Program for 2014 SSA Annual Meeting
Presenting author is indicated in bold. Page numbers refer to pages in SRL 85:2 where full abstracts are printed.
Wednesday, 30 April
Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
DiverseMechanisms Geometric Advances in Site Response: Cold Climate of Subduction Zone Complexities along Seismic Imaging From Site-Specific Installation Fault Slip: Exploring Strike-Slip and Monitoring of Analyses to Techniques and the Relationships Systems: New Time-Dependent Predictive Models Instrumentation among Seismic Insights Variations: Civil around the Globe Developments for Rupture, Transient onSeismicHazards, Structures, Session Chairs: Eric Temp or ar y and Slip, and Steady EarthquakeBehavior, Near-Surface, and Thompson and Long-Term Creep and Fault System Shallow Crustal Dominic Assimaki Networks Session Chairs: Evolution Scales (see page 428) Session Chairs: Harmony V. Colella, Session Chairs: Sean Session Chairs: Bruce Beaudoin and Emily C. Roland, P. Bemis, Jeff Marco Pilz and Nori Christopher Bruton and Aaron G. Wech Benowitz, and Nakata (see page (see page 432) (see page 416) Michele Cooke (see 424) page 420)
8:30 INVITED:WhatDo Dynamic Models of Temporal Changes INVITED:Array INVITED:Cold, AM Seismic Imaging the 2010 Sierra El in Near-Surface Measurements of Wet S eismolog y : Constraints Really Mayor-Cucapah Shear Wave Velocity. Rayleigh-Wave Lessons from Tell Us about the Earthquake. Steidl, J. H. Amplitudes to Instrumenting Fault Zone in Oglesby, D. D. and Estimate Site Temperate Glaciers. Which Great Funning, G. J. Response. Tsai, O’Neel, S.,Larsen, Earthquakes and V. C.,Bowden, C. F., West, M. E., Slow Slip Operate? D. C., and Lin, F. C. Bartholomaus, T. C., Abers, G. A.,Kim, Parker, T., Y. H., Shillington, Amundson, J., and D. J., Saffer, D. M., Wa l ter, J. Li, J., and Janiszewski, H. A.
8:45 ALinkbetween Stress Drop Monitoring STUDENT:The INVITED: AM Silica Enrichment Heterogeneity Temporal Changes Importance of the Maximizing the and the Recurrence within Complex in a Levee with Elastic Half Space Scientific Utility of Time of Slow Tectonic Regions: A Ambient Seismic Assumption in Site Broadband Data Earthquakes in Case Study of the Noise. Planés, T., Response Analysis. from Polar Regions. Subduction Zone San Gorgonio Pass, Parekh, M., Rittgers, Cabas, A., Nettles, M. Forearcs. Audet, P. Southern California. J., Behm, M., Rodriguez-Marek, and Burgmann, R. Goebel,T.H.W., Mooney, M., and A., and Green, R. A. Hauksson, E., Snieder, R. Shearer, P. M., and Ampuero, J. P. Wednesday, 30 April (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Diverse Geometric Adv in Seismic Site Response... Cold Climate... Mechanisms... Complexities... Imaging... 9:00 Laboratory Comparison of Fault Shallow 3D Velocity Site Response Polar Seismology: AM Experiments of Behavior across the Imaging by a Joint Mapping with Fewer Engineered Seismic Cycles: Big Bend of the San Rayleigh- and Proxies. Thompson, Solutions from the Effects of Normal Andreas Fault, Love-Wave Noise E. M. and Wald, D. J. IRIS/PASSCAL Stress and Its California. Scharer, To m o g r a p hy. Pilz, Instrument Center. Gradient. K.,Weldon,R., M., Parolai, S., and Parker, T., Yamaguchi, T., Streig, A., Yule, D., Bindi, D. Carpenter, P., and Hori, T., Sakaguchi, and Wolff, L. Beaudoin, B. H., and Ampuero, J. P.
9:15 INVITED:Scaling Rates and Patterns STUDENT: Validation of Ongoing AM Relations and of Vertical Developing 3D Site-Specific Developments in the Along-Strike Deformation along Shear Wave Models Response Models Plate Boundary Segmentation of the Northern San using a using KIK-Net Observatory Alaska Episodic Slow Slip Andreas Fault. Multi-Objective Ground Motion Network: Testing Events in DeLong, S. B., Joing Inversion Recordings. Shi, J. New Telemetry and Subduction Zones. Prentice, C. S., and Scheme. and Assimaki, D. Power Options for Liu, Y. Hilley, G. E. Thompson, L. E., Improving Station Velasco, A. A., Robustness. Boyce, Garcia, V., Zamora, E.,Enders,M., A.,andSosa,U.A. Bierma, R., Feaux, K., and Mattioli, G. S.
9:30 Similarity and Did Someone Forget STUDENT:Joint Site Effects in Tracking Telemetry AM Difference of to Pay the Modeling of Concepcion Basin: State of Health with Megathrust and Earthquake Bill? Complementary Geometry and Nagios. Bruton, Slow Tsunami Jackson, D. D. Data Functionals for Amplification from C. P. Earthquakes: Seismic Site Gravity and Interpretation from Characterization. Microtremors. Observations and Schwed, M., Montalva, G. A., Simulation. Yagi, Y. Pulliam, J., Sen, M. Chavez-Garcia, F. J., and Mitsui, Y. K.,Willemann,R.J., Tassara , A., and Huerta-Lopez, C., Jara, D. Moschetti, M. P., Schmitz, M., Louie, J. N., Polanco, E., Huerfano Moreno, V., and Pasyanos, M. 9:45 Break & Posters Cook & Arteaga 10:45 AM Wednesday, 30 April (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Diverse Geometric Advances in Site Response: Development of Mechanisms of Complexities along Seismic Imaging From Site-Specific Next Generation Subduction Zone Strike-Slip and Monitoring of Analyses to Field Methods for Fault Slip: Systems: New Time-Dependent Predictive Models Portable Exploring the Insights on Seismic Variations: Civil around the Globe Broadband Seismic Relationships Hazards, Structures, (continued) Arrays among Seismic Earthquake Near-Surface, and Session Chairs: Rupture, Transient Behavior, and Fault Shallow Crustal TimothyParkerand Slip, and Steady System Evolution Scales (continued) David E. Hawthorn Creep (continued) (continued) (see page 433)
10:45 INVITED: Geodetic Basement Structure INVITED:The INVITED: Normal Modes: AM Estimates of Slow and Earthquake Virtual Eruption of PRENOLIN Investigating Signal and Transient Slip in Hazards along the Okmok Volcano, Project: A and Noise the Alaska Queen Charlotte- Alaska. Haney, Benchmark on Phenomena across Subduction Zone. Fairweather Fault M. M. Numerical Instrument Types Freymueller, J. T., System, Simulation of 1-D and Deployment. Fu,Y.,Li,S.,and Southeastern Alaska. Non-Linear Site Hellweg, M.,Araki, Ohta, Y. Walton, M. A. L., Effect. 1 Site E., Rademacher, H., Gulick, S. P. S., Selection for the Taira , T., Haeussler, P. J., and Validation Phase. Uhrhammer, R. A., Roland, E. Regnier, J.,Kawase, and McGowan, H.,Bonilla,L.F., M. G. Bard,P.Y.,Bertrand, E., Hollender, F., Sicilia, D., and Nozu, A. 11:00 Tectonic Tremor Implications of Nonlinear Elasticity Analysis of Local An Analysis of the AM Locations Recent Large and Slow Dynamics Earthquake Data Trade off s b et we en throughout the Earthquakes on the Observed at the from Delaney Park Seismometer Alaska-Aleutian Queen Charlotte Factor Building Downhole Seismic Performance and Subduction Zone Fault. Lay, T. (UCLA-California) Array, Anchorage, Convenience. from 1999 to 2013. by Processing Alaska. Dutta, U. Spriggs, N. and Brown, J. R. Continuous and Thornley, J. D. Greig, D. W. Recordings. Gueguen, P.,Roux, P., and Johnson, P. A. 11:15 Examining Large Rupture Behavior on Seismological Lessons Learned What Should I Do AM and Small Two Parallel Strike Monitoring of a Tall from Conducting with the S13? Or Earthquakes in the Slip Faults: A Case RC Building in Nice, Seismic Site Better: How to Costa Rica from the Central France. Bertrand, Response Analyses Te a c h Ne w Tr i c k s t o Subduction Zone to Longriba Fault E., Deschamps, A., That Require an Old Dog. Braun, Probe Temporal and Zone, Eastern Tibet. Santisi d’Avila, M. P., Explicit T.,Romeo,G.,and Spatial Megathrust Ren, J. J.,Xu,X.W., Gueguen, P., Tahmi, Consideration of the Spinelli, G. Heterogeneity. Yeats, R . S., and N., and Fernandez- Site Attenuation Bilek, S. L., Zhang, S. M. Lorenzo, G. Parameter. Kottke, Rotman, H., and A. R., Hashemi, A., Phillips,W.S. and Elkhoraibi, T. Wednesday, 30 April (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Diverse Geometric Adv in Seismic Site Response... Dev of Field Mechanisms... Complexities... Imaging... Methods...
11:30 Observations of Modeling Observed INVITED: Seismic Site STUDENT:A AM SSE, Tremor, and Aftershock Sequences Noise-based Crustal Amplification in Microseism Catalog Damaging with an Earthquake Seismic Velocity the Port Hills Based on Broadband Earthquakes on the Simulator. Kroll, K. Changes Associated during the Data from the US Southern Hikurangi A., Richards-Dinger, with the 2011 Canterbury Transp or tab le Array. Margin, New K. B., and Dieterich, To h o ku - o ki Earthquake Sufri, O.,Koper,K. Zealand. Fry, B. N. J. H. Earthquake. Sequence: Case D., and Burlacu, R. and Wallace, L. Brenguier, F., Study of Critical Campillo, M., Slopes Kaiser, A. Briand, X., Takeda, E., Holden, C., T., Aoki, Y., Shapiro, and Massey, C. N., and Emoto, K. 11:45 The Downdip Strike-Slip Fault Depth Constraint of Calibration and AGround-Truth AM Location of ETS and Segment Propagation Velocity Changes Evaluation of Mine Monitoring Dehydration Fluids and Linkage via Work caused by the 2011 Response Spectra System Authors: Channelled to Minimization. Cooke, To h o ku - O ki in the Downtown Taylor, S. R ., Jarpe, Forearc Mantle M. L., Madden, E. H., Earthquake. Area of S. P., Harben, P. E., Corner. Hyndman, and McBeck, J. Nakata, N. and Anchorage, Harris, D. B. R. D.,McCrory,P. Lawrence,J.F. Alaska. Thornley, A.,andWech,A.G. J. D.,Dutta,U., and Yang, Z. Noon Annual Luncheon La Perouse 2:00 PM Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Explosive Source Deciphering the Fault Structure, Pillars of Emergence of Characterization Earthquake and Heterogeneity, and Simulation: Continuously Session Chairs: Tsunami Histor y of Implications for Seismic Velocity Recording Very Christopher Bradley, Subduction Zones Rupture Dynamics and Material Large Array Sean Ford, and Kyle Session Chairs: Marco Session Chairs: Models Capabilities in Jones (see page 417) Cisternas, Lisa Ely, Ed Thomas H. W. Session Chairs: Seismology Garrett, Daniel Goebel, Thibault Ricardo Taborda, Session Chairs: Rick Melnick, Alan Nelson, Candela, and Po Chen, and Aster and James and Robert Wesson Heather Savage (see En-Jui Lee (see Gridley (see page (see page 422) page 426) page 430) 434) 2:15 Hydrodynamic The 1730 and 1751 BIEM Simulation Seismic Wavefield Back-Projection PM Modeling of the Chilean Earthquakes: for Anti-Plane Simulations of Imaging of Near-Source Two Major Dynamic Rupture Earthquakes Aftershocks Environment at a Contributors to the Propagation across a within a Complex Recorded by the Jointed Site. Bradley, Seismically Prolific Bimaterial Interface. Crustal Model for Dense AIDA Array C. R., Steedman, D. 18th Century along Hirano, S. and Alaska. Tape, C. after the 2011 S.,Rougier,E.,and the Pacific Coast of Yamashita, T. Virginia Earthquake. Knight, E. E. the Americas. Hole,J.A.,Wang, Cisternas, M.,Ely,L., K.,Davenport,K. Wesson, R., Pilarckzic, K.,Chapman,M.C., J., Gorigoitia, N., Beskardes, G. D., Dura, T., Melnick, D., Quiros,D.A., and Carvajal, M. Brown, L. D., and Mooney,W.D. Wednesday, 30 April (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Explosive Source Deciphering the Fault Structure... Pillars of Emergence of Char... Earthquake... Simulation... Continuously...
2:30 ANewFracture A Comparison of STUDENT:3D Full-3D Waveform Aftershock Imaging PM Material Model for Tsunami Deposits Dynamic Rupture To m o g r a p hy f o r with Dense Arrays Simulating Damage from the 1960 Great Simulation across a Crustal Structure in (AIDA). Brown, L., and Moment Tensor Chilean Earthquake Complex Fault Southern California Hole, J., Quiros, D., Descriptions of in Two Coastal System: The Mw7.0, using Earthquake Davenport, K., Simulated Explosion Lakes on Chiloé, 2010, Haiti Recordings and Wa ng , K . , Ca b o l o va , Sources for Source Chile. Kempf, P., Earthquake. Ambient-Noise A.,andMooney,W. Physics Experiments Moernaut, J., Douilly, R.,Aochi, Green’sFunctions (SPE). Rougier, E., Vandoorne, W., Van H.,Calais,E.,and Based on the Yang,X.,Knight,E. Daele, M., Pino, M., Freed,A.M. Adjoint and the E., and Patton, H. J. Urrutia, R., and De Scattering-Integral Batist, M. Methods. Lee, E., Chen,P.,Jordan,T. H., Maechling, P. J., Denolle, M., and Beroza,G.C. 2:45 Three Dimensional Linking Subduction- Dynamic Rupture Validation of Optimal Design of PM Simulation of Earthquake Models of Physics-Based Large-Scale Seismic Ground Motions Supercycles with Earthquakes on the Ground Motion Array for Generated by Mountain Building Bartlett Springs Earthquake Earthquake Source Underground in the Region of the Fault, Northern Simulations Using a Imaging Explosions in Giant 1960 Chile California. Lozos, J. Velocity Model Constrained by Jointed Rock under Earthquake. C., Harris, R. A., Improved by Wave f o rm Conditions of Melnick, D., Murray, J. R., and To m o g r a p h i c Coherency of Uncertainty. Cisternas, M., Abrahamson, N. A. Inversion Results. USArray. Meng, L. Ezzedine, S. M., Wesson, R . L., Taborda, R .,Lee,E. andAmpuero,J.P. Vorobiev, O. Y., Moreno, M., Nelson, J.,Gill,D.,Chen,P., Glenn, L. A., and A., Jara-Munoz, J., Maechling, P. J., and Antoun, T. H. Dura, T., and Jordan, T. H. Engelhart, S.
3:00 Implications for Two Centuries of Stick-slip Instability Stochastic STUDENT:The PM Chemical/Nuclear Emergence in in Granite Initiated Descriptions of New Wave Equivalence from Northern Chiloé as Acoustic Emission Fine-Scale Basin Gradiometry Observations and before Sudden Event. McLaskey, Velocity Structure Technique Applied Hydrodynamic Submergence G. C. and Lockner, from Well Logs and to USArray. Liu, Y. Calculations. Associated with the D. A. the SCEC and Holt, W. E. Patton, H. J. and Giant 1960 Chile Community Rougier, E. Earthquake. Velocity Model Wesson, R . L., (CVMH). Plesch, Cisternas, M., A.,Shaw,J.H.,Song, Melnick, D., X.,andJordan,T.H. Moreno, M., and Ely, L. Wednesday, 30 April (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Explosive Deciphering the Fault Structure... Pillars of Emergence of Source... Earthquake... Simulation... Continuously...
3:15 Modeling rel as the Understanding Seismic Moment STUDENT:Rupture Long Beach 3D PM Nonlinear Mega-Earthquake Te n s o r s a n d b -va l u e s Dynamics and Seismic Survey: Data Inelastic-Elastic Related Tsunami on of Acoustic Ground Motions Mining Continuous Transition near Subduction Zones Emissions during from Earthquakes in Passive Seismic Explosion Source. without Large Stick Slip Sliding Heterogeneous Data. Hollis, D. D. Morozov, I. B. and Historical Events. Te s t s . Kwiatek, G., Media. Bydlon, S. Stroujkova, A. Williams, C. R., Goebel, T., and A., Kozdon, J. E., Mohammed, F., and Dresen, G. and Dunham, E. M. Lee, R. 3:30 Break & Posters Cook & Arteaga 4:30 PM 4:30 Relocation, Great Earthquakes Fault-Zone Maturity Couple-Stresses in STUDENT:Body PM Discrimination, and Tsunamis during Defines Maximum Elastodynamics and and Surface-Wave Magnitude the Last 1000 years Earthquake Quantitative Ambient-Noise Calculation and in the Kodiak Magnitude. Seismology. Seismic Yield Estimation of Segment of the Bohnhoff, M., Dargush, G. F. and Interferometry the 12 February Alaska-Aleutian Bulut, F., Stierle, E., Hadjesfandiari, A. across the Salton Sea 2013 North Korean Megathrust. and Ben-Zion, Y. R. Geothermal Field, Nuclear Test. Zhao, Shennan, I.,Barlow, California. Sabey, L. F.,Xie,X.B.,Fan, N. L. M., Carver, G., L. E., Hole, J. A., N., Wang, W. M., Davies, F. P., Garrett, Han, L., Stock, J. M., and Yao, Z. X. E., and Hocking, E. and Fuis, G. S. P.
