Tunnelling: Management by Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tunnelling: Management by Design Tunnelling: Management by design Alan Muir Wood London and New York First published 2000 by E & FN Spon 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by E & FN Spon, an imprint of Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 E & FN Spon is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2002. © 2000 Alan Muir Wood All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. The publisher makes no representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy of the information contained in this book and cannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Muir Wood, A.M. (Alan Marshall) Tunnelling: management by design/Alan Muir Wood. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-419-23200-1 (hb: alk. paper) 1. Tunneling. 2. Tunnels—Design. I. Title. TA805.M85 2000 624.1´93–dc21 ISBN 0-203-47766-9 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-78590-8 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-419-23200-1 99–047534 Contents Preface vii Notation ix Introduction 1 1 Background to modern tunnelling 8 1.1 Introduction 8 1.2 Tunnelling in antiquity 9 1.3 Development of rationale 12 1.4 New methods, tools and techniques 14 1.5 Towards the present day 19 1.6 The developing problems of management 34 2 Design: the ubiquitous element 37 2.1 The nature of design and its application to tunnelling 37 2.1.1 Characteristics of design 38 2.1.2 The parties to the design process 39 2.1.3 Uncertainty and risk 40 2.1.4 Qualifications for the design team 47 2.2 Steps in the design process 48 2.3 Examples of application of the principles 54 2.4 Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 55 2.5 Pitfalls in the design process 56 2.6 The observational approach 60 2.7 The Observational Method and Observational Design 63 iv Contents 3 Planning 70 3.1 Introduction to planning 70 3.1.1 Assessment between options 72 3.1.2 In the beginning 74 3.1.3 Planning unfolds 77 3.2 Financial planning 81 3.3 The law: facilitator or tripwire? 82 3.4 Competence in planning 85 3.5 Coordinated planning of projects 87 3.5.1 Multiple-purpose projects 87 3.5.2 Serial planning of projects 87 3.6 Issues of procurement of concern to planning 89 3.7 Reliability of forecasting 90 3.7.1 Political influence 90 3.7.2 Authorship of estimates 91 3.7.3 Economic and political factors 92 3.7.4 Timing of completion 92 3.7.5 Development of competitors 92 3.7.6 Ranges and qualifications 92 3.7.7 Attention to ‘climate of risk’ 92 3.7.8 Changes in requirements, including uncertainty and vacillations 93 3.7.9 Contractual relationships 93 3.7.10 Tendering processes 94 3.7.11 Inflexible programming 94 3.8 Practical examples of success and failure in planning 95 4 Studies and investigations 97 4.1 The methodical acquisition of data 97 4.1.1 Studies relating to operation 97 4.1.2 Studies relating to the execution of the project 99 4.1.3 Instrumentation and its interpretation 106 4.2 How not to manage the site investigation 108 4.3 How much site investigation? 111 4.4 Reporting on site investigation 114 4.5 Identification of patterns in the ground 119 4.6 Specific features of site investigation 121 Contents v 5 Design of the tunnel project 131 5.1 Options in tunnel design 131 5.1.1 The nature of the ground 131 5.1.2 Drill-and-blast 146 5.1.3 Tunnels with Informal Support 146 5.1.4 Squeezing ground 149 5.1.5 Tunnels driven by TBM or Shield 149 5.2 Design of the support system 151 5.2.1 Steel arches 151 5.2.2 Informal Support for tunnels in weak and squeezing ground 152 5.2.3 Segmental linings 154 5.2.4 Tunnel junctions and enlargements 160 5.3 Ground movements and surface settlement 162 5.4 Pressure tunnels 166 5.5 Aids to design calculation 167 Appendix 5A The circular tunnel in elastic ground 167 Appendix 5B Cylindrical cavity with internal support 170 Appendix 5C Spherical cavity with internal support 175 Appendix 5D The reinforced rock arch 177 Appendix 5E The brickwork or masonry tunnel 177 Appendix 5F The ground model 180 Appendix 5G Ground-water flow into a tunnel 182 6 Design of construction 186 6.1 The construction process 186 6.1.1 Prediction 188 6.1.2 Execution 189 6.1.3 Observation 193 6.2 The initial phases 198 6.2.1 Bidding strategy 198 6.2.2 The early phase of construction 201 6.3 Choice of method 203 6.4 Special expedients 210 vi Contents 7 Management 215 7.1 Introduction 215 7.2 