15 Quintin Street PO Box 924 Roma QLD 4455 Ph. 07 4622 2646 Fax 07 4622 1325 [email protected] ABN: 94 617 952 309
Ecological Consulting www.boobook.biz
Ecological Assessment Report Sustain Phase 2018
14WV549, 15WV549, 77WV754, 78WV755, 67WV618, 68WV618, 69WV618, 73WV619, 70WV631 and 71WV1546
Compiled by BOOBOOK for Origin
Document No. Q-4200-15-RP-1253
Revision Date Description Author Verifier Approved
A 3/6/2015 Draft issued for client review R. Johnson, R. Shojinaga R. Aisthorpe C. Eddie 0 11/8/2015 Final version to client R. Shojinaga C. Eddie C. Eddie
Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...... 1 1.1. Scope of Works ...... 1 1.2. Definitions & Abbreviations ...... 1 1.2.1. Definitions ...... 1 1.2.2. Abbreviations ...... 1 1.2.1. Document References ...... 2 2. Site Context ...... 4 3. Methodology ...... 4 3.1. Desktop & Literature Review ...... 4 3.2. Field Survey ...... 5 3.2.1. Vegetation Community Survey ...... 5 3.2.2. Habitat Survey ...... 6 3.2.3. Threatened Flora & Fauna Survey...... 6 3.2.4. Pest Flora and Fauna Survey ...... 6 3.2.5. Disturbance Survey ...... 7 3.2.6. Watercourse/Wetland Survey ...... 7 3.2.7. Survey Limitations ...... 7 4. Results & Discussion ...... 7 4.1. Desktop & Literature Review ...... 7 4.2. Field Survey ...... 7 4.2.1. Commonwealth Environmental Matters ...... 7 4.2.1.1. Ground-truthed Threatened Ecological Communities ...... 8 4.2.1.2. Threatened Flora ...... 9 4.2.1.3. Threatened Fauna ...... 10 4.2.1.4. Migratory Fauna ...... 12 4.2.1.5. Marine Fauna ...... 13 4.2.2. Queensland Environmental Matters ...... 14 4.2.2.1. Ground-truthed Regional Ecosystems ...... 15 4.2.2.2. Threatened Flora ...... 20 4.2.2.3. Threatened Fauna ...... 21 4.2.2.4. Pest Fauna ...... 23 4.2.3. Disturbances ...... 23 4.2.4. Watercourses and Wetlands ...... 23 4.2.5. Conclusions ...... 26 Appendix A. Site Location and Survey Points...... 27 Appendix B. Results of EPBC Protected Matters Search Tool ...... 29 Appendix C. Wildlife Online Database Search Results...... 39 Appendix D. EHP Mapped Regional Ecosystems...... 44 Appendix E. EHP Mapping of ESAs and Other Environmental Values on Site...... 46
Rev 0 i Appendix F. List of Fauna and Native Flora Species Identified on Site...... 48 Appendix G. Ground Truthed TEC at the Site ...... 53 Appendix H. Ground Truthed Regional Ecosystems...... 55 Appendix I. Special Least Concern Flora and Fauna Recorded at the Site ...... 57 Appendix J. Pest Fauna Recorded at the Site...... 59 Appendix K. Ground Truthed Drainage Features and Watercourses Present on Site...... 61
List of Tables Table 1: Definitions ...... 1 Table 2: Abbreviations ...... 1 Table 3: Associated Document References...... 2 Table 4: Site Context ...... 4 Table 5: Desktop and Literature Review Sources ...... 4 Table 6: Commonwealth Environmental Matters – Field Survey Results ...... 8 Table 7: Field survey results for EPBC Act threatened flora with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence. 9 Table 8: Field survey results for EPBC Act threatened fauna with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence...... 10 Table 9: Field survey results for EPBC Act migratory fauna with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence...... 12 Table 10: Field survey results for EPBC Act marine fauna with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence. . 13 Table 11: State environmental matters – field survey results ...... 14 Table 12: Ground-truthed remnant and regrowth regional ecosystems ...... 16 Table 13: Field survey results for NC Act EVNT flora with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence...... 20 Table 14: Field survey results for NC Act EVNT fauna with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence...... 21 Table 15: Pest Fauna Recorded at the Site ...... 23 Table 16: Ground-truthed drainage features ...... 24 Table 17: Ground-truthed wetlands at the Site ...... 25
Conclusions drawn in this report are based on available information at the time of writing. Any additional information may alter such conclusions and the author reserves the right to do so if such information becomes available. This report has been made as at the date of the report and is not to be used after six (6) months and not if there are any material changes meanwhile. In either event it should be referred back for review. To the extent permitted by law BOOBOOK does not accept liability for any loss or damage which any person may suffer arising from any negligence or breach of contract on its part. This report was prepared for the benefit of the party to whom it is directed only and for the purpose identified within. BOOBOOK does not accept responsibility to any other person for the contents of the report.
Rev 0 ii Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others 1. Introduction
This report provides a description of the ecological values found within lot/plans 14WV549, 15WV549, 77WV754, 78WV755, 67WV618, 68WV618, 69WV618, 73WV619, 70WV631 and 71WV1546, herein referred to as ‘the Site’. The results are based on an initial desktop assessment followed by a field survey to confirm the vegetation communities, flora and fauna species, habitat values and areas of disturbance. This report has been compiled by BOOBOOK Ecological Consulting. The field surveys were conducted by Rose Aisthorpe, (BOOBOOK, Botanist) and Richard Johnson (BOOBOOK, Senior Ecologist). Rose Aisthorpe was approved to undertake ecological surveys by Commonwealth Department of Environment (formerly the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities) in writing on 11th of May 2011. BOOBOOK also received company approval by DOE on the 28th of June 2011. 1.1. Scope of Works
An ecological assessment survey was required for lot/plans 14WV549, 15WV549, 77WV754, 78WV755, 67WV618, 68WV618, 69WV618, 73WV619, 70WV631 and 71WV1546, located approximately 60 km west-southwest of Wandoan. The survey was conducted over the entirety of the properties as well as immediately adjacent road reserves, with the exception of 600 m radius exclusion zones around two homesteads. The site location and survey points are shown in Appendix A. 1.2. Definitions & Abbreviations
1.2.1. Definitions
Table 1: Definitions
Term Definition A proprietary product of Motion Computing®: it comprises a tablet PC with in-built GPS positioning capacity, Motion allowing capture of spatial and other data in the field. Lot/plans 14WV549, 15WV549, 77WV754, 78WV755, 67WV618, 68WV618, 69WV618, 73WV619, 70WV631 and Site 71WV1546 and adjacent road reserves but excluding two 600m radius exclusion zones. The likelihood of occurrence of flora and/or fauna of conservation concern at the Site, as used in Origin/Australia Likelihood of Pacific LNG spatial data attribute tables: Possible: <50% likelihood; Probable: 50-90% likelihood; Likely: >90% Occurrence likelihood. The category “Unlikely” is not used in the spatial attribute tables. It is used here to define probabilities of occurrence that are at or approaching zero.
1.2.2. Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are found throughout this report. Table 2: Abbreviations
Abbreviation Description
ALA Atlas of Living Australia BOM Bureau of Meteorology BRI Queensland Herbarium, Brisbane DEHP Department of Environment and Heritage Protection DOE Department of the Environment e.g. For example EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ESA Environmentally Sensitive Area EVNT Endangered, Vulnerable or Near Threatened ha hectare(s) km kilometre(s) LP Act Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002 Rev 0 1 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Abbreviation Description
m Metre (s) MNES Matters of National Environmental Significance NC Act Nature Conservation Act 1992 NC Reg Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 PMST Protected Matters Search Tool RE (s) Regional Ecosystem(s) REDD Regional Ecosystem Description Database SLC Special Least Concern TEC (s) Threatened Ecological Community (ies) VM Act Vegetation Management Act 1999
1.2.1. Document References
The following documents are referred to throughout this report. Table 3: Associated Document References
Document Number Title ALA (2015). Atlas of Living Australia. http://www.ala.org.au/ AVH (2015). Australia’s Virtual Herbarium. http://chah.gov.au/avh/ Barrett, G., Silcocks, A., Barry, S., Cunningham, R. and Poulter, R. (2003). The New Atlas of Australian Birds. Birds
Australia, Melbourne Birdlife Australia (2015). Birdata. Birdlife Australia, Melbourne. http://www.birdata.com.au/homecontent.do Bean, A.R. (2004). The taxonomy and ecology of Solanum subg. Leptostemonum (Dunal) Bitter (Solanaceae) in
Queensland and far north-eastern New South Wales, Australia. Austrobaileya 6(4): 734-736 BoM (2015a). Bureau of Meteorology - Climate statistics for Australian Locations. Australian Government,
Canberra. Accessed 29/04/2015. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_043091.shtml BoM (2015b).Bureau of Meteorology March 2015 Daily Weather Observations – Roma. Accessed 29/04/2015.
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/dwo/IDCJDW4104.latest.shtml Burnett, S. (2012). Northern Quoll. In: Curtis, L.K. and Dennis, A.J. (eds) Queensland’s Threatened Animals. CSIRO
Publishing, Melbourne. Pp. 340-341. Common, I. and Waterhouse, D. (1981). Butterflies of Australia. Revised edition. Angus and Robertson, Sydney. DEHP (2015a) Wildlife Online. Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Brisbane. Accessed
15/04/2015 http://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/wildlife/wildlife-online/ DEHP (2015b) Map of Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Brisbane. Accessed 15/04/2015 http://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/licences-permits/maps_of_environmentally_sensitive_areas.php DEHP (2015c) Map of Referable Wetlands. Department of Environment and Resource Management, Brisbane.
Accessed 15/04/2015 http://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/ecosystems/wetlands/referable-wetlands-maps.html DEHP (2015d) Protected Plants Flora Survey Trigger Map. Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Brisbane. Accessed 15/04/2015 https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/licences-permits/plants-animals/protected- plants/map-request.php DEHP (2015e) Regional Ecosystem Description Database (REDD). https://environment.ehp.qld.gov.au/regional-
ecosystems/ Dennis, A. (2012). Northern Quoll. In: Curtis, L.K. and Dennis, A.J. (eds) Queensland’s Threatened Animals. CSIRO
Publishing, Melbourne. Pp. 374-375. DNRM (2015) Regional Ecosystem and Remnant Map—version 8.1 for the purpose of the Vegetation Management Act 1999. The Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane. Accessed 29/04/2015 http://www.dnrm.qld.gov.au/land/vegetation-management/vegetation-maps/vegetation-map-request DEHP (2012) Mature Regrowth Mapping. The Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Queensland
Government, Brisbane. DoE (2015a) Protected Matters Search Tool. Department of the Environment. Canberra. Accessed 15/04/2015
http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/pmst/index.html DoE (2015b) Species Profile and Threats Database (EPBC Act List of Threatened Ecological Communities).
Department of the Environment, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl DoE (2015c) Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Department of Environment, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/what-is-protected/threatened-species-ecological-communities
Rev 0 2 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Document Number Title DSITIA (2014). HERBRECS Queensland Herbarium specimen database. Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Queensland Government, Brisbane. http://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/plants/herbarium/ Eddie, C. (2012). Yakka Skink. In: Curtis, L.K. and Dennis, A.J. (eds) Queensland’s Threatened Animals. CSIRO
Publishing, Melbourne. Pp. 224-225. Garnett, S.J., Szabo, J.K. and Dutson, G. (2011).The Action Plan for Australian Birds 2010. CSIRO Publishing,
Melbourne Higgins, P.J. and Davies, S.J.J.F. (1996). Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Volume 3:
Snipe to Pigeons. Oxford University Press, Melbourne Higgins, P.J., Peter, J.M. and Steele, W.K. (eds) (2001). Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds.
