DOCSLIB.ORG

Forward Physics at the HL-LHC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forward Physics at the HL-LHC Forward Physics at the HL-LHC Lucian Harland-Lang, University of Oxford Oxford blue Visual identity guidelines LHC Working Group on Forward Physics and Diffraction CERN, 19 December 2018 1 Outline/Context • QCD and SM Working Group for HL-LHC and HE-LHC Yellow Report released recently: CERN-LPCC-2018-03 1 CERN-LPCC-2018-03 December 12, 2018 2 Standard Model Physics 3 at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC 4 Report from Working Group 1 on the Physics of the HL-LHC, and Perspectives at the HE-LHC 6 5 200 6.6.17 Editors: Top quark charge asymmetries at LHCb . 143 1 2 3 4 5 8 P. Azzi , S. Farry , P. Nason , A. Tricoli , D. Zeppenfeld 201 6.6.2 A method to determine V at the weak scale in top quark decays at the LHC . 144 | cb| 202 6.79 Contributors: Flavour changing neutral current . 146 6 7 8 9 9 10 203 10 R. Abdul Khalek , J. Alimena , N. Andari , L. Aperio Bella , A.J. Armbruster , J. Baglio , S. 7 Effective11 coupling12 interpretations13 for top14 quark cross8 sections and13 properties15 . 149 11 Bailey , E. Bakos , A. Bakshi , C. Baldenegro , F. Balli , A. Barker , W. Barter , J. de 204 7.116 , The1 top quark17 couplings18 to the W boson19 . .8 . .20 . .21 . 149 • As part of this-12 Blas chapter, F. Blekman ,on D. Bloch forward, A. Bodek , M. Boonekamp physics., E. Boos , J.D. Bossio Sola , L. 22 9 23 24 25 4 205 137.2Cadamuro t¯tγ .............................................., S. Camarda , F. Campanario , M. Campanelli , Q.-H. Cao , V. Cavaliere , A. 151 26 27 28 29 30 3 31 14 Cerri ¯, B. Chargeishvili , C. Charlot , S.-L. Chen , T. Chen , L. Cieri , M. Ciuchini , G. 206 7.3 ttZ..............................................32 33 34 1 35 36 151 15 Corcella , J.M. Cruz-Martinez , M. Czakon , A. Dainese , N.P. Dang , L. Darmé , S. 207 8 Forward4 physics .37 . .9 . .8 . .38 . .39 . .40 . 153 16 Dawson , H. De la Torre , M. Deile , F. Deliot , S. Demers , A. Denner , F. Derue , L. Di 41 42 43 20 27 208 178.1Ciaccio Photon-induced, W.K. Di Clemente collisions, D. Dominguez at the HL–LHC Damiani . ., . L. Dudko . ., . A. Durglishvili . ., . M. 153 9 44 45 3 99 30 18 Dünser , J. Ebadi , R. B. Ferreira De Faria , G. Ferrera , A. Ferroglia , T. M. Figy , K.D. 209 8.1.146 Anomalous quartic45 gauge couplings47 with48 proton tagging49 ,50 at the HL-LHC45 . .51 . 153 19 Finelli , M.C.N. Fiolhais , E. Franco , R. Frederix , B. Fuks , B. Galhardo , J. Gao ,J. 210 9 52 53 54 55 56 208.2R. Gaunt Central, T. Gehrmann exclusive production:, A. Gehrmann-De QCD Ridder prospects, J. Giljanovic . ., . F. Giuli . ., E.W.N. Glover . ., . 155 49 45 41 52 9 211 218.3M. D. Goodsell Tagged proton, E. Gouveia at the HL–LHC:, C. Goy experimental, M. Grazzini prospects, J.F. Grosse-Oetringhaus . .,P. 157 57 11 11 58 59 9 Mario’s talk 22 Gunnellini , C. Gwenlan , L. A. Harland-Lang , P.F. Harrison , G. Heinrich , C. Helsens , C. 212 8.4 Low-mass9 central60 exclusive production61 .62 . .34 . .63 ., .64 . .9 . 162 23 Helsens , M. Herndon , O. Hindrichs , A. Hoang , K. Hoepfner , J.M. Hogan , A. Huss , 52 65 66 9 13 43 67 68 24 G. Isidori , S. Jahn , Sa. Jain , S. P. Jones , A.W. Jung , H. Jung , S. Kallweit , D. Kar , 52 52 8 69 70 25 A. Karlberg , M. Kerner , M.K. Khandoga , Hamzeh Khanpour , S. Khatibi , A. 71 9 56 2 42 72 43 26 Khukhunaushvili , J. Kieseler , F. Krauss , J. Kretzschmar , J. Kroll , E. Kryshen , V.S. Lang 73 4 74 47 75 14 37 43 • Here - summarise27 , L. Lechner physics, C.A. Lee , M. Leigh prospects, D. Lelas , R. Les discussed, I. M. Lewis , B. Li , Y.here Li ,J. + beyond. 