Parental and Courtship Feeding in Red Jungle Fowl

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parental and Courtship Feeding in Red Jungle Fowl PARENTAL AND COURTSHIP FEEDING IN RED JUNGLE FOWL ALLEN W. STOKES TH•s paper describesparental and courtshipfeeding in a free-living, semidomesticatedpopulation of Red JungleFowl, Gallus gallus,and dis- cussestheir functionsand possibleorigin. Publishedbehavioral studies of unconfinedjungle fowl include those of Beebe (1918-1922), Johnson (1963), Collias et al. (1966), and Collias and Collias (1967). Kruijt (1964) and Lill (1966) studiedcaptive Red Jungle Fowl. Wood-Gush (1955) and Guhl (1962) review the behavior of domesticfowl. These authorssay little aboutparental or courtshipfeeding. The youngof gallinaceousbirds are precocial,but they needhelp from one or both parentsto obtain food during their first few weeks. Typically the parentlocates food and behaves in sucha way that theyoung will get it. The parent may let the chick take the morselfrom its beak, drop the food in front of the chick,or usespecific calls to alert the chick to.the presence of the food. All thesebehavior patterns I includeunder the term parental feeding. In many galliforms (Stokesand Williams, MS) the male may perform somewhatsimilar feedingbehavior toward the hen as part of his courtship. This is commonlycalled "tidbitting" (Domm, 1927) from the fact that the cockoften displayswith choicemorsels. The Red JungleFowl in the 40-hectareSan Diego Zoo are unconfined, but eachbird belongsto a small socialunit and remainswithin a territory the entireyear (Colliaset al., 1966). The birdsobtain some natural food, but rely primarily upon food providedfor other exhibit animalsby the zoo keepersand the generalpublic. I made intensivestudies largely on the birds of the Monkey Mesa from April throughJune 1969. I could recognizeindividually 16 cocksand 22 hens that used this area by means of comb configuration,scars, brood size, and other characteristics.They formedthree separateflocks, each dominatedby a singleadult cock,with little overlappingof homerange. The birdswere so tame I couldfeed them at closerange. The zoojungle fowl are normallysingle brooded with a peak of hatching in April. In 1964 and 1965 the midwinterpopulation ranged between 125 and 142,with cocksmaking up 56 per centof the total (Colliaset al., 1966). In 1969I estimatedthe populationat 222 birds,almost double that of 1964 and 1965. In a singleafternoon's census on 21 May of almostall the avail- able habitat I counted 124 cocks. These fell into two distinct age classes 21 The Auk, 88: 21-29. January 1971 22 ALLEN W. STOKES [Auk, Vol. 88 FEMALE ! SECONDS 1.0 Figure 1. Food ½a]]o:[ Red Jungle Fowl A, the :[ema]e;B, the male. on the basisof spur length and curvature. The 48 cockswith long, curved spursI judged to be at least 2 years old; 76 with shorter,blunt spurs I called yearlings. In their study of Red Jungle Fowl in northern India Collias and Collias (1967) found the breedingseason and sex ratio almostidentical with those at the San Diego Zoo, but the densityof jungle fowl in goodhabitat was only 6 birds/100 hectarescompared to the 555 birds/100 hectaresat the zoo in 1969. Feeding behaviorof the hen to her chicks.--During their first few days after hatchingjungle fowl chicksremained within a meter of the hen. When foraging the hen was ever on the move. She shifted the litter with a side- ways sweepof her beak and scratchedwith her feet. When she found a suitablepiece of food during thesefirst days shepicked it up, held it above or in front of the chick, and waited until it took the morsel from her beak. In good foragingareas she found food every few seconds.This movement of the beak near the chicksattracted their attention,and they soonbecame alert to her motions. At this stage the chickswere so.close to the hen she neededto move only her head to give them the food. In a week the chicks started to forage farther from the hen. Then when she locatedfood she sometimescarried the morsela few stepsto the chick and let it take the food from her beak or droppedit in front of the chick. Jan. 1971] Red Jungle Fowl 23 TABLE I INVENTORYOF RED Ju>mnE Fowl AT SAN DIEGO Zoo, 1969 27 April-I May 21 May Total Adult cock: With singlehen 16 16 32 With hen and chicks 5 2 7 Alone 19 ? ? Yearling cock: With single hen 9 5 14 With hen and chicks 23 6 29 Alone 