Draft Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Template Report of the Inquiry into the Case of Dr Mohamed Haneef Volume One November 2008 © Commonwealth of Australia 2008 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca ISBN Volume One 1 921241 64 0 (printed) 1 921241 66 7 (on-line) Volume Two 1 921241 65 9 (printed) This report is available online at: http://www.haneefcaseinquiry.gov.au/ Clarke Inquiry into the Case of Dr Mohamed Haneef 21 November 2008 The Hon. Robert McClelland MP Attorney-General Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Attorney-General In accordance with the terms of your letter dated 13 March 2008, I have the honour to present the report of my inquiry into the case of Dr Mohamed Haneef. The report consists of two volumes. In Volume One I deal fully with the matters covered by my terms of reference, and I make a number of recommendations arising from those matters. In describing the events of the case, I made every effort to avoid including any material that might be judged a threat to national security information or continuing operations or might jeopardise any current trials. It is my hope that you will be able to release this volume to the public. Volume Two contains supplementary material that provides greater detail and analysis of the events I examined and includes references to sensitive or classified material. It might be that this material cannot be published at present. As you are aware, trials that were pending in the United Kingdom during the time I was conducting this Inquiry greatly influenced the course of my work. Much of the material relating to Dr Haneef’s experience came from the UK Metropolitan Police Service, which did not agree to unfettered use of the material for the Inquiry’s purposes. I am not critical of the approach the UK authorities took: I understand the extreme sensitivity associated with publishing information that might in some way put the trials at risk. Although I was mindful of these concerns, inevitably there are direct and indirect references in the report to information furnished by the Metropolitan Police Service. Much of this material, however, was already in the public domain before the Inquiry began and has now been released as part of the trials in progress. I did not seek clearance of any part of my report from the UK authorities. Yours faithfully MJ Clarke QC Computer Associates House, 10 National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 Clarke Inquiry PO Box 5365 Kingston ACT 2604 t. 02 6270 5844 f.02 6270 5860 e. [email protected] w. www.haneefcaseinquiry.gov.au Contents Overview and recommendations................................................................................vii Overview ..........................................................................................................vii Recommendations............................................................................................ xi 1 The Inquiry.........................................................................................................1 1.1 Independence.......................................................................................1 1.2 Establishment of the Inquiry..............................................................2 1.3 The preliminary hearing.....................................................................2 1.4 Submissions to the Inquiry.................................................................3 1.5 Production of documents ...................................................................4 1.6 Material related to pending trials in the United Kingdom...............................................................................................6 1.7 Witnesses..............................................................................................9 1.8 Consultation.......................................................................................12 1.9 Constitution of the Inquiry ..............................................................14 1.10 Costs....................................................................................................17 1.11 Acknowledgments ............................................................................17 2 Departments and agencies: roles and responsibilities .............................19 2.1 The Australian Federal Police..........................................................19 2.2 The Queensland Police Service........................................................21 2.3 The Office of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions .......................................................................................23 2.4 The Department of Immigration and Citizenship ........................25 2.5 The Australian Intelligence Community........................................26 2.6 The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet ....................33 2.7 The Attorney-General’s Department ..............................................34 2.8 Other organisations...........................................................................36 3 The case of Dr Mohamed Haneef.................................................................45 3.1 The arrest............................................................................................45 3.2 Detention ............................................................................................54 Report of the Inquiry into the Case of Dr Mohamed Haneef v 3.3 The AFP investigation...................................................................... 