DOCSLIB.ORG

RICHARD MONTGOMERY - America's First Military Hero

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RICHARD MONTGOMERY - America's First Military Hero **** RICHARD MONTGOMERY - America's First Military Hero It was on' January 17th~ 1776 that. the Continental Congress while meeting in Philadelphia learned that Major General Richard Montgomery wao, killed ,'It the battle fo," Qu.ebec. President. John Hancock wept as did Benjamin Franklin and others. Papular ballads and poems' were to tell of Montgomery's glorious campaign into Canada, and of his heroic death·in the calIse of libe~ty. Thomas Paine would write an inspira­ tional elegy in which the spirit of Montgomery would call upon the patriots to fight and sacrifice for. independenc~. That writing was published in June of 1776 and when it was distributed to the members of the Continental Congress it is said to have been what convinced ll them to prepare the II Decl arat i'on of Independence • Ri chard l"1c)nt.gnmery thus became ·America's first military hero and th~ inspiratibn behind the fight for independence. In the hope that he would not. be forgotten the Cong,-ess ag,-eed to a resolutiol~ which was r-ecorded in its minutes as follows: . IIResolved, that, to e>:press the venerat.ion of the' United Colonies for the late general, Richard Montgom­ er-y~ and the deep sense th~y erltel-tain o·F the many signal and inlpol~tant services elf ·that gallant officer~ ) who, after a series of successes, amidst the most discouraging difficulties, fell at length .in a gallant attack upon Quebec, the capital of Canada; l'And for transmitting ·to future'ages~ as examples. ·truly wOI-thy of imitation, his patriotism, conduc£~ boldness of enterprise, insuperable per~everance, and contempt of danger and death, a monument be procllred from Paris Clr ~ny other part of Fran~e, w~th an inscrip­ tion sacr~d to his' memory~ and expressive of 'his amiable character.and heroic achievements; l'And that the continental treaSLtrers be directed t.o ~dvance a sum, not e;{ceeding "l30t) sterling, to Dr. Benjamin Franklin .(who is desired to ~ee this resoiution properly e:·,ecL\t",d) for defraying the e:-'pense thereof." December 2nd, 1988 will be the 250th anriiversary of the birth bf Richard Montgomery. He was born near Dublin, Ireland. He was from a proud family where a gr. gr~ grn gr. great grandfather, Gabri~l Morltqomel-Y~ was a captain in tt,e Scottish Guard o·F King I'~enry II of France~'wllO while .jo\Jsting with the king ill 1559 had the bad 'fc)rtu~e to cause his death by a wound to the eye. Later Gabriel M. was involved in ~ rebellion against the crown and execIJted. Richa~d was the youngest 6f three boys and therefore not eligible tci inherit from the family estates. He received a liberal education '_. at TI-inity College in Dublin and became an ensi.gn in the B,-itio.;h a,-my in 1756 just short of his 18th birthday. Richard spent his 16 years 2 in the British army in €he same regiment~ the 17th Foot. It was ther,~ that he became a freemason in their" military lodge. In 1758 he participated with his unit in the capture of louisbourg on t~\e'is12~d of Nova Scotia" Later t,e was with the British troops tll<:\t occupil:.~d Lake George~ Crown Po"int and Fort Ticonder'oga" l!Jhile in these parts he participated in many milita~y campaigns whictl~' little did he know~ would be.of great "benefit in later years when he assumec! command of the Northern Department of George Washington's Continental Arlny. ·Then he would have to capture those lands again but for· the Colonies. He ret~rned to England with his regiment in 1763 and resigned his conlmission nine year's later with the rank of Captain. He thought often of his experiences in America and believed ther~ should be limitless opportunities for a man of spirit willing to work. In 1772 he returned to New York and purchased a small farm in King's Bridge just acr(~ss the Harlem River from the northern tip of Manhattan. After he was settfed on his new property he visited New York lcity) twelve miles to the south on one of his supply trips and was blessed to meet a lady that he tlad-not seen for 14 years. Janet Livingston, the daughter of Judge Robert R. Livingston, was but 16 when Montgomery's British regimerit travelled up the Hudson River toward Albany in 1758. Montgomery's ship frequently stopped for goodwill visits at the estates along the. way. One of those visits was at the estate of Judge Livingston. While their- visit was but one day they re~embered each other. Now years later they would begin ~ friend­ ship, marl~Y and participate in the events that gave our nation its beginning .. On June 22nd, 1775~ one week after Geo~ge Washington became con\mandel--in-chief, Montgomel-y was appointed b~igadier general and assigned under Major General Philip