31 ? ? Hen and chicks: With cock 28 8 36 Alone 26 13 39 Single hens: Alone 3 ? ? Total cocks observed: Adults 31 48 79 Yearlings 48 76 124 Per cent adult cocks 39 39 39 Cocks/100 hens (from Collias et al., 1966: 551) 137 Hens/adult cock 2: I More commonlyshe gavea food call (Figure 1A) which alerted the chicks and brought them on the run to her. By this time she usually dropped the morselbefore the chick, but often she merely pointed her beak at the morselwithout picking it up. As the chickscontinued to developand to forage still farther from her, the ben'sbehavior changed still more. Her food call becamelouder, faster, and longer. In addition she sometimesdabbled at the food with exag- geratedup and down head movements,two or three times per second. Chicksresponded to theseauditory and visualsignals when as far as 10 m from the hen. The hen stoppedsignaling as soonas the chicks arrived. When the broodforaged where food was plentiful, the hen neithercalled nor dabbled, but let the chicks feed for themselveswhile she also fed. Meal- wormsproved highly attractive,and henswith youngchicks never failed to tidbit with them. At 8 to 10 weeksthe chicksbecame fairly independentof the hen and vice versa; when given a worm the hen at this stage merely ate it, without callsor headmovements. The food call has the physical propertiesof soundseasy to. locate: abrupt start and stop, brevity, and wide frequencyrange. Food calls of other galliformshave the samecharacteristics and may be almost identical in form (Stokesand Williams, MS). Parental feeding by the cock.--About half o.f the hens with broodsac- quired a consortcock (Table 1, Figure 2) that helped her feed the chicks. When such a group foraged, the cock was usually farther than the hen from the chicks. When he found food he gave the same food call as the 24 ALLE• W. SToars [Auk, Vol. 88 24[ BROOD •ND BR INC. iBROOD] [YR • ? LA D • I AD • I •5 SINGLE INC 2] A D •' I •22[ BROOD--OFF AREA IND BR• .AD•i j ROOD9 I ADSINGLE 2 2 2 I II 2I I II 21 31 10 20 MARCH APRIL MAY JUN E Figure 2. Associationof male Red Jungle Fowl with females in relation to repro- ductive state of the female. hen (Figure lB) and the sameexaggerated head movements,at which the chicks and hen ran to him. I have seen a cock freeze with his beak a few cm above the grounduntil the chick cameand took the morsel,but more commonlythe hen ran up to him. As shecame to within 0.5 m of him he usually turned away from her, and she then in turn repeatedthe call over the food until her chicks arrived. Courtskip]eeding.--Male jungle fowlscommonly tidbitted to hensat the zoo. They did this to half-grownpullets, to hensready to lay, and to hens with chicks. The displaymovements and call were virtually identicalto thoseboth cock and hen usedwhile feedingchicks as describedabove, but the tidbitting cockusually picked up a greatervariety of items: the tiniest of morsels,whole peanut shells,palm nuts, wood chips, leaves, and leafy twigsup to 0.5 m long. Hence the feedingwas sometimessymbolic. Meal- worms releasedstrong tidbitting, but any novel or uncommonfood also served. If a hen did not run to the cockimmediately, he usuallyintensified his calling and motions. At times he carried the item a few steps toward the hen, especiallyif he found it partly or well-hidden,but only rarely wouldhe go right up to her. Occasionallyhe let the hen take food from Jan. 1971] Red Jungle Fowl 25 TABLE 2 SEXUAL BONDSIN RED JUNGLE FOWL IN RELATIONTO AGE O1*COCKS Monkey Mesa Remainder of zoo Adult Yearling No Adult Yearling males males males males males Single hens 8 1 0 38 14 Hens with brood 2 8 6 6 35 his beak. He wouldrepeatedly pick up the foodand dropit, dabblewith it on the ground,or more rarely freezewith his beak over it. A cock might continuesuch behavior for well over a minute,and then if no hen arrived, eat the morsel. The displayingcock partially flexed his legs, kept the wingsdose to the bodywith primarywing tips concealed, and heldthe. long tail feathershigh off the ground,but the only essentialcomponents of the displayseemed to be the call, the headmovements, and the actualdabbling with the morsel. The sight or soundof a tidbitting cock was a powerful stimulant to nearby cocksto begin tidbitting. If the latter were not near food, they picked up whateverwas at hand, often large leavesand small branches. The conspicuousmovements and