Page 1 of 123

   

   ! "  

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age 2 of 123

 $   !          $ %  !  %# &'"()"*"+'  , .  . /, -  .     A:;  ,  ,/,  , % ,   , $ A(  +  ,#,-, >B  % ,  ' C  A(+.  +  ,#,-, >B  % ,   ' C    5##$ '( -# % $   .  &   ' (  % .  %A8/* - > 1 '  % .  /A8* - *    % .  @;  * ,,"-   % .  +A8 >*    5###$ $  "'# %       % )  - - :1> * - . 1  #D$  /         Page 3 of 123

'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐΘ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞDĞĞƚŝŶŐDŝŶƵƚĞƐ ĞĐĞŵďĞƌϭϴ͕ϮϬϭϵ ŽĂƌĚZŽŽŵ͕dŚĞWůĂnjĂ͕ϰϲϬϬŵƉĞƌŽƌůǀĚ͕͘^ƵŝƚĞϭϬϬ ƵƌŚĂŵ͕E 

ŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞDĞŵďĞƌƐWƌĞƐĞŶƚ͗  ^ŝŐ,ƵƚĐŚŝŶƐŽŶ DĂƌŬDĂƌĐŽƉůŽƐ;Ăƌƌ͘ϭϭ͗ϮϬĂ͘ŵ͘Ϳ sŝǀŝĂŶ:ŽŶĞƐ ůůĞŶZĞĐŬŚŽǁ

ŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞDĞŵďĞƌƐďƐĞŶƚ͗ sĂůĞƌŝĞ:ŽƌĚĂŶ;ďLJƚĞůĞƉŚŽŶĞͿ ^ƚĞǀĞ^ĐŚĞǁĞů;ĞdžĐƵƐĞĚͿ

KƚŚĞƌŽĂƌĚDĞŵďĞƌƐWƌĞƐĞŶƚ͗ tŝůůůůĞŶ///    ŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŚĂŝƌ,ƵƚĐŚŝŶƐŽŶĐĂůůĞĚƚŚĞŵĞĞƚŝŶŐƚŽŽƌĚĞƌĂƚϭϭ͗ϭϴĂ͘ŵ͘

 /͘ ĚŽƉƚŝŽŶŽĨŐĞŶĚĂ ĐƚŝŽŶ͗KŶŵŽƚŝŽŶďLJZĞĐŬŚŽǁĂŶĚƐĞĐŽŶĚďLJ:ŽŶĞƐƚŚĞĂŐĞŶĚĂǁĂƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͘ dŚĞŵŽƚŝŽŶǁĂƐĐĂƌƌŝĞĚƵŶĂŶŝŵŽƵƐůLJ͘

 //͘ ƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨDŝŶƵƚĞƐ ĐƚŝŽŶ͗KŶŵŽƚŝŽŶďLJ:ŽŶĞƐĂŶĚƐĞĐŽŶĚďLJZĞĐŬŚŽǁƚŚĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚƚŚĞ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐŽĨƚŚĞKĐƚŽďĞƌϮϯ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͘dŚĞŵŽƚŝŽŶǁĂƐĐĂƌƌŝĞĚƵŶĂŶŝŵŽƵƐůLJ͘

 ///͘ &zϭϵŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞŶŶƵĂů&ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂůZĞƉŽƌƚ;&ZͿ ZĞŶtŝůĞƐŐĂǀĞĂƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽŶƚŚĞ&zϭϵ&Z͕ǁŚŝĐŚŝƐĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚĂŶĚŚĞƌĞďLJ ŵĂĚĞĂƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƐĞŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͘  DĂƌĐŽƉůŽƐĂƌƌŝǀĞĚ͘   /s͘ dƌĂŶƐŝƚsĞŚŝĐůĞWƵƌĐŚĂƐĞƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶ ƌŝĂŶDĐ>ĞĂŶƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞŽĨƐŝdžůŽǁĨůŽŽƌ'ŝůůŝŐďƵƐĞƐ͕ƚŽ ďĞƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚŝŶ:ƵůLJĂŶĚǁŝůůƌĞƉůĂĐĞďƵƐĞƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞƌĞĂĐŚĞĚƚŚĞϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬŵŝůĞƐ͕ϭϮ LJĞĂƌƐƚŚƌĞƐŚŽůĚ͘dŚĞƚŽƚĂůĐŽƐƚŝƐĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJΨϯ͘ϮŵŝůůŝŽŶ͕ǁŝƚŚtĂŬĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚ ĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŶŐĂŶĚΨϭ͘ϱŵŝůůŝŽŶ͖ƵƌŚĂŵ͕Ψϭ͘ϮŵŝůůŝŽŶĂŶĚKƌĂŶŐĞ͕ΨϲϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘  ĐƚŝŽŶ͗KŶŵŽƚŝŽŶďLJ:ŽŶĞƐĂŶĚƐĞĐŽŶĚďLJDĂƌĐŽƉůŽƐƚŚĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞǀŽƚĞĚƚŽ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŽĂƌĚĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞƚŚĞŝŶƚĞƌŝŵƉƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚĂŶĚKƚŽĞdžĞĐƵƚĞĂ ĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞ ŽĨ Ɛŝdž ;ϲͿ ůŽǁ ĨůŽŽƌ ĚŝĞƐĞů 'ŝůůŝŐ ďƵƐĞƐ ĨƌŽŵ 'ŝůůŝŐ ŽƌƉŽƌĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĨŝdžĞĚƌŽƵƚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞǁŝƚŚĂŵĂdžŝŵƵŵĚŽůůĂƌĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨΨϯ͕Ϯϴϯ͕Ϯϯϲ͘ dŚĞŵŽƚŝŽŶǁĂƐĐĂƌƌŝĞĚƵŶĂŶŝŵŽƵƐůLJ͘ Page 4 of 123

KƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐΘ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ ĞĐĞŵďĞƌϭϴ͕ϮϬϭϵ DĞĞƚŝŶŐDŝŶƵƚĞƐ  s͘ ĚũŽƵƌŶŵĞŶƚ ĐƚŝŽŶ͗KŶŵŽƚŝŽŶďLJ:ŽŶĞƐƚŚĞŵĞĞƚŝŶŐǁĂƐĂĚũŽƵƌŶĞĚĂƚϭϭ͗ϱϰĂ͘ŵ͘    ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ  ^ŝŐ,ƵƚĐŚŝŶƐŽŶ͕ŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŚĂŝƌ

ƚƚĞƐƚ͗   ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DŝĐŚĞůůĞ͘ĂǁƐŽŶ͕D ůĞƌŬƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐ 

Ϯ Page 5 of 123



   DDKZEhD

dK͗'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐΘ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ  &ZKD͗ dƌĂŶƐŝƚKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ d͗&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϯ͕ϮϬϮϬ ^h:d͗sĞŚŝĐůĞsŝĚĞŽdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJ^LJƐƚĞŵWƵƌĐŚĂƐĞƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶ

 ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐKďũĞĐƚŝǀĞ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚ  ĐƚŝŽŶZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ ^ƚĂĨĨƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐΘ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŽĂƌĚĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞƚŚĞ KƚŽĞdžĞĐƵƚĞĂĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞŽĨǀŝĚĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJƐLJƐƚĞŵƐĨŽƌĞŝŐŚƚĞĞŶ;ϭϴͿďƵƐĞƐ ĨƌŽŵƉŽůůŽsŝĚĞŽdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJĨŽƌĂŵĂdžŝŵƵŵĚŽůůĂƌĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨΨϭϵϯ͕ϳϲϵ͘  ĂĐŬŐƌŽƵŶĚΘWƵƌĐŚĂƐĞ dƌĂŶƐŝƚKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐŝƐƐĞĞŬŝŶŐĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƚŽƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞǀŝĚĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJƐLJƐƚĞŵƐĨŽƌĞŝŐŚƚĞĞŶ;ϭϴͿ ďƵƐĞƐƚŽƚĂů͘dŚĞƉŽůůŽǀŝĚĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJƐLJƐƚĞŵǁŝůůďĞƌĞƉůĂĐŝŶŐƚŚĞsĞƌŝŶƚǀŝĚĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJ ƐLJƐƚĞŵ͘ƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ͕ƚŚĞsĞƌŝŶƚǀŝĚĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJƐLJƐƚĞŵŝƐŽďƐŽůĞƚĞĂŶĚƵŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂďůĞ͘tĞĂƌĞŝŶ ƚŚĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŽĨĐŽŶǀĞƌƚŝŶŐƚŚĞǀĞŚŝĐůĞĨůĞĞƚƚŽƚŚĞƉŽůůŽǀŝĚĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJƐLJƐƚĞŵ͘  &ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂů/ŵƉĂĐƚ dŚĞƚŽƚĂůĐŽƐƚƚŽƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞƉŽůůŽǀŝĚĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJƐLJƐƚĞŵƐĨŽƌĞŝŐŚƚĞĞŶ;ϭϴͿďƵƐĞƐŝƐΨϭϵϯ͕ϳϲϵ ǁŝƚŚΨϭϳϲ͕ϯϯϬŽĨƚŚĞĐŽƐƚĨƵŶĚĞĚďLJƚŚĞEĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚŽĨdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĞŵĂŝŶĚĞƌ͕ Ψϭϳ͕ϰϯϵĨƵŶĚĞĚďLJ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘dŚĞĨƵŶĚƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĂŶĚďƵĚŐĞƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ&zϮϬƵƐ ĂƉŝƚĂůWƌŽũĞĐƚďƵĚŐĞƚ͘dŚĞǀŝĚĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJƐLJƐƚĞŵǁŝůůďĞƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ'^ĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚη '^ͲϬϳ&ͲϬϳϳϲy͘  ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ x EŽŶĞ  ^ƚĂĨĨŽŶƚĂĐƚƐ x ƌŝĂŶDĐ>ĞĂŶ͕&ůĞĞƚDĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞDĂŶĂŐĞƌ͕ϵϭϵͲϰϴϱͲϳϰϳϮ͕ďŵĐůĞĂŶΛŐŽƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘ŽƌŐ x ĂǀŝĚDŽŽƌĞ͕WƌŽĐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŽƌ͕ϵϭϵͲϰϴϱͲϳϱϱϵ͕ĚŵŽŽƌĞΛŐŽƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘ŽƌŐ

 Page 6 of 123



   DDKZEhD

dK͗'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐΘ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ  &ZKD͗ dƌĂŶƐŝƚKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ d͗&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϭϭ͕ϮϬϮϬ ^h:d͗dƌĂŶƐŝƚKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐsĞŚŝĐůĞWƵƌĐŚĂƐĞƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶ

 ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐKďũĞĐƚŝǀĞ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚ  ĐƚŝŽŶZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ ^ƚĂĨĨƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐΘ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐ ĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞƚŚĞKƚŽĞdžĞĐƵƚĞĂĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞŽĨĨŽƵƌ;ϰͿůŝŐŚƚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐĨƌŽŵ ƌĞĂƚŝǀĞƵƐ^ĂůĞƐĨŽƌĚĞŵĂŶĚƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞǁŝƚŚĂŵĂdžŝŵƵŵĚŽůůĂƌĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨΨϯϭϴ͕ϬϮϮ͘  ĂĐŬŐƌŽƵŶĚΘWƵƌĐŚĂƐĞ dƌĂŶƐŝƚ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ ŝƐ ƐĞĞŬŝŶŐ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů ƚŽ ƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞ ĨŽƵƌ ;ϰͿ ůŝŐŚƚ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ ƚŽƚĂů͘ ŽĂƌĚ ĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶǁŝůůƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞƌĞĐĞŝǀŝŶŐƚŚĞƐĞǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŶĞdžƚƐŝdž;ϲͿŵŽŶƚŚƐĨƌŽŵ ƉůĂĐŝŶŐƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌ͘dŚĞŶĞǁǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐǁŝůůďĞƌĞƉůĂĐŝŶŐĨŽƵƌ;ϰͿĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞĂůƌĞĂĚLJ ĞdžĐĞĞĚĞĚ ƚŚĞ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚ ƵƐĞĨƵů ůŝĨĞ ŽĨ ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ ŵŝůĞƐͬϰ LJĞĂƌƐ͕ ƉĞƌ &ĞĚĞƌĂů dƌĂŶƐŝƚ ĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĨŽƌƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚ&dŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐ͕ƚŚĞ dƌĂŶƐŝƚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶŚĂƐĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĚĂŶŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶƌĞƉĂŝƌĐŽƐƚƐŝŶŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐƚŚĞƐĞǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐĚƵĞƚŽ ŚŝŐŚŵŝůĞĂŐĞ͘  &ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂů/ŵƉĂĐƚ dŚĞ ƚŽƚĂů ĐŽƐƚ ƚŽ ƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞ ĨŽƵƌ ;ϰͿ ůŝŐŚƚ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ ŝƐ Ψϯϭϴ͕ϬϮϮ ǁŝƚŚ Ă ĨĞĚĞƌĂů ŐƌĂŶƚ ĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ ΨϮϲϲ͕ϯϰϱ͕ Ă E ĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ ŽĨ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ Ψϯϭ͕ϴϬϮ͕ ĂŶĚ Ă 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶŽĨΨϭϵ͕ϴϳϱ͘dŚĞƐĞĨƵŶĚƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ&zϮϬĂŶŶƵĂůďƵĚŐĞƚ͘  ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ x EŽŶĞ  ^ƚĂĨĨŽŶƚĂĐƚƐ x ƌŝĂŶDĐ>ĞĂŶ͕&ůĞĞƚDĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞDĂŶĂŐĞƌ͕ϵϭϵͲϰϴϱͲϳϰϳϮ͕ďŵĐůĞĂŶΛŐŽƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘ŽƌŐ x ĂǀŝĚDŽŽƌĞ͕WƌŽĐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŽƌ͕ϵϭϵͲϰϴϱͲϳϱϱϵ͕ĚŵŽŽƌĞΛŐŽƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘ŽƌŐ

 Page 7 of 123



   DDKZEhD

dK͗'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐΘ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ  &ZKD͗ ĂƉŝƚĂůĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ d͗&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϭϮ͕ϮϬϮϬ  ^h:d͗ ƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƚŽŽŶƚƌĂĐƚĨŽƌĞƐŝŐŶ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌWĂƌĂƚƌĂŶƐŝƚhƉĨŝƚ  ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐKďũĞĐƚŝǀĞŽƌ/ŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚ Ϯ͘ϱĐƚŝǀĞůLJĞŶŐĂŐĞƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐǁĞƐĞƌǀĞ;ĞŵƉůŽLJĞĞƐ͕ĐŝƚŝnjĞŶƐ͕ĐƵƐƚŽŵĞƌƐ͕ĞƚĐ͘Ϳ  ĐƚŝŽŶZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ ^ƚĂĨĨ ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ŽĂƌĚ ĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞ ƚŚĞ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŵ WƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚͬK ƚŽ ĞdžĞĐƵƚĞ Ă ƚĂƐŬ ŽƌĚĞƌ ĨŽƌ ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƵŶĚĞƌ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽŶƚƌĂĐƚηϭϴͲϬϰϭ'͕DĂƐƚĞƌŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚďĞƚǁĞĞŶůĂƌŬ WĂƚƚĞƌƐŽŶ>ĞĞĂŶĚ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞĨŽƌKŶͲĂůůƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĂŶĚŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĂŶ ĂŵŽƵŶƚŶŽƚƚŽĞdžĐĞĞĚΨϭϳϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘  ĂĐŬŐƌŽƵŶĚĂŶĚWƵƌƉŽƐĞ dŚĞ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŽƵƉĨŝƚWĂƌĂƚƌĂŶƐŝƚKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƐĂƉĂƌƚŽĨĂŶĞĨĨŽƌƚƚŽĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂůŽŶŐͲƚĞƌŵ ŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJƐƚƌĂƚĞŐLJĨŽƌƚŚĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ͘dŚŝƐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐLJǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞďĞƚƚĞƌ ŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ WĂƌĂƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ĂƐ ǁĞůů ĂƐ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ŶĞĞĚĞĚ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ Ăƚ ƚŚĞ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ ďƵƐ ŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJĂƚEĞůƐŽŶZŽĂĚ͘  dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞƚŚĞWĂƌĂƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŽƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚĨůŽŽƌŽĨƚŚĞ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞWůĂnjĂƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂƚ ϰϲϬϬŵƉĞƌŽƌŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚ͘^ƚĂĨĨŚĂǀĞǁŽƌŬĞĚƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂĐŽŶĐĞƉƚƵĂůƉůĂŶĂŶĚƐĞĞŬƚŽĞŶŐĂŐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƚŽƌĞĂůŝnjĞĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƚŚŝƐƉůĂŶ͘dŚĞĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚǁŝůůǁŽƌŬǁŝƚŚ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞƐƚĂĨĨƚŽĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƐĐŚĞŵĂƚŝĐƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌŽĨĨŝĐĞƐƉĂĐĞĂŶĚǀĞŚŝĐůĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƌĞĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚůLJƵƚŝůŝnjĞƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐ ůĂLJŽƵƚĂŶĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŽĨƚŚĞWůĂnjĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉƚŚĞƉůĂŶƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ƉĞƌŵŝƚƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘  &ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂů/ŵƉĂĐƚ dŚĞĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƚŽƚĂůĐŽƐƚŝƐΨϵϭϲ͕ϯϮϵĨŽƌƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐďŽƚŚĚĞƐŝŐŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ;ƚŚŝƐĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚͿĂŶĚ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ;ĨƵƚƵƌĞĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚͿ͘dŚĞďƵĚŐĞƚĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĚƐƉůŝƚŝƐϲϮйĨƌŽŵtĂŬĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚĨƵŶĚƐ;Ψϱϲϴ͕ϭϮϰ &zϭϵĚŽƉƚĞĚtĂŬĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚtŽƌŬWůĂŶͿǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶŐϯϴй;Ψϯϰϴ͕ϮϬϱͿĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŵĞĚ ǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ&zϮϬ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ/WďƵĚŐĞƚ͘  ^ƚĂĨĨŽŶƚĂĐƚ x <ĂƚŚĂƌŝŶĞŐŐůĞƐƚŽŶ͕;ϵϭϵͿϰϴϱͲϳϱϲϰ͕ŬĞŐŐůĞƐƚŽŶΛŐŽƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘ŽƌŐ x ƌLJĂŶ,ĂŵŵŽŶĚ͕;ϵϭϵͿϯϭϰͲϴϳϰϮ͕ďŚĂŵŵŽŶĚΛŐŽƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘ŽƌŐ

 Page 8 of 123

FY20 Budget Change Impact - Durham Transit Plan February 2020

Reserve/Cash Revenue Expenditures Impact Fund Affected Comments

FY20 Approved Budget $ 35,570,591 $ 16,561,413 $ 19,009,178

DCHCMPO-Durham (Admin) (750,000) 750,000 41 Reallocate to Capital

Durham County (Admin) 196,000 (196,000) 41 1 FTE for Transit Plan Oversight

GoTriangle-Durham (Admin) (107,595) 107,595 41 Support services reduction

Add night/Sunday frequency to routes 5 & 10; GoDurham (Transit Services) 354,665 (354,665) 41 use FY19 carryover to cover FY19 transit services expense that exceeded FY19 budget

Recalculated holiday service charges and added hours to Route 405; use FY19 carryover to cover GoTriangle-Durham (Transit Services) 36,572 (36,572) 41 FY19 transit services expense that exceeded FY19 budget

DCHCMPO-Durham (Capital) 750,000 (750,000) 41 Reallocate from Admin

Reallocated stop design funds to Durham GoDurham (Capital) (265,000) 265,000 41 City and GoTriangle and added Mobile Ticketing Validators Reallocated bus stop design funds from GoTriangle-Durham (Capital) 675,000 (675,000) 41 GoDurham, added RTC relocation study, and Simme seats/solar light poles.

Credit of budget appropriated in FY18 of $40,000 and no expense assigned and debit of Durham-Wake (94,627) 94,627 41 FY19 consultant expenses received of $134,627 for Durham’s 33% of CRT expenditure.

Bus Service Performance Data Processing and GoTriangle-Durham (Admin) 75,136 (75,136) 41 Visualization Tool and true up adjustment from original budget

Annual budget allocation adjustment for Increased Cost of Existing Services (ICES); add GoDurham (Transit Services) 50,247 (50,247) 41 Food access for Seniors (Pilot Route); and Reassigned the Northern Durham Vanpool service from GoTriangle

L:\Finance\FY20 Budget Information\FY20 Budget Amendments\FY2020 Q3 Budget Amendments\FY20 Budget Change Impact - 3\FY20 Bud Amend - Durham Page 1 of 4 Page 9 of 123

FY20 Budget Change Impact - Durham Transit Plan February 2020

Reserve/Cash Revenue Expenditures Impact Fund Affected Comments

FY20 Approved Budget $ 35,570,591 $ 16,561,413 $ 19,009,178

Increased budget for Route DRX improvements; GoTriangle-Durham (Transit Services) (14,065) 14,065 41 and reassigned the Northern Durham Vanpool service to GoDurham

Reprioritized Village Transit Center, Chapel Hill TEC, Holloway Street and Fayetteville Street Transit Emphasis Corridors; Additional scope for GoDurham Better Bus GoDurham (Capital) (163,748) 163,748 41 Stop Access improvement; Additional schope for Southpoint Transit Center 1 (City Share); and added Bus Speed Reliability improvement project

Increased budget for GoDurham Better Bus Stop Access improvement (GoTriangle Share) for GoTriangle-Durham (Capital) 1,091,000 (1,091,000) 41 construction and equipment; and added budget for Durham County's share of the Mobile Ticket Validators

Amended FY20 Budget (Feb 2020) $ 35,570,591 $ 18,394,998 $ 17,175,593

Changes from Amendments $ - $ 1,833,585 $ (1,833,585)

L:\Finance\FY20 Budget Information\FY20 Budget Amendments\FY2020 Q3 Budget Amendments\FY20 Budget Change Impact - 3\FY20 Bud Amend - Durham Page 2 of 4 Page 10 of 123