81 3.4 The security intelligence investigation......................................... 102 3.5 Charging, prosecution and release ............................................... 132 3.6 Visa cancellation.............................................................................. 162 4 The administrative and policy response................................................... 207 4.1 Overview.......................................................................................... 207 4.2 The counter-terrorism administrative framework ..................... 208 4.3 Whole-of-government action......................................................... 209 4.4 Meetings and teleconferences ....................................................... 216 4.5 Was there government interference or influence?...................... 227 4.6 Were the government meetings effective? .................................. 228 5 Deficiencies in the legislation.................................................................... 231 5.1 The perceived inconsistency between ss. 3W(2)(b)(i) and 23CA(2)(b) of the Crimes Act ........................................................ 231 5.2 The reasonable suspicion or belief thresholds ............................ 233 5.3 Resolving the perceived inconsistency ........................................ 234 5.4 Detention under the Crimes Act................................................... 238 5.5 Procedural fairness ......................................................................... 251 5.6 The counter-terrorism criminal offences...................................... 256 6 Cooperation, coordination and interoperability ..................................... 261 6.1 Laying charges for terrorism offences.......................................... 261 6.2 Visa cancellation.............................................................................. 266 6.3 The AFP’s further five recommendations.................................... 277 Appendix A Terms of reference ......................................................................... 287 Appendix B Administration of the Inquiry..................................................... 289 Appendix C Submissions.................................................................................... 293 Appendix D Witnesses and legal representatives........................................... 294 Appendix E Statements....................................................................................... 296 Shortened forms........................................................................................................... 298 vi Report of the Inquiry into the Case of Dr Mohamed Haneef Overview and recommendations Overview It was in the early hours of 2 July 2007 that the Australian Federal Police first became aware of the probable presence of Dr Mohamed Haneef in Australia and his possible involvement in the terrorist incidents in the United Kingdom on 29 and 30 June 2007. From 2 July until Dr Haneef was charged, a large amount of the information on which the AFP relied came from the United Kingdom. During the investigation, that information was supplemented by information flowing from investigations the AFP and the Queensland Police Service carried out, either themselves or in association with agencies in the Australian Intelligence Community. Nonetheless, reliance on information from overseas bedevilled the investigation. At the outset it must be said that this Inquiry was concerned with the operations of the relevant Australian departments and agencies during July 2007. It was not an investigation into whether Dr Haneef was guilty or innocent. He is, however, entitled to a presumption of innocence. Quite
Recommended publications
  • Chapter Three Assistance to Rural and Manufacturing Industries in Crisis
    Chapter Three Assistance to rural and manufacturing industries in crisis 3.1 The committee considered the first part of the terms of reference in detail to try and break up the definitions contained within it. The committee sought to understand which types of businesses might fall under the banner of rural and manufacturing industries, as well as trying to establish what would constitute a crisis for these types of businesses. The definition of a crisis 3.2 The committee embarked on the inquiry with a general idea of what circumstances could cause a crisis for rural and manufacturing businesses. However it was surprised at the variety of often unforeseen events that could impact trading and productivity. 3.3 In addition to drought, the committee heard that there are a significant number of other events which can affect both rural and manufacturing businesses and associated communities. The committee took evidence in Hobart from a number of stakeholders whose businesses and sectors are susceptible to events beyond their control. 3.4 The aquaculture sector in Tasmania provided many examples of catastrophic events that impacted businesses, both on and off-shore. Professor Christopher Carter from the Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre at the University of Tasmania made the general point that 'aquaculture is vulnerable to catastrophic events because the production cycles are long'. He also outlined some possible scenarios for specific industries: • Salmon hatcheries are located inland and are exposed to bushfire and drought, for example. Shellfish hatcheries are located close to the sea and are vulnerable to extreme coastal events. In addition, abalone farming is land based…Catastrophic events to hatcheries could destroy a year or more of production.
