Arxiv:1909.09689V1 [Cond-Mat.Str-El] 20 Sep 2019 Magnetic ﬁelds and External Pressure Suggest That the Tings

Optical Enhancement of Superconductivity via Targeted Destruction of Charge Density Waves

Hossein Dehghani,1, 2, ∗ Zachary M. Raines,1, 3 Victor M. Galitski,1, 3 and Mohammad Hafezi1, 2 1Joint Quantum Institute, College Park, 20742 MD, USA 2The Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742 MD, USA 3Condensed Matter Theory Center, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742 MD, USA (Dated: September 24, 2019) It has been experimentally established that the occurrence of charge density waves is a common feature of various under-doped cuprate superconducting compounds. The observed states, which are often found in the form of bond density waves (BDW), often occur in a temperature regime imme- diately above the superconducting transition temperature. Motivated by recent optical experiments on superconducting materials, where it has been shown that optical irradiation can transiently improve the superconducting features, here, we propose a new approach for the enhancement of superconductivity by the targeted destruction of the BDW order. Since BDW states are usually found in competition with superconductivity, suppression of the BDW order enhances the tendency of electrons to form Cooper pairs after reaching a steady-state. By investigating the optical coupling of gapless, collective ﬂuctuations of the BDW modes, we argue that the resonant excitation of these modes can melt the underlying BDW order parameter. We propose an experimental setup to implement such an optical coupling using 2D plasmon-polariton hybrid systems.

I. OVERVIEW [27,28],

2 4 2 F[∆, Φ] = a∆(T )|∆| + b∆(T )|∆| + aΦ(T )|Φ| 4 2 2 + bΦ(T )|Φ| + C(T )|∆| |Φ| , (1) Cuprate high temperature superconductors, which are made up of quasi two-dimensional layers of copper-oxide where the exact values of the coefficients and their materials, have been a subject of intense interest in quan- temperature-dependence are determined from the elec- tum condensed matter physics since their experimental tronic theory in terms of the polarization functions [29]. discovery in the 1980s [1] (see [2,3] for a review of the Also for simplicity, we have suppressed gradient terms. properties of these materials). A major feature of these We note that the coefficient of the last term in the free systems is the onset of variety of orders at low temper- energy, which couples the SC and BDW orders, is al- atures [4–8]. More specifically, there is now mounting ways positive C(T ) > 0. Therefore, any decrease in the experimental evidence that at low temperatures in the BDW order Φ energetically favors the formation of the underdoped region spontaneous breaking of crystalline superconducting order ∆. Consequently, we can imag- symmetries and translational symmetries result in charge ine a protocol where we start above the superconducting density wave states, characterized by the nontrivial mod- critical temperature Tc, where only the BDW order is ulation of charge density. Since this modulation is cen- present. Then, by driving the system in such a way as to tered on the bonds of the square lattice rather than on suppress the BDW order we can enhance the tendency the sites, these modes are often referred to as “bond den- toward superconductivity. Upon establishing a steady- sity waves.” These states have been detected universally state, we therefore expect that the superconducting or- in all cuprate families, via various experimental tech- der will be greater than its equilibrium value, which in niques such as scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and the case of T > Tc is 0. X-ray scattering [9–16]. While the debate is still ongo- Experimentally, this competition between charge den- ing regarding the microscopic origin of the BDW state, sity waves and superconductivity has been used to temperature-dependent measurements in the presence of achieve higher values of Tc in out-of-equilibrium set-

arXiv:1909.09689v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 20 Sep 2019 magnetic fields and external pressure suggest that the tings. In particular, it has been shown, in a number BDW order and superconductivity (SC) compete over a of experiments, that irradiation with THz laser fields for wide doping region [10,17–26]. a duration of hundreds of femtoseconds transiently enhances signatures of electron-electron pairing in cuprates [30–35]. Theoretically, this effect has often been at- This competition between the BDW and SC orders tributed to the resulting lattice deformations of the Cu-O can be explained phenomenologically by considering the bonds, which melt the existing charge density wave or- Ginzburg-Landau theory of the SC order parameter ∆, ders [29,36–43]. Alternatively, in other models, it has and BDW order parameter Φ. From symmetry consid- been shown that a combination of the oscillatory be- erations, one can write a Ginzburg-Landau theory for haviour between superconductivity and charge density the total free energy as a function of the temperature T wave [44] can result in the dynamical enhancement of 2

model” of cuprate superconductors [47,48]. This is a minimal theoretical model, built upon the experimental facts regarding the competing orders in cuprates, which does not rely on a particular microscopic mechanism underlying the orders. The model allows us to obtain the optical response of the BDW collective modes, which determines the properties of their optical coupling. From this result, the optical power absorbed by these modes is calculated and used to obtain a phenomenological estimate for the melting rate of the BDW order parameter. More importantly, we derive the momentum-energy FIG. 1. (A) Experimental scheme for generating surface matching condition between the matter and optical plasmon-polaritons, using a 2D high carrier conductor such as modes. Experimentally, this condition cannot be realized doped graphene, on top of a cuprate superconductor. Irradi- via conventional optical methods since the speed of light ation with THz laser fields creates surface plasmon-polariton is nearly two orders of magnitude higher than the Fermi waves propagating along the conductor and penetrating inside velocity of electrons in solids, which determines the prop- adjacent CuO2 planes with a bond density wave condensate. agation speed of BDW collective modes. Nevertheless, The color pattern on the CuO2 plane displays the real part by hybridizing photons with surface plasmons and creat- of the charge modulation Pij on the center of the bonds in ing hybrid modes known as “surface plasmon-polaritons” a bond density phase with (for purposes of illustration) a di- (SPP) the propagation of light can be confined along a agonal wavevector Q = (π/2, π/2). (B) Schematic depiction of processes after irradiation with light. Absorption of pho- metal-dielectric interface [49], which shrinks the effec- tons by the electrons in the bond density ground state excites tive wavelength of light. Concretely, placing a 2D (semi- these electrons to higher energy states. After the inclusion )metal sheet, e.g. graphene, silver, beryllium, in contact of electron-electron and electron-phonon scattering processes, with a dielectric slab, the optical properties of the metal- the effective exhaustion of the bond density wave channel en- lic system are modified so that the effective wavelength hances the formation of Cooper pairs in the non-equilibrium of photons traveling along the metal-insulator interface steady-state of the system. λsp, is shrunk by the surface plasmon-polariton confinement ratio λsp/λo where λo labels the wavelength of photons in vacuum [50]. Thus, by creating a heterostructure superconductivity, when other initially vanishing super- of a cuprate superconductor and an appropriate metal- conducting pairings are incorporated [45] (see [46] for a dielectric SPP, as is schematically illustrated in Fig.1(a), recent review of the field). the energy and momentum mismatch can be remedied in Here, inspired by these experiments, we propose a new a relatively wide range of frequencies. optical approach to directly melt competing electronic The pumping of the system out of the BDW manifold modes in a targeted way (Fig.1(a)). In contrast to the is counter balanced by transition elements from the ex- current experimental methods, which indirectly weaken cited state to the SC state and back to the BDW state the BDW state by stimulating phononic vibrations [30– as schematically depicted in Fig.1(b). These transition 33,35], our proposal is focused on the efficient optical rates together form a non-linear rate equation for the destruction of the BDW order via optically exciting its density matrix, whose solutions determine the steady- collective phase modes. The associated excitations are state behavior of the system. Even after placing a sur- the phase (phasons) and amplitude collective modes of face plasmon-polariton material on top of our supercon- the BDW order parameter. In this work, we focus on the ductor, there are no relevant transitions out of the SC phase mode of the BDW order, since it has a gapless spec- state with which our pumping scheme is resonant. As trum (being the Goldstone mode of the BDW phase) and superconductivity is the closest subleading instability, we can also be optically driven at low energies. Specifically, expect an enhancement of superconductivity to naturally since interactions within the copper-oxygen planes are follow. believed to play the dominant role in superconductivity In the rest of this work, we focus on the optical melting in cuprates, we study the electromagnetic response of the of the BDW order and the resultant suppression. phason mode within a single quasi-2D plane. We argue that by exciting phase modes inside these planes, their fluctuations will deplete the BDW order, and therefore, II. MODEL AND RESULTS provide an environment more conducive to the formation of non-equilibrium superconductivity. The interplay A. Model between the drive and inherent relaxation mechanisms, as depicted in Fig.1(b), then allows for the existence of The BDW state is described by an incommensurate out-of-equilibrium steady-state superconductor. bond density wave order where the modulations of the To this end, we derive a low energy effective theory for charge are, for a single band model, located on the Cu- the phason mode of the BDW order from the “hot-spot Cu bonds, or in models with more bands on the oxygen 3 sites, rather than the Cu atoms [51]. Denoting the BDW ordering wavevector by Q, the BDW order is characterized by a charge expectation value ΦPij on the links of the lattice, with the form-factor

