DOCSLIB.ORG

From the Editor Chris Berg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From the Editor Chris Berg From the Editor Chris Berg n the security scare that followed September 11, it be- statements. (‘It was wrong to break the law to get people out of came something of a sport for American news organisa- slavery—that’s what you just said’) Itions to sneak prohibited items through airport screen- And The Chaser is never funnier than when they are ha- ing security. rassing humourless politicians at their press conferences. So when The Chaser— But Left politics relies on the Australian political satire It was wrong to break the law the heroic politician, blessed group—loosely disguised them- with intellect and political selves as the Canadian delega- cunning, to enact policies in tion convoy, and easily passed to get people out of slavery— the ‘national internet’ for the the security at APEC, it wasn’t betterment of ‘society’. Cyni- surprising. The media pounced that’s what you just said cism about the type of people on the incident—after all, not who choose to go in to politics much else was happening of interest at APEC. The Chaser’s and the capabilities of government action does clash with the War on Everything, when it aired the next week, achieved its ongoing hunt in the left for the political saviour. highest ratings ever. For this reason, The Chaser’s jokes may seem fairly left- The Chaser is part of a genre of satirical news programs, wing, but by undermining the sacred authority of the political which include the US’s The Daily Show and its spin-off, The class, satirical news tends to be more libertarian than socialist. Colbert Report that are gathering loyalty from the apparently A generation raised on cynicism and sarcasm are far less likely ‘disengaged’ youth demographic. to jump on the bandwagon of a charismatic leader-type. (It is conspicuous that the commentators who bemoan The IPA Review has been sceptical of governments, poli- the Australia’s ‘disengaged’ youth always assume that once ticians, regulators and other self-appointed ‘leaders’ for sixty they become engaged they will immediately become Left ac- years, and this edition is no different. tivists. But what if all those yoof got off their bed, put down Sinclair Davidson and Ken Phillips criticise the ideo- their headphones, and en masse joined the Young Liberals?) logical baggage of the union movement, in teaching and The popularity of satirical news programs with youth construction respectively. Tim Wilson treats yet another call audiences has led some on the Left to view these programs as for a government petrol price inquiry with the contempt it the saviour of democratic engagement. But satire is a double deserves. Jennifer Marohasy and Alan Ashbarry decry the cul- edged sword. It doesn’t always do what you think does. tural divide of forest politics. And in our cover story, Nicholas Some on the Left have cottoned on to the uncertain po- Eberstadt stares directly into the eyes of the anti-natalists, and tential of satirical news. One piece last year in the Boston Globe asks what they have against children. was titled ‘Why Jon Stewart Isn’t Funny’, and it argued that Wolfgang Kasper reminds us that federalism is more than the host of The Daily Show, through his relentless satire of just anachronistic ‘State’s rights’, as the Prime Minister seems Washington buffoonery, encouraged political complacency. to consider it. Instead, the principles of federalism are at the The article claimed that The Daily Show leads audiences heart of liberal government. And Richard Allsop completes to adopt a ‘holier than art thou attitude toward… national the thankless task of reading recent Prime Ministerial biog- leaders’ and undermined ‘any remaining earnestness that lib- raphies, to try to discover more important things than the erals in America might still possess’. hometown of John Howard’s grandfather. Given the dreary sanctimony of so many of those in the There is, of course, the standard array of book reviews, American Left, if this is true then Jon Stewart does a fantasti- complaints about regulation, personal digs at high-profile cally important public service. But the Boston Globe writer is environmentalists, and references to Adam Smith that have spot on. Satirical news programs display an extremely cynical made the IPA Review Australia’s leading free market review of attitude towards the political class. politics and public policy. After all, making fun of politicians is really easy, and fan- tastically rewarding. The Colbert Report and The Chaser’s War I P A on Everything are able to take advantage of the self-seriousness and cautious approach to the media that politicians harbour. Stephen Colbert, in his ‘Better Know a District’ interviews, successfully