DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrating Biological Control and Chemical Control of Cabbage Caterpillar Pests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrating Biological Control and Chemical Control of Cabbage Caterpillar Pests Integrating biological control and chemical control of cabbage caterpillar pests THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Emily Kathryn Linkous Graduate Program in Entomology The Ohio State University 2013 Master's Examination Committee: Dr. Celeste Welty (advisor) Dr. Mark A. Bennett Dr. Mary M. Gardiner Dr. Luis A. Cañas Copyrighted by Emily Kathryn Linkous 2013 Abstract Lepidopteran pests Plutella xylostella, Pieris rapae, and Trichoplusia ni are the major species that attack crops in the family Brassicaceae. They are typically controlled by insecticide application, but there are parasitoid species that contribute to mortality. However, parasitoids alone are typically unable to exert sufficient control to reduce pest numbers below economic thresholds. Pest density tends to be lower in more diverse systems, including those that integrate flowering plants that parasitoids use as food resources. These resources are lacking in most agricultural landscapes. Parasitoids tend to be negatively impacted by exposure to broad-spectrum insecticides. The first goal of this research was to investigate the integration of habitat manipulation and insecticide treatment through the planting of floral resources and use of selective microbial insecticides. The integration of sweet alyssum (Lobularia maritima) insectary strips and the insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) was investigated in a cabbage field trial conducted in 2011 and 2012. The results of this study are discussed in Chapter 2. The objectives of this study were: 1) to determine the effects of insectary strips on parasitism rates and pest density; and 2) to determine the effects of insecticides on parasitism rates and pest density. The main plot treatment was the presence or absence of insectary strips and the subplot treatment was insecticide. Plots were sampled weekly. Insectary strips were found to have no significant effect on pest density in or parasitism in 2011. In 2012, insectary strips were found to have increased pest density but also ii increased parasitism. Parasitism rates were lower in subplots treated with B.t. than in untreated subplots. Pest density in subplots treated with B.t. was not significantly different than subplots treated with cyfluthrin. These findings indicate that insectary strips can increase parasitism but may also increase pest density in some circumstances. The use of microbial insecticide did not increase parasitism but did keep pest density low. Because parasitism appeared to be density dependent, use of lower rates or longer intervals of B.t. may increase parasitism while maintaining low pest density. Another goal of the research was to determine what parasitoid species were present in Ohio. The diversity and relative abundance of parasitoid species found in the survey are discussed in Chapter 3. The objectives of this study were: 1) to determine parasitoid diversity and parasitism rate on commercial farms; and 2) to determine whether differences in parasitism rates among farms are associated with differences in insecticide use as measured by the environmental impact quotient (EIQ). Ten commercial fields were used for the surveys in 2011 and 2012. Caterpillars were collected and held until the emergence of parasitoids or pests. Eleven parasitoid species were found. Species abundance varied between years. Farms with a higher EIQ rating tended to have decreased species abundance and percent parasitism, but this correlation was not significant. These findings indicate that many species of parasitoids are present in Ohio and that insecticide usage can impact parasitoid species diversity and abundance. Diadegma insulare and Cotesia rubecula should be the primary target of conservation biocontrol tactics within integrated pest management programs for cabbage. iii Dedicated to my wonderful friends and family and the love of my life. iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Celeste Welty, for her support, guidance, and enthusiasm. I also thank my committee for their helpful feedback throughout my research project and Zhiguang Xu for his assistance with the statistical analysis of my data. My research project would not have been possible without the work of the farm crews at the North Central Agricultural Research Station in Fremont, Ohio, the Waterman Agricultural and Natural Resources Laboratory in Columbus, Ohio, and the Muck Crops Agricultural Research Station in Celeryville, Ohio. My field assistants Amanda Lord, Jeremy Wells, Greg Holthaus, Ryan Caesar, and Mackenzie Dorner were essential for the efficient collection of data, no matter what the weather was like. I thank Stan Gahn and Mark Koenig for their assistance in finding cabbage fields for my survey. I also thank my colleagues, friends, and family for their unending support during my graduate school career. Thanks for being a sounding board or letting me vent. Special thanks to my loving boyfriend Justin Franzen for keeping me sane and always being there to help me through the rough times. This research would not have been possible without my funding sources – thanks to SEEDS at OARDC and the Ohio Vegetable and Small Fruit Research and Development Program for financial support. v Vita May 2006 ......................................................Wilmington High School May 2010 .......................................................B.S. Biology, Wittenberg University 2010 to present ..............................................Graduate Teaching Associate, Center for Life Sciences Education, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: Entomology vi Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... v Vita ..................................