1 X P = eiQ·(ri+rj )/2 eik·(ri−rj )P (k), (2) ij V Q k where V denotes the volume of our system. This instability can be obtained from consideration of the phenomenological t-J-V model [29,51,52] whose Hamiltonian is

X 1 X 1 X H = t c† c + JS · S + V n n , t−J−V ij i,σ j,α 2 i j 2 i j i,j;α hi,ji hi,ji (3) where the spin and density operators at site i are given by FIG. 2. Fermi surface of a square lattice model with up to 3 P † P † Si = αβ ci,ατˆσσ0 ci,σ, and ni = σ ci,σcj,σ, respectively. nearest neighbor hopping amplitudes. Different colors specify Here, τˆ labels the spin operator, and Greek indices in the different doping levels. “Hot-spot” regions 1, 2, represented by summation run over σ, σ0 = {↑, ↓}. The hopping ampli- black dots on the Fermi surface, are connected to regions 3, 4, tude tij, usually includes up to the third nearest neigh- respectively, by the anti-ferromagnetic vector K = (π, π). In bor hoppings; and J, and V denote the nearest-neighbor the bond density wave phase, electron-hole pairs separated spin-spin and density-density interaction strengths, re- by the momentum Q = (−Q, Q), corresponding to the sep- spectively. In terms of the the electronic operators, the aration of hotspots 1 and 2, are condensed. X1 and Y1 are BDW state is characterized by the nonzero expectation the perpendicular and tangent axes to the Fermi surface at P † hot-spot 1, respectively. On the upper right corner the tilt value ΦPij = hc cjσi. α iσ angle θδ, defines the angle between the hot-spot axes and the It should be noted that while the BDW wavevector Brillouin zone axes. For the purpose of visual convenience, Q is usually observed to be axial [10,18,19], i.e. Q = this angle is exaggerated. (Q, 0), or (0,Q), in the t-J-V model introduced above, the optimal instability is found to be diagonal Q = (±Q, ±Q) [51]. Nonetheless, we expect the nature of our results, hot-spot regions are block-diagonalized into two coupled after slight modifications, can be applied to other forms sets. One such set is depicted in Fig.2 labeled by ψσa of bond density waves with different orientations of the where a = 1,..., 4 and σ = ↑, ↓. Furthermore, by im- ordering. posing d−wave symmetry in the Brillouin zone, the hot- In this study, we suppose that there is a spontaneous spot regions 1, 2 becomes redundant with 3, 4. Hence, symmetry breaking down to orders with one of these in the following, we only keep one pair of hot-spots in BDW vectors Q = (−Q, Q). The periodicity of mod- our calculations, which will be combined into the spinor ulation is between 3 to 5 lattice constants and the an- † † † Ψk = (ψ1,k, ψ2,k). Nonetheless, in the final results, we gular symmetry of these orders has been found to be also collect the contributions from the condensation of e- predominantly of “d-wave” (B1g) symmetry PQ(k) = h pairs in regions 3, 4, which are simply related to those cos(kx)−cos(ky)[52]. The spatial profile of this order pa- of regions 1, 2 by a C4 rotation. rameter for a diagonal wavevector is shown in Fig.1(a), Note that as in Fig.2, the momentum axes in the vicin- where a commensurate wave with periodicity of 4 is dis- ity of hot-spot 1 are not exactly aligned with the original played for purposes of illustration. The dynamics of the X,Y axes in the Brillouin zone. Therefore, we define the BDW collective modes emerge from electronic degrees of X1 and Y1 axes, which are perpendicular and tangent to freedom. the Fermi surface, respectively, and are rotated by a tilt In this work, we employ the “hot-spot” approxima- angle δ with respect to the original X and Y axes of the tion, which allows for considerable improvement in the Brillouin zone. More explicitly, for an arbitrary wavevec- analytically tractability of the problem. By restrict- tor k = (kx, ky) its projection along the rotated axes can ing to momentum neighborhoods of the so-called “hot- be expressed in terms of θδ according to spots” on the Fermi surface, the points formed by the intersection of the Fermi surface and the magnetic Bril- k − sin(θ ) cos(θ ) k x1 = δ δ x (4) louin zone, one obtains the low-energy, “hot-spot” model ky1 − cos(θδ) sin(θδ) ky [48,52,53]. These are strongly coupled to each other via anti-ferromagnetic spin fluctations with momentum This angle is doping-dependent and near the SC optimal K = (π, π) [48,54], which are commonly believed to doping (δ ≈ 1/8) this angle is negligible θ π. Starting be important for the formation of superconductivity in from a lattice kinetic energy with up to 3rd nearest neigh- cuprates [55]. There are 8 such electron regions, but for bor hoppings, we can effectively obtain the dispersion in solutions which preserve the time reversal symmetry, the the continuum limit. In the vicinity of region 1 and 2, 4 this dispersion relation can be expanded up to quadratic B. Phason Dispersion order in the momentum deviation from the hotspots

