2021 Route Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2021 Route Assessment Route Assessment Report May 2021 Great American Rail-Trail More Than 3,700 Miles Between Washington, D.C., and Washington State Washington, D.C. When Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (RTC) was founded in 1986, just a handful of rail-trails dotted the landscape. Today, there are more than 24,000 miles of rail-trails crisscrossing the countryside and another 8,000 miles of rail-trails ready to be built—making the Great American Rail-Trail viable for the first time. Analyses implemented in the past few years of open rail-trails and out-of-service rail corridors show the potential to build a rail-trail that spans from Washington to Washington. Hundreds of conversations with state agencies and local trail managers confirm that this is a realistic pursuit. For more information, visit: Existing Trails This map shows the preferred route of the Great American Rail-Trail, greatamericanrailtrail.org. Trail Gaps including the 145+ rail-trails, greenways and other multiuse paths that Planned Segments make the route more than 53% complete. The trail gaps that will connect Unplanned Segments those existing trails are divided into two categories: planned segments, with specific routes that are already identified for completion; and unplanned segments, where potential routes are identified and planning work is ongoing to confirm specific routes. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report, Great American Rail-Trail Route Assessment, was originally published by Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (RTC) in May 2019. This updated version was published in May 2021.* Study authors: • Kevin Belanger, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy • Leah Gerber, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Suggested citation: Rails-to-Trails Conservancy. Great American Rail-Trail Route Assessment. Washington, DC: Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, 2021. Other RTC staff and consultants provided expertise and skills necessary to the production of this report: Amy Ahn, Ken Bryan, Sharon Congdon, Andrea Holliday, Brandi Horton, Annie Hunt, Amy Kapp, Joe LaCroix, Kevin Mills, Yvonne Mwangi, Eric Oberg, Kelly Pack, Aishwarya Shrestha, Laura Stark, Derek Strout, Liz Thorstensen and Marianne Wesley Fowler. ABOUT RAILS-TO-TRAILS CONSERVANCY RTC is the nation’s largest trails organization—with a grassroots community more than 1 million strong—dedicated to connecting people and communities by creating a nationwide network of public trails, many from former rail lines. RTC serves as the national voice for the nation’s 40,000+ miles of rail-trails and multiuse trails, and 8,000+ miles of potential rail-trails ready to be built, with the goal of creating more walkable, bikeable communities in America. Connect with RTC at railstotrails.org and @railstotrails on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Learn more about the Great American Rail-Trail at greatamericanrailtrail.org and RTC’s network-building initiative at trailnation.org. * Trail developments have been provided as of April 2021. greatamericanrailtrail.org Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................5 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 7 ROUTE SELECTION CRITERIA ...........................................................................................8 STATE STRATEGY ...................................................................................................................9 PLAN REVIEW ........................................................................................................................9 EXISTING TRAILS...................................................................................................................9 TRAIL GAPS ............................................................................................................................9 ONGOING RESEARCH ...................................................................................................... 10 STATE-BY-STATE ROUTE ANALYSIS .................................................................. 11 WASHINGTON, D.C. ............................................................................................................13 MARYLAND ...........................................................................................................................19 PENNSYLVANIA ..................................................................................................................23 WEST VIRGINIA ...................................................................................................................28 OHIO ......................................................................................................................................31 INDIANA ...............................................................................................................................45 ILLINOIS ................................................................................................................................54 IOWA......................................................................................................................................59 NEBRASKA ........................................................................................................................... 