Approved Conservation Advice for Egernia Rugosa (Yakka Skink)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Approved Conservation Advice for Egernia Rugosa (Yakka Skink) This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister on 29 Apr 2014 Approved Conservation Advice for Egernia rugosa (Yakka Skink) (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Egernia rugosa, Family Scincidae, commonly known as the Yakka Skink is a robust bodied skink that grows up to 40 cm long. It has a broad dark brown to black stripe from nape to tail bordered on either side by a narrow, pale fawn back/side stripe. Dark brown to pale brown to reddish-brown scales on the flanks form a faintly variegated orange-brown pattern. The throat is cream-yellow, with blackish flecks/spots, and the chest and abdomen are yellow-orange (Cogger, 2000). This skink is often described as robust and is about the same size as a Blue Tongue Lizard (Tiliqua scincoides), making it one of the largest skinks in the region where it is found (TSN, 2008). Conservation Status The Yakka Skink is listed as vulnerable. This species is eligible for listing as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as vulnerable under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). The Yakka Skink is also listed as vulnerable under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland). Distribution and Habitat The Yakka Skink is endemic to Queensland where its distribution is patchy. Isolated populations occur throughout subhumid areas in the interior of Queensland from St George in the south, to Coen and Cape York in the north. In the southern half of the Brigalow Belt it occurs near Rockhampton, south to St George and west to Chesterton Range National Park. The core habitat of this species is within the Mulga Lands and Brigalow Belt South Bioregions (TSN, 2008). Other populations have been recorded throughout the Brigalow Belt North and Einsaleigh Uplands Bioregions (TSN, 2008). Populations have been recorded across a range on land tenures including Thurshton National Park, Culgoa Floodplain National Park. Some populations (size not known) have been detected along the Queensland/NSW border (TSN, 2008). The Yakka Skink is found in open dry sclerophyll forest or woodland (Wilson and Knowles, 1988; Cogger, 2000). This species will often take refuge among dense ground vegetation, large hollow logs, cavities in soil-bound root systems of fallen trees and beneath rocks (Wilson and Knowles, 1988; Cogger, 2000). They may also excavate burrow systems among low vegetation or below logs (Ehmann, 1992). In cleared habitat, Yakka Skinks may persist where shelter sites such as tunnel erosion, rabbit warrens and log piles exist (TSN, 2008). They are extremely secretive and seldom venture far from shelter sites, where they retreat to at the first sign of disturbance. Their presence is often indicated by a shared site where they deposit their droppings (Wilson, 2003). This species occurs within the Border Rivers Maranoa-Balonne, Burdekin, Burnett Mary, Cape York, Condamine, Desert Channels, Fitzroy, Mackay Whitsunday and South West Natural Resource Management Regions. Egernia rugosa Approved Conservation Advice — Page 1 of 3 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister on 29 Apr 2014 The distribution of this species is associated with the “Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla dominant and co-dominant)” EPBC Act-listed threatened ecological community. Threats The main identified threat to the Yakka Skink is a continued legacy of past braodscale land clearing and habitat degradation. The Brigalow Belt Bioregion is an area of high human impact (Covacevich et al., 1998) with much of the region modified through agricultural and urban development (McDonald et al., 1991; Cogger et al., 1993). Other threats to the Yakka Skink include inappropriate roadside management, removal of wood debris and rock microhabitat features, ripping of rabbit warrens and predation by feral animals (TSN, 2008). Research Priorities Research priorities that would inform future regional and local priority actions include: • More precisely assess population size, distribution, ecological requirements and the relative impacts of threatening processes. • Undertake survey work in suitable habitat and potential habitat to locate any additional populations/occurrences/remnants. • Monitor the progress of recovery, including the effectiveness of management actions and the need to adapt them if necessary. Regional and local Priority Actions The following priority recovery and threat abatement actions can be done to support the recovery of the Yakka Skink. Habitat Loss, Disturbance and Modification • Monitor known populations to identify key threats. • Identify populations of high conservation priority. • Actively discourage the removal of fallen logs, leaf litter and rocks from known and potential habitat sites. • Ensure that road widening and maintenance activities and ripping of rabbit warrens in areas where the Yakka Skink occurs do not adversely impact on known populations. • Investigate formal conservation arrangements, management agreements and covenants on private land, and for crown and private land investigate inclusion in reserve