Project procurement 217 7.3 The ‘zero-sum’ fallacy 219 7.4 The functions of project management 222 7.5 Principles of project management 226 7.6 Project management in practice 227 7.7 The team and the contract 230 8 Hazards, disputes and their resolution 243 8.1 Introduction 243 8.2 Hazards in construction 245 8.3 Methane 252 8.4 Defects during operation 257 8.5 Disputes 260 8.5.1 Causes of disputes 260 8.5.2 Resolution of disputes 263 9 Coda: the Heathrow Tunnel collapse 271 9.1 The context of the project 271 9.2 The project unfolds 275 9.3 Technical explanations of the collapse 280 9.4 Failures of management 280 9.5 Summary of factors contributing to failure 285 9.5.1 The project management 285 9.5.2 Relationships between design and construction 286 9.5.3 Acceptance standards for construction 286 9.5.4 Compensation grouting 287 9.5.5 Monitoring 287 9.5.6 Failure to investigate 288 9.6 Events post collapse 288 References 289 Author Index 300 Subject Index 303 Preface Every author will claim that his or her book will cast light on aspects of the chosen topic not previously illuminated by his (or her—to be understood throughout) precursors. Where then are the dark unexplored recesses of the underground world that justify the promised light at the end of the tunnel of this present account? The immediate spur to writing this book is that the author has lived and worked through a period of revolutionary change in tunnelling, with several components: • change from traditional craft to technological art; • spectacular advances in site investigation techniques and in geotechnical analysis; • great strides in technological development in all aspects of tunnel construction; • emphasis on the teachable elements of science applied to tunnelling; • recognition of the interplay of opposites: opportunity and risk, in the development of tunnelling strategies; • institutional recognition of tunnelling as a specific branch of engineering. But costly mistakes—possibly costing more than the original estimate of the project—are now more common occurrences, usually of a foreseeable and preventable nature. Overall, therefore, the industry is nowhere near optimum potential, to the frustration of those who work in it, the wasting of personal effort, the thwarting of the objectives of the promoters of projects who, in the most egregious failures, have themselves through lack of understanding established conditions unconducive to success. Where lawyers earn far more from the failure of projects than do the most skilled engineers from success, clearly there are fundamental systemic faults. From the surface, no single explanation for this contradictory situation is apparent but deeper digging indicates a common set of system failures. A primary purpose of this book is therefore to see tunnelling as a system and to viii Preface develop principles for success based on effective understanding and operation of the system of interplay of specific tunnelling skills. The views expressed in this book are the author’s own but he acknowledges his debt to his many immediate colleagues in Halcrow and to so many tunnellers and others around the world for several of the thoughts which have prompted the book. The author accepts full responsibility for any misunderstanding. The account may be criticised as unduly orientated towards the British and European examples. This is justified by selecting examples for which the circumstances are generally familiar; lessons learned may well have more universal application. The Channel Tunnel, for example, provides many examples of meritorious engineering with less meritorious management. An exemplary account of its engineering geology (Harris et al. 1996) attracts numerous references on account of its depth and breadth. Notation Against each symbol is a brief definition and a reference to the most appropriate Section or Appendix of the book for further explanation. a major semi-diameter of ellipse 9.3 a tunnel radius App. 5A A cross-sectional area of tunnel 5.3 b minor semi-diameter of ellipse 9.3 c cohesion 5.1.1 ca concentration of gas in air 8.3 cu undrained shear strength of soil 5.1.1 cv coefficient of consolidation 5.1.1 cw concentration of gas dissolved in water 8.3 C construction hazard 6.1.3 C circumference 9.3 Cp velocity of compressive wave 4.1.2 Cs velocity of shear wave 4.1.2 d10 size of tenth smallest fraction 6.3 D design of project hazard 6.1.3 E Young’s modulus for lining App.