Schuyler to secure the areas north of New York City to Canada. Montgomery then advised that the neck of the Hudson River near· West F'oint should be secured and he as~~ed that ·FOI-tifications be placed.on the blLlffs overIQo~~ing the river. Mon'tgorn­ ery also conceived the idea to impede war-ships .at ·those narrows with.a massive but controllable chain stretching across the river. The chain was to have forged iron links 40 inch~s in diameter and weighing ·90 pounds each. When raised, ships could not pass. When lowered, it rested on ttle riverbed and the ships could then pass. The plans of this mechanism were one of the items later provided ~y Benedict Arnold. in his conspil-acy with John Andre" In M2Y of 1775 11dntgamery·advanced to occupy Fort Ticondel~oga just captured by Colonel Ethan Allen. By November with their combined forces Ethan Allen and Montgomery captu~ed Forts Chambly and St. Jehn's which were strategically located between British heid Montreal c;l,nd the· u war zone" at Boston. Ethan Allen feeling the glory o·f ea:5ily winning those two forts quickly proceeded to Montreal expecting another easy win. He lost~ was captured and sent to England in irons to wait out the war. Montgomery proceeded to Montreal the following month and wittl prio~ ~~nDwledge of the area successfully captured the 3 city. Our Congress was overjoyed for Montgomery was then in control of .) two-thirds of British Canada . ~., Sir Guy Carleton who was well known to Montgomery was the British tommander and Governor-General of Canada. Montgomery hoped to capture Carleton at Montreal but failed. Carleton slipped away dressed as a farmer and escaped to Ouebec. A month later Montgomery was to attack Quebec and be killed instantly in the first volley of cannon fire. Like Generals Wolfe and Montcalm before him he had died in a battle for that fortress. He was buried three nights later by the civilians of the town. General Guy Carleton permitted neither military nor masbnic services for Montgomery. In retrospect, the actions of Ge~eral Montgomery during 1775 prevented Carleton and his army assisting the British in Boston. Had Carleton been free to come south they most certainly would have surrounded our Continental Army and the war would have then ended. That di d not happen and in March of 1776 the Dri t ish in' Bostem ,~ere force~ to evacuate. And finally the British lost the war and the United States was born~ By the arrangements ofN.w York Governor De Witt Clinton the remains of our first American milit.ry hero ~ere brought to Albany on July 4·th, 1818 to lie in state at the Capitol. Then the coffin was placed an board the steamboat RICHMONn and carried down the Hudson to New York City where it rests today ina crypt at St. Paul's Chapel in Trinity churchyard not too many steps from the resting place of Alexand~r Hamilton and General Horatio Gates. There was a funeral I processiOn of four o~ five thousand people headed by the Vice Presi­ dent. Not since the death of George Washington had the country seen so great and emotional a funeral. The monument designated by congress in 1776 with inscriptions by Benjamin·Franklin was now to be erected at Montgomery~s final restj.ng place. Our colonial leaders wel~e saddened uP08 learning of MontgomerY~5 death. In September of 1776 Montgomery c6unty in Maryland was named. It was the first county to be. named for an Americ~n and by an elected representative body. Previously all counties were named by the King's appointed governDr~ Sdon there would be sixteen counties named after QUI'"" h f.:'r R Q .. The states with those sixteen counties are: Arkansas~ Georgia, Illinois~ IndiaTla~ Iawa~ Kansas, I<entucky~ Maryland, Missi5sippi~' ~li5sdur'i~ New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tex'as and Vi I~gi ni 21... (The Count i es named Montgomery in Al abama and Tennes.see were named after local indi~n fi~hters.) The city of Montgomery in Alabama is also na~ned after our hera. OUI- country did not h".ve another "ar hero like ~10ntgomery until the Second World War ..hen in 1942 a young Navy pilot named Colin Kelly (:rashed his plane into a Japa!'leSE~ battleship" As tt·.E~ memory o'f Colin Kelly helped sell $4-00 million of war bonds in ~942 and 1943 so (jid the memory o·f MDntgomefY~5 death inspire the col(Jnialists" Ma~ylanders enlisted, formed r-egimerlts and marched to the war under the· commands o·f Otho Williams, William S,nallwood and Za~ck Magruder.