2 After condensation of electron-hole (e-h) pairs in the 1,k = 2,−k = vkx1 + γky , (5) 1 BDW phase, ΦQ(k) = φPQ(k), with an amplitude φ, the where the parameters v and γ label the hot-spots’ Fermi mean field Hamiltonian becomes velocity and band curvature, respectively. Due to the X † 1k φ 1 2 H = Ψk Ψk + φ . (8) C4 symmetry of the Fermi surface the dispersion relation φ 2k g around regions 3, 4 can be determined in terms of v and γ k in a similar manner. We denote the UV momentum cut- Note that due to the d-wave symmetry of the order- −1 off around the hot-spots by kΛ πa and in order to be ing, e-h pairs around hot-spot regions 1, 2 and 3, 4 ac- consistent in our approximations the curvature must sat- quire the same condensation value φ. Hybridization isfy γ ∼ 1/kΛ. For future convenience, we use the Fermi of electrons in the bands 1,2 results in an energy gap q velocity and the lattice constant of copper-oxide planes d 2 2 dk = ( ) + φ where we have introduced the “en- a, to define an effective hopping amplitude, th = v/a, k d which forms a natural energy scale for the free electron ergy difference” k = (2,k − 1,k)/2. After diagonalizing dynamics. In what follows, we will take ~ = 1. the above Hamiltonian the corresponding energy of the Above the SC phase transition temperature condensa- quasiparticles in the “valence” and “conduction” bands tion occurs in the BDW channel such that the mean-field become order parameter ΦQ(k) acquires a non-zero expectation q c,v m d 2 2 value. Fluctuations about this mean field solution de- Ek = k ± (k) + φ , (9) scribe the corresponding collective motions of the quasi- m particles in this phase which can be coupled to external where the “mean energy” is defined as k = (2,k+1,k)/2. probes such as electromagnetic fields. In order to study the dynamics of the BDW fluctua- As mentioned above, due to spin-exchange interactions, we need to go beyond the mean field Hamiltonian. tions, electrons in regions 1 and 2 are coupled to elec- This procedure may be done by applying a Hubbard- trons in regions 3 and 4. In the BDW phase, this cou- Stratonovich transformation to the interaction in Eq.6. pling can be described by the dynamical BDW pairing The resulting interaction is P † field Φq(τ) = g ψ q (τ)ψ q (τ). Using this ap- k 4,k− 3,k+ 2 X † e−φ X 1 † 2 ˆ q He−φ = Ψk+ q hk,q Ψk− + ΦqΦq, (10) proximation the continuum limit of the t-J-V model in 2 2 g the BDW phase generates an interaction as follows k,q q ê−φ ρ−ρ X † † where h =σ ˆ2Φq. To derive the dispersion relation ˆ q ˆ q k,q Hint = − gΨ q V Ψk− Ψ 0 q V Ψk0+ , (6) k+ 2 2 k − 2 2 of phason modes we calculate the two-particle Green’s k,k0,q function in the BDW phase channel. In the usual way, the poles of this object correspond to the dispersion of where the short-range interaction vertex Vˆ in terms of the associated excitation, i.e. the BDW phase mode. the Pauli matrices σˆ in the hot-spot basis is Vˆ =σ ˆ . 1,2,3 2 In the random phase approximation (RPA), this prop- The associated BDW pairing field with this Hamiltonian agator is calculated by tracing out electrons from the reads effective action. The result can be compactly written eff P −1 X † S [Φ] = Dq ΦqΦ−q where we have employed com- Φq(τ) = g ψ q (τ)ψ1,k+ q (τ), (7) q 2,k− 2 2 k bined notation for energy-momentum q = (ω, q), with bold symbols indicating the spatial momenta. As shown where τ is the imaginary time. As a complex field Φq(τ) in the Methods and Materials section the BDW propaga- can be decomposed into its Higgs [56] and phason modes tor Dq receives contributions from both inter- and intra- H G † (Φq , −iΦq ) = (Φq ± Φ−q)/2 which identify the ampli- band processes. However, in the low temperature limit, tude and phase fluctuations, respectively. The latter is a T φ, the latter are negligible and the leading order in current-carrying mode which is associated with the slid- frequency and momentum terms of the inverse propaga- ing motion of electrons [57–59]. Since these two kinds tor can be derived analytically of fluctuations decouple from one another and only the 1 latter is linearly optically active, in the following we only D−1 = v2 q2 + q2 + 2q q sin(2θ ) − ω2 q 4d3 B x y x y δ focus on phase fluctuations and henceforth take Φq to Λ mean solely the phase-like component. + O(ω4, q4), (11) Since our goal is the enhancement of SC in the regime where SC is the subleading instability, we consider tem- where θδ is the doping dependent in Eq. (4) and the BDW peratures above the SC transition temperature. Under velocity is these circumstances the hybridization of superconducting v φ2 4 1/2 and BDW fluctuations can be ignored [? ], and therefore, √ 2 2 vB = 1 + 2 2 2 − 4 γ kΛ , (12) in the following we will suppress the spin indices. 2 (φ + v kΛ) 3v 5

m,d m d where we have used the notation vk = ∇k(k , k) for the mean and diﬀerence Fermi velocities, respectively. This leads to a net paramagnetic response for phason modes which can be expressed as X SA−φ = ieΛq. (A−qΦq − AqΦ−q) (14) q

m d where Λq = Λq + Λq is composed of the “mean” and “diﬀerence” momentum-dependent optical coupling strengths of the phason ﬁeld, which receive contributions m d from vk , vk velocity vertices, respectively. At low temperatures, T φ, and for negligible θδ the leading order terms in the gradient expansion of the optical couplings take the form

d 2vω FIG. 3. Intensity map of the inverse Green’s function of bond Λq = − (xˆ − yˆ) (15) −1 φd density wave phason D (ω, qx) as a function of frequency Λ 2 2 2 2 2 and momentum qx for qy = 0. The solid line denotes the 4γ vk 3φ + 2v k Λm = Λ Λ ωq q (xˆ − yˆ), (16) zeros of the inverse Green’s function, corresponding to the q 9φ3d3 x y dispersion of the phason mode. For this plot, we have chosen Λ γ[av] = 0.5, φ[t ] = 0.05, k T [t ] = 0.01, where a, v and t h B h h where d = pφ2 + v2k2 . Note that the interaction ver- label the lattice constant, Fermi velocity and the effective Λ Λ hopping amplitude, respectively. tex vanishes in the limit of DC fields and its dominant component is parallel to the BDW wavevector Q. Also, from the momentum dependence of the “mean” term and its relative sign with respect to the “difference” term it which for small condensation fields asymptotically ap- √ √ can be deduced that at a fixed wavevector |q| the as- proaches v ≈ v/ 2. The 2 factor in v is due to the B B sociated effective coupling strength is strongest when fact that the total polarization bubble Πφ contains con- q q = −q . tributions from both the regions 1, 2 and 3, 4. For doping x y levels in the range θδ ∈ [0, π/4], the momentum dependence in the dispersion relation interpolates between the D. Optical Conductivity 2 21/2 isotropic form qx + qy and |qx ± qy|. The latter case is associated with vanishing values of doping where the While the “local” non-equilibrium optical conductivity Fermi surface becomes a π/4-rotated square in the Bril- of superconductors has been recently studied [60], here louin zone. In this limit the response function of BDW we are primarily interested in the “non-local” behavior of modes can be obtained without applying the hot-spot ap- the conductivity associated with excitation of the BDW proximation (details can be found in the Supplementary collective modes when the resonance condition is satis- Materials section). However, the former limit is most fied. Having calculated the coupling interaction vertex similar to the optimal doping regime in cuprates and will and the self energy of phason modes the non-local con- therefore be limit of main interest in this paper. ductivity can be extracted in a straightforward manner In Fig.3 the dispersion relation which corresponds to by integrating out the BDW fields and obtaining an ef- φ the poles of Re(Dq ) is plotted as a solid black line. As fective action for photons. The Feynman diagrams re- can be seen in this figure the linear dispersion relation is quired in the calculation of the optical response of collec- satisfied in the frequency regime ω < 2φ corresponding tive modes [57], are presented in Fig.6. The final results to the regime where the frequency is within the BDW of these diagrams for the complex conductivity is energy gap. 2 α β ie Λ Λ Dq σ (ω, q) = q −q , (17) αβ ω C. Phason-Photon Coupling where α, β = {x, y}. Inserting the results of Eqs. (15) and (16) in the conductivity tensor, we conclude that at The optical response of phason modes arises from the low-temperature the conductivity tensor satisfies σxx = paramagnetic coupling of electronic current to the gauge σyy = −σxy ≡ σdiag. Hence, from Ohm’s law, Jα = potential A. From the standard minimal gauge coupling σαβEβ, J and E being the current density and the electric one finds the electron-photon interaction field, respectively, it can be inferred that the maximum optical dissipation can be obtained when the electric field ˆ e−A X † ˆ H = Ψ q eAq. vm,kI − vd,kσˆ3 Ψk− q , (13) of the laser is along the diagonal or more generally par- k+ 2 2 k,q allel to the BDW wavevector Q. 6