4:45 Seismic Analysis of Same Asperity, TheRoleofIquique Physical STUDENT:Impact PM the North Korean Different Rupture Area in a Future Characterization of of Scattering on the Nuclear Explosion Pattern: Variations Large Earthquake Seismic Attenuation Design of a Network on February 12, in Holocene Splay A Multi-disciplinary in Earth Models. of Arrays for 2013. Vavr ycuk, V. Fault Motion from Approach. Morozov, I. B. Earthquake Rupture and Kim, S. G. Seward to Sobiesiak, M. M., Imaging. Bowden, Middleton Island, Goetze, H. J., D. C.,Ampuero, Alaska. Liberty, L. Meneses, G., J. P., and Meng, L. M.,Haeussler,P.J., Schaller, T., Eggert, and Finn, S. P. S., Victor, P., Boudin, F., Campos, J., Vilotte, J.P., Métois, M., Madariaga, R., Olcay, M., and Tassara , C. Wednesday, 30 April (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Explosive Deciphering the Fault Structure... Pillars of Emergence of Source... Earthquake... Simulation... Continuously...
5:00 STUDENT:Ms Field Studies of the Fully Automated STUDENT: No-Cost PM Unified: A New 2012 Mw 7.7 Haida Real-time 3D Anelastic Acquisition of 3D Magnitude for Gwaii Tsunamigenic Earthquake Attenuation and Reflection Imagery Rayleigh and Love Thrust Earthquake: Locations in the San Elastic Scattering of the Continental Wave s wi th Implications for Jacinto Fault Zone Models of the Los Basement. Brown, Application in the Paleoseismic and Using High Angeles Region for L. D. Korean Peninsula Paleotsunami Resolution 3D Use in Earthquake and Yellow Sea Studies of Velocity Models. Simulations. Song, Region. Napoli, V., Subduction Zones. Allam, A. A., X. and Jordan, Bonner, J., and Leonard, L. J., Vernon, F. L., and Russell, D. Bednarski, J. M., Ben-Zion, Y. Rogers,G.C., Nykolaishen, L., Wang, K., Haeussler, P. J., and Witter, R. C. 5:15 Identifying and The 1861 2005 Imaging Tremor Regional Phase Discussion PM Characterizing Simeulue Nias Slip Dynamics at the San Attenuationinthe Blasts from Patch of the Sunda Andreas Fault near Iranian Plateau and Recordings at Subduction Zone: Parkfield with a Surrounding USArray Stations. Characteristic Slip Mini Seismic Array. Regions. Sandvol, Astiz, L., Vernon, F. on an Otherwise Ghosh, A. E.,Kaviani,A.,Ku, L., Martynov, M. V., Non-characteristic W., and Gok, R . Tytell, J., Cox, T. A., Megathrust. White, M. C., Reyes, Meltzner, A. J., J., and Eakins, J. Sieh,K.,Chiang,H. W., Shen, C. C., Wu, C. C., Suwargadi, B. W., Natawidjaja, D. H., Philibosian, B., and Briggs, R. W. 5:30 Improving Yield Stratigraphic Slip Characteristics Finite-frequency PM Estimation for Evidence of the 2004 of the Deep Portion Sensitivity of Near-Surface Sumatra-Andaman of the San Andreas Seismic Waves to Explosions Using Subduction Zone Fault Inferred from Fault Zone Seismic And Seismoturbidite. Low-Frequency Structures. Allam, Overpressure Data. Patton, J. R., Earthquakes. Wu, A. A.,Tape,C.,and Rodgers, A. J., Goldfinger, C., C.,Guyer,R.A., Ben-Zion, Y. Bonner,J.L.,Ford,S. Djadjadihardja, Y., Tr ug man, D. T., R., Templeton, D. and Udrekh, U. Shelly, D. R., and C.,Ramirez,A.L., Johnson, P. A. and Dodge, D. Wednesday, 30 April (continued) Wednesday, 30 April Morning Poster Sessions 15. DynamicResponseCharacterizationofaHighwayBridge Using Ambient Vibrations. Mercerat, E. D.,Regnier,J., Advances in Seismic Imaging and Monitoring of Time- Bertrand, E., and Deni, D. Dependent Variations: Civil Structures, Near-Surface, and 16. Application of Instantaneous Phase Methods for Shallow Crustal Scales Improved Noise-Correlation-Derived Dispersion (see page 436) Measurements from a Local Seismic Array. Moschetti, M. P., Noriega, R., Stephenson, W., and Meremonte, M. 17. Reliable Estimation of Shear-Wave Velocity Profile by 1. Lithospheric Earth Structure of Texas-Gulf of Mexico Inverting Phase Velocity Dispersion Curve and Waveform Margin from Surface Wave Dispersion and Migrated Ps Comparison. Hosseini, M.,Pezeshk,S.,andPujol,J. Receiver Functions. Agrawal, M., Pulliam, J., and Sen, 18. Monitoring Pre-Earthquake Activity by Analysis of M. K. Ambient Seismic Noise Encouraging Results. Gupta, 2. P Wave Transfer Functions for the Northern Mississippi I. N. and Schaff, D. P. Embayment: A Different Approach. Mostafanejad, A. and Langston, C. A. 3. 3D Shear Wave Model Development of the Texas Region Cold Climate Installation Techniques and UsinganOptimizationScheme.Thompson,L.E.,Velasco, Instrumentation Developments for Temporary and A. A., and Garcia, V. H. Long-Term Networks 4. Shear Wave Velocity Structure beneath Haida Gwaii, (see page 440) Canada, in the Vicinity of the 2012 Mw 7.7 Earthquake. Cassidy, J. F.,Gosselin,J.,andDosso,S.E. 5. 3D Seismic Reflection Imaging Using Aftershocks of 19. The Seismic Noise Environment of the Antarctic and the the 2011 Central Virginia Earthquake as Illumination InfluenceofInstrumentationTechniques.Anthony,R.E., Sources. Quiros, D.,Brown,L.D.,Davenport,K.,and Aster, R. C., Wiens, D. A., Nyblade, A., Anandakrishnan, Hole, J. S.,Winberry,J.P.,Huerta,A.D.,andWilson,T.J. 6. Group Velocity Tomography for Eastern Mexico and 20. Seismic Noise Analyses and Event Quality Assessment Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Córdoba, F., Iglesias, A.,Singh, for EarthScope Transportable Array Stations in Alaska. S.K.,Spica,Z.,andLegrand,D. Frassetto, A. M. F.,Busby,R.,Hafner,K.,Woodward,R., 7. Ambient Noise Tomography of the Katmai Volcanic Astiz, L., Sharer, G., and Sauter, A. Complex, Alaska. Lemon, S., Thurber, C. H., Haney, M. 21. Development of New Seismological Instrumentation for M., Syracuse, E., Zhang, H., Zeng, X., and Prejean, S. G. Ice Covered Environments. Bernsen, S.,Winberry,P., 8. Shear-Wave Quality Factor Qs Profiling Using Seismic Aster, R., Woodward, R., Carpenter, P., Beaudoin, B., and Noise Data from Microarrays. Parolai, S.,Boxberger,T., Gridley, J. Pilz, M., and Bindi, D. 22. Running Real-Time, Year-Round Seismic Stations across 9. Extracting Site Characteristics at Delaney Park the Greenland Ice Sheet. Childs, D. and Reusch, M. M. Geotechnical Array in Anchorage, Alaska Using Seismic 23. The Yukon-Northwest Seismograph Network: Interferometry. Kalkan, E., Ulusoy, H. S., Wang, F., and Preliminary Results of Direct Burial Posthole Installation Fletcher, J. P. for Real-Time Monitoring. Audet, P. 10. Site Characterization for Marine Earthquake Engineering 24. The Alaska Volcano Observatory’sExperiencein via Modeling of Ocean-Bottom-Seismometer Operating Multi-Parametric Real Time Monitoring Observations of Rayleigh Waves and Microtremors. Li, Systems in Remote and Challenging Environments. Read, Z. W.,Hao,T.Y.,Ni,S.D.,You,Q.Y.,Liu,L.H.,Bao,F., C. W., Power, J. A., Paskievitch, J. F., and Ketner, D. M. and Xu, Y. 25. Development of Seismic Field System for Multi-YearField 11.AWaveGradiometryApplicationinEngineering Deployment at Poker Flat Research Range, Alaska. Hart, Seismology: Field Measurement of Nonlinear Soil D. and Abbott, R. E. Behavior in the Near Surface. Dangkua, D. T.,Langston, 26. Minimizing Snow Losses for Photovoltaic Systems in C.A.,andCramer,C.H. High-Latitude Maritime Environments. Dalton, S. M. 12. Sediment Shear Velocity and Thickness from Seafloor Compliance using Microseisms Noises.Ruan,Y.,Forsyth, D. W., and Bell Deciphering the Earthquake and Tsunami History of 13. InstantaneousMonitoringofSoilandStructureDynamics Subduction Zones using Autocorrelation Functions Computed with the (see page 441) Stockwell Transform. Bonilla, L. F. and Gueguen, P. 14. Monitoring a Building Using Deconvolution 27. Tsunami Recurrence in the Eastern Aleutian Arc: A Interferometry from Earthquake and Ambient-Noise Record of 6-14 High Tsunamis in 3400 Years on Chirikof Data. Nakata, N. and Snieder, R. Island, Alaska. Nelson, A. R.,Briggs,R.W.,Dura,T., Wednesday, 30 April (continued) Engelhart,S.E.,Gelfenbaum,G.,Bradley,L.A.,Forman, 2009 2013. Fu, Y.,Freymueller,J.T.,Argus,D.F.,and S., and Vane, C. H. Owen, S. E. 28. Evidence for High Tsunamis in the Fox Islands Implies 38. Network Matched Filtering as a Tool for Characterizing Repeated Aleutian Megathrust Earthquakes in the Seismic Sequences in Alaska. Holtkamp, S. G. Unalaska Seismic Gap. Witter, R. C.,Briggs,R.W., 39. Potential Causes for Along-Strike Variability of Slow Slip Koehler, R. D., Gelfenbaum, G., Engelhart, S., Nelson, A. EventsinSouth-CentralAlaska. Watkins, W. D., Colella, R., Carver, G. A., Bender, A. M., and Hemphil-Haley, E. H. V., Brudzinski, M. R., Dieterich, J. H., and Richards- 29. Using Tsunami Deposits to Inform Modeling of Potential Dinger, K. B. Tsunamigenic Earthquake Rupture Zones near Unalaska 40. A Provably Stable Finite-Difference Method for Island, Aleutian Islands. La Selle, S. P. M., Gelfenbaum, Earthquake Cycle Simulations within Subduction Zones. G.,Witter,R.C.,Koehler,R.D.,Briggs,R.W.,Carver, Erickson,B.A.andDay,S.M. G. A., and Engelhart, S. E. 41. SSE-Related Seismicity on the Northern Hikurangi 30. Unrevealing the History of Earthquakes and Tsunamis of Subduction Margin, New Zealand. Bannister, S.,Obara, the Mexican Subduction Zone. RamirezHerrera, M. T., K., Wallace, L., Bourguignon, S., Fry, B., D’Anastasio, E., CastilloAja,R.,Cruz,S.,Lagos,M.,Rangel,V.,and and Eberhart-Phillips, D. Nava, H. 42. Earthquake Triggering along the Hikurangi Margin: Implications for Fault Strength and Stability. vanderElst, N. J. and Savage, H. M. Development of Next Generation Field Methods for 43. High Resolution Detection and Location of Low Portable Broadband Seismic Arrays Frequency Earthquakes Using Cross-station and Cross- (see page 442) detection Correlation. Savard, G. and Bostock, M. G. 31. Crustal Structure of the St. Lawrence Corridor from 44. PBO Strainmeter Measurements of Cascadia Episodic Montreal to the Charlevoix Seismic Zone from a Tremor and Sl ip Events . Hodgkinson, K. M., Phillips, Temporary Broadband Array. Bent, A. L. and Kao, H. D.,Mencin,D.,Henderson,B.,Gottlieb,M.,Gallaher, 32. Performance Modeling of the Transportable Array in W., Johnson, W., Pyatt, C., Van Boskirk, Fox, Puskas, Alaska: Estimated Magnitude of Completeness and Mattioli, Meertens Location Accuracy. Ackerley,N.J. 45. Tremor and Seismicity in the Northern Costa Rica 33. NorthernEmbaymentLithosphericExperiment(NELE): Seismogenic Zone Leading up to the September 5, 2012 Summary, Status and Noise Analysis. NELE Team Earthquake. Taylor, S.,Chaves,E.J.,andSchwartz, (Langston, C.) S. Y. 34. Analysis of Micro-Earthquakes in the Sierra Madre- 46. Comparison of Velocity and Attenuation Patterns along Cucamonga Fault Zone Transition as Recorded by a the Frictionally Heterogeneous Nicaragua-Costa Rica Temporary Seismic Deployment. Pazos, C. S.,Levario, Seismogenic Zone. Moore-Driskell, M. M., Bisrat, S. T., J.J.,Nget,D.,andPolet,J. and DeShon, H. R. 35. What Have We Learned from Data from Purpose-Built, 47. Examining Apparent Stress in Microseismicity along the Direct-Bury Sensors at Poker Flat, Alaska? Slad, G. W., Costa Rican and Southern Nicaragua Segments of the Anderson, K. E., Reusch, M. M., Hutton, W., Miller, P., Middle America Trench. Rotman,H.M.M.,Bilek,S.L., Pfiefer, C., Barstow, N., Parker, T., Beaudoin, B.,and and Phillips, W. S. Gridley, J. 48. Spatio-Temporal Variations of Afterslip and Aftershocks 36. A Discussion of Seismic Velocity Models, Attenuation RevealtheRoleofFluidsattheMegathrustRupturedby and Stochastic Properties as Indicators of EGS theMw8.82010Maule(CentralChile)GreatEarthquake. Favorability in Dixie Valley NV. Tibuleac, I. M. and Tassara, A., Soto, H., Bedford, J., Moreno, M., and Baez, Iovenitti, J. J. C. 49. Temporal Variations of Intraplate Earthuake Activity Following the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake. Diverse Mechanisms of Subduction Zone Fault Slip: Delbridge, B., Matsuzawa, T., Kita, S., Buffett, B., and Exploring the Relationships among Seismic Rupture, Roland, B. Transient Slip, and Steady Creep 50. Interaction of Trench-Parallel Fault Systems and the (see page 444) Subduction Zone Earthquake Cycle Investigated with the IPOC Creepmeter Array in N-Chile. Victor, P., Sobiesiak, M., Schurr, B., Gonzalez, G. L., and 37. Temporal Variation of A Large Slow Slip Event Oncken, O. at the Southcentral Alaska Subduction Zone during Wednesday, 30 April (continued) 63. Coupled Non-linear and Linear Acoustic Wave Effects of Topography and Surface Loads on Earthquakes Propagation Codes for Explosion Monitoring. Preston, and Faulting L. and Jones, K. R. (see page 447) 64. Comparing Modeled and Observed Infrasound Signals from the Source Physics Experiment Tests 2 and 3. Jones, 51. Crustal Deformation from Surface Loading in the Great K. R.,Whitaker,R.W.,andArrowsmith,S.J. Salt Lake Region. Amosu, A. M., and Smalley, R. 65. USArray Acoustic Capabilities Confirm Significant 52. Heterogeneous Initial Stress States for Dynamic Rupture Meteor Sighting. Edwards, W. N.,deGroot-Hedlin, Propagation in the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake. C.D.,andHedlin,M.A.H. Duan, B. 66. Fiber Optic Acoustic Sensing (FOAS) Far-Field 53. The Influence of Stresses from Topography on the 2008 Observations of SPE 3. Mellors, R. J.,Pitarka,A., Wenchuan, China Rupture: Implications for Tectonic Kuhn, M., Stinson, B., Ford, S. R., Snelson, C., and Stresses and Rupture Processes. Styron, R. H. and Drachenberg, D. Hetland, E. A. 67. Seismic-Wave Gradiometry Applied to a Small-Scale 54. Coseismic Slip in the 2013 Lushan, China Earthquake Exploration Dataset. Kendall, L. and Langston, C. A. and Topographic Fault Loading. Hetland, E. A.,Styron, 68. Yield and Depth of the SPE Chemical Explosions by R. H., Zhang, G., and Medina Luna, L. Modeling of Local Waveforms Using a Source Consisting 55. Coulomb Stress, Surface Displacement and Seismic Rate of Pure Explosion and Spall Sources. Saikia, C. K. and Changes Associated with Ice Mass Fluctuations on Woods, M. Seasonal, Annual, and Decadal Time Scales in South 69. Resolving Focal Depth with a Near Field Single Station in Central Alaska. Sauber, J. and Ruppert, N. Sparse Seismic Network. Ni, S. and He, X. 56.TheRoleofFrictionalSofteningandErosionon 70. Isotropic Source Rerms of San Jacinto Fault Zone Thrusting Sequences in Accretionary Prisms Based on Earthquakes based on Waveform Inversions with a Sequential Limit Analysis. Mary,B.C.L., Maillot, B., Generalized CAP Method. Ross, Z. E.,Ben-Zion,Y., and Leroy, Y. M. and Zhu, L. 71. Full Moment Tensors for Small (Mw < 3) Events at Uturuncu Volcano, Bolivia. Alvizuri, C. and Tape, C. Emergence of Continuously Recording Very Large Array 72. Time-Dependent Moment Tensors of the First Three Capabilities in Seismology Source Physics Experiments Explosions. Yang , X ., Patton, (see page 448) H.J.,Rowe,C.A.,andLarmat,C. 73. A Spall Model Comparison with Insights from the Source 57. Retrieval of Core Phases from Ambient Noise Cross- Physics Experiment. Ford, S. R., Mellors, R. J., and correlation Using a Dense Large-aperture Broadband Vorobiev, O. Y. Array in Southwest China. Wang , W. T., Tsai, C. V., 74. Local Distance Application of P/S Methods of and Wang, B. S. Discriminating Explosions from Earthquakes How Low 58. An Earthquake Detection Algorithm with Pseudo- Can We Go? Walter, W. R .,Pyle,M.,Ford,S.R.,and Probabilities of Multiple Indicators. Ross, Z. E. and Pasyanos, M. E. Ben-Zion, Y. 75. Source Physics Experiment Site Characterization: 59. Recovering Seismic Green’sFunctionsUsingIcequake Earthquake Relocation and Southern Nevada Coda Interferometry at Erebus Volcano, Antarctica. Attenuation Structure. Pyle, M. L.,Walter,W.R., McMahon, N. D.,Chaput,J.A.,Knox,H.A.,Aster, Pasyanos,M.E.,Myers,S.C.,Smith,K.D.,andHauk,T.F. R. C., and Kyle, P.R. 76. High Resolution Imagery of the Source Physics 60. Rupture Speeds of Recent Large Earthquakes. Wang , D., Experiment Site Using Seismic Interferometry. Matzel, Mori, J., and Koketsu, K. E., Pitarka, A., and Mellors, R. 61. Earthquake Locations Using a Wave Gradiometer in 77. 