Volume 5: Tyrant-flycatchers to Chats. Oxford University Press, Melbourne Hobson, R. (2012a). Dunmall’s Snake. In: Curtis, L.K. and Dennis, A.J. (eds) Queensland’s Threatened Animals.
CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. Pp. 243-244 Hobson, R. (2012b). Grey Snake. In: Curtis, L.K. and Dennis, A.J. (eds) Queensland’s Threatened Animals. CSIRO
Publishing, Melbourne. Pp. 245-246 Holmes, T. (2012). Glossy Black-Cockatoo. In: Curtis, L.K. and Dennis, A.J. (Eds) Queensland’s Threatened Animals.
CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. Pp. 282-283 Limpus, C., Limpus, D., Parmenter, J., Hodge, J., Forest, M. and McLachlan, J. (2011). The Biology and Management Strategies for Freshwater Turtles in the Fitzroy Catchment, with particular emphasis on Elseya albagula and Rheodytes leukops: A study initiated in response to the proposed construction of Rookwood Weir and the raising of Eden Bann Weir. Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management, Brisbane Marchant, S. and Higgins, P.J. (1993). Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Volume 2:
Raptors to Lapwings. Oxford University Press, Melbourne Milligan, F. N., Exon, N. F., Burger, D., Casey, D. J. (1967). Australia Geological Mapping, Roma Map sheet SG55- 12 1:250,000 Geological series. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Department of National Development, Canberra. Neldner, V.J., Wilson, B. A., Thompson, E.J. and Dillewaard, H.A. (2012). Methodology for Survey and Mapping of Regional Ecosystems and Vegetation Communities in Queensland. Version 3.2.Updated August 2012. Queensland Herbarium, Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane. Peck, S. (2012). Collared Delma. In: Curtis, L.K. and Dennis, A.J. (Eds) Queensland’s Threatened Animals. CSIRO
Publishing, Melbourne. Pp. 218-219 Pizzey, G. and Knight, F. (2010). The Field Guide to the Birds of Australia. Eighth edition. Harper Collins,
Melbourne. QMDC (2008). Reptiles of the Brigalow Belt: an information kit. WWF-Australia and Queensland Murray Darling
Committee Queensland Parliamentary Counsel (1999) Vegetation Management Act. Queensland Government, Brisbane.
http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/V/VegetManA99.pdf Queensland Parliamentary Counsel (2002) Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act, Queensland
Government, Brisbane. http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/legisltn/current/l/landprpsrma02.pdf Queensland Parliamentary Counsel, (2000) Water Act. Queensland Government, Brisbane.
http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/legisltn/current/w/watera00.pdf Queensland Parliamentary Counsel, (2006) Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation. Queensland Government,
Brisbane. http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/N/NatureConWiR06.pdf Reis, T. (2012). Squatter Pigeon. In: Curtis, L.K. and Dennis, A.J. (Eds) Queensland’s Threatened Animals. CSIRO
Publishing, Melbourne. Pp. 254-255 Santos (2012). Field Guide to Trees and Shrubs of Eastern Queensland Oil and Gas Fields. Second Edition. Santos,
Adelaide Sattler, P. and Williams, R. (eds) (1999). The Conservation Status of Queensland’s Bioregional Ecosystems.
Environmental Protection Agency, Queensland Government, Brisbane. TSSC (2008a). Approved Conservation Advice for Cadellia pentastylis. [Online]. Threatened Species Scientific Committee, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/9828- conservation-advice.pdf TSSC (2008b). Approved Conservation Advice for Tylophora linearis. [Online]. Threatened Species Scientific Committee, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/55231- conservation-advice.pdf TSSC (2008c). Approved Conservation Advice for Homopholis belsonii. [Online]. Threatened Species Scientific Committee, Canberra. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/species/pubs/2406- conservation-advice.pdf TSSC (2013). Commonwealth Conservation Advice for Brigalow Ecological Community.
http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/communities/pubs/028-conservation-advice.pdf Valentine, P. and Johnson, S. (2012). Pale Imperial Hairstreak Butterfly. In: Curtis, L.K. and Dennis, A.J. (eds)
Queensland’s Threatened Animals. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. Pp. 34-35 Watson, D. (2012). Painted Honeyeater. In: Curtis, L.K. and Dennis, A.J. (eds) Queensland’s Threatened Animals.
CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. Pp. 322-323 Rev 0 3 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Document Number Title Wilson, S. (2005). A Field Guide to Reptiles of Queensland. Reed New Holland, Sydney Q-LNG01-15-MP-0109 Australian Pacific LNG (2011) Environmental Constraints Planning and Field Development Protocol.
2. Site Context
Table 4: Site Context
The Site is entirely within Subregion 26 (Southern Downs) of the Brigalow Belt bioregion. This subregion is characterized by low, hilly landscape with Jurassic and Cretaceous sediments or clay plains (Sattler and Williams 1999). Typically present in this region are forests of Belah (Casuarina cristata) and Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla) with Poplar Bioregion Box (Eucalyptus populnea) and Narrow-leaved Ironbark (E. crebra) communities also present. Spotted Gum (Corymbia citriodora), Dusky-leaved Ironbark (E. fibrosa subsp. nubila), vine thicket, Astrebla and Acacia communities are also present but less extensive. Previous land use of the Site has been agricultural (grazing of domestic livestock and cropping). This use has involved extensive vegetation modification. Much of the Site no longer supports the original open forest or woodland vegetation and remnant RE is uncommon in that which remains. Some relatively large areas of intact vegetation are Current land use still present in the south and the west of the Site. Pastoral development has included pasture improvement using non- native grasses such as Buffel Grass (Cenchrus ciliaris). Disturbances other than grazing include access tracks and farm infrastructure. A sealed road (Cattle Creek Road) crosses the northern part of the Site. The Roma 1: 250,000 series SG 55-12 map (Milligan et al. 1967) indicates that four geological units are exposed at the Site. The lithic sandstones, siltstones and mudstones of the Orallo Formation (Juo) to the north, and in the south the Mooga Sandstone (Klm), form topography of undulating plains with low hills. In the south and west the overlying sandstones of the Bungil Formation (Klk, Kli) form hills, ridges and scarps with residual lateritic surfaces. Yuleba Creek, Soils and geology with its associated deep sandy alluvium, crosses the Site. Soils at the Site are clay loam, sandy loam (deep sands and sandy-surfaced duplex soils) and sandy alluvium. Land zones as defined within Sattler and Williams (1999) occurring at the Site include land zones 3 (Quaternary alluvial systems); 7 (Cainozoic duricrusts); 9 (Cainozoic fine-grained sediment deposits); and 10 (Cainozoic coarse-grained sediment deposits). The nearest Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) weather station to the Site is at Roma, about 65 km southwest of the Site. Yearly average temperatures at Roma range from a mean maximum of 34.2°C in January to a mean minimum of 3.7°C Climate in July (BOM 2015a). Average annual rainfall is 582.4 mm, with the highest monthly average rainfall occurring in February (87.1 mm) and the lowest occurring in July (22.7 mm) (BOM 2015a). At the time of the field survey conditions were fine and warm (daily temperature maxima from 21.0°C to 26.2°C (BOM 2015b)).
3. Methodology
The methodology employed in compilation of this Ecological Assessment Report consisted of: A desktop and literature review of ecological databases and literature sources as direct references for the survey undertaken; and A field survey of the Site. An explanation of these activities is outlined in this section. 3.1. Desktop & Literature Review
Sources utilised in the desktop and literature review are listed in Table 5 below. Table 5: Desktop and Literature Review Sources
Database Co-ordinates or search area Date of search Appendix
DoE (2015a) Environmental Protection Biodiversity and Lat -26.3318°S, Long 149.3671°E 15/04/2015 Appendix B Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) Protected Matters Search Tool with 10 km buffer (PMST) Lat -26.3318°S, Long 149.3671°E DEHP (2015a) Nature Conservation Act 1992 (NC Act) Protected 15/04/2015 Appendix C Species Lists Wildlife Online Database with 10 km buffer
Rev 0 4 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Database Co-ordinates or search area Date of search Appendix Lot/Plans 14WV549, 15WV549, 77WV754, 78WV755, 67WV618, Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM 2015) 15/04/2015 Appendix D Regional Ecosystem and Remnant Map—version 8.1 68WV618, 69WV618, 73WV619, 70WV631 and 71WV1546
Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (DEHP 2015b Lat -26.3318°S, Long 149.3671°E 15/04/2015 Appendix E ) Map of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) Lot/Plans 14WV549, 15WV549, 77WV754, 78WV755, 67WV618, DEHP (2015c) Map of Referable Wetlands and Wetland Protection 15/04/2015 N/A Areas 68WV618, 69WV618, 73WV619, 70WV631 and 71WV1546 DEHP (2015d) Protected Plants Flora Survey Trigger Map Lat -26.3318°S, Long 149.3671°E 15/04/2015 N/A
Australia Geological Mapping, Roma Map SHEET SG55-12 N/A 29/04/2015 N/A 1:250,000 Geological series (Milligan et al.1971).
