DOCSLIB.ORG

Paint Creek Scenic River Designation Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paint Creek Scenic River Designation Study Paint Creek State Scenic River Designation Study June 2021 Paint Creek State Scenic River Designation Study A Study of Paint Creek and its Tributaries for Inclusion in Ohio’s Scenic Rivers System Prepared By John Ritter Professor of Geology and Environmental Science Wittenberg University June 2021 Table of Contents List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................ v Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Description of the Paint Creek Watershed ............................................................................................................... 5 General Overview ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Cultural History of the Paint Creek Watershed ................................................................................................... 11 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Recreational Opportunities ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Abiotic and Biotic Features ...................................................................................................................................... 22 Bedrock Geology ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Glacial Geology .................................................................................................................................................. 29 Water Resources ................................................................................................................................................. 33 Biological Diversity ............................................................................................................................................ 37 Plants ............................................................................................................................................................. 38 Animals Invertebrates ...................................................................................................................................... 47 Animals Vertebrates ....................................................................................................................................... 51 Paint Creek Report ......................................................................................................................................................... 62 Paint Creek .................................................................................................................................................................. 62 North Fork Paint Creek ............................................................................................................................................ 65 Rocky Fork Creek ...................................................................................................................................................... 66 Rattlesnake Creek ....................................................................................................................................................... 68 Paint Creek Corridor Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 77 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................................... 78 Free-flowing ........................................................................................................................................................ 79 Roads .................................................................................................................................................................... 84 Length .................................................................................................................................................................. 84 Impervious Surface Area ................................................................................................................................... 84 Forest or Wetland .............................................................................................................................................. 84 Water Quality ...................................................................................................................................................... 85 Final Assessment ................................................................................................................................................ 94 Findings and Recommendation ............................................................................................................................... 99 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................... 101 References ....................................................................................................................................................................... 103 i Appendix ......................................................................................................................................................................... 106 List of Figures Figure 1. Location map of the Paint Creek watershed and the reaches examined for scenic river designation: 1 - Paint Creek, 2 - Upper Paint Creek, 3 - Rattlesnake Creek, 4 - Rocky Fork Creek, and 5 - North Fork Paint Creek. ............................................................................................................. 4 Figure 2. Location map of Paint Creek and its watershed relative to major highways, state parks, and urban areas. ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 3. Subwatersheds of the Paint Creek (HUC 05060003) watershed at the 10-digit HUC level. HUC numbers and subwatershed characteristics are included in Table 2..................................................... 8 Figure 4. Shaded relief map of the Paint Creek watershed illustrating variation in elevation and relief. The northern half of the watershed is characterized by generally smooth-rolling plains of low relief; the southern half of the watershed is increasingly rugged, with higher relief hills. ............... 10 Figure 5. Ancient earthworks in the Scioto River, Paint Creek, and North Fork Paint Creek valleys located in Ross County. Sites shown with a circular boundary are on multiple properties that are privately held. The irregular boundaries represent the shape of parcels on which earthworks were located, preserved, or restored and are protected by either the National Park Service or Arc of Appalachia Preserve System. ..................................................................................... 11 Figure 6. Archeological investigation of Pricer Mound, the principal mound of the Seip Earthworks in 1925. .................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 7. Pricer Mound, the principal mound of the Seip Earthworks, in 2018. View is to the southwest, towards Paint Creek at RM 28.2. ................................................................................................... 13 Figure 8. Map of Ohio in 1805, shortly after statehood was granted in 1803, showing state and county boundaries at the time, location of areas formerly occupied by historic Native American tribes, and principal rivers (modified from Henry Howe’s “Historical Collections of Ohio,” 1907). The Paint Creek watershed is located in the Virginia Military District (in yellow), bounded by the Little Miami River on the west and the Scioto River to the east. ...................... 15 Figure 9. McCoppin Mill, which included both a sawmill and gristmill, on Rocky Fork Creek, just downstream of Rocky Fork Dam and Lake. .................................................................................................... 16 Figure 10. Land cover in the Paint Creek watershed based on data from the National Land Cover Database for 2011. ............................................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 11. Recreation on Paint Creek in the past near Copperas Mountain (a) and recently in The Narrows (b). ..........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lioconcha Castrensis Species Group (Bivalvia : Veneridae), with the Description of Two New Species
    Molluscan Research 30(3): 117–124 ISSN 1323-5818 http://www.mapress.com/mr/ Magnolia Press The Lioconcha castrensis species group (Bivalvia : Veneridae), with the description of two new species SANCIA E.T. VAN DER MEIJ1, ROBERT G. MOOLENBEEK2 & HENK DEKKER2 1 Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis (department of Marine Zoology), P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Nether- lands. Email: [email protected] (corresponding author) 2 Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis (section Zoological Museum of Amsterdam), Mauritskade 57, 1092 AD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected] Abstract Part of the genus Lioconcha Mörch, 1853 is reviewed. Species strongly resembling Lioconcha castrensis (Linnaeus, 1758) are discussed and two new species are described: Lioconcha arabaya n. sp. from the Northwest Indian Ocean and Lioconcha rumphii n. sp. from Thailand and Sumatra. These three species, together with Lioconcha macaulayi Lamprell & Healy, 2002, share many morphological similarities and we suspect them to be closely related. They are referred to as the Lioconcha cast- rensis species group. Furthermore, lectotypes of Venus castrensis Linnaeus, 1758, and Venus fulminea Röding, 1798, are desig- nated. The latter is considered a junior synonym of V. castrensis. Key words: Indo-Pacific, Mollusca, Persian Gulf, Red Sea, taxonomy Introduction between the anterior and posterior extremities, height is measured vertically from the umbo to the ventral margin and The delimitation within the tropical venerid genus Lioconcha total width (or inflation) is the greatest distance between the Mörch, 1853, is problematic, due to high levels of external surfaces of the paired valves. For an extensive list of intraspecific morphological variability and relatively few synonyms of figured specimens of Lioconcha castrensis we useful morphological characters (Lamprell and Healy 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Foot Abnormalities in Venericardia Antiquata and Venus Verrucosa from the Bizerte Lagoon Complex
    e Rese tur arc ul h c & a u D q e A v e f l o o Béjaoui et al., J Aquac Res Development 2016, 7:7 l p a m n Journal of Aquaculture r e u n DOI: 10.4172/2155-9546.1000434 o t J ISSN: 2155-9546 Research & Development Research Article OpenOpen Access Access Foot Abnormalities in Venericardia antiquata and Venus verrucosa from the Bizerte Lagoon Complex (Northern Tunisia): Hydrodynamics and Sediment Texture Inductions Jihen Maâtoug Béjaoui, Ferdaous Jaafar Kefi, Anwar Mleiki and Najoua Trigui El Menif* Faculty of Sciences of Bizerte (FSB), Laboratory of Environment Biomonitoring, University of Carthage, Bizerte, Tunisia Abstract The Examination of the soft part of the two bivalve species Venericardia antiquata (Linnaeus 1758) and Venus verrucosa (Linnaeus 1758), that occur together in northern coast of Tunisia, allowed us to discover for the first time the presence of morphological abnormalities affecting the foot of many individuals (annual rate of 31.6%). The presence of a developed byssus was also detected in some specimens of V. antiquata. A classification scale of this malformation, established depending on the degree of this anomaly, showed six initial types that evolve to form two or three feet, at the posterior and/or anterior sides of the animal. In order to determine the causes of this malformation, experiments of transplantation were carried out. Specimens of V. verrucosa collected from Zarzouna station were transplanted in Chaâra station which is characterized by low rate of malformations, low hydrodynamics and different sediment type and vice versa. Results revealed that foot malformations degree is highly correlated with both hydrodynamics and substrate type.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Li, Z., Wu, X., and Gao, P.*, Experimental Study on the Process of Neck Cutoff