In Fig.4, we have plotted the real part of the diagonal optical conductivity σdiag(ω, q), which determines the dissipated power in the system, according to the Joule’s law, at a non-zero temperature. From this plot, we can determine the optimal driving frequency for melting of the BDW modes. Note that in this figure the low-frequency and low-momentum behavior of the optical conductivity qualitatively differs from the behavior observed in Fig.3. This is due to the additional dependence of the conductivity on the optical interaction vertices and their non-trivial frequency-dependence, which was derived in Eqs. (15) and (16). In general, there are additional paramagnetic and diamagnetic contributions, which are insignificant under the resonance condition, and therefore, ignored in our study. Besides numerical computations the conductivity can FIG. 4. Intensity map of the resistive part of the conductiv- be analytically evaluated for low frequencies at zero tem- ity Re σxx(ω, q) = σyy(ω, q), for diagonal momentum qx = qy perature and model parameters γ[av] = 0.5, φ[th] = 0.05, kB T [th] = 0.01. The peak response, indicating maximum power absorp- 16ie2v2ωd tion, indicates resonance with the BDW phason mode. The σ (ω, q) = Λ , (18) diag φ2 [v2 q2 − (ω + iη)2] appearance of gap in the conductivity at low momenta, even B though the phason is still gapless, is due to the vanishing of 2 2 2 phason-photon coupling for small q, cf. Eq. (15). where q = qx + qy for vanishing θδ. Note that we have retained a positive infinitesimal imaginary shift η in the frequency, to explicitly demonstrate the retarded analytic Provided that the initial value of the order parameter is structure of this result. sufficiently large, a low-temperature approximation for the optical conductivity is permissible in the early stage of the melting process. In this regime Eq. (20) can be E. BDW Melting Rate integrated

Once the real part of conductivity is inserted into 4 1/4 φ(t) = φ0 − rt , (21) Joule’s law, the absorbed power density can be evaluated. In the zero-temperature limit where the optical conduc- 2 2 2 where we have defined r ≡ 8πgdΛv A0ω0. For a small tivity is given by Eq. (18) and for a resonant narrow- irradiation power this relation can be further recast to a linewidth laser field with a vector potential amplitude of 3 linear decay with a rate equal to r/4φ0. In SI units, for a A0 and frequency ω0 the time-averaged absorbed power laser field with a frequency around 5 THz and an electric density can be expressed as 7 4 field of 10 V/m, the melting time scale tmelt ' φ0/r is in the range of picoseconds, comparable to what has 2 2 2 4πv dΛ been observed for the melting time scale observed when P¯ = A ω δ(ω0 − vBq), (19) 0 0 φ2 melting via phonon excitation [30,61]. To investigate the time dependence of the order pa- In this relation the Dirac δ-function encodes the spectral rameter beyond this limit we numerically solve Eq. (20). behavior of the BDW collective modes and appears due to Fig.5 displays the results of this computation when the + the infinitessimal quantity η → 0 in Eq. (18). Note that laser field’s frequency and wavevector are resonant with once the resonance condition for the laser wavelength is the phason absorption and the initial value of the or- satisfied the delta function can be integrated over which der parameter is chosen such that we are deep inside the results in a finite value for the dissipated power density. BDW phase. Moreover, we utilize the fact that opti- When the resonance condition is satisfied the energy cal coupling can be maximized for diagonal wavevectors absorbed from the drive allows for electrons to leave the qx = ±qy. In this figure three curves are displayed, corre- condensed BDW state. One can obtain a phenomenolog- sponding to different laser frequencies while other param- ical upper bound for the melting rate of the BDW or- eters are kept equal. As explained above for early times der parameter by assuming that after leaving the BDW the melting process demonstrates a nearly linear decay. phase electrons do not return to this state, i.e. equating This behavior is followed by a saturating behavior when the optical power density with the rate of change in the the order parameter becomes comparable to the temper- mean-field energy density of the BDW phase ature. In this regime the non-trivial φ-dependence of the

2 optical conductivity starts to emerge which results in an d φ 1 2 2 overall deceleration of the melting process. Also, com- = − A0ω Re{σ(ω, q)}. (20) dt g 2 parison of diﬀerent curves indicates that since the power 7

or using different dielectric substrates. Recently, it has been observed that this confining ratio can be amplified as high as 300 [64] for frequencies as low as a few THz which is close to the confinement potential required for our proposal. An even higher confinement ratio of up to nearly 103 is reported in other van der Waals materials [49,65]. In the relevant frequency regime for our system, topological materials such as Bi2Te3 accommodate surface plasmon-polariton modes, albeit with a relatively low quality factor. Nevertheless, since we can consider an array of laser fields, this drawback does not affect our experimental setup. Therefore, the frequency and momentum matching in our desired frequency regime is accessible with the current technology.

FIG. 5. Melting of the BDW order parameter as a function III. DISCUSSION of time. The time evolution is plotted for three different frequencies of the laser field with the photon momentum being determined by the resonance condition. The red line shows We have presented here a scheme for enhancing su- the equilibrium temperature at which the melting process is perconductivity via the resonant melting of a competing carried out, for reference. order. While in this work we have not directly considered the interplay between irradiation and superconductivity, it should only play a secondary effect on the applicabil- density increases with the frequency the order parameter ity of our proposal. This is because, in contrast to the decay rate is higher at larger frequencies. BDW order, which couples linearly to light, supercon- It should be borne in mind that in any experimen- ductivity can only couple quadratically to photons due tal realization of this technique a finite fraction of the to gauge invariance of the electromagnetic field. Conse- electrons after being driven out from the BDW phase quently, such processes are beyond linear response and will eventually re-condense into the BDW phase due to the optical power that could be dissipated in the super- the subsequent electron-electron and electron-phonon in- conducting condensate is quartic in the amplitude of the teractions. Hence, our phenomenological computation is laser field, in contrast to the quadratic behavior we dean upper bound on determining the melting rate of the rived in Eq. (19). Furthermore, by tuning the energy BDW order parameter. and momentum of light to be resonant with BDW phason modes, we expect the response of the BDW to be much stronger than the non-resonant processes which are F. Plasmonic Engineering unfavorable for superconductivity. By controlling such adverse effects, via reservoir engineering techniques, we Since the BDW phase transition temperatures could expect that the net effect of our resonant irradiation pro- reach around 150K, the proposed frequency regime in our tocol would be an enhancement of superconductivity. approach is ω . 5THz. In this frequency regime doped Finally, we point out that the same technique may be graphene hosts plasmons that simultaneously have low applied not only to cuprate materials, but also to other losses and significant wavelength confinement ratios. For strongly correlated systems such as iron-pnictide super- a graphene sheet mounted in a substrate with a relative conductors or bismuthates [66] where two or more com- dielectric constant εr, at a given frequency ω the SPP peting or intertwined orders are coexistent. More gener- confinement can be approximated as ally, such optical pumping schemes could become a new tool in manipulation of correlated states of electrons. λsp 4µ 1 ≈ α −1 (22) λo εr (ω + iτ ) METHODS 2 where the fine structure constant is α = e /4πε0 ≈ 1/137, and τ and µ denote the electron relaxation time and the chemical potential of doped graphene, respec- To diagonalize the original mean field Hamiltonian in tively [62,63]. This relation is a reasonable approxima- Eq.(8), we apply a unitary transformation, Uk, to the ˜ tion provided the frequency of photons is smaller than original spinor. The rotated spinor is denoted by Ψk = UkΨk. The rotation matrix up to gauge choice is the optical phonon frequency of graphene ωOph ≈ 50THz which is compatible with our proposal. νk −uk Eq. (22) indicates that the wavelength of plasmons Uk = , (23) can be adjusted by varying the doping level of graphene uk νk 8 where in the above the rotation coefficients are where the momentum summation is limited to the UV momentum cutoff around the hot-spots P = r 1 k u = k , ν = , (24) R d2k/(2k )2. k 2 1/2 k 2 1/2 Λ (1 + rk) (1 + rk) To take into account the collective modes, we must in- clude Gaussian fluctuations of electrons above the mean and rk = φ/(d,k + dk). Next, the combined interaction Hamiltonian in Eq. (10) and (13) is transformed to the field solution. To do so, we integrate out the electrons new basis in the partition function, which gives rise to a number of terms in the effective action for the phason modes and int X ˜ † ˜int ˜ their interaction with photons. Decomposing the total H = Ψ q hk,qΨk− q , (25) k+ 2 2 k,q interaction Hamiltonian in terms of the Pauli matrices ˜int ˜int h = hα σˆα, and using the energy-momentum conven- where tion q = (ωm, q), the effective action is calculated in the rotated basis in terms of the Green’s functions ˜int (0) (2) G (1) h = eAq.vm,kwk,q + iwk,qΦq σˆ0 − ewk,qAq.vd,kσˆ1 eff 1 X ˜ ˜int ˜ ˜int (2) (0) G (3) Sαβ = tr Gk+ q hq;ασˆαGk− q h−q;βσˆβ , (29) + ieAq.vm,kw + w Φ σˆ2 − ew Aq.vd,kσˆ3 2 2 2 k,q k,q q k,q k,q (26) where the trace is taken over fermionic degrees of free- and in the above equation we have defined the coherence dom. It should be emphasized that in the above formal- (i) factors wk,q as ism all the different combinations of Pauli matrix indices α and β which contribute to a single physical process w(0) = ν(k+)ν(k−) + u(k+)u(k−), (27a) must be included. This functional approach is equivalent k,q to employing the RPA to evaluate the resulting Green’s (1) + − + − wk,q = u(k )ν(k ) + ν(k )u(k ), (27b) function of phason fields which is plotted on the top line of Fig.6. Considering the coupling constant g as the w(2) = ν(k+)u(k−) − u(k+)ν(k−), (27c) k,q non-interacting Green’s function of the phase mode D0, (3) + − + − the Dyson equation is wk,q = ν(k )ν(k ) − u(k )u(k ), (27d)

