Organic Agriculture in Kenya and Uganda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
3 Agriculture in Kenya: Large- Versus Small-Scale Farming
3 Agriculture in Kenya: Large- versus Small-Scale Farming Large-scale farming and structural change Before we embark on a chronological account of the changes and developments in Kenya's agriculture it would be helpful to look at the structural changes brought about by the setting up of large scale agricultural estates by European settlers. The history of development or lack of development in the rural areas of Kenya has been largely determined by the imposition of this type of farm ing on the country. Did the kind of agriculture brought by the settlers lead to development? The following sections will show that after forty difficult years it brought about prosperity within the European-settled areas, but that it was directly responsible for (a) holding back agricultural development in other areas, (b) the poli tical explosion in the 1950s, (c) creating the 'peasant capitalist' from the late 1950s and finally (d) the gross underdevelopment in the areas of the nomadic pastoralists. First let us examine the reasons why this large-scale farming was able to succeed. Up to the mid-1950s the settlers' success was un doubtedly at the expense of the African farmers. A large proportion of the land and labour force, capital, administration, communi cations and marketing were directed by the colonial authorities with a favourable bias towards the settler section of production. The mechanics of this channeling of resources will be discussed in other chapters. Initially and up to the mid-1950s the settler and peasant pro ducers were in competition for the above resources. It was essen tially a competition between a few large estates and very many small peasant plots to see which could produce the most cheaply. -
Mapping of Studies on Employment Creation of Agriculture and Agro-Processing in Kenya
MAPPING OF STUDIES ON EMPLOYMENT CREATION OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRO-PROCESSING IN KENYA FINAL REPORT By Dr. Matthew Muma July 2016 Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ...................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... v 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives of the Study ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Organization of the Study ................................................................................................. 3 2. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Macro-economic Profile .................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Current Initiatives in Employment Creation in Agricultural Value Chains ........................... 7 2.2.1 Agriculture ................................................................................................................. -
Read More About SDG Bond Framework
1 C1 - Public Natixis Summary FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 4 PART I: Benin mobilised for the 2030 Agenda ....................................................................................... 5 1. The basics about the Republic of Benin .......................................................................................... 5 1.1 Political and administrative organisation of Benin ..................................................................... 6 1.2 A predominately young and rural population ............................................................................. 6 1.3 Human development indicators are improving .......................................................................... 8 1.4 Benin’s economic structure ........................................................................................................ 8 1.5 The authorities’ response to the Covid-19 pandemic ................................................................ 9 2. Actions and policies closely anchored to the 2030 Agenda .......................................................... 11 2.1 Actions for taking ownership of the 2030 Agenda ................................................................... 11 2.2 Mobilising institutions and transforming public action to reach the SDGs .............................. -
Potential of Contract Farming As a Mechanism for the Commercialisation of Smallholder Agriculture
