DOCSLIB.ORG

Ifm-Geomar Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ifm-Geomar Report FS Sonne Fahrtbericht / Cruise Report SO193 MANIHIKI Temporal, Spatial, and Tectonic Evolution of Oceanic Plateaus Suva/Fiji – Apia/Samoa 19.05. - 30.06.2007 IFM-GEOMAR REPORT Berichte aus dem Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften an der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Nr. 13 September 2007 FS Sonne Fahrtbericht / Cruise Report SO193 MANIHIKI Temporal, Spatial, and Tectonic Evolution of Oceanic Plateaus Suva/Fiji – Apia/Samoa 19.05. - 30.06.2007 Berichte aus dem Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften an der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Nr. 13, September 2007 ISSN Nr.: 1614-6298 Das Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften The Leibniz-Institute of Marine Sciences is a ist ein Institut der Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft member of the Leibniz Association Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (WGL) (Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz). Herausgeber / Editor: Reinhard Werner and Folkmar Hauff IFM-GEOMAR Report ISSN Nr.: 1614-6298 Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften / Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences IFM-GEOMAR Dienstgebäude Westufer / West Shore Building Düsternbrooker Weg 20 D-24105 Kiel Germany Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften / Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences IFM-GEOMAR Dienstgebäude Ostufer / East Shore Building Wischhofstr. 1-3 D-24148 Kiel Germany Tel.: ++49 431 600-0 Fax: ++49 431 600-2805 www.ifm-geomar.de 1 CONTENTS Page Summary..........................................................................................................................................................2 Zusammenfassung..........................................................................................................................................3 1. Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................4 2. Participants..................................................................................................................................................5 2.1. Ship´s Crew ...................................................................................................................................5 2.2. Principal Investigators for MANIHIKI ............................................................................................5 2.3 Scientific Co-operators...................................................................................................................5 2.4 Scientific Party of SO 193 Cruise ..................................................................................................5 2.5. Institutions......................................................................................................................................6 3.Background and Major Objectives of SO193 MANIHIKI............................................................................7 3.1. Large Igneous Provinces ..............................................................................................................7 3.2. The Manihiki Plateau and the Large Plateaus in the SW-Pacific................................................9 3.3. Objectives of the MANIHIKI Project............................................................................................12 4. Cruise Narrative .......................................................................................................................................14 5. Bathymetry and Rock Sampling ...............................................................................................................19 5.1. Methods .......................................................................................................................................19 5.1.1. Bathymetry.....................................................................................................................19 5.1.2. Rock sampling ...............................................................................................................20 5.2. Sampling Report and Preliminary Results .................................................................................21 5.2.1. Western Plateaus ..........................................................................................................21 5.2.2. The Large Interior Fault Systems: Suvorov Trough and Danger Islands Troughs...............................................................................................26 5.2.3. North Plateau and Adjacent Areas. ..............................................................................32 5.2.4. Northeastern Margin and Adjacent Features ...............................................................36 5.2.5. High Plateau ..................................................................................................................40 5.2.6. Manihiki Scarp ...............................................................................................................44 5.2.7. Southern “Apophysis” of the