DOCSLIB.ORG

The Elegies of Theognis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Elegies of Theognis View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ZENODO The Classical Review http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR Additional services for The Classical Review: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The Elegies of Theognis E. Harrison The Classical Review / Volume 26 / Issue 02 / March 1912, pp 41 - 46 DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X00199482, Published online: 27 October 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009840X00199482 How to cite this article: E. Harrison (1912). The Elegies of Theognis. The Classical Review, 26, pp 41-46 doi:10.1017/S0009840X00199482 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR, IP address: 137.132.123.69 on 08 Nov 2015 The Review MARCH, 1912 ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS THE ELEGIES OF THEOGNIS. The Elegies of Theognis and other Elegies en TI cannot easily be got out of the included in the Theognidean Sylloge. A MSS., and is no better than ovSev en in revised text, based on a new collation sense. But fir) Brjv fi in 352, and 7T6\a? of the Mutinensis MS., with introduc- in 1258, are worth considering. The tion, commentary, and appendices. use of brackets is somewhat arbitrary, By T. HUDSON-WILLIAMS, M.A., as in 626 and 1194; and the poem 237- Professor of Greek in the University 54 is ruined thereby. To prefix an College of North Wales, Bangor. asterisk to one word only3 in some four- Pp. xv + 262. London : G. Bell and teen hundred lines is to give a wrong Sons, Ltd., 1910. notion of the trustworthiness of the text. Misjudgment of the character of the THE chief value of this book lies in its inferior MSS. is shown here and there, illustrative commentary and its new col- as in the acceptance of their superfluous lation of the Mutinensis, A. The colla- 8' in 83. They give just such another 8', tion is minute, it commands confidence,1 to patch up the grammar and to make a and it supplies a felt want. Special bad link with the preceding couplet, in attention is paid to the strange fact, 821, where 0% K' . aTi/jbd^coai should observed by Jordan, that some busy- be read.4 A more serious instance of body has made erasures and substitu- the same fault is in 213, where A's Qvfik tions in A since Bekker's time. The is superseded, without comment, by the other MSS., it seems, are quoted ac- vulgar Kvpve, which helps to disguise cording to old collations. the difference between 213-8 and 1071-4. The new evidence about A, though it On the other hand, the editor is wisely clears up a wilderness of error, does little proof against the loose variants of the towards the improvement of the text; testimonia ; and on the whole his choice and the editor's few conjectures do little of readings and other men's conjectures more. In 112 /ivrjfia 8e xot/tr' (for S' is fairly discreet. exov<r'), 'they pile up a memorial [of The commentary is defective in argu- thanks] to good deeds,' is an unlikely 2 and unhappy metaphor ; and in 235 ovB phorically concrete sense, the editor calls pv. Kal \apiv ' hendyadys as 1040': but the Platonic 1 Such doubts as have occurred to me are on trick of coupling metaphor and fact by a KW. small points: e.g., has A ^eiJSea or i^euSeo in strikes me as foreign to poetry; and no stretch 713? Other doubtful accents appear in the of ' hendiadys' can cover Sarpov xal KVVOS notes on 169, 897, 902, 908. The text has a ap^ofiAvov in 1040. misprint in 785. 