A Judicial Shift in Personal Law Paradigm in India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Judicial Shift in Personal Law Paradigm in India Journal of Critical Reviews ISSN- 2394-5125 Vol 6, Issue 6, 2019 A Judicial Shift in Personal Law Paradigm in India Saloni Kabra Research Scholar (LL.M.), Symbiosis Law School, Pune, Symbiosis International (Deemed University) Dr. Sapna Bansal, Assistant Professor, Symbiosis Law School, Pune, Symbiosis International (Deemed University) Richa Dwivedi Assistant Professor, Symbiosis Law School, Pune, Symbiosis International (Deemed University) Received: 26.08.2019 Revised: 25.09.2019 Accepted: 27.09.2019 ABSTRACT The Constitution of India is an organic and living document, which makes it a document alacritous to change and growth, according to the contemporary requirement and the needs of the present society. One such vital change that a society needs is regarding personal laws. Personal laws which are in force find its foundation in the recognition of very “right to practice” religion under Article 25 of the Constitution of India. The question which arises is how then some of personal laws being patriarchal, and on face discriminatory against the women and in violation of part III of the constitution can still exist and manage the scrutiny of fundamental rights? In the judgment delivered by the court in State of Bombay v. NarasuAppa Mali it was held that personal laws are not “laws in force” under the Article 13 of the Constitution of India as they are based on religious precepts and customary practices and the principles enshrined in the part III of the constitution cannot be applied. This research highlights how it is high time for the courts to revisit this judgments. The researcher focusing on the discriminatory matrimonial laws of different religion would like to discuss that personal laws should not fall outside the ambit of judicial scrutiny under article 13. For the purpose of this research problem researcher has adopted a doctrinal form of research and will be majorly analyzing the decisions rendered by the adjudicatory authorities and the relevant literature available on the said topic In this study after establishing the current position of law, the researcher will try to examine and scrutinize the legal reasoning and rationale behind the Bombay High Court decision in State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali because of which even today, after 65 years of developed constitutional jurisprudence, some of the discriminatory personal laws continues to be in practice. KEY WORDS: Personal Laws, Constitution of India, Article 13, Religion © 2019 by Advance Scientific Research. This is an open-access article under the CC BY licens(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/jcr.06.06.26 INTRODUCTION Theoretically, there is no Constitutional restriction on the equal protection of laws culmination into the prohibition of legislative power of the State in respect of personal laws, the discrimination against any citizen on grounds only of policy of successive governments at the Centre has led to religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth [1] and (b) religious their continued exemption from direct interference. Thus, by and cultural freedom. “All laws in force” in India at the time virtue of the main provision of Article 372, those parts of of the commencement of the Constitution, if repugnant of to pre-Constitutional personal laws-both codified as well as these primary fundamental rights, have to cease to apply in uncodified and applicable to whichever community that any manner whatsoever. have not been touched by any “competent authority” remain Now, the questions that are raised are whether it is in force, as before. Apart from these laws, new personal laws permissible under the Constitution that the Muslims, Hindus, have been enacted by the Parliament for the majority Christians, Parsis, and Jews of India be governed by different community bringing the Hindus, Sikhs, Jain, and Buddhists sets of religion-based laws. Should personal laws not be under the umbrella of these new legislations. However, the tested on ground of being contrary tofundamental rights? traditional laws of all these communities not covered by The answer to these questions depends on whether the these new enactments are still applicable to them. phrase “all laws in force” used in Article 13(i) covers The moot question is whether the existence of various personal laws too or not. personal laws, full of conflicting features and applicable to Article 13 itself says that law “includes any Ordinance, order different religious communities, is in itself inconsistent with by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having the fundamental rights enshrined in Part III of the in the territory of India the force of law”[2] It further Constitution. Or, are personal laws supra- fundamental mentions that “law in force” “includes laws passed made by a rights? The following discussion, in this section, throws light legislature or other competent authority in the territory of on these issues. Intended here is the