43 76 56 77 78 60 17 28 Lidrych , Z. Ligeti , J.M. Lindert , Y. Liu , K. Lohwasser , K. Long , D. Lontkovskyi , G. 66 17 79 9 17 80 29 Majumder , M. Mancini , P. Mandrik , M.L. Mangano , I. Marchesini , C. Mayer , K. 66 9 45 43 30 Mazumdar , J.A. McFayden , P. M. Mendes Amaral2 Torres Lagarelhos , A.B. Meyer , S. 81 82 83 44 9 31 Mikhalcov , S. Mishima , A. Mitov , M. Mohammadi Najafabadi , M. Moreno Llácer , M. 9 63 47 84 85 76 48 32 Mulders , M. Narain , A. Nisati , T. Nitta , A. Onofre , S. Pagan Griso , D. Pagani , A. 83 86 83 20 9 9 87 33 Papanastasiou , K. Pedro , M. Pellen , M. Perfilov , B.A. Petersen , M. Pierini , J. Pires , 4 62 43 52 56 5 9 ,88 34 M.-A. Pleier , S. Plätzer , K. Potamianos , S. Pozzorini , A. C. Price , M. Rauch , E. Re , 89 43 90 14 60 66 86 35 L. Reina , J. Reuter , J. Rojo , C. Royon , A. Savin , S. Sawant , B. Schneider , R. 73 9 5 9 2 47 ,9 36 Schoefbeck , M. Schoenherr , H. Schäfer-Siebert , M. Seidel , T. Shears , L. Silvestrini , M. 91 17 73 92 93 86 19 37 Sjodahl , K. Skovpen , D. Spitzbart , P. Starovoitov , C. J. E. Suster , P. Tan , R. Taus , D. 60 94 95 66 45 52 58 38 Teague , K. Terashi , J. Terron , S. Uplap , F. Veloso , M. Verzetti , M. A. Vesterinen , V.E. 58 20 20 12 12 9 39 Vladimirov , P. Volkov , G. Vorotnikov , M. Vranjes Milosavljevic , N. Vranjes , E. Vryonidou 56 9 96 8 74 40 11 40 , D. Walker , M. Wiesemann ,Y.Wu , T. Xu , S. Yacoob , J. Zahreddine , G. Zanderighi , M. 90 43 97 98 63 96 96 41 Zaro , O. Zenaiev , G. Zevi Della Porta , C. Zhang , W. Zhang , H. Zhu , H.L. Zhu , R. 43 9 42 Zlebcik , F. N. Zubair 6 1Introduction The use of diffractive processes to study the Standard Model (SM) and New Physics at the LHC has only been fully appreciated within the last few years; see, for example [1, 2, 3, 4], or the recent reviews [5, 6, 7], and references therein. By detecting protons that have lost only about 1-3% of their longitudinal momentum [8, 9], a rich QCD, electroweak, Higgs and BSM programme becomes accessible experimentally, with the potential to study phenomena which are unique to the LHC, and difficult even at a future linear collider. Particularly interesting are the so-called central exclusive production (CEP) processes which provide an extremely favourable environment to search for, and identify the nature of, new particles at the LHC. The first that comes to mind are the Higgs bosons, but there is also a potentially rich, more exotic, physics menu including (light) gluino and squark production, searches for extra dimensions, gluinonia, radions, and indeed any new object which has 0++ (or 2++)quantumnumbersand couples strongly to gluons, see for instance [2, 10, 11]. By “central exclusive” we mean a process of the type pp → p + X + p, where the + signs denote the absence of hadronic activity (that is, the presence of rapidity gaps) between the outgoing protons and the decay products of the centrally produced system X. The basic mechanism driving the process is shown in Fig. 1. There are several reasons why CEP is especially attractive for searches for new heavy objects. Central exclusive reactionsFirst, if processes the outgoing protons remain intact and scatter through small angles then, to a very good approximation, the primary active di-gluon system obeys a Jz =0,C-even,P-even, selection rule [12]. Here Jz is the projection of the total angular momentum along the proton beam axis. This selection rule readily permits a clean determination of the quantum numbers of the observed new (for example, Higgs-like) resonance, when the dominant production is a scalar state. Secondly, because the process is exclusive, the energy loss of the outgoing protons Central Exclusiveis directly related Production to the mass of the