    [Show full text]
  • Networker We Care
    Networker We care. We share. We all gain. Issue 23, 1 December 2008 A publication for Rotarians and all community-minded people December is Family of Rotary Month Table of Contents Our Fine District Our Fine District ............................. 1 Welcoming New Members ............. 1 There is certainly a lot happening in our District, things aren’t slowing down A Thank You From The RC of Central despite the Festive Season’s fast approach. Melbourne Sunrise ........................ ` 2 Rotary World Peace Fellowship – District 9800 Does It Again ............. 3 Club Visioning is starting to take off with the first program being held with the Adopt A Farmer ............................. 3 RC of Caulfield next week. I look forward to seeing the results. Malaria Awareness Day ................. 4 Making Dreams Real: Success Clubs in our District have been giving great support at the Homeless World Secrets ........................................... 5 Marketing Tip: Spreading The Word Cup and this week helped treat competitors to a good old-fashioned Aussie Further ............................................ 6 barbie at Visy Park in Carlton. A great way to introduce the guests from Notices & Events ............................ 7 some 56 nations to Aussie culture. Congratulations must go to the Rotary Club of Essendon on the great success of the Royce Abbey Celebratory Dinner that was held at the Moonee Valley Racecourse function centre on Wednesday. Over 220 people attended and ten Rotarians from clubs all over Victoria were presented with Royce Abbey Awards. It was great to meet Matt O’Brien at the dinner. Matt is a member of the Kenyan Homeless Soccer team here for the Homeless World Cup. Matt’s attendance at the dinner certainly reinforced the achievements of Rotary and its partners and the impact the we can have on the lives of people less fortunate than ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Alumni Educators Their Utas Memories and Careers Utas
    NEWS DEC 2012 • Issue 42 OUR ALUMNI EDUCATORS Their UTAS memories and careers UTAS ARCHITECTS UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA Building the world CONTENTS Alumni News is the regular magazine for Contents graduates and friends of the University of Tasmania. UTAS alumni include graduates and diplomates of UTAS, TCAE/TSIT, AMC and staff of three years’ service. Alumni News is prepared by the Communications and Media Office for the Advancement Office. edited by sharon Webb Writers Aaron Smith, Amal Cutler, Cherie Cooper, Eliza Wood, Lana Best, Peter 5 12 Cochrane, Rebecca Cuthill, Sharon Webb Photographers Lana Best, Chris Crerar Design Clemenger Tasmania Advertising enquiries Melanie Roome Acting Director, Advancement Phone +61 3 6226 2842 27 Let us know your story at [email protected] Phone +61 3 6324 3052 3 Michael Field 19 Ava Newman Fax +61 3 6324 3402 Incoming Chancellor “Everyone who can possibly UTAS Advancement Office do so should go to university” Locked Bag 1350 4 Damian Bugg Launceston Tasmania 7250 Departing Chancellor T erry Childs “Teaching studies took 5–8 UTAS architects precedence because of Building the world Tasmania’s teacher shortage” NEWS DEC 2012 • ISSUE 42 5 Benjamin Tan, Vietnam 0 2 Professor Geoffrey sharman Legacy in the genetics of 6 Brennan Chan, Singapore the black-tailed wallaby 7 Ben Duckworth, Switzerland and the potoroo 8 Charles Lim, Malaysia 21–23 UTAS in business 9–11 Alumni News Big Read 21 Lucinda Mills James Boyce 22 John Bye, Trish Bennett and Bonnie Reeves 12–14 UTAS in the arts 23 Penelope’s Produce OUR ALUMNI 12 Pat Brassington to the People EDUCATORS Their UTAS Wayne Hudson Jade Fountain memories and careers 13 Benjamin Gilbert UTAS ARCHITECTS 24 Scholarships UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA Building the world 14 Alan Young S pringing into higher education Cover: At the end of WW2 the University Shaun Wilson of Tasmania dispatched newly trained 25–26 6 Degrees teachers to educate the next generation, 15–20 Our alumni educators Helping us all keep in touch after they gained degrees at the Domain campus in Hobart.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of News Reporting on Victims and Survivors of Traumatic Events
