Eucrim Issue 01/2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eucrim Issue 01/2021 eucrim 2021 / 1 THE EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW ASSOCIATIONS‘ FORUM EPPO Now Operational – Perspectives from European Prosecutors Le parquet européen désormais opérationnel – Perspectives des procureurs européens Die EUStA nimmt ihre Arbeit auf – Perspektiven der Europäischen Staatsanwälte Editorial Laura Codruţa Kövesi (European Chief Prosecutor) Perspectives from European Prosecutors: Frédéric Baab (Procureur européen, France) Danilo Ceccarelli (Deputy European Chief Prosecutor, European Prosecutor, Italy) José Eduardo Guerra (European Prosecutor, Portugal) Petr Klement (European Prosecutor, Czechia) Tamara Laptos (European Prosecutor, Croatia) Ingrid Maschl-Clausen (European Prosecutor, Austria) Maria Concepción Sabadell Carnicero (European Prosecutor, Spain) Gabriel Seixas (European Prosecutor, Luxembourg) Kristel Siitam-Nyiri (European Prosecutor, Estonia) Yves Van Den Berge (European Prosecutor, Belgium) Dimitrios Zimianitis (European Prosecutor, Greece) 2021/ 1 ISSUE / ÉDITION / AUSGABE The Associations for European Criminal Law and the Protection of Financial Interests of the EU is a network of academics and practitioners. The aim of this cooperation is to develop a European criminal law which both respects civil liberties and at the same time protects European citizens and the European institutions effectively. Joint seminars, joint research projects and annual meetings of the associations’ presidents are organised to achieve this aim. Contents News* Articles European Union Procedural Criminal Law EPPO Now Operational – Perspec- Foundations 26 Procedural Safeguards tives from European Prosecutors 3 Fundamental Rights 28 Data Protection 5 Reform of the European Union 31 Freezing of Assets 6 Area of Freedom, Security 45 Le parquet européen: un projet entre and Justice Cooperation audace et réalisme politique – Frédéric Baab 8 Schengen 32 Customs Cooperation 8 Legislation 32 European Arrest Warrant 47 A Legal Obstacle in the Regulation? – 37 European Investigation Danilo Ceccarelli Institutions Order 49 The Material Competence of the EPPO 10 Council 37 Criminal Records and the Concept of Inextricably Linked Offences – 12 European Court of Justice 38 Law Enforcement José Eduardo Guerra 12 OLAF Cooperation 14 European Public Prosecutor’s 51 Reporting of Crime Mechanisms and the Office Interaction Between the EPPO and OLAF 15 Europol as Key Future Challenges – Petr Klement 16 Eurojust 17 European Judicial Network Council of Europe 53 EPPO – Diversity and Challenges in Investigation 17 Frontex and Prosecution in 22 Member States – Tamara Laptos 19 Agency for Fundamental Foundations Rights 39 European Court of Human 55 The Permanent Chambers at the Heart Rights of the EPPO’s Decision-Making – Specific Areas of Crime / Ingrid Maschl-Clausen Substantive Criminal Law Specific Areas of Crime 57 The Independence of the European Public 19 Protection of Financial 39 Corruption Interests Prosecutor’s Office – Maria Concepción Sabadell Carnicero 20 Money Laundering Procedural Criminal Law 21 Tax Evasion 42 CCPE 59 Opportunities and Challenges in Cases Involving 22 Counterfeiting & Piracy Proceeds of Crime – Gabriel Seixas 22 Organised Crime 23 Cybercrime 61 EPPO and Digital Challenges – Kristel Siitam-Nyiri 25 Environmental Crime 25 Racism and Xenophobia 63 Role of the Belgian Investigative Judge in EPPO Cases – Yves Van Den Berge 65 EPPO: A Challenging Balance-Striking Exercise in the National and EU Judicial Environment – Dimitrios Zimianitis * The news items contain Internet links referring to more detailed information. These links are embedded into the news text. They can be easily accessed by clicking on the underlined text in the online version of the journal. If an external website features multiple languages, the Internet links generally refer to the English version. For other language versions, please navigate using the external website. Editorial Dear Readers, I have been a prosecutor for half of my life. I have combat- perspective, the EPPO is the ted high-level corruption for many years and possess firsthand first powerful tool to defend the experience in the vital importance of fairness, the willingness rule of law in the EU. to comply with commonly agreed rules, the ability to admin- ister justice − in other words, the rule of law. This is the core Lastly, from my perspective, strength of the European Union for me and, I am sure, for mil- even if I agree that setting up lions of European citizens who grew up under dictatorial re- a prosecutor’s office at the EU gimes in a divided Europe: our only effective way to ensure level is a complex and sensitive the rule of law is true democracy in a globalized world. issue, if we wish to make the EPPO work in an efficient and One of the new instruments that can play a key role in this independent manner, the choic- respect is the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). It es to be made are ultimately is the outcome of more than twenty years of convincing argu- straightforward. These are the ments