Recommended publications
  • Zaalteksten En.Indd
    ground in the city Under g aller EnPlease drop me in the box as you leave y texts Down the rabbit hole 1 We experience what is happening above ground on a daily basis, but what lies underneath the earth’s surface is usually hidden from view. And because that world is largely terra incognita for us, what happens there is shrouded in mystery. Stories about tunnels used to access and rob banks or as secret escape routes capture our imagination. By their very nature, illegal resistance movements operate ‘underground’, shunning the spotlight. The underground scene of artistic subcultures also prefers to avoid the glare of public attention. Besides arousing our curiosity, the unknown frightens us. The devil and other monstrous creatures are said to be lurking deep under the ground. Sewage workers would be well advised to offer up a quick prayer before removing a manhole cover. On the other hand, it is to the earth that we entrust our most cherished treasures. Venture down below and a wondrous world will open up to you! 1.1 Hepworth Manufacturing Company, The deep and Alice in Wonderland, 1903 mysterious underground It is very difficult to fathom what 1.2 Walt Disney Productions, is actually happening inside the earth Alice in Wonderland, 1951 and for a long time this was a matter of guesswork. Even now the deepest 1.3 In 1877 Thomas Wallace Knox, an Ameri- drilling operations into the earth’s can journalist and author of adventure crust are mere pinpricks. stories, wrote a weighty tome entitled The German priest and scholar Athana- The Underground World: a mirror of life sius Kircher tried to explain a number below the surface, with vivid descrip- of phenomena in the influential book tions of the hidden works of nature and he wrote in 1664: Mundus subterraneus, art, comprising incidents and adven- quo universae denique naturae tures beyond the light of day… divitiae.
    [Show full text]
  • Tunnel from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia This Article Is About Underground Passages
    Tunnel From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about underground passages. For other uses, see Tunnel (disambiguation). "Underpass" redirects here. For the John Foxx song, see Underpass (song). Entrance to a road tunnel inGuanajuato, Mexico. Utility tunnel for heating pipes between Rigshospitalet and Amagerværket in Copenhagen,Denmark Tunnel on the Taipei Metro inTaiwan Southern portal of the 421 m long (1,381 ft) Chirk canal tunnel A tunnel is an underground or underwater passageway, dug through the surrounding soil/earth/rock and enclosed except for entrance and exit, commonly at each end. A pipeline is not a tunnel, though some recent tunnels have used immersed tube construction techniques rather than traditional tunnel boring methods. A tunnel may be for foot or vehicular road traffic, for rail traffic, or for a canal. The central portions of a rapid transit network are usually in tunnel. Some tunnels are aqueducts to supply water for consumption or for hydroelectric stations or are sewers. Utility tunnels are used for routing steam, chilled water, electrical power or telecommunication cables, as well as connecting buildings for convenient passage of people and equipment. Secret tunnels are built for military purposes, or by civilians for smuggling of weapons, contraband, or people. Special tunnels, such aswildlife crossings, are built to allow wildlife to cross human-made barriers safely. Contents [hide] 1 Terminology 2 History o 2.1 Clay-kicking 3 Geotechnical investigation and design o 3.1 Choice of tunnels vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Panthera Leo Spelaea
    Quaternaire, 22, (2), 2011, p. 105-127 PLEISTOCENE PANTHERA LEO SPELAEA (GOLDFUSS 1810) REMAINS FROM THE BALVE CAVE (NW GERMANY) – A CAVE BEAR, HYENA DEN AND MIDDLE PALAEOLITHIC HUMAN CAVE – AND REVIEW OF THE SAUERLAND KARST LION CAVE SITES n Cajus G. DIEDRICH 1 ABSTRACT Pleistocene remains of Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss 1810) from Balve Cave (Sauerland Karst, NW-Germany), one of the most famous Middle Palaeolithic Neandertalian cave sites in Europe, and also a hyena and cave bear den, belong to the most im- portant felid sites of the Sauerland Karst. The stratigraphy, macrofaunal assemblages and Palaeolithic stone artefacts range