central at system,HL-LHC allowing a potentially excellent mass resolution, irrespective of the decay mode of the centrally produced system. Thirdly, in many Central exclusive reactionstopical cases,pp in particular,p + X for+ Higgsp bosoncan production, be studied a signal-t byo-background measuring ratio ofX orderin a central 1 (or even better)! is achievable [3, 11], [13]-[18]. In particular, due to Jz = 0 selection, leading- 2 detector and the intactorder protons QCD b¯b productionpp with is suppressed forward by a factor proton (mb/E detectors.T ) ,whereET is the transverse energy ¯ < • Two productionof the b, mechanismsb jets. Therefore, of forinterest a low mass*: Higgs, MH ∼ 150 GeV, there is a possibility to observe p p + − Fig. 5.31: Di-photon exclusive Standard Model productionPhoton-inducedFigure via QCD 1: (left) The and basic photon mechanism induced (right) forQCD-induced the exclusive process pp → p + X + p.ThesystemX is processes at the lowest order of pertubation theory. produced by the fusion of two active gluons, with a screening gluon exchanged to neutralize Higher mass the colour. ‘Lower’ mass p whereas the photon induced ones (QED processes) dominate at higher diphoton masses [176]. It is p very important to notice that the W loop• contributionSensitive dominates to atrather high diphoton different masses [174, physics/areas 175, 177] of phase space. Play whereas this contribution is omitted in most studies. This is the first time that we put all terms inside a MC generator, FPMC [179]. different roles @ HL-LHC. 2 6.1.2 StandardMeasure Model WW and theZZ prduction proton fractional momentum3 loss *In⇠ addition-= ∆p photoproduction/p with forward proton In the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics, the couplings of fermions and gauge bosons are con- i strained by thespectrometers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Simulation Studies of Hydrophobic Gating in Nanopores and Ion Channels
    146 Biochemical Society Transactions (2015) Volume 43, part 2 Molecular simulation studies of hydrophobic gating in nanopores and ion channels Jemma L. Trick*, Prafulla Aryal*†‡, Stephen J. Tucker†‡ and Mark S. P. Sansom*‡1 *Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, U.K. †Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K. ‡OXION Initiative in Ion Channels and Disease, University of Oxford, Oxford U.K. Abstract Gating in channels and nanopores plays a key role in regulating flow of ions across membranes. Molecular simulations provide a ‘computational microscope’ which enables us to examine the physical nature of gating mechanisms at the level of the single channel molecule. Water enclosed within the confines of a nanoscale pore may exhibit unexpected behaviour. In particular, if the molecular surfaces lining the pore are hydrophobic this promotes de-wetting of the pore. De-wetting is observed as stochastic liquid–vapour transitions within a pore, and may lead to functional closure of a pore to the flow of ions and/or water. Such behaviour was first observed in simulations of simple model nanopores and referred to as ‘hydrophobic gating’. Simulations of both the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and of TWIK-1 potassium channels (the latter alongside experimental studies) suggest hydrophobic gating may occur in some biological ion channels. Current studies are focused on designing hydrophobic gates into biomimetic nanopores. Introduction One possible mechanism for channel and pore closure is Ion channels and protein (nano)pores play a key role ‘hydrophobic gating’ (also sometimes known as a ‘vapour in membrane biology, allowing rapid movement of ions lock’ mechanism).