    Geomorphology 327 (2019) 215–229 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Experimental study on the process of neck cutoff and channel adjustment in a highly sinuous meander under constant discharges Zhiwei Li a,b, Xinyu Wu a,PengGaoc,⁎ a School of Hydraulic Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China b Key Laboratory of Water-Sediment Sciences and Water Disaster Prevention of Hunan Province, Changsha 410114, China c Department of Geography, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA article info abstract Article history: Neck cutoff is an essential process limiting evolution of meandering rivers, in particular, the highly sinuous ones. Received 29 July 2018 Yet this process is extremely difficult to replicate in laboratory flumes. Here we reproduced this process in a Received in revised form 1 November 2018 laboratory flume by reducing at the 1/2500 scale the current planform of the Qigongling Bend (centerline length Accepted 1 November 2018 13 km, channel width 1.2 km, and neck width 0.55 km) in the middle Yangtze River with geometric similarity. In Available online 07 November 2018 five runs with different constant input discharges, hydraulic parameters (water depth, surface velocity, and slope), bank line changes, and riverbed topography were measured by flow meter and point gauges; and bank Keywords: fl Meandering channel line migration and a neck cutoff process were captured by six overhead cameras mounted atop the ume. By Neck cutoff
    [Show full text]
  • Preprint 06-041
    SME Annual Meeting Mar. 27-Mar.29, 2006, St. Louis, MO Preprint 06-041 A MEANDER CUTOFF INTO A GRAVEL EXTRACTION POND, CLACKAMAS RIVER, OREGON P. J. Wampler, Grand Valley State Univ., Allendale, MI E. F. Schnitzer, Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries, Albany, OR D. Cramer, Portland General Electric, Estacada, OR C. Lidstone, Lidstone and Assoc(s)., Fort Collins, CO Abstract Introduction The River Island mining site is located at approximately river mile The River Island site provides a unique opportunity to examine (RM) 15 on the Clackamas River, a large gravel-bed river in northwest the physical changes to a river channel resulting from avulsion into a Oregon. During major flooding in February 1996, rapid channel gravel extraction pond. Data from before and after the meander cutoff change occurred. The natural process of meander cutoff, slowed for allow evaluation of changes to river geometry, sediment transport, several years by dike construction, was accelerated by erosion into temperature, habitat, and channel form. gravel extraction ponds on the inside of a meander bend during the An avulsion is defined as a lateral migration or cutoff of a river. It flood. involves the diversion of water from the primary channel into a new In a matter of hours, the river cut off a meander and began flowing channel that is either created during the event or reoccupied. through a series of gravel pits located on the inside of the meander Avulsions may be rapid or take many years to complete (Slingerland bend. The cutoff resulted in a reduction in reach length of and Smith, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Come Home to Highland County
    S1 TOUR HIGHLAND COUNTY Come home to Highland County Tour | HighlandCounty.com | 2 VisitorsBureauof Highland County Highlandcounty.com S2 40876016 Highland County ... | in this issue | your local travel destination Welcome to the newest edition of TOUR magazine your preview of the best of our county. We have become the preferred destination for day trips, contents weekend getaways and extended vacations for Southern Ohio. Located within 60 miles of several major cities your trip is easy to enjoy after a short drive on Out and About........................................4 any of the five major state roads that meet in the center of the county. If you The City of Hillsboro ..............................5 are looking for water activities like boating, fishing or kayaking our creeks and Visitors Bureau of Highland County .......6 two lakes offer the perfect location for fun. Overnight accommodations range from primitive camping to luxurious bed and breakfast cottages or cabins on 24 Exchange..........................................6 working farms. With an emphasis on fresh, locally sourced ingredients our Fallsville Wildlife Area ............................7 eating places offer a wide range of menu items at reasonable prices for every Highland County Birding ........................7 budget. Sample the fresh offerings at our local farmer’s markets, at one of the many Amish or Mennonite stores or at the local gourmet shop in uptown Ohio’s Quilt Barn Trail ............................8 Hillsboro. Shopping options are diverse including everything from handmade Festival of the Bells .............................10 crafts to bridal gowns. You might discover, as many residents have, that Highland House Museum ....................12 Highland County is the perfect place for a family or your retirement home.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • A Fish Habitat Partnership
