DOCSLIB.ORG

Tracing the Sources, Transport and Dispersal of Suspended Sediment from the Burdekin River Catchment Into the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Bainbridge, Zoe T. (2015) Tracing the sources, transport and dispersal of suspended sediment from the Burdekin River catchment into the Great Barrier Reef lagoon. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/42312/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/42312/ Tracing the sources, transport and dispersal of suspended sediment from the Burdekin River catchment into the Great Barrier Reef lagoon PhD thesis submitted by Zoe T. Bainbridge B.App.Sc (Hons) in May 2015 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Marine and Environmental Sciences James Cook University Statement on the Contribution of Others Research funding James Cook University/CSIRO Tropical Landscapes Joint Venture and School of Earth and Environmental Sciences co-funded scholarship JCU Graduate Research School JCU TropWATER North Queensland Dry Tropics Australian Government’s Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility CSIRO (Petra Kuhnert/Rebecca Bartley) Thesis committee Associate Professor Scott Smithers, College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University Dr Stephen Lewis, TropWATER, James Cook University Jon Brodie, TropWATER, James Cook University Dr Scott Wilkinson, Land and Water Flagship, CSIRO Dr Petra Kuhnert, Computational Informatics, CSIRO Editorial support Scott Smithers Rebecca Bartley Stephen Lewis Grant Douglas Scott Wilkinson Stephen Hillier Jon Brodie Jim Wallace Petra Kuhnert Brent Henderson Eric Wolanski Peter Hairsine Jorge Álvarez-Romero Anonymous reviewer of published chapter 2, the Associate Editor, Basil Gomez, Murray Hicks and two anonymous reviewers of published chapter 3 and the Submission Editor and two anonymous reviewers of accepted chapter 4. ii Co-authorship in chapters for peer-reviewed publication This thesis includes some collaborative work. Whilst undertaking this collaboration I was responsible for project conceptualisation, field study design and data collection, laboratory and data analysis and synthesis of results into a publishable format. Stephen Lewis, Scott Smithers, Jon Brodie, Scott Wilkinson, Petra Kuhnert, Grant Douglas (Chapter 4), Stephen Hillier (Chapter 4), Eric Wolanski (Chapter 2), Jorge Álvarez- Romero (Chapter 2) and Brent Henderson (Chapter 3) all provided a range of editorial advice, technical instruction and contributed to publications associated with this thesis. Specifically, in Chapter 2 I undertook field sampling with assistance from SL and SS, I prepared the samples for and took the microphotograph images, analysed the samples for particle size, interpreted the data, conceptualised and constructed the figures and tables and wrote the chapter. EW, JB and SL contributed to study design, provided technical instruction and editorial comments. JA-R provided editorial comments, ran the ocean colour algorithm and created Fig 2.3 (Eduardo Teixeira da Silva is acknowledged for processing the raw satellite imagery for this figure). Pia Harkness assisted with map production (Fig 2.1). In chapter 3 I designed the field study and undertook the sampling with assistance from SL (and others mentioned in acknowledgements), I co-ordinated and trained the grazier volunteer network, analysed selected samples for particle size, processed the raw data, constructed the annual sediment budget and other figures, interpreted and wrote the chapter. PK and BH developed the LRE model (Kuhnert et al. 2012), with Burdekin catchment-specific process understanding provided by myself and SL. SL, SS and JB contributed to study design and provided editorial assistance. Adella Edwards assisted with the final production quality versions of Figures 3.1 and 3.3. Chapter 4 utilises field data collected in Chapter 3. In this chapter I recovered the <10 µm sediment fraction of stored water samples, prepared them for X-ray diffraction, interpreted the raw diffraction data with technical assistance from SH and Raphael Wust, further analysed the particle-size specific catchment budget of Chapter 3, interpreted the data, designed and constructed the figures and tables, and wrote the chapter. All co-authors contributed to various aspects of study design or final data interpretation, and provided editorial comments. iii Every reasonable effort has been made to gain permission from and acknowledge the owners of copyright material. I would be pleased to hear from any copyright owner who has been omitted or incorrectly acknowledged. iv Acknowledgements I am indebted to my supervisory team, for your invaluable wisdom and guidance along this journey. A very special thank you to my