The Rise and Fall of Anti-Psychiatry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Rise and Fall of Anti-Psychiatry ORIGINAL PAPERS Healthcare NHS Trust for allowing us to PRATT.P. (1993) Pharmacokinetics and interactions of the publish the results. SSRIs. In A Review of the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (eds A. Mackay. P. Pratt & B. Leonard). Clwyd: References Unicorn Health Communications Services. DRUGANDTHERAPEUTICSBULLETIN(1993o) Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Depression? Drug and Thera peutics Bulletin, 31, 57-8. "John Lawton, Ciinicai Services Pharmacist. —¿ (1993b) Prescribing costs. Drug and Therapeutics Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust. The Wells Bulletin. 31. 87. ECCLESTON,D. (1993) The economic evaluation of antide- Road Centre, Wells Road, Nottingham NG3 pressant drug therapy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 3AA: and Prakash Naik, Consuiianf Psychia 163. 5-6. trist, Lyndon Clinic. Hobs Meadow. Solihull. MACKAY,A. V. P.I1993) Foreword. In A Review of the West Midlands B92 8PW Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors 1993 (eds A. Mackay. P. Pratt & B. Leonard). Clwyd: Unicorn Health Communications Services. 'Correspondence The rise and fall of anti-psychiatry Mervat Nasser A review is made of the anti-psychiatric movement beginnings can be traced back to the writings through its major protagonists, Lacan, Laing, Cooper of Jacques Lacan who was probably the first to and Szasz. The ideology was set to challenge the glorify madness and regard it as the road to concept of mental illness and question the authority of freedom. In a statement extracted from Propos the psychiatrist and the need for mental health institu sur ¡aCausalitépsychique (Paris. 1947) Lacan tions. The anti-psychiatric movement received a lot of says, "madness is not an insult to liberty but attention in the 1970s but is now considered to be of the follows liberty like its shadow". Lacan was also past and of likely interest to the psychiatric historian. the first to launch an attack on established However, the impact of the movement on current psychiatric thought and demand that psycho psychiatric practice requires further re-examination analysis re-examine its concepts, with parti and appraisal. cular reference to explaining paranoia. He thought that the psychotic experience could The anti-psychiatric movement grew in the be psychoanalytically understood in the same realm of politics, particularly the politics of way as psychoanalysis offers an explanation the left, which was considered at one time the for neurosis. In his rebellion he undermined main source of progressive ideas and possibly genetic disposition and dismissed the possibil the only instrument against capitalist oppres ity of any organic pathology. sion. It gained its initial respect and glamour Lacan attempted to challenge accepted ways from its association with the prevailing exist of understanding the psychotic experience and ential philosophy at that time. The need to introduced to psychiatry what could be called stengthen the relationship between psychiatry a revised Freudian doctrine (Bowie, 1987). and philosophy is an old one and based on However, he is more likely to be remembered Kant's contention that judgements on matters for the importance he gave to language in the of sanity should be the prerogative of the field of psychoanalysis. His system strongly philosophical mind. relates language to the unconscious, where he Despite these connections, the roots of the regards the spoken word as man's peculiar anti-psychiatric movement are undoubtedly to privilege and his tool to displace desire and be found in the psychoanalytic tradition. The attain freedom. In developing his linguistic Psychiatric Bulletin (1995). 19, 743-746 743 ORIGINAL PAPERS theory he was influenced by poetry, particu is representative of an overall repressive social larly the surrealist movement headed by structure. In Laing & Esterson's Sanity, Mad Eluard, and was also impressed by what he ness and the Family (1971) is written "... if the referred to as the poetic power of his patients nuclear patriarchal family is to be opposed, it (Lacan, 1968). His critics found no convincing is because it frustrates peoples' desires and basis to his argument and disputed the limits their possibilities in addition to its validity of his work, especially his inability to necessity to the survival of capitalism..." make distinction between descriptive account Laing expanded his political views in The and the practical means he used to help his Politics of Experience, where he regards mad patients. ness as the product of a struggle between the repressive society and the individual who is seeking to escape its repression. He formulated The age of the true radicals his views on schizophrenia accordingly, and Lacan may or may not have influenced the rejected the notion that schizophrenia is a anti-psychiatric movement that flourished in failure of human adaption, on the contrary, he the '60s and early '70s, but the names that regarded it as a successful attempt not to came to be associated with the movement adapt to what he called pseudo-social realities. knew of him and acknowledged his contribu Laing asserted that political dissidents fell tion even if they did not wholeheartedly agree into this category and were especially prone to with him. David Cooper (1980) writes in his the fate of madness ".. .when a nation is in Language of Madness "... when psychoanaly confusion and disorder, patriots are recog sis is done by a philosophical guru like nised..." (Laing. 