Arsuf: Lionheart Vs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arsuf: Lionheart Vs Arsuf: Lionheart vs. Saladin Following a series of harassing attacks by Saladin’s forces, battle was joined on the morning of 7 September 1191. Richard’s army successfully resisted attempts to disrupt its cohesion until the Hospitallers broke ranks and charged; Richard then commit- ted all his forces to the attack. He regrouped his army after its initial success, and led them to victory. The battle resulted in the coastal area of southern Palestine, including the port of Jaffa, returning to Christian control. This made the capture of Jerusalem an achievable proposition. 7 September 1191 AD Saladin’s plan is to raid and loot the Crusader baggage trains, which is the best way to disrupt the Crusaders’ campaign. The Kurds and Egyptians are poised to strike in the northern part of the map. These divisions are lead by Shirkuk and Taqi. Saladin has the Mamluk Division in the center, while Gobkori leads the Syrians against the southern fl ank. The Crusader Army will become demoralized after the elimination of two of the baggage trains, so this is a target for the Muslims. Additionally, the Muslims gain 5 VP for each train that doesn’t make it to Arsuf by the end of the game. That could result in a total of 20 VP. On the other hand, the Crusaders gain 10 VP for each train that makes it to Arsuf. Either player can win an automatic victory. The Muslims, by destroying all four trains, and the Crusaders by safely passing all four trains to Arsuf. by E.R. Bickford AAR of Arsuf: Otherwise, the victory will be marginal Lionheart vs. Saladin essentially based on loss points. Production: Lise’ Patterson Overview of the Battle The Crusaders will try to learn from their past lessons (the battle of Hattin), © 2013 Decision Games This battle is part of the Third Crusade. and move slowly and methodi- The Crusaders have already captured cally, keeping tight formations. This Bakersfi eld, CA. Acre and have the intent of capturing will protect the baggage trains. Jerusalem. Thinking that he would Hopefully these will pass into Arsuf. need to capture Jaffa to make an attack Richard I is leading the forces in the on Jerusalem feasible, Richard the center. Henry and Robert de Sablé Lionhearted began a march down the are with the vanguard. Guy and coast from Acre. Richard’s counterpart Hugh command the rearguard. was Saladin, the Sultan of Egypt and Syria, who was determined to prevent the capture of Jerusalem. | AFTER ACTION REPORT | A1 Arsuf: Lionheart vs. Saladin Turn 1 supplies to the city. On turn one, the mounted archers so they get one shot Crusader player focuses on advancing to disorder their attackers. Since the hit The Muslim player is the first player toward the city. Since the baggage number is a “one” it is not surprising throughout this game. Saladin con- moves only two hexes per turn, it that there is no effect. Shirkuk and his tinues with his ambush plan. On turn will take 8 of the 10 turns to get them Egyptian cavalry shock attack, and one, Gobkori brings the Syrian division there, even if unhindered. The trains both are repulsed and retreated. around the southern flank to cut the head for the road, which greatly Crusaders off from their intended facilitates (doubles) their movement. In the center, Tariq leads the Mamluks easy passage to Arsuf. Meanwhile, Unfortunately, this places them closer into the Crusader infantry. The Saladin and Tariq threaten Richard’s to danger from the Muslim army. archery fire has limited effect again, central position with the Mamluks. but two of the Mamluk formations In the north, Shirkuk and Taqi press Turn 2 become disrupted. The others charge. forward, but also are charged with These attacks are unsuccessful. Some protecting the Muslim camps. The On the north flank, Shirkuk decides of the Mamluks remain engaged, Crusaders collect 20 VP for entering that there is no sense waiting around. while others are forced to retreat. the camp during the course of the He launches into contact with the some On the southern flank, Gobkori game. There is no contact yet. of the mounted men from Jerusalem. leads the Syrian division against a Several of the light infantry fire formation of cavalry from Jerusalem. The Crusaders begin their movement their archery in defense. These light The Turcopole unit retreats before toward Arsuf. Although Arsuf is a infantry troops have a range of two combat, because it would have been ruined city, there still stood defensible which gives them a little advantage an auto elimination to do otherwise. walls and a port, hence, Richard’s over the Muslims. Unfortunately, plan to move his baggage trains and nothing hits. The Turcopole units are A2 | AFTER ACTION REPORT | The Crusaders try to