St CATHERINE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cross Boundary Bus Services to and from Wiltshire and Somerset Wiltshire
APPENDIX 1 – Cross boundary bus services to and from Wiltshire and Somerset Wiltshire SERVICE OPERATOR ROUTE, DAYS OF OPERATION AND FINANCIAL AVERAGE NUMBER FREQUENCY SUPPORT COST TO FROM B&NES PER COMMENTS B&NES PASSENGER (£ pa) JOURNEY (£ pa) 64 Wiltshire Buses Hilperton – Bath via Bradford -on -Avon - - Operates under contract to Wiltshire F – 1 return journey Council. No contribution from B&NES. 76 Coachstyle Malmesbury – Bath via Marshfield - - Operates under contract to Wiltshire W – 1 return journey Council. No contribution from B&NES. 76A Coachstyle Stanton St Quinton – Bath via Marshfield - - Operates under contract to Wiltshire W – 1 return journey Council. No contribution from B&NES. 86 Beeline Semington – Bath via Farleigh Wick - - Operates under contract to Wiltshire W – 1 return journey Council. No contribution from B&NES. 94 Libra Travel Bath – Trowbridge via Freshford and £27,900 £0.85 Operates under contract to Wiltshire Westwood Council with contribution from B&NES. MS daytime – every 2 hours B&NES contribution was increased from £21,740 pa in July 2013 following a competitive tender. 52% of passenger journeys are made by residents of B&NES 114 Faresaver Malmesbury – Bath (King Edward’s School) - - Commercial service. via Tormarton SD – 1 return journey 185 Somerbus Paulton – Trowbridge via Radstock and £2,808 £0.69 Operates under contract to B&NES. No Midsomer Norton contribution from Somerset or Th – I return journey Wiltshire. SERVICE OPERATOR ROUTE, DAYS OF OPERATION AND FINANCIAL AVERAGE NUMBER FREQUENCY SUPPORT COST TO FROM B&NES PER COMMENTS B&NES PASSENGER (£ pa) JOURNEY (£ pa) 228 Faresaver Bath – Colerne via Batheaston £8,445 £0.43 Partly commercial service. -
Maternal Mortality, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries
Medical History, 1982, 26: 79-90. AN ATTEMPT TO ESTIMATE THE TRUE RATE OF MATERNAL MORTALITY, SIXTEENTH TO EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES by B. M. WILLMOTT DOBBIE* AN ENQUIRY into family structure in previous centuries reveals evidence of the high price in women's lives of replenishment of the population. It could not be otherwise, for when Nature failed in her task, or was thwarted by such adversities as pelvic deformity or malpresentation, attempts to help were mostly fumbling in the dark, literally and metaphorically, and well-meant interference was almost certain to introduce infection, so often fatal. The study that follows is based upon parish registers, and it must be prefaced with a reminder that exact truth is unattainable; most of the data are flawed, some seriously. Nothing better than an informed estimate can be hazarded, using such solid facts as can be gathered, and not scorning crumbs of evidence. This paper draws attention to some sources of error. The subject of childbirth deaths in past centuries has not received much attention; in fact, little is known in any quantitative sense, and the difficulties of collecting and interpreting evidence are daunting. DEFINITION OF MATERNAL MORTALITY The question must be considered: for how long after childbirth may death of the mother be the consequence? The International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics includes deaths up to forty-two days after delivery or termination, though accepting that later fatality is possible. The triennial reports into maternal deaths in England and Wales' include deaths up to a year, but usually have the advantage of an autopsy, and reject deaths obviously unconnected. -
Bathnats Walks
