From the Courthouse to the Schoolhouse

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From the Courthouse to the Schoolhouse U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Shay Bilchik, Administrator February 2000 From the Courthouse to From the Administrator The successful reintroduction of the Schoolhouse: Making juvenile offenders from correctional facilities into the communities in Successful Transitions which they live is fraught with chal- lenges. It is, however, an essential process in which schools play a key role in ensuring the offender’s chances Ronald D. Stephens and June Lane Arnette for success and the classroom’s status as a safe environment of learning. In This Bulletin is one of a series of OJJDP would be compelled to learn and become re- fact, the transition that a juvenile of- Bulletins focusing on both promising and sponsible citizens. The Chicago Board of fender makes from secure confine- effective programs and innovative strate- Education understood that when young ment to school will likely shape the gies to reach Youth Out of the Education people were not in school, they were often youth’s transition to the community. Mainstream (YOEM). YOEM is a joint pro- out in the community committing delinquent gram initiative of the Office of Juvenile Jus- acts. The Board also recognized that school- In 1996, the Office of Juvenile Justice tice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. De- ing was a key to crime prevention. While the and Delinquency Prevention and the partment of Justice, and the Safe and Board’s theory sounds simple enough, the Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program Drug-Free Schools Program, U.S. Depart- process it implies is complex and is filled asked the National School Safety ment of Education. The YOEM initiative with both opportunities and risks. Center to identify strategies for en- focuses on at-risk youth who are truant, hancing services for youth out of the With the approach of a new century, a new dropouts, fearful of attending school, sus- education mainstream. pended or expelled, or in need of help rein- priority has emerged for schools to play a tegrating into mainstream schools from ju- major role in the transition of young offend- This Bulletin, one of a series address- venile detention and correctional settings. ers from confinement within a juvenile jus- ing issues related to that initiative, Each Bulletin in this series highlights one tice setting to life in the community. Schools describes effective approaches to or more of these five separate but often are being asked to shoulder the dual respon- reintegrating youth from juvenile related categories of problems that cause sibility of preventing juvenile crime and de- justice system settings into the ed- youth to forsake their education and thus veloping a responsible citizenry. The public ucation mainstream and provides place themselves at risk of delinquency. believes that school is the right place for information about promising pro- young people to be if they are to stay away grams, practices, and resources. “… We should rightfully have the from trouble and focus on learning and per- power to arrest all these little beggars, sonal development. This belief holds that With help from all concerned, juvenile offenders can return to their commu- loafers, and vagabonds that infest our the interests of young offenders can best be city, take them from the streets and served in school, where these children can nities to lead productive lives. I hope that the information this Bulletin con- place them in schools where they are obtain academic and social skills that will compelled to receive education and enable them to become good students and tains will assist them in taking the first step—successful transition to learn moral principles.” productive members of the community. school. —Chicago Board of Education, Thus, schools need to provide a coordina- 44th Annual Report, 1898 tion and support structure for promoting the Shay Bilchik success of young people who have had con- Administrator It has been over a century since the tact with the juvenile justice system. Chicago Board of Education released its now-infamous edict to arrest disruptive The successful transition of juvenile of- youth and put them in schools where they fenders from correctional systems back to school and community environments can be a difficult one. Juvenile detention and correc- tional facilities are designed to provide a structured environment with continuous supervision and a wide range of services (medical and mental health services, educa- tion, training, counseling, and recreation). Moving from this environment, with its per- sonalized care and intense supervision, to the relatively less structured environment of mainstream education settings presents problems for both the youth and the educa- tors involved in the process. For the most part, neither group is adequately prepared to address these problems. Young offenders making the transition back to school often are still affected by the social and personal influences that contributed to the conduct that placed them under the jurisdiction of the court documentation regarding these students’ to guide youth-serving professionals in the first place. Such influences, or “risk personal and scholastic histories, which toward promising programs, practices, factors,” include delinquent peer groups, makes it difficult to select appropriate edu- and resources. poor academic performance, high-crime cational placements for them. Educators neighborhoods, weak family attachments, must also deal with their own prejudices lack of consistent discipline, and physical and fears regarding juvenile offenders— Scope of the Problem or sexual abuse.1 A youth may also return attitudes that may impede decisions about According to OJJDP’s National Juvenile to school with a variety of special service placement and services for individual juve- Court Data Archive, the Nation’s juvenile needs (such as individual counseling, niles and thereby hinder their successful courts processed 1,757,600 delinquency