    A Fish Habitat Partnership Strategic Plan for Fish Habitat Conservation in Midwest Glacial Lakes Engbretson Underwater Photography September 30, 2009 This page intentionally left blank. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I. BACKGROUND 7 II. VALUES OF GLACIAL LAKES 8 III. OVERVIEW OF IMPACTS TO GLACIAL LAKES 9 IV. AN ECOREGIONAL APPROACH 14 V. MULTIPLE INTERESTS WITH COMMON GOALS 23 VI. INVASIVES SPECIES, CLIMATE CHANGE 23 VII. CHALLENGES 25 VIII. INTERIM OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS 26 IX. INTERIM PRIORITY WATERSHEDS 29 LITERATURE CITED 30 APPENDICES I Steering Committee, Contributing Partners and Working Groups 33 II Fish Habitat Conservation Strategies Grouped By Themes 34 III Species of Greatest Conservation Need By Level III Ecoregions 36 Contact Information: Pat Rivers, Midwest Glacial Lakes Project Manager 1601 Minnesota Drive Brainerd, MN 56401 Telephone 218-327-4306 [email protected] www.midwestglaciallakes.org 3 Executive Summary OUR MISSION The mission of the Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership is to work together to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance sustainable fish habitats in glacial lakes of the Midwest for the use and enjoyment of current and future generations. Glacial lakes (lakes formed by glacial activity) are a common feature on the midwestern landscape. From small, productive potholes to the large windswept walleye “factories”, glacial lakes are an integral part of the communities within which they are found and taken collectively are a resource of national importance. Despite this value, lakes are commonly treated more as a commodity rather than a natural resource susceptible to degradation. Often viewed apart from the landscape within which they occupy, human activities on land—and in water—have compromised many of these systems.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Land Management Plan
    2009 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (Updated Annual Harvest Plan -2014) Itasca County Land Department 1177 LaPrairie Avenue Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3322 218-327-2855 ● Fax: 218-327-4160 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Itasca County Land Department Acknowledgements This Land Management Plan was produced by Itasca County Land Department employees Garrett Ous, Dave Marshall, Michael Gibbons, Adam Olson, Bob Scheierl, Roger Clark, Kory Cease, Steve Aysta, Tim Stocker, Perry Leone, Wayne Perreault, Blair Carlson, Loren Eide, Bob Rother, Andrew Brown, Del Inkman, Darlene Brown and Meg Muller. Thank you to all the citizens for their sincere input and review during the public involvement process. And thank you to Itasca County Commissioners Lori Dowling, Karen Burthwick, Rusty Eichorn, Catherine McLynn and Mark Mandich for their vision and final approval of this document. Foreword This land management plan is designed for providing vision and direction to guide strategic and operational programs of the Land Department. That vision and direction reflects a long standing connection with local economic, educational and social programs. The Land Department is committed to ensuring that economic benefits and environmental integrity are available to both present and future generations. That will be accomplished through actively managing county land and forests for a balance of benefits to the citizens and for providing them with a sustained supply of quality products and services. The Department will apply quality forestland stewardship practices, employ modern technology and information, and partner with other forest organizations to provide citizens with those quality products and services. ________________________________ Garrett Ous September, 2009 Itasca County Land Commissioner 1177 LaPrairie Avenue Grand Rapids, MN 55744-3322 218-327-2855 ● Fax: 218-327-4160 ICLD - LMP Section i., page 1 of 3 Itasca County Land Department Land Management Plan Table of Contents i.
    [Show full text]
  • Waddle Ditch Rattlesnake Creek
    Nine-Element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05) Prepared for: Fayette Soil and Water Conservation District Prepared by: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Toledo, Ohio Version 1.0 Approved: June 29, 2021 This page intentionally left blank. Acknowledgements Version 1.0 prepared and written by: Deanna Bobak Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4841 Monroe Street, Suite 103 Toledo, OH 43623 Brigitte Hisey Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District 1415 US 22 SW, Suite 500 Washington Court House, OH 43160 The Fayette Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) would like to acknowledge the collaboration of multiple partners in the preparation of this Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for the Waddle Ditch-Rattlesnake Creek HUC-12 (05060003 03 05). The Fayette SWCD appreciates those individuals and organizations that contributed background information, insight into objectives and projects for inclusion in this NPS-IS. Thank you to Rick Wilson, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency – Division of Surface Water, for guidance throughout the NPS-IS development process, as well as Jessica D’Ambrosio and the staff of The Nature Conservancy for providing modeling data generated by the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). This product or publication was financed in part or totally through a grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through an assistance agreement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. The contents and views, including any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations, contained in this product or publication are those of the authors and have not been subject to any Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency peer or administrative review and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency or the United States Environmental Protection Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commemoration of Colonel Crawford and the Vilification of Simon Girty: How Politicians, Historians, and the Public Manipulate Memory