3.2. Field Survey
Ecological surveys were conducted in accordance with: The Methodology for Survey and Mapping of Regional Ecosystems and Vegetation Communities in Queensland (Neldner et al. 2012); and In line with the methodology described in the Environmental Constraints Planning and Field Development Protocol (Q-LNG01-15-MP-0109, Australia Pacific LNG 2011). Field surveys were undertaken between the 15th and 19th May 2015. 3.2.1. Vegetation Community Survey
Baseline botanical surveys were undertaken to describe dominant flora and vegetation community structure throughout the survey site. Ground-truthing of the DNRM Regional Ecosystem (RE) designation (DNRM 2015) at and surrounding the Site was undertaken via the quaternary level of data collection as described in Neldner et al. (2012) and random meander assessments. The vegetation community surveys were undertaken within 50 m x 50 m or 50 m x 10 m plots for the purpose of typifying the vegetation community under assessment. Vegetation community data was entered into the data fields provided by the Motion Tablet data capture system. Vegetation community assessments were undertaken at representative plots within all identified REs and regrowth within the Site. The locations of the vegetation community survey sites are presented in Appendix A. Relative abundance data was collected for each stratum within the community as per the methodology described in the Environmental Constraints Planning and Field Development Protocol (Q-LNG01-15-MP-0109 Australia Pacific LNG (2011)), as presented by the vegetation structure point data sheet of the Motion unit. Representative photo(s) were taken of the subject vegetation community via a Canon digital camera. Photo aspect data was recorded. Vegetation community polygons were verified in accordance with Queensland RE description and biodiversity status (DNRM 2015) and EPBC Threatened Ecological Community (TEC) criteria (DoE 2015). RE polygons were assigned to remnant or non-remnant status as defined by the Vegetation Management Act 1999. Remnant vegetation was that which had achieved a canopy layer covering more than 50% of that of the undisturbed canopy and a height more than 70% of the undisturbed height of the vegetation. Reference benchmarks for these criteria were obtained from published data (DEHP 2015e, DSITIA 2014). Threshold minimum patch sizes used to map RE polygons were generally as per the minimum size limits (for inland areas) of 5 ha and 75 m for linear features (Neldner et al. 2012); however, in some cases where the RE type could be recognised within fragments of vegetation smaller than these limits they have been mapped as remnant RE where practical. Areas of vegetation that have previously been cleared or disturbed (e.g. by wildfire) and contained well advanced woody vegetation floristically and structurally consistent with the RE but typically <70% of the height and <50%
Rev 0 5 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others density of the RE were mapped as mature regrowth for the purposes of this report. Other regrowth which lacks structural and floristic components (i.e. immature regrowth) is mapped as non-remnant vegetation. Though Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla dominant and co-dominant) TEC condition criteria with respect to age, patch size and exotic perennial plant cover are available and applicable to both mature (remnant) and regrowth vegetation (DoE 2015) some ambiguity is present in defining the presence of structural elements typical of the community. DoE states (TSSC 2013) that Brigalow regrowth is part of the Brigalow TEC only if it retains the species composition and structural elements typical of that found in undisturbed areas of the TEC and that areas that have been cleared within the past 15 years will not have regained the structure and species composition typical of remnant Brigalow and, therefore, will not qualify as TEC. BOOBOOK has undertaken discussions with DoE (P. Barraclough, DoE, pers. comm.) to attempt to resolve the definition of structural elements. Matters requiring clarification are whether vegetation must possess structural differentiation (e.g. canopy and lower tree/tall shrub layers), whether the presence of species capable of forming structural layers is sufficient, and whether threshold values for these elements and/or species can be established. At this time no advice has been received from DoE. For the purposes of this report a conservative approach to definition of TEC has been taken in that Brigalow regrowth is considered TEC only if evidence of development of structural features typical of the intact vegetation community are present (providing it also meets all other condition criteria) such as patch size (>0.5 ha) and ground layer condition (>50% native perennial species cover in ground layer). 3.2.2. Habitat Survey
Habitat surveys were generally undertaken in conjunction with vegetation community survey within the 50 m x 10 m quadrant (Appendix A). Within each habitat survey plot, a range of habitat features (such as abundance or density of logs, rocks/stones, loose bark, leaflitter, gilgai and tree hollows) were recorded on the relevant Motion data sheet. Where deemed appropriate, representative photo(s) were taken of the given habitat patch using a Canon digital camera. Photo aspect data is entered into the relevant data sheet. 3.2.3. Threatened Flora & Fauna Survey
Threat-listed species are those listed under the EPBC Act 1999 and the Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006. For the purposes of this report, this includes EPBC Act-listed Migratory and Marine fauna, and NC Act-listed Special Least Concern flora and fauna. Targeted threat-listed flora searches were undertaken for species highlighted by the database and literature review. Searches were undertaken based on incidental field observations of high quality habitat, the identification of distinct ecological features through the preliminary desktop and literature review, or within the vicinity of a vegetation community survey/habitat feature plots where field ecologists deemed the given area to be of sufficient potential value to a threatened species to warrant such a search. A representative selection of each SLC flora species detected was recorded; however, additional specimens of SLC plants may occur at the Site. Fauna species were recorded opportunistically at survey sites and in other parts of the Site that were traversed. No systematic fauna surveys were undertaken. Active searches were undertaken for fauna where time permitted. This included overturning rocks, logs, fallen bark and other ground debris, raking leaf litter, peeling loose bark on trees/stumps, checking burrows and crevices with torches, looking for animal traces (scats, sloughs, shells, scratches, diggings and burrows) and scanning logs for basking reptiles. Any observations of threatened or other significant species (whether within search areas or opportunistically) were recorded using the Motion data capture system. Where practicable, photo(s) were taken of the subject threatened species and representative specimens of SLC plants. 3.2.4. Pest Flora and Fauna Survey
A survey was conducted for the presence and abundance of Weeds of National Significance (WoNS), declared weeds fauna as defined by the Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002 (LP Act) and other naturalised flora, including significant environmental and/or agricultural weeds. Full details of the methodology and findings of the survey are presented in the accompanying Weed Survey Report, Origin Document No. Q-4200-15-RP-12561. Presence and abundance of declared (LP Act) and other non-native fauna were recorded at the time of the survey Rev 0 6 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others both within survey plots and opportunistically while traversing the Site. Exotic fauna species records were entered into the Motion data capture system when encountered. 3.2.5. Disturbance Survey
Evidence of disturbance at survey sites was recorded for type, severity and estimated time of most recent occurrence. The recording of disturbance was also conducted at opportunistic levels where appropriate. 3.2.6. Watercourse/Wetland Survey
All mapped ordered streams within each property were assessed, across their full length, to determine if these mapped features were watercourses or drainage features as defined by the Water Act 2000. Ordered stream assessments included assessment of the presence/absence of a defined channel with bed and banks, riparian vegetation and hydrophytes. The extent of streams assessed as watercourses was mapped using imagery and/or a GPS-derived track log. Mapping of the extent of streams assessed as drainage features was not required under the scope of works. If potential wetlands were encountered they were assessed against the hydrological and biotic criteria of the Queensland Wetland Program wetland definition (DERM 2011). 3.2.7. Survey Limitations
A number of factors are considered likely to influence survey results for particular species or species groups. These factors include: Timing (seasons) and duration of the survey period; Weather conditions in the preceding seasons and immediately prior to the survey; and Restricted spatial area of the habitats within the Site. The Site had been unseasonably dry for some time prior to the survey, such that the ground layer flora of many areas was poorly developed. Fauna species activity was also reduced. Due to these reasons, the surveys undertaken may not provide a true indication of seasonal habitat utilisation by fauna species within the Site. Some cryptic flora species may only be detected during particular flowering periods. The field investigations undertaken were limited to passive techniques (e.g. no live trapping) and were limited to late autumn. Additional survey effort would be required to provide a more comprehensive inventory of species, both threatened and common. 4. Results & Discussion
This section includes the results of the database and literature review. Some information is contained in the appendices and is referenced below. 4.1. Desktop & Literature Review
Results of the desktop and literature review can be found in Appendix B, Appendix C, Appendix D and Appendix E, as listed in Table 5. 4.2. Field Survey
Results of field surveys are detailed in the following sections. A comprehensive list of fauna and native flora species encountered at survey sites or opportunistically during the field survey is included in Appendix F. 4.2.1. Commonwealth Environmental Matters
Field survey results for Commonwealth environmental matters (Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES)) are summarised in Table 6.
Rev 0 7 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Table 6: Commonwealth Environmental Matters – Field Survey Results
Commonwealth Present Location Descriptioni Status Condition Comments Environmental Matters (Y/N)
TECs Y Two adjacent Brigalow (Acacia E Six patches of Currently patches in the harpophylla dominant and remnant (31.0 ha) grazed by western part of co-dominant) and one of cattle. the Site, survey advanced regrowth sites S57- and (111.1 ha) RE S62-SP8 11.9.5 EPBC threat-listed flora N n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a EPBC threat-listed fauna N n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a EPBC Act Listed Y various locations Australasian Pipit Anthus Marine n/a n/a Migratory/Marine novaeseelandiae, Black- Species species faced Cuckoo-shrike Coracina novaehollandiae, Nankeen Kestrel Falco cenchroides, Magpie-lark Grallina cyanoleuca, Silvereye Zosterops lateralis i Status taken from DoE 2015c
4.2.1.1. Ground-truthed Threatened Ecological Communities
The only TEC detected at the Site was Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla dominant and co-dominant). Two areas of A. harpophylla dominated RE 11.9.5 in the west of the Site met floristic, structural and condition criteria for the TEC (DoE 2015b, TSSC 2013). Another five areas of remnant RE 11.9.5 were dominated by Belah (Casuarina cristata), i.e. Brigalow was sub-dominant or an associated species, rather than dominant or co-dominant. Though this does not conform to Key Diagnostic Criterion 1 (TSSC 2013), it is likely that the patches are relictual areas of Brigalow- dominant RE 11.9.5 formerly more widespread on the Site. They otherwise meet structural and condition criteria for the community. A precautionary approach has been applied to classify these areas as TEC. Though vegetation floristically consistent with the Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla dominant and co-dominant) TEC was present in several other areas within the Site, none of these areas met the condition criteria for the TEC (DoE 2015b) due to poor ground layer condition (i.e. >50% dominance of exotic perennial grasses), lack of structural elements and/or small (<0.5 ha) patch size. Locations of TEC are given in Appendix G.
Rev 0 8 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others 4.2.1.2. Threatened Flora
No EPBC Act listed threatened flora were recorded during the field survey at the Site. Based on field inspection results, an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence of EPBC Act listed threatened flora identified within the desktop searches (Table 5) is summarised in Table 7. Table 7: Field survey results for EPBC Act threatened flora with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence.
Scientific/ Common Potentially Suitable Family Statusii General Habitat Requirements/ Notes Likelihood of Occurrence Name RE at Site Occurs on ridge slopes and undulating plains within Brigalow (Acacia 11.9.5 Unlikely: all potential habitat was examined and Cadellia pentastylis Surianaceae V harpophylla) woodland - open forest and semi-evergreen vine thicket (SEVT) the species is conspicuous and readily identified. Ooline (TSSC 2008a, Santos 2012). Dry sclerophyll woodland (TSSC 2008b). The Site is 130 km north of the only 11.10.7, 11.10.11 Unlikely: suitable habitat is present but the Tylophora linearis Apocynaceae E collection site in Queensland, near Glenmorgan (AVH 2015). species has only been collected once in Slender Tylophora Queensland. In Brigalow Belt usually found on flat to gently undulating alluvial areas/clay 11.9.5, 11.9.10 Possible: it may occur in shadier parts of remnant plains supporting Casuarina cristata and Acacia harpophylla forest (DOE Brigalow woodland where the ground layer does Homopholis belsonii Poaceae V 2015b, TSSC 2008c). Other associated species include Eucalyptus populnea, not contain or has a low density of invasive Belson’s Panic E. melanophloia, A. melvillei and Geijera parviflora (DSITIA 2014). exotic grasses such as Buffel Grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) and Green Panic (Megathyrsus maximus).
ii E = Endangered; V = Vulnerable
Rev 0 9 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others 4.2.1.3. Threatened Fauna
No EPBC Act listed threatened fauna were recorded during the field survey at the Site (Table 5). An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence of EPBC Act listed threatened fauna, based on field results, is summarised within Table 8. Table 8: Field survey results for EPBC Act threatened fauna with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence.
