AR TICLE Cercosporoid Fungi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AR TICLE Cercosporoid Fungi IMA FUNGUS · 6(1): 25–97 (2015) [!644"E\ 56!46F6!6_ Cercosporoid fungi (Mycosphaerellaceae) 3. Species on monocots (Poaceae, ARTICLE true grasses) Z+ !; G 5_ G > 7 !U .* .Z % N + + ] + ] 9 > 5! 6F6"" 9 @ ] K . [ ^ . [email protected]>/W + % G Z E_4E7GVZ V> 3< U ; ; W / + N Z % ; ; 6665@ / 7] @+ U Z % !4##2 . VU 4!7.E46#` Abstract: V Cercospora Key words: s. latMycosphaerellaceae, Ascomycota $ LiliopsidaK Ascomycota Equisetopsida, Magnoliidae, Lilianae % $ . Cercospora s. lat $ Poaceae $ V Liliopsida Gramineae % $ / $ % [ @% . [V $ % [Cercospora barretoana %C. cymbopogonicola %Cladosporium elymi %Passalora agrostidicola %P. brachyelytri % P. dichanthii-annulati % Article info:@ [7` 56!7K/ [!#U 56!4K; ["/ 56!4 INTRODUCTION $ % V $ Cercospora s. lat + et al56!_V sensu G !"47 $ N + et al56!7 $ $ PoaceaeV % V Poaceae % $ . MATERIAL AND METHODS G et al56!_ ] et al56!_G V $ $ < . $ Mycosphaerella s. str. % / Ramularia + et $ % al 56!_ . $ > % Q +46 N V % _6 % $ G !"47 + et al [ &!666/ % 56!_ [ V % Cercospora Mycosphaerellaceae [ + I ; !""5 + 5667 $ [\\ % /[ \< G \NS$\ % $ . $ NS$ M N$ S$ V $ © 2015 International Mycological Association You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution: [ Non-commercial: No derivative works: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. VOLUME 6 · NO. 1 25 Braun et al. \ \ \ \V [\\ O/ ; P [\\ \ V; * [\\ TAXONOMIC TREATMENT ARTICLE Cercosporoid species on Poaceae (Gramineae ) Cercospora Key to Cercospora species on Poaceae ! G 5 G # 5! G % . !4M54M!56M_56&!4M54M443KSorghum C. sorghi var. ciccaronei G ? K 3 _5 G % !66M5#4&7MF3 56. K % _M#43 !M!43K Eremochloa bimaculata, / C. eremochloae G !663 6M#. K !4M43 K 7 7_ @ K 54M5!4&_M436M#. K 5M743 !4M543 KRottboellia cochinchinensis/ C. rottboelliae @ % \ !663 \ !4M_3 !M53 4 47 G 54M_M44MF3 K% Panicoideae C. barretoana G !4M_3 Panicoideae !4M73 Agrostis Sphenopholis, Pooideae, Aveneae > / F F4 Q Panicoideae C. fusimaculans QAgrostis Sphenopholis Pooideae, Aveneae> / C. agrostidis #! G % . % % _6M!66&!M53 64M!43K !M!43KDigitaria / Q @ / C. digitariae G K !43 K E E# G % 4M56&5M73 K [ . _6M"6&!4M543K !M!43 K Dactyloctenium C. tessellata G \ K % . % . K " "E G % !6 G C. apii$ % . \ % . 5E !6" G % 7M"3 % 143!! G !4M5M4MF3 % ¢43 !7 !!!6G 64M!43 K !6M!4MF4ME4&_MF43 !M53 KOryza Ehrhartoideae, Oryzeae C. janseana 26 IMA FUNGUS Cercosporoid fungi 3 G !43K !663 ARTICLE 7M"3 5M_3 K Panicoideae, Andropogoneae Saccharum, Zea !5 !5!!QSaccharum C. longipes QZea mays !_ !_!5G 76M!E63K % . _6M!66&7M"3K . C. zeae-maydis G !663 K K . C. zeae-maydis ~ C. zeina !7!6G !463 % {463Eragrostis, Ischaemum, Miscanthus, Paspalum, Cenchrus Pennisetum Setaria !4 G % !4MF43 % ¢463 56 !4!7@ %K % 5M!4K Echinochloa, Ischaemum, PaspalumCenchrus Pennisetum~ SetariaPanicoideae !F @ .