3DModelingofRgWavePropagationonGeophoneLines Southern Illinois. Meredith,J.A.and Langston, C. A. Recording the Source Physics Experiment. Larmat,C.S., Rowe, C. A., Coblentz, D. D., and Patton, H. J. 78. Structural Heterogeneity at the SPE Site Revealed Explosive Source Characterization Through Combined P-Wave Travel Times and Sub-Band (see page 449) Rg Phase Velocities. Rowe,C.A.,Patton,H.J.,Yang,X., Larmat, C., and Coblentz, D. 62. Understanding Shear Motion from Underground 79. A New Database of Digitized Regional Seismic Explosions in Granite. Vorobiev, O. Y., Stroujkova, A., Waveforms from Underground Nuclear Explosions in Ezzedine,S.M.E.,Herbold,E.B.,Glenn,L.,and Eurasia.Kim,W.Y.,Mikhailova,N.N.,Richards, P. Antoun, T. G.,andSokolova,I.N. Wednesday, 30 April (continued) 80. High Frequency Network Discrimination Using MLE 92. Rupture and Ground Motion Models on the Source spectra From Global Amplitude Tomography. Claremont-Casa Loma Stepover of the San Jacinto Phillips,W.S.,Fisk,M.D.,Stead,R.J.,Begnaud,M.L., Fault, Incorporating Realistically Complex Initial Yang,X.,andBallard,S. Conditions. Lozos, J. C.,Olsen,K.B.,Oglesby,D.D.,and Brune, J. N. 93. Geometric Complexities of Hosgri Fault Zone Offshore Fault Structure, Heterogeneity, and Implications for Point Sal, Central Coastal California. Hogan, P. Rupture Dynamics J.,Nishenko,S.P.,Greene,H.G.,andBergkamp, (see page 453) B. J. 94. Newly Acquired 2D and 3D Multichannel Seismic 81. Modeling Fault Rupture Process by Lagrange Datasets from the Inner California Borderlands Yield Discontinuous Deformation Analysis Method. Cai, Y. New Constraints on the Timing and Style of Recent 82. Re-visiting Linear Source Inversion with the Full Deformation. Bormann, J. M., Holmes, J. J., Driscoll, Complexity of Earthquake Rupture, Including Both Slip N.W.,Kent,G.M.,Harding,A.J.,Maloney,J.M.,and Re-activation and Supershear Rupture. Song,S.G.and Ucarkus, G. Dalguer, L. A. 95. Aftershocks Following the January 5th 2013 Queen 83. Fault Slip Heterogeneity of the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan, Charlotte-Fairweather Fault Earthquake near Craig, China, Earthquake and Implications for Regional Alaska from Offshore Seismic Observations. Roland, Tectonic Stresses. Medina Luna, L. and Hetland, E. A. E.C.,Ruppert,N.A.,Gulick,S.,Haeussler,P.,andWalton, 84. High-Resolution Geophysical Imaging across the A. L. Olympia Structure, Southern Puget Lowland, WA: 96. Quaternary Crustal Deformation at the Apex of the Defining a Fault System. Odum,J.K.,Stephenson,W.J., Mount McKinley Restraining Bend of the Denali Fault, Pratt,T.L.,andBlakely,R.J. Alaska. Burkett, C. A., Bemis, S. P., Benowitz, J. A., and 85. Rate-and-State Coulomb Stress Evolution: a Pseudo- Walker,L.A. Prospective Southern California Earthquake Forecast. 97. Insight into the Evolution of the Mount McKinley Strader, A. E. S. andJackson,D.D.J. Restraining Bend Through Thermochronology: Long- 86. High-Resolution Aftershock Distribution of 2010 Term Controls on Slip Distribution. Benowitz, J. A., Mw6.9 Yushu, China Earthquake and Its Implication. Bemis, S. P., Burket, C. A., and O’Sullivan, P. B. Wang , B., Yang, H., Peng, Z., Yang, J., Han, L., Yang, 98. Analog Modeling of Restraining Bends: A Study of Strike- W.,Yuan,S.,andMeng,X. Slip Fault Evolution. Hatem, A. E.,Cooke,M.L.,and 87. Velocity Contrast along Ganzi-Yushu Fault from Analysis Madden, E. H. of Fault Zone Head Waves Associated with Aftershocks of 2010 Mw6.9 Yushu, Qinghai Earthquake. Yang , W., Peng,Z.G.,Wang,B.S.,Li,Z.F.,Meng,X.F.,Yuan,S.Y., Pillars of Simulation: Seismic Velocity and Material and Qiao, S. Models (see page 457) Geometric Complexities along Strike-Slip Systems: New Insights on Seismic Hazards, Earthquake Behavior, and 99. UCVM: Open Source Software Framework for 3D Fault System Evolution Seismic Velocity Models. Gill, D.,Small,P.,Maechling, (see page 454) P.,Jordan,T.,Plesch,A.,Taborda,R.,andCallaghan,S. 100. Two-Station Micro-Tremor Measurements to Detect the Depth to Bedrock in Sultan, Washington. Hayashi, K., 88. Determination of Lithosphere Rheology from Cakir,R.,Walsh,T.J.,andDragovich,J.D. Interseismic Deformation and Implications for Fault 101. Detection of Shallow Crustal Discontinuities from Stress Accumulation. Hines, T. T. andHetland,E.A. High-Frequency Waveforms of Local Microearthquakes. 89. Unraveling Enigmas in the GPS Velocity Field in the Big Hrubcova, P.,Vavrycuk,V.,andBouskova,A. Bend Region of the Southern San Andreas Fault System. 102. Detailed Crustal Structure of the North China and Its Thatcher, W. Implication for Seismic Activity. Jiang, W. L.,Zhang, 90. Fault Interaction in the San Gorgonio Pass Region of the J. F., Wang, X., and Tian, T. San Andreas Fault, Southern California. Kendrick, K. J. 103. Frequency Dependent Lg Attenuation in Northeast and Matti, J. C. China. Ni,N.R.,Gallegos,A.C.,Trujillo,A.R.,Sandvol, 91. Paleoseismology of the Northern San Jacinto Fault Zone E. A., Ni, J., Hearn, T. M., Tang, Y., Grand, S. P., Niu, F.L, and Implications for Rupture across Steps in the San Chen,Y.J.,Ning,J.Y.,Kawakatsu,H.,Tanaka,S.,and Andreas Fault System, Southern California. Onderdonk, Obayashi, M. N. W.,McGill,S.F.,andRockwell,T.K. Wednesday, 30 April (continued) 104. High Resolution Regional Travel-Time Tomography in Complementary Site Parameter. Sandikkaya, M. A., South-Central Tibet: Imaging Tibetan Crust beneath Bard, P. Y., and Akkar, S. the Hi-CLIMB Array. Riddle, E., Nabelek, J. L., and 111. Empirical Assessment of Site Effects in Low Seismicity Braunmiller, J. Areas. Perron, V., Hollender, F., Guyonnet-Benaize, C., 105. Sn Attenuation in Northeast China. Yan, Q.,Sandvol,E., Bard, P. Y., and Gélis, C. and Ku, W. 112. Rock and Stiff-Soil Site Amplification: Dependency on > 106. Mechanisms of Postseismic Deformation Following the VS30 and kappa (k0 ). Laurendeau, A., Cotton, F., 2010 M = 7.2ElMayor-CucapahEarthquake.Rollins, Ktenidou, O. J., Bonilla, L. F., and Hollender, F. J. C., Barbot, S. D., and Avouac, J. P. 113. Site Response in Western Washington from Specral 107. Separation of the Earthquake Tomography Inverse Ratios. Keshvardoost, R. and Wolf, L. W. Problem to Refine Hypocenter Locations and 114. Site Amplification Using Generalized versus Hazard- Tomographic Models: A Case Study from Central Consistent Ground Motion: A Site-Specific Comparative Oklahoma. Toth , C. R ., Chen, C. C., and Holland, A. A. Case-Study in CEUS. Li, W.,Quittmeyer,R.C.,Kimball, 108. Detailed Near Surface Velocity Model and Site Response J. K., Blanco, J. E., and Zandieh, A. of the Hayward, East San Francisco Bay Area: 2D 115. Shallow and Deep Shear-wave Velocity Data for Velocity Model Based on Active and Passive Surface Wave ShakeMaps, Characterizations of Earthquake Recording Methods. Craig, M. S. and Hayashi, K. Station Sites and Site Response Analyses in Washington and Oregon. Cakir, R., Walsh, T. J., Hayashi, K., Xia, J., and Madin, I. Site Response: From Site-Specific Analyses to Predictive 116. Computation of H/V Spectral Ratios at Sites with Strong Models around the Globe Lateral Heterogeneity Using Diffuse Field Theory and (see page 459) IBEM. Molina Villegas, J. C., Perton, M., and Sanchez Sesma, F. J. 109. Detailed Near Surface Velocity Model and Site Response 117. Validation of Dynamic Site Soil Profile at the Central of the Hayward, East San Francisco Bay Area: Seismic United States Seismic Observatory, New Madrid Seismic ObservationofaBuildingImplosionanditsInterpretation Zone. Brengman,C.M.J.,Carpenter,N.S.,Woolery, from Site Response Point of View. Hayashi, K. and E. W., and Wang, Z. Craig, M. 118. Infinite Wedge Revisited: Scattering of Plane Waves 110. Effect of Site Models on Standard Deviation of by Wedge Topographic Features. Mohammadi, K. and GMPEs and Fundamental Site Frequency as a New Assimaki, D. Thursday, 01 May Concurrent SSA Oral Sessions
Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Induced Seismicity Large and Recent Advances in Alaska Update of Monitoring Session Chairs: Ivan Damaging Ground Motions the USGS National Dynamic Changes Wong , Justin Earthquakes of Simulation Seismic Hazard at Active Volcanoes Rubinstein, and 2013/2014 Methods and Their Maps and Fault Zones Thomas Braun (see Session Chairs: Validation Session Chairs: Peter Session Chairs: page 461) Gavin Hayes, Session Chairs: Haeussler, John Ninfa Bennington, Thorne Lay, Harley Christine Goulet Anderson, and Mark Matt Haney, and Benz, and Charles and Kim B. Olsen Petersen (see page Silvio de Angelis (see Ammon (see page (see page 469) 473) page 478) 465)
8:30 INVITED:Factors From Simple to Three-Dimensional INVITED: INVITED:Detecting AM That Enhance the Complex: Source Ground-Motion Challenges Facing Temporal Changes Likelihood of Fluid Properties of Some Simulations of theUpdateofthe in Active Fault Injection-Induced Recent Large Earthquakes in the 2007 Probabilistic Zones during Large Earthquakes Large Earthquakes Using Hanford, Seismic Hazard Map Earthquake Cycles. Enough to be Felt. Seismic and Wa s h ing to n A re a . of Alaska and the Peng, Z. McGarr, A. and Geodetic Data. Frankel, A.,Thorne, Aleutians. Wesson, Rubinstein, J. Hayes, G. P., P., and Rohay, A. R. L.,Boyd,O.S., Barnhart, W. D., Mueller, C. S., and Benz, H. M., Briggs, Frankel, A. D. R. W., and Gold, R. D.
8:45 The Curious Case of STUDENT: INVITED: Updating the USGS INVITED:Imaging AM the Timpson, TX Coulomb Stress Verification of Seismic Hazard Dynamic Changes Earthquakes: Changes Resulting Synthetic Maps for Alaska. in Heterogeneous Natural or Delayed from the Mw 7.7 Near-Source Mueller, C. S., Structures Using Triggering? Leidig, 2012 Haida Gwaii Ground Motion Wesson, R. L., Boyd, Diffuse Waves: From M. and Bonner, J. L. Earthquake. Hobbs, against Empirical O. S., Bufe, C. G., Theory to T. E.,Brillon,C., GMPE and Frankel, A. D., and Applications. Cassidy, J. F., Physics-Based Petersen, M. D. Planés, T., Dragert, H., and Stochastic Source Obermann, A., Dosso, S. E. Characterization for Larose, E., Campillo, Future Earthquakes. M., Rossetto, V., Dalguer, L. A., Margerin, L., and Baumann, C., and Froment, B. Song,S.G.
9:00 INVITED:Tryingto Investigating Summary of a Large INVITED:The INVITED: AM Discriminate Dynamic Scale Validation Denali Fault Slip Nonlinear Site Triggered from Interactions between Project Using the Rate and Models of Response in Natural Seismicity: the October 2012 SCEC Broadband Interior Alaska Medium Magnitude Three Case Studies Haida Gwaii and Strong Ground Active Deformation. Earthquakes near from Northern Italy. January 2013 Craig Motion Simulation Haeussler, P. J., Parkfield, Braun, T.,Cesca,S., Earthquakes. Platform. Goulet, Matmon, A., California. and Dahm, T. Walter, J. I.,Kao, C. A. and BBP Schwartz, D. P., and Rubinstein,J.L. H.,Peng,Z.,Aiken, Validation Group. Seitz, G. C.,Meng,X.,and Zimmerman, J. Thursday, 01 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Induced Large and Recent Adv-Gr Alaska Update... Monitoring Seismicity... Damaging... Motion... Dynamic...
9:15 INVITED: The Azle, Magnitude 7.5 INVITED: Recurrence of Large 4D Reflection AM Texas, Earthquake Earthquake of 5 Site-Specific Earthquakes along Monitoring of Deep Sequence of January 2013 on Response in the Denali Fault Magma: Lessons 2013 2014: Induced Queen Charlotte Validation Studies of System. Schwartz, from the or Natural? Fault in Southeast Physics-Based D. P.,Haeussler,P.J., SEA-CALIPSO Ellsworth, W. L., Alaska. Ruppert, N. Earthquake Seitz, G. G., Koehler, Experiment. Brown, Benz, H. M., Cain, A.,Yue,H.,and Simulations. R. D., Personius, S. L. and Quiros, D. C., DeShon, H. R., Freymueller, J. T. Assimaki, D.,Shi,J., F.,Crone,A.J.,and Hayward, C., and Taborda, R. Dawson, T. E. Luetgert, J. H., Quitoriano, V., Stump, B., and Wa l d , D. J.