from the final Saalian (late Middle Pleistocene, Acheulean) over the Middle Palaeolithic (Micoquian/Mousterian), and to the final Palaeolithic (Magdalénien) of the Weichselian (Upper Pleistocene). Most lion bones from Balve Cave can be identified as early to middle Upper Pleistocene in age. From this cave, a relatively large amount of hyena remains, and many chewed, and punctured herbivorous and carnivorous bones, especially those of woolly rhinoceros, indicate periodic den use of Crocuta crocuta spelaea. In addition to those of the Balve Cave, nearly all lion remains in the Sauerland Karst caves were found in hyena den bone assemblages, except those described here material from the Keppler Cave cave bear den. Late Pleistocene spotted hyenas imported most probably Panthera leo spelaea body parts, or scavenged on lion carcasses in caves, a suggestion which is supported by comparisons with other cave sites in the Sauerland Karst. The complex taphonomic situation of lion remains in hyena den bone assemblages and cave bear dens seem to have resulted from antagonistic hyena-lion conflicts and cave bear hunting by lions in caves, in which all cases lions may sometimes have been killed and finally consumed by hyenas.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Pleistocene Panthera Leo Spelaea (Goldfuss, 1810) Skeletons
    Late Pleistocene Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss, 1810) skeletons from the Czech Republic (central Europe); their pathological cranial features and injuries resulting from intraspecific fights, conflicts with hyenas, and attacks on cave bears CAJUS G. DIEDRICH The world’s first mounted “skeletons” of the Late Pleistocene Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss, 1810) from the Sloup Cave hyena and cave bear den in the Moravian Karst (Czech Republic, central Europe) are compilations that have used bones from several different individuals. These skeletons are described and compared with the most complete known skeleton in Europe from a single individual, a lioness skeleton from the hyena den site at the Srbsko Chlum-Komín Cave in the Bohemian Karst (Czech Republic). Pathological features such as rib fractures and brain-case damage in these specimens, and also in other skulls from the Zoolithen Cave (Germany) that were used for comparison, are indicative of intraspecific fights, fights with Ice Age spotted hyenas, and possibly also of fights with cave bears. In contrast, other skulls from the Perick and Zoolithen caves in Germany and the Urșilor Cave in Romania exhibit post mortem damage in the form of bites and fractures probably caused either by hyena scavenging or by lion cannibalism. In the Srbsko Chlum-Komín Cave a young and brain-damaged lioness appears to have died (or possibly been killed by hyenas) within the hyena prey-storage den. In the cave bear dominated bone-rich Sloup and Zoolithen caves of central Europe it appears that lions may have actively hunted cave bears, mainly during their hibernation. Bears may have occasionally injured or even killed predating lions, but in contrast to hyenas, the bears were herbivorous and so did not feed on the lion car- casses.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Options Investigated to Address the Issues at Blackwall Tunnel
    Alternative options considered to address the issues at the Blackwall Tunnel We have considered a wide range of options for schemes to help address the transport problems of congestion, closures and incidents, and resilience at the Blackwall Tunnel and believe that our proposed Silvertown Tunnel scheme is the best solution. This factsheet examines a number of potential alternative schemes, including some which were suggested by respondents to our previous consultation, and explains why we do not consider them to be feasible solutions to the problems at the Blackwall Tunnel. Further detail on each alternative as well as other alternatives is included in the Preliminary Case for the Scheme, which can be found at www.tfl.gov.uk/Silvertown-tunnel. Building a bridge between Silvertown and the Greenwich Peninsula, rather than a tunnel We have considered building a bridge at Silvertown, instead of a tunnel. However, any new bridge built in east London needs to provide at least 50m of clearance above the water level to allow tall sea-going shipping to pass beneath safely. A bridge with this level of clearance would require long, sloping approach ramps. Such ramps would create a barrier within the local area, as well as dramatically affecting the visual environment and going against local authorities’ development plans. A high-level bridge would also not be feasible in the current location due to it’s proximity to the Emirates Air Line cable car. We also considered the option of a lifting bridge (like Tower Bridge). This could be constructed at a lower level, with less impact on the local area.