DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science As a Policy Mechanism for NASA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improving Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science As a Policy Mechanism for NASA Improving Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science as a Policy Mechanism for NASA Brittany Balcom cooperate.across all levels of Government and with non- profit organizations, businesses, and individuals in the private Space Policy Institute, Washington, District of Columbia. sector’’). These three traits make up the Open Government Principles. It directed the White House chief technology of- ABSTRACT ficer to work with the director of the Office of Management This article examines citizen science projects, defined as ‘‘a form and Budget and the Administrator of the General Services of open collaboration where members of the public participate in Administration to develop recommendations for an Open the scientific process, including identifying research questions, Government Directive, laying out specific actions to be taken 1 collecting and analyzing the data, interpreting the results, and to forward these three principles. problem solving,’’ as an effective and innovative tool for National This article will focus on the participatory and collaborative Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) science in line principles, specifically with regard to how the continued use with the Obama Administration’s Open Government Directive. and development of innovative crowdsourced research and Citizen science projects allow volunteers with no technical citizen science can benefit the National Aeronautics and training to participate in analysis of large sets of data that would Space Administration (NASA) and other space-related groups. otherwise constitute prohibitively tedious and lengthy work for Citizen science does not yet have a single widely accepted research scientists. Zooniverse.com hosts a multitude of popular definition. A product of the Internet, it is relatively new to space-focused citizen science projects, many of which have been science, is still evolving, and exists in a multitude of forms. extraordinarily successful and have enabled new research pub- This discussion will use the terms ‘‘crowdsourcing’’ and ‘‘cit- lications and major discoveries. This article takes a multifaceted izen science’’ as defined by the Federal Community of Practice look at such projects by examining the benefits of citizen sci- for Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science (FCPCCS): ence, effective game design, and current desktop computer and . Crowdsourcing: ‘‘a process where individuals or organi- mobile device usage trends. It offers suggestions of potential zations submit an open call for voluntary contributions research topics to be studied with emerging technologies, policy from a large group of unknown individuals (‘the crowd’) considerations, and opportunities for outreach. This analysis in- or, in some cases, a bounded group of trusted individuals cludes an overview of other crowdsourced research methods or experts’’ such as distributed computing and contests. New research and . Citizen science: ‘‘a form of open collaboration where data analysis of mobile phone usage, scientific curiosity, and members of the public participate in the scientific pro- political engagement among Zooniverse.com project participants cess, including identifying research questions, collecting has been conducted for this study. and analyzing the data, interpreting the results, and problem solving.’’2 INTRODUCTION: CITIZEN SCIENCE AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT Although the FCPCCS does not include prizes and chal- n the first day of his position in office, President lenges in its definition of crowdsourcing, some discussion of Barack Obama gave the Memorandum on Trans- these methods will also be included in this article. The primary parency and Open Government his inaugural sig- focus of this research is citizen science projects conducted O nature. The memorandum states that the American over the Internet, often in a ‘‘gamified’’ format. government should be transparent (‘‘put information about The first resulting document from the Memorandum’s call their operations and decisions online and readily avail- to action was the Open Government Directive issued in De- able to the public’’), participatory (‘‘offer Americans in- cember 2009, which established deadlines for executive creased opportunities to participate in policymaking’’), and agencies and departments to take specific action toward the collaborative (‘‘use innovative tools, methods, and systems to development of individual Open Government Plans (OGPs). 98 NEW SPACE 2015 DOI: 10.1089/space.2015.0017 CROWDSOURCING AND CITIZEN SCIENCE The directive laid out a list of requirements detailing relevance National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and to the three Open Government Principles in addition to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).5 The federal government mandating the creation of publicly accessible websites per- has taken advantage of citizen science and crowdsourcing to taining to these goals. It states that ‘‘the Federal Government contribute to agencies’ missions with success in a number of should promote opportunities for the public to participate areas. The EPA has introduced ‘‘volunteer monitoring’’ in throughout the decision-making process,’’ suggesting agen- procuring data about water quality, which it uses for ‘‘delin- cies describe ‘‘new feedback mechanisms, including innova- eating and characterizing watersheds, screening for water tive tools and practices that create new and easier methods for quality problems, and measuring baseline conditions and public engagement.’’ Additionally, each agency is required trends.’’ In addition to data collection, the EPA notes that to ‘‘revise its current practice to further cooperation with. volunteers also gain knowledge in pollution prevention, help the public and non-profit and private entities in fulfilling clean problem areas, and provide information on areas that the agency’s core mission activities,’’ to ‘‘include proposals to would otherwise be overlooked.6 use technology platforms to improve collaboration’’ and ‘‘in- The NARA Citizen Archivist Dashboard provides volunteers clude innovative methods, such as prizes and competitions.’’ access to projects that include tagging images and documents, The OGPs are to be updated every two years.3 NASA released historical film captioning, and transcription of federal records. version 3.0 in June 2014.4 These activities have produced notable results; over 170,000 Building upon the Memorandum on Transparency and volunteers indexed 132 million names from the 1940 Census Open Government and the Open Government Directive in in 5 months. One of its most successful programs is Old addition to collaboration with groups both inside and outside Weather, a ship log transcription program hosted by Zooni- the federal government, White House policymakers developed verse.org, an online platform hosting a variety of citizen a National Action Plan (NAP) to illustrate progress made on science projects across multiple disciplines, and operated in various Open Government efforts and lay out goals for ad- partnership with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Ad- vancing these initiatives. The first U.S. Open Government ministration (NOAA). Old Weather will be addressed in greater National Action Plan, released in September 2011, included detail later in this article. 26 different areas of commitment for federal agencies. One of The USGS uses volunteers from its National Map Corps the included goal categories, ‘‘Open Government to Improve program to collect and improve structure data for the Na- Public Services,’’ touched upon helping scientists by pro- tional Map using a web-based mapping tool. The National moting the publication of guidelines on curating unclassified Map Corps began in 1994 as the Earth Science Corps, which scientific data supported by funding from federal science used volunteers to identify and annotate article maps. In agencies. The NAP also asked that agencies ‘‘Promote In- 2001, the Earth Science Corps was renamed and refocused novation Through International Collaboration,’’ launching toward collecting data on built structures in the United States the International Space Apps Competition as a collaboration using handheld GPS units. From 2003 to 2006, almost 23,000 between NASA and other space agencies worldwide to enable data points were contributed by over 1,000 volunteers. The scientists and interested citizens to solve challenges through program then evolved to a web-based format in 2006, with publicly available data. the GPS input system being suspended in 2008 due to Building upon its predecessor, the Second Open Govern- funding issues.7 ment National Action Plan for the United States of America USGS’s ‘‘Did You Feel It?’’ earthquake response system was released in December 2013. It reported that 24 of the enables people worldwide to document their experiences initial 26 commitments had been completed and thus laun- during and immediately after earthquakes. Questionnaire re- ched new initiatives in addition to expanding and developing sponses contribute to the creation of Community Internet further the existing commitments. The 2013 NAP advocated Intensity Maps (CIIM), which are generated nearly instantly, for the creation of an ‘‘open innovation toolkit’’ for federal compared to the months it would otherwise take to prepare agencies ‘‘that will include best practices, training, policies, and distribute a shaking-intensity map. The CIIMs provide and guidance on authorities related to open innovation, in- descriptions of earthquake shaking due to what contributors cluding approaches such as incentive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • News & Notes, Third Quarter 2016
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Volume 33, Number 3 Third Quarter 2016 FROM IF YOU GIVE A NASA HISTORY INTERN THE CHIEF SOME APPLE JUICE HISTORIAN By Cat Baldwin and Chris Rudeen n last quarter’s issue, II made some fairly s the NASA History summer interns, IN THIS ISSUE: pointed comments on Athere’s a special place in our hearts for decisions being made the Smithsonian National Air and Space From the Chief Historian regarding the history Museum (NASM). We have dragged many 1 office at Johnson Space Center (JSC). As I people into the Apollo exhibit, stopping 1 If You Give a NASA History Intern write this, the situation is still in flux, but I am them at every artifact along the way and Some Apple Juice considerably more inclined to expect a positive telling stories over their loud complaints. 5 News from Headquarters and the outcome. This is in part due to my impressions “That’s the lunar ranging retroreflector! Centers from some very frank discussions between It’s a mirror on the Moon and they shoot senior officials at JSC and Headquarters. It is lasers at it. How cool is that?” “Yes, that’s 11 Other Aerospace History News clear from those discussions that JSC leader- duct tape on that bumper. Gene Cernan 14 Recent Publications and Online ship has a strong commitment to an effective literally had to duct-tape the bumper back Resources history program. However, it was equally clear on the LRV [lunar roving vehicle]. Gene 21 Upcoming Meetings that JSC is feeling the squeeze in their Center Cernan is an artist.” Our friends don’t Management and Operations (CMO) budget.
