Fedex 2019 Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Global Shipping Transaction Guide Important Information
v 2500 Global Shipping Transaction Guide Important Information Payment A shipment given to FedEx with incorrect information is not eligible for refund under any FedEx money-back guarantee. FedEx may suspend applicable You must remit payment in accordance with the FedEx Service Guide, tariff money-back guarantee in the event of automation device failure or if the or pricing agreement, or other terms or instructions provided to you by FedEx automation device becomes inoperative. from time to time. You may not withhold payment on any shipments because of equipment failure or for the failure of FedEx to repair or replace any Confidential and Proprietary equipment. The information contained in this guide is confidential and proprietary to Inaccurate Invoices FedEx. No part of this guide may be distributed or disclosed in any form to any third party without written permission of FedEx. This document is If you generate an inaccurate invoice, then FedEx will bill or refund to you the provided and its use is subject to the terms and conditions of the FedEx difference according to the FedEx Service Guide, service or pricing agreement, PowerShip Placement Agreement. Any conflict between the applicable FedEx or other terms or instructions provided to you by FedEx from time to time. A Service Guide and this document is controlled by the FedEx Service Guide. request for refund on a FedEx® shipment must be made in accordance with the applicable FedEx Service Guide, service or pricing agreement, or terms or © 1998–2011 FedEx. Unpublished. instructions provided by FedEx periodically. FedEx Ship Manager® Software PassPort, Global Shipping Transaction Guide 2 Contents 1 Overview ..................................................................................... -
Shipping Package XML Developers Guide July 9, 2012
Shipping Package - XML 7/9/2012 Shipping Package XML Developers Guide July 9, 2012 © 2012 United Parcel Service of America, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary Page 1 Shipping Package - XML 7/9/2012 Notice In all communications with UPS concerning this document, please refer to the document date located on the cover. Copyright The use, disclosure, reproduction, modification, transfer, or transmittal of this work for any purpose in any form or by any means without the written permission of United Parcel Service is strictly prohibited. © Copyright 2012 United Parcel Service of America, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Trademarks Some of the UPS corporate applications use U.S. city, state, and postal code information obtained by United Parcel Service of America, Inc. under a non-exclusive license from the United States Postal Service. © 2012 United Parcel Service of America, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary Page 2 Shipping Package - XML 7/9/2012 Table of Contents 1.1 Important Information...............................................................................................................6 1.2 Welcome to the UPS API Developer's Guides..........................................................................7 1.2.1 Release features........................................................................................................................7 1.2.2 How to Use this Guide .......................................................................................................12 1.3 Business Processes -
RLA Or NLRA? Fedex and UPS Follow the Money Trail
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW RLA or NLRA? FedEx and UPS Follow the Money Trail By Frank N. Wilner FexEx Express and UPS compete furiously in the market for expedited pickup and delivery service. Labor costs are a significant component of total costs for both competitors, but they compete on different playing fields: UPS ground-service employees are covered by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which permits union organizing at individual terminal locations, while FedEx Express ground-service employees are subject to the Railway Labor Act (RLA), which requires union organizing on a systemwide basis—making it much more difficult to call a strike. UPS has failed on numerous occasions to shift its ground-service employees to RLA coverage and now is aligned with the Teamsters to bring FedEx employees under the NLRA. FedEx Express wants its nonunionized ground-service employees to remain under the RLA; however, legislation has passed the House to bring them under the ambit of the NLRA, and Senate action is expected in early 2010. “We are a freight service with 550-mile per hour delivery trucks” – FedEx founder, Fred Smith1 The Railway Labor Act (RLA) of 19262 is an 83-year-old statute that is distinctly different, in crucial respects, from the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935.3 The RLA was the nation’s first law guaranteeing workers the right to organize and choose their own bargaining representa- tives. The RLA governs the labor-management relations of railroads and airlines (the latter added in 1936), whereas A Brief Introduction to the Players the NLRA governs other private-sector industries. -
A Study on Supply Chain Management of Fedex Express Transportation”
Project Dissertation Report on “A STUDY ON SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT OF FEDEX EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION” Submitted by: Ankesh Kumar (2K18/MBA/103) Under the Guidance of: Mr. Yashdeep Singh Assistant Professor DELHI SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Delhi Technological University Bawana Road Delhi 110042 i DELHI SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY SHAHBAD DAULATPUR, MAIN BAWANA ROAD, DELHI -110042 Dated: 10th April 2020 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the work titled “A study on Supply Chain management of FedEx Express Transportation” submitted by Ankesh Kumar in this project report as part of 4th Semester in MBA (DSM, DTU) during January - April, 2020 was conducted under my guidance and supervision. This work is his original work to the best of my knowledge and has not been submitted anywhere else for the award of any credits / degree whatsoever. The work is satisfactory for the award of MGT-44 Term Project credits. Dr. Rajan Yadav Mr. Yashdeep Singh Head of department Assistant Professor Delhi school of Management Delhi School of Management Delhi Technological University Delhi Technological University ii STUDENT UNDERTAKING Dated: 10th May 2020 This is to undertake that the work titled “A study on Supply Chain management of FedEx Express Transportation”, Project Report is submitted as part of 4th Semester in MBA (DSM, DTU) during January-April, 2020 under the guidance of Mr. Yashdeep Singh (Asst. Prof.) is my original work to the best of my knowledge and has not been submitted anywhere else. The report has been written by me in my own words and not copied from elsewhere. Anything that appears in this report which is not original, has been duly and appropriately referred / cited / acknowledged. -
