American Journal of www.biomedgrid.com Biomedical Science & Research ISSN: 2642-1747 ------Mini Review Copyright@ Peter Klein Invasive Johnsongrass, A Threat to Native Grasslands and Agriculture

Peter Klein1* and C Michael Smith2 Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, USA *Corresponding author: Peter Klein, Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, USA. To Cite This Article: Peter Klein. Invasive Johnsongrass, A Threat to Native Grasslands and Agriculture. Am J Biomed Sci & Res. 2019 - 4(4). AJBSR.MS.ID.000814. DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2019.04.000814 Received: August 01, 2019 | Published: August 08, 2019

Abstract Among the weedy species, Johnsongrass ( halepense) is one of the most destructive. Johnsongrass has invaded new habitats beyond its native Eurasian origin by outcompeting native fauna and cultivated crops, due to a clonal and self-pollinating reproduction strategy,

on every continent. Over the past decades, extensively applied to control Johnsongrass have boosted selection pressure, resulting in the independentcombined with evolution an accelerated of -resistant growth habit. As ecotypes a result, acrossJohnsongrass multiple has locations. reduced However, native plant the diversity presence and of Johnsongrass inflicted economic itself damageis an enhanced to agriculture threat to crop production, as it serves as a host for many plant viral diseases.

Introduction linked to hormone signaling pathways, sugar response and trans- Among the worldwide relevant weeds, Johnsongrass is one of port, cell cycle, cell division and development as well as splicing fac- the top 10 noxious global mild-latitude weeds. Johnsongrass was tors that enable biotic and abiotic stress tolerance [10]. Rhizomes introduced to the U.S. separately, in South Carolina and Arizona [1]. are essential organs in storing carbohydrates and enable Johnson- The earliest introduction occurred around 1830 through contam- grass to reproduce clonally, resulting in enhanced competitiveness inated cotton seeds from Egypt successfully invading agricultural and invasiveness [11,12]. A single plant can produce a rhizome pastures and natural plains in South Carolina [2]. Currently, John- network more than 60 m in in length in 152 days [6]. During early songrass occurs in over 50 countries as a weed in 30 different crops development, Johnsongrass gain up to 4–fold more biomass [3]. Johnsongrass is native to Eurasia and is derived from natural than Panicum virgatum L. (switchgrass), Schizachyrium scoparium hybridization between diploid and Sorghum pro- (Michx.) Nash (little bluestem) and Andropogon gerardii Vitman pinquum less than 2 million years ago, when it underwent a spon- (big bluestem), due to increased leaf area, higher atmospheric car- taneous chromosome number duplication to 40 [4]. - Johnsongrass as invasive plant species house simulated seedling competition experiments between John- bon uptake and photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency [13]. Green One of the remarkable prosperity factors of Johnsongrass is songrass and these same C4 plant species resulted in a dramatic self-pollination [5]. It blooms 46 days after emergence and pro- 95% biomass loss in the native species if grown with Johnsongrass, duces up to 80,000 seed per plant in a single season which remain which suffered a moderate 11% loss of non-root biomass [14]. viable for up to 10 years in the soil [6,7]. Johnsongrass has a broad Johnsongrass Impacts on Agriculture seed depth germination rate ranging from 64% at 1 cm to 30% at 20 The density of Johnsongrass plants is a critical factor that ef- cm depth. Up to 6% of its seeds are able to germinate from depths as low as 25cm [8]. Further, Johnsongrass inherited the ability to increased Johnsongrass density accumulate drastically. In Turkey, reproduce by rhizomes from its S. propinquum parent. Analysis of fects surrounding vegetation, and floral biomass losses caused by a single Johnsongrass plant in an 8 m plant row decreased cot- S. propinquum promoter regions show an enrichment of cis-regu- ton yield by 7.12 % and when densities increased to 32 plants/ latory elements involved in abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellic acid 8 m plant row cotton yield dropped by 30% [15]. Similar results (GA) responses, suggesting a cross-talk between those hormones were observed in in the U. S. in Texas, where a single Johnsongrass in rhizomes. Both phytohormones are key regulators in rhizome plant/15 m cotton plant row reduced yield by 34$/hectare [16]. development [9]. Additional genes enriched in rhizome tips are

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License AJBSR.MS.ID.000814 279 Am J Biomed Sci & Res Copyright@ Peter Klein

threat to cultivated S. bicolor due to its close ancestry. In Texas and - Further studies demonstrated a significant cotton yield increase fop, where treating plots 3 weeks post-Johnsongrass emergence Johnsongrass populations adjacent to long-term sorghum produc- when treating Johnsongrass infested fields with herbicide fluazi Nebraska, up to 32% of unique S. bicolor alleles were identified in produced the same cotton quantity as weed-free lots. However, plot tion sites. The obtained evidence strongly suggests that engineered treatments delayed by 3, 5, 9 and 22 weeks reduced cotton yields by genes and herbicide resistance can potentially be transferred into 20-, 60-, 80- and 90%, respectively [17]. Johnsongrass and widely disseminated [35].