drug rehabilitation, and family counsel- reintegration into the school setting. cases (cases involving juveniles charged ing) that are outside the scope of the with criminal law violations) in 1996.2 Each mainstream education system. case in this count represents one youth Youth Out of the processed on a new referral during the Educators, including both teachers and Education Mainstream calendar year. Although an individual administrators, face unique problems in Initiative youth may be involved in more than one helping young offenders make the transi- case during the year, this figure can be tion back to school. The main problem of- In 1996, the U.S. Department of Justice’s used to estimate that as many as 6 percent ten is a lack of complete information and Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency of the Nation’s school-age youth are pro- Prevention (OJJDP) and the U.S. Depart- cessed through juvenile justice systems ment of Education’s Safe and Drug-Free A Note About Prevention each school year. Juvenile offenders re- Schools Program asked the National School turning to school from out-of-home Although reintegrating young offenders Safety Center to develop strategies for placement represent a relatively small into the education mainstream is a ma- enhancing services to youth out of the percentage of this group of students, but jor concern, emphasis should also be education mainstream. The Youth Out of managing and supporting system-involved given to building prevention programs the Education Mainstream (YOEM) initia- juveniles, including those returning from for young people before they begin a tive drew attention to the needs of five out-of-home placement, are critical to life of crime and violence. Communi- often interrelated categories of at-risk the success of all students, the vast ma- ties must improve their ability to identify youth: students fearful of attending school jority of whom have followed the rules and address the risk factors that cause because of violence, truants, dropouts, and behaved as expected. troubled youth and their families to drift suspended/expelled youth, and youth re- away from mainstream education. turning to school from correctional set- tings in the juvenile justice system. As a Impact of the Problem Many at-risk young people make the result of their separation from mainstream on Youth and Society disastrous choice of dropping out of education, youth in these categories face school or of behaving in ways that many obstacles to becoming successful, The lack of an education can make an cause them to be abandoned by or socially responsible adults. enormous difference in a juvenile’s life. pushed out of the school setting. Next Harold Hodgkinson, a demographer and to the family, school is perhaps the This Bulletin is one in a series designed education analyst, writes that dropping most formative influence in a child’s life. to address issues associated with the five out of school as a youth is a factor closely Providing meaningful educational pro- categories of youth identified by the YOEM related to being a prisoner as an adult. He grams together with support systems initiative. Its purpose is to shed light on estimates that States spend roughly $22,000 3 and networks to assist young people in successful strategies for reintegrating annually on each adult in prison. Other the learning process is essential. youth from juvenile justice system set- researchers estimate that it costs as much tings into the education mainstream and as $35,000 to $60,000 per year to incarcerate 2 one youth.4 In contrast, the average cost or she were an adult. The waiver decision providing services, seldom does one to educate one student for 1 year is is based on a variety of constitutional and agency maintain a portfolio documenting about $7,000.5 It makes economic sense statutory factors, including the severity the complete range of services that have for communities to emphasize education of the offense, the age and prior record been and are being provided to the juve- over incarceration.
Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Youth Justice in Scotland: Policy, Practice and Legislation
    www.cycj.org.uk A Guide to Youth Justice in Scotland: policy, practice and legislation Contents Section 1: Background, Policy and Legislation ………page 1 Section 2: Youth Justice in Scotland: the roles and responsibilities of key partners…………………………………………………page 31 Section 3: Theory and Methods …………………………...page 47 Section 4: Early and Effective Intervention & Diversion from Prosecution ………………………………………………...page 73 Section 5: Managing Risk of Serious Harm ………………page 89 Section 6: Reintegrations and Transitions ………………page 119 Section 7: Vulnerable Girls and Young Women ………..page 138 Section 8: Residential Care …………………………….page 168 Section 9: Speech, Language and Communication Needs in Youth Justice …………………………………………………page 199 Section 10: Mental Health …………………………………...page 232 www.cycj.org.uk A Guide to Youth Justice in Scotland: policy, practice and legislation Section 1: Background, Policy and Legislation Contents 1. Introduction …………………………………………………page 1 2. Key policies and approaches …………………………….page 2 3 Historical background: Youth Justice in Scotland ….page 6 4. Rights ………………………………………………………...page 10 5. Legislative Framework …………………………………….page 12 6. Young people in the Criminal Justice system …………page 26 1 www.cycj.org.uk 1. Introduction In Scotland, one of the principles underpinning the philosophy and practice with both children and young people who offend is a welfare approach. This stems from the work of the Kilbrandon Committee in 1964 and formed the basis of the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968. Based on this principle, the primary role of youth justice in Scotland should be to improve life chances for children and young people, and to work with children, their families and communities to prevent offending and re-offending. The approach to children involved in offending should be guided by GIRFEC (Getting it Right for Every Child), recognising that these are children first and foremost.
