Big Trout Lake, N

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Big Trout Lake, N A 5,000 year old human burial at Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug, Big Trout Lake, n. Ontario. Scott Hamilton Dept. of Anthropology Introduction Continuous Far northern Ontario was fully deglaciated only about ca. 8,000 years ago, Lakehead University Permafrost Manitoba H.R.B. L. Saskatchewan Manitoba In the spring of 2004, human skeletal remains were discovered along The early Holocene occupants McConnell whereupon much of the Hudson Bay Lowland (north of white dashed line) was Hudson Bay the north shore of Big Trout Lake at Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug Discontinuous of northern Ontario confronted innundated by the Tyrrell Sea. The Big Trout Lake region is within the northern El Molto Permafrost (K.I.), (formerly known as Big Trout Lake F.N.) (Fig 1, 2). They were a persisting glacial environment. Alberta limits of the Precambrian Shield, but is a comparatively low relief area dotted Dept. of Anthropology As the glaciers disappeared, the initially exposed when a shoreline gravel ridge was quarried for local Big Trout Lake with many lakes and muskegs. No detailed Pleistocene thematic mapping is University of Western Ontario road construction. Subsequent surface erosion revealed bones that Far North pioneer tundra vegetation likely available to aid in documenting the early Holocene landscape, and how it attracted herd animals such as Big Trout Lake might have been used for human occupation. The accidental discovery of were discovered and excavated by Mr. Terry Childforever. Chief Donny Laurentide Ice Sheet caribou. In turn, Plano hunters multiple early Holocene human burials on well-drained but subtle local uplands Morris contacted the senior author to evaluate the nature and historical Lake Ontario were attracted northward in Agassiz (eskers, gravel ridges) is strongly suggestive of the importance of such features significance of the finds prior to their reburial in the community. The pursuit of their prey. This would for early human settlement. Wapekeka deceased was a young adult Amerindian male. AMS radiocarbon dating have encouraged the time McKay of a foot bone yielded a date of 4,450 ± 50 yBP (TO-11878), with calibration ± 50 transgressive expansion of early In light of anticipated development (mining, all-weather roads, hydro-electric Aboriginal people northward as 9,900 years BP correction indicating death and burial over 5,000 years ago. The site Glacial Ice Sheet Lake transmission corridors, etc), these burials have considerable CRM implications deglaciation proceeded. Thus, Kam. in a huge area with very little extant archaeological information. has been designated the McKay Burial site. Along with the ca. 7,000 THUNDER MontanaGlacial Melt Water North Dakota BAY Near North technologies and adaptations Present configuration of yBP human burials recovered from the nearby Wapekeka F.N.(Fig 2) associated with the late water bodies Lake Early L. Lake Duluth Ontanagan Minong Forest- Tundra 0 100 200 300 400 Alberta Saskatchewan Manitoba 0 km 300 (Hamilton 2004), these discoveries represent some of the oldest human Pleistocene in more southerly Hudson Bay remains yet found in far northern Ontario. With the permission of the Hudson Bay Lowlands latitudes might have persisted km South Dakota (after Dyke and Prest 1987, Minnesota Lake Boreal Forest McAndrewsWyoming et al 1987) Chief and Council, the junior author conducted skeletal analysis at into the Holocene in the north. Chippewa north boundary Québec Great Lakes- St. Lawrence Forest Canadian Shield Lakehead University to document the vital characteristics, with ongoing Deciduous Forest The process of deglaciation proceeded comparatively rapidly after ca. 9,000 yBP, south boundary Ontario chemical analysis to reconstruct diet and nutrition. The remains were with Plano expansion shortly thereafter. However the sequence of meltwater Canadian Shield returned for reburial in the spring of 2005. As part of the research drainage, biotic recovery and isostatic rebound effects are not well understood Big Trout Lake Between 6,500 and 2000 agreement, a report and a public education poster were produced for SH/02 at a scale useful for regional archaeological analysis. 