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... x List of Figures .................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1: A review of previous research on biological control and chemical control of cabbage pests ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Biology and ecology of Lepidopteran cabbage pests and their common parasitoids........................................................................................................................ 6 1.4 A review of the proposed hypotheses and the theoretical basis for the research .... 10 1.5 Previous research on floral resources, pesticides, and natural enemies, and their integration into control programs .................................................................................. 14 1.6 Previous research on parasitoid diversity and abundance in cole crops in North America ......................................................................................................................... 19 vii 1.7 References ............................................................................................................... 22 Chapter 2: Integrating alyssum insectary strips and selective insecticides in cabbage .... 31 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 31 2.2 Methods ................................................................................................................... 34 2.2.1 Field trials at agricultural research stations ...................................................... 34 2.2.2 Harvest evaluation ............................................................................................ 38 2.2.3 Alyssum vacuum sampling ............................................................................... 38 2.2.4 Data analysis ..................................................................................................... 39 2.3 Results ..................................................................................................................... 40 2.3.1 Caterpillar density............................................................................................. 40 2.3.2 Parasitism.......................................................................................................... 41 2.3.3 Harvest .............................................................................................................. 43 2.3.4 Alyssum vacuum sampling ............................................................................... 44 2.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 45 2.5 References ............................................................................................................... 47 2.6 Tables .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ancient Roaches Further Exemplify 'No Land Return' in Aquatic Insects
    Gondwana Research 68 (2019) 22–33 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Gondwana Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gr Ancient roaches further exemplify ‘no land return’ in aquatic insects Peter Vršanský a,b,c,d,1, Hemen Sendi e,⁎,1, Danil Aristov d,f,1, Günter Bechly g,PatrickMüllerh, Sieghard Ellenberger i, Dany Azar j,k, Kyoichiro Ueda l, Peter Barna c,ThierryGarciam a Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovakia b Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics, Research Center for Quantum Information, Dúbravská cesta 9, Bratislava 84511, Slovakia c Earth Science Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, P.O. BOX 106, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovakia d Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya 123, 117868 Moscow, Russia e Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovičova 6, Bratislava 84215, Slovakia f Cherepovets State University, Cherepovets 162600, Russia g Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, D-70191 Stuttgart, Germany h Friedhofstraße 9, 66894 Käshofen, Germany i Bodelschwinghstraße 13, 34119 Kassel, Germany j State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, PR China k Lebanese University, Faculty of Science II, Fanar, Natural Sciences Department, PO Box 26110217, Fanar - Matn, Lebanon l Kitakyushu Museum, Japan m River Bigal Conservation Project, Avenida Rafael Andrade y clotario Vargas, 220450 Loreto, Orellana, Ecuador article info abstract Article history: Among insects, 236 families in 18 of 44 orders independently invaded water. We report living amphibiotic cock- Received 13 July 2018 roaches from tropical streams of UNESCO BR Sumaco, Ecuador.
