'Governor's Economic Development Tour June- 28
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wyoming SCORP Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2014 - 2019 Wyoming Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) 2014-2019
Wyoming SCORP Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2014 - 2019 Wyoming Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) 2014-2019 The 2014-2019 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan was prepared by the Planning and Grants Section within Wyoming’s Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources, Division of State Parks, Historic Sites and Trails. Updates to the trails chapter were completed by the Trails Section within the Division of State Parks, Historic Sites and Trails. The Wyoming Game and Fish Department provided the wetlands chapter. The preparation of this plan was financed through a planning grant from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, under the provision of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578, as amended). For additional information contact: Wyoming Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources Division of State Parks, Historic Sites and Trails 2301 Central Avenue, Barrett Building Cheyenne, WY 82002 (307) 777-6323 Wyoming SCORP document available online at www.wyoparks.state.wy.us. Table of Contents Chapter 1 • Introduction ................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 2 • Description of State ............................................................................. 11 Chapter 3 • Recreation Facilities and Needs .................................................... 29 Chapter 4 • Trails ............................................................................................................ -
University of Wyoming
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN PETROLEUM ENGINEERING BETWEEN CENTRAL WYOMING COLLEGE AND THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING 1. Parties. This Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter “MOU”) is made and entered into by and between the University of Wyoming (hereinafter “University”) and Central Wyoming College (hereinafter “Institution”). 2. Purpose. This MOU provides students who have earned the associates degree in Engineering, as described below, from the Institution, the opportunity to complete a bachelor’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at the University. By this MOU Institution and University express a shared commitment to increasing opportunities for student access to and success in higher education. 3. Term. This MOU shall commence upon the start of the 2017-18 Academic Year and shall remain in full force and effect for five years, subject to an annual review by both parties. If during the annual review, both parties agree that this MOU needs to be amended, amendments will be made to the MOU in accordance with Section (9)(A) below. 4. Termination. Either party can terminate this MOU without cause, upon one (1) year prior written notice. Both parties agree that, should either party desire to terminate this MOU, students currently enrolled prior to the termination date and who remain continuously enrolled will be allowed to complete the program as articulated. 5. Responsibilities of the University of Wyoming: A. Any Institution student who has earned an Associate of Science degree with coursework that adheres to the guidelines within this MOU is guaranteed that the University will: i. Apply the relevant general education credits; ii. -
Summary of Public Comments on Initial Draft Permit WY0002062 and WDEQ Response
Summary of Public Comments on Initial Draft Permit WY0002062 and WDEQ Response: Summary of Public Comments WDEQ Response Water quality model inadequate, inaccurate: The revised draft permit caps the load for Total Multiple concerns were cited regarding the applicant’s Dissolved Solids (TDS) at the existing permitted level of GEMSS mixing model predictions for water quality in 908 tons per month. Because the load and flow from the Boysen Reservoir and the Wind River Canyon, along facility will not be expanded with this revised permit with WDEQ’s review of the model. The model was renewal, WDEQ is not relying on the applicant’s GEMSS used because the applicant was proposing to model. significantly increase flow volumes and loads from this project, and WDEQ required the applicant to demonstrate that no adverse impacts would occur in waters within Boysen Reservoir or the Wind River Canyon. Public concerns included WDEQ’s use of a baseline water quality period in the Wind River (2010- 2016) that occurred during peak discharge years under Aethon’s predecessor Encana Oil and Gas, rather than pre-discharge; along with various other concerns raised about input and algorithm issues which could impact the accuracy of the model and make its results difficult to reproduce independently. Recreational, fish and aquatic life uses in Boysen The revised draft permit includes conditions to protect Reservoir and Wind River Canyon: water quality in Boysen Reservoir and the Wind River Many comments mentioned personal and commercial Canyon. All effluent limits established in this draft use of Boysen Reservoir and Wind River Canyon for permit are set to protect the existing and designated uses fishing, swimming, boating and guiding, as well as the within these water bodies, including primary contact need to protect fish and aquatic life habitat there. -
HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 .......................................... -
Bozeman Climbers Tackle Gan
BOZEMAN CLIMBERS TACKLE GANNETT PEAK TO BENEFIT U... http://chronicleoutdoors.com/2010/03/18/bozeman-climbers-to-tackle-w... Chronicle Outdoors Dedicated to outdoor adventure in Southwest Montana Home Photo Gallery Where Am I Contest About Contact .: This week's poll :. Fifteen years ago wolves were released into Yellowstone Park. They have since established range outside the park and been embroiled in controversy. Do you think their presence is appropriate? Yes, wolves are a native predator that help maintain a natural balance in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. No way, wolves have depleted elk herds, killed sheep and cattle and caused conflict. They create more problems than they solve. Vote View Results .: Gallatin ational Forest Avalanche Report :. GNFAC Avalanche Advisory for Sun Mar 21, 2010 Good Morning. This is Eric Knoff with the Gallatin National Forest Avalanche Advisory issued on Sunday, March 21, at 7:30 a.m. Bountiful Table, in cooperation with the Friends of the Avalanche Center, sponsors today's advisory. This advisory does not apply to operating ski areas. Mountain Weather: A ridge of high pressure has stalled over southwest M […] .: Latest news from Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks :. Wild Bison’s Future In Montana What is the future for wild bison in Montana? […] Three Bear Aware Meetings Planned For Front State wildlife officials are planning three community meetings in April to remind north central Montana residents to be bear aware. The meetings will begin at 7 p.m. and take place April 12, Simms high school; April 13, Marias River Electric Coop in Shelby; and April 14, Wolf Creek School. -
Newsletter September 2015
the wyoming game & fish department LANDERLANDER REGIONREGION newsletter september 2015 Under the Water Fishing in Upper Bull Lake Drainage Golden trout from Bull Lake Creek drainage The Wyoming Game and Fish Department sampled fisheries in the upper Inside: Bull Lake Creek drainage within the Fitzpatrick Wilderness in early August. Twelve lakes were surveyed and only one, Shield Lake, had no fish. Golden Bat blitz pg 3 trout were found in all other lakes that were visited. Fish up to 19.4 inches Golden and brook trout pg 4 were found and good numbers were discovered in most lakes (Table 1). Law Enforcement pg 5 Four Creek Lake and Sassafras Lake provide the best opportunity to catch a Antelope Surveys pg 6 trophy golden trout. Marked Tree Lake, the lowest lake sampled in the drainage, also supports cutthroat trout. The creek upstream of Marked Tree FW Families pg 7 Lake has natural barriers that prevent cutthroat trout from migrating to Outreach pg 8 other lakes with golden trout populations. Carnivores pg 8 Serving Dubois, Rawlins, Lander , Riverton and places between Under the Water, continued The upper Bull Lake drainage is a good area for anglers seeking golden trout. For those thinking about planning a trip, it is important to note that this is a rugged drainage with few trails and lots of fallen trees. The most popular route is over Hays Pass from the west side of the Wind River Mountain Range. Upper Golden Lake in the Bull Lake Creek drainage. Table 1. Number, mean length (inches) and length range (inches) of fish captured by gill nets in lakes sam- pled in the Bull Lake Creek drainage in the Fitzpatrick Wilderness July 31 – Aug 8, 2015. -
Wyoming's Highway Safety Office Annual Report
WYOMING’S HIGHWAY SAFETY OFFICE ANNUAL REPORT FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2013 Highway Safety Program Wyoming Department of Transportation 5300 Bishop Blvd. Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009-3340 MATTHEW H. MEAD MATTHEW D. CARLSON, P.E. Governor Governor’s Representative for Highway Safety FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT WYOMING FY2013 HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN December 23, 2013 Matthew D. Carlson, P.E. State Highway Safety Engineer Governor’s Representative for Highway Safety Dalene Call, Manager Highway Safety Behavioral Program State Highway Safety Supervisor TABLE OF CONTENTS Office Structure ...........................................................................................................................1 Compliance to Certifications and Assurances ............................................................................. 