3 OXAT/I in 1202, which has been satisfactorily 2 If we follow the MSS., /ivijiia in the sense emended. of livrifiri may perhaps be defended by com- 4 Equally superfluous is the 8' accepted from parison with yv&fui. Giving pvrjua a meta- Orelli in 937. NO. CCXXIV. VOL. XXVI. D THE CLASSICAL REVIEW ment and elucidation; some difficulties in the present book, something must be are missed altogether, others are only said: for partly solved.1 But it is very rich in ' A man is fettered by the foolishness quotations and references illustrating He took for wisdom and talked ten years points of diction, combinations of words, since.' and their metrical positions. In such a mass of matter some irrelevancies might It is to be understood that on many be pardoned, but I have noticed very points I find myself in cordial agreement few;2 and I might draw attention to with W.'s Introduction,6 though they many notes3 which say all that need will find little place in the following ever be said in defence of the text. But notes. the merits of this painstaking work The Testimonia.—The clouds of mis- cannot be represented by a sample: the interpretation on which Sitzler and his proof of the pudding is in the eating. like projected their Ur-Theognides are by now dispelled; though W., I think, I have dealt the more briefly with the still overworks the passage of Isocrates, strictly editorial parts of this book be- unduly narrowing the scope of the cause private duty calls me to the phrase rrjv SeoyviSos iro'vt\cnv. On the author's treatment of the Theognidean passages of Xenophon, Dio, Athenaeus, Cyril, Suidas, he is sound enough. The Question. Ten years ago I wrote a e book called Studies in Theognis ; and no passage of the Meno proves to him the sooner was it born, and beheld the rays existence early in the fourth century of of the sharp sun, than Mr. Hudson- a book of poems attributed to Theognis, Williams began to heap earth upon its ' and this,' he says, ' is perhaps all that body. He gives it on the whole a fairly it does prove.' So far, good. Christian burial, so perhaps I ought not The 'Alien' Poems.—Failing ancient to insist too loudly that the book is still evidence for alien authorship, W. is alive. I certainly do not mean to defend chary of ascriptions, though he reports its character against all aspersions; but, a guess here and there in his notes. on the other hand, I am not at present But he follows the scholars who ascribe inclined to pluck up all its wild oats, or 467-96, 667-82, and 1345-50, to Euenus to make its peace with the Higher of Paros. He acknowledges (p. 34) that Criticism against the day when Hercu- 'the mere fact that Th. 472 was read laneum shall give up its dead. Yet among the poems of Euenus does not since my name, and divers compendia in itself entitle him to the whole elegy of it,4 often appear, and are often latent, in which it occurs'; but he thinks that 'several other considerations point in 1 E.g. 127, 287-8, 309-12, 513, 669, 806, 884, 1219, 1247. 428 : the 'parallel' between a 3 E.g., the poems are not arranged by catch- living man heaping together a bed of leaves and words ; they contain many complete poems, of a dead man piling earth over his own corpse— one couplet or more; they are not a school- a difficult feat—is not ' exact.' 843: a good book or a Cotnmersbuch; the pastime of label- counsellor would advise a man to leave a ling pieces with the names of Callinus, Chilon, drinking-bout, not ' when he sees things upside and the like, is full of risk; metrical and lin- down,' but rather earlier, n 33-4 : KtrraTrav- guistic tests have failed. aoptv is of course aor. subj., not fut. ind. 6 He discusses anew the question iv irolois 2 On 3 : some of the examples of the form (wea-iv; and the answer is iv roir eXeyetW o5 ' first, last, midst' are not to the point, and it is X£y« K.T.X., and thinks that the question may not the fact that ' there is no special reference refer not to metre but to matter. Then why to Ptolemy in the middle' of Theocr. 