Plan of Operations for Surface Disturbing Baseline Studies Mount Emmons Project Colorado, Usa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plan of Operations for Surface Disturbing Baseline Studies Mount Emmons Project Colorado, Usa PLAN OF OPERATIONS FOR SURFACE DISTURBING BASELINE STUDIES MOUNT EMMONS PROJECT COLORADO, USA U.S. Energy Corp. P.O. Box 629 Gunnison, Colorado 81230 Distribution: 2 Copies and one electronic copy – United States Forest Service, Gunnison, CO 1 Copy and one electronic copy – Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison, CO March 31, 2010 Compilation December 7, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Plan of Operations ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Potential Mine Operations. ................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Timeline .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 OWNER-OPERATOR AND LOCATION INFORMATION .......................................................... 6 3.0 DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Geotechnical Baseline Study ............................................................................................... 7 3.1.1. Geotechnical Site Investigations ................................................................................ 7 3.1.2. Work Planned at the Points of Diversion and Storage Areas ...................................... 12 3.2 Surface Water Baseline Study ........................................................................................... 13 3.2.1. Streamflow Measurements ....................................................................................... 13 3.2.2. Water Quality Measurements ................................................................................... 13 3.3 Groundwater Baseline Study ............................................................................................. 14 3.3.1. Possible Surface Disturbance and Mitigation Measures ............................................. 14 3.3.2. Site Restoration ............................................................................................................. 15 3.4 Structures ................................................................................................................................ 15 3.5 Materials .................................................................................................................................. 15 3.6 Water Use .......................................................................................................................... 16 3.7 Solid Waste ....................................................................................................................... 16 3.8 Mobile Equipment and Workforce .................................................................................... 17 3.9 Permits and Approvals ............................................................................................................ 17 3.10 Surface Disturbance ........................................................................................................... 18 4.0 SITE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................... 19 4.1 Geology ............................................................................................................................. 19 4.1.1. Geology/Seismicity .................................................................................................. 19 4.1.2. Topography and Physiography ................................................................................ 20 4.1.3. Measures to Protect Scenic Values .......................................................................... 21 4.2 Land Use ........................................................................................................................... 21 4.3 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................. 22 4.3.1. Measures to Protect Cultural Resources ................................................................... 22 4.4 Climate .............................................................................................................................. 22 4.5 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................ 23 ii 4.5.1. Measures to Protect Air Quality ............................................................................... 24 4.6 Water ................................................................................................................................. 25 4.6.1. Surface Water Hydrology ........................................................................................ 25 4.6.1.1 Carbon Creek Area .................................................................................. 26 4.6.2. Surface Water Quality .............................................................................................. 26 4.6.2.1 Carbon Creek Area .................................................................................. 27 4.6.3. Groundwater Hydrogeology .................................................................................... 27 4.6.3.1 Mount Emmons Area ............................................................................... 27 4.6.3.2 Carbon Creek Area .................................................................................. 29 4.6.4. Methods to Minimize Impacts to Water Quality ...................................................... 30 4.7 Soils ................................................................................................................................... 30 4.7.1. Methods to Minimize Impacts to Soils ..................................................................... 31 4.8 Vegetation ......................................................................................................................... 31 4.8.1. Sensitive Areas ........................................................................................................ 32 4.8.2. Threatened and Endangered and USFS Sensitive Species ........................................ 33 4.8.3. Methods to Minimize Impacts to Plants ................................................................... 34 4.9 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................. 34 4.9.1. Threatened and Endangered and USFS Sensitive Species ........................................ 35 4.9.2. Methods to Minimize Impacts to Wildlife................................................................ 36 4.10 Noise ................................................................................................................................. 36 5.0 ACCESS ROUTES ........................................................................................................................ 37 6.0 RECLAMATION ........................................................................................................................... 37 6.1 Slash Clearing ................................................................................................................... 