1967). Jacques Lacan it may be treated with affection, fascination and poetic respect... but the age of romanticisation of madness is now over, Cooper and the non-psychiatry politicisation of psychiatry is indispensable". David Cooper extended Laing's political argu Cooper is one of three major figures linked to ment to an extreme. Capitalism is seen as the the movement that included R. D. Laing and source of all evil and has a responsibility Thomas Szasz. He is, in fact, the one who towards reinforcing the nuclear family ideology introduced the term anti-psychiatry in Psy (Laing & Cooper, 1969). Psycho-technological chiatry and Anti-psychiatry (Cooper, 1971). training is nothing but a method that fulfils the Cooper. Laing and Szasz had one thing in purpose of mystification and social policing. common, the belief in the wickedness of the He advocated 'non-psychiatry', arguing that psychiatric orthodoxy and the desire to chal modern psychiatry is a pseudo-science that lenge it. grew hand in hand with capitalism as society's R. D. Laing is considered in Britain the true repressive device. The main purpose of psy father of this movement although he never regarded himself as an anti-psychiatrist! He chiatry is to médicalisedefianceand persecute the non obedient in order to teach its citizens belonged to the psychoanalytic school and his how to conform to society's norms. Demolishing thoughts reveal his admiration for existentialist psychiatry will be the desired goal which can philosophical ideas. He has been described as only be achieved by a political transformation of Sartrean in theory and Freudian in practice. the society (Cooper, 1980). Politics also played a role in shaping his views: Cooper's views find resonance in Breggin's his politics were socialist in content and based criticism of psychiatry who stated that all on Marxist theory. The fundamentals of his psychiatric therapy is inherently political theory revolve around rejecting the illness "... ultimately every therapy implements some model in psychiatry, based on his conviction Utopian political vision against which the of the intelligibility of the psychotic experience. client will measure his own success and failure Madness and sanity in his opinion are socially in the therapy" (Breggin, 1975). relative phenomena and, in his fascination with the assumed link between genius and madness, he was ready to consider statistical normality as not a necessarily desirable state Szasz, myth of mental illness or attack of affairs. on institutions? For him, to understand madness you must Szasz's contribution to the anti-psychiatric study the family. However, the skewed family movement was made in his famous and in his view that is responsible for the madness notorious book The Myth of Mental Illness 744 Nasser ORIGINAL PAPERS (1972) in which he referred to the "game personal freedom, it is extremely libertarian model" in hysteria; the hysterical symptom compared to other treatment environments." was considered a form of language that is Latterly, Dentali (1993) while identifying meant to mobilise help. The approach adopted weaknesses in the Szaszian premise, pointed is transactional and based on earlier psycho to his contribution in drawing attention to analytic writings by authors like Sullivan and psychiatric prejudice and the role of values in Fairburn. However, Szasz would have not been psychiatric decision making. regarded an anti-psychiatrist if his theories were limited to hysteria. His contention how ever stems from the fact that he considered the Impact of the anti-psychiatric hysterical model applicable to all mental ill nesses. In so doing he rejected the essence of movement on current psychiatric psychiatric morbidity. He described mental practice illness as a metaphorical illness because There is a tendency among psychiatrists to "... the mind (whatever that is) is not an organ regard the anti-psychiatric movement as hav or part of the body. Hence it cannot be ing entered the annals of modern psychiatric diseased in the same sense as the body can". history and to look back on the ideology as an He took the view that any psychiatric diagnosis attempt to flirt with polemics at the expense of is a licence for coercion and the exercise of scientific thought and enquiry. But while the psychiatrist power. "If mental illness is not a anti-psychiatric movement failed to sustain its disease why then treatment or indeed admis claim that it presents a true challenge to sion?" orthodox psychiatry it will be naive to assume Ian Kennedy (1980), in broad agreement that the anti-psychiatric movement had little with Szasz, argued that the psychiatrist acts or no impact on the way psychiatry is conceived as a thought policeman and that psychiatric and practised today.