17: Pt. does the answer bring in a term of metre ? Or, comes next to Zeus in the prelude and the again, he thinks that iv IT. ?«•. may mean no epilogue, and he is the theme and substance of more than ' Where ? Then what does iv T. eX. the middle of the poem.—A note on the relation add to o5? In order to make the question between 239 and Iliad x. 217 is badly wanted.— relevant, he makes the answer irrelevant. The On 903 and 905 (p. 260): avak&xra in Plato Rep. interpretation of oklyov perafias which he follows 591E is verb, not noun (the error is perhaps may be right, but he does not commend it by borrowed from Stephanus-Dindorf or Ast); and asking, ' Would Socrates at one and the same the note on Karibciv wants further thought. moment refer to the poem as showing " a slight 3 See, e.g., 4, 11, 115, 175. change of standpoint " and " a direct self-con- 4 Which encourage me to shorten ' Professor tradiction " ? How many words to a moment ? Hudson-Williams ' to ' W.1 Forty or fifty words intervene. THE CLASSICAL REVIEW 43 the same direction.' They are scarcely This poem has suffered from its popu- a quorum. All three poems are ad- larity and has been changed to suit dressed to Simonides: but no Simonides the problem it discusses.' In the com- to whom the Parian poet should have mentary we read,' a popular revision of addressed them is known.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • De Theognide Megarensi. Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara. a Bilingual Edition
    FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE De Theognide Megarensi Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara – A Bilingual Edition – Translated by R. M. Kerr THE NIETZSCHE CHANNEL Friedrich Nietzsche De Theognide Megarensi Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara A bilingual edition Translated by R. M. Kerr ☙ editio electronica ❧ _________________________________________ THE N E T ! " # H E # H A N N E $ % MM&' Copyright © Proprietas interpretatoris Roberti Martini Kerrii anno 2015 Omnia proprietatis iura reservantur et vindicantur. Imitatio prohibita sine auctoris permissione. Non licet pecuniam expetere pro aliquo, quod partem horum verborum continet; liber pro omnibus semper gratuitus erat et manet. Sic rerum summa novatur semper, et inter se mortales mutua vivunt. augescunt aliae gentes, aliae invuntur, inque brevi spatio mutantur saecla animantum et quasi cursores vitai lampada tradiunt. - Lucretius - - de Rerum Natura, II 5-! - PR"#$CE %e &or' presente( here is a trans)ation o* #rie(rich Nietzsche-s aledi!tionsarbeit ./schoo) e0it-thesis12 *or the "andesschule #$orta in 3chu)p*orta .3axony-$nhalt) presente( on 3epte4ber th 15678 It has hitherto )arge)y gone unnotice(, especial)y in anglophone Nietzsche stu(- ies8 $t the ti4e though, the &or' he)pe( to estab)ish the reputation o* the then twenty year o)( Nietzsche and consi(erab)y *aci)itate( his )ater acade4ic career8 9y a)) accounts, it &as a consi(erab)e achie:e4ent, especial)y consi(ering &hen it &as &ri;en: it entai)e( an e0pert 'no&)e(ge, not =ust o* c)assical-phi)o)ogical )iterature, but also o* co(ico)ogy8 %e recent =u(ge4ent by >"+3"+ .2017<!!2< “It is a piece that, ha( Nietzsche ne:er &ri;en another &or(, &ou)( ha:e assure( his p)ace, albeit @uite a s4a)) one, in the history o* Ger4an phi)o)ogyB su4s the 4atter up quite e)o@uently8 +ietzsche )ater continue( his %eognis stu(ies, the sub=ect o* his Crst scho)ar)y artic)e, as a stu(ent at Leip,ig, in 156 D to so4e e0tent a su44ary o* the present &or' D a critical re:ie& in 156!, as &e)) as @uotes in se:eral )e;ers *ro4 1567 on.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Lyric Syllabus