Soybean (Glycine max) is an important legume crop and was Johnsongrass, A Pathogen Source for Cultivated Plant domesticated 3,000 to 5,000 years ago in Asia with a spread out Over 25% of all existing fauna is estimated to serve as host for of Asia 250 years ago [18,19]. Due to its high protein and oil con- more than 4,000 phloem-feeding Aphidae (aphid) families [36,37]. tent and low carbohydrate content, it is widely used for animal feed Roughly 100 species of aphids are economically relevant species and human consumption [20,21]. Weeds such as Johnsongrass can [38] which incur global agricultural crop losses of billions of dollars drastically impact soybean production. Johnsongrass density of 32 annually [38]. Despite feeding-based biomass reductions due to sig- culms /10 m reduces soybean yield by 13- to 38% if it is allowed to compete uncontrolled for 6 weeks. The reduction increased up [39-41], aphids also have the potential to vector at least 275 plant nificant chlorophyll and carotenoid removal from damaged plants to 69% at a 7-week competition and reached 88% at full-season viruses. The potyviruses (MDMV), Sug- arcane Mosaic Virus (SCMV), Johnsongrass Mosaic Virus (JGMV), varieties heavily infested with Johnsongrass demonstrated yield competition [22]. In addition, field plot experiments with soybean and Sorghum Mosaic Virus (SrMV) are commonly found in corn, reductions of between 23- and 42% over a 3-year period [23]. Sim- Johnsongrass and sorghum, cause corn and sorghum yield losses ilar effects were observed in corn (Zea mays), where uncontrolled of up to 70%, mostly by causing leaf necrosis and photosynthesis 4-week competition between corn and Johnsongrass grown from shutdown [42-44]. rhizomes resulted in 10% to 14% less corn silage. A season-long competition between corn and Johnsongrass led to more than 80% The severity potential of MDMV cross-contamination between corn seed loss compared to weed-free corn plots [24]. In addition Johnsongrass and crop plants was demonstrated in samples col- to crop yield losses from Johnsongrass competition, producers con- lected from Ohio (U. S.) which indicated that 20 of 33 Johnsongrass trolling Johnsongrass with herbicides incur expenses of between plants were infected with MDMV compared to 43 of 56 maize plants $12 to $20 per acre for herbicides and their application, establish- - - ing Johnsongrass as a serious threat to constantly increasing hu- [45]. Virus identification studies on corn and Johnsongrass in corn grass to corn [46], however, virus transmission strategies among man demands for food [25]. fields suggest MDMV and SCMV viruses transfer from Johnson and between plant species are highly diverse. Around 50% of all Emerging Herbicide Resistance in Johnsongrass plant viruses are transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent mecha- Before the introduction of specialized herbicides for Johnson- nism [47]. To identify suitable host plants, aphids use their stylets grass, the species was controlled by repeated deep tilling and hoe- to sample phloem sap. During this process, the stylets contact the ing [26]. Later, pre-emergent application of broad range herbicides plant cell content and included virons which if acquired, are trans- such as Guardian MAX, Merlin and Stromp 330 EC prooved to be mitted by probing to healthy plants, and initiating the infection pro- highly effective against Jognsongrass infestations [27]. Presently, cess in the host plant [48]. susceptible Johnsongrass plants are controlled by from 88- to 97% References with quizalofop, , imazethapyr plus imazapyr, nicosul- 1. Sezen U U, Jacob N, Barney, Daniel Z Atwater, Gary A et al (2016) Multi- furon, and primisulfuron herbicides and by 56% with glufosinate Phase US Spread and Habitat Switching of a Post-Columbian Invasive, herbicide 3 weeks after treatment [28]. Over the past decades, how- Sorghum halepense. PLoS One 11(10): p0164584. ever, glyphosate (N‐(phosphonomethyl) glycine) has evolved as the 2. C. G. McWhorter (1971) Introduction and spread of Johnsongrass in the most preferred herbicide with more than 8.6 billion kg sold since United States Weed Science 19(5): 496-500. 1974 [29]. Glyphosate controls systematically perennial weeds 3. Holm LG, P D L, Pancho JV, Herberger JP (1977) The world’s Worst Weeds Distribution and Biology. Univ press Hawaii Honolulu 53(3): p.7. such as Johnsongrass [30]. However, intensive world-wide glypho- sate application has created glyphosate resistance in 35 known 4. Cox S, NP, Paterson AH Kong W, Nakasagga S (2018) Development of Pe- rennial Grain Sorghum. Sustainability 10(1). weed species, including Johnsongrass [31]. In Argentina, John- 5. songrass has developed independent multiple types of resistance Sorghum, Sorghum Bicolor, and the Common Johnsongrass Weed Sor- towards glyphosate requiring higher dosages for effective control ghumDweikat, Halepense. (2005) A Molecular Diploid, Interspecific, Breeding 16(2): Fertile 93-101. Hybrid from Cultivated [32,33]. Recurrent nicosulfuron application to seedling- and rhi- 6. CG M (1961) Morphology and development of Johnsongrass plants from zome-emerged Johnsongrass has also created resistant Johnson- seeds and rhizomes. Weeds 9(4): p.4. grass biotypes with 33- to 46 times higher herbicide resistance than 7. Ryder N, Dorn KM, Huitsing M, Adams M, Ploegstra J, et al (2018) Tran- susceptible control plants [34]. Johnsongrass poses an exclusive scriptome assembly and annotation of johnsongrass (Sorghum halep-