Recommended publications
  • Soteria – a Treatment Model and a Reform Movement in Psychiatry
    1 Soteria – a treatment model and a reform movement in psychiatry By Volkmar Aderhold - Translated by Peter Stastny - September 2006 In honour of Loren Mosher “Everyone is much more simply human than otherwise” H.S.Sullivan - The interpersonal theory of psychiatry Introduction The Soteria treatment model was originated by the American Psychiatrist Loren Mosher during the early 1970s. As director of the Schizophrenia Branch at the National Institute Mental Health (1968-1980) he developed two federally-funded research demonstration projects: “Soteria” (1971-1983) and “Emanon” (1974-1980). The aim was to investigate the effects of a supportive milieu therapy (“being with”) for individuals diagnosed with “schizophrenia” (DSM-II), who were experiencing acute psychotic episodes for the first or second time in their lives. In these programs neuroleptics were either completely avoided, or given in low dosages only. Since the founding of Soteria Bern by Luc Ciompi in 1984, similar programs have been developed in Europe, mostly in the form of residential facilities situated in proximity to psychiatric hospitals. Initiatives to promote such programs are currently active around the world. Due to the expectation that neuroleptics would be used selectively, in acute as well as long-term situations, the program’s challenge to the medical model of “schizophrenia,” and the wide acceptance of inpatient treatment provided by mental health professionals (Mosher & Hendrix 2004, p. 282), the Soteria model has been consistently marginalized in psychiatric discourse and largely ignored in the scientific literature. On the other hand, during the past twenty years the Soteria approach has become quite influential within the debate about the optimal therapeutic methods and the development of state-of-the-art acute inpatient services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Against Psychiatric Coercion
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 The Case against Psychiatric Coercion —————— ✦ —————— THOMAS SZASZ “To commit violent and unjust acts, it is not enough for a government to have the will or even the power; the habits, ideas, and passions of the time must lend themselves to their committal.” —ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE (1981, 297) olitical history is largely the story of the holders of power committing violent and unjust acts against their people.
    [Show full text]
  • BREAKDOWN Phoebe Sengers
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 8:55 p.m. Surfaces BREAKDOWN Phoebe Sengers SUR LA PUBLICATION ÉLECTRONIQUE Article abstract ON ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION The psychiatric institution mechanizes the patient. Absorbed into the workings Volume 4, 1994 of the psychiatric machine, the patient is reduced to a sign. Breakdown: the machine exceeds its own logic and the patient exceeds the institution's URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1064953ar totalizing grasp. Primary references to Deleuze and Guattari, Blanchot and DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1064953ar Goffman. See table of contents Publisher(s) Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal ISSN 1188-2492 (print) 1200-5320 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Sengers, P. (1994). BREAKDOWN. Surfaces, 4. https://doi.org/10.7202/1064953ar Copyright © Phoebe Sengers, 1994 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ BREAKDOWN Phoebe Sengers ABSTRACT The psychiatric institution mechanizes the patient. Absorbed into the workings of the psychiatric machine, the patient is reduced to a sign. Breakdown: the machine exceeds its own logic and the patient exceeds the institution's totalizing grasp. Primary references to Deleuze and Guattari, Blanchot and Goffman. RÉSUMÉ L'institution psychiatrique mécanise le patient.