37 6.2 Drill and Test Pit Pads ....................................................................................................... 38 6.3 Drill Hole Abandonment ................................................................................................... 38 6.4 Revegetation ...................................................................................................................... 38 6.4.1. Topsoil Application ................................................................................................. 38 6.4.2. Species Selection ..................................................................................................... 39 6.4.3. Seeding and Planting ............................................................................................... 40 6.5 Noxious Weed Control ...................................................................................................... 40 7.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 40 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1 Site Map Figure 2-2 Project Area U.S. Energy Claims Figure 3-1 Photo of Typical Excavator Figure 3-2 Surface Water Monitoring Locations and Access Routes Figure 4-1 Parcel Ownership Figure 5-1 Access to Geotechnical Investigation Locations LIST OF DRAWINGS Drawing No. 1a Mt. Emmons Project General Arrangement and Index Drawing No. 1b Mt. Emmons Project General Arrangement Topo Drawing No. 2 Mt. Emmons Project Potential Paste Plant Site Drawing No. 3 Mt. Emmons Project Reservoir No. 1 Drawing No. 4 Mt. Emmons Project Potential Mill Site No. 1, Water Treatment Plant No. 2 Drawing No. 5 Mt. Emmons Project Potential Mine Portal Drawing No. 6 Mt. Emmons Project Potential Mill Site No. 2 Drawing No. 7 Mt. Emmons Project Potential Tailing Facility No.1, Reservoir No. 2 Drawing No. 8 Mt. Emmons Project Potential Tailing Facility No. 2 Drawing No. 9 Mt. Emmons Project Reservoir 3 Drawing No. 10 Mt. Emmons Project Potential
Recommended publications
  • Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision
    APPENDICES A-D Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision June 2010 Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Appendices for ROD — 1 Record of Decision (ROD) Gunnison National Forest Travel Management DECISION TABLE KEY FOR APPENDICES A-D Decision Code Description F Trail open to and designed for Foot travel l HO Trail designed for Pack and Saddle (P&S) use, allowed use is Foot and P&S U Unmanaged Foot/P&S trail, not a part of the maintained or signed trail system NM/MB Trail open to non-motorized uses, where trail is built to mountain bike trail design standards NM/HO Trail open to non-motorized uses, where trail is built to pack and saddle design standards MO Trail open to and designed for Single Track motorized travel ATV Trail open to and designed for motorized vehicles less than 50 inches in width JEEP OHV Trail - opened to all motorized vehicles, managed as a trail HC High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG3 High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG3_NNL High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG4 Passenger vehicle road (Level 4) licensed and non-licensed vehicles allowed PSG5 Passenger vehicle road (Level 5) licensed vehicles only D Route is identified to be closed DE Route is currently decommissioned and will remain closed A Administrative road, motorized travel is allowed by permit A-TRAIL Non motorized trail allowing administrative use by motorized vehicles less than 50 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Natural Areas Program 2018- 2020 Review
    COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Colorado Natural Areas Program 2018- 2020 Review Triennial Report to Governor Polis 1 Pagosa skyrocket cpw.state.co.us Colorado Natural Areas Program Showcasing & protecting our state’s natural treasures since 1977 The Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) is a statewide conservation program created in 1977 by the Colorado Natural Areas Act (C.R.S. 33-33). The Program is housed within Colorado Parks and Mission: Wildlife (CPW) and is advised by the Colorado Natural Areas Council To identity, evaluate, and protect specific examples of (CNAC), a seven member Governor appointed board. Program natural features and phenomena as enduring resources staff includes one full-time coordinator and one to two seasonal for present and future generations, through a statewide technicians. CNAP’s small base is supported by a contract botanist system of Designated Natural Areas. [C.R.S 33-33-102] and over 50 dedicated volunteer stewards. Table of Contents CNAP Background ......................................................................................2 Natural Features .........................................................................................3 t Natural Areas Council ...............................................................................4 Volunteer Steward Program ....................................................................5 Rare Plant Conservation ...........................................................................6 3 Year Program Highlights .......................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • From East to West
    1/9/14 Registration Confirmation Payment Summary RKMF Educational Grant (2013- Due After 2014/APPLICATION) Registration is Approved 2013/2014 RKMF Expedition Proposal (2013- Due After (719) 389-6943 2014 - Preliminary Proposal ) Registration is Approved chris.c.dickson@coloradoco... 2013/2014 Registration Confirmation RKMF Expedition Grant (2013- Due After Registration is Approved Need Help? 2014/GROUP APP.) 2013/2014 Email [email protected] or call (719) 389-6943. Total $0.00 RKMF Educational Grant (2013-2014/APPLICATION) Thank you for applying for a Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Education Grant. We will look over your application and respond with an answer in about two weeks time. Should you have any questions, please contact Chris Dickson. Thank you, Outdoor Education Staff Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Registration Registration 2013/2014 Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Waiting Open Until 5/12 RKMF Educational Grant 2013-2014/APPLICATION for 20 Enrolled Dates Jul 15, 2013 Approval 3 Waiting Ritt Kellogg Educational Grants are for current CC students wishing to gain training to better prepare them for a Ritt Kellogg Expedition Grant. Price: No Charge 2013/2014 Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Waiting Closed RKMF Expedition Proposal 2013-2014 - Preliminary for 19 Enrolled Proposal Approval 4 Waiting Dates Oct 14, 2013 Submit a preliminary proposal for a RKMF expedition. If approved, you will be allowed to continue the application process by filling out the Group Application. Price: No Charge https://apps.ideal-logic.com/worker/report/28CD7-DX6C/fcb57ff4cd7e3c7b/p22c53cf2/a4dcd67faad9f.53616c7465645f5f2cc4f3d47b4d8751a5ce050400ce964d94… 1/12 1/9/14 Registration Confirmation 2013/2014 Ritt Kellogg Memorial Fund Waiting Closed RKMF Expedition Grant 2013-2014/GROUP APP.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Creek, (2,600 Acres)