Status Potentially Suitable RE Class Scientific / Common Name General Habitat Requirements/ Notes Likelihood of Occurrence iii at Site
Birds Woodlands and open forests, especially those near to permanent water; requires tall 11.3.2, 11.3.35, 11.9.5, Unlikely: a limited amount of Erythrotriorchis radiatus trees (>20 m) for nest sites (Marchant and Higgins 1993). Mobile species with a large 11.9.7, 11.9.10, 11.5.1, foraging habitat is present at the V Red Goshawk home range - population densities are very low, even in optimal habitat 11.7.7, 11.10.7, 11.10.9, Site. 11.10.11 Grassy woodlands with open areas for foraging habitat and a nearby water source 11.3.2, 11.3.25, 11.5.1, Unlikely: potentially suitable Geophaps scripta scripta (Higgins and Davies 1996). The species has disappeared from parts of its former range 11.7.7, 11.10.7, 11.10.9, habitat is present at the Site but V Squatter Pigeon (Reis 2012) and there are no recent records within the tenement (Birds Australia 2015). 11.10.11 there are no recent records of the species within the tenement. Tall grasslands associated with watercourses (DOE 2015b). Historically may have been nil Unlikely: no suitable habitat is Neochmia ruficauda ruficauda E present but no recent records within the Site and the eastern subspecies is considered present and the Site is outside Star Finch to be extinct in the wild (Garnett et al. 2011). the species’ extant range. Dependent on ephemeral and temporary shallow wetlands, including artificial water 11.3.2, 11.3.25 Possible: may be present on Rostratula australis bodies, for feeding and breeding habitat (DOE 2015b). Cryptic and easily overlooked. ephemeral wetlands within the E Australian Painted Snipe nominated RE and margins of farm dams. Mammals Chalinolobus dwyeri Occurs within or near landscapes with relatively high relief (DOE 2015b). Forages in Nil Unlikely: no suitable roosting Large-eared Pied Bat, Large V open forests and woodlands and roosts in adjacent caves and overhangs of cliffs and habitat at or near Site. Pied Bat rocky hills (Dennis 2012). Formerly widespread in South Central Queensland (SCQ) - has declined markedly and is Nil Unlikely: no suitable habitat at or Dasyurus hallucatus now confined to rugged and remote areas throughout its range (Burnett 2012). Shelters near Site. E Northern Quoll in crevices in rocky hills and escarpments and forages in nearby woodland and forest habitats (DOE 2015b). Distribution and habitat preferences very poorly known (Reardon 2012). Inhabits range 11.3.2, 11.3.25, 11.9.5, Probable: suitable habitat trees Nyctophilus corbeni of dry forest and woodland types in SCQ, roosts in tree hollows and crevices and under 11.9.7, 11.9.10, 11.5.1, present. V South-eastern Long-eared Bat loose bark (DOE 2015b). 11.7.7, 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11 Phascolarctos cinereus Requires eucalypt woodland and forest with suitable food trees (primarily Eucalyptus 11.3.2, 11.3.25, 11.5.1, Likely: suitable habitat trees Koala (combined populations V spp.) (DOE 2015b). 11.9.10, 11.10.7, present. of Qld, NSW and the ACT) 11.10.9, 11.10.11
Rev 0 10 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Status Potentially Suitable RE Class Scientific / Common Name General Habitat Requirements/ Notes Likelihood of Occurrence iii at Site Reptiles Occupies eucalypt woodlands and open forests and lives under surface rock and woody 11.3.2, 11.9.7, 11.9.10, Probable: habitat logs present. Delma torquata debris (Wilson 2005, DOE 2015b). Small and difficult to detect. Recent survey work has 11.5.1, 11.7.2, 11.7.7, V Collared Delma greatly expanded knowledge of its distribution and habitat (Peck 2012). 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11 Potentially present in all lowlands associated with the Dawson - Fitzroy River 11.3.2 Unlikely: the species is not known Denisonia maculata catchments (DOE 2015b). Preys on frogs and is associated with ephemeral and to be present within the V Ornamental Snake permanent wetlands where it shelters in soil cracks and under debris e.g. logs, rocks tenement. (Wilson 2005, DOE 2015b). Lives in woodland and open forests and also grassland with regrowth trees where it 11.3.2, 11.5.1, 11.7.2, Probable: habitat logs present. Egernia rugosa requires suitable soils for burrows, sinkholes, abandoned rabbit warrens or large fallen 11.7.7, 11.9.5, 11.9.7, V Yakka Skink woody material for shelter (Eddie 2012). 11.9.10, 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11 Very poorly known species that occupies woodlands and open forests; may be reliant 11.3.2, 11.5.1, 11.7.7, Probable: habitat logs present. Furina dunmalli on presence of abundant fallen woody debris (Hobson 2012a). 11.9.5, 11.9.7, 11.9.10, V Dunmall's Snake 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11 Rheodytes leukops Dependent on permanent streams with a preference for deep pools often with Nil Unlikely: no suitable riverine Fitzroy River Turtle, Fitzroy intervening riffle zones (DOE 2015b). Not recorded from upper drainages of the Fitzroy habitat is available and the V Tortoise, Fitzroy Turtle, River catchment (Limpus et al. 2011). species is not known to be White-eyed River Diver present within the tenement.
iii E = Endangered; V = Vulnerable
Rev 0 11 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others 4.2.1.4. Migratory Fauna
No EPBC Act migratory fauna were recorded during the field survey at the Site (Table 6). An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence of EPBC Act listed migratory fauna, based on field results, is summarised within Table 9. Table 9: Field survey results for EPBC Act migratory fauna with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence.
Class Scientific / Common Name General Habitat Requirements/ Notes Potentially Suitable RE at Site Likelihood of Occurrence
Birds Seasonal migrant to Australia present October – April; aerial, commonly travelling in 11.3.2, 11.3.25, 11.5.1, 11.7.2, Probable: aerial feeder seasonally Apus pacificus flocks ahead of low pressure cells in pursuit of insects which it takes on the wing (Pizzey 11.7.7, 11.9.5, 11.9.7, 11.9.10, present overhead. Fork-tailed Swift and Knight 2010). 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11 Ardea modesta ( as A. alba) Freshwater wetlands, including artificial water-bodies in disturbed habitats (Pizzey and 11.3.2, 11.3.25 Probable: may be present on Eastern Great Egret, Great Knight 2010). ephemeral wetlands within these Egret, White Egret REs, also farm dams. Widely distributed through coastal and near-coastal Australia but a scarce visitor to 11.3.2, 11.3.25 Possible: may be present on Ardea ibis southern inland Queensland (Birdlife Australia 2015). Frequents freshwater wetlands ephemeral wetland within these Cattle Egret but often forages in pasture; roosts in wetlands (Pizzey and Knight 2010). REs, also farm dams. Migrates between Japan and Australia, where it is a spring - autumn visitor. Feeds on 11.3.2, 11.3.25 Possible: may be present on Gallinago hardwickii invertebrates found on the margins of freshwater wetlands, including artificial water- ephemeral wetlands within this Latham's Snipe, Japanese Snipe bodies (Pizzey and Knight 2010). RE, also margins of farm dams. Haliaeetus leucogaster More common coastally but some birds occur far inland along major rivers, including nil Unlikely: no habitat present on White-bellied Sea-Eagle the Fitzroy-Dawson and Maranoa-Balonne systems (Birdlife Australia 2015). the Site. Seasonal migrant to Australia present October – April; aerial, commonly travelling in 11.3.2, 11.3.25, 11.5.1, 11.7.2, Probable: aerial feeder seasonally Hirundapus caudacutus flocks ahead of low pressure cells in pursuit of insects which it takes on the wing (Pizzey 11.7.7, 11.9.2, 11.9.5, 11.9.7, present overhead. White-throated Needletail and Knight 2010). 11.9.10, 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11 Widespread and abundant species frequently present in southern inland Queensland 11.3.2, 11.3.25, 11.5.1, 11.7.2, Probable: suitable breeding Merops ornatus during spring and summer (Birdlife Australia 2015, Barrett et al. 2003). Feeds on aerial 11.7.7, 11.9.7, 11.9.10, 11.10.7, habitat present in RE 11.3.39. Rainbow Bee-eater insects and nests in burrows in sandy soils (Pizzey and Knight 2010). 11.10.9, 11.10.11 October-April breeding migrant to south-eastern Australia (Birdlife Australia 2015). 11.3.2, 11.3.25, 11.5.1, Possible: may use woodland Myiagra cyanoleuca Insectivorous and live in closed forests and moist open forests (Pizzey and Knight 2010). 11.7.7,11.9.7, 11.9.10, 11.10.7, habitat during migratory passage. Satin Flycatcher 11.10.9, 11.10.11 Dependent on ephemeral and temporary shallow wetlands, including artificial water 11.3.2, 11.3.25 Possible: may be present on Rostratula benghalensis (sensu bodies, for feeding and breeding habitat (DOE 2015b). Cryptic and easily overlooked. ephemeral wetlands within the lato) nominated RE and margins of Painted Snipe farm dams.
Rev 0 12 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
4.2.1.5. Marine Fauna
Five EPBC Act marine fauna species were recorded during the field survey at the Site (Table 6). An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence of other EPBC Act listed marine fauna identified in the PMST search (DoE 2015a)as potentially present at the Site, based on field results, is summarised within Table 10. Table 10: Field survey results for EPBC Act marine fauna with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence.
Class Scientific / Common Name General Habitat Requirements/ Notes Potentially Suitable RE at Site Likelihood of Occurrence
Birds Seasonal migrant to Australia present October – April; aerial, commonly travelling in flocks 11.3.2, 11.3.39, 11.9.2, 11.9.5, Probable: aerial feeder seasonally Apus pacificus ahead of low pressure cells in pursuit of insects which it takes on the wing (Pizzey and 11.9.7, 11.9.10, 11.10.7, present overhead. Fork-tailed Swift Knight 2010). 11.10.11 Ardea modesta ( as A. alba) Freshwater wetlands, including artificial water-bodies in disturbed habitats (Pizzey and 11.3.2 Probable: may be present on Eastern Great Egret, Great Knight 2010). ephemeral wetland within this Egret, White Egret RE, also farm dams. Widely distributed through coastal and near-coastal Australia but a scarce visitor to 11.3.2, 11.3.25 Possible: may be present on Ardea ibis southern inland Queensland (Birdlife Australia 2015). Frequents freshwater wetlands but ephemeral wetland within this Cattle Egret often forages in pasture; roosts in wetlands (Pizzey and Knight 2010). RE, also farm dams. Migrates between Japan and Australia, where it is a spring - autumn visitor. Feeds on 11.3.2, 11.3.25 Possible: may be present on Gallinago hardwickii invertebrates found on the margins of freshwater wetlands, including artificial water-bodies ephemeral wetlands within the Latham's Snipe, Japanese Snipe (Pizzey and Knight 2010). nominated RE and margins of farm dams. Haliaeetus leucogaster More common coastally but some birds occur far inland along major rivers, including the nil Unlikely: no habitat present on White-bellied Sea-Eagle Fitzroy-Dawson and Maranoa-Balonne systems (Birdlife Australia 2015). the Site. Seasonal migrant to Australia present October – April; aerial, commonly travelling in flocks 11.3.2, 11.3.25, 11.5.1, 11.7.2, Probable: aerial feeder seasonally Hirundapus caudacutus ahead of low pressure cells in pursuit of insects which it takes on the wing (Pizzey and 11.7.7, 11.9.5, 11.9.7, 11.9.10, present overhead. White-throated Needletail Knight 2010). 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11 Widespread and abundant species frequently present in southern inland Queensland during 11.3.2, 11.3.25, 11.5.1, 11.7.2, Probable: suitable breeding Merops ornatus spring and summer (Birdlife Australia 2015, Barrett et al. 2003). Feeds on aerial insects and 11.7.7, 11.9.7, 11.9.10, 11.10.7, habitat present in RE 11.3.39. Rainbow Bee-eater nests in burrows in sandy soils (Pizzey and Knight 2010). 11.10.9, 11.10.11 October-April breeding migrant to south-eastern Australia (Birdlife Australia 2015). 11.3.2, 11.3.25, 11.5.1, 11.7.7, Possible: may use woodland Myiagra cyanoleuca Insectivorous and live in closed forests and moist open forests (Pizzey and Knight 2010). 11.9.7, 11.9.10, 11.10.7, habitat during migratory passage. Satin Flycatcher 11.10.9, 11.10.11 Dependent on ephemeral and temporary shallow wetlands, including artificial water 11.3.2, 11.3.25 Possible: may be present on Rostratula benghalensis (sensu bodies, for feeding and breeding habitat (DOE 2015b). Cryptic and easily overlooked. ephemeral wetlands within the lato) nominated RE and margins of Painted Snipe farm dams.
