DOCSLIB.ORG

Memo — Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan (Unexpected Find of an Aboriginal Object)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Memo — Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan (Unexpected Find of an Aboriginal Object) Memo — Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan (Unexpected find of an Aboriginal object) Project: Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Date: Friday, 16 October 2020 Stage 2 Project Client: J. Wyndham Prince Authors: Ryan Taddeucci (Senior Heritage Consultant), Josh Symons (Principal) Introduction 1.1.1 Project background and scope Qube Holdings Limited (Qube) has been issued Development Consent (SSD 7709), under Part 4, Division 4.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act), to construct and operate an intermodal terminal (IMT) facility. The project is known as Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 2. On 14 May 2020, Biosis identified an unexpected Aboriginal object within the MPW Stage 2 construction area. The Aboriginal object was neither identified in previous Aboriginal heritage assessments of MPW not registered on the Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System (AHIMS) database. SSD 7709 Condition of Consent (CoC) B148-149 stipulate that works within the vicinity of an unexpected find must cease, a 10 m buffer area around the find must be established and the Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) [now the Department of Premiere Cabinet – Heritage Division (DPC – Heritage Division)] must be contacted. Works may recommence if: • the object or place is confirmed by DPC – Heritage Division upon consultation with the Registered Aboriginal Parties (RAPs), not to be an Aboriginal object or Aboriginal place, or • an Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan (ACHMP) is prepared in consultation with the RAPs and DPC – Heritage Division to include the object or place and appropriate measures in respect of it, and the Plan is approved by the Planning Secretary, or • DPC – Heritage Division is satisfied as to the measures to be implemented in respect to the object or place and makes a written direction in the regard. Artefact Heritage Services Pty Ltd (Artefact Heritage) has been engaged to prepare this ACHMP in compliance with CoC B148-149. This ACHMP was sent to the RAPs and the DPC – Heritage Division for review and comment in fulfilment of Condition B149 of SSD 7709. 1.1.2 Project site The Project site (Figure 5) is generally bounded by the Georges River to the west, Moorebank Avenue to the east, the East Hills Railway Line to the south and the M5 Motorway to the north. It is located on Moorebank Avenue, Moorebank and forms Lot 1 in Deposited Plan (DP) 1197707. The Page 1 Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 2 Project Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan Project site also contains Lots 100 and 101 DP1049508, which are located north of Bapaume Road and west of Moorebank Avenue. The Project site is located wholly within Commonwealth Land. The Project would also require works to upgrade the intersection of the MPW site with Moorebank Avenue and would therefore be undertaken on the following parcels of land: • Moorebank Avenue, owned by the Commonwealth Government, south of Anzac Road Lot 2, DP 1197707 (formerly part of Lot 3001, DP 1125930) • Moorebank Avenue, owned by Roads and Maritime Services, north of Anzac Road • A portion of Bapaume Road, a public road that is the responsibility of Liverpool City Council • A portion of Anzac Road, owned by Liverpool City Council, to the east of Moorebank Avenue 1.1.3 Description of unexpected find Site name: MPW2020-UXPF01 Site Type: Artefact Centroid: MGA94 Zone 56 307826.63 mE 6242029.53mS Site Extent: 3 m x 3 m MPW2020-UXPF01 is located on an undulating levee, 150 m east of Georges River. The site is comprised of a single complete flake of basalt (Figure 1 and Figure 2), located immediately north of an unsealed road (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The artefact measures 24 mm x 19 mm x 8 mm and featured five scars on the dorsal surface and 21 mm of retouch on the left lateral margin. See Figure 5 for the location of the site in the Project site. In accordance with CoA B148(c), MPW2020- UXPF01was registered on the AHIMS database on 10 June 2020 (AHIMS ID 45-5-5332). Figure 1: Complete flake of basalt, in-situ – Figure 2: Complete flake of basalt view east Figure 3: Context shot of site location – view Figure 4: Context shot of site location – view north south Page 2 Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 2 Project Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan Figure 5: Location of MPW2020-UXPF01 Page 3 Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 2 Project Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan 1.1.4 Conditions of Approval Development Consent (SSD 7709) includes a list of CoCs. The relevant CoCs and where they are addressed in this in this report are summarised in Table 1. Table 1: CoC compliance table CoCs Section Section 1.2.2 states that this ACHMP was B148. If any Aboriginal object or Aboriginal place forwarded to DPC – Heritage Division for review is identified on site, or suspected to be on site and comment. (other than those identified in the EIS). Appendix B includes confirmation that the a) all work in the immediate vicinity of the object ACHMP has been received by DPC – Heritage or place must cease immediately. Division. b) a 10 m wide buffer area around the object or Section 1.1.3 states that the artefact was place must be cordoned off and, registered on the AHIMS database serving as c) OEH must be contacted immediately. notification to DPC – Heritage Division. B149. Works in the immediate vicinity may only recommence if: a) the object or place is confirmed by OEH upon consultation with the Registered Aboriginal Parties, not to be an Aboriginal object or Aboriginal place, or Section 1.2.2 states that this ACHMP was b) an Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management forwarded to DPC – Heritage Division and the Plan is prepared in consultation with the RAPs for review and comment. This section also Registered Aboriginal Parties and OEH to include includes a summary of comments received from the object or place and appropriate measures in DPC – Heritage Division and the RAPs. respect in respect of it, and the Plan is approved by the Planning Secretary, or c) OEH is satisfied as to the measures to be implemented in respect to the object or place and makes a written direction in the regard. Consultation 1.2.1 Registered Aboriginal Parties Aboriginal community consultation has been conducted throughout the MPW Stage 1 and MPW Stage 2 approvals and post-approvals process in accordance with the ‘Aboriginal cultural heritage consultation requirements for proponents 2010’. RAPs to be consulted for the project are listed in Table 2. Table 2: List of Registered Aboriginal Parties Name Organisation Ricky Fields DALI Rebecca Jarvis Tharawal LALC Glenda Chalker Cubbitch Barta Native Title Claimants Aboriginal Corporation Anna O’Hara Darug Land Observations Page 4 Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 2 Project Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan Name Organisation Justine Coplin Darug Custodian Aboriginal Corporation (DCAC) Celestine Everingham DACHA Banyadjaminga Brad Maybury Gandangara Local Aboriginal Land Council Danny Franks Tocomwall 1.2.2 RAP and DPC – Heritage Division consultation In accordance with CoC B149(b) the ACHMP must be prepared in consultation with the RAPs and DPC – Heritage Division. A draft copy of this report was forwarded to the RAPs and DPC – Heritage Division for review and comment on 25 June 2020, requesting comment by 9 July 2020. At the end of this period, responses from two RAPs were received. Neither response included comment on the ACHMP. DPC – Heritage Division also confirmed receipt of the ACHMP and confirmed that no comment would be provided. See Table 3 below of a summary or responses received and Appendix B for full consultation records. Table 3: Summary of received comments Contact Organisation Date received Comment/ response Ruth Gandangara 26 June 2020 Request to remove Brad Maybury as the primary Sheridan LALC contact for the project and address all future correspondence to Ruth Sheridan and Darren Duncan. Sam Higgs DPC – 26 June 2020 Confirmed that DPC – Heritage Division has Heritage received a copy of the report and will not be Division providing comment. Glenda CBNTCAC 26 June 2020 Requests a copy of the Biosis 2018 salvage Chalker excavation report and the ‘original heritage management plan’. A response was provided to Glenda explaining that Artefact Heritage does not hold a copy of the final Biosis 2018 report, and it is recommended Biosis is contacted directly for a copy. It was also advised no other heritage management plans have been produced for the MPW Stage 2 Project. In accordance with advice received from the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) additional consultation with the RAPs was completed. On 9 October 2020, a second copy of the ACHMP was issued