tricks junior politicians into making outlandish OCTOBER 2007 R E V I E W Volume 59 Number 3 Inside this issue Oct 2007 Editorial 28 Are there too many people? COVER STORY ‘Stabilising’ human population 2 Inside this issue and the anti-natalists 3 From the Executive Director A demographic spectre is haunting authoritative and influential circles. Nicholas Eberstadt 5 Regretting privatisation: broadband and the 2007 election 34 Australia’s hollow federalism: can we revive Telstra was barely sold a year ago, but both major parties competitive governance? appear to regret it. Chris Berg Federalism is more than states’ rights. Wolfgang Kasper 9 The NT intervention: what next? 39 From botox to Bell Bay The race is on to save Aboriginal children. Gary Johns Forest politics is rife with cultural divides. Jennifer Marohasy & Alan Ashbarry 0 People, pundits and prime ministers: what biographies reveal about Australia’s political culture 4 Burning off the petrol price myths There is more to the Prime Ministerial biography than It’s hard to imagine a retail product more closely party politics. Richard Allsop scrutinised than petrol. Tim Wilson 5 It’s all in Orwell: Eric Blair’s uncertain legacy The joining of the literary world with the actual world is BOOK REVIEWS an old trick. Andrew Kemp 45 Chris Berg reviews Hubbub: Filth, Noise and Stench in England 7 Economic freedom delivers results Economic freedom is heavily associated with prosperity, 47 Matt Brown reviews High and Dry longer life expectancy, and low poverty. Alan Moran 49 Andrew McIntyre reviews Ideas: A History from Fire to 8 A new protectionism: dashed hopes and perhaps Freud worse for US trade policy 5 John Roskam reviews The Age of Turbulence: Some would argue that US protectionism is beyond the Adventures in a New World budding stage. Daniel Ikenson 52 Richard Allsop reviews 150 Years of Spring Street: 22 Who decided that private property was subservient Victorian Government, 1850s to the 21st Century to political protest? 53 Fred Hanson reviews Adam Smith: A Primer The rule of law requires uploading the law. Alan Moran 55 Jayde Lovell reviews Greens in the Balance: 23 Australian Education Union distorting the debate Environmentalism is Hazardous to Your Health! Every student that exits the public system further highlights the failures of the AEU. Sinclair Davidson 56 Strange Times 25 The workplace and the churches Ken Phillips, with contributions from Jodie Patron and Paul Duckett Editor: Chris Berg. Associate Editor: Mary Calomiris. Executive Director: John Roskam. Printed by: Pinnacle Printing, 288 Dundas Street, Thornbury VIC 3071. Published by: The Institute of Public Affairs Ltd (Incorporated in the ACT) ACN 008 627 727. Level 2, 410 Collins Street, Melbourne Victoria 3000. Phone: (03) 9600 4744. Fax: (03) 9602 4989. E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ipa.org.au Unsolicited manuscripts welcomed. However, potential contributors are advised to discuss proposals for articles with the Editor. Views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IPA.Reproduction : The IPA welcomes reproduction of written material from the IPA Review, but for copyright reasons the Editor’s permission must first be sought. From the Executive Director John Roskam he spate of massive advertising campaigns by ily. If you didn’t care about the status of the family this wouldn’t the federal government has legitimately drawn be a problem. Indeed entire political systems have been built on Tcriticism. Kevin Rudd recently commented the basis that the state should replace the family. Plato’s Republic that that is almost impossible to turn on the television attempted to create a model of social organisation in which biologi- without being bombarded by government advertis- cal parents had no role. Conservative governments are supposed ing. What he didn’t say is that advertising by state to protect the family—and the Howard government is avowedly Labor governments is on a similar scale to that under- ‘conservative’. taken by the federal Coalition. No administration has Two recent federal government advertising campaigns— been able to resist the temptation of taxpayer-funded replete with glossy brochures—deal with issues of legitimate advertising. To stop such advertising will take an act community concern. One campaign is costing $189 million. It of will that is beyond the power of any politician. is the NetAlert—Protecting Australian Families Online program. There is another problem with government ad- The other campaign is part of the government’s $1.4 billion Tough vertising. When government takes it upon itself to do on Drugs initiative. It attempts to tell parents how to talk to their the job of parents, or it tells parents how to bring up children about illicit drugs. their children, the government undermines the fam- The ostensible reason for both campaigns is that they provide ‘information’ to parents. The difficulty is that in providing ‘infor- mation’ the government invariably makes value judgements about matters that are best left to the discretion of parents.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Politiker, Parteivorsitzender Communist Party of Australia Biographie 1955-1956 Ein Australisches Studienteam Unter Laurence Aarons Reist in China
