in phpical therapy) ~ A two-time point average in economics and English) ~ A four-year helped the Cornhuskers to an 11-O regular-season record alKulf South Conference selection at outside linebacker, grade-point average in biology) ~ A four-year starter at starter at offensive tackle, Schneider never missed a game and a benh in the 1995 Tostiton Fiesta Bowl, which will de- Barnen snagged seven interceptions in three seasons at hnebacker. Tudor wa5 the Tigers’ top tackler for two sea- and was a first team all-New England Small College Athletic termine a national champion. A 1994 all-Big Eight Confe- Centi Arkansas and registered nearly 100 tackles. Bamea sons. He registered 27 tackles for losses and seven rplar- Conference selection in 1994. Schneider was instrumen- rence selection, Graham helped the Cornhuskers win wire- played at Eastern New Mexico Universiry in 1992 and was tetiack sacks during his career. Ile is a 1994 first-team all- tal in turning around Amherst’s football fortunes, leading cervice national titles that year with a 13-O record. The 1994 named the Lone Star Conference’s freshman of the year Southern Colle8iate Athletic Conference selection and a the team to 11 wins in 19 games after the squad went O-8 Gxnhusker offensive line allowed just four quartemack before going to Cenual Arkansas. A team captain. Barnen four-time SCAC player-of-the-week honoree. Tudor also duriog his freshman campaign. He was selected by the Am- sacks the entire season. A 1995 NCAA Today’s Top V-ID ha.5 been the Bears’ leading tackler ,n each of the past our, has earnrd all-conference recognition in t,ark and field herst taculty as a peer wrung tutor tor tie past three years award recipient, Graham also is a member of the 1995 Col- seasons. He plans to pumue a master’s degree in physical and basketball. He intends to punue a po5tgraduatc dc*grec and helped create the writing center a, Amheng in ad& lege Football Association Good Work.5 Team and is a fre- therapy at Central Arkansas beginning this summer. in medicine at the Medical College ot Ceorg,a brgmning tion 10 working with the faculty to improve the quality of quent speaker at local youth groups and outreach pmgtams. Corey Jowph GunpbeU (Chadron State College, 3.608 next fall. writing and curriculum at the college. He intends to earn John Jeremy Hague (Unive&y of Southern California. grade-point average in biology) - Campbell earned all- a postgraduate degree in creative writing, then pursue a ca- 3.900 grade-point average in political science and business) Rocky Mountain Athletic Conference honon this year af- Alternates reer in teaching. - Hague ha5 started 2 1 game.5 at center for Southern C& ter finishing as the conference’s second-leading rusher with Karl Olaf Barge, Luther College; David Mabus Crowe, fomia. and he helped the 1995 squad to a berth in the Rose 1,123 yards. Campbell is the second Chadrcm State rusher Delta State Universiry; Jason M&hew Hicks; Montana State Bowl. In addition to his stating spot on the T,ujan offen- to amass more than 1.000 yard.5 in a season twice during a At large UniversiryBozeman; Matthew Eric Wells. Universiry of sive line. Hague also sewes as the long snapper. He is a career. He finished his career with 3.258 yards, second best Muk Robert Brungnrd (Youngstown State University, MlZlI,tar,a. December 25, I995 The NCAA News Page 9 Recruiting Some editors,writers in mainstfeom mediu wonder if coverugeof football signingprocess bus becomeexcessive l Continued from page I 44 eight to 10 to 12 to 15 times during an hour, II/~-hour period. M y estimation is that 50 per- Half of the time, it’s not even coaches. I’ll say, ‘Who was that?’ necessary evil. We’ve attempted to cut back only to draw com- Well, that was so and so at this paper or that was such and such ments from readers not to cut back. There’s great interest out cent or better of (a recruit’s) calls recruiting service.’ That’s where all of the time and pressure is there.” coming from. Not from coaches. Miller says the Morning News usually converts one of its high- are from the news media and ‘We are hying to help these kids make a good decision, where- school reporters into a three-month, full-time recruiting reporter. recruiting services. I think it’s very as the media setices are flataut trying to find out where they’re Nearly every day during the major football recruiting season - going to go maybe a month or two ahead of time....These kids, December 1 through early February - some ink is devoted to disruptive. I think it wears the kids in a lot of cases, need that time to be thinking and trying to college football recruiting in the sports pages, Miller said. down and wears their families decide.” “From Sunday nights to Thursday nights, our recruiting writer Issues of privacy has a hellacious workload,” he said. down. It’s disruptive to Considered one of the most active mainstream publications The privacy question is not limited to unwanted telephone tracking college football recruiting, the Dallas Morning News coaches....That’s where all of the calls. Even respected newspapers report that certain prospects publishes a “ToplOO” list - a national collection of recruits it time and pressure is coming from. have not yet qualified academically, a potentially embarrassing considers to be the nation’s best. At one time, Miller said, the revelation for the affected individual. newspaper ranked the players according to talent The Morning Not fern coaches.” Burton said the Advisor’s policy is to publish only scores that News eliminated the list for one year, then reinstated it; how- meet NCAA initial-eligibility standards. He said he has no pmb- ever, recruits now are listed in alphabetical order, rather than LARRY SMITH, HEAD FOOTBALL COACH lem with posing the question to recruits, saying that information ranked. University of Missouri. Columbia is a key piece of the recruiting puzzle. “We eliminated the national list for one year,” Miller said. “It’s every bit as important as if he can run real fast orjump “We were deluged with complainb. (But) how can we possibly real high,” Burton said. “It’s not a violation of privacy if he judge who’s the best? The compromise is that we will run the answers the question. We’ll never say he has a 0.7 CPA or some- list, but we will take away the numerical rankings.” initial name; that’s when you begin to use a recruiting service thing like that If they get a 2.5 GPA and a 17 ACT, some of these Mike Fish, an investigative reporter for the Atlanta Journal- in the first place. Other than that, we do the evaluations. They kids feel like they’re Einstein. It’s not harmful to them at all.” Constitution, agrees that the public is deeply interested in recruit- don’t know a thing about their (athletics) grades. Barron said the Chronicle formerly repotted whether a recruit ing information. As a result, the Journal-Constitution compiles “I think for college coaches, the involvement of the media scored enough on the ACT or SAT to qualify, but does not any- recruiting rankings and lists, and closely tracks Atlantic Coast has become a real problem.” more. “I don’t want to embarrass anybody,” he said. Conference and Southeastern Conference programs during In the nearly two decades that Smith has been a college head Smith said he has encouraged the student-athletes he recruits recruiting season. coach, the media increasingly have become inappropriately to keep academic information between the recruit and the uni- involved in college recruiting, he said. Media members are as versity. In addition, Smith said he instructs university alumni not Accurate projections? busy as coaches in telephoning recruits, he said. to get overly involved in recruiting and to allow the coaching But are the predictions and projections made about recruits “Down South, it used to be a big factor when I was at Tulane staff to do its job. at least remotely accurate? Fish is not a believer. University,” Smith said. “My secretary would spend her day-long While the emphasis on recruiting may be a philosophical “Most of it is preposterous,” Fish said. ‘The readers are fanat- activities screening recruiting calls from alumni - who had headache for some and a practical problem for others, one of ics. That’s why we go to such great lengths. There probably is something to say about things they read in the paper. It’s all over the people not complaining is Guy Troupe, an N

Page IO The NCAA News December 25, I995 Legislation RecrUitinggrouping o/so features proposal to require year-round certification of noninstitutionalbasketball events

l Continued from page I Council. rerognition banqueti to one per year. to evalua~r procpectr a, the Olympic Festival rryomr with- out havtr~g to count chc obsenration as an evaluation in Prohibit paSSiIlg IlOteS t0 a prOSpeCt at a Aspects of amateurism are tbr subject of three n womea’s bask&all. Sponcorcd hy ,be Co,,nr,l: rccom- Kegardlcss of whether the cleainghouse con- practice or competition. The proposal would other proposals. mended by rhr Rrc,uiting Commruec. Diwrio,, 11 I~,,s,ness tinues to certify ehf$Jihy for oticial visits, require- specify that general correspondence must be One of the proposals would delete finm Bylaw session. ments for such visits could increase at rhe DaJlav sent to a prospect by mail. 12 specific rcg&tkJIlS governing lhc iithlclk~l- No. 110: In Dwrion 1. dclctr ,hc kg-cl;,,~m 11x1,lwnmts Convention. n Delete legislation adopted as pan of the con- ly related employment of student-athletes while a,, u,~llmlted n,,mbrr of rvalr,a,1ons by a,, ,nn1,,mon wlrll wh,ch a prospcct,vc sc,,drn,-athlctr has signed a National The NCAA Council is sponsoring a proposal sent package at the lYY5 Convention that per- retaining the principle that an athlete may be Leuer 01 Imcnr. Sponsnrcd by ,hr H,g ren (:onfi~rnre. thdt WoIlld iIlCrcdSe from .SfVeIl to Iline the nUIII- mits a Division I institution an unlimited num- compensated only for work actually performed Rrcn,i,i,,g Comm,ue~ pos,,mn: None I),v,wm I I~usmrss ber of core courses a prospect must present to ber of evaluations of a prospect who has signed and at the local going rate for that work. The cession. No. 111: I’cmut a Ihvision I or II inrtimtion to send prcen- make ;ui official visit. The IJrcJ[JOSd wa9 prompt- a letter of intent with that institution. The Big proposal would retain current restrictions on mllment mformauon ID a pmspecL provided dw prospect ed by new initial-eligibility standards that will Ten Conference, which is sponsoring the pro- fee-for-lesson instruction by Division 1 athletes. has hecn offirially arcepred for enrollment hy the inatimdon, require an incoming freshman to present 13 core posal to delete the provision, believes that the Other amateurism proposals would: even rhough the institution subscribes to the National Leaer courses to he a qualifier for athletics competi- legislation is confusing and misunderstood and n Permit institutions to determine how to USC of Intent program. Sponsored by the Big East Conference. tion. that it fails to create opportunities for unsigned proceeds from a contest between two profes- Recruiting Commiaer position: Suppwt Supported by the Council. Divisions I and II business sessions. The clearinghouse-implementation commit- prospects. sional athletics teams that is hosted and pro- No. lit: Permit a Division II institution to provide prcmn- tee, which recommended the increase in tours n Permit pre-enrollment information to be moted by the institution as a fund-raiser. rollment informacion to a prospective snrdent-athlete. pro- es required for a visit, believes nine coumes is a provided to a prospect who has signed a letter n Delete restrictions in Divisions I and II on v,ded the prospect either has signed a Narianal Letter of better indicator of whether a prospect will be a of intent or been accepted for enrollment at an student-athletes’ use of athletics ability to win a Intern or has heen officially accepted for enrollment hy the qualifier. institution. Other proposals would permit Diti- prize as part of a promotional activity, as long as institution. Sponsored by 14 Divismn 11 mcmherr. Kecruiting Committee position: Support. Opposed by the D,v,s,on II sion II institutions to provide game programs selection for participation remains random and Basketball certification Steering Committee. Division II business session. during official and unofficial visits and permit open to anyone. No. 113: Permit a Division II in&h&n to provide game The recruiting grouping also features a Divisions I and II institutions to provide sched- The deregulation package also includes a pm- programs to prospects during o5cial and uno5cial visits. Council-sponsored proposal to require year- ule cards to prospects. posal dealing with student-athlete benefits. Sponsored by the Lone Star Conference and 15 Division II mrmherr. Recruiting Committee position. Support Sup round certification of such noninstitutional has- n Permit a Division I institution to save up to The proposal would permit the same per diem ported by the Division II Steering Commiaee. Division II ketball events as camps, leagues, tournaments six unused o5cial visits for use during the next ($20) for student-athletes participating in a for- business session. and festivals. academic year. The Division I Steering Commit- eign tour as was approved at last year’s Conven- No. 114: In Dirisions I and II. add schedule cards to the Current legislation requires certification only tee opposes the proposal. tion for participation in an NCAA championship list of permissible recruiting mare&Is. Sponsored by the Big for events during the July evaluation period. n Increase the amount of funds that may be or certified postseason bowl game. The increase Sky Conference. Recruiting Committee posioon: Suppon Supported by the Division II Steering &mm,aee. Diwsions Division I basketball coaches cannot auend non- provided to a student host for entertainment of also is being proposed in anticipation of approval I and II businesssessions. institutional events during that period unless prospects during an o5cial visit to $30 for one of increases in permissible funds for student No. 115: Increase from seven to nme chr number of core they are certified prospect and $15 for each additional prospect. hosts during official recruiting visits and limita- coursesa p~~pect must present m order to take an official More and more event operators are moving n Prohibit Division I coaches’ participation tions on the value of student-athlete awards. risit prior m the early National leaer of intent signing pe- nod. Sponsored by the Council; recommended by the events outside of the July evaluation period to on nonscholastic-based basketball teams that Summary SpecialCommittee to OverseeImplementation of the NCAA the fall contact period or spring evaluation peri- include eligible student-athletes or prospects as Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse. Division I business session. od, thus removing them from the jurisdiction of members. Following is a summary of the 34 proposals No. 116: Delete the requirement that the NCAA Initial- the summer certification program. n Permit Division II institutions to conduct in the recruiting grouping and the amateur- Eligibility Clearinghouse must cenity the test xore, grade- The Council’s proposal would make any event qouts for high-school students during a senior- ism/awar&/benefi& deregulation package. The point average and core courses chat a prospective student- athlete must have before makmg an o5c,al visit poor tn the held at any time during the year subject to certi- year academic term in which the prospect is not summary indicates sponsors of the proposals, initial signing date in a span tha, bar an early crgning peri- fication. competing in the sport for which the prospect is positions (if any) taken by the CcJLIIlCil and od for the National Leuer of Intent. Sponsored by the Pxifir- being recruited Current legislation requires that Presidene Commission, actions resulting from 10 Confrrenre. R~t-~htlg (:omouttrr posmon~ Oppose. Other proposals the senior complete high-school eligibility, thus committee review of a proposal (if any), and the Oppobrd by d,r Division I Sterrmg (:ommruee. Division 1 Telephone calls and correspondence, limio requiring spring-sport prospects to tit until late business session. business session in which a prOlJCJSa1 will be act- No. 117: A trsoluaon dlrecuog the Slrcial (:ommi,,rr to on recruiting contacts and evaluations, and per- in the year to participate in a tryout. ed upon. Ovrner Ir,,plrm~tuauo,~ of the N(‘3A InitialWligihiliry missihlr recruiting materials are among topics n Permit use of institutional equipment and (:lcarmghonse and the Academic Requirements and Re- addressed by other proposals in the grouping. facilities by high-school and junior club pro- Recruiting c&tine, Cornminers to study the necrwicy and dr~i,;d~ility Those other proposals would: pms in the sport of crew. No. 100: In Divisions I and II basketball, permit one tele- of cenificacion by the clearinghouse of prospects’ eligibiiity for early o5rial visits. and to submit approp’-iate rccom H Change the first date on which telephone n Establish a dead period in Division I field phone call to a prospect prior to July 1. and specify that the call may not oqxr prior m June 1 or the completion of the rnendadon m the Council for possible considemuon by the calls can be made to prospective student-athletes hockey in conjunction with the championship prospect’s junior year in high school, whichever is later. Division I membership at the l!W7 C~nwntion. Sponsored in Divisions I and II basketball and ice hockey. game of the Division I Field Hockey Chatnpion- Sponsored by the Council and Big Ten Conference. Rem by the Council; recommended by the Division I Steering The Division II Steering Committee opposes the ship. cruiting Committee position: Suppo~ Divisions 1 and II bui Commiaee. Division I business session. ice hockey proposal, which would permit one ness sessions. No. 118: Permit a Division I institution to “bank” a maxi- Deregulation No. 101: In Divisions I and II ice hockey, permit one tele- mum of six unused 05&l visits annually m the cpon of foot- cd per week to a prospect from April 15 through phone call per week to a prospect from April 15 through May ball, and specify that the unused visir5 may be used only dur- May 15 of the prospect’s junior year in high A package of eight proposals to deregulate or 15 of the prospect’s junior year in high school. Sponsored ing the suhseqnent academic year. Sponsored by 10 Division school. simplify legislation relating to amateurism, by 14 Divisions I and II members.Recruiting Commiaee p I members. Recruiting Committee position: Suppo~ n Specify that a coach cannot direct nor can awards and benefits also is on the Convention sidon: None. Opposed by the Division II Steering Commit- Opposed by the Division I Steering Commiuee. Divisions IA and I-AA business sessions. an institution pay for a currently enrolled stu- agenda tee. Divisions I and II buJiness sessions. No. 102~ Specify that currently enrolled student-athletes No. 119: Inr~easr 6om IM to $54 per day tie entenain- dent-athlete to write to prospects. As with similar deregulation packages rec- may not engage in written correspondence with prospects ment aUowancean institution may protide to a student host n Respond to requests from the National ommended in recent years by the NCAA Legis at the direction of a coach or at the expense of the instiru- entertaining a prospect during an official vrsit and increase Association of Basketball Coaches and Women’s lative Review Committee, these proposals are tion. Sponsored by the Big Ten Conference. Recruiting &om $10 v, $15 the additional ddy allowancefor each ad- listed in a separate grouping. The proposals, Gunmiaee position: None. Supported by the Division II ditional prospect entertained by the host Sponsored by the Basketball Coaches Association to msximize Council and 15 Division I members. Recruiting Committee evaluation opportunities without increasing costs however, will be considered alongside other pro- Steering Commiaee. Divisions I and II business sessions. No. 10% In Division I baskethall. permit 40 evah,ation position: Support Divisions I and II business sessions. for institutions. posals in the amateurism/awards/benefits days in a maximum of 40 days. and define an evaluation day No. 120: Pmhibit Divisions I and II coaching staff mem- One of the resulting Council-sponsored prc+ grouping, which was previewed in the Decem- as one coach engaged in the evaluation of any prospect on hen from palticipating on nonscholastic-based basketball posals would permit an institution to designate ber 4 issue of The NCAA News. one day. Sponsored by the Council; recommended by the teams that include individuals with rhg,b,hty remaining or Recruiting Committee. Division I business session. prospective student-athletes. Sponsored by rhe Corrnc,l; rec- 40 “evaluation days” during the November- Seven of the eight proposals will be consid- ommended by the Recruiting Cnmmirtcr. Divisions I and March evaluation period in Division I men’s has ered by the entire NCAA membership in a gen- No. 164: In Division I basketlxall, specify that an instiur- tion has five recruiting opponunitirs (contacts and evalrra- II business sessions. No. 121: Permit Division II institutions u) conduct ayoue ketball and the October-February period in eral business session. The seventh proposal will &ions combined) during the acadrm,c year and chat not more of senior prospects outside the prospects’ h-~ditional sports Division I women’s basketball, replacing the 20 be considered separately by Divisions I and II than three of the five recruitingoppommides may be in-per- seasons. Sponsored by the South Atlantic Conference. calendar days 011 which evaluations currently institutions. son, off-campus contacts. Sponsored by the Council; ret- ommrnded by the Kecruiting Commiaee. Division 1 busi- Recruiting Gmmittcr position: Support. SupIx~~cd by the may occur. An evaluation day would be defined Four of the general proposals deal with restt-ic- Division II Steering Commiuec. Division II busmrss session. ness se&on. awdrds that No. 122: Speedy that all nonmstimdonal basketball events as evaluation by any coach of any prospect in tions on and requirements for can No. 105: In Divisions I and III, specify that facsimiles and (such as camps, leagues, tournaments and shootouu), no one day; any additional evaluation by an addi- be presented to student-athletes. electronic mail communications are subject to rrstictions maaer when they occur, shall be w&t to the NCAA has- tional coach 011 the same day would count as a A key proposal recommends increases in the on general correspondence, rather than the resuictions ap k&d rvent-cerdfication propm. Sponsored by the (:mm- plicable to telephone calls. Sponsored by the Connrd and second evaluation day, and so on up to the 40- permissible value of various types of awards, cil: recommended by the Recruiting Commirtee. Division I Ivy Group. Recruiting Qmmiuee position: Oppose pending day limit including those for annual participation, special business session. funher study. Divisions I and III buiness sessions. No. 123: Permit a member institution to loan crw equip Another Council proposal would revise lim- events and bowls, and conference and nation- No. 106: Permit Division II institutions that already have ,,,ent to high schools’ andJun,or club programs’ women’s its on contacts and evaluations in Division I has al championships, as well as awards for special- signed a prospective student-athlete to contact the prospect teams on an issuance and retieval basis, and permit an in- ized performance and tirn athletes’ hometowns. on the day or days of competition. Sponsored by the Council; ketball to permit a total of five such “recruiting stiartion to allow high schools’ and junior club programs’ recommended by the Recruiting Cormnittre. The sponsor opportunities” during the academic year. No The proposal would simplify existing legislation women’s teams to use its crew farilities for practice and/or has indicated its intent to withdraw the proposal. Division by creating three standard levels of award val- competition. Sponsored by the Council and Ivy Group. more than three of the five opportunities could II business session. Recruiting Committee position: Support Ditismns 1. II and be in-person, off~ampus contacts. ues ($75, $150 and $300). No. 107: Prohibit an institutional stimember from pr@ III business sessions. n Define faxes and electronic mail as gener- Other awards proposals would: vidmg a prospect with a note at pracdce or competition sites, No. 144: Permit a member institution LO loan crew equip including summer events, even if the note is delivered by a al correspondence, rather than telephone con- n Delete a requirement that awards must bear ment to high schools’ and junior club programs’ women’s third party,and specifythat generalcorrespondence may be taCt.5. an institutional insignia or letter, event specifi- teams on an issuance and retrieval basis. Sponsored by the sent LO a prospect only by mail. Sponsored by the Council; Cauncit and 12 member institutions.ReCNiIing Gmmiaee n Permit various contacts in Division II. Two cation, or comparable identification. recommended by rhe Recruiting Cnmmiaee. Divisions I and position: Support Divisions I, II and III businesssrsrions. of the proposals would permit noncountable n Permit established national awards, such as II business sessions. No. 125: In the sport of Division I field hockey, specify evaluation of prospects at state high-school tour- the Heisman Trophy, to exceed the $300 limit No. 108: In Division II, permit coaching staff memben that the Wednesdayprior to the NCAA Dnwon I Field to evaluaw prospccrs at a state high-school f~urnarnent that naments within an institution’s state and at on permissible value. Hockey Championship game to noon on the day after the occun within the sfate in which the institution is located Olympic Festival tryouts. Another would permit n Give institutions the discretion to determine game shall be a dead period. Sponsored by the 1~ Group. without counting it as an evaluation for any prospect. Recruiting Comminre position: Support DiviGon I bnriness contact on a day or days of competition with a the number and types of banquets to honor stu- Sponsored by the Council; recommended by the Recruiting prospect who already has signed a letter of intent, dent-athletes’ athletics and/or academic achieve- Committee. Division II business session. but that proposal will be withdrawn by the ments. The proposal would limit booster club No. 109: In Division II, permit coaching smt1 mcmbem See Legislation, page I7 l December 25, I995 The NCAA News Page I I

n Division I men’s basketball leaders

REBOUNOlNG 3FG FT PTS AVG CL AVG 1 Jason Oarsy.Northern Iowa 1; s 17 41 15, 30.8 1. Scoll F&y. Mercer Sr 154 2. KevrnGranger. Texas Southern 6 6 66 168 2. MatikRose. Orerel ._...... Sr 15.4 3 ShareefAbdur-&him, California ..;: 4 42 2 25 111 E 3 LorenzenWrrght. Memphis ..so 13.0 4. EddieBenton, Vermont Sr 54 21 65 21.1 4. KvleSnowden. Harvard .._...... :.:... .Jr 127 5. RandyBoldsn, Texas Southern So 5831 40 1: 26.1 4 JamesHarper, South Fla. Jr 12.7 6. TuntlAwotobr. Boston U. Jr 1 32 133 26.6 6. TIM Duncan.Wake Forest Jr 125 7. MarcusBrown, Murra St Sr z: 15 59 186 266 6. ToddFuller, Norlh Cam St. Sr 125 E Chns Mctuthne. Mt I t Mary’s Sr 59 22 14 154 25.7 0 ZendonHamilton, St. John’s (N.Y.) .._ So 12.3 8. ReggioFreeman, Texas 54 19 21 154 25.1 9. DamronWalker, Texas Chrrstian Fr 12.3 10 Andre11Hoard, Northeastern Ill .t 10 33 199 24 9 10. MarcusMann. Mlsslssrppr Val. ._...... sr 121 t 1 Trm Roberts,Southern-B R .Sr :7 16 21 24 8 11. WilliamEley, Southeast MO St. :...... Bo 12 1 12 BubbaWells. Austin Peav .-Jr 53 7 33 1:; 24.3 13. AnthonyHams. Hawau Sr 27 3 15 24.0 12 Harry Harnson,Idaho SC 11.8 14. KedhVeney. Marshall 46 27 23 1:; 23.7 13. MarlonWltherspoon. Morehead St. Sr 11.6 15 RayAllen, Connecticut .:: 235 14. GeorgeRsdd. George Mason Jr 112 16. OarrenMcLinton. James Madrson. SC zs ii 1: 23.4 15 SteveHamer. Tennessee Sr 11.2 11 Mallk Rose,Orexel Sr 0 37 117 234 16. AdonalFoyle. Colgate so 11.1 16. Matt Alosa.New Hampshrre Sr 14 30 116 23 2 16. OuadreLOGS, Montana St. S( 11 1 Bmton FU?-lqr LzGcky 19 Chauncs Billups,Colorado <; 14 48 162 23 1 18 CurtisFincher. Eastern Ky :. Sr 110 19. Jeff NorI gaard,Wls.-Green Bay 2 20 162 23.1 18 Chns Ensmmger.Valpararso Sr 11.0 16 ShaunStonerook Ohlo St Fr 11.0 (Through December 18) 21. ToddFuller NorthCare Sr 92 23 0 22 JafondeWKliams, Ham on Sr ii 2: :i 183 22.9 16. ThaddeousDel&y. Charleston(S.C ) Jr 110 INDIVIDUAL 23. OamionWalker. Texas F hrlstlan ._ Fr 68 0 46 ia2 22.6 No. Player, Team, Opponent Date 24 John Wallace,Syracuse 64 4 1.31 22 6 FIELD-GOALPERCENTAGE 25 DarrellBadey. Canisrus :: 158 22 6 (Mm 5 Pi MadePer Game) CL G FG FGA PCT Points 45 Marcus Brown, Murray St. vs.Washington (MO.) Dec. 16 25 SeaLonsrgan. Darimouth .‘...... ;; 1: ::32 156 22 6 1. Chris Danlels.Dayton Sr 6 35 46 16 1 42 Eddie BentonVermont vs. Hofstra Dec. 9 27 BnanEvans, lndrana 19 31 180 225 2 Scott Snider,Ganzaga I..: Sr 6 75 5 26 ReggreElhott. Mercsr 9 157 22.4 3. JermatneTats. Ohio St Fr 5 ii :i 75.0 22 Scott Farley. Mercer vs.Alabama 29 TommyMcthaa. Rics Sr 1: ;: 22.3 4. GregSmith. Delaware Jr 31 42 73.8 Rebounds Dec. 16 30 Ron Rrley,Arizona St. ;; 1: 22.2 2 I Todd Fuller, North Cam Sr vs.Va. Mihtary Nov. 25 5 AlexanderKout. tea Washrngton So i 735 30. NateLangley, George Mason 1: 2: 111 22 2 6. OuadreLolhs. Montana St Sr 1 ii 4966 12.1 2 I Thaddeous Delaney. Charleston (SC.) vs. Charleston So. Dec. 9 32. KenyaCapers, Houston Jr a 15 133 22 2 1. AmalMcCasklll. Marquette Sr 28 39 71 a 10 19 133 222 32. CharlesSmith, Rider Jr 8 Josh Pittman,N C -Asheville So i 707 19 22 22.2 32 JasonAlexander, Stetson Sr 4133 :; 10.2 Assists I5 Steve Nash. Santa Clara vs. Southern-B.R. Dec. 9 35 Bonri Wells,Ball St. So 4 22 1: 22.0 9. CodyJohnson, Texas-San Antonlo Sr 10 Malik Rose,Orerel ..Sr 702 14 Shane B&rap. Montana vs. Simon Fraser Nov. I I 35. OemarcoJohnson, N.C.-Charlotte ._...... _.. So 3 27 132 22.0 : 35. Eric WashIngton.At&ma 17 9 8.3 22 0 11. DarvrnHam. Texas Tech Sr 6 4030 i: 69.8 12. Otis Hill, Syracuse Jr i 59 69.5 Blocked I I Jelani McCoy, UCLA vs. Maryland Dec. 9 36. Monty Wilson,Tennessee ..:: ii 15 26 131 21 a 3.3. Angus9 McCollum.Western Cam ___.Sr 6 15 22 131 21 .a 13 JosephBlair. Arizona _...... _...... Sr : 69.2 Shots IO Keith Gloss. Central Corm. Sr vs. Delaware Sr Dec. 2 14. MauriceRobInson. Oklahoma St. Jr 6 39 :; 68.4 IO Lorenzo Coleman.Tennessee Tech vs. Lambuth Dec. I6 ASSISTS 15 DanielWans. Nsvada Sr 34 50 680 AVG 15. TerquinMon. CoppinSt .Jr E 34 50 68.0 1 CuRIsMcCants. George Mason 5: Steals 9 Alvin Sims, Louisville vs.Va. Commonwealth Nov. 25 2. Dan PO ue. Campbell...... ;; FREE-THROWPERCENTAGE 9 Jason Hamilton.Washington vs. Eastern Wash. Nov. 28 3. Skne is Inap.Montana ...... :.z (Min. 2.5 Made Per Game) CL G Fl FTA PCT 4. PointerWillrams. McNwse St...... Sr K 1. Drew Barry.Georgia Tech 10 21 27 loo.0 3-k FG 9 Brian Green, Nevada vs. Baylor Dec. 2 5 AllenWatson, Coppln St...... s; 6.2 1. TommyMumlord. McNsase St .2 4 11 11 100.0 6. God Shammgod,Pmvldence ...... 80 1. JasonSutton,,North Care. St...... _.. .. ’. ..._._..’.._.... Jr 4 10 10 1wo 9 Stuart Sullivan, Evansville vs.Wichiu St Dec. 9 1. R gle Gear-y.Artzona ...... sr 1 OareckoRawhns, MO.-Kansas CKy Sr loo.0 9 Pete Lisicky, Penn St vs. Pennsylvania Dec. 9 8. Ky‘& Kessel.Texas ALM ...... So :.i 5. BrianLloyd, Brown _.___....__ Sr i 1: 1: W.? 9 RaimondsMigtinleks, UC Irvine...... Sr 1.6 6 DamsonSansom, Southwest Tex. St...... _...... ’Jr 16 17 Q41 10 Jason Manln,Texas Tech ...... 7.7 Fr Pet. IO0 ( I4 of 14) Vincent Rainey, Murny St vs.Westem Mich. Nov. 20 Sr 6. TerrenceMartIn, St Francis(Pa.) ..__...... __....__...... Jr Ii 16 17 941 11. BrevlnKmgM. Stanford ...... Jr 76 8. G C Marcacclnl.George Mason Sr 5 31 33 93.9 IO0 ( I4 of 14) Daryl Oliver, Richmond vs. Radford Dec. 4 12. DavidHadale. San Diego ...... Sr 1.5 9.Jeff Rogers.Butter _...... _.. So 15 16 93.8 12 DarttckKldd, Southern-B.R...... Jr 1.5 9 RustyLarus. Wake Forest .._...._...... Sr i 938 FG Pet 94.4 (I7 of 18) Silas Mills, Utah St vs. Hawaii-Hilo NW. 26 12. DewayneBanner, Tulsa ...... 75 .Jr 6 :i :: 93.5 ...... 73 11. TraceyAnderson. Texas A&M 15. DannyHurtey, Seton Hall :: 12. JamesSIngleton, St. Bonaventure..__...... So 5 14 15 93.3 TEAM 15 AnthonyJohnson, Charleston (S.C.) ...... Jr 1.3 13 RayDonald. Auburn .._...... _.._...... Sr 10 93 1 No. Team, Opponent Date BLOCKEDSHOT6 13. AlhamtsrSrmms. MO -BaK County .._.._.___...... __...... Fr 8 :: ;i 93.1 Points I42 Prairie View vs. Bay Ridge Christian Nov. 27 AVG 1. K&h Class,Central Corm. St. .._. 6.2 II-POINTFIELD GOALS MADE PER CAME 142 George Mason vs.Troy SL NW. 20 2. Tim Duncan.Wake Forest ..__ CL G NO AVG 3 Roy Rogers.Alabama it :.i 1. Tom Pipkms.Duquesns Jr 5 4.0 3-R FG 23 Troy St. vs. George Mason Nov. 20 4 Lorsruo Coleman,Tennessee Tech .Jr 4.6 2. OarrenMcLlnton. James Madtson .._...... :.. ‘. Sr :“2 46 I8 Three tied. 5. JelanlMcC UCLA ..__...... 4.6 3 Mark Klnnaird,Morehead St. Sr ; 5. TerrellBell. %orgta :: 3. KedhVenay, Marshall ;; :.: 7 Calvrne00m, PennSt Fr 2 3. PeteLlslcky. Penn St. .._...... 2: z 21 4.5 FG Per 69.8 (30 of 43) Tulsa vs. North Care. A&T Dec. 2 8. AdonalFoyle. Colgate .._.. 4.1 3. Mike Maninho.Buffalo ...... So 9. PeterAluma. Liberty ..“J”, 7 RandyBotdsn. Texas Southern so : :Y :.i FT Pet. 100.0 (I7 of 17) Cincinnati vs.Temple Dec. I6 10. Enck Damprer.Mrssissrppr St ...... Jr !i 8. EncWashrngton. Alabama Jr 4 11 4.3 11 AvondreJonss, Southern Cal ...Jr 3.6 9 LanceWeems, Auburn S( 10 41 41 9 FrankSsckar, Vanderbilt ...... Sr 10 41 STEALS 11 OawdSlvuhch, St Mary’s (Cal) so 4 16 :A GIL G AVG 1 PointerWilliams, McNeese St. Sr 7.3 a-POINTFIELD-GOAL PERCENTAGE 2. NateLangley, George Mason : 46 (Mtn 1.5 MadePer Game) CL G FG FGA PCT 3. Andre11Hoard, Northeastern Ill :: 8 1. IsaacFont&e. WashlngtonSt. ._..... __ Jr 6 14 10.0 7 El 4 BenLarson: Cal Poly SLO Fr 2. PeteLislcky. Penn St. So 6 27 zi 692 4. Jason Hamrlton.Washington ._ 5 4.0 I: 3 WallySzczsrbiak, Miamr (Ohio) Fr 8 12 667 6. Johnny Rhodes.Maryland 3 SkeetWoolard. N.C.-Grwnsboro _...... _...... Jr a 12 667 1. Allen kerson Geor etown .._...... _. _. ; 3”: : (Through December 17) B Alvin Sims

Steals 9 Mike Hancock, Neb.-Keamey vs. Neb.-Omaha Dec. I6 SCORINQTRNSE FIELD-GOALPERCENTAGE S-POINTFIELO GOMS MME~R GAMM W-L PTS AVG FG FGA AVG 3-R FG IO Manin Lattibeaudiere.West Tex.A&M vs. LeToumeau Nov. 24 1. GeomeMason .._...... 5 3-2 598 119.6 1 Tulsa ...lJO 57: 1 Troy St...... 7 102 14.6 2. TroySt...... 1 3-4 725 1036 2 Catbrnia .__..__...... _....I...... : 131 E 54.4 2. MoreheadSt ...... 11.1 Fr PCL IO0 ( I8 of IB) Carlos Knox, IUIPU-IndianaPolis vs. Hawail-Hilo Dec. I6 3. Nor81Care. St...... 4 4-o 364 3. MlsslsslpplSt. ..__..._...... ;;; 355 541 3 Princeton ...... 5 :: 10.6 4. Marshall...... 6 4-2 ii.! 4. Arizona_...___ 469 53.7 4. North Cam. St...... 4 42 105 5. Oregon ...... 10.1 FG Pet IO0 ( I4 of 14) Derrick Freeman, Cal% (Pa.) vs. Columbia Union Dec. 6 5. Orenon ...... 7 4-3 z! 94.1 5 Louisville ...... 287 52.9 6. Calsrnla _...... _.....4 46 316 94.0 6. Nebraska 296 52.3 6 Alabama ...... : 10.0 TEAM 7. Tulsa ...... 4-o 373 93.3 7. ColoradoSt 175 ia 52.1 1. FloridaInt ’t ...... 6 9.6 No. Team, Opponent Date 8. Nebraska ...... z 7-2 826 91.a 8 New Msxlco ..: 212 405 52.3 8. SouthernMISS...... 9.6 9. Southern-RR ...... 4 ” 9.3 Points I58 Cenual Okla. vs. Ark. Bqrtist Dec. 9 9 Gsor etown ...... :__:...... 9 6-l 621 91.2 9. CoppinSt. _.._...... 165 522 10 N.CE bad& ...... 6 5-l 90.5 10. EasternMlch. .._..._...__..... 170 iii 52 2 10. TexasTech ...... 6 9.2 11. Murray St ...... 7 5-2 ii: 90.1 11. N.C.-Asheville 323 52.0 11. Vandelblit...... 10 3-R FG I8 Southwest Sr vs. Washburn Nov. 25 12. Mississi pi St: ...... 6 5-l 80.0 12 Radtord _. _..._....: :...2 414 51.9 12. WakeForest ...... i.! 13 CoppinP t ...... 5 3-2 iii 69.6 13. CentralMlch. 101 207 517 13 CoppinSt ...... E 9.4 FG Pa. 78.0 (32 of 4 I) Coker vs. Morris Nov. 2 I 14 EasternMich...... 5 5-o 446 692 14. LlbeRy 357 51 5 14 Nevada ...... 6 6.3 15. PennSt. 1: 346 51.4 15. Auburn ...... 10 16. ChartsstonSo...... 7 i.: Fr Pet 93. I (27 of 29) Indiana (pa.) vs. Ky.Wesleyan Nov. 20 SCORINGDEFENSE 16 MiddleTmnn St .._...... 1.115 51.3 G W-L PTS AVG 11 Clemson 180 it1 16. Vermont ...... 6.3 1. Princeton 5 4-l 252 504 18. LJTEP .._...... 201 393 :1 i 1.9 Hampton...... 0 a.3 2. TexasAIM 6 4-2 325 54 2 19 OklahomaSt ....166 325 51.1 19. Evansville...... 5 3. Cinclnnatl 6 328 54.7 20 Gsorgatown 315 616 51 0 19. NolthernIowa 5 i.: 4. SouthernMethodrst ::; 329 54.8 19 Samford ...... 5 a.2 5. WakeForest E 5-l 331 55.2 RELO-GOALPERCENTAGE OEFEN ILE FG FGA PCT S-POINTFIELD-GOt PER;\NlAQE 6. Clemson 6 6-O 338 56.3 (Min. 3.0 madeper game) 7 Tulsa 4 4-o 226 1. Clnclnnatl...... 114 33.4 FGA PCT E 2 orexel ...... iia ii: 34.5 1. PennSt. 6 45 556 8 Massachu& 6 6-O 341 2. Evansvrlle 5 ii 48.8 9. Detroit 6 5-l 570 3. Tulsa...... 62 35 0 (Through December IO) 4. Tennsssee 125 ‘3:: 35.2 3 St Peter’s 6 :i 60 46 3 10. YoungstownSt 5 3-2 ;z 51.6 79 48 t 11 SouthAla 5 2-3 56.0 5 Vrrginia ...... 106 300 35.3 4. N.C.-Greensboro...... 5 INDIVIDUAL 6. BostonCollege ...... 147 415 35 4 5. Alabama 4 ii 41.6 12 Marquette 6 5-l :: 50.2 6 WakeForest ...... 45.9 No. Plaver.Team. ODDonent Date 13 Manst 5 5-o 292 584 7 Utah 149 411 35.1 5 51 1: Points 59 Ed Brands. Grinneil is. Chicago Nov. I0 590 a. WakeForest ...... ,124 35.7 1. Nonhern Iowa ...... 5 41 45 6 14 BostonCollege 1 5-2 413 9. Marquene...... 122 ii; 36.0 8 Rrce ...... 6 Y5 45.3 10 NorthCaro. St...... 96 211 36.2 9. CentralMich...... 4 ii 45 2 Rebounds 25 Mike Bockenstedr Luther vs. Grinnell Nov. 28 SCORINGMARGIN 11. Mlssourl ...... 10. N.C-Asheville 6 37 i: 45.1 25 Gilberto parker, Medgar Evans vs. Purchase St Dec. 2 OFF OFF MAR 12 PennSt -12 z ii.: 11 Mrssouri .._..a 35 16 44.9 1 Tulsa Q3.3 565 36.6 13 Georgia...... ,170 461 12. ArkansasSt. 5 21 47 447 2. Cincinnati 66.5 54.7 31 8 Assists I7 Jeff Bo$e. Grinnell vs. Chicago Nov. I8 14. Marlst ...... 110 297 zz 13. North Cero.ALT 6 ii 43.6 3 Nonh Caro.St. ,960 665 295 15 MrssrssrpprSt ...... 153 411 31.2 14 NEWMsxico ._ _...... _...7 41 1;: 43.5 I7 Chris errm. Sampson vs. Grmnell Nov. 25 4. PennSt. .._.._.._... a7 7 608 268 16. LoyolaMarymount ...... ,167 447 37 4 15. Vandelbllt 10 88 204 43 1 5. Georgetown _..__.. 91 2 26.6 11. Butler ...... 124 331 37 5 16. New Hampshrre 36 84 42.9 Blocked I I Ira Nicholson, Mt StVincent vs. Bard Dec. 7 6. Clemson ii.: 23.1 18 Bucknell ,180 478 31.1 16 NorlhCaro St .._....: 42.9 2.: 66.5 22.5 Shots 9 Mark Awantang,Washington (Md.) vs. Rutgers-Camden Nov. I B 7 Tex.asTech 19. EasternMich...... ,113 18. VlrglniaTech 5 4234 ii 42 5 8. EasternMich ..a92 61.2 22.0 20. Ala.Blrmlngham...... 168 E i:: 19. Valparalso._..._... ._.. .,; 47 111 42.3 9. Mlamr(Ohio) ...... B4.3 62.1 21.l 20. EastCar0 33 10 42.3 Steals IO Jeff Boyle, Grinnell vs. ML Mercy Nov. 2 I 10. Missouti ...... 96.4 64.9 21.5 FREE-THROWPERCENTAGE 11 Conrwcttcut .. .I.... I ...... 66.1 65.3 20.9 Fr REBOUNDMARGIN 3-k FG IO 3tied. 1. Stetson .._...... i3 9 iit: OFF OEF MAR WON-LOSTRRCENTAGE 2. JamesMadtson 122 19.2 1. PennSt. .._.... 470 25.8 21.2 W-L l=TPct IO0 ( I5 of 15) Matt George, Colby-Sawyer vs. Norwich Nov. I8 _. 3 Utah .._129 1; 19.1 2. Iowa _...._ .._.48.2 29.4 19.6 1. Arizona .._. 84 1.000 4 Furman 90 115 16.3 3 Harvard _..._...... :.._...... 43.1 21.3 16.3 1 s racuw l.WO 5. Stanford 91 125 77.6 4. Georgetown 46.6 34.3 142 FG Pet IO0 (* I8 of 18) Jason Light. Emory & Henry vs. King Dec. 2 1 IIr inors ;; l.wO 6. Maswchuwns 113 146 77 4 5. Missouri 46 1 133 l.OW TEAM 1. Kansas 7. UTEP .._.... 126 163 713 6. Northern III. 460 5: 132 1 New Me& _...... l.M10 6. Harvard 111 144 11.1 6. TexasTech _...... 482 350 13.2 No. Team, Opponent Date 1. Cmclnnatr l.M)o 9. NorthCaro St so 111 76.9 .3 Gear II Mason ._. 59.6 41.0 12.6 Points I57 Simpson vs. Grinnell Nov. 25 1. Clemson Eli l.wO 10 Md.-Bait.County 112 146 767 9 L o a Marymount 44.9 32.1 12.1 1 Massachusetts .: 64 1.000 11. PennSt. 125 163 767 10. Co“rpondo St. 39.5 27 7 11 a 3-Pt FG *30 Grinnell vs. Colorado Cal. Nov. I? 1 Mrami(Ohio) 6-O 1WO 12 CentralFla a5 111 16.6 11. UtahSt. 38 7 27.0 11.1 1. PannSt. 6-g 1000 13. Murray St. ::.152 199 12 North Caro.St. 41.0 35.5 11.5 1. PoRland 6-O 1DCQ 14. Radford tta ::: 13. Providence 43.3 115 FG Pet. 76.9 (70 of 9 I) Simpson vs. Grinnell Nov. 25 1. TekasTech 6-g 1000 15 St Joseph’s[Pa) .z 61 16.1 14. TennesseeTech 466 %.i 11.4 1. Marlst 16. St John’s (N.Y.) 123 162 759 15 Marquette _.... 42.5 31.2 11.3 t=T Pet IO0 (20 of 20) Juniata vs.Widener Dec. 2 1 Memphrs z: 1.z 17. UC SantaBarb 75.9 16. MlsslsslpplSt. 44 5 33 2 113 *NCAA Division Ill record 1 OhloSt 5-o l.wO 16 Marshall .1:: 1:; 15.6 17. Connecbcut 45 3 34 3 110 current wmntngstreak Arizona8. Syracuse8. 19 WIS-Green Bay ‘.. .97 128 75 a 18 SouthernMethodist ..40.3 29.3 11.0 The NCAA News December 25, I995

H Division I women’s basketball leaders

REBOUNDING PTS AVG AVG 1 Tanh Kos~k OraoonSt .._....._...... __...... Sr ii ‘81 221 27.6 1. TimothsaClammsr, Wright St. ..__. ii 13.6 2. SGnnonJohnson, South Cam ...... ir 8 27.3 2. Lasha Byean. DeRUI ’ ...... Sr 13.3 3. ShalondaEnis, Aiabama ...... Jr i:: 26.3 3. MsoanBoguriawakl. H kstsm Mkh ...... Sr 12.6 4. ha Webb Lamar...... so : 206 4. AifrsdiaSeals, Jackson h ’ilb St...... Jr 126 5. CmleYunnlon. Georgia Tech .._..._.._... So 5 126 E 5. StaceyDsngler, Marls1 12.3 6. -a Byaars,DePaui .._...._...... Sr :: 175 6. LaphsiiaDoss. Eastern .....::.::::::::::::::::::::::.- ‘I...... :2 12.0 7. AnodeSimmon. Nolmwastarn .._...._ Sr i 50 145 2: 7. Eriu Scott.Mhissipp ...... sr 11.9 8. 651%Franki. Wbconsln ...... Sr 7 66 169 24.1 6 F&da Atiw. Camotmi,I...... so 117 9. llna Thompson.Soulbarn Cal ...... Jr 49 120 24.0 9. KarenJohnbn-tii braSt ...... So 116 10. AnitaMaawait. New Msxlco St ...... Sr i 23.6 10. LatashaRica. dr---- W~I’ ...... I r 11.5 11. G/M Somma,Manhattan ...... Sr 6 :: 1: 23.5 11. DanieilaGOlaY. I bton Hail ...... Fr 11.3 12 Plwiiis Ksiiv SouthAir ...... Sr 7 60 164 12.Jamie Cavaness, St Louis ...... so 11.3 13. NadlnsMa(coim, Provldsncs ...... Jr 5 116 ii:: 13 AllahaHill Howml ...... so 11.2 14. Gray Hank. SouthdastMO. St...... Sr 5 115 14. Tan/aKostic, On bgon St ...... Sr 11.1 15. BethMorgan. Notre Dama ...... Jr 59 :ti 15. TamikaCOiaY, cc mtrai Fia...... Sr 110 15. AdrlaSchnack. Navy ...... Jr : :: 22:5 16. Ka@Gordon. Ha lmra ...... sa 108 17. Dabs Wliiiams.Louisiana Tach ...... Sr 9 E 10 202 22.4 16 JoskaanGarner, Northwosmrn Sr ...... Sr 100 16. Ma n Eoguslawski.Wostam Mkh...... S; 112 22.4 16. WendyPalmer. \Ilr Inia ...... Sr 10.6 19 Trica9” WaimhrDrairn ...... 2 :: : 22.2 19.la)am.aAbraham I.. e . ao.-.“ .Washington ...... Jr 10.7 26 K&Smith, OhioSt ...... Sr li $ 24 :t 21.9 19. StaphanlsMinor, murmy DI. .._...... _...Jr 10.7 21. AngiePotthoft, Penn St...... Jr 10 0 219 21.9 21. MarlahTaturn. Southam-B.R. .._.____ Fr 10.7 (Thruugh December 18) 22. Nat&n Parts. CoooinS1 ...... Sr 4 34 10 21.6 23. Shalk Danlor,Nsw Hampshin...... Jr 1:: 21.7 FIELD-COAL PERCENTME INDIVIDUAL ...... (Min. 5 FGMade Par Game) PC1 23. AdanneBoyar, Dragon Jr : 130 21.7 1 BarbaraFarrls. Tuisna ...... Es 75.0 No. Player, Team, Opponsnt Date 25 tioiiy Portar,Boston Collage...... Jr 151 21.6 2. ish Hail,Ouks ...... Jr 74.1 Points 43 Tanja Kostic. Oregon St vs. Boise St Dec. lb 26. Kain Wartlaid,Mar an St ...... Jr r, 21.5 3. 2 enskaKnowles, Southesmm Le...... Sr 70.9 27 ErteAlasander, UC % nta Barb ...... Jr 14 1: 21.4 4. TamikaWhttmara, Memphis ...... Fr 26. Ca Robinson,Florida AhM ...... Sr 0 171 21 4 28 Latasha Byean, DePaul vs. Northeastern III. Nov. 29 5 FahhCyr, Detroit ...... Sr Z! Rebounds 20. Min% Rica,Idaho ...... Sr 1 149 21.3 5 Chasi Melvm.North Car0 St...... So 66.7 23 Laphelia Doss, Eastern Ky. vs. Western Cam. NW. 29 Xl. KorieHbds, Duquasne...... So 127 21.2 7. Sky x ssbitt. GsorgiaSt...... Sr 65.2 31. KathyBrown, Florida inl ’l...... Sr 1: 126 21.o 8. PyraAardsn, Nebraska ...... Sr 31. PlotraGay, LSU ...... Jr 2 126 21 0 Assists 17 Lisa Branch.Texas ABM vs. Duke Nov. I7 9 ValsdeGiiian. San Francisco ...... E 33. ClndvBiodoeit. Maine ...... S0 17 209 209 10 JonsidaBuck. Middle Tsnn. St ...... __ s: 64.0 34. Jan hacneL. drmxei .. ..Jr 6 2 124 207 11. NicoleCushmp, Michigan St...... Fr 64.6 Blocked IO Teresa Jenkins. Florida A8M vs. Southern Miss. NW. 27 35. BeckyDowting. Navy ...SO cl 165 12. TeresaJenkins, Florida A&M ...... SO Shots 36 PatriciaNash, Southam Miss .. . ..Sr Y 59 144 E 13 KatrinaCranshaw. Nevada ...... 2: 37. KaraWetters, Connactkut...... Jr 9 20.4 14. SamanthaCemy. Coastal Cam...... i i 64.1 36. lasha King, Rhodeisland ...... Jr : 1: 20.4 15. KaraWoltsm. Cannactlcul ...... Jr 63.6 Steals IO Shirkea Carter, Gnmbling vs. Wiley Dec. lb 36. KristenMcCorvy, Syracuse...... Sr : 45 102 20.4 IO Clentana Dawkins. Northeastern Ill. vs.Wis.-Milwaukee Dec. I5 FREE-THROW PERCENTAOE ASXISTS IO Jessica Mudry, Lehigh vs. Pennsylvania Nov. 28 (Min. 2.5 MadePer Game) FlA PC1 CL AVG 1. EncaMashia, Southern Cal ...... CA 23 IWO IO Delon Walker, Coppin St. vs. Southern Miss. Dec. 0 1. BrandaPantoja. Arizona ...... 112 1. Julie Sammar,William 6 Mary ...... Fr lM0 2. HaatharSmith, Toiedo ...... 2 9.2 3 HeatherAare, Canisius ...... :: 96.0 3-Pt FG 9 Amy Englo. East Term. St. vs. South Caro. St. Dec. 4 3 Lisa Branch,Texas AbM ...... Sr 9.1 4. ReneeDemudlian. San Francisco ...... :: 95.8 4 lina Nicholson.Penn S1 ...... Sr 6.6 5. Trace Oslong.Chadaston So...... :: 8 Stacy Nelson, Idaho St vs. Southern Utlh Dec. 2 5. UsishaAnderson. Wisconsin ...... Jr 6.3 6. Juhst urderd,San Francisco ...... Z 19 ii:: 6. Kim L rich, Hoiy Cross ...... Sr 8.1 7. SarahWii erd, Old Dominion...... ;; 17 FT Pet 100.0 I I5 of 15) Chrism Smith. Arkansas vs. Ohio St NW. I9 7. Elin I okoiowska,Califomla ...... 8.0 7. DanisiieI.? anln, StephenF. Austin ... 17 ii.1 7. Liz Hufford.Stetson ...... g 6.0 9 MelissaGurila, Massachusetts ...... 93.1 9. Akia Hardy,Lon BeachSI...... 76 10. Jodir Porter.%x.-Pan Amarlcan ...... : 91.7 FG Pet 93.3 (I4 of 15) Jonelda Buck Middle Finn. St. vs. Ga. Southern Dec. IS 10 EdcaGamez, U E LA ...... 7.5 10 ChrlssyKail CharlestonSo...... Sr 91.7 10. DalmaI I FloridaInrl ...... :: 7.5 10. Jill Guhke.6 IS.-Mdwaukao...... Sr 13. BehkaStafford. Brigham Young TEAM 10. Krissy HoT* sn, indlanaSt...... Jr 7.5 ...... Sr % 13. JannifarRlnotti. Connacticut...... 7.4 13. Kim Burks.N at-a ...... Sr 90.9 No. Team, Opponent Date 14 Juiy Mahaffay.Georgia St...... f : 74 13. Marci Sblson.2 rizonaSI...... Jr Points 126 Grambling vs. Paul Quinn Dec. 9 15 DaynaSmiih. RhodeIsland ...... Sr 7.4 13. BrittanyLindhe, San Francisco ...... So it2 ILOCKEOswan J-POINT FIELD UUML MOE PER GAME 3-Pt FG lb Harvard vs. Fir Atlantic Dec. 2 CL AVG G AVG lb Tmy St vs. Jacksonville St Dec. I4 1. KisaBradley, Oral Robarts...... Jr 4.1 1. JannLr Howard,North Cam. St...... t 6 3.6 2. VaneaseNygaard. Stanford ...... so I3 Lamar vs. Kansas St NW. 25 2. TaresaJenkins. Fiorida A&M ...... So 40 3. NlcoieBlaksslee. Buttala ...... So 3.0 2. ChnstieLambaR, West Va...... So ::i I3 California vs. Lone Beach St Dec. I 4. VaasoBeskeW, New Orleans ...... Fr 38 4. Haath8Tx lro; St ....J r 3.5 5. Km woiiera. ConneGlicul ...... 5. BrennaDoty ‘uffao ...... :.:.::::::.:::: ““““““’ .: ...... Jr 3.4 ...... Jr 6. Amy En le. EastTsnn. St...... Sr FG Pet. 64.2 (34 of 53) Fordham vs. Niagara Dec. 2 5. AngaiaGonice. Vanderbilt...... :: 7 AitradlaSeals. Jacksanviiis St...... ;‘: 3.5 7. Joanne cCarthy,iii.Chicago ...... Jr 3”: 7 DeniqueGraves. Howard ...... 8 LaIaniaMcIntyre. North Cam. A61 ...... 3.3 Fr Pet. 96.0 (24 of 25) Marist vs.Army Dec. 5 9 Juile Hand,Iowa St ...... :.:.:: 3.3 9. OuacyBarens. Indiana ...... z i: 10. OsanaLansmg. Paniand ...... Jr 10 Onions Jones.Northsashrrn iii...... SO 10. Julie Whaaier,Providence ...... ii 11 lajama Abraham,Geo Washlnoton...... 12 Julia Krommsnhoak.Lhah ...... z: 2.9 12.An~aiia Biabar. Montana ...... s ”,’ 1.1 13. KrisP ReInking.iiiinois ...... SO 29 13 Jss~icaToth. Cleveland St ...... Jr 14. KellyPaMnan. St. Mary’s (Cal.) ...... __ 6 14.Ja ’netDavis, Long Beach St ...... Sr 2”.: 15. RhianJones, Georgia St ...... Sr 27 S-POINT FIELD-GOAL PERctnlnit--..-_ -- \.lMln...... 1 5- Made..--.Par Gamal.. ~, PI G FG STEALS 1. KlrstenMcKnkht. Oregon ...... 2: 6 6?: AVG 2 Keiis Burrier.Akron ...... Jr 1:: 58 6 1. LeKeyrhaJohnson, Southern-B R ...... 2 6.0 2. Saraii WIllyard,Old Oomlnlon ...... Sr : 10 58.8 (Through December 17) 2. ShiaklsaCaltar, Grambling ...... s0 50 4 JsnnflerKalfer. Mkhigan ...... g 7 566 INDIVIDUAL 3. bathrr Smhh.Toledo ...... Sr 5. KristmnSullivan. St. Joseph’s(Pa.) 1: 56.3 No. Player, Team. Opponent Date 4 CbntanaDawkins. Norlhnastam ill...... Jr :: 6. Tritha Ripton.Maina ...... Jr 1; 18 563 5. LaraWebb. bmar ...... So 4.0 6. Michriis Paimiwo, Vandatiiit ...... Jr 6 56.3 Point 4 I Stacy Johnson. Delta St vs. North Ala. Dec. 4 6. ChrIstineFryer. Falrfbid ...... Sr 4.7 6. ClaimMoiloy Lcyois Ill ) ...... 56.0 4 I Allagra Stoeael. Alas. Anchorage vs. Spring Arbor Nov. 24 7. Altads Jettenon, DabwareSt...... Sr 4.6 9. Summrr Arnistmnp,Lii St...... % : 41 Shauna Nevel, Edinboro vs. IUIPU-FrWayne NW. I8 7. NatashaJohnson, Pxaa-Arlington ...... I; 4.6 10. CollesnJoycr. St. rancis (Pa.) ...... g; zi 9. Joy Dunnd. St. Maw’s (Cal.)...... 4.5 11. CarriaThompson. Austin F ’aa ...... 54.2 , 10. Sha ia la ue, SamHouston St...... sb 4.4 12 SallyStal~asrwald. Clavaland I 1...... Sr 526 Rebounds 27 Kisha Conway, Fnncis Marlon vs. Scnnton Dec. I 10. RadL nca“ %(ar!x#, Nolttwastam Ill ...... SO 4.4 13. LatorryaJohnson, Memphis ...... so 52.5 12. StephanlsShaw, NorIhwestam St ...... Sr 4.3 14. StacySmlti-Elliot, LSU...... Sr 51.9 kSlSt.5 I8 Stephanie Williams.West Tex.A&M vs. panhandle St Dec. 4 13. Jassiu Gaspar.Norlh Cam ...... Fr 4.3 15 StacyNaison. Idaho St ...... Jr 51 2 Blocked I5 LKeisha Phifer, Sr Paul’s vs. St Augustine’s Dec. 5 Shots IO Gretchen Frlcko. Millersvllle vs. Stony Brook Dec. 7 Through December 18 Steals I I Three tied. n Team leaders