% E63 K _6 K Eragrostis Miscanthus !" !F!4G 6M!. KIschaemum australe Cenchrus spicatus Pennisetum glaucum~!# G 6M7. KEchinochloa Setaria !E !#!FG % . K Cenchrus spicatus Pennisetum glaucum~N C. typhoides G % KIschaemum australe/ C. ischaemi !E!FG EM743KPaspalum Setaria C. setariae G !6ME63KEchinochloa C. echinochloae !"!4G !4M76M!563!M#. KMiscanthus, Taiwan C. miscanthi G !4M_6M4636M!M5. KEragrostis brownei> C. eragrostidis 56!7G 64M!43 K _MF43 !M53 KOryza ........... C. janseana G !4M53 \ 5M435! 5!56G 6M!. KCymbopogon Erharta 55 G 5_ 555!G 5E4M#63!. K !M!6. KCymbopogonN C. cymbopogonicola G !4M_6M7636M!. KEhrharta> C. microlaenae 5_5!@ .% 56M_663 K _6M!F63K ChusqueaBambusoideae, Bambuseae C. chusqueae @ !6M_63 K E63K 57 575_G !6MF636M!. KBothryochloa saccharoides C. bothryochloae G 7 K 54 5457G !6ME6&_ME3 % . KEchinochloa C. echinochloae G 5M43 K 5F 5F54@ KZizaniaEhrhartoideae, Oryzeae C. zizaniae @ _63 K Cynodon Sporobolus Chloridoideae 5# VOLUME 6 · NO. 1 27 Braun et al. 5#5FQCynodonChloridoideae, CynodonteaeN C. cynodontis QSporobolusChloridoideae, Eragrostideae> / C. seriata 5E" G % . 5" G _4 ARTICLE 5"5EG % !6MF#36M!M5. K % . K Bromus Cenchrus spicatus Pennisetum glaucum~ _6 G _M56 % K _! _65"G K 54M43 K Cenchrus spicatus Pennisetum glaucum~N C. typhoides G K !M_43 K Bromus> / Cercospora sp. _!5"@ .% 463 K 54M_663 !M!4M53 K 5F63KEleusine/ C. eleusines @ % 563 K \ !4M53 % K _5 _5_!@ !6M463 K !6M56M!46M556&54M_MF4M#3K !4M_3 KSorghum C. sorghi and C. sorghicola @ % 563 K !4M53 % E663 33 ___5G % 56ME663K _6M_663K !4M5M_3K Festuca> / C. festucae G !F63K !4M53 K _7 _7__G 56ME63 % % K Bouteloua Chondrosus> / C. boutelouae G 76M5_43 KRottboellia/ @ / C. rottboelliigena _45EG FM5E3 % . K _6M!_6&5M_3KOplismenus C. oplismeni G 56M5763 \ 5M43 K _F _F_4G !4M463KCoix Secale _# G {463 _E _#_F* !M4 KCoixN C. coicis * 64 _4&_KSecale C. secalis _E_F@ % K 5463K % 5M73KBromus Cenchrus Pennisetum _" @ !6M463 \ 56M!463K \ 5M543 K \ !4M56M46M!663 76 _"_EG 5763KCenchrus Pennisetum C. penniseti G !563KBromus inermis Cercospora sp. 76_EG % !4M56M46M!663KSecale C. secalis G !4M!443KAristida Arthraxon7! 7!76* % 64M5 KAristida > / C. aristidae * 5M4 KArthraxonN C. arthraxonis 28 IMA FUNGUS Cercosporoid fungi 3 Tabular key to Cercospora species on Poaceae ARTICLE V QAgrostis C. agrostidis QAristida C. aristidae QArthraxon C. arthraxonis QAvena C. secalis QBeckeropsis C. fusimaculans QBothriochloa C. bothryochloae QBouteloua ! G C. bouteloae G C. fusimaculans QBrachiaria C. fusimaculans QBromus ! G _M73 K _6M5663 5M_43 C. apii s. lat. G % !M_43 K !6M763 % !M53 Cercospora sp. QCenchrus Pennisetum ! G C. fusimaculans G 5 5! G 46M5463 K C. penniseti G !#MF#36M!. K % . C. typhoides QChasmopodium C. fusimaculans Q Chondrosus C. bouteloae QChusquea C.