    Greek 115 Greek Lyric Grace Ledbetter Fall 2010: Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy This seminar will focus on the development of early Greek poetry and philosophy (including Archilochus, Callinus, Tyrtaeus, Alcaeus, Alcman, Sappho, Hipponax, Mimnermus, Semonides, Solon, Homeric Hymns to Demeter and Apollo, Xenophanes, Heraclitus, Parmenides, and Pindar) paying particular attention to questions of normativity and subversion, exclusivity and inclusion, monstrosity, aristocracy, praise, integration, anxiety, connection, deceit, language, and bees. Required books 1) Hesiod, Theogony. ed. Richard Hamilton, Bryn Mawr Commentary. 2) D. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry. 3) Homeric Hymn to Apollo, eds Peter Smith and Lee Pearcy, Bryn Mawr Commentary. 4) Homeric Hymn to Demeter, ed. Julia Haig Gaisser, Bryn Mawr Commentary. 5) Heraclitus: Peri Phuseus, Henry W. Johnston, jr. Bryn Mawr Commentary. 6 Parmenides, eds David Sider and Henry Johnston, Bryn Mawr Commentary. Required work Weekly reading, presentations and discussion Weekly short translation quizzes, marked but not graded Midterm exam Thursday, 10/28 Final exam will be scheduled by registrar (date will be posted Oct. 1) Final Paper due 12/18/10 (topics and drafts due earlier) 1 Week 1 (9/2) Reading: H. Fraenkel, Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy. Individual presentations on Fraenkel Week 2 (9/9) Hesiod. Reading in Greek: Theogony 1‐616 Rest of Theogony in English Works and Days in English M. L. West, Theogony. Introduction + commentary. Week 3 (9/16) Archilochus, Callinus, Tyrtaeus Reading in Greek: all of Archilochus in Campbell + Archilochus, “cologne epode” (text on blackboard) all of Callinus and Tyrtaeus in Campbell Secondary (required) B. Snell, “The Rise of the Individual in the Early Greek Lyric” in his The Discovery of the Mind, ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics and Policy in Corinth 421-336 B.C. Dissertation
    POLITICS AND POLICY IN CORINTH 421-336 B.C. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by DONALD KAGAN, B.A., A.M. The Ohio State University 1958 Approved by: Adviser Department of History TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD ................................................. 1 CHAPTER I THE LEGACY OF ARCHAIC C O R I N T H ....................7 II CORINTHIAN DIPLOMACY AFTER THE PEACE OF NICIAS . 31 III THE DECLINE OF CORINTHIAN P O W E R .................58 IV REVOLUTION AND UNION WITH ARGOS , ................ 78 V ARISTOCRACY, TYRANNY AND THE END OF CORINTHIAN INDEPENDENCE ............... 100 APPENDIXES .............................................. 135 INDEX OF PERSONAL N A M E S ................................. 143 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................... 145 AUTOBIOGRAPHY ........................................... 149 11 FOREWORD When one considers the important role played by Corinth in Greek affairs from the earliest times to the end of Greek freedom it is remarkable to note the paucity of monographic literature on this key city. This is particular­ ly true for the classical period wnere the sources are few and scattered. For the archaic period the situation has been somewhat better. One of the first attempts toward the study of Corinthian 1 history was made in 1876 by Ernst Curtius. This brief art­ icle had no pretensions to a thorough investigation of the subject, merely suggesting lines of inquiry and stressing the importance of numisihatic evidence. A contribution of 2 similar score was undertaken by Erich Wilisch in a brief discussion suggesting some of the problems and possible solutions. This was followed by a second brief discussion 3 by the same author.
