DOCSLIB.ORG

Archibots : Intelligent and Adaptable Built Environments a Workshop on Architectural Robotics at Ubicomp 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archibots : Intelligent and Adaptable Built Environments a Workshop on Architectural Robotics at Ubicomp 2009 archibots : intelligent and adaptable built environments a workshop on architectural robotics at ubicomp 2009 all references from the papers: 1. Aarts, E., Harwig, E., and Schuurmans, M.: Ambient Intelligence in Denning, J. (ed.): The Invisible Future, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 235-250, 2001. 2. Addington, M., Schodek, D., Smart materials and technologies for the architecture and design professions, Amsterdam, Elsevier / Architectural Press, 2005. 3. Al-Emam, F., Kuo, C-L., Masse, D. Care On Rail: Extendable Adaptable Sliders, Emergency Room of the Future 2008, http://www.hsi.gatech.edu/erfuture/ 4. Ariely, D. Predictably Irrational. Harper Collins (2008), 244. 5. Asimov, I. I, Robot. Random House, New York, USA, (2004). 6. Atchley, R. C., and Barusch, A. S.: Social Forces and Aging: An Introduction to Social Gerontology, Thomas Wadsworth Inc., Belmont, CA, 2004 7. Bach, K., Berthold Burkhardt and Frei Otto (1987).IL18: Forming Bubbles. Stuttgart: Institute for Lightweight Structures. 8. Bains, Sunny “Modular bots learn art of selfreinvention.” EE Times, October 15, 2007. 9. Bar-Cohen, Yoseph. Biologically Inspired Intelligent Robots. Boca Raton, FL: SPIE- International Society for Optical Engineering, 2003. 10. Bernal, M., Do, E.Y-L. Variation from Repetition, in Proc. eCAADe (2007), 791-798 11. Beukers, A. and Ed van Hinte (1998). Lightnesss the Inevitable Renaissance of Minimum Energy Structures. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers. 12. Bier, H.: System-embedded Intelligence in Architecture, Dissertation, TUD, Delft, 2008. 13. Bratton, Benjamin, “The Turing City?” Mediascapes symposium, the Southern California Institute of Architecture. June 11, 2009. 14. Brown, Gary. “Introduction.” In Transportable Environments 2, edited by Robert Kronenburg, Joseph Lim and Wong Yunn Chii. London: Spon Press, 2002. 15. Bubner, E. (et al) (1975). IL12: Convertible Pneus. Stuttgart: Institute for Lightweight Structures. 16. Capek, K. Rossum’s Universal Robots. Penguin Books, London, UK, (2004). 17. Carnegie Mellon Claytronics Team. Claytronics. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~claytronics/. 18. Chapman, J., Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experience and Empathy, Earthscan, London, UK, 2005. 19. Chen, I .M., and J. Burdick. “Determining Task Optimal Modular Robot Assembly Configurations.” Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan, 1995. 20. Chen, J., DAM: Digital Animation Museum, M. Arch thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, 2002 21. Ciesielski, A. (1999). An Introduction to Rubber Technology. Shawbury, UK: Rapra Technology Ltd. 22. Coehlo, M., Maes,P., Responsive Materials in the Design of Adaptive Objects and Spaces, 2007. 23. Cohen DL, Malone E, Lipson H, Bonassar LJ. Direct Freeform Fabrication of Seeded Hydrogels in Arbitrary Geometries . Tissue Engineering 2006. 24. Concrete CanvasTM. http://www.concretecanvas.co.uk/. 25. Corchero, E., Solar Vintage http://www.distancelab.org/projects/solarvintage/ 26. Corwin, E.I., Jaeger, H.M., and Nagel, S.R. Structural signature of jamming in granular media. Nature 435, (2005), 1075-1078. 27. D. A. Norman. The Design of Future Things. Basic Books, 2007. 28. D. Wolber and G. Fisher. A demonstrational technique for developing interfaces with dynamically created objects. In UIST ’91: Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 221–230. ACM, 1991. 9 29. DESTATIS: Bevölkerung Deutschlands bis 2050, Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden 2007, https://wwwec.destatis.de/csp/shop/sfg/bpm.html.cms.cBroker.cls?CSPCHD=00210001000142v 3xik3003646720647&cmspath=struktur,vollanzeige.csp&ID=1020576, last visited03.03.2008. 