and negotiations, and it marks one of the most ambi- key questions that need to be Laura Codruţa Kövesi tious European integration projects of the last decade. answered before we can assess whether the EPPO is capable of fulfilling its potential: The EPPO is a specialized prosecution office. Any fraud in- Can we agree that the European Delegated Prosecutors volving EU funds or serious cross-border VAT fraud commit- should work full-time for the EPPO? ted in the participating Member States after November 2017 Can we agree how many prosecutors there should be in falls within our jurisdiction. As we have a mandatory com- each of the Member States in order to do the job properly? petence, it is our legal obligation to investigate all new cases What types of support and equipment will they receive? from the day we start operations. What will the overall budget of the EPPO be? Will the EPPO’s central office be able to analyze all the In practice, 22 European Prosecutors in Luxemburg will over- available information in order to genuinely improve cross- see investigations initiated by the European Delegated Pros- border investigations? ecutors in the participating Member States. The European Will the EPPO’s central office be able to improve the iden- Delegated Prosecutors will be active members of the judici- tification of criminal assets, thus helping the Member States ary in their respective national systems, and they will perform improve the recovery of damages? prosecutorial functions before the national courts. Our work is that of true pioneers. I am convinced that we are This is the basic definition and description of the EPPO, but ready. And we are not alone. We can count on the European what does it mean? Court of Justice, with all its authority and decisive jurispru- dence. I am confident that we can also count on our fellow From a magistrate’s point of view, the EPPO is the most excit- prosecutors, judges, and police officers in the Member States. ing challenge of our generation. For the first time, a European Union body will investigate, prosecute, and bring to trial crim- Why will the EPPO be a game changer in the fight against inal offences. Of course, it will not be easy to find solutions fraud involving European funds? for 22 different judicial systems, especially because there is no precedent for a European Public Prosecutor’s Office. Until now, the level of protection of the financial interests of the EU varied across the Member States. In some Member From a political perspective, the EPPO establishes a trans- States, thousands of investigations have taken place, while in fer of sovereignty and a new instrument to protect the Union other Member States, there were two or even fewer cases per budget in the 22 participating Member States. From a citizen’s year. From now on, the investigation and prosecution of these eucrim 1 / 2021 | 1 EPPO NOW OPERATIONal – PERSPECTIVES FROM EUROPEAN PROSECUTORS crimes will be a priority for all the European Delegated Pros- We also adopted our financial regulation, our data protection ecutors. This alone should already increase the overall level of rules, and the rules on public access to documents. protection for European funds. The preparation of internal governance tools, such as the code The second, key expected improvement is the likely increase of good administrative behavior, an anti-fraud strategy, and in the efficiency of investigations. The EPPO will be inde- internal control standards, is well underway. We are also final- pendent from national governments, the Commission, and izing our operational templates in addition to the investigation other European institutions, bodies, and agencies. This is very and prosecution policy of the EPPO and related guidelines. important, because the independence of the institution and the independence of prosecutors is the first premise for obtaining We just signed a working arrangement with Europol and Eu- efficient results when fighting corruption and other serious rojust and expect one with OLAF to be signed soon. Discus- crime. Without this independence, we cannot talk about the sions on cooperation between the EPPO and the Commission rule of law or about equality in the face of the law. Independ- are progressing well. We initiated negotiations on working ence is a crucial, basic rule for the functioning of the EPPO. arrangements with non-participating Member States and are And this should be the model followed by all the national pub- about to sign such an arrangement with Hungary. We decided lic prosecutor’s offices. on the number and composition of the permanent chambers – the true engine of the EPPO. A first version of our case man- The main characteristic of the type of criminality that the agement system has already been developed. EPPO will tackle is the speed with which criminals shift their modus operandi in reaction to law enforcement actions. All in all, at the central level, we are ready. We are now wait- ing for the Member States to nominate enough candidates as The EPPO has unprecedented possibilities to act in this re- European Delegated Prosecutors to be able to start.