3-R FG 8 Deanna Richard, Oakland vs.Auburn-Man ornery Dec. I SCORING FFENSE FIELD-GOAL PEflCENl~GE 6-WINT FIELDGOALS MADE PER QAME 6 Danyelle Harrison, Qulncy vs. Lincoln (MO.7 Dec. 6 W-L PTS AVG FGA NO AVG 1. LSU ...... 6 6-o 948 1. LSU ...... 2ia 4M 1. iowa St. .I “B FTPcL IO0 ( I4 of 14) Leslie Shippy-Schroeder, Cameron vs. Air Force Nov. 25 2 Gmmblhu ...... 7 4-3 iY 66.4 2 Duke ...... __ ...... ,341 2. Harvard 9 E !! 3. NonhwsaiemSt...... 6 4-2 527 87.6 3. Memphis ...... 256 s 51.6 3 CiavaiandSt. .__... 5 38 7.6 FG Pet 9 I .7 (I I of 12) Sue Patch- Stonehill vs.Valdosta St Dec. 2 4. Dklahoma...... 6 5-3 693 4. Connactkut ...... 290 567 51.1 $ Pnypsrdins 8 60 7.5 5 NsbraskO...... J. umhoma ..a 56 5. Dub ...... 10 9-l 855 2 .246 50.8 C. , “a TEAM 5. Virginia ...... 4-2 513 B5.5 6. NotreDams ...... 244 2 50.6 31. t 2 7. OklahomaSt...... ,138 275 50.2 ::3 Uaw’s (Cal) _... 6 i7 6.6 No. Team, Opponent Dati 7. GeorgisTach ...... -5 5-o 424 84.8 8. Georgh ...... 6. Vandarbiil...... ,186 371 $0.1 &6&t Cam:...... 6 Points I27 West Tex. A&M vs. Panhandle St Dec. 4 1 5-2 9. Nonhwastsm ...... 233 465 50.1 9 Sianford ...... 5 :.i I 9. Dhbst...... ll a-3 E 52 10. San01s 0 St...... 10. EastInn. St ...... 10. LouisianaTach ...... 9 753 85.7 166 494 6 6.5 3-R FG lb Oakland vs.Auburn-Montgomery Dec. I 11. Harttar8 ...... ,131 46.2 10. Ill -ChlcqO ...... 6 6.5 11. Syracuss ...... 6 : 83.5 12. Wisconsin._ ...... ,215 ii 49.2 12. Duks ...... lO 6.4 12. Staphan. Austtn ...... 5 3-2 :: 63 4 13. Amkansas...... 49.0 13. Cinclnnatl...... 6 63 FG Pet 70.7 (4 I of Se) Valdosa St vr.Tuskegee Dec. 5 14 GaorgieTech ...... :..:...:; :, 2 49.0 13. N C -Greensboro...... 6 6.3 SCORING DEFENSE 15. Tulane...... ,139 48.9 15 Michigan...... 7 6.3 FT Pn. 96.2 (25 of 26) Western N.M. vs. Cal St Stanislaus Nov. I7 G W-L PTS AVG. 16. TexasTech ...... ,282 z; 48.0 1;. ;;v!hsm Iowa ...... 5 6.2 1 Auburn 0 8-O 50.8 17. Pactttc(Cal.) ...... ,159 40.5 ..A IS-SanAntonio .._ 6 37 2. Arizona 6 6-O ET 51.2 18 DragonSt ...... 240 40.4 17. Toiada 6 6”.: 2,iowa .._. .._....6 6-O 51.2 19. Dstrolt ...... 203 ii!! 4u3 19. Purdue .._. _.._...... ,.. 7 :: 6.1 4. Ciamron .._..... a 8-o i: 52.1 20. Arizona ...... 188 389 483 20. MisslssipplSt. ..0 49 61 5. North Cam A&T _... “““‘7 5-2 372 53.1 6. SatonHall .._...... _6 5-l 321 53.5 FIELD-GOAL PERCENTAGEDEFENSE a-POINT FIELD-00;~ PERCENTAGE 7. WilliamI Mary 3 2-l 163 54.3 FGA PCT (Min. 3.0 madsper game) FG FGA PCT 6. Dartmouth_...... 5 3-2 273 54.6 1. William& Mary ...... z..L! 166 29.8 1, ~oyo!aMarymount ...... 6 50.0 9. Montana __. .._.._6 6-O 326 54 7 2 LSU ...... 121 ..121 377 32.1 2. NorthCam. Ah7 ...... 7 :; .i: 45.0 10 Vanderbiir.._...... 6 6-O 336 56.0 3. IowaIovVa ...... ,109109 339 32.2 3 Austin Pea ...... 7 44.6 (Thmugh December IO) 11. Iowa St a 8-O 451 56.4 4. iii.-Chkago ...... 118 365 4. Old Oominron ...... 5 ;: G 44 4 INDIVIDUAL 12.LSU .,..... 6 66 341 568 5. iowa St ...... i:z 5. Northwsstsm ...... 6 44 2 6 Sston Hall _...... %.:.17 i ii! 32.7 6. Notrs Dame...... 6 4236 ii 43.2 No. Player, Team, Opponent Date 7 Arizona ...... ,120120 365 32.9 7 TerasA&M ...... 9 :: 109 43.1 Points 40 Rebecca Morrls.Wenmnh Inst. vs. MIT Nov. I8 SCORING MARGIN 0. Auburn ...... 139 422 329 6. Akron ...... 5 42.9 OFF OEF MAR 9. Vanderbik...... 33.2 9. Oklahoma ...... 56 1:: 42.7 1. LSU ...... g4.6 56 8 36.0 6 Rebounds 30 Sayunan Lopez, Lehman vs. Marymount (vr.) Dec. 7 10 Akron ...... :.1:: g 33.5 lo. Loyoia(iii.) ...... 25 59 42.4 2. Arizona ...... 82.0 51.2 30.6 11. Buffalo...... ,105 33.5 11 NbRhCare. St...... 6 41.o 28 Pattie Koontz.Williams vs. Salve Regina Nov. 28 3 Grambiing ...... 66.4 59.7 26.7 12. Florida ...... 182 541 33.6 12. Dub ...... 10 400 4. Clsmson ...... 60.0 52 1 27.9 13. Taras-Ariingmn...... 9a 291 12. Malne ...... 10 400 ASSISCS IS Diana Devlin. Bates vs. Westbmok Nov. I8 5. Duke ...... 65.5 58.9 26.6 14 Ciamson...... ,142 419 z.; 14. Wisconsin ...... 39.4 I5 lvetce Coma, Salem St vs. Clark (Mass.) Dec. 2 6 LouisianaTech ...... 63.7 57.7 26.0 15. Temple...... 233 34.3 14. Arizona...... 6 7. GeorgiaTach ...... 84.8 59.6 25.2 16. Loulnvilla...... 1: 14. Troy St ...... 4 Et: a5.5 25.2 Dec. 5 6. Virginia ...... 60.3 17 North Cam.St...... ,130 2: iti 17 Michi an ...... 39.3 Blocked I I Lanen Stephan. Fnnklln vs. Knox 9. Auburn ...... 74.6 50.6 23.9 16. Virginia ...... ,120 342 35.1 17. Vlr ina ...... 6 393 Chotc 10. Syncusa ...... 63.5 59.7 23.6 19. Montana...... ,119 336 35.2 19. N.r!! .-Grssnrboro ...... 6 39.2 11. StephenF. Austin ...... 03.4 608 22.6 20 New Mexico ...... ,169 480 35.2 20 Harvard ...... 9 39.2 Steals I5 Enma Riven. CCNY vs. Simon’s Rock Dec. 3 12. Vanderbitt...... 70.2 54.0 22.2 FREE-THROW PERCENTAGE REBOUND MARGUl 3-R FG 8 Bryna Burda. Geneseo St. vs. Fredonia St Dec. 5 WON-LOST PERCENTAGE PCT OFF DEF MAR W-L PC7 1 N.C.-AshawiisN.C.-Ashrvrlls ...... lZ 1,; 1”4: 76.0 1. SmphenF.Ausbn ...... 53.6 34.6 19.0 2. Lshl h .:...... _...... 95 123 77.2 2. LSU ...... 49.2 33 5 15.7 100 ( I2 of 12) Kristen Vennc. Surquehanna vs. Lebanon Valley 1. Florida...... 9-O 1000 FTPa. Dec. S 1. LouIslanaTech ...... 9-o 1.000 3 San! nncisco _...... Q698 127 77.2 3 Tannessee...... ,46.2 306 15.7 1 Auburn ...... B-O l.wO 4. Maraochua.ells...... 0B88 116 75.9 4. Missouri ...... 46.6 31.0 156 FG Pet IO0 (IO of IO) Marie Mullooly, Baloit vs. Manchester Nov. 25 1, Clemson ...... 6-O l.OOD 5 PennSt. ..,,..._..._...... ,171171 75.7 5. S mm.5 ...... 50.2 15.2 6. Auburn ,...... ,117117 :fi 755 6 J anderblil...... 46 8 iti 14.5 1. IowaSt...... 6-O 1.000 13.2 TEAM 1 Nonhwastorn...... 6-O l.ooO 7. Pmvidsncs ...... 95 126 75 4 7. DslawarsSt ...... 52.6 39.4 No. Team, Opponent Data 6. CharlsstonSo...... ,103 74.6 6. Alabama...... 50.6 379 12.6 1 Navy ...... a-o l.WO 9. Mo.-KansasCity ...... 61 1: 74.3 9. Connecticut__.,_ ...... 45.0 32.3 12.7 Points I I9 Defiance vs. Rose-Hulman Nov. 29 1, Arlzonn...... 6-O l.CSlO 10. GaorpaMason ...... 1.3: 175 14.3 9. LouisianaTech ...... 47 6 34.9 127 1 Iowa ...... 6-o 1.000 11 UCSanta Barb...... 123 74.0 11. GeorgiaTech ...... 4B.O 35.4 12.6 3-R FG I2 Geneseo St vs. Fredonia St Dec. 5 1. LSU ...... 6-O l.WO 12. Drake ...... ,155 73.0 12. Auburn ...... 46.0 12.3 1. Montana...... 6-O 13. Buffalo...... 64 :1: 73.7 13 BUrFaiO...... ,494 “33 12.0 1 Vanderbin...... 64 1:E FG Pet 63.8 (44 of 69) Mlllsaps vs. Loyola (La.) Nov. I8 14. NewMexko ...... llO 150 733 14. TexasTech ...... 44,; 33.9 11.7 1. GeorgiaTech ...... 5-D l.MM 15. Arkansas ...... lB3 250 73 2 15. SanFrancisco ...... 33.6 114 1. OkiahOM s t...... 5-o l.DDO 16. St. JoSaph’s(Pa.) ...... 73 73.0 16 IowaSt...... 46.9 11.1 FTPCt. 92.3 (24 of 26) Albright vs. Messiah Dec. 2 1. Rhodaisland ...... 5-O 1.000 17 St. Mary’s [Cal.) ...... 66 17 72.9 17 Norlh Cam St ...... 46.0 E 10.6 1. TuLnns ..___.___.._..__...... _ 5-O 1.xlo ra indiana ...... 2~4 280 72.9 16 DePaul...... m; 40.6 10.1 Currantwlnning streak Fiorida9, LouisianaTech 9. 19. Ah.-Birmingham ...... 174 239 72 8 19. VirDuua ...... 39.5 100 b -* ..,A.

December 25, I995 The NCAA News Page 13

H Division II men’s basketball leaders n Team leaders Through December 17

REBOUNDING SCORINGOFI rEN8E SCORINGDEFENSE sctYcG TFG 3% Ff PTS AVG CI G W-L PTS AVG G W-L PTS AVG 1 Alan Rainga.Northwood 227 324 1 LamentDuckett. Alabama A&M ii 1 CentralOkla a99 1124 1 ArmstrongSt. ...7 6-l 401 57 3 2 Brett Beeson,Moorhead St ;J ;a 1:: 1: 1:: 416 320 2 AndrewBet&. LIU-CW. Post so 2 Morningside t ;I: 539 107.8 2. Lewfs 7 61 414 59 1 3 CarlosKnox, IlJ/PU~lndlanapolis 96 27 aa 307 307 2 Josh Chaoin.Tamoa Jr 3 Tuskegee 4-2 614 1023 3 Phrla.lextfle .6 6-2 492 61 5 4. TyroneMason, Edinboro Sr 6 ii 1: ;I: 170 28.3 4 KsvinLss ’.Shippansburg 4. SouthernInd. E 5-l 609 1015 4 Prssbyterran 3-3 374 62.3 5. Tim Jones,Gear ia Cal. Jr 7 192 27.4 5 VictorlusPayns. Lans iz 5. NewYork Tmch 8 7.1 811 1014 5 UCoavls ioo 62 5 6. JaoonHall.EastP ex St ..Sr 7 68 15 ii 186 26.6 6. Larry Steimer.Molloy ‘... So 6. SI. Rose 7 6-i 687 98.1 6. Regis(Colo.) 629 62 9 7 Jrm Coyle,Shepherd so B :t 26 212 26.5 7 BrllyLayne. Wfn ate Jr 7 FortHays St 11 11-o 1075 91.7 568 63 1 8. lyrons Hopkins,Central Okia .h a 10 zi 210 263 8 TommieFostsr, Rorris Brown S( 8. ValdostaSt 6 5-l 579 96 5 379 63 2 9. RobbfeTurner, Gardner-Webb ..Sr 9 236 26.2 9. KrnoOutlaw, Mount Olive Sr 9. CentralMO. St. 7 7-o 675 9 TarlstonSt 10 7-3 638 63 a 10. OerrfckHenry, Mercy ,..,. ,...,...Jr 7 :: 2: 26 160 25.7 10. J.J. Sims.West Ga. Sr 10 west va. Tech 8 7-l 771 LE.: 9.ROllklS 5 5-O 319 63 8 11 StevsMsrcsr. Bellarmme Jr 4 :; : 21 102 255 11 PatColeman, Ma&to St. Sr 11 Nsb-Ksarney 9-o 663 95.9 11. St Joseph’s(Ind.) ::..I S-2 447 63.9 12. PatColeman, Mankato St... Sr 6 2 152 253 11 Stew Msrcer.Bellarmine 9-2 1049 95 4 12 SeattlePaClflC 7 6-l 450 64.3 13. JerranCobb. Ma. WesternSt Sr 8 72 20 199 24.9 13. KevinVulin. Sacred Heart i: 5-3 760 95.0 13. Concordia(N Y) 4-4 515 64 4 14 TrovAnderson. Eastern N M Jr 8 70 33 25 198 248 14. Sham Myers.West Ga. Jr 13 Assumpbon _. ..7 3-4 665 95.0 14. CalSt. Bakersfield .! 8-O 517 64.6 15 Leiells Moton.‘NC Cantral Sr 5 21 123 246 15 MrchaelJackson, Cal St Bakersfield Jr 16. RennlaClemens, Mercy Sr 7 if 0 ii 172 24.6 SCORINGMARGIN WON-LOSTPERCENTAGE 17. Ashle Day.Denver .Sr 9 79 17 45 220 24.4 FIELD-GOALPERCENTAGE OFF OEF MAR. W-L PC1 1.9 Damer Parks.Rollmn 121 242 CL 1 CalSt Eakersfreld 90.8 64.6 26 1 1. Fort Ha sSt. 11-O l.MM 19. KevinRowe. Millersville... ..i: i ;z 1: ii 191 23.9 \M$li lZ$i%FYY~~na so 2. Alas.Anchorage .95 4 69 3 26 1 1 Regrs(E 010) 1o-o IOW 20. WIIPlerce.WesternSt. Sr 14 104 60 62 330 23.6 2. C ris Sneed.Nonh Fla. Sr 3. SouthDak. ::...91.4 65.4 26.0 1. lndrana(Pa.) 9-o 20 RogerPowsrs. St Rose Jr 7 62 30 11 165 23.6 3. Andy Robertson,Fla. Southern .-Jr 4 Mornmgsrde 1076 82.6 25 2 1 Neb.-Kearney :...‘... 9-O 1.z 3 Josh Chapin.Tampa 5. Fort HaysSt 97 7 73 3 24 5 1 CalSt Bakersfield 8~0 1.000 BLOCKEDSHOTS 5. StevnMercsr, Bellarmlne ..:: 6. EasternN.M. ..91.6 67 4 24 3 1 VirginiaUnion E-O CL G ND AVG 6. DewaynoRogers, Central Okla. Sr 7. VfrgrnraUnion 88.5 65.1 23.4 1. FairmontSt. a-o 1E 1 John Burke.LIU-Southampton .Sr a 42 5.3 7. JacquesAgero. Shaw Jr 8 S C.-Spartanburg 92.3 69.6 22.7 1. GrandCanyon B-O 1000 2 KmoOutlaw, Mount Olivs Sr a 8 ErrcHarrrs. St Au ushne’s Jr 9 Rollins a5 4 63.6 21.6 1. CentralMO. St. 7-O 1.000 3 JamesDo le. Concord ! :: 9 DanBuzz. Oaklan B 10 SouthernInd 1015 803 21 2 1 ClarkAtlanta 7-O 1.000 4. HoracloL r amas, Grand Canyon . ..% ; 10 MikeJohnson, Edinboro :: 11. St. CloudSt. 93 1 720 21 1 1 MankatoSt 6-O 1000 5. VlctorlusPayne, Lane Sr 10 :z :: 11. Jeff Kohl, MooRolIn Jr 11. CentralOkla. y.112.4 91.3 21.1 1. Rollins 5-o 1000 6. DerekMoore. S C.-Arken .Fr 7 29 4.1 11. MaunceProfft, Mercyhurst So 1. AlabamaABM 4-O 1000 7 CoataMalone, Alabama ABM Sr 4 16 40 13 John Drxon.Drst Columbra Sr FIELD-COALPERCENTAGE 1 NorfolkSt. 3-O 1.000 B BenWallacs. Vrrgmra Lfnron Sr FGA PC1 CurrentWrnnmg Streak, Fort HaysSt 11. Regrs(Colo.) 10. 9 John Tomsich.LB Moyns i ;:, ii FREE-THROWPERCENTAGE 1 CalSt. Baksrsfield 2:: 455 57 a 9 KerwinThompson. Eckerd ;: {Mm 2 5 FTMade Per Game) CL G 2. Foe HaysSt. ,409 731 560 FIELD-GOALPERCENTAGE DEFENSE 11. AntwlneMoore, Mlllersville ..‘...... ’ ‘.. ‘. ..Jr ii :i :.i C J Arellano,Metropolitan St. .Jr 3. CentralMO. St. 252 465 54.2 FG FGA PCT 11. GregWatfs, Southern Corm. St. Sr 6 la 3.0 1. ChadAnderson, West Va. Wesleyan Sr ; 4. Salem-Tefkyo ..22B 423 53.9 380 34.5 13. GanhJoseph, St. Rose So ;i 2.62.9 1. MarcHoutakker, WisParksrde Sr 4 5 St CloudSt 267 537 53.4 507 35.1 14. BrranJones, Gardner-Webb Jr ; 4. RogerSuchy. Lewfs Sr 6 Presbyterran 173 326 53 1 539 37 7 15 CarlBooker, Concord Jr 16 5 WrnkWoodard. West Ala. : 7 UCRiverside 220 415 53 0 544 31.7 16 John Skokan.Neb -Omaha Sr i :: i; 5 DeartrusGoodman. Alabama A&M .i: a IU/PU-FtWayns 241 459 52 5 511 17 AlonroGoldston. Fort Hays St Jr 11 7 AdnanMachado, Stonehill Sr i 9. Rolhns 148 282 52 5 544 ii: 18. AntwainSmith, St. Paul’s Fr 17 :.i 8. PeteHe Denver ..: Sr 9 10 NorthernKy. 210 401 52.4 422 38.2 19.Jason Domlnlck. Southern Ind. Jr : 12 2.4 9. Desmon7 Greer.Norlh Ala. Jr 10 11 Lewis 405 52 3 38.3 20 MrkeJohnson, Edrnboro Fr 6 14 23 10 ToddSorrell. Mrssrssrppr Col 7 12 SouthernInd s:: 428 52 3 3; 11 MrchaelDesantrs. Sonoma St z: is :: 9191.4 7 13. GrandCanyon 276 528 52.3 z:i ASSISTS 12. John Miller,Cal Poly Pomona .Jr ; 295 38.6 CL G NO AVG 13. AdamStockwell, Le Moyne ..Sr FREE-THROWPERCENTAGE 292

1. Jay Dnscoll,Durncy So 6 56 9.1 13. LoutsJudson, Mansffeld Jr i i1 i: 91.2 ET Frb.I. PCT 392 E 2 MrchaelMcClam. MO -Rolla 7 15 GreggSchmsddmg. Southwest Baphst Sr 7 20 22 909 178 78 7 3 Alsx Mavroukas.Bsntlsy 2 :A :; 2 lndranapoks ,120 153 78.4 REBOUNDMARGIN 4 BobbyBanks, Mstropohtan St. Sr i J-POINTFIELD-GOAL PERCENTAGE 3 Lewis 125 76 4 OFF DEF MAR 5. Mlke Sheppard,Tampa ‘.‘..‘. .’ .‘..‘ . “.‘.;; :; 8.67.7 (Mm 1 5 Ff MadePer Game) 4. Oakland ..li! 128 78 i 1 VrrginiaUnwon 49 5 34 1 154 6. CandrcePfckens. Cakf. (Pa.1 i 60 75 1 RogerSuchy. Lewis “s: G 5. Denver 195 250 78.0 2. NorfolkSt. ..: ..47.7 32.7 15.0 7 DemckHenry, Mercy 7 2 RyanM&y Wis.-Parksrds .Sr : 6 WIS-ParksrOe .50 65 76 9 32.2 14.3 7 Jay Butler,Vu inia Union i.: z; :.: 3. Jon Bryant, 1.Cloud St. Fr 7 Dowlinp 131 172 76 2 304 136 9.Tro McGee. uskegee Sr Ii 44 1.3 4 John Irby, Shaw : 8. Adelphr ,109 144 75 7 27 5 135 10 Rrcz Stafford,$Alas Anchorage 11 4 Mm Grovanmr.Bellarmrne :: 9. MoorheadSt. ...286 378 75.7 6. Augustana(SD.) 35.4 12.5 11 OrlandoRanson. Nsw Hamp Col ...... a :: :.: 6. TheronCurry, Elizabeth City St. Sr : 10 St Mrchael’s 130 172 75 6 6 AlabamaABM 53 5 41 0 125 12. ChrisBrown. Tarleton Sl. .-Jr 10 72 1.2 7 KarfmAnderson, West Va. St Jr 5 11 sdtl~ Pacific 102 135 75 6 a FortVallsy St 47 3 35 2 122 13. RobAtene. Le Moyne B MrchaelBrooks, lndianapohs $1 12. WesternN.M. 98 130 75.4 9.Lewis 37.9 26.1 11.7 14 DsanDoss. Edinboro 2 : :: ::, 9 GeoffEck, Fort HaysSt. .._...... Sr 1: 13 Mont St.-Brllmgs 171 227 75 3 lO.WestGa. 447 33.2 11.4 15 BurkeBarlow, North Dak Sr 48 6.9 10. BradWalker, B@ntle .._...... Sr 7 11 WestTex A&M 42 8 32 5 103 15. WarrenKfng. Seattle Pacfftc Sr : 46 6.9 11 RogerPowers, St x ose 3.POINTFIELD-OOAL PERCENTAGE 12. GeorgiaCal. .45.9 35.7 101 12 JsromeGoforth. New Haven .;: L (Mm 3.0 MadePer game) “, FG FGA PC1 13. TarletonSt. 40.4 30.4 10.0 STEALS 1 Shaw 107 49.5 CL NO AVG J-POINTFIELD GOALS MADE PER GAME 2 St Ross :: 93 495 J-POINTFIELD GOAL MAOE PER GAME 1. DavidClark, BluefIeld St. ...Sr CL__ 3. FORHays St. .._. ..l. 117 245 47 a G NO AVG 2. AdrianBell. ElizabethCfty St. Jr :: 6.350 1 WII PIme, westernSt Sr 4. N&-Omaha ...a 47.7 1. Bellarmlne 4 12.8 3. DeanDoss, Edmboro Jr 1 RogerPowsrs. St Rose .Jr 5 WestVa. Tech B 41.2 2. WestVa. Tech ...6 ii 11.6 4. TerranceGrst. SC Spartanburg so :: :: 3. LsvellsMoron. N.C. Central Sr 6 Tuskegee 6 472 3 WesternSt 14 155 111 5 BobCunnmgham. New York Tech .Sr 4. TonyAveuano. Angelo St. Fr 7 Rollins 5 46 7 119 loa 6 OronnBrown. Clarion Jr :i 4.33.8 5. TroyAnderson, Eastern N.M ;; a. Barry ...a 52 115 45.2 itfa lo.8 7 MonteReese, Pace Sr :i 3.6 6. Jay Harfie.Cal St. Chrco 9. 9 45.2 117 10.6 B. BillieOwens, Shaw .._Sr 6 FrankEarly. West Va. Tech ..Jr 10. .._...... 6 E 146116 44.8 104 9. LavorneRichmond. LeMoyne-Owen Jr :; 6. ShanaKarfon, St. Andrew’s ::...:...... Jr 11 JohnsonSmrth 447 ii 102 10. MfkeHancock. Neb -Kearney SO ii: 3.6 Sr 12. St CloudSt. ...a 2 II 44.5 a0 100 11 DsartrusGoodman, Alabama A&M Sr :: 3.5 13. ElizabethCity St. 5 44.1 10.0 12 RsnnieClemens. Mercy Sr “. 3: 14. OaklandCity 12 i; 1;: 43.9 ii 9.8 12. Tfm Jones,Georgia Col. .._.._ Jr 24 :: 12 ChrisBrown, Tuskegee .._..._...... Sr 15 WesternSt 14 155 353 4.39 78 98

H Division II women’s basketball leaders W Team leaders Through December 17

SCORlNGpSE SCORtNGDEFENSE TFG 3FG PTS AVG G ND AVG W-L PTS AVG G W-I PT.< AVG 1 MekssaGrrdsr, Mo SouthernSt SrCL 7 51 21 :: 194 21.7 1 AuousfanaIS 0 I a 6-2 743 92 9 1. NotreDams (Cal.) .i Ti 333‘- 41.6 2. VanessaEdwards, Metro ohtanSt Sr 9 95 0 43 233 25 9 i 140144 17516.0 2 We-dTsx i&M 7 6-1 650 92 9 46 1 3 RhondaWrlson, Texas up Oman ’s Jr 9 25.8 7 111 15.9 3 NorthernMrch 7 6-1 635 90.7 : !!%xi~c?.. .i fj ;g 47 1 4. MarqueetaRandolph, Vlrgrnra Unwon Jr 25 0 a 115 144 4 NorthernCo10 7 7-o 629 89.9 4 CalSt. Dom Hrlls 47 6 5. JsnnrfsrClarkson. Abilens Christian...... Sr i 24 1 7 96 13.7 5 IU/PU-Ft.Wayne 7 7-o 628 a9 7 5. NoRhDak. St. g a-f 6 LorrameL rich. Drst Cofumbra sr a 23 9 6 AblleneChrlsrian a a-o 716 a9 5 6 Wsst TBX. A&M ..7 6~1 :zi E 6. EkaterlnaE ordova. Weslern N M 23 9 : 107105 13413.1 7 Ashland 6 6-O 533 aa a 7 Shepherd 2-3 259 51 B 8 LenaElhott. Ecksrd s”,’ ; 23.9 8. Faye’Wriht. Lander ‘..‘...... Jr 5 1:: 126 6 Cakf (Pa) 10 9-1 a86 aa 6 8. Phila.Textile : 6-l 377 53 9 8. LlndyJones, IU/PUFt. Wayne. 59 a 167 23 9 9. Heather ates Edrnboro so 9 126 9 SouthernInd 5 4-l 436 a7 2 9 CentralMO St 7~0 378 54 0 10 TeashaMurphy, Barton :: i 7a 1 :: ia9 23.6 10 JodrePren er. Charleston(WVa ) .Jr 10 Wfngate...... a 7-l 692 a5 5 10. BowreSt I; l-3 553 55 3 11 LawannaMonday, Augusta ...So ; a3 11 Lakw ha!f if ir St Paul’s Fr ; E 12.4 11. Alas.Anchorage ...... 10 a-2 a57 85.7 11 NorthDak 10 9~1 554 55 4 12. ElenaShandrfna, Western N M S( 60 ;ii 12 Kendra Konesk/.Adel p h i .‘..‘‘.. ‘:.. ‘. ‘.‘ :. ‘.‘.‘.‘.‘.‘..‘..‘::..‘.‘..‘..‘ .‘.‘Sr 7 i 12.3 12 CentralMa. St...... 7 7-o 594 84.9 12 Saolnawvallev a 5-3 444 55 5 13 StacyJohnson, Delta St Jr 10 22.9 12. Ca.Hampton-Johnson. Vrrgmra Sl. Jr ; 123 13. Befiarmine ..’ 6 5-l 336 56 0 14 Shaw 7 4-3 397 56 7 14 CharlottePowell. Salem-Teikyo Sr 6 22 a 14. KathyComeaux. Henderson St Sr SCORINGMARGIN 15 Dons Moncnef.Vrrgrnra St 22 6 15 MrchelleSessoms, Norfolk St ..Jr 7 a5 12.1 OFF DEF MAR WON-LOSTPERCENTAGE 16 BethHilbink, Hrllsdale ? : 22.4 1 WestTex A&M 92 9 50.6 42 3 17. La TlnaBullock, Norfolk St .’ ” 52 22 4 FIELD-GOALPERCENTAGE W-L PCT 2 NorthDak St al 6 504 31 1 1. DeltaSt. 1o-o 1 000 17 KrrstenSkoglund. St Ansslm :: 7 22.4 (Min. 5 FGMade Per Game) FG FGA PC1 3 CentralMO St a4 9 54 0 30 4 19 TamrScott. Ashland Jr i ;: i iS 134‘-’ 22 3 1 DerdreWrllrams. Valdosta St “s: ;: 1:: 69.973.6 1 MO-Rolla 9-o 1 000 60 2 34 156 22 3 4 OaklandCrty 77 4 47 1 30 3 1 OaklandCity 9-O 1 000 20. FayeHagan. Cal St Dom Hrlls sr 7 2 AngleaWatson, Cenfal Ark Sr 5 NorthernMrch 90 7 61 4 29 3 3 TarraBlackwell, Fla. Southern So 53 79 67 1 1 AbrleneChnshan a-o 1000 BLOCKEDSHOTS 4. Lori Reavis.Wlnoate Sr 6. NorthDak...... 64.4 55 4 29 0 1 CsntralMO St 7-o 1.000 CL G AVG i! 7294 66 70 7. MlsslssipplCal...... 72.4 46.1 26.3 1. IU/PUFt.Wayne I’... 7-O 1 000 1 LakershaPhrfer. St Paul’s Fr ii 1: 6565.3 6 8 Alas Anchora s ...... ,857 60.0 25.7 1 NorfolkSt 7-o 1 000 2 EvrjaAtace, Sf. Rose S; : :: 9 AuoustanaIS g .) ...... 92.9 67.4 25.5 1 NorfhsrnCola. 7-o 1.000 3 GretchenFrrcko. Mrllersvrlle 49 ii 63.6 10 S&m-Terlryo a3 2 590 24.2 1. Mars Hdl 7-o 1 Do0 4 AndreaKsllv. North Dak St ..Jr i :.i 56 63 6 11 Cahf (Pa ) 886 64 7 23 9 1 MO SouthernSt 7-o 1 000 5. NatashaHaiiell. LeMoyne-Owen ...-r. a 49 ii: 63 6 12 AbfleneChrrsban 89 5 65 9 236 1 Ashland.._... .._ 6-O 1.000 5 AmberBurgess, Wmgate ii ii 103 6363.1 2 1. Stonehdl 1000 7 DsbbisStiles, Franklin Pierce ..Sr i 3.2 FIELD-GOALPERCENTAGE 1 Salsm-Terkyo ;:; 1.000 8. EmilyAnspach, Le MO ne FG FGA PCT Current Wlnnlng Streak Delta State 10. Mrssourr~Rolla 9. OaklandCrty 9 9 MaryVandsvsndsr. Ds Y ta St. .:: 1; ;.i FREE-THROWPERCENTAGE 1. TexasWoman ’s -261 540 52 0 10. MichelleRlservato. Pace ‘.’ 9 2. NonhernColo. 239 51 5 (Mm 2.5 FT MadePer Game) CL G FIELD-GOALPERCENTAGE DEFENSE 11 lseth Cowan.Cal St Chrco i: 10 ;.: 1 KrmPacrorsk. Cahf (Pa) ...... Jr 10 3. MississippiCol. 256 :i 51 1 11. KishaFarmer, Clark Atlanta Fr 4 2.5 4. ValdostaSt. 253 498 io:a FG FGA._.. PCT 13 ChrrsbnaHollms. Fayettevrlle St .Jr 10 2.4 2 ThsrasaK&ala, Indiana(Pa.) ...... Fr 7 716 29.7 3. BarbDen-f. IUIPU-Ft. Wayne ...... Jr 7 5. CentralMa. St. 233 462 50.4 365 29.9 13. AshleyToledo. Shippensburg Fr 10 2.4 4 TonylaEdwards. Chrrn~ Jr 6. OaklandCity 281 559 50.3 15. D Anderson.Alderson-Broaddus Jr 2.4 7. NonhernMlch. 247 492 502 265 30 9 16. Mari Lou Gonralur.Bellrrmine So : 2.3 5 Rat ni Rodnqust,Ers ne Jr : 602 31.6 .._...... Jr a 8. WestPx. A&M 247 493 50 1 521 31 9 16 rdsay Frank,West Lrberty St Fr 6 9. AbileneChrfscian ..274 547 50 1 1.9 onrquePrercs, St. Augustfnes So 9 ;.; Jr 566 31.9 So : 10. IU/PUFt.Wayne ...224 448 500 356 32.0 ASSISTS 9. KarlSlveslnd. UC Davis .._. Sr 11. SlU~Edwardsvllle ..205 412 49 a 501 32.9 CL G NO AVG 10 HeatherHopkms. Lake Suparior St Jr li 12. Wlngate .._...... 242 49 4 541 33.1 1. JoannaBsmaber. West Liberty St. Jr 6 65 106 11 HaafharSims. Northwood Jr 13 Neb-Keamsy _.. 267 :z 48 a 562 33 1 2 HayleyLystlund. Augusta Sr 10.4 12. AngelLewis, Kentucky St. so !i 392 33 4 3. DinahJowers. Pace ...Sr i ii 12. SarahMcAlbstar. Kannesaw St Jr 6 706 33 5 4. PamCummrn s, NolthwestMO St so :: PCT 5 CharlondaRo mson,Lander Jr i :i a.4 3-POINTFIELD-GOAL PERCENTAGE 1. IU/PU-FtWayne 160 E a00 REBOUNDMARGIN \Mln. 1 5 Ff MadePer Game) G 2. Ashland ...... 1: 1. 113 143 790 OFF OFF MAR 6. FallclaWrl &.! ht. DeftaSt. Jr 10 7 Stsphanis rlhams,Wad Tax.ALM ...... ’...... ’ Sr !i i.1, CuntaBanner. Sauthsrn Ind...... iy 3. SouthwestSt...... :.157 77 0 34.0 19.4 8. LorraineL rich. Dbl. Columbia ..Sr ; 2. LaudeMnlum, Augurtans (S.D.) ...... Jr i 4. MO. SouthernSt...... 155 :c 75 2 169 9 KrmMan ny ssto. Portand St Sr Ei :.: 3. ChrlsUnaJest. WestVa. Wesleyan ...... Fr 5. WesternN.M...... ,161 217 74.2 i:.: 13.5 9. CarlaGladden, St. AugustIns’s .f; : 7.6 3 MfchslleBranam. St Andrew Jr : 6. Tex.A&M-Kingsvillo 105 142 73.9 33.1 13 1 11 SusreGames, Gardner-Webb 9 Ef 74 5 MelissaStahl. Grand V&y St...... Jr 7. Eckerd 164 223 73.5 459 13.1 12. Wlndi Bisvins.Central Ark. .._...... Jr 10 7.4 6. EstherKing. Stonehill ...... Sr z 8. Phila.Textile .._...... _...... 127 173 73.4 32.3 13.1 12. DarlaWelt&. Southern Ind. ..Sr 5 :: 74 7. TanyaBrshop. Southern Cola...... Jr 10 9 Shippensburg ..242 332 72.9 14 StephanieHall. Charlsnton (WVa) 9 8. GretchenPrince. West Ala...... Jr 10 SouthsmInd to2 72 5 E 1% 15 TammyAlbon, fake SuperiorSt. Sr ; zli :.i 9 NrkkrHall, Longwood .Jr : 11 Oakland 1:: 156 724 42.0 12.1 9 WandyHansIms. Mars Hill ...... So 12. LakeSuperfor St. .._..... ,144 199 724 426 121 Il. ToriCrampton, Mollo ...... Jr : 34.3 12.1 G ND AVG 12. BeckyRelchard, MO.- R olla ...... So 3-POINTFlELO-GOAL PERCENT! IGE 12. NebbKearney 45 1 33 1 12.0 1 DonsMoncrlef. Virginia St 5: 66 12. MarlsaGroman. Sllppsrj Rock ...... Sr ; (Min. 3.0 madeper game) f {; FGA PCT 2 LorrameLynch, Orst Columbra Sr : 2: 12. NatashaTaylor, West Tex. AhM ...... :.:_.J; 1 WestAla 96 43 a I-POINTFIELD GOAL MAOE F ’f” 3 Tamm Walsh,LIU-Southampton Jr 9 45 z.: 12. AddleHolbrook. Wlngate ...... ; a0 AVG 1 Stonehrll .6 43 a 1. Oakland...... Ii 105 3 April k dams,Lincoln (MO.) ;: 7 35 5.0 3. SouthernInd. .._... 5 ii 434 5 KrmManrfesto. Portland St S-POUlTFIELD GOALS MADE PERtAME 2 Clarron ...... a 7.9 4. NorthernColo. 7 125 42.4 3. NonhernCola. .7 6. ChiaultWrloht. Albanv St. IGa.) So ; :: 2 5. PoHfandSt...... 10 109 404 7 EkaierlnaCordova W&tern N M Jr a 36 45 1. ShellaLeopold, Lincoln (MO.) ...... 4 MO WesternSt a :: 7 MichsllsHarris&N C. Csntral ...... Jr 4 4.5 2 DanyelleHamson, Ouin s”,’ 5. WesternN.M...... B 404 5. Augustana(S.D.) ...... f; 7.4 9. NlcoleHeinz. MO. Southern St...... Jr 7 :Y 3 Kristin Brssn.Southarn P onn. St...... Fr 7. MO.Soumern St...... 6 1: 39.7 6 AdamsSt 10 AllsgraStoshel, Alas Anchorage .Sr :.: 4. ChlqultWrl ht. AlbanySt. (Ga.) So 8. FORValley St...... 7 111 39.6 7. UcColo. spas. 9 :.: 9. SIU-Edwardsvllle...... 7 a6 39.5 6 Cakf.(Pa ) 11. SandraPlnto. Cal St. Stanlslaus...... Sr 1: :“8 4.4 5. DeannaRr Rard. Oakland lnd 12 MelrssaGrose, Concord Jr 6 KrrstenFrancrs. Oakland :: 10. Wingate...... a 39.4 a. SouthernInd. 1: :.; 13.Jennifer Gross, UC Davis Jr ; !.i 2 7. BsaGallsgos. N.M. Highlands Sr 11. Augustana(S.D.) ...... a 39.3 10. Lincoln(MO.) 14. GabrrellaSandovol Colorado Mmsr so 7 29 41 a. Jennl MllNr. PlRsburg~St...... f; 12. MO.-Rolla...... 9 39.1 10 N.M. Highlands ...... :.i 14 MichsllsSnssoms, ‘NorfolkSt. .._Jr 4.1 9. NfcholeJonksr. Cahf. (Pa ) 13. Southerntolo...... 10 38.8 12. SaginawValley 6 14. LeobeVelarde. N.M. Hfghlands...... I. ‘...::.. ..;i : ;; 41 9 KrmPaciorsk, Calif (Pa.) ...... Jr 14 LincolnMemorial ...... B 38.5 13 Mercyhurst 7 i.: 17 MrrnaRadic, Notre Dame (Cal.) a 33 4.1 11. SequoiaBaloni. Notre Dams (Cal.) ...... Jr 14. Wsst Lit&y St...... 6 38.5 14. Dulncy 5 6.8 Page14 The NCAA News December 25, I995 l Division 111men ’s basketball leaders n Team leaders Through December IO

