DOCSLIB.ORG

RR-01 082213 Reviewdraft with Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RR-01 082213 Reviewdraft with Comments RECREATION FACILITY CONDITION AND PUBLIC ACCESSIBILITY ASSESSMENT, AND RECREATION USE ASSESSMENT DON PEDRO PROJECT FERC NO. 2299 eck ba Prepared for: Turlock Irrigation District – Turlock, California Modesto Irrigation District – Modesto, California Prepared by: HDR Engineering, Inc. December 2013 Recreation Facility Condition and Public Accessibility Assessment, and Recreation Use Assessment Study Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section No. Description Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Relicensing Process ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.3 Study Plan ............................................................................................................ 1-3 2.0 STUDY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .......................................................................... 2-1 3.0 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................ 3-1 4.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Step 1A – Inventory and Evaluate the Developed Project Recreation Facilities for Condition, ADA Compliance, and Use Impacts ............................. 4-1 4.1.1 Inventory Recreation Facilities ................................................................ 4-1 4.1.2 Facility Condition Assessment ................................................................ 4-1 4.1.3 Accessibility Assessment ......................................................................... 4-3 4.1.4 Assessment of Recreation Use Impacts ................................................... 4-3 4.2 Step 1B – Inventory and Evaluate Recurrent Dispersed Shoreline Recreation Use Locations along the Don Pedro Reservoir Shoreline ................. 4-4 4.3 Step 2 – Identify Recreation Uses and Visitor Attitudes, Beliefs, and Preferences ........................................................................................................... 4-4 4.3.1 Survey Development ................................................................................ 4-4 4.3.2 Field Reconnaissance, Logistics, and Preparation ................................... 4-5 4.3.3 Sampling Approach and Data Collection ................................................ 4-5 4.3.3.1 Pre-Test Survey Instrument ................................................... 4-5 4.3.3.2 Sampling Frequency .............................................................. 4-5 4.3.4 Observation Survey .................................................................................. 4-6 4.3.5 Visitor Survey .......................................................................................... 4-6 4.3.6 Angler-Specific Survey Questions ........................................................... 4-7 4.4 Step 3 – Estimate Current Recreation Use ........................................................... 4-7 4.5 Step 4 – Identify Future Use and Demand Opportunities .................................... 4-7 RR-01 i Updated Study Report Recreation Assessment Don Pedro Project, FERC No. 2299 Table of Contents 4.5.1 Existing Unmet Demand Assessment ...................................................... 4-7 4.5.1.1 Assess National, Statewide, and Regional Unmet Recreation Demand Information ............................................ 4-7 4.5.1.2 Collect Unmet Project Recreation Demand Information ....... 4-7 4.5.1.3 Identify Potential Activities with High Unmet Demand at the Project .......................................................................... 4-8 4.5.2 Future Recreation Demand Assessment .................................................. 4-8 4.5.2.1 Review Existing Recreation Use Trends ............................... 4-8 4.5.2.2 Review Existing Population and Recreation Activity Participation Projections ........................................................ 4-8 4.5.2.3 Review Reasonably Foreseeable Events that May Influence Future Use .............................................................. 4-8 4.5.2.4 Estimate Future Recreation Use over the License Period ...... 4-8 4.5.3 Regional Uniqueness and Significance Assessment ................................ 4-9 4.5.3.1 Review Results of Visitor Questionnaires ............................. 4-9 4.5.3.2 Identify Regional Recreation Opportunities .......................... 4-9 4.5.3.3 Assess the Uniqueness and Significance of the Project- Related Recreation Opportunities .......................................... 4-9 4.6 Step 5 – Data Analysis and Report Preparation ................................................. 4-10 5.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Summary of Visitor and Observation Survey Efforts .......................................... 5-1 5.1.1 2012 Field Survey Season Schedule ........................................................ 5-1 5.1.2 Summary of Surveys Received ................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Project Recreation Visitor Use............................................................................. 5-2 5.2.1 Peak Season Recreation Visitor Use ........................................................ 5-2 5.2.2 Non-Peak Season Recreation Visitor Use ................................................ 