FY20 Budget Change Impact - Orange Transit Plan February 2020

Reserve/Cash Fund Revenue Expenditures Impact Affected Comments

FY20 Approved Budget $ 9,915,326 $ 13,788,676 ($3,873,350)

DCHCMPO-Orange (Admin) (500,000) 500,000 42 Reallocate to Capital

GoTriangle-Orange (Admin) (148,274) 148,274 42 Support services reduction

Recalculated holiday service charges GoTriangle-Orange (Transit Services) 8,725 (8,725) 42 and added hours to Route 405 Increased cost of existing bus stop Carrboro (Capital) 29,000 (29,000) 42 improvement budget

DCHCMPO-Orange (Capital) 500,000 (500,000) 42 Reallocate from Admin

Reallocate to OPT for Hillsborough GoTriangle-Orange (Capital) (737,500) 737,500 42 Park & Ride and add back RTC relocation study Reallocated from GoTriangle for OPT (Capital) 800,000 (800,000) 42 Hillsborough Park & Ride Annual budget allocation adjustment for Increased (Transit Services) (43,755) 43,755 42 Cost of Existing Services (ICES)

Annual budget allocation adjustment for Increased Orange Public Transit (Transit Services) (32,625) 32,625 42 Cost of Existing Services (ICES)

Reallocation of sponsor for Planning for new Transit DCHCMPO-Orange (Capital) (500,000) 500,000 42 Plan from DCHC MPO to Orange County

Added budget for Durham County's share of the GoTriangle-Orange (Capital) 74,000 (74,000) 42 Mobile Ticket Validators

Reallocation of sponsor for Planning for new Transit Orange County (Capital) 500,000 (500,000) 42 Plan from DCHC MPO to Orange County

Amended FY20 Budget (Feb 2020) $ 9,915,326 $ 13,738,247 $ (3,822,921)

Changes from Amendments $ - $ (50,429) $ 50,429

L:\Finance\FY20 Budget Information\FY20 Budget Amendments\FY2020 Q3 Budget Amendments\FY20 Budget Change Impact - 3\FY20 Bud Amend - Orange Page 3 of 4 Page 11 of 123

FY20 Budget Change Impact - Wake Transit Plan February 2020

Reserve/Cash Revenue Expenditures Impact Fund Affected Comments

FY20 Approved Budget $ 154,223,495 $ 165,095,323 ($10,871,828)

GoRaleigh (Operating) 55,000 (55,000) 43 1 FTE for Procurement Analyst

GoRaleigh (Operating) 69,000 (69,000) 43 1 FTE for Transit Planning Analyst

GoRaleigh (Capital) 380,000 (380,000) 43 4 expansion vehicles for

GoTriangle (Capital) 156,000 (156,000) 43 Bus On Shoulder - Install and Design

Amended FY20 Budget (Feb 2020) $ 154,223,495 $ 165,755,323 $ (11,531,828)

Changes from Amendments $ - $ 660,000 $ (660,000)

L:\Finance\FY20 Budget Information\FY20 Budget Amendments\FY2020 Q3 Budget Amendments\FY20 Budget Change Impact - 3\FY20 Bud Amend - Wake Page 4 of 4 Page 12 of 123



DDKZEhD

dK͗'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐΘ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ  &ZKD͗ &ŝŶĂŶĐĞΘĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ d͗&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϭϵ͕ϮϬϮϬ  ^h:d͗ tĂŬĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚ&zϮϬϮϬYϯWƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ  ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐKďũĞĐƚŝǀĞŽƌ/ŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƚŚĞtĂŬĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚWůĂŶǁŝƚŚdƌĂŶƐŝƚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ  ĐƚŝŽŶZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ ^ƚĂĨĨ ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚ ĨŝǀĞ ;ϱͿ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ Ɛŝdž ;ϲͿ tĂŬĞ dƌĂŶƐŝƚ &zϮϬ Yϯ ĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐďĞĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚďLJƚŚĞŽĂƌĚ͘ůůƐŝdž;ϲͿĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚǁĞƌĞƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞϯƌĚ ƋƵĂƌƚĞƌŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚďLJdW͘^ƚĂĨĨŝƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƌĞƋƵĞƐƚŝŶŐĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŽĨƚŚĞĨŝǀĞ;ϱͿ ďĞůŽǁĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͘dŚĞƐŝdžƚŚ ĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚďLJƚŚĞ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐĂƚƚŚĞŝƌDĂƌĐŚ ŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͘  ĂĐŬŐƌŽƵŶĚĂŶĚWƵƌƉŽƐĞ &ŝǀĞ;ϱͿŵĂũŽƌĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐůŝƐƚĞĚďĞůŽǁŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů͗ ϭ͘ /ͲϱϰϬƵƐŽŶ^ŚŽƵůĚĞƌ/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ Ϯ͘ WƌŽũĞĐƚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƵƐZĂƉŝĚdƌĂŶƐŝƚͲ^ŽƵƚŚĞƌŶŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ ϯ͘ WƌŽũĞĐƚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƵƐZĂƉŝĚdƌĂŶƐŝƚͲtĞƐƚĞƌŶŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ ϰ͘ WƌŽũĞĐƚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƵƐZĂƉŝĚdƌĂŶƐŝƚͲEŽƌƚŚĞƌŶŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ ϱ͘ EĞǁZŽƵƚĞͬZŽƵƚĞZĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚͲϮϬͬϮϬ>'ĂƌŶĞƌ  ƐĂƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƉĂĐŬĞƚƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚŝƐŵĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵ͕ƚŚĞĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞǁŝůůĨŝŶĚ͗ x DĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵĨƌŽŵtĂŬĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚWƌŽŐƌĂŵDĂŶĂŐĞƌ x WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ&zϮϬϮϬYϯŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ>ŝƐƚ x ĞƚĂŝůĞĚ/ŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůWƌŽũĞĐƚŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚZĞƋƵĞƐƚ x WƵďůŝĐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚ x dW:ŽŝŶƚŝƐƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶĂŶĚsŽƚŝŶŐZĞĐŽƌĚͲƵĚŐĞƚΘ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞĂŶĚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐΘWƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĂƚŝŽŶ ƐƵďĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƐ 