± −1 0 −1 φ where k = k ± q/2. Dq = (Dq ) + Πq The building blocks of the required Feynman diagrams 1 X 1 (φ) = + (1 − f˜ )(χvv + χcc) in Fig.6, are the e-h correlation functions. These correla- g 4 k,q q q tions can be calculated in the imaginary time Matsubara k i formalism. We introduce Matsubara frequencies which at ˜(φ) vc cv +(1 + fk,q)(χq + χq ) , (30) inverse temperature β = 1/T are given by ωm = 2πmT and n = 2π(n + 1/2)T for bosonic and fermionic fields, ˜(φ) respectively. Ultimately, in order to obtain the causal where fk,q are coherence factors originating from the ro- (retarded) response of the system, we will analytically tation of spinors from the 1, 2 basis to the v, c bands, + continue to real frequencies iωm → ω + iδ . Introducing 2 d d −1 φ + k+ q k− q the fermionic Green’s functions Gn,k = (in − a(k)) ˜(φ) 2 2 fk,q = . (31) the e-h correlations are obtained after the frequency sum- d q d q k+ 2 k− 2 mation Next, the optical coupling of BDW fields can be ex- a,b X χ = T G q G q q,k n+m,k+ 2 n,k− 2 pressed in terms of the e-h correlations n d d b a φ( q − q ) nF (E q ) − nF (E q ) X k+ k− k+ 2 k− 2 m m 2 2 vv cc vc cv = , (28) Λq = vk χk,q + χk,q − χk,q − χk,q b a 2dk+ q dk− q iωm + E q − E q k 2 2 k+ 2 k− 2 (32) βE −1 where the Fermi-Dirac distribution nF (E) = (1+e ) is obtained after performing the fermionic Matsubara fre- and quency summation and a, b = {v, c} indexes the lower " ! (valence) and upper (conduction) bands’ eigenenergies d X d φ φ vv cc Λq = vk − (χk,q − χk,q) according to Eq. (9). 2dk− q 2dk+ q k 2 2 From here, one can find the saddle point of the parti- ! # tion function which requires the mean field BDW order φ φ vc cv − + χk,q − χk,q . (33) parameter to satisfy 2d q 2d q k+ 2 k− 2

1 X 1 v c As it is illustrated in the bottom line of Fig.6 this in- = nF (Ek) − nF (Ek) , g 2dk k teraction vertex appears in photons’ polarization tensor. 9

the vertical axis ω → ω + iη. Numerically, this leads to a Lorentzian approximation for the real part of the conductivity. a. Energy Absorption Rate. For a general probe ﬁeld Yˆ we associate a coupling Hamiltonian. We deﬁne the susceptibility of operator Xˆ with respect to the operator Aˆ as

0 0 0 χXY (t, t ) = iθ(t − t )h[Xˆ(t), Yˆ (t )]i (35)

For a sinusoidal perturbation f(t) = f cos(ωt) at fre- FIG. 6. Feynman diagrams of polarization functions. Solid, 0 dashed and wiggly lines represent electrons’, phasons’ and quency ω0 and with amplitude f0, the calculation of the photons’ propagators, respectively. Top row: On the left the energy absorption rate yields polarization diagram of phason modes, and on the right the 1 phason-Photon interaction vertex. Middle row: phason prop- Q = f 2ω Im{χ˜ (ω )}. (36) agator obtained from a Dyson equation summation of phason 2 0 0 XY 0 polarization diagrams. Bottom row: Collective mode’s con- tribution to the conductivity by exchanging phason fields. where χ˜XY denotes the Fourier transform of the susceptibility. The appropriate susceptibility in this problem is A the polarization tensor Πq . Next, by equating the en- Notice that the related process only includes the collec- ergy absorption rate with the melting rate of the ground tive contributions to the susceptibility originating from state energy we obtain a non-linear differential equation the exchange of BDW phason modes. for the time dependence of the BDW field φ(τ) which we solve by the Runge-Kutta method. δ2S [A] ΠA (q) = eff ACKNOWLEDGMENTS αβ α β δAq δA−q 2 α β = e Λq Λ−qDq, (34) This research was supported by supported by US- ARO (contract No. W911NF1310172) (Z.R.), NSF where α, β = {x, y}. The associated non-local conduc- DMR-1613029, DARPA DRINQS project FP-017, “Long- A tivity is given by σαβ(ω, q) = iΠαβ(q, ω)/ω. For θδ ≈ 0 term High Temperature Coherence in Driven Supercon- only the diagonal terms of this tensor have a significant ductors,” and Simons Foundation (V.G.), and AFOSR value. FA9550-16-1-0323, ARO W911NF-15-1-0397, and NSF For the numerical computation of the retarded Green’s Physics Frontier Center at the Joint Quantum Institute functions in the frequency domain we apply a shift along (H.D. & M.H.).