Rev 0 13 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others 4.2.2. Queensland Environmental Matters
Field survey results for State environmental matters are summarised in Table 11. Table 11: State environmental matters – field survey results
Present State Environmental Matters Location Descriptioniv Status* Comments (Y/N) 19 areas 11.9.5 Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla) and/or Belah distributed Y (Casuarina cristata) shrubby open forest on Endangered Six areas of remnant and 13 of advanced regrowth. throughout the Cainozoic fine-grained sediments Endangered regional ecosystems site 11.9.10 Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla), Poplar Box Two small areas of regrowth and one of advanced Y Three areas (Eucalyptus populnea) shrubby open forest to Endangered regrowth. woodland on Cainozoic fine-grained sediments Nine patches 11.3.2 Poplar Box (Eucalyptus populnea) woodland Small patches of remnant RE on plains adjacent to Y associated with Of Concern on alluvial plains Yuleba Creek. Of concern regional ecosystems Yuleba Creek Seven patches on 11.3.25 Eucalyptus tereticornis or E. camaldulensis Forms a discontinuous narrow riparian corridor on Y Of Concern Yuleba Creek woodland fringing drainage lines Yuleba Creek and associated drainage lines. Nine areas 11.9.7 Eucalyptus populnea, Eremophila mitchellii Eight small patches of remnant RE and one of Y throughout the shrubby woodland on fine-grained sedimentary Of concern mature regrowth. Site rocks NC Act listed flora (EVNT) N n/a n/a n/a n/a NC Act listed fauna (EVNT) N n/a n/a n/a n/a Kurrajong (Brachychiton populneus) Refer to Appendix Narrow-leaved Bottle Tree (Brachychiton rupestris) Y Special Least Concern n/a Special Least Concern flora I. Black Orchid (Cymbidium canaliculatum) Sandalwood (Santalum lanceolatum ) Refer to Appendix Detected by characteristic diggings around tree base Y Short-beaked Echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) Special Least Concern Special Least Concern fauna I. and logs on hill-top in RE 11.7.2.
iv Status and description taken from Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006
Rev 0 14 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others 4.2.2.1. Ground-truthed Regional Ecosystems
DNRM (2015) mapping for the Site and the results of ground truthing can be summarised as follows: Regrowth and remnant vegetation associated with major drainage lines (Yuleba Creek and two un-named drainages) was mapped as RE 11.3.2/11.3.25. This was largely confirmed during field assessment. Some small areas of mapped (DNRM 2015) RE 11.10.11 on minor drainage lines was found to be 11.3.2 on inspection. Several areas of remnant vegetation on hill-tops in the north and central region of the Site were identified as RE 11.9.5 or 11.9. 10. The majority of these areas were found to be either RE 11.10.7 or 11.10.9. Small ground truthed areas of advanced regrowth or remnant attributable to RE 11.9.5, 11.9.7 and 11.9.10 in these regions were limited to minor rises adjacent to Yuleba Creek. A large tract of remnant vegetation mapped (DNRM 20125) as RE 11.10.9/11.10.11/11.7.2 was found to consist largely of RE 11.10.9 and 11.5.1, with minor occurrences of 11.9.5 and 11.9.10 present on the margins of the tract. To the immediate south of this tract, mapped regrowth RE 11.9.5 was found in the field to be more extensive and included a relatively large area of remnant RE. The largest tract of vegetation present at the Site occupied most of the southern extent of Lot/Plans 14 and 15/WV549. This vegetation was mapped (DNRM 2015) as RE 11.10.9/11.10.11/11.7.2 and 11.7.6/11.7.2/11.5.1. A small area of RE 11.9.5 was mapped at the north-western extremity of this vegetation. Ground truthing confirmed the presence of both regrowth and remnant 11.9.5 covering an increased area. RE 11.7.2 was found to cover the most elevated parts of this tract while most of the remaining vegetation on lower slopes was attributed to 11.10.7. Smaller areas of RE 11.7.7, 11.10.11, 11.5.1 and 11.9.7 were also present. A summary of ground-truthed vegetation is presented in Table 12. All ground truthed regional ecosystems and regrowth are represented schematically in Appendix G.
Rev 0 15 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Table 12: Ground-truthed remnant and regrowth regional ecosystems
Survey Status RE ID RE Polygon Identifiers REDD Short description Field Description Condition Site(s) (Biodiversity)v
Remnant 7A6F38E965481D1 S17-SP7 No concern at Eucalyptus crebra woodland on Eucalyptus melanophloia woodland; lower tree layer Four patches ranging in size from 8.4 ha to present 175.1 ha. Total area is 315.1 ha. Evidence 11.10.7 6423E9A86B86F3C S19-SP8 coarse-grained sedimentary of Callitris glaucophylla; shrub layer and grass layer rocks of varying spp. or absent. of clearing, logging. 7A7D2DBF2E3B832 15F5CCC62BA9A1B Remnant 489517AD522F827 S29-SP7 No concern at Callitris glaucophylla woodland Callitris glaucophylla woodland, Eucalyptus Three patches, total area 117.9 ha present Evidence of selective logging. 11.10.9 183B45194F6198C S32-SP8 on coarse-grained sedimentary melanophloia, E. crebra usually co-dominant, other rocks species include Angophora leiocarpa, Corymbia 57D693EC3A37A68 S46-SP8 clarksoniana. Shrub/low tree layer of varying composition and density, probably relating to fire history. Grassy ground layer. Remnant S12-SP8 No concern at Eucalyptus populnea, E. Eucalyptus populnea, Callitris glaucophylla Seven patches with total area of 73.4 ha. present 11.10.11 S23-SP8 melanophloia +/- Callitris woodland on sandy loam soils; E. melanophloia glaucophylla woodland on sometimes co-dominant. Shrub/low tree layer of S33-SP8 coarse-grained sedimentary varying composition and density, probably relating S37-SP8 rocks to fire history. Grassy ground layer. Regrowth 687306B12834FA2 S36-SP8 Two small patches in largely cleared area, total area is 7.8 ha. Evidence of clearing, 11.10.11 747F31641BC8E7F logging. Remnant 3C96F666E4B2CAF S1-SP8 Of concern Eucalyptus populnea woodland Eucalyptus populnea woodland with shrub layer of Nine areas associated with alluvial plains adjacent to Yuleba Creek, total area is 81.8 11.3.2 7B91C43F11C0535 S5-SP8 on alluvial plains varying density and grassy ground layer. ha. 6EBF6D356F8DD11 S7-SP8 154BCE4F3030366 S28-SP8 62EFC31335D5F8B 6CD17FD17E9EF30 395F0FD938C6281 3B7AB30A2BEB889 43B6E93039F8F81
Rev 0 16 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Survey Status RE ID RE Polygon Identifiers REDD Short description Field Description Condition Site(s) (Biodiversity)v
Remnant 23CCC10C545FCFA S6-SP8 Of Concern Eucalyptus tereticornis or E. Eucalyptus tereticornis or E. camaldulensis Seven areas fringing major drainage lines and forming a discontinuous riparian 11.3.25 659D761C662AF5F S14-SP8 camaldulensis woodland dominated woodlands. Angophora floribunda, fringing drainage lines Corymbia tessellaris frequent on deeper sandy corridor, total area 133.8 ha. Old 92E4A64CB0C80D5 S31-SP8 alluvium. ringbarking seen in some areas. 48AAE1167AA4F4D 43D175699CF4A9E 6E40471371F46B2 74BA503168F8BA2 Remnant 3185225D39C5D8B S41-SP8 No concern at Eucalyptus crebra and/or E. Woodland of Eucalyptus crebra with E. populnea, One large tract present in the west of the present Site with a smaller area in the southeast. 11.5.1 7DB0D2435D04B67 S44-SP8 populnea, Callitris glaucophylla, Angophora leiocarpa often present. a lower layer of Angophora leiocarpa, Allocasuarina luehmannii present. Total area is 205.8 ha. S60-SP8 Allocasuarina luehmannii woodland on Cainozoic sand plains and/or remnant surfaces Remnant 7FBE5B5432F3620 S49-SP8 No concern at Acacia spp. woodland on Acacia shirleyi woodland, sometimes with Extensive continuous area on scarp crest present and slopes in the southeast: Total area 11.7.2 376CD7D04331BCB S52-SP8 Cainozoic lateritic duricrust. associated Eucalyptus fibrosa, Corymbia Scarp retreat zone trachyphloia, E. exserta. Sparse grassy ground layer. 189.0 ha. E16603AE79481F3 Remnant 498B132F5CC8F6B S50-SP8 No concern at Eucalyptus fibrosa subsp. nubila Eucalyptus fibrosa open forest to woodland with One patch of 7.9 ha. present 11.7.7 +/- Corymbia spp. +/- Eucalyptus sparse shrubby layer of Acacia conferta, A. spp. woodland on Cainozoic amblygona and others. Grassy ground layer. lateritic duricrust Remnant 374E81FA309C00E S24-SP7 Endangered Eucalyptus populnea open Eucalyptus populnea, Casuarina cristata shrubby low Two small, adjacent areas, total area 2.3 ha. 11.9.10 1463709E682CCD2 forest with a secondary tree open forest to open forest layer of Acacia harpophylla and Regrowth 353C23913C3C338 S42-SP8 One small area of 2.8 ha. sometimes Casuarina cristata 11.9.10 on fine-grained sedimentary rocks
Rev 0 17 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Survey Status RE ID RE Polygon Identifiers REDD Short description Field Description Condition Site(s) (Biodiversity)v
Remnant 541E9ED24B55166 S55-SP8 Endangered Acacia harpophylla and/or Casuarina cristata or Acacia harpophylla dominated Six areas, total area 31.0 ha. One area (polygon 5DEC32FC4A8558B) 11.9.5 218E36BC658E8BD S57-SP8 Casuarina cristata open forest open forest. Well-developed shrub layer (typically on fine-grained sedimentary Geijera parviflora, Eremophila mitchellii) with a meets Brigalow TEC criteria; Acacia 4D376D62A7ED190 S59-SP8 rocks ground layer dominated by Paspalidium harpophylla dominated remnant RE 11.9.5 2FC82EC71B691FB caespitosum, Ancistrachne uncinulata meeting structural and condition criteria 5DEC32FC4A8558B (DoE 2015b). The remaining areas are remnant RE 11.9.5 67EF728A787067A that are dominated by Casuarina cristata (i.e. Acacia harpophylla is not dominant or co-dominant (TSSC 2013)). Though this does not conform to Key Diagnostic Criterion 1 (TSSC 2013), it is likely that the patches are relictual areas of Brigalow- dominant RE 11.9.5 formerly more widespread on the Site. They otherwise meet structural and condition criteria. A precautionary approach has been applied to classify these areas as TEC. Regrowth 618F995FD252AA3 S9-SP8 Acacia harpophylla dominated regrowth of tall Thirteen areas, mostly small, with a total area 75.5 ha. Ground layer typically 11.9.5 4AE98CDE233D0F1 S10-SP8 shrubs/small trees. Typically little shrub layer development. Ground layer dominated by Cenchrus dominated by non-native pasture grasses, 629EBDD170C3730 S15-SP8 ciliaris in most cases. especially Buffel Grass Cenchrus ciliaris 30672E9A28340B9 S18-SP8 33ABBFD13CD66D4 S40-SP8 One area (polygon 1E62267F6F963D2) meets Brigalow TEC criteria: mature 173F4AB662C7C8C S47-SP8 regrowth (>15 years old) of Acacia 56B544CE4F6DDA6 S62-SP8 harpophylla dominated RE 11.9.5 meeting 1E62267F6F963D2 structural and condition criteria (DoE 2015b). 61A19A7F66D7919
3C01733B53800B3 The remaining areas do not meet TEC 104ECA6B69FEE3C criteria in that they lack structural 6EA843877D4A645 elements of the community and/or have >50% cover of exotic perennial plants. 7427F21773CD83B
Rev 0 18 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Survey Status RE ID RE Polygon Identifiers REDD Short description Field Description Condition Site(s) (Biodiversity)v
Remnant 125B50DB2C2CF6B Of concern Eucalyptus populnea, Eucalyptus populnea, Eremophila mitchellii shrubby Eight areas, total area is 28.4 ha. 11.9.7 5DFC4A5A3550E2F Eremophila mitchellii shrubby woodland (E. melanophloia sometimes co- woodland on fine-grained dominant). 7FABB2AE4DFD0A5 sedimentary rocks 172B7F2F4DA20C0 7830786A7396DCC 3460D148344FE66 669966BE69042E9 330FC944E2BE66B Regrowth 27AA5577ACE70B1 S13-SP8 Eucalyptus populnea, Eremophila mitchellii shrubby One area of 0.8 ha. 11.9.7 woodland. v Status and description taken from DEHP 2015e
Rev 0 19 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others 4.2.2.2. Threatened Flora
No records of threatened flora were contained in a Protected Plants Flora Survey Trigger Map for the Site (DEHP 2015d). No NC Act listed flora species were recorded during the field survey at the Site. An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence, based on field inspection results, of NC Act listed threatened flora species potentially present at the Site is summarised in Table 13. Table 13: Field survey results for NC Act EVNT flora with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence.