Settlement Terms, As Approved by Venus’S Counsel and Class Counsel, Subject to Approval by The
Case3:15-cv-03578-EDL Document15 Filed09/29/15 Page1 of 29 1 LEXINGTON LAW GROUP Mark N. Todzo, State Bar No. 168389 2 Abigail Blodgett, State Bar No. 278813 503 Divisadero Street 3 San Francisco, CA 94117 Telephone: (415) 913-7800 4 Facsimile: (415) 759-4112 [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 HALUNEN LAW Melissa W. Wolchansky (pro hac vice pending) 7 Charles D. Moore (pro hac vice pending) 80 South Eighth Street, Suite 1650 8 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 605-4098 9 Facsimile: (612) 605-4099 [email protected] 10 [email protected] 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Classes 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 REBEKAH BAHARESTAN and JENA Case No. 3:15-cv-03578-EDL MCINTYRE, on behalf of themselves and all 17 others similarly situated, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF 18 Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 19 v. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 20 Date: November 3, 2015 VENUS LABORATORIES, INC., dba EARTH Time: 10:00 a.m. 21 FRIENDLY PRODUCTS, INC., Location: Courtroom E Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:15-cv-03578-EDL MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case3:15-cv-03578-EDL Document15 Filed09/29/15 Page2 of 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Page 2 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION ....................................................................................... vi 3 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES .................................................................1 4 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 5 STATEMENT OF FACTS ..............................................................................................................2 6 I. -
Fedex Corp Proxy
4AUG200523421009 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To Be Held September 28, 2009 To Our Stockholders: We cordially invite you to attend the 2009 annual meeting of FedEx’s stockholders. The meeting will take place in The Grand Ballroom at The Peabody Hotel, 149 Union Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38103, on Monday, September 28, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. local time. We look forward to your attendance either in person or by proxy. The purpose of the meeting is to: 1. Elect twelve directors; 2. Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as FedEx’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2010; 3. Act upon four stockholder proposals, if properly presented at the meeting; and 4. Transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on August 3, 2009, may vote at the meeting or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. By order of the Board of Directors, 4AUG200523413606 CHRISTINE P. RICHARDS Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary August 17, 2009 HOW TO VOTE: Please complete, date, sign and return the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction card, or vote electronically via the Internet or by telephone. The enclosed return envelope requires no additional postage if mailed in the United States. REDUCE MAILING COSTS: If you vote on the Internet, you may elect to have next year’s proxy statement and annual report to stockholders delivered to you electronically. We strongly encourage you to enroll in electronic delivery. It is a cost-effective way for us to provide you with proxy materials and annual reports. -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc. -
TNT Annual Report 2008
Sure we can Annual report 2008 WorldReginfo - 731da950-9e55-4f32-8b5e-cc096546682d Sure we can Annual report 2008 WorldReginfo - 731da950-9e55-4f32-8b5e-cc096546682d Cautionary note with regard to Introduction and “forward-looking statements” financial highlights Some statements in this annual report are “forward-looking statements”. This is TNT’s annual report for the financial year ended 31 December 2008, By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty prepared in accordance with Dutch regulations. TNT delisted its American because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in Depositary Receipts from the New York Stock Exchange on 18 June 2007, the future. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown and its reporting obligations with the United States Securities and Exchange risks, uncertainties and other factors that are outside of TNT’s control and Commission terminated on 16 September 2007. TNT is therefore no longer impossible to predict and may cause actual results to differ materially from any required to file its annual repor t on Form 20-F. future results expressed or implied. These forward-looking statements are However, where TNT thinks it is helpful, certain information is retained for based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, analyses and projections comparative purposes. In this way TNT intends to provide its stakeholders with about the industries in which TNT operates and TNT management’s beliefs a clear overview of its financial year 2008. and assumptions about future events. Unless otherwise specified or the context so requires, “TNT”, the “company”, You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on these forward-looking the “group”, “it” and “its” refer to TNT N.V. -