5-2 5.3 Evaluation of the Condition, Accessibility and Use Impacts at Developed Project Recreation Facilities ................................................................................ 5-2 5.3.1 Fleming Meadows Recreation Area ......................................................... 5-3 5.3.1.1 Inventory and Condition Evaluation ...................................... 5-5 5.3.1.2 Accessibility Evaluation ...................................................... 5-10 5.3.1.3 Recreation Use Impact Evaluation ....................................... 5-11 5.3.2 Blue Oaks Recreation Area .................................................................... 5-12 5.3.2.1 Inventory and Condition Evaluation .................................... 5-14 RR-01 ii Updated Study Report Recreation Assessment Don Pedro Project, FERC No. 2299 Table of Contents 5.3.2.2 Accessibility Evaluation ...................................................... 5-18 5.3.2.3 Recreation Use Impact Evaluation ....................................... 5-19 5.3.3 Moccasin Point Recreation Area ........................................................... 5-19 5.3.3.1 Inventory and Condition Evaluation .................................... 5-21 5.3.3.2 Accessibility Evaluation ...................................................... 5-26 5.3.3.3 Recreation Use Impact Evaluation ....................................... 5-26 5.3.4 Wreck Bay Boat-In Camping Area ........................................................ 5-27 5.3.4.1 Inventory and Condition Evaluation .................................... 5-27 5.3.4.2 Accessibility Evaluation ...................................................... 5-28 5.3.4.3 Recreation Use Impact Evaluation ....................................... 5-28 5.3.5 Ward’s Ferry Bridge .............................................................................. 5-28 5.3.5.1 Inventory and Condition Evaluation .................................... 5-29 5.3.5.2 Accessibility Evaluation ...................................................... 5-29 5.3.5.3 Recreation Use Impact Evaluation ....................................... 5-29 5.3.6 Dispersed Developed Toilet Facilities ................................................... 5-30 5.3.6.1 Detailed Feature Inventory and Condition Evaluation ........ 5-30 5.3.6.2 Accessibility Evaluation ...................................................... 5-31 5.3.6.3 Recreation Use Impact Evaluation ....................................... 5-31 5.4 Current Recreation Use and Activity Participation ........................................... 5-31 5.4.1 Fleming Meadows .................................................................................. 5-32 5.4.1.1 Boat Launch Main Lot ......................................................... 5-32 5.4.1.2 The Lots ............................................................................... 5-36 5.4.1.3 The Marina ........................................................................... 5-38 5.4.1.4 The Swim Lagoon ................................................................ 5-42 5.4.1.5 Group Picnic Area ................................................................ 5-44 5.4.1.6 Amphitheatre Area ............................................................... 5-47 5.4.1.7 Campground Loop B Parking Lot........................................ 5-49 5.4.1.8 Campground Loop D Parking Lot ....................................... 5-53 5.4.1.9 Private Houseboat Parking Lot ............................................ 5-54 5.4.2 Blue Oaks ............................................................................................... 5-58 5.4.2.1 Boat Launch ......................................................................... 5-58 5.4.2.2 Group Picnic Area ................................................................ 5-62 5.4.3 Moccasin Point......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Development of Tuolumne River Flow and Temperature Without Dams Model
    DEVELOPMENT OF TUOLUMNE RIVER FLOW AND TEMPERATURE WITHOUT DAMS MODEL Prepared For Turlock Irrigation District Modesto Irrigation District Prepared by Nimal C. Jayasundara Mike L. Deas Ert Sogutlugil Eric Miao Edwin Limanto Andrew Bale Stacy K. Tanaka Watercourse Engineering, Inc. 424 Second Street, Suite B Davis, California 95616 (530) 750 – 3072 March 2014 Revised September 2017 September 2017 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1. Study Area .................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Previous Work .............................................................................................................................. 4 3. Modeling Approach .............................................................................................................................. 5 4. Model Selection and Conceptual Framework Development (Pre-Model Phase) .................................. 6 4.1. Model Selection ............................................................................................................................ 6 4.1.1. RMAGEN ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, Dod § 208.82