    [Show full text]
  • A Foucauldian Analysis of Black Swan
    Introduction In the 2010 movie Black Swan , Nina Sayers is filmed repeatedly practicing a specific ballet turn after her teacher mentioned her need for improvement earlier that day. Played by Natalie Portman, Nina is shown spinning in her room at home, sweating with desperation and determination trying to execute the turn perfectly. Despite the hours of gruesome rehearsal, Nina must nail every single aspect of this particular turn to fully embody the role she is cast in. After several attempts at the move, she falls, exhausted, clutching her newly twisted ankle in agony. Perfection, as shown in this case, runs hand in hand with pain. Crying to herself, Nina holds her freshly hurt ankle and contemplates how far she will go to mold her flesh into the perfectly obedient body. This is just one example in the movie Black Swan in which the main character Nina, chases perfection. Based on the demanding world of ballet, Darren Aronofsky creates a new-age portrayal of the life of a young ballet dancer, faced with the harsh obstacles of stardom. Labeled as a “psychological thriller” and horror film, Black Swan tries to capture Nina’s journey in becoming the lead of the ever-popular “Swan Lake.” However, being that the movie is set in modern times, the show is not about your usual ballet. Expecting the predictable “Black Swan” plot, the ballet attendees are thrown off by the twists and turns created by this mental version of the show they thought they knew. Similarly, the attendees for the movie Black Swan were surprised at the risks Aronofsky took to create this haunting masterpiece.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychiatry and Anti-Psychiatry: History, Rhetoric and Reality
    2 (4) 2018 DOI: 10.26319/4717 Daniel Burston, Psychology Department, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh PA [email protected] Psychiatry and Anti-psychiatry: History, Rhetoric and Reality Abstract: The term “anti-psychiatry” was coined in 1912 by Dr. Bernhard Beyer, but only popularized by Dr. David Cooper (and his critics) in the midst of a widespread cultural revolt against involuntary hospitalization and in-patient psychiatry during the 1960s and 1970s. However, with the demise of the old-fashioned mental hospital, and the rise of Big Pharma (with all its attendant evils), the term “anti-psychiatry” has outlived its usefulness. It survives merely as a term of abuse or a badge of honor, depending on the user and what rhetorical work this label is expected to perform. Those who use the term nowadays generally have a polemical axe to grind, and seldom understand the term’s origins or implications. It is time that serious scholars retire this term, or to restrict its use to R.D.Laing’s followers in the Philadelphia Associates and kindred groups that sprang up in the late 1960s and 1970s. Keywords: psychiatry, anti-psychiatry, psychoanalysis, DSM V, Big Pharma, normalization, psychopolitics On November 16, 2016, Dr. Bonnie Burstow, Associate Professor of Adult Education and Community Development at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, which is affiliated with the University of Toronto, launched the first (and thus far, only) scholarship in North America to support doctoral theses on the subject of “anti-psychiatry.” Predictably, this bold gesture garnered praise in some quarters, but provoked a barrage of criticism from both in and outside the university.
    [Show full text]
  • Subverting the Narrative: Addressing Gaps in the Medical Model of Mental Health Through Expressive Arts and Critical Race Feminism Paradigms
    Lesley University DigitalCommons@Lesley Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences Expressive Therapies Capstone Theses (GSASS) Spring 5-16-2020 Subverting the Narrative: Addressing Gaps in the Medical Model of Mental Health Through Expressive Arts and Critical Race Feminism Paradigms Sofiya Kostareva [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lesley.edu/expressive_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kostareva, Sofiya, "Subverting the Narrative: Addressing Gaps in the Medical Model of Mental Health Through Expressive Arts and Critical Race Feminism Paradigms" (2020). Expressive Therapies Capstone Theses. 250. https://digitalcommons.lesley.edu/expressive_theses/250 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences (GSASS) at DigitalCommons@Lesley. It has been accepted for inclusion in Expressive Therapies Capstone Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Lesley. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. SUBVERTING THE NARRATIVE 1 Subverting the Narrative: Addressing Gaps in the Medical Model of Mental Health Through Expressive Arts and Critical Race Feminism Paradigms Sofiya Kostareva Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences, Lesley University SUBVERTING THE NARRATIVE 2 Abstract: This paper discusses the problematic theoretical underpinnings of the medical model of mental health, first examining the historical development of the mental health field. Reviewing literature on the paradigms of expressive arts therapy, critical race feminism, and the medical model of mental health, the author argues how systemic oppression in such forms as racism, classism and ableism contribute to the issues of mental health accessibility for individuals who possess historically marginalized identities in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Human Rights Have Merit in Foucault's Disciplinary Society?