30. Dietz, A. (1969). Plastics for Architects and Builders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 31. Do, E. Y-L., Gross, M. D. Environments for Creativity - A Lab for Making Things. Proc. Creativity and Cognition, ACM (2007), 27-36 32. Donev, A. et al. Improving the Density of Jammed Disordered Packings Using Ellipsoids. Science 303, (2004), 990-993. 33. Eastman, C. “Adaptive-Conditional Architecture.” Design Participation, Proc. Design Research Society’s Conference, 1971, Academy Editions, (1972), 51-57 34. EMERGE (Emergency Monitoring and Prevention), Specific Targeted Research Project (FP6- 2005-045056), http://www.emerge-project.eu, last visited 03.03.2008. 35. Eng, M., Camarata, K., Do, E. Y-L., Gross, M.D. FlexM: Designing a Physical Construction Kit for 3D Modeling", International Journal of Architectural Computing, (2006), 4 (2), 27-47, Multi- Science 36. F. Kawsar, T. Nakajima, and K. Fujinami. Deploy spontaneously: supporting end-users in building and enhancing a smart home. In UbiComp ’08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, pages 282–291, 2008 37. Fairs, M. On the Bri(n)ck at Graduate School of Design, Harvard University. Dezeen magazine, (11 May2009). http://www.dezeen.com/2009/05/11/. 38. Feenberg, A. Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press (2002), 08. 39. Festo InteractiveWall. http://www.festo.com/cms/eu-us_us/10326.htm. 40. Forty, A., Space, in Forty, A., Words and buildings: a vocabulary of modern architecture, Thames & Hudson, London, UK, 2000. 41. Fox, Michael. “Beyond Kinetic.” Transportable Environments 2. Edited by Robert Kronenburg, Joseph Lim and Wong Yunn Chii. London: Spon Press, 2002. 42. Funiak, S. et al. Distributed Localization of Modular Robot Ensembles. Proc. RSS IV, (2008). 43. Gardner, M. Mathematical Games: The Fantastic Combinations of John Conway's New Solitaire Game 'Life'. Scientific American, 223, 4. (1970), 120-123. 44. Giselbrecht & Partner, Dynamic Façade, Kiefer Technic Showroom, Austria (2007), http://www.earchitect.co.uk/austria/kiefer_technic_showroom.htm 45. Gracias, D.H. et al. Forming Electrical Networks in Three Dimensions by Self-Assembly. Science 289, (2000), 1170-1172. 46. Green, K. eT al.; Three Robot-Rooms/The AWE Project. In the Proceedings of the 2006 CHI Conference, Montreal, Canada, April (2006). 47. Greenberg, S and Fitchett, C. Phidgets: Easy Development of Physical Interfaces through Physical Widgets. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), ACM, (2001), 209-218. 48. Grosz, E., Architecture from the Outside, in Architecture from the Outside: Essays on Virtual and Real Space, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, London, UK, 2001. 49. Hennicke, J. (et al) (1974). IL10: Grid Shells. Stuttgart: Institute for Lightweight Structures. 50. Herron, R., Harvey, B., A Walking City, in Archigram 5 (1964). 51. Hjelle, D. and Lipson, H. A Robotically Reconfigurable Truss. Proc. ReMAR 2009, (2009). 52. Hoberman Associates, Transformable Design, Adaptive Fritting, Harvard Graduate School of Design, http://hoberman.com/portfolio/gsd.php?projectname=Adaptive%20Fritting 53. Houayek, H. The Animated Work Environment: A Vision for Working Life in a Digital Society. Ph.D.Dissertation, Clemson University (2009). 54. Houayek, H., Green, K.E., and Walker, I.D., The Animated Work Environment: An Architectural- Robotic System for a Digital Society, VDM Verlag, (2009). 55. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambient_Assisted_Living 56. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assistive_technology 57. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_automation 58. http://www.ambient-lighting.eu/, last visited11.07.2009 59. Ishii, H and Ullmer, B. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms. Human Factors in Computing (CHI), ACM, (1997), 234-241. 60. J. Ledford. 25 Home Automation Projects for the Evil Genius. McGraw-Hill, 2006. 61. J. O’Brien, T. Rodden, M. Rouncefield, and J. Hughes. At home with the technology: an ethnographic study of a set-top-box trial. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 6(3):282–308, 1999. 62. Johanson, B., Fox, A., and Winograd, T., The Interactive Workspaces Project: Experiences with Ubiquitous Computing Rooms. Pervasive Computing, April-June (2002), 71-78. 63. Kahn, N, Portfolio, http://nedkahn.com/wind.html 64. Kay, A. The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Invent It, Stanford Engineering, 1, 1 (1989), 1- 6. 65. Kemp, C.C., Fitzpatrick, P., Hirukawa, H., Yokoi, K., Harada, K., and Matumoto, Y., Humanoids. Chapter 56, in Springer Handbook of Robotics, Siciliano and Khatib, Eds., Springer, (2008), 1301-1334. 66. Kemp, M. Nano Meta-morphic Architecture. http://www.seriesdesignbuild.com/nano/main2.htm. 67. Kemp, Miles. “Meta-Morphic Architecture.” M.Arch thesis project: Southern California Institute of Architecture, 2004. 68. Khoshnevis, Behrokh. Automated Construction by Contour Crafting. Journal of Automation in Construction. 2004, Vol. 13, 1. 69. Kirby, B.T. et al. A Modular Robotic System Using Magnetic Force Effectors. Proc. IROS 2007, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press (2007), 2787-2793. 70. Kolarevic, B.: Digital Morphogenesis, Architecture in the Digital Age: Designing and Manufacturing, SponPress, London, 2003. 71. Koledin, M.J. Vacuum Immobilizer Support. USA (1992), Patent #5121756. 72. Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996. 73. Kurokawa, H. et al., “M-TRAN II: Metamorphosis from a Four-Legged Walker to a Caterpillar,” Proc.IROS03, pp.2452–2459, 2003. 74. Kurokawa, H. Murata S. Mtran 1, 2 and 3 Robot. http://unit.aist.go.jp/is/dsysd/mtran/top.htm. 75. L. Sun, K.J. Jakubenas, J.E. Crocker, S. Harrison, L.L. Shaw, and H.L. Marcus. Fabrication of In-Situ SiC/C Thermocouples by Selective Area Laser Deposition. Proc. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 1997. 76. Latour, Bruno, “Where are the Missing Masses?: The Sociology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Claytronics - a Synthetic Reality D.Abhishekh, B.Ramakantha Reddy, Y.Vijaya Kumar, A.Basi Reddy
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 3, March‐2013 ISSN 2229‐5518 Claytronics - A Synthetic Reality D.Abhishekh, B.Ramakantha Reddy, Y.Vijaya Kumar, A.Basi Reddy, Abstract— "Claytronics" is an emerging field of electronics concerning reconfigurable nanoscale robots ('claytronic atoms', or catoms) designed to form much larger scale machines or mechanisms. Also known as "programmable matter", the catoms will be sub-millimeter computers that will eventually have the ability to move around, communicate with each others, change color, and electrostatically connect to other catoms to form different shapes. Claytronics technology is currently being researched by Professor Seth Goldstein and Professor Todd C. Mowry at Carnegie Mellon University, which is where the term was coined. According to Carnegie Mellon's Synthetic Reality Project personnel, claytronics are described as "An ensemble of material that contains sufficient local computation, actuation, storage, energy, sensing, and communication" which can be programmed to form interesting dynamic shapes and configurations. Index Terms— programmable matter, nanoscale robots, catoms, atoms, electrostatically, LED, LATCH —————————— —————————— 1 INTRODUCTION magine the concept of "programmable matter" -- micro- or which are ringed by several electromagnets are able to move I nano-scale devices which can combine to form the shapes of around each other to form a variety of shapes. Containing ru- physical objects, reassembling themselves as we needed. An dimentary processors and drawing electricity from a board that ensemble of material called catoms that contains sufficient local they rest upon. So far only four catoms have been operated to- computation, actuation, storage, energy, sensing & communica- gether. The plan though is to have thousands of them moving tion which can be programmed to form interesting dynamic around each other to form whatever shape is desired and to shapes and configurations.