Recommended publications
  • Dismissed! Victims of 2015-2018 Brutal Crackdowns in the Democratic Republic of Congo Denied Justice
    DISMISSED! VICTIMS OF 2015-2018 BRUTAL CRACKDOWNS IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO DENIED JUSTICE Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2020 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: “Dismissed!”. A drawing by Congolese artist © Justin Kasereka (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2020 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: AFR 62/2185/2020 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 2. METHODOLOGY 9 3. BACKGROUND: POLITICAL CRISIS 10 3.1 ATTEMPTS TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION 10 3.2 THE « GLISSEMENT »: THE LONG-DRAWN-OUT ELECTORAL PROCESS 11 3.3 ELECTIONS AT LAST 14 3.3.1 TIMELINE 15 4. VOICES OF DISSENT MUZZLED 19 4.1 ARBITRARY ARRESTS, DETENTIONS AND SYSTEMATIC BANS ON ASSEMBLIES 19 4.1.1 HARASSMENT AND ARBITRARY ARRESTS OF PRO-DEMOCRACY ACTIVISTS AND OPPONENTS 20 4.1.2 SYSTEMATIC AND UNLAWFUL BANS ON ASSEMBLY 21 4.2 RESTRICTIONS OF THE RIGHT TO SEEK AND RECEIVE INFORMATION 23 5.
    [Show full text]
  • European Commission
    COMMISSION EUROPEENNE Bruxelles, le 7 mars 2014 CALENDRIER du 10 au 16 mars 2014 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Déplacements et visites Lundi 10 mars Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council Eurogroup meeting European Parliament plenary session Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO attends the EU Innovation Conference Ms Catherine ASHTON travels to Teheran (Iran) Ms Neelie KROES opens Cyber Security Conference at CEBIT in Hannover (Germany) Mr Janez POTOČNIK delivers a speech "If environment and sustainability join social justice as the two key issues with economic success, what then are the key business government issues?" at the Ad Hoc Council annual meeting in Brussels (Belgium) Mr Andris PIEBALGS meets with Mr Abdou DIOUF, Secretary-General of La Francophonie in Paris (France) Mr Michel BARNIER receives Lord YOUNGER, UK Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Intellectual Property at the Department for Business Innovation and Skills Ms Androulla VASSILIOU visits Bucharest (10-11/03): visits together with Mr Georges SOROS and Romanian Minister of Education various Roma projects around Bucharest; opens the Conference on "Keeping Young People in Employment, Education and Training; meets with students of the Roma Education Fund (Romania) Mr Karel DE GUCHT visits Atlanta (USA) Ms Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN gives the award for the EU Prize for European Women Innovators 2014, at the 'Innovation Convention' in Brussels (Belgium) Ms Maria DAMANAKI in Athens: delivers keynote speech at the High Level Conference on Maritime and Coastal Tourism; attends informal tourism ministerial meeting (Greece) Mr Günther H. OETTINGER receives European Affairs Committee of the Bavarian Parliament, Brussels (Belgium) Mr Günther H.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendrier Du Lundi 26 Avril Au 2 Mai 2021 Brussels, 23 April 2021 (Susceptible De Modifications En Cours De Semaine) Déplacements Et Visites