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Weather on Armies During the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 The Force of Nature: The Impact of Weather on Armies during the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T. Engel Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE FORCE OF NATURE: THE IMPACT OF WEATHER ON ARMIES DURING THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1775-1781 By JONATHAN T. ENGEL A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2011 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Jonathan T. Engel defended on March 18, 2011. __________________________________ Sally Hadden Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Kristine Harper Committee Member __________________________________ James Jones Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This thesis is dedicated to the glory of God, who made the world and all things in it, and whose word calms storms. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colonies may fight for political independence, but no human being can be truly independent, and I have benefitted tremendously from the support and aid of many people. My advisor, Professor Sally Hadden, has helped me understand the mysteries of graduate school, guided me through the process of earning an M.A., and offered valuable feedback as I worked on this project. I likewise thank Professors Kristine Harper and James Jones for serving on my committee and sharing their comments and insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas During the American Revolution Daniel S
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-11-2019 Navigating Wilderness and Borderland: Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas during the American Revolution Daniel S. Soucier University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Other History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Soucier, Daniel S., "Navigating Wilderness and Borderland: Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas during the American Revolution" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2992. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2992 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAVIGATING WILDERNESS AND BORDERLAND: ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURE IN THE NORTHEASTERN AMERICAS DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION By Daniel S. Soucier B.A. University of Maine, 2011 M.A. University of Maine, 2013 C.A.S. University of Maine, 2016 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School University of Maine May, 2019 Advisory Committee: Richard Judd, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-Adviser Liam Riordan, Professor of History, Co-Adviser Stephen Miller, Professor of History Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History Stephen Hornsby, Professor of Anthropology and Canadian Studies DISSERTATION ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT On behalf of the Graduate Committee for Daniel S.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Fathers" in American History Dissertations
    EVOLVING OUR HEROES: AN ANALYSIS OF FOUNDERS AND "FOUNDING FATHERS" IN AMERICAN HISTORY DISSERTATIONS John M. Stawicki A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2019 Committee: Andrew Schocket, Advisor Ruth Herndon Scott Martin © 2019 John Stawicki All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew Schocket, Advisor This thesis studies scholarly memory of the American founders and “Founding Fathers” via inclusion in American dissertations. Using eighty-one semi-randomly and diversely selected founders as case subjects to examine and trace how individual, group, and collective founder interest evolved over time, this thesis uniquely analyzes 20th and 21st Century Revolutionary American scholarship on the founders by dividing it five distinct periods, with the most recent period coinciding with “founders chic.” Using data analysis and topic modeling, this thesis engages three primary historiographic questions: What founders are most prevalent in Revolutionary scholarship? Are social, cultural, and “from below” histories increasing? And if said histories are increasing, are the “New Founders,” individuals only recently considered vital to the era, posited by these histories outnumbering the Top Seven Founders (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Paine) in founder scholarship? The thesis concludes that the Top Seven Founders have always dominated founder dissertation scholarship, that social, cultural, and “from below” histories are increasing, and that social categorical and “New Founder” histories are steadily increasing as Top Seven Founder studies are slowly decreasing, trends that may shift the Revolutionary America field away from the Top Seven Founders in future years, but is not yet significantly doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • William Marsh, 'A Rather Shadowy Figure