76 WYOMING ............................................................................................................................88 MONTANA ............................................................................................................................96 IDAHO .................................................................................................................................108 WASHINGTON ..................................................................................................................... 111 APPENDIX – GLOSSARY OF TERMS .....................................................................123 railstotrails.org greatamericanrailtrail.org GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE “GREAT AMERICAN” IMPACT Now—and at an even grander scale when complete—the Great THE GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL VISION American Rail-Trail will magnify the economic, social and community benefits that trails have delivered to people and places for decades. For Imagine pedaling across the entire country on a safe, seamless and scenic example, a study conducted by RTC in 2014 found that Pennsylvania’s pathway—or walking a local trail that connects you to historic routes from Three Rivers Heritage Trail—a trail along the route of the Great coast to coast. You’re enthralled in the experience of exploring America’s American—generates an estimated $8.3 million annually as a result heritage—its potential, its beauty and bounty, its people and places. of outdoor tourism and local business patronage. As a large-scale, Consider the intimacy of taking in all the country has to offer from the cross-country trail network, the Great American has the potential to most personal vantage point: the trail. generate billions of dollars a year for communities along its route by increasing trail connectivity between places, catalyzing new investment Spanning more than 3,700 miles, the Great American Rail-Trail promises in trailside businesses and commercial opportunities, and enhancing an all-new American experience. The trail travels through 12 states and tourism as well as outdoor recreation, which, according to a report by the District of Columbia, connecting trail users and communities from the Outdoor Recreation Roundtable, is currently the fastest-growing Washington to Washington, and possibly someday from the Atlantic to the industry in the country. Pacific. As the first cross-country trail of its kind, the “Great American” will be hosted primarily by rail-trails—public paths created from former railroad As new trails and connecting corridors are developed, communities corridors—as well as other multiuse trails, offering a route across the nation along the Great American route will also gain safer walking and biking that is completely separated from vehicle traffic. Upon its completion, the access to the places they want to go—like jobs, public transportation Great American will serve more than 50 million people within 50 miles of and shopping centers. All who enjoy the Great American will have its route, as well as the millions from across the country and the world who better access to the outdoors as the trail intersects with green space will explore America’s diverse places via the trail. within communities and connects to public lands along the route. The potential for a trail of this magnitude has been on Rails-to-Trails Conservancy’s (RTC’s) radar since the early days of RTC, some three THE PREFERRED ROUTE OF THE decades ago, when co-founder David Burwell first dreamed of a trail “GREAT AMERICAN” for the nation. It would not be long before this dream would transform into vision, as RTC began to track rail-trail development in the 1980s, With RTC’s commitment to complete the Great American Rail-Trail, efforts and the skeleton for a cross-country trail began to take shape. While have focused on working with trail partners and states to confirm a route the team at RTC “always knew” the potential for this trail, it also knew across the country that would provide the highest-quality experience for the significant undertaking and commitment required to get it done,
Recommended publications
  • Summary of Public Comments on Initial Draft Permit WY0002062 and WDEQ Response
    Summary of Public Comments on Initial Draft Permit WY0002062 and WDEQ Response: Summary of Public Comments WDEQ Response Water quality model inadequate, inaccurate: The revised draft permit caps the load for Total Multiple concerns were cited regarding the applicant’s Dissolved Solids (TDS) at the existing permitted level of GEMSS mixing model predictions for water quality in 908 tons per month. Because the load and flow from the Boysen Reservoir and the Wind River Canyon, along facility will not be expanded with this revised permit with WDEQ’s review of the model. The model was renewal, WDEQ is not relying on the applicant’s GEMSS used because the applicant was proposing to model. significantly increase flow volumes and loads from this project, and WDEQ required the applicant to demonstrate that no adverse impacts would