principal and co-supervisors Scott Smithers and Stephen Lewis – for your endless support, patience, friendship and editing, and your invaluable instruction in undertaking and publishing clear science. Jon Brodie, my mentor, thank you for all you have taught me since I volunteered to work for ACTFR on a tiny Burdekin project all those years ago, and for encouraging me to undertake this PhD. I am immensely grateful for the additional support received by my CSIRO supervisors Scott Wilkinson and Petra Kuhnert part-way through the thesis – I have learnt so much from you both, and you have helped to shape and strengthen this thesis in many ways. I am also grateful to Rebecca Bartley, Grant Douglas, Eric Wolanski and Steve Hillier, from whom I have been fortunate to receive additional guidance and scientific inspiration during the course of this PhD. A huge thank you to Damien Burrows and Susan Lesley, and TropWater more generally, for administrative, financial and emotional support throughout my PhD. I am also appreciative of the academic and administrative support provided by the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences (now CMES), especially Adella Edwards, Clive Grant, Paul Givney, Glenn Connolly, Bec Steele, Melissa Crawford and Beth Moore, as well as Jodie Wilson and the Graduate Research School team. I am grateful to the CSIRO’s Ian Watson, Di Popham, Keith Bristow and Jim Wallace for their support and guidance through this endeavour. Finally I am extremely grateful to Scott Crawford, Di O’Donnell, Ian Dight and Paul Duncanson of NQDT for believing in the community volunteer project and finding ways for me to continue the network between funding cycles. I am grateful to a number of people for their contributions to this thesis including Raphael Wust for generous assistance with initial clay mineral interpretation discussions; Michelle Tink, Pat Cunningham and Brett Baker and the TropWATER laboratory for all their assistance and for making long days in the lab much more enjoyable; Brendan Jones for XRD analytical support; the Queensland Government’s DSITIA Loads Monitoring Program (Ryan Turner) for providing additional water samples and Reef Policy Project (RP65G) for providing the Old Reef sediment sample; v Morgain Sinclair, Geoff Pocock and Phil Kerr of the DNRM for providing streamflow gauging station data, and collection of water samples at Inkerman in 2011; Brett Baker and Peter Lawn for plume sampling assistance; and a number of TropWATER and Qld Government staff for field support including Alan Mitchell, David Reid, Michelle Cooper, Peter Verwey, Shane Ross, Sarah Thornton, Tom Coughlin, and to Katrina Cullen for starting the grazier network. Finally I am forever indebted to the network of graziers across the Burdekin who embraced this project and whose collection efforts were invaluable in capturing real time suspended sediment in transport across this large, episodic catchment: John & Lindy, Nevil & Stacey, Chris & Kathy, Bill & Milly, Keith & Alma, Pat & Colleen, Jim & Kim, John, Trevor & Selina, Cath, David & Di, Robyn & Richard, Mick & Amanda, Tim & Alison, Shane & Trish, Elsie & Jack, Chris & Jenny, Kath & Dan, John & Janet, Jamie & Gail, Glen & Kellie, Tony & Dominie. To the additional volunteers in the Haughton and Don River catchments (data reported in outputs associated with this thesis) my gratitude is also extended to Steve and Kristine, Owen & Marjorie, Jenny & Graham, and Russell Todd from Bowen State High School. Tony Bailey and Gary Caddies of Sunwater are also acknowledged for their dedicated daily wet season sampling of the Burdekin Falls Dam spillway. Thank you to my GBR water quality colleagues for support throughout this PhD, especially Jane Waterhouse, Joanne Burton, Bronwyn Masters, Louise Hateley, Amelia Wenger, Michelle Devlin, Caroline Petus, Britta Schaffelke, Colette Thomas, Dom O’Brien, John Bennett and Nyssa Henry, many of whom were involved in a MTSRF conference dance floor discussion that kicked-off my PhD enrolment! I am forever indebted to my regular field companions, Steve Lewis and Aaron Davis, for all those long days travelling and sampling across the Burdekin, and your encouragement in completing this thesis. To my friends outside the science world, thank you for your continued support and comic relief as needed. Finally, and most importantly, I wish to thank my family for all the support, patience and encouragement you have shown throughout this journey. A special mention to Will’s wonderful Grandmas who travelled the distance of this country multiple times over the past year to support me in this
Recommended publications
  • Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 by Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane

    Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 by Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane

    ARCHIVE: Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 By Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane The date of the cyclone refers to the day of landfall or the day of the major impact if it is not a cyclone making landfall from the Coral Sea. The first number after the date is the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) for that month followed by the three month running mean of the SOI centred on that month. This is followed by information on the equatorial eastern Pacific sea surface temperatures where: W means a warm episode i.e. sea surface temperature (SST) was above normal; C means a cool episode and Av means average SST Date Impact January 1858 From the Sydney Morning Herald 26/2/1866: an article featuring a cruise inside the Barrier Reef describes an expedition’s stay at Green Island near Cairns. “The wind throughout our stay was principally from the south-east, but in January we had two or three hard blows from the N to NW with rain; one gale uprooted some of the trees and wrung the heads off others. The sea also rose one night very high, nearly covering the island, leaving but a small spot of about twenty feet square free of water.” Middle to late Feb A tropical cyclone (TC) brought damaging winds and seas to region between Rockhampton and 1863 Hervey Bay. Houses unroofed in several centres with many trees blown down. Ketch driven onto rocks near Rockhampton. Severe erosion along shores of Hervey Bay with 10 metres lost to sea along a 32 km stretch of the coast.
  • Tropical Cyclone Justin 6 - 24 March 1997

    Tropical Cyclone Justin 6 - 24 March 1997

    Severe Tropical Cyclone Justin 6 - 24 March 1997 Queensland Tropical Cyclone Warning Centre Bureau of Meteorology A. Summary Severe Tropical Cyclone Justin was a large, long-lived Coral Sea cyclone that crossed the Queensland coast as a category two cyclone northwest of Cairns on 22 March. Two lows that merged in a very active monsoon trough in the Coral Sea developed into Tropical Cyclone Justin on 7 March, reaching maximum intensity on 9 March as a very large system. Justin remained almost stationary and due to cooling SST’s it was downgraded to a tropical low on 13 March. Justin then drifted north over warmer SST’s and re-intensified to tropical cyclone strength on 14 March, reaching a peak intensity on 17 March before weakening and crossing the coast northwest of Cairns on 22 March. The combined effects of heavy rain, large seas and gale to storm force winds caused widespread damage in the region between Cairns and Townsville and the loss of two lives. Earlier in Justin’s lifecycle 30 people were killed in Papua New Guinea and five people died when their yacht was destroyed. Justin was reportedly responsible for an estimated loss of $150 million to the agricultural industry alone. B. Meteorological Description Intensity Analysis The monsoon trough was characterised at 2300 UTC 3 March by a series of MSL low pressure centres below 1000 hPa extending from northeast Australia across the Coral Sea and by 2300 UTC 5 March one centre had developed in the Coral Sea. This low intensified and was named Justin at 1900 UTC 6 March.
  • Natural Hazard Resilient Communities and Land Use Planning: the Limitations of Planning Governance in Tropical Australia

    Natural Hazard Resilient Communities and Land Use Planning: the Limitations of Planning Governance in Tropical Australia

    Harwood et al., J Geogr Nat Disast 2014, 4:2 Geography & Natural Disasters http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-0587.1000130 ResearchResearch Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Natural Hazard Resilient Communities and Land Use Planning: The Limitations of Planning Governance in Tropical Australia Sharon Harwood1*, Dean Carson2, Ed Wensing3 and Luke Jackson4 1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns QLD 4870, Australia 2Professor of Rural and Remote Research, Flinders University Rural Clinical School , PO Box 889, Nuriootpa SA 5355, Australia 3National Centre for Indigenous Studies, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200 4School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns QLD, 4870, Australia Abstract This paper examines how two Australian land use planning systems address the creation of hazard resilient communities in tropical areas. The application of substantive hazard knowledge and how this influences the associated procedures within the planning system is examined. The case studies of Darwin the capital of the Northern Territory, and the beachside suburb of Machans Beach within the Cairns Regional Council in far north Queensland are investigated. Both case study locations have experienced tropical cyclones since settlement and despite their hazard prone locations, both have intensified over their 120 year existence. Moreover, it is predicted that cyclones in tropical Australia will decrease in number, but increase in intensity. It would be rational to assume that industry, community and government would actively pursue planning strategies to negate the risks of natural hazards and the corresponding level of vulnerability to a hazard event. However, neither communities nor planning are driven by rational technical decision making processes.
  • Status of Non-Native Freshwater Fishes in Tropical Northern