associatedloud calling often attracted the henand her chicksto the secondcock, and sheand her broodmight then run back and forth betweenthe two cocksstanding perhaps 6-10 m apart. These rival cocksrarely fought, but often low-intensitydisplay and chasing ensuedthat madethe subordinatecock withdraw temporarily a meteror so and stop tidbitting. Sometimesafter such sessionsof rival tidbitting the hen shifted her attachment from one cock to the other and let him stand closeto her whileshe was feeding or resting. The sightof a mealwormmust be a strongstimulus for the cockto eat it, but he rarelydid so.while a henwas within about10 m of him. Exceptions were when a cock had been dominatedrecently by another cock standing nearby,after somegeneral disturbance in the vicinity,or whenthe hen and chickswere actively feedingwhere food was plentiful. A cock'sassociation with hensdepends upon his age and socialstatus (Table 2).
Recommended publications
  • Sage-Grouse Hunting Season
    CHAPTER 11 UPLAND GAME BIRD AND SMALL GAME HUNTING SEASONS Section 1. Authority. This regulation is promulgated by authority of Wyoming Statutes § 23-1-302 and § 23-2-105 (d). Section 2. Hunting Regulations. (a) Bag and Possession Limit. Only one (1) daily bag limit of each species of upland game birds and small game may be taken per day regardless of the number of hunt areas hunted in a single day. When hunting more than one (1) hunt area, a person’s daily and possession limits shall be equal to, but shall not exceed, the largest daily and possession limit prescribed for any one (1) of the specified hunt areas in which the hunting and possession occurs. (b) Evidence of sex and species shall remain naturally attached to the carcass of any upland game bird in the field and during transportation. For pheasant, this shall include the feathered head, feathered wing or foot. For all other upland game bird species, this shall include one fully feathered wing. (c) No person shall possess or use shot other than nontoxic shot for hunting game birds and small game with a shotgun on the Commission’s Table Mountain and Springer wildlife habitat management areas and on all national wildlife refuges open for hunting. (d) Required Clothing. Any person hunting pheasants within the boundaries of any Wyoming Game and Fish Commission Wildlife Habitat Management Area, or on Bureau of Reclamation Withdrawal lands bordering and including Glendo State Park, shall wear in a visible manner at least one (1) outer garment of fluorescent orange or fluorescent pink color which shall include a hat, shirt, jacket, coat, vest or sweater.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Turkey Education Guide
    Table of Contents Section 1: Eastern Wild Turkey Ecology 1. Eastern Wild Turkey Quick Facts………………………………………………...pg 2 2. Eastern Wild Turkey Fact Sheet………………………………………………….pg 4 3. Wild Turkey Lifecycle……………………………………………………………..pg 8 4. Eastern Wild Turkey Adaptations ………………………………………………pg 9 Section 2: Eastern Wild Turkey Management 1. Wild Turkey Management Timeline…………………….……………………….pg 18 2. History of Wild Turkey Management …………………...…..…………………..pg 19 3. Modern Wild Turkey Management in Maryland………...……………………..pg 22 4. Managing Wild Turkeys Today ……………………………………………….....pg 25 Section 3: Activity Lesson Plans 1. Activity: Growing Up WILD: Tasty Turkeys (Grades K-2)……………..….…..pg 33 2. Activity: Calling All Turkeys (Grades K-5)………………………………..…….pg 37 3. Activity: Fit for a Turkey (Grades 3-5)…………………………………………...pg 40 4. Activity: Project WILD adaptation: Too Many Turkeys (Grades K-5)…..…….pg 43 5. Activity: Project WILD: Quick, Frozen Critters (Grades 5-8).……………….…pg 47 6. Activity: Project WILD: Turkey Trouble (Grades 9-12………………….……....pg 51 7. Activity: Project WILD: Let’s Talk Turkey (Grades 9-12)..……………..………pg 58 Section 4: Additional Activities: 1. Wild Turkey Ecology Word Find………………………………………….…….pg 66 2. Wild Turkey Management Word Find………………………………………….pg 68 3. Turkey Coloring Sheet ..………………………………………………………….pg 70 4. Turkey Coloring Sheet ..………………………………………………………….pg 71 5. Turkey Color-by-Letter……………………………………..…………………….pg 72 6. Five Little Turkeys Song Sheet……. ………………………………………….…pg 73 7. Thankful Turkey…………………..…………………………………………….....pg 74 8. Graph-a-Turkey………………………………….…………………………….…..pg 75 9. Turkey Trouble Maze…………………………………………………………..….pg 76 10. What Animals Made These Tracks………………………………………….……pg 78 11. Drinking Straw Turkey Call Craft……………………………………….….……pg 80 Section 5: Wild Turkey PowerPoint Slide Notes The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruffed Grouse