    Report Title - p. 1 of 104 Report Title Aarons, Laurence = Aarons, Laurie (Sydney 1917-2005 Sydney) : Politiker, Parteivorsitzender Communist Party of Australia Biographie 1955-1956 Ein australisches Studienteam unter Laurence Aarons reist in China. [StraL2:S. 201] 1958 Laurence Aarons besucht Beijing. [StraL2:S. 227] Albinski, Henry = Albinski, Henry Stephen (1931-2003 Sydney) : Professor University of Sydney, University of Melbourne, Curtin University Bibliographie : Autor Albinski, Henry S. Australian policies and attitudes towards China. (Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1965). [WC] Allgrove, John (um 1966) : Australischer Diplomat Biographie 1966 John Allgrove ist australischer Handelskommissar in Hong Kong. [ChiAus3] Alston, Richard = Alston, Richard Kenneth Robert (Perth 1941-) : Politiker, Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Biographie 2000 Sun Jiazheng besucht Canberra und trifft Richard Alston. [Tho2] 2000 Richard Alston besucht Shanghai um über ein online Handels-System zu diskutieren, Xi’an und Beijing. Er trifft Wu Bangguo in Beijing. [Tho2] 2000 Eine chinesische kulturelle Regierungs-Delegation unter Sun Jiazheng besucht Australien. Er trifft Richard Alston, Peter McGauran und Zhou Wenchong. [ChiAus] Ambrose, David (um 1988) : Australischer Diplomat Biographie 1985-1988 David Ambrose ist Botschafter der australischen Botschaft in Beijing. [Int] 1997-2000 David Ambrose ist Generalkonsul des australischen Generalkonsulats in Shanghai. [ChiAus4] Anderson, John Duncan = Anderson, John (Sydney
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Discrimination Legislation in Australia
    Parliament of Australia Parliamentary Research Service Background Paper Sex Discrimination Legislation in Australia Consie Larmour Education and Welfare Research Group 3 October 1990 This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Members of the Australian Parliament. The views expressed in the paper do not necessarily reflect those ofthe Research SeNice or of any part of the Parliament. The content of the paper may be attributed to the author. ISSN 1034-8107 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 1990 , Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the COPyriq" transmitted in any form or by any means including information of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by M~ duties. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 199( It Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or storage and retrieval system, without the prior written consent ,mbefs 01 the Australian Parliament In the course of their official (' This paper updates Current Issues Brief No 9 of 1983, Basic Paper No 3 of 1985 and Basic Paper No 9 of 1986-87. Johanna Sutherland, then of the Law and Government Group, Catherine Wildermuth, then of the Education and Welfare Group and Sue Bromley then Principal Legal Officer, Human Rights Branch, Attorney-General's Department, read the 1987 paper and provided valuable comments. This updated paper has been read and commented on by Dy Spooner, Dennis Argall, Ian Ireland, and Geoff Winter. My thanks for this assistance and that provided by Carole Wiggan, Cathy Madden, Paula O'Brien and David Anderson. Special thanks to Kate Matthews. Note on style Only where an Act is referred to in the text by its full title and date, is it italicised.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Inquiry Into Services and Treatment Options for Persons with Cancer by the Community Affairs Committee, the Senate, Parliament of Australia
    Submission to the Inquiry into services and treatment options for persons with cancer by the Community Affairs Committee, The Senate, Parliament of Australia March 2005 Dennis Argall founder (in 2000) and ‘facilitator’ of the Australian Internet Brain Tumour Support Group http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/OzBrainTumour/ OzBrainTumour is not an organisation with a view on anything but an open group where people (over 200 hundred subscribed at any time these days) share information and provide mutual support, strength and empowerment. This is not a submission on behalf of any group, but an individual submission informed by what I have learned, with others, along this road. In memory of Margaret Gray 1949-2001 Dennis Argall [email protected] www.aplaceof.info 349 Hawken Rd TOMERONG NSW 2540 02 4443 4499 The author is a former ambassador to China, former head of the research group in the Parliamentary Library, has personally experienced long term illness (not cancer) and recently was a member of a steering group to establish a ‘world’s best’ cancer support web site at Northern Sydney Health. Dennis Argall’s submission to Senator Cook’s Cancer Inquiry 1 RECOMMENDATIONS 1 That it be recognised that case management based on support for the whole person is essential. 