    [Show full text]
  • FULLTEXT01.Pdf
    Designing transparent display experience through the use of kinetic interaction A Master’s Thesis by Interaction Design Master’s Programme Rafael Rybczyński School of Arts and Communication (K3) Malmö University, Sweden August 2017 MSwedenugust 2017 Designing transparent display experience through the use of kinetic interaction Interaction Design Master’s Programme School of Arts and Communication (K3) Malmö University, Sweden August 2017 Author: Rafael Rybczyński Supervisor: Susan Kozel Examiner: Clint Heyer Thesis Project I 15 credits 2017 Acknowledgements Over the lengths of this thesis project I have received support and encouragement from a many people. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor Susan Kozel for advising me to trust my own instinct. Moreover I would like humbly to thank all the participants without whom this project would not have been possible. Also humbly I thank Alvar, Sanna, and Susanne for shelter and feedback. For proofreading my thanks goes to Jan Felix Rybczyński and Sanna Minkkinen. Finally, my deepest gratitude is reserved to my father Dr. med. Jerzy Antoni Rybczyński. Rest in peace. I would have wished for you reading this paper. Author’s notes Often during the process of doing this study I was asked why transparent displays. What’s the point? Probably I would say this goes way back to my childhood when enjoying my father reading novel stories to us as good night stories. A good example of great stories was Scheerbart’s utopian architectural vision The Gray Cloth who told about the great Swiss architect who traveled by an airship. Wherever he went, he designed buildings made from brightly colored glass, including the roof.
    [Show full text]
  • Openfog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing
    OpenFog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing Produced by the OpenFog Consortium Architecture Working Group www.OpenFogConsortium.org February 2017 1 OPFRA001.020817 © OpenFog Consortium. All rights reserved. Use of this Document Copyright © 2017 OpenFog Consortium. All rights reserved. Published in the USA. Published February 2017. This is an OpenFog Consortium document and is to be used in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. The information in this publication was developed under the OpenFog Consortium Intellectual Property Rights policy and is provided as is. OpenFog Consortium makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to the information in this publication, and specifically disclaims implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. This document contains content that is protected by copyright. Copying or distributing the content from this document without permission is prohibited. OpenFog Consortium and the OpenFog Consortium logo are registered trademarks of OpenFog Consortium in the United States and other countries. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Acknowledgements The OpenFog Reference Architecture is the product of the OpenFog Architecture Workgroup, co-chaired by Charles Byers (Cisco) and Robert Swanson (Intel). It represents the collaborative work of the global membership of the OpenFog Consortium. We wish to thank these organizations for contributing
    [Show full text]
  • Swarm Robotics Applications Using Argos and Mavproxy |
    WHITE PAPER Autonomous Swarms in Active Services Abstract Robotics has evolved across multiple industry segments, from manufacturing to advanced technology, surveillance, and disaster management. Typically, robotics-driven processes are characterized by a set of pre-defined requirements and operations, carried out by individual robots (bots), and performed at an accelerated pace. However, collective decision making by autonomous intelligent robots, leveraging the concepts of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI), is becoming increasingly important for agile operations. Technological advances have helped realize swarm operations, in which autonomous bots work in a coordinated manner to effectively execute tasks. In this paper, we propose the approach, design, and implementation of a robot swarm ecosystem that enables: n Active servicing: Collective decision making and execution to solve problems n Collaboration: Automated swarm response to priority services, without