    Ruffed Grouse Photo Courtesy of the Ruffed Grouse Society Introduction The ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) is North America’s most widely distributed game bird. As a very popular game species, the grouse is in the same family as the wild turkey, quail and pheasant. They range from Alaska to Georgia including 34 states and all the Canadian provinces. Historically in Indiana, its range included the forested regions of the state. Today the range is limited to the south central and southeastern 1/3 of the state in the southern hill country, with a few pockets in counties bordering Michigan. Ruffed grouse weigh between 1 and 1.5 pounds and grow to 17 inches in length with a 22-inch wingspan. They exhibit color phases with northern range birds being reddish-brown to gray while those in the southern part of their continental range, including Indiana, are red. History and Current Status Before settlement, grouse populations ranged throughout the hardwood region of the state. In areas where timber was permanently removed for farms, homes and towns grouse habitat has been lost. During the early1900’s, many farms in the south-central portion of Indiana were abandoned. As a result of this farm abandonment, the vegetation around old home sites and in the fallow fields grew through early plant succession stages. About the same time, the reforestation era began as abandoned farms reverted into public ownership under the management of state and federal natural resource agencies. By the 1950’s, natural succession, reforestation, and timber harvest management were beginning to form a myriad of early successional forest patches across a fairly contiguous forested landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Molt and Plumage
    The Auk 124(2):ART–XXX, 2007 © The American Ornithologists’ Union, 2007. Printed in USA. REVISION OF MOLT AND PLUMAGE TERMINOLOGY IN PTARMIGAN (PHASIANIDAE: LAGOPUS SPP.) BASED ON EVOLUTIONARY CONSIDERATIONS Peter Pyle1 The Institute for Bird Populations, P.O. Box 1346, Point Reyes Station, California 94956, USA Abstract.—By examining specimens of ptarmigan (Phasianidae: Lagopus spp.), I quantifi ed three discrete periods of molt and three plumages for each sex, confi rming the presence of a defi nitive presupplemental molt. A spring contour molt was signifi cantly later and more extensive in females than in males, a summer contour molt was signifi cantly earlier and more extensive in males than in females, and complete summer–fall wing and contour molts were statistically similar in timing between the sexes. Completeness of feather replacement, similarities between the sexes, and comparison of molts with those of related taxa indicate that the white winter plumage of ptarmigan should be considered the basic plumage, with shi s in hormonal and endocrinological cycles explaining diff erences in plumage coloration compared with those of other phasianids. Assignment of prealternate and pre- supplemental molts in ptarmigan necessitates the examination of molt evolution in Galloanseres. Using comparisons with Anserinae and Anatinae, I considered a novel interpretation: that molts in ptarmigan have evolved separately within each sex, and that the presupplemental and prealternate molts show sex-specifi c sequences within the defi nitive molt cycle. Received 13 June 2005, accepted 7 April 2006. Key words: evolution, Lagopus, molt, nomenclature, plumage, ptarmigan. Revision of Molt and Plumage Terminology in Ptarmigan (Phasianidae: Lagopus spp.) Based on Evolutionary Considerations Rese.—By examining specimens of ptarmigan (Phasianidae: Lagopus spp.), I quantifi ed three discrete periods of molt and three plumages for each sex, confi rming the presence of a defi nitive presupplemental molt.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey, Grouse, Bobwhite & Pheasant Wildlife Chapter Template