9:30 Characterization of STUDENT:Seismic INVITED:Some Synthesis of Results Three-Dimensional AM an Earthquake Slip Distribution of Modifications to from a Transect of Velocity Structure of Sequence Triggered Large Inter- and Parameters Used in Paleoseismic the Galeras Volcano by Hydraulic Intra- Plate Oceanic the Stochastic Investigations across (Colombia) from Fracturing in Strike-slip Method for the Alaska Range. Local Earthquake Harrison County, Earthquakes. Simulating Bemis, S. P.,Walker, To m o g r a p hy a n d Ohio. Friberg, P. A., Aderhold, K., High-Frequency L. A., Federschmidt, Evolution of the Besana-Ostman, G. Abercrombie, R. E., Ground Motions. S., DeVore, J. R., and Volcanic Activity. M., and Dricker, I. and Antolik, M. Boore, D. M. and Taylor, T. P. Vargas Jimenez, C. Thompson, E. M. A. and Torres, R. 9:45 Break & Posters Cook & Arteaga 10:45 AM 10:45 INVITED: Triggered How the 2013 INVITED: Implications of STUDENT, AM Earthquakes Far Lushan Earthquake Comparison of 3D Recent Paleoseismic INVITED:Changes from the Wellbore: (Ms = 7.0) and 1D Wave Observations for in Seismic Velocity Fluid Pressure Triggered Its Propagation Models of during the Migration and the Aftershocks: Modeling in the San Alaska-Aleutian 2004 2008 2008 2014 Jones Insights from Static Francisco Bay Area. Megathrust Rupture Eruption of Mount Swarm, Central Coulomb Stress Pitarka, A., Patterns. Briggs, R. St. Helens Volcano. Oklahoma. Change Rodgers, A. J., W., Witter, R. C., Hotovec-Ellis, A. J., Keranen, K. M., Calculations. Zhu, Petersson, A., and Nelson, A. R., Vidale, J. E., Weingarten, M., S.,Miao,M.,Ren,J., Sjogreen, B. Koehler, R. D., Gomberg, J. S., Bekins, B., Ge, S., and Shi, Y. Haeussler, P. J., Moran, S., and and Abers, G. A. Engelhart, S. E., Thelen, W. A. Gelfenbaum, G., Dura, T., and Carver, G. Thursday, 01 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Induced Large and Recent Adv-Gr Alaska Update... Monitoring Seismicity... Damaging... Motion... Dynamic...
11:00 INVITED:Potential Rupture History of The Shakeout GPS-Derived Fault STUDENT, AM Case of Induced the 2013 Mw6.8 Earthquake Scenario Geometries and Slip INVITED: Seismicity from a Lushan, China with Plasticity. Rates for Eastern Observations of Water Disposal Well Earthquake Based Roten, D.,Olsen,K. Prince William Time-Lapsed in South-Central on Strong Motion B., Day, S. M., Cui, Sound and the St. Velocity Changes at Oklahoma. Data Inversion: A Y., and FAh, D. Elias Orogen. Yellowstone from Holland, A. A. High-Angle Blind Elliott, J., Ambient Noise Thrusting Event. Freymueller, J. T., Correlation Zhang, G.,Hetland, and Larsen, C. F. Functions. Seats, K. E.A.,Shan,X.,and J. and Lawrence, J. F. Vallee, M.
11:15 Constraints on STUDENT:Rupture PRENOLIN INVITED:The Dynamics of the AM Recent Earthquake Process of the Project: A Castle Mountain Yellowstone Source Parameters, November 17, 2013 Benchmark on Fault, South-Central Volcanic System Fault Geometry and Mw 7.8 Scotia Sea Numerical Alaska: Sense of Slip Using 4-D Seismic Aftershock Earthquake. Ye, L., Simulation of 1-D and Slip Rate. Imaging. Farrell, J., Characteristics in Lay,T.,Koper,K.D., Non-Linear Site Koehler, R. D. and Smith, R. B., and Oklahoma. Smalley, R., Bevis, Effect. 2 Reger, R. D. Lin, F. C. McNamara,D.E., M.G.,Zakrajsek,A. Preliminary Results Benz, H. M., F., and Teferle, F. N. from the Verification Herrmann, R. B., Phase on Idealistic and Bergman, E. A. Cases. Régnier, J., Bonilla, L. F., bard, P. Y., Bertrand, E., Hollender, F., Kawase, H., Sicilia, D., the PRENOLIN participants: D. Assimaki, D. Boldini, S. Iai, S. Kramer, E. Foerster, C. Gélis, G. Gazetas, J. Gingery, Y. Hashash, P. Moczo, S.Foti,G.Lanzo,F. Lopez-Caballero, D. Roten, K. Pitilakis, F. DeMartin, B. Jeremic, A. Nieto-Ferro, M.P. Santisi, and D. Mercerat Thursday, 01 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Induced Large and Recent Adv-Gr Alaska Update... Monitoring Seismicity... Damaging... Motion... Dynamic...
11:30 INVITED: The 2013 The Implosive Rupture Dynamics New Seismic Hazard Monitoring Changes AM Seismic Sequence Component of the and Ground Model for in Seismic Velocity Close to the Gas 2013 Okhotsk Sea Motions from 3-D Northwestern Related to Injection Platform of Deep Earthquake: Dynamic Canada. Allen, T. I., Magmatism at the Castor Project, Evidence from Rough-Fault Adams, J., Rogers, G. Okmok and Offshore Spain. Radial Modes and Simulations of C.,andHalchuk,S. Redoubt Volcanoes, Cesca, S.,Grigoli, Constraints from Dip-Slip Events. Shi, Alaska. F., Heimann, S., Geodetic Data. Z. andDay,S.M. Bennington, N. L., Gonzalez, A., Okal, E. A.,Saloor, Haney, M., De Maghsoudi, S., N.,Freymueller,J.T., Angelis, S., and Buforn, E., Blanch, Steblov, G. M., and Thurber, C. H. E., and Dahm, T. Kogan, M. G.
11:45 SeismicResponseto Slip Models for the STUDENT: Site-Specific STUDENT:Imaging AM Power Production at 2013 M7.7 and High-Complexity Probabilistic Seismic Seismic Source the Coso and Salton M6.8 Balochistan Deterministic Q(f ) Hazard Analyses of Variations with Sea Geothermal Earthquakes in Simulation of the Anchorage, Alaska Back-Projection Fields, Southeastern Pakistan. Fielding, 1994 Northridge and Comparison to Methods at Sierra CA: Using E. J.,Wei,S.J., Mw 6.7 Earthquake. the 2007 National Negra Volcano, Operational Yag ue-Martinez, N., Withers, K. B., Seismic Hazard Galapagos Islands. Parameters and Leprince, S., Olsen, K. B., Shi, Z., Maps. Wong , I., Kelly, C. L., Relocated Events to Hudnut, K. H., and Day, S. Zachariasen, J., and Lawrence, J. F., and Study Khan, S. D., Motagh, Dober, M. Ebinger, C. Anthropogenic M., Ayoub, F., and Seismicity Rates and Samsonov, S.V. Reservoir Scale Tectonic Structure. Lajoie, L. J., O’Connell, D. R. H., Brodsky, E. E., and Creed, R. J. Noon Lunch La Perouse 1:15 PM Thursday, 01 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Induced Seismicity Great Earthquakes Recent Advances in Seismic Imaging as Development of (continued) and Slip to the Ground Motions USArray Moves to 2014 U.S. National Trench Simulation Alaska Seismic Hazard (Seismological Methods and Their Session Chairs: Maps and Their Society of Validation Carene Larmat, Implementation in Japan/Seismological (continued) Frank Vernon, Bob Engineering Society of America Woodward, and Applications Joint Session) Lindsay Session Chairs: Session Chairs: Jim Worthing ton (se e Sanaz Rezaeian, Mori, David Wald, page 475) Christine Goulet, and Emily C. Roland John Anderson, and (see page 467) Mark Petersen (see page 480)
1:30 STUDENT:Induced INVITED:Low Using Attenuation Seismic Velocity INVITED: The 2014 PM Seismicity Coseismic Friction in Ground Motion Structure and Update of the Mechanisms at The on the Tohoku Fault Prediction Anisotropy of the United States Geysers Geothermal Determined from Equations: Alaska Subduction National Seismic Field from the Temperature Validating Zone Derived from Hazard Models. Analysis of Stress Measurements. Improvements to Surface Wave Petersen, M., Field Variations Fulton,P.M., Strong Ground To m o g r a p hy. Wa n g , Moschetti, M., Related to Fluid Brodsky, E. E., Kano, Motion Predictions. Y. and Tape, C. Powers, P., Mueller, Injection. Y., Mori, J., Chester, Pasyanos,M.E. C., Haller, K., Martínez-Garzón, F., Ishikawa, T., Frankel, A., Zeng, Y., P.,Kwiatek,G., Harris, R. N., Lin, Rezaeian, S., Bohnhoff, M., W., Eguchi, N., Harmsen, S., Boyd, Dresen, G., and To c z ko , S . , O., Field, N., Chen, Hartline, C. Expedition 343, R., Rukstales, K., 343T, and KR13-08 Luco, N., Wheeler, Scientists R., Williams, R., and Olsen, A.
1:45 Geomechanical INVITED:Stress Constraining INVITED:Seismic INVITED: PM Reservoir State near Updip GMPEs in Critical Imaging along a Recommendations Characterization End of the 2011 Ranges for Complex Dense Broadband for Future Updates Using Induced To h o ku - O ki Ruptures Using Transe ct throug h of the National Seismicity and Earthquake Inferred Strong Motion Central Alaska. Seismic Hazard State-of-The-Art from OBS Simulation Abers, G. A. and Maps. Anderson, J. Wave f o rm Aftershock Procedures on the Christensen, D. H. G., Abrahamson, N. Processing Observations. SCEC Broadband A., Campbell, K. W., Techniques. Obana, K.,Kodaira, Platform. Bayless, J., Chapmann, M., Kwiatek, G., S.,Hino,R.,and Dreger, D., Hamburger, M. W., Bohnhoff, M., Shinohara, M. Wooddell, K., Lettis, W. R., Shome, Martínez-Garzón, Abrahamson, N., N.,WeldonII,R.J., P., Bulut, F., and and Donahue, J. and Wills, C. J. Dresen, G. Thursday, 01 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Induced Great Recent Adv-Gr Seismic Imaging as Dev of 2014 Seismicity... Earthquakes... Motion... USArray... Hazard Maps...
2:00 Moment Tensor Large Shallow Slip STUDENT:The Imaging the The 2014 National PM Dynamics of of the 2011 Effect of Megathrust Zone Seisimic Hazard Hydraulic Fracturing To h o ku - o ki To p o g r a p hy o n th e and Yakutat/Pacific Maps: Updated in Hydrocarbon Earthquake. Mori, J. Seismic Wavefield. Plate Interface in the Catalogs and Reservoirs. Baig, A. 30 minutes Cahayani, U. and Alaska Subduction Seismicity Models. M. and Urbancic, Tape, C. Zone. Kim, Y., Mueller, C. S. T. I. Abers, G. A., Li, J., Christensen, D., Calkins, J., and Rondenay, S.
2:15 INVITED:Seismic Large Shallow Slip Long-Period INVITED:Seismic Ground Motion PM Hazard and Ground of the 2011 Ground Motion To m o g r a p hy o f Models Used in the Motion Implications To h o ku - o ki Simulation for the Alaskan Volcanoes: 2014 U.S. National of Induced Earthquake. Mori, J. 2007 Chuetsu-oki, Accomplishments Seismic Hazard Seismicity. (continued) Japan, Earthquake and Opportunities. Maps. Rezaeian, S., Atkinson, G. M. Using the Ambient Thurber, C.,Zhang, Petersen,M.D., Seismic Field. H., Prejean, S., Moschetti, M. P., Miyake, H., Haney, M., Powers, P., Harmsen, Denolle, M. A., and Ohlendorf, S., S. C., and Frankel, Beroza,G.C. Lemon, S., and A. D. Brown, J.
2:30 INVITED: Constraining the STUDENT: Seismicity of Alaska INVITED:New PM Quantifying the Broadband Slip Validation of the 1973 2013: A Time-Independent Seismic Hazard History of 2011 Equivalent Well-constrained and From Natural and Tohoku Earthquakes Point-Source Catalog of Time-Dependent Induced Using a Two-Step Method for Earthquake Seismic Source Earthquakes. Finite Fault Modeling Ground Locations Using Models for the Rubinstein,J.L., Approach. Ji, C. and Motions from Large Multiple Event Wa s atc h Fro nt , Uta h Llenos, A., Archuleta, A. J. Earthquakes. Yenier, Relocation Methods. for the National Ellsworth, W. L., E. and Atkinson, Benz, H., Myers, S., Seismic Hazard McGarr, A., G. M. Johannesson, G., Maps. Wong , I., Michael, A., Mueller, Bergman, E., Earle, Lund, W., DuRoss, C., and Petersen, M. P., and Hayes, G. C., Thomas, P., Arabasz, W., Crone, A., Hylland, M., Luco, N., Olig, S., Pechmann, J., Personius, S., Petersen, M., Schwartz, D., and Smith, R. 2:45 Break & Posters Cook & Arteaga 3:45 PM Thursday, 01 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Induced Seismicity Great Earthquakes Merging Paths: Seismic Imaging as Development of (continued) and Slip to the Earthquake USArray Moves to 2014 U.S. National Trench Simulations and Alaska (continued) Seismic Hazard (Seismological Engineering Maps and Their Society of Applications Implementation in Japan/Seismological Session Chairs: Engineering Society of America Ricardo Taborda, Applications Joint Session) Aysegul Askan, and (continued) (continued) Tsuyoshi Ichimura (see page 472)
3:45 INVITED:Managing INVITED: Simulation of Tracking Glaciers Integrating PM Seismic Hazard Due Constraining Structure Seismic with the Alaska UCERF3 into the to Induced Shallow Slip and Response Based on Seismic Network. 2014 National Earthquakes in Tsunami Excitation Analyzing West,M.E. Seismic Hazard Central Arkansas in Megathrust Fault-structure Maps. Powers, P. M. through Partnership Ruptures Using System in Large and Field, E. H. between Scientific Seismic, Ocean Computing and Regulatory Acoustic, and Environment. Agencies. Horton, Tsunami Waves Quinay,P.E.B., S. P.,Ausbrooks,S. Recorded on Ichimura, T., and M., Withers, M. M., Ocean-Bottom Hori, M. and Ogwari, P. O. Sensor Networks. Dunham, E. M., Kozdon,J.E.,and Lotto,G.C.
4:00 Protocol and Best Complete Stress End-to-End STUDENT: INVITED:A PM Practices for Drop in Shallow Simulation of the Automated Surface Summary of Addressing Induced Great Earthquakes. Response of Wave Phase Velocity Findings and Models Seismicity Hardebeck, J. L. Building Clusters Measuring System of the NGA-West2 Associated with during Earthquakes and Its Application Research Program. Enhanced in the Presence of on USArray. Jin, G. Bozorgnia, Y., Geothermal Systems Coupled and Gaherty, J. Abrahamson, N., (EGS). Majer, E., Soil-Structure Campbell, K., Nelson, J., Interaction Effects. Rowshandel, B., and Robertson-Tait, A., Taborda, R ., Shantz, T. Savy, J., and Wong , Isbiliroglu, Y., and I. Bielak, J. Thursday, 01 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
Induced Great Merging Paths... Seismic Imaging as Dev of 2014 Seismicity... Earthquakes... USArray... Hazard Maps... 4:15 Discussion Seismic Versus City-Soil Interaction Resurrection Plate Proposed PM Aseismic Slip: in the Valley of Revisited: Does a Earthquake Ground Probing Mechanical Mexico: New Kinematic Motion Maps for Properties of the Amplification and Model of the Model Building Northeast Japan Long Duration Yakutat, Crescent, Codes Based on the Subduction Zone. Ground Motion. and Siletz Terranes 2014 United States Shirzaei, M., Ramirez-Guzman, Solve an Old Puzzle? Geological Survey Bürgmann, R., L.,MaciasCastillo, McCrory, P. A. and National Seismic Uchida,N.,Hu,Y., M., Contreras, M., Wilson, D. S. Hazard Model. and Pollitz, F. Zepeda, O., and Luco, N., Bachman, Aguirre, J. R. E., Crouse, C. B., Harris, J. R., Hooper, J. D., and Kircher, C. A., (Rezaeian, S.)