Recommended publications
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    Cryptogamie, Mycologie, 2014, 35 (2): 151-156 © 2014 Adac. Tous droits réservés Two new species of Passalora and Periconiella (cercosporoid hyphomycetes) from Panama Roland KIRSCHNERa & Meike PIEPENBRINGb aDepartment of Life Sciences, National Central University, No. 300, Jhong-Da Road, Jhongli City, Taoyuan County 32001, Taiwan (R.O.C.) email: [email protected] bDepartment of Mycology, Cluster for Integrative Fungal Research (IPF), Institute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Abstract – New species of Passalora on Aphelandra scabra (Acanthaceae) and of Periconiella on Persea americana (Lauraceae) are described from tropical lowland vegetation in Panama. The new Passalora species differs from congeneric species on members of Acanthaceae by its external hyphae giving rise to conidiophores. The new Periconiella species can be distinguished from other species of the genus by its conidiogenous cells being conspicuously oriented outwards from the conidiophore head and by its sizes being intermediate between those of P. machilicola on the one hand and of P. longispora and P. rapaneae on the other. Anamorphic Dothideomycetes (Ascomyocta) / microfungi / Mycosphaerella / neotropics INTRODUCTION Plant-associated hyphomycetes with relationships to Mycosphaerella and related taxa of Dothideomycetes (Ascomycota) are generally considered cercosporoid fungi with frequently changing generic concepts. Reviews and keys of the present stage of generic concepts in the cercosporoid hyphomycetes are provided by Crous & Braun (2003). Species of two genera with pigmented conidiophores and conidia with blackened conidiogenous loci and conidial hila are treated in this study, namely of Passalora and Periconiella. Species of Periconiella are additionally characterized by conidiophores differentiated into a stipe and head composed of branches and conidiogenous cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Macquarie Island. Introduction1
    Pacific Insects 4 (4) : 905-915 December, 15, 1962 INSECTS OF MACQUARIE ISLAND. INTRODUCTION1 By J. Linsley Gressitt BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU Abstract: Collections of land arthropods were made on Macquarie Island by J. L. Gres­ sitt and J. H. Calaby, 4-10 December 1960, and by Keith Watson, December 1960-Decem- ber 1961. This paper is a brief discussion of the geography and environment of Macquarie, introductory to the systematic papers describing the fauna. Watson, of the Australian Na­ tional Antarctic Research Expeditions, will later publish his general ecological studies, when the species are all identified. INTRODUCTION This paper is a brief description of the geography and environment of Macquarie Is­ land, as related to land arthropods. It is presented by way of introduction to the series of reports by various specialists on the land arthropod fauna of the island. The bulk of these reports immediately follow this article. (One Macquarie mite is discussed in the third of the preceding articles by Wallwork on Antarctic mites, and another is mentioned in his second article.) Others will appear in later issues, when they are completed. After publication of the bulk of these taxonomic reports, Keith Watson will publish his general report on the land arthropod fauna of Macquarie, incorporating his ecological studies on the fauna. Through the kindness of Mr. P. G. Law, Director of the Antarctic Division, Australian Department of External Affairs, I was permitted to join the Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition for the annual resupply trip to Macquarie Island in early December 1960. The operation, supported by the chartered Danish ice-breaker Magga Dan, was car­ ried on at Macquarie from 4th to lOth December.