    [Show full text]
  • Disclosing the Identities of Juvenile Felons: Introducing Accountability to Juvenile Justice Arthur R
    Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 27 Article 7 Issue 2 Winter 1996 1996 Disclosing the Identities of Juvenile Felons: Introducing Accountability to Juvenile Justice Arthur R. Blum Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Juvenile Law Commons Recommended Citation Arthur R. Blum, Disclosing the Identities of Juvenile Felons: Introducing Accountability to Juvenile Justice, 27 Loy. U. Chi. L. J. 349 (1996). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol27/iss2/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago Law Journal by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Comments Disclosing the Identities of Juvenile Felons: Introducing Accountability to Juvenile Justice When he wasn't stealing cars, he was throwing things at them or setting them on fire. "What could you do? . Tell his grandmother? She'd yell at him, and he'd be right back on the street. If the police picked him up, they'd just bring him back home because he was too young to lock up. He was untouchable, and he knew that."' I. INTRODUCTION The above passage articulates the exasperation felt by many who knew and feared eleven-year-old Robert Sandifer.2 In just a year and a half, he compiled a rap sheet that contained twenty-three felonies and five misdemeanors. 3 On August 28, 1994, apparently acting upon in- structions from older members of his gang, 4 he fired a semi-automatic weapon into a group of kids playing football and killed fourteen-year- old Shavon White, who happened to be in the area.5 Shortly after the shooting, according to the Chicago Police, fourteen-year-old Derrick Hardaway and his sixteen-year-old brother Cragg, both members of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Justice Statistics 2018/19 England and Wales
    Youth Justice Statistics 2018/19 England and Wales Youth Justice Board / Ministry of Justice Statistics bulletin Published 30 January 2020 1 Youth Justice Statistics, England and Wales, April 2018 to March 2019 The Youth Justice System (YJS) in England and Wales works to prevent offending and reoffending by children. The YJS is different to the adult system and is structured to address the needs of children. This publication looks at the YJS in England and Wales for the year ending March 2019. It considers the number of children (those aged 10-17) in the system, the offences they committed, the outcomes they received, their demographics and the trends over time. Main points The number of children who received a caution or sentence has 21,700 children were fallen by 83% over the last ten years, with a 19% fall in the last cautioned or sentenced year. The number of first time entrants has fallen by 85% since the 11,900 first time entrants to year ending March 2009, with an 18% fall since the year ending the YJS March 2018. 4,500 knife and offensive There was a 1% decrease in these offences compared with the weapon offences were previous year after four year-on-year increases. Levels are 31% committed by children lower than those seen in the year ending March 2009. The average custodial sentence length given to children The average custodial increased by more than six months over the last ten years, sentence length has increased from 11.4 to 17.7 months. The number of children held in The number of children held in youth custody on remand custody on remand has increased by 12% in the last year and accounted for 28% of all increased children in youth custody.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of 'Prolific' Offending by Young People in Wales 2009-2015
    A study of ‘prolific’ offending by young people in Wales 2009-2015 Diana Johns, Katherine S Williams and Kevin Haines. Welsh Centre for Crime and Social Justice (WCCSJ) January 2018 Cover photograph used under free MorgueFile licence. Original image URI: http://mrg.bz/PS3Js9 Acknowledgments This research is the result of collaborative work between the Welsh Centre for Crime and Social Justice and the Youth Justice Board (YJB) Cymru. In particular Dusty Kennedy and Lynzi Jarman (YJB Cymru) who, along with the authors, formed the steering group. We wish to acknowledge this team of people for their genuine commitment to understanding and improving the experience of young people in conflict with the law, and for the wonderful support they gave us in undertaking this research. Diana acknowledges with particular gratitude our YJB colleagues who offered invaluable assistance, support and friendship during her year in Wales. The people in the YOTs Diana visited across Wales are too numerous to mention individually. Needless to say, without their openness and willingness to help, this research would not have been possible. Thank you to all the YOT workers, managers, information officers, police officers and administrative staff who welcomed Diana into their workplaces, gave their time and energy, and shared their stories, experience and passion for the young people they work with. We are all incredibly grateful to the four young men who shared their personal experiences of ‘getting into lots of trouble’, and to the YOT workers they trusted enough to allow Diana to meet with them. The perspective of the ‘lads’ themselves on what helped them and made it hard to stay out of trouble was invaluable for the research and to help us understand some of the complexities associated with young people’s ‘prolific’ offending.