SCORING REROLINDINC SCORING FFENSE SCORING DEFENSE CL G TFG 3FG Fl PTS AVG CL NO AVG W-L PTS AVG G W~l PTS AVG 1 Ed Brands,Grmnsll ..: .;.:S; 102 60 1. CraigJones. Rochester Ins1 Jr 1 Grmnsll 5-4 1043 115.9 1 Hanover a 7-l 40s 51.0 2. BryantButler, Plattsburgh St i 20 ;i 294169 32.728.2 2. KevinBraalert. Baldwrn-Wallace ” ;: 143137 2 Simpson z 5-O 535 107.0 2 Wrlhams E 6-O 338 56.3 ‘2 AnlornsHarden, Eastern ...Sr 6 i: 6 3. JamesWdson, Utica/Rome i: 66 132 3 St. Joseph’s(Me:) ’ ..::.:::.6 6-O 602 1003 3 Gust Adolphus 5~0 282 56.4 4. JR. Shumale,Ohio Wesleyan Sr 7 66 30 ;i 169195 282279 4. Mrks Bockensledl.Luther Sr 77 128 4. Lycomlng 8 7-l 783 4 St Norbert .s 4-l 284 56.8 5. Mark Spechf,Neb Wesleyan Sr 6 35 164 273 4 AntornsHarden, Eastern 5. Babson 7 5-2 673 E 5. WisOshkosh .7 7-o 402 57 4 6 Erlk Quamms,Beloll Sr 4 z: :i 6. WabareGladman. Waynesburg 2 :; 12.812.7 6 AnnaMarra 7-1 761 95.1 6. Rose-Hulman 8 K-2 46.3 50 5 7 Nick Benks.Ohio Northern Sr 6 67 :: 105157 263262 6. ScottAr abrde.Waynesbur Jr 76 127 7 Shenandoah ; 52 663 94.7 7 WIS-La Crosse ...... 5-2 411 58.7 7 Rick Hughes,Thomas More Sr 6 63 ; .Y JasonJh rle, Westminster(L 0 ) .Sr 110 122 8. SaIlsburySt. .:I 8 3-5 754 94 3 8 Frank.8 Marsh. 7-o 415 59 3 9 Rob Sader,Macalesler so 9. Wilkes 8-O 749 93.6 8. FredonlaSt. 7 3-4 415 59 3 9 John Pabarbs,Anna Marla SO 8 0 ii 2091.57 26.226.1 10 Ramapo : j:; 535 59 4 sr 5 !: 24 33 129 25.8 10 Jim NaughtOn.Worcester Tech ii 12.011.9 10.Amherst : 8-O 740 92.5 10. TommyDoyle. Salem St 11. RyanSlumpl. Capdal z: 11 Hardin-Simmons ...9 8-l 831 92.3 11 Yeshwa 537 59 7 11 JamreSmrth. Merchant Marine ..So 9 83 18 45 229 25.4 ii 11811 6 12. Hope B 6-2 737 12 Wis -Platteville .8 7-l 470 59 8 12.Al While. Shenandoah ..sr 7 12. tire Belmfan1r.New York U Sr ii 17817.3 254 12 MarI Harrrs.Coast Guard Sr ii: 1111.6 6 13. Trinlly (Cam 7 63.3 ::1 12. Phll Dixon,Shenandoah .sr 7 i: 2; 14 John Douglas,Catholic St 14. Augusta&i(II I ) ;i{ 727 909 WON-LOST PERCENTAGE 14. JasonLight, Emory A Henry so 0 0 40 202 253 15 Gilbert0Parker, Medgar Evers St 69 11.5 15 Roanoke 632 90.3 W-L PCT 15 ClarencePierce, N.J Inst. of Tech Sr 8 i1, 1. Amherst 8-O 1 060 16 Jay Longino.Colorado Cal. sr 8 71 s:, zi 200198 25024.8 FIELD-GOALPERCENTAGE SCORINGMARGIN 1 utrca 8-O 1.000 17 Carl Cochran.Richard Stockton .,.. Jr 7 52 23 46 173 24.7 Mm 5 FGMade Per Game) CL G FGA PCT OFF DEF MAR 1 Wheaton(Ill.) 8-O 1.000 18. CrargJones. Rochester Ins1 ..Jr 18 98 24.5 I GeoffVon Wlegen. Hobart :; 1. St. Joseph’s(Me ) 1003 62 2 38.2 1. Wilkes 8-O 1 000 19. GregCnder. Eureka ..Sr 1: ii 2: 2 NathanAckerman, Stmpson : iz 85.776.1 2. Wdkams a7 7 56 3 31.3 1. Frank.8 Marsh 7-o 1000 20 Sill Carr.Cabm Sr 4 31 5 1: 24497 24.4243 3 John Palrallls.Anna Mana so 112 75.9 3 Wrlkes .93.6 63.4 30.3 1. Rrpon 7-o 1.000 4. Jason Lrghl.Emory S Henry i 107 75.7 4 Anderson 87.5 64.1 23.4 1. Wrs -0shkosh 7-o 1.000 BLOCKED StlOTS 5. NealRtchards. Mount Union “;: 40 75 0 5 Cabrini 85.2 63 6 21.6 1 Rowan 6-O 1.000 CL 5. SteveEllen% Simpson : 6. Amherst -92.5 71 4 21 1 1 Ill Wesleyan 6-O 1.000 1. Ira Ntcholson,Ml St Vincent Jr 7 RobVellhouse. Calvin 2 7 :i 75071.4 7. Rowan 65 7 208 1 St. Joseph’s(Me.) 6-O 1 000 2. DamonAvrnger. CCNY 0 ChadKlopp, Aigsburg ...... 8. Hope !2 71.4 20.8 1. St. Olaf 6-O 1 000 3. Rob Sader.Macalester :i 9. BrianCarroll, Salem St ...... :: : ii 71.271 1 9 Ill Wesleyan 81.5 60.8 20.7 1 lmllty (TSX) 6-O 1.000 4. Mark Awantang.Washrnglon (Md ) Jr 10. MrkeMehaffey, Frank. d Marsh...... Sr 4 10. Hardin-Simmons .92 3 71 9 204 1 Williams 6-O 1 000 5 Chris McGill,North Central St 11 Jeff McLean.Chris. Newpon ...... Jr 8 i; 70069.0 11. Rose-Hulman 70 9 58 5 204 1 Baruch 5-o 1 000 5. ScottArgabrile. Waynesburg 12. SteveWllhs. Dante1 Webster ...... so 7 12 Hanover 71.0 51.0 20.0 1 Gust Adolphus 5-o 1 000 7. AntoineHyman. Keuka :: 13. RonJones, Connsclicul Col ...... Jr 7 93 ~~.~ 13 Ripon 03 9 196 1 Sampson 5-o 1000 8. DavtdKline. Wrdener 14 Jon LitwilIer,III. Wesleyan...... St 6 :: 68.2 14. Whealon(Ill ) 90 3 ;:i 18.0 1. RochesterInst. 4-o 1 ow 9. AIJumarEarl, Monlclarr St :: CurrentWmrhn Streak Amherst12. Trinity(Ts x ) 8. Wheaton 10. JamesWilson. Utica/Rome sr FREE-THROW PERCENTAGE FIELD-GOAL PERCENTAGE (Ill ) 8, Wilkes8 11 JasonWhite. Weslmrnsler (MO ) ” sr \Mrrr 25FTMadsPerGame) CL G FTA PC1 FG FGA PC1 12. Jeremy Pulman,Dubuque Jon 0 Orlando.Endlcotl so 9 1. Sampson .....,215 359 59.9 FIELD-GOAL PERCENlAGEC$FI ENSE 13 SholaRlchards. Union (NY.) ..i: 2. AdamPIandes! Bales ...... Sr 6 ;i 97.195 0 2 Nsb.Wesleyan ...... ,177 329 53.8 FGA PCT 14 Ksrm7Nelson, Concordra-M ’head .sr 3. KerlhWolff, lnnity (Conn) ...... :.I ...... Sr 32 93.8 3. lg. Wesleyan...... ;;; 360 53 6 1 CCNY ,132 391 15 PalerCraig, Frostburg St. ..sr 3 ShaltaSsrville. Ithaca ...... : 4. UooerIowa.. 265 53.6 2. Bowdoln 116 333 iii 15 Jim Ooumalo,Muhlenberg Fr 5. Chris Couren.Wash. 8 Lee ...... j: 10 :i 93.893.3 5 Augustana(Ill) 271 508 53.3 3. Dln’el ..121 338 35.8 6. J. J. Rrchardson.John Carroll ...... Jr 7 :; 9392.6 1 6. Rose-Hulman 237 446 53 1 4 Emory ..162 451 A3SlSlS 7. KevrnFraser, Rutgers-Newark ...... Jr 7. Denlson 163 310 52.6 5. Willlams 127 344 E CL AVG 7 TonyFisher, WI%-River Falls ...... i 8. Wllllams 375 52.5 6. Wls.-LaCrosse 143 31.2 1. Phtl Dixon.Shenandoah ...... Sr 10.4 9. Erlan Ince.North Central...... :: ;: 92.692.0 9 Hardln-Simmons ::.:i: 51.8 7. Edgewood .._..._..203 ii 37.2 2. AndreBollon. Chris Newport’ ...... Sr 10.4 10. TomJanlk. Haftwlck ...... Jr f 10 Frank h Marsh. 201 :z 51.8 8 Muhlsnberg .._.._... :...: 152 37.4 3. Matf Nadelhoffer.Wheaton (Ill ) ...... 9.5 11. Josh Cherry,St John’s (Minn.) ...... Sr 6 :“3 91.791 3 11. Eureka 285 551 51 7 9 Luther .._...... 140 Fi 37 7 12 Phil Dixon,Shenandoah ...... Sr :: 90.9 12. Hendrlx .._...... 262 507 51 7 10. Trinity (Corm.) .._...... 185 4.57 38.0 3 AdamPlandes, Bales ...... i: 95 263 38.0 5 Jeff Boyle,Grmnell ...... sr 8.9 12 PeterLark, Concordla (Ill.) ...... S i m.9 13. Lycomlng.._...... _ ._ 283 51.6 11. Gust.Adolphus ..__...... 100 12 Bretf Davis,Wls.-Oshkosh I 22 90.9 14. Alvernla _.. 256 ii: 51.4 12. MerchantMarlne ,220 578 38.1 6. Chrrs Psrrm.Slm son ...... Jr 8.8 13. Lynchburg ,201 528 38.1 7. ZachGorIng. St 1 laf ...... Fr 8.2 81 3-POINT FIELD-GOAL PER;;NlAeEPERE;NlAeE FREE-THROW PERCENTAGE 0. Marl Grleser.Anderson ...... Fr FTA PC1 9 DennisTurner, Phtfsburgh St...... I: 7.5 1Min.1.5 Ff MadePer Game) G FGA PC1 1.I%l~z%~~~~~ PeteDdlon. &wan& ’ ...... SrSt 6 1. Kalamazoo 125 159 766 -. DEF MAR 10. GregDean, Concordia-M ’head...... Jr 1.2 2. soon Powers.Powdo. Bridgewater (Va.)(Va~j ...... ”.‘.‘.~~.‘.‘.‘.‘.‘.‘.~‘Jr.‘.~. ’.’.’.’.’.’.’.‘.‘.‘.‘.Jr :i 2 170 78 2 1 Waynsrburg 54.8 362 187 11. Rob Lee.Augusfana (Ill ) ...... Sr 7.1 3. Al Soltazzo.New Pattz St...... Jr ; 140 77.9 2 St. Joseph’s(Me.) 46 7 303 163 12. KevinCllppelton. Upper Iowa ...... 4. AnthonyDspasquale, Nichols ...... So E 60.750.3 149 77.9 3. Wilkes .._..._...... 33 5 14.8 13 J J Slepierski,WashIngton (MO.) ... 1...... :: ii 4. Jay Watts.Ithaca ...... Fr : 107 77.0 4. RochesterInst. % 320 14.0 14. Jay Adams,Brockpon St...... Jr 6.7 6 A J Shanley,Swarihmore ...... :; ; :; 58.357.7 151 11.5 5. CarnegteMellon 47 3 33.5 13.8 15. Joel Heckendorf.Martin Luther...... Jr 6.7 7 J T. Furnish,Blackburn ...... 143 76.9 6 Amherst ..44.9 32.0 12.9 15. Jason Malotf.Fontbonne ...... Jr 6.7 8. Jerry Ambooken.Alleph.sn& ...... so ;; 56.556.3 129 76 7 7 Bridgewater(Va.) 42.3 296 128 9. KevinRIchardson.Richardson, Hardrn- unrnons...... Sr i ;: 5655.6 1 282 76.6 8. Rowan 44.3 123 SlEAlS 10. PaulMorrlssey. Cortland St...... :‘ .S.S 144 76.4 9. Ull&Rome .._ 42 8 3 12.2 Cl AVG 10 TonySeahare, Upper Iowa .... : 18 55.6 122 76 2 10 Hampden-Sydney .._...45.6 33.5 12.1 1. IYOMO ano, Potytechnlc(N.Y.) x 12. JasonMllesko. Chrcago ...... so 9 47 55 3 107 75 7 11. Hanover 37 6 25 6 120 2 Dsron lack, Allegheny sr :i 86 75.6 12. OanlelWebster .._ .._. 51 0 394 11.6 3. Gre Dean.Concordla-M ’head.._... .Jr 44 3-POINT FIELD GOALS MADE PERjLAME 4. JoePi Heckondorf, MaRIn Luther .. ...Jr NO AVG S-POINT FIELD40;L PERFiN [ACE f-POINT FIELD QOAL MADE PER GAME 5. Rusty Loyd.Chlca o :.: 1. Ed Brands.Grlnnsll ...... Sr 60 6.7 FGA PCT c AVG 6. Marvin Patterson.,R unter 2 3.9 2. Erlk Duamms.B&it ...... Sr 20 5.0 \%h:i?o!;t.)! .?.? 8 ;. 139 40.2 1. Grlnnell .._. s 1% 17.7 7. BruceHlgglns. Errwaler (Mass.) ;; 3.8 3. Tomm Doyle,Salem St...... Sr .9 105 47.6 2. UC San Drego 96 12.0 8. Barry Annoff. Yeshtva 3.8 4 Martyr( elthllne.King ’s (Pa.) ...... Sr ii 4.04.8 7 63 133 47 4 3 Bal0it .:. . . . . ::::: 46 115 9 John Dertchle.Sellsbury St “““‘.::‘.‘.:‘.‘.~:::::::::::::::::::::Jr 3.8 5. MichaelKlngslrKlnoslev. Baboon ...... Jr 4 Blackburn 7 45 469 4. Sewanee_...... 6 9. ShakaServllle. Ithaca Jr 3.8 6. J.R. Shumale.‘OhioI hio Wesleyan ...... ~.~....:.: .: $ ii :.: 5. Rutgers-Newark 1: 46.7 5. Elmhursl z.: 11. BenArcurl. Ramapo Jr 3.7 7. GregBoncrkowskl. Hattwlck ._.... ;: 4.3 6 NewPalh St...... :: 103 466 6 Union NV.) ._ ...... 11, WllllamHoulman. Mass :Da&noulh Sr 3.7 8. TurnerEmery. Sewanse ...... so 7 Manchester 9 123 46.3 7. Annah-I aria 8 ii 13. DalmenHunter. Alvernla so 3.6 8. Jeff Branson.Fontbonna ...... __.._...... ;; :i 8. Hardln-Simmons 9 z: 141 46.1 8. Babson.__...... _ .._..._ 9.0 14. DallasPreston. Wesley so 3.6 lo GeneNolan, Washln ton (Ma.) _...... ii 4.0 9. RrchardStockton 7 41 69 46.1 8 Fonfbonne .. . ..__..._...... 9.0 14 Mike Grueamacher.St. Norbert Sr 10 Burt Paddock,Mane R ester ...... 10 Capital._...... 6 45 2 10. Gettysburg 14 DarnallHlckman. UtlcaIRome St :z 12. Eric Johnson,Capdal ...... ii 3623 :.i 11. Haltwick 8 2 1:: 44.9 10 rrmny (Corm) : I n Division 111women ’s basketball leaders H Team leaders Through December IO

SCORING REBOUNDING SCORlNG;FFENSE SCORING DEFENSE 'G PTS AVG CL NO AVG W-L PTS AVG W-L PTS AVG RabeccaMorrlr. WentworthIns1 ...... z 6 177 29.5 1. SayunaraLoper. Lehman ...... 82 20.5 1 MIllsaps 9 9-o 930 1. Gallauder 6 5-l 249 41.5 :. MeeganGarrdy. Clark (Mass ) .._Jr 199 284 2 LaraMssssrsmllh, Bard ...... St 2 Dehance 9 9-o ii: 92 3 2. Monmouth(Ill ) 5-o 214 42 8 3. MelanlsPayna. Msdgar Even, E; 182 260 3 Kerry Ceurvels.Salve Regina 11: 17.016 1 3 Emmanuel a 7-l 710 08 0 3 GroveCdy .i 4-2 271 45 2 PsgglsSweeney, Pine Manor 207 25.9 4. EmmaBascom. Drew ...... :: 4 Rowan 5 5-o 436 a7 2 4. Wesley 8 4-4 45 a :. Karl Tuft& Luther sr 155 25.0 5 JuheAndarson, Johns Hopkins ...... So 1:: 15415.3 5 Gallaudet 6 5-l 505 84 2 5. Vassar 8 6-2 ;5 46.4 6. NlcoleMerchant. Whsaton (Ill.) ;; 192 240 5 PathsKoonu. Wllllams ...... 6 Hardin-Simmons 8 7-l 654 81.a 6. Union(N.Y.) 3-3 279 46 5 AnnetteWeller, LyCOmlng 213 237 7. LananSlephan. FrankIm ...... i: ‘2 15315.0 7 Baldwm-Wallace 5 4-l 81 2 7 WrlhamSmith E 5-o 233 46 6 ;. KlrslenVogl. Vassar St 173 21 6 .Y BettyJo Welch,Daniel Webster ...... 134 149 8 Bales 6 4-2 :: 81.2 7 Nsw York U. 5 5-o 233 46 6 9 MandyPile, Junlata So 150 21 4 9. Amy HID.Unwon (N V) ...... :: 9. GsneseoSt. 6-O 405 00.8 9. Greensboro 4-2 280 46 7 AnnieGuzek. Dlcktnson St 171 21.4 10. MarlesseSchlott, Penn St.-Behrsnd ...... 1:: 14714.4 10. Susquehanna E 5-l 80.5 10. Ullca/Rofne .i S-1 281 46 8 1:. ClaudettePrrwti. Haverford .: :,::;; 11 Mimi Taylor,lmmaculsla ...... :: 111 139 11. NotreDame (Md ) 7 4-3 :z 79.6 11 Eastern 5 3-2 235 47 0 Kanwaral Dhallwal,Mdl 1:: K 12. AnrueGuzek. Dkkinson ...... 110 13.8 12. WesternMd .._..8 7-l 636 79 5 12 Baruch. . . ..I 4 2-2 189 47.3 1:. Lanenl lephan.Franklin ...... ;; 125 208 13 Jan Whrte,Neumann ...... z: Kim Landry.Wotceslsr Tech 166 20.8 14. SaraWhrlefreld. North Park ...... Fr El! 13713.6 SCORING MARGIN WON-LOST PERCENTAGE 1:. MonicaRodnguez. Plattsburgh St. ;; 103 206 15 KarenProvinskl. Rochester Inst...... St 67 13.4 “FF DEF MAR W-L PCT. Molly Lieberman.Lawrence 82 205 16. MichelleScecrna. Sprln field ...... Jr 120 13.3 41.5 42.7 1. Mlllsaps 9-o 1.000 1;. JenndarNrsh. Scranton Jr 184 20.4 17. Jenny Lambsrt,Onerbe Pn ...... Jr 79 13.2 54.2 38.1 1 Defiance 9-o 1.000 Jsn Whrta.Neumann St 142 203 18. KerlJenkins. Pine Manor ...... Fr 104 130 59.0 34.0 1 Whsalon(Ill.) 8-O 1 000 1: Carl Carson,Marymount (Va ) Jr 140 20.0 16. MrsbWrlliams. Bard ...... Jr 13 13.0 53.2 34 0 1. Bowdoln 7-o l.OCKl 19. LaraMesssrsmrth. Bard So 20 200 466 32 6 1. Capital 6-O 1000 StsphCunningham. Belhany (W Va) .So 138 19.7 FIELD-00AL PERCENTAGE 466 292 1 GsneseoSt 6-O 1 wo ;1. LauraHaynss. Guilford .So FGA PCT 60 3 20.5 1 Luther 6-O 1000 23. DanaCurran. Connecbcul Cal Jr 1:: E 53.5 27.3 1. Mllllkln 6-O 1.000 24. EmmaBascom. Drew 98 196 z; 68.566 0 50.1 26.0 1 Randolph-Macon 6-O 1 wo EmilyYanaro. Notre Dame 2 137 19.6 55.2 260 1. Rowan 5-o 1.000 ;i. Klm Huber,Allegheny ;; 176 19.6 ii 65.864 5 52 9 234 1. WillramSmdh 50 IWO SaraMusser. Kalamazoo 117 195 ii 6362.5 2 54 1 22.4 1 Monmoulh(Ill.) 5-o 1 wo z;. SharonLaddey, Rowan ..sr 97 194 ...... 56.6 21.1 1. NewYork U. 5-o 1 000 29. AngleRienrsls. Dubuque S; il 6261.I! 3 47.3 19.7 CurrentWrnnrng Streak Caprtal58,Bowdoin 12. Oeflame and 29 CarlssaLucas, Rhodes 1:: 1z.: 8. MandyPde. Juruata ...... Mrllsaps9 Davrs.Hardin-Simmons ...... 103 61.2 BLOCKEDfiHOTS a Harris. NewYork U ...... so 5 FIELD-GOAL PERCEN;;GE FIELD-GOALPERCENTAGEFDGEFENSE CL NO AVG 11 KrrsbnLong, Capital ...... Jr 6 :: 607604 FGA PC1 FGA PCT Sr 6 57 596 1. Eastern 150 242 62 0 1 Con Carson,Marymount (Va.) ...... 12 Kris Addis.Gust. Adolphus 412 590 1 NewYork U 77 25 1 2 KamllahByrd, Rutgers-Camden ...... ;: 2 665.1 2 Rust 243 2 AlbenusMagnus 124 ii!: 26 8 3. LanetfSlephan. Frankkn ...... Sr 26 4.3 FREE-THROW PERCEN;;GE 3 Rowan 178 348 51 1 3. Vassar . ..144 499 28 9 4 Amy Strand.North Adams St ...... \Mln. 2.5 FT MadePer Game) G FfA PCT 4 Luther ia 381 49.3 4 Monmoulh(Ill ) 84 291 28 9 5 LaloylaFoster, Emerson-MCA ...... z: ii 433.7 SusanBoyle. Affrsd ...... ,;; ;1 95.2 5. Beloit 221 448 49.3 5 Gallaudst 101 346 292 6. EmrheBrand ka B n Mawr 1 JanslleGancl. Allentown ...... : 6 Millsaps 309 628 49.2 6 PotsdamSt. 108 360 30.0 7 Kim Kovar,do&la? St ...... i: 2’: E 3. MelanteHendsbee, Roger Williams ...... Jr 6 20 E.i 7. Wheaton(Ill.) 245 498 49.2 7. Neumann 445 30 1 8 GvvynetleHammond, Marret@ ...... St 4. LuanneFrancis, St Elizabeth...... 2; 16 93.8 0. Hardln-Simmons 235 486 40.4 .5 SouthernMe :...E 441 30 2 8. Jen Whlls. Neumann ...... i: 3.0 5 MarshaHarris, NewYork U...... z :: 9392.0 3 9. Capital 154 319 40.3 9 CedarCreSt .t 17 385 304 8 Dsnlrs Brace.Albenus Magnus ...... s ”,’ 6. RenaeHuyck. Adrran ...... 10. Gallauds ,218 452 48 2 10 Wesley 136 444 30.6 11. Held1Meyers, Waynesburg ...... z 3.02.9 7. LeslieBaldwrn, Csntre ...... :: : 11. Bowdotn 215 446 482 ll.Wldener... 160 520 30.8 12. Lisa Ttmmer.Hops ...... :: 14 2.3 8 Kristin Schaefer, Augustana(Ill ) ..Jr 33 :; 12. Dehance 344 723 47 6 11. St. Ehrabelh 299 9. Amy Carier,Emory ...... Jr i :: 07.5 13. Bates 191 409 467 13 Srmpson ;: 258 z: ASSISTS 10 SarahClarke, Muhlenberg ...... Fr CL NO AVG 11 An is Vlzachero,Brl ’walsr (Va) ...... Sr i si 87.086 8 12. Ho y Malnes,Wostfrsld St ...... Fr 8 37 86.5 FIA PCT 1. DianaDevlln. Bales ...... :i 8.0 a I.. DEF MAR 1. StefanleTetar. Mary Washington...... :: 1 WilliamSmith ;b 74.5 1 Mrddlebury ...53 7 31 .3 21.a 3 KalliTallfsrro. Junlata ...... so S-POINT FIELD-GOAL PERE:NTAGE SouthernMe. .._... 100 1:: 74.1 2. Rowan 498 32.8 17.0 4. AngleArnold. Johns Hopkins ...... :? 2 ;.i7.3 \Mrrr 15FTMadsPerGame) G FGA PCT : Adrian .85 115 73.9 3. Elmhursl .59.0 42.2 16.8 5. LesheBaldwin. Centn ...... StephanieArrlgo. Wm. Paterson ...... Fr 9 43 62.8 4. WesternMd. .._ 161 221 72.9 4 Defiance 151 5 Jill Walker,CaplIal ...... :: :.i 2. Held1SchwicMenborg, St. Benedlct...... 13 61.5 5. John Carroll lD.9 149 72 5 5 Gallaudel...... :z! ;:i 143 5. suly venet. Mounl Union ...... ““:““““““““‘::::: El: 35 70 3. Amy Macy.Hanover ...... :: i 6. Ill. Wesleyan 123 170 72 4 6. ConnectlculCol ..495 35.2 14.3 5 Nab&haShrleves. Bard ...... so 4. KlrstenVogl, Vassar ...... SE :.: 7. Alblon 107 148 72 3 7 Marywood 55.0 40.9 141 9. Chris Webb,NC Wesleyan...... 6: ;.i 5 MarshaHarris, NewYork U...... soSr ! ::, 5756.5 1 Alfred 104 144 72.2 6 TrentonSt. 43 5 308 12.8 10. MandyKin , SouthernMe...... :: 6. CarlaWebb, Mtllsaps ...... Jr i OhioWe&an 86 122 72.1 9. Washlngton(MO.) 48 9 36.5 12.4 11. AndreaLl ill e. Eowdoln ...... :: :.; ...... St .i 27 55 6 10. Eastern ...I _. 72.1 10. WorcesterTech 51.8 40.0 11 a 11. LsanneLake, Manchester ...... :: 47 67 errnan.Lawrence ...... Jr 4 11. Mlllsaps .1;: 2:; 72 1 11 AtbsrfusMagnus 50 9 39 1 117 ...... St ;i 55.255 0 12. North Central 64 89 71 9 STEALS 10. MichelleMcLellan, Hardm-Summons ...... Jr : 13 Hartwrck 102 143 71.3 J-POINT FIELD GOAL MADE TR GAME 11 LeeAnn Azrrswicz, Wilkes ...... ZY 53.052.4 27 51.9 ND AVG 1. EnmaRvera. CCNV...... E k 12 Amy Flory.Detlancs ...... i: G 3-POINT FIELD-GOAl . PERCENTAGE 1. Manchester 7 77 2. ColleenMcCrave. Bales ...... Fr \~;i,“,i”,_~g;;;uN ; FG FGA PCT 2 GsneseoSt. 6 3. El Henderson,Emmanuel ...... S-POINT FIELD GOALS MADE PERtLAME 54 109 495 3 Wilkes 5 2 4 Sh? Ridfwy FroslbureSl ...... G!: 2. MIllsaps .9 s4 114‘-- 474 4. Hanover...... 9 5. Son aluc er. msrson-M A ...... 1. MeganM&key. GenesaoSt ...... so 3 Rand-Macon Woman ’s ...... 7 56 44.6 5 ThomasMore ...... 4 E.! 6. Ma Stagliano,Utica/Rome ...... :: 2. NlcoleAnderson, Loras ...... I...... Jr 4 Gust Adolphus 6 ;; 52 44.2 6 Wm. Paterson 6.1 7 JamleCum Ilk. Skldmore ...... 2. MolN Lieberman,Lawrence ...... 5 GenassoSt. 6 42 95 44.2 7. Gettysburg ; 42 6.0 0. ThersseRo P tven. Gallauder ...... :: 4 Kim Graf,Kenyon ...... ;: 6. Lawrence 4 43.4 7. MIllsaps 9 54 60 9 Jan Denby,Rowan ...... ‘so 5. MeepanGarrrty, Clark (Mass.) ...... 7 Loras 5 43.1 7 NewYorkU 5 9. Judy Mender.St. Elizabeth ...... :::,z; 6 JamrsWilson, Manchester ...... :: ...... so 8. ThomasMore 4 41 0 10 Macalsster i.: 11. ShannonGalbratth, Thomas More 7. CaseyColllns. Hendrrx 9. Centre 7 40.3 11. St Benedrct z 5.6 12 Mar o McGowan,Ithaca ...... so 8. Sls hanwArrigo. Wm. Paterson...... i: 10. Wlnenberg 405 12. Marymount(Va ) 7 56 13. SaraR Bay.Wellsslsy ...... 0 Anc! rea Eetilnl,Westlleld St. : 405 13 St Joseph’s(Me.) :. ; 5.4 14. Jenny Lambert,Dnerbeln ...... :: 8. MechellePothasl. Wittenberg ...... 10. NewYork U ...... :: 12. Welleslsy .8 40 3 14. Carthage 5.3 15. KellyJackson, Neumann ...... St 11.Carla Webb, Mlllra a ...... 400 15. Carleton 5 5.2 16. SamsnthaDonaldson, John Jay ...... SO 12. MeredithEngoke. E east Guard ...... so 13. Sl. Benedlcl 5 December 25, I995 The NCAA News Page 15

H Division I ice hockey leaders W Team Through December 17

POINTSPER GAME GOALS-AGAINST AVERAGE WINNING PERCENTAGE CL G GLS ASTS AVG CL G MINS GLS AVG w L 1 Pet RyanEquale. Connechcut SR B 10 12 2.75 1. John Grahame.Lake Superror St. SO 8 423 12 1.70 1. ColoradoCol. 14 0 3 912 Pat Lyons,Iona .SR 10 14 11 2 50 2. Daryl Chambertam.Army... 23 1.80 Chns Drury. BostonU SD 15 17 2 3.3 2. BostonU. 13 1 1 900 3 Judd Lambert.Colorado Cal S; 1; :;; 13 184 3 Army 11 2 1 ,821 Eric Pernn,Vermont JR 12 217 4 KevrnKrsuhsr, Canisius FR 7 330 12 2.18 MartInSt LOUIS.Vermont JR 11 i 4 Denver 14 3 1 ,806 Jay Pandolto.Boston U SR 15 17 E 5. J. J. Doherty,Connecticut JR 4 209 8 2.30 5. Vermont ...9 2 1 ,792 Josh Dart, Canisrus SD 10 6 Marc Magllardltl.Western Mlch FR 16 938 36 230 7 TrmThomas. Vermont JR 12 732 29 2.38 6 LakeSuperror St 14 4 0 770 Pointc 8. Mrb Hall, 8owtmg Green vs. Atas Farrbanh, Vln Mannetta.lona SR 10 : ;.i 6. Minnesola 13 3 2 ,776 EnanBonm, Mmnesota SR 18 13 1 94 8 Jeff Moen.Minnesota SR 10 569 23 2.43 Nov. 13. 9 MartrnLegaull. Mernmack 26 252 8. WesternMlch 13 4 0 765 PeterGeronauo. Colorado Cal .. ...SR 17 19 1.94 JR 10 616 Goair: 5, Eric Healey, Rensselaer vs. kr Force. Nav. IN. Rob Bonneau.Massachusetts ...... JR 15 12 1 07 10 Dan Brenzavrch.Colgate SD 9 543 23 254 9 Mame 13 3 3 ,763 ToddWhite, Clarkson JR 13 11 1 77 11. Many Turco.Michigan SO 15 838 36 2.58 10. Connecticut.. ..6 2 0 ,750 Asirh: 5. Chris DeProBo. Cal@e n.Yale. Dec. 2; Mrke 14 5 0 737 ColinSchmidt, Colorado Cal SR 16 1 7s 12. Dan Murphy,Clarkson... SO 13 790 34 2.56 11. MrchtganSt Halt, Bawlmg Green vs. Alas. Fanbanks. Nav. 23; Bryan BradKonlk. Harvard ...SR 12 ! 1 7s 13 SteveDeBus, Minnesota SD 10 523 23 264 12 Mrchrgan 11 4 0 ,733 JamreVenezra, Connecbcut SD 7 1 71 14. DavidWenlnger. Michigan Tech FR 10 so2 23 2.75 13. Providence .9 3 2 714 Richardson. Rensselaer vs. Air For-cc.Nov. 18:Jason Gud- Mike Crowley.Minnesota SO 18 l 167 15. ChadAiban. Mrchrgan St. SO 16 1026 48 280 14. Canrsrus...... 7 3 0 7DO mundson. Color-ado CoLvs. Norchsm Mich.. Nov. 17. Sal Man anaro.Massachusetts SR 15 11 1 67 16 Dan Dennis,Providence JR 13 761 36 2.84 KsvmHI Iton, Mrchigan SR 15 1 67 15 Clartson ...... 8 3 2 ,692 Godie Savas: 53. ht Sands.lona vs. Cnisius. Nov. 24 J.C. Ruid,Vermont JR 12 1; 1 67 17. RyanBach, Colorado Cal :... .JR 10 610 29 2.85 16. Mlnn.-Duluth...... 13 6 1 675 RandyRobdarlle. Mramr (Ohro) FR 17 11 1 65 18 TnppTracy, Harvard 26 2~88 17 Colgate .6 3 2 636 TEAM HIGHS 19 TarasLsndzyk, Minn -Duluth :i 1; 2 47 209 18 Mass -Lowell. 8 4 3 ,633 GOILS PERGAME 20. BlarrAllison. Maine ...... SR 15 956 47 2.95 19. Massachusetts 9 6 0 6W Scoring: IS. Connecticut vs.Villanova.Nov. 24. CL AVG 20 BowkngGreen 9 6 1 594 Pat Lyons,lona 1: “2 1 40 GOALIE WINNING PERCENTAGE Powcr.Play krccntige: ID00 (4 of 4). Iowa vs. R an Equale.Connsctrcut :i 10 1.25 CL w L 1 PC1 Currentunbeaten streak (record during streak). ColoradoCol. 17 (14-O-3). Wencwardl In.% Dec. 2. c 118oru BostonIJ ..: ,230 1: 17 1.13 1 MlchelLarocqus. Boston U.. FR 6 0 0 1.000 BostonU 10 (9-0-l). Clarkson10 (8~0-2).Mame 9 (B-O-1).Mrnnesota 9 (B- n-1, Pedty-Killing R?medge l.DOD(l I of I l).Narchem Jayi Pando7lo. BostonU. 15 17 113 1. John Grahame.Lake Superror St SO 6 0 0 1OW - .I PeterGeronazzo, Colorado Cal :El 112 3 Judd Lambert ColoradoCol JR 6 0 1 929 SCORING OFFENSE Mrch.vr. Alas. Anchorage. Nov. I I. J C Ruid,Vermont JR 1: 1; 4 RyanBach, Colorado Col JR a 0 2 ,900 6 W-L-T GLS AVG DavidVallleres. Alas. Anchorage. ..I...... ; 19 17 23 5. TomNoble, Boston U ...... SO 7 1 1 ,833 1 BostonU 15 13-1-l 97 6.47 SeanTallarre, Lake Supenor St 0 a9 8 6-2-O 51 6% 1: 1: 0 86 5. KevinKreuuer. Canrstus ...... FR 5 1 0 833 2. Connectkut RussGuzror. Provrdence 7 Daryl Chamberlam,Army so 10 2 1 a08 3. Canws 10 7-3-o 62 620 POWER-PLAY PERCENTAGE Enc Healey.Rensselaer ..4 12 0.86 PPGLS PF’ ASTS PC1 Mike Peluso,MinnDuluth ...SO :; 17 0 65 8 TrmThomas, Vermont JR 9 2 t 792 4 ColoradoCot 17 14-o-3 94 553 9 SteveDeBus. Minnssota so 7 2 0 778 1. Boston0. 36 111 324 ToddWhite, Clarkson. JR 13 11 0 85 5 Army 14 11-2-l 70 so0 2 ColoradoCol 35 111 315 BurkeMurph St. Lawrence 0 a5 9 Jeff Moen,Minnesota...... SR 6 1 2 ,770 6 Mrchigan 1s 11-4-o 71 4.73 11 Marc MagliarditnWestern Mtch ...... FR 12 4 0 ,750 3 Connechcut 15 313 ShawnWans Y, orough. Marne :t 1: 1: 0 84 7. Mmnssola 1.5 13-3-Z a4 467 4 Mramr(Ohro) 23 i! 284 CodyBowtell, Alas Farrbanks .JR 17 14 0 82 11. SmuheWalhnhermo. Denver...... SR 10 3 1 750 8. lona 10 5-5-o 45 450 5 Cornell 68 279 11 DanDenrus. Provtdence...... JR 8 2 2 750 9. LakeSuperror St ia 14-4-o 79 439 6 Denver :i 265 ASSISTS PER GAME 11 J J Doherty,Connechcut JR 3 1 0 750 7 Mmnesota i: 253 ASTS AVG 11 Mark Northup,Connecticut...... FR 3 1 0 ,750 10 Mass-Lowell 1s B-4-3 64 4.27 10. Massachusetts. 15 9-6-O 64 427 8 Ranssslaer E 100 ,250 MarhnSt LOUIS.Vermont iA 20 1B2 16. Marty Turco.Michigan...... SO 11 4 0 ,733 9. MassLowell .23 94 245 Jamis Venaria.Connecticut SO 11 1 57 17. ChadAlban. Mrchrgan St so 13 5 0 r22 12. MlchlganSt 19 14-5-o 81 426 10. lona 13 54 241 Josh Oort Canrsrus 1 50 1.5 BlarrAlhson, Mams .SR 10 3 3 ,719 13 Clarkson 13 B-3-2 55 4.23 11 Army 100 240 Eric Perrin.Vermont ....: 1: 1 42 19. Dan Murphy,Clarkson ...... SO 8 3 2 ,692 14 Denver 16 14-3-l 76 422 12 Michigan .s: 106 ,236 KevinHilton, Michigan ...... ’. .... ’ SR 20 1 33 13 4-a-t 54 415 Vln Mann&N. Ions 13 1 30 20. SeanKukck. Lake Superror St...... JR 8 4 0 15. Rensselaer CohnSchmrdt, Colorado Cal z: 1 25 20 Ian Perkins,Alas Farrbanks FR 4 2 0 ii: 16. blame. .lQ 13-3-3 77 4.05 PENALN-KILLING F-ERCENTAGE BrianBenin. Minnesota SR ;: 1.22 17 WesternMich 17 13-4-o 68 4.00 PP GLS PP ATrS Mike Crowley.Minnesota ;i 22 I 22 GAWE WINNING GOALS 17. St. Lawrence 13 7-5-t 52 400 1 Connecbcut 52 i;i CL GLS GWG 2 Denver .I: 111 ,892 BryanRtchardson. Rensselaer 1 21 17 Vermont. 12 9-2-l 48 4.00 3. WesternMrch ...... 14 116 ,879 Chris Drury, BostonU .._..._ SO 1; 1.20 1 SeanTallarm. Lake Superior St SR 1B 6 20 North Dak. 20 9-10-l 79 395 Scott Swanson,Colorado Cal. ...FR 112 2. PeterGeronauo. Colorado Col. SR 17 4. Rensselaer 13 101 671 SR 17 1.10 5 Mame 114 PatLyons, lona. 3 SteveFerranb. Mrchrgan St . ...JR 16 i SCORING OEFENSE 6 LakeSuperior St 1; 120 .E DerekLadoucaur, St Lawrence SO 12 1.09 4 BnanBenin. Minnesota _...... ’. .... ’ SR 18 7. Brown :...ll .BS3 Rob Bonneau.Massachusetts .._...... JR 1 07 5. 15 playerstied G W-L-T GLS AVG DanTrebd. Mrnnesota SR 1: 1. Army .._...... 14 11-2-i 28 2.~) a. Harvard 10 ii ,653 leader Wynns,North Dak :.$ 20 1: 17 13-4-g 38 2.24 9. Clarkson 16 103 SHOR’UANOEO GOALS 2. WesternMrch 10. FernsSt. 115 Liz Rand Robltallle.Mtamt (Ohto). G SHG 3 Vermont 12 s-2-1 29 242 11 Canrsrus 1: ,835 Tomr en-y.Massachusetts 1: 1: 4. ColoradoCal...... 17 14-D-3 42 247 Bob Lachancs,Boston U. i! 14 1.00 1. Jay Pandoifo.Boston U ...... ;k 15 5 12 Army 15 i: .a35 2. TonyFrennette. Maine SR 19 3 5. Colgate...... 11 6-3-2 28 2.55 SAVE PLRCENTA;; 3 BatesBatQglia, tats SuperiorSt...... ::...:.S 0 18 3 6 Michigan ...... 15 11-4-O 39 260 SCORING MARGIN MINS PC1 4. JeremyBrown. Western Mlch...... SA 3 7. LakeSuperior St...... 18 14-4-o 47 261 G GF AVG GA AVG MARG John Graham&Lake Superior St. SO 8 1;; ,934 5. John Madden,Mlchrgan...... JR 1: 3 a. Clarkson 13 a-3-2 34 2.62 1 Connectlcul...... 6 51 636 22 2.75 3 63 Dar+ Chambsrtaln.Army ;; 316 927 6. Tom Holmes,Harvard ...... SR 12 3 2 Canrsrus 10 62 620 27 270 3 50 9 Maine..... 19 13-3-3 50 2.63 3 BostonU 15 97 647 46 307 3 40 Marc Magllardlh.Westarn Mrch 1: 471.._ 924 7 1B playerstied ...... 2 10 Denver ..I6 14-3-l 48 267 Tim Thomas,Vermont 12 370 ,922 4 ColoradoCal 17 94 553 42 247 306 10 Minnesota. .._ 18 13-3-2 48 267 5 Army 14 70 5.00 28 200 3.w Judd Lambert,Colorado Col ...!l. 7 163 ,920 POWER-PLAY GOALS J J Doharty,Connectlcul...... JR 4 9.3 918 12. Canlslus 10 7-3-o 27 2.70 6. Michigan 1..15 71 4.73 39 2.60 2.13 CL G PPG 13. Connectrcul _. 8 6-2-O 22 2.75 7 Minnesota 18 84 4.67 48 2.67 2.00 DanBrsnzavlch. Colgate 6.6. 270 915 1. PeterGeronauo, Colorado Cal ...... SR 17 11 DanMurphy, Clarkson ,913 14 MrchrganSt 19 14-5-o 53 279 8. LakeSupenor St 16 79 439 47 261 1 70 2 Mike Psluso.Minn -Duluth...... SO 20 10 9. WesternMrch 17 68 4W 3.9 2 24 1 76 lrevor Koerug.Union (N Y) .so 912 2 DavidVallleres. Alas. Anchorage...... JR 19 10 15 Harvard 12 6-5-l 35 292 KevinKreuher. Canisius. 912 20 13-6-1 61 3.05 10 Clarkson 1; :i 2: :i E 1 62 2. Cody Bowtell.Alas Farrbanks JR 17 10 16. MlnnDuluth ...... 11 Vermont i sa Dan Dennis.Providence 1: 17. BostonU 1s 13-1-l 46 307 SteveDeBus. Mrnnesota so .E 5 ShawnWansborough, Maine ...... so 19 8 12 Denver 1B 76 4.22 48 2.67 1.56 Jeff Mosn. Mrnnssota _...... SR 6 Mike Hall,Bowling Green ...... S R 16 7 1B Providence 14 9-3-Z 45 321 13.MrChrQanSt. ..19 81 4.26 53 2.79 1.47 TamsLend k, Mlnn.-Duluth SR :;: % 6 Chris Drury. BostonU...... SD 19 MichiganTech 21 a-10-3 71 338 14.Maine. ..19 77 405 50 2 63 1 42 ToddReyoo 7 ds. Northeastern SR 204 ,902 6 Nell Donovan,Mass ~Lowell JR 1: : 20. Massachusells.. 15 9-6-O 52 3.47 15.Colgate 11 42 382 28 255 1 27

H Division 111ice hockey leaders W Team Through December 10

POINTS PER OAME GOALS-AGAtNST AVERAGE WINNING PERCENTAGE G GLS ASTS AVG CL G MINS GLS AVG w L T Pet 1 Crab Muse,lrmdy (Conn) :k 16 a 3.00 1. Chns Farron.Middlebury SD 3 ia0 2 0.67 1 Mass -Dartmouth ._ a 0 0 1ODD 2 M c aramante,Roger Wllllams S.3 i 2 BradyAlstead, WN-River Falls ..FR 4 240 3 075 1 Mrddlsbury .._ 7 0 0 l.OCQ 3. Joe Doldo,Skrdmore E 1: S.! 4 J DiBona.Mass -Danmouth SO i 10 3. ShawnGreruer. Mass -Dartmouth _..SR a 450 9 1.20 3 Babson.._...... _...... 5 0 1 ,917 5. DannyWhde. Skrdmore. ..SR 9 1: 7 :.: 4. BobbyGorman. WN-Stevens Polnl ...... FR a 371 11 178 4. RogerWllllams ...... 4 1 0 .aw 6. DaveCatarurolo. Bowdoln .._..._.SO 7 14 2.29 5. Jeff Hell.Wls -RrverFalls ...... SD 6 361 12 1.99 4. Wis.-RiverFalls...... B 2 0 .wo INDIVIDUAL HIGHS .SR 7 : 9 2.29 240 a 2.w 6. BrianThlbodeau. Salem St 6. Fnncols Bourbeau.MIddlebury...... SO 4 6. PotsdamSt...... 9 3 0 750 Points 8. Craig Mure.Trinip (Corm.) vs. Wesleyan B Chris Porter,Gust. Adolphus it 17 2 22 7. JakeDeEwver, Hamdton ...... FR 2 124 S 2.42 6. Trinity (Corm.)...... 5 1 2 .750 9. Mark Spsnce.Middlebury ; E 2.14 B. SeanCondon. B&son...... SR 5 315 14 2.67 (Corm.). Dec. 8. 9 TerryLon Trinity Corm.) JR 7 6 i 214 8. Skldmore...... 6 2 1 ,722 11. MarcSalv! ‘ Mass.-6artmouth ; ; 10 2.13 9. Stuart Logan,Bowdom _. ___.__.._.._...... JR 5 280 13 2.79 9, Amherst...... 5 2 0 ,714 11 Mark Dar&y, Nichols ii 10. Mike Lane.Curry FR 5 215 10 2.79 9, SalemSt...... S 2 0 714 13. J. Lest&erg. Gust.Adolphus SR ; 17 i.1: 11. Mark Braeden.Genes-so St .FR 5 255 12 2.82 11. Elmira...... 7 3 0 ,700 14. Gntt Bracken.Babson .._...SR i 4 2.00 12 Mark Berubs,Skidman _..._...... SO 6 330 16 291 12. PlattsborghSt...... B 4 0 ,667 14. MichaelDeRoche. Mass.-Boston..SR 6 2w 13. BIINWm. SalemSt. .._.... FR 5 305 15 2.95 Coallc Saves: 60. Mark Stnna.Wentwarth Inst. vs. 14. Joe Rotortdo.Mass -Boston .JR 6 ; 2.00 12. Wls.-StevensPotnt ...... B 4 0 ,667 14 JoeBranca.Amhrnt ...... _.... JR 6 364 16 297 14. Bowdoln...... 4 2 1 643 Nichols, Dec. IO. 14 MlchaalW&by, MassBoston SR 6 15 Mark KeQner,St. John’s (Mlnn.) JR 6 363 18 298 14. DennisNlgro. Nrchols 8 : El 15. ConnectbutCal...... 4 3 1 ,563 TE&M HIGHS 14 KennyJones. Salem St ..:i 7 4 2.00 16. Roby Gropp,St. Norbert SD 11 635 32 3.02 16. Gust.Adolphus...... 5 4 0 ,556 17 KendallBrook, Hamilton. SR 3 189 10 3.17 16 Nichols..._...... ,.,,..,.,...,._ 5 4 0 ,556 hhgZIZ%l~Sr~ -Mc.Dec.9:kmbu& la DeanReed, WN-Superior JR 6 369 20 3.25 GOALS PEN GAWE Current unbeatenstreak (record durrng streak). Middlebury27 (25-O-2). Sm. 8rocm St. Dec. I ; Au8sburg vs. Hamline. Nm.24. CL AVG 19. DerekWhite. Connecbcut Col. FR 3 125 7 3.36 Mass-Dartmouth 8 (B-04) Wrs-Rrver Falls 7 (7-O-O).Babson 5 (5-0-O). 1 CraigMuss, Trini (Corm.) ;; 2ckl 20. DaveDragone, Potrdam St JR 9 531 30 3.39 Rwml-Play Pen-c-: t .cao (4 of 4). Ptymouch St 2. DannyWhite. Skl “d more ._.. 1.67 SkrdmoreS (4-0-l). Wrs -StevensPoint S (SD-O). vs.Worcemr SL, Dec. 4. 3. MrchaelWelby. Mass -Boston SR 1.50 4 Jarrod DiBona.Mass -Dartmouth. ?33 1 25 GOALIE WINNING PERCENTAGE Penalty--Killing Rrccntagc: l.DDD (I I of I l).Wis.- CL W L T PCT SCORING OFFENSE 5. Grlff Bracken.Baboon 1.20 G W-L-T GLS AVG S-s Parrisvs. Sr Schotassiu. Occ 27. 5 MrkeCaramante, Roger Wrlkams so 1 20 1 ShawnGrenlar. MassDanmoulh SR 8 0 0 lD30 7. Mike Daagla.Cur 1 10 1. FrancorsBourbeau. Mrddlebury ..so 4 0 0 l.Dw 1, Middlebury ...... 7 7-o-o 51 729 8 Man LeDuc,Augs 1 urg :; 1.00 1 Chns Fanon.Middlebury SO 3 0 0 1wo 2. MasssDanmoulh...... B 8-0-O 56 700 B Joe Mrehan.Bowdoin ..SR 4 SeanCondon. Babson SR 4 0 1 ,900 3. SalernSt...... 7 s-2-0 46 657 8 Mark Hagan.Cortland St SD 1.: 4. PlansburghSt...... 12 B4-0 73 6.06 POWER-PLAY PERCENTAGE a DanGsnatassio, Fitchburg St ..J; 4 Mark Bsrube.Skrdmore. SD 401 SW 6. Jeff Hell.Wls.-Rrver Falls SD 5 1 0 ,833 5. Trlnlty (Corm.)...... B s-1-2 47 588 PP GLS PPASTS PCT 8. TobyKlnsler. Lawrence 1.: 14 33 ,424 6 JOB Rotondo,Mass.-Boston JR 7 Scott Gaudraau,Roger Williams. JR 4 1 0 8W 6. Mass.-Boston ...... 6 3-3-o 32 533 1 SalemSt 8. Jim Walsh,Mrddlebury 1.: 8. DaveDraoone. Potsdam St JR 7 2 0 ,770 7 PotsdamSt ...... 12 9-3-o 63 525 2 Mass-Danmouth 19 46 413 8 Mark Dorsey,Nrchols 4 9 BradyAl&ad, Wis -River Falls FR 3 1 0 750 8. Skrdmore ...... 9 6-2-l 47 522 3 Skrdmore 21 63 ,333 a. DennisNlgro. Nrchols 1.: 9. DavidFletcher, Wls Stevens Point SR 3 1 0 ,750 9 RogerWrlkams ...... 5 4-1-o 26 5 20 4 Middleburv 15 48 313 8 BnanThrbodeau, Salem St :i 1w 11 BobbyGerman. Wrs Stevens Point .FR 5 2 0 714 10 Nrchols 9 5-4-o 46 5.11 s WISSuperror 21 71 ,296 12. Stuan Logan,Bowdoln JR 3 1 1 ,700 11 Babson...... 6 5-0-l 30 5.00 6 Babson 8 26 286 ASSISTS PER GAME 14 49 ,286 CL G ASTS AVG 12 Jethey Blarr.Trimty (Corm.) FR 3 1 1 700 12 CortlandSt...... 12 6-5-l 59 4.92 6. WlsRlver Falls. 1 DaveCatarurolo. Bowdoin ..SO 2w 14. Joe Branca Amherst JR 4 2 0 ,667 12 Wis:Superior...... 12 5-5-2 59 4.92 B Potsdamst 24 a7 276 2. Chris Porter.Gust Adolphus JR ; 1: 1 09 14 Mark KsQner,St John’s (Mlnn.) .JR 4 2 0 667 14. FitchburgSt...... 3-4-o 34 466 9. ConlandSl. 21 79 ,266 2 Joe Doldo.Skidmore ;; 9 17 I a9 16. Pal D’Neil.Plansburgh St SD 7 4 0 ,636 15. Elmira...... lO 7-3-o 46 480 IO PlattsburghSt 18 71 254 4. Marc Belllveau.MIddlebury... 11 1.57 17 BryanMuss. Elmira-.. SR 5 3 0 625 5 JasonCormisr. Mass -Dartmouth $ ; 1 50 16. PlymouthSt...... B 3-s-o 38 4.75 17. Jetl Rathburn.Gust. Adolphus JR 5 3 0 ,625 17. ConnecticutGoI...... B 4-3-l 37 463 PENALTY-KILLING PERCENTAGE 6. Kenn Jones.Salem St 7 1: 1.43 PPGLS PP AFTS PCT 7 TomE olasanto. Mass -Boston... SR S 7 1 40 19. Billy Wrtt. SalemSt FR 3 2 0 6W 18. Bowdoln...... 7 4-2-l 32 457 7 Mike Caramante.Roger Williams 1 40 5-2-O 31 4.43 1 Wls.-RiverFalls 3 32 9136 19. Amherst...... 7 2 Mrddleburv .._. S 47 694 9. JamreJanezrch, Au sburg % z 1.33 GAME WINNING GOALS 20. FredoniaSt...... 12 6-5-l 53 4.42 9 PaulNapOlltanO. Ba % son SR 1 33 CL GLS GWG 3 Tufts .. . . 6 46 a70 9 OavldWoodward Baboon Sr i 1.33 1. Jarrod OiBona.MasssDartmouth ...... SD B 3 4. Sktdmore a 60 ,867 9 NateSunda PotsdamSt...... SO 12 1 33 SCORING DEFENSE 5 St Norbert 10 73 ,863 2 Mike Paters PotsdamSt...... SR 11 3 G W-L-T GLS AVG 13. Jon Smith.ii lddlsbury SR 7 1.29 6. MassDartmouth 7 48 a54 13 Mark S ence.Middlebur ...... :...:..S0 7 1 29 3. 14 playerstied .._.... 2 1 Mass -Dartmouth...... a a-o-o 11 1.38 13 BrianT i ibodeau.Salem 5 1...... SR 1 29 7 CoRlandSt. ._...... 12 at a52 2 Middlebury ...... 7 7-o-o 10 143 8. Amherst. 7 45 .B44 13. Terry Long.Trlndy (Corm ) ...JR i 1.29 SHORT-HANDEDGOALS 3 Wis -River Falls ...... 10 8-2-D 15 150 SHG 9 Babson .4 24 ,833 CL G 4. SalemSt ...... 7 5-2-O 19 271 SAVE PERCENTAGE 1. DannyWhite. Skrdmore ...... SR 9 4 10 Hamilton ...7 41 829 CL MINS svs SH PCT 5. Babson...... s-o-1 17 283 11 Wis.-StevensPoint 14 81 a27 1 BradyAlstead. Wis -River Falls FR jJ 113 973 2 Mrks LeDuc.Augsburg ...... JR 10 3 5-2-O 20 2.86 3. Mike Zambon,Wls.-Stevens Potnt ...... SR 12 3 6. Amherst...... 7 12. SouthernMe. 7 40 a25 2. Chns Farion.MIddlebury .SO i 7. Hamitton...... 1-3-l 1s 3.00 3. ShawnGrenrer, Mass -Dartmouth ..SR 9 1:: :E 4. DaveEvans, Elmrra ...... JR 10 2 13 FredonraSt 14 78 ,821 4 BobbyGorman. Wis.-Stevens Point .I; .i 172 936 5 BradShaver.Elmira...... SR 10 2 8. Wls.-StevensPolnl...... 12 a-44 38 3.17 14 PotsdamSt ..15 83 619 5. Mark Braeden,Geneseo St 1: 146 ,918 6. RogerManloll, Geneseo St...... JR 12 2 9. St John’s (Minn.)...... a 4-4-g 26 3.25 15. Trinity (Corm.) 12 62 a06 6 MrkeLane. Curry .FR z 10 119 7 Jeff Azar.Plattsburgh St ...... SR 12 2 10 CortlandSt...... 12 6-5-l 40 3.33 7 SeanCondon. Babson SR 163 i1; 8. Mike Peters.Potsdam St...... SR 11 2 10 Tufts ...... 9 3-4-2 30 3.33 SCORING MARGIN 8. RobyGro p, St Norbert SD 1: :: 357 ,910 12 PbdtsburghSt...... 12 a-4-D 42 3.50 G GF AVG GA AVG MARG 9 Jeff Hail,L Is.-RiverFalls SO 6 12 130 9 5-4-o 32 356 10. SluaRLogan, Bowdoin 137 .zl: POWER-PLAY GOALS 13 Gust Adolphus... 1 Mrddlebury 7 51 729 10 1.43 5.86 11 DaveDragons, Potsdam St ii ; :i CL G PPG 13 WesternNew Eno. 9 4-5-o 32 3.56 2 Mass:Dartmouth 8 56 7.00 11 136 5 63 12. Mark Kehner.St John’s (Mlnn ) :z .z: 1 BryanYoung. Buffalo St ..JR 14 6 t 5. Williams...... I...... 7 3-4-o 25 3.57 3. SalemSt 7 46 657 19 271 3.86 13 Joe Albano.Western New Eng... .FR ; :: 264 902 2. DannyWhite, Skrdmore SR 9 6 16 PotsdamSt...... 12 9-3-g 43 3.58 4 PlattrburghSt 12 73 6.08 42 3.50 2.56 27 270 14. Jeff Rathburn.Gust. Adolphus 3 Jett LUPU. FredoniaSt SR 12 5 17 Genes80St...... 12 3-a-i 46 3.83 5. Babson 6 30 500 17 283 217 15. Joe Eranca.Amherst :; : 10 177 ifi 18...... 7 4-2-l 27 3.86 6 PotsdamSt 12 63 5.25 43 3.58 1.67 16. Mark Berube.Skldmore SD 6 153 a95 4. StephanBourbonnals. Plattsburgh St SR 12 5 Bowdoin 17 DerekRabold. Geneseo St. ..’ FR 5 1: 179 5 MrkeSweeney, St John’s (Minn.) SR 8 5 19. FrsdonlaSt...... 12 6-5-l 49 4.08 7 ConlandSt. 1.-12 59 492 40 333 I 58 18 Jake DeBoever.Hamilton. FR 2 5 47 .:z 6 13 playerstied.. 4 20. St. Olaf...... 9 4-5G 37 4.11 8 Amherst 7 31 4.43 20 2.86 1.57 Page 16 The NCAA News December 25, I995 NCAA