    [Show full text]
  • Pindaric Kleos
    http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.18.02 Maciej JASZCZYŃSKI PINDARIC KLEOS KLEOS PINDARA Artykuł porusza kwestię funkcjonowania pojęcia sławy - kleos - w Odach zwycięskich Pinda- ra. Pierwszym problemem jest stosunek pomiędzy kleos Pindara a kleos epickim, w szczególności Homeryckim. Staram się odpowiedzieć na pytanie, dlaczego Pindar w bardzo ograniczony sposób korzystał z motywów pochodzących z Iliady i Odysei, natomiast bardzo często sięgał do poezji cyklicznej. Przeprowadzam dokładną analizę ostatnich wersów trzeciej Ody Pytyjskiej w świetle Homeryckiej koncepcji kleos oraz bardzo archaicznej formuły poetyckiej kleos aphthiton. Następ- nie rozważam relację Pindara z wcześniejszymi poetami lirycznymi, głównie na podstawie fragmen - tów z Ibykosa 282a (S151), Elegii Platejskiej Symonidesa, krótko wspominając Stezychora. Staram się pokazać jak koncepcje kleos w tradycji poetyckiej wpłynęły na Pindara. Słowa klucze: Pindar, poezja grecka, tradycja poetycka, kleos. In this article I am going to look at the mechanics of Pindaric In many of his odes, Olympian 1 being a prime example, Pindar was often at pains to renounce the poetic tradition and establish his own authority. However, in terms of conferring glory onto his subject he seems to rely heavily on mythological tradition. In the first part, I shall scrutinise the function of originating from the epic as a means of praise for the victors. Secondly, I shall look at Pindar’s re- lationship to lyric encomiastic tradition, especially Ibycus, Simonides and briefly Stesichorus and their take on in poetry. There are several remark and ob- servations which have to be made before I move on to the discussion. We are not sure about the appropriation of authorship of the cyclic poems in the early fifth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Isocrates and the Rhetorical Creation of Europe: the Medium As
    Isocrates & Europe - 1 Isocrates and the Rhetorical Creation of Europe: The Medium as Message I. Introduction: Overview The idea that Isocrates helped create the concept of transnationalism that fostered Europe both as an idea and as an eventual political union is common fare in rhetorical studies. De Romilly (1992) writes that “Isocrates was perhaps the first in antiquity to focus his political theories on the idea of Europe” (p. 2). Isocrates anticipated “the idea of Europe” (Hariman, 2004, p. 231) and used the words Europen and Europes 13 times in his essays. But, to date, critical exploration of Isocrates’ role in developing the idea of Europe has primarily dealt with the content of his works – with his eloquent and relentless focus on panhellenism and the related conflict between Europe and Asia. This paper, however, will focus on medium rather than message. It will focus on Isocrates’ pioneering use of a new medium – written documents/syggrammata – and the role that the new rhetorical medium played in forming Europe. The most famous passage in the Isocratean canon, the so-called Hymn to Logos (Jaeger, 1944/1971), which first appeared in Nicocles (5-9) and was repeated in Antidosis (253-257), holds that speech/logos is a civic and political unifier, by means of which “we have come together and founded cities and made laws and invented arts” (Nicocles 6). Yet before Isocrates, who was “the first individual who could be termed a ‘writer’ in the modern sense of the term” (Lentz, 1989), logos and its community-building powers Isocrates & Europe - 2 traveled primarily orally: Cities, alliances, arts, and laws were built through face-to-face communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyrtaeus and the Cult of Heroes , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 22:3 (1981:Autumn) P.215
    FUQUA, CHARLES, Tyrtaeus and the Cult of Heroes , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 22:3 (1981:Autumn) p.215 Tyrtaeus and the Cult of Heroes Charles Fuqua N RECENT YEARS studies of Tyrtaeus have moved beyond the I extensive debates about the historical context and authenticity of the fragments that characterized scholarship on the poet in the first part of this century. The 'Tyrtaean question' has for the most part been laid to rest, and it is now generally believed that virtually all the extant poems and fragments are genuine. Since the appearance of such studies as Jaeger's "Tyrtaeus on True Arete" and Bowra's Early Greek Elegy critics have shown a much greater willingness to accept the poet on his own terms.1 The recent edi­ tions of Prato and West have done much to facilitate this pro­ cess, and such studies as those by Adkins, Shey, and Tarkow have greatly furthered our understanding of the poet's style and intent.2 Considerable efforts have been devoted to understanding the rela­ tionship of Tyrtaeus and the epic tradition.3 A consistent interest of these studies has been the manner and extent to which a par­ ticular element of diction or content marks a change or advance from epic tradition and technique. This approach has led to the 1 W. Jaeger, Five Essays (Montreal 1966) 101-42. This essay, which has exercised con­ siderable influence on contemporary scholarship, originally appeared under the title "Tyr­ taios tiber die wahre dpsnj," SitzBerlin 23 (1932) 537-68. C. M. Bowra, Early Greek Elegy (Martin Classical Lectures 7: Cambridge [Mass.] 1938).