    [Show full text]
  • (US) 38E.85. a 38E SEE", A
    USOO957398OB2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,573,980 B2 Thompson et al. (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 21, 2017 (54) FUSION PROTEINS AND METHODS FOR 7.919,678 B2 4/2011 Mironov STIMULATING PLANT GROWTH, 88: R: g: Ei. al. 1 PROTECTING PLANTS FROM PATHOGENS, 3:42: ... g3 is et al. A61K 39.00 AND MMOBILIZING BACILLUS SPORES 2003/0228679 A1 12.2003 Smith et al." ON PLANT ROOTS 2004/OO77090 A1 4/2004 Short 2010/0205690 A1 8/2010 Blä sing et al. (71) Applicant: Spogen Biotech Inc., Columbia, MO 2010/0233.124 Al 9, 2010 Stewart et al. (US) 38E.85. A 38E SEE",teWart et aal. (72) Inventors: Brian Thompson, Columbia, MO (US); 5,3542011/0321197 AllA. '55.12/2011 SE",Schön et al.i. Katie Thompson, Columbia, MO (US) 2012fO259101 A1 10, 2012 Tan et al. 2012fO266327 A1 10, 2012 Sanz Molinero et al. (73) Assignee: Spogen Biotech Inc., Columbia, MO 2014/0259225 A1 9, 2014 Frank et al. US (US) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this CA 2146822 A1 10, 1995 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 EP O 792 363 B1 12/2003 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. EP 1590466 B1 9, 2010 EP 2069504 B1 6, 2015 (21) Appl. No.: 14/213,525 WO O2/OO232 A2 1/2002 WO O306684.6 A1 8, 2003 1-1. WO 2005/028654 A1 3/2005 (22) Filed: Mar. 14, 2014 WO 2006/O12366 A2 2/2006 O O WO 2007/078127 A1 7/2007 (65) Prior Publication Data WO 2007/086898 A2 8, 2007 WO 2009037329 A2 3, 2009 US 2014/0274707 A1 Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • Resupinate Fungi (Basidiomycetes, Aphyllophoraies) of Macquarie Island, Australia
    Hikobia 13: 745-750, 2002 Resupinate fungi (Basidiomycetes, Aphyllophoraies) of Macquarie Island, Australia GARY A. LAURSEN, HAROLD H. BURDSALL AND RODNEY D. SEPPELT LAURSEN, G. A., BURDSALL, H. H. & SEPPELT, R. D. 2002. Resupinate fungi (Basidiomycetes, Aphyllophorales) of Macquarie Island, Australia. Hikobia 13: 745-750. Fourteen collections of resupinate higher fungi in the order Aphyllophorales (Basidiomycetes) were made on Subantarctic Macquarie Island (54°30'S, 158°57' E) in 1995. Of the 14, three proved to lack species-determining characteristic basidiospores and 12 were determined to belong to three species in two genera; Athelopsis lembospora (Bourdot) Oberwinkler, Athelopsis subinconspicua (Lirschauer) Julich, the first report of this species from the Southern Hemisphere, and Epithele galzinii Bres., the first reportr of E. galzinii from an Australian territory and also representing a southern range extension by several hundred kilometers. None are endemic and all are suspected to have reached the Island by long-distance transoceanic wind dispersal from other southern continental sources. Their habitats are restricted to old and clustered culms, frond bracts, and leaf petioles of the fern Polystichum vestitum (G. Forst.) C. Presl, the raised pedestals of old giant russock grass stem bases of Poa foliosa (Hook. f-) Hook. f., and the woody, but thin, stems of Acaena magellanica (Lam.) Vahl (Rosaceae) and Coprosma perpusilla Colenso ssp. subantarcrica Orchard (Rubiaceae). Gary A. Laursen. University of Alaska Fairbanks, Institute of Arctic Biology, Fairbanks, AK 99775-6100, USA. Harold H. Burdrall, Jr.. retired Center for Forest Mycology Research, Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, USDA, Madison, WI 53705 USA. Rodney D. Seppelt, Australian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston, 7050 Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Mancha Parda (Cercospora Longipes E
    LIGA AGRÍCOLA INDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR Dirección de Investigación y Extensión de la Caña de Azúcar Escalas Descriptivas para la Evaluación de Enfermedades de la Caña de Azúcar Erick Chavarría Soto San José, Costa Rica Septiembre 2006 ÍNDICE ÍNDICE ______________________________________________________________ ii ÍNDICE DE CUADROS __________________________________________________ iii ÍNDICE DE FIGURAS ___________________________________________________ iv PRESENTACIÓN ______________________________________________________ v INTRODUCCIÓN ______________________________________________________ 1 PRINCIPALES CARACTERÍSTICAS DE LAS REGIONES AZUCARERAS DE COSTA RICA___ 2 Región de Guanacaste: _____________________________________________________________________ 2 Región de Puntarenas:______________________________________________________________________ 