    THE COMMEMORATION OF COLONEL CRAWFORD AND THE VILIFICATION OF SIMON GIRTY: HOW POLITICIANS, HISTORIANS, AND THE PUBLIC MANIPULATE MEMORY Joshua Catalano A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2015 Committee: Andrew Schocket, Advisor Rebecca Mancuso ii ABSTRACT Andrew Schocket, Advisor In 1782, Colonel William Crawford led a force of a few hundred soldiers in a campaign to destroy the Indian forces gathered on the Sandusky Plains in present day Ohio. Crawford was captured by an enemy party following a botched offensive and was taken prisoner. After being tried, Crawford was brutally tortured and then burned alive in retaliation for a previous American campaign that slaughtered nearly one hundred peaceful Indians at the Moravian village of Gnadenhutten. This work analyzes the production, dissemination, and continual reinterpretation of the burning of Crawford until the War of 1812 and argues that the memory of the event impacted local, national, and international relations in addition to the reputations of two of its protagonists, William Crawford and Simon Girty. iii For Parker B. Brown iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank both members of my committee, Andrew Schocket and Rebecca Mancuso, for their continuous support, critique, and feedback. Their flexibility and trust allowed me to significantly change the overall direction and composition of this work without sacrificing quality. Ruth Herndon’s encouragement to explore and interrogate the construction and dissemination of historical narratives is evident throughout this work. I am also in debt to Christie Weininger for bringing the story of Colonel Crawford to my attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Water Quality Study of the Paint Creek Watershed 2006
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Biological and Water Quality Study of the Paint Creek Watershed 2006 Hydrologic Units 05060003 010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090, 100. Clinton, Fayette, Greene, Highland, Madison, and Ross Counties OHIO EPA Technical Report EAS/2008-1-2 August 29, 2008 Ted Strickland, Governor, State of Ohio Chris Korleski, Director DSW/EAS/2008-1-2 Paint Creek TSD August 29, 2008 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Paint Creek Watershed 2006 Clinton, Fayette, Greene, Highland, Madison, and Ross Counties August 29, 2008 OHIO EPA Technical Report EAS/2008-1-2 Prepared by: State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Mailing Address: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Lazarus Government Center P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 Ted Strickland Governor, State of Ohio Chris Korleski Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency i DSW/EAS/2008-1-2 Paint Creek TSD August 29, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Notice To Users .............................................................................................................................xv Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................... xvii Foreword.................................................................................................................................... xviii Introduction......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Where to See Ohio's Geology
    PLEASE NOTE: Some of the information provided, such as phone numbers and Web addresses, may have changed since release of this publication. No. 21 OHIOGeoFacts DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • DIVISION OF GEOLOG I CAL SURVEY WHERE TO SEE OHIO’S GEOLOGY Listed below are places where you can hike through scenic areas, collect fossils, or visit archaeological or historical sites that have a geological focus.The facilities of the Ohio Geological Survey (Delaware County__Horace R. Collins Laboratory, 740-548-7348; Erie County__Lake Erie Geology Group, 419-626-4296; Franklin County__main offi ce, 614-265-6576) have displays and information on geology. For ad di tion al in for ma tion on the sites listed below, please contact the ap pro pri ate agency, not the Ohio Geolog i cal Survey. KEY: Franklin County: Co lum bus and Franklin Coun ty Metropolitan Park District (614-508-8000, <http://www.metroparks.net>): Blendon Woods A archaeology site (S, MP), Highbanks (S, H, A, MP, RR7); Friendship Park (S, CP); Glen CP city or county park Echo Park (S, CP); Griggs Reser voir and Dam (S, CP); Hayden Run Falls F fossil collecting, by permission only (S, CP); Indian Village Camp (S, H, CP); Whetstone Park (S, CP); Ohio GSA# Ohio Division of Geological Survey GSA reprint (see Refer- Historical Center ($, 614-297-2300, <http://www.ohiohistory.org>); Ohio ences) State Uni ver si ty Orton Muse um (614-292-6896) H historical site Gallia County: Tycoon Lake State Wildlife Area (S); Bob Evans MP metropark Farm (S, H) PR permit required Geauga County: Aquilla
    [Show full text]