    Status of Non-Native Freshwater Fishes in Tropical Northern

    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, Vol. 140, p. 63–78, 2007 ISSN 0035-9173/07/020063–16 $4.00/1 Status of Non-native Freshwater Fishes in Tropical Northern Queensland, Including Establishment Success, Rates of Spread, Range and Introduction Pathways alan charles webb Abstract: At least 20 non-native fishes have been reported from northern Queensland fresh waters, a 75% increase since 1994. Eleven of these species have established breeding populations and some are locally abundant and highly invasive, such as the tilapiine cichlids (Oreochromis mossambicus and Tilapia mariae) and the poeciliids (Gambusia holbrooki and Poecilia reticulata). Besides the continued introduction of non-native species, of great concern is the further spread of the tilapias, especially Oreochromis mossambicus and its hybrid form, and of another invasive, the three-spot gourami, Trichopterus trichogaster. Initial introductions are most probably releases of unwanted aquarium fish directly into open waters, or indirectly from ornamental ponds by flood waters. While natural dispersal is occurring, most of the range expansion of the tilapiine cichlids, particularly into impoundments in flood- prone areas, has been as a result of human translocation, and possibly the use of live bait by anglers. Keywords: Cichlidae, distribution patterns, Gambusia, Gourami, introduction pathways, invasive fishes, Oreochromis mossambicus, Poeciliidae, Tilapia INTRODUCTION native fishes in northern Queensland (McKay (1978, 1989, Arthington et al. 1984, Lear 1987), The history of non-native fishes, i.e., those orig- while McKay (1989) also referred to a previ- inating from overseas, introduced into northern ous, though unsuccessful, introduction of Jor- Queensland fresh waters has been well docu- danella sp.
  • Tropical Cyclone Risk and Impact Assessment Plan Final Feb2014.Pdf

    Tropical Cyclone Risk and Impact Assessment Plan Final Feb2014.Pdf

    © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 Published by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Tropical Cyclone Risk and Impact Assessment Plan Second Edition ISSN 2200-2049 ISBN 978-1-922126-34-4 Second Edition (pdf) This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without the prior written permission of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Director, Communications and Parliamentary 2-68 Flinders Street PO Box 1379 TOWNSVILLE QLD 4810 Australia Phone: (07) 4750 0700 Fax: (07) 4772 6093 [email protected] Comments and enquiries on this document are welcome and should be addressed to: Director, Ecosystem Conservation and Resilience [email protected] www.gbrmpa.gov.au ii Tropical Cyclone Risk and Impact Assessment Plan — GBRMPA Executive summary Waves generated by tropical cyclones can cause major physical damage to coral reef ecosystems. Tropical cyclones (cyclones) are natural meteorological events which cannot be prevented. However, the combination of their impacts and those of other stressors — such as poor water quality, crown-of-thorns starfish predation and warm ocean temperatures — can permanently damage reefs if recovery time is insufficient. In the short term, management response to a particular tropical cyclone may be warranted to promote recovery if critical resources are affected. Over the long term, using modelling and field surveys to assess the impacts of individual tropical cyclones as they occur will ensure that management of the Great Barrier Reef represents world best practice. This Tropical Cyclone Risk and Impact Assessment Plan was first developed by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) in April 2011 after tropical cyclone Yasi (one of the largest category 5 cyclones in Australia’s recorded history) crossed the Great Barrier Reef near Mission Beach in North Queensland.
  • The Age Natural Disaster Posters

    The Age Natural Disaster Posters

    The Age Natural Disaster Posters Wild Weather Student Activities Wild Weather 1. Search for an image on the Internet showing damage caused by either cyclone Yasi or cyclone Tracy and insert it in your work. Using this image, complete the Thinking Routine: See—Think— Wonder using the table below. What do you see? What do you think about? What does it make you wonder? 2. World faces growing wild weather threat a. How many people have lost their lives from weather and climate-related events in the last 60 years? b. What is the NatCatService? c. What does the NatCatService show over the past 30 years? d. What is the IDMC? e. Create a line graph to show the number of people forced from their homes because of sudden, natural disasters. f. According to experts why are these disasters getting worse? g. As human impact on the environment grows, what effect will this have on the weather? h. Between 1991 and 2005 which regions of the world were most affected by natural disasters? i. Historically, what has been the worst of Australia’s natural disasters? 3. Go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Global_tropical_cyclone_tracks-edit2.jpg and copy the world map of tropical cyclones into your work. Use the PQE approach to describe the spatial distribution of world tropical cyclones. This is as follows: a. P – describe the general pattern shown on the map. b. Q – use appropriate examples and statistics to quantify the pattern. c. E – identifying any exceptions to the general pattern. 4. Some of the worst Question starts a.
  • Knowing Maintenance Vulnerabilities to Enhance Building Resilience