 

 Page 13 of 123

ƚƚŚĞƚŝŵĞŽĨƚŚĞKΘ&ŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞĂŶĚŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐƌĞĐĞŝǀŝŶŐ ƚŚŝƐ ŝƚĞŵ͕ dW ǁŝůů ŚĂǀĞ ĂůƌĞĂĚLJƌĞǀŝĞǁĞĚĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƚŚĞĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐƚŽďŽƚŚƚŚĞDWKdžĞĐƵƚŝǀĞŽĂƌĚĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐ͘dŚĞDWKdžĞĐƵƚŝǀĞŽĂƌĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚƚŚĞĨŝǀĞ;ϱͿĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐ ůŝƐƚĞĚĂďŽǀĞĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϭϵƚŚdžĞĐƵƚŝǀĞŽĂƌĚDĞĞƚŝŶŐ͘  &ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂů/ŵƉĂĐƚ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐǁŝůůŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƚŚĞ&zϮϬtĂŬĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚtŽƌŬWůĂŶďLJΨϭϱϲ͕ϬϬϬĐŽŵƉĂƌĞĚ ƚŽƚŚĞ&zϮϬĚŽƉƚĞĚƵĚŐĞƚ͘dŚĞĨŝŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚĐĂŶƉŽƐƐŝďůLJďĞƌĞĚƵĐĞĚĂƐƚŚĞ/ͲϱϰϬƵƐŽŶ ^ŚŽƵůĚĞƌǁĂƐƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚďLJƐƚĂĨĨĨŽƌĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞ>ŽĐĂůůLJĚŵŝŶŝƐƚĞƌĞĚWƌŽũĞĐƚƐWƌŽŐƌĂŵ ;>WWͿ͘/ĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĂǁĂƌĚĞĚ>WWĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƚŚĞĨŝŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚǁŝůůďĞƌĞĚƵĐĞĚƚŽϮϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ ŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚĂŵŽƵŶƚ͘  ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ x ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨǁŽƌŬƉůĂŶĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐ  ^ƚĂĨĨŽŶƚĂĐƚ;ƐͿ x ^ƚĞǀĞŶ^ĐŚůŽƐƐďĞƌŐ͕ƐƐĐŚůŽƐƐďĞƌŐΛŐŽƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘ŽƌŐ͕;ϵϭϵͿϰϴϱͲϳϱϵϬ x ^ĂƵŶĚƌĂ&ƌĞĞŵĂŶ͕ƐĨƌĞĞŵĂŶΛŐŽƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘ŽƌŐ͕;ϵϭϵͿϰϴϱͲϳϰϭϱ 

 $WWDFKPHQW( Page 14 of 123 WAKE COUNTY TRANSIT PLAN: IMPLEMENTATION

From: Bret Martin, Wake Transit Program Manager, Capital Area MPO

To: Wake County Transit Planning Advisory Committee (TPAC)

Date: 1/6/2020

Re: Summary of Requested FY 2020, 3rd Quarter Work Plan Amendments

Six (6) amendments to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Wake Transit Work Plan were submitted for consideration of approval in the 3rd quarter of FY 2020. The six (6) amendment requests were each reviewed by CAMPO staff to determine their appropriate amendment type classifications (major versus minor) as outlined in the Wake Transit Work Plan Amendment Policy. All six (6) of the amendment requests submitted are categorized as Major Amendments because they meet the established criteria for one of the following reasons:

1) The requested amendment(s) would require a change in budgeted reserves or fund balance; 2) The requested amendment(s) involve the addition of new project(s) to the FY 2020 Work Plan; and/or 3) The requested amendment(s) involve a significant change in scope that causes a major deviation to the outcome of the project as contemplated when the project scope was included in the FY 2020 Work Plan.

The six (6) specific amendment requests are detailed in the pages following this memorandum. The amendment requests were released for public comment on December 13, 2019, and the public comment period closes on January 12, 2020. One public comment has been received to date for the amendment requests, which was submitted specifically for the amendment requests involving the BRT corridors. This public comment is provided as Exhibit A in this Work Plan amendment request packet.

Attached to this memorandum are the following:

x Proposed FY 2020 Q3 Amendment List (released for public comment) x Completed Amendment Request Forms (released for public comment) x Exhibit A – Public Comment Received x Joint Budget & Finance/Planning & Prioritization Subcommittee Disposition Memo and Voting Record

All six (6) of the amendment requests were recommended for approval by the Planning and Prioritization and Budget and Finance Subcommittees and will be considered for recommendation of approval to the Wake Transit governing boards by the TPAC at its January 15th regular meeting. Page 15 of 123

FY 2020, Quarter 3, Requested Wake Transit Work Plan Amendments

REQUESTED MAJOR AMENDMENTS FY19 Original FY20 Requested FY 20 Original FY 20 Funding Project ID # Agency Project Title Funding Funding Reason for Major Amendment Status Funding Allocation Impact Allocation Allocation Capital Budget Amendment Requests