occur in waters within Boysen Reservoir or the Wind River Canyon. Public concerns included WDEQ’s use of a baseline water quality period in the Wind River (2010- 2016) that occurred during peak discharge years under Aethon’s predecessor Encana Oil and Gas, rather than pre-discharge; along with various other concerns raised about input and algorithm issues which could impact the accuracy of the model and make its results difficult to reproduce independently. Recreational, fish and aquatic life uses in Boysen The revised draft permit includes conditions to protect Reservoir and Wind River Canyon: water quality in Boysen Reservoir and the Wind River Many comments mentioned personal and commercial Canyon. All effluent limits established in this draft use of Boysen Reservoir and Wind River Canyon for permit are set to protect the existing and designated uses fishing, swimming, boating and guiding, as well as the within these water bodies, including primary contact need to protect fish and aquatic life habitat there.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming
    Environmental and Recreational Water Use Analysis for the Wind – Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update Prepared for: Wyoming Water Development Commission 6920 Yellowstone Rd Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 Prepared by: Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 415 W. 17th St., Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 September 7, 2017 Draft Pre-Decisional Document - Privileged and Confidential - Not For Distribution Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2010, the Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC) requested a study to develop more robust and consistent methods for defining environmental and recreational (E&R) water uses for the River Basin Planning program. The study outlined that recreational and environmental uses needed to be identified and mapped, in a way that would assess their interactions with traditional water uses throughout the state of Wyoming. Harvey Economics completed the study in 2012, with a report and handbook being produced to identify a consistent viewpoint and accounting process for E&R water demands and to help guide river basin planning efforts in moving forward. The methods developed in the handbook were implemented on the Wind-Bighorn River Basin (Basin), and the results of the Basin plan update are provided in this report. In addition to the handbook guidelines, Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. coordinated with the WWDC to further the analysis through the development of three models: 1) protection, 2) environmental, and 3) recreation. The Basin is located in central and northwestern Wyoming. Approximately 80% of Yellowstone National Park (YNP) is included in the Basin. Elevations in the Basin are variable as the Wind River and Bighorn Mountains funnel water from alpine areas to lower river corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind River Canyon ©WYDOT/Rick Carpenter )|
    Wind River Canyon ©WYDOT/Rick Carpenter )| Aê CORRIDOR 8 Aå Shoshoni to Lovell A÷ US 20/WYO 789 )| Aû A¹ A¹ PARK MONTANA )| Aå Aã Shoshoni ?Æ +» )y A÷ Thermopolis Aì Burlington WASHAKIE Byron )| Cowley )y B I G )q H O R N )y HOT Aý ?Ä )v Lovell FREMONT +» SPRINGS STATE SIGNIFICANT CORRIDOR )y A÷ ?Ë N A÷ Basin Worland* Aî )v Greybull )y A÷ )v )r 0 5 10 MILES )v o ?Å BLM BIA NPS Designated Bike Route Intercity Bus Route Primary Airport p General Aviation Greyhound Stations Local Service Urban Area )q 03 CORRIDOR 8 CORRIDOR 8 00157 GOALS CORRIDOR CHARACTERISTICS Connects agricultural communities to Billings, Safety Wind River Canyon the major regional center System Preservation Bighorn Lake and Bighorn Canyon Irrigation and stormwater runoff Economic Recreation Area Sustainability Wildlife/vehicle crashes are problematic Hot Springs State Park, Boysen State Park Environment throughout & Reservoir PRIMARY INVESTMENT TYPE: SAFETY The primary investment need on this corridor is to reduce the number and severity of vehicle crashes, especially in the Wind River Canyon and north of Thermopolis as well as between Greybull and Basin. The possible correction of horizontal and vertical curves should be further investigated in the future corridor plan. Regular maintenance and pavement resurfacing should be included to prevent deterioration of roadway surfaces. Plans should include the rehabilitation and replacement of deficient bridges. CORRIDOR CHARACTERISTICS Corridor Description State Significant Corridor (SSC) 8, from Shoshoni to Lovell, is 157 miles long and passes through the counties of Fremont, Hot Springs, Washakie, and Big Horn. It follows US 20, also called WYO 789, from Shoshoni to Worland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wind & Lower Big Horn River from Boysen Reservoir