open up the southern flank. Henry and Robert de Sablé lead an attack. Unfortunately, the Syrian archers disrupt some of Robert‘s attacking formations. Not much prog- ress is made in opening up the road or the southern flank. Henry does manage a little success on the eastern side of the road. In the center, the Crusaders push back the Muslim forces to gain a little breathing room for the trains. The Muslims have lost three units this turn. Turn 3 Shirkuk tries to recover his forces from disorder. Meanwhile, Taqi attempts to smash into the heavy infantry on the rear flank. His Egyptian cavalry manage to inflict a retreat result. Since the Crusaders have to pass through friendly units, they become disordered. Then Tariq attacks the center of the Crusader position. This yields mixed | AFTER ACTION REPORT | A3 Arsuf: Lionheart vs. Saladin results. One of the Muslim units is Shirkuk’s units and it disintegrates. I strikes the western part of the caught in an attack without a clear None of the Crusaders recover during Muslim position. Saladin is pushed retreat path and is eliminated. The key reorganization, but one of the heavy back. Nablus engages Shirkuk in the area of the battlefield, which is develop- infantry formations does rally. rear. This has mixed results, but one ing, is the southern flank facing Arsuf. Egyptian formation is destroyed. Here, both Henry and Robert are facing Turn 4 Gobkori and the Syrian division. Most Turn 5 of Gobkori’s forces retreat after being On the south flank, the Syrians attack repulsed in combat. One unit is elimi- again. The archers have no effect Although Saladin’s Army has lost nated in an exchange result which also here but Gobkori successfully drives a lot of strength, they still have the wrecks a Crusader infantry formation. back Henry’s and Robert’s forces. Crusaders cut off from Arsuf and there Then both Saladin and Tariq strike is some hope of knocking out more In the van, Henry and Robert renew the southern position from the units. In the south, Gobkori launches their attacks on the enemy. The east. Miraculously, this pushes the another round of hit and run strikes Muslims are still blocking the approach Crusaders backwards into their central against Robert and Henry’s formations. to Arsuf. An exchange of archery area. Farther north, the Egyptians Most of the attacks are repulsed, volleys yields some success. In the end, strike Avesnes and Guy. Both are however. Next, Saladin and Tariq attack the Crusaders push the Muslims back, retreated toward the coastal road. In Richard in the center. Some of the partially opening the way to Arsuf. the north, Shirkuk gets an exchange Muslim archery volleys are effective. and takes out some of the Knights Although outnumbered, the Muslim In the center, Guy and the Poitevan Templar, while Nablus and the Knights forces gain some ground, but a Mamluk Knights attack the Muslim skirmishers. Hospitaller are driven southward. heavy cavalry unit is eliminated. These attempt a Karr-wa-farr (a feigned retreat to entice the Crusaders out of The Crusaders’ baggage train Taqi orders the Kurds to attack in the line) hoping to surround Guy’s knights. advances into a dangerous position. north. The archers are unsuccessful This fails, however, and the Muslim The Crusaders in the south perform on both sides, but an exchange result skirmishers retreat before combat. successful archery fire and disorder takes out some of the Crusaders’ Guy of Lusignan safely advances. some Muslim units. Both Henry and heavy infantry. The other attacks Farther north, Hugh attacks one of Robert gain ground. Then Richard in the north are successful. The A4 | AFTER ACTION REPORT | Kurds use archers against a heavy infantry formation and then push it backwards in the shock attack. The Crusaders now react. Henry and Robert attack the southern defensive position with charging knights. These are met by a hail of archery fire. Fortunately, none of Gobkori’s skirmishers have any effect; the Muslim cavalry figure retreat before combat is their best option. On the eastern flank, Saladin’s division holds fast. One Muslim unit is lost though. Guy, Avesnes and Hugh are engaged with Taqi in the north. The other attacks between Hugh and Shirkuk result in a couple of exchanges. Both sides are becoming weak in the north position, but the baggage trains are in the south by now. The Muslim player is also concerned with protecting his encampment. | AFTER ACTION REPORT | A5 Arsuf: Lionheart vs. Saladin Loss results knock out two of the Syrian cavalry units. That hurts. Despite the rallying of units, the Muslim player has too many units in the dead pile. The Crusaders see an opportunity to break things open to Arsuf. Robert de Sablé, Henry, and Richard I all charge the position with their knights.