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 208.82 agent, shall report at once to the Dis- § 208.82 Hetch Hetchy, Cherry Valley, trict Engineer by telephone or tele- and Don Pedro Dams and Res- graph and, unless otherwise instructed, ervoirs. shall report once daily thereafter in The Turlock Irrigation District and that manner until the reservoir level Modesto Irrigation District, acting recedes to elevation 1039. These latter jointly, hereinafter called the Dis- reports shall reach the District Engi- tricts, shall operate Don Pedro Dam neer by 9 a.m. each day. and Reservoir in the interest of flood (d) The regulations of this section, control, and the City and County of insofar as they govern use of flood con- San Francisco, hereinafter called the trol storage capacity above elevation City, shall operate Hetch Hetchy Dam 1039.0, are subject to temporary modi- and Reservoir and Cherry Valley Dam and Reservoir in the interest of flood fication in time of flood by the District control all as follows: Engineer if found desirable on the basis (a) Storage space in Don Pedro Res- of conditions at the time. Such desired ervoir shall be kept available for flood- modifications shall be communicated control purposes in accordance with to the representative of the Bureau of the Flood-Control Storage Reservation Reclamation and its designated agent Diagram currently in force for that in immediate charge of operations of reservoir, except when storage of flood- the Norman Dam by any available water is necessary as prescribed in means of communication, and shall be paragraph (d) of this section.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuolumne River Regional Park Master Plan
    Master Plan Tuolumne River Regional Park December 2001 Tuolumne River Regional Park Master Plan Master Plan Tuolumne River Regional Park Prepared for the Joint Powers Authority: City of Modesto, City of Ceres, Stanislaus County Prepared by: EDAW, Inc. 753 Davis Street San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 433-1484 With assistance from: McBain and Trush, Stillwater Sciences, and HDR Engineering, Inc. December 2001 Tuolumne River Regional Park Master Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Issues and Opportunities 9 Chapter 3: Conservation and Open Space 19 Legion Park Chapter 4: Land Use and Recreation 29 Chapter 5: Access and Circulation 53 Chapter 6: Implementation 57 Bibliography 67 Appendices 71 Tuolumne River Regional Park Master Plan List of Figures and Tables Figures Pages Figures Pages Figure 1: Tuolumne River Regional Park - Location 2 Figure 18: Gateway Parcel - Cross Section 43 Figure 2: Tuolumne River Regional Park Figure 19: Golf Course Area - Illustrative Plan 45 Illustrative Plan 3 Figure 20: Carpenter Road Area - Illustrative Plan 47 Figure 3: Tuolumne River Regional Park Planning Jurisdictions 11 Figure 21: Carpenter Road Area - Illustrative Cross Section A 48 Figure 4: Tuolumne River Watershed 12 Library Project, Gerald and Buff Corsi Digital UC Berkeley, Figure 22: Carpenter Road Area - Illustrative Figure 5: Tuolumne River Regional Park Cross Section B 48 Flooding and Hydrology 13 Figure 23: Carpenter Road Area - Sketch of the Park 49 Figure 6: Riparian Floodplain Terraces 20 and Sports Complex Figure 7:
    [Show full text]
  • Final 2020 Agricultural Water Management Plan
    Modesto Irrigation District – 2020 Agricultural Water Management Plan Update AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 Update FOR THE MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT Prepared Pursuant to Water Code Section 10826 Adopted March 23, 2021 1 Modesto Irrigation District – 2020 Agricultural Water Management Plan Update Table of Contents Section I: Introduction _________________________________________________________ 8 1. Description of Previous Water Management Activities _______________________________ 11 2. Coordination Activities _________________________________________________________ 16 a) Notification of AWMP Preparation _______________________________________________________ 16 b) Public Participation ___________________________________________________________________ 16 3. AWMP Adoption and Submittal _________________________________________________ 16 a) AWMP Adoption _____________________________________________________________________ 16 b) AWMP Submittal _____________________________________________________________________ 16 c) AWMP Availability ____________________________________________________________________ 16 4. AWMP Implementation Schedule ________________________________________________ 17 Section II: Description of the Modesto Irrigation District and Service Area ______________ 24 1. Physical Characteristics ________________________________________________________ 24 a) Size of the Service Area ________________________________________________________________ 24 b) Location of the Service Area and Water Management Facilities
    [Show full text]
  • Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory Relief