High Plateau ...................................................................51 5.2.8. Samoan Basin Seamounts............................................................................................53 5.2.9. Bathymetry and Hard Rock Sampling Summary .........................................................55 5.3. Volcaniclastic Rocks (C.I. Schipper) ..........................................................................................57 6. Tectonics (M.F. Coffin)..............................................................................................................................62 6.1. Background..................................................................................................................................62 6.2. Formation of the Manihiki Plateau..............................................................................................65 6.2.1. Tectonic Framework......................................................................................................65 6.2.2. Geodynamic Models......................................................................................................67 6.3. Post-emplacement Tectonism of the Manihiki Plateau..............................................................68 6.3.1. Danger Islands Troughs................................................................................................69 6.3.2. High-North Basin ...........................................................................................................72 6.3.3. Linear Ridges.................................................................................................................72 6.3.4. Suvorov Trough .............................................................................................................74 6.3.5. East Manihiki Scarp.......................................................................................................75 6.3.6. Seamounts.....................................................................................................................75 7. Biology (C. Lüter, B. Neuhaus, J. Kasper, E. Ullrich) ..............................................................................77 7.1. Methods .......................................................................................................................................77 7.1.1. Shipboard Collecting Procedures .................................................................................77 7.1.2. Meiofauna ......................................................................................................................77 7.1.3. Macrofauna....................................................................................................................78 7.2. Preliminary Results and Discussion ...........................................................................................78 7.2.1. General Observations and Collecting Report...............................................................78 7.2.2. Meiofauna ......................................................................................................................79 7.2.3. Macrofauna....................................................................................................................80 7.2.4. TV-Observation of the Sea Floor..................................................................................80 8. References ................................................................................................................................................82 Appendices: I. Sampling Summary II. Rock Description III. Biological Sampling IV. Overview Map I (locations of the map sections presented in chapter 5) V. Overview Map II (SO193 sampling sites) 2 SUMMARY The research project SO193 MANIHIKI comprises investigations of volcanic and tectonic structures, magmatic rocks and marine organisms at the submarine Manihiki Plateau in the SW-Pacific. The Manihiki Plateau largely consists of volcanic rocks and represents a Mid- Cretaceous flood basalt or Large Igneous Province (LIP). The geological studies carried out on R/V SONNE cruise SO193 focused on bathymetric mapping of key areas in the Manihiki Plateau region, and representative hard rock sampling of all major geomorphological units of the plateau as well as seamounts on the adjacent oceanic crust, and the major fault systems crosscutting the plateau. SO193 MANIHIKI aims to reconstruct the origin and spatial and temporal evolution of the Manihiki Plateau and to characterize the relationship between the Manihiki Plateau and other LIPs in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Playing Jigsaw with Large Igneous Provinces a Plate Tectonic
