1 Theories of Failure • Failure: Every Material Has Certain Strength

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Theories of Failure • Failure: Every Material Has Certain Strength Theories of Failure • Failure: Every material has certain strength, expressed in terms of stress or strain, beyond which it fractures or fails to carry the load. • Failure Criterion: A criterion (standard/principle/measure/gauge/norm) is used to hypothesize (imagine/assume/theory/visualize) the failure. • Failure Theory: A Theory behind a failure criterion. Why we need failure theories? • To design structural components/elements and calculate margin of safety. • To guide in materials development. • To determine weak and strong directions. Failure Mode • Yielding: a process of global permanent plastic deformation. Change in the geometry of the object. • Low stiffness: excessive elastic deflection. • Fracture: a process in which cracks grow to the extent that the component breaks apart. • Buckling: the loss of stable equilibrium. Compressive loading can lead to bucking in columns. • Creep: a high-temperature effect. Load carrying capacity drops. Theories OF Failure 1 Four important failure theories, namely (1) maximum shear stress theory, (2) maximum normal stress theory, (3) maximum strain energy theory, and (4) maximum distortion energy theory. Out of these four theories of failure, the maximum normal stress theory or Rankins’s theory is only applicable for brittle materials, and the remaining three theories are applicable for ductile materials. Following are the important common features for all the theories. 1. In predicting failure, the limiting strength values obtained from the uniaxial testing are used. 2. The failure theories have been formulated in terms of three principal normal stresses (S1, S2, S3) at a point. 3. For any given complex state of stress (sx, sy, sz, txy, tyz, tzx), we can always find its equivalent principal normal stresses (S1, S2, S3). Thus the failure theories in terms of principal normal stresses can predict the failure due to any given state of stress. 4. The three principal normal stress components S1, S2, & S3, each which can be comprised of positive (tensile), negative (compressive) or zero value. 5. When the external loading is uniaxial, that is S1= a positive or negative real value, S2=S3=0, then all failure theories predict the same as that has been determined from regular tension/compression test. 6. The material properties are usually determined by simple tension or compression tests 7. Some structural members are subjected to biaxial or triaxial stresses. 8. To determine whether a component/element will fail or not, some failure theories are proposed which are related to the properties of materials obtained from uniaxial tension or compression tests. 9. Ductile materials usually fail by yielding and hence the limiting strength is the yield strength of material as determined from simple tension test which is assumed the same in compression also. For brittle materials limiting strength of material is ultimate tensile strength intension or compression. 2 Conservative ( traditional/old fashioned/ conventonal) 3 Problem solving strategy for Failure thoery: Syp- yield strength , Sut and Suc=ultimate tensile strength and ultimate compressive strengths Failure Theories 1. Failure under load can occur due to excessive elastic deflections or due to excessive stresses. 2. Failure prediction theories due to excessive stresses fall into two classes: Failure when the loading is static or the number of load cycles is one or quite small, and failure due to cyclic loading when the number of cycles is large often in thousands of cycles. Failure under static load Parts under static loading may fail due to: a) Ductile behavior: Failure is due to bulk yielding causing permanent deformations that are objectionable. These failures may cause noise, loss of accuracy, excessive vibrations, and eventual fracture. In machines, bulk yielding is the criteria for failure. Tiny areas of yielding are OK in ductile behavior in static loading. b) Brittle behavior: Failure is due to fracture. This occurs when the materials (or conditions) do not allow much yielding such as ceramics, grey cast iron, or heavily cold-worked parts or concrete. End of Lecture…….. 