4 Región del Valle Central Occidental: __________________________________________________________ 4 Región de San Carlos:______________________________________________________________________ 5 Región de Turrialba: _______________________________________________________________________ 6 Región de Pérez Zeledón: ___________________________________________________________________ 7 ESCALAS DESCRIPTIVAS PARA LA EVALUACIÓN DE ENFERMEDADES________ 9 Enfermedades causadas por Hongos______________________________________________ 9 Carbón (Ustilago scitaminea H. Syd. & P. Syd.):_________________________________________________ 9 Roya (Puccinia melanocephala H. Syd & P. Syd.): ______________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Poa Tennantiana
    Poa tennantiana COMMON NAME Muttonbird Poa SYNONYMS Poa foliosa var. tennantiana (Petrie) Cheeseman FAMILY Poaceae AUTHORITY Poa tennantiana Petrie FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS No ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Grasses NVS CODE POATEN CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n = 56 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | At Risk – Naturally Uncommon | Qualifiers: RR PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | At Risk – Naturally Uncommon 2004 | Range Restricted DISTRIBUTION Endemic. New Zealand: South (Otago (Taieri River Mouth), Stewart, Snares and Auckland Islands. It has not been seen on the Auckland Islands recently. HABITAT Coastal usually in or near sea bird nesting grounds, on forest margins, clearings, in low scrub, on cliff faces and damp banks. FEATURES Yellow-green, rather stout, stiff-leaved, perennial tussock-forming grass up to 1 m tall, arising from a strong rhizomatous base covered by abundant fibrous remnants of leaf-sheaths; branching intravaginal; leaf-blades persistent. Leaf-sheath submembranous, striate, densely, retrorsely, minutely pubescent-scabrid between ribs in basal leaves, glabrous in cauline leaves, very light brown, later becoming darker and shredding into fibres. Ligule 6-16 mm, apically glabrous, entire, narrowed to a long fine point, abaxially short-pubescent. Leaf-blade 160.0-380.0 x 4.5-9.0 mm, flat, finely striate, abaxially smooth, adaxially minutely papillose, very rarely minutely ciliate-scabrid on ribs; margins ciliate-fimbriate for a short distance above ligule, otherwise glabrous, gradually narrowed to straight-sided acute tip. Culm 150-330, internodes glabrous. Panicle 90-160 mm, broad, dense but much-branched, upper branches almost completely hidden by numerous, rather small spikelets, lower branches naked towards base; rachis smooth, branches and pedicels ¡¾ scabrid to occasionally smooth.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSOONIAL R Eflections
    Persoonia 23, 2009: 177–208 www.persoonia.org doi:10.3767/003158509X482951 PERSOONIAL R eflections Editorial: Celebrating 50 years of Fungal Biodiversity Research The year 2009 represents the 50th anniversary of Persoonia as the message that without fungi as basal link in the food chain, an international journal of mycology. Since 2008, Persoonia is there will be no biodiversity at all. a full-colour, Open Access journal, and from 2009 onwards, will May the Fungi be with you! also appear in PubMed, which we believe will give our authors even more exposure than that presently achieved via the two Editors-in-Chief: independent online websites, www.IngentaConnect.com, and Prof. dr PW Crous www.persoonia.org. The enclosed free poster depicts the 50 CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT most beautiful fungi published throughout the year. We hope Utrecht, The Netherlands. that the poster acts as further encouragement for students and mycologists to describe and help protect our planet’s fungal Dr ME Noordeloos biodiversity. As 2010 is the international year of biodiversity, we National Herbarium of the Netherlands, Leiden University urge you to prominently display this poster, and help distribute branch, P.O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. Book Reviews Mu«enko W, Majewski T, Ruszkiewicz- The Cryphonectriaceae include some Michalska M (eds). 2008. A preliminary of the most important tree pathogens checklist of micromycetes in Poland. in the world. Over the years I have Biodiversity of Poland, Vol. 9. Pp. personally helped collect populations 752; soft cover. Price 74 €. W. Szafer of some species in Africa and South Institute of Botany, Polish Academy America, and have witnessed the of Sciences, Lubicz, Kraków, Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Manuscript