    [Show full text]
  • ELIZABETH LOCKARD SKILLEN Diversity of Parasitic Hymenoptera
    ELIZABETH LOCKARD SKILLEN Diversity of Parasitic Hymenoptera (Ichneumonidae: Campopleginae and Ichneumoninae) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park and Eastern North American Forests (Under the direction of JOHN PICKERING) I examined species richness and composition of Campopleginae and Ichneumoninae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) parasitoids in cut and uncut forests and before and after fire in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee (GSMNP). I also compared alpha and beta diversity along a latitudinal gradient in Eastern North America with sites in Ontario, Maryland, Georgia, and Florida. Between 1997- 2000, I ran insect Malaise traps at 6 sites in two habitats in GSMNP. Sites include 2 old-growth mesic coves (Porters Creek and Ramsay Cascades), 2 second-growth mesic coves (Meigs Post Prong and Fish Camp Prong) and 2 xeric ridges (Lynn Hollow East and West) in GSMNP. I identified 307 species (9,716 individuals): 165 campoplegine species (3,273 individuals) and a minimum of 142 ichneumonine species (6,443 individuals) from 6 sites in GSMNP. The results show the importance of habitat differences when examining ichneumonid species richness at landscape scales. I report higher richness for both subfamilies combined in the xeric ridge sites (Lynn Hollow West (114) and Lynn Hollow East (112)) than previously reported peaks at mid-latitudes, in Maryland (103), and lower than Maryland for the two cove sites (Porters Creek, 90 and Ramsay Cascades, 88). These subfamilies appear to have largely recovered 70+ years after clear-cutting, yet Campopleginae may be more susceptible to logging disturbance. Campopleginae had higher species richness in old-growth coves and a 66% overlap in species composition between previously cut and uncut coves.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Moving on from the Insect Apocalypse Narrative
    Moving on from the insect apocalypse narrative: engaging with evidence-based insect conservation Manu E. Saunders1,2, Jasmine Janes1,3, James O’Hanlon1 1School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England Armidale NSW Australia 2UNE Business School, University of New England Armidale NSW Australia 3Biology Department, Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, BC, Canada This is the author’s version of a manuscript published in BioScience. Please cite as: Saunders ME, Janes J, O’Hanlon J (2019) Moving on from the insect apocalypse narrative: engaging with evidence-based insect conservation. BioScience https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz143 1 Abstract Recent studies showing temporal changes in local and regional insect populations received exaggerated global media coverage. Confusing and inaccurate science communication on this important issue could have counter-productive effects on public support for insect conservation. The ‘insect apocalypse’ narrative is fuelled by a limited number of studies that are restricted geographically (predominantly UK, Europe, USA) and taxonomically (predominantly bees, macrolepidoptera, and ground beetles). Biases in sampling and analytical methods (e.g. categorical vs. continuous time series, different diversity metrics) limit the relevance of these studies as evidence of generalised global insect decline. Rather, the value of this research lies in highlighting important areas for priority investment. We summarise research, communication and policy priorities for evidence-based insect conservation, including key areas of knowledge to increase understanding of insect population dynamics. Importantly, we advocate for a balanced perspective in science communication to better serve both public and scientific interests. 2 Introduction Insects are the most diverse and abundant group of animals on Earth and are critical drivers of ecosystem function in terrestrial and aquatic systems; yet the majority of insect taxa are understudied, publicly misunderstood and face numerous environmental threats (Samways 2007; Cardoso et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Predaceous Ground Beetles Caterpillar Hunters and Bombardier
    E-185 5-03 PredaceousPredaceous GroundGround BeetBeetlesles Caterpillar Hunters and Bombardier Beetles Rick Minzenmayer, Extension Agent-IPM Chris Sansone, Extension Entomologist Texas Cooperative Extension redaceous ground beetles can be a nui- genus Calosoma, a brightly colored ground sance when numerous. They are beetle. Some species are called “bombardier PPattracted to lights and can sometimes beetles” because they emit what appears to be be found by the hundreds around lights in the smoke from the rear of the abdomen. The morning. The large numbers can also be a “smoke” is actually a glandular fluid that problem because the beetles defend them- vaporizes when it hits air; the fluid can irri- selves by emitting an odor. tate the skin. The ground beetles also emit an Ground beetles are part of the order odor to stop their enemies, including