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Curiosity Pages 16 and 17
    STAFF MAGAZINE | Michaelmas term 2017 Pages 16 and 17 Pages riosity Focus on Cu contributors index EDITORIAL TEAM 4 Day in the life of: Professor Louise Annette Cunningham Richardson Internal Communications Manager Public Affairs Directorate 6 So, you think you can’t dance? Dr Bronwyn Tarr discusses her Shaunna Latchman research Communications Officer (secondment) Public Affairs Directorate 8 News 11 My Oxford: Anne Laetitia Velia Trefethen Senior Graphic Designer Public Affairs Directorate 12 Team work: making Designer and Picture Researcher a great impression – Print Studio OTHER CONTRIBUTORS 14 Behind the hoardings – Beecroft Building 16 Curiosity Carnival: Rebecca Baxter the feedback Capital Projects Communications Manager Estates Services 18 CuriOXities – favourites from the University’s collections Meghan Lawson HR Officer (Policy & Communications) 20 Intermisson – staff Personnel Services activities outside of work 22 What’s on Caroline Moughton Staff Disability Advisor 24 My Family Care / Equality & Diversity Unit Disability support 25 Introduction to: Kevin Coutinho Matt Pickles Media Relations Manager 30 Perfection on a plate Public Affairs Directorate – enhancing your Christmas dinner experience Dan Selinger Head of Communications 31 Deck the halls – Academic Administration Division college festivities 2 Blueprint | Michaelmas term 2017 student Spotlight Amy Kerr, a second-year opportunity you’ve been given – The Moritz– undergraduate student, studying discussing legal issues with the academics Heyman Scholarship Law with Law Studies in Europe who wrote your textbook or who was made possible at Lady Margaret Hall, tells Dan administer the contracts for the University thanks to a Selinger about her experience is, well, rather cool. generous donation at Oxford. by Sir Michael How do your experiences Moritz and Ms Amy applied to Oxford after compare to your expectations Harriet Heyman.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Meets Biology 2019 9–11 September 2019 University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
    Delegate Handbook Physics Meets Biology 2019 9–11 September 2019 University of Oxford, Oxford, UK http://pmb2019.iopconfs.org Contents Contacts 2 Disclaimer 2 Social media 2 Sponsors 3 Committee 3 Venue 4 Site Maps 5 Accommodation 5 WiFi 5 Travel 5 Programme 6 Registration 6 Catering 6 Dietary requirements 6 Social Programme 7 Payment 7 Presenter instructions 8 Poster presentations 8 Safety and emergency evacuation procedures 9 Smoking 9 First aid 9 Weather 9 Conference app 10 1 | Page Contacts If you have any questions or require further information, please contact a member of the Institute of Physics conference organising team, Jason Eghan or Marcia Reais. Jason and Marcia will be on-site for the duration of the conference and will be based on Sunday in St. Anne’s College in the Lodge and then in the Department of Physics, Martin Wood Foyer on the Reception Desk during registration times (see page 6). Outside of these times and only in case of an emergency, please telephone 07884 426 8232. Jason Eghan Tel: +44 (0)207470 4984 Mobile: +44 (0)7884 426 8232 Email: [email protected] Marcia Reais Tel: +44 (0)207470 4831 Email: [email protected] Conferences Tel: +44 (0)20 7470 4800 Email: [email protected] We hope that your time at the conference is trouble free. If you do encounter any problems, please report them to the conferences team who will make every effort to rectify the issue as soon as possible. Disclaimer The Institute of Physics, University of Oxford and their approved representatives accept no responsibility for any accident, loss or damage to participant’s property during the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Today 2009, Reproduced with Kind Permission of the the Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford
    A refuge for the persecuted, release for the fettered mind An organisation set up in 1933 to find work for refugee academics is still very much in business. Georgina Ferry reports. Seventy years ago, on 5 February 1939, the great and the good of Oxford poured into the Sheldonian to hear distinguished speakers address 'The Problem of the refugee Scholar'. The aim was to persuade the University and its colleges to open their hearts and their pockets to academics from countries where fascism had deprived them of their livelihood and of the opportunity to teach and research. On the platform was Lord Samuel, former Home Secretary and head of the Council for German Jewry, and Sir John Hope Simpson, the former Indian civil servant whose subsequent career as a colonial administrator had frequently focused on migration, forced and otherwise, in countries as diverse as Kenya and Palestine. Both were Balliol men. Distinguished Oxford figures including the Master of Balliol, A D Lindsay, the Provost of Oriel, Sir William David Ross, and the regius Professor of Medicine, Sir Edward Farquhar Buzzard - had worked indefatigably over the previous five years to create the conditions in which the University would be prepared to stage a high-profile event in such a cause. It all began in 1933, when Sir William Beveridge, then director of the London School of Economics (and subsequently Master of Univ), was on a study trip to Vienna. Reading in a newspaper that, since Adolf Hitler's recent rise to power, Jewish and other non-Nazi professors were losing their jobs in German universities, Beveridge returned to England and mobilised many of his influential friends to form the academic assistance Council (AAC).