    Gallinaceous Birds Order Galliformes Family Phasianidae Gallinaceous birds refer to a group of ground-living birds, like pheasants, turkeys, grouse and quail, that are chicken-like and share certain physical characteristics. They have strong legs and very thick, powerful toes with well developed nails, which are perfect for scratching the ground in search of seeds & grains. They also eat fruits, berries, shoots, leaves, grasses and insects. They have strong seed-craking bills. Males in this group often have elaborate plumage they can raise or spread during breeding season to entice a harem of females. Most males, also known as cockbirds or roosters, do not help with raising the precocial chicks. Females are called hens. These birds usually only fly in short, explosive bursts for short distances (sometimes accom- panied by a racous call) before settling down again. Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopavo Famous for its role in that all-American of holidays, Thanksgiving, the turkey is our largest game- bird. Adult males, “gobblers” or “toms,” stand up to 3 feet tall and 3 to 4 feet long. The hens are almost a third shorter and weigh half as much. Like all ground birds that rely little on flight, turkeys are heavy birds – an adult tom may be up to 25 pounds. Compare that to a large great horned owl that may weigh only three pounds! Wild turkeys have long slender necks and bodies with a fleshy, multi-colored head and neck. Their overall plumage is metallic bronze, browns and blacks to help them camouflage in the wild, and their tail feathers are edged in brown instead of the white tips found on domesticated turkeys.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Molts and Plumages
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Grouse and Quails of North America, by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences May 2008 3 Molts and Plumages Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscigrouse Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "3 Molts and Plumages" (2008). Grouse and Quails of North America, by Paul A. Johnsgard. 5. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscigrouse/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Grouse and Quails of North America, by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Molts and Plumages dunderstanding of the molts and plumages of the quails and grouse is of great importance to the applied biologist, for they provide clues that are valuable for determining age and sex of individ- ual birds without resorting to internal examination. They thus offer a means of analyzing wild populations as to sex and age composition, which are basic indices to past and potential reproductive performances and probable mortality rates. Additionally, molts and plumages are generally species- specific traits, which have resulted from pressures of natural selection over a long period of time in a particular habitat and climate. The ecology of the species is of major importance in this regard; species occurring in more northerly regions may undergo their molts more rapidly than those in south- erly ones or, as in the case of the willow ptarmigan, certain races may even lack particular plumages that occur in populations existing in other areas having different climates.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Two Introductions of Merriams Wild Turkey Into Montana by Beverly J Rose a THESIS Submitted to the Graduate Facult
    Evaluation of two introductions of Merriams wild turkey into Montana by Beverly J Rose A THESIS Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Fish and Wildlife Management Montana State University © Copyright by Beverly J Rose (1956) Abstract: Merriam's wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo merriam), were introduced into the Judith Mountains, in central Montana, in November of 1954. A second liberation was made in the Longpines Area, in southeastern Montana, in January of 1955. Field studies were conducted on both areas from December 21, 1954, to March 25, 1956. Emphasis was placed on securing data on survival, food habits, movements, nesting and reproductive success, use of cover types, and limiting factors. Direct field observations provided most of the data, but laboratory analysis of droppings was utilized primarily for food habits evaluation. A total of 2,192 droppings collected from both study areas, during the summer of 1955, and winter of 1955-1956, were analyzed. The procedure of analysis is described. To facilitate the identification of items in the droppings, extensive insect, plant and seed reference collections were made. AW EVALUATION OF TWO INTRODUCTIONS OF MERRIAM 1S WILD TURKEY INTO MONTANA by BEVERLY J . ROSE A THESIS Submitted to the Graduate Faculty- in , partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Fish and W ildlife Management a t Montana State College Approved: -Al Hjefm, TSajor ^ejfertmehf Chairman, Examining Committee Dean5 Graduat^yDivision Bozeman, Montana June, 1956 ' hV'-! , h PJ 3 7/ - 2 - Q- <H9. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A b stract ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beginner's Guide to Greater Sage-Grouse