    Michael R. Lozeau (Bar No. 142893) 1 Richard T. Drury (Bar No. 163559) Richard M. Franco (Bar No. 170970) 2 LOZEAU DRURY LLP 3 410 12th Street, Suite 250 Oakland, California 94607 4 Tel: (510) 836-4200 Fax: (510) 836-4205 5 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] 6 [email protected] 7 Richard M. Frank (Bar No. 63482) 8 School of Law University of California 9 Davis, California 95616 Tel: (530) 752-7422 10 Fax: (530) 752-4704 E-mail: [email protected] 11 Attorneys for Petitioner and Plaintiff 12 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE 14 RESTORE HETCH HETCHY, a non-profit, public Case No. 15 benefit corporation, VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF 16 Petitioner and Plaintiff, MANDATE AND COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF 17 vs. (Article X, section 2, California Constitution; 18 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a Water Code § 100; Code Civ. Pro. § 1060; 19 municipal corporation; SAN FRANCISCO Code of Civil Procedure § 1085) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, a municipal 20 agency; and DOES I – X, inclusive, Respondents and Defendants. 21 22 MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT, a public 23 agency; TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT, a public agency; BAY AREA WATER SUPPLY 24 AND CONSERVATION AGENCY, a public agency, and ROES I–XXX, inclusive, 25 Real Parties in Interest and Defendants. 26 THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and its agency, the SAN FRANCISCO 27 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (collectively “CCSF” and “Respondents”) are employing an 28 1 _________________________________________________________________________________ Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory Relief 1 unreasonable method of diverting municipal water supplies from the Tuolumne River by drowning 2 the Hetch Hetchy Valley of Yosemite National Park with a reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Water Quality Certification Table of Contents 1.0 Projects Background
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD In the Matter of Water Quality Certification for TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT DON PEDRO HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT AND LA GRANGE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT NOS. 2299 AND 14581 Sources: Tuolumne River and Tributaries Counties: Stanislaus and Tuolumne WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION FOR FEDERAL PERMIT OR LICENSE Don Pedro Hydroelectric Project and La Grange Hydroelectric Project January 2021 Final Water Quality Certification Table of Contents 1.0 Projects Background ......................................................................................... 7 2.0 Projects Description ........................................................................................... 8 3.0 Water Rights ....................................................................................................... 8 4.0 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licensing Process ....................... 13 5.0 Regulatory Authority ........................................................................................ 13 5.1 Water Quality Certification and Related Authorities ..................................... 13 5.2 Water Quality Control Plans and Related Authorities ................................... 14 5.3 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) Listing .......................................................... 16 5.4 Construction General Permit ........................................................................... 16 5.5 State Wetland Definition
    [Show full text]
  • California Recreational Trails Plan Phase 1 June 2002
    California Recreational Trails Plan Phase 1 June 2002 “The face and character of our country are determined by what we do with America and its resources.” Thomas Jefferson California Recreational Trails Plan (Phase I) Place Artwork Here Prepared by: State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Planning Division, Statewide Trails Office PO Box 942896 Sacramento California 94296-0001 Gray Davis, Governor Mary Nichols, Secretary for Resources Ruth Coleman, Interim Director, Department of Parks and Recreation Keith Demetrak, Chief, Planning Division Ken McKowen, Manager, Statewide Trails Office i Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Trails and the State Parks Mission 2 III. Statewide Trails Office Mission 3 IV. The California Recreational Trails Plan 4 V. A Basic Trails Philosophy 5 VI. History of Trails 7 “We cannot VII. Societal Benefits of Trails 9 command nature VIII. California’s Changing Demographics 13 except by obeying her.” IX. Program Goals 14 Francis Bacon, Goal for Funding 15 1561-1626 Goal for Trails Inventory 16 Goal for Regional and Statewide Land Use Planning 17 Goal for Trail Advocacy & Collaboration 19 Goal for Trail Research 20 Goal for Statewide Trail Stewardship 21 Goal for Encouraging Public Use of Trails 22 Goal for Trail Accessibility 23 Goal for Multi-Use Trail Cooperation 25 Goal for Private Property Owners 26 Goal for Trails Program Leadership 27 Goal for the California Riding and Hiking Trail 28 Appendix A: Public Resources Code 5073.5 – 5074 Appendix B: 2000 California Trails Corridor Map Appendix C: Original California Riding and Hiking Trail Map Appendix D: Trail Information Resources ii Introduction California State Parks manages more than 3,000 miles of trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Canal Reservoir
