George Jacobs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

George Jacobs GEORGE JACOBS RESEARCH ASSOCIATE DIVISION OF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE NO. 30 1975 Division of Reptiles 4 Amphibians National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 2O56O i AFRICA Amphibia fam. to subsp. Oourmeque, Amsterdam reprnt 1572 Amnhic;ba(»nia sD. Gray, P.Z.S.Lond. 442, 1865 A:fnr(s::ner ?;ads) Lov^ridge, Occ. Pap.BostonS.N.H. 8=43, 1932 Thorn, Pans, I968 Caudata fam. to sp. adults & larva , „ ,, uj u c> -,.qc ,q7i Maxwell -Busack Ibid., transl. Bull.Md.Herp.Soc. I'-')^, 1971 Bull.M.C.Z. 115:l6l, Crvptodira fam. to subsp. Loveridge,W i 11 iams, 1957 Gymnophiona sp. Nieden, Si tz.Ak.Berl. 3=186, I9I2 gen., sp. Nieden, 37. Berlin, I913 fam. to sp. Taylor, Lawrence, Kans., I968 Serpentes fam. to sp. Villiers, IFAN, 2:1, I95O fam. to subsp. FitzSimons, An. Transv.Mus. 25:35, I966 Testudines gen. Schmidt, BuU.A.M. N.H. 39=385, 1919 Ablepharus sp. Werner, Denk.Ak.W ien 96:437, I919 Adenorhinos, Bitis, Atheris sp. diff. Marx, Rabb, Field. Zool. 44;l6l, I965 Acontias sp., subsp. Broadley, Greer, Arnold i 4:1, I969 Aeluroglena, Coronella, Coluber, Meizodor diff. Bogert, Bull. A .M. N.H, 77:107, I94O Agama sp. Werner, M i tt. Na t.Mus.Hamb. 30:1, I913 agama turuensis & a. elongis diff. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 7*'195» 1933 cyanogaster subsp. Klausewltz, Senck.Biol. 35=137j 195* Algiroides, Lacerta diff. Loveridge, Bull. M.C.Z. 91:235, 1942 Amblyodipses sp. Broadley, Occ.Pap.Nat.Mus. Rhodes ia 4:629, I97I Amphisbaena, Trogonophis Bipes, Leposternon gen. diff. Strauch, Bull. Ac. St. Peter. 11:355, 1882 Amphisbaen idae gen., sp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 87:351, 19*1 Werner, M tt.Mus.Hamb. 27:1, I9IO fam. diff. Gray, P.Z.S.Lond. 442, I865 Ancyclocranium barkeri, A. somalicum diff. Loveridge, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 59'73, 19*6 Aparallactus sp. Boulenger, An. Mag. N.H. l6:171, 1895 Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 95:119, 1944 P.Z.S. lineatus, anomalus, niger diff. Loveridge, Proc. New Eng. Zool. Club 17:49, 1938 after Boulenger Lond. 267, 1919 Arthroleptides sp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 79:1, I935 Arthroleptis sp. Boulenger, An. Mus. Genoa 42:157, I9O5-O6 Noble, Bull. A.M. N.H. 49:147, I924 ogoensis A roux i diff. Loveridge, P.Z.S.Lond. 763, 19^5 Aspidelaps scutatus subsp. Broadley, Arnoldia 4:1, I968 Atheris sp. Marx, Rabb, Field. Zool. 44:l6l, I965 Atheris, Bitis, Adenorhinos, sp. diff. Marx, Rabb, Filed. Zool. 44:l6l, I965 Atractaspis sp. Boulenger, An. Mus. Congo 2:7, I9OI; Werner, Mi tt. N.M.Hamb. 30:1, I913; Laurent, Mem.Roy.Sci.Nat.Belg. 38, I95O Bitis sp. Marx, Rabb, Field. Zool. 44:l6l, I965 Boaedon sp. Gunther, An. Mag. N.H. 1:322, 1885; Boolenger, An. Mus. Genoa, 32:5, I892 sp., subsp. Roux, Esteve, Gulbe, Bull. Mus. Nat. Paris 36:371, 1964 Boodon - see Boaedon Breviceps sp. Power, An.S.Af r.Mus. 20:451, I926 uluguruens is, rugosus, usambaricus diff. Barbour, Loveridge, Mem. M.C.Z. 5'''87, 1928 Brookesia sp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 106:175, I95I Brookesia, Chamaeleo, Rhampholeon diff. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 74:195, 1933; Boulenger, Cat. Liz., Hi, I887 Bufo sp. Boulenger, P.Z.S.Lond. 545, 1880; Noble, Bull. A .M. N.H. 49:147, I924 micranotis, anotis diff. Loveridge, P.Z.S.Lond. 763, 1925 Cacosternum sp. Hewitt, An. Natal Mus. 5:435, I926; inger, S.Af r.An im.L i fe, 6:510, I959 Calamelaps sp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 95:119, 1944 Cardioglossa sp. Noble, Bull.A .M.N.H. 49:147, 1924 Chaleides ocellatus subsp. Mertens, Senck. 3'll6, 1921 Chamaeleo sp. Werner, Zool.Jb. 15s295, I9O2 three horned sp. Rand, Breviora 99, 1958 bitaeniatus so. group Rand, Bull.M.C.Z. 130:1, I963 dilepis (males) subsp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 79:207, I936 Chamaeleo, Brookesia, Rhampholeon diff. Loveridge, Bull. M.C.Z. 7*'195, 1933 Chamaeleon idae gen., sp. Cray, P.Z.S.Lond. 465, 1864 gen. Werner, 27 Berlin, I9II Chamaeleont i dae - see Chamaeleon idae Chamaelyeus sp. deWitte, Copeia 634, I963 Chamaesaura sp. Boulenger, P.Z.S.Lond. 722, 189* Cherainella sp., Peltastes diff. Gray, P.Z.S.Lond. 6I5, I872 Chilorhinophis sp., subsp. Loveridge, Bull. M.C.Z. 106:175, I95I; Loveridge, 119:1, 1958 Chiromantis sp. Werner, Verh.Zool. Bot. Wien 72:62, 1922(1923); Noble, Bull. A. M.N.H. 49:147, 1924 Ahl, Zool.Anz. 80:27, I929; Ahl, S i tzFreundeBerl. 211, I93I Chlorophis sp. Schmidt, Bull.A .M.N.H. 49:1, I923; Hecht, Zool.Amz. 81:329, I929 - irregularis, heterolep idotus diff. Loveridge, Proc. A. N.S.Ph i la. 89:265, I937 see Boulenger P.Z.S.Lond. 193, 1915 Chlorophis, Philothamnus sp. Gunther, An. Mag. N.H. 15:526:1895 diff. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 119:1, I958 Cinixys mogueyi & belliana diff. Siebenrock, Sitz.Ak.Wjen 112:439, I9O3 Cnemaspis sp. Loveridge, P.Z.S.Lond. 8I7, I935; Angel, Bull.Mus.Na t. Par is 15:163, I943; Angel, Guibe, Lamotle, Mem. IFAN 40:371, I954 BuU.A .M.N.H. 77-1, igiO Coluber, Coronella, Meizodon, Aeluroglena diff. Bogert, I^IO Colubridae gen. grouped Bogert, Bull.A .M. N.H. 77:1, 2<), gen.,sp. deWitt. Mem. I nst.Roy.H.N.Belg. 1947 M.N.H. I967 Colubridae (based on Bogert's arrangement) gen. Aaron, Bull. A. 138:1, I96B Conraua sp. Lamotte, Perret, BuU.IFAN 30:1603, Cordyiidae gen. to subsp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 95:!, 194$ . _ „ , , /,„ P.Z.b.Lond. b4U, lee^, Rf-q Cordylosaurus, Platysaurus, Pleurostrichus, Gerrhosaurus diff. Gray, M.N.H. 1940 Coronella, Coluber, Meizodon, Aeluroglena diff. Bogert, Bull. A. 77:107, Crocodilidae - see Crocodylidae Crocodylidae gen., sp. Schmidt, Bull.A.M. N.H. 39:385, 19^9 Crocodilus - see Crocodylus Mem. IPAN 19^1 Crocodylus cataphractus & vulgaris, Osteolaemus tetraaspis diff. Monard, 1:1<;3, miloticus subsp. Deran yagala, Spol.Zeyl. 25:1, 1948 i 1^74 vulgaris i madagascari ens is, Philas Johnston! diff. Gray, P.Z.S.Lond. 177, Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia tornieri 4 hotamboeia diff. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 75:195, 1933 werneri shrevei & w. werneri diff. Loveridge, P.Z.S.Lond. 133'29, L959 Cyclamorbis, Emyda, Cycloderma diff. Siebenrock, Si tz.Ak.W ien 111:807, I9O2 Cycloderma, Cyclamorbis, Emyda diff. Siebenrock, Sitz.Ak.Wien 111:807, I9O2 Dasypeltis sp. Gans, An. Mus. Roy. Congo Belg. 7^=237, 1959 " see also Loveridge, Dendroaspis jamesoni iamesoni i j. kaimosae diff. Pitman, Uganda J. 5:93, 1937 Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 49:63, I936 Dromophis sp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 95:119, 1944 Duberria sp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 95:119, 1944 lutrix lutrix 4 1. shiranum diff. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 74:195, 1933 Echis sp. Strauch, Mem.Ac.St .Petersb. 14:1, I869 Elapsoidea sunderwalli subsp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 95'115> 19^'' Emyda, Cyclanorbis, Cycloderma diff. Siebenrock, Sitz.Ak.Wien 111:807, I9O2 Eremias sp. Boulenger, P.Z.S.Lond. 920, I896 Eryx sp. Tsarewsky, An. Mus. St. Petersb. 20:340, I915 colubrinus subsp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 79'207, 193^ Eumeces sp. Taylor, Bull.U.Kans. 33'1> 1935 Feylinia sp. Schmidt, Bull. A .M. N.H. 39:385, I919 Gastropholis sp. Werner, Zool.Anz. 27:461, 1904 Gekkonidae gen., sp., subsp. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 98!l, 19^7 Gerrhosauridae gen., sp. Boulanger, Cat. Liz. IN, 1887; Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 89:483, 1942 Gerrhosaurus flavigularis subsp. Loveridge, P.Z.S.Lond. I3I, I92O - see also Schmidt, Bull.A.M. N.H. 39:385(579), 1919 major geek i 4 m. major diff. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 74:195, 1933 Gerrhosaurus, Pleurostrichus, Platysaurus, Cordylosaurus diff. Gray, P.Z.S.Lond. 640, I865 Glauconia - see Leptotyphlops Glauconidae - see Leptotyphlop i dae Grayia sp. Schmidt, Bull. A .M. N.H. 49:1, I923 Heleophryne sp. Hewitt, An. Natal Mus. 5:435, I926 Hemidactylus brookii goegraphic forms Loveridge, Copeia 245, 1941 Hemisus sp. Noble, Bull. A .M.N.H. 49:147, I924 marmoratum marmoratum 4 m. guineensis diff. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 7'''155» 1933 Holaspis guentheri laevis & g. guentheri diff. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. llo:141, 1953 Homopholis wahlbergii wahlbergii 4 w. arnoldi diff. Loveridge, Proc. Biol. Soc.Wash. 57'1» 19^* Homopsus sp. Siebenrock, Zool.Anz. 34:623, I9O9 Hylambates sp. Boulenger, An. Mus. Genoa 42:157, I9O5-O6; Noble, Bull. A .M. N.H. 49:147, I924 Hymenochyrus sp,, subsp. Arnoult, Lamotte, BuU.IFAN 30:270, I968 Hyperolius sp. Noble, Bull.A.M. N.H. 49:147, 1924; Ahl, Mi tt.Zool. Mus. Berl. 17:1, 1931 Ichnotropis sp. Schmidt, Bull. A. M.N.H. 39:385, I919 Ichnotropis capensis capensis 4 c. longipos diff. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 110:141, 1953 - see also FitzSimons, Transv.Mus.Mem. 1, 1943 llysiidae - see Anillidae Kassina sp. Noble, Bull.A.M. N.H. 49:147, I924 sp., subsp. Ahl, Zool.Anz. 88:277, I93O Kimixys beliana subsp. Laurent, Breviora I76, I962 Kinixys sp., Kinothorax diff. Gray, P.Z.S.Lond. I92, I863 Kinothorax, Kinixys sp. diff. Gray, P.Z.S.Lond. I92, I863 Lacerta sp. Schmidt, Bull. A .M. N.H. 39:385, I919 Lacerta (allied to L. muralis) sp. Boulenger, Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 21:1, I9I6 Lacerta, Algiroides diff. Loveridge, Bull.M.C.Z. 91:235, I942 Lacertidae sp. Dungar, Niger. Field. 32:117, I967 Latastia sp. Werner, Mi tt.