1800 years RCago, a series of Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug. Post Contact Period culturesyBP were found Shield Archaic Fig 1 Modern vegetation zones in Ontario. Big Trout Lake is a major Fig 9 A surpisingly large collection of formal headwater lake that drains north into the Severn River system, and is 1600 throughout northeastern The Site Location and expedient tools were recovered from North America.500 The most located at the northern limit of the Precambrian Shield. the gravel beach in the vicinity of the two 1400 Minnesota Big Trout Lake is the primary headwater lake of the Fawn River, a geographicallyMontana extensive burial find areas (Fig. 3 and 4). With the Duck Bay 1200 (and least well-known)North is Dakota the Old Copper tributary of the Severn River in far northwestern Ontario (Fig 1). The Sandy Lake b exception of item 9b, all are produced from Lake Clearwater Culture Mistikwas Kame Hills Late Woodland Late Shield (Shield Archaic) region is currently within the northern limits of the boreal forest, about Selkirk Hudson Bay Lowland chert that was readily 1000 1000 Wisconsin Laurentian culture. The burial at the Michigan 100 km south of the Hudson Bay Lowlands. Given the age of the burial, Archaic 90˚ W 90˚ a available from stream beds and rocky McKay Site is likely affiliatedSouth Dakota New York the regional ecology was likely very different at the time of interest. shorelines, or from the eskers found 800 Wyoming Blackduck with Shield Culture. Iowa Wapekeka Nebraska Illinois Pennsylvania Very little is known about the early post-glacial landscape, and even throughout the region. Indiana Ohio SH/03 Burial Site 600 less about the human cultures of this northern region. The discovery 1500 of human remains is an important first step for developing a more Some of the tools are slightly polished and 400 McKay Burial water-worn in keeping with their deposition Fig 13 Wapekeka Gouge detailed understanding of early Aboriginal occupation of the northern c within Big Trout Lake. The collection 200 recovered from mixed AD Laurel Precambrian Shield. includes notched and unnotched projectile Woodland Middle context from Airstrip d 0 2000 points (9a, b, f). These stone tips were BC quarry pit. The burial was located within a 20 metre long low gravel ridge that, hafted on light spears, and likely date to 200 before quarrying operations, ran parallel to the north shoreline of Big between 2,000 and 5,000 years ago. Item 53˚ 45’ N 400 9a is superficially similar to a late Plano Radiocarbon years Before Present years Trout Lake, immediately north of Post Island (Fig 2, Fig 3: loc 1). Several Big B.P. projectile point (Fig 12), but the midsection 0 such gravel and sand ridges are reported along the shoreline, and local Trout 600 Late Woodland Big Trout Lake Region thickness and low quality of knapping is 1000 informants indicate that past gravel quarrying in a nearby ridge led to Woodland Early in not present Subarctic Holocene Middle Woodland 0 5 10 Lake F.N. not consistent with Plano techology. 800 (post-glacial) 2000 the accidental discovery of at least two other human graves (Fig 3: loc 3000 km N Instead, it may be a knife, or alternatively, ? 4000 2, Fig 8). The skeletons from location 2 were reburied in the community derived from portions of e Fig 10 A biface produced from Hudson Bay 1000 Big Trout Lake a presently undocumented unnotched ? Human Burial Shield NTS 53G & 53H projectile point type. This latter possibility Lowland chert. It is a general purpose cutting 5000 cemetery without investigation some time ago. 1200 Human Burials 6000 is very real given the lack of archaeological and scraping tool of a non-diagnostic sort at Wapekeka 7000 Fig 2 The McKay Burial Site along north shore of Big Trout Lake. (Also information about far northern Ontario. produced and used for thousands of years. 