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Extinctions of Late Ice Age Cave Bears As a Result of Climate/Habitat Change and Large Carnivore Lion/Hyena/Wolf Predation Stress in Europe
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN Zoology Volume 2013, Article ID 138319, 25 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/138319 Research Article Extinctions of Late Ice Age Cave Bears as a Result of Climate/Habitat Change and Large Carnivore Lion/Hyena/Wolf Predation Stress in Europe Cajus G. Diedrich Paleologic, Private Research Institute, Petra Bezruce 96, CZ-26751 Zdice, Czech Republic Correspondence should be addressed to Cajus G. Diedrich; [email protected] Received 16 September 2012; Accepted 5 October 2012 Academic Editors: L. Kaczmarek and C.-F. Weng Copyright © 2013 Cajus G. Diedrich. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Predation onto cave bears (especially cubs) took place mainly by lion Panthera leo spelaea (Goldfuss),asnocturnalhuntersdeep in the dark caves in hibernation areas. Several cave bear vertebral columns in Sophie’s Cave have large carnivore bite damages. Different cave bear bones are chewed or punctured. Those lets reconstruct carcass decomposition and feeding technique caused only/mainlybyIceAgespottedhyenasCrocuta crocuta spelaea, which are the only of all three predators that crushed finally the long bones. Both large top predators left large tooth puncture marks on the inner side of cave bear vertebral columns, presumably a result of feeding first on their intestines/inner organs. Cave bear hibernation areas, also demonstrated in the Sophie’s Cave, were far from the cave entrances, carefully chosen for protection against the large predators. The predation stress must have increased on the last and larger cave bear populations of U.
    [Show full text]
  • I Subsurface Waste Disposal by Means of Wells a Selective Annotated Bibliography
    I Subsurface Waste Disposal By Means of Wells A Selective Annotated Bibliography By DONALD R. RIMA, EDITH B. CHASE, and BEVERLY M. MYERS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2020 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS G. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 77-179486 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1.50 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1229 FOREWORD Subsurface waste disposal or injection is looked upon by many waste managers as an economically attractive alternative to providing the sometimes costly surface treatment that would otherwise be required by modern pollution-control law. The impetus for subsurface injection is the apparent success of the petroleum industry over the past several decades in the use of injection wells to dispose of large quantities of oil-field brines. This experience coupled with the oversimplification and glowing generalities with which the injection capabilities of the subsurface have been described in the technical and commercial literature have led to a growing acceptance of deep wells as a means of "getting rid of" the ever-increasing quantities of wastes. As the volume and diversity of wastes entering the subsurface continues to grow, the risk of serious damage to the environment is certain to increase. Admittedly, injecting liquid wastes deep beneath the land surface is a potential means for alleviating some forms of surface pollution. But in view of the wide range in the character and concentrations of wastes from our industrialized society and the equally diverse geologic and hydrologic con­ ditions to be found in the subsurface, injection cannot be accepted as a universal panacea to resolve all variants of the waste-disposal problem.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 5.2 Billion 109 230 113 35 23.13 17.4