determination of the India before the commencement of this Constitution and not relationship between fundamental rights and personal laws. previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such laws or any part, therefore, may not be then in operation either at all Testing Personal Laws under Article 13 or in particular area”[3] Personal law is not specified herein Article 13 of Part III of Constitution of India enunciated the this Article. Are, then, the words used in Article 13(3)(a)&(b) following general principle: wide enough to include personal laws; or was a reference to “All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before personal laws deliberately omitted? The use of the word the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are "includes" shows that the lists are not exhaustive and could inconsistent with the provisions of this part shall, to the extent extend to rules of conduct not specified in them. The history of such inconsistency, be void.” Clause (2) of the same Article of the enactment of this Article and of some other restraints the State from making any law which “takes away Constitutional provisions (Article 19, 25, 44) shows that the or abridges the Fundamental Rights”. The fundamental Constituent Assembly did not intend to exempt personal rights include, inter alia, (a) equality before the law and laws from the legislative competence of the State. So then, Journal of critical reviews 194 A Judicial Shift in Personal Law Paradigm in India the different personal laws become automatically void in existence of separate personal laws and applied them to terms of Article 13(1)? The answer to this question is not respective communities without questioning the legality or free from difficulty. the Constitutionality of the personal-law system. In the case of State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali [5] a case The judicial opinion of the two great judges of the time under the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriage namely late Justice M.C. Chagla and late Justice P.B. Act, 1946, it was argued before the Bombay High Court that Gajendragadkar in Narasu Appa‟s case, [14]has been the rule of Muslim personal law permitting bigamy had dissented from by the eminent scholars like D.D. Basu, [15] become void, after the commencement Constitution, by H.M. Seervai [16] and Mohammad Ghause [17], who are virtue of Articlei13(1), since it allowed Muslim men to have convinced that all personal laws including their non- more than one wife while the Bombay Act of 1946 forced statutory parts are hit by Article 13(1). The Chagla- Hindus to stick to monogamy. Chief Justice Chagla and Gajendragadkar verdict pronounced in 1952 has, however, Justice Gajendragadkar thereupon examined in detail if been followed, though often silently and without specific Article 13 (1) was applicable to personal laws, and they reference, by all the higher courts in the country. arrived at the negative finding. The following points were In its recent decision in Krishan Singh v. Mathura Ahir [18], stressed by the Chief Justice. the Supreme Court has categorically ruled that:“Part III of i. The words “custom and usage” used in Article 13 do the Constitution does not touch upon the personal laws.” [19] not include personal laws. “Custom or usage is a deviation This judgment has been vehemently criticized by Justice A.M. from personal law and not personal law itself”. Bhattacharjee in hisM.N. Bose Lectures of 1981[20]. It is, ii. Relisting the difference between customary law and however, submitted that this was the only way in which the personal law, The Constituent Assembly, in defining “law” various provisions of the Constitution relating to personal under Article 13 has expressly and advisedly used only the laws, apparently generating various kinds of tensions and expression custom or usage and has omitted personal law. conflicts, could have been reconciled by the Supreme Court. This is a “very clear pointer” to the intention of the Constitution-making body to exclude personal law from the Scrutiny of Personal Laws under Article 14 and 15 purview of Article 13. So far as the applicability of Part III of the Constitution to iii. There are other “pointers” as well. Article 17 abolishes non-statutory personal laws is concerned, the question that untouchability. Article 25(2)(b) enables the state to make has been particularly, raised is whether the religion and sex- laws for the purpose of throwing open of Hindu religious based diversities found in the fabric of any such laws would institutions of a public character of all classes and sections of be affected by the equality- clauses of the Constitution Hindus. Now, if Hindu personal laws became void by reason contained in Articles 14 and 15. It is alleged and all classical of Article 13 and by reason of its provisions contravening personal laws particularly those applicable to Hindus and any fundamental rights, then it was necessary specifically to Muslims – abound in discrimination between persons on the provide in Article 17 and Article 25(2) for certain aspects of basis of religion or sex.