2 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 Performance and Core Outcome Measures Statewide .................................................................................................................... 4-6 Alcohol Impaired Driving ...............................................................................................7-9 Occupant Protection ................................................................................................. 10-12 Speed Enforcement ................................................................................................. 13-14 Motorcycle Safety .....................................................................................................15 -
Chapter 3 – Community Profile
Chapter 3: COMMUNITY PROFILE The Physical Environment, Socio-Economics and History of Fremont County Natural and technological hazards impact citizens, property, the environment and the economy of Fremont County. These hazards expose Fremont County residents, businesses and industries to financial and emotional costs. The risk associated with hazards increases as more people move into areas. This creates a need to develop strategies to reduce risk and loss of lives and property. Identifying risks posed by these hazards, and developing strategies to reduce the impact of a hazard event can assist in protecting life and property of citizens and communities. Physical / Environment Geology Much of Fremont County is made up of the 8,500 square mile Wind River Basin. This basin is typical of other large sedimentary and structural basins in the Rocky Mountain West. These basins were formed during the Laramide Orogeny from 135 to 38 million years ago. Broad belts of folded and faulted mountain ranges surround the basin. These ranges include the Wind River Range on the west, the Washakie Range and Owl Creeks and southern Big Horn Mountains on the north, the Casper Arch on the east, and the Granite Mountains on the south. The center of the basin is occupied by relatively un-deformed rocks of more recent age. Formations of every geologic age exist in Fremont County. These create an environment of enormous geologic complexity and diversity. The geology of Fremont County gives us our topography, mineral resources, many natural hazards and contributes enormously to our cultural heritage. Topography Fremont County is characterized by dramatic elevation changes. -
Lander Final Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement Lander Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement
United States Department of the interior Bureau of Land Management Rawlins District Office March 1990 Lander Final Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement Lander Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Impact Statement Type of Action: ( ) Administrative (X) Legislative Responsible Agencies: Lead Agency: Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Cooperating Agencies: None Abstract The Lander Final Wilderness Environmental Impact Statement analyzes six wilderness study areas (WSAs) in the Rawlins District to determine the re source impacts that could result from designation or nondesignation of those WSAs as wilderness. The following WSAs are recommended as nonsuitable for wilderness designation: Lankin Dome, WSA 030-120 (6,316 acres), Split Rock, 030-122 (12,749 acres), Savage Peak, 030-123a (7,041 acres), Miller Springs, 030-123b (6,429 acres), and Copper Mountain, 030-111 (6,858 acres). For the Sweetwater Canyon WSA, 030-101 (9,056 acres), 3,518 acres are rec ommended as nonsuitable for wilderness designation; the remaining portion (5,538 acres) is recommended for wilderness designation. Comments have been requested and received from the following: See the “Consultation" section. Date draft statement made available to the Environmental Protection Agency and the public. Draft EIS: Filed 11/7/85 Final EIS: United States Department of the interior JSraSTAKE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WYOMING STATE OFFICE P.O. BOX 1828 CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82003 Dear Reader: Enclosed is the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for six Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs) in the Lander Resource Area of our Rawlins District. The WSAs include; Sweetwater Canyon, Lankin Dome, Split Rock, Miller Springs, Savage Peak, and Copper Mountain. -
Brooks Lake Lodge And/Or Common Brooks Lake Lodge 2