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Calendar Barbara A Hill, president at Sweet Briar, announced her resignation, effective June .January 24 l!~~fi...Leh F. Snyder, vice-presidrnt and National Youth Sports Progt-ant San Diego Committee dean of the college at Eastern Mennonite, named president at Rlttfhott, effective in January 4 Administrative Committer Dallas June...John Darling selected as president ;d January 4-5 Professional Sports Liaison Committee Nashville Pittshurg State. He IS a former chancellor Summer Baseball Subcommittee at LSUShrrvepon. January 5 SJ)et la1 Evrtlb Commiacc DIRECTOR OF ATHLETICS Januaty 5-6 (kmncil Dudley Wet4 named interim athletics ,Jattuaty 6 Special (:ommittre to Sludy Division II ditrt tot‘ at ‘Texas-Arlington. Athletics Certificatiott ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR Allison Weston of Nebtaska as Divi- selected a~ head women’s baskethall roach Bowl benh in his first year there, received in 24 ycan before retiring aher last season. ment at Nonhcast Louisiana. sion 1 national coplayers of the yczar. The at Nonheast Louisiana. a new multiyear ~ottltacL Men’s and women’s swimming and Marketing assistantJim O’Conoor, AVCA also sele

. AIM-Amund 1. Indiana (Pa) (t%O) ...... 160 0.7. Oneonta state. 62; 8. Rmarrelatr, 5-2. parentheses and points: 10. Trinity (Corm ) (51-2)...... 5 Athk#ia Progun. 2. Virginia Union (6-O) ...... 152 Middle A&u&: 1. Wilkes. 8-0, 2. Ftankltn & I. Ala-Huntsville (Rn)...... 30 llivikn I Women’s vollyhn The Scan Directors’ Cup top 25 NCAA Divlston 3. Alirhama A&M (4-O)...... 143 Manhall. 70,X Cahrini. 4-1: 4. Lycoming, 7-l; 4. 2. Bemidji St, (%2-l) ...... 23 The USA Today/American Volleyhall Co&her I all-around athletics ptogrdtns through Decem- 4. Southern Ind (91) ...... I30 Moravian, 62: 6. Muhlenberg, 5-I; 7. Johns 3. Mercyhunt (63-l) ...... I8 Association top 25 NCAA Division I women’s vol- ber 11. administered by the National Association 5. Cal Sr Bakenfield (MO) ...... 124 Hopkins, 62; 8. Goucher, 62. 4. Mankato St (441) ...... 13 leybafl teams through December 12, tith records of Collegiate Directors of Athlettcs and based on 6. Camal MO. SL (7-O) ...... 118 Atlantic: 1. Rowan. 6-0; 2. Richard Stockton, 7- 5. St Amelm (4-S) ...... 6 m parentheses and points: performance to date in NCAA men’s arld wo- 7. St Anselm (6-l)...... 116 L, 3. Staten Island, 62; 4. New Jersey Institute of Division III Mm’s Ice Hockey 1. Stlnford (2p2) ...... I,431 men’s PalI championships. Championships in- 8. Fort Hilys SL (10-Q ...... 113 Technology, 5--y; 5. Mount SL Vincent 61; 6. New The top ill NCAA Division III men’s ice hock- 2. Nebraska (ml) ...... 1,409 cluded in thta tanlring are men’s and women’s 9. s L lzme (64)...... 87 York Univrrsity, 53; 7. Ramapo, 63; 8.Jersey City ey teams in each region through December 12, 3. Michtgan St. (34-2) ...... 1.319 cross country. field hcxkey, men‘s and women’~ 10. Fairmont St (EO) ...... 84 slate. 44. with records in parenthrarr and Points: 4. Texa (276) ...... 1.2’XJ soccer. and mm’s water polo. Point, are award- 11. Central Okla (F-1) ...... 81 Swflt: 1. Tnnrty (‘l’exar). IGO. 2 Christopher Wd S. Hawaii (31-l) ...... I.218 ed cm the basts of an institutirm’r finish in each 12. Neb.-Reamey (6-9) ...... 70 Newport, 7-1: 3 Virginia Wesleyan, 5-l: 4. I Wir:River Falls (8-2)...... 40 6. Florida (352) ...... 1,160 of 22 spotts. These midrcds~n rtandtngs are II”- 13. Alas. Anchorage (7-Z) ...... 66 Rodnoke. 61, 5. Hendnx, 7-l; 6. Bridgewater 2. Ms.-Stevens Point (I%%) ...... 36 7. UClA (23-9) ...... 1,098 officd; official r~ndings roll he pehlishcd upon 14. Fla. Southem (4-I) ...... 60 (Virginia), 81; 7. Stillman, 7-2, 8 Shcttandoah, 5- 3. St. ‘Thomas (Minn.) (9-2) ...... 32 R. Penn St (27-R) ...... 1.012 romplctiott or the fall championships season: 15. Northern 51. (7-l) ...... 48 2. 4. SL John‘s (Mmn.) (!‘2) ...... 26 9. Ohm st. (228)...... 1966 1. Wisconsm, 222K. 2 stanrord, 215: 3. 15. Queens (NC.) (.%I) ...... 48 Great Lakes 1. John Catmll, 61; 2. Wib&~tg, 4. Gustavus Arlolphus (S-4)...... 26 1II. Oral Roberts (3&3) ...... 90R Southern Mcthcxlist. 212; 4. Maryland. 174. 5. If. South Dak. (&I) ...... 21 S-2; 3. Hope, 6-2; 4. Calvin. S-2, 5. Baldwtn- 6. SL Mary’s (Mitm.) (If&2) ...... Xl 1 I Arizona St (1’9-8) ...... 865 James Madison, lf2; b. Virginia. lfi; 7. UCLA, I#. Nnrthrn~ Ky. (5-l)...... I7 I/x Wallace. 4-2: 6 Calrit.ll, 4-2; 7. Wooster. 62: X 7. lake Forest (Y7m2)...... 16 12. Southern Cal ( 1%9) ...... 836 I6 I ; 8. Nonh Carolina Stati. 159‘ /A;9. Wtlham and 19. MC>.-Rolla(6-0) ...... ll Alhion. 4-3 8. St. Norbrn (2-7-3) ...... ll % 13. San Dicgv St. (27-S) ...... 745 Mary. 145; 10. Washir#on, 144; 11. Penn State, 20. New Hamp. Cal. (7-I) ...... IO ‘/x Midwtstz 1. llhnots Wesleyan. 7-O. 2 Hanover, I). ws:EdI1 cklirc (4-51) ...... &I% 14 Notic Dame (27-f) ...... 677 143/.; 12. North Carulma. 125’/<; 13. P~~rtland. Division III Men’s Basketball 7-I; 3. Whcaton (Illinois). 8-O; 4. Washtngton 1Il. wk.-SuJmior (Se%2)...... 3 15. Texas A.&M (‘L3-7)...... f37 124’h: 14. G>lt,rado. 124; 15. (tie) Nobe Dame and The top right Divrsron III men’s tyaskc-tba11 (Missouri). 63; 5. Ripon, 7-0; 6. DePauw. 6-2; 7. East I6. nllnols (24-9) ...... 5H’L Provider1cc. lzO’/.; 17. Oregon. IIR: IR. (tie) teams in rat h region through December 12. with Augustana (lllinoi*). C-2: A Rose-Hulman, 62. I. Middlebury (74) ...... 50 17. Washingmn St. (22-7) ...... 537 Arkamrs and Santa Clam. I I7; 20. (tie) Bngham rwmlr: Westz 1. Wisc0ttritGlauewlle, 7-l; 2. Wisconsin- 2. Rochester Inst. (8-2) ...... 45 18. Pacific (Cdl.) (21-9) ...... 470 Young and Georgetorm. I 16. 22. Duke, 115~,; 23. Northease 1. Amherst. MO. 2 Witliarns, 6+ 3. Oshkorh. 7-0, 3. Stmpson, 5-O; 4. C;ustavu.* 3. Babson (w-1) ...... 40 19. IF Smtir Bath (269)...... 4 I5 Massachusetts, 113’/1: 24. (tie) Mtchtgan am-l Sp+$ield, .%l; 4. Sahson. S-2; 5. Massachusetts Adolphus, .W; 5. Cal Lutheran, 5-l; 6. Wisonsin- 4. Colby (5-l) ...... 33 20. lrmg Brx h SL (2%10) ...... 349 villatlova, 112. Danmouth, 51; 6. Anna Maria, 7-l; 7. Salem Stiltr. Whitewater, 6-l; 7. Nehmsb Wrslcyan, 4-2; 8. St 5. Elmira (7-3) ...... 32 2 1. Loyola Matymount (2G) ...... 272 Dihion II Mcn’m Ba&etbnll Cl; 8. (tic) Bates. 5-I. and Colby, 4-2. Olaf, 6-o. 6. Plattsburgh SL (FX) ...... 25 22 Georgia Tech (m-7) ...... 229 The top 20 NCAA Division I1 men’5 haslutball M I. StJohn Fisher, .5-& 2. Plaushurgh St;ru. Division II Ma’s Ice Hockey 7. Pot&m St (9-3) ...... 20 23 Bngham Young (21-9) ...... 1X2 teams through December 11. with r?~otda in 5-l; 3. Hamilton, 5-l; 4. Buffalo State. 5-I: 5 The top five NCAA Divirion II men’s ice hock- 8. osw.?go SL (R5) ...... IS 24. Northern lowa (29-2) ...... ,125 parentheses and Points: Rahestcr Institute ofTechnology, 40,; h IJtica R ey teams through Dcrtmber 12. mth records in 9. &>wdoin (4-2-l) ...... lO 25. Georgia (21-9) ...... __ ...... 5Y December 25. I995 The NCAA News Pane 17 Rifle l Continued from page 6 be no individual air rifle championship. riots (because there will not be enough teams for the NCAA to A more likely problem is that the field size could be so small sponsor a championship).” for each rifle, an institution that qualifies in both disciplines that some of the nation’s top shooters would be left out That Ideas for change may advance as many as eight individual shooters and as few would have happened had the current system been in place in as four. Usually schools that qualify in both rifles advance five 1990, when the University of South Florida’s Michelle Arata has worked up three potential solutions. or six shooters, which leaves little room for any individuals to Scarborough won the individual smallbore title. Although her One possibility is for the top six teams to be selected based qualify. qualifying score ranked her 16th that year, she would not have on a combined score; then, the next-best smallbore and air rifle Once the teams are selected, the committee lists ~ in qualified. teams not already invited would be selected. The committee descending order - the individual smallbore and air scores, West Virginia University coach Marrha Beasley, whose squad then would alternate between the best air rifle and smallbore respectively, of all shooters who have reported scores. has won five of the last six team championships (but has not individual scores from across the nation until the maximum Qualifying slots remaining after team selection are awarded won an individual dtle since 1993), crunched numbers for the field of 48 is reached. alternately to the highest placing smallbore and air rifle shoot- past seven years and found that only four individuals would Beasley said she would support this change. ers who were not on a team that qualified in the team selection. have qualified in 1990 and 1994 to compete for the air rifle “In five of the past seven years, one or more of the institu- The field for each individual championship is made up of all crown under the cument qualifying system and new cap. tions placing in the top six based on combined qualifying scores the shooters who have an invitation (whether team or individ- “The rifle committee chose to give priority to team rlualifi- did not qualify in both events and therefore could not compete ual), who qualified higher than the first shooter in that event cation, which, in itself, makes sense; however, it seems more for the team title,” Beasley Kdid. “It is more meaningful to win who was not part of a qualifjring team and who did not receive thought should have been given to the ramifications the field- when competing against all of the top competition, and I’d like an individual invitation. If the first non-team qualifier is ranked size reduction will have on the individual championships,“ to see at lezt the top six teams, based on combined scores, com- first, no one would qualify for that individual event. Beasley said. peting for the overall title.” The logic is that someone cannot qualify individually by The negative is that fledgling programs, which often have Modification deemed inappropriate being part of a qualifying team if a better shooter must stay only an air rifle team because it is less expensive, would have home. Skidmore said the committee spent considerable time dis- less of a chance of qwdlifjrhg and therefore might be more like- cussing a number of possible changes in championship struc- ly to drop rifle sponsorship. An example ture, but opted to go through one year of championships under Another possibility is changing the team format from four For example, take two shooters: Davy Crockett from Mummy the current qualifying procedure before making acljustments. shooters per team to three, which would free up more spots for State University and Annie Oakley from DePaul University. “We did not feel that it was our prerogative to change the individuals. Murray State has qualified as an air rifle team, and Crockett structure of the championships at the time,” the rifle chair said. Elvis Green, coach at Murray State, said that he would be shoots on that team, so he will go to the site to compete in the Coach Alan Arata of the U.S. Air Force Academy fears that opposed to such a change because he would “hate to tell a lop team championships. Crockett’s qualifying score for the indiL if no change is made, the sport has a dim future at the colle- notch shooter he (or she) can’t compete in a championship vidual championship in air rifle is 385. giate level. because of that.” DePaul’s air team did not qualify, but Oakley’s individual air “No good shooter will compete for an upandi-oming team, Arata’s third idea is to permit the host team to qualify auto- rifle score is 390, which is ranked first nationally. The maxi- since he or she would have to rely on his or her team to make matically. That would save travel cost and encourage institu- mum field of 48 qualifiers has been filled by team competitors. it to the NCAAs,” he said. “This will drive all quality shooters tions to host, which has been a problem in the past. But some Under the rules, no one ranked under Oakley could compete to the already-established programs, so the haves will keep get- balk at permitting a team to qualify automatically. in the individual air rifle championship ~ even if he or she is ting and the have-riots will never geL Once these championships are over - and some worthy already at the site - because Oakley cannot compete without “It won’t be long before the have-nots will get rid of the sport individual shooters are left out - Skidmore said he expects “a pushing the field size over the cap of 48. Therefore, there would and once rifle drops below 40 teams, all the teams will be have- cascade of suggestions.”

Legislation

~mmitter. General business session; all divisions voting. sions VOtiinK. > Continued from page IO No. 12% Delete the requirement that awards received by student-athletes must No. 131: Indicate that an institution may conduct awards barrqueLr at in dis- credan to commemorate the athletics and/or academic accomplishmcnrr of its serrion. include an appropriate institutional insignia or letter, event specification, orcom- parable identift~tion. Sponsored by the Council, recommended by the Legislative student-athletes and remove the bme limit related u) booster club recognition ban- quets. Sponsored by the Council; recommended by the Legislative Review Deregulation Review Commiaee. General business session; all divisions voting. Committee. General business session; all divisions voting. No. 129: Increase the Association’s awards liitilations for the following. annual No. 126~ Delete legislation related to various athlrtical~ r&red employment No. 132: Incnzase from $10 to $20 the per diem a student-athlete may receive participation awards. special events and bowls, conference and national cham- a&&es, while retaining current rest&ions related to fee-for-lesson instruction for incidental expenses in connecuon with a foreign tout. Sponsored by the pionships, artd orher awards. Sponsored by the Council; recommended by the in D&ion I. Sponsored by the Council; recorruurnded by the L@slative Review Ckmncil: recommended hy the le~slative Review timmicree. Crnera! business Committee. General business sessmn; all divisions voting. Legislative Review Commiaee and Commiaee on Financial Aid and Amateurism. session; all divisions voting. No. 127: Specify that an institution may host and promote an athletics contest General business session; all divisions voting. No. 135: Permit student-athletes in Divisions I and II to use athletics ability to between two professional teams as a fund-raising activity for the instituiiou and No. lw): Specify that an established national award received by a skdent-ath- win a prize as part of a promotional activity withoutjeopardizing their rligibllity that the funds generated may be used in any manner determmed hy the iustitu- lete is not subject to the $SOll value liititation. Sponsored hy the Council; recom- Sponsored by the kuncil; recommended by the Legislative Review Committee. tion. Sponsored by the Council; nxommended by the IagAarive Review mended by tie Legislative Review Cammitier. General business seession; all diti~ Divisions I and II business sessions

WANTED: NCAA Record photos

Please send information regarding personnel moves at your institution to Lisa Stalcup at The NCAA News, 620 I College Boulevard, Overland Park, Kansas 662 I I-2422 (FAX 9 I 3/339-003 I). Individuals submitting information also are invited to provide photographs, preferably black and white.

U The Market

broad spedrum of backgrounds. AD CATEGORIES ISSUE DATES/DEADLINES Readers of The NCAA News are invited to use The Market to locate I candidates for positions open at their institutions, to advertise open Ali Deadlines: AthleticsTrainer dates in their playing schedules or for other purposes relating to the Noon Cenkol rime Athletics Director administration of intercollegiate athletics. In addition, individuals seeking employment in intercollegiate athletics also are welcome to place posi- CIASSIFIEDS Olson College, m liberal SN, college For tions-wanted advertisements. Idaho &ate Univenlty, Dire&x of Athktks. women. Is wcklna ~1Head Arhkuc Trainer for Issue dam badline date Principal administrator for seven men’s and Its five winter/sp& NCAA Division Ill vanity Rates: 65 cents per word for general classified advertising (agate type) Jonuory 8...... December 28 seven women’s s~c~rts which corn~te at the teams. An mterim pasltian from January 16 through May IO to ovctnee .I1 a~- of 0th. and $32 per column inch for display advertising for member institutions. January 15 ...... January 4 NCAA Divlslon I level (Division 1-h in Foot- bell1 and the Bw Skv Conference. The direc- IeUc &inini and pcvlbly teach &te physical (Commercial display advertising is available only to NCAA corporate January 22 ...... January 1 1 tor Aas overall rcsp&ibility for the athI& fa- education course Possibility of full-bmc poni- 11w for 1996-97 academic year. N.A.T.A. CCT- sponsors, official licensees and members. or agencies acting on their January 29 ___.___.__.__._ January 18 cl&s: will prowdc Icsdtiip to ensure a sue- Gication rwurcd clhibk for PA certification. behalf.) Positions-wanted advertisements are placed on a prepayment ccssful stiletic prcharam consistent with the February 5...... January 25 academic goals bndmawn of the institution master’s d&me ‘pr&ed. salary. $6.400. basis only. February 12 ...... February 1 and the wkaes and procedures of the NCAA $8.000. Send resume, two letters of reference. February 19 ...... February 8 and Big bky Confer&e. This posibon reports and names of five references to: Lor! Frey, Word-counting example: “‘&&iQn wanted. RM athletics a&c& to the president of the univenity. Minimums Athleuc Director, Wilson College. 1015 jstrator seeks pa-fime work, Swct: John F?Roe. I234 f’?& a February 26 ...... February 15 Should possess a baccalaureate degree with Philadelphia Avenue. Chambenburg. PA m. KS 99999- 1234. w d 9991555-5555.” (22 words x 65 cents outstandIng leadership sblltty end sound FIs- 71201. mrmative Acbon/Ewal O~portunib’ cal and penonnel management effecbvencss. Employer. = $14.30) DISPIAYS Salary: Commmsurste vim educauon and cx- Head Women’s Athktk Tralncr. Univcrritv of Copy restrictions: Advertisements that indicate a closing date for Issue dab Doodline dare perience. Compudvc benefit package. To ap- the Pacific. Full-bme, 12.month &on January 8...... December 27 ply: submit letter of application. resume. and Partk~pates in the overall administrabon and applications and nominations must list a date that does not precede the d-e names. addresses and telephone numbers manaaemcnt of a Division I-A. 17-sport atf- publication date.The NCAA News reserves the right co refuse adver- January 15 ...... Jonuar y 3 al Five profe&orral reference; to. Ken Prob. letic training program with the head athlctlc tisements that do not comply with this or other restrictions. January 22 ...... January 10 Athkucs Search CommIttee. Human Rervlurce Vainer. and is primary health csre liaison for Office. Campus Box 8107. Idaho State January 29 ...... January 17 w-en athletes. Responsibilities Include de For more information, call The NCAA News at 9 I 3/339- 1906, ext 3000, University, Pocaklla, ID 83209-8107 Search lhvcry of athletic Mlrung services for selected February 5 ...... January 24 will continue until position is fllkd. Review of sports: team travel planning: coordination of or write: The NCAA News, 620 I College Boulevard, Overland Park, February 12 ...... Janaury 3 1 applications upon receipt. Idaho State medical coverage for summer spom camps; Kansas 662 I l-2422, Attention: The Market. To fax an ad, call Univenlty IS en Equal Opportunity/Affirmative instructional respannbilities within the sp-arr% February 19...... February 7 9 I 3/339-003 I. Action Employer actively commn’ted to the medune major, including cllnlcal superviSion February 26 ...... February 14 principles of dwerxity and encourages norniL nations and applications of indwduals horn a See The Market, page 18 * Page 18 The NCAA News December 25, I995

5tete University is seeking applicants wkh et &tion/Equal Opportunity Employer and en- S.M.S.U.. 901 S. Netianal. Springfield. MC is Kensas’ oldest four-year college The uni- directnr. Quallficabans: Undergreduate degree lkaslwo yaws of full-time experience in a&- courages diversity smong iy employees. 65804 Ammauve Action/Equal oppartunlt versity’s women’s soccer pmgram is the two- from an accredited fowycar uuvcnity me,- IkUc media relations to serve es main contect Employer. time Heart of America Athletic Conference &r’s degree preferred; rmn,mum three years’ for valleybell. women’s bssketbell, track and Asslstmd Fontbell Conch Level I: Defensiv chsmpion. Baker is e member of the Nsllanal coaching expcncncc et the four-year level. or neld. Strong msnsgement, writing and corn- Secondary. B.S. or B.A. degree requxe, Association of lnlercollegiale Athletks flvc years et ,he hlgh~rhool vanity level. Send puter skills we required. including erperieme Football Master’s degree preferred. T&e years’ colk (N.A.I.A.). The Univenlly serves 850 full&umc Ietkr of spplrauon. resume. names, addres.m l Continued from page I7 vlth desktop publishing end the &em& giate coaching experience preferred wit students in the College of AM and Sclcncca es and phone numbers of five references by Demansuercd ebllny u) meet daily deedlines kwwledqe of NCM rules and regulation: at it. main campus in Baldwin City, e growing January IO, 1996, to: Armand Dikranian, of graduate and undergraduate swden, ,re,n~ I must Send resume. work samples and rd- As&tent Football Coach (Four PosItIons): Familian~y with I-AA footboll. 0k.C. an community with a populstion of 3.000 locat- Chairperson. Search Comminee. Moore Field ed 45 mllcs southwest of Kansas City and 15 en Requirements Master’s degree, N.A.T.A. crences by January 15 to: l3en Bayle, Spans Tennessee State University ii LI member of&e soulheest eree preferred. Dubes w&II includ House. S.C.S.U.. 120 Wintergreen Avenue. southeast of lnwerlce. Screemng of appllcanu end C.P.R. ccmfice,~on: minimum three years’ Informetlon Director, 144 Bramlage Coliseum. Division I Ohio Vallev Confcrmce. Positions VIII recruitment of qualified student~athkles, or New Haven. CT 06515; 203/392-6009 will begin immediately and continue until the expermce 05 a ccnfkd trsmer m an intend Manhattan, KS 66502. K.S.U. Is an Affirmawe report to and es& the head coach I” all es- field coachmg, ass~stsnce with nonseason p’c S.C.S.U. is an Equal Opportunity/Af6rmativc position is filled. Please send or fax B letter of kgkte athkw prcgram: admvwtrstion, orga- Action/Equal Opporlunily Employer and en- pd% of coaching and admlnlstcrlng the pro- grams. and other duties ss deemed “ecess~r Action Employer end strongly encourages mi- application, resume, and names and addresa~ nimfianol end cammunwbon skills. Previous courages diversity among its employees. gram, including recruiting, team prsct~ces and by tie heed football conch The position els noritiea and women to apply. es of three references to: Don Hank, Athletic experience in college lcschlng and clinical su- other duties es directed by the head coach. mcludes (eachi”g rerponr~b!hber in the dc Asdstmt Mm’s Soccer Coach. North Carolina Director, Baker University, P.0 Box 65. per&ion of sludcnl achleuc V(II~CR desirable High priority will be placed on academic de- partmcnt of phydcal education Salary cw State U”ivrrsity IS weking .s men’s soccer Baldwin City, KS 66006.0065. phone Salary commensure~e wkh expcnence and velopment of student-athletes. Academic I”- mcnsurate w&h expcr~e”cc. M~nor~ues urged I coach. Thus IS a nine~month appointment The 913/594-8074. fax. 913/594-a377 qualifications. Subimt I*Ier of applrstian. R- Sports Medicine strucbon or other responsibilities outside ath apply. AppllcaUons accepted unul January 1( post!on end fob s,a,us VIII be evaluated on a Head Women’s Soccer Coach. Western Micht- sume and three letters of reference 10. Cmdy lews department may be requred, dependent 1336. Send letter, resume and references 11: yearly bass. The ess&s”, coach wll assist the aan Unwcrsltv 1s seeklna an lndivtdual to fill the Spiro, Assistant Athletic Director. Unlvcrs~ly of upon quakficsuons and experience Bachelor’s Mike Hennigan. Tennessee Tech Universit head coach wth ail phases of coaching. I”- Box 5102. Cookevilk. TN 38505 Equ, &~bon of h&d worn& soccer coach. This &ding recruiting. field coachmg. game and Ihe PsclRc. 3601 Pxific Avenue, Stocklo”. CA Sports Medlclne. Pos~tlow 1 proposed .sp. degree requwed. cxperlence I” coaching or .ss Opportunny Employer/Aft?rma,we ActIon. is a full~ome IZ~monlh appoln,ment. Mayor R- event management, scoutmg, team trainmg. 9521 I. Closmg date is January 15. 1996. pointmen,. tenure [rack. 2. Availsble for the a member of the coachmg s,aR of B highly Asslstant Footbell Coach Level II: Offensl sponsibilities include recruiting. providing skill marketng and promobon. and all phases of Untvcrs~ty of the Pacific is an Affirmative Act academic year 1996~97. 3. Salary: Placement competitive and successful faolball program: B S. or B.A. degree required. Master‘s degre and strategy training, developing game slrate- csmp operabon. A bachelor’s degree 1s re- ,lo”/Equal Oyportwty Employer on the salary schedule is dependenl upon ace- strong recruiting skills and s comm&nen, 10 preferred Three years’ collegiate coaching e> goes for varsity athletes. identifying high school qurcd and college r.oachang erpenencr 1s prey drmic prrpamtion and professional expenence. academic excellence BR essential; knowledge and tumor college players. selecting freshmen fend. The salary offered wll be commensw 4. Tearhng load. 12 wmester unit equivakn- of NCM regulabons required. Interested apt penence preferred ~11th knowledge of NCA ;ulcs and regulsrlons Famlharltj wth IDA and ,ransfer srudenrs es scholsrshlp car& rate with qualificabons and experience. full bent cy. 5. Course level. Undergraduate 6 Specific pkcants should send resume and request Env footbell. O.V.C. and southeast wee. Admv dates. 9 wcolleg~ete sport?l. Bschelor’s work collaboratively with n variety of people. strrmgth end conditioning program; recruiting hockey rink, and other duties assigned by U of Dwwon II athletes in an assigned area se- Demonstrated success in recruitment s”d to- recreational opportunities, and B pleasant sol degree and e minimum of three yeen of com- end sthktic training experience in a variety of athletic director. Salary is commensurate wil tal development of stude”t~sUlletes. Know- c1.1 and physrsl ewironment Centrally 10~ Iec,ed by the heed coach: other duties as 8%. experience and qualifications. Women and rr pliance experience et Divlsnn I a,hle,tic pro- sports. Flkng Desdlirw To ensure full consid- ledge of NCAA rules and NCAA cert~ficauon lo cated. Fresno 1s wthln e.ssy driviw distance slgned by rhe head coach Qualifications: nonbes are encouraged to .spply Send Ien< gram. Strong sktlls I” verbal and wnnen corm eratlon. appkcanu we encoureged to have all of San Franc~xo. Los Angel&. Yoser&. Kings municstion. inkrpewmal relations, suprvlslon application informaban an file by February 15. Bachelor’s degree: bsckgrou”d in physical of apphcation. cunerrt vitae s”d three ktte condilioning: prior successful callcge coaching Canvan and Scauo~s National Parks. the end orasmzsbon required. Send letter of opt 1996: position will remsin open until filled. of r&ommend.Uon to. Gabby Llwlls. Assls,e 1,,.te soccer requred. &se submilleller of experience. This will be e I Z-month caachlng~ MO&y Penlnsuld. lake Tahoe. beaches. sell- pllcatl& and resume with references by Appl~cauon~ Correspondence, applications Athletic Director, S.U.N.Y. Osvego. 205 bkt application. resume and references to: Jane cwttr.sct position. Salary will be cormnc”surete ing lakes, and numerous ski resortr. Flllng January 15. 19% ,o. Assocwe Alhlet~c Direc. and conndcnllal papers should be sent to: Hall. Oswego, NY 13126. Review of applia Mdler. Assoc~ale Athletic D,rertor. P.O. Box with er~erimce and credentials. Review of Ed- Deadline. To ensure full cons~dcratxxx appll- to,, Naval Academy Athletr ,Qsoc~s,~on. 566 Joanne W. Schroll. Chas Department of tions will beg{” February I, 19%; however thr 3785. Charlat,esv,lle. VA 22903. DeadlIne. plicsti&s will begin on January 15. 1996. and cants are encouraged 10 subml, all correspcw Brownson Road. Annwolis. MD 21402. or far Physical Education and Human Performsnce. will be accepted until the position is filk January a. 19%. The Unwersily of Vlrgncl 16 continue until the Do&ion is filled. Send letter dence. resume. applicalion and three letters of nformation to 4 10/2&7390 Navel Academy California Sbk University, Fresna, Fresna. CA S.U.N.Y Osweqo IS an Affirmative Action/E en Affkmatlve AannlEqual Oppor,unmy Emu of application, r&me, transcripts and three recommendation. Review of eppkcet~ons wll Athlehc Assonabon 1s an Equal Opportunity 93740~0028: phone: 209/278~2016. fax qual OpportunS Employer. player. klrern of recommendation lcwies accetiblc) begin January 12.19%. and contlnuc un~l pa- Employer 209/278~70 IO As&tent Women’s Soccer Coach. Auburn to. Male” Luke, Chair of Search Come&, sition is filled. John Blucm. Men’s Soccer The Untvcrsitr of Tulsa. Camollance Unlvcrs~ry seeks ssslstant women’s soccer Clarion Univeni~ of PA. T&in Gvmnasum. Coach, Callfornla Stare Unlverslty. Fresno. Coordinator. Inte~colkgiak Athletics. The come coach. Bachelor’s degree requwed. Master’s Clerion, PA 1621h. Clarion h&e&y is butId- 1620 East Bulldog Lane. Fresnc. CA 93740. pbancc coordinator reporu to the athlebc dl~ degree preferrrd. Callcg~ate playlng expnence mg n diverse scademic community and en- Lacmsse 0087: phone 2091278-4226: fax 2091278~ rector and is respansible for the organuatwn preferred end sotnc caschng cxpenence on Aquatics courages mirtorities, women, Vietnam~era vets 6363. Affirmative Acban/Equal Opporlumty and sdministretion of the athletk deD.smenl’s the club. camp or calleglalc levels. Proven ersns and persons with disabilities to apply. Employer. NCAA compliance program. This’indlvidual leadership and organlzatlanal qualities. Must AMrmswc Acbon/Equsl Opportunity Em- Women’s Lacrosrre Cosches: Openings fi AssIstant Women’s Soccer Coech. The wo- will wok cioselv with the offtccs of fmancial aid have knowledge of and be able 10 work effecm Director of Aquetlcs and Pool Mmagcr- ployer. heed coaches ens, at Ule following club p” men’s athletics department at the Untvcrs~ly Harvard Un~versny ~nwtcs spplicstions for the grams. Clrl PolymSan Lus Oblrpo. U.C -SE tively wlthln the rule structure of Auburn of Tennessee. KnoxwIle. ~nnou”ccs Ihe opcnm coechng &offs regarding cerl,ficstion compli- Head Footbell Coech/Klncsiology Lecturer. position of director of aquaucs and pool men- Diego, U.C.L.A.. Unlvcrs~ty of hn Dlcgo. Sail University, the Southces~ern Conference and ing of the position of assistant MCCC~ coach. ance. Specific respansnblkties include cmrdi- Position Full~time eppomrment m the depsrt- ager. Ropwsibillties in&de me”egcmen, and Mary’s College, Unlvcnlty of ,hc Paafic. er the NCM. Must have strong communlcabon Qualifications: Bachelor’s degree required, noting the prDcessi”g dadmnsion application ment of kineslalagy. Head football coach re- coordinstion of both the Melkln and Blodgm Whittier College. Salary varies eccardlng I skills. Available Januery a, 1996. PosItion will msster’r degree preferred. Previous coaching ma(erisls end financial aid forms on behalf of rponsible for the organlrstlan and manage- Pool facllltws including scheduling. malnte~ progrem. Please contad: W.A.L.L. Commi remsin open until suitable candidate is select- and/or playing experience at the Division I kv- stude&athletes: emu+ eligibility of student- mcnt of the football program including budget “ewe. event management. rafetylpradice stoner, P.O. Bon 54 11. Berkeley, CA 9470 ed. Submit spplication letter, resume and three l l. Responslbihbes: Promote academic pm sthletes. momtonng coaching sbff and baa& end schedule mommendatis, V.sveI, precm oversight Will ,eech and oversee classes rang 510/891~%32. letters of mommendatio” to: Barbara Camp, gress of stude”t~sthletes by walking closely er acUvkks LO ensure that NCAA regulations tice, and recruiting. Lecturer In the klmslolo~ ing from Level One to American Natwmsl Red Associste Athletic Director, P.O.B. 35i, wrh rhe offke of academics and student life. arc king met provldlng rules educstion and gy depar+mnmt. Qusliicstionr: Master’s degree Cross l,fegusrd Instructor’s Course and all re Auburn. AL 36831. fax 334/344-4191. Affir- Home game management. conditioning. trw interpretation of NCAA rules and regulations preferred I” k~neslology or e related arem. leted firs, eld end cardio-pulmonary require ITI~UVC Acuon/Equsl Opportunity Employer. el. recrubng. pubkc reletions. and other coach~ for coaching and professlanal stetaR:end work- Successful cxpcrience in teaching. Demon- menu offered et Malkin Athletic Center. Will M,mr,ber end women ere encouraged to ‘pm ing and sd&nistretive duties as assigned by ing with the unlvcnnty commumty wth the ccr- streted abllny to coach I” II highly compelitive Soccer to,,,,nu~ l x,stmg progrems for Harvard corn- PlY the head coach. Mud be committed to cant Ufketian process and requsements Minimum footbell progrsm. Excellent communication mu@ (e.g.. eedy bird swim). Will .sdminls,er Soccer-Women’s Conch. Seeklng appl~ca- duciina the ~romam in accordance w,h Lhe quellficatlons mcludc e bachelor’s degree, at and public relations skills. Salary: Cornmen- and evaluate swim tests Will hire and super- tions for a ~omeris soccer coach ilO-month philosophy dr tiz department of mtercolkg~ete boat one year of experience in caardlnaling surete with qualifications end experience Head Women’s Soccer Coach. B& vise lifeguards and instructor?). Quallficsbons: paslaan) e, Solxhcrn Connecticut state athletics. undersand end adhere to all policies, complian& rquire&ts et e unlvenlly. con- Application procedures: Send leder of sppli- Universitv invites arrdicatiow. for rhe DaR-,iII &lven~ty. (I Dwrwn II institution participating Baccalaureate degree required: et Iess~ three procedures and regulations of the university, fe-ce or the NCAA “elianal office: e (harough cation. resume. names. eddresses and phone position of head women’s saccc; coec’ I” the New England Collegiale Conference. years’ coaching expcrlence wth pool man- numbers of three (3) references speaking to the Southeastern Conference and the NCAA. knowledge of NCAA rules and regulations; and Reswnslb!lnes include dwedinq alI phases Responsibilities. Orgamrlng and managing B agement necessary. must be American Red professionsl end coaching abilities, and un- Salary: Commensurate with experknce. Appk excellent verbal, wrltlcn end interpersonal Lhe ‘program. bu, do not in&e dassmo~ sound student recrunment progrsm: partici- cross Waler Safety Ins-r tramer: strong OT- dergrsduate and graduate tmnxrlpts by skills. This indivlduel must dcmonrtrete cffec- aachnng. Expcnence es B head coach or e pating In fund~relslng: home event manage- ganhational end intcrpnonsl sktlls necessary: Jswsry 19, 19%. to: Chair, Department of tivemss In dcehng wth II vsnety of admink sls~n, coach D preferred The succ&l C~I ment; other dues es assigned by the athlelic ability to communicate &ecttvely with Harvard See The Market, page I9 l tmtlvc levels end drveme groups of people lo) Klnesiology, McPhee ~yslcal Educauon dldalc wll possess excepbonal recruiting skill cawd both mtcmally snd externally to Un ins community and outside groups. Salary will be CerlkT. urlivenity ofwkonsh-Enu Clawe. Eau A lhbersl srts university four&d in 1858. Bsk l tuuon The University of Tulsa is I” E$~al comrneruurete with exprience and qualifica- Claire, WI 54702-4004. Fax 715/836-4074. Employment Opportunity/Affirma6ve Ation tions. This is e l2~month posItlo”. full-time. Ihe Univenky of Wlscons~n~Esu Cls~re is an Employer. To assure Nl ccnslderaoan. sppli& De&line: January 31.1996 Send letter of np- Equal O~por,unlty/Affinnative Action Employ- cations must be received by January 12.1996. plica6on and resume wth three letters of ref- er. To epply. please forward (1 le,ter of application, erence 10: Patnc~s Henry, Senior Associate Coordlnetor. Csreer De”elopmenvAsslsran~ ,cs~,,,c. and Ihe nemcs, sddresses and telem Athktr Dwector. Harvsrd Depsrtment of Athm Football Coach. Salary: $24,4a2 ,o $29.580 phone number of three references to. The kucs. 60 John F Kennedy Streel. Cambridge, D.O.E. for IO-month asslgnmcnc. Bachelor’s ihverrty of Tulsa, Of6ce of Personnel MA 02138 No faxes, please. Harvard is an degree with coursework I” human relsbons. The Princi ia krv,ces. 600 South Colleae Avenue. Tulsa. ~uslOpp.xtun1ty/Af6rmativeAdion Employ- psychology, counseling. cIc.. placement-relat- OK 74104.3189: far 918/6-j~2058. cr. ed experience or tralnlng. Demon&r&d abili- Elsah, Illinois f 2028 ly to coach foolball and effechvely supervise others in an orgmuntton. Ekgtblhty for corw nunny college tesching certificate preferred. Principia College invites Marketing/Promotions Basketball “rpplrauons avsilebk from Arizona Western applications for the fol- :olleae/Perso”nel Df6c.e. P.O. Box 929. Yurna. 42 85366: phone 520&7504. Afflm~eUvc lowing faculty position: 4cbon/Equal Opportunity Employer. Closes. the NCAA. The Unlverslty of T&e. Dwector of Marketing Full~tlmc. IO-month opening .ss head men’s and Pmmobonn, Intercollegiate Athletics. The xskelbell coach. Rerponribilibes include bud- January 22. 19%. 4wistant Footbell Coach. Tri&Stale Un~vers~tv. Head Women’s director of marketing and promofwnr reports geting. schedukng. recruting. other duties as Primary responsibilities include: an N.A.I.A. Division II school. 1s seekIng appi- Soccer Coach to t!w ethle,~c d,rector end is responsible for cog *q&cd. B.A. and cosching experience at :etions for an offensive line coach wrh expe ard,nst,ng msrketing and promotional activl~ ?igh-schaol/colleglate level rquired. collegiate Beginning Fall 1996 rience in the zone blocking schemes and Ihe bes for the department of inlercallegla,e 0th~ uperkrKe p&erred. salary $30.05&$33.@m l Assist in the administration of the NCAA’S domestic and international me-beck set. Applicati must be able u) teach lktics. Specific respbnslb~l~bes ~ncludc coordi- Starting April I, 1996. or Iefer. Send letter of licensing programs and trademark protection for NCAA championships. business, math, English or wrktcn/oral come mung annual csmpaigns to increase seesan spplication, resume, and the nsmes and phone Qualifications: nunicstiona. M.A. in approprla,e scademlc l Manage staff, inventory and catalogs featuring NCAA merchandise for end individual ticket wlcs: es~abllshmg cam- wmbem of three referewes ld. Cisry Frederick. ares required. T&State Univcrslty Is (I prwste. l B.A. required, master’s pus and community ecuwbes designed to en- Director of Athletics, Central Wsshlngtan the gift shop in the NCM Hall of Champions. hance awendsnce and the suppolt of the Independent inslllulian with an enrollment of preferred. 3niversity. Ellensburg, WA 98926-7570. l Assist I, 150 and is recognized es e leader I” cereer~ with special events held by the NCAA Hall of Champions Unwcmity of Tulsa athletic program: soIlclUng jcreenmg begins January 5, 19% AffirmaUve . Coaching experience for xiented educaflan. The unwerrity offers un- l Coordinate activities for participation in bade shows. corporate sponsorships end advertising s&s; \cbon/Equal Oppartunily Emplaycrflllle IX end represe,,t,ng the athletic progrem through- dergraduaa degrees I” the schools of artx t winter/s ring sports I”5~,tlNim. l Act as liaison with official NCAA concessionaire. out the Tulsa wee to enhance community re. sciences. buslners end engineering. Candi- preferre B lauons. Mnmum quslifications include e be& dews should submit n letter of interest, resume &is degree in marketing. busmess or e rc- and three references to: Dale Carlsan. Heed . Phys. Ed./sports This position requires working knowledge of the coueg&c licensing and latcd erce. wo 10 rhree yews experience in Football Coach, TriGtale Univcnty. 300 S. management teaching product market as well as the ability to work with internal and external athletic mahetinq. promotions and edvcmsmg Crew Dariing Street. Angola. IN 46703-1764 Phone: experience preferred. publics. S&S; strong v&i. wnnen end interpersonal - 219/665-4142. ?ri-SWe Unwenty 1s en sk,lls: end strong organizational and admlnls~ Affnrmativc AcUanlEqual Opportumty Em- trabve skills. This m&duel must dcmonsvste Heed Women’s Crew Coach: Kansas Srste ployer. Applications due by Jan- Intrresred candidates should send a letter of application and resume to: cffecUvcncss m deahng w&h B variety of ads Unwen~ty 1s seeking candidates for (I 12~ Asslsbnt Conch: Swxhwest Missouri State mmm~rnhve levels and diverse groups of pew month, f&time position mponsnble for the ore University seeks apphcahom for assistant foot- uary 22,1996. pk localed both mtemally end crtemally to the ganiration and stewardship of the women’s ball coach Position responsible for working ?kmmIc M. Kerley Inswtion The preferred candidate will possess crew pmgram starting July I, 1996. The head wrh wde receivers. Also includes recruilina Human Resources Manager .a master’s degree The Unwemy of Tulsa is B” coech will supervise the lrans~t~on of an entab- snd other assigned duties by the head coach For more information, Equal Employmen, Opportunity/Affirmative lished club-level crew thal Is being elevated 10 S M S U. cormxtes at the NCAA DIVISIONI-AA please contact: NCM A&on Employer. To assure full considera,ion. vardy status. The head coach also IS respond level and is B member of Galeway Conference 6201 cokge ~OUkXird applications must be rcccwed by Jsnuary 12. sibk for ell aspects of the program 10 t”clude Bachelor’s degree and two yew’ coaching ex- Overland Park, KS (621 I-2422 19%. To apply. plesse forward n letter of ‘pm recwtment, scheduling, budgel. equlpmen,. perience at intercollegiale level rqwred: how- Seth C. Johnson phcsbo”. resume. and the names. addresses practice and competllion. Qusllficatlons mm ever. extensive olaver., exwrlerrze at the colle- Director of Athletics and telephorw numbers of three references to: elude e bachelor’s degree, successful expend giate level can be subsbtuted for Vie coaching Review of applications will begin immediately and G+ndidatcs arc The Unlvers~ry of Tulsa, Office of Permnncl ence .ss B collegiate crew coach. stro”g inters expermce. Coaching experience in B” NCAA 800/277-4648 ext. 2855. krvrcr. 600 South College Avenue. Tulsa. encouraged to apply hy January 8, 1996.The starting salary for this posi- pnonsl and organizational skills, the abllt,y to Division I level program preferred. Demon- OK 7410.&3189. fax 918/631-2058 mo,we,e wjividuals and work effectively w&h s!re,ed knowledae of NCM rules and reuula~ Principia welcomes applications from tion is $32,000. dwene constituencies, and e commlLmenl 10 lions gavcrnmg &wtment. eligibility & re Christian Scientists of 111 culture1 and uphold stetsndards end regulatiom of the NCAA. loLed funcuons required. Salary negotiable. racinl bxkgmunds. Sports Information Sub”,,, ,esumc and letters of reference by Pos~uo” 1s open unbl filled. Submit letter of in- The NCAA is an Equal Opportuniry/Affirmative Action Employer and Jenusry 5 10: Mer Urick, Dir&r of Athletics. terest, resur”e. end names, eddresses and cncOUrdgcS women, minorities and disabled persons to apply. Bramlegc Calaeum. 1800 College Avenue, phone numbers of three references by January Adstar& Spats Information Dhctm: Kams MenheMn. KS 66502. K S U is B” Affirmative 5. 1996. 16: Del Miller, Heed Footbell Coach, December 25, I995 Page 19 - The NCAA News

ProfePpiand reference, to’ Sharon King, Head snd playing experience at Dividon I level pr+ snd the name, and addresses of three refer- natch. Accommodations for families and sin- 1997-September 6. 20, 27. 1996- Vollevball Coach. 264 Hickcv Gvm. Univer& irmd. Candidate must panrcss effective con- ence, b Ms. Jackie Myers. Awxiate Director gle, S.al.$rles ne@abfe, -, boerd and haw September 12. 19,26. 1999-September I I. of California. Davis, CA 956~16.- nunication ,kill, with srudenr-athlete. admin- of Women’s Athletics, Geneva College. 3200 ?Iexp ”s” provided. Call 800/544-5448. Staff II, 25. Contact Monte Csrer, 3041876~5263 Heed Women’s Volkytwll Coach. Quahfica~ ~straton. parent, and community. A pa~ltive Colleqe Avenue. &aver Falls. PA 15010. *arch, 3 West Mam Street. Elmsford. NY or 304/876-6393. tin: Bachelor’, degree required: mwter’s pre- pence of humor I, sought. Must be competent Worn& and ethnic mlnatiti~ are encouraged 10523. Footkll ~ Presbywnan (S.C.) College is wek- ferred; knowledge of and ablllty to apply NCAA with Macintosh computer,. This pa,luon dw to apply The mi,sion of Geneva College is to F Continued from page I8 ing home-and-home serie, (NCAA Division II) rules and regulstions. Two (2) year,’ callcgc urg the cwme of university empbyment will be edu& and minister to II diveme community or gusrentee (NCAA Division I-M) for coaching expncnce preferred. Must have rerpowible for the recclpt of. or accountabili- of ,tudents for the purpose of developing per- SeptRnkr 7.1996. and September 6.1997; cation Deadline. January 10.1996. or until po demonrtrated ability in the followlng: coachmg ty for, universe funds or other items of value: vsnt~lesder,. +mrwforming sbclety for tie king- Contact Head Coach John Perry at 600/476- ,ition i, filled. Appointment Dale: January and development of volleyb.sll s~~athletex. and will be mvolved in un,upewi,ed access dom d Chtist. 7272, ext. 6244. recruhlng. tlwal management, vheduling end with the developmentally &sablcd, vulnerable 19%. Application,: Return resume snd three Dlvfrlon I Women’, Soccer. Cempkll Uni- fund-raunq. Responsibilitlcs to include the or- adula or children. Successful epplicent must “mstbug State Udversfly needs foothll (3) recommendation, to: Joan Cronsn. Direc versity need, one Dlvln~on I teen-, to play v1 the gsnusbon;dir&ion and admlnistratlon of a pass (I background investigation. Review d ep- aernes for: September 14. 19%; September br of AthleUcs. Unwcr,lty of Tennessee. 207 4th annual Kickoff Cls&c S@emkr 13-14. Dwlswn I women’s volkyball progmm; to in- Pllcatlans will begln January 1.1996, and con- 13.1997.Scplcmkrl2.1998:Septcmberll, ThompPan~Boling Arena. 1600 Stadium Drive, Graduate Assistant 1996. Field of teams include, Csmpbell, Knoxville, TN 37996-4610. U.T.K. i, en clude coaching. coordination of recruiting the until Alled. Submit I&r d sppliieUon. re- 1999. Please contact Loyal K. Park. Director of Central Flarlda and Hofstra. Please contact E.E.O./A.A.flitle lX/SecUon 504/&D A ~rocezxx monllodna academic pwro%. bud- sume, and the name,. sddres,es and phone UhkUcs. at Ml/6674471 or 4462. Heed Coach Rick Helms, 9 lO/693- 1332. Employer. &t msnagemcn~. piblic releti&. f&d-raising wmhrs of three references to: Selection ulcn’a Ba,ketbau: Urbana Unwen~ty I, ,eek- Assistant Coach. Women’s Sacor. Unwersity and instrudina H.P.E. courz,. Send letter of Cmmittee, Divls& of Human Rcuwca. Mall Graduate A,,f,tantshlp, (2). Edmboro Pootbelf: Wllkc, Unlverslty. PA (Dwsion Ill): “9 one team (N.A.I.A. br NCAA II or Ill). for the of Arizona. Full-time, 12~manlh po,,Uon. application and resume w& name, and phone stop #114. Eastern we&Iii unfvenlty, 526 Unwe&y of Penr+vmia I, weking two con- hw openings in 1997 and 1996. Laoking for +p,iTip-CffT-amentforthe 1996-97 Y,~ Minimum qualiications: Bachelor’, degree re numbers of three reference, to: Mr. Bobbv Flflh Skeet Cheney. WA 99OM-2431. b,tern dIdam for araduate a&stint pa,lUan In atb a i-w-year home and home. Open dotes we: ian. on Novemkr 22 & 23, 19%. in U&ma, quired. ms,ter’s preferred; need lndlwdual, Thompson, Director of Athleuc,. The Unl Wa,hmngton University is governed by the I&C us~ti@ ~hn~ ~&bon~ will b&n in June October 11 and October 25 in 1997, and Ii-l. tunrentee ladglng. banquet. postgame who have soccer coaching experience. versity of Texas at San Antonlo. 6900 N. Lcop Wahlngcan State Law on Gender Equity in of 1996: Dutiuz Graduaa Assiihnts will nuist October ID and OrIokr 24 In 1996. Conted losDitalitv room. dfts. indlvldusl and te--I.., Asastant cosching experience at a Dlvlslon I 1604 west. Se” Antonio, TX 76249.0691. Ap Higher Education and I, committed to affir- the head athletic trainer and associate athletic Add” Melstesta at 7 17163 I -4036. wards. &,o, se&g teams for home and level 1, derrired with demonsbated ability tore dtcabon deadlme is December 29. 1995. The mative action. Women and minorities we en- trainer in -II phases of iiw sports medicine pro- Women’s 6e,ketball: Dnvls & sway @antests for the 1996.97 see-. contact cruit. teach and motivste skilled athletes; thor- Unlvcnl~y of Texas at hn Antonio is an Af6r- couraged to apply. gram at s Division II univenlty. Qualifications: Bachelor’, degree horn an accredited college bb Ransl. Head Men’s Bssketball Coach. at Elkln, College (W.V.) is seeking opponents to augh knowledge of NCAA rules and regulam marive Action/Equal Opportunity Employer. Heed Women’, Vdkybafl Coach. Emory fill the DBE Tip-Off Tournament on November Untverdty. Pc&on Summsry: This position Is or univcrs~ty. fither ~.x,esws N.A.T.A. ccnim 513/484- 1325. tions: administratlve, budgetary and organira- Women and minorities are cncouragcd to ap- 15~16. 1996. Conwx~ Jeff Price. 304/637- , f&time. lo-month appoin!ment in the Rcation or ;, chglble for ,uch. Acce~tence to IUomen’, Be,kctball: The University of tional ability; concern for rhe s~udent~sthlete: PlY 1402. skilled in public relations. Monitor acedcmlc Head Women’s Volkybell Coach. Salary corm Deparbnent of Athletics and Recreation within the graduate school which includes m Miller +lernphla needs a DIVISIONI team to complete Football: St John Fisher College, Diusion Ill. prqlms. a,,& with community involvement. mmsurate with qualificauanr and experience. rhe Divi,ion of Campus Life. The heed coach Analogy Twt or Gmduate Records Exam SC- he Lady Tiger Classic, November 29-30. is seekina opponent, for Swtemkr 26. 1996. Salary is commensurate wth experience and Bachelor’s degree required, masher’s preferred LVIIIplan. orgamze. conduct and ev.luate all a=~ Sbcend. Full tution waiver. In addltlon. first 1996. Banquet and gift,. with B guarantee ne- - qualifications. Appllcauolu wll be reviewed be- m phyricsl education or related field. Five years pects of the women’, volleyball program year, $2,700; second year. $3.200. Summm #iable. Return game negotiable. Contact and Novemkr 16. 1996. and the corresponds tng date, in 1997. Contact Phil Kahlcr. ginning January 19, 1996, and accepted until of experlencc coschmg volleyball in intercol- These responsibilities include, but are not Ihm- (mandatory) and vscstlon breaks will provide 4ngela Scott. 90 l/678-23 15. the pos~tian has been filled. Send letter of “pm legiate athlebcs. The umvcrrlry I, (1 member I& 10: recruitmg. structure of daily practices. sddluonal moneys Applicabon: Send letter, of Dlvf,lan 1 Women’s Volleyball. Northern 7 16/365-6311. pllcauon. resume snd two letters of recorw of the Southland Conference and the NCAA game rcsponrlb!hties. team travel, develop- mtemt. resume end letter, of recommendaoon Arizona University is looking for Iwo teams to Men’, Ba,kctbdl Division I11 - U.W.- mendatian to. lx, Fraur. Head Soccer Coach, Dwsion I Responsibilities: Provide coachma ment of role of a,,,smnt coach(c,) end scout- to: George M. Roberts. A.T.,C.. Head Athletic ill rhe Annual Lumberjack Clwsic, September Whitewater Team needed for Rocky Rococo University of Arizona, McKale Center Room leadcrshlp. organwabon and supervision for ail ing of opponents Budgeting and xhcduhng Tramer, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, I3 & 14, 1996. Guarantees: Two nights lodg- Classic Tournament, Dccembcr 28-29. 19% 31 I, P 0 Box 2 10096. Tucson. AZ 65721~ asp~ts of the women’s volleyball program in. wll be conducted under the direction of the dim McComb Fleldhowe. Edinbara. PA 16444. ng (eight rooms). banquet, tournament T~shlrt Guarantee and lodgmg provided Contact Dave 0096: 602/621~7771 The University 01 cludlng recruiting. compliance with NCAA Icg~ rector of athletics and recreabon The head Tarleton State University. Graduate Assistant. and awards. Also lookIng for two-year home Vender Meulen. 4141472~ I 154 Aiiona 1, an E.E.O./A A./A DA Employer. 1slal1on. scheduling. practice, training and con- coach slso will instruct in the physical cduca- Women’, Besketball Bachelor’s I” P.E or 24 snd home series. Please contact N.A.U. The University of Hawall wornen’s basketball ditioning, scouting. lund~ramng. promobow. tlon program and perbcipate in selected c.wrv undergraduale P.E. hours requwd. Stdrt

Page 20 The NCAA News December 25, I995 n Legislative assistance

or her original institution as a full-time student during the sub- dance with Bylaw 13.4.1, Division I or II institutions may not pro- sequent academic year. vide recruiting materials to a prospect until September 1 at the Further, as set forth in Bylaw 13.1.1.3,if permission is not grant- beginning of the prospect’s junior year in high school. Institutions ed, the second institution is not permitted to encourage the trans.- are permitted to provide only the printed recruiting materials NCAA Bylaw 13. I. I .3 fer, and in Divisions I and II may not provide financial assistance listed in Bylaw 13.4.1 to prospects, coaches of prospects or any Fowlyear college prospects to the student-athlete until the student-athlete has attended the other individuals responsible for teaching or directing an activ- NCXA institutions should note that in accordance with NCAA institution for one academic year. Please note that per Bylaw ity in which the prospect is involved. During its May 25,1995, Bylaw 13.1.1.3, an athletics staff member or other representative 13.1.1.3.1, if the institution denies a student-athlete’s request to telephone conference, the Interpretations Committee deter- of the institution’s athletics interest is not permitted to make con- permit any other institution to contact the student-athlete regard- mined that it is permissible for an institution to provide business tact with a student-athlete of another four-year cotlegate insti- ing transfer, the institution must inform the student-athlete that cards to a prospect as a pemlissible printed recruiting item, sub tution, directly or indirectly, without first obtaining the written he or she, upon request, must be provided a hearing conducted sequent to the beginning of the prospect’sjunior year, provided permission of the first institution’s athletics director (or his or by an institutional entity or committee outside of the athletics the business card is not an item with value in and of itself (e.g., her designated representative) to do so, regardless of who makes department. Finally, during its August 24, 1995, telephone con- magnetic business card). the initial contart. If such pemlission is granted, all applicable ference, the Interpretations Committee determined that when NCAA recruiting rules apply. NCAA regulations require an institution to provide notice of a During its May 25,1995, telephone conference, the NCAA In- hearing opportunity to a student-athlete, such notice must be ThLs material was provided b the lxgirlatiue senti~s staflac an aid terpretations Committee determined that once an institution provided in writing to the student-athlete. to member institutions. Ifan institution has a question or comment grants permission to a student-athlete to contact another four- regarding this column, swzh wrre.s~ shauld bedirected to Nancy year institution regarding a possible transfer, it is not permissi- NCAA Bylaw 13.4. I L. Mitchell, assistant executive director for IPgLclativeservices, at thx ble for the institution to revoke such permission. Such pemlis- Printed Recruiting Materials - Business Cards NCAA national offi. Thtc information tc available on th GGgiate sion expires at the time the student-athlete enrolls again at his NCAA Divisions I and II institutions should note that in accor- .!$m-h Network.