Recommended publications
  • THE BANARAS LAW JOURNAL [Vol
    2014 1 THE BANARAS LAW JOURNAL 2 THE BANARAS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 43] Cite This Issue as Vol. 43 No. 1 Ban.L.J. (2014) The Banaras Law Journal is published bi-annually by the Faculty of Law, Banaras Hindu University since 1965.Articles and other contributions for possible publication are welcomed and these as well as books for review should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief, Banaras Law Journal, Faculty of Law, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221005, India, or e-mailed to <[email protected]>. Views expressed in the Articles, Notes & Comments, Book Reviews and all other contributions published in this Journal are those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Editors of the Banaras Law Journal. In spite of our best care and caution, errors and omissions may creep in, for which our patrons will please bear with us and any discrepancy noticed may kindly be brought to our knowlede which will improve our Journal. Further it is to be noted that the Journal is published with the understanding that Authors, Editors, Printers and Publishers are not responsible for any damages or loss accruing to any body. In exchange for Banaras Law Journal, the Law School, Banaras Hindu University would appreciate receiving Journals, Books and monographs, etc. which can be of interest to Indian specialists and readers. c Law School, B.H.U., Varanasi- 221005 Composed and Printed by Raj Kumar Jaiswal, Dee Gee Printers, Khojwan Bazar, Varanasi-221010, U.P., (India). 2014 EDITORIAL COMMITTEE 3 Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion-Based Personal Laws in India Has Been Looked at from Many Perspectives: Secularism, Modernity, National Unity And
    Südasien-Chronik - South Asia Chronicle 5/2015, S. 369-398 © Südasien-Seminar der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin ISBN: 978-3-86004-316-5 Südasien-Chronik - South Asia Chronicle 5/2015, S. xx-xx © Südasien- Seminar derReligion Humboldt--UniversitätBased Personal zu Berlin ISBN: Laws xxxxxxxxxxxx in India from a Women ’s Rights Perspective: Context and some Recent Publications TANJA HERKLOTZ [email protected] Reviewed Works Flavia Agnes. 2011. Family Law Volume 1: Family Laws and Constitutional Claims. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 247 pp., ISBN: 9780198067900, Rs. 350. Flavia Agnes. 2011. Family Law Volume 2: Marriage, Divorce, and 370 Matrimonial Litigation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 508 pp., ISBN: 9780198072201, Rs. 410. Nandini Chavan & Qutub Jehan Kidwai. 2006. Personal Law Reforms and Gender Empowerment: A Debate on Uniform Civil Code. New Delhi: Hope India, 380 pp., ISBN: 9788178710792, Rs. 795. Alamgir Muhammad Serajuddin. 2011. Muslim Family Law, Secular Courts and Muslim Women of South Asia: A Study in Judicial Activism. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 350 pp., ISBN: 9780195479683, Rs. 995. Gopika Solanki. 2011. Adjudication in Religious Family Laws: Cultural Accommodation, Legal Pluralism, and Gender Equality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 438 pp., ISBN: 9781107610590, £29.99. Narendra Subramanian. 2014. Nation and Family: Personal Law, Cultural Pluralism, and Gendered Citizenship in India. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 400 pp., ISBN: 9780804788786, $65. REVIEW ESSAY Setting the Stage The topic of religion-based personal laws in India has been looked at from many perspectives: secularism, modernity, national unity and integration, community identity, religious freedom and the right to equality. The gender dimension has only featured recently as a topic and has mainly been discussed by feminist scholars and women’s rights activists.
    [Show full text]
  • Postmodern Hindu Law
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CrossAsia-Repository Postmodern Hindu Law Dr. Werner Menski Abstract This study, based on indological and legal scholarship, explores to what extent Hindu law, as a conceptual entity and a legal system, is visibly and invisibly present in contemporary Indian law-making. It is found that, defying many death wishes and contradicting pronouncements of its demise, Hindu law is alive and well in various postmodern manifestations. Both at the conceptual level and within processes of official law-making and policy formulation, postmodern Hindu concepts and rules retain a powerful voice in how India, in the 21st century, is seeking to achieve social and economic justice for over a billion people. Rejecting the agenda of hindutva and its opponents as too narrow and politically motivated, the present study presents a holistic view of Hindu legal systems and concepts and their contemporary and future relevance. Chapter 1 The contemporary relevance of Hindu law Hindu law has defied many death wishes, copious predictions of its gradual demise and almost complete displacement (e. g. Galanter 1972; 1989), and even proclamations of its death (Derrett 1978). It holds its position as a major legal system of the world, often despised and largely unrecognised, but massively present in the world of the new millennium. At least 800 million people, roughly a seventh of the world citizenry, remain governed by Hindu law in one form or another. Despite its numerous traditional elements, Hindu law today must be seen as a postmodern phenomenon, displaying its much-noted internal dynamism and perennial capacity for flexibility and re-alignment in conjunction with the societies to and in which it applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Law and Property Rights of Hindu Woman in India