people. Coleoptera. This is the largest order of insects with over a quarter of a million species described throughout the world — about 30,000 species in the United States. Most beetles have two pairs of wings (elytra). The front pair is usually thickened and hard and meet in a straight line down the back when the wings are at rest. The back pair are mem- branous and folded beneath the front pair. All beetles have chewing mouthparts and under- go complete metamorphosis (egg, larva, pupa and adult). Predaceous ground beetles belong to the fami- ly Carabidae. This is the second largest family Caterpillar hunter, Calasoma scrutator (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: of beetles, with more than 2,500 species in Carabidae). North America. Most members of this family are considered beneficial, feeding on other insects in both the larval and adult stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Alyssum) and the Correct Name of the Goldentuft Alyssum
    ARNOLDIA VE 1 A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University VOLUME 26 JUNE 17, 1966 NUMBERS 6-7 ORNAMENTAL MADWORTS (ALYSSUM) AND THE CORRECT NAME OF THE GOLDENTUFT ALYSSUM of the standard horticultural reference works list the "Madworts" as MANYa group of annuals, biennials, perennials or subshrubs in the family Cru- ciferae, which with the exception of a few species, including the goldentuft mad- wort, are not widely cultivated. The purposes of this article are twofold. First, to inform interested gardeners, horticulturists and plantsmen that this exception, with a number of cultivars, does not belong to the genus Alyssum, but because of certain critical and technical characters, should be placed in the genus Aurinia of the same family. The second goal is to emphasize that many species of the "true" .~lyssum are notable ornamentals and merit greater popularity and cul- tivation. The genus Alyssum (now containing approximately one hundred and ninety species) was described by Linnaeus in 1753 and based on A. montanum, a wide- spread European species which is cultivated to a limited extent only. However, as medicinal and ornamental garden plants the genus was known in cultivation as early as 1650. The name Alyssum is of Greek derivation : a meaning not, and lyssa alluding to madness, rage or hydrophobia. Accordingly, the names Mad- wort and Alyssum both refer to the plant’s reputation as an officinal herb. An infu- sion concocted from the leaves and flowers was reputed to have been administered as a specific antidote against madness or the bite of a rabid dog.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Biological Control Agents of the American Plum Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Michigan Cherry and Plum Orchards
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 47 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2014 Numbers Article 8 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2014 April 2014 Observations on the Biological Control Agents of the American Plum Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) In Michigan Cherry and Plum Orchards David J. Biddinger Pennsylvania State University Timothy W. Leslie Long Island University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Biddinger, David J. and Leslie, Timothy W. 2014. "Observations on the Biological Control Agents of the American Plum Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) In Michigan Cherry and Plum Orchards," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 47 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol47/iss1/8 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Biddinger and Leslie: Observations on the Biological Control Agents of the American Plu 2014 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 51 Observations on the Biological Control Agents of the American Plum Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) In Michigan Cherry and Plum Orchards David J. Biddinger1 and Timothy W. Leslie2 Abstract The American plum borer, Euzophera semifuneralis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), is an important pest in orchards, yet little is known regarding its biological control. We performed a comprehensive survey of the natural enemy complex contributing to American plum borer control in Michigan plum and cherry orchards, while also exploring the relationship between pest infestation and tree wounding from mechanical harvesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabbage Looper, Trichoplusia Ni (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 John L