    [Show full text]
  • A Citation Study of Citizen Science Projects in Space Science and Astronomy
    Odenwald, S. 2018. A Citation Study of Citizen Science Projects in Space Science and Astronomy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2): 5, pp. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.152 RESEARCH PAPER A Citation Study of Citizen Science Projects in Space Science and Astronomy Sten Odenwald This paper presents a citation study of 143 publications in refereed journals resulting from 23 citizen science (CS) projects in space science and astronomy. The projects generated a median of two papers during their average of six years of operation. The 143 papers produced 4,515 citations for a median of 10 citations/paper. These papers were compared to a uniform group of papers published in the year 2000 in refereed space science journals. The CS papers have an average annual peak citation rate that is about four times the average of the year-2000 sample. The CS citation history profiles peak within 3 years after paper publication but decline thereafter at a faster pace than the average paper published in 2000. This suggests that CS papers “burn brighter” but remain of interest for only half as long as other papers in space science and astronomy. Nevertheless, CS papers compare well with some of the most highly ranked “Top-1000” research papers of the modern era. The proportion of CS papers surpassing 200 citations is one-in-26, which is 40-fold higher than the proportion for the typical paper published in 2000. The study concludes that CS projects are not only as good as conventional non-CS research projects in generating publishable results, but can actually outperform the citation rates of the typical non-CS papers in space science and astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Hunters, Zooniverse Evaluation Report
    Planet Hunters | Evaluation Report 2019 Planet Hunters, Zooniverse Evaluation report Authored by Dr Annaleise Depper Evaluation Officer, Public Engagement with Research Research Services, University of Oxford 1 Planet Hunters | Evaluation Report 2019 Contents 1. Key findings and highlights ..................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4 3. Evaluating Planet Hunters ....................................................................................... 5 4. Exploring impacts and outcomes on citizen scientists ............................................. 6 4.1 Increased knowledge and understanding of Astronomy ..................................................................... 7 4.2 An enjoyable and interesting experience ......................................................................................... 12 4.3 Raised aspirations and interests in Astronomy ................................................................................ 13 4.4 Feeling of pride and satisfaction in helping the scientific community ............................................... 17 4.5 Benefits to individual wellbeing ...................................................................................................... 19 5. Learning from the evaluation ................................................................................ 20 5.1 Motivations for taking part in Planet Hunters
    [Show full text]
  • POTOMAC VALLEY MASTER NATURALISTS Citizen Science Projects West Virginia Citizen Science Opportunities
    POTOMAC VALLEY MASTER NATURALISTS Citizen Science Projects West Vir inia Citizen Science Opportunities Crayfishes in WV: Zach Loughman, Natural History Research Specialist at West Liberty State College, is running a statewide survey of the Crayfishes found in W and would appreciate any help in collecting. Contact him at: Zachary J. Loughman, Natural History Research Specialist, Campus Service Center Box 139, West Liberty State College, West Liberty, W , 26704, .hone: (3040 33612923, Fax: (3040 33612266, 4loughman5westliberty.edu . WVDNR Research Projects: Contact Keiran O89alley at Romney and volunteer to help on any surveys or other pro:ects. (He teaches the . 9N Reptiles and Amphibian Class.) Contact him at 6ieran.M.O89alley5wv.gov )ird Bandin : Contact Bob Dean who bands locally and volunteer to help him. Contact Bob at 304175413042 or BobDean525gmail.com . Fish Research Projects: Contact Vicki Bla4er at the USGS National Fish Health Research Lab in 6earneysville W . You8ll start out recording notes during research field work, but as you gain knowledge and experience, you can do more. Contact Vicki at vbla4er5usgs.gov. Citizen Science Opportunities Astronomy and Weather The Mil.y Way Project www.Milkywaypro:ect.org The Milky Way .ro:ect is currently working with data taken from the Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid1 .lane Survey Extraordinaire (GLI9.SE0 and the 9ultiband Imaging .hotometer for Spit4er Galactic .lane Survey (9I.SGAL0. We're looking for bubbles. These bubbles are part of the life cycle of stars. Some bubbles have already been found 1 by the study that inspired this pro:ect 1 but we want to find more! By finding more, we will build up a comprehensive view of not only these bubbles, but our galaxy as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundup LYNDON B
