Equity and Trust Law John Duddington
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rights to Light Consultation
Law Commission Consultation Paper No 210 RIGHTS TO LIGHT A Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commission: The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, Chairman, Professor Elizabeth Cooke, David Hertzell, Professor David Ormerod and Frances Patterson QC. The Chief Executive is Elaine Lorimer. Topic of this consultation: This Consultation Paper examines the law as it relates to rights to light. Rights to light are a type of easement which entitle a benefited owner to receive light to his or her windows over a neighbour’s land. We discuss the current law and set out a number of provisional proposals and questions on which we would appreciate consultees’ views. Geographical scope: This Consultation Paper applies to the law of England and Wales. Impact assessment: In Chapter 1 of this Consultation Paper we ask consultees to provide evidence in respect of a number of issues relating to rights to light, such as the costs of engaging in rights to light disputes. Any evidence that we receive will assist us in the production of an impact assessment and will inform our final recommendations for reform. Availability of materials: The consultation paper is available on our website at http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/rights-to-light.htm. Duration of the consultation: We invite responses from 18 February 2013 to 16 May 2013. Comments may be sent: By email to [email protected] OR By post to Nicholas Macklam, Law Commission, Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9LJ Tel: 020 3334 0200 / Fax: 020 3334 0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, whenever possible, you could also send them electronically (for example, on CD or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format). -
Nos. 116 to 130)
ESSEX SOCIETY FOR ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY (Founded as the Essex Archaeological Society in 1852) Digitisation Project ESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY NEWS DECEMBER 1992 TO AUTUMN/ WINTER 1999 (Nos. 116 to 130) 2014 ESAH REF: N1116130 Essex Archaeology and History News 0 December 1992 THE ESSEX SOCIETY FOR ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTOI~Y NEWSLETTER NUMBER 116 DECEMBER 1992 CONTENTS FROM THE PRESIDENT ............................ ... ....I 1993 PROGRAMME ..•...... ....... .. ...............•.. .2 SIR WILLIAM ADDISON ... .................... .........•2 VlC GRAY ..... ...... ..... ..... ........ .. .. .. ...... .4 THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF TilE ESSEX COAST ..............•.. .....•4 ESSEX ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONGRESS: LOCAL HISTORY SYMPOSIUM .. .................... ...•.... .5 TilE ARCHAEOLOGY OF ESSEX TO AD 1500 .........•.........•... .5 NEW BOOKS ON ESSEX at DECEMBER 1992 ... ... .. ... ......•6 BOOK REVlEWS ....•. ..... .................. .........•6 RECENT PUBLICATIONS FROM THURROCK .. ........ ........... 7 SPY IN THE SKY ............................. •......... 7 COLCHESTER ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT ..•. ............... ...8 LIBRARY REPORT .... ......... ... .... .. ........ .......8 ESSEX JOURNAL ....... ............... .. ..... ........8 WARRIOR BURIAL FOUND AT STANWAY ..........................9 ENTENTE CORDIALE .................... ...........•......10 WORK OF THE TliE COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SECTION . .. ..........11 Editor: Paul Gilman 36 Rydal Way, Black Notley, Braintree, Essex, CM7 8UG Telephone: Braintree 331452 (home) Chelmsford 437636(work) -
IN the HIGH COURT of JUSTICE QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY VETTING INFORMATION GROUP LITIGATION Amended Pursuant to an Order of 29 November 2013
Claims listed in the CIVIG Group Register IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY VETTING INFORMATION GROUP LITIGATION Amended Pursuant to an Order of 29 November 2013 BETWEEN: VARIOUS CLAIMANTS (as listed in the attached Schedule CIVIG Group Register) Claimants - and - VARIOUS DEFENDANTS (as listed in the attached Schedule CIVIG Group Register) Defendants _________________________________________________ RE-AMENDED GENERIC PARTICULARS OF CLAIM __________________________________________________ These Re-Amended Generic Particulars of Claim are intended to be read in conjunction with the (Amended) Claimant Specific Particulars of Claim and Schedules of Loss. PARTIES 1 The Claimants are individuals who work or have worked in the construction industry. Further details in relation to each Claimant are to be found in (Amended) Claimant Specific Particulars of Claim. In these Re-Amended Generic Particulars of Claim and in the (Amended) Claimant Specific Particulars of Claim, unless otherwise specified, all references to the employment or engagement of any Claimant or other construction worker are intended to include work on the basis of any “employment” status, including employment, self-employment, ‘false’ self-employment and engagement via an agency, sub-contractor or other tripartite arrangement. All references to ‘employment’, ‘work’, ‘recruitment’, ‘engagement ’, ‘job’ or related or similar terms should be construed accordingly. 