4 The yield point, alternatively called the elastic limit, marks the end of elastic behaviour and the beginning of plastic behaviour. When stresses less than the yield point are removed, the material returns to its original shape. For many materials that do not have a well-defined yield point, a quantity called yield strength is substituted. Yield strength is the stress at which a material has undergone some arbitrarily chosen amount of permanent deformation, often 0.2 percent. Any increase in the stress beyond the yield point causes greater permanent deformation and eventually fracture. A point at which Maximum load or stress required to initiate the plastic deformation of material such point is called as Upper yield point. And a point at which minimum load or stress required to maintain the plastic behavior of material such a point is called as Lower yield point. Upper yield point is the point after which the plastic deformation starts. This is due to the fact that the dislocations in the crystalline structure start moving. But after a while, the dislocations become too much in number and they restrict each other’s movement. This is called strain hardening and lower yield point is the point after which strain hardening begins. Dislocations are defects present in crystal areas where atoms are out of position (irregular alignment). Why the lower yield point stress value of mild steel is consider as a strength of material instead of upper yield point stress? Failure of mechanical component means it fail To perform it's operations efficiently for example consider shaft which transmits rotational motion ,now when shaft is unable to transmit motion efficiently then it will fail. Basically their are three types of failure in case of mechanical component i.e 5 1) failure due to elastic deformation 2) failure due to plastic deformation 3) failure due to fracture When component deforms elastically it's dimensions changes and it fails. And this failure is known as failure due to elastic deformation When component undergoes plastic deformation it's dimension changes permanently and failure takes place this is known as failure due to plastic deformation. For ductile metals elastic failure is criteria of failure because ductile metals undergo elastic deformation before failure. And elastic deformation starts at lower yield point. As Mild steel is ductile material we consider lower yield point Upper yield point is not constant it varies with shape of specimen and rate of loading Lower yielding point is constant for all shapes and rate of loading because of its consistency lower yielding point is taken as yield stress of mild steel Upper yield point corresponds to the load that is required to initiate yielding. Lower yield point corresponds to the min load that is required to maintain yield. Normally we use the lower yield point to determine the yield strength of the material being tested, cause the upper yield is momentary. Upper yield point is the max load at which deformation starts, starting of deformation means dislocations are started moving in the material. So this type of phenomenon is called permanent deformation by slip ( slip mechanism). 6 As the slip is taking place in the material, it offers less resistance to the material and hence curve falls slightly ( stress is the measurement of resistance offered by the material during the application of load). And it reaches to some stress ( lower yiled point stress) which is the minimum stress required to maintain the deformation in the mateial.. And at the lower yield point for the low carbon steels ( mild steels) the stress strain cure is in some wave nature , this is because to break bonds with impurites while dislocations are moving out of the material , hence resistance increases and decreases periodically after that strain hardening takes place which increases resistance slowly by increasing of dislocations in the material... What is strain softening and strain hardening? Work hardening, also known as strain hardening is the strengthening of a metal by plastic deformation. This strengthening occurs because of dislocation movements and dislocation generation within the crystal structure of the material. Reason for Work hardening: As the deformation of the material occur in the plastic region, the dislocation of the material increases. The dislocation interaction is repulsive in nature. As the dislocation density increases the further deformation of the material become difficult, this is called Work Hardening or Strain Hardening. some materials exhibit an elevation in yield stress along with plastic strain, sometimes strain rate or some internal variables which is known as hardening and if it shows a decrease in yield stress with plastic strain, it is called softening. Strain hardening is the process of increasing the hardness and strength of a metal by plastic deformation and is a cold working process. Strain hardening is due to the increased resistance to dislocation movement through a crystal lattice. No crystal lattice is perfect, it has some crystallographic defects called dislocations ( Dislocation). The dislocation movement is along the slip plane (plane of greatest atomic density and direction is along the closest packed direction within the slip plane).Slip will occur when the shear stress along the crystallographic plane reaches a critical value, which leads to movement of dislocations. What is Plasticity?