Recommended publications
  • Throughout Anglo-Saxon and Norman Times, Many People – Not Just Rich Kings and Bishops
    THE CRUSADES: A FIGHT IN THE NAME OF GOD. Timeline: The First Crusade, 1095-1101; The Second Crusade, 1145-47; The Third Crusade, 1188-92; The Fourth Crusade, 1204; The Fifth Crusade, 1217; The Sixth Crusade, 1228-29, 1239; The Seventh Crusade, 1249-52; The Eighth Crusade, 1270. Throughout Anglo-Saxon and Norman times, many people – not just rich kings and bishops - went to the Holy Land on a Pilgrimage, despite the long and dangerous journey – which often took seven or eight years! When the Turks conquered the Middle East this was seen as a major threat to Christians. [a] Motives for the Crusades. 1095, Pope Urban II. An accursed race has violently invaded the lands of the Christians. They have destroyed the churches of God or taken them for their own religion. Jerusalem is now held captive by the enemies of Christ, subject to those who do not know God – the worship of the heathen….. He who makes this holy pilgrimage shall wear the sign of the cross of the Lord on his forehead or on his breast….. If you are killed your sins will be pardoned….let those who have been fighting against their own brothers now fight lawfully against the barbarians…. A French crusader writes to his wife, 1098. My dear wife, I now have twice as much silver, gold and other riches as I had when I set off on this crusade…….. A French crusader writes to his wife, 1190. Alas, my darling! It breaks my heart to leave you, but I must go to the Holy land.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CRUSADES Toward the End of the 11Th Century
    THE MIDDLE AGES: THE CRUSADES Toward the end of the 11th century (1000’s A.D), the Catholic Church began to authorize military expeditions, or Crusades, to expel Muslim “infidels” from the Holy Land!!! Crusaders, who wore red crosses on their coats to advertise their status, believed that their service would guarantee the remission of their sins and ensure that they could ​ ​ spend all eternity in Heaven. (They also received more worldly rewards, such as papal protection of their property and forgiveness of some kinds of loan payments.) ‘Papal’ = Relating to The Catholic Pope (Catholic Pope Pictured Left <<<) The Crusades began in 1095, when Pope Urban summoned a Christian army to fight its way to Jerusalem, and continued on and off until the end of the 15th century (1400’s A.D). No one “won” the Crusades; in fact, many thousands of people from both sides lost their lives. They did make ordinary Catholics across Christendom feel like they had a common purpose, and they inspired waves of religious enthusiasm among people who might otherwise have felt alienated from the official Church. They also exposed Crusaders to Islamic literature, science and technology–exposure that would have a lasting effect on European intellectual life. GET THE INFIDELS (Non-Muslims)!!!! >>>> <<<“GET THE MUSLIMS!!!!” Muslims From The Middle East VS, European Christians WHAT WERE THE CRUSADES? By the end of the 11th century, Western Europe had emerged as a significant power in its own right, though it still lagged behind other Mediterranean civilizations, such as that of the Byzantine Empire (formerly the eastern half of the Roman Empire) and the Islamic Empire of ​ ​ ​ the Middle East and North Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crusade of Andrew II, King of Hungary, 1217-1218
    IACOBVS REVIST A DE ESTUDIOS JACOBEOS Y MEDIEVALES C@/llOj. ~1)OI I 1 ' I'0 ' cerrcrzo I~n esrrrotos r~i corrnrro n I santiago I ' s a t'1 Cl fJ r1 n 13-14 SAHACiVN (LEON) - 2002 CENTRO DE ESTVDIOS DEL CAMINO DE SANTIACiO The Crusade of Andrew II, King of Hungary, 1217-1218 Laszlo VESZPREMY Instituto Historico Militar de Hungria Resumen: Las relaciones entre los cruzados y el Reino de Hungria en el siglo XIII son tratadas en la presente investigacion desde la perspectiva de los hungaros, Igualmente se analiza la politica del rey cruzado magiar Andres Il en et contexto de los Balcanes y del Imperio de Oriente. Este parece haber pretendido al propio trono bizantino, debido a su matrimonio con la hija del Emperador latino de Constantinopla. Ello fue uno de los moviles de la Quinta Cruzada que dirigio rey Andres con el beneplacito del Papado. El trabajo ofre- ce una vision de conjunto de esta Cruzada y del itinerario del rey Andres, quien volvio desengafiado a su Reino. Summary: The main subject matter of this research is an appro- ach to Hungary, during the reign of Andrew Il, and its participation in the Fifth Crusade. To achieve such a goal a well supported study of king Andrew's ambitions in the Balkan region as in the Bizantine Empire is depicted. His marriage with a daughter of the Latin Emperor of Constantinople seems to indicate the origin of his pre- tensions. It also explains the support of the Roman Catholic Church to this Crusade, as well as it offers a detailed description of king Andrew's itinerary in Holy Land.