    Notes from the Lek BEGINNER’S GUIDE Greater Sage-grouse Conservation Primer Series TO GREATER SAGE-GROUSE Primer # 1 A detailed description of seasonal habitats, sage-grouse natural history and population trend analyses can be found in the Fish and Wildlife Service’s March 2010 status review (http://www.fws.gov/wyominges/PDFs/Findings/SageGrouse/FR03052010.pdf). This following abbreviated discussion provides key points for a basic understanding of the species and its habitats. Life History reater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) are members of the Phasianidae family. They are one of two species; the other species in the genus is the Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). The G Greater sage-grouse is the largest North American grouse species. Adult male greater sage-grouse range in length from 26 to 30 inches and weigh between 4 and 7 pounds. Adult females are smaller, ranging in length from 19 to 23 inches and weighing between 2 and 4 pounds. During the spring breeding season, male sage-grouse gather together to perform courtship displays on areas called leks. Areas of bare soil, short-grass steppe, windswept ridges, exposed knolls, or other relatively open sites typically serve as leks, which are often surrounded by denser shrub-steppe cover, which is used for escape, thermal and feeding cover. The proximity, configuration, and abundance of nesting habitat are key factors influencing lek location. Leks can be formed opportunistically at any appropriate site within or adjacent to nesting habitat. Therefore, lek habitat availability is not considered to be a limiting factor for sage-grouse. Leks are indicative of nesting habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Turkey in Alabama
    1 The Wild Turkey in Alabama Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Cover “Oak Ridge Monarch” provided courtesy of Larry Zach www.zachwildlifeart.com The Wild Turkey in Alabama by Steven W. Barnett & Victoria S. Barnett Wildlife Biologists Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries M. Barnett Lawley M. N. “Corky” Pugh Commissioner Director Fred R. Harders Gary H. Moody Assistant Director Chief, Wildlife Section Support for development of this publication was provided by the Wildlife Restoration Program and the Alabama Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries with funds provided by your purchase of hunting licenses and equipment. Additional funding assistance provided by the Alabama Chapter of the National Wild Turkey Federation. outdooralabama.com 0009-2008 The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, age, gender, national origin or disability in its hiring or employment practices nor in admission to, or operation of its programs, services or activities. This publication is available in alternative formats upon request. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must first express my sincere appreciation to my wife, Victoria, for coauthoring this book with me. She graciously volunteered her time and energy to assist me with this endeavor which greatly expedited the completion of the manuscript. Both authors thankfully acknowledge those individuals who provided extensive and constructive reviews of this
    [Show full text]
  • Ruffed Grouse Bonasa Umbellus