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice for Juveniles
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. )OS!, 7 JUSTICE FOR JUVENILES Charles E. Springer Vice-Chief Justice Supreme Court of Nevada ~ " :tment of Justice lvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention OJJDP Ie * JUSTICE FOR JUVENILES Charles E. Springer Vice-Chief Justice Supreme Court of Nevada U.S. Department of Justice Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention OJJDP II ,I;' - c :;;w '&-••1\'£:-.' ¥W, Charles E. Springer is Vice-Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada. Prior to being commissioned to the Supreme Court, he was Juvenile Court Master for the Second Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada from 1973 to 1980. He has also served the State of Nevada as Attorney General. He received the Outstanding Service Award from the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges in 1980 and has served on the Boards and Commissions of numerous civic and State organizations in an effort to improve the quality of justice for adults and juveniles . ........ * & & !MI',. u. S. ~partment of Justice Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention NmionallnslituJejiJr Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Juvenile Ju.rl;" Cfrorin8/w"''' NCJRS Box6000. Rochill<. MD 20lJjO Dear Colleague: "Justice for Juveniles" is a serious and deliberative look at the juvenile justice systeln, its philosophical and historical underpinnings, the strengths and weaknesses of today's system, and the implications for its future. Last year over 35,000 juveniles were arrested in this country for violent crimes, including murder, rape, and aggravated assault. The success of this office's e~forts to reduce juvenile crime and create a nlore secure society depends on the ready exchange of information and ideas among professionals in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix VIII the YOUNG OFFENDER
    ABSTRACT The present thesis is a detailed examination of bullying behaviour in Young Offender Institutions and assaultive behaviour in adult prisons and Young Offender Institutions. An amalgam of methods of enquiry were used throughout, which comprised i) questionnaires, ii) structured interviews. Hi) focus groups, iv) standardised measures of personality, intelli^ ce and social background, v) analysis of official discipline report records, vi) analysis f f official assault incident report records and vii) analysis of computerised prisoner records. This mixture of methods, known as 'triangulation', was adopted in an attempt to achieve a more reliable and valid representation of bullying and assaultive behaviour occurring within penal establishments. Information was obtained from a variety of subject groups, including convicted young offenders, young offenders on remand, convicted adult prisoners, adult prisoners on remand, prison officers, prisons management and specialist staff working in the prisons. Data were analysed by means of parametric and non-parametric statistical techniques. Seven cross-sectional studies were designed and conducted, the results of which are reported herein. The first five studies examined only Young Offender Institutions. Concerning young offenders, the levels of bullying ivere comparatively high when compared with studies done on analogous populations. Among young offenders, the most common types of bullying were similar to those shown in previous studies, such as taxing, threats and name calling. More staff in Young Offender Institutions perceived bullying as a problem both nationally and in their own establishment than did young offenders. While staff and young offenders had discordant opinions as to the levels and types of bullying taking place within Young Offender Institutions, they had concordant views as to the characteristics of 'bullies' and 'victims'.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Violence in Institutions for Juvenile Offenders