    Knowing Maintenance Vulnerabilities to Enhance Building Resilience

    Knowing maintenance vulnerabilities to enhance building resilience Lam Pham & Ekambaram Palaneeswaran Swinburne University of Technology, Australia Rodney Stewart Griffith University, Australia 7th International Conference on Building Resilience: Using scientific knowledge to inform policy and practice in disaster risk reduction (ICBR2017) Bangkok, Thailand, 27-29 November 2017 1 Resilient buildings: Informing maintenance for long-term sustainability SBEnrc Project 1.53 2 Project participants Chair: Graeme Newton Research team Swinburne University of Technology Griffith University Industry partners BGC Residential Queensland Dept. of Housing and Public Works Western Australia Government (various depts.) NSW Land and Housing Corporation An overview • Project 1.53 – Resilient Buildings is about what we can do to improve resilience of buildings under extreme events • Extreme events are limited to high winds, flash floods and bushfires • Buildings are limited to state-owned assets (residential and non-residential) • Purpose of project: develop recommendations to assist the departments with policy formulation • Research methods include: – Focused literature review and benchmarking studies – Brainstorming meetings and research workshops with research team & industry partners – e.g. to receive suggestions and feedbacks from what we have done so far Australia – in general • 6th largest country (7617930 Sq. KM) – 34218 KM coast line – 6 states • Population: 25 million (approx.) – 6th highest per capita GDP – 2nd highest HCD index – 9th largest
  • Guidelines for the Development of Community Education, Awareness & Engagement Programs

    Guidelines for the Development of Community Education, Awareness & Engagement Programs

    AUSTRALIAN EMERGENCY MANUALS SERIES Guidelines for the Development of Community Education, Awareness & Engagement Programs MANUAL 45 Education, Awareness & Engagement Programs & Engagement Awareness Education, Community of theGuidelines Development for MANUAL 45 Emergency Management in Australia website www.ema.gov.au AUSTRALIAN EMERGENCY MANUALS SERIES AUSTRalIan EmeRGenCY ManaGemenT InSTITUTE Guidelines for the Development of Community Education, Awareness & Engagement Programs © Commonwealth of Australia 2010 First edition ISBN 978-1-921152-22-2 Edited and published by Attorney-General’s Department Written by G Elsworth, J Gilbert, K Stevens, P Robinson and C Rowe, School of Global Studies, Social Science and Planning, RMIT University. Basic editing and typesetting by Rebecca Carey Printed in Australia by GEON Impact Printing, an ISO14001 and FSC accredited printer Cover images courtesy of Australian Emergency Management Institute and iStockphoto MANUAL 45 – Guidelines for the Development of Community Education, Awareness & Engagement Programs i ii Copyright Permission to use the document and related graphics is granted provided that (1) the below copyright notice appears in all copies and that both the copyright notice and this permission notice appear, and (2) use of the document and related graphics is for educational, informational and non-commercial or personal use only. In all cases the Commonwealth of Australia must be acknowledged as the source when reproducing or quoting any part of this publication. Examples and quotations from other sources have been attributed to the original publication whenever possible and are believed to fall within fair use provisions, but these portions retain their copyright protection and must not be used without attribution. Enquiries related to copyright should be addressed to: Attorney-General’s Department 3 – 5 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 Telephone +61 (0) 2 6141 6666 Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved.
  • Spatial Processes and Management of Marine Populations