    William Marsh, ‘a rather shadowy figure,’ crossed boundaries both national and political Vermont holds a unique but little-known place in eighteenth-century American and Canadian history. During the 1770s William Marsh and many others who had migrated from Connecticut and Massachusetts to take up lands granted by New Hampshire Governor Benning Wentworth, faced severe chal- lenges to their land titles because New York also claimed the area between the Connecticut and Hudson rivers, known as “the New Hampshire Grants.” New York’s aggressive pursuit of its claims generated strong political tensions and an- imosity. When the American Revolution began, the settlers on the Grants joined the patriot cause, expecting that a new national regime would counter New York and recognize their titles. During the war the American Continental Congress declined to deal with the New Hampshire settlers’ claims. When the Grants settlers then proposed to become a state separate from New York, the Congress denied them separate status. As a consequence, the New Hampshire grantees declared independence in 1777 and in 1778 constituted themselves as an independent republic named Vermont, which existed until 1791 when it became the 14th state in the Ameri- can Union. Most of the creators of Vermont played out their roles, and their lives ended in obscurity. Americans remember Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys and their military actions early in the Revolution. But Allen was a British captive during the critical years of Vermont’s formation, 1775-1778. A few oth- ers, some of them later Loyalists, laid the foundations for Vermont’s recognition and stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Article Ethan Allen: Vermont Hero from the Historic Roots
    HISTORIC ROOTS HISTORIC ROOTS Ann E. Cooper, Editor Deborah P. Clifford, Associate Editor ADVISORY BOARD Sally Anderson Nancy Chard Marianne Doe Mary Leahy Robert Lucenti Caroline L. Morse Meg Ostrum Michael Sherman Marshall True Catherine Wood Publication of Historic Roots is made possible in part by grants from the A.D. Henderson Foundation, the Vermont Council on the Humanities, and Vermont-NEA. A Magazine of Vermont History Vol. 3 April 1998 No. 1 BENEATH THE SURFACE ETHAN ALLEN: VERMONT HERO Ethan Allen is without doubt the most famous Vermonter. Because he and his Green Mountain Boys captured Fort Ticonderoga in the early days of the Revolution, his fame has gone far beyond Vermont. But we really don't know that much about the man himself. There are no known pictures of him that were drawn from life. We have books he wrote on religion and government, but few letters. What we know is mostly what others wrote and told about him. We do know that Ethan Allen was very tall, had a fierce temper and a loud voice. He drank a lot. He loved a good fight. Whatever he did or said pleased some people, but made many others angry. But one thing is true, whatever he wrote or did, people noticed. He was often in trouble. He was kicked out of Northampton, Massachusetts for his The artist used descriptions of Ethan Allen to make this rowdy behavior. He left his home town of portrait. Salisbury, Connecticut in debt, having angered many of the religious and civic leaders of the town.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophies and Plunder: After the Battle of Bennington
    Trophies and Plunder: After the Battle of Bennington The seizure of “plunder” and its sale for distribution to troops routinely occurred during the Revolutionary War. The Battle of Bennington provides a closer look at how “plunder” worked and some of the complications it entailed. By Michael P. Gabriel1 s night fell on August 16, 1777, General John Stark’s militia and Green Mountain Boys army had won a resounding victory near Walloomsac, New York, defeating two German forces in what is known as the Battle of Bennington. In addition to capturing over seven hundred prisoners, Stark and his men recovered an enor- mous amount of equipment that littered the battlefield. While the main details of the battle are well known, what became of this equipment is less so. Many soldiers kept trophies of their participation in the victory, while Stark presented some items to Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire to commemorate the battle. He also sent some military equipment to the Continental Army. However, most of the items were sold as “plunder” at public auctions or vendue and the proceeds distrib- . Michael P. Gabriel is Professor of History at Kutztown University. He is the author or editor of three books on the American Revolutionary War, including The Battle of Bennington: Soldiers and Civilians (2012). Vermont History Vol. 87, No. 2 (Summer/Fall 2019): 111–125. © 2019 by the Vermont Historical Society. ISSN: 0042-4161; on-line ISSN: 1544-3043 112 . Southeast view from the Bennington Battlefield circa 1900. Note the Bennington Battle Monument on the far right. (From the author’s collection).