Scientific / General Habitat Potentially Family Statusvi Likelihood of Occurrence Common Name Requirements/ Notes Suitable RE
Apocynaceae Tylophora linearis E Dry sclerophyll woodland 11.10.7, Unlikely: suitable habitat is present (TSSC 2008b). The Site is 130 11.10.11 but the species has only been Slender Tylophora km north of the only collected once in Queensland collection site in Queensland (AVH 2015).
Asteraceae Rutidosis lanata V Occurs along ecotones Nil Unlikely: suitable habitat is absent at between dry sclerophyll the Site Red-soil Woolly woodland communities Wrinklewort dominated by Acacia harpophylla, Eucalyptus woollsiana, Eucalyptus crebra, E. fibrosa and E. populnea on clay, loam and sand (DSITIA 2014).
Poaceae Homopholis belsonii E In Brigalow Belt usually found 11.9.5, Possible: this species is known to on flat to gently undulating 11.9.10 occur within Brigalow woodland and Belson’s Panic alluvial areas/clay plains its range overlaps with the Site (TSSC supporting Casuarina cristata 2008a). It may occur in shadier parts and Acacia harpophylla forest of remnant Brigalow woodland (DOE 2015b, TSSC 2008c). where the ground layer does not Other associated species contain or has a low density of include Eucalyptus populnea, invasive exotic grasses such as Buffel E. melanophloia, A. melvillei Grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) and Green and Geijera parviflora (DSITIA Panic (Megathyrsus maximus). 2014).
Solanaceae Solanum V Inhabits grassland or 11.9.5, Possible: the Site is within the known stenopterum woodlands of Belah 11.9.10 range of this species (DERM 2012e) (Casuarina cristata) and and potentially suitable habitat is Winged Nightshade Poplar Box (Eucalyptus present within Belah and Poplar Box populnea) on black, brown or woodlands at the Site red clay loam soils. It also grows on loamy ridges, along roadsides and in paddocks. (Bean 2004).
vi E = Endangered; V = Vulnerable; NT = Near Threatened
Rev 0 20 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others 4.2.2.3. Threatened Fauna
No NC Act listed fauna species were detected during the field survey. An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence of all other NC Act listed threatened fauna species potentially present at the Site, based on field results, is summarised within Table 14. Table 14: Field survey results for NC Act EVNT fauna with potentially suitable RE and likelihood of occurrence.
General Habitat Requirements/ Notes Potentially Scientific / Common Name Statusvii Likelihood of Occurrence Suitable RE
Calyptorhynchus lathami V Dependent on the fruits of several species of 11.9.5, 11.9.10 Probable: potentially Casuarina and Allocasuarina spp. found in a suitable habitat food Glossy Black-Cockatoo variety of forest types (Pizzey and Knight 2010, plants Casuarina cristata Garnett et al. 2011). It will visit isolated trees are present in nominated and remnant patches where food trees are REs and as scattered present (Holmes 2012). trees throughout the Site.
Erythrotriorchis radiatus E Woodlands and open forests, especially those 11.3.2, 11.3.25, Unlikely: a limited near to permanent water; requires tall trees 11.5.1, 11.7.2, amount of foraging Red Goshawk (>20 m) for nest sites (Marchant and Higgins 11.7.7, 11.9.5, habitat is present at the 1993). Mobile species with a large home range 11.9.7, 11.9.10, Site. - population densities are very low, even in 11.10.7, optimal habitat. 11.10.9, 11.10.11
Geophaps scripta scripta V Grassy woodlands with open areas for foraging 11.3.2, 11.3.25, Unlikely: potentially habitat and a nearby water source (Higgins and 11.5.1, 11.7.7, suitable habitat is present Squatter Pigeon (southern Davies 1996). The species has disappeared 11.10.7, at the Site but there are subspecies) from parts of its former range (Reis 2012) and 11.10.9, no recent records of the there are no recent records within the 11.10.11 species within the tenement (Birds Australia 2015). tenement.
Grantiella picta V A seasonal visitor to SCQ which is dependent 11.3.2, 11.3.25, Unlikely: potential food upon fruiting mistletoes present in a variety of 11.5.1, 11.7.7, plants (i.e. Amyema spp.) Painted Honeyeater Eucalyptus and Acacia woodlands and 11.9.5, 11.9.10, are absent or in low shrublands (Birdlife Australia 2015). It nests 11.10.7, densities within the Site. near to an abundant supply of fruits (Higgins et 11.10.11 al. 2001, Watson 2012).
Neochmia ruficauda E Tall grasslands associated with watercourses nil Unlikely: no suitable ruficauda (DOE 2015b). Historically may have been habitat is present and the present but no recent records within the Site Site is outside of extant Eastern Star Finch and the eastern subspecies is considered to be range. extinct in the wild (Garnett et al. 2011).
Rostratula australis V Dependent on ephemeral and temporary 11.3.2, 11.3.25 Probable: may be present shallow wetlands, including artificial water on ephemeral wetlands Australian Painted Snipe bodies, for feeding and breeding habitat (DOE within this RE and 2015b). Cryptic and easily overlooked. margins of farm dams.
Jalmenus eubulus V Usually associated with Brigalow (Acacia 11.9.5 Likely: suitable larval food harpophylla) open forests and woodlands plants (mature Acacia Pale Imperial Hairstreak (Valentine and Johnson 2012) but larvae will harpophylla) are present also forage on other Acacia spp. (Common and within the Site. Waterhouse 1981).
Chalinolobus dwyeri V Occurs within or near landscapes with nil Unlikely: no suitable relatively high relief (DOE 2015b). Forages in roosting habitat at or Large-eared Pied Bat open forests and woodlands and roosts in near Site. adjacent caves and overhangs of cliffs and rocky hills (Dennis 2012).
Rev 0 21 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
General Habitat Requirements/ Notes Potentially Scientific / Common Name Statusvii Likelihood of Occurrence Suitable RE
Nyctophilus corbeni V Distribution and habitat preferences very 11.3.2, 11.3.25, Probable: suitable habitat poorly known (Reardon 2012). Inhabits range 11.5.1, 11.7.7, trees present. South-eastern Long-eared of dry forest and woodland types in SCQ and 11.9.5, 11.9.7, Bat roosts in tree hollows and crevices and under 11.9.10, loose bark (DOE 2015b). 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11
Acanthophis antarcticus NT A widespread but patchily distributed snake 11.10.7 Possible: areas of dense (ALA 2015). Lives in woodlands, open forests shrub and litter cover in Common Death Adder and heathlands; requires abundant limited amounts within shelter/ambush predation cover e.g. low the Site. shrubs, rocks, logs, dense leaf litter (Wilson 2005).
Delma torquata V Occupies eucalypt woodlands and open forests 11.3.2, 11.3.25, Probable: habitat logs are and lives under surface rock and woody debris 11.5.1, 11.7.2, present in some areas at Collared Delma (Wilson 2005, DOE 2015b). Small and difficult 11.7.7, 11.9.7, the Site but overall are in to detect. Recent survey work has greatly 11.9.10, limited amounts. expanded knowledge of its distribution and 11.10.7, habitat (Peck 2012). 11.10.9, 11.10.11
Denisonia maculata V Potentially present in all lowlands associated 11.3.2, 11.3.25 Unlikely: the species is with the Dawson - Fitzroy River catchments not known to be present Ornamental Snake (DOE 2015b). Preys on frogs and is associated within the tenement. with ephemeral and permanent wetlands where it shelters in soil cracks and under debris e.g. logs, rocks (Wilson 2005, DOE 2015b).
Egernia rugosa V Lives in woodland and open forests and also 11.3.2, 11.5.1, Probable: habitat logs grassland with regrowth trees where it 11.7.2, 11.7.7, present. Yakka Skink requires suitable soils for burrows, sinkholes, 11.9.5, 11.9.7, abandoned rabbit warrens or large fallen 11.9.10, woody material for shelter (Eddie 2012). 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11
Furina dunmalli V Very poorly known species that occupies 11.3.2, 11.3.25, Probable: habitat logs woodlands and open forests; may be reliant on 11.5.1, 11.7.7, present. Dunmall’s Snake presence of abundant fallen woody debris 11.9.5, 11.9.7, (Hobson 2012a). 11.9.10, 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11
Hemiaspis damelii E Strongly associated with seasonally inundated 11.3.2 Unlikely: potential habitat plains, especially those with cracking clays and is very limited at the Site. Grey Snake gilgai development (Hobson 2012b).
Rheodytes leukops V Dependent on permanent streams with a nil Unlikely: no suitable preference for deep pools often with watercourses are present Fitzroy River Turtle intervening riffle zones (DOE 2015b). Not within the Site. recorded from upper drainages of the Fitzroy River catchment (Limpus et al. 2011).
Rev 0 22 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
General Habitat Requirements/ Notes Potentially Scientific / Common Name Statusvii Likelihood of Occurrence Suitable RE
Strophurus taenicauda NT Lives in dry open forest and woodlands, 11.3.2, 11.3.25, Probable: habitat trees especially those with well-developed shrub 11.5.1, 11.7.2, with small hollows and/or Golden-tailed Gecko layer where it shelters in tree hollows and 11.7.7, 11.9.5, decorticating bark are splits, and under loose bark (QMDC 2008). 11.9.7, 11.9.10, present. 11.10.7, 11.10.9, 11.10.11
vii E = Endangered; V = Vulnerable; NT = Near Threatened
4.2.2.4. Pest Fauna
Pest fauna on site has been mapped based on field survey results (Appendix J). Table 15 describes pest fauna detected at the Site. Table 15: Pest fauna recorded at the Site.