    European Commission - Weekly activities Calendrier du lundi 26 avril au 2 mai 2021 Brussels, 23 April 2021 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Déplacements et visites Lundi 26 avril 2021 President Ursula von der Leyen receives Mr Aleksandar Vučić, President of Serbia. President Ursula von der Leyen receives Mr Philippe Lamberts, Member of the European Parliament and Co-President of the Greens/EFA. President Ursula von der Leyen meets with Mr Manfred Weber, Member of the European Parliament and Chair of the EPP Group. President Ursula von der Leyen participates in the EP Plenary debates on Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 25 and 26 March and outcome of the high level meeting between the EU and Turkey. Mr Frans Timmermans receives Ms Barbara Pompili, Minister for the Ecological Transition of France. Ms Margrethe Vestager receives Mr Cătălin Drulă, Minister for Transport and Infrastructure of Romania. Mr Josep Borrell receives Mr Vincent Biruta, Minister for Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Rwanda. Mr Josep Borrell receives Mr Aleksandar Vučić, President of Serbia. Mr Maroš Šefčovič holds a videoconference call with Mr Frédéric Bierry, President of the European Collectivity of Alsace, and Mr Jean Rottner, President of the Grand Est Region (France). Mr Margaritis Schinas meets via videoconference Senior students from the 5th High School of Kavala (Greece). Mr Margaritis Schinas participates via videoconference in the EIF-EIT Digital EFSI agreement Signing Ceremony. Mr Valdis Dombrovskis participates via videoconference in the EU Trade Policy Day 2021. Mr Valdis Dombrovskis holds a videoconference call with Mr João Leão, Minister of Finance of Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • GROUP of STATES AGAINST CORRUPTION (GRECO) Anti-Corruption Trends, Challenges and Good Practices in Europe & the United States of America PREMS 024921
    GROUP OF STATES AGAINST CORRUPTION (GRECO) Anti-corruption trends, challenges and good practices in Europe & the United States of America PREMS 024921 Feature article: Anti-corruption body Justice Commissioner Didier REYNDERS, of the Council of Europe European Commission 21st General Activity Report (2020) 21st General Activity Report (2020) of the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) Anti-corruption trends, challenges and good practices in Europe & the United States of America Adopted by GRECO (March 2021) Feature article: Justice Commissioner Didier REYNDERS, European Commission Council of Europe French edition: 21e Rapport général d’activités (2020) du Groupe d’États contre la corruption www.coe.int/greco All requests concerning the reproduction or translation of all or part of this document should be addressed to the Directorate of Communication (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). All other correspondence concerning this document should be addressed to the GRECO Secretariat, Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law. Cover and layout: Document and Publications Production Department (SPDP), Council of Europe This publication has not been copy-edited by the SPDP Editorial Unit to correct typographical and grammatical errors. Cover photo: Shutterstock Photos: GRECO © Council of Europe, April 2021 Printed at the Council of Europe CONTENTS INTRODUCTION BY THE PRESIDENT 5 KEY FINDINGS 8 4th Round – Evaluation and compliance 8 5th Round – Evaluation and compliance 9 FEATURE ARTICLE 16 FRAMEWORK FOR GRECO’S ONGOING
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the New Commission