Recommended publications
  • 10-1 CHAPTER 10 DEFORMATION 10.1 Stress-Strain Diagrams And
    EN380 Naval Materials Science and Engineering Course Notes, U.S. Naval Academy CHAPTER 10 DEFORMATION 10.1 Stress-Strain Diagrams and Material Behavior 10.2 Material Characteristics 10.3 Elastic-Plastic Response of Metals 10.4 True stress and strain measures 10.5 Yielding of a Ductile Metal under a General Stress State - Mises Yield Condition. 10.6 Maximum shear stress condition 10.7 Creep Consider the bar in figure 1 subjected to a simple tension loading F. Figure 1: Bar in Tension Engineering Stress () is the quotient of load (F) and area (A). The units of stress are normally pounds per square inch (psi). = F A where: is the stress (psi) F is the force that is loading the object (lb) A is the cross sectional area of the object (in2) When stress is applied to a material, the material will deform. Elongation is defined as the difference between loaded and unloaded length ∆푙 = L - Lo where: ∆푙 is the elongation (ft) L is the loaded length of the cable (ft) Lo is the unloaded (original) length of the cable (ft) 10-1 EN380 Naval Materials Science and Engineering Course Notes, U.S. Naval Academy Strain is the concept used to compare the elongation of a material to its original, undeformed length. Strain () is the quotient of elongation (e) and original length (L0). Engineering Strain has no units but is often given the units of in/in or ft/ft. ∆푙 휀 = 퐿 where: is the strain in the cable (ft/ft) ∆푙 is the elongation (ft) Lo is the unloaded (original) length of the cable (ft) Example Find the strain in a 75 foot cable experiencing an elongation of one inch.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanics of Materials Plasticity
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This article was originally published in the Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Lubarda V.A., Mechanics of Materials: Plasticity. In: Saleem Hashmi (editor-in-chief), Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering. Oxford: Elsevier; 2016. pp. 1-24. ISBN: 978-0-12-803581-8 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. unless otherwise stated. All rights reserved. Author's personal copy Mechanics of Materials: Plasticity$ VA Lubarda, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA r 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Yield Surface 1 1.1 Yield Surface in Strain Space 2 1.2 Yield Surface in Stress Space 2 2 Plasticity Postulates, Normality and Convexity
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Yield Strength on Inelastic Buckling of Reinforcing
    Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering Vol. 14, No. 2 (2010) 247{255 ⃝c Technical University of Lodz The Effect of Yield Strength on Inelastic Buckling of Reinforcing Bars Jacek Korentz Institute of Civil Engineering University of Zielona G´ora Licealna 9, 65{417 Zielona G´ora, Poland Received (13 June 2010) Revised (15 July 2010) Accepted (25 July 2010) The paper presents the results of numerical analyses of inelastic buckling of reinforcing bars of various geometrical parameters, made of steel of various values of yield strength. The results of the calculations demonstrate that the yield strength of the steel the bars are made of influences considerably the equilibrium path of the compressed bars within the range of postyielding deformations Comparative diagrams of structural behaviour (loading paths) of thin{walled sec- tions under investigation for different strain rates are presented. Some conclusions and remarks concerning the strain rate influence are derived. Keywords: Reinforcing bars, inelastic buckling, yield strength, tensil strength 1. Introduction The impact of some exceptional loads, e.g. seismic loads, on a structure may re- sult in the occurrence of post{critical states. Therefore the National Standards regulations for designing reinforced structures on seismically active areas e.g. EC8 [15] require the ductility of a structure to be examined on a cross{sectional level, and additionally, the structures should demonstrate a suitable level of global duc- tility. The results of the examinations of members of reinforced concrete structures show that inelastic buckling of longitudinal reinforcement bars occurs in the state of post{critical deformations, [1, 2, 4, 7], and in some cases it occurs yet within the range of elastic deformations [8].