tenure if possible. Animal Predation or Competition • Develop and implement a management plan for the control of foxes and feral cats in the region. Fire • Develop and implement a suitable fire management strategy for the habitat of the Yakka Skink. Conservation Information • Raise awareness of the Yakka Skink, and other reptiles, within the local community. • Engage with private landholders and land managers responsible for the land on which populations occur and encourage these key stakeholders to contribute to the implementation of conservation management actions. This list does not necessarily encompass all actions that may be of benefit to the Yakka Skink, but highlights those that are considered to be of highest priority at the time of preparing the Conservation Advice. Egernia rugosa Approved Conservation Advice — Page 2 of 3 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister on 29 Apr 2014 Information Sources: Cogger HG (2000). Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia – 6th edition. Sydney: Reed New Holland. Cogger HG, Cameron EE, Sadlier RA and Eggler P (1993). The Action Plan for Australian Reptiles. Canberra, ACT: Australian Nature Conservation Agency. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/action/reptiles/index.html Covacevich JA, Coupler PJ and McDonald KR (1998). Reptile diversity at risk in the Brigalow Belt, Queensland. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum. 42 (2):475-486. Ehmann H (1992). Reptiles. In: Strahan, R., ed. Encyclopedia of Australian Animals. Sydney: Angus and Robertson. McDonald KR, Covacevich JA, Ingram GJ and Couper PJ (1991). The status of frogs and reptiles. In: Ingram, G.J. & R.J. Raven, eds. An Atlas of Queensland's Frogs, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals. Page(s) 338-345. Brisbane: Queensland Museum. Richardson R. DRAFT-Brigalow Belt Reptile Recovery Plan. Report to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra. WWF-Australia, Brisbane. Threatened Species Network (TSN) (2008). Yakka Skink: Egernia rugosa: National Threatened Species Day Information Sheet: Threatened Species Network; Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Available on the Internet at: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/tsday08-skink.html Wilson SK and Knowles DG (1988). Australia’s Reptiles: A Photographic Reference to the Terrestrial Reptiles of Australia: Collins Publishers. Wilson S (2003). Reptiles of the Southern Brigalow Belt. WWF-Australia. Egernia rugosa Approved Conservation Advice — Page 3 of 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Brigalow Belt Bioregion – a Biodiversity Jewel
    Brigalow Belt bioregion – a biodiversity jewel Brigalow habitat © Craig Eddie What is brigalow? including eucalypt and cypress pine forests and The term ‘brigalow’ is used simultaneously to refer to; woodlands, grasslands and other Acacia dominated the tree Acacia harpophylla; an ecological community ecosystems. dominated by this tree and often found in conjunction with other species such as belah, wilga and false Along the eastern boundary of the Brigalow Belt are sandalwood; and a broader region where this species scattered patches of semi-evergreen vine thickets with and ecological community are present. bright green canopy species that are highly visible among the more silvery brigalow communities. These The Brigalow Belt bioregion patches are a dry adapted form of rainforest, relics of a much wetter past. The Brigalow Belt bioregion is a large and complex area covering 36,400 000ha. The region is thus recognised What are the issues? by the Australian Government as a biodiversity hotspot. Nature conservation in the region has received increasing attention because of the rapid and extensive This hotspot contains some of the most threatened loss of habitat that has occurred. Since World War wildlife in the world, including populations of the II the Brigalow Belt bioregion has become a major endangered bridled nail-tail wallaby and the only agricultural and pastoral area. Broad-scale clearing for remaining wild population of the endangered northern agriculture and unsustainable grazing has fragmented hairy-nosed wombat. The area contains important the original vegetation in the past, particularly on habitat for rare and threatened species including the, lowland areas. glossy black-cockatoo, bulloak jewel butterfl y, brigalow scaly-foot, red goshawk, little pied bat, golden-tailed geckos and threatened community of semi evergreen Biodiversity hotspots are areas that support vine thickets.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Matters Wildlife Conservancy