Bathwick to Batheaston www.bathnats.org.uk Take a walk with BathNats Bathwick to Batheaston Bath Natural History Society guide to nature around the city Beckford Road, Bathwick, to Batheaston via canal towpath and fields, with optional variation No. 3 Proceed under the A4 by-pass with New Leaf self-catering No.7. Exit the car park and turn right and stop when you just compiled by Lucy Starling Recommended OS Map Explorer 155 Bristol & Bath cottages on your right heading for a metal gate in the hedgerow past the car sales room. Here, you can look across the river to that meet the farm tarmac track. Alternatively, follow the the edge of the AWT reserve. In March, I noted a single Grey riverbank. You will come across lots of Cuckoo Flower in the Heron’s nest low down in a willow; the adults were clearly damp patches on this walk, along with Red Campion and Garlic feeding a youngster. And, below them, I saw a pair of Teal , Mustard and on a warm April day, you should see many Orange along with Cormorant and the ever- present Canada Goose . In n to 7 Tip and also Comma, Peacock, Small Tortoiseshell, Brimstone April, I was amazed to see a male Mandarin Duck flying low as 6 he at way and Green Veined and Small White butterflies. over the river, heading off in the direction of Box. Best sighting A l B 8 Rai 4 here was on 26 December, about 11am, some 10 or more 4 A No. 4 . There are good thick hawthorn hedges in this area and years ago, a large male dog Otter! The reserve does attract 5 n you should find at least one Common Whitethroat and o wetland species such as Reed Warbler , Sedge Warbler and v r A e iv perhaps if you are lucky and listen carefully, a Lesser R 4 4 Reed Bunting and perhaps Common Snipe (winter) . -
THE GREAT BATH ROAD, 1700-1830 Brendaj.Buchanan
THE GREAT BATH ROAD, 1700-1830 BrendaJ.Buchanan The great turnpike highway from London to the spa city of Bath is surrounded by legend and romance, 1 which have come to obscure the fact that at no time in the period studied was there any one single Bath Road. Instead, from the beginning of the eighteenth century there were created over the years and in a patchy, disorganized sequence, some fifteen turnpike trusts which with varying degrees of efficiency undertook the improvement of the roads under their legislative care. Not until the mid-eighteenth century was it possible to travel the whole distance between capital and provincial city on improved roads, and even then the route was not fixed. Small changes were frequently made as roads were straightened and corners removed, the crowns of hills lowered and valley bottoms raised. On a larger scale, new low-level sections were built to replace older upland routes, and most significant of all, some whole roads went out of use as traffic switched to routes which were better planned and engineered by later trusts. And at the time when the turnpike roads were about to face their greatest challenge from the encroaching railways in the 1830s, there were at the western end of the road to Bath not one but two equally important routes into the city, via Devizes and Melksham, or through Calne and Chippenham along the line known to-day as the A4. This is now thought of as the traditional Bath Road, but it can be demonstrated that it is only one of several lines which in the past could lay claim to that title. -
Somerset. [ Kelly's
716 MAR SOMERSET. [ KELLY'S MARKET GARDENERs--continued. Duddridge W. Nth.Newton,Bridgwtr Kitchen M. Walton.in-Gordano,Clvdni Atherton In. North Weston, Clevedn Durbin John, Cheddar R.S.O Large George, 4 Stanbridge place,. Bacon Miss Mary, WaIton-in-Gor- Durbin Samuel, NaiIsea, Bristol Batheaston, Ba,th dano, Clevedon Durbin William, Cheddar RS.O Laverton Hy. 37 Vallis way, Frome Baker Mi.ss Annie, Nailsea, Brrstol DurmanGeorge, Moorsherd, North Lloyd J. The Hill, Langport R.S.O Baker Charles, Tickenham, Nailsea. Petherton, Bridgwater Mar,sh In. Benedict st. Glastonbury Baker John, Tickenham, Nailsea Durman Henry, Spanish hill, North MarshaII Wm. In. Henlade, TauntOn! Baker Thomas, Sandford, Bristol 'Petherton, Bridgwater Marshall Wm. F. Wrington, Bristol Bartlet F. WorIe, Wes,ton-super.Mare Eason George, Merriott 8.0 Martin Edwd. H. Batheaston, Bath Bennett John, Rydon, North Pether. Edmonds George, Grove cottage, Martin Richard, Sydney cottage, ton, Bridgwater Charlcombe, BathSmallcombe, Horse Shoe rd. Bath,) Bennett Thomas, Bankland, North Ellis Albert, West Coker~ Yeovil Maynard T. 