    [Show full text]
  • De Expugnatione Terrae Sanctae Per Saladinum: the Battle of Hattin, 11871 This Account Was Written by an Eyewitness, Possibly A
    De Expugnatione Terrae Sanctae per Saladinum: The Battle of They sent to Jerusalem to ask the Patriarch to bring the Holy Cross Hattin, 11871 with him to the camp...so that they might become bearers and keepers of This account was written by an eyewitness, possibly a Templar or the Lord’s Cross… Hospitallar. Meanwhile, the Syrians crossed the Jordan. They overran and laid In the year of the Lord’s incarnation 1187, the King of Syria [Saladin] waste the area around the springs of Cresson, from Tiberias to gathered together an army as numerous as the sands of the seashore in Bethany...After these advance parties had wrought their destruction, order to wage war on the land of Judah. He came up to the Jaulan, across Saladin and his whole army crossed the river. Saladin ordered his forces to the [Jordan] River, and there made camp. push on to Tiberias and besiege it. On Thursday, July 2, the city was The King of Jerusalem [Guy de Lusignan] also gathered his army from surrounded by archers and the battle was joined. The Countess [Eschiva, all of Judea and Samaria. They assembled and pitched camp near the wife of Raymond III of Tripoli] and the Galileans, since the city was not springs at Saffuriyah. The Templars and Hospitallers also assembled many fortified, sent messengers to the Count and King with the news: “The people from all their castles and came to the camp….Not a man fit for war Turks have surrounded the city. In the fighting, they have pierced the walls remained in the cities, towns, or castles without being urged to leave by the and are just now entering against us.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the Royal Succession of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem (1099–1291)*
    Women in the Royal Succession of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem (1099–1291)* Alan V. Murray (Leeds UK) »During this time Baldwin, king of Jerusalem, died, leaving adaughter of marriageable age (for he lacked ason) as heir to the kingdom, which wasdeservedly divided against it- self, forsaken on account of itssins, and despised by the pagans, since it had passed into the hands of agirl, in what wasnogoodomen for government. For each of the foremost men of the kingdom desired to becomeruler and wanted to secure the girl and the royal inheritance by marriage –tohimself, if he lacked awife,tohis son, if he wasmarried, or to akinsman,ifhehad no son of his own;this caused the greatestill-will among them, which led to the destruction of the kingdom. Yet she, spurning the natives of the realm, took up with Guy, countofAscalon, anew arrival of elegantappearance and proven courage, and, with the approval of both the patriarch and the knights of the Temple, took him as her husband and conferred the kingdom on him«1). *) Dates given in parentheses in this essay relate to the reigns of the individualsaskings or queens of Je- rusalem.For ease of reference, royal documents issued in the kingdom of Jerusalem will be given accord- ing to their number in: Die Urkunden der lateinischen Könige vonJerusalem, ed. Hans EberhardMayer, 4vols. (MGH Diplomata Regum LatinorumHierosolymitanorum), Hanover 2010 (cited henceforth as D/DDJerus.), as well as those in the calendared forms given in: Regesta Regni Hierosolymitani (MXCVII–MCCXCI), ed. Reinhold Rçhricht, 2vols.,Innsbruck 1893–1904 (cited henceforth as RRH), which has been widely used in earlier scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Crusade, 1095-1099 the Second Crusade, 1145-1149 the Battle of Hattin, 1187 the Third Crusade, 1189-1192
    The First Crusade, 1095-1099 The Second Crusade, 1145-1149 In 1095 Pope Urban II declared a crusade to win Although the Christians and Muslims had back the holy city of Jerusalem from the been living near each other for some time, Muslims. Thousands of people from across fighting again started in 1145. The Muslims Europe agreed to go on Crusade. Initially the attacked and captured the city of Edessa, Crusaders suffered from the burning heat and which had been conquered by the Crusaders Muslim ambushes. The Crusaders managed to in 1098. The Pope sent thousands of capture the major city of Antioch before Crusaders to the Holy Land to defend attacking Jerusalem. In the summer of 1099 the Jerusalem in case the Muslims attacked Crusaders finally took control of Jerusalem, further, but on the way many Crusaders fell killing thousands of Muslims, including women sick and died. Many more died of starvation and children living inside. The Christian world or from Muslim attacks. The Crusaders tried made prayers of thanks that Jerusalem had been to attack the Muslim city of Damascus, but captured for Christianity, but the Muslim world after five days of fighting they could not was filled with horror. succeed. The Crusaders returned to Europe having failed to defeat the Muslims – although they still held Jerusalem. The Battle of Hattin, 1187 The Third Crusade, 1189-1192 Over time the Muslims began to threaten the The fall of Jerusalem shocked the Christian city of Jerusalem again. The Muslim leader was a world: the Pope is said to have died of grief! man called Saladin who was very successful in In 1189 several kings – including Richard I battle.