    australian wildlife matters wildlife conservancy Spring 2009 Pungalina reveals one of Australia’s rarest mammals Carpentarian Pseudantechinus 2 australian saving australia’s threatened wildlife wildlife Pictograph conservancy Welcome to the Spring 2009 edition of Wildlife Matters. As this edition goes to print, we are in the process of fi nalising the acquisition of Bowra (see pages 4-5), a 14,000 the awc mission hectare property located in the heart of the Mulga Lands in Queensland. Bowra will The mission of Australian Wildlife Conservancy be our 21st sanctuary, bringing the AWC network to more than 2.56 million hectares (AWC) is the effective conservation of all (6.3 million acres). Australian animal species and the habitats in While the overall scale of the portfolio is impressive, it is not the number of properties or which they live. To achieve this mission, our hectares that really count. A more accurate measure of the value of the portfolio is the actions are focused on: number of species and ecosystems that occur within the AWC estate. In this respect, • Establishing a network of sanctuaries the statistics are even more impressive – for example, around 80% of all Australian which protect threatened wildlife and terrestrial bird species and over 60% of all terrestrial mammal species occur on one or ecosystems: AWC now manages 20 more of our sanctuaries. sanctuaries covering over 2.56 million The fact that our portfolio captures such a high percentage of Australia’s wildlife species hectares (6.3 million acres). refl ects a deliberate, science-based strategy to ensure that AWC invests in properties • Implementing practical, on-ground of the highest environmental value.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Fauna Assessment
    Cameby Downs Continued Operations Project EnvironmentalEnvironmental Values Assessment Assessment APPENDIX E Terrestrial Fauna Assessment Cameby Downs Continued Operation Project Terrestrial Fauna Assessment May 2018 Syntech Resources Pty Ltd ecology / vegetation / wildlife / aquatic ecology / GIS Executive summary The Cameby Downs Mine is owned and operated by Syntech Resources Pty Ltd (Syntech) and is managed by Yancoal Australia Ltd (Yancoal). Syntech are considering expanding their operation area as part of the Cameby Downs Continued Operations Project (the Project) and an environmental values statement is being prepared to accompany a major Environmental Authority Amendment application. Syntech commissioned Ecosure Pty Ltd (Ecosure) to undertake terrestrial fauna field surveys and ecological assessments to address the minimum requirements in the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage (DEHP) Information Request for an Amendment Application for an Environmental Authority. To supplement previous fauna surveys undertaken over the last decade, Ecosure undertook preliminary surveys and targeted surveys in July 2016. More comprehensive surveys followed in October 2016. Overall, six detailed trapping sites, 50 observational surveys and 56 targeted surveys were undertaken across the study area to determine the likelihood of occurrence of species listed as conservation significant species under State legislation and/ or threatened under Commonwealth legislation. A total of five conservation significant species have been recorded during field surveys (including previous surveys) conducted in the study area. These were: • koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) • glossy black-cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami lathami) • grey snake (Hemiaspis damelii) • short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) • yakka skink (Egernia rugosa) (during previous surveys only). A total of 192 species were recorded during the field surveys, including 13 amphibians, 101 birds, 25 mammals and 26 reptiles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Faunal Values Within and Adjacent EPC 1029, Styx Basin, Central-East Queensland
    A preliminary assessment of faunal values within and adjacent EPC 1029, Styx Basin, central-east Queensland ) Prepared for Yeats Consulting Engineers by Ed Meyer, Ecological Consultant,S Luscombe Street, Runcorn QLD 4113 ([email protected]) Conditions of use This report may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned. The use of this report, or part thereof, for any other reason or purpose is prohibited without the written consent of the author. Front cover: Fauna recorded from EPC 1029 during March 2011 surveys. Clockwise from upper left: ornamental snake (Denisonia maculata); squatter pigeon (southern race) (Geophaps scripta scripta); metallic snake-eyed skink (Cryptoblepharus metal/icus); and eastern sedgefrog (Litoria tal/ax). ©Edward Meyer 2011 5 Luscombe Street, Runcorn QLD 4113 E-mail:[email protected] Version 2 _ 3 August 2011 2 Table of contents 1. Summary 4 2. Background 6 Description of study area 6 Nomenclature 6 Abbreviations and acronyms 7 3. Methodology 9 General approach 9 ) Desktop assessment 9 Likelihood of occurrence assessments 10 Field surveys 11 Survey conditions 15 Survey limitations 15 4. Results 17 Desktop assessment findings 17 Likelihood of occurrence assessments 17 Field survey results -fauna 20 Field survey results - fauna habitat 22 Habitat for conservation significant species 28 ) 5. Summary and conclusions 37 6. References 38 Appendix A: Fauna previously recorded from Desktop Assessment Study Area 41 Appendix B: likelihood of occurrence assessments for conservation significant fauna 57 Appendix C: March 2011 survey results 73 Appendix D: Habitat photos 85 Appendix E: Habitat assessment proforma 100 3 1. Summary The faunal values of land within and adjacent Exploration Permit for Coal (EPe) 1029 were investigated by way of desktop review of existing information as well as field surveys carried out in late March 201l.