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Research Online Asia Pacific Media ducatE or Issue 7 Article 4 7-1999 Fair game or fair go? Impact of news reporting on victims and survivors of traumatic events T. McLellan Queensland University of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/apme Recommended Citation McLellan, T., Fair game or fair go? Impact of news reporting on victims and survivors of traumatic events, Asia Pacific Media ducatE or, 7, 1999, 53-73. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/apme/vol1/iss7/4 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] TRINA McLELLAN: Fair game or fair go? ... Fair Game Or Fair Go? Impact Of News Reporting On Victims And Survivors Of Traumatic Events When traumatic incidents occur, victims and survivors – as well as their families, friends and immediate communities – respond in varying ways. Over the past century, however, researchers have mapped common psychosocial consequences for victims/survivors in their studies of what has come to be known as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Over the same period, journalists and news media managers have adopted local, medium-specific and industry-wide journalistic standards for acceptable ethical and operational behaviours when it comes to covering such incidents. Yet, despite numerous prescriptive codes – and growing public criticism – Australia’s news media continues to confront victims/ survivors in large numbers when they are at their most vulnerable... and sometimes in ways that are, at best, questionable.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth DPP Annual Report 2008-2009
    annual report 2008–09 Commonwealth direCtor of publiC proseCutions © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 ISSN: 1034-3318 ISBN: 978-0-9751368-7-4 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at www.ag.gov.au/cca. ii annual report 2008–09 22 October 2009 Attorney-General Parliament House Canberra Dear Attorney I have the honour to submit my report on the operations of the Office of the Commonwealth Director Public Prosecutions for the year ended 30 June 2009, in accordance with section 33(1) of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983. Yours faithfully CHRISTOPHER CRAIGIE SC Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions www.cdpp.gov.au commonwealth director of public prosecutions iii Office of the Commonwealth DPP Canberra OffiCe briSbane OffiCe Director: Christopher Craigie SC Deputy Director: David Adsett 4 Marcus Clarke St, 19th Floor, 15 Adelaide St, CANBERRA CITY ACT 2601 BRISBANE QLD 4000 Tel: 02 6206 5666, Fax: 02 6257 5709 Tel: 07 3224 9444, Fax: 07 3229 4124 PO Box 3104, CANBERRA CITY ACT 2601 GPO Box 847, BRISBANE QLD 4001 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Sydney OffiCe Perth OffiCe Deputy Director: Jim Jolliffe Deputy Director: Ros Fogliani Level 7, Civic
    [Show full text]
  • Alumni, University of Tasmania, September 2016
    $300m plan to address the education deficit Pre-eminent economist joins the University Table talk of the London Biennale ISSUE 48 2016 Gift makes possible $5m Warren Chair in Astrophysics Have blog, will travel New TV series brings Alumni comic back on campus Vice-Chancellor Professor Peter Rathjen: “We have to train at the highest possible standards the future leaders of this state and to bring our knowledge and our culture to the professions.” Anniversary issue wins praise The University of Tasmania’s special of trying to develop the human capital of an 125th Anniversary Alumni entire state. magazine (pictured) was not Global portability matters enormously when only well received by alumni you are located on an isolated island in the but also enjoyed national Southern Ocean where the future must be built peer recognition. PETER MATHEW on cultural respect – respect for diversity and integration into a globalised economy. Here the University plays such an important It was voted the best role, from affording opportunities for its alumni hardcopy students to participate in that global economy magazine at the to its supportive alumni networks around the Australian Alumni world. We act as a bridge between Tasmania Professionals biannual WELCOME and the world, the world of cultures, of ideas, conference held at the of ethnicities – the world we have to be part of University of Melbourne What makes this university, and its alumni, in we want a prosperous future for our children. in late February. Thirty distinctive is addressed by the Vice-Chancellor Underpinning all of these is a commitment institutions from in this edited extract from a speech he gave at not just to this state but to people.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia-Literate Graduates to Talk Turkey