2 That, in particular, the opening discussions with patients with cancer diagnosis focus on that whole perspective, not just the perspective of the first line professional. 3 That case management be focused on supporting the strengths of the person with the diagnosis and granting control and support for patients and carers who wish to have degrees of responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • The China Narrative, Part One: War-Machine Propaganda Republished from Australian Alert Service, 12 August 2020
    Australian Citizens Party Postal address: PO Box 376 Coburg VIC 3058 | Phone: 03 9354 0544 Website: http://citizensparty.org.au | Email: [email protected] Authorised by R. Barwick, 595 Sydney Rd Coburg VIC 3058. Printed by Citizens Media Group Pty Ltd, 595 Sydney Rd Coburg VIC The China Narrative, Part One: War-machine propaganda Republished from Australian Alert Service, 12 August 2020. By Melissa Harrison occupation with “sovereignty”— Clive Hamilton’s books exposing China “interference”, used as an imperialist buzzword Silent Invasion and Hidden Hand, are important, not be- justifying anti-China protection- cause of the quality of the content—paranoid propagan- ism—and Hamilton’s embrace da—but because the influencers behind Hamilton’s cru- of a US-centric foreign and stra- sade reveal his role as a cog in a vast narrative-management tegic policy perspective. He machine. The public, as well as MPs and other government warns of “Beijing’s plan to shift officials, are being directed how to think about China by a Australia away from the US al- small group of ideologically driven propagandists, funded liance…. A military standoff or by institutions of the section of the Anglo-American power engagement between the Unit- establishment that seeks war without end, even risking nu- ed States and China is quite pos- clear warfare that would annihilate mankind. sible in the foreseeable future. It Clive Hamilton is a Professor of Public Ethics at Charles may be the only way to stop Chi- Sturt University. His first book on China, Silent Invasion na annexing and controlling the entire South China Sea.… (2018), continued the obsession with Chinese spies, dissi- In these circumstances Australia would be under an obli- dents and foreign interference that had been escalating in gation to back the United States.” A year later, US Secretary Australia through 2016-17.
    [Show full text]
  • The China Narrative, Part One: War-Machine Propaganda
    The China narrative, part one: War-machine propaganda Clive Hamilton’s books exposing China “interference”, Silent Invasion and Hidden Hand, are important, not because of the quality of the content—paranoid propaganda—but because the influencers behind Hamilton’s crusade reveal his role as a cog in a vast narrative-management machine. The public, as well as MPs and other government officials, are being directed how to think about China by a small group of ideologically driven propagandists, funded by institutions of the section of the Anglo-American power establishment that seeks war without end, even risking nuclear warfare that would annihilate mankind. (Part one of a series. Read part two here; part three here; part four; and part five.) Clive Hamilton is a Professor of Public Ethics at Charles Sturt University. His first book on China, Silent Invasion (2018), continued the obsession with Chinese spies, dissidents and foreign interference that had been escalating in Australia through 2016-17. Hamilton alleges growing, sinister influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in Australian society, his case built with anecdotes from student newsletters and hawkish journalism. Hamilton sees espionage and influence everywhere: the Chinese diaspora can “transform Australian society in a way that makes us all sympathetic to China and easy for Beijing to control. Australia will then assist China to become the hegemonic power in Asia and eventually the world.” Hamilton’s CCP “spies” include church parishioners and uni students. His argument concludes with his assertion that between 20- 40 per cent of Chinese-Australians are loyal to Beijing first. How does he arrive at this figure? From the “guesses” of some of his Chinese- Australian friends.