    [Show full text]
  • National Society Sons of the American Revolution Veterans Recognition Committee Multi-Service Corps Roster
    NATIONAL SOCIETY SONS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION VETERANS RECOGNITION COMMITTEE MULTI-SERVICE CORPS ROSTER Certificates of Patriotism by State Society Alabama 87 Mississippi 20 Arkansas 19 Montana 7 Arizona 76 North Carolina 177 California 182 Nebraska 7 Colorado 91 New Hampshire 16 Connecticut 44 New Jersey 25 Dist. of Columbia 8 New Mexico 7 Delaware 39 Nevada 24 Florida 361 New York 32 Georgia 238 Ohio 128 Hawaii 4 Oklahoma 72 Iowa 6 Oregon 5 Idaho 16 Pennsylvania 149 Illinois 39 Rhode Island 9 Indiana 155 South Carolina 34 Kansas 88 Tennessee 154 Kentucky 72 Texas 161 Louisiana 20 Utah 10 Massachusetts 19 Virginia 243 Maryland 31 Vermont 23 Maine 6 Washington 55 Michigan 24 Wisconsin 33 Minnesota 3 West Virginia 31 Missouri 70 Wyoming 8 TOTAL CERTIFICATES ISSUED 3128 Certificates of Patriotism by Veterans Corps WWI 5 0.2% WWII 637 20.4% Korea 284 9.1% Vietnam 748 23.9% SW Asia 325 10.4% Special Ops 138 4.4% Military Service 991 31.7% 3128 To find a specific Patriot's Service Corps, scroll down to his State Society then scroll down to his Chapter. Find his name listed alphabetically. CERT # NSSAR # LAST NAME FIRST NAME M.I. SOCIETY CHAPTER CORPS ALABAMA 632 160241 Finley Wayne H. AL Birmingham WWII 289 151004 Banks Joe H. AL Black Warrior River MilServ 462 190811 Carroll David E. AL Black Warrior River Vietnam 244 147414 Dockery Walter E. AL Black Warrior River MilServ 279 152719 Gambrell, Jr. Samuel C. AL Black Warrior River MilServ 241 166097 Graham John H. AL Black Warrior River MilServ 366 205245 Grammer Charles K.
    [Show full text]
  • Our History and Government
    Montgomery County Maryland OurOur History History and and Government Government General Richard Montgomery Montgomery County, Maryland Our History and Government A Joint Project of Montgomery County, Maryland and the Montgomery County Historical Society ————————­ Copyright © 1999 Montgomery County Government Office of Public Information Rockville, Maryland 20850 ————————— To learn more about Montgomery County, Maryland, please visit the county web site: www.co.mo.md.us or the web site of the Montgomery County Historical Society: www.montgomeryhistory.org CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................1 History of the County..........................................................3 Principal Historic Events..................................................21 Official Symbols Montgomery County Emblem ............................. 23 Coat of Arms .......................................................... 23 County Bird and Blossom .................................... 24 Flag of Montgomery County................................ 25 County Executives and Council Members, Past to Present...................26 County Demographics......................................................29 INTRODUCTION Montgomery County is proud of its history. From Indian stone quarries and trails to present day high technology centers, it has played an integral part in the develop­ ment of this country. By settling the frontier in the 1700s, supporting independence, and ceding Georgetown for the new capital, the
    [Show full text]
  • America's Founding Fighters
    America’s Founding Fighters If George Washington had fallen in battle, would the limping former Quaker Nathanael Greene have been the father of our country? By Stephen Brumwell Nov. 5, 2014 7:19 p.m. ET The dust jacket of Jack Kelly’s “Band of Giants: The Amateur Soldiers Who Won America’s Independence” depicts a group of steely-eyed, square-jawed militiamen, dressed in homespun clothing and staring unflinchingly at an unseen foe. Their inexorable enemies will of course be minions of the tyrannical British Empire bent on crushing American liberties: redcoats advancing in solid ranks with robotic precision, presenting a menacing hedge of bayonet-tipped muskets. Thankfully, “Band of Giants” (the title comes from a remark made by the Marquis de Lafayette, who volunteered for the American cause) is far more balanced than such first impressions suggest. Its lively narrative of the Revolutionary War (1775-1783) realistically assesses the motley collection of men who led the military struggle against Britain, revealing both their strengths and weaknesses. Pitched squarely at the general-interest reader, “Band of Giants” offers no research revelations for the specialist, and at less than 250 pages of text, it is a short book for such a sprawling topic. Yet Mr. Kelly packs in a remarkable amount of information, thanks to his lean, readable prose and a smoothly integrated structure. Rather than a series of distinct, potted biographies, inevitably leading to some repetition, Mr. Kelly’s chronological account weaves in enough background to provide context for his “giants” before each of them gets his moment in the spotlight.