    A guide to the new Commission allenovery.com 2 A guide to the new Commission © Allen & Overy LLP 2019 3 A guide to the new Commission On 10 September, Commission President-elect Ursula von der Leyen announced the new European Commission. There were scarcely any leaks in advance about the structure of the new Commission and the allocation of dossiers which indicates that the new Commission President-elect will run a very tight ship. All the Commission candidates will need approval from the European Parliament in formal hearings before they can take up their posts on 1 November. Von der Leyen herself won confirmation in July and the Spanish Commissioner Josep Borrell had already been confirmed as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Policy and Security Policy. The new College of Commissioners will have eight Vice-Presidents technological innovation and the taxation of digital companies. and of these three will be Executive Vice-Presidents with supercharged The title Mrs Vestager has been given in the President-elect’s mission portfolios with responsibility for core topics of the Commission’s letter is ‘Executive Vice-President for a Europe fit for the Digital Age’. agenda. Frans Timmermans (Netherlands) and Margrethe Vestager The fact that Mrs Vestager has already headed the Competition (Denmark), who are incumbent Commissioners and who were both portfolio in the Juncker Commission combined with her enhanced candidates for the Presidency, were rewarded with major portfolios. role as Executive Vice-President for Digital means that she will be Frans Timmermans, who was a Vice-President and Mr Junker’s a powerful force in the new Commission and on the world stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Twitter Accounts Compiled in May 2016 By
    Diplomatic Twitter accounts Compiled in May 2016 by www.unfoldzero.org Twitter accounts: Europe Andorra Prime Minister: Mr. Antoni Martí @GovernAndorra Albania President: Mr. Bujar Nishani @BujarNishani Prime Minister: Mr. Edi Rama, @ediramaal Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Ditmir Bushati @AlbanianMFA UN office in Geneva @AlMissionUNGen Austria Federal Chancellor: Mr. Werner Faymann @Werner_Faymann Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Sebastian Kurz @MFA_Austria Belarus Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Vladimir Makei @BelarusMFA UN office in Geneva @BelarusUNOG Belgium Prime Minister: Mr. Charles Michel @CharlesMichel Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Didier Reynders @dreynders Bosnia and President: Mr. Bakir Izetbegović @B_Izetbegovic Herzegovina Prime Minister: Mr. Denis Zvizdić @DrZvizdic Bulgaria President: Mr. Rosen Plevneliev @PlevnelievRP Prime Minister: Mr. Boyko Borissov @BoykoBorissov Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Daniel Mitov @MFABulgaria Croatia President: Mrs. Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović @KolindaGK Prime Minister: Mr. Tihomir Orešković @ZoranMilanovi Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Miro Kovač @MVEP_hr Czech Republic President: Mr. Miloš Zeman @MZemanOficialni Prime Minister: Mr. Bohuslav Sobotka @SlavekSobotka Minister of Foreign Affairs: Lubomír Zaorálek @ZaoralekL Denmark Prime Minister: Mr. Lars Løkke Rasmussen @larsloekke Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Kristian Jensen @UM_dk UN office in Geneva @DKUNmisgva Estonia President: Mr. Toomas Hendrik Ilves @IlvesToomas Prime Minister: Mr. Taavi Rõivas @TaaviRoivas Finland President: Mr. Sauli Niinistö @TPKanslia Prime Minister: Mr. Juha Sipilä @juhasipila Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr. Timo Soini @Ulkoministeriö UN office in Geneva @FinlandGeneva France President: Mr. François Hollande @fhollande Page 1 Diplomatic Twitter accounts Compiled in May 2016 by www.unfoldzero.org Prime Minister: Mr. Manuel Valls @manuelvalls Minister of Foreign Affairs: Mr Jean-Marc Ayrault @jeanmarcayrault UN office in Geneva @FranceONUGeneve Germany Chancellor: Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Trombinoscope ASEM11 Carla 2