    Can Human Rights Have Merit in Foucault’s Disciplinary Society? Alexandra Solheim Thesis presented for the degree of MASTER IN PHILOSOPHY Supervised by Professor Arne Johan Vetlesen and Professor Espen Schaaning Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas UNIVERSITY OF OSLO December 2018 Can Human Rights have Merit in Foucault’s Disciplinary Society? II © Alexandra Solheim 2018 Can Human Rights Have Merit in Foucault’s Disciplinary Society? Alexandra Solheim http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo III Summary This thesis’s inquiry sets out to study the apparent irreconcilability between Foucault’s notion of disciplinary power and the idea of human rights. By reconceptualising human rights, this thesis attempts to redeem the merit of human rights in the context of Foucault’s disciplinary society. This thesis shall, firstly, address four issues of human rights, which are: the large number of contestations concerning its content, the increasingly expanding scope, the technocratic characteristics of human rights practice, and lastly, the adverse effects of human right struggles. By looking at Foucault’s power as disciplinary, it can account for and explain the challenges identified. Foucault does not envision himself to provide a normative theory, but rather a descriptive theory. This might illuminate why and how rights become problematic in practice. If we adopt Foucault’s notion of power, it appears that it would discredit the idea of human rights altogether. In this view, human rights reinforce power structures instead of opposing them. Firstly, disciplinary power renders emancipatory human rights nonsensical, as power is not uniform and the opposite of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolishing the Concept of Mental Illness
    ABOLISHING THE CONCEPT OF MENTAL ILLNESS In Abolishing the Concept of Mental Illness: Rethinking the Nature of Our Woes, Richard Hallam takes aim at the very concept of mental illness, and explores new ways of thinking about and responding to psychological distress. Though the concept of mental illness has infiltrated everyday language, academic research, and public policy-making, there is very little evidence that woes are caused by somatic dysfunction. This timely book rebuts arguments put forward to defend the illness myth and traces historical sources of the mind/body debate. The author presents a balanced overview of the past utility and current disadvantages of employing a medical illness metaphor against the backdrop of current UK clinical practice. Insightful and easy to read, Abolishing the Concept of Mental Illness will appeal to all professionals and academics working in clinical psychology, as well as psychotherapists and other mental health practitioners. Richard Hallam worked as a clinical psychologist, researcher, and lecturer until 2006, mainly in the National Health Service and at University College London and the University of East London. Since then he has worked independently as a writer, researcher, and therapist. ABOLISHING THE CONCEPT OF MENTAL ILLNESS Rethinking the Nature of Our Woes Richard Hallam First published 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2018 Richard Hallam The right of Richard Hallam to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Michel Foucault, Philosopher? a Note on Genealogy and Archaeology1 Rudi Visker
    PARRHESIA NUMBER 5 • 2008 • 9-18 MICHEL FOUCAULT, PHILOSOPHER? A NOTE ON GENEALOGY AND ARCHAEOLOGY1 Rudi Visker My title formulates a question that is mainly addressed to myself. Less elliptically formulated, it would read as follows: please explain why you, a professor in philosophy, have published over the years so many pages in which you kept referring to the work of someone who has authored a series of historical works on topics which, at first sight, have hardly any bearing on the discipline which your institution pays you to do research in. Whence this attraction to studies on madness, crime or sexuality? Wasn’t one book enough to make you realize that however enticing a reading such works may be, they bring little, if anything, for philosophy as such? I imagine my inquisitor wouldn’t rest if I were to point out to him that he seems badly informed and apparently unaware of the fact that Foucault by now has come to be accepted as an obvious part of the philosophical canon for the past century. Should I manage to convince him to take up a few of the books presenting his thought to philosophers, he would no doubt retort that what he had been reading mainly consisted of summaries of the aforementioned histories, and for the rest of exactly the kind of arguments that gave rise to his suspicion: accusations of nihilism, relativism, self-contradiction, critique without standards… And worse, if I were honest, I would have to agree that for all the fascination that it exerted on us philosophers, Foucault’s work also put us before a deep, and by now familiar embarrassment.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Resistance: a Response to Žižek's Critique of Foucault's Subject