1400 Slow Human Burial 8000 Post Island contains the balance of the Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug Deglaciation at Cummins Plano note Wapekeka Burial Site (FlJj-1). The raw material is widely distributed 9000 town site, and is connected to the mainland by a partially submerged 10000 Also of note are items 9c, d and g which throughout northwestern Ontario in gravel 1600 Late Folsom g Pleistocene 11000 esker ridge that is now developed as a roadway (Fig 3). The shoreline Clovis location of former house f are unifacially chipped ‘side scrapers’. Item deposits and glacial drift. Since it was 1800 Late Shield 3,000 to 1,000 BC (Ice Age) 12000 gravel ridges likely formed as part of this esker complex. Throughout 9e is a flake that was used as an expedient recovered from the beach zone, there is no northern Ontario these eskers are a common feature, and in a rugged gravel ridge (approx) cutting tool. All of these materials are from way of knowing whether it dates to the time Fig 11 A ‘timechart’ showing the archaeologically- landscape mantled with lakes, rivers and muskeg, offered attractive artifact yielding section of beach a local private collection, and brief of the nearby human burial. defined history of northern Ontario. Human occupation well-drained travel corridors and ecologically diverse micro-habitats. inspection by Hamilton did not yield any of northern Ontario likely began after about 9,000 years 1,2 gravel ridges Between 2 and 5 burials were disturbed during construction of the Wapekeka The ancient burials at both Wapekeka and Big Trout Lake were recovered other cultural material on the exposed ago. The McKay burial site from Big Trout Lake dates airstrip. They were buried within water-laid sand on a stranded beach feature on or near esker features, and other similar burials might lie undiscovered gravel beach.
Recommended publications
  • Supplement 1997
    Open Doors – Ontario's Environmental Bill of Rights Environmental Commissioner of Ontario Supplement to the 1997 Annual Report The Environmental Bill of Rights requires that the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario include a summary of the information gathered in the review of the implementation of the legislation and how ministries comply with the act. In addition, the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario must provide a list of all proposals posted on the Environmental Registry for which decisions had not been posted by December 31, 1997. This Supplement provides the following information, intended to complement the main body of the 1997 Annual Report of the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario. Appendix A: Posted Acts and Regulations Appendix B: 1997 Policy Postings Appendix C: Unposted Decisions Appendix D: Selected 1997 Exceptions Appendix E: Environmental Monitoring Programs Appendix F: Selected Ontario Voluntary Agreements Appendix G: Applications for Reviews and Investigations Appendix H: Ministry Compliance with 1996 Recommendations Appendix I: Technical Supplement Section 1: List of Policies, Acts and Regulations Section 2: List of Instruments Section 3: Education Outreach Appendix A: Posted Acts and Regulations ONTARIO MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL RELATIONS AND RURAL AFFAIRS (OMAFRA) (MCCR) Bill 146, Farming and Food Production Protection Act, Standard adopted under the Gasoline Handling Act: 1997 (AC7E0001.P) Diking and Secondary Containment for Aboveground Tanks (RL6E0003.D) Proposal posted 28-Jan-97 Decision not posted Proposal posted 28-Nov-96 • Provides broader protection to farmers against complaints from neigh- Decision posted 9-May-97 bours than the Farm Practices Protection Act 1988 (FPPA) which it • Double-walled aboveground gasoline storage tanks will no longer be replaces required to be surrounded by an earth dike (single-wall tanks will still • Expands list of nuisances that farmers are permitted to cause as a require dikes).