    PUBLICATIONS Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems RESEARCH ARTICLE Playing jigsaw with Large Igneous Provinces—A plate tectonic 10.1002/2015GC006036 reconstruction of Ontong Java Nui, West Pacific Key Points: Katharina Hochmuth1, Karsten Gohl1, and Gabriele Uenzelmann-Neben1 New plate kinematic reconstruction of the western Pacific during the 1Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum fur€ Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany Cretaceous Detailed breakup scenario of the ‘‘Super’’-Large Igneous Province Abstract The three largest Large Igneous Provinces (LIP) of the western Pacific—Ontong Java, Manihiki, Ontong Java Nui Ontong Java Nui ‘‘Super’’-Large and Hikurangi Plateaus—were emplaced during the Cretaceous Normal Superchron and show strong simi- Igneous Province as result of larities in their geochemistry and petrology. The plate tectonic relationship between those LIPs, herein plume-ridge interaction referred to as Ontong Java Nui, is uncertain, but a joined emplacement was proposed by Taylor (2006). Since this hypothesis is still highly debated and struggles to explain features such as the strong differences Correspondence to: in crustal thickness between the different plateaus, we revisited the joined emplacement of Ontong Java K. Hochmuth, [email protected] Nui in light of new data from the Manihiki Plateau. By evaluating seismic refraction/wide-angle reflection data along with seismic reflection records of the margins of the proposed ‘‘Super’’-LIP, a detailed scenario Citation: for the emplacement and the initial phase of breakup has been developed. The LIP is a result of an interac- Hochmuth, K., K. Gohl, and tion of the arriving plume head with the Phoenix-Pacific spreading ridge in the Early Cretaceous. The G.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Is Divided Into Two Parts
    Earth-Science Reviews 140 (2015) 72–107 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Geologic and kinematic constraints on Late Cretaceous to mid Eocene plate boundaries in the southwest Pacific Kara J. Matthews a,⁎, Simon E. Williams a, Joanne M. Whittaker b,R.DietmarMüllera, Maria Seton a, Geoffrey L. Clarke a a EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia b Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, TAS 7001, Australia article info abstract Article history: Starkly contrasting tectonic reconstructions have been proposed for the Late Cretaceous to mid Eocene (~85– Received 25 November 2013 45 Ma) evolution of the southwest Pacific, reflecting sparse and ambiguous data. Furthermore, uncertainty in Accepted 30 October 2014 the timing of and motion at plate boundaries in the region has led to controversy around how to implement a Available online 7 November 2014 robust southwest Pacific plate circuit. It is agreed that the southwest Pacific comprised three spreading ridges during this time: in the Southeast Indian Ocean, Tasman Sea and Amundsen Sea. However, one and possibly Keywords: two other plate boundaries also accommodated relative plate motions: in the West Antarctic Rift System Southwest Pacific fi Lord Howe Rise (WARS) and between the Lord Howe Rise (LHR) and Paci c. Relevant geologic and kinematic data from the South Loyalty Basin region are reviewed to better constrain its plate motion history during this period, and determine the time- Late Cretaceous dependent evolution of the southwest Pacific regional plate circuit. A model of (1) west-dipping subduction Subduction and basin opening to the east of the LHR from 85–55 Ma, and (2) initiation of northeast-dipping subduction Plate circuit and basin closure east of New Caledonia at ~55 Ma is supported.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Cretaceous Tectonic Evolution of the Tongareva Triple Junction in the Southwestern Pacific Basin
    Mid-Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the Tongareva triple junction in the southwestern Paci®c Basin Roger L. Larson Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, Robert A. Pockalny USA Richard F. Viso Elisabetta Erba Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, UniversitaÁ di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy Lewis J. Abrams Center for Marine Science, University of North Carolina, Wilmington, North Carolina 28409, USA Bruce P. Luyendyk Department of Geological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA Joann M. Stock Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California Robert W. Clayton 91125, USA ABSTRACT The trace of the ridge-ridge-ridge triple junction that con- nected the Paci®c, Farallon, and Phoenix plates during mid-Creta- ceous time originates at the northeast corner of the Manihiki Pla- teau near the Tongareva atoll, for which the structure is named. The triple junction trace extends .3250 km south-southeast, to and beyond a magnetic anomaly 34 bight. It is identi®ed by the inter- section of nearly orthogonal abyssal hill fabrics, which mark the former intersections of the Paci®c-Phoenix and Paci®c-Farallon Ridges. A distinct trough is commonly present at the intersection. A volcanic episode from 125 to 120 Ma created the Manihiki Pla- teau with at least twice its present volume, and displaced the triple junction southeast from the Nova-Canton Trough to the newly formed Manihiki Plateau. Almost simultaneously, the plateau was rifted by the new triple junction system, and large fragments of the plateau were rafted away to the south and east.
    [Show full text]
  • STRUCTURAL and KINEMATIC EVOLUTION of the MIDDLE CRUST DURING LATE CRETACEOUS EXTENSION in WESTERN NEW ZEALAND a Thesis Presente