    [Show full text]
  • Dead Men Tell No Trauma the Construction of a Traumatic Narrative in Audita Tremendi (1187)
    Dead men tell no trauma The construction of a traumatic narrative in Audita Tremendi (1187) Rens van de Peppel 15 January 2020 Dr. Rutger Kramer Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 1: Trauma theory and methodology........................................................................................ 11 1.1 Four rhetorical representations ............................................................................................ 11 1.2 Potentially traumatizing change ............................................................................................ 12 Chapter 2: Trauma and the causa scribendi .......................................................................................... 15 2.1 Collective authorship ................................................................................................................... 15 2.2 A fast and wide dissemination .................................................................................................... 16 2.3 News from the East to the West ................................................................................................. 17 2.4 The horrendous events in the East .............................................................................................. 19 2.5 The loss of the True Cross ........................................................................................................... 21 2.6 Pope Gregory
    [Show full text]
  • Salah Al-Din
    Salah al-Din Salah al-Din (Saladin) was born in 1138 to a powerful Kurdish Muslim family in Syria. He was a schoolboy in Damascus when the Christians attacked the city during the Second Crusade. He observed firsthand how important it was for Muslims to defend their religion and themselves from the Christian crusaders. When Salah al-Din was a teenager, he served in the army of Nur al-Din, the powerful Syrian-Mesopotamian leader. As a soldier, Salah al-Din was respected and successful. In 1156, at the age of 18, he was put in charge of the Muslim security forces in Damascus. He became the personal assistant to Nur al- Din and relayed messages between Nur al-Din and his military commanders. Salah al-Din gained valuable experience in military and political organization and effective communication. He fought successfully with the Syrian Muslim troops in Egypt against the crusaders. Stop Here and Discuss • When and where was Salah al-Din born? • What happened when he was a schoolboy? How do you think this affected him? • Describe Salah al-Din’s early military experience. Salah al-Din’s successful military performance brought him more honors and leadership positions. When Syria took over control of Egypt, he was appointed to be the Muslim military leader in Egypt. In 1169, he was chosen commander-in-chief of the entire army of Nur al-Din. At this time, the many groups of Muslims fighting against the crusaders were not united. Often Salah al-Din and his army fought against other rival Muslims.
    [Show full text]
  • Actions and Receptions of the Knights Templar from 1118-1192
    Actions and Receptions of the Knights Templar from 1118-1192 By Neil Wu A thesis submitted to the Department of History for honors Duke University Durham, North Carolina Under the advisement of Dr. Mary J. Morrow April 15, 2019 Wu i Abstract In 1118, a quasi-monastic military order known as the Knights Templar was founded in the crusader kingdom of Jerusalem. Church leaders saw this organization as an opportunity to inspire the religiosity of the crusading movement. In 1129, their aspirations were expressed through the Latin Rule of the Knights Templar, a document that regulated the Templars’ conduct. The Latin Rule’s rigid guidelines prescribed a lifestyle that combined elements of monasticism and knighthood. The Church hoped that under the influence of this mandate, the Templars would promote an agenda of piety, religious duty, camaraderie with peers, and ferocity against the enemy. However, the Templars were quick to form their own interpretations of purpose. Previous scholarship has primarily focused on the late thirteenth century actions of the Knights Templar in order to determine what factors led to their eventual downfall in 1307. However, this thesis argues that even without considering these later actions of the Knights Templar, there is significant evidence from 1118-1192 alone that demonstrates how the order began forming their own interpretations of their purpose. Rather than living under strict adherence to the original mandates of the Latin Rule, what resulted was an organization that excelled in battle and utilized its military abilities to pursue their own financial and political agendas in the Holy Land. Many contemporaries took note of the Templars’ choice of actions and of their apparent priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • UNF Crusades: Bibliography