    [Show full text]
  • Eton Range Realignment Project ATTACHMENT 2 to EPBC Ref: 2015/7552 Preliminary Documentation Residual Impact Assessment and Offset Proposal - 37
    APPENDIX 3: KSAT RESULTS – PELLET COUNTS Table 5: KSAT results per habitat tree. Species Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Total Eucalyptus tereticornis 9 30 16 - 42 7 104 Eucalyptus crebra 91 16 29 2 0 25 163 Corymbia clarksoniana 11 0 0 1 4 5 21 Corymbia tessellaris 5 0 0 0 0 20 25 Corymbia dallachiana - 12 - - - - 12 Corymbia intermedia - 3 1 0 11 - 15 Corymbia erythrophloia - - 0 - 0 - 0 Eucalyptus platyphylla - - - 0 0 0 0 Lophostemon - - - 0 0 - 0 suaveolens Total 116 61 46 3 57 57 Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 22 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder APPENDIX 4: SITE PHOTOS The following images were taken from the centre of each BioCondition quadrat and represent a north east south west aspect, top left to bottom right. Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 23 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 3: BioCondition quadrat 1 (RE11.3.4/11.12.3) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 24 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 4: BioCondition quadrat 2 (RE11.3.4/11.12.3) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 25 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 5: BioCondition quadrat 3 (RE11.12.3) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 26 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 6: BioCondition quadrat 4 (RE11.3.9) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 27 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 7: BioCondition quadrat 5 (RE11.3.25) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 28 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 8: BioCondition quadrat 6 (RE11.12.3/11.3.4/11.3.9) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 29 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Appendix E: Desktop Assessment for Potential
    [Show full text]
  • Carmichael Conservation and Research Program
    Carmichael Conservation and Research Program 3 April 2019 Version 6 1 Carmichael Conservation and Research Program Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2 Carmichael Conservation and Research Program ....................................................................... 5 2.1 Objective ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Descriptions of Matters of National Environmental Significance ........................................ 7 2.2.1 Black-throated Finch (southern) .................................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Brigalow Threatened Ecological Community .............................................................. 7 2.2.3 Ornamental snake ....................................................................................................... 8 2.2.4 Squatter pigeon (southern) .......................................................................................... 8 2.2.5 Waxy cabbage palm ................................................................................................... 9 2.2.6 Yakka skink ............................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Species recovery information - threats .............................................................................. 10 2.4 Existing research gap analysis .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NSW REPTILE KEEPERS' LICENCE Species Lists 1006
    NSW REPTILE KEEPERS’ LICENCE SPECIES LISTS (2006) The taxonomy in this list follows that used in Wilson, S. and Swan, G. A Complete Guide to Reptiles of Australia, Reed 2003. Common names generally follow the same text, when common names were used, or have otherwise been lifted from other publications. As well as reading this species list, you will also need to read the “NSW Reptile Keepers’ Licence Information Sheet 2006.” That document has important information about the different types of reptile keeper licenses. It also lists the criteria you need to demonstrate before applying to upgrade to a higher class of licence. THESE REPTILES CAN ONLY BE HELD UNDER A REPTILE KEEPERS’ LICENCE OF CLASS 1 OR HIGHER Code Scientific Name Common Name Code Scientific Name Common Name Turtles Monitors E2018 Chelodina canni Cann’s Snake-necked Turtle G2263 Varanus acanthurus Spiney-tailed Monitor C2017 Chelodina longicollis Snake-necked Turtle Q2268 Varanus gilleni Pygmy Mulga Monitor G2019 Chelodina oblonga Oblong Turtle G2271 Varanus gouldii Sand Monitor Y2028 Elseya dentata Northern Snapping Turtle M2282 Varanus tristis Black-Headed Monitor K2029 Elseya latisternum Saw-shelled Turtle Y2776 Elusor macrurus Mary River Turtle E2034 Emydura macquarii Murray Short-necked Turtle Skinks T2031 Emydura macquarii dharra Macleay River Turtle A2464 Acritoscincus platynotum Red-throated Skink T2039 Emydura macquarii dharuk Sydney Basin Turtle W2331 Cryptoblepharus virgatus Cream-striped Wall Skink T2002 Emydura macquarii emmotti Emmott’s Short-necked Turtle W2375