    The Australian Financial Review 24 COURSES AND CAREERS Monday 9 July 2012 l www.afr.com COURSES AND CAREERS 25 In brief CQU `back on the Region to work together Wanted: Asia-literate graduates to talk turkey Tertiary Education Minister Chris Evans has announced Australian support for two regional projects following the There is a strong view that McCallum says the report will be international business courses but be track to greatness' inaugural East Asia Summit education released in August to coincide with embedded in the undergraduate and ministers meeting that was held in more Australians must study the anticipated launch of the Henry postgraduate programs in humanities Indonesia from July 3 to 5. The first the languages and cultures white paper. and social sciences, particularly Joanna Mather that C-Management Services would project, to be carried out in partnership “Despite our geographic proximity, economics, law, creative industries, eventually be listed on the Australian with Korea, is to establish a regional of our influential neighbours, Australia’s engagement with Asia science and engineering and CQUniversity vice-chancellor Scott Stock Exchange, securing a network of technical and vocational writes Joanna Mather. threatens to decline while other education,” its submission says. Bowman has declared his institution comfortable future for the university’s education and training providers to countries enhance educational, Several submissions cite the back from the brink of financial main campus in Rockhampton, exchange ideas, share expertise and business and people-to-people links,” Australian Consortium for In- disaster and on track to become one central Queensland. form commercial partnerships. The Business leaders say the single biggest he says.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of News Reporting on Victims and Survivors of Traumatic Events
    Asia Pacific Media ducatE or Issue 7 Article 4 7-1999 Fair game or fair go? Impact of news reporting on victims and survivors of traumatic events T. McLellan Queensland University of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/apme Recommended Citation McLellan, T., Fair game or fair go? Impact of news reporting on victims and survivors of traumatic events, Asia Pacific Media ducatE or, 7, 1999, 53-73. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/apme/vol1/iss7/4 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] TRINA McLELLAN: Fair game or fair go? ... Fair Game Or Fair Go? Impact Of News Reporting On Victims And Survivors Of Traumatic Events When traumatic incidents occur, victims and survivors – as well as their families, friends and immediate communities – respond in varying ways. Over the past century, however, researchers have mapped common psychosocial consequences for victims/survivors in their studies of what has come to be known as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Over the same period, journalists and news media managers have adopted local, medium-specific and industry-wide journalistic standards for acceptable ethical and operational behaviours when it comes to covering such incidents. Yet, despite numerous prescriptive codes – and growing public criticism – Australia’s news media continues to confront victims/ survivors in large numbers when they are at their most vulnerable... and sometimes in ways that are, at best, questionable. Drawing on the experiences of those touched by the 1996 Port Arthur massacre and by industrial deaths, this paper examines the consequences of media actions for victims/survivors.
    [Show full text]
  • Pretty in Pink
    NEWS JUNE 2011 • Issue 39 FILMMAKER SEAN BYRNE: A new take on Pretty in Pink THE RHODES LEss TRAVELLED (special feature pages 12-21) UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA Do you receive our monthly eNewsletter? The Alumni eNews contains discounts for alumni, news of upcoming events worldwide, UTAS news and postgrad opportunities. Let us know your email address by returning the coversheet or emailing us at [email protected] www.utasalumni.org.au CONTENTS Alumni News is the regular magazine Contents for graduates and friends of the University of Tasmania. UTAS alumni include graduates and diplomates of UTAS, TCAE/TSIT and AMC. Alumni News is prepared for the Development and Alumni Office by the Communications and Media Office. Edited by Janette Brennan. Contributors Peter Cochrane, Cherie Cooper, Rhonda Ewart, Nicki Fletcher, 2 Catherine Rogers, Melanie Roome and Sharon Webb. Design Clemenger Tasmania Advertising enquiries Melanie Roome Alumni and Development Manager Phone +61 3 6324 3472 6 12 Let us know your story at [email protected] 2 A gilt-edged gift 16 Potential and limits Phone +61 3 6324 3052 Fax +61 3 6324 3402 600 works and $1m to Judge Richard Cogswell UTAS Development and Alumni Office establish the Tyler Collection. on the Oxford experience. Locked Bag 1350 4 Scream king 18 Our very own Launceston Tasmania 7250 UTAS academics and Filmmaker Sean Byrne former Rhodes Scholars. goes for the jugular. 20 Movember 6 Childhood heroes Alex Shabala dressed for success. Dr Phil Hilton’s tribute to soldier convicts. 21 Caring about life’s journey Professor Marnie Hughes- 7 Tanzmanian Warrington’s approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report 'Public Office Is Public Trust'