    fall 2020 The Irrigator Modesto Irrigation District Water Operations Newsletter inside this issue main canal reservoir main canal reservoir MID’s primary focus for the 2019 winter work season was to complete the Main Canal MCR Project Overview Reservoir Project (MCR Project). The vision for the MCR Project Purpose MCR Project began after purchasing 60 acres of land in March 2011. Following a rigorous system Water Supply analysis, the MCR Project was formally Rainfall recommended by MID’s Water Advisory Committee in 2013 in an ongoing effort to modernize MID’s Snowpack gravity flow delivery system. Modernizing MID’s Don Pedro Reservoir Storage delivery system is an important step to improve water delivery reliability in drought years and allow irrigation field services for strategic beneficial use of water. Online Water Ordering Debris Removal The design was conceptualized over the next few years along with a host of other projects as part of Fleabane the District’s Comprehensive Water Resources Ditchtender Cell Phone Numbers Management Plan (CWRMP). A design was completed early last year and construction on the regulatory processes MCR Project began in July 2019 and was completed Voluntary Agreement & Relicensing in March 2020. Until the Last Drop Documentary MID Water Operations division Monday - Friday | 7 a.m. - 4 p.m. 209.526.7639 mCR Project overview MID’s MCR Project included development of a new, nearly 300 acre-foot (AF) regulating reservoir located at MID’s Main Canal and Lateral 3. In addition to the reservoir, project construction was comprised of four water control structures, two flow measurement flumes downstream of the project site, a new Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system and system integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Hetch Hetchy Restoration Study
    Hetch Hetchy Restoration Study F WATER O R T E N S E O M U T R R C A E P S E D S T A IA T N E R O O F CALIF STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY Department of Water Resources • Department of Parks and Recreation HETCH HETCHY RESTORATION STUDY HETCH HETCHY RESTORATION STUDY STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY Department of Water Resources Department of Parks and Recreation 2006 CONTENTS FOREWORD 1 CHAPTER 6 – COSTS OF RESTORATION 42 OVERVIEW OF REPORT 2 STATE COST ESTIMATING METHODOLOGY 43 COST ESTIMATES 4 Contingencies 44 NEXT STEPS 5 Some Issues that Could Significantly Change the Cost Estimate 44 Plan Formulation 45 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 6 CONCEPT-LEVEL COST ESTIMATE 46 PURPOSE OF REVIEW 6 STATE INVOLVEMENT 7 CHAPTER 7 – NEXT STEPS – FUTURE WORK 50 SCOPE OF REVIEW 7 ROLE OF THE STATE 50 CHAPTER 2 - BACKGROUND 10 MORE DIALOGUE IS NEEDED 51 MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE 51 HETCH HETCHY SYSTEM 10 LEVEL OF STUDY DETAIL 52 O’Shaughnessy Dam 10 FORMAL STAKEHOLDER PROCESS 53 Water Conveyance Facilities 10 PURPOSE AND NEED 53 Drinking Water Quality 11 DEVELOP AND EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES 53 LEGAL BACKGROUND 13 IMPORTANT ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED 54 Yosemite Enabling Legislation 13 Project Planning and Objectives 54 Raker Act 13 Restoration and Public Use 54 Water Rights and Interagency Agreements 14 System Operations, Conveyance Pipelines, and Facilities 55 Organic Act 14 Legal Issues 56 Wilderness Act 14 Cost, Financing, and Institutional Arrangements 56 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 15 CHAPTER 3 – PRIOR STUDIES 16 REFERENCES 58 THE HODEL PROPOSAL 16 APPENDICES ( ON CD ) RECENTLY PUBLISHED WORKS 16 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.3 Tuolumne River System and Downstream Water Bodies
    5.3 Tuolumne River System and Downstream Water Bodies 5.3 Tuolumne 5.3 River 5. WSIP Water Supply and System Operations – Setting and Impacts 5.3 Tuolumne River System and Downstream Water Bodies Section 5.3 Subsections 5.3.1 Stream Flow and Reservoir Water Levels 5.3.2 Geomorphology 5.3.3 Surface Water Quality 5.3.4 Surface Water Supplies 5.3.5 Groundwater 5.3.6 Fisheries 5.3.7 Terrestrial Biological Resources 5.3.8 Recreational and Visual Resources 5.3.9 Energy Resources (References included under each section) 5.3.1 Stream Flow and Reservoir Water Levels The following setting section describes the streams and reservoirs in the Tuolumne River watershed and downstream that could be affected by the WSIP. The impact section (Section 5.3.1.2) provides a description of the changes in stream flow and reservoir water levels that would result from implementation of the WSIP. 5.3.1.1 Setting The Tuolumne River flows from the crest of the Sierra Nevada westward to its confluence with the San Joaquin River. The San Joaquin River flows north to the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. Water from the Delta discharges to the San Francisco Bay Estuary and the Pacific Ocean. Surface water bodies in the Tuolumne River system that could be affected by the proposed program include the Tuolumne River, Cherry Creek, Eleanor Creek, and a quarter-mile reach of Moccasin Creek. Several reservoirs could be affected by the WSIP, including Hetch Hetchy Reservoir, Lake Lloyd, Lake Eleanor, and Don Pedro Reservoir. Because the Tuolumne River drains to the San Joaquin River and the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, these water bodies could also be affected by the WSIP.