    ParrHesia number 5 • 2008 • 19-31 BEYOND RESISTANCE: A RESPONSE TO ŽiŽek’s critique of foucault’s subject of freedom Aurelia Armstrong introduction in a brief introduction to his lively discussion of judith butler’s work in The Ticklish Subject, slavoj Žižek outlines the paradoxes which he believes haunt michel foucault’s treatment of the relationship between resistance and power. taking into account the trajectory of foucault’s thought from his early studies of madness to his final books on ethics, Žižek suggests that foucault employs two models of resistance which are not finally reconcilable. on the first model, resistance is understood to be guaranteed by a pre-existing foundation which escapes or eludes the powers that bear down on it from outside. We can see this conception of resistance at work in foucault’s exhortation in Madness and Civilization to liberate madness from medico-legal discourse and “let madness speak itself,” and in his call in The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1 to “break away from the agency of sex” and “counter the grips of power with the claims of bodies, pleasures, and knowledges, in their multiplicity and their possibility of resistance.”1 Yet even in this latter work—and in Discipline and Punish—we find a second model of resistance. on this other model resistance is understood to be generated by the very power that it opposes. in other words normalizing-disciplinary power is productive, rather than repressive, of that upon which it acts. as Foucault explains in Discipline and Punish, “the man described for us, whom we are invited to free, is already in himself the effect of a subjection much more profound than himself.”2 one way to distinguish between these two models of resistance is to point to the different conceptions of power underpinning each.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Thomas Szasz M
    f Ps al o ych rn ia u tr o y J Journal of Psychiatry Ruffalo, J Psychiatry 2014, 17:6 ISSN: 2378-5756 DOI: 10.4172/2378-5756.1000152 Short communication Open Access Remembering Thomas Szasz M. Louis Ruffalo* Psychotherapist, Carolina East Medical Center *Corresponding author: M. Louis Ruffalo ,Adjunct Faculty, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, 1304- B Commerce Drive, New Bern, NC 28562, USA; Tel: 412-916-4014; E-mail: [email protected] Received Date: September 4, 2014, Accepted Date: September 23, 2014, Published Date: September 30, 2014 Copyright: © 2014, M. Louis Ruffalo, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Short Communication literature. But it is only half-correct. Szasz maintained throughout his career that mental illness is illness only in the metaphorical sense and Two years ago, Thomas Stephen Szasz passed away at his home in that psychiatric disorders do not meet any of the established upstate New York at the age of 92. Best known as the author of the pathophysiological criteria for classification of disease. “Strictly controversial 1961 book The Myth of Mental Illness, Szasz served for speaking, disease or illness can affect only the body; hence there can be many years as professor of psychiatry at the State University of New no mental illness,” Szasz (1961) wrote. Indeed, he viewed “mental York and authored hundreds of books and articles over the course of illness” as a contradiction of terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Ragins, M.D
    Recovery: Changing From A Medical Model To A Psychosocial Rehabilitation Mode by Mark Ragins, M.D. Ever since Kraeplin defined schizophrenia, or dementia praecox, 100 vears ago, as a chronic, unremitting, gradually deteriorating condition, it has been difficult to talk credibly about or work towards recovery with severe mental illness. The relationship between treatment professionals, patients and their families has frequently been frustrating, unsatisfying, and noncollaborative often to the point of coercion. Clients and families are often waiting for their illnesses to go away, or be cured, in order to go on with their lives and are angry at professionals for not helping them, or doing anything for them, since their lives are not improving at all. At present, most people on all sides have abandoned the process entirely out of despair. Very few psychiatrists treat the chronically mentally ill and increasing numbers of patients are described as "treatment resistant" and families are "burned out" and disengaged. The result is the abandonment, neglect and deterioration we see all around us. All this hopelessness exists despite clear evidence of the growing efficacy of our treatments, and more benign outcomes than traditionally thought. I would argue that the problem may be as much in our conceptual model of treatment and recovery as in the inherent nature of the conditions. Schizophrenics in third world countries are regularly reported to have better outcomes than here. Also people with schizophrenia who explain their conditions spiritually, instead of medically, apparently fare better. The medical model tends to define recovery in negative terms. Symptoms and complaints need to be eliminated.
    [Show full text]