4:30 CMT Re-analysis of STUDENT: Lithospheric On NGA and PM the Great 1964 Nonlinear Time Modification at the NEHRP Site Alaska Earthquake. History Analyses of Southern Edge of Coefficients Inferred Nettles, M. and Structures under Laurentia Revealed for Site Classes in Ekström, G. Real and Synthetic by Broadband U.S. Building Codes. 30 minutes Ground Motions. Seismology. Borcherdt, R. D. Karimzadeh, S., Pulliam, J.,Grand, Askan, A., Yakut, A., S. P., and Gurrola, H. and Ameri, G. 4:45 Rupture to Rafters Attenuation and Preliminary PM to Response: Shear-Wave Speed Application of the Completing the To m o g r a p hy i n th e 2014 U.S. National Loop of Earthquake Central U.S. from Seismic Hazard Map Science, Engineering Teleseismic Ambient and Its Implication and Policy. Lin, T. Seismic Field in the Reinsurance Correlations. Poli, Industry. Lee, S. W. P. and Prieto, G. A. and Wang, Z. 5:15 Joyner Lecture - Alaska Ballroom, Hilton (see page 482) 6:15 PM Ground Motion Prediction Equations: Past, Present, and Future Boore, D. M. Thursday, 01 May (continued) Thursday, 01 May Morning Poster Sessions Great Earthquakes and Slip to the Trench (Seismological Society of Japan/Seismological Society of America Joint Alaska Update of the USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps Session) (see page 482) (see page 485)
1. Earthquake Risk in Alaska. Nyst, M., Williams, C., and 14. Could a Sumatra-Like Megathrust Earthquake Occur in Fitzenz, D. the South Ryukyu Subduction Zone? Lin, J. Y., Sibuet, 2. Preliminary Results from the Watana Seismic Network J.C.,Hsu,S.K.,andWu,W.N. and Development of a 3D Slab Model, South-Central 15.CanCompactionFurtherEnhanceInelasticWedge Alaska. LaForge, R.,Ostenaa,D.,Shumway,A., Failure in Shallow Subduction Zone Earthquakes? Turner, J., Lajoie, L., Ruppert, N., Carey, B., and Hirakawa, E. T. and Ma, S. Bruen, M. 16. A JointSeismic andGeodetic Rupture Model forthe 2012 3. Slip on the Suckling Hills Splay Fault during the 1964 Haida Gwaii Earthquake and the Location of Slip on the Alaska Earthquake. Chapman, J. B., Elliott, J.,Doser, Interface Relative to the Queen Charlotte Fault. Polet, J., D. I., and Pavlis, T. L. Simons, M., Fielding, E. J., and Samsonov, S. V. 4. Creation of the Alaska Earthquake Scenario Atlas: 17. Relationship between High-frequency Radiation and Using ShakeMap to Improve Awareness of Seismic Asperity Rupture, Revealed by Hybrid Back-projection Hazard and Risk in the Last Frontier. Gardine, M., with Non-planer Fault. Okuwaki, R.,Yagi,Y.,and Ruppert, N., West, M. E., Wald, D., Quitoriano, V., and Hirano, S. Worden, B. 18. TheOccurrenceofTwoTypesofMegathrustEarthquakes 5. Estimating Mmax of Intraslab Earthquakes. Shumway, in South Central Alaska. Reeder, J. W. A. M., Reyes, D. K., and LaForge, R. Induced Seismicity (see page 486) Development of 2014 U.S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Their Implementation in Engineering Applications 19. Characteristics of Induced/Triggered Earthquakes during (see page 483) The Guy-Greenbrier Earthquake Sequence (2010 2011) in North-Central Arkansas. Ogwari,P.O.,Horton,S.P., and Ausbrooks, S. M. 6. NGA-West2 Horizontal Ground Motion Model: 20. Earthquake Monitoring in Eastern Canadian Areas with Comparison of CB08 and CB14. Campbell, K. W. and Shale Gas Exploration Potential. Lamontagne, M. Bozorgnia, Y. 21. Seismic Monitoring at the Decatur, IL, Carbon Dioxide 7. Alternative Approaches for the National Seismic Hazard Sequestration Demonstration Site. McGarr, A.,Kaven, Mapping. Wang , Z. and Cobb, J. J.O.,Hickman,S.H.,Walter,S.R.,Svitek,J.,and 8. A Fault-Based Model for Crustal Deformation in the Ellsworth, W. L. Western United States and Its Application to Seismic 22. Microseismic Network Performance Estimation: Hazard Analysis. Zeng, Y. and Shen, Z. K. Comparing Predictions to an Earthquake Catalogue. 9. Update of the Pacific Northwest Fault and Ground- Greig, D. W. and Ackerley, N. J. motion Models for the 2014 National Seismic 23. Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Earthquake Clusters in Hazard Maps. Petersen,M.D.,Frankel,A.D.,and Natural and Induced Seismicity. Zaliapin, I. and Chen, R. Ben-Zion, Y. 10. Effect of Adaptive Smoothing Seismicity Rate Models on 24. Geothermal Pumping and Induced Seismicity in Seismic Hazard in the 2014 Update to the U.S. National California Geothermal Fields. Weiser, D. A.,Jackson, SeismicHazardMaps.Moschetti,M.P.,Powers,P.,Felzer, D. D., and Jones, L. M. K.,andPetersen,M. 25. Precision and Accuracy of Micro-Seismic Event 11. Implications of Recent Findings from Bayesian Inversion Locations. Myers, S. C.,Johannesson,G.,Templeton, ofGPSDataforSeismicHazardAssessmentinCalifornia. D.C.,andMatzel,E.M. Murray, J. R. and Minson, S. E. 26. Examining Induced Seismicity in SE New Mexico in the 12. Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Mapping. Thio,H.K., Vicinity of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Edel,S.S., Polet, J., Li, W., Wilson, R., and Somerville, P. Bilek, S. L., and Ingate, S. F. 13. Ground Motion Attenuation Relations for Central U.S. 27. Source Characteristics and Failure Process of Hydraulic Using Hybrid Broadband Synthetics. Shahjouei, A. and Fracturing Micro-Seismic Events Located within and Pezeshk, S. Below the Target Formation. Viegas, G. and Urbancic, T. Thursday, 01 May (continued) 28. Comparison of Empirical and Model-Based Matched Venegas , A. M., Martinez, F., Mattioli, G. S., Huerfano, Field Processing (MFP) Earthquake Detection V., Baez, G., Irizarry, H., and von Hillebrandt, C. Techniques at the Newberry EGS Site. Templeton, D. C., Matzel, E. M., and Harris, D. B. Merging Paths: Earthquake Simulations and Engineering 29. Seismic Efficiency, Overshoot and Enhanced Dynamic Applications Weaking of Fractures Associated with Stimulation in (see page 491) Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Meighan, L. N., Urbancic, T. I., and Baig, A. M. 30. A Study of the Potential for Induced Seismicity Resulting 41. Hybrid Low-High Frequency Ground motion Time from CO2 Injection at Kimberlina, Southern San Joaquin Histories for Central U.S. Shahjouei, A. and Pezeshk, S. Valley, California. Bradley, C. R.,Lee,R.C.,Coblentz, 42. Synthetic Strong Ground Motion from a Scenario D. C., Wilson, J. E., and Stone, I. P. Earthquake in a Region of Sparse Seismological Data: 31. Characterizing Potentially Induced Earthquake Rate Xanthi, N. Greece. Roumelioti, Z.,Margaris,B.,and Changes in the Brawley Seismic Zone, CA. Llenos, A. L. Kiratzi, A. and Michael, A. J. 43. The Ambient Seismic Field Captures Complex 32. Extreme Shallow Earthquakes in the Sedimentary Basin Sedimentary Basin Effects. Denolle, M. A.,Miyake,H., of Imperial Valley, Triggering of Extensional Faulting by Nakagawa, S., Hirata, N., and Beroza, G. C. Fluid Injection. Wei, S.,Hudnut,K.,Andrea,D.,Parker, 44. Ground Motion Similarity and Coherency between Total J. W., Graves, R., Helmberger, D. V., Fielding, E. J., and and Effective Stress Analyses. Montoya-Noguera, S. and Liu, Z. Lopez-Caballero, F. 33. Estimation of Seismic Hazard Due to Induced 45. Developing Ground Motions for Tall Buildings in Seismicity Related to Deep Geothermal Wells. Spies, T., Southern California. Zafir, Z. Schlittenhardt,J.,Kopera,J.R.,andMorales,W. Monitoring Dynamic Changes at Active Volcanoes and Large and Damaging Earthquakes of 2013/2014 Fault Zones (see page 489) (see page 492)
34. The ISC Event Bibliography: A Useful Service for 46. Ambient Noise Monitoring of Temporal Changes in Studying Notable Seismic Events. Di Giacomo, D., Seismic Velocity at the Geysers Geothermal Field, Storchak, D. A., Safronova, N., Ozgo, P., and Harris, California. Lai, V. H.,Taira,T.,andDreger,D.S. 35. Possibility of the Independence between the 2013 Lushan 47. Nonlinear Deformation Examples Recorded by the Plate Earthquake and the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake on Boundary Observatory. Puskas, C. M.,Phillips,D., LongmenShanfault,Sichuan,China.Jia, K., Zhou, S., Hodgkinson, K., Berglund, H., Sievers, C., Meertens, Zhuang, J., and Jiang, C. C. M., Mattioli, G. S., and Mencin, D. 36. Near Field Dynamic, Co-seismic and Post-seismic 48. Study of the Site Effects at Cotopaxi Volcano: Deformations Associated with the 2013, M7.8, and 2003, Construction of a Seismic Activity Index. Ortiz, H. D., M7.6, South Scotia Ridge Earthquakes Observed with Palacios, P. B., and Ruiz, M. C. GPS. Smalley, R.,Bevis,M.G.,Zakrajsek,A.F.,Teferle, 49. ExplosionEarthquakesduringthe2007EruptionofPavlof F.N.,Dalziel,I.W.D.,Lawver,L.A.,andLarter,R.D. Volcano, Alaska. Smith, C. M. and McNutt, S. R. 37. Characterization of Recent Large Earthquakes in Asia 50. ReceiverFunctionAnalysesofUturuncuVolcano,Bolivia. from Backprojection Imaging of Regional Seismic Data. McFarlin, H.,Christensen,D.,Thompson,G.,and Euler, G. G., Randall, G. E., and Hartse, H. E. McNutt, S. 38. Mainshock and Aftershock Mechanisms of the Mw = 7.5 Craig, Alaska Earthquake of January 5, 2013 from Network Operations and Data Centers Continuous Moment Tensor Scanning. Macpherson, K. (see page 493) A.,Ruppert,N.A.,Dreger,D.S.,Lombard,P.,Freymueller, J. T., Nicolsky, D. J., and Guilhem, A. 51. Datasets for Seismology: ISC, EHB and GT Bulletins, 39. Puerto Rico M6.4 Earthquake of January 13, 2014: PGA Station Registry, ISC-GEM Catalogue and Event & IMM Distribution in the Island. Huerta-Lopez, C., Bibliography. Storchak, D. A.,DiGiacomo,D., Martinez-Pagan, J., Santana-Torres, E., Upegui-Botero, Richardson, W. P., and Harris, J. M., and Martinez-Cruzado, J. 52. Field Observation and Quality Control of China Array 40. Response and Fault Characteristics of the Mw6.4 January Project. Yuan, S. Y.,Yang,W.,Song,L.L.,Wang,B.S., 13, 2014 Puerto Rico Earthquake: The Largest Event Xu,W.W.,Liu,Z.Y.,Jia,Y.H.,andQiao,S. Recorded at the Puerto Rico Seismic Network. Lopez- Thursday, 01 May (continued) 53. The Next Generation of Data Flow at the USGS 67. Evaluation of the Point-Source Stochastic Simulation National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC). Guy, MethodwithintheSCECBroadbandPlatformValidation M., Patton, J., Ketchum, D., Fee, J., Martinez, E., Hearne, Effort. Di Alessandro, C., Boore, D. M., and M.,Benz,H.,andEarle,P. Abrahamson, N. A. 54. The Mexican Seismic Network. Alcantara, L.,Ramirez- 68. ValidationoftheStochasticFiniteFaultModule(EXSIM) Guzman, L., Valdes, C., Perez, C., Perez, J., and Implemented on the SCEC Broadband Platform. Almora, D. Assatourians, K. and Atkinson, G. 55. Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) 69. Refinements to the Graves and Pitarka (2010) Broadband Comprehensive Catalog. Fee, J. M., Martinez, E. M., Simulation Method. Graves, R. W. Hunter,E.J.,Hearne,M.,andGuy,M. 70. The SDSU Broadband Ground Motion Generation 56. A New Shallow Water Cabled OBS Network Off Central Module Version 1.5. Olsen, K. B. and Takedatsu, R. California. McLaren, M. K. and Rademacher, H. 71. Adapting the Composite Source Model for the SCEC 57. Remote Calibration Procedures for STS-2s: Example Broadband Platform. Anderson,J.G. from the STS-2HG for CTBTO at YBH. Hellweg, M., 72. Separating Low- and High-Frequency Wave Propagation Uhrhammer, R. A., and Taira, T. in Synthetic Broadband Ground Motion Modeling. 58. Large Scale Real-Time GPS Networks, Data Processing Crempien, J. G. F. and Archuleta, R. J. Systems and Community Datasets. Phillips, D. A., 73. Pseudo-dynamic Source Modeling with 1-Point and 2- Mencin,D.J.,Sievers,C.,Austin,K.,Berglund,H.T., Point Statistics of Earthquake Source Parameters. Song, Blume, F., Meertens, C. M., and Mattioli, G. S. S. G., Dalguer, L. A., and Mai, P. M. 59. Automatically Processed Aftershock Sequence for the 74. Broadband Acceleration Time Histories Synthesis by 2012 Oct 27 Haida Gwaii Earthquake. Mulder,T.L., Coupling Low Frequency Seismic Noise and High Vernon,F.L.,Rosenberger,Kilb,White,M.C.,Rogers, Frequency Stochastic Modelling. Viens, L., Laurendeau, G. C., Brillon, C., and Bentkowski, W. A.,Bonilla,L.F.,andShapiro,N. 60. Need Data? The IRIS DMC Can Help. Tr abant , C., 75. DeterministicSimulationoftheMw5.4ChinoHillsEvent Ahern,T.,Casey,R.,Reyes,C.,Suleiman,Y.,Weertman, with Frequency-Dependent Attenuation, Heterogeneous B.,andBenson,R. Velocity Structure and Realistic Source Model. Savran, W. H. and Olsen, K. B. 76. Sensitivity of Ground Motion Simulation Validation New Insights into Ground Failure as an Urban Earthquake Criteria to Filtering. Khoshnevis, N. and Taborda, R . Hazard 77. 