    [Show full text]
  • New Melones Lake, Stanislaus, California
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEM ENT NEW M ELONES LAKE STA N ISLA U S, RIVER,CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY U S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA M AY 1 9 7 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT NEW MELONES LAKE STANISLAUS RIVER, CALIFORNIA Prepared by U. S. ARM! ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA May 1972 SUMMARY New Melones Lake, Stanislaus River Basin, California ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Statement Responsible Office: U.S. Army Engineer District, Sacramento, California 1. Name of Action; (X) Administrative ( ) Legislative 2. Description of Action: New Melon2s Lake project consists of a 625-foot high dam across the Stanislaus River to impound up to 2,400,000 acre-feet of water. The Corps of Engineers will maintain the Stanislaus River below the dam to a capacity of 8,000 cubic feet per second and provide for the protection of fish and wildlife resources. Access roads to the dam area, resident engineer facilities, downstream public overlook and safety scaling of the damsite have been completed. Currently, construction of the diversion and outlet tunnel is underway and is scheduled for com­ pletion in August 1973. The construction contract for the dam and spill­ way is scheduled to be awarded in the fall of 1972. To construct the dam, about 16,000,000 cubic yards of material will be excavated from the spillway and adjacent borrow areas. Additional work will include road and utility relocations, powerhouse, switchyard, surge tank, reservoir clearing and initial recreation facility construction. When completed the project will be integrated with the Central Valley Project and will be operated by the Bureau of Reclamation.
    [Show full text]
  • RE-ASSEMBLING HETCH HETCHY Water Supply Implications And
    1 1 2 3 RE-ASSEMBLING HETCH HETCHY 4 Water Supply Implications and Costs of Removing O'Shaughnessy Dam 5 6 7 8 Sarah Null and Jay R. Lund2 9 10 11 ABSTRACT: The Hetch Hetchy System provides San Francisco with most of its water supply. 12 O’Shaughnessy Dam is one component of this system, providing approximately 25% of water 13 storage for the Hetch Hetchy System and none of its conveyance. Removing O’Shaughnessy 14 Dam has gained interest to restore Hetch Hetchy Valley. The water supply feasibility of 15 removing O’Shaughnessy Dam is analyzed by examining alternative water storage and delivery 16 operations for San Francisco using an economic-engineering optimization model. This model 17 ignores institutional and political constraints and has perfect hydrologic foresight to explore 18 water supply possibilities through re-operation of other existing reservoirs. The economic 19 benefits of O’Shaughnessy Dam and its alternatives are measured in terms of the quantity of 20 water supplied to San Francisco and agricultural water users, water treatment costs, and 21 hydropower generation. Results suggest there would be little water scarcity if O’Shaughnessy 22 Dam were to be removed, although removal would be costly due to additional water treatment 23 costs and lost hydropower generation. 24 (KEY TERMS: water supply, dam removal, Hetch Hetchy, optimization, filtration avoidance, 25 restoration.) 2 Respectively, Doctoral Student, Geography Graduate Group, University of California, Davis; Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, 3109 Engineering Unit III, Davis, California 95616 2 1 INTRODUCTION 2 O’Shaughnessy Dam, located in the Hetch Hetchy Valley of Yosemite National Park, 3 was built by the city of San Francisco in 1923, as a component of the Hetch Hetchy water 4 system.
    [Show full text]