'Chilton Trinity, Brdgwtr Petherton, Bridgwa,ter Escott Isaac, Newton rd. North Peth- Melluish William James, Bailbrook. Bishop Gllorge Hacker, Milton, Wes- erton, Bridgwater gardens, Batheaston, Bath ton-super-Mare Evans William, Cheddar R.S.O Minty Mrs. Emily, Ghilcompton, Bath-. Biss .!fUd. In. Long Ashton, Bristol Every Wm.North end,Batheaston,Bth Mitchel Reuben, Merriott S.O Biss John, IS King street, Frome Evry Henry, St. Catherine, Bath Mitchell William, Merriott S.O Blackmore John, Bower Ashton, Long Evry Mrs. Mary, Radford farm, Moxham James, Tickenham, Nailseal Ashton, Bristol Batheaston, Bath Nicholls W. West Chinnock, Seaving- Bond Samuel, Moon lane, North Peth- Evry Thomas, Avonland cottage,Bath. -
Stirling Hall Business Foyer Center
TERRACE LOADING DOCK K J I H G OFFICES EDINBURGH HALL SALONS KITCHEN STAGE L F STAGE M STIRLING E BALLROOM V I TERRACE TERRACE SALONS EAST SALONS N D X I EDINBURGH V O C BALLROOM GARDEN X EAST I V LAWN TERRACE TERRACE SALONS SALONS P B WEST I X III STIRLING Q BOARDROOM VIII II WEST FOYER EDINBURG VII BOARDROOM STIRLING HALL BUSINESS FOYER CENTER STIRLING HALL Stirling Ballroom Ceiling Height is 14’ 9” Room Name Sq. Ft. Dimensions Terrace Theater Classroom Hollow Conference U-Shape Reception Banquet Exhibit Cresent Stage Dimensions Square Rounds of 6 Stirling Ballroom 8,280 115 x 72 1,100 600 140 800 660 48 (8x10) 396 20D x 30W x 3 8”H Stirling East 5,112 71 x 72 550 300 400 360 216 Stirling West 3,168 44 x 72 300 180 250 240 144 Stirling Boardroom 576 18 x 32 14* Salons B – Q 576 18 x 32 60 32 30 24 20 40 40 24 Salons B – C 1,152 36 x 32 110 65 46 32 36 125 80 78 Salons D – F/I – K/L – N/O – Q 1,760 55 x 32 175 100 56 48 125 120 72 Salons G – H 1,344 42 x 32 150 76 48 36 40 100 100 54 Salon G 768 24 x 32 75 45 35 28 32 65 50 30 Salon H 576 18 x 32 60 32 30 24 20 40 40 24 Terrace Salons B – F 99L x 15 5”W Terrace Salons G – K 111L x 15 7”W Terrace Salons L – Q 114L x 16 4”W All dimensions are in square feet unless otherwise noted. -
English Heritage Battlefield Report: Lansdown 1643
English Heritage Battlefield Report: Lansdown 1643 Lansdown Hill (5 July 1643) Parish: Cold Ashton, Doynton, Bitton, Charlcombe, North Stoke Districts: Bath and North East Somerset, South Gloucestershire County: Bath and North East Somerset, South Gloucestershire Grid Ref:ST 723712 Historical Context In the early summer of 1643 the Royalist position in England gave rise to a certain optimism. Parliamentarian morale had been dented by a series of Royalist successes which included Adwalton Moor, Hopton Heath, Ripple Field, Stratton and Chalgrove. Moreover, Oxford was still reasonably secure. In the West, however, Parliamentarian garrisons continued to hold out in Devon, while Gloucester, Bristol and Bath were firmly controlled by Parliament. Sir William Waller, as Major General of the Western Association Forces, commanded Parliament's not inconsiderable military resources in Shropshire, Worcestershire, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Somerset. If there was to be a chance of Sir Ralph Hopton's Royalist army marching east to join the King's Oxford army in a combined advance on London, Parliament's position in the West must first be destroyed. Hopton's victory at Stratton in May 1643 and his subsequent progress through Devon encouraged the King to send him additional troops under Prince Maurice and the Marquis of Hertford. At Chard on 4 June Hopton's reinforced army totalled some 4,000 foot, 2,000 horse and 300 dragoons, together with 16 pieces of artillery. An ingenious command system was now evolved to encompass the dignity, rank and military skills of Maurice, Hertford and Hopton. While Hertford commanded in name, Hopton commanded in the field and Maurice devoted his attention to the Horse. -
73 Batheaston to Solsbury Hill