    Volume 6 Issue 1 April 2018 Kathmandu School of Law Review Personal Law and Property Rights of Hindu Woman in India - The Need for Codifi cation Sindhu Thulaseedharan* Abstract In India, the familial relations of any citizen, including inheritance, are governed by law related to his or her religion, which came to be known as personal law. The property rights of Hindu woman from the vedic age refl ected that daughter was given a share equal to that of a son, who in the later age of smritis ( traditional law) , came to inherit only in the absence of male issue. The nature of property of a Hindu woman, stridhanam (woman’s property) thus came to be distorted from absolute property right to ‘limited estate’ known as ‘woman’s estate’. That is, the property passed only to the next heirs of the last male owner of the female intestate. The legislations in the pre-independent India strengthened the position of Hindu woman. But the later laws limited her interest in property to the sense that she could alienate it for certain purposes only and the property possessed by her devolved on the heirs of her husband and not on her own heirs. The retention of testamentary power has further undermined gender-equality largely. Even at present, the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, allows existing property disputes to continue and does not affect rights that became vested prior to its implementation. Therefore, the codifi cation of personal law on succession becomes the need of the hour, since the patriarchal norms retained in the law have to be dropped.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Laws: Undetermined Norms and Undetermined Concept?
    Liverpool Law Review (2019) 40:253–270 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-019-09227-x Personal Laws: Undetermined Norms and Undetermined Concept? Jean‑Louis Halpérin1 Published online: 7 August 2019 © Springer Nature B.V. 2019 Abstract Many Asian and African constitutional and statutory texts use the phrase personal laws in order to determine the rules applicable to family matters such a marriage, divorce, maintenance and in some countries inheritance. However, this term is extremely vague and often without a clear defnition in the legal texts. This paper tries to show the high degree of un-determination of the statutory references to per- sonal laws. This chaotic situation can be explained by historical and political factors. Nevertheless, the paper proposes to stipulate a conventional defnition of personal laws in order to facilitate the comparison between the Asian and African countries with a plurality of personal laws. Based on common features of these legal systems knowing a plurality of personal laws, such a defnition can be useful for practical as well as for theoretical purposes. Keywords Africa · Asia · Legal concept · Legal pluralism · Personal law Introduction Personal law is one of those technical terms used by jurists that common man might not immediately understand. To begin with, it is a legal concept, but also an abstrac- tion used, at the same time, by ofcial statements in constitutions or statutory laws and by opinions of legal writers. It is both a concept of the law and a concept of the science of law. As used in constitutional and statutory laws, the concept of the law is not defned and its various confgurations seem to be resistant to any unifed defni- tion as a concept of the science of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism and Personal Law Jeffrey A
    Slicing the American Pie: Federalism and Personal Law Jeffrey A. Redding1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………….… 2 I. Personal Law Systems ………………………………………………………………………... 5 A. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………... 5 B. Basic Definition of “Personal Law” …………………………………………… 7 C. An Example: Personal Law in India ………………………………………….. 10 1. Basic Workings …………………………………………………… 10 2. Problems and Issues …………………………………………………… 12 a. Communalism …………………………………………………… 12 b. Equality …………………..……………………………….. 13 c. Conversion …………..……………………………………….. 15 II. American-Style Personal Law …………………………………………………………..… 16 A. Introduction …………………………………………………………………….… 16 B. Overview of Contemporary American Family Law ………………………. 18 1. Marital Name-Changing ………………………………………….. 19 2. Same-Sex Marriage …………………………………………………… 20 3. Age of Marital Consent ………………………………………….. 21 C. Analogy 1: States Also Have Politically-Motivated Borders ……..……… 22 D. Analogy 2: States Also Prevent Conversion ………………………………... 30 E. Analogy 3: States Also Are Communities ………..………………….…… 33 1. Introduction …………………………………………………………….. 33 2. The Potential Thinness of Religion ……………….……………….. 36 3. The Potential Thickness of Territory ……………….……………..… 40 a. Stability in Community Membership …..…………………... 43 b. Community Consensus on Moral Precepts …………...... 45 III. U.S. Case Law Discussion …………………………………………………………….. 46 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………….. 50 1 Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fellow in Law, Yale Law School. For helpful comments on earlier drafts of this Article, I would like