    The Wind & Lower Big Horn River from Boysen Reservoir Location: Not so far out of Yellowstone Parks East side, in the NW quadrant of Wyoming, lies the town of Thermopolis (N43.64585 W108.21130), the kick-off point for reaching the Fishery that includes a section of the Wind River and the Big Horn River, joined at the famous Wedding of the Waters. Traveling out of Casper, Wyoming, take US Hwy 20 North to Thermopolis and in doing so, you will travel up a part of the Fishery through the beautiful Wind River Canyon. The other direction of travel is to come out of Cody, Wyoming, down State Hwy 120. Either direction of travel is about 90 miles. Description: Narrative by Mike Mufich of The Humble Fly This Fishery includes a section of the Wind River from the Boysen Dam (N43.40732 W108.17070) through the Wind River Canyon, thence continuing to the Wedding of the Waters (N43.58908 W108.21604) and on into the Big Horn River up through the town of Thermopolis, then continuing about nine miles beyond the town. Total fishery length is 30 miles. The fishery can be broken down into four segments covering walk/wade/float fishing: 1. Segment One winds from the Boysen Dam through the Boysen State Park campgrounds, and finally ends at the start of the Wind River Canyon. This is a walk/wade section. 2. Segment Two is the Wind River Canyon itself, which is mostly a wade with a little bit of walk to it. 3. Segment Three runs from the Wedding of the Waters boat ramp to the Hot Springs State Park boat ramp and is usually a float section.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Cryptantha Subcapitata (Owl Creek Miner's Candle)
    STATUS OF CRYPTANTHA SUBCAPITATA (OWL CREEK MINER’S CANDLE) Fremont County, Wyoming Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office and Lander Field Office By Bonnie Heidel Wyoming Natural Diversity Database Dept. 3381, University of Wyoming 1000 E. University Ave. Laramie, WY 82071 31 March 2021 Cooperative Agreement No. L1600389, Modification 1 ABSTRACT Surveys of Cryptantha subcapitata (Owl Creek miner’s candle) were conducted in 2019-2020 to gather current information on species’ distribution, habitat requirements and biology; and survey for new populations using potential distribution models and photointerpretation. It is a long- lived species and recent surveys indicate that species numbers may be only 8-27% of former numbers reported in 1989. Surveys were hampered by low flowering levels two years in a row, in 2019-2020. The prevalence of plants in vegetative state constrained the effectiveness of survey efforts and confounded the quantification of decline, but low flowering levels may help explain decline and identify a framework for further species’ studies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work reflects the outstanding research of earlier botanists. I relied on their work and the resources of Rocky Mountain Herbarium to interpret recent survey results. Boysen State Park coordination was made available by John Bass, Superintendent of the Park. The editors of Madroño kindly provided permission to reprint the illustration appearing with the species’ description. This study was conducted under the BLM Cooperative Agreement No. L1600389, Modification 1. Report citation: Heidel, B. 2021. Status of Cryptantha subcapitata (Owl Creek miner’s candle), Fremont County, Wyoming. Prepared for the USDI Bureau of Land Management - Wyoming State Office and BLM Lander Field Office by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database - University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Permitting Solar Energy Projects in Wyoming Wyoming Renewable Energy Coordination Committee
    Guide to Permitting Solar Energy Projects in Wyoming Wyoming Renewable Energy Coordination Committee February 22, 2021 Tetra Tech would like to acknowledge the following who were instrumental in the development of this document by providing their support, information, direction, and review: Glen Murrell, Executive Director of the Wyoming Energy Authority; Sarah Young, Director of Public Affairs & Communications at Wyoming Energy Authority; Colin McKee, Senior Policy Advisor at the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality; Beth Callaway, Policy Advisor with the Wyoming Governor’s Office; Joe Budd, Policy Advisor with the Wyoming Governor’s Office; Randal Luthi, Chief Energy Advisor with the Wyoming Governor’s Office; Mary Throne, Deputy Chair at Wyoming Public Service Commission; Holly S. Dyer, Assistant Director at the Office of State Lands & Investments; Bailey K. Brennan, Natural Resource Staff Attorney with the Wyoming County Commissioners Association; Michael Valle, Renewable Energy Program Lead with the Bureau of Land Management - Wyoming State Office Division of Minerals and Lands; Amanda Losch, Wyoming Game and Fish Department Habitat Protection Program; Steve Wolff, Wyoming State Engineer’s Office; Carly-Ann Carruthers, Wyoming Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources; Tanya Geiselhofer, Wyoming Department of Transportation; Sandra Underhill, U.S. Forest Service; Michael T. Happold, State Program Manager, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Wyoming Regulatory Office; Justin Williams, Senior Policy Analyst at the Wyoming Department of Agriculture; Chris Wichmann, Natural Resources Manager at the Wyoming Department of Agriculture; and local county land use offices. This document is property of the State of Wyoming, all rights reserved. ©2020 The U.S. Department of Energy and the State of Wyoming reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, unlimited and irrevocable license to reproduce; publish; or other use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermopolis Hot Springs