    Paul Halsall The Crusades: Bibliography Created. 2001. Last Update: April 28, 2019. This bibliography of literature on the Crusades in English was prepared for courses I taught 2001-2005. It is not meant to be exhaustive, but it is meant to point to the main sources (where English translations are available) and secondary works on the major areas of Crusade historiography. I undertook a major update in April 2019. Because some people might be interested in what happened in published research the roughly 20 years since this was first compiled a separate document on works since c. 2000 is available. Contents Crusade Overviews o Bibliography o Reference Works o Source Collections o Online Encyclopedia o Historiography o Secondary Literature Origins of The Crusades The First Crusade The Second Crusade The Third Crusade Other 12th Century Expeditions The Fourth Crusade The Fifth Crusade The Sixth and Later Crusades Other 13th Century Expeditions o General o Children's Crusade o Shepherd's Crusade Crusades in The Later Middle Ages The Latin States in Palestine Latin Cyprus Latin Constantinople and Greece Crusaders and Islam o General o Political/Military Response to the Crusade o Intercultural Relations o Mongol Impact Crusaders and Jews Crusaders and Byzantium The Spanish Reconquista o Interaction of Three Communities o The Reconquest Crusades and Heretics The Northern Crusades Crusades: Ecclesiastical Aspects o Canon Law o Papacy and Crusading o Monasticism and Crusading o Pilgrimage o Preaching Crusades: Military Aspects
    [Show full text]
  • Network Analysis of Crusader Fortifications and Settlements in the Kyrenia
    Defend Your Coast: Network Analysis of Crusader Fortifications and Settlements in the Kyrenia Region of Cyprus By Tyler Martin Caldwell March 2019 Director of Thesis: Dr. David Stewart Major Department: Program in Maritime Studies, Department of History The Mediterranean island of Cyprus is situated at the crossroads of the Near East and the Aegean Civilizations. During the Middle Ages, Cyprus experienced raids that would devastate the coastal landscape. Coastal towns and villages were destroyed, and many of them never rebuilt. Fortifications were constructed to defend the coastline from raiders and potential invaders. Scholars believe that during times of heavy raiding coastal settlements are abandoned in favor of inland settlements. This theory has not been tested using Geographic Information System (GIS). This study used GIS to test the area of influence raiders could exert inland during a raid. Based on past research the extent of influence was determined to be 3000 m inland. The Network Analyst tool was used to determine the shortest routes raiders and defenders took to reach undefended villages and churches. The time needed for defenders and attackers to reach sites was determined using a hiking calculator. Based on the results of the test the majority of sites are situated outside the range of raiders influence. Defend Your Coast: Network Analysis of Crusader Fortifications and Settlements in the Kyrenia Region of Cyprus A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Program in Maritime Studies of Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Maritime Studies by Tyler Caldwell March 2019 © Tyler Caldwell, 2019 Defend Your Coast: Network Analysis of Crusader Fortifications and Settlements Within the Kyrenia Region of Cyprus By Tyler Martin Caldwell APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS: (David J.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrayals of the Third Crusade in Film and How Their Inaccuracies Encompass Contemporary Movements
    History in the Making Volume 8 Article 11 January 2015 Here and There, Now and Then: Portrayals of the Third Crusade in Film and How their Inaccuracies Encompass Contemporary Movements Steven Anthony CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons, and the Islamic World and Near East History Commons Recommended Citation Anthony, Steven (2015) "Here and There, Now and Then: Portrayals of the Third Crusade in Film and How their Inaccuracies Encompass Contemporary Movements," History in the Making: Vol. 8 , Article 11. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making/vol8/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in History in the Making by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Here and There, Now and Then: Portrayals of the Third Crusade in Film and How their Inaccuracies Encompass Contemporary Movements by Steven Anthony Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between films dealing with historical events and how they encompass events of the time the film was made. This work uses two film representations of the Third Crusade, from 1187 – 1192; the first is Youssef Chahines’ 1963 film Al Nasser Salah Ad-Din and the second is Ridley Scotts’ 2005 film, Kingdom of Heaven. Between the films’ narrations of events and the actual history, parallels are created between past and present, dealing with ideas such as tolerance and peaceful dialogue, as well as movements such as national, ethnic, or religious unity and inclusiveness.
    [Show full text]