POTENTIAL OF CONTRACT FARMING AS A MECHANISM FOR THE COMMERCIALISATION OF SMALLHOLDER AGRICULTURE THE ZIMBABWE CASE STUDY REPORT PREPARED FOR: FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION (FAO) John J. Woodend September 2003 1 Acknowledgements The ongoing initiative on contract farming has largely resulted from the unstinting efforts of Dr. Tobais Takavarasha who has worked tirelessly to promote contract farming in Zimbabwe. I am grateful to the many people (Appendix 2) who took time of their busy schedules to either meet with me or answer several questions over the phone. I am particularly grateful to David Mfote (MoLARR); Roy Bvekerwa (Hortico); Rob Jarvis (Quton); Chris Lightfoot (Tanganda Tea Estates); E. Chenyika (Southdown Tea Estates); A. Gagiano (Mkwasine Sugar Estates); Kristian Jensen (Khula Sizwe Trust); Atwell Muropa (IDC); Phil Cunningham, Dave Irvine and Graeme Murdoch (Irvines Day Old Chicks); Ian Goggin (ZIMACE); and Raphael Zuze and B. Chipanera (ARDA) who generously shared their views on contract farming with me The study has also benefited from the advice and guidance provided by members of the interim Steering Committee on Contract Farming, i.e. Dr. Tobias Takavarasha, David Mfote (MoLARR), Reggie Mugwara (SADC FANR Hub), Dr. David Rohrbach (ICRISAT), Basilio Sandamu (HPC) and Susan Minae (FAO). However, the opinions expressed herein are those of the Consultant and should not be attributed to any member of the Steering Committee. The following people readily provided relevant reports and publications at short notice: Alexandra Rottger (FAO, Rome); Thomas Jayne (Michigan State University, USA); Clive Drew (USAID Agribusiness Development Unit, Kampala, Uganda); Christopher Delgado and Nicholas Minot (IFPRI, USA); Andrew Dorward (Wye College,UK); and Jonathan Coulter, Rachel Springfellow and Anne Tallontire (Natural Resources Institute, UK). -
The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon Public Disclosure Authorized 00000_CVR_English.indd 1 12/6/17 2:29 PM November 2017 The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 1 11/29/17 3:34 PM Photo Credits Cover page (top): © Georges Tadonki Cover page (center): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Cover page (bottom): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Page 1: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 7: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 15: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 32: © Dominic Chavez/World Bank Page 48: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 56: © Ami Vitale/World Bank 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 2 12/6/17 3:27 PM Acknowledgments This study was prepared by Nga Thi Viet Nguyen The team greatly benefited from the valuable and Felipe F. Dizon. Additional contributions were support and feedback of Félicien Accrombessy, made by Brian Blankespoor, Michael Norton, and Prosper R. Backiny-Yetna, Roy Katayama, Rose Irvin Rojas. Marina Tolchinsky provided valuable Mungai, and Kané Youssouf. The team also thanks research assistance. Administrative support by Erick Herman Abiassi, Kathleen Beegle, Benjamin Siele Shifferaw Ketema is gratefully acknowledged. Billard, Luc Christiaensen, Quy-Toan Do, Kristen Himelein, Johannes Hoogeveen, Aparajita Goyal, Overall guidance for this report was received from Jacques Morisset, Elisée Ouedraogo, and Ashesh Andrew L. Dabalen. Prasann for their discussion and comments. Joanne Gaskell, Ayah Mahgoub, and Aly Sanoh pro- vided detailed and careful peer review comments. -
Annual Operational Eoa- I Project Report for Benin 2018
0 REPUBLIC OF BENIN -=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Organisation Béninoise Pour la Promotion de l’Agriculture Biologique (OBEPAB) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Project Mainstreaming Ecological Organic Agriculture (EOA) intoNational Policies, Strategies and Programmes in Africa Technical annual report for 2018 Reporting Period: January to December 2018 Supported by 0 1 Table content Page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 3 3. Major achievements ............................................................................................................................ 3 4. Challenges of EOA Implementation in Benin ..................................................................................... 7 5. Lessons to be learnt in EOA Implementation in Benin ...................................................................... 7 6. Recommendations and Conclusions in EOA Implementation in Benin ............................................ 8 1 2 1. Introduction Agriculture is the basis of the national economy. It occupies almost 70% of the active population and contributes 38% of GDP. However, current production systems, farmers use mostly mineral fertilizers for soil fertilization and synthetic chemical pesticides for pest management. Chemicals are used for other purposes among which are for food storage. -
Bigwala Mus Ic and Dance of the Bas Oga People