3D Modeling of Full Waveform Propagation to Evaluate (see page 495) Site Effects on Design Ground Motions at LANL. Larmat,C.S., Miller, T. A., Gable, C. W., and Lee, 61. Mapping Earthquake Induced Liquefaction Surface R. C. Effects from the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Using Satellite 78. Two Summation-By-Parts Finite Difference Codes for Imagery. Zhu, J.,Baise,L.G.,Koch,M.,andGaber,A. Large Scale Simulations of Seismic Motion. Petersson, 62. The Age of Landslides in Anchorage, Alaska. Reeder, N. A. J. W. ,Sjogreen,B.,andRodgers,A.J. 79. GPU-based3DSimulationofAcousticWavePropagation 63. Landslide Hazard Mapping and Quantitative Landslide with Complex Topography. Kim, K. and Lees, Hazard Planning Scenario for Aizawl, India. Clahan, J. M. K. B. and Dee, S. 64. Influence of Near Surface Stiffness, Material Type, and Prior Rupture History on Reverse Fault Surface Rupture. Seismic Imaging as USArray Moves to Alaska Stanton, K. V. and Moss,R.E.S. (see page 499) 65. Updated Geospatial Liquefaction Model for Global Use. Zhu, J.,Baise,L.G.,Thompson,E.M.,Magistrale,H., 80. New Data Products at the IRIS DMC. Bahavar, M., and Wald, D. J. Hutko, A., and Trabant, C. 81. EarthScope’s Transportable Array in Alaska. Busby, R. W., Hafner, K., and Woodward, R. L. Recent Advances in Ground Motions Simulation Methods 82. Celebrating 10 Years of Delivering EarthScope USArray and Their Validation Transportable Array data from the Array Network Facility (see page 496) (ANF). Eakins, J. A., Vernon,F.L., Astiz, L., Davis, 66. Using the SCEC Broadband Platform for Strong Ground G. A., Meyer, J., Reyes, J., Martynov, V., Tytell, J., and Motion Simulation and Validation. Silva, F.,Maechling, Cox, T.A. P., Goulet, C., Somerville, P., and Jordan, T. 83. Flat-Slab Subduction and Whole Crustal Faulting in Alaska: Potential Targets for Earthscope and Joint Thursday, 01 May (continued) Active-Passive Seismic Imaging. Worthington, L. W., Regulatory Perspective. Li, Y.,Stirewalt,G.L.,and Gulick, S. P. S., Christeson, G., van Avendonk, H. J. A., Manoly,K.A. Pavils, G. L., Ruppert, N., and Pavlis, T. L. 99. The Impact of the L’Aquila Trial on the Scientific 84. Joint Inversion of Seismic and Gravity Data for Velocity Community, An Update. Braun, T., Amato, A., Cocco, Structure and Hypocentral Locations at Akutan and M.,Cultrera,G.,Galadini,F.,Margheriti,L.,Nostro,C., Makushin Volcanoes. Syracuse,E.M., Maceira, M., and Pantosti, D., Bonaccorso, A., Demartin, M., Marco De Zhang, H. Martini,P.,DiStefano,R.,Hunstad,I.,Marzocchi,W., 85. Using S Receiver Functions to Investigate Lithospheric Meletti, C., Pacor, F., Pondrelli, S., Quareni, F., Selvaggi, and Crustal Structure Below Alaska. O’Driscoll,L.J.and G., and Todesco, M. Miller, M. S. 100. Using Fragile Geologic Features to Place Constraints on 86. WaveformModelingofLargeEarthquakesoftheSouthern LongTermSeismicHazard.Stirling,M.W.,Rood,D.H., Fairbanks Seismic Zone, Alaska (1929 1947). Doser, and Barrell, D. D. I. 101. Defining the Usable Bandwidth for Response Spectra 87. Seismic Moment Tensors in Southern Alaska Derived from Records with Different Sampling Rates and Anti- from Body Waves and Surface Waves. Silwal, V. and aliasing Filters. Goulet, C. A. andBoore,D.M. Tape, C. 88. Earthquakes of the Minto Flats Seismic Zone, Central Alaska. Keyson, L., Silwal, V., West, M., and Topics in Seismology: Processes Tape, C. (see page 504) 89. Crustal Thickness beneath the Western United States from Virtual Deep Seismic Sounding (VDSS). Yu, C. 102. Analysis of High-Frequency Icequakes at a Marine- Q.,vanderHilst,R.D.,andChen,W.P. Terminating Glacier in Greenland. Veitch , S. A. and 90. The Wyoming Province and the Llano Province: A Tale Nettles, M. of Two Proto-continents. Porritt, R. W.,Allen,R.M., 103. The Response of Elastic Systems in the Earth to Dynamic Pollitz, F. F., and Miller, M. S. Perturbations. Delorey, A. A.,Chao,K.,Uchida,N., 91. Application of Advanced Multivariate Inversion Obara, K., and Johnson, P. A. Techniques to the Western U.S. Maceira, M.,Ammon, 104. Thermal Aging of the Oceanic Asthenosphere. Paulson, C. J., Chai, C., and Herrmann, R. B. E. M. and Jordan, T. H. 92. Arc Structure around Mount Rainier From the Joint 105. Icequakes Triggered by Surface Waves From Large Inversion of Receiver Functions and Seismic Noise. Teleseismic Earthquakes. Peng, Z.,Walter,J.I.,Aster, Obrebski, M., Abers, G., and Foster, A. R., Nyblade, A., Wiens, D., and Anandakrishnan, S. 93. A Joint Local, Regional and Teleseismic Tomography 106. Observations of Seismic Whistlers in USArray. Young , Study of the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Nyamwandha, B. A. and Langston, C. A. C. A.,Powell,C.A.,andLangston,C.A. 107. Permeability Evaluation According to Complex Precision 94. Joint Inversion for Kilauea Volcano with an Edge- Observations. Besedina, A. N., Vinogradov, E. A., Preserving Constraint. Lin, Y., Syracuse, E., Maceira, M., Gorbunova, E. M., and Kabychenko, N. V. Larmat, C., and Zhang, H. 95. Low Wave Speed Zones in the Crust beneath the SE Tibet Revealed by Ambient Noise Adjoint Tomography. Topics in Seismology: Regional Seismicity and Tectonics Chen, M.,Huang,H.,vanderHilst,R.D.,and (see page 505) Niu, F. 96. Which Receiver Function Features Warrant Geological Interpretation? Lekic, V. and Kolb, J. M. 108. Properties of the Subduction System in Mexico. Kim, Y. andClayton,R.W. 109. The Significance of the Yakutat Plate to the Alaska Reeder,J.W. Topics in Seismology: Hazards Orocline. (see page 503) 110. Seismicity in the Basin and Range Province of Sonora, México, near the Rupture of the 3 May 1887 Mw 7.5 Earthquake, between 2003 and 2011. Castro, R. R. 97. 3-D Dynamic Analysis of Precariously Balanced Rocks 111. Seismic Studies of the Jalisco Block. Escudero, C. R., under Earthquake Excitation. Veeraraghavan, S. and Nuñez-Cornu, F. J., Gomez, A., Guitierrez, Q. J., Pinzon, Krishnan, S. J.I.,Perez,O.G.,Robles,F.J.,andCordoba,D. 98. Performance of the North Anna Nuclear Power Plant 112. RevisitingtheUljinSequenceofApril2006.VanDeMark, during the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, Earthquake A T. F., Kim, T. S., and Kang, I. B. Thursday, 01 May (continued) 113. Analysis on Co-seismic Responses of Well Water Level 116. An M 4.8 Earthquake in the Upper Mantle beneath the and WaterTemperature in Ganshu Province to Wenchuan Wind River Range, Wyoming. Pechmann, J. C.,Koper, Ms8.0 Earthquake and Japan Ms9.0 Earthquake. Zhang, K.D.,Herrmann,R.B.,Whidden,K.M.,Benz,H.M., Z.,Wang,W.,andLiu,L. Pankow, K. L., Lin, F., and Chapman, D. S. 114. SeismicityoftheLauBasinasViewedfromOcean-Bottom 117. Implications of Gravitational Anomalies within the Seismometer and Sound Channel Moored Hydrophone MuckleshootBasinofNorthwestWashington.Cox,J.H., Arrays. Bohnenstiehl, D. R.,Dziak,R.P.,Conder,J.,and Wolf, L. W., and Taylor, J. P. Matsumoto, H. 118. Delineation Seismic Source Zones Based on Seismicity 115. Downhole Seismic Monitoring in the Istanbul/Eastern Parameters and Seismotectonic Characteristics around Sea of Marmara Region: Recent Results from the ICDP- SabahandNorthBorneo.Adnan, A., Harith, N. S. H., GONAF Project. Bohnhoff, M., Dresen, G., Bulut, F., andShoushtari,A.V. Raub, C., Kilic, T., Kartal, R. F., Kadirioglu, F. T., Nurlu, M., Malin, P.E., and Ito, H. Friday, 02 May Concurrent SSA Oral Sessions
Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
From the Advances in Seismic Location ADecadeofGreat Tr acking Fluid Earthquake Source Understanding and Processing Subduction Movement in to Damage of Earthquake Hazard Techniques Earthquakes Volcanic Systems Buildings: in Central and Session Chair: What Have We Session Chairs: John Bridging the Gap Eastern North Natasha Ruppert Learned From Lyons, Helena between America (see page 516) Their Buurman, Diana Seismology and Session Chairs: Ground-Motions? Roman, and David Earthquake Robert Williams, Session Chairs: Fee (see page 524) Engineering Mitch Withers, Tre vor Al len and Session Chairs: Luis William Gail Atkinson (see A. Dalguer, Carlo Stephenson, and page 520) Cauzzi, Aysegul John Ebel (see page Askan, and Philippe 512) Gueguen (see page 508)
8:30 INVITED:Doesa STUDENT: Hypocentral INVITED: Re-Examining the AM 1D Velocity Paleoseismic Relocations Aided Ground-Motion Te c t o n i c / Ma g ma ti c Structure Hurt or Evidence for by Virtual Receivers Prediction Controls on Help Ground Persistent Intraplate Constructed via Equations for Large Dynamic Triggering Motion Predictions? Seismicity Seismic Interface in the Brittle Crust. Crempien,J.G.F. Associated with Interferometry. Earthquakes Based Prejean, S. G. and and Archuleta, R. J. Reactivation of Horowitz, F. G. on Empirical Data Hill,D.P. Precambrian Crustal from the 2011 M9.0 Structures in Central To h o ku , Canada. Doughty, Earthquake. D.,Eyles,N., Ghofrani, H. G. Wallace, K . E., and Atkinson, G. M. Eyles, C. H., and Boyce, J. I.
8:45 Stress Drop The St. Lawrence Real-time Automatic INVITED: INVITED:Magmatic AM Variations and Their Rift System and Its Detectors of P and S Magnitude Scaling and Hytrothermal Relevance for Relationships with Wave s Us ing Rates for Large Fluid Controls on Ground Motion Recent Earthquakes. Singular Value Earthquakes in Deep, Distal and Prediction. Oth, A. Lamontagne, M. Decomposition. Ground Motion Shallow Volcanic and Bindi, D. Kurzon, I., Vernon, Prediction Seismicity. White, F. L., Rosenberger, Equations for Japan. R. A. and A., and Ben-Zion, Y. Zhao,J.X. McCausland, W. Friday, 02 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
From the EQ Advances in Seismic A Decade of Tr acking Fluid... Source... Understanding... Location... Great...
9:00 Stress Drop USArray APure-Python INVITED: Do Pre-Eruptive AM Variability and Its Transp or tab le Array Phase Picker and Broadband Swarms have Relationship to Evolving into the Event Associator. Synthetic Systematically Variability in Central and Eastern Chen,C.and Seismograms for M9 Different GMPEs. Baltay, United States Holland, A. A. Cascadia Earthquakes than A. S. and Hanks, Network (CEUSN). Earthquakes Using Non-Eruptive T. C. Vernon , F.,Busby, 3D Simulations. Swarms? Buurman, R., Woodward, R., Frankel, A., H. and West, M. E. and Astiz, L. Phillips-Alonge, K., Stephenson, W., and Delorey, A.
9:15 Identification of STUDENT: Doing More with Broadband Strong Short-Term Seismic AM Near-Field Referenced Short Period Data: Motion Simulations Quiescence Ground-Motion Empirical Using Coda of Large Subduction Immediately Characteristics and Ground-Motion Envelopes to Earthquakes. Preceding Explosive Predictors Based on Model for Eastern Estimate Skarlatoudis, A. A., Eruptions. Roman, Synthetic Data North America, Magnitudes for Somerville, P. G., D. C.,Rodgers,M. Obtained from Based on the Clipped and Thio,H.K.,and J., Geirsson, H., Dynamic Rupture NGA-West 2 Over-Run Bayless, J. R. B. LaFemina,P.C., Models. Dalguer, L. GMPE. Hassani, B. Earthquakes. Munoz, A., and A.,Cauzzi,C., and Atkinson, G. M. Wellik, J. J., Te n o r i o , V. Baumann, C., and McCausland, W., Giardini, D. and Waite, G. P.
9:30 Squeezing Kappa STUDENT: Identification and INVITED: INVITED: Evidence AM out of the Comparing the Extraction of Surface NGA-Sub: Plan to for Ongoing Magma Transp or tab le Array : CENA GMPEs Wave s f ro m Develop Next Recharge at Mount When the Going using NGA-East 3-Component Generation Ground St. Helens, gets Tough. Ground Motion Seismograms Based Motion Models for Wa s h ing to n . Ktenidou, O. J., Database. Ogweno, on the ‘‘Normalized Subduction Moran, S. C. and Silva, W., Darragh, L. P. and Cramer, Inner Product’’. Earthquakes. Lisowski, M. B., Abrahamson, N. C. H. Meza-Fajardo, K. Bozorgnia, Y. and A., Kishida, T., and C.,Papageorgiou,A. Kishida, T. Cotton, F. S., and Semblat, J. F. 9:45 Break & Posters Cook & Arteaga 10:45 AM Friday, 02 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
From the Advances in Recent Advances 75 Years of Tr acking Fluid Earthquake Source Understanding and Findings in Frequency-Size- Movement in to Damage of Earthquake Hazard Earthquake Distribution of Volcanic Systems Buildings: in Central and Geology and Earthquakes: (continued) Bridging the Gap Eastern North Paleoseismology Observations, between America (continued) Session Chairs: Models and Seismology and Scott Bennett and Understanding Earthquake Christopher DuRoss Session Chairs: Engineering (see page 517) Thessa Tormann, (continued) Max Wyss, and Jeanne Hardebeck (see page 521)
10:45 INVITED:Progress Time Dependence INVITED:Third INVITED: b-Values, STUDENT:Volcanic AM of the Southern of Magnitude Generation Stress and Fault Tremor and California Conversion Paleoseismology: Heterogeneity Frequency Gliding Earthquake Center Relations for Eastern Clustering, during Laboratory during the 2011 Technical Activity Canada: More Segmentation, Stick-Slip Kamoamoa Group on Ground Complex than We Supercycles and Experiments. Eruption, Kilauea, Motion Simulation Thought. Bent, Paleo Slip Models. Goebel,T.H.W., Hawai‘i. Unglert, K. Validation. Luco, N. A. L. Goldfinger, C. Becker, T. W., and Jellinek, A. M. and Rezaeian, S. 30 minutes Sammis, C. G., Schorlemmer, D., and Dresen, G.
11:00 Stochastic Model for STUDENT: INVITED: Growing Air-Ground AM the Simulation of Regional Study of Large Scale Fractures Coupling of Seismic Ground Fourier Amplitude in a Salt Mine and Volcanic Tremor Motion for Drop of Lg-Wave Their Effects on the Using Cross-Spectral Reliability Analysis Acceleration in Frequency- Analysis. Fee, D. E. of Industrial Central United Magnitude and Matoza, R. S. Structures and States.Chapman,M. Distribution. Components. C., Pezeshk, S., Maghsoudi, S., Zentner, I. Hosseini, M.,and Cesca, S.,Hainzl,S., Conn, A. Dahm, T., and Kaiser, D.
11:15 Directivity Pulse High-Resolution A3DMarine INVITED: Seismic Radiation AM Characterization of Aeromagnetic Data Paleoseismology Geomechanical from Volcanic NGA-West2 Illuminate Crustal Investigation Modeling of Conduits: Earthquakes Structure Associated Offshore South Frequency- Characterization of PSHA with the New Central Coastal Magnitude Propagating Waves Implementation and Madrid Seismic California. Distributions of and Source Seismic Structural Zone, Missouri and Nishenko, S. P., Induced Seismicity. Excitation. Response Arkansas. Blakely, Greene, H. G., Bachmann, C. E., Karlstrom, L. and Implications. R. J., Williams, R. Hogan, P., and Wiemer, S., and Dunham, E. M. Rowshandel, B. A., Shah, A. K., AbramsonWard, H. Goertz-Allmann, Sherrod, B. L., and B. P. Weaver, C. S. Friday, 02 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
From the EQ Advances in Recent 75 Years of... Tr acking Fluid... Source... Understanding... Adv-Geology...
11:30 Ground Motions STUDENT:Relative 10 m Slips on the Te c t o n i c b -Va l u e Volcanic and AM Due to Earthquakes Locations of Pitas Point Thrust: Variation Non-Volcanic Events on Creeping Faults. Earthquakes and M8 Earthquakes in Interpreted as from the Nascent Harris, R. A. and Potential Driving the Western Stress-Meter Mt. Pagan Abrahamson, N. A. Mechanisms of Trans verse R ang es of Examples from Seismo-Acoustic Seismicity along the Southern California. Different Scales. Network. Lyons, J. Northeast U.S. Rockwell, T. K., Tormann , T., J. L.,Haney,M.M. Atlantic Passive Clark, K., Oskin, M., Wiemer, S., H.,Fee,D.E.F., Margin. Napoli, V. Gamble, L., Haaker, Woessner, J., and Read,C.W.R.,and J.,andEbel,J.E. G.,Ucarkus,G., Enescu, B. Paskievitch, J. F. P. Kent, G., and Driscoll, N.