TopVIII Honorees include I 995 NCAA Woman of the Year,football and basketball standouts, and individual-sport champions l Continued from page I He also was a recipient of the Burger King Stu- T he Today’s lop VIII award honors distinguished stu- dent-Athlete of the Week Award earlier this sea- nized at the honors dinner January 7 during son. the NCAA Convention in Dallas. dent-athletes from the preceding calendar year for ath- Myers has compiled a 3.710 grade-point aver- Following are biographical sketches of the letics ability and achievement, academic achievement, age while earning a degree in biological sci- Today’s Top VIII: ences. A member of the College of Natural Sci- character, and leadership.This year’s Today’s Top VIII will ences dean’s list, Myers also is a GTE Academic Caria Ainsworth All-America honoree and a two-time all-WAC Kenyon be recognized during the honors dinner January 7 at scholar. He also is a 1995 recipient of a National Swimming and diving the NCAA Convention in Dallas. Football Foundation and College Hall of Fame Ainsworth’s performance during the 1995 Postgraduate Scholarship. NCAA Division III Women’s Swimming and In addition to serving as team captain, Myers Diving Championships made her Kenyon’s is president of Colorado State’s Student-Athlete most successful female swimmer. She won three Advisory Committee. individual titles and participated on three win- importance of academics and to other offcam- She has served as a motivational speaker at ning relays to lead the Ladies to a 12th con- pus groups abbut life in South Africa. elementary schools, churches, camps and youth Cheril Santini secutive team title, the longest streak in NC* group meetings, delivering positive messages Southern Methodist women’s sports. Aaron G. Graham about succeeding in athletics, school and life. Swimming and diving Named swimmer of the meet for a third time, Nebraska She also has served as a campus Bible study The 1995 Division I women’s diver of the Ainsworth set records in the 50-, lOO- and 200- Football leader and was active in Centtal’s Campus Min- year, Santini is a &v&me NCM one-meter div- yard freestyles and won the latter two races for Graham is the center of a Nebraska offen- istries. ing champion (winning in 1992 and 1995) and the fourth consecutive year. Her time of 23.53 sive line that has helped produce one of the a lo-time diving all-American. She has com- seconds in the 50-yard freestyle surpassed the most prolific offenses in the country. He helped Rebecca Lobo peted in several international events, including previous best set by Kenyon’s Patricia Abt in the Comhuskers to an 11-O regular-season re- Connecticut the 1994 World Championships in Rome - 1985. Ainsworth’s six titles during the 1995 cord and a berth in the 1995 Tostitos Fiesta Basketball where she finished fourth in the one-meter championships gave her 26 career wins, top- Bowl, which will determine a national cham- The 1995 NCAA Woman of the Year, Lobe event - and the 1994 Goodwill Games. ping Abt’s 23 compiled from 1984 through pion. helped lead Connecticut to the 1995 Division I Santini majored in German and chemistry, 1987. A 1994 all-Big Eight Conference selection, Women’s Basketball Championship and was earning a 3.906 grade-point average. A 1!)!)5 Ainsworth compiled a 3.730 grade-point aver- ~rdhalI1 helped the Cornhuskers win wire- the 1995 Women’s Final Four’s Most Outstand- NC&4 Woman of the Year finalist, Santini also age (4.000 scalr) while obtaining a degree in scrvicc national titles last year with a 13-O rem ing Player. is the 1995 (XE Academic All-America at-large animal science, and she graduated magna cum cord. The 1994 Cornhusker offensive line Lobo received many accolades for basket- team member of the year and a recipient of the laudr. She is a two-time GTE Academic All- allowed just four quarterback sacks the entire ball, including the Ban/Naismith Award and NACDA/Disney Scholar-Athlete Postgraduate America honoree and a recipient of a 1995 season. the Wade Trophy, plus player-of-the-year hon- Scholarship award. NCAA Walter Byers Postgraduate Scholarship. In 1995, Graham has averaged more than ors from The Associated Press and the Wo- She has served as president of Southern She also was named Division III athlete of the eight “pancake” blocks per game and has estab- men’s Basketball Coaches Association. She Methodist’s chapter of Amnesty International, year by College Sports magazine. lished himself as one of the top centers in completed her career with Big East Conference receiving the William K McElvancy Fcacc and Cornhusker history. The 1995 Comhuskers led records for career blocked shots (227) and re- Justice Award for her service. She also has Charirine Coetzee the nation in scoring with more than 50 points bounds (714). served as a tutor for Dallas area schools and is Longwood per game and in rushing with nearly 400 yards Lobo majored in political science, earning one of Glamour Magazine’s “Top 10 College Gay per contest. a 3.637 grade-point average. She was one of Women.” Coetzee graduated magna cum laude last Graham has compiled a 3.330 grade-point two recipients of the 1995 GTE Academic All- May with a 3.620 grade-point avenge in histc+ average while earning a degree in animal sci- America Team Member of the Year and was Jenny Thompson t-y. A six-time dean’s list student at Longwood, ence. He is a member of the 1995 College Foot- the first woman to receive the honor. She cur- Styrford Coetzee received the school’s Dan Daniel ball Association’s Good Works Team and is a rently is a member of the USA Basketball Na- Swimming and diving AWAI-~for Scholarship and Citizenship. In 1994, frequent speaker at local youth groups and out- tional Team. The top point scorer in the 1995 Division I she received the C. Gordon Moss Scholarship, reach programs. Lobo has served as a guest speaker at var- Women’s Swimming and Diving Champion- given to the junior history major with the high- ious educational and civic functions and has ships, Thompson won the 50-, lOO- and 200- est grade-point aver-age. Emiiie Hanson volunteered at the Paul Newman Hole in the yard freestyle events and helped Stanford win A participant in the 1995 National Collegiate Centrai (Iowa) Wall Camp for terminally ill children. She its fourth straight team title. Women’s Golf Championships, Coetzee also Basketball also is a two-year participant and honorary She is a 19-time NC&4 champion and a 26 won the National Golf Coaches Association’s Hanson is a two-time Division III scoring lea- cochair of the Susan G. Koman Breast Cancer time all-American. She was narned the 1995 Division II championship for the third con- der, averaging 29.5 points in 1994 and 27.7 Foundation-Connecticut Race for the Cure female athlete of the year by Cottege Sports secutive year. She is a four-time NCZ4 Division points in 1995. She helped lead Central (Iowa) Benefit. rrrdgazinc. 11 ail-Ametican. to the 1993 NCAA Division III Women’s Basket- Thompson ~6 a member of two relay teams Coetzee is a membc-r of the 1995 NGC4 All- ball Championship. Gregory J. Myers that won gold medals at (he 1!)92 Summer Scholar Academic Team and a 1994 Smith- Hanson holds tivc school records, including Colorado State Olympics in Barcelona. She also has earned Corona Scholastic All-America choice. In 1994, most points in a game (45). season (800) and Football medals at the 1987 Pan American Games, the Coetzee was named to (;olf World magazine’s career (2,235). She w;Ls named the 1995 Kaw- A two-time al-American defensive back My- 1989 and 1993 Pan Pacific Games, and the 1991 Women’s Top 50, which honors the Cop colle- lings/‘Women’s Basketball Coaches Association ers this month became the first four-time all- World Championships. giate golfers in the country. Coetzee also was Division III player of the year. Western Athletic Conference selection. He is Thornpson earned a degree in human biol- NCAA Woman of the Year for the state of A 1995 NCAA Woman of the Year finalist, the 1995 winner of the Jim Thorpe Award, g- ogy and compiled a grade-point average of Virginia. Hanson also is a two-time GTE Academic All- ven to the nation’s best defensive back, and was 3.200. She wds the recipient of Stanford’s “Block Captain of Longwood’s College Bowl team, America honoree and a 1995 NCAA postga- a finalist for that award in 1994. S” Award as the most outstanding f’emale ath- Coetzee also was a member of the school’s Stu- duate scholarship recipient. She compiled a Myers has helped Colorado State to an 8-3 lete in her freshman, sophomore and junior dent-Athlete Advisory Committee. She also fre- 3.892 GPA while majoring in English and grad- record in 1995 and the Rams’ second consecu- years, and she shared Stanford’s All-Masters quently speaks at area high schools about the uated summa cum laude last May. tive appearance in the Plymouth Holiday Bowl. Award her senior year. I

...... TheNCAA Register

A Monthly Collection Containing Reports of Interest to the NCAA Membership December 25, 1995 Institutional secondary in+ ractions

In addition to the secondary cases n n n rials u) a prospect before September 1 of her summarized below, a case involving Also, a case involving the University juntor year in high school. Coach was given of North Alabama football and base- the young woman’s name by the admissions the Central Missouri State University department and thought thar Lhe pospect was women’s basketball prog-ram was ball programs was reviewed. Spe- a senior in high school. reviewed. Specifically, the following cifically, the following violation of InstitucionaI action: Reviewed appropriate legislation with assistant coach and coaching violations were self-reported to the NCAA Bylaw 15.5.3.4 was self-report- Infractions cases ...... Page 3 ed to the NCAA. During the academ- staff members. NCAA: (a) On or about August 2, NCAA actiom No funher action. Young 1994, members of the women’s bas- ic years 1989-90 through 1992-93, the Council minutes ...... 6 woman is ineligible unless restored through ketball team coaching staff paid a university exceeded the NCAA finan- NCAA appeals process. n n n $100 housing deposit each for two cial aid team equivalency limits in Presidents Commission minutes ...... 7 How report& Self-repotted prospective student-athletes, and a football (40 awards) and baseball (10 Sport Men’s lacrosse member of the stafFalso paid the $25 awards) primarily by excluding funds Eligibility appeals .._...... 8 Citation: B 13.6.2.9 cost for a parking sticker for one of fmm the equivalency calculations p’~ Factaz Head coach made travel arrange- the young women; (h) on or about vided to student-athletes from the men& for a prospect and his mother for an of- December 16,1994, the then head Supplemental Educational Opportu- ficial visit and arranged to have the institution tions do not occur, and that a public missihle sue. pay for their airline tickets. At the time offidal women’s basketball coach paid the nities Grant (SEW) Program and the announcement of this case should be InstitutionaI action: Covered the logo and visit was scheduled, institutional policy permit- state’s companion program, the Ala- approximate $60 cost for an airline made. will order new ha& with correct size of logo, ted athletics staff members to make travel ticket for a student-athlete to return bama Student Assistance Program and instructed equipment manager to verify arrangemenu for prospects on official visits, to her home; (c) on or about October (State Supplemental Income Grant or n n n logo size on all future uniforms and equip but policy no longer permits this action. ment Prospecr will aaend another institution. 24,1994, then members of the wo- SSIG). The following identifies the Finally, 26 cases were processed regarding a violation of Bylaw 30.1 in NCAA action: No further action. No eligt- Institutiollpl action: Sought repayment for men’s basketball coaching staff ar- excess number of equivalency grant.+ bility consequences. atrline tickets and required head coach to at- ranged for a student-athlete to receive in-aid awarded: which the involved institutions failed tend NCAA compliance workshop. between $300 and $400 for a medical Academic Bz3sehall FcK&alI to submit their enrollment and per- Bylaw 13 NCAA action: Required institution to issue Year letter of reprimand to head coach. procedure; (d) on or about August 26, sistence-rates forms by the prescribed 19w!lO ...... 1.79 deadline (April 1’7, 1995). The in- How reported: Self-reponed n n n 1994, the then assistant basketball How reported: Self-reported 199@91...... 3.11 8.86 volved institutions were admonished Sport Men’s u-a& outdoor coach provided $40 cash to a pros- 1991-92 7.48 12.37 Citation: B 13.02.4.4 and 30.10.7 S~ortz Women’s basketball pective student-athlete to repay a loan 1992-93 _.._.___.._._.______...... 5.56 7.95 to ensure that the form is submitted Facb: Head coach invited prospect for an Citation: B 13.7.1.2.1 at a community college in order for Total 17.94 29.18 on time in the future in order to avoid on-campus unofficial visit during a dead peri- Fa&z Prospect was not provided notification od. Coach thought it was permissible for him of the five-visit limitanon hefore her official vis the young woman to receive her tran- In regard to the case and the uni- action being taken. versity’s responsibility for the viola- to make an unofficial visit. Young man signed it Visit started as uno5cial but became official script from that institution; and (e) in a National Leaer of Intent with another ins& when the institution provided meal tickets to April 1995, the then head women’s tions, it was determined that the case tution. prospect and her father. The young woman basketball coach provided a $140 should be classified as secondary. In Inst&uticmal action: Wtll require prior ag will not aaend the institution. Iatitufiontsl actian: Ceased recruitment of check as an advance on the earnings response to the violations, the insti- p1’0yrl fram COmptiNICe O@Cer for fUNre Offi- tution self-imposed the following cial and uno5ciaI visits: required head coach the young woman, reduced the total number for a student-athlete at the coach’s Bylaw I I to meet twice a month for one year with com- of official visits for the 199596 year by one. is- summer basketball camp during corrective and punitive actions: (1) pliance o5cer to review NCAA rules and reg- sued letters of reprimand to coaching-staff which she would officiate. During 199495 and 1995-96, equiva- HIJW reportedz Self-reponed ulations; and issued letter of reprimand to memhen and required coaches to attend a In response to the violations the lency grants-in-aid were reduced in sporr: Women’s basketball head coach. compliance seminar. football by three and in baseball by Citation: B 11.2.2 NCAA actiom No further action. Young man NCAA action No furtber action. No eligi- institution took the following correc- Factaz Head coach and athletics trainer re- is ineligible un1e.s.vrestored through NCAA ap bility consequences. tive and punitive actions: (1) obtained two; (2) the university reprimanded ceived payment as guest lecturers at outside peals process. n n n the resignation of the head coach and the athletics department; (3) the new evenLs before receiving written approval from n n n How reportedz Self-reponed did not renew the contract of the director of athletics and faculty ath- the institution’s president Coach was not How reported: Self-reported Spore Men’s basketball letics representative were required to aware that he would receive income and train- Sport Baseball Cimtiom B 13.7.1.2.3.2 assistant coach, and (2) required the er was not aware that he needed to get prior t3ation: B 13.1.1.3 Facts: Potential transfer student-athlete attend an NCAA raining session; (4) student-athlete to return the $140 tiaen permission. Fe Assistant coach had in-person contact made an official vtsit before rhe college re- check to the then head coach. In the university appointed a compliance I&tutional action: Senr memorandum to with a student-athlete from anotherinstitution ceived the young man’s banscript from the fir% addition, the institution acknowledged coordinator to oversee compliance each staff member reminding them of the before obtaining written permission from the institution. Student-athlete was en route to the college for his visit when word was received that the three involved student-ath- and education of NCAA rules; and (5) need to get prior approval for all athletically re- first institution. Young man remained at the the institution conducted another lated outside income. first institution. from the second institution that it would not r~ letes were ineligible for intercollegiate NCAA action: No funher action. Institutional action: Placed letter of repri- lease his banscript due to an outstanding bill. competition at Centi Missouri State NCAA self-study. mm= mand in assistant coach’s file. Student-athlete decided to attend another in- University and successfully petitioned After consideration of the univer- How report& Self-reported NCAA action: Required institution to ad- .%ianion. for restoration of one of the young sity’s actions, and based upon prior Sportz Men’s basketball monish coaching staff. Young man is ineligible NCAA actions Cautioned institution to take similar cases, it was determined that Cik~tian: B 11.7.1.1.1.2 unless restored through NC44 appeals pm steps to prevent similar violations. Young man women’s eligibility. Also, the confer- Facts: Restricted-earnings coach recruited cess. is ineligible unless restored through NCAA ap- ence fined the institution $500, de- it was appropriate to require the in- off campus for two days as a replacement n n n peals process. clared the four student-athletes inel- stitution to reduce equivalency grants coach before receiving approval from tie How reporte& Self-reponed n n n igible and required the university to in-aid by the amount equal to the NCAA Council (which ulumately was denied). Sport Men’s basketball How reporte& Self-reponed over~wards. To accomplish that, it was Coach has left instirution for a full-time coach- Cimtiom B 13.4.1 Sport: Women’s tennis withhold the student-athletes from ingjob at another school. Factz Assistant coach directed an adminis Citation: B 13.7.5.7 the first four contests of this season. determined that the university should Iustitational action: Issued leaer to all native assistant to prepare and mail recruiting Facnz During an o5cial visit. a prospecr was In regard to the case, although reduce equivalency grants-in-aid by coaching staff members stating that approval material to numerous prospects before Seg provided a meal at an offtampus faciliry even there was concern expressed regard- no less than 7.2 equivalency grants of NCAA or conference rules will be valid only tember 1 of theirjunior year in high school. though on-campus dining facilities were avail- ing the serious nature of the viola- per year in football and by no less if issued in titing from either the director of Institutional action: Prohibited coaching able. 05&l visit took place at the beginning than 1.8 equivalency grants per year athletics or the associaw director of athletics. staff from mailing any other correspondence of spring break, and when coaches called in- tions, it was determined that the case NCAA vtiac Required institution to reduce to same prospeco until October 15,1995; Sent quiring about hour. they were told the facili- should be classified as secondary. in baseball (20 percent of the maxi- off-campus recruiting by men’s basketball leaer to each young man notifying him of the ties would be closed during spring break Later Although the NW accepted the uni- mum allowable limits) for consecu- coaching staff hy two days. violation; issued letter of admonishment to it was discovered that a facility on campus wu versity’s actions, it was determined that tive years until the amount equivaJent coach and letter of reprimand to adminisua- open. Young woman will not attend the insti- to the overawards (29.18 in football Bylaw II rive assistant; and required both to complete Ntion. it was appropriate to require the insti- one hour of recruiting rules education. Institutional action: Reviewed appropriate tution to reduce the grant-in-aid and 17.94 in baseball) has been satis- How report& Self-reponed NCAA action: No further action. No eligi- legislation with coaching ti members. equivalency limit in women’s basket- fied. The institution was advised that !Sport Men’s soccer bility consequences. NCAA aaiom No further action. Young wo- ball by one (from 10 to nine) for the it is the NCAA’s position that the uni- Citation: B 12.5.4-e) n n n man is ineligible t.nless restored through 1996-i-97 academic year and limit the versity should not reduce the aid of Facts Team’s rain-gearjacket carried a logo How reported: Conference NCAA appeals process. that exceeded the permissible size. Head coach Sportz Women’s basketball n n n number of official visits to four (one any current student-athlete, but rather did not think that legislation applied to rain Cikdom B 13.4.1 How report& Conference less than the university’s five-year preclude the institution from award- gear. Factaz Recruiting letfen were sent 10 nine Spa* Women’s golf average). In addition, the institution ing aid available as the result of gnd- Instiutticmal action: Will replace rain gear prospects before September 1 of their junior Cimticm B 13.7.5.7 was required to submit a written uating student-athletes. (It should be before 199697 season. year in high school. Leaen were correctly dat- Fncts: Head coach provided a meal for a NCAA action: Alerted institution that it may ed September 1, but were mailed early by mis- prospect during an official visit at an off-cam- noted that the institution’s self- report that outlines its established pro- wear its current uniforms (even though they take. pus facility even though dining facilities were cedures for self-reporting violations imposed reduction of grants-in-aid are not in compliance) until new ones are or- Institutional action: Precluded recruiting in available on campus. (including the manner in which during the 199495 and 1995-96 aca- dered. assuming the tin gear was purchased any manner for two months, sent a follow-up Institutional ~&on: Reprimanded coach coaching staff members are educat- demic years will be applied toward the before April 1994, when an article appeared in letter to each young woman explaining the vi- and required her to attend a rules meeting re- olation and reviewed appropriate legislation viewing applicable legislation, and conference ed about the self-reporting process), total reduction required by the the NCAA legislative assistance column re- garding logos on uniforms. Any item pur- with all coaching staff members. precluded recruitment of the young woman. as well as the institution’s compliance NCXA.) chased subsequent to April 1994 must be in NCM a&on: No further action. No ehgi- NCAA actiam No further action. Young wm and education programs for athletics In addition, it was determined that compliance. No eltgttultty consequences. bility consequences. man is ineligible unless restored through department staff members regarding the institution should submit a writ- n n n n n n NCAA appeals process. NCAA legislation. Finally, it also was ten report that outlines the results of How reported: NCAA inquiry How reported: Self-reported n n n Sport: Baseball Sportz Field hockey determined that a public announce- a review of its current financial aid Chation: B 12.5.w) Cimhon: B 13.4.1 ment of this case should be made. program to ensure that future viola- Factaz Logo on team’s hats exceeded the per- Factz Assistant coach sent recruiting mate- See Institutional, page 2 l Page 2 The NCAA Register December 25, I995 Institutional secondaw infractions

P Continued from page I process was unaware of the time frame. Sport: Men’s golf to the insdNtiOn’S alhletics department and are Insdtudonal action: Reviewed applicable Citation: B 17.8.4.1 no longer available to staff members to dis- How repoti Conference legislation with administxative assistant Facts Team participated in 26 scheduled uibute. Sport Men’s tennis NCllA acdon: No further action. dates of competition during its permissible NCAA action: No further action. No eligi- Umdon: B 13.11.7 and 13.11.7.5 playing season. Cbach entered the junior var- hility consequences. he& lnstiartion released informadon to a Bylaw I6 sity team in two of the varsity’s scheduled Bylaw I7 local newspaper announcing the verixil com- dates, and did not believe they would count How reported: Conference against the overall. mitment of a prospect before the young man How reported: NCAA inquiry How reported: Conference Sportz Adminisuative signed a National Letter of Intern The young Sport: Men’s baskethall Institutional action: Reduced its total nom- Sport: Football Citation: B 13.4.1-(f) brr of dates of competition for 1995-96 to 23. man will aaend another institution. Citadon: B 16.02.3 and 16.12.2.3-(a) Citation: B 17.7.2.3. I Facts: Institution published both an all- Insdh~donal action: Issued letter of repri- Faetsz Assistant coach loaned $5 to a rtu- NCAA action: Admonished institution to Faetx Team participated in contact activities sports program arid a media guide for the ensure that rule interpretations are obtained mand to head coach, and required him to at- dent-athlete. Money was repaid by the young before completing the three-day nonconmct 1994-95 academic year. No prospect received tend the conference orientation seminar and man and coach is no longer at the instihnion before acting in order to avoid future viola- conditioning period. &aching staff counted Ihe publications. sign the conference code of ethics. NCAA aedon: No further action. Young tions. Sunday as one of the three days of condition- Institadonal aedon: Ceased publication of NCAA mien: No further action. Young man man is ineligible unless restored through n n n ing activities. Institution is in process of filling its program. is ineligible unless restored through NCAA ap NCAA appeals process. How reported: Self-reponed recently vacated position of compliance coor- NCAA action: No further action. No eligi- peals process. n n n Sport Men’s soccer dinator. bility consequences. n mm How reported: Self-reported Citadon: B 17.14.2.1-(a) Insdtutional actions Will require new corn- n n n How reported: Conference Sport: Men’s basketball Facts Team staned practice three days be- pliance coordinator to review all playing- and How retort& Self-reported Sport: Adminisoative Citation: B 16.1.4.1.2 fore allowable starting date. practice-season forms before start of each sea- Sport: Men’s basketball Citatiom B 13.16.1.5.1 Facts: Four senior student-athletes received Insdtudonal action: Suspended pracocc son, and reviewed appropriate legislation with Cimtion: B 13.7.1 2.1 and 13.7.1.2.9 Faetx Graduate assistant sent 20 pairs of old annual participation war& that exceeded the time for three days and canceled a scheduled coaching staff members. Faetw Head coach provided an official visit ankle braces to a high-school athletics trainer $200 limit for each award. Booster club made scrimmage; instructed head coach to return NCAA action: Required institution to ad- to a prospect before sendrng written notifica- who was a friend. partial payment for the awards. and staff mem- from vacation and outside camp activities by monish head coach for his actions inasmuch tion of the five-tint limttation to the young man Institutional action: Retrieved the ankle ber assigned as booster club liaison failed to August 1 and placed let&r of reprimand in his as Bylaw 17.7.2.3.1 clearly states that Sunday and before receiving the prospect’s test scores. braces from the high school. provide a purchase order for approval in ad- personnel file; required coaching staff mem- may not be counted toward fulfillment of the NCAA aelion: Required institution to issue NCAA aedon: No funher action. No eligi- vance of payment for the awards. Staff liaison bers to attend four compliance education three-day conditioning practice requirement. a written reprimand to brad coach and review bility consequences. has since left the university. seminars during the 1995-96 academic year; Bylaw 13.7. Young man is ineligible unless re- Institutional action: Instituted a new proce- and reviewed applicable legislation with stored through NCAA appeals process. Bylaw I4 dure for ordering and purchasing all awards, coaching staff members. reviewed appropriate legislation with coach- NW aedon: No funher action. Bylaw I4 How reported: Self-reported ing staff members, and requested reimbune- Sport: Women’s golf ment from student-athletes. How reported: Self-reported Utadon: B 14.1.6.1 NCAA a&m No futther action. Constitution 3 Sport: Women’s softball Faetw Student-athlete practiced with the n n n Cikuion: B 14.1.2.1, 14.3.1 and 14.3.5.1.2 team on three occasions while not enrolled in How reported: Self-reported How reported: Self-reponed FELIX Head coach allowed a student-athlete a full-time program of studies. Young woman Sport: Field hockey Sport: Men’s track, outdoor to practice and compete in six contests before was unable to preregister for her fall classes. Citation: B 16.8.1.2.1 Citadon: C 3.2.4.5-(l) being certified by the NCAA Initial-Ehgibility and consequently enrolled in one three-hour Factsz Team depaned for a contest 52 hours Bylaw I I Facts !&dent-athlete traveled with the team Clearinghouse. Both the coach and the young course and attended the other courses. After before the start of actual competition. and competed even though the young man woman were aware that she was not ceni6ed receiving permission to enroll in the other NCAAaeticux Required institwion tb review How reported: Self-reported had not signed the scudenl-athlete statement. Student-athlete has left the university. courses, student-athlete did not realize she had applicable legislation with coaching staff Sport Football Young man was certified for two additional Insdtudonal actions Forfeited all games that to confirm the courses. Registrar’s office dis- members and to submit a written report that Citations B 11.7.1.1.1.3 sports. the young woman participated in while ineli- covered the violation while certifying the team indicates the steps taken to ensure that a sim Fach An outside consultant brought in to Insti~ticausl aedon: Will take steps to ensure gible; instructed coach to submit a squad list for competition on another date. ilar tiolation does not occur. work with special teams coach also interacted that multispon athletes are properly certified. and line-up card before each contest; reviewed Inedtuticmal acfion: Withheld student-ath- n n n with two football student-athletes. NCAA action: No further action. No eligi- appropriate legislation with coaching-staff lete from three days of practice. How reported: Self-reported Institutional action: Vernally reprimanded bility consequences. members: and instructed roach to monitor NC4Aaetiom Required institution to submit Sporb: Women’s soccer and men’s swim- head and assistant coaches, and required both the initial certification and continuing el- a written report that outlines procedures by ming coaching staff to review internal procedures Constltutlon 6 igibility of his players. which coaches will know which ntudent-ath- Cimtioo: B 16.12.2.3 and attend rules seminar. NCAA acdom Required institution to with- letea are eligible for practice and the sratun of Factrr: One head coach loaned money to NCAA tiedore No further action. How reportd Self-reponed hold coach from one contest each student-athlete’s enrollment in classes. each of her ntident-athletes to buy dinner for wum Sport: Administrative HBW one nighC and another head coach lent $120 How reported: Conference Urndon: C 6.2.3.2 Bylaw I5 How reported: Self-reported to a student-athlete before the young man had Sport: Football Facb: Institution failed to complete its ti- Sport: Baseball completed his camp employment Fit head C&ion: B 11.7.2.1 nancial audit within prescribed three-year pe- How rcpmtd Self-reponed Cimtiom B 14.2 coach did not realize that on-campus dining F~~IBZ During a contest, smngih coach sig- riod. Sport: Women’s volleyball Faetx Transfer student-athlete competed in facilities were closed, and because she was naled play assignments to the defense from the Lvltihrtiorml action: Has since conducted Citation: B 15.3.3.1 and 15.3.4.3 five seasons of competition. Young man had new to the university, did not follow proper sidelines. Coaching staff checked with its com- audir Faetsz Student-athlete was awarded renewal petitioned for a medical waiver for his fresh- procedures to receive institutional per diem pliance coordinator before allowing coach u) NCAA action: Admonished university to of her original financial aid for a period in ex- man year at his previous college, and also pm for the young women. The second student- signal plays. make every effort to ensure that future audirc cess of one year and the contmuaoon ot her fi- vided false information. athlete left the university early and will not be Institutional action: Prohibited his atten- are conducted within the prescribed time pe nancial aid was condidoned on athletically re- Institutional action: Forfeited 11 contests in returning for the 1995% academic year. dance during the next home conference game riod. lated activities. which the young man participated and will re- Institudonal aetion: Reprimanded both and issued leaer of reprimand to compliance Instih~tional action: Amended financial aid view procedures to prevent a similar occur- coaches; required the young women to repay officer. Bylaw I I letter to be in compliance. rence. cost of dinners; billed the young man for the NCAA action: No further action. NCAA action: No further action. No eli@ NCAA aedon: No further action. $120; and reviewed appropriate legislation How report& Conference hiliry consequences. mm= with coaching staff members. .+r~% Women’s softball and baseball How repoti Self-reported NCAA action: No further action. Young Bylaw I3 Citation: B 11.5.1.1 Bylaw I6 Sport: Men’s track, outdoor man and women are ineligible unless restored Faetaz Head and assistant coach each at- Cimtion: B 14X2.4 through NCAA appeals process. How reported: Conference tended a tournament in which prospects were How re~ortedz NC%4 inquiry Facts Nonqualifier panicipated in team Sporti Football participating before passing their coaches cer- Sport Men’s basketball practices and weight-lifting sessions. The Bylaw I7 Cimtion: B 13.1.1.1 tification test. Both coaches since have been Citndoa: B 16.12.2.1 young man has transferred to another insti- Fact% Assistant coach contacted a prospect certified. Faemz President of the institution arranged tution. How rePorte& Conference by telephone on two occasions during his ju- Institudod action: Restricted both coach- for the university to provide airline tt-an~potta- Imtitndonal action: Not requesting restora- Sport! Women’s basketball nior year in high school. Calling list was sup es from off-campus recruiting for seven days. tion, lodging and meals to the the mother and tion of student-athlete’s eligibility. Citation: B 17.1.5.2.1 posed to be senior prospecrs only. NCAA aedon: No funher action. sister of an international student-athlete in or- NCAA action: No funher action. Young Factx Outside the regular playing season. Insdtudond aetiom Checked computerized der for them to attend the young man’s gradu- man is ineligible unless restored through head coach conducted skill instruction while calling list to all questionnaires to verify pros Bylaw I3 alion. NCAA appeals process. the remainder of the team played in a half- pects’ year in high school. Institutional action: University thought it n Drn court pick-up game at the same facility. NCAA don: Admonished institution to How reported: Self-reported could provide transportation, lodgiog and How reported: Self-reported Inatimdonal action: Wtthheld coach from make every effort to ascenain a prospect’s year Sport: Football meals since the student-athlete’s ehgtbthty had Sport: Men’s golf one team practice before first scheduled game. in high school before making a contact. citation: B 13.1.1.1 expired. Citation: B 14.10.2 and 30.12-(d) NCllA action: Required institution to con- mum Facts Assistant coach contacted the parents NCAAactiax Admonished mstmmon to en- Faetaz Student-athlete participated even duct a rules-review sewon with the coaching How reported: NCAA inquiry of four prospects by telephone before first per- sure that all involved institutional and coach- though his name was omitted from squad lisr staft Sport: Football missible time. ing staff members have a clear undentanding Young man had signed appropriate paper- n rnrn Cimtion: B 13.11.1 Inslitu&nal action Sent letters to the par- of the application of NCAA legislation, and en- work and had been ceded as academically How repoti NCAA inquiry Faclz Offensive coordinator made public entr of the four prospect5 explaining the vib couraged institution to Lot-&act its conference eligible. Omission was an oversight by former Sportz Women’s basketball comments regarding a prospect’s athletics lation. regatding the availability of a special-assistance compliance staff. citation: B 17.32 abilities before the young man signed a NCAA- No funher action. Young men fund for student-athletes W&I special financial Insdtodooal a&on: Squad lists will be veri- Fsutaz Student-athletes were required to par- National Letter of Intent are ineligible unless restored through NCAA needs. fied by compliance officer. ticipate in practice activities other than condii NC4A action: Required institution to review appeals process. NCAA aedom: No fmther action. No eligi- tioning before Ocmber 15. applicable legislation with coaching staff and n mw Bylaw I7 bility consequences. Insdtudod action: Did not renew head other athletics staff members in order to avoid How reported: Self-reponed n BD coach’s cormact for 199!%96, and new compli- similar violations. Young man is ineligible un- Spotiz Men’s tennis How reportnl: Self-reported How reported: Self-reported ance officer till conduct weekly NCAA rules- less restored through NCAA appeals process. Cita~ B 13.1.1.3 Sport Men’s basketball sport: Women’s hack, outdoor education workshops for all coaching and ath- Faetw Head coach had telephone contact Uta&m B 17.3.6-(d) Ubsdon: B 14.10.2 and 30.12-(d) letics staff members. with a prospect from another member insliht Facts Team members participated in a Faas Student-aLhlete competed even though NW action: Cautioned institution that Bylaw I4 tion before receiving winen permission from wheelchair game against an established wheel- her name was not on the squad list Ovenight any future similar violaiionn will result in prac- the Or&id institution. Young man will remain chair team before the start of the season. was due to a clerical ermr; the young woman tice reductions. How report& Self-reported at Otigind institution. Imdtudod action: Reviewed appropriate was otherwise eligible. n n n Sport: Football NCAA a&m Required institution to issue legislation wirh members of the team’s coach- . . e a&om Added student-athlete’s How reported: Self-reported Ciratiom B 14.1.6.1 a letter of reprimand to head coach. Young ing staE name to list Sport Men’s basketball Faetaz Student-athlete practiced one day with man is ineligible unless restored through NCAA aedom No further action. NCAA action: No further action. No eligi- Cimdon: B 17.3.2.1.2+) the team before he o5cially was admitted to NCAA appeals process. bility consequences. Foctrr: Coaches observed student-athletes in the institution. Director of admissions failed to n Irn a pick-up game before first permissible pre- communicate that the young man would be How repoti Self-reported Bylaw I5 se-n practice date. admitted after his financial holds were cleared Sportz Women’s volleyball Institutional aetiom Precluded coaches Athletics depamnent withdrew the student-ath- Urndon: B 13.4.1 How rqnwrted: Conference from first two permissible preseason practices, lete from the team, but subsequently, the young Facts: Associate director of athletics gave sport: Administrative and placed a letter in each coach’s personnel man was admitted and reported to practice. three posters to an assistant coach of a high Constitution 6 Umdon: B 1535.1 file that outlines the infraction and institu- Institutionnl Iction: Will continue to moni- school. None of the posteterowere displayed in Faetaz fro student-athletes did not receive tion’s response. tor closely the admissions status of all incom- the high school or given to any prospects, and How reported: NCAA inquiry (two cases) notice of the renewal of their financial aid by NCAA action: No further action. ing student-athletes. no prospects from the high school were being x July 1. New administrative assistant responsi- n n n NCAA action: No further action. No eligi- recruited. blc for coordinating the renewal notification How reported: Conference bility consequences. Insdtndod action: Posters were returned See Institutional, page 3 * December 25, I995 The NCAA Register Page 3 Institutional secondary infractions l Continued from page 2 Bylaw I I legislation with coaching staff members, and ment carried logos that are impermissible. Sport: Men’s basketball will conduct a special rules review during the InstitutianaI action: WiII replace uniform Citation: B 13.1.1.3 Sport: Adminisuative How reported: Self-reponed summer before the smrt of preseason camp and equipment at next regular rotation of Fach: Head coach had recruiting conrxt citation: c 6.3.1 Sport: Men’s soccer for fall sports. purchae. with a student-athlete from another instiul- Facts: Institution failed 10 complete a self- Citation: B 11.6.3 NCAA action: No further action. NCAA action: Requested that institution tion before receiving written permission study within the prescribed five-year period. Facts: Gnduace assistant coach attended a forward to NCAA ofiirr rhe date that it antic- from rhe original institution. Institution completed IWO self-studies within scrimmage at another institution in which the ipates replacmg the uniforms and equipment Instih~tionaI action: Held rules-review set- a six-ycar period. host team’s opponent was a member of the Bylaw I2 No eligibility consequences. sion regarding recruiting with the involved same conference and an opponenr of rhe coach. NCAA action: Admonished institution to coach’s ~nstinrtion. Coach attended the scrim- How reported: Self-reponed NCAA actions Required institution to rep take every precaution 10 ensure thar future magc- to watch two recruited prospects from Sport: Women’s soccer Bylaw I3 rimand head coach. Young man is ineligibh. self-studies are completed withm the pre- the host tram. Citation: B 12.5.4-(b) unless restored through NC%A appeal? scribed five-year period. InstitutionaI action: Reviewed appropriate Facts: Part of team’s uniform and equip How reported: Self-reponed process. Infractions case appeal: University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa

ILViola~ionr of NCAA Iegislation A summary of this me wa.sjn&tthed fractions: ment staff to the Committee on Infractions due process clauses of Ihe Fifth and Four- as determined by the a. The third year of probation; January 17 and March 20, 1995, did not in- teenth Amendments 10 lhe U.S. ConstiNtion, in the llember II issueof Th,eNCAA Committw on Infkctions NtWS. b. Prohibition from participating in post- clude an allegation of an unethical-conduct there was agreement by all panics present ar season competition in football during the violation. To the conuary, the institution and the Infractions Appeals Committee’s hearing I. lntmduction Violations found by the Committee on ln- 199.5-96 academic year. and the enforcement staff reported that the evi- that the enforcement program, as a matter of fractions were summarized by the commitfee c. Reduction in the number of initial fi- dence did not support a conclusion that the policy, should provide those protections that On January 17.1995, following a lengthy as follows: nancial aid awards in football by nine during actions of university officials were willful or generally are necessary 10 fairness. That pot- investigation, the Universiry of Alabama. 1. A football student-athlete obtained the 1997-98 academic year. intentionat. The revised official inquiry that icy is reflected in Consti~tion 2.7.2 and By- Tuscaloosa, and the NCAA enforcement six impermissible deferred-payment loans, to- was sent by the enforcement staff April 28, laws 19 and 32. Notice and an opportunity 10 staff jointly submitted to the NCAA Corn taling $24.400, that were based on his future v. Appellate pmcadums 1995. set forth allegations that essentially were defend are especially important in cases in- miltee on Infractions a summary-disposition earnings as a professional athlete. These the findings set fond in the amended sum- volving a possible violation of Bylaw 10 (eth- report under the provisions of NCAA Bylaw loans were facilitated by representatives of the In considering the appeals of the inStiN- mary-disposition report submitted March 20, ical conduct). A finding that an individual’s 32.6. That repon contained a description of insutution’s athletics interests. The inSLiNtiOn tion and the former faculty athletics repre- 1995. That revised o5cial inquiry, which was action or inaction consiiitutes unethical con- two violations in the institution’s football failed to obtain the required documentation sentative, the Infractions Appeals Committee the basis for the Committee on Infractions duct under Bylaw 10.1 is. in and of iuelf, a se- program rhat rhe institution and enforce- for the student-athlete’s purchase of disabili- reviewed the notices of appeal: the nanscript hearing June 3, 1995, did not allege an ethi- vere sanction. If an individual is to be found ment staff agreed had occurred, rhe correc- ty insurance. These records would have re- of the isstitution’s June 3. 1995, hearing be- caltonduct violation. At no point during that in violation of Bylaw 10.1, he or she must first tive actions taken by the university, and the vealed the existence of at Ieat one impermis- fore the Committee on Infractions; respons- hearing were the parties specifically advised be given notice of the specific charge and an penalties self-imposed and proposed by the sible loan. es submitted by the institution and the former chat a possible unethical-conduct violation by opportunity to appear and answer that charge institution. 2. The institution lacked institutional conuol faculty athletics representative; the Commit- the former faculty athletics representative or by the production of evidence. The various communications from the Committee on ln- On February 20, 1995, the Committee on m the review, investigation and communica- tee on Infractions’ response in the form-of an any other individual was at issue. The first un- tion of information concerning the amateur expanded report; rebuttals submitted by the equivocal statement that this case included fractions to the in&ution and 10 the former Infractions notified the institution and the stams of a second football student-athlete. By institution and the former faculty athletics such a violation was made by the Committee faculty athletics representative in this case did enforcement staff that it was unable 10 ac- failing to obtain essential information, cor- representative; and two amicus filings. The on Infractions in its August 2, 1995, lnfrac- not include armal notice of a specific Bylaw cept the findinlp in the summary-disposition roborate it and share it with one another. the hearing on the appeal was held by the ln- tions Repon 10.1-(d) charge. The references by the Corn- report. The committee directed the institu- head football coach. director of athletics. dim fractions Appeals Committee November 16, The Committee on Infractions assened mittee on Infractions to Bylaws 19.5.3 and cion and the enforcement staff to reconsid- rector of complianre and faculty arhletics rep 1995. in Atlanta. The president president’s that it had provided notice thar this case could 32.7.5.6 and the obligation of instirucional staff er the information provided to the commic- resenutive permitted the student-athlete 10 executive assistant (who also serves as the in- result in an unethicalxonduct finding. It members to be knowledgeable about NC%4 tee to determine the nature of individual rem participate in 11 regular-season football games terim faculty athletics representative), interim pointed to several communications in which legislation, including rhose bylaws, did not sponsibiliry as a factor in the institution’s when hr was ineligible. director of athletics, university general coun- it advised the parties that it was concerned remedy that absence of actual notice of a spe- failure 10 properly mvestigate and report sig- 3. The institution’s faculty athletics repre- sel and independent legal counsel appeared about individual responsibility for the vi+ cific charge. nificant violations of NCAA legislation. sentative violated NCAA standards of ethical on behalf of the institution. The former fac- lations agreed upon in the summarydisposi- The findings by the Infractions Appeals On March 20, 1995, the institution and conduct by providing false and misleading in- ulty athletics representative appeared through tion reports, that the committee’s authority ID Committee regarding the effect and applira- enforcement staff submitted an amended formarion to the NCAA eligibility appeals staff legal counsel and was available upon call by 6nd violations of NCAA rules is not limited tion of Bylaws 19.5.3 and 32.7.5.6 are limited summary-disposition report identifying the the Infractions Appeals Committee. The chair LO allegations in an official inquiry, and that to the facts of this case. In other situations rhat individual responsibilities of the head foot- of the Committee on Infractions, another the committee is empowered under Bylaws do not involve a failed summary-disposition ef- ball coach, the director of athletics, the dim by the Commlttw on Infractions member of that committee and the adminis- 19.5.3 (new findings) and 32.7.5.6 (scope of in- fan and a subsequent finding of a Bylaw lO.l- rector of compliance and the faculty athlet- nator for the committee appeared on behalf quiry) to find violations resulting from infor- (d) violation, these “new findings” bylaws will its representative for the athletics certifica- Prior to the hearing before the Committee of the Committee on Infractions. mation developed or discussed during a hear- be applied as wriaen. (ion failures. These four individuals signed on Infractions, the institution took several The chair of the Infractions Appeals &m- ing, particularly those that relate to compli- For the reasons staled. tie Infractions and submitted sumnlary-disposition agree- steps 10 ruengthen its administrative policies mirtee recused himself from this matter after ance with the principles of ethical conduct Appeals Commmee concludes that in the ment forms indicating their agreement with and procedures. The institution reduced by the notices of appeal were filed because he is and institutional control. The Cornminer on present case, a procedural error (i.e., lack of the violations. four the total number of permissible financial being represented in an unrelated personal le- Infractions also noted that member insti- adequate notice) affected the reliabiliry of tie On April 24, 1995, the Committee on ln- aid awards in football during tie 1995-96 aca- gal mamer by a member of the same law firm tutions and their officers and employees are information that was used to suppon the find- fractions notified the institution, the four in- demic year, i%srred a written letter of admon- with which the institution’s independent legal charged with knowledge of NCAA regula- ing that the institution’s faculty athletics rep dividuals and the enforcement staff that it iahrnenc to the head football coach and writ- counsel is associated. The chair took no part tions, including those cited. resetnative violated NCAA standards of ethi- had again rejected the findings in the amend- ten letters of reprimand to the former direc- in the consider&on or decision of the ap Counsel for Ihe institution and the former cal conduct by providing false and misleading ed summary-disposition repon and had de tor of athletics and the former facuhy athlrt- peals. In his absence, the hearing before rhe faculty athletics representative questioned the information to the NCAA eligibiliry appeals termined that Ihe case should be submitted its representative, and disassociated two rep Infractions Appeals Committee m chaired by adequacy of the notice relied on by the Com- SK& For that reason, it hereby vacates that under the official inquiry and hearing pro- resentatives of the institution’s athletics inter- another member of the committee. mit-tee on Infractions. They noted that a rep- finding. cedures as set forth in Bylaws 32.5 and 32.7. ests. The chreccor of compliance previously In the course of the hearing before the resentative of the institution and a represen- Havingvacated the finding, the Infractions Accordingly, on April 28, 1995. the enforce- had retired. Infractions Appeals Committee, questions native of the enforcement staff made a rpecif- Appeals Commiaee does not find it necessary ment staff sent a revised official inquiry Lo the In addition to the disassociation of Ihe two and concerns were voiced about the summa- ic inquiry to the chair of the Committee on to decide the questions of whether the facts institution, Ihe head football coach, the ch- represrntativer of the institution’s athletics in- ry-disposition process and its application in Infractions as to rhe basis for the committee’s found by the Committee on Infractions con- rector of athletics, the director of compliance terests, penalties adopted by tie Committee this instance. That subject will be addressed February 20.1995, rejection of the mmal sum- stituted a knowing violation of NCAA rules and the faculty athletics representative. The on Infractions were summarized a follows: in Section No. VI-C of this report marydisposition report and were told that the and whether the commiuee’s finding clearly allegations essentially were the findings ac- ! Public reprimand and censure; Afier the hearing, the parties and all staff “letter was self-explanatory.” That response was conttary to the evidence presented to it knowledged by the institution and involved 2. Three yeam of probation; were excused. The Infractions Appeals Com- was not inappropriate. As discussed in !ieccion B. AppeaI OfPenalties In the summary-dis- individuals in the amended summarydisposi- 3. Prohibition from participating in post- mittee then deliberated and reached its deci- No. VIC of this repon. rhe Committee on In- position reporrs submitted by the institution tion repon submitted March 20, 1995. season competition in football during the sion. fractions is an adjudicatory body. It is not an and the enforcement staff to rhe Committee On May 15, 1995, the instimtion submit- 1995-96 academic year; investigative or charging body; however, iu on Infractions, the institution admitted the ted iu response to the amended official in- 4. Reduction by four in the total number of VI. lnfiactions Appeals Cammittaa~ response in this instance to the request for two violations chat ultimately were found by quiry. On June 3, 1995, representatives of permissible financial aid awards in football resolution of issuuo nisad on appad clarification, though not inappropriate, was the Committee on Infractions and not ag the mstitution and the enforcement staff ap during each of the 1995-96 and 199697 acad- not su5cient to give adequate notice of a po.+ pealed by the institution. In those summary- disposition reporu the institution also pro- peared at a hearing before the Committee emic years. (The institution had self-imposed A. Appeal of Finding. Although phrased sible ethical-conduct violation. Counsel for on Infractions. The head football coach, the this reduction for the 1995-96 academic year.); somewhat differently, the institution and rhe the institution and the former faculty athlel- posed, as appropriate penalties for those director of athletics, the director of compli- 5. Reduction in the number of initial fi- former faculty athletics representative urged its representative emphasized that the com- violations, the following sanctions: public rep ance and the faculty athletics representative nancial aid awards in football by 13 during the the Infractions Appeals Committee to set munications from the Committee on lnfrac- rimand and censure; probation for one year; report to the Commiaee on Infractions before were included among the insutution’s rep 199697 academic year, and by nine during aside the unethical-conduct finding on each tions referred to in the preceding paragraph of the three grounds specified in Bylaw also encouraged parties to limit their presen- the end of rhe probationary period: disassb resentatives. the 1997-98 academic year; 32.10.2. tations to the allegations in the official in- ciation of specified representatives of the in- On August 2, 1995, the Committee on 6. FolfeiNre of 1 I regular-season football games in which an ineligible snrdent-athlete 1. That a procedural error tiected the re- quiry. In this case, as previously noted. the stitution’s athletics interests; written admon- Infractions issued Infractions Report No. participated during the 199594 academic year liability of the information that was used to o5cial inquiry did not include an unethical- ishmenu to the head football coach, the di- 120, in which the committee found three vi- 7. Requirement that Lhe inSdNtion contin- support the finding; specifically. Ihar no no- conduct allegation. Also. the Committee on rector of athletics and the faculty athletics rep- olations of NCAA legislation in Alabama’s ue to develop a comprehensive athletics corn- tice was given that Bylaw 10.1-(d) (unethical Infractions’ prehearing expression of con- resentative; and a limitation of 81 total foot- football program. On the basis of these find- pliance education program, with annual rem conduct) was at issue and, as a result, there cern regarding individual responsibility re- ball grant.Gn-aid during the 1995-96 acade- ings, the Committee on Infractions deter- ports to the committee during the period of was no oppormniry to present a defense 10 ferred to four individuals, with no indication mic year. That proposal was part of the sum- mined that this was a major infractions case probation; such a charge. that the former faculty athletics representative mary-disposition reports rhat were rejected by and imposed penalties accordingly. [Rem 8. Requirement that the institution send 2. That the facts found by the Commiaee on might be singled out as the subject of an un- the Committee on Infractions, which direct- ference: August 30, 1995, edition of The four individuals to an NCAA rules seminar Infractions did not constitute a violation of the ethical-conduct finding. ed that the case be submitted under the 05~ N(IAA Register, page 8.1 each year of the probation; and Association’s rules; specifically, that the com- The NCAA is required by Cbwi~rion 2.7.2 cial inquiry and hearing procedures of Bylaws After the Committee on Infractions issued 9. Recertification of current athletics poli- miaee’s finding did not state that the former to provide “fair procedures in the considera- 32.5 and 32.7. ES infractions report. the instituuon and its cies and practices. faculty athletics representative acted “know- tion of an identified or alleged failure in com- Following the hearing before the Com- former faculty athletics representative filed ingly” and, absent such a finding, there was no pliance.” Numerous provisions in Bylaw 19 mittee on l&actions, the comminee imposed separate timely notices of appeal August 17. Iv. Issues mid on appeal violation of Bylaw 10.1-(d). (enforcement) and in Bylaw 32 (enforcement penalties that were more severe in several rem 1995. The institution and the former facul- 3. That the finding clearly was conhary to policies and procedures) emphasize the im- spe~ts than those proposed early by the insti- ry athletics represemanve submitted addi- 1 Both the institution and the former fat- the evidence presented to the committee. portance of notice. Bylaw 19.5.1 specifically tution, as follows: tional information in support of their ap- uhy athletics representative appealed the find- The Infractions Appeals Commiccee first requires Ihat: 1. Three years probation rather than one; peals to the Infractions Appeals Committee ing that the leuer fo the eligibility staff re- considered the assertion chat a procedural er- “A member under investigation for major 2. Limitation of 81 on the total number of September 20, 1995. The Commmee on quesung restoration of a football student-ath ror - lack of notice ~ affected the reliabil- violations shall be given the following: financial aid awards in football for two years Infractions submitted its response in the lete’s eligibility “violated NCAA standards of ity of rhe information that was used to support “(a) Notice of any specific charges agamst (1995-96 and 199697) rather than one year form of an expanded infractions report ethical conduct by providing false and mip Ihe finding. It is agreed thar the former fat- it and the facts upon which such charges are (199596); October 20, 1995. The institution and rhe leading information to the NCAA eligibility ulty athletics representative never was for- based. and 3. A reduction in the number of initial fi- former faculty athletics representative filed appeals staft” mally charged wirh a possible violation of By- “(b) An opponuniry to appear...to answer nancial aid awards in football as follows: rebuttals to the Committee on Infractions’ 2. The institution appealed the following law 10.1-(d). The summary-disposition reporfs such charges by the production of evidence.” response November 6, 1995. penalties imposed by the Committee on ln- submiued by the institution and the enforce- Although the NCAA is not bound by the See Infractions. page 4 l The NCAA Register December 25, I995 Infractions case appeal: University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa

b Continued from page 3 evolving into a major infractions case. In the Infractions. Those penalties included proba- “(3) The violation(s) reflect a lack of institu- 32.7. judgment of the committee. thii “distressing tionary periods that exceeded the hvo-year pm tional control.” Bylaw 32.6.1.4 reflects the basic policy of the a. 19Y6-97 - a reduction of 13 awards; and failure” -nted the sanctions impost-d hationary period specified in Bylaw 19.621 a Any one of these factors would be adequate NCAA enforcement process that the authority b. 1997-98 - a reduction of nine awards. The Committee on Infractions also argued one of the presumptive penalties for a major to warrant a one-year prohibition on poruea- to investigate and prosecute and the authority 4. Forfeiture of all 199SY4 foothall contests that the penalties should stand even if the 6nd- violation. Considering this case in the conten son competition. In this case. all three factors to adjudicate should not he vested in the same in which an ineligible student-athlete panici- ing of unethical conduct on the part of the for- of those earlier decisions, the commiaee notes were presenr entity. Thus, the enforcement staff is autho- pated. mer faculty athletics representative is eve- that those cases involved numerous or repeat- Except as otherwise provided in this report rized to investigate and charge and the The institution appealed the penalties im- rmrned on appeal. The committee stated in its ed violations, active participation of head the penalties imposed by the Committee on Committee on Inftactions is authorized to ad- posed by the Commi&ee on I&actions on the response to the appeals that: coaches or other stafTmembers in those viola- Infractions remain in full force and eff&ct judicate. In the summary-disposition process, ground that they are excessive and inapprc+ “[Tlhose penalties were imposed in direct tions, violations that were flagrant and delib- C. .Sum~-~W Roeess. As indi- the enforcement staff investigates in a coop. priate based on all the evidence and circum response to the lackof institutional conuol and erate and violations of recruiting rules that cated in Section No. Vof this report, questions erative endeavor with the institution and in- stances. However, as previously noted, the in- the competitive advantage described in were mtended to protide the institution a com- and concerns regarding the summatydisposi- volved individuals in an effoon to develop a re- stitution limited its appeal to the following Finding 11-B.” petitive advantage. The failure of institutional tion process, and its application in this case, port that sets forth an agreed-upon statement penalties: The institution acknowledged that this cam control in this case, while serious, did not pre- were voiced during the hearing before the of finding. If the Committee on Infractions 1. The third year of probation; involved a serious breakdown in institutional sent those elements. Also, the institution in this Infractions Appeals Commit&e. Most of those decides that it cannot accept those findings, it 2. Prohibition from participation in postsea- control hut pointed to the conclusion reached case took appropriate corm&e acrion and cb questions and concerns involved the role and cannot direct the enforcement staff to make Y)I-I competition in football during the 199596 jointly by the institution and the enforcement operated fully in the investigation, as seen in function of the enforcement staff and the different or additional findings nor can it academic year; and staff that the evidence did not support a con- ih, effoarts to resolve the case through the sum- Commiaee on Infractions. The Infractions usurp the enforcement staffs authority and 3. Reduction in the number of initial finar~ cl-ion that the mistakes were willful or inten- marydisposition process. Appeals Cmmmiaee’s response to those ques- make different or additional findine on ia dal aid awards in football by nine during the tional, or that they represented a systemic ab. After weighing all of these considerations, tions and concerns, while not necessary to iu own motion. Under Bylaw 32.6.1.4. it can rec- 1997~Y8 academic year. sence of institutional control. In the view of the the Infractions Appeals Commiaee concludes disposition of this appeal. is intended to clari- ommend that the enforcement staff and the in- The institution and the Committee on In- institution, the sanctions imposed by the that the thiid year of probation (1997-98) and fy the issues that might otherwise discourage stitution reconsider the agreed-upon statement fractions were in agreement “that the NCAA Commiaee on Infractions would be appro- the reduction in the number of initial financial continued use of the summarydisposition of findings or it can direct that the case be pre- membership approved the current penalty priate in a case involving willful violations or aid awards in football by nine during the aca- process by member institutions. sented under the official inquiry and heating stmcture, including the presumptive penalties, malfeasance, but not in a case such as this in- demic year (1997-98) are excessive and inap- Bylaw 32.6 (summary disposition and expe procedures. to provide the committee greater flexibility in volving negligence or nonfeasance. propriate. It, therefore. sets aide the third year dited hearing) was adopted by the NCAA mem- In the present case, the regulations were not imposing penalties for each infractions case.” In determining whether the specific penal- of probation and the 1997X% limitation on ini- bemhip to provide an alternative procedure for administered so as to provide the institution In this case, the committee applied some, but ties imposed in a case are “excessive or inag tial financial aid awards. treating major violations that would eliminate and the former faculty athleucs representative not all. of the presumptive penalties. The ins& pmpriate.” the Infractions Appeals Committee The Infractions Appeals Committee also the need for a full hearing before the with the notice of the ethicaltonduct violation tution and the Committee on Intiactions were must consider factors such as the namre, num- concludes that the third penalty appealed by Committee on Infections. Since the summa- required by other NCAA policies and legida- not in agreement regarding the severity of the ber and seriousness of the violations; the con- the institution ~ prohibition from participa- ry-disposition process was adopted, 45 percent tion. Nonetheless, m the judgment of the penalties imposed by the committee. duct and motives of the individuals involved in tion in potirason competition in foothall dur- of all major inftztions cases have been re- Infractions Appeals Committee, the summary The Committee on Infractions described this the violations; corrective action taken by the iri- ing the lYYW6 academic year - is neither ex- solved as summa@isposition cases. IJnder disposition and expedited-hearing process prD- case as “extremely unique” hecause the admit- stitution; propottionality of the penalty or cessive nor inappropriate. Bylaw 19.6.2.1-(1) Bylaw 32.6.1.4, the Committee on Infractions, tided by Bylaw 32.6 provides a beneficial al- ted lark of institutional control resulted from penalties imposed; inbtitutional cooperation in provides that one of the presumptive penaltie, in each summarydisposition case, must decide ternative to the official inquiry and hearing failures on the pan of the head foothall coach, the investigation; the impart of penalties on in- for a major violation shall be: whether to approve the findings developed in procedures. Such a process is consistent with the director of athletics, rhe compliance officer nocent student-athletes and coaches; and the “Sanctions precluding portseason competi- thr course of an investigation conductedjoint- the NCAA policy of separating prosccutorial and the faculty athletics representative. It char- purposes of the NC& enforcement pro@-am. tion in the sport, particularly in those cases m ly by the institution and the enforcement staff. and adjudicative powrrb in the NC&4 en- actrrirrd the case ils one that “demonsuates the In irr earlier decrsions, such as those involv- whi&: ‘This case was the first case in which the corn- forcemrnr process. has worked well. and its conbequefices of a distressing failure of insti- ing appeals from rhe Unive&y of New Mexico “(I) Involved individuals remain active in miaee did not accept the findings in the sum- use, when appropriate m trmlrr C~\WS.1% en- tutional control,” noting that “had the institw and the University of Mississippi, this commit- the program; marydisposition repon and directed that the coumged. uon acted proactively. the violations rniKht have tee considered those factors and upheld severe “(2) A signiticant competitive advantage re- case be presented under the official inquuy NCAA INFRACI’IONS been resolved in a timely manner” nther than penalties imposed by the Committee on suln from the violauon(s); or and hearing procedures of Bylaws 32.5 and AWEALS COMMI-ITEE

Infractions case: University of Mami (Florida)

A summa? of this use a#wred in the informed the NCAA enforcement staff that indicating its belief that the alleged violations ploymerit arranged by hvo former student- n Receniiication of current athletics poli- December1 I issueof TheNCAA News. the university had discovered that an athletics were “major in nature.” On August 18. the athletes. cies and practices. depanment staE member had assisted stu- university submitted a final repon on the Pell n During the 1986 through 1992 football W Show-cause requirement regarding the I. Introduction dent-athletes to obtain Pell Grant funds ftaud- Grant matter. The staff continued to conduct seasons. numerous football student-athletes former athletics department srafl member for ulently, possibly in violation of NCAA legisla- interviews through October 1995. received cash awards for their performances seven years. This case invblved the football. baseball, tion. At approximately the same time, the uni- On October 23, 1995. university represen- in regular-season and postseason games. women’s golf and men’s tennis programs at versity was in contact with appropriate feder- tatives met with the enforcement staff at the n During the 1993-94 and 1994-95 acade- II. Finding of violations the University of Miami (Florida) and con- al agencies, which immediately began an in- NCAA national o5ce to review memoran- mic yearn, the institution’s athletics depart- of NCAA I~girlation cerned violations of NCAA bylaws governing vestigation and requested that the university dums of interviews conducted by the staff. At ment failed to follow the institution’s drug- extra benefits. financial aid, amateurism, in- cease its investigation until informed other- that time the staff shared with university rep- testing policy and permiued three football stu- A Excessive J.inanciaI aid awarded throu$ stitutional drug policy. ethical conduct and in- wise. The federal investigation lasted for three resentatives the contents of the letter of 05~ dent-athletes to compete without being sub deulation of off-pus room and board stitutional control. years and involved interviews with more than cial inquiry. which was to be forwarded to the ject to the required disciplinary measures stipends. [NCAA Bylawa 15.01.7, 15.02.4.1, The Miami (Florida) is a Division IA instim 100 university student-athletes, coaches and university’s president October 25. Also on that specified in the policy. 15.1, 15.2.2.1, 15.5.f.l.1, 15.5.3.1.2 and tution and a member of the Big East Con- administrators. During the fall of 1992, ap day, the enforcement staff sent a letter to the n The assistant director for aLademiLs in 15.5.s.q ference. The university has an enrollment of proximately 60 student-athletes entered the athletics department staff member in care of athletics support services involved in this case During the 1990-91 through 199394 acad- approximately 8.300 undergraduate students government’s pretrial-diversion program to his attorney, notifying him of the allegations violated NCAA standards of ethical conduct emic years, the institution improperly calcu- and sponsors seven men’s and six women’s avoid criminal prosecution as a result of im- in which he was named. n There was a lack of appropriate in&u- lated off-campus room and board stipends for intercollegiate nponc. properly obtaining Pell Grant funds. In the On October 27, 1995, the university sub- tional control and monitoring of the athlet- 141 foothall student-athletes and an undeter- The case revealed significant failures in fall of 1993, the athletics depanment staff mitted its response to the o5cial inquiry. In ics program. mined number of baseball. women’s gnlf and oversight in a variety of areas within the in- member pled guilty to obtaining approxi- a November 1 letter to the NCAA assistant ex- men’s tennis student-athletes. As a result, the stitution’s athletics department. Lack of man- mately $220,000 in Pell Grant funds through ecu&e director for entorcement and e&ibil- c summary of the penaltie. institution awarded a total during those years itoring and inadequate procedures to ensure fraud, false statement and forgery from June ity appeals, the attorney for the staff member In imposing the following penalties, the of $412,348.43 in excess financial aid. (After compliance with NCXA legislation contrib- 1989 through June 1991. After receiving prr- indicated that the staff member had nothing Committee on Infractions considered the cor- the hearing. on November 21.1995, the insti- uted to many of the violations, which pre- mission from the federal prosecutors to pro- further to add to the information previously rective actions taken by the university, as de- tution submitted information indicating that dominantly involved excessive financial aid ceed, the university continued its investigation provided in his two interviews with NCAA tailed in Part 111-A of this report these overpayments may have rtarted as ear- or extra benefits that were provided to nu- of the Pell Grant fraud. On June 16.1994, the staff and university representatives. although 1. The committee adopted am its own the ly as 1986.) mrrous student-athletes in several sports, par- university submitted a preliminary report to he “takes issue with the allegauons” in the in- tollowtng penalties self-imposed by the ins& 1. From the 1990-91 academic year through ticularly football. In some cases the violations the NCAA concerning the fraud. quiry and believes the information to be in- tution: the 1993 fall semester, a total of 141 foothall occurred over several years without institu- Before submitting its preliminary report on consistent with his recollection of the even& W Reduction hy seven in the number of student-athletes who lived off-campus re- tional athletics personnel either detecting the Pell Grant fraud, the university had contact- described in his interviews. permissible initial financial ard awards in ceived $223.705.04 in excessive institutional violations or taking action that would have ed the enforcement staff May 20, 1994, re- On November 2, 1995. the enforcement football during the 199996 academic year. financial aid as a result of the institution’s mi.+ prevented them from continuing. garding several allegations of NW rules vi- slaff held a prehearing conference at the na- n Reduction by five in the number of total calculaoon of the offtampus room and board A9 a result of the violations, more than olations primanly involving “pay-for-play” is- lional office with university representatives. financial aid awards in football for the 1995- stipend. The institution included the cost of $223,000 in impermissible financial aid was sues, which were reported in a Miami news- On November lO,lYY5, representatives of the 96 academic year. the uaining-table meal plan in the offaampus distributed among 141 football student-athletes paper. The univenity indicated that it planned enforcement staff, the institution and the Big 2. The committee imposed the following room and board stipend even though the from the academic years I%91 through IYYP to investigate and would submit a complete re- East Conference appeared at a hearing be- additional penalties: training-table meal plan was not listed as an 94 and approximately $188,000 in excess of port to the staff after its investigation. On April fore the NCAA Committee on Infractions. W Public reprimand and ~ensore. o5cial allowance for hoard in the institution’s permissible limits was awarded in three other 12, 1995, the university submitted a report on I Three years of probation. catalog and was not open and available to all sponr because an improper method was used the “pay-for-play” issues, involving perfor- B. Summary of the 6ndingp of violations. W Prohibition from paniclpating m post- students. The cost of the university’s 20-meal in calculating off-campus room and board mance awards from pools of cash contributed The violations found by the committee may season romp&ion in football following the plan (ranging from $2,140 to $2,585 annual- &pen&. Additionally, extra benefirr totaling by football student-athletes and, in at least one be summarized as follows: 1995 season. ly over the four-year period) should have more than $212,000 were received by football instance, a former student-athlete. The uni- n During the 1990-91 through 1993-94 aca- n Reduction in the number of permissible been used in determining the value of the student-athletes in the 1989-90 and 1990-91 versity filed an additional report April 21 con- demic years, the institution awarded more initial financial aid awards in football as fol- proper off-campus room and hoard stipend academic years. Had these and other violations cerning violations of scholarship limitations, than $412.000 in excessive financial aid as a lows: instead of the higher cost of the training-table involving impermissible employment cash which had been repotted in October 1993 and result of improperly calculating off-campus - reduction of 13 initial scholarships dur- meal plan (ranging from $5,313 to $5.X06 an- awards and institutional drug policy been ret- March 1994. room and hoard stipends for 141 foothall stu- ing the 199&97 academic year. nually over the four-year period). ognized and addressed in a timely manner, Also during April 1995, media reporw al- dent-athletes and an undetermined number ~ reduction of 11 initial scholarships dur- As a result of the miscalculation of the NCAA legislation governing student-athlete el- leged that a potential NFL draftee and uni- of baseball. women’s golf and men’s tennis ing the 1997-98 academic year. off-campus room and board stipend. the in- igibility could have been appropriately ap versiry football student-athlete had failed nev- student-athletes. n Reduction hy five in the number of per- stitution exceeded individual scholarship plied. era1 drug tests at the university. The universi- I From the 1989 fall semester through the missible total financial aid awards in foothall amounts as follows: The majority of the violations were discov- ty immediately conducted a thorough exami- 1993 fall semester, the institution awarded ex- during each of the 199697 and 1997-98 aca- Average ered by the institution and reported to the nation of its drug-testing program and submit- cessive financial aid to student-athletes by per- demic years. EXCesS NCAA enforcement staff. Remaining viola- ted a report to the enforcement staffJuly 28. mitting them to receive an average of $110 in n Reduction by 6.12 equivalency financial Am- Football Total Fmpncinl tions were reported initially by the news me- In May 1995. the enforcement staff began impermissible books each semester. aid awards in baseball over a three-year peri- demic Student- Fi!masa Aid dia. The institution’s cooperation and active to conduct independent and joint interviews n During the 1989-90 and 1990-91 acade- od. Year Athletes role during the investigation resulted in its with the institution, primarily with individu- mic years, an athletics depanment staff mem- n Reduction by 1.98 equivalency financial 1990-91 31 $60.060~ $1~~: agreement with the enforcement staff as to als knowledgeable about student-athletes al- her provided exaa benefits to approximately aid awards in men’s tennis over a three-year 1991-92 45 $86,523.64 $1,922.75 material facts. and the institution admitted a legedly receiving “pay for play,” the universi- 60 to 77 student-athletes by assisting them in period. 1992-93 51 $75.512.93 $1,480.64 majority of the violations. Most of the matters ‘y’s drug-testing program and student-athletes fraudulently obtaining a total of $212.969 in n Reduction by 1.06 equivalency financial 1993-94 1 $ 1.607.79 $ 114.84 in dispute at the hearing before the commit- receiving Pell Grant funds to which they were Pell Grant funds. aid awards in women’s golf over a three-year The individual amounts varied as a result tee were confined to interpretation and ap not entitled. On July 20. the enforcement staff n During the 1985-89 through 1991-92 aca- period. of the difierent number of meals relrivrd on plication of NCAA legislation. sent a letter of preliminary inquity to the uni- demic years, numerous football student-ath- W Requirement that the institution develop Lhe traming table. versity outlining the scope of the staffs inves- letes received financial aid in excess of a full a comprehensive athletics compliance edu- A Or ~WOUOI~. tigation. acknowledging the reports of possi- athletics scholarship when they were com- cation program, with annual reports to the OnJune 13.1991, university representatives ble violations provided by the university and pensated during the academic year for em- committee dunng the period of probation. See Infractions, page 5 l December 25, I995 The NCAA Register Page 5 Infractions case: University of Miami (Florida)

l Continued from page 4 for academics, 55 were members of the foot- and food vouchers for the three-day evem mic year but was not suspended from one ing list of persons who have assisted their rem ball team. The other shrdent-athletes partici- competition in the fall of 1994 as required un- spective programs to assure that the institu- 2. From the 1990-91 academic year through pated in baskethall, swimming, golf, baseball, E cash award.9 for atble(io participation. der the drug policy. tion can provide them with NCAA legislation. the 1993-94 academic year, the institution ex- track, tennis and crew. The average of Pell [Bylaws 12.1.1, lt.l.2aml 16.1.5.1] 5. Placed all responsibility with the compli- ceeded the NG4A equivalency scholarship Grant funds fraudulently received by the 77 During each of the football seasons from G. Unethical conducta [Bylaws 10.01.1 and ance office for purchasing books for student- hmirs in baseball, women’s golf and men’s student-athletes was approximately $1.970. 1986 through 1992, football student-athletes 10.1-(c)] athletes and tutors and instituted an issuance tennis as a result of using an improper off- Because the majority of the Involved shrdent- contributed approximately $5 to $20 to a pool During the 198WO through 1991-92 acad- and retrieval policy for all student-athletes. campus room and board figure when calru- athletes received full athletics scholarships. of money that was collected by a defensive emic years, the assistant director for acade- 6. Indicated it will issue a letter of reprim lating the number of equivalency scholar- they were able to spend the money on items player for the puvse of providing cash to a mics in athletics suppon services acted con- mand to the assistant athletics director for ships awarded. As a result of rhe miscalcula- unrelated to then educational expenses. No selected student-athlete who made the best trary to the principles of ethical conduct and academic support and student services rem tions, the institution awarded excessive fi- studrnt~athlete received an amount that ex- defensive tackle during the course of a game. did not on all occasions depon himself in ac- garding providing student-athletes with only nancial aid totaling $123,783.79 tn baseball, ceeded NCAA financial aid limits for student- As a result of this cash being collected and dis- cordance with the generally recognized stan- course-related books. $39,320.26 in men’s tennis and $25.539.34 in athletes entitled to receive Pell Cram funds. tributed for this purpose. numerous football dards normally associated with the conduct 7. Revamped its Pell Grant application as- women’s golf. The institution used the cost of The assistance of a staff member, however, in student-athletes received between $20 and and administration of intercollegiate athlet- sistance in the athletics depattment and in the the training-table meal plan (ranging from fraudulently obtaining the Pell Grant funds, $200 for their performance in regular-season ics. His involvement in the activities set forth office of financial assistance services, includ- $5,133 to $5.X06 annually over the four-year which most of the student-athletes were not and postseason football games. in Finding II-C of this report demonstrated a ing instituting new checks and balances and period) in the off-campus room and board fig- entitled to receive, violares NCL4A em-bet-- At least one former football student-athlete knowing effon to provide student-athletes monitoring systems beyond federal regula- ure for its athletics scholarship calculauons in efits legislation. contributed cash to this pool of money. Dur- with extra benefits by creating and organizing tions. these three programs, even though that plan The assistant director for academics orga- ing the 1991 football season, a professional a fraudulent system over a two-year period 8. Developed and adopted a new drug-test- was not listed as an official allowance for nized the submission of Pell Grant documenrs f’ootball player and former student-athlete that allowed the student-athletes to receive ing policy drafted by nationally recognized board in the institution’s official catalog. containing deliberate misrepresentations, contributed $50 when he visited the locker federally funded financial aid for which they expew. Other equivalency sports at the university cor- omissions, forgeries and false statementi. His room as the pool was being collected before did not qualify. 9. Assigned a high-level task force to review rectly used the 20-meal rate plan (ranging assistance was not limited to the student-ath- a football game. the administrative structure within rhe z&let- from $2.140 to $2,585 annually over the four- letes who were in financial need but was of- The head football coach and the associate H. Lack of institotional conuol. [~onsti- its department with particular attention fo- yearperiod) in calculating equivalency schol- fered to any student-athlete. chiefly as a result director of athletics for compliance and in- twion4.1.1,4.1.2,2.7.1aod6.01.1] cused on the drug-testing policy. arships. of his belief that student-athletes should re- ternal operations were aware of the existence The scope and nature of the violations de- The evidence did not demonsnate that the ceive some type of financial assistance for of the pool. Although the head coach re- scribed in this report, and the length of time B. Penalties self-im+ by the university. university exceeded the permissible financial participating in athletics. Although the ass& quested the student-athletes to discontinue that some went undiscovered. demonstrate a The Committee on Infractions adopted as aid limits for any individual snrdent-athletes. tant director for academics provided this as- the pool, neither individual took any signifi- lack of appropriate instiitutional control and its own the following penalties self-imposed but as a result of these miscalculations, the in- sistance to six srudents who were not snrdent- cant steps to stop the pool or to ensure that monitoring in the conduct and administra- by the institution: stitution exceeded the permissible number of athletes, the assistance he provided to the SN- the activity ceased. tion of the institution’s athletics programs. 1. The number of initial athletically relat- equivalency scholanhips as follows: dent-athletes was not generally available to 1. The use of an improper method of cal- ed financial aid awards in football that are others on the same scale and thus violated F. Faibwe to Mlow institotionnl policies culating off-campus room and board stipends countable under Bylaw 15.023 shall be re- BASEBALL NCAA extra-benefits legislation. All six of the ad procedurea on drug abuse. [Bylawa 10.2 over a four-year period in football, baseball. duced by seven during the 1995-96 academic AmourIt nonathletes had connections U) the athletics and 14.01.q men’s tennis and women’s golf, as set forth in year, which limits the instiNtiOn to 18 initial that over- department. During the 1993-M and 1994-95 academic Finding II-A, while similar stipends were be- scholarships. lixcdedmud The inbtitution disputed its responsibility years, the university’s athletics department ing calculated properly in other sports, is ev- 2. The number of total athletically related Aadeti NCAA Auto& qui- percent- for the extra benefits because they resulted failed to follow institutional policies and pro- idence of inadequate oversight as well as the financial aid awards in football shall be re- YtU from the criminal acuons of an employee. Al- cedures concerning student-athlete drug use. inadequate knowledge of individual p&son- duced by five during the 1995-96 academic 1990-91 l?Yz”” 1.94 15%4F though NCAA bylaws do not address criminal As a resulf three football student-athletes nel about NCAA legislation regarding such year, which limits the in.dNtiOn to 80 schol- 1991-92 13 14.86 1.86 14% behavior, that does not preclude the finding were permiaed to participate in compedtion stipends. arships. 1992-9s 13 14.81 1.81 14% of an NCAA violation resulting from or relat- without being subjected to the required diri- 2. Lack of an adequate system precluding 1993-94 11.70 12.21 .51 4% ed to criminal activity. In this case. the Pell plinary measures set forth in the policy. the receipt by snrdent-athletes of impermisai- c. Additiooal pMlrie!s imposed by the Total 6.12 12% Grant funds with few exceptions were ob- During the academic years 198WO through ble books contributed to the excess financial committee 00 Ir&&&mm rained for student-athletes, which thus con- 1992-99, the univetity’s athletics department aid described in Finding 11-B. Although the Committee on Infractions stiNted a violation of NCAA exua-benefits leg- engaged in drug-testing its student-athletes in 3. Failure either to stop or to monitor ac- agreed with and approved of the actions tak- Amoum isldon as well as federal criminal law. The in- accordance with the university’s drug-testing tivities of an athletics department staff mem- en by the institution. the commiaee imposed thl cmzr- SLiNLiod violation of NCAA legislation is the policy. ber in an area outside his job responsibilities, the following additional penalties: l?xceddmvanl exua benefit provided to the sNdent-athlete During the 1993-94 academic year, the drug after the staff member had been reprimand- 1. Public reprimand and censure. Acukmic NCAA Ammu Equi- percent- rather than the criminal conduct of the em- policy was published in the student-athlete ed for improper performance of responsibii~ 2. Three years of probation from Nov- Ym Iid Amrded vaknq .ge ployee, who also will a representative of the handbook, reviewed with the student-athletes ides to which he was officially assigned, con- ember 10,1995, the date of the hearing. 1990-91 5 5.71 .fl 14% instiNrion’s athletics interests. and believed to be in effect by assistant foot- bibuted to the extent and dmation of the ex- 3. The institution’s football team shall end 1991-92 5 5.81 .81 16% It was widely known among the student- ball coaches, football student-athletes. the di- a-a-beneiirs violations described in Finding II- its 1995 season with the playing of its last reg- 1992-93 5 5.46 .46 % athletes that funds could be obtained through rector of athletics, an assistant director of ath- C. ularly scheduled. in-season contest and shall Total 1.98 13% the help of the assistant director for acade- letics who was responsible for supervising the 4. Failure to question the nature of student- not be eligible to participate in any postsea- mics in athletics suppon services. Some stu- drug-testing staff and the assistant athletics athlete pariicipation as security guards at the son competition or take advantage of any of woMENsGoJ.‘F dent-athletes were not aware that fraudulent nainer responsible for coordinating the drug annual am festim1 described in Finding II-D the exemptions prodded in Bylaw 17.7.5.2. &llotult documents were submitted for them or may tests. However, the head football coach and resulted in repeated impermissible employ- 4. The number of initial athletically relat- thaI over- not have fully understood the extent of the tie head athletics uainer, who was in his first ment of student-athletes over a period of sev- ed financial aid awards in football that are F.sm&dmnId system but the great majority understood that year of employment at the university. did not en years. countable under Bylaw 15.023 shall be rc kdemic NCM Amount Equi- P-t- the information being submitted for them was believe that the drug-testing policy with disci- 5. Failure to stop the conuibution to cash duced as follows: Ya* Limit km&d nLacy a&e fraudulent plinary measures was in effect As a result. if pools aher they became known to athletics de- a. 199697 - reduction of 13 initial schol- 1990-91 6 6.25 25 4% Although the job description for the ass& a sNdent-athlete tested positive, the head atb partment administrators permiaed the cash- arships, which limitp the institution to 12 un- 1991-92 6 6.60 .60 10% tant director for academics in athletics sup letics aainer notified the head football coach, award violation described in Finding II-E. der current rules. 1992-93 6 6.21 .21 4% port services did not include any responsibil- who did not forward the information to any 6. Lack of communication regarding instim b. 1997-98 - reduction of 11 initial schol- Total 1.06 6% ities related to assisting student-athletes with other athletics deparbnent staff member. NtiOd policy on drug abuse and inadequate arships, which limits the institution to 14 un- financial aid matten, his immediate supervi- During the 1994-95 academic year, the pol- supervision regarding us implementation re- der current rules. B. Excessive financial aid in impermtaible sor became aware that he was assuming those icy was not published in the student-athlete sulted in the violations described in Finding 5. The number of total athletically related booka provided to student-athletes. [Bylaws responsibilities but did not inform her super- handbook because the policy was being re- II-F. financial aid awards in football shall be re- 152.3 and 155.3.1] visor or the director of athletics. As a resulf vised, but drug testing continued. The direc- duced by five during each of the 199697 and Each semester from the 1989 fall semester rhere was no system in place to monitor the tor of athletics and the assistant director of I. Saeomlary violation. [Bylaw 16.S.S-(b)] 1997-98 academic years, which limits the in- through the 1993 fall semester, approximate- staff member’s assistance with financial aid, athletics responsible for supervision over the After the hearing. the inStiNLiOn reported stitution to 80 scholarships each year under ly 40 to 60 student-athletes received without even though he had been reprimanded twice athletics naining stalf who coordinated drug- to rhe committee November 21, 1995, that a cument rules. cost an average of $110 in impermissible during the summer and fall of 1990 for in- testing believed that the policy and discipli- women’s booster group at tie beginning of 6. The number of athletically related fi- books as a result of the actions of the assistant volvement in improprieties associated with re- nary measures were still in effecr The head each semester since 1986 had been providing nancial aid awards in baseball shall be rem director for academics in athletics suppon ner- sponsibilities wthin his job description. football coach and the head athletics hainer $200 worth of paper, pencils, pens and note- duced by 6.12 over the next three academic vices and the lack of proper oversight by the In accordance with federal guidelines. the continued to believe that there was no policy pads to the Academic Support Center where yean. academic support services office. These books university’s financial aid department was rem in effect and did not notify other adminisua- they could be taken by student-athletes for 7. The number of athletically related fi- were impermissible because they were not re- sponsihle for reviewing and verifying infor- tars of the srudent-athletes who tested posi- their own use throughout the semester. The nancial aid awards in men’s tennis shall be re- quired, were not course-related or were not mation submitted by students to qualify for tive. in&N&n has put an end to this activity and duced by 1.98 over the next three academic included in a srudent-athlete’s scholanhip. fedeml aid. The university’s financial aid staff As a result of continuing lack of communi- has informed all parties that it is contrary to yeX.3. During the 1989-90 and 1990-91 academic reviewed falsified tax return forms and other cation and misunderstanding concerning Bylaw 16.3.3-(b), which precludes providing 8. The number of athletically related fi- years, the assistant director for academics documents that contained false information the policy, disciplinary measures were not im course supplies as an academic support ser- nancial aid awards in women’s golf shall be signed book vouchers that allowed scudent- completed by the assistant director for acad- plemented in accordance with the policy in vice. reduced by 1.06 over a three-year period. athletes in several sports to receive books that emics but failed to notice any false or fictitious the following cases during the 1993-94 and 9. During this period of probation, the in- were not required for the courses in which names, addresses and Social Security num- 1994-95 academic yean: III. Committam on Infractions penattie, stitution shall: the sNdent-athletes were enrolled. On at least hers, irregular signatures, misreported infor- 1. Football student-athlete A tested positive a. Continue to develop and Implement a one occasion during the 1990-91 academic mation or false claims of dependency that tie second time during the spring of the 1992- For the reasons set forth in Parts I and II comprehensive educational program on year, he also arranged for a track and field would have caused them to suspect that the 93 academic year but was not suspended from of this repon, the Committee on Infractions NCAA legislation, including seminars and student-athlete to receive books at no cost form> were completed fraudulently. participating in one competition during the found that this case involved several major vi- testing, to instruct the coaches. the faculty ath- even though the student-athlete’s scholarship fall of 1999 as required under the drug poli- olations of NCAA legislation. letics representative, all athletics department did not include books. Further, during the D. Impermkible employment during the cy. personnel and all university &alf members 1991-92 and 1992-93 academic years through academic year. [Bylaw 15.01.7. 15.02.4.1, 2. Football student-athlete B tested positive A Corrective actions taken by the uoiver- with responsibility for the certification of SN- the 1993 fall semester, when the assistant di- 15.1, 15.1.1-(n) and 152.61 on four occasions during the 1991-92 through say. dent-athletes for admission. retention, finan- rector for academics was no longer employed During the 1985-86 through 1991-92 acad- 1994-95 academic years. Upon hi second po+ In determining the appropriate penalties to cial aid or competition; at the university. several snrdent-athletes con- emic years, numerous football student-atb itive rest, the student-athlete was withheld impose, the committee considered the insti- b. Submit a preliminary repon to the ad- tinued to receive hooks that were not course- letes received financial aid that exceeded the from a regular-season contest. During the tution’s self-imposed corrective actions. S.pe- ministrator for the Committee on Infractions related due to a lack of proper oversight by value of a !Zull grant-in-aid when they received 1993-94 academic year, the student-athlete cifically. the university: by January 5,1996. retting forth a schedule for the academic suppon services staff concem- compensation for employment during the tested positive for a third time before the uniL 1. Issued a letter of reprimand to the arts establishing this compliance and educational ing book-requisition procedures. academic year. Two former Miami (Florida) venity’s participation in the 1994 Fiesta Bowl. festival committee and the two Individuals in- program; and football student-athletes arranged the em- No disciplinary measures other than manda- volved in securing employment for the stu- c. File with the committee’s adminlsuator c. Extra benefilx provided to student-atb- ployment. tory counseling were imposed at that time, dent-athletes and recommended that one of annual compliance reports indicating the letes by kmdulent arrangements for Pell In February during each of those academ- and the student-athlete participated in the the individuals not be hired as a commenta- progress made with this program by October Grant tiuxls. [Bylaws 16.62.3 and 16.12.4.1] K years, approximately 15 to 30 football stu- 1994 Fiesta Bowl even though the policy in- tor by a radio station that will broadcast the 15 of each year during the probationary pe During the 1989-90 and 1990-91 academic dent-athletes who were receiving full athletics dicated the student-athlete may have been institution’s football games. riod. Particular emphais should be placed on years. the assistant director for academics in grant-in-aid awardr worked as security guards subject to the disciplinary measure of a one- 2. Indicated it will refine its procedures con- monitoring of all types of financial aid to stu- athletics support services arranged for ag at an arts festival that was a three-day event year suspension. Funher, the student-athlete cerning student-athlete employment, volun- dent-athletes, supervision of athletics depart- proximately 60 to 77 student-athletes who par- on President’s Day weekend. The student-ati- was not withheld from any regular-season teering and public appearances during the ment staff members, and implementation of ticipated in several athletics programs to re- letcs received approximately $100 for each contest in the 199495 academic year. The sit academic year. policies governing drug abuse and student- ceive Pell Grant funds that they otherwise day that they worked, which could have to- dent-athlete tested positive for a fourth time 3. Established procedures regarding the athlete employment The reports also must in- would not have received, totaling a maximum taled as much as $9,000 in any one year, de- before the university’s participation in the presence of former student-athletes in the clude documentation of the university’s com- of $212,969 over a three-year period. Of 77 pending on the number of student-athletes 1995 Orange Bowl but was permitted to par- team locker room and on the sidelines during pliance with e penalties adopted and im- student-athletes who received money from who were employed and how many days they ticipate in the game. insLiNtional football games. 7 the Pell Grant program through fraudulent worked. They also received transportation 3. Football student-athlete C tested positive 4. Indicated it will require each head coach means with the help of the assistant director from the institution’s campus to the festival on two occasions during the 199394 acade- to provide the director of athletics with a mail- page6 The NCAA Register December 25, I995 infractions case: University of Miami (Florida)

l Continued from page 5 lated position at an NCAA member institution Miami (Florida) shall be subject t” the pr”- stitution prior to the institution’s appearance Should any portion of any of the penalties during a seven-year period (December 1. visions of Bylaw 19.6.2.3, concerning repeat before the appeals committee. in this case be set aside for any reason other posed by the committee. 1995, to December 1. ZOOZ), he and the in- violators. for a five-year period beginning on The Committee on infractions wishes to than by appropriate action of the Association. 10. The institution’s president shall recer- volved institution shall be requested to appear the effective date of the penalties in this case, advise the institution that it should take every the penalties shall be reconsidered by the tify that allot the university’s current athletics before the Committee on Infractions to con- November 10, 1995. precaution to ensure that the terms of the Committee on lnfraccions. Should any actions policies and practices conform to all require- sider whether the member institution should Should Miami appeal either the findings of penalties are observed. The committee will by NCAA Conventions directly or indirectly ments of NCAA regulations. be subject to the show-cause procedures of violations or penalties in this case to tbe monitor the penalties during their effective modify any provision of these penalties or the 11. The athletics depanment staff member Bylaw 19.6.2.2-(l), which could iimit the staff NCAA Infractions Appeals Committee, the periods, and any action contrary to the terms effect of the penalties, the commiaee reserves involved in Findings 11-B. C and G will he in- member’s athletically related duties at the new Committee on Infractions will submit a re- of any of the penalties or any additional vio- the right to review and reconsrder the penal- formed in writing by the NCAA thar due to institution for a designated period. sponse to the members of the appeals com- lations shall be considered grounds for ex- ties. his involvement in cenain violations of NCfi n n n mittee. This response may include additional tending the institution’s probationary period, legislation found in this case, if he seeks em As required by NCAA legislation for any in- information in accordance with Bylaw 32.10.5. as well as imposing more severe sanctions in NCAACOMMITTEE ployment or affiliation in an athletically rem stitution involved in a major infractions case, A copy of the report will be provided to the in- this case. ON IN?RACIIONS Council minutes

Meeting issue he referred to the Division I Task Force to ture conduct regional seminars in February 1996 (b) The Divisions I1 and Ill Steering Corn- approval of the use of the term “international” Review the NCAA Membership Structure for fur- to obtain feedback from the membership re- m&es reponed that they concurred with the rec- instead of “foreign.” October O-IO, I995 ther review and possible consideration at the garding the models of Division III membership ommendation of the Division I Steering Com- (L) It was voted that IJK rtalf research Iunher 1997 Convention. and championship criteria that are presented at mince. an alternative term for “foreign” student-athlete. Following are tk minutes of the (i) That the Council sponsor an amendment- the Convention. The steering c”mmmee noted (c) It was voted that the Council approve rhe c. Infractioru. The committee recommended m-amendment for the 1996 Convention to insti- that tJlis would provide an adequate am”unf of commiaee’s recommendation. that the Council approve the tollowmg revtst”ns odober 9-l 0, 1995, meeting of tk NCAA tute a pmess where legislation may be suspend time for the task force to forward ns final rec- (5) The Council considered Proposal No. 2-2 1, LOBylaw 52: Council at the Hyatt RegencyCrown ed upon receipt of 100, rather than 75. institu- ommendations to the Division III subcommittee which would specify instances in which a dc min- (1) That Bylaw 323.8 be revised to permrt the Center in Kansas City, Missouri. All tional petitions for an ovenide. of the Presidents Commission for review during imis violation will not render a prospective stu- use of c”un rep”nen during enforcement staIT a&ons takn by tk C.ouruil are irulud- (k) That the Councd approve an editorial its June 1996 meeting. dent-athlete or enrolled student-athlete ineligi- interviews, subject to specieed conditions. ed.Highlights of tk meetingwere rt@nt- change to Proposal No. 2-2 to modify Bylaw 4. Commtttce Rcprts. [Now: The Council re- ble while retaining the fact that such a violation (2) That Bylaw 32.3.9 be revised to clan@ that 5.3.2.2.3.3 to clarify that a non-I-A or non&AA ceived reports from a number of committees. in. shall he considered an institutional violation. NCAA interview documents are conlidenual. ed in tk October23 issueof Tk NCAA conference reprerencative may vote on football &ding a number of informational items. Only (a) The committee recommended that the (3) It war voted that the Council appmve the News. issues for his or her conference. Council actions or points noted for the record Council sponsor an amendment-to-amend- committee’s recommendations. (1) That the Council sponsor an amendment- are reftected in theses minutes.] ment to Proposal No. 2-21 to indicate that the d. Infractions AppeaIs. m-amendment to Proposal No. 2-2 for the 19Y6 a. A* . . dve Review Panel. The Council individual’s eligibility would not be affected, (1) The committee recommended that the I. opmingRcmmh. Convention to require that each conference sub received a rel~on of actions taken by the panel “unless specifically declared so by the Ehgtblhty Council sponsor noncontroversial legislation to a. NCAA President Eugene E Corrigan wel- mit to tie Division I Board of Directon its policy from June 24, 1995, through September 8, 19Y5. Committee.” make the Iength of the terms for memben of the comed the Council members to Kansas City. for ensuring that the chief executive 05cers with It was noted that of those cases reviewed by the (i) The Division I Steering Commitiee report- Infractions Appeals Comminee ~“ns~stent with h. President Corrigan reponed that Presidents in the conference have signed&f on an override panel during this period 46 were granted and 38 ed that it agreed to recommend that the Council tie terms for memben of the CommIttee on Robert A Alost of Northwestern State University petition. were denied; further. that since January lYY3, a refer this issue hack to the Ehgtblhty Committee Infractions (i.e.; three-year term, reelection per- and FAward G. Co11 of Alfred University, and (m) That the Council oppose an amendment- total of 899 appeals have been considered; 489 for further review. mlssible, limit of nine years on the committee). Shirley Green Reese of Alhany State College tmunendment to permit the constituent body that have been granted and 410 have heen denied. (ii) The Divisions II and III Steering Corn- (a) The Division I Steering Committee report- (Georgia) would not be in auendance. He al&” an individual represents to designate an alternate b. FuvneiaI Aid and Amateurimn. mincer reported that they agreed to recommend ed that it agreed to auppon the committee‘s rec- rated that Richard A Rosenthal of the University to artend an Executive Committee meeting that (1) The Council considered a recommenda- that the Council nor sponsor such an amend- 0mmrr1dati0n of Notre Dame and President Caml A Cartwright a member of the Executive Committee is unable tion that 1996 Convention Proposal No. 2-78 be ment-to-amendment (b) It war voted that the Council sponsor non- of Kent State University would he arriving later to attend. placed before Proposal No 2-69 in the Official (b) The committee recommended that the controversial legislation as recommended by the in the day and would he in attendance at the (n) It was voted that the Council approve the Notice for the 1996 Convention. Council withdraw parts E. E H and I of Proposal committee. Division 1 Steering Committee meeting Tuesday, Division I Steering Committee’s recommenda- (a) The Division I Steering Commiaee recom- No. 2-21 if the Council sp”ns”rs the amendment- (2) The committee recommended that the as would Willie G. Shaw of Morehouse College tions. mended that Proposal No. 2-78 be placed hefore toamendment proposed in (a) above. Council approve the following revision* to Bylaw in Division II. (2) The Division II Steering Committee re- 269 in the Official Notice. (i) The Division II Steering Committee repon- 32: c. President Corrigan welcomed David G. ported that it reviewed recent actions taken by the (b) It was voted that the Council approve the ed that it agreed to recommend that the Council (a) That Bylaw 32.11.1-(c) be revi& IO delete Caner. Division III chair of the NCAA Presidents Division II Task Force to Review the Membership Division I Steering Committee’s recommenda- sponsor an amendment-to-amendment to Ro- the reference to. “as recommended hy the insti- Commission, and noted thatJudith E. N. Alhino. Structure and noted the following: tion. posal No. 2-21 to withdraw pans D, E, F and H tution.” Commission chair, would be in aaendance later (a) That it reaffirmed the use of conference (2) The Council considered a recommenda- of the pmposal. (b) That Bylaw 32.103 be revlsed t” indicate in the afternoon to present the report of the representation rather than regional representa- tion that it sponsor an amendment-t-amend- (II) It was moved and seconded that the that current and former inctitorion;d staff mcm- Commission’s September meeting. tit-m. ment to Pmposal No. 70 that would specify that Council rponror an amendment-to-amendment hen have direct access to the Intmcsons Appeals 2. e Mlnuta. The Council reviewed the (b) That it clarified that the pmposed new gov- a student-athlete’s demonstrated need must he to ProposaJ No. 2-21 to withdraw parts D. E, F and Committee and are not required to submit such minutes of its August 7-Y. lYY5, meeting. emancc structure should include Association- calculated by a cenoal processing entity. similar H of the pmposal. (Defeated ~ voice vote) an appeal through the staffmembeis institution. It was Mted that the minutes of the August 7- wide committees. m that outlined in 1996 Convention Proposal No. (c) The committee recommended that the (c) That Bylaw 32.103 he revised to indicate 9, 1995. meeting he approved as distributed (c) That the 1997 Council and Presidents 2-71; fur&r, that the Council clarify whether the Council sponsor an amendment-bxamendmcnt dm cummt or former institutional at&rncmben Commission elections should be suspended to c”st of the proposed processing center for to indicate that in Part J of F’roposal No. 2-21. the may appeal any finding of a violation in whrch a. The Council reviewed a repn from the ensure continuity during the transition pmeps. Division II would be ahsotid by the Association exception for not rendering a prospect ineligible they are involved (as opposed only to a violation Oversight Committee on the NCAA Membenhip (d) The importance of emphasizing the actual independent of the Division II revenue alloca- applies only to the length of the o5cial visit itself of ethical conduct or other findings resulting in Structure. including 1996 NCAA Convention increase in division dollars under the new prc+ tion under the restrucnuing model. and n”t w the provision related to a prospect proposed disciplinary action against the mdivid- Proposal No. 2-2 (as it appears in the Second posed governance suucrure and that considera- (a) The Divlsion I Steering Committee noted who does nor return home before artelIding the ual) and that the Council sponsor noncontro- Publication of Proposed Legislation). tion be given to providing projections of increa6 that such an amendment-toamendment is not in instituuon. venial legislation to make the same change in (1) The Division 1 Steering Committee report- es to the Division II membership hefore the vote order and therefore, the steering Lommiaee t”“k (i) The Division 1 Steering Committee report- Bylaw 19.7.3. ed clmt it reviewed the report and a number of at the 1YY6 Convention. no action on the committee’s recommendation. ed that it agreed to recommend that the Council (3) The committee recommended that Bylaw amendments-to-amendments to 199% Conven- (e) That if the new governance structure is (b) The Division II Steering Committee COD sponsor such an amendment-t+amcndment 32.10 be revised to add new Bylaw 32.10.7 (with tion Pmposal No. 2-2 that had been forwarded to adopted. current membcn of the Division II sidered the amendment-uxamendment and took (ii) It was voted that the Council sponsor such a reference in Bylaw 19.6.2.8) (0 indicate that if the national office as of October 6. 1995. and Steering Committee, Division II Subcommittee of the following actions: an amendment-to-amendment an institution (or involved parry) appeals a tind- made the following recommendations: the Presidents Commission and Division II Task (i) Recommended that the Council not span- (6) The Council considered several recom- ing of major violations or a per&y. a showing of (a) That the Council agree to continue to de- Force to Review the NCX4 Membership Structure s”r such an amendment-teamendment mendations related to Prop”sal No. 2-fl, which. new evidence directly related to the finding in velop an amrndme”t to funher detail the rev- seme on the Division II transition team. (ii) Agreed to take no posirion on Reposal No. in Division I, would mquire that institutional fi- the case that is discovered during the appeals enuedisuihution guarantees for Divisions I-AA b. President Albino reported actions taken by 2-70, noting that such a posirion does not indi- nancial aid awarded beyond the value of tuition pmcess shall be referred back to the Commmee And 1-w and that the Council sponsor such an the Presidents Commission during its September cate opposiuon u) the concept of need-baaed and fees and required course-related books be on Infractions for its revrew. The committee rec- amendment for the 1997 Convention. meeting. financial aid; rather. the steering committee be- awarded on the basis of a student-athiete‘s de- ommended that the Council sponsor nonton- (b) That the Council sp”ns”r an amendments (1) The Division I Steering Committee repon- lieves that this issue may best be addressed monstrated need as determined by a central pry troversial legislation to define new evidence as to-amendment for the 1YY6 Convention t” spec- ed that it considered an amendment+xamend- through the normal pmess in the revised mem- crsring agency using federal methodology. “evidence that could not reasonably be aster- ify the Division I access to national champi- ment sl~nsored by the Resident Commission that bership structure, if adopted. (a) The Division I Steering Committee report- tained prior to the Committee on Infractions’ onships. would specify that the IWO at-large positions for (iii) Agre ed to recommend that the sponsors ed that it considered the commiuee’s recommen- hearing” and to include this definition in the (I) That the Council sponsor a resolution for Divisions I-AA and I-AAA institutions on the &ard of Proposal No. 2-70 consider withdrawing the dations related to Proposal No. 2-7 I and took the Definitions and Apphcauons section in Bylaw the 1996 Convention directing that the Division of Direcmm and/or Management Council shall be pr”p”sa1. following actions: 19.02. I transition team (to be selected after the 1995 used to enhance and ensure ethnic and gender di- (3) The Division II Steering Committee rem (i) Agreed t” recommend that the last line of (4) It was voted that the Council appmve the Convention) review the issue of Divisions 1-A. verniry if those objectives are tmt achieved through viewed the committee’s recommendation that the the intent statement of Proposal No. 2-71 be commirtee’s recommendations. I-AA and I-AAA autonomy on issues unrelated to other appointment3 to those bodies. It was the Council take no further action on Pmposal No. changed to indicate that the receipt of an acacL e. Initial-Elifiity W&en. The Council con- foothall. sense of the meeting that tbe Council ask the P-17, which would establish an exception to the emit honor award would not alter a student-atb sidered appeals of previous subcommittee deci- (d) That the Council rpons”r an amendment- Commission to reconsider spcmsming that p”nion Association’s amateurism legislation for an indi- let& equivalency calculation, as opposed to the sions submitied by Brigham Young University, m-amendment for the I996 Convention to clari- “f the arnendment-tc+amendment set forth in vidual who receives acrual and necessary ex- student’s con-of-attendance calculation. the University of Idaho and liberty Univeniry mm $ the Divisions I-AA and I-AAA voting repre- 4.2. I+)-(J) and 4.5.1-(+(3). penses based on place timsh, provided the ex- (ii) Agreed to recommend that the Council lated to the application of core-curriculum re- sentation in the new structure. (2) The Division II Steering Committee re- penses do not exceed $1,000 per event and ac- sponsor an amendment-to-amendment to Pro- quirements. (e) That the Council sponsor an amendment- poned that it considered the actions of the crue during a p&xl not t” exceed one year. The posal No. 2-71 to specify that a student-athlete’s It was voted that the Council uphold the sub tcemendment for the 1996 Convention to more Presidents Commission related U, Division II ini- srzering committee reported that it agreed to rec- receipt of supplies, a uannpottation allowance committee decision in each situation fully define the notification process for Division tial-eligibility standards and made the following ommend that the Council continue to sponsor and miscellaneous expenses related to the cost f.Legi&~Review. I members r&t.ed to the adoption of new Aegis recommendations: Proposal No. 2-17. The steering committee also of attendance shall be based upon the student- (1) The Council reviewed a compilation of in- tation under the new governance strucnue. (a) That the Council use its audmriry per Con- recommended that clarification of F’tup”sal No. athlete’s demonsuated need. terpretations recommended by the commiaee for (f) That the Council approve an editorial stitution 5.4.1.1.1 (modification of wording) to Z-17 be provided 1” the membership (through a (iii) Agreed to recommend that the language incorporation into the lYYti-97 NM Manual. change to Propasal No. 2-2 to change the word amend Bylaw 14.3 to require that the minimum position paper on the flbor of the 1996 Con- in the note at the heginning of Proposal No. 2-71 It was voted that the committee’s compilation .‘app”inted” to “selected” in Bylaws 4.2.5.1 and required ACT sc”re he defined in terms of a sum vention or The NCAA News) that an individual he changed to indicate that the Council does not of interpretations be appmved for incorporation 4.5.3.1. sccore (as opposed to a composite score) and to may not receive such pnze money based on place support the pmposal. into the 19Y697 NCAA Manual, with the excep (g) That the Council approve an editorial eliminate the practice of “rounding up” ACT finish if such money exceeds actual and neceb (b) It was voted that the Council approve the tion of Item No. 7 regarding the definition of a change u) Pmp”sal No. 2-2 (0 modify ByIaw 4.1.2 scores (effective for students first entsring a col- sary expenses. Division I Steering Committee’s recommenda- bona fide alumni organization. to clarify that the Exccurive Commiaee has the au- legi&e institution on or after August 1, 1996). (4) The Council considered a recommenda- tions. (a) The Division I Steering Committee repot%- thority LOconvene annual or special Conventions. It was voted that the Council adopt such legi* tion that the intent statxment of Proposal No. 2- (7) The Council considered a recommenda ed that it voted to recommend that the Council (h) That an amendment-m-amendment to Iation. 20 he amended to clarify that in order for a stat rion that the st5 research a replacement term approve the committcc’r recommendation tom- gram the Division I membership the right to ~6 (h) That the NCAA public affairs staliprepare dent-athlete to use the identified wa~ven/excep for “foreign” student-athlete and make appro- corporae inlo Lhe 1996-97 Manual Item No. 7 re- tablish pi agenda items for an annual or and disseminate information regarding the use dons. the World ChampionshIp and/or World priate revisions to the NCAA Manual and other g-arding the definition of a bona fide alumni “r- special Convention is wt of order. but that the is of the ACT sum score in Division II as soon as Cup event would need to be sancrioned by the NCAA documents. ganitation. sue be referred to the Division I Task Force to possible. appropriate national or international governing (a) The Division III Steering Committee rc- (b) The Division Ill Steering Committee re- Review the NCAA Membenhip Shucture for fur- (3) The Division III Steering Committee re- body for that sport ported chat it agreed to recommend that the erm quested that the mcorporarion of Item No. 7 re- ther I-C&W and pouible consideration at the lYY7 ported that it discussed tie prepamrion and di.+ (a) l%e Division I Steering Committee report- “international” be used instead of “foreign.” garding the definiuon of a bona fide alumni “r- Gmvention. uiburion of additional educational materials re- ed that it agreed u) recommend that the Council It was voted that the Council approve the pnization apply only to Divisions I and Il. inab (i) That an amcndment~amendment to gadhgthe new governance smmure. The steer- amend the intent statement of Ptuposal No. 2- Division III Steering Cornmince’s recommenda- vt the Division I membenhip the right to call ing committee recommended that the Division 20 in accordance with the committee’s recom- tion. (For 18. Against 17) a special Convert&n is out of o&r. but that the III T-k Force to Review the Membership Sbuc- mendation. (b) It was ~ted that the Council reconsider its See Council minutes, page 7 F December 25. I995 The NCAA Register Page 7 Council minutes