American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research 280 Am J Biomed Sci & Res Copyright@ Peter Klein

27. Toth V, E Lehoczky (2007) The analysis of the effect of different her- 2(6): e00065. bicides on Johnson-grass in maize. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 72(2): ense) rhizomes identify candidate rhizome-specific genes. Plant Direct 279-282. 8. Tóth V, E Lehoczky (2006) Investigations on the germination depth of (Sorghum halepense [L.] pers). Commun Agric Appl Biol 28. Johnson W, LJ, Wait J (2003) Johnsongrass Control, Total Nonstructural Sci 71(3 Pt A): 803-808. Carbohydrates in Rhizomes, and Regrowth After Application of Herbi- cides Used in Herbicide-Resistant Corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology 9. Jang CS, Kamps TL, Skinner DN, Schulze SR, Vencill WK, et al. (2006) 17(1): 34-41. regulatory elements, and relationship to quantitative trait loci, of sor- 29. Benbrook C M (2016) Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United ghumFunctional genes classification, with rhizome-enriched genomic organization, expression. Plant putatively Physiol cis-acting 142(3): States and globally. Environ Sci Eur 28(1): 3. 1148-1159. 30. Alan D Baylis (2000) Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, 10. - weaknesses and prospects. Pest Management Science 56(4): 9.