Powering Global Connections Corporate Overview Updated 9/2018 Corporate Overview Updated 2/2021 Who We Are Our Mission
Powering Global Connections Corporate Overview Updated 9/2018 Corporate Overview Updated 2/2021 Who We Are Our Mission FedEx Corporation will produce superior financial returns for its shareowners by providing high-value-added logistics, transportation, and related business services through focused operating companies. Customer requirements will be met in the highest quality manner appropriate to each market segment served. FedEx will strive to develop mutually rewarding relationships with its team members, partners, and suppliers. Safety will be the first consideration in all operations. Corporate activities will be conducted to the highest ethical and professional standards. 3 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion "At FedEx, our workforce is as diverse as the world we serve, and we believe that everyone deserves respect. Embracing diversity is not just the right thing to do; we also have proven that it fosters innovation and makes us a more competitive company. It’s also about fostering acceptance, promoting anti-biases, and encouraging a more inclusive society. These values are core to who we are and how we operate." -Chairman and CEO Fred Smith and President & COO Raj Subramaniam 4 FedEx is consistently named among the world’s most valuable and admired brands. FORTUNE No. 14 among Forbes “World’s Most Admired One of the “Best Companies” Employers for Diversity” Reputation Institute Forbes “RepTrak 100” “World’s Most Valuable List of the World’s Most Brands” Reputable Companies U.S. Chamber of FORTUNE “100 Best Commerce Foundation Places to Work” “Corporate Citizenship Hall of Fame Inductee” Newsweek Magazine America’s Best Customer Service 2021 - #1 for Shipping and Delivery Services 5 Strength in Numbers TEAM 680 AIRCRAFT ≈ 600K MEMBERS COUNTRIES AND OPERATING > 220 TERRITORIES SERVED > 5K FACILITIES DAILY TRACKING > 400M REQUESTS SHIPMENTS >18M PER BUSINESS DAY (AVG. -
September, 2008
WWW.AIRCARGOWORLD.COM SEPTEMBER 2008 International Trends & Analysis INTERNATIONAL EDITION The World’s Top Cargo Airlines50 Cargo Security • India • Anti-Trust 2008 SUPPLY CHAIN INNOVATION AWARD FINALIST 6H>6 IDD J#H# EDGII"ID "9DDG# 96NN"9:;>C>I::# ,% A:HH I=6C6>G# As fuel prices send airfreight costs soaring, only OceanGuaranteed ® provides day-definite delivery from Asia to the U.S. that’s just as reliable, but at a fraction of the cost.With the combined resources and expertise of APL Logistics and Con-way Freight, OceanGuaranteed provides a unique single-source LCL/LTL solution with proven 99% on-time performance. In fact, your shipment is guaranteed to arrive on schedule, or we’ll pay 20% of the invoice.* Call 866-896-2005 or visit www.oceanguaranteed.com/22 for more information or to book a shipment today. *Conditions and restrictions apply. See website for full details. Service also available to Canada and Mexico. International Edition September 2008 CONTENTS Volume 11, Number 7 COLUMNS Top Cargo 12 North America Airlines With all the turmoil in Ohio, 22 The annual ranking of the growth at Toledo Express the world’s top 50 cargo air- Airport as a freight center is lines by traffic, with aircraft noteworthy orders and cargo revenue. 14 Pacific Yields on freighters may be down, but handling cargo in China remains a feast • JAL Slimmer 17 Europe Despite its bad timing of entering the market, Cargo 30 India B could be a survivor among India could become a plenty of airline failures key growth market for air 30 cargo, but overcapacity could spoil the party for freight operators. -
A Longitudinal Analysis of Port Systems in Asia Joyce
A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF PORT SYSTEMS IN ASIA JOYCE LOW MEI WAN @ PHAN MEI LING JOAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2008 A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS OF PORT SYSTEMS IN ASIA JOYCE LOW MEI WAN @ PHAN MEI LING JOAN (B.B.A (Hons), M.Sc. (Mgt), NUS) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2008 CONTENTS List of Tables v List of Figures vii Acknowledgments viii Summary ix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1. Background 1.1 Research Scope and Objectives 1.2 Structure of Dissertation Chapter 2 An Empirical Investigation on the Cargo Traffic 11 Performances in East Asian Ports 2. Introduction 2.1 Model of Analysis 2.2 Empirical Analysis at the Aggregate Port Industry Level 2.2.1 Data Description and Sample 2.2.2 The Variables 2.2.3 The Results 2.2.4 Implications of Findings 2.3 Cluster Analysis at the Disaggregate Individual Port Level 2.3.1 Seaport Clusters 2.3.2 Airport Clusters 2.4 Discussions 2.5 Conclusions i Chapter 3 Assessment of Hub Status among Major Asian Ports 68 from A Network Perspective 3. Introduction 3.1 Literature Review 3.2 Model Components 3.2.1 Port Connectivity Index 3.2.2 Port Cooperation Index 3.3 The Case Studies 3.3.1 Alpha Shipping Lines 3.3.2 Gamma Shipping Lines 3.2.2 Beta Shipping Lines 3.4 Discussions 3.4.1 Qualitative Analysis of Empirical Results 3.4.2 Robustness of Analysis 3.4.3 Key Factors Influencing Port Competitiveness 3.4.4 Importance of Inter-Port Relationship to Port Traffic 3.5 Conclusions Chapter 4 The Changing Landscape of the Airport Industry and its 104 Strategic Impact on Air Hub Development in Asia 4. -
Shipping Guide
Shipping Guide September 9, 2020 2020.2 Copyright © 2005, 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error- free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. If this is software or related documentation that is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, delivered to U.S. Government end users are "commercial computer software" pursuant to the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency-specific supplemental regulations. As such, use, duplication, disclosure, modification, and adaptation of the programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, shall be subject to license terms and license restrictions applicable to the programs. No other rights are granted to the U.S. Government. This software or hardware is developed for general use in a variety of information management applications.