    15-16 July 2016 List of participants as of 14 July ASEAN SECRETARIAT Le Luong Minh Secretary general ASEF Zhang Yan Executive Director AUSTRALIA Ric Wells Deputy Secretary AUSTRIA Muna Dudzar Secretary of State BANGLADESH Sheikh Hasina Prime Minister BELGIUM Didier Reynders Deputy PM/ Foreign Minister BRUNEI DARUSSALAM Magdalene Teo Ambassador to China BULGARIA Rosen Plevneliev President 15-16 JULY 2016 | EN | Participants CAMBODIA Hun Sen Prime Minister CHINA Li Keqiang Premier CROATIA Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovi ć President CYPRUS Nicos Anastasiades President CZECH REPUBLIC Miloš Zeman President DENMARK Kristian Jensen Foreign minister ÉIRE/IRELANDE Charles Flanagan Foreign minister ESTONIA Taavi Rõivas Prime Minister Participants | EN | 15-16 JULY 2016 EUROPEAN COUNCIL Donald Tusk President EUROPEAN COMMISSION Jean-Claude Juncker President EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE Federica Mogherini High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy FINLAND Juha Sipilä Prime Minister FRANCE Jean-Marc Ayrault Foreign Minister GERMANY Angela Merkel Federal Chancellor GREECE Nikos Kotzias Foreign Minister HUNGARY Péter Szijjártó Foreign minister 15-16 JULY 2016 | EN | Participants INDIA Mohammad Hamid Ansari Vice President INDONESIA Muhammad Kalla Vice President ITALY Paolo Gentiloni Foreign minister JAPAN Abe Shinzo Prime Minister KAZAKHSTAN Karim Massimov Prime minister KOREA Geun-hye Park President LAOS Thongloun Sisoulith Prime minister LATVIA Raimonds V ējonis President Participants | EN | 15-16 JULY 2016 LITHUANIA Alirdas Butkevi čius
    [Show full text]
  • Homicidehijacking Trafficking in Wildlife
    Terrorism HomicideHijacking Trafficking in wildlife Burglary Assault Piracy Corruption Kidnapping 0207 Illicit enrichment 0308014 Smuggling of migrants Child pornography 0609 Sexual exploitation rty 05 Trafficking in persons Deprivation of libe Robbery Fraud Theft Forced labour Rape INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF CRIME FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES (ICCS) VERSION 1.0 February 2015 2013 Copyright © 2015, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Acknowledgments The development of the International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes was coordinated by the UNODC Research and Trend Analysis Branch (RAB), Division of Policy Analysis and Public Affairs (DPA), under the supervision of Jean-Luc Lemahieu, Director of DPA, Angela Me, Chief of RAB, and Chloé Carpentier, Chief of RAB Statistics and Surveys Section. Core team Research coordination and report preparation Enrico Bisogno Michael Jandl Lucia Motolinia Carballo Felix Reiterer Atsuki Takahashi Graphic design and layout: Suzanne Kunnen Kristina Kuttnig Editing: Jonathan Gibbons The International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes (ICCS) was developed using the “Principles and framework for an international classification of crimes for statistical purposes” produced by the UNECE-UNODC Joint Task Force on Crime Classification and endorsed by the Conference of European Statisticians in 2012. The ICCS was produced on the basis of the plan to finalize by 2015 an international classification of crime for statistical purposes, as