BIGWALA MUSIC AND DANCE OF THE BASOGA PEOPLE written by James Isabirye 2012 Background The Basoga are Bantu speaking people who live in southeastern Uganda. They are neighbors to the Baganda, Bagwere, Basamia, Banyoli and Banyoro people. The Basoga are primarily subsistence agricultural people. "Bigwala” is a Lusoga language term that refers to a set of five or more monotone gourd trumpets of different sizes. The music of the trumpets and the dance performed to that music are both called “Bigwala”. Five drums accompany “Bigwala” music and they include a big drum “Engoma e ne ne ”, a long drum “Omugaabe,” short drum “Endyanga”, a medium size drum “Mbidimbidi” and a small drum “Enduumi ” each of which plays a specific role in the set. Bigwala heritage is of significant palace / royal importance because of its ritualistic role during burial of kings, coronations and their anniversaries and stands as one of the main symbols of Busoga kingship. When King Henry Wako M uloki passed away on 1st September 2008, the "Bigwala" players were invited to Nakabango palace and Kaliro burial ground to perform their funeral function. 1 During the coronation of late king Henry Wako Muloki on 11th February 1995; the Bigwala players performed their ritual roles. It is important to note that Busoga kingdom like all others had been abolished in 1966 by the Ugandan republic government of Obote I and all aspects its existence were jeopardised including the Bigwala. The Kingship is the only main uniting identity which represents the Basoga, offers them opportunity to exist in a value system, focuses their initiatives to deal with development issues with in the framework of their ethnic society and connects them to their cherished past. -
Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Uganda: a Case Study of the Lango Subregion
sustainability Article Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Uganda: A Case Study of the Lango Subregion Sara Kaweesa 1,* , Saidi Mkomwa 2 and Willibald Loiskandl 3 1 Centre for Development Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Strasse 76, 1190 Vienna, Austria 2 African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT), P.O. Box 10375, Nairobi 00100, Kenya; [email protected] 3 Institute of Hydraulics and Rural Water Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +43-676-43-808-26 Received: 8 August 2018; Accepted: 18 September 2018; Published: 20 September 2018 Abstract: Conservation agriculture (CA) is based on three principles: minimum soil disturbance, maintaining a soil cover through mulching with crop residues or planting cover crops, and practicing crop rotations. CA is practiced in many parts of the world for its benefits to soil and ability to improve yields, among others. There is little documented information on the status of CA adoption in the Lango region in mid-Northern Uganda. This study aimed at determining the extent of CA adoption in relation to the socioeconomic status of the farming population and suggesting relevant strategies for accelerating CA uptake specific to this region. A non-discriminative snowball-sampling technique was used to gather data from 417 households spread over three districts. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using household questionnaires. Farmers’ uptake of CA was related to information gained from training and the benefits that were observed in their fields. Some farm-level constraints in the region included the diminutive ratio of shared tools and equipment; the minimum presence and involvement of extension services; and seasonal rural markets that are dominated by middlemen. -
Consulting Services)
Request for Expression of Interests (Consulting Services) FOR ECONOMIC AND SECTOR WORK ON AGRICULTURAL VALUE CHAIN STUDY IN UGANDA Agriculture sector in Uganda is a key sector and also will remain the main economic base of the country. As a result, future rate of poverty reduction, overall economic growth, social development and political stability of the country will depend on the growth trajectory of the sector. The President of Uganda, His Excellency, Yoweri Museveni, has recently called for the transformation of Agriculture in Uganda from subsistence to a commercial oriented sector. The end result of agricultural transformation in Uganda are millions of would be thriving small-, medium, and large-scale agribusinesses in every segment of agricultural value chains. In order to better understand the growth potentials and constraints of the agriculture sector and optimize its intervention in the sector, the Bank aims to conduct agricultural value chain study. The main tasks of the study are to prioritize, select and conduct a detailed value chains analysis of priority agricultural commodities. The findings of the study will serve as a guide to design the Ugandan Agricultural Transformation Agenda (UATA), investment direction of the Bank and other development partners. Promoting agriculture and agro-industry/business is recognized as one of the most effective ways to drive inclusive growth and reduce poverty. The African Development Bank (AfDB) is launching study that will inform the development of competitive regional and global value chains with the potential for advancing Uganda’s economic prosperity, increasing food security, job creation and poverty reduction. The study will also inform the Bank’s public sector operations towards creation of an enabling environment especially relating to land tenure policies and laws, financial inclusion efforts, and Private Public Partnerships in physical infrastructure development. -