Amendment request reprograms funding from FY 22 to FY 20 and increases total TC002-BC GoTriangle I-540 Bus on Shoulder Improvements $ - $ - $ 156,000.00 $ 156,000.00 project cost from $43,264 to $156,000. This amendment request requires a change in budgeted reserves or fund balance. The original $42,724,000 allocation for project TC004-A was allocated to reserves in the Adopted FY 2020 Wake Transit Work Project Development for commuter rail from TC004-A GoTriangle $ - $ 42,724,000.00 $ 6,000,000.00 $ - Plan. This amendment request requires a Garner to Western Durham (Wake County Share) change in budgeted reserves to allocate the requested funding to a specific project sponsor. City of Project Development for - TC005-A, TC005-A2 $ - $ 6, 539,515.00 Raleigh Southern Corridor Amendment request is to add projects to the City of Project Development for Bus Rapid Transit - Work Plan. The requested projects TC005-A, TC005-A3 $ - $ 20,368,545.00 $ 8, 289,515.00 $ - Raleigh Western Corridor disaggregrate project TC005-A into individual City of Project Development for Bus Rapid Transit - corridor-based BRT projects. TC005-A, TC005-A4 $ - $ 5, 539,515.00 Raleigh Northern Corridor Operating Budget Amendment Request

Amendment request involves a significant change in scope that causes a major deviation to the outcome of the project as contemplated when the City of TO005-R New Route/Route Realignment - 20/20L Garner $ - $ 1,977,573.00 $ 1, 977,573.00 $ - project scope was included in the FY 2020 Raleigh Work Plan. The request involves an increase in frequency on the route that advances an implementation element in the Work Plan originally programmed in FY 24.

Distributed for Public Comment on 12/13/2019 Public Comments Accepted Through 1/12/2020 Submit all comments to Bret Martin, Wake Transit Program Manager - [email protected] or 919-996-4410 Page 16 of 123 Wake Transit Project ID # FY 2020 FY START DATE Wake Transit Work Plan 2/1/2020 TC002-BC Project Amendment Request Form 6/30/2018 Operating and/or Capital

Type of Amendment Minor Major

Minor amendment – Required when there is: A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations but requires less than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects equal to or greater than $500,000 A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations bus requires less than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that does not meet any criteria of a major amendment

Major amendment - Required when there is: A project requested to be added to the Work Plan A project requested to be removed from the Work Plan Significant changes in scope of funded project A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects greater than $500,000 A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that requires a change in budgeted reserves or fund balance

New/Amended Project Name Requesting Agency Project Contact Estimated Operating Cost Sharon Chavis Base Year $ - I-540 Bus on Shoulder Improvements GoTriangle Schavis@.org Recurring $ - Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Notes Estimated Capital Cost This cost is assumed to cover design and Base Year $ 156,000 February 2020 TBD construction. Cumulative $ - Project Description Enter below a summary of the project amendment and impact on approved plan.

GoTriangle will work with NCDOT to utilize BOS on I-540 to facilitate faster bus services. This work will include design of a signage plan, fabrication, installation of signage, and traffic management along I-540. GoTriangle is working with NCDOT to identify where BOS can be safely implemented under existing conditions. GoTriangle staff has performed preliminary field review to identify these safe locations. The project was submitted for LAPP FY21 funds, pending final scoring.

1. Enter Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Increase Recurring Project ID Project Appropriation Amount Notes Category Amount

TOTAL$ - -$

2. Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Reduce Appropriation Recurring Project ID Project Amount Notes Category Amount

TOTAL$ - -$

3. Impact on Transit Plan Project Costs From above, indicate whether amounts impact operating or capital budgets in Wake Current Year $ - Estimated Operating Cost Transit Plan. Recurring $ - Base Year Estimated Capital Cost Cumulative $ -

Provide responses to EACH of the questions below. Answer the questions as fully as possible. Enter Non- Project Justification / Business Case Applicable (N/A) as appropriate.

4. Is this New/Amended project Operating, Capital or Both? Operatingg Capitall Bothh

5. What is the timeframe for the request? Are you requesting a full year of funds or a partial year to be annualized in future fiscal years?

This project was funded in the multi-year CIP in FY21. The original costs were assumed for signange and minor design work, after further review more funds are needed to match the full scope of the project. The request is to move it from FY21 to FY20 in efforts to support the NRX route.

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 1 of 2 Amendment Form Page 17 of 123 6. What is the expected outcome(s) if this request is funded? What is the alternative if the request is not funded?

The NRX will improve on time performance and maintain schedule if the project is funded. If the request is not funded, the route will continue to operate as it does today.

7. List below the Key Performance Indicators (deliverables) while this project is in progress. These performance measures will be reported quarterly. Are these the same measures as currently being reported?

a) Contract award date for site or program of sites b) Number of signs purchased c) Number of segments completed

8. List any other relevant information not addressed.

9. Please enter estimated appropriations to support expenses identified above. Enter FY 2020 and the estimated annualized cost in FY 2021 using the 2.5% growth factor, if applicable. The spreadsheet will calculate 2021 and beyond by 2.5%. If your project is not expected to have recurring costs in FY 2021 and/or beyond, delete the calculation(s) in columns E-H.

Cost Break Down of Project Request OPERATING COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Growth Factors 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Salary & Fringes - - - - - Contracts - - - - - Bus Operations: Estimated Hours - - - - - Cost per Hour - - - - - Estimated Operating Cost ------Bus Leases - - - - - Park & Ride Lease - - - - - Other - - - - - Other - - - - - Subtotal: Bus Operations ------Other: Administrative Other: Database Hosting - - - - - Other: Supplies and Materials - - - - - TOTAL OPERATING COSTS ------

10. Please enter estimated appropriations to support contractual commitments and other expenses related to proposed capital projects identified above.