    EENY-116 Cabbage Looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 John L. Capinera2 Distribution stages. In Florida, continuous activity and reproduction occur only south of Orlando. The remainder of Florida and The cabbage looper is found throughout much of the world the portion of Georgia south of Byron, as well as southeast where crucifers are cultivated, and during the summer South Carolina, have intermittent adult activity during the months can be found throughout most of the USA. How- winter months, depending on weather.All points north of ever, overwintering in the US apparently occurs only in the this have no winter activity. southernmost states. It is somewhat erratic in occurrence, typically very abundant one year, and then scarce for two Egg to three years. This is likely due to the residual effects of Cabbage looper eggs are hemispherical in shape, with a nuclear polyhedrosis virus, which is quite lethal to this the flat side affixed to foliage. They are deposited singly insect. The cabbage looper is highly dispersive, and adults on either the upper or lower surface of the leaf, although have sometimes been found at high altitudes and far from clusters of six to seven eggs are not uncommon. The eggs shore. Flight ranges of approximately 200 km have been are yellowish white or greenish in color, bear longitudinal estimated. ridges, and measure about 0.6 mm in diameter and 0.4 mm in height. Eggs hatch in about two, three, and five days at Description and Life Cycle 32, 27, and 20°C, respectively, but require nearly 10 days at The number of generations completed per year varies from 15°C (Jackson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawk Moths of North America Is Richly Illustrated with Larval Images and Contains an Abundance of Life History Information
    08 caterpillars EUSA/pp244-273 3/9/05 6:37 PM Page 244 244 TULIP-TREE MOTH CECROPIA MOTH 245 Callosamia angulifera Hyalophora cecropia RECOGNITION Frosted green with shiny yellow, orange, and blue knobs over top and sides of body. RECOGNITION Much like preceding but paler or Dorsal knobs on T2, T3, and A1 somewhat globular and waxier in color with pale stripe running below set with black spinules. Paired knobs on A2–A7 more spiracles on A1–A10 and black dots on abdomen cylindrical, yellow; knob over A8 unpaired and rounded. lacking contrasting pale rings. Yellow abdominal Larva to 10cm. Caterpillars of larch-feeding Columbia tubercle over A8 short, less than twice as high as broad. Silkmoth (Hyalophora columbia) have yellow-white to Larva to 6cm. Sweetbay Silkmoth (Callosamia securifera) yellow-pink instead of bright yellow knobs over dorsum similar in appearance but a specialist on sweet bay. Its of abdomen and knobs along sides tend to be more white than blue (as in Cecropia) and are yellow abdominal tubercle over A8 is nearly three times as set in black bases (see page 246). long as wide and the red knobs over thorax are cylindrical (see page 246). OCCURRENCE Urban and suburban yards and lots, orchards, fencerows, woodlands, OCCURRENCE Woodlands and forests from Michigan, southern Ontario, and and forests from Canada south to Florida and central Texas. One generation with mature Massachusetts to northern Florida and Mississippi. One principal generation northward; caterpillars from late June through August over most of range. two broods in South with mature caterpillars from early June onward.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabbage Looper Pest Fact Sheet 11 Dr
    Bringing information and education into the communities of the Granite State Cabbage Looper Pest Fact Sheet 11 Dr. Alan T. Eaton, Extension Specialist, Entomology Introduction The cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni) is a North American native found throughout the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. It attacks all plants of the cabbage family, as well as lettuce, spinach, beets, peas, celery, parsley, potatoes, and some flower varieties. Description The larva of the cabbage looper is a small, green caterpillar with a thin white to yellow stripe on each side of the body and two stripes down the center of the back. It has three pairs of Adult cabbage looper. Credit: Whitney Cranshaw, legs near the head and three pairs of club-shaped legs (prolegs) Colorado State University, Bugwood.org. on the abdomen. The area between these legs humps into a loop during movement, giving the insect its name. The adults The cabbage looper does not overwinter are about 1" long and gray-brown in color with a 1½" wing outdoors in New Hampshire. span. The middle of the front of each wing has a silvery spot that resembles a figure 8. Life Cycle The cabbage looper does not overwinter outdoors in New Hampshire. It flies north from the south as early as mid-July, but often not until mid to late August. This accounts for the overlapping of stages in New Hampshire. Once the adult reaches New Hampshire, it lays eggs singly on the upper surfaces of the host plant. Each female lays 275-350 eggs. Upon hatching, the larva immediately feeds upon the host plant and completes development in 2-4 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Five Pests You Don't Want in Your Garden