NPS Form 10-900 (7-81) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name historic Brooks Lake Lodge _ _ and/or common Brooks Lake Lodge 2. Location street & number Lower Brooks Lake Shoshone National Forest not for publication city, town Dubois X vicinity of state Wyoming code 056 Fremont code 013 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public occupied agriculture museum X building(s) private unoccupied commercial park structure X both X work in progress educational X private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object _ in process X yes: restricted government scientific X being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property name Kern M. Hoppe (buildings) United States Forest Service (land) street & number 6053 Nicollet Avenue Region 2 (Mountain Region) Box 25127 city, town Minneapolis, 55419__ vicinity of Lakewood state Colorado 80225 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Dubois Ranger District Shoshone National Forest street & number Box 1S6 city, town Duboi state Wyoming 82513 title Wyoming Survey of Historic Sites has this property been determined eligible? yes X no date 1967; revised 1973 federal _X_ state county local depository for survey records Wyoming Recreation Commission 604 East 25th Street city, town Cheyenne state Wyoming 82002 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered X original site good ruins X altered moved date N/A JLfalr unexposed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The Brooks Lake Lodge complex is situated on the western edge of the Shoshone National Forest in northwestern Wyoming, only two miles east of the Continental Divide. -
COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL COPYRIGHTED I
Avalanche Campground (MT), 66 Big Horn Equestrian Center (WY), Index Avenue of the Sculptures (Billings, 368 MT), 236 Bighorn Mountain Loop (WY), 345 Bighorn Mountains Trail System INDEX A (WY), 368–369 AARP, 421 B Bighorn National Forest (WY), 367 Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness Backcountry camping, Glacier Big Red (Clearmont, WY), 370 (MT), 225–227 National Park (MT), 68 Big Red Gallery (Clearmont, WY), Academic trips, 44–45 Backcountry permits 370 Accommodations, 413–414 Glacier National Park (MT), Big Salmon Lake (MT), 113 best, 8–10 54–56 Big Sheep Creek Canyon (MT), 160 for families with children, 416 Grand Teton (WY), 325 Big Sky (MT), 8, 215–220 Active vacations, 43–52 Yellowstone National Park Big Sky Brewing Company AdventureBus, 45, 269 (MT—WY), 264 (Missoula, MT), 93 Adventure Sports (WY), 309, 334 Backcountry Reservations, 56 Big Sky Candy (Hamilton, MT), 96 Adventure trips, 45–46 Backcountry skiing, 48 Big Sky Golf Course (MT), 217 AdventureWomen, 201–202 Backroads, 45, 46 Big Sky Resort (MT), 216–217 Aerial Fire Depot and Baggs (WY), 390 Big Sky Waterpark (MT), 131 Smokejumper Center (Missoula, Ballooning, Teton Valley (WY), Big Spring (MT), 188 MT), 86–87 306 Big Spring Creek (MT), 187 Air tours Bannack (MT), 167, 171–172 Big Timber Canyon Trail (MT), 222 Glacier National Park (MT), 59 Bannack Days (MT), 172 Biking and mountain biking, 48 the Tetons (WY), 306 Barry’s Landing (WY), 243 Montana Air travel, 409, 410 Bay Books & Prints (Bigfork, MT), Big Sky, 216 Albright Visitor Center 105 Bozeman, 202 (Yellowstone), 263, 275 -
Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming
Environmental and Recreational Water Use Analysis for the Wind – Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update Prepared for: Wyoming Water Development Commission 6920 Yellowstone Rd Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 Prepared by: Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 415 W. 17th St., Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 September 7, 2017 Draft Pre-Decisional Document - Privileged and Confidential - Not For Distribution Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2010, the Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC) requested a study to develop more robust and consistent methods for defining environmental and recreational (E&R) water uses for the River Basin Planning program. The study outlined that recreational and environmental uses needed to be identified and mapped, in a way that would assess their interactions with traditional water uses throughout the state of Wyoming. Harvey Economics completed the study in 2012, with a report and handbook being produced to identify a consistent viewpoint and accounting process for E&R water demands and to help guide river basin planning efforts in moving forward. The methods developed in the handbook were implemented on the Wind-Bighorn River Basin (Basin), and the results of the Basin plan update are provided in this report. In addition to the handbook guidelines, Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. coordinated with the WWDC to further the analysis through the development of three models: 1) protection, 2) environmental, and 3) recreation. The Basin is located in central and northwestern Wyoming. Approximately 80% of Yellowstone National Park (YNP) is included in the Basin. Elevations in the Basin are variable as the Wind River and Bighorn Mountains funnel water from alpine areas to lower river corridors.