approved by the Statistical Commission in its decision 44/110 and by the Economic and Social Council in its resolution 2013/37. Gratitude is expressed to all Member States, international organizations and individual experts who contributed to the development of the ICCS. The continuous support of the UNODC-INEGI Center of Excellence on Statistics on Governance, Public Safety, Victimization and Justice is gratefully acknowledged, as is the contribution of Steven Malby who developed the initial concept of the classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Ë‚Ó·Ó‰‡ Ë Ëë„Û ÌÓÒÚ Freedom and Security
    ëÔËÒ‡ÌË Á‡ ÔÓÎËÚË͇, ËÍÓÌÓÏË͇ Ë ‡Á‚ËÚË ̇ „‡Ê‰‡ÌÒÍÓÚÓ Ó·˘ÂÒÚ‚Ó 53 äÓÌ„ÂÒ Ì‡ ã˷‡ÎÌËfl àÌÚÂ̇ˆËÓ̇Πë‚Ó·Ó‰‡ Ë ëË„ÛÌÓÒÚ Freedom and Security 53rd Liberal International Congress ËÁ‰‡ÌË ̇ ꉇ͈ËÓÌÂÌ ÍÓÏÂÌÚ‡ Editorial ë‚Ó·Ó‰‡ Ë ÒË„ÛÌÓÒÚ Freedom and Security Ç Ì‡˜‡ÎÓÚÓ Ì‡ ÌÓ‚ÓÚÓ ıËÎfl‰ÓÎÂÚË ҂ÂÚ˙Ú Ò ËÁÔ‡‚Ë In the beginning of the new millennium, the world is faced with Ô‰ ÌÓ‚Ë Ô‰ËÁ‚Ë͇ÚÂÎÒÚ‚‡ ‚ ӷ·ÒÚÚ‡ ̇ Ò‚Ó·Ó‰‡Ú‡ Ë new challenges in the area of freedom and security. The tragic ÒË„ÛÌÓÒÚÚ‡. 퇄˘ÌËÚ Ò˙·ËÚËfl ‚ ëÄô ÓÚ 11 ÒÂÔÚÂÏ‚- events from September 11, 2001 in the USA and from March 11, Ë 2001 „. Ë ‚ àÒÔ‡ÌËfl ÓÚ 11 Ï‡Ú 2004 „. ÔÓÏÂÌËı‡ ÓÚÌÓ- 2004 in Spain changed the attitude towards security on a glob- ¯ÂÌËÂÚÓ Í˙Ï ÒË„ÛÌÓÒÚÚ‡ ‚ „ÎÓ·‡ÎÂÌ Ï‡˘‡· Ë ÔÓÒÚ‡‚Ëı‡ al scale and posed the question of the boundaries of freedom. ‚˙ÔÓÒ‡ Á‡ „‡ÌˈËÚ ̇ Ò‚Ó·Ó‰‡Ú‡. ë˙‚ÂÏÂÌÌËflÚ Ò‚ÂÚÓ- The world terrorism, poverty, threat of international conflicts, ‚ÂÌ ÚÂÓËÁ˙Ï, ·Â‰ÌÓÒÚÚ‡, Á‡Ô·ı‡Ú‡ ÓÚ ÏÂʉۉ˙ʇ‚ÌË menace of biological and other weapons of mass destruction, ÍÓÌÙÎËÍÚË, ÓÚ ËÁÔÓÎÁ‚‡ÌÂÚÓ Ì‡ ·ËÓÎӄ˘ÌË Ë ‰Û„Ë Ó˙ÊËfl organized crime, and ethnic conflicts are the realities, which the Á‡ χÒÓ‚Ó ÛÌˢÓʇ‚‡ÌÂ, Ó„‡ÌËÁˇ̇ڇ ÔÂÒÚ˙ÔÌÓÒÚ Ë contemporary liberal society ought to address.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World Report, Belgium
    6/5/2020 Belgium | Freedom House FREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2020 Belgium 96 FREE /100 Political Rights 39 /40 Civil Liberties 57 /60 LAST YEAR'S SCORE & STATUS 96 /100 Free Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See the methodology. https://freedomhouse.org/country/belgium/freedom-world/2020 1/13 6/5/2020 Belgium | Freedom House Overview Belgium is a stable electoral democracy with a long record of peaceful transfers of power. Political rights and civil liberties are legally guaranteed and largely respected. Major concerns in recent years have included the threat of terrorism, and corruption scandals that have unsettled the country’s complex institutional setting and political landscape. Key Developments in 2019 The federal and regional elections in May shifted the established balance of power in Belgian politics: parties on the far-left and far-right of the political spectrum gained seats, while establishment parties saw their support dwindle. No governing coalition had been formed by the end of the year. In October, police rescued 12 migrants in the back of a refrigerated truck in a highway parking area in the north of the country. Authorities were investigating the existence of a human trafficking ring; two days before this, British officials had found 39 people dead in the back of a truck entering the United Kingdom from Belgium. Political Rights A. Electoral Process A1 0-4 pts Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The Belgian monarchy is largely ceremonial, although the king retains constitutional authority to mediate the process of government formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Vlaams Belang Zit Op Rozen