∗ Correspondence to [email protected] 6 MJ Lawler, K Fujita, Jhinhwan Lee, AR Schmidt, 1 J George Bednorz and K Alex Müller. Possible high tc Y Kohsaka, Chung Koo Kim, H Eisaki, S Uchida, superconductivity in the ba- la- cu- o system. Zeitschrift JC Davis, JP Sethna, et al. Intra-unit-cell electronic ne- fürPhysik B Condensed Matter, 64(2):189–193, 1986. maticity of the high-Tc copper-oxide pseudogap states. Na- 2 Bernhard Keimer, Steven A Kivelson, Michael R Norman, ture, 466(7304):347, 2010. Shinichi Uchida, and J Zaanen. From quantum matter 7 Colin V Parker, Pegor Aynajian, Eduardo H da Silva Neto, to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides. Aakash Pushp, Shimpei Ono, Jinsheng Wen, Zhijun Xu, Nature, 518(7538):179, 2015. Genda Gu, and Ali Yazdani. Fluctuating stripes at the 3 Patrick A Lee, Naoto Nagaosa, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Dop- onset of the pseudogap in the high-Tc superconductor ing a mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature super- Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x. Nature, 468(7324):677, 2010. conductivity. Reviews of modern physics, 78(1):17, 2006. 8 Kazuhiro Fujita, Mohammad H Hamidian, Stephen D Ed- 4 A Kaminski, S Rosenkranz, HM Fretwell, JC Campuzano, kins, Chung Koo Kim, Yuhki Kohsaka, Masaki Azuma, Z Li, H Raffy, WG Cullen, H You, CG Olson, CM Varma, Mikio Takano, Hidenori Takagi, Hiroshi Eisaki, Shin-ichi et al. Spontaneous breaking of time-reversal symmetry in Uchida, et al. Direct phase-sensitive identification of a d- the pseudogap state of a high-Tc superconductor. Nature, form factor density wave in underdoped cuprates. Proceed- 416(6881):610, 2002. ings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(30):E3026– 5 Y Kohsaka, C Taylor, K Fujita, A Schmidt, C Lupien, E3032, 2014. T Hanaguri, M Azuma, M Takano, H Eisaki, H Takagi, 9 WD Wise, MC Boyer, Kamalesh Chatterjee, Takeshi et al. An intrinsic bond-centered electronic glass with uni- Kondo, T Takeuchi, H Ikuta, Yayu Wang, and EW Hud- directional domains in underdoped cuprates. Science, 315 son. Charge-density-wave origin of cuprate checkerboard (5817):1380–1385, 2007. visualized by scanning tunnelling microscopy. Nature Physics, 4(9):696, 2008. 10

10 AJ Achkar, R Sutarto, X Mao, F He, A Frano, S Blanco- 22 Markus Huecker, Niels Bech Christensen, AT Holmes, Canosa, M Le Tacon, G Ghiringhelli, L Braicovich, M Mi- Elizabeth Blackburn, Edward M Forgan, Ruixing Liang, nola, et al. Distinct charge orders in the planes and chains DA Bonn, WN Hardy, Olof Gutowski, M v Zimmermann, of ortho-III-ordered YBa2Cu3O6+δ superconductors iden- et al. Competing charge, spin, and superconducting or- tified by resonant elastic x-ray scattering. Physical review ders in underdoped YBa2Cu3Oy. Physical Review B, 90 letters, 109(16):167001, 2012. (5):054514, 2014. 11 Darius H Torchinsky, Fahad Mahmood, Anthony T 23 S Blanco-Canosa, A Frano, E Schierle, J Porras, T Loew, Bollinger, Ivan Boˇzović, and Nuh Gedik. Fluctuating M Minola, M Bluschke, E Weschke, B Keimer, and charge-density waves in a cuprate superconductor. Nature M Le Tacon. Resonant x-ray scattering study of charge- materials, 12(5):387, 2013. density wave correlations in YBa2Cu3O6+x. Physical Re- 12 R Comin, A Frano, Michael Manchun Yee, Y Yoshida, view B, 90(5):054513, 2014. H Eisaki, E Schierle, E Weschke, R Sutarto, F He, Anjan 24 Tao Wu, Hadrien Mayaffre, Steffen Krämer, Mladen Soumyanarayanan, et al. Charge order driven by fermi- Horvatić, Claude Berthier, WN Hardy, Ruixing Liang, arc instability in Bi2Sr2−xLaxCuO6+δ. Science, 343(6169): DA Bonn, and Marc-Henri Julien. Incipient charge or- 390–392, 2014. der observed by NMR in the normal state of YBa2Cu3Oy. 13 R Comin, R Sutarto, F He, EH da Silva Neto, L Chauviere, Nature communications, 6:6438, 2015. A Frano, R Liang, WN Hardy, DA Bonn, Y Yoshida, et al. 25 Xiaoyu Wang, Yuxuan Wang, Yoni Schattner, Erez Berg, Symmetry of charge order in cuprates. Nature materials, and Rafael M Fernandes. Fragility of charge order near an 14(8):796, 2015. antiferromagnetic quantum critical point. Physical review 14 R Comin, R Sutarto, EH da Silva Neto, L Chauviere, letters, 120(24):247002, 2018. R Liang, WN Hardy, DA Bonn, F He, GA Sawatzky, and 26 B Loret, N Auvray, Y Gallais, M Cazayous, A Forget, A Damascelli. Broken translational and rotational symme- D Colson, M-H Julien, I Paul, M Civelli, and A Sacuto. try via charge stripe order in underdoped YBa2Cu3O6+y. Intimate link between charge density wave, pseudogap and Science, 347(6228):1335–1339, 2015. superconducting energy scales in cuprates. Nature Physics, 15 MH Hamidian, Stephen David Edkins, Chung Koo Kim, page 1, 2019. James C Davis, AP Mackenzie, H Eisaki, S Uchida, 27 LD Landau, EM Lifshitz, and LP Pitaevskij. Statistical MJ Lawler, E-A Kim, Subir Sachdev, et al. Atomic-scale physics, part 2: Theory of the condensed state. volume 9, electronic structure of the cuprate d-symmetry form factor chapter 45. 1987. density wave state. Nature Physics, 12(2):150, 2016. 28 Steven A Kivelson, Dung-Hai Lee, Eduardo Fradkin, and 16 Andrej Mesaros, Kazuhiro Fujita, Stephen D Edkins, Mo- Vadim Oganesyan. Competing order in the mixed state of hammad H Hamidian, Hiroshi Eisaki, Shin-ichi Uchida, high-temperature superconductors. Physical Review B, 66 JC Séamus Davis, Michael J Lawler, and Eun-Ah Kim. (14):144516, 2002. 29 Commensurate 4a0-period charge density modulations Zachary M. Raines, Valentin Stanev, and Victor M. throughout the Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x pseudogap regime. Pro- Galitski. Enhancement of superconductivity via pe- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(45): riodic modulation in a three-dimensional model of 12661–12666, 2016. cuprates. Phys. Rev. B, 91:184506, May 2015. doi: 17 AM Gabovich, AI Voitenko, T Ekino, Mai Suan Li, 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.184506. URL https://link.aps. H Szymczak, and M Pe˛ka la. Competition of supercon- org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.184506. ductivity and charge density waves in cuprates: Recent 30 Daniele Fausti, RI Tobey, Nicky Dean, Stefan Kaiser, A Di- evidence and interpretation. Advances in Condensed Mat- enst, Matthias C Hoffmann, S Pyon, T Takayama, H Tak- ter Physics, 2010, 2010. agi, and Andrea Cavalleri. Light-induced superconductiv- 18 J Chang, E Blackburn, AT Holmes, Niels B Chris- ity in a stripe-ordered cuprate. science, 331(6014):189–191, tensen, Jacob Larsen, J Mesot, Ruixing Liang, DA Bonn, 2011. WN Hardy, A Watenphul, et al. Direct observation of 31 Stefan Kaiser, Cassandra R Hunt, Daniele Nicoletti, competition between superconductivity and charge density Wanzheng Hu, Isabella Gierz, HY Liu, M Le Tacon, wave order in YBa2Cu3O6.67. Nature Physics, 8(12):871, T Loew, D Haug, B Keimer, et al. Optically induced coher- 2012. ent transport far above tc in underdoped YBa2Cu3O6+δ. 19 G Ghiringhelli, M Le Tacon, Matteo Minola, S Blanco- Physical Review B, 89(18):184516, 2014. Canosa, Claudio Mazzoli, NB Brookes, GM De Luca, 32 Wanzheng Hu, Stefan Kaiser, Daniele Nicoletti, Cas- A Frano, DG Hawthorn, F He, et al. Long-range in- sandra R Hunt, Isabella Gierz, Matthias C Hoffmann, commensurate charge fluctuations in (Y, Nd)Ba2Cu3O6+x. M Le Tacon, T Loew, B Keimer, and Andrea Cavalleri. Science, 337(6096):821–825, 2012. Optically enhanced coherent transport in YBa2Cu3O6.5 by 20 Tao Wu, Hadrien Mayaffre, Steffen Krämer,Mladen Hor- ultrafast redistribution of interlayer coupling. Nature ma- vatić,Claude Berthier, Philip L Kuhns, Arneil P Reyes, terials, 13(7):705, 2014. Ruixing Liang, WN Hardy, DA Bonn, et al. Emergence of 33 R Mankowsky, A Subedi, M Först,SO Mariager, M Chol- charge order from the vortex state of a high-temperature let, HT Lemke, J. Robinson, JM Glownia, MP Minitti, superconductor. Nature communications, 4:2113, 2013. A Frano, M Fechner, NA Spaldin, T Loew, B Keimer, 21 E Blackburn, J Chang, M Hücker, AT Holmes, Niels Bech A Georges, and A Cavalleri. Nonlinear lattice dynamics as Christensen, Ruixing Liang, DA Bonn, WN Hardy, U Rütt, a basis for enhanced superconductivity in YBa2Cu3O6.5. Olof Gutowski, et al. X-ray diffraction observations of Nature, 516(7529):71–73, 2014. doi:10.1038/nature13875. a charge-density-wave order in superconducting ortho-II URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25471882. 34 YBa2Cu3O6.54 single crystals in zero magnetic field. Phys- Eliza Casandruc, Daniele Nicoletti, Srivats Rajasekaran, ical review letters, 110(13):137004, 2013. Yannis Laplace, Vikaran Khanna, GD Gu, JP Hill, and Andrea Cavalleri. Wavelength-dependent optical 11