    GRAND MESA, UNCOMPAHGRE, AND GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST Agate Creek, (11,800 acres)............................................................................................................ 3 American Flag Mountain, (11,900 acres) ....................................................................................... 4 Baldy, (2,300 acres) ........................................................................................................................ 5 Battlements, (24,400 acres)............................................................................................................. 6 Beaver (3,700 acres) ....................................................................................................................... 7 Beckwiths, (18,400 acres) ............................................................................................................... 8 Calamity Basin, (12,500 acres) ....................................................................................................... 9 Cannibal Plateau, (14,500 acres) .................................................................................................. 10 Canyon Creek (10,900 acres); Canyon Creek/Antero, (1,700 acres) ........................................... 11 Carson, (6,000 acres) .................................................................................................................... 13 Castle, (9,400 acres) ...................................................................................................................... 14 Cataract,
    [Show full text]
  • Sell-1601, Molybdenum , , MILS
    CONTACT INFORMATION Mining Records Curator Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-770-3500 http://www.azgs.az.gov [email protected] The following file is part of the James Doyle Sell Mining Collection ACCESS STATEMENT These digitized collections are accessible for purposes of education and research. We have indicated what we know about copyright and rights of privacy, publicity, or trademark. Due to the nature of archival collections, we are not always able to identify this information. We are eager to hear from any rights owners, so that we may obtain accurate information. Upon request, we will remove material from public view while we address a rights issue. CONSTRAINTS STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey does not claim to control all rights for all materials in its collection. These rights include, but are not limited to: copyright, privacy rights, and cultural protection rights. The User hereby assumes all responsibility for obtaining any rights to use the material in excess of “fair use.” The Survey makes no intellectual property claims to the products created by individual authors in the manuscript collections, except when the author deeded those rights to the Survey or when those authors were employed by the State of Arizona and created intellectual products as a function of their official duties. The Survey does maintain property rights to the physical and digital representations of the works. QUALITY STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey is not responsible for the accuracy of the records, information, or opinions that may be contained in the files. The Survey collects, catalogs, and archives data on mineral properties regardless of its views of the veracity or accuracy of those data.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF GRAND MESA, UNCOMPAHGRE, AND GUNNISON NATIONAL FORESTS ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAND MESA, UNCOMPAHGRE, AND GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST ........................................................5 Agate Creek, # 40 (12,700 acres)...............................................................................................................................5 American Flag Mountain, # 32 (9,500 acres) ............................................................................................................5 Baldy, #53 (2,300 acres).............................................................................................................................................6 Battlements, #04 (24,700 acres).................................................................................................................................7 Beaver # 18 (3,600 acres) .........................................................................................................................................7 Beckwiths, #16 (18,600 acres)...................................................................................................................................8 Calamity Basin, #63 (12,200 acres) ...........................................................................................................................9 Cannibal Plateau, #44 (14,500 acres).......................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • (Griseb.) Scribn. & Merr
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF (Systematic Botany) Curt Gerald Carlbom for the Ph.D. in Botany (Name) (Degree) (Major') Date thesis is presented July 28, 1966 Title A BIOSYSTEMATIC STUDY OF SOME NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF AGROSTIS L. AND PODAGROSTIS (GRISEB.) SCRIBN. & MERR. Privacy Abstract approved Redacted for (Major professor) A taxonomic investigation was made of 24 taxa be- longing to the section Trichodium (Michx.) Trin., of Agrostis, and the genus Podagrostis. Experimental methods were employed, including: uniform garden culture of trans- plants and plants grown from seeds collected in natural populations; breeding studies; physiological and pheno- logical investigations; cytological studies; ecological studies in natural populations. Herbarium exsiccatae including the type material of most of the 24 taxa were studied. In addition, compara- the tive morphological studies were made of several of taxa in their natural habitats and again in the uniform experimental garden. Twenty -four taxa are recognized in this study. Gen- eric and species descriptions, distributional maps, gen- eric and species keys, photographs of 23 taxa including several types, and photomicrographs of meiotic and mitotic figures of 12 taxa are presented. In addition, the vari- ous taxa are discussed individually, and the criteria and concepts used for species delimitation in Agrostis and Podagrostis are presented. Chromosome counts of nine species and two varieties of Agrostis and three species of Podagrostis are reported for the first time. Additional counts of other native taxa confirm earlier published counts. Eleven of the 19 species of Agrostis are hexaploids, four species are known to be tetraploids and two species are octoploids.