    Mycosphere Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/4/2/3 New species and new records of cercosporoid hyphomycetes from Cuba and Venezuela (Part 2) Braun U1* and Urtiaga R2 1Martin-Luther-Universität, Institut für Biologie, Bereich Geobotanik und Botanischer Garten, Herbarium, Neuwerk 21, 06099 Halle (Saale), Germany 2Apartado 546, Barquisimeto, Lara, Venezuela. Braun U, Urtiaga R 2013 – New species and new records of cercosporoid hyphomycetes from Cuba and Venezuela (Part 2). Mycosphere 4(2), 174–214, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/4/2/3 Examination of specimens of cercosporoid leaf-spotting hyphomycetes made between 1966 and 1970 in Cuba and Venezuela, now housed at K (previously deposited at IMI as “Cercospora sp.”), have been continued. Additionally examined Venezuelan collections, made between 2006 and 2010, are now deposited at HAL. Several species are new to Cuba and Venezuela, some new host plants are included, and the following new species and a new variety are introduced: Cercosporella ambrosiae-artemisiifoliae, Passalora crotonis-gossypiifolii, P. solaniphila, P. stigmaphyllicola, Pseudocercospora calycophylli, P. coremioides, P. lonchocarpicola, P. lonchocarpigena, P. paulliniae, P. picramniae, P. psidii var. varians, P. solanacea, P. teramnicola, P. trichiliae-hirtae, P. zuelaniae, Pseudocercosporella leonotidis, Zasmidium cubense, Z. genipae-americanae. The new name Pseudocercospora toonae-ciliatae and the new combination Zasmidium hyptiantherae are proposed. Key words – Ascomycota – Cercospora – Cercosporella – Mycosphaerellaceae – Passalora – Pseudocercospora – South America – West Indies – Zasmidium Article Information Received 6 November 2012 Accepted 8 February 2013 Published online 16 March 2013 *Corresponding author: U. Braun – e-mail – [email protected] Introduction specimens have recently been sent on loan to Cercosporoid fungi are anamorphic the first author to be determined and for further ascomycetes [Ascomycota, Pezizomycotina, treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S1 18Jan 2021
    Supplementary Table S1. Accurate scientific names of plant pathogenic fungi and secondary barcodes. Below is a list of the most important plant pathogenic fungi including Oomycetes with their accurate scientific names and synonyms. These scientific names include the results of the change to one scientific name for fungi. For additional information including plant hosts and localities worldwide as well as references consult the USDA-ARS U.S. National Fungus Collections (http://nt.ars- grin.gov/fungaldatabases/). Secondary barcodes, where available, are listed in superscript between round parentheses after generic names. The secondary barcodes listed here do not represent all known available loci for a given genus. Always consult recent literature for which primers and loci are required to resolve your species of interest. Also keep in mind that not all barcodes are available for all species of a genus and that not all species/genera listed below are known from sequence data. GENERA AND SPECIES NAME AND SYNONYMYS DISEASE SECONDARY BARCODES1 Kingdom Fungi Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Asterinales Asterinaceae Thyrinula(CHS-1, TEF1, TUB2) Thyrinula eucalypti (Cooke & Massee) H.J. Swart 1988 Target spot or corky spot of Eucalyptus Leptostromella eucalypti Cooke & Massee 1891 Thyrinula eucalyptina Petr. & Syd. 1924 Target spot or corky spot of Eucalyptus Lembosiopsis eucalyptina Petr. & Syd. 1924 Aulographum eucalypti Cooke & Massee 1889 Aulographina eucalypti (Cooke & Massee) Arx & E. Müll. 1960 Lembosiopsis australiensis Hansf. 1954 Botryosphaeriales Botryosphaeriaceae Botryosphaeria(TEF1, TUB2) Botryosphaeria dothidea (Moug.) Ces. & De Not. 1863 Canker, stem blight, dieback, fruit rot on Fusicoccum Sphaeria dothidea Moug. 1823 diverse hosts Fusicoccum aesculi Corda 1829 Phyllosticta divergens Sacc. 1891 Sphaeria coronillae Desm.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of New Fungi Isolated from Echinochloa Spp., As Potential Biological Control Agents in Paddy Fields in Iran