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Rock Mass Properties in Elasto-Plasticity D
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archive Ouverte en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication Identification of rock mass properties in elasto-plasticity D. Deng, D. Nguyen Minh To cite this version: D. Deng, D. Nguyen Minh. Identification of rock mass properties in elasto-plasticity. Computers and Geotechnics, Elsevier, 2003, 30, pp.27-40. 10.1016/S0266-352X(02)00033-2. hal-00111371 HAL Id: hal-00111371 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00111371 Submitted on 26 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Identification of rock mass properties in elasto-plasticity Desheng Deng*, Duc Nguyen-Minh Laboratoire de Me´canique des Solides, E´cole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France Abstract A simple and effective back analysis method has been proposed on the basis of a new cri-terion of identification, the minimization of error on the virtual work principle. This method works for both linear elastic and nonlinear elasto-plastic problems. The elasto-plastic rock mass properties for different criteria of plasticity can be well identified based on field measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Plasticity Model with Back Stress Evolution. Wei Huang Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1996 Crystal Plasticity Model With Back Stress Evolution. Wei Huang Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Huang, Wei, "Crystal Plasticity Model With Back Stress Evolution." (1996). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6154. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6154 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Crack Tip Elements and the J Integral
    EN234: Computational methods in Structural and Solid Mechanics Homework 3: Crack tip elements and the J-integral Due Wed Oct 7, 2015 School of Engineering Brown University The purpose of this homework is to help understand how to handle element interpolation functions and integration schemes in more detail, as well as to explore some applications of FEA to fracture mechanics. In this homework you will solve a simple linear elastic fracture mechanics problem. You might find it helpful to review some of the basic ideas and terminology associated with linear elastic fracture mechanics here (in particular, recall the definitions of stress intensity factor and the nature of crack-tip fields in elastic solids). Also check the relations between energy release rate and stress intensities, and the background on the J integral here. 1. One of the challenges in using finite elements to solve a problem with cracks is that the stress field at a crack tip is singular. Standard finite element interpolation functions are designed so that stresses remain finite a everywhere in the element. Various types of special b c ‘crack tip’ elements have been designed that 3L/4 incorporate the singularity. One way to produce a L/4 singularity (the method used in ABAQUS) is to mesh L the region just near the crack tip with 8 noded elements, with a special arrangement of nodal points: (i) Three of the nodes (nodes 1,4 and 8 in the figure) are connected together, and (ii) the mid-side nodes 2 and 7 are moved to the quarter-point location on the element side.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 42: Failure Analysis – Buckling of Columns Joshua Pribe Fall 2019 Lecture Book: Ch
    ME 323 – Mechanics of Materials Lecture 42: Failure analysis – Buckling of columns Joshua Pribe Fall 2019 Lecture Book: Ch. 18 Stability and equilibrium What happens if we are in a state of unstable equilibrium? Stable Neutral Unstable 2 Buckling experiment There is a critical stress at which buckling occurs depending on the material and the geometry How do the material properties and geometric parameters influence the buckling stress? 3 Euler buckling equation Consider static equilibrium of the buckled pinned-pinned column 4 Euler buckling equation We have a differential equation for the deflection with BCs at the pins: d 2v EI+= Pv( x ) 0 v(0)== 0and v ( L ) 0 dx2 The solution is: P P A = 0 v(s x) = Aco x+ Bsin x with EI EI PP Bsin L= 0 L = n , n = 1, 2, 3, ... EI EI 5 Effect of boundary conditions Critical load and critical stress for buckling: EI EA P = 22= cr L2 2 e (Legr ) 2 E cr = 2 (Lreg) I r = Pinned- Pinned- Fixed- where g Fixed- A pinned fixed fixed is the “radius of gyration” free LLe = LLe = 0.7 LLe = 0.5 LLe = 2 6 Modifications to Euler buckling theory Euler buckling equation: works well for slender rods Needs to be modified for smaller “slenderness ratios” (where the critical stress for Euler buckling is at least half the yield strength) 7 Summary L 2 E Critical slenderness ratio: e = r 0.5 gYc Euler buckling (high slenderness ratio): LL 2 E EI If ee : = or P = 2 rr cr 2 cr L2 gg c (Lreg) e Johnson bucklingI (low slenderness ratio): r = 2 g Lr LLeeA ( eg) If : =−1 rr cr2 Y gg c 2 Lr ( eg)c with radius of gyration 8 Summary Effective length from the boundary conditions: Pinned- Pinned- Fixed- LL= LL= 0.7 FixedLL=- 0.5 pinned fixed e fixede e LL= 2 free e 9 Example 18.1 Determine the critical buckling load Pcr of a steel pipe column that has a length of L with a tubular cross section of inner radius ri and thickness t.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuning the Performance of Metallic Auxetic Metamaterials by Using Buckling and Plasticity
    materials Article Tuning the Performance of Metallic Auxetic Metamaterials by Using Buckling and Plasticity Arash Ghaedizadeh 1, Jianhu Shen 1, Xin Ren 1,2 and Yi Min Xie 1,* Received: 28 November 2015; Accepted: 8 January 2016; Published: 18 January 2016 Academic Editor: Geminiano Mancusi 1 Centre for Innovative Structures and Materials, School of Engineering, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne 3001, Australia; [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (X.R.) 2 Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-3-9925-3655 Abstract: Metallic auxetic metamaterials are of great potential to be used in many applications because of their superior mechanical performance to elastomer-based auxetic materials. Due to the limited knowledge on this new type of materials under large plastic deformation, the implementation of such materials in practical applications remains elusive. In contrast to the elastomer-based metamaterials, metallic ones possess new features as a result of the nonlinear deformation of their metallic microstructures under large deformation. The loss of auxetic behavior in metallic metamaterials led us to carry out a numerical and experimental study to investigate the mechanism of the observed phenomenon. A general approach was proposed to tune the performance of auxetic metallic metamaterials undergoing large plastic deformation using buckling behavior and the plasticity of base material. Both experiments and finite element simulations were used to verify the effectiveness of the developed approach. By employing this approach, a 2D auxetic metamaterial was derived from a regular square lattice.