Scientific Name Common Name Status* Area of Occurrence One individual seen near survey site S47- Canis lupus dingo Dingo Class 2 declared pest SP8. One individual seen crossing road near Felis catus Feral Cat Not declared survey site S6-SP8. Animals and scats were observed several Oryctolagus cuniculus. European Rabbit Class 2 declared pest locations. Diggings seen at a drainage line in Brigalow Sus scrofa Feral Pig Class 2 declared pest (S47-SP8).
*Status taken from LP Act/DoE 2015a 4.2.3. Disturbances
The majority of the Site has been cleared of original vegetation during development for livestock grazing and cropping. Much of the retained vegetation is in the form of small patches, linear strips and corridors of vegetation along the major drainage lines. Many of these smaller patches are comprised of advanced regrowth, with few at remnant RE status. However, some extensive areas of remnant vegetation remain in the west and south of the Site. The understorey of these retained areas has been, and continues to be, grazed by livestock. Logging of some remnant areas has significantly altered their floristics and structure. Farm buildings, dams, power lines and access tracks are present throughout the Site. A sealed road crosses the northern part of the Site. Some soils at the Site (generally associated with drainage lines) showed severe sheet and gully erosion. 4.2.4. Watercourses and Wetlands
Twenty-six mapped (DNRM 2015) streams within the property were assessed (three of these were examined at more than one location). Two watercourses were identified. Yuleba Creek is a large, stream order 4 watercourse flowing west-east across the northern region of the Site. An un-named stream order 3 drainage line arising in the central region of the Site was observed to form a watercourse. The remaining drainages lines were determined to be drainage features as defined by the Water Act 2000. Table 16 provides details of the characteristics of examined streams and their classification as per the Water Act 2000 criteria. Ground-truthed watercourses and the location of drainage feature assessment sites are mapped in Appendix K.
Rev 0 23 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Table 16: Ground-truthed drainage features at the Site.
Mapped stream Is Site Description and justification order Watercourse?
Irregular banks to 0.5 m height and sandy loam bed to 4 m width; hydrophytes include S3-SP8 unmapped No occasional Eucalyptus camaldulensis* and rare Juncus usitatus*; no riparian vegetation ( disturbed RE 11.3.2); no evidence of extended flows or retention of water. Defined banks to 4 m height, sandy bed to 6 m width, some benching present; a discontinuous strip of riparian vegetation (RE 11.3.25) present; hydrophytes otherwise S6-SP8 4 (Yuleba Creek) Yes absent; sufficient flows to maintain riparian vegetation, algal crusts on some exposed rock indicate prolonged retention of water. Low banks to 0.4 m height, sandy loam bed to 3.5 m width; no hydrophytes detected; S11-SP8 1 No no riparian vegetation (cleared, possibly former RE 11.9.7); no evidence of extended flows. Broad shallow U-shaped drainage line with central scoured channel to 0.25 m deep, 1.0 S16-SP8 1 No m wide; no hydrophytes present; no riparian vegetation (RE 11.9.7); no evidence of extended flows.
S17-SP8 Broad shallow U-shaped drainage line with some recent scouring and gully erosion; no 1 No hydrophytes present; no riparian vegetation (RE 11.10.7); no evidence of extended flows. No defined bed or banks; no hydrophytes; no riparian vegetation (cleared ex-RE S20-SP8 unmapped No 11.10.7); no evidence of extended flows. No banks but some small, ephemeral (dry) pools; some Juncus usitatus*, Cyperus sp.; S22-SP8 unmapped No no riparian vegetation (regrowth RE 11.10.7); no evidence of extended flows or prolonged retention of water. A V-shaped gully with a narrow sandy bed, some exposed rock; no hydrophytes S25-SP8 1 No detected; no riparian vegetation (RE 11.10.9); no evidence of extended flows. Broad drainage line with defined outer banks to 50 m width, benching obvious, bed to 25 m width; hydrophytes including Eucalyptus camaldulensis*, Persicaria lapathifolia*, S27-SP8 4 (Yuleba Creek) Yes Juncus usitatus* present; riparian vegetation (RE 11.3.25) present; sufficient extended flows to maintain a riparian community but no evidence at this point of retention of water. Sinuous U-shaped gully with banks to 0.9 m height, 2.5 m width; occasional Leptochloa S28-SP8 1 No digitata* present; no riparian vegetation present (RE 11.3.2); no evidence of extended flows. Broad U-shaped drainage line without defined bed or banks; no hydrophytes detected; S30-SP8 1 No no riparian vegetation (pasture ex-RE 11.3.2/11.9.7); no evidence of extended flows. No defined bed and banks but some shallow scouring of a central channel present: no S33-SP8 1 No hydrophytes detected; no riparian vegetation present (RE 11.10.11); no evidence of extended flows. No defined bed and banks but some minor scouring of a central channel present: no S34-SP8 1 No hydrophytes detected; no riparian vegetation present (RE 11.9.7); no evidence of extended flows. Defined steep banks to 1.2 m height, to 5 m width banks or bed; no hydrophytes; no S37-SP8 2 No riparian vegetation (RE 11.10.11); no evidence of extended flows. Defined banks 1.0-2.5 m height, to 5 m width; no hydrophytes detected; no riparian S38-SP8 2 No vegetation present (RE 11.10.11); no evidence of extended flows. Broad V-shaped gully with banks to 1.2 m height, to 6 m width; no hydrophytes S39-SP8 1 No detected; no riparian vegetation present (RE 11.101.11); no evidence of extended flows. Broad shallow U-shaped gully to 5 m width with irregular low banks to 0.3 m height; no S41-SP8 1 No hydrophytes detected; no riparian vegetation present (RE 11.10.11); no evidence of extended flows. Shallow gully with banks to 0.8 m height, to 3 m width; no hydrophytes detected; no S43-SP8 1 No riparian vegetation present (RE 11.9.10); no evidence of extended flows.
Rev 0 24 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Mapped stream Is Site Description and justification order Watercourse?
No defined bed or banks; no hydrophytes detected; no riparian vegetation (cleared, S45-SP8 1 No former RE 11.9.5); no evidence of extended flows. No defined banks, a sinuous channel to 1.5 m width with some scouring; no S48-SP8 1 No hydrophytes detected; no riparian vegetation present (advance regrowth of RE 11.9.5); no evidence of extended flows. No defined bed or banks but a minor scoured channel present; no hydrophytes S51-SP8 1 No detected; no riparian vegetation (cleared, former RE 11.10.11); no evidence of extended flows. Poorly defined banks to 0.3 m height with a shallow U-shaped bed, minor scouring and S54-SP8 1 No sheet erosion present; no hydrophytes detected; no riparian vegetation (cleared, former RE 11.9.7); no evidence of extended flows. Narrow U-shaped gully, banks to 0.8 m height, to 5 m width; no hydrophytes detected; S56-SP8 1 No no riparian vegetation present (regrowth RE 11.9.5); no evidence of extended flows. V-shaped gully, banks to 1.5 m height with an incised channel; no hydrophytes S57-SP8 1 No detected; no riparian vegetation present (regrowth RE 11.9.5); no evidence of extended flows. Shallow U-shaped gully, banks to 1.5 m height and bed averaging 4 m width; no S58-SP8 3 No hydrophytes detected; no riparian vegetation present (regrowth RE 11.9.5); no evidence of extended flows. Shallow U-shaped gully, banks to 0.9 m height, 4 m width; no hydrophytes detected; no S60-SP8 1 No riparian vegetation present (regrowth RE 11.5.1); no evidence of extended flows. U-shaped gully, banks to 1 m height, 5 m width; no hydrophytes detected; no riparian S62-SP8 2 No vegetation present (regrowth RE 11.9.5); no evidence of extended flows. Broad shallow drainage line with central incised channel to 0.6 m height, 1.0 m width; S63-SP8 1 No no hydrophytes detected; no riparian vegetation present (regrowth RE 11.5.1); no evidence of extended flows. Steep U-shaped channel to 1.8 m height, 3.5 m width; Leptochloa digitata* in channel and on banks; a narrow fringe of riparian woodland (RE 11.3.25) present; ephemeral S65-SP8 3 Yes pools (currently dry) indicating retention of water; sufficient flows to maintain riparian vegetation. Broad drainage line without defined bed or banks originally but now showing severe S66-SP8 1 No gully erosion; no hydrophytes; no riparian vegetation present (RE 11.7.6); no evidence of prolonged flows. *Flora Wetland Indicator Species (DEHP 2015f)
No Referable Wetlands were identified during desktop searches (DEHP 2015c). Six unmapped wetlands were detected during field assessments at the Site. They met wetland definition criteria (DERM 2011) in that they showed topographic and hydrologic evidence of inundation and the presence of indicator biotic features (hydrophytes, wetland dependent fauna). Details of these features are shown in Table 17. The locations are mapped at Appendix K. Table 17: Ground-truthed wetlands at the Site.
Survey Site Site Characteristics
Wooded swamp (RE 11.3.25) on drainage line, currently dry; Eucalyptus tereticornis prominent in tree layer, S2-SP8 ground layer of Eleocharis cylindrostachys*, E. plana*, Juncus usitatus* Shallow drainage depression (swamp) in disturbed RE 11.3.25 (2 retained Eucalyptus tereticornis present); S4-SP8 substrate is grey cracking clay loam; ground layer of Eleocharis cylindrostachys*, Paspalum distichum*, Eragrostis parviflora Anabranch of Yuleba Creek: clay substrate with evidence of retained pools, flood debris; large Eucalyptus S8-SP8 tereticornis* present, also Leptochloa digitata* patches
Wetland embedded in disturbed RE 11.3.25: shallow basin, currently dry; anaerobic cracking clay loam S14-SP8 substrate; vegetation dominated by Cyperus exaltatus*, minor areas of Eleocharis plana, Glinus lotoides
Rev 0 25 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Anabranch of Yuleba Creek: shallow, sparsely wooded swamp, one shallow pool still with water, otherwise dry; S31-SP8 fringing RE 11.3.25, ground layer dominated by Cyperus exaltatus*, Cyperus sp., Chrysopogon filipes. Wetland associated with margins of mapped stream order 3 watercourse: drainage depression, currently dry; S64-SP8 grey cracking clay loam substrate with much organic enrichment; ground layer dominated by Leptochloa digitata*, with areas of Eleocharis plana*, Juncus usitatus*. *Flora Wetland Indicator Species (DEHP 2015f)
4.2.5. Conclusions
An ecological assessment of the Site showed the following ecological values to be present: Two Endangered REs: 11.9.5 and 11.9.10. Three Of Concern REs: 11.3.2, 11.3.25 and 11.9.7. Four Special Least Concern flora species: o Kurrajong (Brachychiton populneus); o Narrow-leaved Bottle Tree (Brachychiton rupestris); o Black Orchid (Cymbidium canaliculatum); and o Sandalwood (Santalum lanceolatum). Potential habitat for seven EPBC Act threat-listed species: Belson’s Panic, the Australian Painted Snipe, Koala, South-eastern Long-eared Bat, Collared Delma, Dunmall’s Snake and the Yakka Skink. Potential habitat for eleven NC Act threat-listed species: Belson’s Panic, Winged Nightshade, Glossy Black- Cockatoo, Australian Painted Snipe, South-eastern Long-eared Bat, Collared Delma, Common Death Adder, Dunmall’s Snake, Golden-tailed Gecko, Yakka Skink and the Pale Imperial Hairstreak butterfly. The following environmental constraints were recorded at the Site: Four Class 2 declared pest animals: o Dingo; o Feral Cat; o European Rabbit; and o Feral Pig. It is recommended that the findings in this report are considered during detailed development planning such that disturbance to the ecological values of the site and locality may be avoided wherever practical. Where disturbance is unavoidable, impact mitigation measures are to be implemented in accordance with the approved site environmental management plan and regulatory approval conditions.