    Scientific Research and Essays Vol. 6(3), pp. 567-574, 4 February, 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE DOI: 10.5897/SRE10.813 ISSN 1992-2248 ©2011 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Identification of new fungi isolated from Echinochloa spp., as potential biological control agents in paddy fields in Iran Mohammad Reza Safari Motlagh Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Rasht Branch, Rasht, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted 24 November, 2010 Echinochloa spp . are the most important weeds of rice. Fungal pathogens can be exploited as biological agents for the management of agricultural weeds. Two pathogenic fungal species were isolated from naturally infected Echinochloa species and identified. In order to isolate the fungus from disease tissues, the obtained samples were cultured on potato dextrose agar medium. Isolates were cultured due to sporulation on water agar medium. Morphological characters of isolates were studied in order to identify the taxonomy. According to the results, isolates belonged to Bipolaris maydis (Nisikado and Miyake) Shoem., and Bipolaris australiensis (Tsuda and Ueyama) Alcorn. Pathogenicity test of isolates in species was done in desiccators, and revealed the pathogenicity of the species and their ability to cause leaf blight on Echinochloa spp.. Inoculation was done using a spore suspension consisting of 10 5 spore/ml distilled water and 1%Tween-20 at the 2 to 3 leaf stage. Results indicated that the disease rating caused by B. maydis and B. australiensis in Echinochloa spp. was higher than that observed in the studied rice cultivar. Hence B. maydis and B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of the Saccharum Spp. (Sugarcane)
    The Biology of the Saccharum spp. (Sugarcane) Version 3: May 2011 This document provides an overview of baseline biological information relevant to risk assessment of genetically modified (GM) forms of the species that may be released into the Australian environment. FOR INFORMATION ON THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE GENE TECHNOLOGY REGULATOR VISIT <HTTP:/WWW.OGTR.GOV.AU> TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE .................................................................................................................................................. 1 SECTION 1 TAXONOMY.......................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2 ORIGIN AND CULTIVATION............................................................................................ 3 2.1 CENTRE OF DIVERSITY AND DOMESTICATION ........................................................... 3 2.1.1 Commercial hybrid cultivars ............................................................................. 3 2.2 COMMERCIAL USES ............................................................................................................ 4 2.2.1 Sugar production ............................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Byproducts of sugar production......................................................................... 5 2.3 CULTIVATION IN AUSTRALIA .......................................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Commercial propagation..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Duke University Dissertation Template
    Systematics, Phylogeography and Ecology of Elaphomycetaceae by Hannah Theresa Reynolds Department of Biology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Rytas Vilgalys, Supervisor ___________________________ Marc Cubeta ___________________________ Katia Koelle ___________________________ François Lutzoni ___________________________ Paul Manos Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 iv ABSTRACTU Systematics, Phylogeography and Ecology of Elaphomycetaceae by Hannah Theresa Reynolds Department of Biology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Rytas Vilgalys, Supervisor ___________________________ Marc Cubeta ___________________________ Katia Koelle ___________________________ François Lutzoni ___________________________ Paul Manos An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 Copyright by Hannah Theresa Reynolds 2011 Abstract This dissertation is an investigation of the systematics, phylogeography, and ecology of a globally distributed fungal family, the Elaphomycetaceae. In Chapter 1, we assess the literature on fungal phylogeography, reviewing large-scale phylogenetics studies and performing a meta-data analysis of fungal population genetics. In particular, we examined
    [Show full text]