    Thermopolis Hot Springs FREE Visitor Guide • Hot Springs State Park • Gift of the Waters Pageant • Wyoming Dinosaur Center • Cowboy Rendezvous PRCA Rodeo • Legend Rock Petroglyphs • Hot Springs County Museum • W ind River Canyon Scenic Byway • Boysen State Park 2 Thermopolis Hot Springs Visitor Guide Real Cowboy Gear Since ‘97 Two Great Stores - One Location Check us out on Facebook 180 Hwy 20 South • Thermopolis, WY 82443 307-864-3047 • Toll Free 1-877-864-3048 [email protected] • Open Monday - Saturday • Closed Sunday WelcomeWelcome Travelers!Travelers! • Year round mineral spa/seasonal Best Western Plus freshwater pool • Free deluxe Plaza Hotel continental breakfast • Free high-speed Hot Springs State Park 100% wireless internet Thermopolis, WY • HD DirecTV Smoke Free • 18 Suites Phone: 800-780-7234 & Pet Free • Newly remodeled bathrooms 307-864-2939 email: [email protected] www.bestwestern.com Thermopolis Hot Springs Visitor Guide 3 Wind River Canyon Whitewater & Flyfishing Thrills & Scenery You’ll Never Forget... Open 7 days a week Memorial day to Labor day Guided Fly-fishing trips available in wind River Canyon & on Big Horn River year round (weather permitting) wind River Reservation and state of wyoming Fishing permits The canyon, named after the Wind River, lies north of Boysen Reservoir and is located on part of the Wind River Indian Reservation (home of the Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribes). WhiteWater trips: •2 Hour Trips pete and Darren Calhoun 210 Hwy. 20 South, Ste. #5 •5-6 Hour Trip with BBQ Thermopolis, WY
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Ice Ages
    JadeWyoming State State Mineral & Gem News Society, Inc. Award-Winning WSMGS Website: wsmgs.org Volume 2021, Issue # 1 Glacial Ice Ages By Emma Groeneveld Ancient History Encyclopedia* An ice age is a period in which the earth's climate is colder than normal, with ice sheets capping the poles and glaciers dominating higher altitudes. Within an ice age, there are varying pulses of colder and warmer climatic conditions, known as “glacials” and “interglacials.” Even within the interglacials, ice continues to cover at least one of the poles. In contrast, outside an ice age, temperatures are higher and more stable, and there is far less ice covering the WSMGS OFFICERS Earth. The Pleistocene Epoch is typically defined as the time period that began President: Jim Gray about 2.6 million years ago and lasted until about 11,700 years ago. The [email protected] Vice President: Linda Richendifer [email protected] Secretary: Leane Gray [email protected] Treasurer: Stan Strike [email protected] Historian: Roger McMannis [email protected] Woolly mammoth is the most recognized of the glacial ice-age animals. Credit: Yukon Beringia, https://beringia.com (Continued on Page 2) Jade State News Editor: Ilene Olson [email protected] Table of Contents Glacial Ice Ages...........................................................................................Page 1 RMFMS WY State Director: Natural Trap Cave........................................................................................Page 5 Jim Gray Wyoming Valley Glaciers............................................................................Page
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Road Trip by the Mile Marker
    Available at Amazon.com BROOK BESSER WYOMING ROAD TRIP BY THE MILE MARKER Travel guide to Yellowstone/Grand Teton National Park, Devils Tower, Oregon/Mormon Trail, badlands, petroglyphs, waterfalls, camping, hiking, tourism and more... Brook Besser NightBlaze Books Golden, Colorado Copyright © 2010 by Brook Besser All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and scanning, or stored in any information storage and retrieval system, without the express consent of the author. ISBN 978-0-9844093-0-3 Library of Congress Control Number: 2010923145 Manufactured in the United States of America WARNING! NightBlaze Books and the author assume no responsibility or liability for any damages, losses, accidents, or injuries incurred by readers who visit the attractions or engage in the activities described in this book. It is the reader’s responsibility to be aware of all risks and take the necessary precautions to handle those risks. The! suggestions and "Cool Ratings" in this book are strictly the author's opinion, and expressed to help you make a decision on whether to visit an attraction. You are responsible for making your own judgment on the worthiness of an attraction. Special thanks to the following people: My wife Mianne who accompanied me for 5 weeks in Wyoming and supported my endless hours working on this book; my brother Brant and my daughter Brianna who each spent a week out on the road with me; my brother Brett who helped with my book summaries; my sister-in-law Sue who proofed many pages of the book; and the rest of my family for their support.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming
    Environmental and Recreational Water Use Analysis for the Wind – Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update Prepared for: Wyoming Water Development Commission 6920 Yellowstone Rd Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 Prepared by: Luke Martinson Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 415 W. 17th St., Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 June 2018 Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2010, the Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC) requested a study to develop more robust and consistent methods for defining environmental and recreational (E&R) water uses for the River Basin Planning program. The study outlined that recreational and environmental uses needed to be identified and mapped, in a way that would assess their interactions with traditional water uses throughout the state of Wyoming. Harvey Economics completed the study in 2012, with a report and handbook being produced to identify a consistent viewpoint and accounting process for E&R water demands and to help guide river basin planning efforts in moving forward. The methods developed in the handbook were implemented on the Wind-Bighorn River Basin (Basin), and the results of the Basin plan update are provided in this report. In addition to the handbook guidelines, Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. coordinated with the WWDC to further the analysis through the development of three models: 1) protection, 2) environmental, and 3) recreation. The Basin is located in central and northwestern Wyoming. Approximately 80% of Yellowstone National Park (YNP) is included in the Basin. Elevations in the Basin are variable as the Wind River and Bighorn Mountains funnel water from alpine areas to lower river corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Governor's Economic Development Tour June- 28
    ’GOVERNOR’S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOUR ! JUNE- 28-29 & 30, 1989 FREM.ONT COUNTY GoVeKnor's Ecomomic DeveLopment Field Tour Of Fremont County, Wyoming Tour Guide & Information Booklet Prepared with the cooperation of the: Fremont County Board of County Commissioners Fremont Office, University of Wyoming Cooperative Extension Service State of Wyoming Economic Development and Stabilization Board Small Business Development Center Fremont County Planning Department Fremont Coiinty Data Processing Department Information for this this document was obtained from the various local municipalities involved, as weL1 as from many state and federal agencies and local industries. Editor: Raymond E. Price Tour dates: June 28,29 & 30, 1989 Front Cover, courtesy of Fremont County Chamber of Commerce ?ABLE OF CONTENTS FREMONT COUNTY OVERVIEW 2 RESERVATION OVERVIEW 20 --1ST DAY AGENDA 27 LANDE:R COMMUNITY OVERVIEW 30 2ND DAY AGENDA 42 DUBOIS COMMUNITY OVERVIEW 45 PAVILLION COMMUNITY OVERVIEW 69 SHOSHONI COMMUNITY OVERVIEW 72 3RD DAY AGENDA 78 RIVEKTON COMMUNITY OVERVIEW 79 JEFFHEY CITY OVERVIEW 98 SOURCES OF INFORMATION 102 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 103 PREMllNT COUNTY OVERVIEW 'E'remont County, Wyoming Picked by Outxide Magazine as one of the best 100 counties in America. Population 36,300 --_I_Climate: Semi-arid with various local mountain climates Hicrhest point: Gannett Peak 13,783 feet highest point in Wyoming Lowest point: Sand Mesa 4,800 feet -Land ownershie: Federal 54% Reservation 27% Private 14% State & local government 4% Water 1% --Taxes : There is no personal income tax, no corporate income tax, and no business inventory tax in Wyoming. Sales tax is 3% of retail sales. After 1989 industrial land and buildings and personal property will be assessed at 11.5% of market value.
    [Show full text]
  • And Boysen State Park in the Wind River Country of Central Wyoming Are the Legacy of Danish Immigrant Asmus Boysen
    Across Oceans, Across Time ® … Stories from the Family History & Genealogy Center … Boysen Dam and Boysen State Park in the Wind River country of central Wyoming are the legacy of Danish immigrant Asmus Boysen. Born in Skanderup, in Ribe County in 1868, the entrepreneurial Boysen came to America around 1886. He met and married Illinois native Anna Leet in Chicago and settled near Gray, in Audubon County, Iowa, in the early 1890s. Over the next decade or so Asmus was involved in banking and other capitalist ventures in northwestern Iowa and also served as Representative in the Iowa General Assembly from 1900-1903. By this time, however, Boysen’s eyes had already turned toward the west. While on a mining exploration trip to Wyoming at the turn of the century he envisioned a dam on the Wind River Canyon that might provide both power for local copper and gold mines and irrigation water for farming. In 1899 he secured a grazing lease on 78,000 acres from local Indian tribes, which he exchanged for clear title to 640 acres in 1905. Moving his family to the nearby town of Shoshoni, he financed construction of a concrete dam at the mouth of the Canyon in 1908 at a cost of $2,000,000. The 710kw power plant operated until 1923, when a flood caused the lake behind the dam rise, inundating the tracks of the Burlington Northern Railroad. The railroad sued Boysen for damages. Boysen lost the lawsuit, and part of his dam was blasted away to prevent future flooding. It continued to generate power until the early 1930s; the remaining dam was dismantled in 1948.
    [Show full text]