external directives n Automaticity: Leveraging blockchain for real- time processing of services being advertised as well as exchange of information WHITE PAPER Autonomous Swarms: Current Trends and Challenges The robotics landscape is rapidly evolving, with bots already being deployed for enterprise operations, commercial purposes, home automation and industrial applications. Robot swarms are being leveraged across segments including retail, travel, healthcare, manufacturing and semiconductors, for a variety of use cases. These swarms are being enabled with the autonomy to operate independently once a preset task or a passive service is assigned, leading to an evolved ecosystem of autonomous nodes or swarms. However, autonomous nodes/swarms executing passive services have two specific failure points. One is central management and the other is a non-configurable preset task. De-centralized management is a viable option, but it only scales down the risk and does not eliminate the point of failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Pairbot: a Novel Model for Autonomous Mobile Robot Systems
    Pairbot:ANOVEL MODEL FOR AUTONOMOUS MOBILE ROBOT SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF PAIRED ROBOTS APREPRINT Yonghwan Kim Yoshiaki Katayama Koichi Wada Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science Department of Applied Informatics Nagoya Institute of Technology Nagoya Institute of Technology Hosei University Aichi, Japan Aichi, Japan Tokyo, Japan [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] October 1, 2020 ABSTRACT Programmable matter consists of many self-organizing computational entities which are autonomous and cooperative with one another to achieve a goal and it has been widely studied in various fields, e.g., robotics or mobile agents, theoretically and practically. In the field of computer science, programmable matter can be theoretically modeled as a distributed system consisting of simple and small robots equipped with limited capabilities, e.g., no memory and/or no geometrical coordination. A lot of theoretical research is studied based on such theoretical models, to clarify the relation between the solvability of various problems and the considered models. We newly propose a computational model named Pairbot model where two autonomous mobile robots operate as a pair on a grid plane. In Pairbot model, every robot has the one robot as its unique partner, called buddy, each other. We call the paired two robots pairbot. Two robots in one pairbot can recognize each other, and repeatedly change their geometrical relationships, long and short, to achieve the goal. In this paper, as a first step to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed Pairbot model, we introduce two simple problems, the marching problem and the object coating problem, and propose two algorithms to solve these two problems, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Dust Technology
    250, Mini-Project Report Amy Haas Smart Dust Technology Smart dust is an emerging technology with a huge potential for becoming an internationally successful commercial venture. Now is the best time to invest in smart dust – right at the point at which the scientific community is close to perfecting the technology and its applications but its potential has not yet been realized by the capitalist market. Fundamental Concept Smart dust is a theoretical concept of a tiny wireless sensor network, made up of microelectromechanical sensors (called MEMS), robots, or devices, usually referred to as motes, that have self-contained sensing, computation, communication and power1. According to the smart dust project design created by a team of UC Berkeley researchers2, within each of these motes is an integrated package of “MEMS sensors, a semiconductor laser diode and MEMS beam-steering mirror for active optical transmission, a MEMS corner-cube retroreflector for passive optical transmission, an optical receiver, signalprocessing and control circuitry, and a power source based on thick-film batteries and solar cells.” The intent is that these motes will eventually become the size of a grain of sand or a dust particle, hence the name “smart dust”, but the technology still has a long way to go to achieve its target size. In current sensor technology, the sensors are about the size of a bottle cap or small coin. As with most electronic devices or technologies, the biggest challenges in achieving actual smart dust are the power consumption issues and making the batteries small enough. Although there is a lot of work being done on solar cells to keep the motes self-sustaining, the components are just not small enough yet to actually be considered smart dust.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Mobile Swarm Robotics in Low Power and Lossy Sensor Networks 1 Introduction