START/FINISH Batheaston Car Park, London Road East, Bath, BA1 7NB WALK INFORMATION AND ACCESSIBILITY: There are a couple of steep uphill sections and two stiles The section through the woodland is on a muddy/uneven path so take care Some of the route is on quiet country lanes, once you’ve crossed the London Road There are facilities (shops, cafes, pubs, loos) in Batheaston The car park has only a small number of spaces, and is free for 3 hours, there are frequent buses to and from the city centre There may be livestock in the fields and on Solsbury Hill EXPECT TO SEE • Wildflowers on top of Solsbury Hill, including rare species typical of calcareous grassland • Views • The remains of medieval field system THINGS TO DO • Explore the village of Batheaston and the riverside path at the start and finish • Enjoy the views towards the eastern end of Bath and into Wiltshire from the top of Solsbury Hill DID YOU KNOW? • The flat top of Solsbury Hill was an iron age fort • The small turf labyrinth was put there in 1994, by protestors against the widening of the A46 TRAILS BATHEASTON TO SOLSBURY HILL SHORT WALK 4.5km / 2.75 MILES 1.5-2 HRS ROUTE 1 Leave the car park turning left, crossing the road when it’s safe. As the road bends left, take the steps on the right. Continue from the path onto the road ahead going uphill, and take Solsbury Lane on the left. After 150m towards the top of the rise, take the kissing gate on the right and head down the field towards the church taking the gate on the right back onto the road and continue ahead. -
Free Piston Stirling Engines
1 Free Piston Stirling Engines The story of a novel remote power solution that helps companies improve efficiency, decrease cost and reduce emissions Dan Midea | VP Sales and Marketing Isaac Garaway | CTO John Sine | Consultant 2 A New Power Solution for Off-the-Grid Pipelines Combining a 19th Century Technology With 21st Century Power Electronics Provides Cost-Effective Power. Ever since there have been gas and oil pipelines, there has been a need for a remote power source to provide electricity for off-the-grid remote locations. And since that need first arose, there has been a competition to provide the ideal generator that could deliver the power required that was affordable and reliable. Off-Grid Solutions? Until very recently, the choices available always involved compromises and none provided a totally acceptable solution for pipeline companies. First was the obvious – expanding the grid to reach the pipeline. It was also the most expensive due to permitting cost and timeline and therefore was quickly replaced, in most instances by internal combustion engines. But they required fuel shipments and frequent maintenance and repair, often causing downtime for the wells and transmission pipelines. 3 Fortunately, a new solution has recently appeared that gives all indications of solving the most challenging problems of remote power generation. Ironically, it is based on a technology that is more than 200 years old and invented by a clergyman – the Stirling Cycle External Combustion Engine. But before we look at how this old technology has been modernized to fit the needs of the pipeline industry, we’ll look briefly at the technologies it can replace and their attendant problems. -
The Moore Family1 the First Moore We Are Sure About Was John Moore G9
Chapter 1 The Moore Family1 The first Moore we are sure about was John Moore G9. (See Charts 3) His father almost certainly was William Moore G10, who received a patent for 300 acres on a branch of the Nansemond River in Virginia on the 6 of December 1652. The records of the Isle of Wight show that in 1667, William Smelley patented land on the western branch of the Nansemond River adjoining John Moore. In 1668. Thomas Cullen also is listed as patented 400 acres adjoining John Moore in the Upper Parish of Nansemond Co. The property being referred to must certainly be the same as that patented by William Moore in 1652. The fact that John Moore owned property on the Nansemond River makes the likelihood very high that William was John’s father. I believe it is also significant that a William Moore (More) was a member of the Virginia Company of London.2 He is one of the signers of the May 23,1609 Second Charter. Many of those members sailed to Virginia to become planters; some, however, were only investors. There is no evidence that William Moore of London ever came to America. Nothing is really known about either William Moore of London or the one who patented land in 1652 beyond what is described above. It is plausible that the William Moore who was a member of the Virginia Company of London was father to William Moore (G10) who patented land in 1652. Members bought shares hoping to earn profits but also possibly land. -