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Roundup LYNDON B. JOHNSON SPACE CENTER Winter | 2014 JSC 2.0.13: A LOOK BACK JSC Director In this edition… I’D LIKE TO START OFF 2014 by relating a couple of JSC 2.0 stories. The 3 ISS Science Corner first one involves the External Relations Office taking a fresh look at how 4 Orion sets the stage in 2013 they communicate about the International Space Station on NASA TV. They for Exploration Flight Test-1 determined they could more effectively and efficiently communicate by morphing the daily one-hour show called “Space Station Live” into a daily half- 6 Milestones hour show, primarily aimed at media representatives who follow NASA closely 8 2013 Social Media Spotlight and are interested in details, plus a weekly two-minute video called “Space to 10 NASA’s ‘what’s next’ team Ground” designed for the general public. The snappy “Space to Ground” has the advantage that it can be easily used in a variety of venues, including the 12 NASA hails success of NASA home page, outreach events, airport kiosks, museums/science centers, commercial space program, traveling exhibits and various social media. The changes allow us to reach plans readied for astronauts more people, produce products better suited to two different audiences and overall make better use of our resources. We’re getting good feedback on the PHOTO changes, but one of the first responses came in an email from a woman who NASA/ said her 79-year-old mother, who is a big NASA fan and avid watcher of NASA TV, was very disappointed that her 60-minute show had been cut in half! While I don’t like disappointing anyone (and I’ve sent a signed photo to the mom in a gesture of goodwill), it’s actually a nice reminder that there are people everywhere who are inspired by what we do and really want to hear all about it.
    [Show full text]
  • Zooniverse: Observing the World's Largest Citizen Science Platform
    Zooniverse: Observing the World’s Largest Citizen Science Platform Robert Simpson Kevin R. Page David De Roure Department of Physics Oxford e-Research Centre Oxford e-Research Centre University of Oxford University of Oxford University of Oxford United Kingdom United Kingdom United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT data is shown to users in the form of images, video and au- This paper introduces the Zooniverse citizen science project dio via one of the Zooniverse websites. Volunteers are shown and software framework, outlining its structure from an ob- how to perform that required analysis via a simple guide or servatory perspective: both as an observable web-based sys- tutorial such that they can then identify, classify, mark, and tem in itself, and as an example of a platform iteratively label them as researchers would do. developed according to real-world deployment and used at The first Zooniverse project, Galaxy Zoo [4, 3], launched scale. We include details of the technical architecture of Zo- in July 2007 and successfully engaged 165,000 volunteers in oniverse, including the mechanisms for data gathering across the morphological classification of images of galaxies. The the Zooniverse operation, access, and analysis. We consider early success of this first project led the team behind it to the lessons that can be drawn from the experience of design- explore new research domains and types of task and user ing and running Zooniverse, and how this might inform de- interface. velopment of other web observatories.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus
    NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus NASAs Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus Committee on NASAs Strategic Direction Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu PREPUBLICATION COPYSUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. NASA's Strategic Direction and the Need for a National Consensus THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study is based on work supported by Contract NNH10CC48B between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-XXXXX-X International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-XXXXX-X Copies of this report are available free of charge from: Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences National Research Council 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • Inis: Terminology Charts