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Mohammedan and Anglo-Hindu Law 1
    Anglo-Mohammedan and Anglo-Hindu Law 1 Anglo-Mohammedan and Anglo-Hindu Law- Revisiting Colonial Codification Shahnaz Huda* Introduction: Their respective personal religious laws govern family or private matters of Muslims, Hindus and of other communities in Bangladesh. Most of these laws continue to remain uncodified, although legislative enactment have, to a certain extent through the decades, reformed, amended or supplemented the personal laws of different communities. A great majority of such statutory codification relating to family matters was accomplished during the British rule of the sub-continent. These laws continue to dominate the personal legal regime of Bangladeshi Muslims, Hindus, and Buddhists who are also governed by Hindu Law in many respects. The present article discusses and critiques the legal initiatives, which the colonizers undertook by way of legislation. Although some of such laws have been repealed, most continue to remain important pieces of law. This is especially true in the case of Bangladesh but also applies to a greater or lesser extent to Pakistan and India. Brief History of colonial law making: Before the advent of the British i.e. under the Moguls, Mahomedan law and not Hindu law was the law of the land. The East India Company was granted restricted legislative powers first by Queen Elizabeth through the Charter of 1600, which set up the Company. The Company's powers remained confined to employees of the company in furtherance of their primary objective i.e. to carry on trade and business in India. Successive charters granted similar powers. In 1726 the Crown recognized the Company as a ruling power in respect of several towns, places and factories that were already within its control.1 The Charter of 1726 for the first time created a subordinate legislative authority in the three Presidency towns of Calcutta, Bombay and Madras.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Adultry As a Ground Of
    SUPREMO AMICUS VOLUME 6 ISSN 2456-9704 ______________________________________________________________________________ REVISITING ADULTRY AS A question arises about the eclipsical provision GROUND OF DIVORCE UNDER of the Hindu Personal Laws and the Indian HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 Penal Code. This Article has attempted to articulate these controversies from the legal By Pallavi Raitani & Kashish Saxena point of view in contemporary India From Law College Dehradun, Uttranchal addressing the question of legal dilemma University that whether the legal regulation of Adultery in either laws is relevant or not? “As between the husband and the wife social Creating a feministic liability in Adultery in good will be promoted by permitting them a male chauvinistic society is akin to rewrite to 'make up' or 'break up' the matrimonial tie the dictates of Manusmriti. But whoso rather than to drag each other to the criminal commieteth Adultery with a woman lacketh court. They can either condone the offence understanding: He doeth it, destroys his own in a spirit of ‘forgive and forget’ or live soul. A wound and dishonour shall he get; together happily again.”5 and his reproach shall not be wipped away.1 Adultery is a threefold evil. It sullies the - Justice M Thakker body of the women. It torments the women in her mind. It impliedly states that the sole 1. Introduction responsibility for this grave sin is of the Adultery also known as infidelity or extra male partner. If the marriage is not thought marital affair is certainly a moral crime and of in terms of sexual property but in terms of is thought out a sin by almost all religions.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature on the Indian Personal Law System from a Women's Rights
    Indian Law Review ISSN: 2473-0580 (Print) 2473-0599 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rilw20 Law, religion and gender equality: literature on the Indian personal law system from a women’s rights perspective Tanja Herklotz To cite this article: Tanja Herklotz (2017) Law, religion and gender equality: literature on the Indian personal law system from a women’s rights perspective, Indian Law Review, 1:3, 250-268, DOI: 10.1080/24730580.2018.1453750 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2018.1453750 © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 30 Mar 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 227 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rilw20 INDIAN LAW REVIEW, 2017 VOL. 1, NO. 3, 250–268 https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2018.1453750 LITERATURE REVIEW Law, religion and gender equality: literature on the Indian personal law system from a women’s rights perspective Tanja Herklotz Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY This literature review seeks to portray the scholarship on the Received 15 October 2017 feminist critique and women’s activism vis-à-vis religion-based Accepted 14 March 2018 family law in India. The key question is: Which aspects of the KEYWORDS ’ Indian family law system are problematic from a women s rights Religion; personal laws; perspective and how can these aspects be addressed and feminism; women’s rights; reformed? The scholarship on this topic stems from three broad legal pluralism; Indian strands of literature: The first looks at family law and jurisprudence Supreme Court; triple talaq from a feminist perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIT 15 WOMEN, RELIGION and PERSONAL Response to Women's LAW Movements