Recommended publications
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of Equatorial African Lacertidae, with the Description of a New Genus and Species from Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 163, 913–942. With 7 figures A molecular phylogeny of Equatorial African Lacertidae, with the description of a new genus and species from eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo ELI GREENBAUM1*, CESAR O. VILLANUEVA1, CHIFUNDERA KUSAMBA2, MWENEBATU M. ARISTOTE3 and WILLIAM R. BRANCH4,5 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USA 2Laboratoire d’Herpétologie, Département de Biologie, Centre de Recherche en Sciences Naturelles, Lwiro, République Démocratique du Congo 3Institut Superieur d’Ecologie pour la Conservation de la Nature, Katana Campus, Sud Kivu, République Démocratique du Congo 4Bayworld, P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, South Africa 5Research Associate, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa Received 25 July 2010; revised 21 November 2010; accepted for publication 18 January 2011 Currently, four species of the lacertid lizard genus Adolfus are known from Central and East Africa. We sequenced up to 2825 bp of two mitochondrial [16S and cytochrome b (cyt b)] and two nuclear [(c-mos (oocyte maturation factor) and RAG1 (recombination activating gene 1)] genes from 41 samples of Adolfus (representing every species), two species each of Gastropholis and Holaspis, and in separate analyses combined these data with GenBank sequences of all other Eremiadini genera and four Lacertini outgroups. Data from DNA sequences were analysed with maximum parsimony (PAUP), maximum-likelihood (RAxML) and Bayesian inference (MrBayes) criteria. Results demonstrated that Adolfus is not monophyletic: Adolfus africanus (type species), Adolfus alleni, and Adolfus jacksoni are sister taxa, whereas Adolfus vauereselli and a new species from the Itombwe Plateau of Democratic Republic of the Congo are in a separate lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 365.21 K
    Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics (IJAB) Vol.12, No.2, 225-237, 2016 ISSN: 1735-434X (print); 2423-4222 (online) DOI: 10.22067/ijab.v12i2.47546 Systematics of the genera Eumeces Wiegmann, 1834 and Eurylepis Blyth 1854 (Sauria: Scincidae) in Iran: A review Faizi, H. a*, Rastegar-Pouyani, N. a, Rastegar-Pouyani, N. b and Heidari, N. c a Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Razi University, 6714967346 Kermanshah, Iran. b Department of Biology, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar- Iran. c Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Biological Science, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran. (Received: 14 June 2015 ; Accepted: 15 July 2016 ) There are several papers related to the split of the genus Eumeces sensu lato into four distinct genera ( Eumeces sensu stricto Wiegmann, 1834; Plestiodon Duméril & Bibron, 1839; Mesoscincus Griffith, Ngo & Murphy, 2000 and Eurylepis Blyth, 1854). From these, three important ones stand out. The genus has undergone extensive taxonomic changes. There was an initial morphologcial split which identified the correct four groups but failed to get the correct nomenclatures. These errors were later corrected. In a chronological order, Novoeumeces suggested as a new name for the schneiderii group and subsequently re- changed to the genus Eumeces sensu stricto. North American-clade is now considered as Plestiodon . The name Eumeces (sensu stricto) was retained for the group close to the type species ( Eumeces pavimentatus ) which is part of the African-Central Asian clade. There are now only five species of Eumeces left. The others (old Eumeces ) are now found in Eurylepis (2 species), Mesoscincus (3 species) and Plestiodon (47 species). A detailed story of these changes plus a brief comparison of current four genera based on mentioned morphological characters in the literatures are discussed in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lizard Fauna of Kurdistan Province, Western Iran
    Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics (IJAB) Vol.8, No.1, 27-37, 2012 ISSN: 1735-434X The Lizard Fauna of Kurdistan Province, Western Iran Bahmani, Z.a,c*, Karamiani, R. b,c, Gharzi, A.a,c aDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran bDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Razi University, 6714967346 Kermanshah, Iran cIranian Plateau Herpetology Research Group (IPHRG), Faculty of Science, Razi University, 6714967346 Kermanshah, Iran Kurdistan Province in the western Iran possesses varied climatic and geographical conditions that led to rich biodiversity. An investigation on the status of lizards in this Province was carried out from June 2010 to September 2011. A total of 73 specimens were collected and identified. The collected specimens represented four families, 10 genera, and 14 species and subspecies, including Agamidae: Laudakia nupta nupta, Laudakia caucasia and Trapelus lessonae, Gekkonidae: Cyrtopodion scabrum, Asaccus kurdistanensis, Lacertidae: Eremias montanus, Eremias sp. (1) and Eremias sp. (2) (unknown taxa which may be related to E. persica complex), Apathya cappadocica urmiana, A. c. muhtari, Lacerta media media and Ophisops elegans, Scinicidae: Eumeces schneideri princeps and Trachylepis aurata transcaucasica. With respect to the data which was reported by Rastegar-Pouyani et al. (2008) and Anderson (1999) Eremias sp. (1) and Eremias sp. (2) may belong to two new taxa, Apathya cappadocica muhtari is a new record from Iran, and also Eremias montanus is a new record from Kurdistan