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Photo by SC DNR Ruffed Grouse Bonasa umbellus Contributors (2005): Judy A. Barnes (SCDNR) Reviewed and Edited (2012): Billy Dukes (SCDNR) DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description Linnaeus first described the Ruffed Grouse in 1776, and since then, many subspecies have been named. Johnsgard (1983) distinguishes 11 subspecies; Atwater and Schnell (1989) list 12; and del Hoyo et al. (1994) recognizes 14 subspecies. The Ruffed Grouse is a gallinaceous bird in the Order Galliformes and the Family Phasianidae, which includes grouse, quail, turkey, and pheasants. The Ruffed Grouse is a chicken-like bird that weighs about 500 g (1.1 lbs.). The genus Bonasa is translated as “good when roasted” and the specific epithet umbellus means “sunshade” referring to the long, shiny, black or chocolate colored neck feathers most prominent on the male. Males tend to be slightly larger than females and have a large tail that it fans to attract a mate or defend its territory. The female’s tail is similar but smaller and usually is the best external basis for determining sex (Gough 1998). Across most of its range, a fully-grown tail feather of over 14.9 cm (5.87 in.) in length usually belongs to a male; less than 14 cm (5.5 in.), a hen. Ruffed Grouse have two or more color phases ranging from a grayish to a reddish-brown color. Red-phased grouse become more prevalent in milder climates while gray birds are more abundant where winter climates are more severe. Male Ruffed Grouse are aggressively territorial throughout their adult lives and proclaim their area with a “drumming” display.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses of the Ocellated Turkey (Meleagris Ocellata) to Human Disturbance
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1-1-2017 Responses of the Ocellated Turkey (Meleagris ocellata) to Human Disturbance Thomas Hughes Martin University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Thomas Hughes, "Responses of the Ocellated Turkey (Meleagris ocellata) to Human Disturbance" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1279. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1279 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESPONSES OF THE OCELLATED TURKEY (MELEAGRIS OCELLATA) TO HUMAN DISTURBANCE A Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biology The University of Mississippi by, Thomas H. Martin May 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Thomas H. Martin ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Habitat loss and habitat degradation are major drivers of the current biodiversity crisis. Nowhere else are these threats more severe than in the tropics. Because the tropics are estimated to contain as much as 60% of all the species on Earth, they are critically important for the conservation of biodiversity. To conserve species we need to understand both the factors that lead to extinction and how the taxa that persist are able to adapt to the rapid anthropogenic change of their environment. The Ocellated Turkey (Meleagris ocellata) is a Neotropical galliform bird of conservation concern because it faces a rapidly changing environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruffed Grouse of New York State- Conservationist
    ltuffed Orouse By Timothy J. Post ound, plump birds a little larger During winter, grouse will burrow or dive into soft, powdery than pigeons, ruffed grouse are a snow when available. This not only helps keep them warm, but favorite of birders and hunters alike. Also known as par- also hides them from predators. In times of extreme cold, tem- tridges, they are year-round residents of New York State. peratures beneath the snow can be as much as 25 degrees Though these birds go unseen by many, the familiar warmer than the air. drumming performed by males, especially in spring, lets Male grouse are aggressively territorial throughout their people know they are there. adult lives, defending a 5-20 acre patch of forest. Males claim A forest species, ruffed grouse prefer young forest habi- their territory by standing on a log, rock, or mound and beating tats and are generally found in areas with active forestry, their wings against the air. Called drumming, it sounds like a in recently abandoned agricultural areas that have distant lawn mower engine slowly starting up and then increas- reverted to early successional forest, or in areas affected ing to a rapid beat. Drumming is most frequently heard during by fire. Grouse can often be seen along the sides of gravel the spring mating season, but it can occur throughout the year. roads near these young forest thickets where they pick up grit (small stones) to aid them in digestion. Reproduction Each spring, male grouse ruffle their Description neck feathers, fan their tails and drum in an Ruffed grouse come in two basic color phases.
    [Show full text]