    [Show full text]
  • John Haton: Shoalhaven Vision P3 | Lake Wollumboola P3 | Bomaderry Creek P7
    Late Summer 2008 | Edition #99 | Circulation 4000 copies John Haton: Shoalhaven Vision p3 | Lake Wollumboola p3 | Bomaderry Creek p7 We have had sufficient audacity of faith to advance a pathway to that future, page together: indigenous and local fishermen and there were with arms extended rather than with fists still clenched. So let us seize the non-indigenous Australians, such mutterings and complaints government and opposition, about that that our people were day. Let it not become a moment of mere sentimental reflection. Prime Commonwealth and state, and brought out to Wreck Bay, and Minister Kevin Rudd 13 February 2008 write this new chapter in our a school was established there. nation’s story together. “ We wait [Note again the first imposed to see how indigenous people priority: “Let us resolve today to are to be represented, to have begin with the little children.”] elected representatives. Locally, It was a government policy we need to be sensitive to what to move the Aboriginal fami- Aboriginal people want. Even a lies.” (Jean Carter “A Big Dose very materially generous white of Social Justice.” Steppin’ Out NEXT… man, late at night – indeed last and Speakin’ Up, Older Women’s night, as I write this – can say: Network, 2003, p 57.) Dennis Argall justifies cruelty towards those language), to learn our world “What our [Koori] friends have Sorry about losing your not like us.” view as so contrary to their own to learn is...” Sorry mate, no, home brother... Sorry not REACHED across the table • Hard for all decent people deeply-rooted sense of country, start again please.
    [Show full text]
  • Absenteeism and the Australian Public Service
    , Parliament of Australia Research Service Background Paper Absenteeism and the Australian Public Service Constance Larmour Director Education and Welfare Research Group 19 April 1990 This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Members of the Australian Parliament. The views expressed in the paper do not necessarily reflect those of the Research Service or of any part of the Parliament. • The content of the paper may be attributed to the aiithor. .' ISSN 1034-8107 © Commonwealth oi Australia 1990 Except to the extent ot the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmittea in any form or by any means, inclUding inlormalion storage and retrieval system, Without the prior written consent ot the Department of the Parliamentary library. Reproduction is permined by Members of the Parliament ot the Commonwealth in the course ot their official duties. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary library, February 1990. This paper was undertaken as an Executive Development Scheme project with the co-operation and backing of the Department of Finance and the Department of the Parliamentary Library. My thanks to Sue Fergusson, Nick Mersiades, Tim Burke, Gary Hodgson, Julie Pettit, Jamie Pryor, Chris McLennnan and Fiona Duncanson of the Department of Finance; Geoff Winter, Dom Garreffa, Mark Peters, Carole Wiggan, Carol Kempner, Jane Chapman, Diane Hynes, Sandra Bailey, Linda Calis, Paula O'Brien, Mary Lindsay, Bob Stewart and Dennis Argall of the Parliamentary Library; Helen Bladen and Greg Bunnett of the Public Service Commission; Grant Doxey and Dave Roberts of the Department of Industrial Relations; Jordan Serena and Personnel Officers of the Personnel Practices Contact Group, and Mark Wooden of the National Institute of Labour Studies.
    [Show full text]