to all RAPs requesting confirmation of receipt and comment. Danny Franks (Tocomwall) responded on 9 October 2020 to request a copy of the Biosis 2018 salvage excavation report and the ‘original heritage management plan’. Danny was advised that the there is no other ACHMP other than the one provided, and that Artefact Heritage would seek approval to release the Biosis 2018 salvage report. On 14 October 2020, Tylah Blunden (DCAC) Page 5 Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 2 Project Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Management Plan provided a response to the ACHMP supporting the reburial of the unexpected find and noting that the artefact is of high cultural significance to DCAC. On 12 October 2020, all RAPs were contacted by telephone to confirm receipt of the ACHMP and request comment. Banyadjaminga was not contacted as no telephone number was provided at registration. All RAPs that were not reached by telephone were called again on 13 October 2020. See Table 4 below for the call log. Table 4: Call log Organisation Date received Comment/ response Des Dyer (DALI) 12-Oct-20 Happy with methodology and recommendations, No further comment Tharawal LALC 12-Oct-20 No answer Glenda Chalker 12-Oct-20 Has received the stage 1 report.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Club Veedub Sydney. December 2014
    NQ629.2220994/5 Club VeeDub Sydney. www.clubvw.org.au Merry Christmas to all our members! December 2014 IN THIS BUMPER CHRISTMAS ISSUE: Eastern Creek Marshals Marques in the Park Boris’ Picnic Day Snowy Mountains 1000 Pie In the Sky Run Eat St Parramatta 1956 Chicago Run Plus lots more... Club VeeDub Sydney. www.clubvw.org.au A member of the NSW Council of Motor Clubs. Also affiliated with CAMS. ZEITSCHRIFT - December 2014 - Page 1 Club VeeDub Sydney. www.clubvw.org.au Club VeeDub Sydney Club VeeDub membership. Membership of Club VeeDub Sydney is open to all Committee 2014-15. Volkswagen owners. The cost is $45 for 12 months. President: Steve Carter 0490 020 338 [email protected] Monthly meetings. Monthly Club VeeDub meetings are held at the Vice President: Craig Adams 0404 184 893 Greyhound Social Club Ltd., 140 Rookwood Rd, Yagoona, on [email protected] the third Thursday of each month, from 7:30 pm. All our members, friends and visitors are most welcome. Secretary and: Norm Elias 0421 303 544 Membership: [email protected] Correspondence. Assist. Secretary: David Birchall (02) 9534 4825 Club VeeDub Sydney [email protected] PO Box 1340 Camden NSW 2570 Treasurer: Martin Fox 0411 331 121 [email protected] Our magazine. Editor: Phil Matthews 0412 786 335 Zeitschrift (German for ‘magazine’) is published monthly [email protected] by Club VeeDub Sydney Inc. Members with email details receive Assistant Editor: Lily Matthews Zeitschrift as a full-colour PDF from our website. We welcome all letters and contributions of general VW interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing the Impact of Weirs on Aquatic Habitat
    REDUCING THE IMPACT OF WEIRS ON AQUATIC HABITAT NSW DETAILED WEIR REVIEW REPORT TO THE NEW SOUTH WALES ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST SYDNEY METROPOLITAN CMA REGION Published by NSW Department of Primary Industries. © State of New South Wales 2006. This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in an unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal use or for non-commercial use within your organisation provided due credit is given to the author and publisher. To copy, adapt, publish, distribute or commercialise any of this publication you will need to seek permission from the Manager Publishing, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (July 2006). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check the currency of the information with the appropriate officer of NSW Department of Primary Industries or the user‘s independent adviser. This report should be cited as: NSW Department of Primary Industries (2006). Reducing the Impact of Weirs on Aquatic Habitat - New South Wales Detailed Weir Review. Sydney Metropolitan CMA region. Report to the New South Wales Environmental Trust. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Flemington, NSW. ISBN: 0 7347 1753 9 (New South Wales Detailed Weir Review) ISBN: 978 0 7347 1833 4 (Sydney Metropolitan CMA region) Cover photos: Cob-o-corn Weir, Cob-o-corn Creek, Northern Rivers CMA (upper left); Stroud Weir, Karuah River, Hunter/Central Rivers CMA (upper right); Mollee Weir, Namoi River, Namoi CMA (lower left); and Hartwood Weir, Billabong Creek, Murray CMA (lower right).