1 The Defendants are (a) companies (both known and as yet unidentified) which operated in the construction industry at all relevant times and were members of the Services Group of the Economic League (“SGEL Defendants”) and/or the Consulting Association (“CA Defendants”) and 1 (b) individuals who were officers and/or employees of such companies at the relevant times and represented the companies in relation to the Services Group of the Economic League (“the Services Group”) or the Consulting Association and/or who acted as officers of the Services Group and/or the Consulting Association. -
Key Facts and Key Cases
KEY FACTS KEY CASES Equity & Trusts 25726.indb i 18/11/2013 10:40 KEY FACTS KEY CASES The Key Facts Key Cases revision series is designed to give you a clear understanding and concise overview of the fundamental principles of your law course. The books’ chapters refl ect the most commonly taught topics, breaking the law down into bite- size sections with descriptive headings. Diagrams, tables and bullet points are used throughout to make the law easy to understand and memorise, and comprehensive case checklists are provided that show the principles and application of case law for your subject. Titles in the series: Contract Law Criminal Law English Legal System Equity & Trusts EU Law Family Law Human Rights Land Law Tort Law For a full listing of the Routledge Revision range of titles, visit www.routledge.com/law 25726.indb ii 18/11/2013 10:40 KEY FACTS KEY CASES Equity & Trusts Chris Turner and Judith Bray Routledge Taylor & Francis Group LONDON AND NEW YORK 25726.indb iii 18/11/2013 10:40 First edition published 2014 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2014 Chris Turner and Judith Bray The right of Chris Turner and Judith Bray to be identifi ed as authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. -
Unit 5 – Equity and Trusts Suggested Answers - January 2013
LEVEL 6 - UNIT 5 – EQUITY AND TRUSTS SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2013 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students should have included in their answers to the January 2013 examinations. The suggested answers set out a response that a good (merit/distinction) candidate would have provided. The suggested answers do not for all questions set out all the points which students may have included in their responses to the questions. Students will have received credit, where applicable, for other points not addressed by the suggested answers. Students and tutors should review the suggested answers in conjunction with the question papers and the Chief Examiners’ reports which provide feedback on student performance in the examination. SECTION A Question 1 This essay will examine the general characteristics of equitable remedies before examining each remedy in turn to analyse whether they are in fact strict and of limited flexibility as the question suggests. The best way to examine the general characteristics of equitable remedies is to draw comparisons with the common law. Equitable remedies are, of course discretionary, whereas the common law remedy of damages is available as of right. This does not mean that the court has absolute discretion, there are clear principles which govern the grant of equitable remedies. Equitable remedies are granted where the common law remedies would be inadequate or where the common law remedies are not available because the right is exclusively equitable. One of the key characteristics of equitable remedies is of course that they act in personam. -
Sharing Homes: a Discussion Paper
The Law Commission (LAW COM No 278) SHARING HOMES A Discussion Paper Presented to the Parliament of the United Kingdom by the Lord High Chancellor by Command of Her Majesty November 2002 Cm xxxx The Law Commission was set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Toulson, Chairman 1 Professor Hugh Beale QC Mr Stuart Bridge Professor Martin Partington CBE Judge Alan Wilkie, QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ. This Discussion Paper was first published online on 18 July 2002. The text of this Discussion Paper is available on the Internet at: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk 1 At the date this report was signed, the Chairman of the Law Commission was the Right Honourable Lord Justice Carnwath CVO. ii THE LAW COMMISSION SHARING HOMES A Discussion Paper CONTENTS Paragraph Page Executive Summary vi PART I: INTRODUCTION 1 The shared home 1.6 2 A property-based approach 1.23 6 PART II: THE CURRENT LAW 9 Introduction 2.1 9 Trusts of land 2.4 10 Legal and beneficial ownership of the shared home 2.10 11 Legal title – joint tenancy 2.12 11 Beneficial ownership- joint tenancy or tenancy in common 2.16 12 Resolution of disputes between trustees and beneficiaries 2.23 14 Dealings with third parties 2.27 15 Occupation of the shared home 2.32 17 Where a person has an interest under a trust of land 2.34 17 Matrimonial home rights 2.37 18 Orders regulating -