    State and Civil Soceity's UNIT 15 WOMEN, RELIGION AND PERSONAL Response to Women's LAW Movements Contents 15.0 Aims and Purpose 15.1 Introduction 15.2 Personal Law and Women in India 15.3 Hindu Personal Law 15.4 Women’s Rights under Customary law 15.5 Islam and the Muslim Personal Law 15.6 Christian Personal Law 15.7 Parsis and Personal Law Reforms 15.8 Present Scenario — Reforms in Personal Laws 15.9 Concluding Remarks 15.10 Clarification of the Terms Used 15.11 Some Useful Readings 15.0 AIMS AND PURPOSE India is a multi-religious society with every religious group having their own personal law to deal with the civil matters. Women are discriminated against in all of these religious specific laws, though the level of discrimination varies from one community to other. In the pre-independence as well as post independence periods there was a call for uniform civil code, one which provides gender justice and cutting across different communities. But it is yet to be materialized. After reading this unit on Women, Religion and Personal law, you should be able to: • Explain the relationship between women, religion and personal law; • Describe personal laws of different religions like – Hinduism, Islam, Christianity and Parsi as prevalent in India; and • Discuss the debate between personal law, customary law and the uniform civil code. 15.1 INTRODUCTION India has been home to many world religions like Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Zoroastriaism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism for a long time. Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism, the so-called Indic religions were born here.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Law and Human Rights in India and Israel
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 2000 Personal Law and Human Rights in India and Israel Jayanth K. Krishnan Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Marc Galanter University of Wisconsin - Madison Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Krishnan, Jayanth K. and Galanter, Marc, "Personal Law and Human Rights in India and Israel" (2000). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 419. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/419 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PERSONAL LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN INDIA AND ISRAEL Marc Galanterand Jayanth Krishnan* Although India and Israel differ dramatically in size, population, and affluence, there are many important similarities. Each is the contem- porary vehicle of an old and resilient civilization that expresses a distinctive, influential and enduring arrangement of the various facets of human experience. Each of these cultures underwent a prolonged colonial experience in which its traditions were disrupted and subordi- nated to a hegemonic European Christian culture;' each had an earlier experience with victorious, expansive Islam; 2 each has reached an un- easy but flourishing accommodation with the secular, scientific moder- 3 nity of the West. * Marc Galanter is the John & Rylla Bosshard Professor of Law and Professor of South Asian Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism and Personal Law
    \\server05\productn\N\NYI\40-4\NYI401.txt unknown Seq: 1 7-OCT-08 11:50 SLICING THE AMERICAN PIE: FEDERALISM AND PERSONAL LAW JEFFREY A. REDDING* I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 943 R II. DIVERGING TRENDS IN U.S. JURISPRUDENCE ON RELIGION AND TERRITORY ........................ 949 R III. PERSONAL LAW SYSTEMS ......................... 954 R A. “Personal Law” .............................. 957 R B. Personal Law in India ........................ 961 R 1. Basic Workings ........................... 963 R 2. Issues and Problems ...................... 966 R a. Communalism........................ 966 R b. Women’s Equality .................... 968 R c. Conversion........................... 970 R IV. AMERICAN FEDERALISM AND PERSONAL LAW ....... 972 R A. Overview of Contemporary American Family Law ........................................ 975 R 1. Marital Name-Changing .................. 976 R 2. Age of Marital Consent ................... 978 R 3. Same-Sex Marriage ....................... 979 R B. Similarities Between States and Religious Communities ................................. 981 R * Assistant Professor of Law, Saint Louis University School of Law; Os- car M. Ruebhausen Fellow in Law, Yale Law School (2006-08). For helpful comments and discussion on earlier versions of this Article, I would like to thank Bruce Ackerman, Ian Ayres, Chirag Badlani, Shyam Balganesh, Asli Bali, Jack Balkin, Frederic Bloom, Richard Brooks, Eleanor Brown, Jennifer Brown, Robert Burt, Mary Anne Case, Glenn Cohen, Rodrigo Correa, Rajeev Dhavan,
    [Show full text]