    STRUCTURAL AND KINEMATIC EVOLUTION OF THE MIDDLE CRUST DURING LATE CRETACEOUS EXTENSION IN WESTERN NEW ZEALAND A Thesis Presented by Williams C. Simonson to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Specializing in Geology October, 2003 Accepted by the Faculty of the Graduate College, The University of Vermont, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, specializing in Geology. Thesis Examination Committee: Advisor Keith A. Klepeis, Ph.D. Barry Doolan, Ph.D Tracy Rushmer, Ph.D. Chairperson Donna Rizzo, Ph.D. Special Assistant, David S. Dummit, Ph.D. to the Provost for Graduate Eductation Date: August 28, 2003 CITATION Material in this thesis will be submitted for publication in the geologic and geophysical journal, Tectonics, pending the arrival of geochronologic data, in the following form: Simonson, W.C., and Klepeis, K.A., (in prep.), Structural evolution of the middle crust during exhumation by continental extension: The Paparoa Metamorphic Core Complex, South Island, New Zealand. Tectonics. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not exist without the help of many. In no particular order I am grateful to: My parents, Pat and Ric Simonson, who have been educating me for my entire life. Thank you so much for everything that you have given me (TPS, AC). I promise to repay you with love and understanding. My teachers, far too numerous to list, who have challenged and pushed me. Thank you for your time and energy. Keith Klepeis, my mentor, who has taken me so many places I never expected to see.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for a Two-Phase Palmer Land Event from Crosscutting
    TECTONICS, VOL. 31, TC1010, doi:10.1029/2011TC003006, 2012 Evidence for a two-phase Palmer Land event from crosscutting structural relationships and emplacement timing of the Lassiter Coast Intrusive Suite, Antarctic Peninsula: Implications for mid-Cretaceous Southern Ocean plate configuration Alan P. M. Vaughan,1 Graeme Eagles,2 and Michael J. Flowerdew1 Received 10 August 2011; revised 29 November 2011; accepted 12 December 2011; published 9 February 2012. [1] New analysis of the relationships between geological structural data and radiometric ages for the Lassiter Coast Intrusive Suite indicate that the collisional mid-Cretaceous Palmer Land Event orogeny in the Antarctic Peninsula has had two kinematic phases, forming an intersection orocline, one of which can be related to Cretaceous Southern Ocean plate motions. Both are compressional phases along the Eastern Palmer Land Shear Zone: Phase 1 occurred at 107 Ma with a principal paleostrain axis of 341°, and is best expressed in southern Palmer Land although evident elsewhere on the Antarctic Peninsula; Phase 2 occurred at 103 Ma with a principal paleostrain axis of 259.5°, but is confined to between 68°S and 74°S. A peak in Lassiter Coast Intrusive Suite magma emplacement rate was coeval with Phase 1, whereas Phase 2 may have coincided with a lull. During Phase 1, the allochthonous Central and Western Domain terranes may have been transported to the Gondwana margin, represented by the para-autochthonous Eastern Domain, on board the Phoenix plate or on board the South American plate. The variable provenance indicators from the Central and Western terranes can be cited to support either, or a combination, of these scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • A Plate Model for Jurassic to Recent Intraplate Volcanism in the Pacific Ocean Basin
    A Plate Model for Jurassic to Recent Intraplate Volcanism in the Pacific Ocean Basin Alan D. Smith Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK Email: [email protected] 1 ABSTRACT Reconstruction of the tectonic evolution of the Pacific basin indicates a direct relationship between intraplate volcanism and plate reorganisations, which suggests volcanism was controlled by fracturing and extension of the lithosphere. Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous intraplate volcanism included oceanic plateau formation at triple junctions (Shatsky Rise, western Mid Pacific Mountains) and a diffuse pattern of ocean island volcanism (Marcus Wake, Magellan seamounts) reflecting an absence of any well-defined stress field within the plate. The stress field changed in the Early Cretaceous when accretion of the Insular terrane to the North American Cordillera and the Median Tectonic arc to New Zealand, stalled migration of the Pacific- Farallon and Pacific-Phoenix ocean ridges, leading to the generation of the Ontong Java, Manahiki, Hikurangi and Hess Rise oceanic plateaus. Plate reorganisations in the Late Cretaceous resulted from the breakup of the Phoenix and Izanagi plates through collision of the Pacific-Phoenix ocean ridge with the southwest margin of the basin, and development of island arc-marginal basin systems in the northwest of the basin. The Pacific plate nonetheless remained largely bounded by spreading centres, and intraplate volcanism followed pre-existing lines of weakness in the plate fabric (Line Islands), or resulted from fractures generated by ocean ridge subduction beneath island arc systems (Emperor chain). The Pacific plate began to subduct under Asia in the Early Eocene from the record of accreted material along the Japanese margin.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontong Java–Manihiki–Hikurangi