11:45 A Naive Bayesian Recent Earthquakes Multi-Method INVITED:Local Cyclic Hybrid AM Approach to Strong in the Central and Measurement of Magnitude Swarms at Soufriere Ground Motionn Eastern U.S. Prompt Offset from the Distributions in the Hills Volcano, Selection for Variable Responses 1857 Fort Tejon 3rd Uniform Montserrat, Non-Linear Seismic to Reduce Future Earthquake along California 1996 2001. Analysis of Earthquake Losses. the San Andreas Earthquake Rupture Thompson, G. and Structures. Lancieri, Williams, R. A. Fault in the Carrizo Forecast McNutt, S. R. M.,Reanult,M., Plain at Channel (UCERF3). Page, Lecomte, L., Sieh31. Akciz, S. O., M. T.,Field,E.H., Perrault, M., Grant Ludwig, L., and Milner, K. R. Baumont, D., Halford, D., Gueguen, P., and Maliyani, G. I., Berge-Thierry, C. Salisbury, J. B., Kleber, E. J., Arrowsmith, J. R., Rhodes, E., and Capaldi, T. Noon Lunch La Perouse 1:15 PM Friday, 02 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
From the New Directions in Recent Advances Fifty Years of Citizen Earthquake Source PSHA: Ins, Outs, and Findings in Tsunami Science: Seismology: to Damage of and Uncertainty Earthquake from the 1964 Citizens Helping Buildings: Session Chairs: Peter Geology and Earthquake and Science Helping Bridging the Gap Powers, Morgan Paleoseismology Tsunamitothe Citizens between Moschetti, and Ned (continued) SAFRR Tsunami Session Chairs: Paul Seismology and Field (see page 514) Scenario Earle, Susan Hough, Earthquake Advances in and Gail Atkinson Engineering Tsunami Source (see page 526) (continued) Characterization, Numerical Analysis and Hazard Mitigation Session Chairs: Elena Suleimani, Stephanie Ross, Hong Kie Thio, and Dmitry Nicolsky (see page 522)
1:30 On the Use of Incorporating Time STUDENT, Far-Field Tsunami Earthquake Intensity PM Earthquake Early Dependence in INVITED:3D Detection and Distributions: A Wa rn ing a n d PSHA in the (Near) Comparison of Wa rn ing , New View. Hough, Operational Absence of Data. Coseismic Fold 1854 2014: One S. E. Earthquake Biasi, G., Deformation for the Hundred and Sixty Forecasting for Thompson, S., Last 5 Events across Years in the Intricate Real-Time Risk AbramsonWard, H., a Releasing Relation between Mitigation at Abrahamson, N., Step-over at the Earthquake Source Nuclear Power Hanson, K., Lettis, Frazier Mountain and Tsunami. Okal, Plants in W., Caskey, J., and Paleoseismic Site, E. A. Switzerland. Cauzzi, Gregor, N. Southern San C.,Behr,Y.,Renault, Andreas Fault, CA. P., Clinton, J., Streig, A. R., Wiemer, S., Le Weldon, R. J., Guenan, T., Scharer, K. M. Douglas, J., 30 minutes Woessner, J., Caprio, M., and Cua, G. 1:45 Real-time GPS Computing Elastic- Tsunami Modeling Reconciling PM enhanced Rebound-Motivated and Inundation Intensity Prediction Earthquake Early Earthquake Mapping in Equations with Wa rn ing : Th e Probabilities in Southcentral Alaska. Ground Motion Northern California Un-segmented Fault Nicolsky, D. J., Prediction Setup. Grapenthin, Models The Suleimani, E. N., Equations. R., Johanson, I. A., UCERF3 Koehler, R. D., and Atkinson, G. M., and Allen, R. M. Methodology West,M.E. Worden,C.B.,and Supported by Wa l d , D. J. Physics-based Simulators. Field, E. H. Friday, 02 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
From the EQ New Directions in Recent 50 Years of Citizen Source... PSHA... Adv-Geology... Tsunami... Seismology... 2:00 An Evaluation of How Can We ATaleofTwo Inundation Mapping Quantitative PM U.S. Geolog ical Combine Epidemic Seisms Down and Hazard Analyses of Did You Survey’sPAGER’s Type Aftershock Under: 23 March Assessment of Feel It? Data. Alerting Accuracy. Sequences (ETAS) 2012 Mw 5.4 Te c t o n i c a n d Worden, C. B., Marano, K. D., and Finite Source Ernabella and 9 June Landslide Tsunamis Wa l d , D. J. , Garcia, D., Hearne, Rupture Models? 2013 Mw 5.6 Mulga in Southeast Alaska. Quitoriano, V., and M., Jaiswal, K., and Segou, M. S. Park. Clark, D. J., Suleimani, E., Caprio, M. Wa l d , D. J. McPherson, A., Nicolsky,D.J.,and Allen, T. Koehler, R. D.
2:15 Real-Time Shake Maximum Possible STUDENT: The SAFRR Performance of PM Mapping in Istanbul. Earthquake Geomorphic and Tsunami S cenario : Several Low-Cost Zulfikar, C.,Tunc, Magnitude: Limits Geologic Evidence Improving Accelerometers. S.,Yas,T.,andErdik, of Inferences from of Recently Active Resilience for Evans, J. R.,Allen, M. Longterm Data in Faults and Folds in California from a R.M.,Chung,A.I., the Framework of Java, Indonesia. Plausible M9.1 Cochran, E. S., Guy, the Poisson Model. Marliyani,G.I., Earthquake near the R., Hellweg, M., and Zöller, G. and Arrowsmith, J. R., Alaska Peninsula. Lawrence, J. F. Holschneider, M. and Helmi, H. Ross,S.L.,Jones,L. M., Wilson, R. I., Miller, K., Bahng, B., Barberopoulou, A., Borrero, J. C., Brosnan, D. M., Bwarie, J. T., Geist, E. L., Johnson, L. A., Kirby, S. H., Knight, W. R ., Long , K., Lynett, P., Mortensen, C. E., Nicolsky,D.J., Oglesby, D. D., Perry, S. C., Plumlee, G. S., Porter, K. A., Real, C. R., Ryan, K.,Suleimani,E., Thio,H.K.,Titov, V. V., Wein, A., Whitmore, P. M., and Wood,N. J. Friday, 02 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
From the EQ New Directions in Recent 50 Years of Citizen Source... PSHA... Adv-Geology... Tsunami... Seismology...
2:30 Multi-Hazard Risk INVITED:Usingthe The Timing of the Advances in Twitter Based PM Maps for Coastal Averaging-Based Recent Two Faulting Tsunami Risk Earthquake Communities of Factorization to Events on the Assessment and Risk Detection and Wa s h ing to n . Cakir, Assess Low Himalayan Frontal Mitigation. Porter, Characterization: R.,Walsh,T.J., Frequency (<0.5 Fault in Ramnagar K. A. System Assessment Slaughter, S., and Hz) CyberShake Area, Uttarakhand, and Future Norman, D. K. Hazard Models. India. Okumura, Directions. Earle, Wang , F.,Jordan, K.,Malik,J.N., P. S.,Guy,M.R., T. H., Callaghan, S., Santiswarup, S., Horvath, S. R., Graves,R.W., Naik, S. P., and Turner, J. S., and Olsen, K. B., and Khan, A. Bausch, D. Maechling, P. 2:45 Break & Posters Cook & Arteaga 3:45 PM Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
From the New Directions in Recent Advances Fifty Years of Earthquake Physics Earthquake Source PSHA: Ins, Outs, and Findings in Tsunami Science: and Interaction to Damage of and Uncertainty Earthquake from the 1964 Session Chair: Chen Buildings: (continued) Geology and Earthquake and Braunmiller (see Bridging the Gap Paleoseismology Tsunamitothe page 528) between (continued) SAFRR Tsunami Seismology and Scenario Earthquake Advances in Engineering Tsunami Source (continued) Characterization, Numerical Analysis and Hazard Mitigation (continued)
3:45 Fatalities in Greek Visualizing the New Paleoseismic Numerical Modeling STUDENT: PM Earthquakes, Past Range of Epistemic Study of the of the SAFRR Temporal and and Future. Wyss, Uncertainty of Septentrional Fault, Tsunami S cenario. Spatial Clustering of M. and Tolis, S. GMPEs. Kuehn, N. Dominican Thio,H.H., Intermediate-Depth M., Gianniotis, N., Republic. Prentice, Suleimani, E., Ryan, Earthquakes: Scherbaum, F., and C. S.,Scharer,K., K., Ross, S., Evidence for a Abrahamson, N. Gold, R., DeLong, Nicolsky, D., Knight, Cascading Effect. S.,andPena,L. W., Lynett, P., Barrett, S. A. and Borrero, J., Wilson, Prieto, G. A. R., and Geist, E. Friday, 02 May (continued) Time Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 7/8
From the EQ New Directions in Recent 50 Years of Earthquake Source... PSHA... Adv-Geology... Tsunami... Physics...
4:00 Macroscale INVITED: Revised Earthquake STUDENT: AFluid-Induced PM Vulnerability Comparison of Hazard of the Hat Modeling Seasonally Assessment Using Epistemic Creek Fault, Megathrust Rupture Modulated Association Rule Uncertainty in Northern through Earthquake Swarm Learning, A Hazard in California California: Stable-Sliding near Maupin, Data-Mining Tools. between UCERF2 Paleoseismology in Zones, and Oregon. Riedel, I. and and UCERF3. Pleistocene Lava Implications for an Braunmiller, J., Gueguen, P. Shome, N.,Powers, Flows. Kattenhorn, Alaskan-Aleutian Nabelek, J. L., and P. M., and Petersen, S. A. and Blakeslee, Megathrust Trehu, A. M. M. D. M. W. Earthquake and Tsunami. Ryan, K. J.,Oglesby,D.D., and Geist, E. L.
4:15 Estimation of INVITED:Testing ACandidateFault Incorporating Seismic Evidence for PM Seismic Losses in for Ontological Scarp from the 1872 Progressive Rupture Thermal Shear Urban Regions Errors in Earthquake near into Tsunami Runaway during within an Probabilistic Seismic Chelan, Models for Tsunami Intermediate-Depth Interdisciplinary Hazard Models. Wa s h ing to n . Wa rn ing . Fryer, G. Earthquake Rupture. Framework: A Case Jordan, T. H. and Sherrod, B. L., J.,Becker,N.C.,and Prieto, G. A. Study. Askan, A., Marzocchi, W. Blakely, R. J., Wa ng , D. Erberik, M. A., Barnett, E. A., Yakut, A., Kilic, N., Schermer, E., Lasher, Karimzadeh, S., J. P., Sherrod, J. M., Sisman, F. N., and Miller, B., and Asten, M. Slaughter, S.
4:30 Evaluation of Effects of Various INVITED: Joint Earthquake AGlobal PM Building Declustering and Challenges and Source Inversion of Comparison of Vulnerability Due to Smoothing Methods Opportunities in Land- and Crustal Earthquake Liquefaction Using on Earthquake Synthesizing Ocean-based Scaling from Stable the Canterbury Catalogs and Multiple Geophysical Sensors Event Ratio Levels. Earthquake Consequences for Paleoseismic Data for Tsunami Early Yo o, S. H., Wa lter, Sequence Seismic Hazard and Sets. Biasi, G. P. and Wa rn ing . Melgar, W. R ., and Mayeda, Observations. Seismic Risk in New Weldon, R. J. D. and Bock, Y. K. Ancheta, T. D. and Zealand. Apel, E. V. 30 minutes van Balleygooy, S. and Nyst, M.
4:45 Building The Global STUDENT: STUDENT:Stress PM Time-Dependent Earthquake Activity Meteotsunamis Drop Studies of Earthquake Model: What It Is, Generated by Earthquakes in the Recurrence Models What It Can Do, Mesoscale Southern North for Probabilistic and How It Can Be Convective Systems Island and Cook Loss Computations. Te s t e d . Jackson, D. along the U.S. East Strait Region of New Fitzenz, D. D. and D.,Bird,G.P., Coast on June 13th, Zealand. Barnes, Nyst, M. Kagan, Y. Y., 2013. Wertman, C. K.,Doser,D.I.,and Kreemer, C., and A.,Yablonsky,R.M., Abercrombie, R. E. Stein, R. Shen, Y., Merrill, J., Kincaid, C. R., and Pockalny, R. A. Friday, 02 May (continued) Friday, 02 May Morning Poster Sessions AdvancesinUnderstandingEarthquakeHazardinCentral 75 Years of Frequency-Size-Distribution of Earthquakes: and Eastern North America Observations, Models and Understanding (see page 512) (see page 528) 14. Ground Motion Site-Effects from Multi-Method Shear- Wave Velocity Characterization at Portable Seismograph 1. A Lower Bound for Gutenberg-Richter’s b-Value and Stations Deployed for Aftershocks of the August 2011 Speculations on Fractal Dimensions. Nava,F.A. Mineral, Virginia Earthquake. Stephenson,W.J.,Odum, 2. Using b-values and Apparent Stress to Characterize J. K., McNamara, D. E., and William, R. A. Stability of Hydraulic Fracture Growth. Karimi, S., 15. Airborne Geophysical Survey Data Used to Infer Urbancic, T. I., and Baig, A. M. Geological Features Associated with Fault Slip in the 3. Microseismicty and Glacier Dynamics at the Vaughn Central Virginia Seismic Zone. Shah, A. K.,Horton, Lewis Icefall, Alaska. Lipovsky, B. P., Karlstrom, L.,and J. W., McNamara, D. E., Spears, D. B., and Burton, Denolle, M. A. W. C. 4. Evolution of the 2008 Mogul Earthquake Swarm, Reno, 16. Earthquake Swarms Associated with the Saratoga- Nevada: Identifying Complex Structures in a Shallow McGregor Fault System near Albany, NY. Ebel,J.E., Urban Seismic Sequence. Ruhl, C. J.,Smith,K.,and Jacobi, R. D., O’Hara,A.,andStarr,J.C. Abercrombie, R. E. 17. ANewSetofFocalMechanismsfortheEasternTennessee 5. How Complete is the ISC-GEM Global Earthquake Seismic Zone. Cooley, M. T. and Powell, C. A. Catalog? Michael, A. J. 18. Hazard Associated with the Eastern Tennessee Seismic 6. Confidence Intervals for the Magnitude of the Largest Zone. Powell, C. A. Aftershock. Shcherbakov, R. 19. Discerning Faults Responsible for the Charleston, South 7. Statistical Properties of Aftershock Sequences Generated Carolina Earthquake of 1886. Pratt, T. L.,Shah,A.K., by Large Subduction Earthquakes. Shcherbakov, R., and Horton, J. W. Goda, K., and Atkinson, G. 20. Lg Propagation and Attenuation across Continental 8.TheTemporalStabilityofb-Valueestimatesand Margins, Scotia Basin. Mousavi, S. M. and Cramer, Its Implications for Regional and Local Studies. C. H. Zúñiga,F.R., Figueroa-Soto, A., and Márquez, 21. Initial ENA Empirical GMPEs Using the NGA-East V. H. Database. Al Noman, M. N. and Cramer, C. H. 9. 1/f and the Earthquake Problem: A Forecasting 22. Improving Stress Drop Measurements from EGF Scaling Framework Based on Fault Weakening and Scaling and Stress Release in the Darfield-Christchurch, New Constrained ETAS. Yo der, M. R . and Rundle, Zealand Earthquake Sequence. Abercrombie, R. E.,Fry, J. B. B., Doser, D. I., and Gerstenberger, M.