    [Show full text]
  • US History/American Revolution 1 US History/American Revolution
    US History/American Revolution 1 US History/American Revolution The Beginning of the War (1775 - 1778) Lexington and Concord The British government commanded General Thomas Gage to enforce the Intolerable Acts and shut down the Massachusetts legislature. Gage also decided to confiscate a stockpile of colonial arms located in Concord. On April 19, 1775, Gage's troops marched to Concord and on the way, at the town of Lexington, Americans, who were warned in advance by Paul Revere and others of the British movements, made a token attempt to stop the troops. No one knows exactly which side fired the first shot, known as The Shot Heard 'Round the World, but it sparked a battle on Lexington Green between the The skirmish at Lexington. British and the Minutemen. Faced against an overwhelmingly superior number of British regular troops in an open field, the Minutemen were quickly routed. Nevertheless, alarms were sounded throughout the countryside and the colonial militias poured in and were able to launch sporadic guerrilla attacks on the British while they marched on to Concord. The colonials managed to amass a sizeable number of troops at Concord and they engaged the British in force there and they were able to repulse them. The British were forced to depart without destroying the armory. They were compelled to retreat to Boston while all the way under a constant and withering fire from all sides. Only a reinforcing column with artillery support, on the outskirts of Boston, prevented the British withdrawal from becoming a total rout. The following day the British woke up to find Boston surrounded by 20,000 armed colonists.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ethan Allen and His Brothers Chased Success in the Real Estate Business
    A grand plan: Flirting with treason How Ethan Allen and his brothers chased success in the real estate business John J. Duffy Ira Allen 1751-1814 Bennington Museum collection In memorials produced long after his death in 1789, Ethan Allen has been remembered in statues in Vermont and in the Congressional Hall of Statuary in Washington, DC; in military posts named for him in Virginia during the Civil War and in Colchester, Vermont, an 1890s post, its original structures now residential and commercial sites. Though Allen sailed the seas only as a British prisoner in 1776, two Union coastal defense boats dis- played his name in the 1860s. A century later, the nuclear submarine Ethan Allen fired the first nuclear-tipped missile from below the ocean’s surface in the early 1960s. Ethan is probably best remembered from mostly fictional tales and stories about his heroic and other deeds, especially the pre-dawn capture of the British forts at Ticonderoga and Crown Point in May 1775 during the earliest months of the American War for Independence from Great Britain. Some say he was the most important founder of Vermont. On that latter point, however, remembrances of Ethan Allen seem to forget that he was far from Vermont when the state’s independence was de- Walloomsack Review 14 clared in 1777. He had been a prisoner of the British since September 1775 when he was captured after foolishly attacking Montreal with only one-hun- dred poorly armed Americans and Canadians against a force of five-hundred defenders – British regulars, Loyalist militia, and Mohawk warriors.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 (The American Revolution, 1763-1783)
    SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Chapter 3: The American Revolution, 1763-1783 Historians have written many fine surveys of the American Revolution, but among the best are Don Higginbotham, The War of American Independence (Macmillan, 1971); John R. Alden, A History of the American Revolution (Knopf, 1969); Robert Middlekauff, The Glorious Cause (Oxford University Press, 1982); and James Kirby Martin and Mark Edward Lender, A Respectable Army: The Military Origins of the Republic (Harlan Davidson, 1982). Piers Mackesy's The War for America (Harvard University Press, 1965) presents a British perspective, and Eric Robson's The American Revolution in Its Political and Military Aspects (Archon Books, 1965) emphasizes British problems in conducting the war. More recent surveys include Robert Leckie, George Washington's War: The Saga of the American Revolution (HarperCollins, 1992); Edward Countryman, The American Revolution (Hill and Wang, 1985); Colin Bonwick, The American Revolution (Palgrave MacMillan, 2005); and John Ferling, Almost a Miracle: The American Victory in the War of Independence (Oxford University Press, 2007). Several edited volumes contain important insights into the war: Stanley J. Underdal, ed., Military History of the American Revolution: The Proceedings of the 6th Military History Symposium United States Air Force Academy (Office of Air Force History, 1976); John Shy, A People Numerous and Armed: Reflections on the Military Struggle for American Independence (Oxford University Press, 1976); Don Higginbotham, ed., Reconsiderations
    [Show full text]