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 241 (2006) 372–380 www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl The single largest oceanic plateau: Ontong Java–Manihiki–Hikurangi Brian Taylor Department of Geology and Geophysics, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA Received 9 August 2005; received in revised form 29 November 2005; accepted 29 November 2005 Available online 4 January 2006 Editor: R.D. van der Hilst Abstract Oceanic plateaus are mafic igneous provinces commonly thought to derive from ascending mantle plumes. By far the largest, the Ontong Java Plateau (OJP) was emplaced ca. 120 Ma, with a much smaller magmatic pulse of ca. 90 Ma. Of similar age and composition, the Manihiki and Hikurangi Plateaus (MP and HP) are separated from the OJP by ocean basins formed during the Cretaceous long normal magnetic period. I present new seafloor fabric data that indicate the three plateaus formed as one (OJMHP). The data support previous interpretations that the Osbourn Trough is the relict of the spreading center that separated the MP and HP but they require a different interpretation than prevailing tectonic models for the Ellice Basin. Closely spaced, large offset, fracture zones in the Ellice Basin bound former right-stepping spreading segments that separated the OJP and MP. The MP was emplaced near the axis of the Pacific–Phoenix ridge and additional plateau fragments formerly bordered its eastern margins. Following OJMHP break-up, seafloor spreading removed these fragments to the east and SSE, together with the symmetric conjugates to the extant Phoenix magnetic lineations. D 2005 Elsevier B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Accretionary Orogenesis with Supercontinent Assembly ⁎ Peter A
    Earth-Science Reviews 82 (2007) 217–256 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Linking accretionary orogenesis with supercontinent assembly ⁎ Peter A. Cawood a, , Craig Buchan b,1 a Tectonics Special Research Centre, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009 Australia b Tectonics Special Research Centre, Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845 Australia Received 6 September 2005; accepted 28 March 2007 Available online 20 April 2007 Abstract Age relations for assembly of Gondwana and Pangea indicate that the timing of collisional orogenesis between amalgamating continental bodies was synchronous with subduction initiation and contractional orogenesis within accretionary orogens located along the margins of these supercontinents. Final assembly of Gondwana occurred between c.570 and 510 Ma, amalgamating the various components of East and West Gondwana. This was coeval with a switch from passive margin sedimentation to convergent margin activity along the Pacific margin of the supercontinent. Timing of subduction initiation along the Pacific margin ranges from 580 to 550 Ma as evidenced by the first appearance of arc derived detrital zircons in the upper Byrd Group sediments and the oldest supra-subduction zone plutons along the Antarctic segment of the margin. A phase of extension marked by supra-subduction zone ophiolite generation at 535–520 Ma is preserved in greenstone successions in eastern Australia and overlaps the onset of Ross–Delamerian contractional orogenesis between 520 and 490 Ma, inboard of the plate margin that coincides with the cessation of collisional orogenesis between the amalgamating blocks of Gondwana.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Pacific Absolute Plate Kinematic Reconstruction Reveals
    Tectonics RESEARCH ARTICLE Southwest Pacific Absolute Plate Kinematic 10.1029/2017TC004901 Reconstruction Reveals Major Cenozoic Key Points: Tonga-Kermadec Slab Dragging • Tonga-Kermadec subduction zone is likely only ~30 Ma old Suzanna H. A. van de Lagemaat1 , Douwe J. J. van Hinsbergen1 , Lydian M. Boschman1 , • Northward Australian absolute plate 2 1,3 motion is illustrated by 1,500 km Peter J. J. Kamp , and Wim Spakman offset between South Loyalty Basin 1 2 slab and New Caledonian suture Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, School of Science, University of Waikato, • Tonga-Kermadec slab was dragged Hamilton, New Zealand, 3Center for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 1,200 km northward through the mantle, alongside eastward rollback Abstract Tectonic plates subducting at trenches having strikes oblique to the absolute subducting plate fi “ Supporting Information: motion undergo trench-parallel slab motion through the mantle, recently de ned as a form of slab • Supporting Information S1 dragging.” We investigate here long-term slab-dragging components of the Tonga-Kermadec subduction • Data Set S1 system driven by absolute Pacific plate motion. To this end we develop a kinematic restoration of • Data Set S2 Tonga-Kermadec Trench motion placed in a mantle reference frame and compare it to tomographically Correspondence to: imaged slabs in the mantle. Estimating Tonga-Kermadec subduction initiation is challenging because S. H. A. van de Lagemaat and D. J. J. van another (New Caledonia) subduction zone existed during the Paleogene between the Australia and Pacific Hinsbergen, plates. We test partitioning of plate convergence across the Paleogene New Caledonia and Tonga-Kermadec [email protected]; [email protected] subduction zones against resulting mantle structure and show that most, if not all, Tonga-Kermadec subduction occurred after ca.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plate Ids to Accompany Seton Et. Al. Global Model 000 Hotspots