    [Show full text]
  • Chipping Norton Lake Scheme
    I rn .FI-rZH E-N . "1 Department of Public Works NSW I I Chipping Norton Lake Scheme I Hydraulic Investigation Report No 270 April 1980 I I I )1 :1 I I I 'I I I I I 1 1 I I I I t I I I I CHIPPING NORTON FEBRUARY 1978 I ( Phot09raphy by Qosco Ply. Ltd. ) 'I I I Department of Public Works, N.S.W. I MANLY HYDRAULICS LABORATORY I I CHIPPING NORTON LAKE SCHEME I HYDRAULIC INVESTICATION I I I I I I I I I I I I A.T. Webb I P. Spurway Report No. 270 1980 I April I I I SUMMARY Dredging of the Georges River at Ch1pping Norton has been a I major source of clean bU1lding sand for some years. Further dredging and assoc1ated works will eventually convert the area 1nto a recreational lake. I A scaled hydraul1c model was used in conJunct10n with f1eld data collection and hand calculations to determine various aspects of the behaviour of the proposed lake scheme. The following problems assoc1ated I with creation of the scheme were considered : • continuously stagnant cond1tions in a tidal cycle in any area could I allow the accumulation of noxious debr1s. Inadequate m1xing of any pollutants enter1ng the lake. result1ng from insuff1cient c1rculation 1n the lake. could also be possible. I • strat1ficat10n of waters in the lake could lead to nOX10US conditions due to deoxygenat10n of the deep layers. I • the silt and sand load 1n the r1ver would tend to settle in the lake. with assoc1ated siltation problems in the upstream reaches a I possib111ty.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Action Group Celebrating 10 Years of Serving the Community
    Feature Liverpool Action Group Celebrating 10 Years of Serving the Community. Liverpool’s greatest natural asset is without doubt the Georges River. The Liverpool Action Group (LAG) Environment Group, volunteer their service and expertise to maintain the Liverpool section of the Georges River, where feral woody weeds, like Lantana, have inundated hectares of river-side woodland and scrub to the point where the bush can no longer regenerate naturally without immediate restoration Top: Bob Storey wades into thick lantana with a works. vengeance. Bottom: Bob Storey plans his attack while Gary A 40 page booklet entitled ‘’Plan to Restore Lucas offers a suggestion. Environmental Assets” was prepared by LAG’s Environment Officer, Bob Storey and presented Photos: Ian Bailey 28th September 2015. to three levels of Government with a request for funding over a five year period, 2014 to 2019. The Georges River is without doubt Liverpool’s The NSW Government agreed to a grant in 2015 greatest natural asset. The land adjacent to the which made it possible to purchase a few power Georges River was occupied for many thousands of tools and plant 2,000 to 3,000 trees and shrubs years by the Tharawal and Eora Aboriginal peoples, by the end of summer 2016. In addition, a number and prior to the arrival of Europeans, Georges River of generous donations were received from local was formerly known as Tucoerah River. companies and LAG members. From its source east of Appin within the Wollondilly Council’s Environment Management team have Shire & Wollongong Local government area, the assured the LAG Environment Group has the correct Georges River flows north through rugged sandstone indemnity in place while working on public land, and gorges to the east of Campbelltown, roughly parallel Council Parks and Gardens staff support LAG in to the Main South railway line, with its eastern bank removing noxious waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Heritage Impact
    STATEMENT OF HERITAGE IMPACT 25-35 SCOTT STREET LIVERPOOL NSW 2170 NOVEMBER 2015 NBRS & PARTNERS Pty Ltd Level 3, 4 Glen Street Milsons Point NSW 2061 Australia Telephone +61 2 9922 2344 - Facsimile +61 2 9922 1308 ABN: 16 002 247 565 Nominated Architects Geoffrey Deane: Reg No.3766; Garry Hoddinett: Reg No 5286; Andrew Duffin: Reg No 5602 This report has been prepared under the guidance of the Expert Witness Code of Conduct in the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules and the provisions relating to expert evidence This document remains the property of NBRS & PARTNERS Pty Ltd. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was produced. Unauthorised use of the document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. Issued: Revision A — 26 October 2015 Final Rev A — 2 November 2015 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Site Location ............................................................................................... 4 1.2 Methodology ............................................................................................... 5 1.3 Heritage Listings ......................................................................................... 5 1.4 Heritage Significance .................................................................................. 6 1.5 Authorship ................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Documentary Evidence ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nsw Estuary and River Water Levels Annual Summary 2015-2016
    NSW ESTUARY AND RIVER WATER LEVELS ANNUAL SUMMARY 2015–2016 Report MHL2474 November 2016 prepared for NSW Office of Environment and Heritage This page intentionally blank NSW ESTUARY AND RIVER WATER LEVELS ANNUAL SUMMARY 2015–2016 Report MHL2474 November 2016 Peter Leszczynski 110b King Street Manly Vale NSW 2093 T: 02 9949 0200 E: [email protected] W: www.mhl.nsw.gov.au Cover photograph: Coraki photo from the web camera, Richmond River Document control Issue/ Approved for issue Author Reviewer Revision Name Date Draft 21/10/2016 B Tse, MHL S Dakin, MHL A Joyner 26/10/2016 Final 04/11/2016 M Fitzhenry, OEH A Joyner 04/11/2016 © Crown in right of NSW through the Department of Finance, Services and Innovation 2016 The data contained in this report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Manly Hydraulics Laboratory and the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage permit this material to be reproduced, for educational or non-commercial use, in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. While this report has been formulated with all due care, the State of New South Wales does not warrant or represent that the report is free from errors or omissions, or that it is exhaustive. The State of NSW disclaims, to the extent permitted by law, all warranties, representations or endorsements, express or implied, with regard to the report including but not limited to, all implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraordinary Sequence of Severe Weather Events in the Late-Nineteenth Century
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science, 2020, 70, 252–279 Review https://doi.org/10.1071/ES19041 Extraordinary sequence of severe weather events in the late-nineteenth century Jeff Callaghan Retired. Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane, Qld., Australia. Postal address: 3/34 Macalister Road, Tweed Heads, NSW 2486, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Between 1883 and 1898, 24 intense tropical cyclones and extra tropical cyclones directly impacted on the southern Queensland and northern New South Wales coasts, with at least 200 fatalities in what was then a sparsely populated area. These events also caused record floods and rainfall, for example Brisbane City experienced its two largest ever floods over this period and Brisbane City set a 24-h rainfall record that still stands today. Additionally, a 24-h rainfall total of 907 mm occurred in a tributary of the upper Brisbane River resulting in a 15-m wall of water advancing down the river. Recent studies have shown that this part of Australia incurs the largest weather-related insurance losses. A major focus in this study is the seas these storms generated, leading to the loss of many marine craft and changes these waves brought to coastal areas. As a famous example of coastal erosion near Brisbane, the continual impacts from large waves caused a channel to form through Stradbroke Island to the open ocean forming two separate islands. Details of how this channel formed are described in relation to the storms. A climatology study of 239 Australian east coast storms that caused severe ocean damage between Brisbane and the Victorian border over the period between 1876 and February 2020 showed that 153 events occurred with a positive Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) trend and 86 events with a negative trend.