    [Show full text]
  • B|D Landscape Architects Review Journal 2010 – 2015 “Landscape Architecture’S Best-Kept Secret (Until Now)”
    B|D Landscape Architects Review Journal 2010 – 2015 “Landscape architecture’s best-kept secret (until now)” Peter Tisdale, THAT Property Man Foreword BY rob beswick, director t has been a busy and productive first five years for B|D During the last five years we have been published in a number landscape architects and this journal is a round-up of of architectural journals and shortlisted for a series of Inew, in progress and completed projects. A reminder for awards. In 2013 we featured in a new book on landscape ourselves, existing clients & collaborators of time well spent, architectural graphics, a dialogue piece in an American and a brief moment of B|D reflection to see where we are design journal and won a Civic Trust Award. In 2014 we heading for the next five years! were published in four books and won a national Landscape Institute award. Through testing times we have grown into a progressive and dynamic landscape practice with an increasing number of I am very proud of what we have achieved in a short space award winning and published projects in the UK and overseas. of time and equally optimistic about where we can get to I take great pleasure in seeing each project develop from for our ten year review. I would like to take this opportunity those first flat white fuelled sketches through planning and to thank all of the talented consultants and forward-thinking construction to the completed scheme being enjoyed by the clients who have commissioned or collaborated with us public. The beauty of landscape architecture is that projects during the first five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Report 2017/18 Welcome
    Campaign Report 2017/18 Welcome It is a real privilege to witness the power of philanthropy here at the University of Oxford. The generosity of our donors, coupled with the calibre and ambition of our academics and students, is inspiring and improving lives across the world via a wide range of projects and research. Our Campaign Report for 2017/18 features just a few of the areas that have been supported through the Oxford Thinking Campaign. These include a look at the significance of the Department of Physics’ magnificent new Beecroft Building and how the Bodleian Libraries’ first Education Officer is driving a variety of community, school and public activities. Your support plays a critical role in maintaining the highest levels of academic excellence at Oxford, which in turn enables us to effect positive change on a global scale. Thank you for your continued support. I hope you enjoy this year’s report. Liesl Elder Chief Development Officer University of Oxford Main photography – John Cairns Front cover photography – Radcliffe Camera and University Church © Oxford University Images / David Williams Photography Additional photography – Martin Handley – Global Initiative – Global Jet Watch – Stuart Bebb – Fotohaus – Hawkins\Brown Architects – Dr Karl Harrison – Ian Wallman Design – williamjoseph.co.uk 4 Contents 2 Thanks to your support… 12 Tackling prostate cancer How your donations are making Professor Ian Mills discusses his a difference research into the disease, which now claims the lives of more than 11,000 4 Foundations for new
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating Sir Martin and Lady Audrey Wood's 90Th Birthdays 2017
    Department of Physics Celebrating Sir Martin designed by www.imageworks.co.uk and Lady Audrey Wood’s 90th birthdays 2017 My parents, Martin and Audrey, A MAGNETIC VENTURE are the epitome of everything that is good about humankind. They are generous of spirit, of time, of resources, and ideas. Martin and Audrey met while they were students at Cambridge and They believe in giving back in multitudes that which they have married in 1955. Shortly afterwards they moved to Oxford where benefitted from themselves. We often talk about networks, Martin began work as a Senior Research Officer at the Department but rarely with the sense of a mesh that embraces and of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, building some of the first strengthens, reaching across many levels of society. That is what Martin and Audrey have superconducting magnets. created over more than sixty years together. Realising the commercial potential of this, Martin and Audrey Through an amazing partnership that has always played to their strengths, they have founded Oxford Instruments in 1959. The University of Oxford’s first 1 created and nurtured not just a hugely successful commercial business in Oxford 2 spin-out company was established in the Woods’ garden shed and Instruments but also outstanding charities that reflect the interests and passions that have steered their lives. went on to become a huge commercial success. Superconducting magnets were in demand for MRI scanners all over the world, and They have shared their love of nature, the countryside, forestry and environmental in 1983 the company floated on the stock market. This enabled sustainability through the Earth Trust and the Sylva Foundation while actively supporting Martin and Audrey to found and support science and environmental groups such as Wild Oxfordshire and the University of Oxford’s Department of Plant organisations and projects across Oxfordshire which, as you will Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Composite Dark Matter from Strongly-Interacting Chiral Dynamics