    List of Plate IDs to accompany Seton et. al. Global Model Plate ID Abbreviation Name and Description 000 Hotspots 001 AHS Present Day Atlantic/Indian Hotspots 002 PHS Pacific Hotspots 003 PPH Present Day Pacific Hotspots 100 North America and the Arctic 101 NAM North American Craton 102 GRN Greenland 103 NSL North Slope Alaska 104 MEX Mexico 105 BAJ Baja California 106 NBJ Northern Baja California 107 BIS Baffin Island, North America 108 AVA Avalon-Acadia, Alaska 109 PDM Piedmont-Florida, North America 110 ALR Alpha Cordillera Ridge, Arctic 111 MNR Mendeleev Ridge, Arctic 112 CHP Chukchi Plateau, Arctic 113 NWR Northwind Ridge, Arctic 114 LMN Lomonosov Ridge, Arctic 115 CBM Northern Northwind Ridge, Arctic 117 LMN2 Lomonosov Ridge 2, Arctic 118 NSA2 North Slope Alaska 2 116 MVR Marvin Spur Ridge, Arctic 119 AAB Amerasia Basin, Arctic 120 CAI Canadian Arctic Islands 121 ELA East Ellesmere Island, Arctic 122 ELB East-Central Ellesmere Island, Arctic 123 ELC West-Central Ellesmere Island, Arctic 124 ELD West Ellesmere Island, Arctic 125 STT Stikine Terrane, British Columbia 126 WAT Wrangelia and Alexander Terrane, Alaska 127 FRP Faeroe Plate (trapped Greenland crust north of Faeroe Islands) 128 GV1 Trapped Greenland crust off Voring Plateau Plate 1 129 GV2 Trapped Greenland crust off Voring Plateau Plate 2 130 BAF Baffin Bay, North America 147 NSI1 North Sea/Icealand 1 148 NSI2 North Sea/Icealand 2 149 NSI3 North Sea/Icealand 3 150 CHO Chortis, North America 155 FARW Farewell Terrane, North America 160 NAMC North America Craton Margin 161
    [Show full text]
  • Accretionary Orogens Through Earth History
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 2, 2021 Accretionary orogens through Earth history PETER A. CAWOOD1*, ALFRED KRO¨ NER2, WILLIAM J. COLLINS3, TIMOTHY M. KUSKY4, WALTER D. MOONEY5 & BRIAN F. WINDLEY6 1School of Earth and Environment, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia 2Institut fu¨r Geowissenschaften, Universita¨t Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany 3School of Earth Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia 4Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA 5US Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA 6Department of Geology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: Accretionary orogens form at intraoceanic and continental margin convergent plate boundaries. They include the supra-subduction zone forearc, magmatic arc and back-arc com- ponents. Accretionary orogens can be grouped into retreating and advancing types, based on their kinematic framework and resulting geological character. Retreating orogens (e.g. modern western Pacific) are undergoing long-term extension in response to the site of subduction of the lower plate retreating with respect to the overriding plate and are characterized by back-arc basins. Advancing orogens (e.g. Andes) develop in an environment in which the overriding plate is advancing towards the downgoing plate, resulting in the development of foreland fold and thrust belts and crustal thickening. Cratonization of accretionary orogens occurs during con- tinuing plate convergence and requires transient coupling across the plate boundary with strain concentrated in zones of mechanical and thermal weakening such as the magmatic arc and back-arc region.
    [Show full text]
  • And Argon-Argon Age Spectra from Artificially Mixed Micas
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-2007 Thermochronological constraints on Mesozoic tectonism in southwest US and New Zealand; and argon-argon age spectra from artificially mixed micas Joseph Kula University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Kula, Joseph, "Thermochronological constraints on Mesozoic tectonism in southwest US and New Zealand; and argon-argon age spectra from artificially mixed micas" (2007). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 2771. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/ecyt-omvz This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THERMOCHRONOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS ON MESOZOIC TECTONISM IN SOUTHWEST U.S. AND NEW ZEALAND; AND '^Ar/^^Ar AGE SPECTRA FROM ARTIFICIALLY MIXED MICAS by Joseph Kula Bachelor of Science, Geoscience Montclair State University 2000 Masters of Science, Geoscience University of Nevada, Las Vegas 2002 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Geoscience Department of Geoscience College of Sciences Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas December 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]