    2009 (No. 24) _______________ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA _______________ JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICAL CONDUCT Final Report ‘Public Office is Public Trust’ ______________ Brought up by Mr Wilkinson and presented to the Deputy President of the Legislative Council pursuant to Standing Order 197 (L.C.). ______________ MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE Legislative Council House of Assembly Mr Wilkinson (Chair) Mr Best Mr Hall Mr Llewellyn Mr Martin Mr McKim Ms Thorp Mr Rockliff Table of Contents 1 Appointment & Conduct of the Inquiry ................................................. 2 2 Summary of Findings .................................................................................. 5 3 Summary of Recommendations ............................................................ 10 4 Overview.................................................................................................... 17 5 Parliament ................................................................................................. 26 6 Executive ................................................................................................... 50 7 State Service ............................................................................................. 57 8 Auditor-General: Office of the............................................................... 68 9 Ombudsman: Office of the .................................................................... 70 10 Director of Public Prosecutions: Office of............................................. 80 11 Tasmania Police.......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Annual Report (PDF 2.6
    distinctive university06 of tasmania annual report UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA ANNUAL REPORT 2006 This is the report of the Council of the University of Tasmania approved by resolution at its meeting on 30 March 2007. To His Excellency the Honourable William Cox AC, RFD, ED Governor of Tasmania May it please Your Excellency: The Council of the University of Tasmania, in conformity with the provisions of the University of Tasmania Act 1992, has the honour to report, for Your Excellency’s information, the proceedings of the University for 2006 and to present the financial statements for that year. Damian Bugg QC Chancellor June 2007 The University of Tasmania is the State’s university. It is a generator of ideas and knowledge and makes a significant contribution to the economic, social and cultural fabric of the Tasmanian community. It has a crucial role to play in the State’s long-term prosperity. CONTENTS Mission and Vision 2 The Chancellor’s Message 3 The Vice-Chancellor’s Message 4 2006 at a Glance 6 Governance 7 Performance 13 Teaching and Learning 21 Research and Research Training 26 Our People 31 Community Engagement 33 Development 37 Organisational Chart 40 Financials 41 mission The University of Tasmania is committed to excellence in the creation, preservation, communication and application of knowledge and to scholarship that is international in scope, reflecting the distinctiveness of Tasmania and serving the needs of its community. The University will continue to provide leadership within its community, contributing to the cultural, economic and social development of Tasmania. vision By 2010, the University of Tasmania will be ranked among the top echelon of research-led universities in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Independence and Accountability of the Director of Public Prosecutions: a Comparative Survey
    NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Independence and Accountability of the Director of Public Prosecutions: A Comparative Survey by Rowena Johns Briefing Paper No 9/2001 ISSN 1325-5142 ISBN 0 7313 1696 7 July 2001 8 2001 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent from the Librarian, New South Wales Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. Independence and Accountability of the Director of Public Prosecutions: A Comparative Survey by Rowena Johns NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Dr David Clune, Manager..................................................... (02) 9230 2484 Dr Gareth Griffith, Senior Research Officer, Politics and Government / Law ............................................. (02) 9230 2356 Ms Rachel Callinan, Research Officer, Law.......................... (02) 9230 2768 Ms Rowena Johns, Research Officer, Law............................ (02) 9230 2003 Ms Rachel Simpson, Research Officer, Law ......................... (02) 9230 3085 Mr Stewart Smith, Research Officer, Environment................ (02) 9230 2798 Mr John Wilkinson, Research Officer, Economics ................ (02) 9230 2006 Should Members or their staff require further information about this publication please contact the author. Information about Research Publications
    [Show full text]