    1 Supporting Mobile Swarm Robotics in Low Power and Lossy Sensor Networks Kevin Andrea [email protected] Robert Simon [email protected] Sean Luke [email protected] Department of Computer Science George Mason University 4400 University Drive MSN 4A5 Fairfax, VA 22030 USA Summary Wireless low-power and lossy networks (LLNs) are a key enabling technology for the deployment of massively scaled self-organizing sensor swarm systems. Supporting applications such as providing human users situational awareness across large areas requires that swarm-friendly LLNs effectively support communication between embedded and mobile devices, such as autonomous robots. The reason for this is that large scale embedded sensor applications such as unattended ground sensing systems typically do not have full end-to-end connectivity, but suffer frequent communication partitions. Further, it is desirable for many tactical applications to offload tasks to mobile robots. Despite the importance of support this communication pattern, there has been relatively little work in designing and evaluating LLN-friendly protocols capable of supporting such interactions. This paper addresses the above problem by describing the design, implementation, and evaluation of the MoRoMi system. MoRoMi stands for Mobile Robotic MultI-sink. It is intended to support autonomous mobile robots that interact with embedded sensor swarms engaged in activities such as cooperative target observation, collective map building, and ant foraging. These activities benefit if the swarm can dynamically interact with embedded sensing and actuator systems that provide both local environmental or positional information and an ad-hoc communication system. Our paper quantifies the performance levels that can be expected using current swarm and LLN technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey on Terahertz Nanocommunication and Networking
    1 Survey on Terahertz Nanocommunication and Networking: A Top-Down Perspective Filip Lemic∗, Sergi Abadaly, Wouter Tavernierz, Pieter Stroobantz, Didier Collez, Eduard Alarcon´ y, Johann Marquez-Barja∗, Jeroen Famaey∗ ∗Internet Technology and Data Science Lab (IDLab), Universiteit Antwerpen - imec, Belgium yNaNoNetworking Center in Catalunya (N3Cat), Universitat Politecnica` de Catalunya, Spain zInternet Technology and Data Science Lab (IDLab), Ghent University - imec, Belgium Email: fi[email protected] Abstract—Recent developments in nanotechnology herald Communication and coordination among the nanodevices, nanometer-sized devices expected to bring light to a number of as well as between them and the macro-scale world, will groundbreaking applications. Communication with and among be required to achieve the full promise of such applications. nanodevices will be needed for unlocking the full potential of such applications. As the traditional communication approaches Thus, several alternative nanocommunication paradigms have cannot be directly applied in nanocommunication, several alter- emerged in the recent years, the most promising ones being native paradigms have emerged. Among them, electromagnetic electromagnetic, acoustic, mechanical, and molecular commu- nanocommunication in the terahertz (THz) frequency band is nication [2]. particularly promising, mainly due to the breakthrough of novel In molecular nanocommunication, a transmitting device materials such as graphene. For this reason, numerous research efforts are nowadays targeting THz band nanocommunication releases molecules into a propagation medium, with the and consequently nanonetworking. As it is expected that these molecules being used as the information carriers [3]. Acoustic trends will continue in the future, we see it beneficial to nanocommunication utilizes pressure variations in the (fluid summarize the current status in these research domains.