Climate-Smart Agriculture Manual for Zimbabwe, Climate Technology Centre and Network, Denmark, 2017
Climate-Smart Agriculture supporting low carbon and climate resilient development Climat e-Smart A griculture Manual f or A griculture Educ The Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) fosters technology transfer and deployment at the request of developing countries through three core services: technical assistance, capacity building and scaling up international collaboration. The Centre is the operational arm of the UNFCCC Technology Mechanism, it is hosted and managed by Email: [email protected] the United Nations Environment and the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation Web: www.ctc-n.org (UNIDO), and supported by more than 300 network partners around the world. ation in Zimbab CTCN Supported by: w e United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Climate-Smart Ministry of Agriculture, Mechanisation and Irrigation Development Department of Agriculture Education and Farmer Training Agriculture Manual Ngungunyana Building No. 1 Borrowdale Road for Agriculture Education in Zimbabwe Harare, Zimbabwe Tel: +263 (0) 4 797390 Email: [email protected] www.moa.gov.zw Ministry of Environment, Water and Climate 11th Floor, Kaguvi Building, Cnr S. V. Muzenda Street and Central Avenue, Harare, Zimbabwe Tel: +263-4-701681/3 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.climatechange.org.zw Climate-SmartClimate-SmartClimate-SmartClimate-Smart AAAgricultureAgriculturegriculturegriculture Manual ManualManual Manual for ffAororgriculturefor AA griculturegricultureAgriculture Educ EducEduc Educationationationation in Zimbab inin -
Kenya: Agricultural Sector
Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURE GLOBAL PRACTICE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized KENYA AGRICULTURAL SECTOR RISK ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized Stephen P. D’Alessandro, Jorge Caballero, John Lichte, and Simon Simpkin WORLD BANK GROUP REPORT NUMBER 97887 NOVEMBER 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURE GLOBAL PRACTICE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAPER KENYA Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment Stephen P. D’Alessandro, Jorge Caballero, John Lichte, and Simon Simpkin Kenya: Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment © 2015 World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank Group. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank Group or the governments they represent. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank Group concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. World Bank Group encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clear- ance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone: 978-750-8400, fax: 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright .com/. -
Agriculture in Uganda
ENHANCING AGRICULTURAL RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA Key Findings and Recommendations for Uganda Drake N. Mubiru, Jalia Namakula, William Nanyeenya, James Lwasa, Godfrey Otim, Joselyn Kashagama and Milly Nakafeero 1 Contents Agriculture in Uganda A New Approach to Agriculture 4 Project Overview 5 SIMLESA-Uganda 6 Strategic Approach 6 Project Sites 7 Partners 7 Key Findings 8 Smallholder Farmers’ Food Security, Productivity, and Incomes Levels 9 Strategies to Improve Resilience, Reduce Risks and Protect Natural Resources 9 Gender and Equity 10 Supporting Mechanisms and Partnerships 10 Achievements Farmer Reach and Adoption 11 Improved Varieties Released 11 Capacity Strengthening 11 Opportunties for Integrating the New Approaches into Maize Farming Systems 12 Packages for Farmers 12 Factors Preventing the Widespread Adoption of CASI Technologies 14 Successes to Date 16 A Sustainable Future for Farming and Food Systems 17 Scaling the New Approaches 17 What is at Stake? 15 Conclusion 15 References 16 2 List of Figures 1. Conservation agriculture based on sustainable intensification 4 2. SIMLESA-Uganda project sites: Lira and Nakasongola districts and the cattle corridor 7 3. The impact of different tillage practices on bean grain yields, with and without fertilizer 10 4. The impact of different tillage practices on maize grain yields, with and without fertilizer 10 List of Tables 1. Summary of CASI options for two of Uganda’s agroecological zones 13 List of Acronyms ACIAR Australian Centre for International Agricultural