enhancement of superconducting interlayer coupling in 52 Subir Sachdev and Rolando La Placa. Bond order in two- La1.885Ba0.115CuO4. Physical Review B, 91(17):174502, dimensional metals with antiferromagnetic exchange inter- 2015. actions. Physical review letters, 111(2):027202, 2013. 35 Daniele Nicoletti and Andrea Cavalleri. Nonlinear light– 53 Yuxuan Wang and Andrey Chubukov. Charge-density- matter interaction at terahertz frequencies. Advances in wave order with momentum (2Q, 0) and (0, 2Q) within Optics and Photonics, 8(3):401–464, 2016. the spin-fermion model: Continuous and discrete symme- 36 SJ Denny, SR Clark, Y Laplace, A Cavalleri, and D Jaksch. try breaking, preemptive composite order, and relation to Proposed parametric cooling of bilayer cuprate supercon- pseudogap in hole-doped cuprates. Physical Review B, 90 ductors by terahertz excitation. Physical review letters, (3):035149, 2014. 114(13):137001, 2015. 54 KB Efetov, H Meier, and C Pépin.Pseudogap state near 37 Michael Knap, Mehrtash Babadi, Gil Refael, Ivar Martin, a quantum critical point. Nature Physics, 9(7):442, 2013. and Eugene Demler. Dynamical cooper pairing in nonequi- 55 AV Chubukov, D Pines, and J Schmalian. A spin fluctua- librium electron-phonon systems. Physical Review B, 94 tion model for d-wave superconductivity. In Superconduc- (21):214504, 2016. tivity, pages 1349–1413. Springer, 2008. 38 Aavishkar A Patel and Andreas Eberlein. Light-induced 56 David Pekker and CM Varma. Amplitude/higgs modes in enhancement of superconductivity via melting of com- condensed matter physics. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter peting bond-density wave order in underdoped cuprates. Phys., 6(1):269–297, 2015. Physical Review B, 93(19):195139, 2016. 57 PA Lee, TM Rice, and PW Anderson. Conductivity from 39 Michael A Sentef, AF Kemper, A Georges, and C Kollath. charge or spin density waves. Solid State Communications, Theory of light-enhanced phonon-mediated superconduc- 88(11-12):1001–1007, 1993. tivity. Physical Review B, 93(14):144506, 2016. 58 TM Rice, PA Lee, and MC Cross. Dynamics of charge- 40 JR Coulthard, Stephen R Clark, S Al-Assam, Andrea Cav- density waves in the presence of free carriers. Physical alleri, and D Jaksch. Enhancement of superexchange pair- Review B, 20(4):1345, 1979. ing in the periodically driven hubbard model. Physical 59 D. A. Browne and K. Levin. Collective modes in charge- Review B, 96(8):085104, 2017. density-wave superconductors. Phys. Rev. B, 28(7):4029– 41 Yao Wang, Cheng-Chien Chen, Brian Moritz, and TP De- 4032, 1983. doi:10.1103/physrevb.28.4029. URL http:// vereaux. Light-enhanced spin fluctuations and d-wave su- dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.28.4029. perconductivity at a phase boundary. Physical review let- 60 Dante M Kennes, Eli Y Wilner, David R Reichman, and ters, 120(24):246402, 2018. Andrew J Millis. Nonequilibrium optical conductivity: 42 Zhiyuan Sun and Andrew J Millis. Transient trapping into General theory and application to transient phases. Phys- metastable states in systems with competing orders. arXiv ical Review B, 96(5):054506, 2017. preprint arXiv:1905.05341, 2019. 61 M Först,A. Frano, S. Kaiser, R. Mankowsky, C. R. Hunt, 43 Hiroaki Niwa, Naotaka Yoshikawa, Kaito Tomari, Ryusuke J. J. Turner, G. L. Dakovski, M. P. Minitti, J. Robin- Matsunaga, Dongjoon Song, Hiroshi Eisaki, and Ryo Shi- son, T. Loew, M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer, J. P. Hill, Andrea mano. Light-induced nonequilibrium response of the su- Cavalleri, and S. S. Dhesi. Femtosecond x rays link melt- perconducting cuprate La2−xSrxCuO4. arXiv preprint ing of charge-density wave correlations and light-enhanced arXiv:1904.07449, 2019. coherent transport in YBa2Cu3O6.6. Phys. Rev. B, 90 44 Nikolaj Bittner, Takami Tohyama, Stefan Kaiser, and Dirk (18):184514, 2014. doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.184514. URL Manske. Possible light-induced superconductivity in a http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.90.184514. strongly correlated electron system. Journal of the Physi- 62 Marinko Jablan, Hrvoje Buljan, and Marin Soljaˇcić.Plas- cal Society of Japan, 88(4):044704, 2019. monics in graphene at infrared frequencies. Physical review 45 Michael A Sentef, Akiyuki Tokuno, Antoine Georges, and B, 80(24):245435, 2009. Corinna Kollath. Theory of laser-controlled competing su- 63 Xiaoguang Luo, Teng Qiu, Weibing Lu, and Zhenhua Ni. perconducting and charge orders. Physical review letters, Plasmons in graphene: recent progress and applications. 118(8):087002, 2017. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 74(11): 46 Andrea Cavalleri. Photo-induced superconductivity. Con- 351–376, 2013. temporary Physics, 59(1):31–46, 2018. 64 Mark B Lundeberg, Yuanda Gao, Reza Asgari, Cheng Tan, 47 Ar Abanov and Andrey V Chubukov. Spin-fermion model Ben Van Duppen, Marta Autore, Pablo Alonso-González, near the quantum critical point: one-loop renormalization Achim Woessner, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, group results. Physical review letters, 84(24):5608, 2000. et al. Tuning quantum nonlocal effects in graphene plas- 48 Max A Metlitski and Subir Sachdev. Quantum phase tran- monics. Science, 357(6347):187–191, 2017. sitions of metals in two spatial dimensions. ii. spin density 65 David Alcaraz Iranzo, SébastienNanot, Eduardo JC Dias, wave order. Physical Review B, 82(7):075128, 2010. Itai Epstein, Cheng Peng, Dmitri K Efetov, Mark B Lun- 49 DN Basov, MM Fogler, and FJ Garc´ıa De Abajo. Po- deberg, Romain Parret, Johann Osmond, Jin-Yong Hong, laritons in van der waals materials. Science, 354(6309): et al. Probing the ultimate plasmon confinement limits aag1992, 2016. with a van der waals heterostructure. Science, 360(6386): 50 Note1. In general, to create surface plasmon-polaritons, 291–295, 2018. one sandwiches a metal between two dielectric slabs, one 66 D Nicoletti, E Casandruc, D Fu, P Giraldo-Gallo, of which can be air, as depicted in Fig.1. IR Fisher, and A Cavalleri. Anomalous relaxation ki- 51 Jay D Sau and Subir Sachdev. Mean-field theory of com- netics and charge-density-wave correlations in underdoped peting orders in metals with antiferromagnetic exchange BaPb1−xBixO3. Proceedings of the National Academy of interactions. Physical Review B, 89(7):075129, 2014. Sciences, 114(34):9020–9025, 2017. 67 Sudip Chakravarty, RB Laughlin, Dirk K Morr, and Chetan Nayak. Hidden order in the cuprates. Physical Review B, 63(9):094503, 2001. 12