l Continued from page 6 cd noted its concern that the concept of sports equipment and/or apparel directly from a man- test score, grade-point average and core counes b. The Division II Steering Commirtee repon- manship and ethical conduct has the potential ufacturer and the involvement of apparel man- that a prospective student-athlete must have be- ed as appmval of all acuons m the five telephone much as this incorporation does not appear to for being overshadowed at this Convention by rc- ufacturen with member instirurions. The Council fore making an official visit prior to the initial conferem es. reflect the application of Division III legislation structuring issues. reviewed tie issues without taking formal action. signing date in a sport that has an early signing L. The Division III Steering Committee re- in this area; funher, that the commntee reuse the 6. Membesabip. penod for the Nanonal Leaer of Intent, and rec- ported that ,t renewed Conference No. 15 and wording 01 Bylaw 1X15.5 to make it consistent (1) ‘The Council considered a recommenda- a. The quarterly report of NCAA membership ommended that the Councd sponsor a resolution expressed an interest in increasing the number with current Division III practices. uon that it sponsor an amendment-t-amend- was noted for the record. It reflected 903 active for the 1% Convenuon to refer to the Academic of Division III representatives on the Specml (c) It was voted that Item No 7 regarding the ment to Proposal No. 262 that would exempt members as of September 29, 1995 (unchanged Requirements Committee, the Recruiting Com- Committee on Marketing and Licensing. definition of a bona fide alurrmi organization no1 from the mandatory “redshin” year those rw& from the August report), and 1,200 memben in mittee and tbc Special Committee to Ovcrrec d It was voted tJlat the Council approvr all of be incorporated into the I%97 NCAA Manual. ycat’ mllep uansfeta in the spom of foorhall and all categories as of that date (up 54 from the Implementation of the NCAA Initial-Eligibility the Admit&rat& Committee actions in Corr- rather, that it he referred hark to the Inter- mco’s haakctl,all who were not qualifiers and August report). Clearinghouse the issue of whether it is neces- ferencr Nos. 13-17 as modifirrl hy actions of the pretations Committee for further review as it ap who cam at 1c;utsrJ percent of the credit hours b. It was voted that the Council approve an ap vary to have such xademir. Lredentials certified steering committees. plies to Division III. nrcdcd for their baccalaureate degree before plication for correspondmg member&p sub- by the clearinghouse. considering the burdens 9. Interpretations. Thr Coura il rcvicwcd the (2) The Council reviewed a compilation of cd. tr*n*ftr to the certifying institution. mitted by AlI Sporis Community Service, Inc. placed on the clearinghouse, and to direct those minutes of 1% lnterprttatiorrs Commiuec Cr,n- itorial changes rrcommrndetl by the cvmmitltc (a) The Division I Steering Committee repon- c. It was voted that the Council approve an ap committees to report to the 1997 Convention. ferencr Nos. Y through 11. The following actions to he made in the I-97 NCAA Manual. ed that it agmed to recommend that the Council plication for corresponding membership sub- L. The Council reviewed a compilation of pro. were taken by the division steering committees It was voted that the committee’s compilation sponsor an amendment-to-amendment wth the mined by Nova Southeastern Universiry. posed amendments to the Association’s admin- or by the Council after review by those commit- of recommended editorial changes he approved requirement that at least 40 percent rather than d. It was voted that the Council approve an ap rstrative mgularions on which the Council is au. WCS: for incorporation into the lYY&Y7 Manual. 50 pcrcen~ of the credit hourn needed for the stu plicarion for at?iliated membership suhmitted hy thorized to act in the intenm berween NCAA a. The Divrslon I Steenng Committee noted (5) The committee noted that dunng iu renew dent’s baccalaureate degree he earned hefore College C-If Foundation. Conventions. It was noted that all amendments that it renewed Item No. 6 of Conference No. Y, 01 Bylaws 12 and 16 for possible deregulation transfer to the certifying institution. c. The Division I Steering Committee reported to Bylaw JO approved by the Council will be pub which indicates that a student-athlete who has proposals for the l‘Y96 Convention, the commit- (b) It was voted that the Council approve the the following actions lished in the News. The three steering commit- designated a specific degree program with an tee idenufied several areas within the two bylaws Division I Strcring Committee’s recommenda- (1) Approved a request submiaed by Texas tees reported that they approved all revisions to identified major may use a course to fulfill the for reformarting, refinement and clarification. tior1. Southern Univerriry for a waiver of the mimmum Bylaw 30. credit-hour requirement for meeting satisfacm The Council reviewed a compilation of the corn- (2) The Council considered a recommcnda- number of contests in men’s and women’s cross d The Cr,uncil rcvicwcd a compilation of non- ry progress if the course fulfills an elective corn- mittee’s suggestions for such revisions in the tion that if Proposal No. Z-62 is adopted, the country per Bylaw 20.9.3.3.8. controvcraial legislative proposals per Conrti- ponent of the student-athlete’s degree program, lYY697 Manual. Council withdrsv Proposal No. Z-66. which spec- (2) Denied a request by Texas Southern for a tution 5.3.1.1.1. It was noted for the record that even if the student ultimately must repeat tbc It was voted that the committee’s compilation ifies that partial qualificn and nonqualifiers in waiver of the minimum number of contests in propoosalareceiving the ~uppon of a tbm-fourths course to fulfill the requirementi of the student’s of recommended reformatting, refinement and Division I must earn at Icast 40 percent (as op- men’s and women’s Indoor track per Bylaw majority of the Council present and voting are cf- major, and recommended that tbc Council re- clarification of areas within Bylaws 12 and 16 he posed to 25 percent) of the credit hours needed 20.9.3.3.8. fective immediately, published in the News and verse the interpretation. approved. to fulfill the academic degree requirements of a f. The Division III Steering Committee repon- reported by the Council at the 1996 Convention. h. At the request of the Interpretations Com- g. Olympic sp0rt.s Iiiisal. two-year college transfer student at the two-year cd that it approved a request submiaed by Rose- Proposals that the Council adopted during its mittee, the Council considered reversing a pre- (1) The rommittee noted the Council’s prevl- college that awards the degree. Hulman Institute of Technology for a waiver of April and August meetings were included in the vious Council-approved interpretation or. in the ous recommendiltiorl that the Olympic Sports (a) The Dlvmon I Steering Committee repon- the four-sport sponsorship requirement for we compilauon but are not retlected in these min- alternative, sponsoring legislation for the 1997 Liaison Committee and the Fl@ubty Qmmiuee ed that it agmed to recommend that the Council men per Consti~tion 3.2.4.11.5. utes unless additional action was taken. Convenuon to permit a commercial publication discuss concerns raised by the Eligibility Com- titld-aw Proposal No. 24% if Proposal No. 2-62 7. NCAA c0avmtion.s. (1) The Division II Steering Committee re- to use a highlight tilm/vidcotapc that includes mittee in regard to the proposed definitions of a is adopted. a. The Councd revrewed the schedule of ma- ported that it reconsidered the previous action of the namer and pictures of current student-atb- professional athletics team/league set forth in (11)It was voted that the Council approve the jor meetings for the 19% Convention, as well as the Council during its August meeting regarding letes with remaining eligibility as a “premium” in 1996 Convention Proposal No. 2-16. Thr corn- Division I Steering Committee‘s recommenda- plans for the honon dinner. the first permissible contest date in the sport of a marketing promotion designed to solicit sub- mittee reported that the two committees had not lion. (1) The Division III Steering Committee re- basketball for the lYY&Yf academic year and scriben to the publication. been able to meet to discuss the proposal and, (3) The Council connldered a recommenda- ported that it discussed scheduling concerns re- recommended that the Council rescind the leg- (1) The Division I Steering Committee repon- therefore, recommended that the Council with- uon that if Proposal No. 242 fails. the Council lated to the Sunday, January 7. meeting sched- &tion as it apples to Division II. ed that n agreed not to reverse the mterpretauon. draw Pmposal No. ‘L-16 until the nvo comminees sponsor an amendment-~amendment to indi- ule for the 1996 Convention and made the fol- It was moved and seconded that the Council (2) The Division 111 Steering Committee rem have an opporruniry to discuss the proposal. c ate that Proposal No 2-&i applier only to stu- lowing recommendations: remove the portion of the noncontroversial leg- ported that it deferred to the position of the It was voted that the Counc~il withdraw Pro- dent-athletes in the spans of football and men’s (a) That the Presidents Commission meet from islative proposal related to the first permissible Division I Steering Committee. posal No. 2-K. basketball. 7 to 10 a.m. starung date in the sport of basketball for c. It was voted that the minutes of lYY5 Inter- (2) NCAA Executive Director Cedric W Demp (a) The Division I Steering Committee report- (b) That the Chief Executive 05cers Forum Division II during the 19Y6-97 academic year, pretations Committee Conference Nos. 9 through sey reported on recent meetings of the lJSOC/ ed that it agreed to recommend that the Council take place fmm 10 to 11 a.m. consistent with the steering rommititc’s recom 11 be approved as amended by the actions of the NCAA Task Force, which was appointed hy the spon9or such an amendment-tcxmendment that (c) That the division Legislative Forums take mendation. (Defeated - For 7, Against 11) Division I Steering Comminee. United States Olympic Comminee to strengthen would he moved at the Convention only if place fmm 11 bm. to 12% pm. (2) The three steering committees approved 10. Report of Division Steering Committees. the relationship and increase cooperation be- Proposal No. 2-62 fails. (2) The Council recommended that the staff the adoption of all remaining noncontmvental Division II Vice-President Lynn L Dom reponed tween the USOC and the NC&4 (b) It was voted that the Council approve the communicate these recommendations to the legdative pmposals. that the Division II Steering Committee agreed to (a) The Division III Steering Commirtee rem Divmon I Steering Committee’s recommcnda- Convcntiot~ management staff for consideration. e. The Council reviewed a compilation of pm recommend that the Academic Requirements ported that it discussed Dempsey’s report and ap tion. b. The Council reviewed legislative amend- posed legislative modifications punuant to Con- Committee further analyze the initial~ligihility plauds the efforts of the USOC and the NCAA rem (4) The Council considered a recommenda- ments set fond in the Second Publication of Ro stitution 5.4.1.1.1. which permits the Council to data speciGc to Division II; in paticular. the po- garding the proposed grant program to protect tior~ that the Council sponsor an amendment+z- posed Legislation for the 1996 Convention. modify the wording of NCAA legslation in a tential impact of the new Division I initial++- crdar~gercd and emerging spom. The steering amendment to Proposal No. 283 to limit the (1) The Division I Steering Committee report- manner consistent with the intent of the mem- bilicy standards on Division II student-athletes. committee expressed an interest in having number of hours taken during the summer term ed that it agreed to remove its opposition to hership in adopting the original legislation. It ll.ChherBti. The Council received are- Division III msutuuons included in the discus- immediately before transfer to nine semester or Proposal No. 2-3. which would incorporate into war noted for the record that all such modifica- port fmm Lt Gen. Claudius E. Waus of The sions and planning for the proposed grant prrr I2 quarter hours. the Association’s “Principles of Intercollegiate tions approved by the Council will be reported by Cnadel. chair of the Nominating Committee. of w- (a) The Division I tiering Commiaee report- Athletics” the principle that the maximum ath- the Council at the 19Y6 Convention. the nominees for the upcoming vacancies on the (h) The Council received the report without ed that it agreed to recommend that the Council letics aid an individual student-athlete may re- Modifications adopted by the Council during Council: taking any formal actioo sponsor such 111amendmentxo-amendment ceive is the full cost of attendance as defined and its April and August meetings were included in (1) Division I Vice-President - Roben hf. (3) The Council reconsidered a recommend* (b) It was voted that the Council approve the published by each institution. the compilation but are not reflected in these Sweaty. Texas Tech Univemiry; non that u sponsor legislation to permit nation. Division I Steering Commiaee’s recommenda- (2) The Division I Steering Committee report- minutes unless additional action was taken. (2) Division III Vtce-President - Bridget al governing bodies (NGBs) to sell trading cards tion ed that it reviewed Pmposal No. 2-8, which would (1) The Division II Steering Commiaee re- Belgiovine ~ University of Wisconsin, La Crosse; that contain the names or pictures of current stu- k Student-mete Advimuy. The commiaee prohibit student-athletes from participating in viewed Item No. 8 of the compilation, which (3) Atlantk Coast Conference Representative dent-athletes, provided the proceeds go directly reported that during its August 27-29. 1995, meet- any gambbng activities associated with profes- specifies that the elimination of the required - Arthur W. Cooper, Nonh Carolina State to the NGBs. ing, the committee identified its three primary plonal sports contests, and recommended that one-day-off-per-week restriction shall apply dur- Univeniry; It was voted that the Council use ire authority goals for the upcoming year. In ad&non, the the issue of coaches gambling on professional mg one conference and postseason champi- (4) Pacific-10 Conference Rcprescntativr - per Constitution 5.X1.1.1 (noncontmvenial a- commmce reported 1t.sposition on a number of sports contests be referred to the Professional onship. and recommended that the Council Edward Leland, Stanford Univenity; mendment) co amend Bylaw 12.5 to pernut na- legislative proposals for the 1YY6Convention. It Sports Liaison Committee for funher review and adopt noncontroversial legislation to effectuate (5) &vision 1-A Independent ~ Albert nod governing bodies to sell trading cards that was the sense of the meeting (hat the Council ask that the commmee report hack to the Council: the change. Vanderbush. United States Military Academy. contain the naea or pichres of current student- the commiaee to review the deregulation pack- further, that in its review of the issue. the Profes (2) It was voted that the Council use its au- (6) Ditision 1. Region I, District 2 - Laurence athletes, provided the proceeds go directly to the age bemg sponsored by the Council in the areas rional Spans Liaison Committee seek input from thority per Constitution 5.3 1.1 1 (noncontrover- C. Rearing, Seton Hall Uruversny; NGB. of amateurism and awards/hen&s before the the various coaches assoclauons and profesm sial amendment), rather than 5.4.1.1.1 (mod& (7) Division I-AA+ West Region ~ Gorge M. h. Recruiting. The committee recommended 1596 ConvrtltiotL sional sports o~nizarions. cation of wording), to amend Bylaw 17.1.5.4 to Dennison. University of Montana; that the Council reaffirm an April 14. 19R6. 1 Women’s Athlerica. The committee reported (3) The Division I Steering Committee noted specify that in Division 11, the elimination of the (8) Division I-AAA. Region l-2, District 2-3 - Administrative Committee interpretation that that n agreed to suppon 1996 Convention Pro- its opposition to an amendment-t+amcndment required one-day-off-per-week restriction shall Thomas E. Yeagrr. Colonial Athleac Assocmuon; specifies that the 4Rhour period for an official posal Nos. 2-X2 (expenses for pracrice ~ wo- to Proposal No. 2-1.X which would require only apply during one conference and postseason (9) Division II - C. Donald Cook, Sacred visit begins at the time a prospect arrives on the men’s crew ~ weather exception) and 2-106 (nh one of the three graduate assistant coaches in championship. Heart University; institution’s campus, rather than with the iruab tional collegiate championship - women’s Division I-A football to be an ethnic minoriry. R.Mmhlisuacive commincc Report on Inte- (10) Division III ~ Lynda J. C&ins. Hollins tion of the prospect‘s transportation hy a coach crew). The Council took no formal action in re (4) The Division II Steering Commiaee re- rim Actions and other Matters. The Council re College; and or at tie time of the prospect’s amval at the air- gard to the report ported that it agreed to recommend that the viewed the record of Conference Nos. 13-17 (11) Division III. Region I - John S. pon or elsewhere m the communiry. 5. Miiuaneou. Council withdraw sponsorship of Pmposal No. P- conducted by the Adnumstrauve Commirtee Biddiscomhe. Wesleyan University (ConnertiLut). It was voted that the Council approve the com- a. The Council received a quarterly report 28, which would permit Division II institutions since the previous meeting of the Council. in- 12. Dats and Sites of Future Meetings. The mittee’s recommendation. from Dempsey related to the Association’s gov- that already have signed a prospective student- cluding all decisions reached on behalf of the Council noted its 1996 meetings for the record: i. R&and PLnning The Council reviewed cnrmcntal affain. [Note: A summary of the re athlete to contact the prospect on the day or days Council by the commiaee and the executive di- a January 56 (1995 Council) and January 10 a report of the actions taken by the committee port appeared in the November 6.1995, issue of of competition. rector. (1996 Council), Wyndhatn Anatolc Hotel, Dallas,; during its September 11, 1995, meeting and re- The NCAA News.] The Council received the re It was voted that the Council withdraw Pm- a The Division I Steering Committee reported b. April 1517, Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Kansas City, ferred back to the Presidents Commission for pan without taking formal action. pod No. 2-28. that it reviewed Conference No. 1.5and agreed to Missouri; consideration the recommendation that the h. The Council considered a referral from tbe (5) The Division I Steering Commiaee repon- recommend that the Administrative Commiuee c. August 12-14. Homestead. Hot Springs, charge of the Residents Commission Committee Administrative Commitfee regarding issues re- ed that it reviewed Proposal No. P-38, which expand the Special Comminee on Marketing and Virginia; and on Sportsmanship and Fhical Conduct be ex- lated to apparel manufacturers. includmg would delete the requirement that the NCAA Licensing by 25 percent to include two I-AA and d. October 7-9. RitzCarlton Hotel. Kansas City, ten&d beyond the 1996 Convention. Tbe Coun- prospective student-athletes receiving athletics Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse must certify the two I-AAA representarives. Missouri. Presidents Commission minutes Meeting 1 openingRemu~ Division II Vice-President Lynn L Dam and incorporated in recent months m the repon of 4. .%bfoMnittec cm Minority hues. President a. President Judith E. N. Albino, Commission Division III Vice-Resident Edward G. Co11Jr. the OversIght Commirtee on the NCAA Mem- John B. Slaughter of Occidental College report- September 26-27, I995 chair, welcomed Resident Chades A Kiesler, a c. President Albino also extended the Com- berxhip Strucmre. She also’noted that the corn ed on hehalf of the subcommittee. He expressed new member of the Commission in artendance at mission’s welcome to Asa N. Green. retained as miaee discussed recommendations of the Com- concern on behalf of the Committee on Wom- thrs meeung. President Albino noted that three consultant to the Commission. mission’s Committee on Sportsmanship and en‘s Athletics and the Minority Opportunities Following are the minutes of the other new Commission members were unable to 2. Revious MimJtes Ethical Conduct in Intercollegiate Athletics and and Interests Commiaee as to whether le~sla~ attend this meeting: E. Cordon Ge. Ohio State It was voted char the minutes of the June 1940, legislation sponsored by the NCAA Council re- tion for the proposed Division I governance September26-27, 1995, meeting of the structure provided adequate assurances of rep- University: Isis B. DeFleur. State University of lYY5. meeting be appmved as distributed garding two-year college u-aosfero. resentation by women and ethnic minorities. NCAA Presidents Commission at th New Yoric at Binghamton; and Wendell G. 3. Executive commiase. President Albino re- h. President Albino noted that representatives President Slaughter requested on behdfof those Hyatt Regency Hotel in Denver. All Raybum, Lincoln University (Missouri). ported on the executive committee’s meeting of the NCAA met earlier in September with “rp committees and the Commission’s subcommittee actions taken by the Presidents Com- b. President Albino welcomed five officers of held earlier in the day. rewntarives of other national higher-zducation that Division I develop language that would more mission are included. Highlights of the the Associarion who attended all or a portion of a Resident Albino reported that the majority associations. She reponcd that the Associarion cledy define how diver&y will be assured in the the tnceting: NCAA President Eugene E Cur- of the execurive committee’s time was spent dis- received plewr of support and offers of ass& meeting were rt$totied in the October 9 rigan. Secretary-Treasurer Phyilis L HowIe& cussing issues related ro nzsmuturing, with par- mnce in garnering suppon for the nzmucruring issue of The NCAA News. Drvrsion I Vtce-President William M. Sangster. ticular attention tn modificaiom chat had been iniriative. See Pmsidenb, page 8 l The NCAA Register December 25, I995 Presidents Commission minutes

b Continued from page 7 consider offering an amendment-toamendment emphasize the imponance of gender and ethnic Committee the subcommmee’s support for mob and representatives of three constituent organi- to exempt from the application of this rule any dive&y in the composition of the Division I ilications to standardized ACT test-score rem zations during the committee’s August 21, 199.5. pmpoSed new structure. [For related action, see such transfer student who, at the time of transfer, Board of Directors and Management Council; quirements in Division II. consistent with mod& meeting. The Commission reviewed summaries Minute Nos. 6+ and 6b.l has completed 40 percent of the requirements further, that the Commission sponsor amend- licatioris approved by Division I during the Au- of presentations by the Faculty Athletics Reprc- 5.19!8 NCAA Convention for his or her specilic baccalaureate degree pro ments to proposed Constitution 42.1~&t(3) and gust Council meeting to use ACI sum scores (as sentatives Assaiarion. individuals arrxiated with a. The Commission reviewed legislative a palam at the four-year institution. 4.5.1-(c)-(3) to indicate that the two at-large posi- opposed to composite scores) arid to eliminate the sport of intercollegiate skiing and the Di n~endments proposed for the 1996 Convention. (ii) It was the sense of the meeting that the tions from the Division I-AA anrVor Division the practice of “rounding up” test scores. vision I-A Athletics Directors Association. Presi- [Note: Specific legislative proposals notedbelow Commission support the recommendirtians of I-AAA membership used to fill the remaining b. President David G. Carter reported that the dent Peck noted the interest in the iritcrt ollegiate refer to numbered amendmmts set forth in the the Division I subcommittee. Division I-AA and I-AAA positions on the Board Division III subcommittee had accepted without skiing uXI?tWt~ity in 5ecUting ruppon from the Second Publication of Proposed Legislation for b. The Commission reviewed the 19% Con- of Directors or Division I Management Council action a report from the Division III restructur- Presidents Commission for Proposal No. 2-I lg. the lr996 NCAA Convention.] vention schedule. It was the sense ofthe meeting shall be utilized to ensure both ethnic and gen- ing task force regarding the possible expansion which would establish a monuorium on any re- that the Commission express support for a re- (I) The Commission reviewed actions by divii der diversity of representation, if these objectives or reduction of championships brackets after im- duction in the sire of championship fields for all vised schedule for Convention business sessions are not achieved through other appoinunents. rion subcommmees regarding proposed Irgisla- plementation of increased budget allocations to NCAA men’s and women‘s National Collegiate that would permit a general business session to It was voted that the Commission sponsor an Division III. President Caner reported that the tion. Championships through the 199899 academic address Association-wide restructuring issues be- amendment to the amendment consistent with subcommittee agreed that more discussion re (a) The Division I wbcommiuee reported the year. President Peck reported that the Liaison fore considering division-specific proposals in the recommendations of the Division I subcom garding this topic will be necessary during the following actions: Committee did not recommend that the Corn- separate business sessions. miaee. 1996 Convention due to the complexity and (i) Agreed to oppose Proposal Nos. 2-9, Z-10, mission suppon such a proposal. The Commir c. The Commission diwussed the format of the b. It was voted that the Commission instruct controversial nature of this rssue; funher, that 2-1 I. 246,247,24FJ. Z-55,2-57 and 2-79. sion received the report without taking fonrld dc- (ii) Ag-reed to support Proposal No. 2-76. Chtef Executive Officers Forum scheduled for representatives of its executive commiaee to meet the task force should develop various models of tiOIl. (iii) Determined not to support (as distinct Sunday, January 7. with representauves of the Committee on Division III membership criteria and cham- 12. NCAA CHAMPS/Life Skills Program. The from a position to oppose) Proposal Nos. 2-72 It was voted that the format 01 the forum be al- Women’s Athletics and the Minortty Oppor- pionships criteria for discussion and straw votes Commission received a report roncrrning the and 2-73. tered to begin with an hour-long session open tunities and Interests Committee to convey the in January, and finally, that the task force should Association’s CHAMPS/Life Skills Program with (b) The Division II subcommtttee repotted the only to chief executive 05cers. followed by 90- Commission’s shared concern for assuring di- forward to the subcommittee by its June 1996 out taking formal action. following actions: minute division breakout sessions open to chief verse representation and to explain the Corn- meeting final recommendations regarding new (i) A5irrned the subcommittee’s continued sup executive o5cen and/or institutions’ primary mission’s actions to address those concerns. membership and champtonships criteria, for 13. Benefits to Student-Athletes. The Corn- pat for Proposal No. 24. voting delegates; further, that the Commission c. The Division II subcommittee expressed likely consideration as proposed legislation at the mission received a report of discussions by the (ii) Took no position on Proposal No. 2-70 and conduct a brief meeting at the conclusion of the support for the following recommendations of 1997 convention. NCAA Executive Committee regardmg possible also declined to suppott an alternative resolution CEO Forum. the Division II Task Force to Review the NCAA 8. Moratorium on Nm NCAA Members, The apptoaches for increasmg benefits to student- being proposed by the sponsors to form a corn d. It was voted that the Commission affirtn its Membership Smtcture: Commission reviewed action taken by the aMeteS. mittee to continue to study the issue of need- existing policy authorizing the Commission’s ex- (1) That signi6cant gmwtb in any division con- Councit during its August 1995 meeting to estab a. The Division I subcommittcr reported that based financial aid. ecutive committee to amend or withdraw leginla- sdNtcs “extmonlinary circumstances” of the type lish a moratorium on the acceptance of new it did not take formal action in this regard but (c)The Division III subcommittee repotted the tion sponsored by the Commission or sponsor that would merit a request for additional finan- members into the NC&4 until changes in the conveyed a sense of the meeting that: following actions: new legislation if the executive committee deter- cial araistance from the Executive Commitwe. governance structure being considered at the (1) Any proposals to increase benefits to stu- (i) Supported Proposal Nos. 2-90,2-96 and 2- mines that such action would further the ex- (2) That Association-wide committees be re- 1996 and 1997 Conventions are implemented, if dent-athletes should not result in increased costs 101. pressed intent of the Commission with respect to tained as part of the new membership structure. adopted. The Commission received this infor- to campus budgets. (ii) Opposed Proposal Nos. 2-103.2-104 and 2- the subject matter of the legislation. (3) That the Division II Management Council mation without taking fortnal action. (2) The subcommittee would not be inclined 105. e. Green offered a brief rummaty of tentative should be based on a conferenccreprewntation 9. Nominating Cnmmlttu. The Commission to suppon acmss-theboard increases in grants- (d) It was the sense of the meeting that the plans to gain support for the Commission’s 1996 model. received the Presidential Nominating Commit- in-aid up to the cost of attendance. Commission support the legislative actions of the Convention agenda. He reminded Commission (4) That elections of Presidents Commission tee’s slate of candidates for vacancies on the (3) Some support existed for further explo- division subcampiaees. membera that as the Convention draws near, and Council memben at the 1997 Convention be Commission occurring upon adjournment of the ration of means by which to meet the financial (2) Jerry Kingston. chair of the NCAA Aca- chcy will be asked to contact their colleagues to suspended; further. that a transition team be e.+ 1996 Convention. It vsa.9the sense of the meeting needs of SN&nt-atiktCS, not to exceed the cost demic Requirements Committee and a member urge involvement in and support of the Com- tablished atier the 1996 Convention. including that the report of the Presidential Nominating of aaendance. of a joint committee of the Academic Require- mission’s restructuring initiative and that they members of the Division II subcommittee of the Committee be accepted (4) Considerable sentiment existed for pro- ments and Two-Year College Relations Commit- may be requested to engage in various activities Presidents Commission. the Division II Steering 10. SI&wtama&iIt and E.U Cmr&ct The viding additional benefits to student-athletes tees, joined the meeting. The Commission rem during the Convention. including goor manage- Committee of the Council, membera of the Commission reviewed a rcpott submitted by the through existing special programs (e.g.. Special viewed a reties of propor& applicable to (ran+ ment and commentary in suppoti of or opposi- Division II Task Fotre to Review the Membership Commission’s Committee on Sportsmanship and Assistance Fund), especially to the extent that fen from twoyear colleges. tion to specific legislative proposals. SUU~N~~ and addidonal appointees as necessary Ethical Conduct in Intercollegiate Athletics. The such assistance could directly benefit SNdcnt-ath- to 511positions on the Division II Presidents and (a) It was the sense of the meeting that the 6. Membeeabip Reahwchsrlng. Joseph N. report included a revised draft statement on letes at the campus level in ways that are dis- Ctnwley. chair of the Overnight Commiaee on Management Councils. shared values related to spommanship and eth- Commission support the action of its executive cernible and meaningful to them as individuals. the NCAA Membenhip Structure, joined the 7. other ActioDn hy Dividon subcommiaeea. ical conduct, a resolution sponsored by the commiUee in August tojoin the Council in rpon- b. The Division II subcommittee reponed that meeting. President Cruwley summarized recent The Commission’s division subcommittee chairs Commission and Council to incorporate sport+ soling Proposal Nos. 263.264.266 and Z-67. it did not take formal action but agreed on two The Division II subcommiaee noted its interest activities of the ovetaight commiaee and reported reported on the meetings of those subcommit- manship and ethical conduct as a speci6c com- principles: in development of a mote rpeclc definition of on a meeting conducted earlier in Seprember be tees. It was noted for the recotd that actions tak ponent of the Division I athletics ceniflcation (1) Proposals to increase benefits should relate comspondcnce courser for purposes of this leg tween represcntaclver of the NCAA and repre- en by the subcommittees in relation to dircur- prngram and proposed legislation amending the directly to educational coats. islation. and it was the sense of the meeting that scnta6vcs of the Knight Foundation Commiarion sions of possible increased benefits for srudent- Association’s principle of sportsmanship and eth- (2) Roposals to increase benefits should be ap this matter be referred to the Academic Re- on IntercoIIegiate Athletics, in which represen- athletes would be reported later in the meeting. ical conduct plicable to student-athletes in all divisions. quirements Committee. tatives of the Knight Commission expressed sup a. President Judith A. Ramaley reported the a. The Division II subcommittee reported that 14. Data and SIta of Future Meetin.@s. The (b) The Commission reviewed the provisions port for the restructuring proposal and offered following actions of the Division II rubcommlt- it had discussed proposed changes to Consti- of Proposal No. 262. which would mandate a to assist in garnering suppott for the proposal. tee: NtiOn 2.4, noting that the committee’s charge Commission reviewed its schedule of meetings “redshirt” year for -year college transfers in The Commission reviewed a final draft of the (1) Reviewed new data regarding the impact originated from concerns related to conduct dur- for 1996: the rpons of football and men’s basketball who membership restructuting proposal sponsored that Division I inidal~ligibility standards might ing competition, and agreed that the values pro a Japuary 7. Wyndham Anatole, Dallas (1996 were partial or nanqualifters. The Commission by the Commission and the Council. The have on Division II student-athletes if imple- mulgated by the Association should be applicable Convention) (Presidendal Agenda Day January noted concerns expressed by the American As- Commission also discussed the recommen- mented in that division and declined to suggest not only to athletics panicipation but also to the 8). sociation of Community Colleges and other dation of the Subcommirtee on Minority Issues modifications in Division 11initial+grbtbry stan- broad specuum of activities affecting the athlet- b. March 2829. Marriott Marquis Hotel, New higher-education associations about applying concerning assurances of diverse representa- dards at this time; further, agreed that artention ics program. York City (1996 Final Four games are Marrh 30 this rule to all such transfer students. tion in the proposed Division I governance should continue to be given to whether the aca- b. The Commission received the report dth- and Apnl 1). (i) The Division I subcommittee recommend structure. demic profiles of student-athletes entering Divi- Out tat&K fOr”i~ Xth. c. June 2.5-26, hotel to be determined. San cd that the Commission support the action of the a. The Division I subcommittee recommend- sion 11 undergo significant changes as the new I I. L.&iaon cOmmittee. President Richard E. Francisco. Council to sponsor the pmpo6d; further, that the ed that the Commission sponsor amendments to standati take effeci in Division I. Peck infomred the Commirsron of discussions d. September 24-25, hotel to be determined. Commission recommend to the Council that it proposed Constitution 4.2.1 and 4.5.1 that would (2) Agreed to convey to the Division II Steering that occurred between the Liaison Committee Kansas City, Missouri. Eligibility appeals

Bemuse reouiting violations involve had been modified for the 1995% academic n n n naced contact with her. during the young man’s unofficial visit to the the@xsibility of an advantagebeing ob year. One F’SA had verbally commiaed prior to Case No.: 4 NCAA eligibiity don: Eligibility restored institution’s campus, prior to receiving per- tained in the recruitment of a @aspect, the violation and the other PS.4 will not sign a Citation: B 13.02.4.4 NCAA action qarding hstitudonal re- mission from the young man’s previous in& letter of intent during the early signing period. Spcntz Men’s basketball aponaibility: Secondary violation; no further rution to discuss his possible transfer to the in- thosecaw arepublished sepafately @om NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. Factaz PSA’s official visit to the institution’s action. stitution. other matters.Also, pleacenote that an. NCAA action regnrding institutionttl re- campus extended into a dead period. Institutiond/conference acdo~ Not ap NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. actions takn by the institution, confer- aFors.aibility: Secondary violation; no further NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. plicable. NCAA action regarding institutional te- action. NCAA action regarding imtihrtionat te- ence OT NCAA &w&tee on k&zcZions n n n rponaibii~ Secondary violation; no further regarding the institution i sesponribility Institutional/conference action: Institution aFonaibiity: Secondary violation; no funher fhac No.: 7 aCti0l-l. will not allow the coaching staff to participate action. Citation: B 13.1.1.1 and 134.1 Imituciond/conference action: The con for the occurwn.ceof the viokatiun that in futther evaluations of PSAs and will forfeit Institutiod/conference action: Not ag spart: Women’s gymnastics ference reprimanded both the head and as- caused the ineligibility of thestudent-ath- three evaluation days. plicable. Faetar Gymnastics coaching staff contacted sistant coach. leteare r$toTtcdalong with the @blti n n n n n n P&4 by telephone and mailed the young wo n n n tion of theparticular eligibility uzse. Case No.: 2 Gase No.: 5 man recruiting materials prior to September Case No.: 10 Cihtiom B 13.02.4.4 Citntion: B 1302.5.2-(b) 1 of her junior year in high school. Coaches Citation: B 13.1.2.1, 132.1, 136.1 and 13.8 Sport Women’s basketball Sponr Women’s basketball relied on erroneous information and con- Sport: Men’s basketball Eligibility appeals Factc P!Xs 05ciA paid tisit extended into FCXQC Student-athlete (SA) made a tele- cluded that these activities were permissible. Fnrrs: A representative of the institution’s the first day of a recruiting dead period phone contact with PSA (who has signed a let- NCAA eIig&iity ac&mt Eliglbiliry restored athletics interests made arrangetnents for and concerning recruiting NCAA eli@Rty act&x Eligibility restored. ter of intent to attend institution) after .SA was NCAA acrioo regdiog itsstitotio~I re- participated in the P&4’s unoflicial visit by ac- violations involving NCAA action repding bmtih~tioml re- provided with PSA’s telephone number by two sponsibiity: Secondary violation; no further companying the young man on his trip to the sponsibiti~ Secondary violation; no further basketball coaches. The coaches also provid- action. campus and assisting him during the visit prospective student- action. ed the Peas telephone number to another en- Insiitntional/confcrence action: Not ap NCAA eli$iity action: Eligibility restored. athletes I~tit~tional/eonference actiorn Reduced rolled Sq who v+aaunsuccessful in her attempt plicable. NCAA action repding institutional re- the number of official visits for women’s ba+ to contact PSA n n n a~ouaibiitp: This matter has been treated by ketball by one for the remainder of the 1995 NCAA di+iIity action: Eligibility restored. fhc No.: 8 the Committee on Infractions as part of a ma- 96 school year. PSA was not permitted to sign NCAA action regnrding institutional re- Gbatiom B 13.1.1.3 jor case. letter of intent duting the early signing period. aponaibility: Conference office is reviewing Spati Wrestling Inatitutional/eonference action: Not ap n rnB this matter and till forward a report to the Faettu Assistant wrestling coach contacted a plicable. Case No.: 3 NCAA enforcement staff upon completion of four-year college PSA prior to receiving writ- n n n Citation: B 13.02.4.4 it.5 review. ten permission from athletics depanment of- CnscNo.: 11 Sport: Men’s cross country InstitotioruVcon6crcnce action: The insti- ficials at the young man’s current inStiNtion. Citntion:B 13.1.2.1.1 and 13.1.2.6 Fati Peas official visit extended, by four tution cautioned the coaches and required the NCAA ellgibllity a&ion: Eligibility restored. Sport Men’s basketball Bylaw 13 hours. into a recruiting dead period. The visit women’s basketball staff to undergo a review NCAA action regarding i~tihrtiod re- Facta: While recruiting off campus, head mightally was scheduled to end on the day pri- of NCAA recruiting legislation with tbe insti- spanaibllty: Secondary violation: no further coach was accompanied by his wife during CaseNo.: 1 or to the dead period but was changed in or- tution’s compliance coordinator. action. home visits with the PSAs mentioned above. Citation: B 13.0243 and 30.10.1-(c) der to accommodate a scheduled cross coun- n wm Institutional/conferre action: Not ap Apparently, head coach war unaware that his S~orb Men’s basketball try meet involving the young woman. CaseNo.: 6 plicable. wife could not accompany him on recruiung Factat Bvo men’s assistant bank&all coach- NCAA eIi@tdtIty a&ion: Eligibiliry restored. citation: B 13.1.1 n n n visits. es participated in evaluation activities involv- NCAA action regarding imtihstlo~I re- Span: Women’s soccer fhsc No.: 9 NCAA eR@iity action: Eltgihility restored. ing two prospective student-athletes (PSAa) aponsdbility: Secondary violation; no further Fncbr: Head coach contacted PSA on three Citation: B 13.1.1.3 NCAA action regarding instih~tional TC- during a quiet period. Apparently, the coach action. occasions by telephone during herjunior year Sport: Men’s volleyball ing m misread the NCAA rule book and lmtltudonaVamkm~~c actioax Not applic- in high school. Once the coach became aware Fae& The head men’s volleyi~all coach and failed to realize that the applicable regulation able. of the young woman’s class status. he temri- assistant men’s volleyball coach contacted IiS4 See Eligibility, page 9 l December 25, I995 The NCAA Register Elinibiiitv ammeals

l Continued from page 8 Institutional/conference action: Not ap Staff. pus (a distance of 180 miles) for PSA’s offi- action. plicable. DUB cial visit. Institutional/conference action: Not ap sponaibiih/: Secondary violation; no further mum Gise No.: 26 NCAA el@iity action: Ehg&lbry restored plicable. action. Case No.: 19 Citation: B 1X2.1 NCAA action regarding insdtotional re- n BD Institutional/co~ence action: Not ap Cimtion: B 13. I .3.1 Sport: Football sponsibility: Secondary violation; no further Case No.: 38 plicable. Sport: Men’s basketball Facts: Assistant athletics trainer provided a action. Citation: B 13.7.5.2 mum Factsz On three occasions, the head men’s medical evaluation of PSA’s knee injury as a Institutional/conference action: Iostitu- Sport: Field hockey Case No.: 12 basketball coach made more than one tele- favor to P&4’s mother, but did not provide lion reduced the number of official visits by Faas: Assistant coach and assistant facility Citation: B 13.1.2.4-(a) phone call to the PSA during a one-week pe- ueatment based upon this evaluation. This two for the 199596 academic year and pro- director permiued two PSAs to watch a field Sport Men’s basketball riod. evaluation did not occur during an o5cial or vided additional rules education to the asnis- hockey contest from the institution’s press F& During PSA’s official visit to institu- NCAA eli@iity action Eligibility restored. uno5cial visit to the institution‘s campus. tant coach. box rather than the general seating area used tion’s campus, the young man met with a fac- NCAA action regarding imtitotiond rc- NCAA eli@ity actionz Eligibility restored. mum for the event . . . ulty member at an offsampus location. spo”slbsbty: Institution will forward a report NCAA action regarding inatihrtiotd re- Case No.: 32 NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. to the enforcement staff. sponsibii~ Secondary violation; no further Citation: B 13.7.1.2.1 NCAA action regarding instihttional re- NCAA action regarding insdttdonal re- Institutional/conference action: Not ag action. Sport: Men’s baketball spm&bii: Secondary violation; no further spomibiIityz Secondary violation; no further plicable. Imtitutio”al/amferfercncc action: Institu- Factx PSA was not provided the required action. action. mum tional guidelines will be developed regarding five-visit notification letter prior to his official Inatitutiottal/conferme action: Institu- Institutional/conference action: Not ag Came No.: 20 permissible training-room contacts with. and paid visit. tion will require assistant coach to engage in plicable. Citation: B 13.1.3.1 services to, PUs. and all previous interpre- NCAA eli@liv action: Eligibiliry restored. a five-question case study quiz for approxi- mum Sport. Football tations related to this issue will be provided NCAA action regarding instihttional re- mately a six-month period. and facility per- Case No.: 13 Factsz Due to a miscommunication among to the training staff. sponsibility: Secondary violation; no further sonnel will be notified regarding seating re- Citation: B 13.1.3.1 coaching staff members, PSA was contacted mum action. strictions for all events uulizing the football Sport Women’s gymnastics twice by telephone during the same week. Case No.: 27 Institutional/conference action: Subse- skdium. Facttc PSAwas contacted by phone on three NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. Citation: B 13.2.1 and 13.1.2.1 quent to the visit, the institution sent PSA a mum occasions while classified as a junior in high NCAA action regarding institutional re- Sport: Field hockey five-visit letter. Case No.: 39 . school. The institution’s initial contact oc- sponslblty: Secondary violation; no further Facy: During PSA’s o&la1 visit to the in- HUD Citation: B 13.11.1 curred based on the fact that the young action. stitution’s campus, the parents of an SA pro- Case No.: 33 Sp6rt: Men’s basketball woman indicatrd that she would graduate Insti~tionaVconference action: Not ap- vided the young woman with a meal. The SA citation: B 13.7.1.2.2 Fact.% The head coach commented about from high school in .June 1996. However, plicablr. was serving as the young woman’s student Sport: Women’s gymnastics PSA’s athletics ability in a newspaper aniclc upon funher investigation by the institution, it mum host during the visir Factz During the fall, PSA was provided an prior to the young man signing his National was determined that PSA was classified as a ju- Case No.: 21 NCAA eligibiily action: Eligibility restored. expense-paid visit while classified as ajunior Letter of Intent with the institution. nior by her high school. Avo of the three calls Citation: B 13.1.3.1 NCAA action regarding institutional re- in high school. Institution provided the visit NCAA eligibiity action: Kligibilicy restored. were made to try and explain the recruiting rem Sport: Women’s volleyball sponsibility: Secondary violation: no further based on the young woman’s intent to grad- NCAA action regarding institutional re- suictions to PSA and her parents. Facts: Assistant coach contacted PSA by action. uate in June 1996. Additionally, the institu- sponsibility: Secondary violation; no futthrr

NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. phone during the summer prior to the be- Institutional/conference action: The ins& uon also relied on NCAA Initial~Eligihiliry aCtiOn. NCAA action regarding institntiod re- ginning of her junior year in hrgh school. tution rrvihed ira guidelines for student hosts Cleannghouse’s approval for her official vis- Institutional/conference action: Inatitu- sponsibiit)r: Srrondary violation; no further ‘1 he coach was acting on rnlormation pro- and reviewed appropriate legislation with all it. It later was learned that PSA would not of- tion reviewed the appropnatc legislation with action. vided by a publisher of a scouting service. coachrs. ficlally be classified ah a senior at her high all head coaches. Institutional/conference action: Not ap who indicated that the young woman had mum school unul.January 1996. mum plicahle. rornpletrd her junior year in high school. Case No.: 28 NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. Case No.: 40 mum NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility rebtored. Citation: B 13.2.1 and 13.2.2-(h) NCAA action regarding institutional re- Citation: B 13.11.1.1 Case No.: I4 NCAA action regarding institutional te- Sport: Women’s basketball sponsibility: Secondary violation; no fnnhrr Sport: Football Citation: B 13.1.3.1 spoosibility: Secondary violanon; no funhet Facts: Two PSAa received lodging and action. Facts: Head coach commented to a news- Sport Field hockey action. meals from representatives of the institution’s InstitutionaVconference action: Instim paper reponer about PSA’s athletics ability. Facta: Head coach contacted PSA by phone Institutional/conference action: Not ap- athletics imeres& prior to their enrollment at tion will not recruit PSA for approximately Apparently, the coach made the comment in on one occasion during the young woman’s plrcable. thr institution. The young women. interna- three months after she has been o5clally de- response to a question by the reporter at the junior year in high school. mum tional SAs, atrived at the institution’s campus clared a senior by her high school. end of an interview about another matter. NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. Case No.: 22 prror to the availability of housing in the in- mum The comment subsequently appeared in a NCAA action regarding institutional re- Citation: B 13.1.3.1 and 13.1.3.3.1 stitution’s residence halls. The women‘s has- Case No.: 34 newspaper article written by the reporter. sponsibility: Secondary violation; no funhrr Sport: Baseball k&all coaching staff arranged for the young Citation: B 13.7.1.2.4 NCAA eligibility n&ion: Eligibility restored. action. Facts: The institution’s baseball coaching women to stay in the homes of the repre- Sport: Women’s swimming NCAA action regarding institotional re- Institutional/conference action: Not ap sotl contacted PSA by telephone on two oc- srntatives until the young women could move Facb: Two PSAS each were provtded an of- SponaibiIity: Secondary violation; no further plicahle. casions during a one-week period. The into the residence halls.. ficial paid visit prior to receiving approval of action. .,r== .,, young man scheduled an official visit to the NCAA eligibility at&m: Eligibility restored their academic credentials from the NCAA InstituliomI/cooference action: Not ap- ‘&se Nd.: 15 institution’s campus and, subsequent to the on the basis of institutional action. Initial~Eligibiliry Clearinghouse. The visit oc- plicable. Citation: B 13.1.3.1 contacts, canceled the visit. NCAA action regarding instihaional rc- curred due to an assistant coach’s error. mum Sport Men’s diving NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. sponsibiity: The conference will forward a NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. the No.: 41 Facts: Men’s and women’s diving coach NCAA action regarding instittttional re- report to the enforcement staff. NCM action regarding institutional re- Citation: B 13.12.1 made three telephone calls to PSA before July sponsibility: Secondary violation; no further InsdhationUconference action: The insti- sponslbtityz Secondary violation; no funher Sport: Baseball 1 following completion of the young man’sju- action. tution required the PSAs to pay for the im- action. Factsz Head baseball coach allowed PSA to nior year in high school. Inrtitotiosal/confetence action: Not ap- permissible benefits. Institutional/conference action: Instim participate in a practice session while visiting NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. plicahle. mum tion will not resume recruiting PSAs until the institution’s campus oo an uno5cial vis- NCAA action regarding institutional re- mum Case No.: 29 November 16. which will prevent them from it PSA previously had committed to attend the sponsibility: Secondary violation; no further Case No.: 23 Citation: B 13.2.1 and 13.7.5.5-(a) signing a National Letter of Intent with the institution. acuon. Cibdon: B 13.1.4 and 30.10.2 Sport: Women’s basketball institution during the early signing period. NCM eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. Instih&xd/conference action: Not ap Spore Women’s babketball Fsas: Assistant women’s basketball coach Additionally, the head and assistant coaches NCAA action regardig institutional re- plicable. Facts: Head men’s basketball coach con- provided two PSAs’ mothers with chair-back will receive letters of reprimand. sponsibiity: Secondary violation; no further mum tacted PSA during a designated quiet period seats and beverages while attending a foot- mum action. Case No.: 16 for women’s baskethall. Head women’s bas- ball contest during the young women’s 05~ Case No.: 35 Institutional/conference action: Institu- citation: H 13.1.3.1 kethall coach requested that the men’s has- cial visirr to the institution‘s campus. The val- Citation: B 13.7.1.2.4 and 13.7.1.2.4.4 tion will withhold PSA from two practice ses- Sport: Women’s volleyball Lethal1 coach meet with the young woman, ue of these items were not deducted from the Sport: Men’s golf sions upon his enrollment at the instimtion. Facts: The institution’s women’s volleyhall an mternational SA enrolled in a junior col- host money provided to the student hosts. Factsz PSA made an o5cial paid visit prior Further, institution issued a l&&r of reprim coaching btaff contacted PSA by telephone lege, while he was visiting a men’s basketball NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. to receiving Let-t&cation from the NC&$ mand to head coach and required him to rem on two occasions during a one-week period. PSA at the junior college. NCAA action regarding insdtotional re- Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse. The visit view appropriate NCAA leglslauon. NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. sponsibiity: The conference will forward a took place September 9-10 and official rrr& mum NCAA action regarding institutional re- NCAA action regarding imtitutionnl re- report to the enforcement staff. fication was received September 12. Case No.: 42 sponsibility: Secondary violation: no funher sponsibility: Conference will forward a report Institutional/conference action: The insu- NCAAeligibiityaedon: Eliflbllity restored. Citation: B 13.13.4 2lCtiOIl. to the enforcement staff. tution required PSAs to repay the value to NCAA action regarding institutional re- Sport: Women’s soccer Institutional/conference action: Not ap- Institutional/conference action: Institu- chair-back seats and the beverages. Further, sponslblty: Secondary violation; no further Facb: Two assistant coaches were em plicable. tion reduced the number of allowable con- the institution cautioned the assistant coach action. ployed in a privately owned camp that also DUD tacti with PM and required her to review appropriate Institutional/cooference action: Institu- employed two PSAs. Once the coaches be- Case No.: 17 mum NCAA legislation. uon prohibited recruitment of the young came aware of the violauon, they approached Citation: B 13.1.3.1 Case No.: 24 mum man until November 10. the camp director, who rhen decided it would Sport: Women’s gymnastics Citation: B 13.1.7.3-(f) CPM No.: 30 n n n he best for the young women to leave the Facb: A member of the mstitution’s ath- Sport: Women’s golf Citation: B 13.2.1. 13.6.1 and 10.1-(d) Case No.: 36 camp. letics deparunent staff contacted a PSRs par- Facts: Head women’s golf coach had an in- Sporh Men’s bask&all Citation: B 13.7.12.4 and 1X7.1.2.4.4 NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. ent by phone, which resulted in MO phone person contxt with PSA and her parents at Facts: Assistant men’s basketball coach Sport: Women’s swimming NCAA action regardiig institutional rc- calls to the family during the same week. The the site of a competmon. prior to the con- provided automobile transportation for PSA Facts: The institution allowed PSA to make sponsibiity: Secondaty violation: no further staff member returned a call from the parent clusion of the competition. ‘The young wo- from the airpon to campus, which resulted in an 05cial visit without prior certification of action. However. the coachrs were admon- and was unaware that the call was from a par- man previously committed to artend the in- a violation when the young man did not en- her academic credentials by the NCAA ished to avoid similar violauons in the future. ent of the recruit or that the gymnastics coach smution. roll, and arranged lodging for the young man Initial-Eligibility Clearmghouse. InstihItionnl/confercnce action: Iasutu- already had made her one call per week. NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. at an off-campus apartment for a two-week NCM eligibiity action: Ehgrlxhry restored. tion has ceased all recruitment act&i&s since NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. NCAA action regarding institutional re- period at no cost to the young man. Also, PSA NCAA action regarding imaitntional re- the violation was discovered. NCAA action regarding institutional re- sponsibiity: Secondaxy violation; no further provided false and misleading information to sponsibility: Secondary violation; no further spomblty: Institution suhmined a repon of XUOII. the institution and enforcement staff. action. Bylaw 30 the violation to the confereme o5ce and is Institutional/conference action: Not ap- NCAA eligibility action Eligibility restored Institutional/conference action: Institu~ awaiting its action on the matter. plicable. after PSA is withheld from one additional tion required PSA to repay the expenses in- Case No.: 43 Insbtutional/conference action: Institu- mum contest (a total of seven contests or 25 per- curred during her visit ($95.50), placed a writ- Citation: B 30.10.5(i) tion established a new policy for returning tkse No.: 25 cent of the season) and repays the value of ten reprimand in the head coach’s file and Sport: Football phone messages. Citation: B 13.1.8.2 the transponation and lodging. will not permit 05cial visiti for the women’s Fe During May 1995, members of the mum Spar’: Women’s basketball NCAA action regarding institutional re- swimming program for the remainder of coaching staff visited the same high school Came No.: 18 Facts: Assistant women’s basketball coach sponsibility: This matter and others will be 1995. on two separate occasions. ‘The high school Citation: B 13.1.3.1 had an in-person contact with PSA on a day treated by the Committee on Infractions as mum was located on the horder of two recruiting Sport: Women’s basketball of competition for the young woman’s high- part of a major case. Came No.: 37 areas and the violation occurred as a result Facts:On two occasions. an assistant coach school softball team, prior to the team’s com- IMtih.ltio”al/confercnce action: Institu- Citation: B 13.7.1.2.4 and 13.7 1.2.4.4 of a mistake by the involved coaches. contacted PSA by phone twice in the same petition. This contact was made at the young tion required PSA to be withheld from first Sport: Women’s lacrosse NCAA eligibility act&x Eligibility restored. week. In both instarrcrs, the second call was woman’s high school. six regularly scheduled intercollegiate has- Facts: Institution provided PSA with an ear- NC%4 action regarding iostitational re- as a result of the coach returning a phone NCAA eligibility aetion: Eligibility restored. ketball contests. ly 05cial visit to the institution’s campus pn- sponsibility: Secondary violation; no further message from the PSA and informing her NCAA action regarding institutional re- mum or to the young woman being approved by action. that she could talk to her on only one occa- sponsibility: Secondary violation; no funher Case No.: 31 the NCAA Initial-Eligihiliry Clearinghouse. Institutional/conference action: Not ap sion per week. action. Citation: B 13.6.2.2.3 The young woman subsequently was cleared plicable.

NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. Iostihdional/com&rence action: The insti- Sport: Women’s basketball for early o5cial visits by the clearinghouse. NCAA action regarding institutional re- tution reprimanded the assistant women’s Facb: Assistant women’s basketball coach NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. spoosibiity: Secondary violation; no further basketball coach and reviewed appropriate provided automobile transportation to PSA NCAA action regarding institutional re- action. legislation with the institution’s coaching from her hometown to the institution’s cam- spon.sibiIityz Secondary violation; no further See Eligibility, page IO l Page 10 The NCAA Register December 25, I995 Eligibility appeals

l Continued from page 9 Citation: B 13.1.1.3 at $40); an airline ticket to LIS Vegas, Nevada Case No.: IO after FSAis withheld from one additional con- Sport: Men’s basketball (valued at $144); and cab fare from the Las Citatioo: B 12.4.2.2 test (a total of seven contests or 25 percent of Facti Head men’s basketball coach contact- Vegas airport to a casino (valued at $3..5U) from Sport: Women’s swimming tie season) and repays the value of the tran~+ ed P&4 (a four-yearcollege transfer PSA) without a “runner” for a known sports agent. Further, Facmz SA earned $5U on a fee-for-lesson ba- pmtatinn and lodging. first obtaining tinen permission from athleucs SA accepted a meal at the casino (valued at sis by providing swimming lessons. officials at tie young man’s previous mstimtion. NCAA action regarding i~~tiNtiond re- NCAA eligihiity action: EliIpblliry restored $10) after being invited to a privaw party bad NCAA eligibiility wtion: Eligibility restored spotihiity: This matter and others will be NCAA action regding i~6~tional nmpan- on the young man’s stants as a member of the upon repayment of the money earned on a treated by rhe Committee on Inftacuons as sibiility: Secondary violaoon; no further action. institution’s football team. Funher, w accept- fee-for-lesson basis. part of a maJor case. Bylaw 13 Institutio~/contmnce action: Not appllca- ed approximately $3,650 of financial assis- NCAA action regarding iosti~tional re- Institional/confiic action: lnstinnion ble. tance, because he is an SA at the institution, spcmsibiity: Not applicable. required PSA to be withheld from the lirst six Case No.: 44 from individuals upon whom he is not natu- Institional/conference actior Not ap regularly scheduled intercollegiate basketball Citation: B lY.01.5.2. 13.1.2.2, 13.1.3.1, 13.5.1 rally or legally dependent (these individuals plicable. CONIdS. and l3.12.2.L(a) Eligibility appeals were from the young man’s tribe). This ii- 888 w Men’s basketball other than those nancial assistance was provided to the SA PI+ GmeNo.: 11 Bylaw 14 PaeN Rior to the PSAk o&ial visit to the in- involving recruiting marily from three individuals who believed Citation: B 12.4.2.2 sthtion’v campus, the young man had an in- they should assist the young man in succrr& Sport Men’s swimming Gme No.: 17 person, off*ampus contact with a representa- ing in his academic and athletics endeavors. Factsz SA received $480 in impermissible Citation: B 1401.1 tive of the institution’s athletics interests, in Finally, SA also received small amounts of compensation for teaching on a fee-for-lesson Spoti Men’s haskethall which the merits of the young man attending money from indiwdrrals that he met at social basis. Faclx Sq ajunior college transfer, pmcticed the iostimtion were discuswd, Further. during events NCAA eligibility P&XI: Eligibility resrored and paticipated in IWO preseason contests pri- the young man’s OffiCid Vi&t to the instinrtion’s NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored after SA repays the impermissible compensa- or to being certified as eligible to compete by campus, a friend of the PSA vw provided with upon repayment of all impermi&ble benefits tion. the NCXA Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse. meals by a member of the in.%tiNlion’s basket- Bylaw It received by SA ($397.50 from the “runner” NW action regarding imti~ticmd re- NCAA ellgihiliq s&on: Eligibility restored. ball coaching stalf. Also. the young man par- and fS,6.5U from tribe members) and after tbr sponsibility: Nor applicable. NCAA action repdog institutional re- ticipated in two tryout activities during hi 05- cwbe No.: I young man is withheld from a total of four Iwti~tional/ccm&rmcenctlom institution sponsibiility: Secondary violation; no further cial tisir. Finally. the young man was contxtcd Cit&iom B 121.1 and 12.1.2 contests (40 percent). The eligibility appeals withheld SA from the first three regularly schc XtiOIl. by telephone by the basketball coaching staff sport: Women’s tennis staff determined that the SA’s acceptance of duled swim meets. Insti~tiodconfcrm action: Not ap more than once during the one-week period Fe Prior to her enrollment. student-a& benefits from a runner for a spans agent tvar- mmm plicable. subsequent lo his 05cial visit lo the campus. lete (ti) received $250 in prize money for her ranted the young man being withheld from hse No.: 12 n n n NCU di@lBty aetionz Eligibility restored participation in a tennis tournament The two contests and that the young man’s acceg Citation: B 12.5.2.1 Case No.: 18 upon rrpaymment of the cost of the impermis young woman never intended to profession- tmce of money from people who were mem Sport Men’s bask&all Citatioo: B 14.1.2.1, 14.3.1 and 14.3.5.2 sible meals. alize henelf and her expenses exceeded the hen of hi hihe warranted the young man be- Factx A sporting goods company, in con- Sport Football NCM aetion rqardiq insti~tiooal te- prize money won. ing withheld from two additional contests. junction with the institution’s marketing staff, Fpetrr: Assistant football coach allowed SA spohbi& This matter is being fowaxded to NCM +ibllity wximx Eligibility restored On appeal to the Eligibility Committee for created a television advertisement that fea- to practice beyond the permissible 4.5day pe- the enforcement s&for further review. after SA is withheld from the first two contests Division I. the staffs initial decision was af- tured former men’s basketball SAS in actual riod and paticipate in two contests prior to Imtitutjonal/car6aaKe metion: The insti- of the 1995% regular season. firmed. game situations; however, the final clip also in- being certified as eligible hy the NCAA Initial- nuion reprimanded the men’s basketball NCAA aciion regarding instituW FE NCAA action regarding imti~tiooal re- cluded a dunk by a currem men’s basketball Eligibility Clearinghouse. Subsequently, the coaching sta& reduced the men’s basketball spomibiiv Not applicable. sponsim This matter is being forwarded to SA who can be identified by the name on the young man was cenified by the clearinghouse. program’s budget for the 199596 academic Insti~tionaVcooferenee a&on: Not ap the enforcement staff for further review. back of his jersey. This violation occurred even NCAA eligihiity action: Eligibility restored. year by $S.CKQ prohibited the as&tam men’s plicable. InstiNfiod/e4mfereoce action: lnsdnnion though the institution’s marketing stalT ex- NCAA action regarding insti~cional rc- basketball coach from participating in any re n n n required SA u) pay the value of the benefits re- plicitly advised the advertising staff that cur- sponsibilityz Secondary violation; no funher cruiting activities during the 199$% aadem Gust No.: 2 ceived from the runner to a charity. rent SAs could not appear in this advertise- action. ic year and reduced the number of official virt Citations B 12.1.1, 12.1.2 and 12.1.2 n n n ment. InstiNtio~conference action: Institution its for men’s basketball F’SAs during the 1995- Spo& Men’s ice hockey Case No.: 7 NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. reprimanded assistant coach and required 96 academic year. Further, the institution re- Fpcrs SAs were provided a meal by a local Cimti~ B 12.2.3.2 NCAA action regarding imtitutional R- him to submit a written review of appropriate quired the head men’s basketball coach to pre scout for a National Hockey League team. Sport Women’s basketball spomibility: Secondary violation; no further NCAA legislation. Further, institution ~111rem pare a written repon proposing a plan to de- NCAA el&ibZty utian: Eligibility restored Facts A former international athlete par- action. quire assistant coach to submit weekly practice velop adequate NCAA rules compliance with on tie basis of institutional action. ticipated as an amateur on a team that was Inslitutional/conference action: In&w and travel rosters to the institution’s compli- in the basketball program. NCAA action repding imti~tional re- supported by a professional club. The young tion’s marketing st&Tcontacted the television ante coordinator. Conference requirrd instim 888 sponsiM* Not applicable. woman did not sign a contract nor did she r= station and required it to edit out the part that tution to take corrective actions in order to Gae No.: 45 hstiNtionavc adon: h&NliOn ceive remuneration for competing with the included the current SA. prevent violations of this nature in the future, Cimtion: B 1X02.4.4 required SAs to repay the value of the meal. team. n n n to contact the institutions in which the young spar* Men’s basketball n n n NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored Case No.: 13 man competed against while ineligible and to Faek FSA made an unof6cial visit to the in- Gsw No.: 3 on the basis of institutional action. Citation: B 12.5.2.1 withhold the young man from two contests tin&n’s campus during a designated dead Citatiorx B 12.1.1-(a) and 12.1.2-(l) NCAA action repding innti~tiond re- Spwr: Baseball upon certification of his eligibility hy the clrar- period. The young mao had no contact with Sports Men’s cross counuy; men’s a-& spmmibii Not applicable. FSCIB: SA won a J.50 gift certificate from a inghouse. . . the athletics staff upon his arrival and was in- outdoor IldN&mWa stetkmz Tbe insti- coffeehouse as a result of his participation in n n n formed that his visit was impermissible. Factx 54 prior to his enrollment at the in- Orion withheld the youngwo- from one of a television show look-alike contest The win- Char No.: 19 NCAA eligibiity action Eligibility restored. stitution, received $52 bawd on his place fin- the institution’s regularly scheduled inurcoL ners’ pictures appeared in a congratulatory Cimion: B 14.1.4 NCM aetion regarding institutional re- ish in a half-marathon race. The young man legiate contests of the 199596 season. newspaper ad chat was sponsored by the cof- Sports Men’s tr;rck. indoor, women’s track, spnsihiljty: &condaT violation; no further indicated that he war unaware that receipt of n n n feehouse. indoor action. the money would jeopardize his eligibility. Case No.: 8 NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. Facts: The institution allowed the young InstiNtional/c&enee adon: The insti- NCL4 e&bility nction: Eligibility restored. Cit&ion: B 1223.2 and 12.2.3.2.1 NCAA action regarding insti~tional cc- men and women to pra~iicr before they had . . tution will not allow the young man tn sign a NCAA action mgmling institutional re- Sportz Women’s basketball Fmub&Ly: Not applicable. signed the Drug-Testing Conscnt Form. National Letter of Intent during the e&y sign- rpomribi6ty: Secondary violation; no funher Fa&: A former international athlete par- hStiNtiod/Confer~~ aCtiON hSriNliOn NCAA eligibility action: Ehgibiliq restored ing period. action. ticipated as an amateur for two years on a required SA to return the gift certiCcate. on the basis of institutional action. n n n Iststitutional/conferenee action: Not ag team that included professionals. The young n n n NCAA action regarding insti~tional re- Case No.: 46 plicable. woman did not sign a contract nor did she re- thse No.: 14 spousihiity: Secondary violation; no further Gtntio~ Et 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 n 8m ceive remuneration for competing wicb the Citation: B 125.2.1 action. Sport: Men’s tennis Case No.: 4 team. Sport Wrestling In&iNliomd/conference action: The insti- Fra: While on a recruiting tip, head coach Citatiam B 12.1.2-(m) and 1231.2 NCAA eligibility seton: Eligibility restored Fac&z SA participated in a television corn- tution required the young men and women to provided PSA with bansponation to a restaw Spoe Football after tbe institution withholds rhe young wm medal and accepted $1,600 for his involve- sign the form and took steps to avoid a simi- rant, where he provided the young man witi Facta: SA received a meal from a repre- man from the 6rsst five percent (one contest) ment The commercial (which was made for lar violation in the future. a meal valued at $9. Institution first became sentative of spotis agents The representative of the institution’s regularly scheduled inter- the purpose of promoting the sale of a soli n n n aware of the violadon when the head coach joined the young man and three now former collegiate contests of the 1995-96 season. drink) involved Lhe young man in a taste test Case No.: 20 submitted his expense form and requested re SAS and paid the entire cost of the meal. NCAA aetim regarding imti~tionml re- NCAA eligibiity Icdan: Eligibility restored Cihtion: B 14.1.6.1.1 and 16.5.1-(e) imbunement for the cost of the meal. Appa- NCAA &g&i&y wliaw Eligibility restored m Not applicable. on the basis of insticucional action. !3porr: Baseball rently, the coach was unaware that his actions on the basis of institutional action. I Orion: Not appli- NCAA action regarding imSiNtiond re- Facts: SA pracuced on rwo occasions prior violated NCAA legislation. NCAA action regar&ng institutional re- cable. sqxuuihili3: Not applicable. to being enrolled and was pmvided with $100 NCAA .&i&by Don: J$$Glity reslored. spmGw Not applicable. n n n h.lStiNtiOOlWC- action: The insti- for meal expenses for the 6mt week of prac- NC&4 adon regudiog imti~tiond re- Jndiwc adinN InstiNtion Che No.: 9 NLiOo required the young man to repay rhe tice prior to being cenified as eligible. spodbilItyt Secondaty violation: no furrher required tie SA to repay his portion of the Citati B 12.3.1.2 impermissible remuneration in 12 monthly in- NCAA eligibility tsaioo: Eligibilxy restored aciion. meal. Sporr: Foolhall cremenu of $100 to a charity of his choice. after rhe young man repays the impermissi- Jimdie rtan: hliNtion n Bm F.actsz SA accepted a telephone debir card ble benefit will not recruit PSA until his ehpbtluy is re- Came No.: 5 from a sport3 agent’s representative. or ‘Yun- Bylaw I3 NCAA adion regarding hStiNCiOd re- smred by the NCAA. Additionally, the confer- Clh&u: B 12.1.2-(m) and 12.3.1.2 ner.” .SA was aware that the man was a run- sponsibilityz Secondary violation; no further ence o5ce has instructed the instiNtion to is 8poriz Men’s basketball ner for an agent but did not use the card be- Cane No.: 15 action. sue a written reprimand m the head coach. Fads .%4nxeived the use of a pager for one cause he felt it would affect his eligibility to Citadon: B 13.i.3.1 and 13.12.2.1.2 hmtiNhod/amferenee paion- Institution Finally, the instinuion has requested repay- year and two long-distance telephone debit participate in imercollegiate football. After Sportz Men’s basketball placed leaen of caution in the penonnel files ment of the nonpermissible entmajnment ex- cards (for a total of appmximately 60 minutes) having the telephone debit card in his pos- Fati PS.& were employed at a basketball of involved staffmemben and addressed this penses. from his father, who had received the items session for approximately six months. the camp held on the msritution’s campus without pri- issue at a subsequent coaches’ meeting. n n n from a sports agent, while he (the father) was young man gave it to a teammate on the in- or approval from the institution. Also, one of the mmm Case No.: 47 employed by the agent for a five-month peri- StiNtiOn’S football team. The second SA used PSAr received two telephone calls during one Gw No.: 21 Cimtion: B 1X6.2.2.2 od. !Xs father met the agent through his son. the telephone debit card to make appmxi- week from the head men’s basketball coach. Citation: B 14.1.6.2 Sport Men’s swimming SA’s relationship with the agent was based on malrly 100 minutes of long-distance telephone NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored Sport: Women’s swimming Fncb: Head swimming coach allowed SA to his athletics pardcipacion at a previous ins& &IS. NCAA nclion regarding imtiNtiod re- Facbx SA panicipated in one contest while use his automobile in order for SA to hanspon Ntion. NCAA eligibii action: Eligibility restored sponsibility: Institution will submit a report of enrolled in less than a full-time program of a PSA during the P&4’s visit NCAA eligibii ncticmz Eligibility restored on the basis of institutional a&on for the sec- this and other mane- to the enforcement staff studies. The young wOrnan was told hy an ath NCM &glbility action: Eligibility restored based upon the institution’s actions and afvr ond SA In the case of the fint SA, the young for review. letics department staff member that she could NCM adon rqpding hti~tiond re- the young man is withheld from the first sev- man is restored after being with held from one InstitutioomVmnference action: Not ap compete while enrolled in less than 12 hours spndhiliv Secondary violation; no further en regularly scheduled intercollegiate basket- contest plicable. hecause of a waiver of NCAA rules based on action. ball contests. On appeal to the Eligibility Committee for n n n her training for the United States Olympic ._ I OckioN In5titulion On appeal to tbe Ehgb~bcy Committee for Division I, the staffs initial decision was af- theNo.: 16 team. However, although SA is currently on will delay the start of swim practice by three Division I, the s-s initial decision was af- firmed. Citntion: B 13.2.1, 13.6.1 and 10.1-(d) the World Championship team, she is not a days and limit the men’s swim program to hvo 6mled NCM netion regmdiog instih~tionml rc. Sport: Men’s basketball member of the Olympic team. Therefore, the official visits nen year. NCAA acrion regarding instin&maJ re- spc&bi&ty: This matter till be forwarded to Factw Assistant men’s basketball coach pro. waiver did not apply to her. nparnibUi* Not applicable. the enforcement staff for further review. vided automobile uanrportation for PSA fmm NCAA eligjbilify actlom Eli@bllity restored. bStiN‘iO,,d,e‘“&m”~ aCLi00: trl5dNtion the airpon to campus, which resulted in a vi- NCAA action regarding i~~ti~tional re- will require the young man to repay the value withheld second SA from one contest and re- olation when the young man did not enroll, sponsibilicy: Secondary violation; no firrther of the pager and debit cards. quired repayment of the cost of the telephone and arranged lodging for the young man at an action. n n n calls ($17). Further. instinuion will require the offcampus apartment for a two-week period hsfiNtiond/lxmfere action: InsliNtiorl c&eNa:6 first SA to panicipate in tie production of a at no cost to the young man. Also, PSA pro- vacated the points earned hy the SA in the Bylaw 13 CiW B 12.1.2-(m) and 12.3.1.2 videotape to be used as part of an agent edit vided false and misleading information to tbe sport: Football cation program for S&s. inStiNtion and enforcement sm. Cue No.: 48 Fat@ SA accepted a paging device (valued 888 NCAA eligibil&y act&nx Eligibiiry restored See Eligibility, page I I l December 25, I995 The NCAA Register Page I I Eligibility appeals

l Continued from page IO sponsibiility: Secondary violation; no further Institutional/mnfercne action: The insti- expenses for the SA who sustained a knee in- gible. The clearinghouse subsequently cer& action. tution decreased the second SAs institutional jury while participating in an NCAA-approved lied the young man as eligible. contest in which she participated while ineli- InstitulioniUconferenx petion: Institution financial aid by $213 for the 1995-96 academic basketball league. NCAA eligibiliry actiom Eligibiliry restored. gible. will require SA to repay the impermissible fi- year and reviewed appropriate legislation with NWlA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored NCAA action regarding institutional re- n Bm nancial aid. Also, msutution intends to review the institutton’s tennis coach. on the basis of institutional acrion. sponsibili~ Secondary violation; no further f&e No.: 22 its financial aid procedures to avoid a similar NCAA action regading insthtional re- action. . . . C&ion: B 14.2.4.1 and 14.3.1 violation in the future. Bylaw I5 sponmbUyz Secondary violation; no further Institutiod/mtetece action: The insti- Sport: Men’s swimming n n n action. tution disqualified the young man’s resulrs in Facts Head swimming/diving coach al- Case No.: 28 Case No.: 34 Institutiemal/co&rence action: Institution the contest and declared him ineligible for lowed SA to compete in one contest before the Citation: B 14.3.2.1.1 and 14.3.4.1 Citation: B 15.01.3 and 15.1 requested refunds of the payments submitted practice and competition for the institution’s NCAA Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse ceni- Sport: Women’s tennis Sport: Men’s basketball by its insurance carrier. In the event a cam- 1995 fall season. Also, the instihuion took ad- fied him as eligible. The clearinghouse sub. Facts: Institution awarded SA financial aid Fncts: SA received a ~1.000 scholarship plrtr refund is not attained, the SA will be rem ditional steps to prevent a similar violation in sequendy idenufied the young man as a par- for one semrster prior to notification from the from an outside source not administered quired to repay the remaining balance. the future. tial qualifier. NC44 Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse that through the institution. which resulted in an n n n n n n NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. th e young woman was not a qualifier, because amount that exceeded the cost of a frdl grant- Case No.: 41 Case No.: 47 [SA has used a season of competition per B she had not taken a precollege entrance in-aid. Citation: B 16.8.1.2 Citation: B 14.1.2.1 and 143.1 1424.1 and, therefore, has two seasons of exam. NCAA eligibility a&on: Eligibiliry restored Sport Women’s track, outdoor Sport Women’s soccer competition remaining.] NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored on the basis of institutional action. Factx SA traveled with the team to an away Factez Institution allowed SA to participate in NCAA action regarding institutional re- on the basis of institutional action. NCAA action regarding institutional re- contest while completing her transfer year in three contests prior to being certified as ehgi- sponsibiIityz Secondary violation; no further NCAA netion regarding institutional re- sponsibiity: Secondaty violation; no further residence. ble by the NCAA Initial~Eligibility Clearing- action. sponsibility: This case was forwarded to the action. NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. house. The clearinghouse subsequently cetti- Inatitotiodconference action: The insti- enforcement staff. Iostitutional/conkree aaiom Institution NCAA action regarding institutional re- fied the young woman as eligible. tution intends to withhold the young man Inst.itulional/co&rence setion: Institution required SA to repay the amount of the out- sponsibility: Secondary violation; no funher NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. from the first contest of the 1996-97 season. required SA to repay tmpermissible aid. side scholarship. acrion. NCAA netion regarding insdtotional re- Also, the institution took addiuonal steps to n n n n n n Institutional/conference action: Not ag sponsibility: Sccondaty violation: no further prevent a similar violation in the future. Case No.: 29 Case No.: 35 plicable. action. n n n Citation: B 14.3.5.1.1 Citatiom B 15.01.3 and 15.2.5.4.2 n n n Institutional/conference action: Not ap Case No.: 23 Sport Men’s u-ad, outdoor Sporr: Women’s crack, outdoor Case No.: 42 plicable. Citation: B 14.2.4.1, 14.3.1 and 14.3.2.1 Factsz Head men’s track coach allowed SA Facts: SA received an outside financial Citation: B 16.10.2.7 n n n Sport: Men’s tennis to practice with the institution’s ttack team be- award not dispersed through the institution. Sport: Women’s volleyhall Case No.: 48 Facar: Institution allowed SA to participate yond the permissible two-week period for rem NC&4 eligibility action: Eligibility restored Factsr Head women’s volleyball coach pro- Cifatiom B 14.1.6.1 in four contesu prior to the young man be- rruited .SAs who have not been certified as el- on the basis of institutional action. vided SA with ttansportation from the instint- Sport: Men’s basketball ing certified as eligible by the NCAA Initial- igible by the NCAA Initial&Eligibility Clear- NCAA action repding institutional re- tion to another state during a semester break. Fach: SA participated in practice sessions Eligibiliry Clearinghouse. Further, the instim- inghouse. sponsibility: Secondary violation: no further SA agreed to pay for half of the expense of the while enrolled in less than a minimum full- tion provided the young man with $5,250 of NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. acrion. gasoline for the trip; the young woman paid time program of studies. The young man athletically related financial aid. Subsequently. NCAA action regarding instihltional re- Iraticutional/conference action: lnstimtion for this and the remainder of her expenses dropped below the required number of hours the clearinghouse determined that the young rpomihiity: Secondary violation; no funher will reduce SA’s nonathletics aid for the spnng during the rrip. Head coach traveled for re- based on advice from a faculty advisor that man was a partial qualifier. action 1996 semester. cruiting purposes; however, SA did not have such an action would not affect his full-time NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored In.stitutional/~ence adoa Institution n n n contact with any prospective student-athletes smlls. on the basis of institutional action. reprimanded the head coach and revised its Case No.: 36 (FSAs) during the trip. NCAA eligibility e Eligibthty restored. NCAA action regarding institotional re- notification process regarding eligibility is- Citation: B 15.1 NCAA eligibiity paion: Eligibility restored. NCAA adion regardiog iostitutiond re- sponslb&ty: Secondary violation; no further sues. Sport: Men’s basketball NCAA action regarding institutional rc- sponsibiity: Secondary violation; no further action. n n n Facm SA received an ouuide grant, without spondnhtyz Secondary violation; no further action. InstitutionnVconkrene action: The insti- Case No.: 30 regard to his athletics ability, from a founda- action. Institutional/conference action: Not ap. tution will withhold the young man’s athleti- Citation: B 14.4.1 tion, even though the young man was already InstitutionaVco&rence a&m: Insatution plicable. cally related financial aid during the first se- Sport Women’s volleyball receiving a full grant-in-aid This grant would reprimanded the head coach. n n n mester he is othrrwise eligible for such aid, Fachs: Head women’s volleyball coach al- have been permissible had it been provided n n n Case No.: 49 as repayment for receipt of impermissible aid. lowed S&s m participate in three volleyball con- after August 1. 1995, due to new legislation Case No.: 43 Citation: B 14.4.3.1 n n n terts prior to the young women meeting insti- permitting receipt of outside gran& having no Citation: B 16.12.2.1 Sportz Wrestling Case No.: 24 trrtlonal satisfactory-progress requiremenrs. relationship to athletics ahiliry. up to the in- Sport: Men’s basketball Facbz SA competed in five comes& while in- Citation: B 143.1 Subsequently, SA No. 1 was certified as eligi- stitution’s cost of attendance. Face: A representative of the institution’s eligible under satisfactory-progress require- Sport: Women’s track outdoor ble for competition and it was determined that NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored athletics interests provided SA with mans- ments. Facts: The institution provided SA with SA No. 2 did not meet institutional satisfactory- on basis of institutional action. portation to a local car dealership, where the NCAA eligibiIity action: Eligibility restored $903 of athletically related financial aid, even progress requirements. NCAA action regrding institutional re- young man began the process of purchasing on the basis of institutional action. though the young woman did not meet initial- NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored. sponsibility: Not applicable. an automobile. NCAA netion regarding institutional re- rligibility requirements. The young woman [SA No. 2 used a season of competition per B Instihztional/confcrence action: Institution NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility resrored spotibiity: Secondary violation: no further was provided thr impermissible financial as- 14.2.4.1.1 required SA to repay $500 to the foundation. cm the basis of institutional action. action. sistance as a result of an error in the athletics NCAA action regrding institutional re- n n n NCAA action regarding institutional re- Instih&md/ecmference action: Institution depamnem. sponsibility: Secondaly violation; no further the No.: 37 sponsibiility: This matter is being forwarded to will withhold SA from the first five intercoIL NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored action. Citation: B 15.2.5.2-(b) the enforcement staff for further review. giate contestS of the 1995% season. on the basis of institutional action. Institutional/conhme action: The insti- Sport: Men’s ice hockey In&itutional/conference adon: Institution n n n NCAA action repding instihrtional re- tution suspended the head coach without pay Facts: SA accepted two otherwise permissi- required SA to repay the value of the tranb Case No.: 50 . . . sponrublty: Secondary violation; no further and withheld .SA No. 1 from eight contesn. ble scholarships, valued at $1,000, from out- portation. Citation: B 14.7.2 XtiOIl. n n n side awarding agencies that were not disaib- n n n Sport: Women’s basketball Institutionallcoderence netion: The insti- Case No.: 31 uted chrorrgh tie institution. Casr No.: 44 Factx While spending six weelcs in Mexico tution required the young woman to repay the Citation: B 14.7.2 and 14.7.6.1-(d) NCAA eligibility action: Eligibility restored CitMion: B 16.12.2.3 as pan of a language program, SA participat- impermissible aid. Sport: Women’s basketball NCAA action regarding institutional re- Sporr: Women’s soccer ed in two confestS as a member of an outside n n n Facg: Institution allowed young women to sponsibili~ Not applicable. Facfa: Head women’s soccer coach loaned basketball team. Case No.: 25 participate in the I1.S Olympic Festival w* Iostihdodcon&reoce action: The insti- money to SAs for one meal when informed NCAA eligibility action: Eligibiliry restored Citation: B 14.3.1 mm’s basketball tryouts before obtaining a tution contacted the awarding agencies to in- that the on-campus dining facilities would be on basis of institutional action. Sport: Men’s iLe hockey waiver from the NCAA Council. The Council form them of appropriate NCAA legislation. closed. NCAA nction regarding institutional re- Faa Institution allowed SAs to participate would have granted the young women a waiv- n n n NCM eligibility action: Eligibility restored sponsibility: Not applicable. in one contest pnor to the young men being er for their involvement in the event Case No.: 38 on the basis of institutional action. InstiNticmal/c iwtion: lnstinrtion certified as eligible by the NGL4 Initial-Eli- NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. Citation: B 15.2.5.%(b) NCAA action regarding institutiod re- will withhold SA from the first two regular-sea- gibility Clearinghouse. The young men subse- NCAA action regarding instihdod te- Sport Women’s track outdoor ~ponsibii~ Secondaty violation; no further son contests of the 1995-96 basketball season. quently were certified as eligible by the clear- sponsibility: Not applicable. Facts SA received $1,000 in financial assis- XtiOIl. inghouse. InstitutionaVconference acttom The insti- tance from two outside awarding agencies that ImtiNliodconfermcc action: Institution NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. tution admonished the compliance staff to were not disbursed through the institution. required SAs to repay the loan and repri- Bylaw I6 NCAA action regarding institutional re- thoroughly check all “assumptions” with the NCAA eli@biity action: Eligibility restored manded the head coach. sponsibility: Secondary violation; no further appropriate conference or NC,&4 staff mem on the basis of inrtirutional action. Case No.: 51 action. brrs. NCAA action regarding in.stitutionaI re- Citation: B 16.12.2.2.1 Institutional/conference action: Not ap n n n sponsibility: Not applicable. Sport: Women’s basketball plicable. Case No.: 32 Insticutional/co~enu action: The insti- Factsz Head women’s basketball coach and n n n Citation: B 14.7.5.2-(a) tution required the SA to provide this assis- assistant women’s basketball coach provided Case No.: 26 Sport: Men’s basketball tance to the financial aid office in order for SA with $300 to $400 in cash for a medical Citition: B 14.3.1 and 14.3.5.1.1 Factlr: During the summer of 1995. SA p”r- the moneys to be credited to the young procedure. While SA told the coaches of the Sport Football tiripated in a three-on-three basketball tour- woman’3 account Bylaw I2 medical procedure. she did not solicit the Factax Institution allowed SA to parucipate nament without written permission of the in- money and, in fact, returned the money to the m two contests prior to the young man being smution’s director of athletics. Subsequently. Came No.: 45 coaches. certified as eligible by the NCAA Initial- the young man participated in one contest of Bylaw 16 Citation: B 12.2.3.2.3 NCAA eligibility nctiw: Eligibility restored. Eligibiliry Clearinghouse. Further, the in&u- a sanctioned summer league after receiving Sport: Women’s basketball NCAA action regarding insti~tid re- tion allowed the young man to practice be- approval from the institution. CaseNo.: 39 Factat A former international athlete par- sponsibili~ This and other mattem are being yond the permissible two-week period while NCAA eligibility actiom Eligibility restored Citalion:B 16.1.4.1.1 and 16.1.4.1.2 ticipated for five years on amateur youth handled by the enforcement staff. not being certified by the clearinghouse. on the basis of the institutional action. Sports Football, men’s gymnastics teams that are supported by a professional Insdtutional/confrrecnce action: Confe- Subsequently, the clearinghouse determined NCAA aeiion rrgnding institutional re- Facts Due to the failure of administrative club. The young wcunan did not sign a con- rence will require SA to be withheld from the that the young man was a qualifier. rrponaibilityz Not applicable. officials to determine exact pricing of awa& tract nor did she receive remuneration for first four intercollegiate conference contests. NCAA e@ihiIity a&o= Engibility restored. InstitutionaVcoaferrnce donz Institution prior to their distribution. several SAs received competing with the teams. NCAA action regarding institutional re- will withhold SA from the first contest of the a benefit in excess of the $100 permitted for NCAA eligibility &on: Eligibility restored spcmsibiityz Secondary violation; no further 1995-96 basketball season. their participation award. after tie institution withholds the young wo- action. n n n NCAA eli@hility action Eligibility restored man from the first five percent (one contest) Institutional/conference action: Not ag Case No.: 33 upon repayment of the benefit received over of the institution’s regularly scheduled inter- plicable. Citation: B 14.10.2 and 15.1 the $100 limit. collegiate contests of the 199596 season. n n n Spom Men’s tennis. women*s tennis NW action regarding institutional re- NCAA action regarding institutional te- Case No.: 27 Factx SA participated in one contest prior qxmsibiity: Secondaty violation; no further sponsibilityz Not applicable. Bylaw IO Citation: B 14.3.2.1 to bemg added to the institution’s squad list action. InstitotionaUconference action: Not ag Sport: Baseball The young woman previously had been in- hstitulionaVm~ence action Institotion plicable. Case No.: 52 Facbr The institution provided SA with ath- cluded on the institution’s volleyball squad list established a new procedure for the reporting, Citation: B 10.3 letically related financial aid before being no- Also, a second SA was overawarded $213 of fi- checking, ordering and administering of the Bylaw I4 Sport Football tified by the NCAA Initial-Eligibility Clear- nancial aid during the 1994-95 academic year annual awards program. Facbr: SAs placed bets on professional and inghouse that the young man did not satisfy due to an award from an outside agency that n n n CaseNo.: 46 intercollegiate football contesLn through the the NCAA core-curriculum requirement there- was not properly calculated by the institution. Case No.: 40 Citation: B 14.121 and 14.3.1 use of football parlay cards, which provided by rendenng him a partial qualifier. NCAA eligibiIiry a&xx Eligibility restored. Citation: B 16.4.2-(b) Sport: Men’s golf odds when betting on numerous contests. SA NCAA eligibiity aetion: Eligibility restored NCAA action regarding institutional re- Sport: Women’s baskerball Facm The institution allowed SA to com- on the basis of institutional acuon. spoosibiity: Secondary violation; no further Factx An athletics depamnent staff trainer pete in one contest before the NCAA Initial- NCAA action regarding instihrtional re- action. arranged for the institution to pay the medical Eligibdiry Clearinghouse certified him as eli- See Eligibility, page I2 l PageI2 The NCAA Register December 25, I995 Eligibility appeals l Continued from page I I S4 used a season of competition based on lim- Face: SA participated in one contest while pete in track and field because asked to leave ited participation per B 14.2.4.1. not enrolled in a full-time program of stud- tram. 199091: Institution No. 1; withdrew in fall No. 1 received these cards from an uniden- NCAA n&on regniing institutional re- ies. The young man dropped a course, which lYgg, began church mission spring 1991.1991- tified individual who delivered these cards to sponaibiity: Secondary violation; no further reduced his enrollment status to pan time, 92: Church mission. 1992-93: Released early SA No l’s residence, and the young man action. just prior to competing. Subsequent to com- Bylaw I4 from church mission in December 1992 due to made these cards available to SA No. 2 and InstitutionaI/conference setion: Inntitu~ family’s financial bankruptcy; employed during peting, the SA added a course, raising his en- C&e No.: 1 SA No. 3. During the fall of 1995. SA No. 1 tion has revised its noufication procedures spring 1993.199X% Enrolled Institution No. rollment status to full time. Citation: B 14.2.1 and 30.6.1 wagered $15 to $40. SA No. 2 wagered St3 to regarding the eligibility status of enrolled 2; competed in cross country and hack and NCAA eIigIbiity action: Eligibility restored Sport: Men’s hack outdoor $10 and SA No. 3 wagered $15 to $30. SAS. field. 1994-95: Institution No. ‘L: competed in after the young man is withheld from one Fnetx 1990-91: Institution; participated. NCAA eligibility t&on: Eligibiliry restored n n n cnxs counby and oack and field. contest. 1991-92: Institution; did not participate due to after the young men are withheld from two NCAA eIi@hiIity actions Extension granted Came No.: 54 left shoulder surgery (October 1991) and right contests. NCAA action regarding institutional re- for the 199,596 track and field season. Con- Citation: B 14.1.2.1 and 143.1 shoulder surgery (February 1992). 1992-93: On appeal to the Eligibility Committee for sponsibiity: Secondary violation; no further temporaneous medical documentation sub- Sport: Men’s soccer Institution; fall 1992, did not enroll. Institu- Division III. the staffs initial decision was af- action. mitted by the institution for the 198889 track Fati Institution allowed .% to participate tion; spring 1993, did not participate due to in- firmed tar SA No. 1 and the conditions for IMtihrtional/coeference action: Not ap and field .season and documentation of the in numerous contests prior to being certified capacitating shoulder injury. 1993-94: Insti- restoration for SA No. 2 and SA No. 3 were young man’s family’s bankruptcy and his rem as eligible by the NCAA Initial-Eligibility plicable. tuiton: participated. 199495: Institution: par- reduced to one contest. suiting employment during the 1992-93 track Clearinghouse. The institution erroneously ticipated. NCAA action regarding institutional re- and field season indicates that the young man determined that since these young men are in- NCAA eligibility action: Extension waiver rpnuibii~~: Not applicable. Extensions was denied more than one season of partici- ternational SAs, they did not have to be certi- granted for tbe 199.5-96 season. Contempor- pation opponuniry due to circumstances he- Inrtih~tion~I/conference action: Not ap fied through the clearinghouse. Subsequently, aneous medical documentation submitxed by and waivers yond his control. plicable. the young men were ceriified as eligible by the the institution indicates that the stident-athlete clearinghouse. (SA) was denied two seasons (i.e., 1991-92 and NCAA eligibiity action: Eligibility restored. The NCAA Eligibility Committee also is au- 1992-93) of participation oppommity due to cir- cumstances beyond hi or the institution’s con- NCAA action regarding institutional re- thorized to grant extensions of periods of el- Bylaw 14 sponsibility: Secondary violation; no further igibility under NCAA Bylaws 14.2.1.4 and trol. action. 14.2.1.5: hardship waivers for student-ath- n wm &se No.: 53 Case No.: 2 Institutional/conference action: Not ap- letes at independent institutions under By- Clurion: B 14.01.2.1 Citation: B 14.2.1 and 30.6.1 plicable. law 14.5.5: waivers of the transfer-residence Sport: Women’s soccer sport: Men’s track outdoor Facts M participated in a soccer scrim- n n n requirement because of a discontinued aca- Faetzx 19l3&89z Enrolled Institution No. 1; mage while ineligible during the 1995 soccer the No.: SS demic program under Bylaw 14.6.5.3.3: and competed in cross country; did not compete tn season. Citation: B 14.1.6.2 season-of-competition waivers under Bylaw track and field due to injury. 19&4yO: lnsritution NCAA elipjbility aelion: Eli@bility restored. Sport: Men’s cross country 14.2.6. No. 1; competed in cross country; did not com-

n NCAA staff directory

colrrmtion Honon hugrun kgiond Was-Compliance Seminars Bachrll-scan w. str.4rrx.u Arrangemenu-Louis J. Spry Jamrr A. Marchmny Nancy L Miubeil Fmrball-Richard M. Czam”hrll Hanon, Dinner-James A Marchiony John H. Lravrm Mm’s Barkerball- k@ulon-Nnncy L Mitchell Ice Hockey, Man’s R-h Can, K Iohnron Div. I-Philip A. Butrafuno Daniel T Dutrher Uraulr R. Walsh S&h&J-John D. Painter Medn-lohn D. Painter Todd A. Petr Media-Karhryn M. Reirh Women’rr Barkcthnll- Publication%-Nancy L. Mitchell Divr. II/III-Carl E. Dauclr nrna.ran ’9 d w0mh Sean W. Sm3zk.x lrrrric Brag Publiratiom-Theodore A. Bre1dcnrh.4 Michelle A. Pond Richard M. Camphell Kevin C Lennon Rc~watwn-Phylhr M lbnn Rules-Theodore A. Brridcnrhal l~hhcationa-Marry Benson Voting-S. David Bern Initid-EllSlbilk, ClurinShouv Swiaical Plaque Awn& Cow F Karner (Divirm” II) Scholurhips Aa9nhulc. Daniel W. Spencer Robert A. Oliver Jamer F. Wrighl copyright Raydcylnbund Degree Completion-Ursula R. W&h Bauball--Scan W. Srr.lziurr Inidd-Elidbiiiw Wdven Ethnic Minoriry-Swnky D. John-n Scaedng Commkmer Pm&all-James E Wright Regina L. MrNcai Jacq”&e C: Hudson Div. I-Nancy L. Mitrhell corpena Puenmn Porrgxaduaq-Fannie B. Vaughan Men’s Bs&erhsll-Gary K Jrabwm Marybeth Rurkamp Waker Byeyen-Todd A Pea DIV. II-SteDhm A Mallrmrr SoI+ball-John D. Palntrr Dsvld E. Crwuod Illjury s”mllbnu sysmn Div. III--D&l T Dmchn Alfred R. While Women’s Enhancement-Sanley 1) Womm’l Fu~ltbrll-Richard M. Randall W Dick lotwon Sc”denr-Arhiem loua Cnmphell Council Nnnr L Mltr hell Intiond WcJeudy Sklin~, Men’s and Women’% Jane1 M. Juwl Robert W Thomar Philip A. Rutubsx o Sfudent-Aehlae Sasament Ba..bdl Cmn 20 untry, Wda and Worn-n’s Div. I-Dehorrh R Nel*on In‘“nrlc. Propams Pohhc rtlon,-Many nenwn Carolaynr E. Henry Div. I-Dennis L. Poppe Michael S. McNeely Soccer, Men’s Me&-James F. Wright Dw II-Carl I. Danielr Summr thmbdl Div. III--Stan” Tare Inmm Prqmn Div. I-Thomas A Jacob6 Record+Jamc~ E Wright Div. II-Christine M. Pohi Rlchrrd C. Pcrko Div. II-R Wayne Burmw Publicatiom-Srcphe” R Hnlp*tli SunIcy D. Johnron S”rnrnor BuWdI LW”., intupnatlan Div III-Chrirdne M. Pohl Div. III-Thomas A. Jacob* UlhhcationcCarv 7 Brown Chri,Lopher D. Schoemann Puhlicnuon-Theodore A Breidemhal Dab Pmc”Al~ Nancv L Mitchell Da&4 W. Spencer Ruler-tialy r. B&t, Summr BuWdl E- RulecThcaiore A Breidentbal &pi-&” A. Mallonce D#mnpi8tian cm&la soccar. womds Chrirtapher D. Schammr, Bumbdl,Fhn’l Inbm~tbnd CemP&tcion IJrsuln R Walsh Philip A. Bum-0 Swlmmin~. Plan* Div. I-Thomas W Jrmrrrdr Shanc Lyom Fxblications--Gary T Brown Div. I-Michcllc A. Pond wliiom Hancock DitiuUon d Rev=nru Frank E. Marshall jdnt hlky uoud Ruler-Gary T. Brown Dw. II-R Wayne Burmw Dm”el A. Crlandm Keith E. Martin Thorna W. Jcmstedr Wdl Bernard M. Muir Div. III-Christine M. Pohl Dru# and Akohoi Eduuti”n Nancy L MilchelI Div. I--c:hrvune M Pohl Medaa-David I. Gwocd P,rhb< moo+Gav 7 Brown Frrnk II. Uryar Mrdlr-To be nrmed borrl-Gary K Johnson Cindy Thorn& Lumssa, Ran’s DIV. II-Deborah R. Ncbun Dw. I-Ma helle A. Poml Firwnccr-Ke”h F Marlin Dru~ldn~ Philip A. Buwafuuo Div. III-Deborah R. N&on Div. II-Thomar A.,lrroh, Frank D. Uryarr Media-James A. Marchiony Publiradonr-I-uric Bollig Div. II-R. Wawe Burrow Media--Sean W. Smariuar Donna L. Hocketrnmirh Publications-Marry Benson spadmn Buma” Div. III-Chri& M. P&l hv. Ill-c:hri%ine M. Pohi Cindy Thomar hcmru,wommn*9 To he named Yohbcarmn~Cary T Bmwn PublicarioncIaurle BolliS R. Wayw Burrow Specid Events Commktw Rules-Laurie Bollig Eduruion Sw.km David I. Caved Techniques for Efkaiva Akohol Manymcnr Summer Lm~w-(:hru~~pher D P”bhradan+-M.rry Be”ron Daniel E+gan Jr. Keith E. Mawin CsmW Schumann Lm&htion EiiSibiiky llnrontlon Appada Spore S&ty, Hedkine Frank 1) lllyau Summer Even--Chrirtopher D. Nancy L Miuhcll Cnrrle A. Doyle Frank D. IJrvarz DInirl T Dutrhcr lamer A. Marchiony .Srhoemanr> Enforc~mmr R;mddl W. I&k Bu-I.wumal’s 5. Dnwd Rcnr Donna L Hockerrrmith Div. I-Tricia Bark Charles F Smrt Chriaophcr D. Schoemann Cindy Thomu Donna J. Noonm Library d Filmr squd U.b Media-Cvnrhin M. Van Marc Maria K &Julio Regina L. McNeal N Beal’ray Recard+jamcr F. Wright Exqatlwml %,d.nt-Ahlot. DlvMilty Div. II-R. Wapc Burmw LicansinS sucbtkr l mFm To he named Ranking8 Ihv III-Dehonh R N&on DIV. II-Thomas A. lacohs Michael S. McNerlv Dim. I-A/I-AA Foolhall- R,hlica,on~-Lawic Bollig Lxu”tin Comm& Dir. III-Carl E. Dam& Ruic,-Ia”+ Bolhw CIadta Inq”blu Gary KJohnron Tricia Bark Rathryn M. Rcirh P”hltrrt,onr~Steph~o R Hryrrll S”mmrr LrrS”c-Chnra,l,brr D James F. wipht Mambanhlp Tennl*Womwr’s Schumann F.cllhy sprmution, Div. II Football- Shirley Whiwrrc Div. I-hixhclle A. Pund S”mmcr Campr-Chiirmphrr D. Michael V Earle .John D. Pamter Flwchmndbin~ Div. II-Michelle A. P”ond Schumann kncing, Mmnk ud wom9nk Div. III Fmtbnll- Alhcd B. Whirc Div. III-Carl E. Drmclr Botcy Ford Cmltw Prqnm Stann Tae Scan W. Smriwar neuks Frank I) Ilrv~,z Fublicationr-J. Gregory Summrn “I”. I Men’s Ba&eBnll- Publicarionr-Stephen R. ~lrgwcll Michael V F&c F*ld Hoc@ Gary K Johnmn Titb IX Mlncwlq-Enhancemmrr Prqrun Michelle A Pond Francis M. Canawn Stanley D. Johnron Diw. II/III Mcn’r Ba~kerball P&licndon+Mnrry Benson Janet M. Jurrur Wl a- whemy I- Sean w Slrazlnr Fll- Turk and Fldd, Hen3 and Women’s David E. Cawocd Sunlcy D. Johnron Div l Women’s Bakahall- Keith E. Mnnin Regina L MrNed Jamer F Wright Div. I-Deborah R. N&on kwin I. Hudson Dwr. II/Ill Women’, B&ah& Media (O”tdoor)- FlrmwW A”& C.ta,trsphk AhlUk, Injury Pm- DPVC Gwin lemfer l- Schahler Slephen R Hagwell Michael S. McNcely David R Brunk Divr. I/II/III ICC Hockcy- Div II-Carl E. Da&Is POOtbdl ThaNCAANews Cwdlkrlon d Complkna Editorial-P. Dwld Phkle John D. Painter Ihv Ill-Stan,, 7% Div. I-AA-Dennir L Poppe Gmnm Pumcll Jack L. Copeland Pubbcauonr-Stepher, R Hrf,well Media-W31 J. Rudd WV,. 141411 Men’s Lr