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the Herpetological Trips to Northern Cyprus
    North-Western Journal of Zoology Vol. 4, No. 1, 2008, pp.139-149 [Online: Vol.4, 2008: 16] Results of the Herpetological Trips to Northern Cyprus Bayram GÖÇMEN1,*, Nazım KAŞOT1, Mehmet Zülfü YILDIZ1,2, Istvan SAS3, Bahadır AKMAN1, Deniz YALÇINKAYA1, Salih GÜCEL4 1. Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Zoology Section, Tr 35100 Bornova, Izmir-Turkey 2. Harran University, Faculty of Art-Science, Department of Biology, Zoology Section, Osmanbey Campus, Sanliurfa-Turkey 3. University of Oradea, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Universităţii St. 1, Oradea 410087, Romania 4. Near East University, Environmental Sciences Institute, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus * Corresponding author: Bayram GÖÇMEN, E-mail: [email protected], Tel: 0 (232) 388 40 00/1795, Fax: 0 (232) 388 18 91 Abstract. During the three trips conducted to Northern Cyprus in 2007, we found that three frog and toad species (Anura), 11 lizards (Lacertilia), 3 turtles (Testudinata) and 9 snakes (Ophidia) inhabit the northern part of the Cyprus Island. The distributions of a total of 26 reptile and amphibian species were observed and some ecological information on their biotopes was summarized, and the taxonomic states of some of the species determined discussed. Key Words: Northern Cyprus, herpetofauna, snakes, lizards Cyprus, with 9251 km2 area, is the part of the island has a mountain chain third largest island after Sicily and which is called Pentadactylos, made of Sardinia in the Mediterranean Sea. It is mesozoic calcareous rocks, runs in east- located in 34o33’-35o42’ northern latitudes west direction and has the highest point and 32o16’-34o36’ eastern longitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • (Sauria: Scincidae) from Western Anatolia, Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2015) 39: 987-990 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Short Communication doi:10.3906/zoo-1410-5 New locality records of Eumeces schneideri (Daudin, 1802) (Sauria: Scincidae) from western Anatolia, Turkey Kerim ÇİÇEK*, Oğuzkan CUMHURİYET, Yusuf BAYRAKCI, Dinçer AYAZ Section of Zoology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey Received: 02.10.2014 Accepted/Published Online: 27.02.2015 Printed: 30.09.2015 Abstract: In this study, we report 2 new close localities for Eumeces schneideri from Aydın, western Anatolia, Turkey. The specimens were examined morphologically and compared with the relevant literature. These new localities have filled in the gap in the species’ distribution range in western Anatolia, Turkey. According to the morphological results, the female specimens resembled E. s. barani in terms of the scales along the dorsal midline. However, the color-pattern characteristics of the specimens were found to be somewhere between E. s. barani and E. s. princeps; thus, the specimens were accepted as E. s. cf. barani. Key words: Eumeces schneideri, new locality, distribution, western Anatolia, Turkey The genus Eumeces Wiegmann, 1834 is widely In our field studies in Aydın Province, we captured distributed throughout the Holarctic region; the an adult female E. schneideri in Savcılı village, Buharkent approximately 50 recognized species display a considerable (Aydın Province, 37.976706°N, 28.772630°E, 286 m amount of morphological and ecological diversity (Griffith a.s.l.), and an adult female in the Maiandros Antiokheiası et al., 2000). Recently, Griffith et al. (2000) suggested ancient ruins, located in the vicinity of Başaran village that the genus could be paraphyletic, and Eumeces was (37.869779°N, 28.545458°E, 118 m a.s.l.), on 11 June 2014 divided into various genera (Schmitz et al., 2004; Smith, (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestral Reconstruction of Diet and Fang Condition in the Lamprophiidae: Implications for the Evolution of Venom Systems in Snakes
    Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 55, No. 1, 1–10, 2021 Copyright 2021 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Ancestral Reconstruction of Diet and Fang Condition in the Lamprophiidae: Implications for the Evolution of Venom Systems in Snakes 1,2 1 1 HIRAL NAIK, MIMMIE M. KGADITSE, AND GRAHAM J. ALEXANDER 1School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. PO Wits, 2050, Gauteng, South Africa ABSTRACT.—The Colubroidea includes all venomous and some nonvenomous snakes, many of which have extraordinary dental morphology and functional capabilities. It has been proposed that the ancestral condition of the Colubroidea is venomous with tubular fangs. The venom system includes the production of venomous secretions by labial glands in the mouth and usually includes fangs for effective delivery of venom. Despite significant research on the evolution of the venom system in snakes, limited research exists on the driving forces for different fang and dental morphology at a broader phylogenetic scale. We assessed the patterns of fang and dental condition in the Lamprophiidae, a speciose family of advanced snakes within the Colubroidea, and we related fang and dental condition to diet. The Lamprophiidae is the only snake family that includes front-fanged, rear-fanged, and fangless species. We produced an ancestral reconstruction for the family and investigated the pattern of diet and fangs within the clade. We concluded that the ancestral lamprophiid was most likely rear-fanged and that the shift in dental morphology was associated with changes in diet. This pattern indicates that fang loss, and probably venom loss, has occurred multiple times within the Lamprophiidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography of the Reptiles of the Central African Republic
    African Journal of Herpetology, 2006 55(1): 23-59. ©Herpetological Association of Africa Original article Biogeography of the Reptiles of the Central African Republic LAURENT CHIRIO AND IVAN INEICH Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle Département de Systématique et Evolution (Reptiles) – USM 602, Case Postale 30, 25, rue Cuvier, F-75005 Paris, France This work is dedicated to the memory of our friend and colleague Jens B. Rasmussen, Curator of Reptiles at the Zoological Museum of Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract.—A large number of reptiles from the Central African Republic (CAR) were collected during recent surveys conducted over six years (October 1990 to June 1996) and deposited at the Paris Natural History Museum (MNHN). This large collection of 4873 specimens comprises 86 terrapins and tortois- es, five crocodiles, 1814 lizards, 38 amphisbaenids and 2930 snakes, totalling 183 species from 78 local- ities within the CAR. A total of 62 taxa were recorded for the first time in the CAR, the occurrence of numerous others was confirmed, and the known distribution of several taxa is greatly extended. Based on this material and an additional six species known to occur in, or immediately adjacent to, the coun- try from other sources, we present a biogeographical analysis of the 189 species of reptiles in the CAR. Key words.—Central African Republic, reptile fauna, biogeography, distribution. he majority of African countries have been improved; known distributions of many species Tthe subject of several reptile studies (see are greatly expanded and distributions of some for example LeBreton 1999 for Cameroon). species are questioned in light of our results.
    [Show full text]
  • Amblyodipsas Polylepis (Bocage, 1873) Feeding on the Amphisbaenid Monopeltis Luandae Gans, 1976
    Herpetology Notes, volume 14: 205-207 (2021) (published online on 26 January 2021) A snake with an appetite for the rare: Amblyodipsas polylepis (Bocage, 1873) feeding on the amphisbaenid Monopeltis luandae Gans, 1976 Werner Conradie1,* and Pedro Vaz Pinto2,3 Specimens in natural history museum collections catalogue number PEM R22034. The snake measured represent a unique snapshot of the time and place they 634 mm in snout–vent length (no tail length is provided were collected, while the analysis of stomach contents as the tail was truncated). Identification to the nominate often leads to unexpected results and new discoveries. For subspecies A. p. polylepis was based on a series of example, the Angolan lizard Ichnotropis microlepidota characteristics (fide Broadley, 1990), including enlarged Marx, 1956 was described based on material recovered fangs below a small eye; loreal absent; preocular absent; from the crop of a Dark Chanting Goshawk (Melierax one postocular; seven supralabials, with the 3rd and metabates), and the species has not been collected since 4th entering the orbit; seven infralabials, with the first (Marx, 1956; van den Berg, 2018). Specifically, such four in contact with a single pair of genials; temporal an approach is known to provide extremely valuable formula 0+1 on both sides; 19-19-17 midbody scale insights into highly cryptic and rarely sighted fossorial rows; 227 ventrals; 16+ paired subcaudals (truncated). species, such as amphisbaenids (Broadley, 1971; Shine The specimen was re-examined in mid-2019 and it was et al., 2006). These tend to be generally underrepresented discovered that the stomach was full. Upon dissection, a in museum collections and, therefore, make a case for fully intact amphisbaenian was removed (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use