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS Law and Practice
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS Law and Practice CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS Law and Practice Richard Wilmot-Smith Joint Head of Chambers, 39 Essex Court; Recorder; One of Her Majesty’s Counsel; Bencher Middle Temple 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Oxford University Press, 2006 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) Crown copyright material is reproduced under Class Licence Number C01P0000148 with the permission of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland First published 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wilmot-Smith, Richard. -
Regent's Canal Conservation Area Appraisal
1 REGENT’S CANAL CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL Urban Design and Conservation Team Regeneration & Planning Division London Borough of Hackney 263 Mare Street London E8 1HT October 2007 Regent’s Canal Conservation Area Appraisal October 2007 2 All images are copyright of Hackney Archives/LB Hackney, unless otherwise stated London Borough Hackney, LA08638X (2006). Regent’s Canal Conservation Area Appraisal October 2007 3 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1.1 What is a Conservation Area? 1.2 Location and Context of the Conservation Area 1.3 The format of the Conservation Area Appraisal 1.4 Acknowledgments 1.5 Conservation Area Advisory Committees 2 Planning Context 2.1 National Policy 2.2 Local Policies 3 Historic Development of the Area 3.1 Archaeological Significance 3.2 Origins and Historic development 3.3 Geology and Topography 4 The Conservation Area and its Surroundings 4.1 The Surroundings and Setting of the Conservation Area 4.2 General Description of the Conservation Area 4.3 Plan Form and Streetscape 4.4 Views, Focal Points and Focal Buildings 4.5 Landscape and Trees 4.6 Activities and Uses 5 The Buildings of the Conservation Area 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Listed buildings 5.3 Buildings of Local Significance 5.4 Buildings of Townscape Merit 6 “SWOT” Analysis 6.1 Strengths 6.2 Weaknesses 6.3 Opportunities 6.4 Threats 7 Conclusion Map of Regent’s Canal Conservation Area Regent’s Canal Conservation Area Appraisal October 2007 4 APPENDICES Appendix A Historic Maps of the Regent’s Canal Conservation Area Appendix B Schedule of Listed and Locally Listed Buildings and Buildings of Townscape Merit Appendix C Bibliography Appendix D List of illustrations Appendix E Further information Regent’s Canal Conservation Area Appraisal October 2007 5 1 INTRODUCTION The Regent’s Canal Conservation Area was designated by the London Borough of Hackney in 2007. -
RECIPIENTS of CITY HERITAGE AWARDS Buildings
RECIPIENTS OF CITY HERITAGE AWARDS Buildings (and, where known, the contractors who carried out the work) that have received City Heritage Awards since the scheme started in 1978 are as follows:- 1978 Building: 31 Newbury Street Contractor: BWP Ltd Architect: Anstey Horne 1979 Building: Porter Tun Room Contractor: Trollope & Colls Ltd Architect: Wolff Olins and Roderick Gradidge 1980 Building: Union Discount Company Contractor: Dove Brothers Ltd Architect: Fitzroy Robinson & Partners 1981 Building: Cannons City Sporting Club Contractor: McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd Architect: John Scrivener Associates 1982 Building: Fishmongers’ Hall Contractor: R Mansell (City) Ltd Architect: Holford Associates 1983 Building: Unilever House Contractor: Wates Special Works Ltd Architect: Unilever Design Team 1984 Building: 68-73 Cornhill Contractor: Higgs and Hill Building Ltd Architect: Rolfe Judd Group Practice 1985 Building: Magnesia House Contractor: Harry Neal Ltd Architect: Green Lloyd & Adams 1986 Building: Bengal Warehouse Contractor: Sir Robert McAlpine & Sons Ltd Architect: Erith & Terry 1987 Building: Clothworkers Hall Contractor: Higgs and Hill Management Contracting Ltd Architect: Donald W Insall 1988 Building: 41-43 Trinity Square and 6-7 Crescent Contractor: Walter Lilly & Co Ltd Architect: Lyons & Sleeman & Hoard 1989 Building: Cologne House Contractor: Robert Runciman & Son Architect: Roger, Carpenter, Kerr & O’Hara and Building: Bank of England Museum Contractor: Holloway White Allom Architect: Higgins Gardner & Partners 1990 Building: Lutyens -