    [Show full text]
  • Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) – Stage 2 Proposal
    Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) – Stage 2 Proposal Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment Part 4, Division 4.1, State Significant Development October 2016 Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 2 Proposal Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment Report to Arcadis August 2016 Moorebank Precinct West (MPW) Stage 2 Proposal EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On the 3 June 2016 Concept Plan Approval (SSD 5066) was granted, under Part 4, Division 4.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act), to develop the Moorebank Precinct West Project (MPW Project) on the western side of Moorebank Avenue, Moorebank, in south-western Sydney (the MPW site). The MPW Project involves the development of intermodal freight terminal facilities (IMT), linked to Port Botany, the interstate and intrastate freight rail network. The MPW Project includes associated commercial infrastructure (i.e. warehousing), a rail link connecting the MPW site to the Southern Sydney Freight Line (SSFL), and a road entry and exit point from Moorebank Avenue. Under the Concept Plan Approval, the MPW Project is to be developed in four phases, the first of which is Early Works (MPW Stage 1) and is already underway This Aboriginal heritage assessment is for MPW Stage 2, which involves the construction and operation of an Intermodal terminal (IMT) facility and associated warehousing (the Proposal). Overview of findings It was found that there are five outstanding mitigation measures which require management as part of the Proposal: • Management of scar trees MA6 and MA7 • Staged salvage excavation
    [Show full text]
  • Georges River Estuary Coastal Zone Management Plan
    Georges River Estuary CoastalNEW CITY Zone PLAN Management Plan FLOOD HAZARD OVERLAY CODE Final Report July 2013 Georges River Estuary Coastal Zone Management Plan Prepared For: GRCCC Prepared By: BMT WBM Pty Ltd (Member of the BMT group of companies) C:\N2099_GEORGES_RIVER_EMP\DOCS\R.S1197.001.02.FINAL_PLAN.DOCX DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Prepared by BMT WBM Pty Ltd Document : R.S1197.001.02.Final_Plan.docx BMT WBM Pty Ltd Project Manager : Dr Philip Haines Level 1, 256-258 Norton Street PO Box 194 LEICHHARDT NSW 2040 Australia Client : GRCCC Tel: +61 2 9713 4836 Fax: +61 2 9713 4890 Alison Hanlon Client Contact: ABN 54 010 830 421 www.bmtwbm.com.au Client Reference Title : Georges River Estuary Coastal Zone Management Plan Author : Dr Philip Haines, Dr Rebecca Kelly (isNRM Pty Ltd) Synopsis : The Georges River Estuary Coastal Zone Management Plan provides a strategic framework and action plan for the future management of the Georges River Estuary. It aims to redress current issues, and conserve existing values, using a range of implementation mechanisms, including planning instruments, on-ground works, and education programs. The Plan includes an indicative costing, potential funding sources, and identifies key agencies and Councils for responsibility of implementation and future monitoring. REVISION/CHECKING HISTORY REVISION DATE OF ISSUE CHECKED BY ISSUED BY NUMBER 0 December 2011 RK PEH 1 May 2012 PEH PEH 2 July 2013 PEH PEH DISTRIBUTION DESTINATION REVISION 0 1 2 3 GRCCC e e e BMT WBM File BMT WBM Library C:\N2099_GEORGES_RIVER_EMP\DOCS\R.S1197.001.02.FINAL_PLAN.DOCX Disclaimer The Georges River Combined Council’s Committee (GRCCC) has prepared this document with financial assistance from the NSW Government through the Office of Environment and Heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 Under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