    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 6 IUCN - The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biologi- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna cal diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- of fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their vation of species or biological diversity. conservation, and for the management of other species of conservation con- cern. Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: sub-species and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintaining biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of bio- vulnerable species. logical diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conservation Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitoring 1. To participate in the further development, promotion and implementation the status of species and populations of conservation concern. of the World Conservation Strategy; to advise on the development of IUCN's Conservation Programme; to support the implementation of the • development and review of conservation action plans and priorities Programme' and to assist in the development, screening, and monitoring for species and their populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    : : PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM by the SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol. 91 Washington : 1941 No. 3128 REPORT ON THE SMITHSONIAN-FIRESTONE EXPEDI- TION'S COLLECTION OF REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS FROM LIBERIA By Arthur Loveridge Dr. William M. Mann, director of the National Zoological Park in Washington and leader of the Smithsonian-Firestone Expedition, 1940, is to be congratulated on finding time to assemble a representa- tive collection of the Liberian herpetofauna, despite the exacting duties involved in the capture and care of wild creatures, the securing of which was the primary purpose of his journey. This coUection, consisting as it does of over 500 specimens repre- senting 56 species, naturally adds considerably to our knowledge of the lower vertebrates of the country whose fauna is so imperfectly known as that of the Liberian Republic. Among the results of a study of this material, therefore, the following species have had to be described as new Typhlops manni, new species from Harbel. Hylamlatcs cochranae, new species from Bendaja. Leptopelis Icquaerti, new species from Gbanga, Gibi, etc. Rana albolabris parkeriana, new name for acutirostris Parlier, preoccupied. (This is the Angolan race of the typical form occurring in Liberia.) In addition we are able to add the undermentioned to the steadily growing list of species to be found within the boundaries of the Republic Boaedon Uneatus lineatus. Rana longirostris. Crotaphopeltis duchesnii guineensis. Phryno'batrachus natalensis. Eylambates leonardi. 113 406739—41 1 : 114 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. 91 Neusterophis variegatus should be substituted for NatHx fuliginoides^ whose admission was based on a misidentification, and Agama a.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe Zambia Malawi Species Checklist Africa Vegetation Map
    ZIMBABWE ZAMBIA MALAWI SPECIES CHECKLIST AFRICA VEGETATION MAP BIOMES DeserT (Namib; Sahara; Danakil) Semi-deserT (Karoo; Sahel; Chalbi) Arid SAvannah (Kalahari; Masai Steppe; Ogaden) Grassland (Highveld; Abyssinian) SEYCHELLES Mediterranean SCruB / Fynbos East AFrican Coastal FOrest & SCruB DrY Woodland (including Mopane) Moist woodland (including Miombo) Tropical Rainforest (Congo Basin; upper Guinea) AFrO-Montane FOrest & Grassland (Drakensberg; Nyika; Albertine rift; Abyssinian Highlands) Granitic Indian Ocean IslandS (Seychelles) INTRODUCTION The idea of this booklet is to enable you, as a Wilderness guest, to keep a detailed record of the mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians that you observe during your travels. It also serves as a compact record of your African journey for future reference that hopefully sparks interest in other wildlife spheres when you return home or when travelling elsewhere on our fragile planet. Although always exciting to see, especially for the first-time Africa visitor, once you move beyond the cliché of the ‘Big Five’ you will soon realise that our wilderness areas offer much more than certain flagship animal species. Africa’s large mammals are certainly a big attraction that one never tires of, but it’s often the smaller mammals, diverse birdlife and incredible reptiles that draw one back again and again for another unparalleled visit. Seeing a breeding herd of elephant for instance will always be special but there is a certain thrill in seeing a Lichtenstein’s hartebeest, cheetah or a Lilian’s lovebird – to name but a few. As a globally discerning traveller, look beyond the obvious, and challenge yourself to learn as much about all wildlife aspects and the ecosystems through which you will travel on your safari.
    [Show full text]