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Men and Books in Fourth-Century BC Athens
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archivio istituzionale della ricerca - Università di Bari 4 Men and books in fourth-century BC Athens pasquale massimo pinto The cultural background Between the last quarter of the fifth and the beginning of the fourth cen- tury BC a major change appears to have taken place in Athenian culture. Despite differences of opinion over specific problems, today scholars tend to agree that the textual and archaeological evidence together allows us to reconstruct an age in which literacy became more widespread and a “book culture” gradually gained ground.1 We may observe the spread of a new culturalmedium,thebook,inthelifeofthepolis and also infer that this change took place not only in everyday life but also in people’s minds. The papyrus roll, introduced into Greece from Egypt during the preceding centuries, proved to be an effective medium for preserving writing and an easy and versatile means of written communication. It was employed to preserve regulations governing the lives of citizens of the polis;tocirculate political programmes and cultural polemics; to advertise a victory won in the law courts through publication of the successful speech; and as an aid to study and entertainment both for individuals and for groups of listen- ers and readers.2 In addition, there is another aspect which must be taken into consideration when dealing with Greek written culture of this period, namely the development of the genres of prose. By the fourth century, prose had partly replaced poetry and drama as a means of communicating social and political values and ideas.3 It is against the background of these developments that this chapter deals with the emerging practice of preserving and collecting books, and 1 The 1952 paper of Eric Turner, Athenian Books in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries B.C.,canstill serve as a valid point of departure for those who want to carry on research on this subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Excellence: Tyrtaeus' Own View. a Literary Analysis of Fragment 9
    Excellence: Tyrtaeus’ own View A Literary Analysis of Fragment 9 1 Carmen Sánchez-Mañas DOI – 10.7358/erga-2013-001-sanc ABSTRACT – The aim of this article is to undertake a socio-literary reading of the ninth poem of Gentili and Prato’s collection of fragments (9 Diehl, 12 West). This fragment can be associated to other poems, which were written in elegiac distichs and have survived under Tyrtaeus’ name. In terms of form and content, the so-called ἀρετή-Poem is consid- ered the most perfect work among the preserved elegies attributed to Tyrtaeus. Its special interest lies in the fact that it proposes a canon of values that differs from the Homeric hero ethics, insofar as ἀρετή is exclusively identified with martial achievement and applica- ble to all citizens. As a consequence, it is necessary to carefully analyse this poem in order to understand the transformation of the value system in the 7th century b.C. KEYWORDS – ἀρετή, πόλις, war, symposium. 1. INTRODUCTION There is no doubt that fr. 9 of Gentili and Prato’s collection of fragments (= 9 Diehl, 12 West) can be associated to other poems, which were written in elegiac distichs and have survived under Tyrtaeus’ name. In terms of form and content, the so-called ἀρετή-Poem is considered the most perfect work among the preserved elegies attributed to Tyrtaeus 2. But its main characteristic also lies in the fact that it proposes a canon of values that dif- fers from the Homeric hero ethics, insofar as ἀρετή is exclusively identified with martial achievement and applicable to all citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greece from Homer to Alexander: the Evidence / Joseph Roisman
    Roisman Historical Sources in Translation Ancient Greece from Homer to Alexander Ancient Greece from Homer to Alexander to Homer from Greece Ancient “Students of ancient Greece will respond to this book as John Sheffield (1709) did to Homer: ‘you will hardly need another book.’ The new compilation of evidence merits the same praise for its range, aids, and the quality of its illustrations and commentaries.” Carol Thomas, University of Washington “This wide-ranging collection of passages from the ancient sources, judiciously selected and edited by Joseph Roisman, and freshly translated by John Yardley, provides students of Greek history with an essential corpus of evidence for the period from Homer to the Macedonian conquest of the East. Roisman and Yardley are richly deserving of our praise and gratitude.” Waldemar Heckel, University of Calgary “If you want a thorough and expert introduction to the evidence of ancient Greek history – in other words, to the building blocks of western civilization – read this book.” Barry Strauss, Cornell University Incorporating fresh, new translations of original Greek and Roman texts and drawing on a range of sources, including artistic evidence, this sourcebook provides an inclusive and integrated view of Greek history, from Homer to Alexander the Great. Linking the political, military, and social history of the Greeks to their intellectual accomplishments, Ancient Greece from Homer to Alexander offers a full and integrated perspective on the period. Rather than Historical Sources in Translation compartmentalizing Greek history and civilization into a number of thematic studies, the book focuses on important developments, placing them within their political, economic, cultural, and intellectual contexts, and examining both their influences and their effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/View PDF (GK)
    GREEK In the Department of Classics The Classics Department offers courses listed in this catalogue under “Classics,” “Greek,” and “Latin.” Course Offerings [GK111] Introductory Greek An introduction to the ancient Greek language as spoken and written at Athens during the 5th and 4th centuries BCE. The first of a two-semester sequence in which students learn to read authors such as Homer, Sophocles, and Plato. Careful attention to grammar, syntax, and vocabulary forms the foundation of the course. Four credit hours. GK111Jj Introductory Greek An introduction to the ancient Greek language as spoken and written at Athens during the 5th and 4th centuries BCE. The first of a two-semester sequence in which students learn to read authors such as Homer, Sophocles, and Plato. Careful attention to grammar, syntax, and vocabulary forms the foundation of the course. Three credit hours. MILLER GK112s Intermediate Greek The second of a two-semester sequence in which students learn to read the ancient Greek of classical Athens. Careful attention to grammar, syntax, and vocabulary forms the foundation of the course. Prerequisite: Greek 111. Four credit hours. MILLER GK131f Introduction to Greek Literature Introduction to reading original ancient Greek texts, coupled with a review of grammar and syntax. Texts vary from year to year and may include poetry and/or prose. Prerequisite: Greek 112. Four credit hours. L. BARRETT [GK235] Plato: Apology of Socrates In 399 BCE, Socrates was charged with impiety and put on trial. Plato's Apology presents Socrates' defense speech in which he explains himself and his unusual way of life as a lover of wisdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Link to PDF File
    THE ORIGIN OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT AND THE MACEDONIANS DOCUMENTATION ACCORDING TO ANCIENT GREEK LITERARY TEXTS Herodotus, Thucydides, Plutarchus, Arrian, Demosthenes, Polybius, Isocrates, Strabo, Hesiod INTRODUCTION This survey is written to prove historical facts that are actually indisputable and beyond the shadow of any doubt. However, since today there is on-going discourse on the self- evident, it might be useful that we should remain and explore these issues for a while. One of my recent studies on the origin of Alexander and the Macedonians, based on the works of great authors of ancient Greece has led to the documentation of the –more or less known- arguments on the issue. And since the semiotic value of the word is a far more serious issue that one could assume, and even more significantly when it concerns an historic and highly controversial word as Macedonia, it is essential to take a close look on what is recorded by the historians of antiquity1. Ι. THUCYDIDES (464 – 395 BC) Starting from the beginnings of the references on the term Hellenes/Greeks we see that Thucydides, one of the greatest historians and political philosophers of all times reports that before the Trojan War, there is no mention of the term Hellenes and that the first time we meet the term is in Homer as a definition of those from Fthiotis under Achilles who participated in the expedition against Troy – “the first Hellenes”2. In Homer, Thucydides continues, the Hellenes are referred to in the same sense as the Achaeans, Argaei (from Argos), Danaäns. It should be pointed out that the term “barbarians” is not met in the Homeric epics since the term “Hellenes” had not yet been singled out (and later established) “as the exact opposite definition” to distinguish Hellenes from ‘barbarians’3, as the great historian concludes.
    [Show full text]