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Big Trout Lake Area
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Kenora—Rainy River 35
    Hudson Bay FORT SEVERN 89 POLAR BEAR Provincial Park PEAWANUCK ke La e rc ie P SEVERN RIVER Provincial Park SACHIGO LAKE 2 SACHIGO LAKE 1 BEARSKIN LAKE WAPEKEKA 2 S ach KITCHENUHMAYKOOSIB AAK 84 (BIG TROUT LAKE) igo Lake FAWN RIVER Provincial Park WAPEKEKA 1 Big Trout Lake KASABONIKA LAKE OPASQUIA Provincial Park WAWAKAPEWIN MUSKRAT DAM LAKE WINISK RIVER Provincial Park WEBEQUIE TIMMINS--JAMES BAY SANDY LAKE 88 KINGFISHER LAKE 1 Lake Sandy KEE-WAY-WIN WEAGAMOW LAKE 87 WUNNUMIN 1 WUNNUMIN 2 NIBINAMIK DEER LAKE DISTRICT OF KENORA, UNORGANIZED M is s is a L a k NORTH SPIRIT LAKE KENORA--RAINY RIVER e PIPESTONE RIVER Provincial Park LANSDOWNE HOUSE OTOSKWIN-ATTAWAPISKAT RIVER Provincial Park NESKANTAGA MACDOWELL LAKE POPLAR HILL PIKANGIKUM 14 MARTEN FALLS 65 Y W H 8 0 CAT LAKE 8 FORT HOPE 64 ALBANY RIVER Provincial Park TOWNSHIP OF PICKLE LAKE Y W H 9 9 5 WOODLAND CARIBOU Provincial Park OSNABURGH 63B Trout Lake D R R O SLATE FALLS S S TROUT LAKE Provincial Park E G U N MUNICIPALITY OF RED LAKE D AY R TH B SOU MISHKEEGOGAMANG Y W H DISTRICT OF COCHRANE, UNORGANIZED 8 61 OGOKI RIVER Provincial Park LITTLE CURRENT RIVER Provincial Park 1 WABAKIMI Provincial Park 0 5 PAKWASH Provincial Park H W Y ST. RAPHAEL LAKE Provincial Park SEDGMAN LAKE Provincial Park TOWNSHIP OF EAR FHAWLY LS 657 804 HWY D L R AL 643 HWY DF IN W WHITESAND Provincial Park WEST ENGLISH RIVER Provincial Park WABAUSKANG 21 OJIBWAY NATION OF SAUGEEN Lac Seul 5 16 HW WHITESAND 5 Y AROLAND 83 Y N 2 4 HW 5 58 H W LAC SEUL (KEJICK BAY) WINDIGO BAY Provincial Park Y LAC SEUL (WHITEFISH
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Ontario Hunting Regulations Summary
    Table of Contents Table Table of Contents Important Messages for Hunters ......................................................4-6 Maps Map 1 – Southwestern (includes WMUs 79 to 95) ................ 8-9 Map 2 – Southeastern (includes WMUs 46 to 78) ............. 10-11 Map 3 – Northern (includes WMUs 1 to 45) ......................12-13 • How to Use this Summary 2014 Hunting Licence Information .............................................14-21 The Ontario Hunter Education Program .........................................22 How to Use General Regulations ..................................................................... 23-30 this Summary Firearms, Methods of Hunting, Crown Lands, Hunting in Provincial Parks, Conservation Officers, Fish and This is a summary of information Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997 dealing with hunting licences and Wild Turkey Regulations...............................................................31-33 hunting laws. This summary is neither Moose Regulations ....................................................................... 34-52 a legal document nor a complete collection of the current regulations. Elk Regulations ............................................................................. 53-59 It is meant to be a convenient reference Deer Regulations .......................................................................... 60-74 only. For complete details, see: Black Bear Regulations ................................................................ 75-78 a) the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997,
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Rivers: James Bay and Hudson Bay
    Indian and Affaires indiennes Northern Affairs et du Nord Wild Rivers: Parks Canada Pares Canada James Bay and Hudson Bay Published by Parks Canada under authority of the Hon. Warren Allmand, Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs, Ottawa, 1977 QS-7042-000-EE-AI Les releves de la serie «Les rivieres sauvages» sont egalement publies en francais. Canada Canada metric metrique Wild Rivers: James Bay and Hudson Bay Wild Rivers Survey, Planning Division, Parks Canada, Ottawa, 1977 2 Casting a line in the Rupert River, Quebec. 