    75ste jaargang • nummer 38 • donderdag 19 september 2019 Weekblad P608721 Afgiftekantoor 2099 Antwerpen X € 2,50 Voor mensen met een goed hart en een slecht karakter... “Vragen bij de compatibiliteit van UNIA met de grondwettelijke scheiding der machten” Gelijkekansencentrum UNIA is en blijft een weinig geliefde instel- ling in (centrum)rechtse kringen. Professor en conservatief denker Matthias Storme (N-VA) zetelt er inmiddels vijf jaar in het bestuur en getuigt onder meer over het doorge- slagen linkse gedachtegoed bij Unia. Hoe ziet Storme de toekomst van UNIA? Wat met de antidis- criminatiewetgeving en moet Dries Van Langenhove gestraft worden? Vlaams Belang Een gesprek. zit op rozen Lees het interview met Matthias Storme, Er is geen peiling voor nodig. Op het partijhoofdkwartier het Madouplein is men er ge- rust in: het Vlaams Belang zit als uitgesproken oppositiepartij in een comfortabele posi- prof en UNIA-bestuurder (N-VA), op blz. 11 tie en kan in 2024 oogsten. Daar zijn vier redenen voor. 1. N-VA in een federale sitie: Vlaams Belang is zui- Belang een gemakkelijkere schiet- PS-regering: vijf jaar hak- verder op de graat schijf van voor N-VA. Ondanks de ken in de Kamer meningsverschillen rond integratie Gewelddadige illegalen Een Vlaams-nationalistisch blok en Belgische versus Vlaamse iden- De parking aan de E34 op de gemeentegrens tussen Vosselaar en Stapt de N-VA in een federale van N-VA en Vlaams Belang in de titeit zijn er op sociaaleconomisch Gierle, een deelgemeente van Lille, is een verzamelplaats gewor- Bourgondische coalitie met de PS? Kamer tegen een paarsgroene re- vlak veel raakpunten tussen N-VA den voor mensensmokkelaars en transmigranten.
    [Show full text]
  • KYOS Online Curriculum 2021 Market Abuse
    Market Abuse Online curriculum KYOS Online training MARKET ABUSE 2 ONLINE CURRICULUM COURSES – INCLUDING EXAMINATION & CERTIFICATION Page 5 Misconduct at Work (MISCONDUCT) 6 1. Concepts – Conduct versus Misconduct 7 2. Concepts – Morality, ethics & integrity 8 3. Ethics in the workplace – Discrimination 9 4. Ethics in the workplace – Harassment 10 5. Ethics in the workplace – Sexual intimidation 11 6. Governance – Conflicts of interests & moral dilemmas 12 7. Governance – Rules & codes 13 8. Governance – KYC 14 9. Governance – Whistleblowing policy 15 10. Governance – Anti-retaliation policy 16 11. Culture – Corporate climate 17 12. Culture – Remuneration 18 Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR) 19 1. Background & Scope 20 2. Conduct Rules 21 3. Certification Regime 22 4. Senior Managers Regime 23 Data protection (DP) 24 1. Data protection & privacy 25 Financial crime (FC) 26 1. Introduction to financial crime 27 2. Money laundering 28 3. Terrorist financing 29 4. Bribery 30 5. Financial fraud 31 6. Tax fraud 32 7. Employee fraud 33 8. Market abuse 34 Market Abuse (MA) 3 1. 1EU regulations & institutions 36 2. REMIT 37 3. MAR 38 4. Ethics & integrity 39 5. Commodity value chain 40 6. Inside information 41 7. Inside information – Under REMIT 42 8. Inside information – Under MAR 43 9. Insider trading & market manipulation 44 10. Markets & trading 45 11. Products 46 12. Pricing 47 3 Conduct 48 i. Morality 49 ii. Decision-making & behaviour 50 iii. Ethical blindness 51 iv. Conduct Management 52 v. Psychology 53 vi. Leadership features & performance rules 54 Regulation 55 i. Definitions – MAR 55 ii. Definitions – MiFID II 56 iii.
    [Show full text]