On the Xxiii Biennial Congress on Human Ethology in Stirling, Scotland
Human Ethology Bulletin 32 (2017)1- Proc. of the XXIII Biennial ISHE Congress: 1-5 Letter from the Editorial Board A HIGHLAND FLING TO REMEMBER: A SHORT REPORT ON THE XXIII BIENNIAL CONGRESS ON HUMAN ETHOLOGY IN STIRLING, SCOTLAND Caroline Allen Center of Behaviour and Evolution, NewcastleUniversity, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK [email protected] The University of Stirling, nestled between the Scottish cities of Glasgow and Edinburgh, was the stage for the 23rd Biennial Congress on Human Ethology, in August 2016. In true ISHE spirit, the organising committee were keen to create as many opportunities as possible for delegates to immerse themselves in Scottish culture and tradition, and organised a packed calendar of social events. This began with an opening ceremony with a piper, and live performances of traditional Scottish dancing by the Stirling Highland Dancers (with socially mandated audience participation, see figure 1!), This was followed by dinner and whiskey tasting overlooking the beautiful University campus, cloaked in the shadow of the Ochil Hills. Figure 1 Native Scots demonstrating local Highland Dancing and piping rituals to naïve travellers. After some persuasion the delegates bravely attempted the ancient, intimidating, and much revered Highland Fling. Allen, C.: Letter from the Editorial Board Human Ethology Bulletin 32 (2017)1- Proc. of the XXIII Biennial ISHE Congress: 1-5 On Tuesday evening delegates were tasked with foraging for their own meals in the small spa town of Bridge of Allan, just north of Stirling. The majority of delegates overcame this challenge with ease, making their way to the Allanwater Brewhouse to sample the selection local ale (This gruelling research practice is detailed in figure 2). -
Stirling Council
Stirling Council Response to Consultation: National Policy Framework 4 – Call for Ideas Part 1: Ideas for what Scotland will be like in 2050 and the changes we need to get us there. 1. What development will we need to address Climate Change? What will we need to do to reach the target of net zero emissions by 2050 We will need to: Use energy more efficiently by improving the thermal performance of buildings and specify building insulation measures that have a low-carbon impact and/or that naturally sequester carbon. Retain and re-use existing and historic buildings in order to preserve the embodied energy within existing structures through restoration, upgrading and adaptation. Utilise vacant and derelict land and make best use of existing infrastructure. Create robust, resilient and diverse zero/low carbon energy generation and distribution networks that harness energy from the sun (solar farms/installations), land (ground source heating), water (water source heat and hydro), air (air source heat), wind (onshore and offshore wind turbines/farms), and waste (anaerobic digestion). Continue to invest in afforestation/reforestation and peatland restoration projects to sequester carbon. Invest in green transportation and associated infrastructure. Put carbon impacts at the heart of decision making; improving our carbon literacy is key to this. In the context of planning, with regulatory support from the Scottish Government, all new development could be required to be carbon neutral/carbon negative. How places can be made more resilient to the long term impacts of climate change? Climate change resilient places need to be well-adapted in order to be able to withstand warmer and wetter weather.