    Spatial Processes and Management of Marine Populations

    17th Lowell Wakefield Symposium Spatial Processes and Management of Marine Populations Gordon H. Kruse, Nicolas Bez, Anthony Booth, Martin W. Dorn, Sue Hills, Romuald N. Lipcius, Dominique Pelletier, Claude Roy, Stephen J. Smith, and David Witherell, Editors Proceedings of the Symposium on Spatial Processes and Management of Marine Populations, October 27-30, 1999, Anchorage, Alaska University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program Report No. AK-SG-01-02 2001 Price $40.00 Elmer E. Rasmuson Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data International Symposium on Spatial processes and management of marine populations (1999 : Anchorage, Alaska.) Spatial processes and management of marine populations : proceedings of the Sympo- sium on spatial processes and management of marine populations, October 27-30, 1999, An- chorage, Alaska / Gordon H. Kruse, [et al.] editors. – Fairbanks, Alaska : University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program, [2001]. 730 p. : ill. ; cm. – (University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program ; AK-SG-01-02) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Aquatic animals—Habitat—Congresses. 2. Aquatic animals—Dispersal—Congresses. 3. Fishes—Habitat—Congresses. 4. Fishes—Dispersal—Congresses. 5. Aquatic animals—Spawn- ing—Congresses. 6. Spatial ecology—Congresses. I. Title. II. Kruse, Gordon H. III. Lowell Wakefield Fisheries Symposium (17th : 1999 : Anchorage, Alaska). IV. Series: Alaska Sea Grant College Program report ; AK-SG-01-02. SH3.I59 1999 ISBN 1-56612-068-3 Citation for this volume is: G.H. Kruse, N. Bez, A. Booth, M.W. Dorn, S. Hills, R.N. Lipcius, D. Pelletier, C. Roy, S.J. Smith, and D. Witherell (eds.). 2001. Spatial processes and management of marine populations. University of Alaska Sea Grant, AK-SG-01-02, Fairbanks.
  • Annual Report for Inshore Coral Reef Monitoring

    Annual Report for Inshore Coral Reef Monitoring

    MARINE MONITORING PROGRAM Annual Report for inshore coral reef monitoring 2015 - 2016 Authors - Angus Thompson, Paul Costello, Johnston Davidson, Murray Logan, Greg Coleman, Kevin Gunn, Britta Schaffelke Marine Monitoring Program Annual Report for Inshore Coral Reef Monitoring 2015 - 2016 Angus Thompson, Paul Costello, Johnston Davidson, Murray Logan, Greg Coleman, Kevin Gunn, Britta Schaffelke MMP Annual Report for inshore coral reef monitoring 2016 © Commonwealth of Australia (Australian Institute of Marine Science), 2017 Published by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority ISBN: 2208-4118 Marine Monitoring Program: Annual report for inshore coral monitoring 2015-2016 is licensed for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logos of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and Australian Institute of Marine Science any other material protected by a trademark, content supplied by third parties and any photographs. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 This publication should be cited as: Thompson, A., Costello, P., Davidson, J., Logan, M., Coleman, G., Gunn, K., Schaffelke, B., 2017, Marine Monitoring Program. Annual Report for inshore coral reef monitoring: 2015 to 2016. Report for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.133 pp. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the National Library of Australia Front cover image: The reef-flat coral community at Double Cone Island, Central Great Barrier Reef. Photographer Johnston Davidson © AIMS 2014. DISCLAIMER While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this document are factually correct, AIMS do not make any representation or give any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, currency or suitability for any particular purpose of the information or statements contained in this document.
  • Tropical Cyclone Awareness and Education Issues for Far North

    Tropical Cyclone Awareness and Education Issues for Far North

    Tropical cyclone awareness and education issues for far north Queensland school students Storm Watchers — a cyclone awareness education package for upper primary school children airns is a rapidly growing far north Primary school Year 5 students and Secon- Queensland coastal city of about by Linda Berry and David King (Director), dary school Year 9 students. Knowledge 120,000 with a booming tourist James Cook University Centre for Disaster and, more importantly, understanding of Studies, Cairns C industry. Community and Tourism cyclones was examined along with where, infrastructure are concentrated on a low, and from whom, children have acquired narrow and relatively flat coastal plain that support of extended families and com- their knowledge. An effort was made to is skirted by tropical rainforest covered munities were shown to be mobile and determine whether the students have been mountains and the Great Barrier Reef. fragmented. Demonstrated household influenced by biases that exist throughout Annually, between the months of Novem- preparedness and stated willingness to the adult community. Areas where in- ber and April the north Queensland coastal appropriately respond to cyclone warnings formed hazard awareness education is region is likely to be threatened with the was shown to be limited and would very lacking were to be identified. It was apprec- impact of tropical cyclones and associated likely be inadequate in the event of a severe iated that some 10–11 year olds (the Year 5 storm surges. In 1996 the resident popu- cyclone
  • Surface Water Network Review Final Report

    Surface Water Network Review Final Report

    Surface Water Network Review Final Report 16 July 2018 This publication has been compiled by Operations Support - Water, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Interpreter statement: The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding this document, you can contact us within Australia on 13QGOV (13 74 68) and we will arrange an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. Surface