A Decade of Great Subduction Earthquakes What Have Citizen Seismology: Citizens Helping Science Helping We Learned from Their Ground-Motions? Citizens (see page 520) (see page 526)
10. Source Scaling Relations of Subduction Earthquakes 23. Detecting Frequency Content of Ground Motion with for Strong Ground Motion and Tsunami Prediction. Smart Phones Using Wavelet Analysis. Aktas, M.,Kuyuk, Skarlatoudis, A. A.,Somerville,P.G.,Thio,H.K.,and H. S., Durgun, G. Y., and Dok, G. Bayless, J. R. 24. Limits of Smart Phones as Seismic Sensors. Kuyuk, H. S. 11. Ground-Motion Prediction Equations of Intermediate- and Aktas, M. Depth Earthquakes in the Hellenic Arc, Southern Aegean 25. Relationship between Seismic Intensities (MMI), PGA, Subduction Area. Skarlatoudis, A. A., Papazachos, C. and PGV for the April 20, 2013, Mw6.6 Lushan, China B., Margaris, B. N., Ventouzi, C., Kalogeras, I., and Earthquake and a Comparison with North America. EGELADOS Group. Mooney,W.D.and Wang, H. L. 12. GlobalAnalysisofRuptureDurationforIntermediateand 26. Developing Ground Motion Estimates from M > 6.0 Deep Earthquakes. Poli, P. and Prieto, G. A. EarthquakeIntensityObservationsforUseinENA 13. Seismic High-frequency Radiation during the March Emperical GMPEs. Cramer, C. H. 20th 2012 (Mw 7.5) Mexican Earthquake, Using Strong 27. Frequency Distribution of JMA Seismic Intensity and Motion Data. Aguirre, J. Ishimoto-Iida Law. Kato, M. Friday, 02 May (continued)
Earthquake Physics and Interaction From the Earthquake Source to Damage of Buildings: (see page 528) Bridging the Gap between Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (see page 536) 28. The Seismic Quiescence Phenomenon in Taiwan. Wang , J. C., Shieh, C. F., and Wang, J. H. 29. The Construction of the Fault Model in Ordos, China. 39. 3D Spontaneous Dynamic Rupture on Geometrically Gao, B., [email protected], Q., Jia, K., and Zhou, S. Complex Faults: The 2010 Mw 7.1 Darfield (New 30. Quantifying and Explaining the Frequency-Dependent Zealand) Earthquake. Abolfathian, N., Galvez, P., and Radiation Pattern of the 2000 Tottori, Japan, Earthquake. Dalguer, L. A. Seats, K. J. and Dunham, E. M. 40. Forecasting the Rupture Directivity of Large Earthquakes. 31. Applying the Time-Domain Moment Tensor Inversion Donovan, J. and Jordan, T. H. Technique to Regional Earthquake Data in the Puerto 41. Effects of Difference of Source Spectrum Modeling Rico-Virgin Island Region. Martinez-Torres, F. A.,and on Synthetic Motions in Empirical Green’s Lopez-Venegas, A. Function Method. Yamaguchi, M., Dan, K., and Kitamura, H. 42. Quantifying the Spatial Variability of Ground Motion Fifty Years of Tsunami Science: from the 1964 Earthquake Residuals Using Site-to-Site Closeness Index as a Distance and Tsunami to the SAFRR Tsunami Scenario Advances Metric. Hollenback, J. C. and Moss,R.E.S. in Tsunami Source Characterization, Numerical Analysis 43. Progress Report for the Center for Engineering Strong and Hazard Mitigation Motion Data in 2014. Haddadi, H., Stephens, C., Shakal, (see page 535) A., Savage, W., Huang, M., and Parrish, J. 44. Demonstration of PEER Record Processing Methodology. Ancheta, T. D., Chiou, B. S. J., Darragh, 32. California Marshes as Recorders of Paleotsunamis: R. B., Goulet, C., Kishida, T., Kottke, A. R., Ktenidou, Example from Pillar Point. Jaffe, B. E., Richmond, B. M., O., and Silva, W. J. Wilson, R.,Hemphill-Haley,E.,Kelsey,H.M.,Peters,R., 45. V/H from an Analysis of Kiban Kyoshin Network Data. Leeper, R., and Watt, S. Yazd,M.S.,Gregor, N. J.,andMarrone,J.E. 33. Observations on the 1964 Distant-Source Tsunami 46. Ground Motion Hazard Maps for Engineering Design Deposit at Crescent City, California, USA. Hemphill- in the New Madrid Seismic Zone of the Central United Haley, E.,Kelsey,H.,Graehl,N.,Caldwell,D.,Robinson, States. Wang , Z. M., Loofbourrow, C., and Vermeer, J. 47. Developing Worldwide Capacity for Analysis of Data 34. Geospatial Methods in Support of Tsunami Research. Supporting Earthquake Hazard Analysis. Willemann, Macpherson,A.E., Nicolsky, D. J., and Suleimani, E. R. J.,Beck,S.L.,Pulliam,J.,Sandvol,E.,Meltzer,A.S., 35. Tsunami Evacuation Modeling for Cannon Beach, Pasyanos, M. E., Louie, J. N., Waldhauser, F., and Russo, Oregon. Madin, I. P., Priest, G. R., and Watzig, R. J. R. M. 36. Seismic Monitoring Capabilities of the Caribbean 48. The Effects of Local and Background Seismic Sources on and Adjacent Regions Tsunami Warning System. von the New Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Map of Peninsular Hillebrandt-Andrade, C. G.,CrespoJones,H.,Saurel, Malaysia. Adnan, A., Shoushtari, A. V., and Harith, J. M., McNamara, D., Huérfano Moreno, V. A., and N. S. H. Working Group 1 UNESCO IOC Intergovernmental 49.CISNShakeAlert:AnUpdateonEarthquakeEarly Coordination Group for the Tsunami and other Wa rn ing s f ro m El a rmS . Hellweg, M.,Allen,R.H., Coastal Hazards Warning System for the Caribbean and Grapenthin,R.,Johanson,I.,Henson,I.,Neuhauser,D., Adjacent Regions (CARIBE EWS) andStrauss,J.A. 37. Stochastic Models of Earthquake Slip for Probabilistic 50. StatusofEarthquakeEarlyWarninginCascadia.Crowell, Tsunami Modeling . LeVeque, R. J.,Waagan,K., B.W.,Bodin,P.,Hartog,J.R.,Vidale,J.E.,Schmidt,D.A., Gonzalez, F. I., and Lin, G. and Kress, V. C. 38. A Coupled Model for Dynamic Wedge Failure, Coseismic 51. Real-time Seismogeodetic Monitoring of Structural Landslides, and Tsunami Propagation for Shallow Deformation during Shaketable Experiments. Goldberg, Subduction Earthquakes. Yao, Q.,Hirakawa,E.T., D.,Bock,Y.,Geng,J.,Haase, J. S.,Melger,D., Ma, Friday, 02 May (continued) Offield, D. G., Restrepo, J., Saunders, J. K., and HazardAnalysis.Bora,S.S.,Scherbaum,F.,Kuehn,N.M., Squibb, M. Stafford, P. J., and Edwards, B. 52. Cross Disciplinary Practices and Approaches to Assure 63. Event Terms for the Shallow 2011 Normal Faulting Safety of Schools. Dargush, A. S. Earthquakes in the Ibaraki Fukushima Prefectural 53. SEISMInstituteandSINAPS@Project:Synergybetween Border Region, Japan. McBean, K., Anderson, J. G., and ScientistsandEngineersinFrancetoImproveSeismicRisk Kawase, H. Assessment. Berge-Thierry, C.,Bard,P.Y.,Baumont, 64. Memphis Urban Seismic Hazard Mapping Update: D., Bertrand, E., Clouteau, D., Grange, S., Erlicher, S., New Geology Plus Shear-Wave Velocity and Earthquake Kotronis, P., Moussallam, N., Nicolas, M., Ragueneau, F., Observations. Cramer, C. H., and Dhar, M. S. Semblat, J.-F., and Voldoire, F. 65. MagnitudeDependentSiteAmplificationSeismicHazard 54. Seismic Response of Building Clusters: A Numerical Calculation Outside the Hazard Integral for St. Louis, and Laboratory Study. Colombi, A.,Roux,P.,and MO. Cramer,C.H. Rupin, M. 66. Results of a Preliminary Earthquake Hazard Study in North Baja California, México. Munguía, L. 67. A UCERF3-Based Seismic Source Model for the Near-Field Seismoacoustics of Natural and Man-Made Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Region, California. Explosions Ostenaa, D.,LaForge,R.,andSawyer,T. (see page 540) 68. Seismic Source Characterization (SSC) Approaches for a Site-Specific PSHA Controlled by Fault Sources: The 55. Hydroacoustic Recordings of Explosive Submarine Diablo Canyon Power Plant Seismic Hazard Update, EruptionsatNWRota-1andWestMataVolcanoes. Central Coastal California. Thompson, S., Lettis, W., Caplan-Auerbach, J.,Dziak,R.P.,Chadwick,W.W., AbramsonWard, H., Biasi, G., Caskey, J., Hanson, K., and Lau, T. K. Abrahamson, N., and Gregor, N. 56. Acoustic Signatures of Different Explosive-Detonator 69. Hazard Implementation of Simplified Seismic Source Configurations in Small HE Explosions. Marcillo, O., Characterization Allowing for Linked Faults. Wooddell, Arrowsmith, S., and Morton, E. K. E.,Abrahamson,N.A.,Acevedo-Cabrera,A.L.,and 57. An Analysis of Repeating Explosions Using Young s, R . R . Seismoacoustic Data. Morton, E., Arrowsmith, S. J., 70. RuptureSynchronicityinComplexFaultSystems.Milner, Marcillo, O., and Whitaker, R. K. R. and Jordan, T. H. 58.TheAcousticSignaturesofGroundAcceleration,Gas 71. Estimating and Utilizing the Space Covered by GMPEs Expansion, and Spall Fallback in Experimental Volcanic for PSHA. Kuehn, N. M., Scherbaum, F., Gianniotis, N., Explosions. Bowman, D. C., Taddeucci, J., Kim, K., and Abrahamson, N. Lees, J. M., Graettinger, A. H., Sonder, I., and Valentine, 72. Between-Event Uncertainty for ‘‘Repeating Earthquakes’’. G. A. Yagoda-Biran, G., Anderson, J. G., Miyake, H., and 59. Large Scale Blast Experiments Integrate Field, Remote Koketsu, K. Sensing, and Laboratory Based Techniques. Sonder, I., 73. Straightforward Bayesian Procedure for Estimation of the Graettinger, A. H., Valentine, G. A., Bowman, D. C., and Regional Characteristic, Maximum Possible Earthquake Lees, J. M. Magnitude mmax. Kijko, A. and Smit, A. 60. ASeismo-AcousticInfrasoundMethodologyforAccurate 74. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Using the Single Large Scale Simulations. Petersson, N. A.,Sjogreen,B., Station Sigma Concept: Application to a New Nuclear and Rodgers, A. J. Site. Rodriguez-Marek, A., Rathje, E. M., Bommer, J. J., Scherbaum, F., and Stafford, P. J. New Directions in PSHA: Ins, Outs, and Uncertainty 75. PreliminaryPrecariouslyBalancedRock(PBR)AgeDates (see page 541) Based on Various Models of Erosion. Brune, R. J., Brune, J. N., and Grant Ludwig, L. 61. Empirical Hazard Curve Constraints Using Precarious 76. Testing UCERF3. Jackson, D. D. Rocks of Southern California. Biasi, G. P., Anderson, 77. Challenges of Developing a Simulation-Based Risk J. G., and Brune, J. N. Model: Are All Realization of Event Time Series 62. A New Perspective towards the Generation of Response Equally Relevant? Fitzenz, D. D. and Williams, Spectral Ground Motion Prediction Equation for Seismic C. R. Friday, 02 May (continued) 90. Paleoseismic Investigations of the Kango fault, South RecentAdvancesandFindingsinEarthquakeGeologyand Africa: Incorporating Temporal and Spatial Clustering Paleoseismology Behavior into a Seismic Source Characterization Model. (see page 545) Hanson, K., Slack, C., Coppersmith, R., Neveling, J., Glaser,L.,Bierman,P.,Forman,S.,Goedhart,M.,Johnson, 78. A Paleoseismic Transect of Forearc Lakes at the Latitude C., and Black, D. of Seattle, Washington. Goldfinger, C.,Morey,A.M., 91. Comprehensive Study on Holocene Paleoearthquakes in Galer, S., Beeson, J., and Erhardt, M. Daqingshan Piedmont Fault, Inner Mongolia of China. 79. 3-D Investigation of Channel Morphology across the San He, Z. T.,Ma,B.Q.,andHou,J.J. Andreas Fault Zone Using Structure from Motion and 92. Faulting Constraints and Incision Rates in the Krsko TerrestrialLaserScanning. Kleber,E.J.,Arrowsmith,J.R., Basin and Upper Sava River, Eastern Slovenia. Cline, M. Akciz, S. O., Salisbury, J. B., Grant Ludwig, L., Halford, L.,Cline,K.M.,Bavec,M.,Riznar,I.,Poljak,M.,and D., DeLong, S. B., Marliyani, G. I., and Henderson, Lowick, S. W.M. 80. Is There a Discrepancy between Geological and Geodetic Seismic Location and Processing Techniques Slip Rates along the San Andreas Fault System? Tong , X ., (see page 548) Smith-Konter, B., and Sandwell, D. T. 81. Near-FieldPost-SeismicDeformationofthe1992Landers Earthquake Using Time-Series Analysis of ERS and 93. A Linear Formulation for Earthquake Location in Envisat InSAR. Barba, M. and Peltzer, G. a Homogeneous Half-Space Based on the Bancroft 82. Estimation of Coseismic Ground Deformation in Algorithm Developed for GPS Location. Gomez, D. D., the Mexicali Valley, Baja California, Mexico, during Langston, C. A., and Smalley, R. 2006 2009, Using Precise Leveling, DInSAR and 94. Low-Frequency-EarthquakeLocationsDeterminedUsing Geotechnical Instruments Data. Sarychikhina, O., Time-Reverse-Imaging. Horstmann, T., Harrington, Glowacka, E., Marquez-Ramirez, V. H., and Nava R. M.,Cochran,E.S.,andShelly,D.R. Pichardo,F.A. 95. Preconditioning Seismic Data using the Hilbert Huang 83. Re-evaluation of the Pyramid Lake Fault Zone Slip TransformPriortoGradiometricAnalysis.Johnson, C. E. Rate:IntegratingHigh-ResolutionDatasetsfromLiDAR, and Poppeliers, C. J. Drone Photography, and Aerial Photographs. Angster, 96. Accurate Depth Determination of Earthquakes along the S. J., Haung, W., Wesnousky, S. G., and Kent, KurilIslandsOuterRisefromWaveformModeling.Mejia, G. M. H.,Polet,J.,Thio,H.K.,andPitarka,A. 84. Preliminary Paleoseismic Trenching Results from the Flat 97. LookingforNonVolcanicTremorinMexicaliValley,Baja Canyon Site, Southern Provo Segment, Wasatch Fault California, Mexico. Márquez Ramírez, V. H., Glowacka, Zone:TestingHoloceneFault-SegmentationattheProvo- E., Vidal-Villegas, J. A., Wong, V., Díaz de Cossío Batani, Nephi Segment Boundary. Bennett, S. E. K.,DuRoss, G., Ramirez Ramos, E., Arregui Ojeda, S. M., Garcia C.B.,Gold,R.D.,Briggs,R.W.,Personius,S.F.,and Arthur, M. A., and Farfan, F. J. Mahan, S. A. 98. Scaling Rotational Motion and Its Induces Effects. Chiu, 85. Revised Earthquake Timing and Displacement Data H. C. Indicate Complex Fault-Rupture Behavior for the Central 99. Depths of Indian Ocean Intraplate Earthquakes From WasatchFaultZone,Utah.DuRoss,C.B.,Personius,S.F., Waveform Modeling. Baca, A. J. and Polet, J. Crone, A. J., and Olig, S. S. 100. Examination of the Storfjorden Aftershock Sequence. 86.EvidenceforQuaternaryReverseSlipofRattlesnake Junek, W. N., Kvaerna, T., Pirli, M., Schweitzer, J., Mountain Fault, Yakima Fold Belt, Eastern Washington. Harris, D. B., Dodge, D. A., Woods, M. T., and Slack, C., Hanson, K., Coppersmith, R., and VanDeMark, T. F. Unruh, J. 101. Estimation of Rocking and Torsion Associated with 87. Recently Discovered Northeast-Oriented Transpression Rayleigh and Love Waves, Respectively, Identified StructureintheNorthernNewMadridSeismicZone. on Recorded Motions. Meza-Fajardo, K. C. and Wooler y, E. W. and Almayahi, A. Z. Papageorgiou,A.S. 88. Rupture Properties of the Mw 7.7 2012 Haida Gwaii 102. Revised Geometry of Nodal-Plane Uncertainty Volume Earthquake from an Empirical Green’s Function Method. UsedintheSeismo-LineamentAnalysisMethodtoLocate Hobbs, T. E., Cassidy, J. F., and Dosso, S. E. Seismogenic Faults. Cronin, V. S. and Cronin, K. E. 89. Factors Contributing to Multi-Segment Rupture in the 103. Predicting P and S Wave Body Wave Travel Times at 2010M7.1Darfield,NewZealand,Earthquake.Aagaard, Regional and Teleseismic Distances. Simmons, N. A., B. T., Williams, C. A., and Fry, B. Myers, S. C., Johannesson, G., and Matzel, E. Friday, 02 May (continued) 108. Lower-Crustal and Upper-Mantle Seismicity beneath Tracking Fluid Movement in Volcanic Systems Aleutian Arc Volcanoes. Ketner,D.M.,andPower,J.A. (see page 551) 109. Joint Inversion of Ground Rotation and Translation from Small Explosions at Fuego Volcano. Waite, G. P.,and 104. Calibration of the Seismic Network at the Hawaiian Brill, K. A. Volcano Observatory: Improvements to Locations and 110. Conduit Processes Driving Pre-Explosive Harmonic Magnitudes. Thelen,W.A., Carmichael, J. D., and Tremor in the 2009 Redoubt Volcano Eruption. Murray, K. Summers, P. T. S., and Dunham, E. M. D. 105. Mapping Magma Pathways with Tremor at Kilauea 111. Using Spatial Density Estimates to Assess Volcanic Volcano. Wech, A. G. and Thelen, W. Hazards in Dominica, Lesser Antilles. George, O. 106. Seismic Structure of the Tonga Arc and Lau Backarc A., Latchman, J., Malservisi, R., Connor, C., and Spreading Center from Local and Teleseismic Body Wave Connor, L. To m o g r a p hy. Adams, A. N., Wiens, D., Blackman, D., 112. The Subtle Beginning of an Earthquake Swarm beneath Webb, S., Dunn, R., Conder, J., and Zhao, D. Long Valley Caldera, California, Detected by Downhole 107. Deep Seismicity Linked to Shallow Unrest at Little Sitkin Seismometers. Montgomery-Brown, E. K.,Shelly,D.R., Volcano, Alaska. Haney, M. M.,Buurman,H.,Qu,F.,and Ellsworth,W.,Hill,D.P.,andPitt,A.M. Lu, Z.
Late changes will be reflected in the list of abstracts online at www.seismosoc.org/meetings/2014/abstracts/.