    [Show full text]
  • ASH Newsletter 47 E.Pub
    THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF HERPETOLOGISTS INCORPORATED NEWSLETTER 47 2 History of Office Bearers Formation Committee (April 1964):- MJ Littlejohn (Convenor); State Reps IR Straughan (Qld), FJ Mitch- ell (SA), HG Cogger (NSW), G Storr (WA), RE Barwick (ACT), JW Warren (Vic), AK Lee (Editor). First AGM (23 August 1965):- President MJ Littlejohn, Vice-President NG Stephenson, Secretary- Treasurer AA Martin, Asst Secretary-Treasurer KJ Wilson, Ordinary Members FJ Mitchell and IR Strau- ghan, Editor AK Lee. PRESIDENT:- MJ Littlejohn (1965-69); AK Lee (1969-70); HG Cogger (1971-73); J de Bavay (1974); H Heatwole (1975-76); GC Grigg (1976-77); MJ Tyler (1978-79); GF Watson (1979-81); AA Martin (1981- 82); RS Seymour (1982-83); R Shine (1983-84); GC Grigg (1984-86); J Coventry (1986-87); RE Barwick (1987-88); J Covacevich (1988-91); M Davies (1991-92); R Shine (1992-94); A Georges (1994-6); D Roberts (1996-98); M Bull (1998-9); R Swain (1999-2001); S Downes (2001-03); J Melville (2004-2005); J -M Hero (2005-2007); P Doherty (2007-2008); M Thompson (2008-2009); M Hutchinson (2009-2010); L Schwarzkopf (2010-2011); F Lemckert (2011-) VICE-PRESIDENT:- NG Stephenson (1965-67); RE Barwick (1967-69); HG Cogger (1969-70); MJ Lit- tlejohn (1971-72); MJ Tyler (1973); HG Cogger (1974); J de Bavay (1975-76); H Heatwole (1976-77); GC Grigg (1977-79); MJ Tyler (1979-80); GF Watson (1981-82); AA Martin (1982-83); RS Seymour (1983- 84); R Shine (1984-86); GC Grigg (1986-87); J Coventry (1987-88); RE Barwick (1988-91); J Covacevich (1991-92); M Davies (1992-94); R Shine (1994-6); A Georges (1996-98); D Roberts (1998-99); M Bull (1999-2001); R Swain (2001-2003); S Downes (2004-5); J Melville (2005-2007); J-M Hero (2007-2008); P Doherty (2008-2009); M Thompson (2009-2010); M Hutchinson (2010-); L Schwarzkopf (2010-2011) SECRETARY/TREASURER:- AA Martin (1965-67); GF Watson (1967-72); LA Moffatt (1973-75); J Caughley (19375-76); RWG Jenkins (1976-77); M Davies (1978-83); G Courtice (1983-87); J Wombey (1987-99); S Keogh (1999-2003); N Mitchell (2004-5); E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Life-History, and Behavior in the Australian Scincid Genus Egernia, with Comments on the Evolution of Complex Sociality in Lizards
    Herpetological Monographs, 17, 2003, 145–180 Ó 2003 by The Herpetologists’ League, Inc. ECOLOGY, LIFE-HISTORY, AND BEHAVIOR IN THE AUSTRALIAN SCINCID GENUS EGERNIA, WITH COMMENTS ON THE EVOLUTION OF COMPLEX SOCIALITY IN LIZARDS 1 DAVID G. CHAPPLE School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia ABSTRACT: Squamate reptiles generally have been ignored in the search for a unified theory for the evolution of sociality due to the perception that they exhibit little social behavior beyond territoriality and dominance hierarchies and display polygynous mating systems. However a growing body of research has revealed unsuspected levels of social complexity and diversity in mating systems within the squamate lineage, particularly among the members of the Australian Scincid genus Egernia. Several species of Egernia are amongst the most highly social of all squamate reptiles, exhibiting stable social aggregations and high levels of long-term social and genetic monogamy. Social complexity is widespread within the Egernia genus, with reports of social aggregations in 23 of the 30 described species. The purpose of this review was to examine the potential for the Egernia genus as a model system for study of the evolution of sociality and monogamy within squamate reptiles. Current evidence indicates there is substantial variability in social complexity both within and between species, with social organization covering the spectrum from solitary to highly social. Four highly social Egernia species are known to live in stable social aggregations consisting of closely related individuals (adults, subadults, juveniles; i.e., ‘family’ groups) that appear to utilize chemical cues to recognize group members (kin recognition).