Rev 0 26 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Appendix A. Site Location and Vegetation Survey Points.
Rev 0 27 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 28 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Appendix B. Results of EPBC Protected Matters Search Tool
Rev 0 29 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 30 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 31 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 32 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 33 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 34 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 35 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 36 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 37 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 38
Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Appendix C.Wildlife Online Database Search Results.
Rev 0 39 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 40
Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 41
Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 42
Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 43
Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Appendix D. EHP Mapped Regional Ecosystems.
Rev 0 44 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 45 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Appendix E. EHP Mapping of ESAs and Other Environmental Values on Site.
Rev 0 46 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 47 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Appendix F. List of Fauna and Native Flora Species Identified on Site.
Legislative status Legislative status Class Scientific name Common name (NC Act, LP Act)* (EPBC Act)*
Flora Acacia amblygona Fan Wattle LC - Acacia caroleae Carole’s Wattle LC - Acacia conferta Crowded-leaf Wattle LC - Acacia decora Pretty Wattle LC - Acacia excelsa Ironwood LC - Acacia harpophylla Brigalow LC - Acacia leiocalyx Early Flowering Black Wattle LC - Acacia salicina Sally Wattle, Doolan LC - Acacia shirleyi Lancewood LC - Alectryon diversifolius Scrub Boonaree LC - Allocasuarina inophloia Thready-bark She-oak LC - Allocasuarina luehmannii Bulloak LC - Alphitonia excelsa Red Ash LC - Alstonia constricta Bitterbark LC - Ancistrachne uncinulata Hooky Grass LC - Angophora floribunda Rough-barked Apple LC - Angophora leiocarpa Smooth-barked Apple LC - Anthobolus leptomerioides No common name LC - Aristida caput-medusae Many-headed Wiregrass LC - Aristida spp. Wiregrasses - - Arundinella nepalensis Reedgrass LC - Atalaya hemiglauca Whitewood LC - Auranticarpa rhombifolia Diamond Pittosporum, Hollywood LC - Austrostipa verticillata Slender Bamboo Grass LC - Bertya oleifolia No common name LC - Boronia occidentalis Rock Boronia LC - Bothriochloa decipiens Pitted Bluegrass LC - Brachychiton populneus Kurrajong SLC - Brachychiton rupestris Narrow-leaved Bottle Tree SLC - Brunoniella australis Blue Trumpet LC - Callitris glaucophylla White Cypress Pine LC - Capparis canescens Wild Orange LC - Capparis lasiantha Wait-A-While LC - Carissa ovata Currant Bush LC - Casuarina cristata Belah LC - Chloris ventricosa Tall Chloris LC - Chrysocephalum apiculatum Yellow Buttons LC - Chrysopogon filipes Australian Vetiver LC -
Rev 0 48 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Legislative status Legislative status Class Scientific name Common name (NC Act, LP Act)* (EPBC Act)*
Cleistochloa subjuncea No common name LC - Corymbia clarksoniana Clarkson's Bloodwood LC - Corymbia tessellaris Carbeen LC - Corymbia trachyphloia Brown Bloodwood LC - Cymbidium canaliculatum Black Orchid SLC - Cymbopogon refractus Barbed-wire Grass LC - Cyperus exaltatus Tall Flat-sedge, Giant Sedge LC - Dianella longifolia Long-leaved Flax Lily, Smooth Flax LC -
Lily Digitaria brownei Cotton Panic LC - Dimorphochloa rigida No common name LC - Elaeodendron australe Red Olive Plum LC - Eleocharis cylindrostachys Drooping Spike-rush LC - Enchylaena tomentosa Ruby Saltbush LC - Enteropogon ramosus Twirly Windmill Grass LC - Eragrostis lacunaria Purple Lovegrass LC - Eremophila deserti Ellangowan Poison-bush LC - Eremophila mitchellii False Sandalwood LC - Eriachne mucronata Mountain Wanderrie Grass LC - Eucalyptus chloroclada Baradine Red Gum LC - Eucalyptus crebra Narrow-leaved Ironbark LC - Eucalyptus exserta Queensland Peppermint LC - Eucalyptus fibrosa Dusky-leaved Ironbark LC - Eucalyptus melanophloia Silver-leaved Ironbark LC - Eucalyptus populnea Poplar Box LC - Eucalyptus tereticornis Queensland Blue Gum LC - Gahnia aspera Rough Saw-Sedge LC - Geijera parviflora Wilga LC - Glinus lotoides Hairy Carpet Weed LC - Goodenia rotundifolia Star Goodenia LC - Grewia latifolia Dysentery Bush LC - Hakea lorea Bootlace Oak LC - Imperata cylindrica Blady Grass LC - Jasminum didymum Native Jasmine LC - Juncus usitatus Common Rush LC - Leptochloa digitata Umbrella Canegrass LC - Leucopogon mitchellii A Beard-heath LC - Lomandra leucocephala Woolly Mat-rush LC - Lomandra longifolia Spiny-headed Mat-rush LC - Lomandra multiflora Many-flowered Mat-rush LC -
Rev 0 49 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Legislative status Legislative status Class Scientific name Common name (NC Act, LP Act)* (EPBC Act)*
Lomandra sp. A Mat-rush - - Lysiana subfalcata Lemon-flowered Mistletoe, Northern LC -
Mistletoe Maireana microphylla Cotton Bush LC - Melaleuca uncinata Broom Honey-myrtle LC - Melia azedarach White Cedar LC - Ozothamnus diosmifolius White Dogwood LC - Paspalidium caespitosum Brigalow Grass LC - Paspalidium sp. A Grass LC - Paspalum distichum Water Couch LC - Petalostigma pubescens Quinine Tree LC - Philotheca difformis No common name LC - Prostanthera sp. (Baking Board V.Hando 135) A Mintbush - - Psydrax johnsonii Brigalow Canthium LC - Santalum lanceolatum Sandalwood SLC - Scaevola spinescens Maroon Bush LC - Scleria sphacelata Razor Grass LC - Sclerolaena birchii Galvanised Burr LC - Sida hackettiana Spiked Sida LC - Solanum coracinum A Prickly Nightshade LC - Solanum ferocissimum Spiny Potato Bush LC - Solanum parvifolium Small-leaved Nightshade LC - Themeda triandra Kangaroo Grass LC - Ventilago viminalis Supplejack LC - Fauna Acanthagenys rufogularis Spiny-cheeked Honeyeater LC - Acanthiza apicalis Inland Thornbill LC - Acanthiza chrysorrhoa Yellow-rumped Thornbill LC - Acanthiza uropygialis Chestnut-rumped Thornbill LC - Accipiter cirrocephalus Collared Sparrowhawk LC - Alisterus scapularis Australian King-Parrot LC - Anthus novaeseelandiae Australasian Pipit LC Marine Aprosmictus erythropterus Red-winged Parrot LC - Aquila audax Wedge-tailed Eagle LC - Ardea pacifica White-necked Heron LC - Cacatua galerita Sulphur-crested Cockatoo LC - Canis lupus dingo Australian Dingo Class 2 - Carlia pectoralis Open-litter Rainbow-skink LC - Centropus phasianinus Pheasant Coucal LC - Colluricincla harmonica Grey Shrike-thrush LC - Coracina maxima Ground Cuckoo-Shrike LC -
Rev 0 50 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Legislative status Legislative status Class Scientific name Common name (NC Act, LP Act)* (EPBC Act)*
Coracina novaehollandiae Black-faced Cuckoo-Shrike LC Marine Corvus coronoides Australian Raven LC - Corvus orru Torresian Crow LC - Cracticus tibicen Australian Magpie LC - Cracticus torquatus Grey Butcherbird LC - Cryptoblepharus pulcher pulcher Elegant Snake-eyed Skink LC - Dicaeum hirundinaceum Mistletoebird LC - Dromaius novaehollandiae Emu LC - Egretta novaehollandiae White-faced Heron LC - Eolophus roseicapillus Galah LC - Eopsaltria australis Eastern Yellow Robin LC - Falco cenchroides Nankeen Kestrel LC Marine Falco longipennis Australian Hobby LC - Felis catus Cat Class 2 - Gehyra dubia Northern Dtella LC - Geopelia humeralis Bar-shouldered Dove LC - Gerygone albogularis White-throated Gerygone LC - Gerygone fusca Western Gerygone LC - Grallina cyanoleuca Magpie-lark LC Marine Heteronotia binoei Bynoe's Gecko LC - Macropus giganteus Eastern Grey Kangaroo LC - Macropus robustus Common Wallaroo LC - Macropus rufogriseus Red-necked Wallaby LC - Malurus cyaneus Superb Fairy-wren LC - Malurus lamberti Variegated Fairy-wren LC - Manorina melanocephala Noisy Miner LC - Microeca fascinans Jacky Winter LC - Morethia boulengeri Boulenger's Skink LC - Nesoptilotis leucotis White-eared Honeyeater LC - Nymphicus hollandicus Cockatiel LC - Ocyphaps lophotes Crested Pigeon LC - Oryctolagus cuniculus Rabbit Class 2 - Pachycephala rufiventris Rufous Whistler LC - Pardalotus punctatus Spotted Pardalote LC - Pardalotus striatus Striated Pardalote LC - Platycercus adscitus Pale-headed Rosella LC - Plectorhyncha lanceolata Striped Honeyeater LC - Pomatostomus temporalis Grey-crowned Babbler LC - Ptilonorhynchus maculatus Spotted Bowerbird LC - Rhipidura albiscapa Grey Fantail LC -
Rev 0 51 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Legislative status Legislative status Class Scientific name Common name (NC Act, LP Act)* (EPBC Act)*
Rhipidura leucophrys Willie Wagtail LC - Smicrornis brevirostris Weebill LC - Sus scrofa Feral Pig Class 2 - Tachyglossus aculeatus Short-beaked Echidna SLC - Taeniopygia bichenovii Double-barred Finch LC - Trichoglossus haematodus moluccanus Rainbow Lorikeet LC - Trichosurus vulpecula Common Brushtail Possum LC - Turnix varius Painted Button-Quail LC - Vanellus miles Masked Lapwing LC - Vanellus tricolor Banded Lapwing LC - Varanus panoptes Yellow-spotted Monitor LC - Zosterops lateralis Silvereye LC Marine
*Status taken from Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 and DoE 2015c
Rev 0 52 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Appendix G.Ground Truthed TEC at the Site
Rev 0 53 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 54 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Appendix H.Ground Truthed Regional Ecosystems.
Rev 0 55 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 56 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Appendix I. Special Least Concern Flora and Fauna Recorded at the Site
Rev 0 57 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 58 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Appendix J. Pest Fauna Recorded at the Site.
Rev 0 59 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 60 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others Appendix K. Ground Truthed Drainage Features and Watercourses Present on Site.
Rev 0 61 Ecological Assessment Report – Lot/Plan 14WV549 and others
Rev 0 62