    [Show full text]
  • 28 Combined Bending and Compression
    CE 479 Wood Design Lecture Notes JAR Combined Bending and Compression (Sec 7.12 Text and NDS 01 Sec. 3.9) These members are referred to as beam-columns. The basic straight line interaction for bending and axial tension (Eq. 3.9-1, NDS 01) has been modified as shown in Section 3.9.2 of the NDS 01, Eq. (3.9-3) for the case of bending about one or both principal axis and axial compression. This equation is intended to represent the following conditions: • Column Buckling • Lateral Torsional Buckling of Beams • Beam-Column Interaction (P, M). The uniaxial compressive stress, fc = P/A, where A represents the net sectional area as per 3.6.3 28 CE 479 Wood Design Lecture Notes JAR The combination of bending and axial compression is more critical due to the P-∆ effect. The bending produced by the transverse loading causes a deflection ∆. The application of the axial load, P, then results in an additional moment P*∆; this is also know as second order effect because the added bending stress is not calculated directly. Instead, the common practice in design specifications is to include it by increasing (amplification factor) the computed bending stress in the interaction equation. 29 CE 479 Wood Design Lecture Notes JAR The most common case involves axial compression combined with bending about the strong axis of the cross section. In this case, Equation (3.9-3) reduces to: 2 ⎡ fc ⎤ fb1 ⎢ ⎥ + ≤ 1.0 F' ⎡ ⎛ f ⎞⎤ ⎣ c ⎦ F' 1 − ⎜ c ⎟ b1 ⎢ ⎜ F ⎟⎥ ⎣ ⎝ cE 1 ⎠⎦ and, the amplification factor is a number greater than 1.0 given by the expression: ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ 1 ⎟ Amplification factor for f = b1 ⎜ ⎛ f ⎞⎟ ⎜1 − ⎜ c ⎟⎟ ⎜ ⎜ F ⎟⎟ ⎝ ⎝ E 1 ⎠⎠ 30 CE 479 Wood Design Lecture Notes JAR Example of Application: The general interaction formula reduces to: 2 ⎡ fc ⎤ fb1 ⎢ ⎥ + ≤ 1.0 F' ⎡ ⎛ f ⎞⎤ ⎣ c ⎦ F' 1 − ⎜ c ⎟ b1 ⎢ ⎜ F ⎟⎥ ⎣ ⎝ cE 1 ⎠⎦ where: fc = actual compressive stress = P/A F’c = allowable compressive stress parallel to the grain = Fc*CD*CM*Ct*CF*CP*Ci Note: that F’c includes the CP adjustment factor for stability (Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • “Linear Buckling” Analysis Branch
    Appendix A Eigenvalue Buckling Analysis 16.0 Release Introduction to ANSYS Mechanical 1 © 2015 ANSYS, Inc. February 27, 2015 Chapter Overview In this Appendix, performing an eigenvalue buckling analysis in Mechanical will be covered. Mechanical enables you to link the Eigenvalue Buckling analysis to a nonlinear Static Structural analysis that can include all types of nonlinearities. This will not be covered in this section. We will focused on Linear buckling. Contents: A. Background On Buckling B. Buckling Analysis Procedure C. Workshop AppA-1 2 © 2015 ANSYS, Inc. February 27, 2015 A. Background on Buckling Many structures require an evaluation of their structural stability. Thin columns, compression members, and vacuum tanks are all examples of structures where stability considerations are important. At the onset of instability (buckling) a structure will have a very large change in displacement {x} under essentially no change in the load (beyond a small load perturbation). F F Stable Unstable 3 © 2015 ANSYS, Inc. February 27, 2015 … Background on Buckling Eigenvalue or linear buckling analysis predicts the theoretical buckling strength of an ideal linear elastic structure. This method corresponds to the textbook approach of linear elastic buckling analysis. • The eigenvalue buckling solution of a Euler column will match the classical Euler solution. Imperfections and nonlinear behaviors prevent most real world structures from achieving their theoretical elastic buckling strength. Linear buckling generally yields unconservative results