    Sources: CTRL; Guardian graphics; main photograph: Dan Chung A12 Route in greater London BLACKHORSE St Pancras junction RD SNARESBROOK Hornsey WALTHAMSTOW Stratford international CENTRAL NEWBURY Thameslink surface line and domestic station, Chadwell Heath A116 PARK East Coast Main Line HIGHGATE set inside excavated Freight connection at North London Line with connection “box” 1.07km long Wanstead Ripple Lane, Dagenham to East Coast Main Line CHADWELL HTH Connection to West New interchange for LEYTONSTONE GOODMAYES Coast Main Line Eurostar and fast south- SEVEN KINGS Channel Tunnel rail line ARCHWAY Stoke Covered bridge feeds Camden east domestic trains. ILFORD is mainly for passengers Newington Links to: mainLeyton line – but some freight could Channel rail link into St Pancras/King's services, Docklands use new line, with loops twin-bore tunnel Cross interchange GOSPEL Light Railway, and WANSTEAD Ilford where faster trains can Midland Main Line feeds passengers Hackney LEYTON OAK London Underground's PARK Manor overtake Channel onwards via: Jubilee and Central lines Park Tunnel London St Pancras international and domestic station, east side -Midland and East HACKNEY Rail Link Gasworks tunnel Coast Main Lines CANONBURY CENTRAL -New Thameslink hub KENTISH Islington station Camden TOWN Thameslink tunnel HIGHBURY& BARKING -North London Line connection to East ISLINGTON West Ham EAST UPNEY Coast Main Line A12 HAM London tunnel 7.53km London tunnel 9.9km Islington UPTON PLAISTOW PARK East Ham Regent's canal London St Pancras Kings ANGEL international and Cross domestic station Tower WEST DAGENHAM DOCK Hamlets HAM From 2007, Eurostar Newham services arrive at BECKTON New domestic platforms (3): St Pancras – later High-speed Kent commuter City PRINCE ROYAL joined by fast south- CANNING trains will use Channel line The drill head of one of six boring machines used for the London tunnel TOWN REGENT ALBERT eastWestminster commuter trains St Paul's A13 GALLIONS St Pancras roof from 2009 using Channel tunnel CUSTOM BECKTON PARK REACH extension under ROYAL rail tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Tower Hamlets Local History Library Classification Scheme – 5Th Edition 2021
    Tower Hamlets Local History Library and Archives Tower Hamlets Local History Library Classification Scheme 5th Edition | 2021 Tower Hamlets Local History Library Classification Scheme – 5th Edition 2021 Contents 000 Geography and general works ............................................................... 5 Local places, notable passing events, royalty and the borough, world wars 100 Biography ................................................................................................ 7 Local people, collected biographies, lists of names 200 Religion, philosophy and ethics ............................................................ 7 Religious and ethical organisations, places of worship, religious life and education 300 Social sciences ..................................................................................... 11 Racism, women, LGBTQ+ people, politics, housing, employment, crime, customs 400 Ethnic groups, migrants, race relations ............................................. 19 Migration, ethnic groups and communities 500 Science .................................................................................................. 19 Physical geography, archaeology, environment, biology 600 Applied sciences ................................................................................... 19 Public health, medicine, business, shops, inns, markets, industries, manufactures 700 Arts and recreation ............................................................................... 24 Planning, parks, land and estates, fine arts,
    [Show full text]
  • Leven Road Poplar E14 0Ll