    [Show full text]
  • NMGS 32Nd Field Conference
    West Elk Breccia volcaniclastic facies in amphitheatre on north side of Mill Creek Canyon, West Elk volcanic field. Courtesy D. L. Gas kill, U.S. Geological Survey. "The hills west of Ohio Creek are composed mainly of breccia . eroded in the most fantastic fashion. The breccia is stratified, and there are huge castle-like forms, abrupt walls, spires, and towers." A. C. Peale, Hayden Survey, 1876 Editors RUDY C. EPIS and ONATHA ALLE.NDER Managing Editor JONATHAN F. CALLENDER A 44. iv CONTENTS Presidents Message vi Editors Message vi Committees vii Field Conference Schedule viii Field Trip Routes ix LANDSAT Photograph of Conference Area ROAD LOGS First Day: Road Log from Grand Junction to Whitewater, Unaweep Canyon, Uravan, Paradox Valley, La Sal, Arches National Park, and Return to Grand Junction via Crescent Junction, Utah C. M. Molenaar, L. C. Craig, W. L. Chenoweth, and I. A. Campbell 1 Second Day: Road Log from Grand Junction to Glenwood Canyon and Return to Grand Junction R. G. Young, C. W. Keighin and I. A. Campbell 17 Third Day: Road Log from Grand Junction to Crested Butte via Delta, Montrose and Gunnison C. S. Goodknight, R. D. Cole, R. A. Crawley, B. Bartleson and D. Gaskill 29 Supplemental Road Log No. 1: Montrose to Durango, Colorado K. Lee, R. C. Epis, D. L. Baars, D. H. Knepper and R. M. Summer 48 Supplemental Road Log No. 2: Gunnison to Saguache, Colorado R. C. Epis 64 ARTICLES Stratigraphy and Tectonics Stratigraphic Correlation Chart for Western Colorado and Northwestern New Mexico M. E. MacLachlan 75 Summary of Paleozoic Stratigraphy and History of Western Colorado and Eastern Utah John A.
    [Show full text]
  • North Valley
    1% for Open Spa0 ce(! Funded Properties North Map 1 0 3 0 0 0 1200 *2 * 0 * 1 Mount Baldy Purple Mountain 0 Aver*y Peak P 11 White Rock Mountain Pearl Mountain 110 (! k 00 o e * v 12 e * Mineral Point e (! r 130 r MAROON BELLS 00 * t C * y r SNOWMASS Augusta G e Mineral 1000 p WILDERNESS Carbonate Hill 0 1 Mountain Point u p lc 0 o Teocalli Mountain * h 0 C 1 Gothic Mountain * Richmond Mountain 1 * * 13 (! (!14 GOTHIC Schuylkill Mountain S GUNNISON NATIONAL l W a G 1 Hancock Peak * a 39 FOREST t o (! 1 e s t h 0 * R h ic 0 in Oh-Be iv * R 0 -Jo e g d y r to Snodgrass RAGGEDS fu n l Mountain WILDERNESS C G Garfield Peak r u 20 l (! Purple Peak e c * e h E Mount Owen* k as 0 * 15 17 t 0 (! R * Peeler Peak (! i 0 ve 2 r 1 0 9 k Ruby Peak 0 16 0 e 0 (! 0 re 1 0 C * 1 h MT CRESTED BUTTE us S r 1 B 1 t 2 Mount Emmons 18 1 r (! 0 a 0 0 n 0 0 0 * 9 k 0 Crested Butte d 0 0 0 e 0 H * 0 e 21 i l r 0 l (! 19 T C (! 1 0 r IRWIN 0 a k i l 0 l k 0 e E Rd e s CRESTED BUTTE 1 r Pas 22 s C ler (! rri Keb Fa eek (!23 l Cr Coa 25 lch (! (!40 0 u 0 24 G 0 (! 1 Mt.
    [Show full text]