Study of Almond Shell Characteristics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Agroforestry News Index Vol 1 to Vol 22 No 2
Agroforestry News Index Vol 1 to Vol 22 No 2 2 A.R.T. nursery ..... Vol 2, No 4, page 2 Acorns, edible from oaks ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 3 Aaron, J R & Richards: British woodland produce (book review) ..... Acorns, harvesting ..... Vol 5, No 4, Vol 1, No 4, page 34 page 3 Abies balsamea ..... Vol 8, No 2, page Acorns, nutritional composition ..... 31 Vol 5, No 4, page 4 Abies sibirica ..... Vol 8, No 2, page 31 Acorns, removing tannins from ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 4 Abies species ..... Vol 19, No 1, page 13 Acorns, shelling ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 3 Acca sellowiana ..... Vol 9, No 3, page 4 Acorns, utilisation ..... Vol 5, No 4, page 4 Acer macrophyllum ..... Vol 16, No 2, page 6 Acorus calamus ..... Vol 8, No 4, page 6 Acer pseudoplatanus ..... Vol 3, No 1, page 3 Actinidia arguta ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 10 Acer saccharum ..... Vol 16, No 1, page 3 Actinidia arguta, cultivars ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 14 Acer saccharum - strawberry agroforestry system ..... Vol 8, No 1, Actinidia arguta, description ..... Vol page 2 1, No 4, page 10 Acer species, with edible saps ..... Vol Actinidia arguta, drawings ..... Vol 1, 2, No 3, page 26 No 4, page 15 Achillea millefolium ..... Vol 8, No 4, Actinidia arguta, feeding & irrigaton page 5 ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 11 3 Actinidia arguta, fruiting ..... Vol 1, Actinidia spp ..... Vol 5, No 1, page 18 No 4, page 13 Actinorhizal plants ..... Vol 3, No 3, Actinidia arguta, nurseries page 30 supplying ..... Vol 1, No 4, page 16 Acworth, J M: The potential for farm Actinidia arguta, pests and diseases forestry, agroforestry and novel tree .... -
Topological Interlocking and Geometric Stiffening As Complementary Strategies for Strong Plant Shells
COMMUNICATION www.advmat.de Topological Interlocking and Geometric Stiffening as Complementary Strategies for Strong Plant Shells Jessica C. Huss,* Sebastian J. Antreich, Jakob Bachmayr, Nannan Xiao, Michaela Eder, Johannes Konnerth, and Notburga Gierlinger* in the process of fruit wall (pericarp) and Many organisms encapsulate their embryos in hard, protective shells. While seed coat (testa) formation, where they birds and reptiles largely rely on mineralized shells, plants often develop serve as protective covers for the delicate highly robust lignocellulosic shells. Despite the abundance of hard plant embryos.[6] During development on the shells, particularly nutshells, it remains unclear which fundamental proper- parental plant, individual layers of the peri- carp or the testa may harden substantially ties drive their mechanical stability. This multiscale analysis of six prominent via extensive secondary cell wall formation (nut)shells (pine, pistachio, walnut, pecan, hazelnut, and macadamia) reveals and lignification.[7,8] Cracking these shells geometric and structural strengthening mechanisms on the cellular and mac- after they have reached maturity requires roscopic length scales. The strongest tissues, found in walnut and pistachio, remarkably high compression forces in exploit the topological interlocking of 3D-puzzle cells and thereby outperform some species, ranging from 300 to ≈700 N the fiber-reinforced structure of macadamia under tensile and compressive for pecans, walnuts, and hazelnuts; and up to ≈4000 N for macadamia shells.[9] In loading. On the macroscopic scale, strengthening occurs via an increased the natural environment, the encapsulated shell thickness, spherical shape, small size, and a lack of extended sutures. seed, known as the dispersal unit or dia- These functional interrelations suggest that simple geometric modifications spore, is typically dispersed by granivo- are a powerful and resource-efficient strategy for plants to enhance the frac- rous and scatter-hoarding animals.[10] ture resistance of entire shells and their tissues. -
In a Nutshell