IV. APPENDIX

A. Phason dispersion near half-ﬁlling

In this section, we present our results for the dispersion relation of BDW phasons near half ﬁlling. In this limit, we are able to go beyond a low energy “hot-spot” model. However, since the dispersion relation of the quasiparticles has nodal lines in the Brillouin zone the momentum integrals appearing in the particle-hole correlations need to be regularized. At low dopings the Hubbard model on a square lattice is susceptible to the formation of d-wave charge density waves at wavevector Q = (π, π) [67]. Therefore, in the following, we assume a density-density interaction whose dominant mean-ﬁeld solution is a d-wave BDW state

ρ−ρ X † † 0 Q−q Q−q Hint = − gfkfk c Q−q ck+ ;σc 0 Q−q 0 ck0− ;σ0 , (A.1) k− 2 ;σ 2 k + 2 ;σ 2 k,k0,q where fk is the d-wave symmetry factor fk = cos(kx) − cos(ky) and Q = (π, π). It should be borne in mind that unlike the hot-spot model, here, the momentum summations are initially evaluated over the whole Brillouin zone. However, BDW phase, in order to avoid overcounting the fermionic degrees of freedom, the new Brillouin zone should be identified with the magnetic Brillouin zone of the original square lattice model to reflect the period doubling due to symmetry breaking. Doing so introduces an additional index for fermions, describing A or B site within the period-doubled lattice. The BDW order parameter is then defined as

X † Φq = g fkc Q−q ck− Q−q , (A.2) k+ 2 2 k where we sum over all internal fermionic indices. After condensing the interaction Hamiltonian at hΦq=0i = φ the mean-ﬁeld Hamiltonian becomes ! Q −fkφ 1 X † k− 2 2 HMF = Ψk Ψk + φ , (A.3) −fkφ k+ Q g k 2

† † † where Ψk = (c Q , c Q ). Also, the dispersion relation can be described by the ﬁrst and second nearest neighbor k− 2 k+ 2 hoppings t and t0,

0 k = −2t(cos kxa + cos kya) + 4t cos(kxa) cos(kya). (A.4)

Notice that the only diﬀerence of this MF Hamiltonian and the hot-spot model is the fact that the symmetry factor fk appears in the oﬀ-diagonal component of the Hamiltonian vertex. The energy of the quasiparticles when the nearest neighbor hopping is included reads q d 2 2 2 dk = (k) + fkφ (A.5)

m,d 1 where k = 2 (k+Q/2 ± k−Q/2). The self-consistency equation for the coupling strength g is obtained at the saddle point of the eﬀective action

2 −1 X fk g = nF (−dk) − nF (dk) . (A.6) 2dk k The BDW dispersion and its optical coupling can be studied by incorporating the interaction ﬂuctuations over the MF solution m d X † eAq.(v − v ) −ifkΦq k k q Hint = Ψk+ q m d Ψk− . (A.7) 2 ifkΦq eAq.(v + v ) 2 k,q k k The calculation of the Green’s function of the phason ﬁelds is similar to the main text’s derivation and follows from Eq.29

−1 0 −1 φ Dq = (Dq ) + Πq 2 1 X f h (φ) (φ) i = + k 1 − f˜ χvv + χcc + 1 + f˜ χvc + χcv . (A.8) g 4 k,q q q k,q q q k 13

˜(φ) As before the coherence factors fk,q display the rotation of spinors from the 1, 2 basis to the v, c bands,

2 q q d d φ fk+ fk− + k+ q k− q ˜(φ) 2 2 2 2 fk,q = . (A.9) d q d q k+ 2 k− 2

The phason’s dispersion relation is determined from the poles of Dq. At the zero-temperature limit these poles can be calculated analytically by expanding the Green’s function in powers of the momentum q. This expansion is more conveniently performed in a π/4-rotated basis q˜x,y = qx ± qy, because the momentum summation must be performed in the magnetic Brillouin zone |q˜x,y| ≤ π, " # 2 2 ˜ 2 ˜ −1 X fk 2 dk ˜ 3ω q˜ij∂ijdk 1 ˜ dq˜ijmn∂ijmndk Dq = 3 −ω + q˜ij∂ijdk + − q˜ij∂ijdk + (A.10) 8d 2 8dk 16 96 k k + O ω4, q6 , (A.11)

˜ ∂2 where we have introduced the compact notation q˜ij =q ˜iq˜j, and ∂ij = . Also according to the Einstein notation ∂k˜i∂k˜j a summation over the repeated coordinate indices is presumed. Note that the momentum integrals in the above are divergent. This is because the energy gap has nodal lines along kx = −ky q 2 2 2 2 dk = φ (cos(kx) − cos(ky)) + t (sin(kx) + sin(ky)) (A.12)

Furthermore, it can be shown that inclusion of longer-range hopping amplitudes when constrained to preserve the C4 symmetry of the square lattice does not eliminate this nodal line. Therefore, to regularize the integrals we consider a small C4-symmetry breaking hopping which makes the integrals ﬁnite yet large. Therefore, to evaluate the zeros −1 of the inverse Green’s function Dq , we need to consider the terms with the most divergent behavior. Under this constraint we reach

2 " 2 2 # X f (˜qxq˜y) D−1 ≈ k ∂˜ d − ω2 . (A.13) q 2d3 16 xy k k k

Recalling that q˜x,y = (qx ± qy), we can see that the dispersion relation of the phason ﬁeld up to some regularization- dependent coeﬃcient is

ω ∝ |(qx − qy)(qx + qy)| . (A.14)

Note that similar to the results of the hot-spot model in the extreme limit of θδ = 0, the dispersion relation could be a function of (qx ± qy) factors. Hence, at the low-doping limit, the anisotropic symmetry structure of the phason ﬁeld becomes more pronounced. It should be also pointed out that the peculiar quadratic dispersion which arises at this −1 level of the truncation of the Taylor expansion of Dq , is due to the fact that in our model the manifold in which the band gap vanishes is a 1D nodal line instead of some isolated nodal points. Therefore, for more generic models, where the singularity of the correlation functions is a discrete zero-dimensional manifold, one should reproduce the more conventional linear behavior which is expected for phase modes.