    - LEVEN ROAD POPLAR E14 0LL FLEXIBLE SHORT TERM STORAGE FACILITY TO LET - UP TO 111,358 SQ FT POPLAR BLACKWALL DLR CANARY DLR WHARF EAST INDIA DLR LANGDON PARK A13 DLR CANNING TOWN A12 BLACKWALL TUNNEL APPROACH STATION LEVEN ROAD A12 DESCRIPTION The unit is of brick construction and comprises a number of chambers throughout providing an ideal short term opportunity for a storage or distribution user. In addition, there is a substantial amount of Ground, First and Second floor office accommodation available. Further amenities are listed below: • Secure Gated Yard & Entrance • ‘Extensive Parking Facilities • 30m Yard Depth • 9m Clear Internal Height • Male & Female WCs • Ancillary Office Accommodation LOCATION Leven Road is located closely to the A12 Blackwell Tunnel Northern Approach and to the west of the River Lea at Bow Creek. The unit is well connected to a number of employment and residential hubs with Canning Town Station just 0.72 miles away to the South East and Canary Wharf 1.04 miles away to the North. CONNECTIVITY The site provides potential occupiers with great access to both employment and residential hubs and conveniently links the gateway between London City Airport and the wider Essex area to inner Central London. There is the additional benefit that goods transported via the River Thames to Northumberland Wharf, Orchard Wharf & Thames Wharf are all accessible in under 8 minutes providing an ideal location for storage/distribution facilities. As illustrated below, there are a number of rail and underground stations within
    [Show full text]
  • Silvertown Tunnel from a Category a Tunnel to a Category E Tunnel
    Appendix 2: assessment of Transport for London’s reasons for changing the proposed Silvertown Tunnel from a category A tunnel to a category E tunnel Cost It has been advised by Transport for London that a category A tunnel would cost approximately £2.5 million more than a category E tunnel. This is considered to be a very small sum of money in the context of the cost of the scheme as a whole (nearly £1 000 million) and saving this sum appears to be a false economy given the benefits that would accrue from safely conveying dangerous goods across the River Thames without unnecessarily long routes via Central London. Concurrent Operation of the Blackwall and Silvertown Tunnels Transport for London’s position is that the shared Greenwich Peninsula approach road would increase the risk of vehicles conveying dangerous goods using the Blackwall Tunnel, which is an existing category E tunnel that is not capable of safely conveying dangerous goods. This does not seem to be a valid reason for designing the Silvertown Tunnel so as to also be incapable of safely conveying dangerous goods. The need to sign vehicles carrying dangerous goods away from the Blackwall Tunnel onto a diversion route is an existing situation. Currently the diversion is to Tower Bridge. A diversion to a category A Silvertown Tunnel would be a vastly shorter and less complicated diversion that would be much more likely to be complied with. The only operational situation when a category A Silvertown Tunnel would not represent a much less onerous diversion away from the Blackwall Tunnel would be when the Silvertown Tunnel was closed (for maintenance or because of an incident) but the Blackwall Tunnel remained open.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of the Tubes
    THE BIRTH OF THE TUBES by Antony Badsey-Ellis A report of the LURS meeting at All Souls Clubhouse on Tuesday 10 December 2019 Antony’s latest book, co-written and edited by Jim Whiting, is also called “The Birth of the Tubes” and was published by Capital Transport in September 2019. He explained that tonight’s talk would feature many pictures which are not in the first edition of the book. This book is a non-technical history of the social side of the building of the Underground and how people were involved and how the railways were received at the time. In the 1860s the Metropolitan and District Railways had used conventional steam locomotives going through cut and cover tunnels. The tube railways were a completely new system with electric locos running through deep level tunnels. The first tube tunnel was not (as many people think) the City and South London Railway (C&SLR) but the Tower Subway from near the Tower of London to Tooley Street. This tunnel was about 7 feet in diameter and dug fully by hand, lit only by candles, and with very little Health & Safety as we would know it today. Each ring of the tunnel lining was in four parts (three large and a small key segment) weighing four hundredweight (203 kg) each which were man-handled into place and secured with bolts. The shield was then moved forward, about 18 inches at a time, by hand-cranked screw jacks. Spoil was removed via small trucks on a temporary railway and then lifted up the 60-foot-deep access shaft in small buckets using a steam crane.
    [Show full text]