3 'It is difficult to find in life any event which so effectually condenses intense nervous sensation into the shortest possible space of time as does the work of shooting, or running an im­ mense rapid. There is no toil, no heart breaking labour about it, but as much coolness, dexterity, and skill as man can throw into the work of hand, eye and head; knowledge of when to strike and how to do it; knowledge of water and rock, and of the one hundred com­ binations which rock and water can assume — for these two things, rock and water, taken in the abstract, fail as completely to convey any idea of their fierce embracings in the throes of a rapid as the fire burning quietly in a drawing-room fireplace fails to convey the idea of a house wrapped and sheeted in flames." Sir William Francis Butler (1872) 4 ©Minister of Supply and Services Now available in the Wild Rivers Metric symbols used in this book Canada 1977 series: mm-millimetre(s) Available by mail from Printing and A Iberta m-metre(s) Publishing, Supply and Services Quebec North Shore km-kilometre(s) Canada, Ottawa, K1A0S9, or through Saskatchewan km/h—kilometres per hour your bookseller.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: LAND-BASED FOOD INTIATIVES in TWO RURAL and REMOTE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES
    Running head: LAND-BASED FOOD INTIATIVES IN TWO RURAL AND REMOTE INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES Land-Based Food Initiatives in Two Rural and Remote Indigenous Communities By Michael Leibovitch Randazzo B.Arts. (Hons.), Psychology 2013 Supervisor. Dr. Michael Robidoux Committee Member: Dr. Alexandra Arellano Committee Member: Dr. Alexander Dumas THESIS Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in Human Kinetics School of Human Kinetics University of Ottawa ©Michael Leibovitch Randazzo, Ottawa, Canada, 2017 LAND-BASED FOOD INITIATIVES IN TWO RRI ii Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to describe the harvesting and dietary practices of two rural and remote Indigenous communities. The ethnographic methods of participant observations and semi-structured interviews availed an abundance of rich and detailed data that allowed for a clear understanding of the barriers these two communities face when accessing food. This is an articled-based thesis containing three parts. Part one is composed of a literature review that describes the barriers that have contributed to food insecurity problems in Indigenous communities. It finishes with a chapter dedicated to why the postcolonial perspective was chosen to best understand the historical forces that caused food insecurity in Indigenous communities and justify my position as a non-indigenous researcher in the field of Indigenous health. The second part of the thesis is made up of two articles. Article one will describe the current situation of food access challenges and responses in Canada, more specifically in two rural and remote First Nations communities. The article illustrates how both First Nations are experiencing challenges obtaining healthy food from the market and from the land.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Ontario Hunting Regulations Summary
    Fall 2015 – Spring 2016 2015 Hunting Regulations Summary Draw Deadlines Moose Draw: June 1 Elk Draw: June 10 Antlerless Deer Draw: June 30 Controlled Deer Draw: August 31 New Moose Season Information - Page 4 Report Resource Abuse Please call 1-877-847-7667 ontario.ca/hunting IT’S IN YOUR IT’S IN YOUR NATURE.® Let’s face it, hunting isn’t just something you do. It’s who you are. At Cabela’s, we feel the same way. That’s why it’s in our nature to support you with thousands of experts, more than 50 years of experience and every last bit of expertise, so you can treasure this passion for the rest of your days. CABELAS.CA • 800.265.6245 HUNTING SEASON is fast approaching If you are hunting big game in Ontario, you can use the following draw application methods: n Online n ServiceOntario* ontario.ca/outdoorscard BIG GAME DRAWS n Licence Issuers* n Telephone 1-800-288-1155 Contact the Outdoors Card Centre with any questions at 1-800-387-7011. *For a list of participating ServiceOntario centres and local licence issuers, visit ontario.ca The elk draw is only available at participating ServiceOntario locations. ontario.ca/outdoorscard Has your Outdoors Card expired? More than 400,000 Ontario-resident fishing and hunting Outdoors Cards expired on December 31, 2014 If your Outdoors Card has expired, renew it today: n Online: ontario.ca/outdoorscard n By phone: 1-800-288-1155 n In person: at a licence issuer ontario.ca/outdoorscard BLEED Table of Contents Table Table of Contents Important Messages for Hunters ......................................................4-6 Maps Map 1 – Southwestern (includes WMUs 79 to 95) ...............
    [Show full text]