    2008 No 403 New South Wales Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 I, the Minister for Planning, pursuant to section 33A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, adopt the mandatory provisions of the Standard Instrument (Local Environmental Plans) Order 2006 and prescribe matters required or permitted by that Order so as to make a local environmental plan as follows. (S07/01249) FRANK SARTOR, M.P., Minister for Planning Published in Gazette No 106 of 29 August 2008, page 8893 Page 1 2008 No 403 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 Contents Page Part 1 Preliminary 1.1 Name of Plan 5 1.2 Aims of Plan 5 1.3 Land to which Plan applies 6 1.4 Definitions 6 1.5 Notes 6 1.6 Consent authority 6 1.7 Maps 6 1.8 Repeal of other local planning instruments applying to land 7 1.8A Savings provision relating to pending development approvals 7 1.9 Application of SEPPs and REPs 7 Suspension of covenants, agreements and instruments 7 Part 2 Permitted or prohibited development 2.1 Land use zones 9 2.2 Zoning of land to which Plan applies 10 2.3 Zone objectives and land use table 10 2.4 Unzoned land 11 2.5 Additional permitted uses for particular land 11 2.6 Subdivision—consent requirements 11 2.6A Demolition requires consent 12 2.6B Temporary use of land 12 Land Use Table 13 Part 3 Exempt and complying development 3.1 Exempt development 32 3.2 Complying development 33 3.3 Environmentally sensitive areas excluded 34 Part 4 Principal development standards 4.1 Minimum subdivision lot
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Due Diligence Assessment
    Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Due Diligence Assessment 20 Shepherd Street, Liverpool Submitted to Liverpool City Council On Behalf of Coronation Property Group Pty Ltd. May 2015 | 15-045 M:\CPHERITAGE\CPH-2015\15-045 20 SHEPHERD STREET, LIVERPOOL\REPORT.DOCX I Report Revision History Revision Date Issued Prepared by Reviewed by Verified by 01 21/05/15 Susan Kennedy Kerime Danis Kerime Danis Senior Heritage Director - Heritage Director - Heritage Consultant 02 26/05/15 Susan Kennedy Kerime Danis Senior Heritage Director - Heritage Consultant This document is preliminary unless approved by a Director of City Plan Heritage. CERTIFICATION This report has been authorised by City Plan Heritage, with input from a number of other expert consultants, on behalf of the Client. The accuracy of the information contained herein is to the best of our knowledge not false or misleading. The comments have been based upon information and facts that were correct at the time of writing this report. Copyright © City Plan Heritage P/L ABN 46 103 185 413 All Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced without prior permission. While we have tried to ensure the accuracy of the information in this publication, the Publisher accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions or resultant consequences including any loss or damage arising from resilience in information in this publication. M:\CPHERITAGE\CPH-2015\15-045 20 SHEPHERD STREET, LIVERPOOL\REPORT.DOCX II Table of Contents 1. Introduction.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 022 Moorebank IMT Project Chapter 20 Aboriginal Heritage.Pdf
    Chapter 20 Chapter 20 – Aboriginal heritage Aboriginal heritage Contents Page number 20. Aboriginal heritage 20-1 20.1 Assessment approach 20-2 20.1.1 Literature and database review 20-2 20.1.2 Field surveys and subsurface testing 20-3 20.1.3 Aboriginal consultation 20-4 20.1.4 Significance assessment 20-6 20.1.5 Cumulative assessment 20-7 20.2 Existing environment 20-7 20.2.1 Geomorphological context 20-7 20.2.2 Aboriginal cultural context 20-7 20.2.3 Aboriginal archaeological context 20-8 20.2.4 Archaeological field survey results 20-13 20.2.5 Subsurface testing program results 20-16 20.2.6 Tenure history of the Project site 20-22 20.3 Significance assessment 20-22 20.3.1 Significance of the Project site 20-24 20.3.2 Significance of recorded surface sites 20-24 20.3.3 Significance of the deposits 20-26 20.3.4 Aboriginal cultural value 20-26 20.4 Impact assessment 20-27 20.4.1 Impacts on Aboriginal recordings 20-27 20.4.2 Impacts on Aboriginal heritage across the Project site 20-30 20.5 Management and mitigation 20-31 20.5.1 Mitigation strategies 20-31 20.5.2 Proposed mitigation measures 20-34 20.5.3 Effectiveness of mitigation measures 20-36 20.6 Summary of key findings 20-36 Parsons Brinckerhoff i List of tables Page number Table 20.1 Relevant Commonwealth EIS Guidelines and NSW SEARs 20-1 Table 20.2 Summary of 2010 Aboriginal field survey results 20-13 Table 20.3 Results summary of subsurface testing 20-17 Table 20.4 Response to research questions 20-20 Table 20.5 Summary of significance assessments of each Aboriginal recording 20-23
    [Show full text]