    IAEA-INIS-13A(Rev.0) XA0400071 INIS: TERMINOLOGY CHARTS agree INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, AUGUST 1970 INISs TERMINOLOGY CHARTS TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ... ......... *.* 1 PREFACE 2 INTRODUCTION ... .... *a ... oo 3 LIST OF SUBJECT FIELDS REPRESENTED BY THE CHARTS ........ 5 GENERAL DESCRIPTOR INDEX ................ 9*999.9o.ooo .... 7 FOREWORD This document is one in a series of publications known as the INIS Reference Series. It is to be used in conjunction with the indexing manual 1) and the thesaurus 2) for the preparation of INIS input by national and regional centrea. The thesaurus and terminology charts in their first edition (Rev.0) were produced as the result of an agreement between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). Except for minor changesq the terminology and the interrela- tionships btween rms are those of the December 1969 edition of the Euratom Thesaurus 3) In all matters of subject indexing and ontrol, the IAEA followed the recommendations of Euratom for these charts. Credit and responsibility for the present version of these charts must go to Euratom. Suggestions for improvement from all interested parties. particularly those that are contributing to or utilizing the INIS magnetic-tape services are welcomed. These should be addressed to: The Thesaurus Speoialist/INIS Section Division of Scientific and Tohnioal Information International Atomic Energy Agency P.O. Box 590 A-1011 Vienna, Austria International Atomic Energy Agency Division of Sientific and Technical Information INIS Section June 1970 1) IAEA-INIS-12 (INIS: Manual for Indexing) 2) IAEA-INIS-13 (INIS: Thesaurus) 3) EURATOM Thesaurusq, Euratom Nuclear Documentation System.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Customer Service Plan 10-20-2011
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Customer Service Plan October 20, 2011 NASA Customer Service Plan – 2011 Executive Summary The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has a long tradition of enabling professionals, interested amateurs, educators, students, and the general public to actively participate in its missions of research and development, science, discovery, and human exploration. The goal of such public engagement is to provide opportunities for active involvement of individuals in the experience of, as contributors to, and collaborators in, NASA’s research, science, and discovery activities. These opportunities deepen the public’s understanding, appreciation, and ownership in NASA Mission. In turn, these opportunities tap into the nation’s creativity and capabilities. The spectrum of activities ranges from passive receipt of routine information, to citizens using their computers to help collect satellite data for programs, to direct hands-on activities such as students building and operating experiments and/or flight hardware, to citizen scientists collaborating on interpretation of data and discoveries. The Agency is uniquely positioned to introduce a broader community to the benefits of aeronautics and space research and development. The emergence of new communication technologies, computer and mobile applications, high definition imagery, social media, and an emphasis on greater transparency in government activities provides NASA a new environment for increasing engagement opportunities. In Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Mars 2001: Integrated Science in Preparation for
    WORKSHOP ON MARS 2001: INTEGRATED SCIENCE IN PREPARATION FOR ......... SAMPLE RETURN AND HUMAN EXPLORATION October 2--4, 1999 Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Texas Edited by John Marshall and Cathy Weitz Sponsored by Lunar and Planetary Institute Mars Program Office, Jet Propulsion Laboratory National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Contribution No. 991 Compiled in 1999 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under Contract No. NASW-4574 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This volume may be cited as Marshall J. and Weitz C., eds. (1999) Workshop on Mars 2001: Integrated Science in Preparation for Sample Return and Human Exploration. LPI Contribution No. 991, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 129 pp. This volume is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 Phone: 281-486-2172 Fax: 281-486-2186 E-mail: order @lpi.j sc.nasa.gov Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost of shipping and handling. LPI Contribution No. 991 iii PREFACE The Workshop on Mars 2001: Integrated Science in Preparation for Sample Return and Human Exploration was held on October 2-4, 1999, at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas. The workshop was sponsored by the Lunar and Planetary Institute, the Mars Program Office of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAIL Reveals Secrets of the Lunar Interior