736 AND EVERYTHING NICE IN A NUTSHELL DUCT I TCP NUT AVAILABLE DLAJ 1 UijCi AMOUNTS ALMOND Oval- shaped nut with Whole in skins and Snacks, sweets, breads, in 1 pound in shell = woody shell, reddish brown blanched, sliced, chopped, marzipan, with poultry, as 1 cup whole meats = skin, and smooth white slivered, ground, paste garnish 1 Y2 cups chopped; meat. Two kinds are bitter 4 ounces shelled = 1 cup and sweet. Bitter almonds used only in extract. BRAZIL NUT Also called elephant toes, Whole in shells; shelled Snacks, sweets, breads, 1 pound in shell = 1 !4 this nut has a very hard, whole and in pieces fruitcake, in stuffing, rice cups whole meats; 1 pound dark brown, and wrinkled dishes, and salads shelled = 3 K cups whole shell shaped like an orange meats segment. The nutrrieat is large, beige, rich, and creamy. CASHEW Expensive, crescent-shaped Shelled and skinned, whole Snacks, sweets, breads, cas- 1 pound shelled = 3 !4 cups nutmeats; sweet, rich, and or in pieces, raw or roasted seroles; in Middle Eastern, whole meats creamy with high fat con- Indian, and Chinese dishes; tent. ground for cashew butter, and as a garnish for vegeta- bles CHESTNUT A Round, mahogany-colored In shell, or shelled and Roasted as snack; cooked 1 pound in shell = 2 */2 shell with sweet floury nut. blanched, pureed, can- with vegetables and game, cups whole meats Has much less oil than other died, in syrup, and mar- in soups, sauces, and stuff- nuts. rons glaces ing; in sweets, breads, and marrons glaces HAZELNUT Also called filbert, this nut Shelled whole nuts in skins Snacks, sweets, and breads, 1 cup whole meats = 1 14 u has a hard reddish brown or without; also chopped especially pastries and with cups chopped or 1 YQ cups \^ shell and dense, creamy and ground chocolate; with fish and finely chopped > meat with delicate taste and vegetables; oil for vinai- fragrance. -
Walnut and Hazelnut Shells: Untapped Industrial Resources and Their Suitability in Lignocellulosic Composites
applied sciences Article Walnut and Hazelnut Shells: Untapped Industrial Resources and Their Suitability in Lignocellulosic Composites Marius Cătălin Barbu 1,2 , Thomas Sepperer 1 , Eugenia Mariana Tudor 1,2,* and Alexander Petutschnigg 1 1 Forest Products Technology and Timber Construction Department, Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, Markt 136a, 5431 Kuchl, Austria; [email protected] (M.C.B.); [email protected] (T.S); [email protected] (A.P.) 2 Faculty of Wood Engineering, University of Transilvania in Brasov, Romania, Bld. Eroilor nr.29, 500036 Brasov, Romania * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 24 August 2020; Accepted: 10 September 2020; Published: 11 September 2020 Abstract: Walnut and hazelnut shells are agricultural by-products, available in high quantities during the harvest season. The potential of using these two agricultural residues as raw materials in particleboard production has been evaluated in this study. Different panels with either walnut or hazelnut shells in combination with melamine-urea formaldehyde or polyurethane at the same level of 1000 kg/m3 density were produced in a laboratory hot press and mechanical properties (modulus of elasticity, bending strength, and Brinell hardness) and physical properties (thickness swelling and water absorption) were determined, together with formaldehyde content. Although Brinell hardness was 35% to 65% higher for the nutshell-based panels, bending strength and modulus of elasticity were 40% to 50% lower for the melamine-urea formaldehyde bonded nutshells compared to spruce particleboards, but was 65% higher in the case of using polyurethane. Water absorption and thickness swelling could be reduced significantly for the nutshell-based boards compared to the spruce boards (the values recorded ranged between 58% to 87% lower as for the particleboards). -
Studies in the Late Prehistory of Indiana, AD 700 to 1700 Indiana
Facing the Final Millennium: Studies in the Late Prehistory of Indiana, A.D. 700 to 1700 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation & Archaeology Facing the Final Millennium: Studies in the Late Prehistory of Indiana, A.D. 700 to 1700 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation & Archaeology State of Indiana Frank L. O’Bannon Joseph E. Kernan Governor Lieutenant Governor Indiana Department of Natural Resources John R. Goss Paul J. Ehret Director Deputy Director Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology Jon C. Smith James R. Jones III Director State Archaeologist Editors Brian G. Redmond, Cleveland Museum of Natural History James R. Jones III, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology Acknowledgements Shelia M. Griffin Authors of Chapters This publication has been financed in part with funds from the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, and administered by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability in its federally assisted programs. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street. N.W., Washington, D.C.