    Strasbourg, 7 November 2014 PC-CP (2014) 13 rev 2 PC-CP\docs 2014\PC-CP(2014)13e rev2 EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) Council for Penological Co-operation (PC-CP) Report on Violence in Institutions for Juvenile Offenders Document prepared by: Prof Dr T. Liefaard Dr J. Reef M. Hazelzet, LL.M Leiden University, Leiden Law School UNICEF Chair in Children’s Rights The Netherlands ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This report has been prepared with the support of Ms. Ilina Taneva, Secretary to the PC-CP and Ms. Christine Coleur, Assistant to Ms. Taneva. The authors would like to express their gratitude to all respondents to the questionnaires and to the offices of the ombudspersons for children that responded to the request for materials. In addition, the authors would like to thank Prof Dr Frank Neubacher M.A. of the University of Cologne, Germany, for his feedback on an earlier draft of the report. This report is also contributing to the activities carried out within the framework of the CoE Strategy for the Rights of the Child. Content Chapter 1 Components of the study 1.1 Objectives and focus of study 1.2 Methodology 1.2.1 Literature study 1.2.2. Empirical Research 1.3 Structure of the report Chapter 2 Introduction to violence in institutions for juvenile offenders Chapter 3 Prevalence of violence in institutions for juvenile offenders 3.1 General observations 3.2 Violence by inmates (among juveniles,
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Custody in Scotland: Rates, Trends and Drivers
    YOUTH CUSTODY IN SCOTLAND: RATES, TRENDS AND DRIVERS SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION The upward trend in youth custody rates across the UK has led the Prison Reform Trust, with support from The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund, to identify the drivers to youth custody and to reduce the overall numbers of children and young people in prison or secure settings. The Trust’s concerns rest on the following facts: • Imprisoning children is harsh and ineffective; • Children can suffer mental health problems as a result of being deprived of their liberty and having limited contact with family and friends; • The incarceration of children is not cost-effective; • Custody exacerbates rather than reduces youth crime (Prison Reform Trust/ SmartJustice, 2008). Two studies have been undertaken in England and Wales to date as a result of this campaign (Gibbs and Hickson, 2009; Prison Reform Trust/SmartJustice, 2008). The Prison Reform Trust now wants to explore youth custody rates, trends and drivers in Scotland, with a view to reducing numbers of children and young people held in custody north of the Border. This review therefore gives some key statistics on youth custody rates and trends and explores the drivers to changes in those rates over time. The review identifies four key drivers: a) increasingly stringent requirements imposed on children and young people who offend; b) the increased use of remand; c) shorter prison sentences with little scope for rehabilitation; and d) the earlier criminalisation of children and young people. Reducing child imprisonment requires attention to all four of these factors which interact in different ways and at different times, depending on policy, practice and public concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • European Perspective on Youth Crime Prevention and Reintegration
    European Perspective on Youth Crime Prevention and Reintegration Prof. Dr. Ton Liefaard | Santiago de Chile, 28 November 2016 Discover theDwisocroldverattLheidene worldUnaitvLereidensity University Content and objectives of presentation Focus: How to respond to youth committing criminal offences? A European Perspective Outline: I. How is Europe organized? – Council of Europe & European Union - Standard-setting (law), agenda-setting (policy) and implementation II. Four themes - Prevention - Reintegration - Deprivation of liberty of children - Child-friendly justice III. Some reflections & lessons (to be) learned IV. Q&A Overarching perspective: international children’s rights. Discover the world at Leiden University European Union (EU) - 28 member states Discover the world at Leiden University Europe – Council of Europe Albania Estonia Lithuania San Marino Tirana Tallinn Vilnius San Marino Council of Europe 47 Member States Andorra Finland Luxembourg Serbia Andorra-la-Vella Helsinki Luxembourg Belgrade t f o r E a s t a u S i B e b e r i a n S e S a a e O k of Alask a ho Armenia France Malta Slovakia t sk Yerevan Paris Valletta Bratislava E a st S i ber i a a n S t S e ea f or J a u a p B e c t i a n r c S A ea o f a J a d a pa a n n Austria Georgia Republic of Moldova Slovenia n i Vienna Tbilisi Chişinău Ljubljana a h C O C c e a n Azerbaijan Germany Monaco Spain G Baku Berlin Monaco Madrid r e e n ( a o D n en i y y s Ma e l Jan l a d n.