    [Show full text]
  • On the Path-Dependence of the J-Integral Near a Stationary Crack in an Elastic-Plastic Material
    On the Path-Dependence of the J-integral Near a Stationary Crack in an Elastic-Plastic Material Dorinamaria Carka and Chad M. Landis∗ The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, 210 East 24th Street, C0600, Austin, TX 78712-0235 Abstract The path-dependence of the J-integral is investigated numerically, via the finite element method, for a range of loadings, Poisson's ratios, and hardening exponents within the context of J2-flow plasticity. Small-scale yielding assumptions are employed using Dirichlet-to-Neumann map boundary conditions on a circular boundary that encloses the plastic zone. This construct allows for a dense finite element mesh within the plastic zone and accurate far-field boundary conditions. Details of the crack tip field that have been computed previously by others, including the existence of an elastic sector in Mode I loading, are confirmed. The somewhat unexpected result is that J for a contour approaching zero radius around the crack tip is approximately 18% lower than the far-field value for Mode I loading for Poisson’s ratios characteristic of metals. In contrast, practically no path-dependence is found for Mode II. The applications of T or S stresses, whether applied proportionally with the K-field or prior to K, have only a modest effect on the path-dependence. Keywords: elasto-plastic fracture mechanics, small scale yielding, path-dependence of the J-integral, finite element methods 1. Introduction The J-integral as introduced by Eshelby [1,2] and Rice [3] is perhaps the most useful quantity for the analysis of the mechanical fields near crack tips in both linear elastic and non-linear elastic materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to FINITE STRAIN THEORY for CONTINUUM ELASTO
    RED BOX RULES ARE FOR PROOF STAGE ONLY. DELETE BEFORE FINAL PRINTING. WILEY SERIES IN COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS HASHIGUCHI WILEY SERIES IN COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS YAMAKAWA Introduction to for to Introduction FINITE STRAIN THEORY for CONTINUUM ELASTO-PLASTICITY CONTINUUM ELASTO-PLASTICITY KOICHI HASHIGUCHI, Kyushu University, Japan Introduction to YUKI YAMAKAWA, Tohoku University, Japan Elasto-plastic deformation is frequently observed in machines and structures, hence its prediction is an important consideration at the design stage. Elasto-plasticity theories will FINITE STRAIN THEORY be increasingly required in the future in response to the development of new and improved industrial technologies. Although various books for elasto-plasticity have been published to date, they focus on infi nitesimal elasto-plastic deformation theory. However, modern computational THEORY STRAIN FINITE for CONTINUUM techniques employ an advanced approach to solve problems in this fi eld and much research has taken place in recent years into fi nite strain elasto-plasticity. This book describes this approach and aims to improve mechanical design techniques in mechanical, civil, structural and aeronautical engineering through the accurate analysis of fi nite elasto-plastic deformation. ELASTO-PLASTICITY Introduction to Finite Strain Theory for Continuum Elasto-Plasticity presents introductory explanations that can be easily understood by readers with only a basic knowledge of elasto-plasticity, showing physical backgrounds of concepts in detail and derivation processes
    [Show full text]