    GRAIL Reveals Secrets of the Lunar Interior — Dr. Patrick J. McGovern, Lunar and Planetary Institute A mini-flotilla of spacecraft sent to the Moon in the past few years by several nations has revealed much about the characteristics of the lunar surface via techniques such as imaging, spectroscopy, and laser ranging. While the achievements of these missions have been impressive, only GRAIL has seen deeply enough to reveal inner secrets that the Moon holds. LRecent Lunar Missions Country Name Launch Date Status ESA Small Missions for Advanced September 27, 2003 Ended with lunar surface impact on Research in Technology-1 (SMART-1) September 3, 2006 USA Acceleration, Reconnection, February 27, 2007 Extension of the THEMIS mission; ended Turbulence and Electrodynamics of in 2012 the Moon’s Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) Japan SELENE (Kaguya) September 14, 2007 Ended with lunar surface impact on June 10, 2009 PChina Chang’e-1 October 24, 2007 Taken out of orbit on March 1, 2009 India Chandrayaan-1 October 22, 2008 Two-year mission; ended after 315 days due to malfunction and loss of contact USA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) June 18, 2009 Completed one-year primary mission; now in five-year extended mission USA Lunar Crater Observation and June 18, 2009 Ended with lunar surface impact on Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) October 9, 2009 China Chang’e-2 October 1, 2010 Primary mission lasted for six months; extended mission completed flyby of asteroid 4179 Toutatis in December 2012 USA Gravity Recovery and Interior September 10, 2011 Ended with lunar surface impact on I Laboratory (GRAIL) December 17, 2012 To probe deeper, NASA launched the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission: twin spacecraft (named “Ebb” and “Flow” by elementary school students from Montana) flying in formation over the lunar surface, tracking each other to within a sensitivity of 50 nanometers per second, or one- twenty-thousandth of the velocity that a snail moves [1], according to GRAIL Principal Investigator Maria Zuber of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curtis L. Ivey Science Center DEDICATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2004
    NON-PROFIT Office of Advancement ORGANIZATION ALUMNI MAGAZINE COLBY-SAWYER Colby-Sawyer College U.S. POSTAGE 541 Main Street PAID New London, NH 03257 LEWISTON, ME PERMIT 82 C LBY-SAWYER CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED ALUMNI MAGAZINE I NSIDE: FALL/WINTER 2004 The Curtis L. Ivey Science Center DEDICATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2004 F ALL/WINTER 2004 Annual Report Issue EDITOR BOARD OF TRUSTEES David R. Morcom Anne Winton Black ’73, ’75 CLASS NOTES EDITORS Chair Tracey Austin Ye ar of Gaye LaCasce Philip H. Jordan Jr. Vice-Chair CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Tracey Austin Robin L. Mead ’72 the Arts Jeremiah Chila ’04 Executive Secretary Cathy DeShano Ye ar of Nicole Eaton ’06 William S. Berger Donald A. Hasseltine Pamela Stanley Bright ’61 Adam S. Kamras Alice W. Brown Gaye LaCasce Lo-Yi Chan his month marks the launch of the Year of the Arts, a David R. Morcom Timothy C. Coughlin P’00 Tmultifaceted initiative that will bring arts faculty members to meet Kimberly Swick Slover Peter D. Danforth P’83, ’84, GP’02 the Arts Leslie Wright Dow ’57 with groups of alumni and friends around the country. We will host VICE PRESIDENT FOR ADVANCEMENT Stephen W. Ensign gatherings in art museums and galleries in a variety of cities, and Donald A. Hasseltine Eleanor Morrison Goldthwait ’51 are looking forward to engaging hundreds of alumni and friends in Suzanne Simons Hammond ’66 conversations about art, which will be led by our faculty experts. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT Patricia Driggs Kelsey We also look forward to sharing information about Colby-Sawyer’s Beth Cahill Joyce Juskalian Kolligian ’55 robust arts curriculum.
    [Show full text]