Trade Unions: Blacklisting
BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP-06819, 1 September 2017 By Doug Pyper Trade unions: blacklisting Inside: 1. Introduction 2. The legal framework 3. Background to the 2010 Regulations 4. Subsequent developments www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number CBP-06819, 1 September 2017 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. The legal framework 6 2.1 The 2010 Regulations 6 Prohibited lists 6 Remedies 6 2.2 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 7 2.3 Other relevant law 8 Data protection 8 European Convention on Human Rights 8 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union 9 International Labour Organization 9 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 10 3. Background to the 2010 Regulations 11 3.1 Employment Select Committee Report 11 3.2 Trades Union Congress complaint to the International Labour Organization 12 3.3 The Employment Relations Act 1999 13 3.4 The Information Commissioner’s investigation of the Consulting Association 14 3.5 Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010 16 4. Subsequent developments 18 4.1 Compensation scheme 18 Overview of TCWCS 18 4.2 Scottish Affairs Committee Inquiry 18 4.3 High Court litigation and settlement 21 4.4 Information Commissioner call for evidence 21 4.5 Smith v United Kingdom 22 Cover page image copyright: no attribution required 3 Trade unions: blacklisting Summary Blacklisting is the practice of compiling information on individuals concerning their trade union membership and activities, with a view to that information being used by employers or employment agencies to discriminate in relation to recruitment or treatment. -
Notes and News
Notes and News ARCHAEOLOGICAL NOTES : Ig62-63 Abingdon, Berks. ( I) Further excavations were undertaken on the site of the Neolithic causewayed camp by Mr. D. M. E. Avery, Miss H. J. Suterrneister and Mr. J. Maddicott in advance of housing development.' (SU/51Ig82.) (2) Sherds of Romano-British and 12th-century pottery were found in a small cutting in the cellar of Ig, East St. Helens by J. W. B. Dunthorne. (3) Sherds of Romano-British pottery were reported from small excavations in the cellars of 28, East t. Helens by M. Braybrooke. These two areas extend the Romano-British site Icported in 18652 and 1961.3 (4) A fragmentary medieval floor-tile was found among dredged material upstream of the lock above the town. It was of Hohlers type W 13, not so far recorded from Abingdon.' (SU/50797I.) Aslhall, Oxon. Struck flints, including barbed-and-tanged arrowheads, micro cores, small blades and a fabricator, were found by Mr. W. Castle in ploughed field. on the site of the large Romano-British she. A bronze brooch and many coins were also found. (SP/2goI12.) Bampton, Oxon. Sherds of indeterminate Romano-British pottery were found at Calais Farm during fencing in advance of housing development, immediately east of the farm-buildings. The gravel-pit adjacent on the north, now disused, produced Iron Age pottery. (SP/3Igo33.) Banbury, Oxon. A pit containing sherds of 12th-century pottery was excavated by Mr. R. Fearon, during rebuilding of the White Horse Hotel in High Street. Undisturbed clay was observed more than a foot above the present street-level. -
AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS of Tile STRATEGIC GROUP CONCEPT WITHIN Tile UK CONSTRUCTION 1]NT)USTRY
AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF TIlE STRATEGIC GROUP CONCEPT WITHIN TIlE UK CONSTRUCTION 1]NT)USTRY by AVAN ABDUIL RAllAK [BRAIHM A thesis submitted to Heriot- Watt University, in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Heriot-Watt University Department of Building Engineering and Surveying, Edinburgh, UK (January 1995) This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that the copyngfl rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author or the university (as may be appropriate). DEDICATION My heartfelt thanks and appreciation goes to my parents Without their love, encouragement, and prayers this thesis would never have come to fruition. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Table of Contents List of Tables vi List of Figures viii Acknowledgements ix Abstract x 1. CHAPTER ON1: INTRODUCTION 1.1. Overview. 1 1.2. Problem Statement. 1 1.3. Aims and Objectives. 2 1.4. Original Contributions of the Study. 2 1.5. Overview of Research Design. 4 1.6. Organisation of Thesis. 5 2. CHAPTER TWO: A REVIEW OF STRATEGIC GROUP THEORY 2.1. Introduction. 7 2.2. The Concept of Strategic Groups. 7 2.3. The Rationale for the Formation of Strategic Groups. 8 2.4. Industrial Organisation Economics. 10 2.4.1. Limitations of the 10 Perspective. 12 2.5. Strategic Management. 14 2.5.1. Evolution of Strategic Management as a Field. 15 2.6. Positioning of Strategic Group Theory.