    [Show full text]
  • Robot Based Home Automation
    International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-8, Issue-1S4, June 2019 Robot based Home Automation L. Nikhil Manikanta, M. Pushpavalli, P. Saikumar, P. Sivagami, M. Vikram Reddy, P. Abirami Abstract--- Robot Based Home Automation, nowadays in the information for the security outside the home for potential society we cannot trust anyone compared to systems and robots. threats and smart control of things like main gates, garage By trusting robots and the internet of things is much more than and also scanning the person through facial recognition human beings. When it comes to our home, the concept is to outside the home [4]. The setup also contains the solar make it smarter, safer and automatic and with the security of a robot. This project looks on building smart wireless and robotic panels for lighting purpose in the garden at the night. There security system which sends second to second information to is a waterproof fire sensor for when the fire appears owners and that too stored in the cloud by using the internet of accidental in the home automatically it detects and sprinkler things in case of any raises an alarm. Home automation by will on and water will appear inside the home. Gas sensor making some set of sensors. Internet of things is growing more by also used in the kitchen due to detection of leakage of day by day. Internet of Things is a system that uses computers cooking gas and it gives the alarm. For old age people, the and mobile devices to control home functions through the internet from anywhere in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • A Literature Review on New Robotics: Automation from Love to War
    A literature review on new robotics : automation from love to war Citation for published version (APA): Royakkers, L. M. M., & Est, van, Q. C. (2015). A literature review on new robotics : automation from love to war. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(5), 549-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0295-x DOI: 10.1007/s12369-015-0295-x Document status and date: Published: 01/11/2015 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Modular Robots
    Introduction to modular robots Speakers Houxiang Zhang Juan González Gómez Houxiang Zhang 1 Houxiang Zhang 2 Outline of today’s talk ● What is a modular robot? ● Review of modular robots – Classification – History of modular robots – Challenging ● From Y1 to GZ -I, our modular robot – Y1 modular robot and related research – GZ-I module ● Control hardware realization ● Locomotion controlling method ● Current research Houxiang Zhang 3 Acknowledgments ● ““BioinspirationBioinspirationand Robotics: Walking and Climbing Robots” Edited by: Maki K. Habib, Publisher: I-Tech Education and Publishing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 978-3-902613-15-8. – http://s.i-techonline.com/Book/ ● Other great work and related information on the internet – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self- Reconfiguring_Modular_Robotics Houxiang Zhang 4 Lecture material ● Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot Systems: Challenges and Opportunities for the Future , by Yim, Shen, Salemi, Rus, Moll, Lipson, Klavins & Chirikjian, published in IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine March 2007. ● Self-Reconfigurable Robot: Shape-Changing Cellular Robots Can Exceed Conventional Robot Flexibility, by Murata & Kurokawa, published in IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine March 2007. ● Locomotion Princippfles of 1D Top pgyology Pitch and Pitch-Yaw-Connecting Modular Robots, by Juan Gonzalez-Gomez, Houxiang Zhang, Eduardo Boemo, One Chapter in Book of "Bioinspiration and Robotics: Walking and Climbing Robots", 2007, pp.403- 428. ● Locomotion Capabilities of a Modular Robot with Eight Pitch-Yaw-Connecting
    [Show full text]
  • Future Communication Technology: a Comparison Between Claytronics and 3-D Printing Vijay Laxmi Kalyani, Divya Bansal
    Journal of Management Engineering and Information Technology (JMEIT) Volume -3, Issue- 4, Aug. 2016, ISSN: 2394 - 8124 Impact Factor : 4.564 (2015) Website: www.jmeit.com | E-mail: [email protected]|[email protected] Future Communication Technology: A Comparison Between Claytronics And 3-D Printing Vijay Laxmi Kalyani, Divya Bansal Vijay Laxmi Kalyani, Assistant professor, Government Mahila Engineering College, Ajmer [email protected] Divya Bansal, ECE, B.Tech Third Year student, Government Mahila Engineering College, Ajmer Abstract: Man has always dreamt of changing the world around him; this led him to gradual advancement of beating drums or waving flags, etc. Human involvement is communication technology that brought into reality the necessary at every stage of communication. In modern things, which were once termed impossible. It may be communication systems, the information is first converted possible that in future-a chair can change its shape into into electrical signals and then sent electronically. We use a bed; the car could automatically change their shape, many of these systems such as telephone, TV and radio colour and size etc. The cell phone could turn into a communication, satellite communication etc. laptop, and when the work is done it will turn back into a cell phone or any other object we want it to become. The technology that allows this kind of shape shifting is called Claytronics. Claytronics is a collection of programmable matter. It is also known as catoms. These The work of the earlier scientists of 19th century and 20th catoms can work together in a vast network to build 3D century like J.C Bose, F.B.
    [Show full text]