    [Show full text]
  • Timely Justice: Turning 18 a Briefing on the Impact of Turning 18 in the Criminal Justice System
    Timely Justice: Turning 18 A briefing on the impact of turning 18 in the criminal justice system Introduction Quite simply, the impact of turning 18 is profound. If a child reaches this age before criminal proceedings Young adults who have committed offences are commenced, they will become an adult in the as children must have the opportunity to build eyes of the law. Significant inequities arise for those meaningful futures and be treated fairly. The United who commit offences as children but cross the age Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (the threshold in to adulthood before their cases are “UN Committee”), has made it clear that “child heard. justice systems should also extend protection to children who were below the age of 18 at the time of The data available indicates that each year the commission of the offence but who turn 18 during approximately 2%-3% of proven offences are the trial or sentencing process1.” committed by children who turn 18 prior to conviction. This corresponds to 2,500 offences for System delay is the main reason children turn the twelve months ended March 2017 and 1,400 18 between the commission of an offence offences for the twelve months ended March 20183. and prosecution, resulting in real injustice. Turning 18 prior to conviction has a significant The coronavirus crisis has exacerbated delays impact as the young people affected are prosecuted throughout the criminal justice system and the in adult courts and lose the opportunity to benefit impact on children approaching their 18h birthdays from the youth justice system.
    [Show full text]
  • Wartime Alliances Versus Coalition Warfare How Institutional Structure Matters in the Multilateral Prosecution of Wars
    ASPJ Africa & Francophonie - 3rd Quarter 2011 Wartime Alliances versus Coalition Warfare How Institutional Structure Matters in the Multilateral Prosecution of Wars DR. PATRICIA A. WEITSMAN* raffiti on the latrine walls at Kandahar airfield in Afghanistan do not make entirely clear who the enemy is. One Canadian says to the Americans, “Identify your . target before you kill.” And the response is, “Canadians, first learn how to fight and stop getting your ass kicked every time you go outside the wire.”1 Tension within the Granks is normal, especially under pressure-cooker conditions of wartime. Yet the dynamics of intracoalition and intra-alliance politics are largely ignored in advance of decisions on how to prosecute wars and in under- standing the politics of state behavior once wars are under way. This is troubling, given the importance of institutional design and its impact on fighting effectiveness. No one doubts that military alliances are highly consequential in shaping the landscape of international politics. States pursue alliances to preserve themselves in the face of threats or to augment their power. Once formed, military alliances send ripples through the system, shaping the patterns of interaction among states, and may alter the identity politics among members.2 Because of the increased threat confronting nonmembers once an alliance is formed, it may alter future patterns of alignment or culminate in military hostilities. The most consequential realm of multi- lateral action is in the area of military operations, but scholars and policy *The author is professor of political science at Ohio University. She has published numerous articles and chapters in prominent journals, newspapers, and books, and has authored, coauthored, or coedited The Politics of Policy Making in Defense and Foreign Affairs (1993); Towards a New Europe (1995); Enforcing Cooperation (1997); and Dangerous Alliances: Proponents of Peace, Weapons of War (2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Harmony, Sone Wrote Several Letters to a Friend Describing the Living Conditions in the Camp
    AUTOBIOGRAPHY from Nisei Daughter by Monica Sone Dust storm at Manzanar War Relocation Authority Center, 1942. Photographer: Dorothea Lange. How do people react QuickWrite when they are forced What would you take if you had to leave home abruptly and you could to leave home? bring only two suitcases? What would you fi nd hard to leave behind? 512 Unit 2 • Collection 5 SKILLS FOCUS Literary Skills Understand charac- Reader/Writer teristics of autobiography; understand unity. Reading Notebook Skills Analyze details. Use your RWN to complete the activities for this selection. Vocabulary Autobiography and Unity An autobiography is a person’s tersely (TURS lee) adv.: briefl y and clearly; account of his or her own life or of part of it. Through autobiogra- without unnecessary words. The child phy we learn about the events in a person’s life as well as the writ- tersely gave his one-word description of the pigs near the camp. er’s observations about the impact of those experiences. Like all nonfi ction, an autobiography should have unity: Its details should breach (breech) n.: opening caused by a all support the main idea or topic. break, such as in a wall or in a line of defense. Monica was small enough to TTechFocuse As you read the story, think about how you might wiggle into the breach. create a graphic depiction of it by using a storyboard program. riveted (RIHV iht ihd) v. used as adj.: intensely focused on. The family was riveted by the sight of the burning stove. vigil (VIHJ uhl) n.: keeping guard; act of staying awake to keep watch.
    [Show full text]