PLoSZhang One T, Zhao 8(3): X, e60202. Huang L, Liu X, Zong Y, et al. (2013) Tissue-specific tran 31. Heap I, SODuke (2018) Overview of glyphosate-resistant weeds world- scriptomic profiling of using a rice Genome Array. wide. Pest Manag Sci 74(5): 1040-1049. 11. Anderson LE, AAP, Weseloh JW (1960) Characteristics of Johnsongrass Rhizomes. Weeds 8(3): 402-406. 32. Vila-Aiub M, BM Gundel P, Ghersa C, Powles S (2007) Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in Glypho- 12. Jang CS, Kamps TL, Tang H, Bowers JE, Lemke C, et al (2009) Evolution- sate-Resistant Soybean. Weed Science 55(6): 6. - type. Heredity (Edinb) 102(3): 266-273. 33. Fernandez L, De Haro LA, Distefano AJ, Carolina Martínez M, Lía V, et al. ary fate of rhizome-specific genes in a non-rhizomatous Sorghum geno (2013) Population genetics structure of glyphosate-resistant Johnson- 13. Reichmann LG, SS, Polley HW, Fay PA (2016) Traits of an invasive grass grass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of conferring an early growth advantage over native grasses. Journal of the resistance. Ecol Evol 3(10): 3388-3400. Plant Ecology 9(6): 672-681. 34. Hernández M, LR, Fischer A, Gebauer M, Galdames R, et al. (2015) Tar- 14. Schwinning S, Meckel H, Reichmann LG, Polley HW, Fay PA, et al. (2017) get-Site Resistance to Nicosulfuron in Johnsongrass (Sorghum halep- Accelerated development in Johnsongrass seedlings (Sorghum halep- ense) from Chilean Corn Fields. Weed Science 63(3): 631-640. ense) suppresses the growth of native grasses through size-asymmetric competition. PLoS One 12(5): e0176042. 35. Morrell PL, Williams-Coplin TD, Lattu AL, Bowers JE, Chandler JM, et al. (2005) Crop-to-weed introgression has impacted allelic composition of 15. Uludag A, Gozcu D, Rusen M, Guvercin RS, Demir A, et al. (2007) The ef- johnsongrass populations with and without recent exposure to cultivat- fect of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.) densities on cotton ed sorghum. Mol Ecol 14(7): 2143-2154. yield. Pak J Biol Sci 10(3): 523-525. 36. Jaouannet M, Rodriguez PA, Thorpe P, Lenoir CJ, MacLeod R, et al. (2014) 16. WOOD, ML (2002) alJohnsongrass (Sor- Plant immunity in plant-aphid interactions. Front Plant Sci 5: 663. ghum halepense) Density Effects on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Harvest and Economic Val- 37. ue. Weed Technology 16(3): 495-501. between aphids and men: a review of aphid damage and control strate- gies.Dedryver C R Biol CA, 333(6-7): A Le Ralec, 539-553. F Fabre (2010) The conflicting relationships 17. Paul E Keeley, Robert J Thullen (1989) Growth and Interaction of John- songrass (Sorghum Halepense) with Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum). 38. Van Emden HF, HR (2007) Aphids as Crop Pests CABI Publishing, Lon- Weed Science 37(3): 339-344. don 30. 18. Lee GA, Crawford GW, Liu L, Sasaki Y, Chen X, et al. (2011) Archaeological 39. Ni X, SS Quisenberry (2006) Diuraphis noxia and Rhopalosiphum padi soybean (Glycine max) in East Asia: does size matter? PLoS One 6(11): (Hemiptera: Aphididae) interactions and their injury on resistant and e26720. susceptible cereal seedlings. J Econ Entomol 99(2): 551-558. 19. Liu Z, Li H, Wen Z, Fan X, Li Y, et al. (2017) Comparison of Genetic Diver- 40. W RW E, KR (1995) Feeding damage effects of three aphid species on sity between Chinese and American Soybean (Glycine max (L.)) Acces- wheat root growth. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18(9): 10. sions Revealed by High-Density SNPs. Front Plant Sci 8: 2014. 41. Ni X, QSS, Heng‐Moss T, Markwell J, Higley L, et al. (2013) Dynamic 20. Rizzo G, L Baroni (2018) Soy, Soy Foods and Their Role in Vegetarian change in photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll degradationelic- Diets. Nutrients 10(1). ited by cereal aphid feeding. Entomologia Experimentaliset Applicata 105(1): 10. 21. Sedivy EJ, Wu F, Hanzawa Y (2017) Soybean domestication: the origin, genetic architecture and molecular bases. New Phytol 214(2): 539-553. 42. E GM J, TG (1993) Occurrence of Johnsongrass mosaic virus on sorghum in Venezuela. Plant Disease 77(8): 4. 22. Williams CS, Hayes RM (1984) Johnsongrass (Sorghum Halepense) Com- petition in Soybeans (Glycine Max). Weed Science 32(4): 498-501. 43. Wamaitha MJ, Deepti Nigam, Solomon Maina, Francesca Stomeo, Anne Wangai, et al. (2018) Metagenomic analysis of viruses associated with 23. McWhorter C G, E Hartwig (1972) Competition of Johnsongrass and maize lethal necrosis in Kenya. Virol Journal 15(1): 90. Cocklebur with Six Soybean Varieties. Weed Science 20(1): 56-59. 44. Seifers DL, Salomon R, Marie-Jeanne V, Alliot B, Signoret P, et al, (2000) 24. Michalis B Mitskas, Christos E Tsolis, Ilias G Eleftherohorinos, Christos A Characterization of a novel potyvirus isolated from maize in Israel. Phy- Damalas (2003) Interference between corn and johnsongrass (Sorghum topathology 90(5): 505-513. halepense) from seed or rhizomes. Weed Science 51(4): 540-540. 45. Stewart LR, Teplier R, Todd JC, Jones MW, Cassone BJ, et al. (2014) Vi- 25. Paterson AH, Schertz KF, Lin YR, Liu SC, Chang YL, et al. (1995) The ruses in maize and Johnsongrass in southern Ohio. Phytopathology - 104(12): 1360-1369. persal and persistence of johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Procweediness Natl Acad of wild Sci Uplants: S A 92(13): molecular 6127-6131. analysis of genes influencing dis 46. Mohammadi MR, Koohi-Habibi M, Mosahebi G, Hajieghrari B (2006) 26. Poienaru S, N Sarpe I (2005) The chemical control of Shorgum halepense (Johnson grass) in soybean culture in the Danube meadow. Commun Ag- CommunIdentification Agric of Appl prevalent Biol Sci potyvirus 71(3 Pt B):on maize1311-1319. and johnsongrass in corn ric Appl Biol Sci 70(3): 459-463. fields of Tehran province of Iran and a study on some of its properties.

American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research 281 Am J Biomed Sci & Res Copyright@ Peter Klein

47. Hooks CR, A Fereres (2006) Protecting crops from non-persistently 48. Ng JC, BW Falk (2006) Virus-vector interactions mediating nonper- aphid-transmitted viruses: a review on the use of barrier plants as a sistent and semipersistent transmission of plant viruses. Annu Rev Phy- management tool. Virus Res120(1-2): 1-16. topathol 44: 183-212.

American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research 282