    Twenty-five Pests You Don’t Want in Your Garden Prepared by the PA IPM Program J. Kenneth Long, Jr. PA IPM Program Assistant (717) 772-5227 [email protected] Pest Pest Sheet Aphid 1 Asparagus Beetle 2 Bean Leaf Beetle 3 Cabbage Looper 4 Cabbage Maggot 5 Colorado Potato Beetle 6 Corn Earworm (Tomato Fruitworm) 7 Cutworm 8 Diamondback Moth 9 European Corn Borer 10 Flea Beetle 11 Imported Cabbageworm 12 Japanese Beetle 13 Mexican Bean Beetle 14 Northern Corn Rootworm 15 Potato Leafhopper 16 Slug 17 Spotted Cucumber Beetle (Southern Corn Rootworm) 18 Squash Bug 19 Squash Vine Borer 20 Stink Bug 21 Striped Cucumber Beetle 22 Tarnished Plant Bug 23 Tomato Hornworm 24 Wireworm 25 PA IPM Program Pest Sheet 1 Aphids Many species (Homoptera: Aphididae) (Origin: Native) Insect Description: 1 Adults: About /8” long; soft-bodied; light to dark green; may be winged or wingless. Cornicles, paired tubular structures on abdomen, are helpful in identification. Nymph: Daughters are born alive contain- ing partly formed daughters inside their bodies. (See life history below). Soybean Aphids Eggs: Laid in protected places only near the end of the growing season. Primary Host: Many vegetable crops. Life History: Females lay eggs near the end Damage: Adults and immatures suck sap from of the growing season in protected places on plants, reducing vigor and growth of plant. host plants. In spring, plump “stem Produce “honeydew” (sticky liquid) on which a mothers” emerge from these eggs, and give black fungus can grow. live birth to daughters, and theygive birth Management: Hide under leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxa Named in Honor of Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz
    TAXA NAMED IN HONOR OF IHSAN A. AL-SHEHBAZ 1. Tribe Shehbazieae D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 22. 2014. 2. Shehbazia D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 20. 2014. 3. Shehbazia tibetica (Maxim.) D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 20. 2014. 4. Astragalus shehbazii Zarre & Podlech, Feddes Repert. 116: 70. 2005. 5. Bornmuellerantha alshehbaziana Dönmez & Mutlu, Novon 20: 265. 2010. 6. Centaurea shahbazii Ranjbar & Negaresh, Edinb. J. Bot. 71: 1. 2014. 7. Draba alshehbazii Klimeš & D. A. German, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 158: 750. 2008. 8. Ferula shehbaziana S. A. Ahmad, Harvard Pap. Bot. 18: 99. 2013. 9. Matthiola shehbazii Ranjbar & Karami, Nordic J. Bot. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.00326.x, 10. Plocama alshehbazii F. O. Khass., D. Khamr., U. Khuzh. & Achilova, Stapfia 101: 25. 2014. 11. Alshehbazia Salariato & Zuloaga, Kew Bulletin …….. 2015 12. Alshehbzia hauthalii (Gilg & Muschl.) Salariato & Zuloaga 13. Ihsanalshehbazia Tahir Ali & Thines, Taxon 65: 93. 2016. 14. Ihsanalshehbazia granatensis (Boiss. & Reuter) Tahir Ali & Thines, Taxon 65. 93. 2016. 15. Aubrieta alshehbazii Dönmez, Uǧurlu & M.A.Koch, Phytotaxa 299. 104. 2017. 16. Silene shehbazii S.A.Ahmad, Novon 25: 131. 2017. PUBLICATIONS OF IHSAN A. AL-SHEHBAZ 1973 1. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1973. The biosystematics of the genus Thelypodium (Cruciferae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 204: 3-148. 1977 2. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1977. Protogyny, Cruciferae. Syst. Bot. 2: 327-333. 3. A. R. Al-Mayah & I. A. Al-Shehbaz. 1977. Chromosome numbers for some Leguminosae from Iraq. Bot. Notiser 130: 437-440. 1978 4. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1978. Chromosome number reports, certain Cruciferae from Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysoperla Carnea by Chemical Cues from Cole Crops
    Biological Control 29 (2004) 270–277 www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Mediation of host selection and oviposition behavior in the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella and its predator Chrysoperla carnea by chemical cues from cole crops G.V.P. Reddy,a,* E. Tabone,b and M.T. Smithc a Agricultural Experiment Station, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA b INRA, Entomologie et Lutte Biologique, 37 Bd du Cap, Antibes F-06606, France c USDA, ARS, Beneficial Insect Introduction Research Unit, University of Delaware, 501 S. Chapel, St. Newark, DE 19713-3814, USA Received 28 January 2003; accepted 15 July 2003 Abstract Host plant-mediated orientation and oviposition by diamondback moth (DBM) Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Ypo- nomeutidae) and its predator Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) were studied in response to four different brassica host plants: cabbage, (Brassica oleracea L. subsp. capitata), cauliflower (B. oleracea L. subsp. botrytis), kohlrabi (B. oleracea L. subsp. gongylodes), and broccoli (B. oleracea L. subsp. italica). Results from laboratory wind tunnel studies indicated that orientation of female DBM and C. carnea females towards cabbage and cauliflower was significantly greater than towards either broccoli or kohlrabi plants. However, DBM and C. carnea males did not orient towards any of the host plants. In no-choice tests, oviposition by DBM did not differ significantly among the test plants, while C. carnea layed significantly more eggs on cabbage, cauliflower, and broccoli than on kohlrabi. However, in free-choice tests, oviposition by DBM was significantly greater on cabbage, followed by cauliflower, broccoli, and kohlrabi, while C.
    [Show full text]