    Prepared for submission to JHEP Composite Dark Matter from Strongly-Interacting Chiral Dynamics Roberto Contino,a,b Alessandro Podo,a,b Filippo Revelloa,c aScuola Normale Superiore, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, 56126, Pisa, Italy bIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) - Sezione di Pisa Polo Fibonacci Largo B. Pontecorvo, 3, I-56127 Pisa, Italy cRudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics Beecroft Building, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, University of Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: A class of chiral gauge theories is studied with accidentally-stable pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons playing the role of dark matter (DM). The gauge group contains a vector-like dark color factor that confines at energies larger than the electroweak scale, and a U(1)D factor that remains weakly coupled and is spontaneously broken. All new scales are generated dynamically, including the DM mass, and the IR dynamics is fully calculable. We analyze minimal models of this kind with dark fermions transforming as non-trivial vector-like representations of the Standard Model (SM) gauge group. In realistic models, the DM candidate is a SM singlet and comes along with charged partners that can be discovered at high-energy colliders. The phenomenology of the lowest-lying new states is thus characterized by correlated predictions for astrophysical observations and laboratory experiments. arXiv:2008.10607v2 [hep-ph] 8 Feb 2021 Contents 1 Introduction2 2 Analysis of minimal models5
    [Show full text]
  • Physics in Oxford, 1839-1939
    R2.1 R. Fox, Physics in Oxford, 1839-1939, Atti del XXV Congresso Nazionale di Storia della Fisica e dell’Astronomia, Milano, 10-12 novembre 2005, (Milano: SISFA, 2008): R2.1- R2.9. PHYSICS IN OXFORD, 1839-1939 ROBERT FOX Professor of the History of Science University of Oxford In 1939, Oxford’s Dr Lee’s professor of experimental philosophy, Frederick Lindemann, delivered a devastating retrospective judgement on the state of the laboratory – the Clarendon Laboratory – as he had inherited it twenty years before. On his arrival in Oxford, as Lindemann recalled, the reputation of the Clarendon had “sunk almost to zero”. Lindemann identified his predecessor in the chair, Robert Bellamy Clifton, as the man responsible for this state of affairs. Clifton had been appointed in 1865 and had served until his retirement at the age 80 in 1915. He had arrived as one of the ablest young physicists of his generation, a distinguished product of the Cambridge Mathematical Tripos and with five years’ experience as professor of natural philosophy at Owens College, Manchester (the future University of Manchester). But long before his retirement, Clifton had become a notorious problem in Oxford. He had published virtually nothing for almost forty years and had presided over a laboratory in which students specializing in physics had become ever rarer birds. In these circumstances, Lindemann’s criticism appeared all too plausible, and it would be hard to defend Clifton against the core charge that the Clarendon in 1919 was in a “moribund” state. What we can hope to do, however, is to understand why things looked so bleak to Lindemann.
    [Show full text]
  • 19/03149/FUL: Site of Oxford University Science Area, South
    Agenda Item 7 WEST AREA PLANNING COMMITTEE Application number: 19/03149/FUL Decision due by 28th February 2020 Extension of time 19th June 2020 Proposal Public realm works, including hard and soft landscaping, rationalisation of car and cycle parking, provision of new cycle store buildings and creation of public spaces. Site address Site Of Oxford University Science Area, South Parks Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire – see Appendix 1 for site plan Ward Holywell Ward Case officer Natalie Dobraszczyk Agent: Steven Roberts Applicant: The Chancellor, Masters And Scholars Of The University Of Oxford Reason at Committee Large scale application 1. RECOMMENDATION 1.1. West Area Planning Committee is recommended to: 1.1.1. approve the application for the reasons given in the report and subject to the required planning conditions set out in section 11 of this report and grant planning permission; and 1.1.2. agree to delegate authority to the Head of Planning Services to: finalise the recommended conditions as set out in this report including such refinements, amendments, additions and/or deletions as the Head of Planning Services considers reasonably necessary; and 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1. This report considers public realm works, including hard and soft landscaping, rationalisation of car and cycle parking, provision of new cycle store buildings and creation of public spaces at the site of the University Science Area. 2.2. The report considers the following material planning considerations: 1 91 Principle of development; Impact on heritage assets; Design Transport Biodiversity Drainage Other matters. 2.3. On balance the proposal is considered to comply with the development plan as a whole.
    [Show full text]