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Ecology Mnes Assessment Bmc Dragline Move Project
    TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY MNES ASSESSMENT BMC DRAGLINE MOVE PROJECT Prepared for Advisian Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd PO Box 1376 CLEVELAND 4163 Specialised ecological knowledge that reduces your risk Document Control Sheet File Number: 0402-007 Project Manager/s: Dr Lindsay Popple Client: Advisian on behalf of BHP Billiton Mitsui Coal Project Title: BMC Dragline Move Project Terrestrial Ecology MNES Assessment Project Author/s: Dr Lindsay Popple, Dr Penn Lloyd, Jedd Appleton, Lauren Thorburn (ESP) and Paulette Jones. Project Summary: An assessment of terrestrial ecology Matters of National Environmental Significance associated with the BMC Dragline Move Project corridor between Goonyella and South Walker Creek Mines north-east of Moranbah. Draft Preparation History: Draft No. Date draft Reviewed by Issued by completed 0402-007 Draft A 19/09/2016 Paulette Jones Paulette Jones 0402-007 Draft B 23/09/2016 Jedd Appleton Paulette Jones Revision/ Checking History Track: Version Date of Issue Checked by Issued by 0402-007 Version 0 30/09/2016 Paulette Jones Lindsay Popple Document Distribution: Destination Revision 1 Date 2 Date 3 Date 4 Date Dispatched Dispatched Dispatched Dispatched Client Copy 1 - A 19/09/2016 B 23/09/2016 0 30/09/2016 digital Client Copy 1- hard copy PDF - server A 19/09/2016 B 23/09/2016 0 30/09/2016 PDF – backup – A 19/09/2016 B 23/09/2016 0 30/09/2016 archived Hard Copy -library BAAM Pty Ltd File No. 0402-007 Draft B NOTICE TO USERS OF THIS REPORT Copyright and reproduction This report and all indexes, schedules, annexures or appendices are subject to copyright pursuant to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).
    [Show full text]
  • Saraji East Mining Lease Project Environmental Impact Statement
    Saraji East Mining Lease Project Environmental Impact Statement Appendix C-3 Central Queensland Threatened Species Habitat Descriptions Central Queensland Threatened Species Habitat Descriptions © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 1 Central Queensland Threatened Species Habitat Descriptions Citation This report should be cited as Kerswell A, Kaveney T, Evans C and Appleby L. (2020) Habitat descriptions for 12 threatened species, specific to central Queensland. Report commissioned by BHP. Acknowledgements This document has been prepared with support from BHP, Steve Wilson, Brad Dreis (E2M), Lindsay Agnew (Austecology), Penn Llyod (BAAM), Greg Ford, Berlinda Ezzy & Andy Jensen (EMM), Craig Eddie (Boobook), Liz Fisher (AECOM), David Watson (CSU), Kevin Wormington (Kleinfelder), Steve Debus (UNE), Andrew Veary (Footprints) and Alistair Melzer (CQU). Version v4, prepared 2 November 2020 2 Central Queensland Threatened Species Habitat Descriptions Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 9 2. Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Desktop assessment and literature review ........................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Spatial analysis ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Life Earth & Environment
    Life Earth & Environment: Annual Report School of Environmental and Rural Science 2014 Table of Contents ZOOLOGY 36 37 Thermal energetics INTRODUCTION 4 38 Form and function in living and fossil species 39 Avian Behaviour 5 Our Theme 39 Parasite Evolution and Ecology 5 Our Students 40 Other Research Staff & Students 6 Theme Leader’s Review 41 ZOOLOGY: Research Snapshots 6 Prof Caroline Gross ECOLOGY 10 PhD Graduates in 2014 43 11 Plant Reproduction Ecology 11 Aquatic Ecology & Restoration 12 Mammal Ecology and Conservation 12 Movement and Landscape 2014 Research Outputs 44 13 Other Research Staff & Students 14 ECOLOGY: Research Snapshots in 2014 45 PUBLICATIONS 52 HDR Awards and Honours 53 Seminar Series ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 16 17 Biodiversity, Landscapes and Ecosystem Stewardship LEE in the Media and the Community 54 17 Ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes 18 Environmental Policy 55 News 19 Sustainable Engineering 55 Radio 20 Other Research Staff & Students 56 Out in the Community 21 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: Research Snapshots 56 Blogs EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY 24 International Research & Education : Bhutan 57 25 Biogeography & taxonomy of Australian plants 58 LEE Webpages 25 Molecular ecology, landscape genetics and genomics 26 Morphological evolution in burrowing animals 27 Other Research Staff & Students Facilities 59 28 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY: Research Snapshots 59 Laboratory Upgrades 59 Herbarium 59 Zoology Museum EARTH SCIENCE 30 59 Geology Collection 31 Palaeozoic fossil arthropods 31 Mesozoic vertebrates and palaeoecology
    [Show full text]