CAPITAL COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Design/NEPA $ 156,000 ------Equipment ------Land - Right of Way ------TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS 156,000 ------

Assumptions for Costs and Revenues Above:

11. Please state any assumption(s) used to calculate the capital and operating dollars and revenues shown above.

The initial project cost was to complete minimum work for signage along the existing cooridor. However, GoTriangle staff conducted an analysis and determined that approximately 160 signs are needed for 37 segments on I-540 east and west bounds. The costs include the design of signage plans, traffic management, fabrication, and installation that was not included in the original project cost.

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 2 of 2 Amendment Form Page 18 of 123 Wake Transit Project ID # FY 2020 FY START DATE Wake Transit Work Plan 2/1/2020 TC004-A Project Amendment Request Form 6/30/2018 Operating and/or Capital

Type of Amendment Minor Major

Minor amendment – Required when there is: A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations but requires less than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects equal to or greater than $500,000 A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations bus requires less than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that does not meet any criteria of a major amendment

Major amendment - Required when there is: A project requested to be added to the Work Plan A project requested to be removed from the Work Plan Significant changes in scope of funded project A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects greater than $500,000 A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that requires a change in budgeted reserves or fund balance

New/Amended Project Name Requesting Agency Project Contact Estimated Operating Cost Commuter Rail from Garner to West Sharon Chavis Base Year $ - GoTriangle Durham (Wake County Share) [email protected] Recurring $ - Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Notes Estimated Capital Cost Transfer funds from reserve to a specific project Base Year $ 6,000,000 02/2020 12/31/2020 sponsor to advance pre-project development. $ 6,000,000 Cumulative Project Description Enter below a summary of the project amendment and impact on approved plan.

$45,027,038 ($42,724,000 - FY20 / $2,303,038 - FY19) is included in previous years Adopted Wake Transit Work Plan for commuter rail project development. The request is to use $6,000,000 of those previously approved funds. The funds are currently in reserve. GoTriangle was invited to be the Project Sponsor and will use the funds to pursue additional study to resolve key items prior to making a decision to request entry into the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) pipeline. Activities may include but not be limited to the following: land survey; utility investigation; preliminary engineering and environmental study for key risk areas; assessment of land availability for park-and-rides; identification of site options for maintenance facility; railroad coordination; community engagement planning and initiating community engagement; stakeholder engagement planning and advancing stakeholder engagement activities; additional assessment of project feasibility for CIG; development of a project management plan; and preparation to engage project development consultants.

1. Enter Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Increase Recurring Project ID Project Appropriation Amount Notes Category Amount

TOTAL$ - -$

2. Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Reduce Appropriation Recurring Project ID Project Amount Notes Category Amount

TOTAL$ - -$

3. Impact on Transit Plan Project Costs From above, indicate whether amounts impact operating or capital budgets in Wake Current Year $ - Estimated Operating Cost Transit Plan. Recurring $ - Base Year $ 6,000,000 Estimated Capital Cost Cumulative $ 6,000,000

Provide responses to EACH of the questions below. Answer the questions as fully as possible. Enter Non- Project Justification / Business Case Applicable (N/A) as appropriate.

4. Is this New/Amended project Operating, Capital or Both? Operatingg Capitall Bothh

5. What is the timeframe for the request? Are you requesting a full year of funds or a partial year to be annualized in future fiscal years?

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 1 of 3 Amendment Form Page 19 of 123

The request is for allocation of a portion of the funds from previous years adopted Wake Transit Plans to be expended for a full-year of additional study.

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 2 of 3 Amendment Form Page 20 of 123 6. What is the expected outcome(s) if this request is funded? What is the alternative if the request is not funded?

The funds will allow GoTriangle to pursue additional study to resolve key items on the commuter rail project prior to making a decision to request entry into the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) pipeline.

7. List below the Key Performance Indicators (deliverables) while this project is in progress. These performance measures will be reported quarterly. Are these the same measures as currently being reported?

a) Date RFP/RFQ released for project development professional services

b) Date contract awarded for project development professional services

c) Date of concurrence for established concurrence points/milestones

d) Date of completion of 30% design and NEPA

e) Date of completion of final design 8. List any other relevant information not addressed.

9. Please enter estimated appropriations to support expenses identified above. Enter FY 2020 and the estimated annualized cost in FY 2021 using the 2.5% growth factor, if applicable. The spreadsheet will calculate 2021 and beyond by 2.5%. If your project is not expected to have recurring costs in FY 2021 and/or beyond, delete the calculation(s) in columns E-H.

Cost Break Down of Project Request OPERATING COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Growth Factors 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Salary & Fringes - - - - - Contracts - - - - - Bus Operations: Estimated Hours - - - - - Cost per Hour - - - - - Estimated Operating Cost ------Bus Leases - - - - - Park & Ride Lease - - - - - Other - - - - - Other - - - - - Subtotal: Bus Operations ------Other: Administrative Other: Database Hosting - - - - - Other: Supplies and Materials - - - - - TOTAL OPERATING COSTS ------

10. Please enter estimated appropriations to support contractual commitments and other expenses related to proposed capital projects identified above.

CAPITAL COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Design/NEPA $ 6,000,000 ------Equipment ------Land - Right of Way ------TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS 6,000,000 ------

Assumptions for Costs and Revenues Above:

11. Please state any assumption(s) used to calculate the capital and operating dollars and revenues shown above.

Cost projections for future fiscal year budgets will be developed once the Project Sponsor completes the additional studies detailed above.

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 3 of 3 Amendment Form Page 21 of 123 Wake Transit Project ID # FY 2020 FY START DATE Wake Transit Work Plan 7/1/2019 TC005-A2 Project Amendment Request Form 6/30/2018 Operating and/or Capital

Type of Amendment Minor Major

Minor amendment – Required when there is: A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations but requires less than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects equal to or greater than $500,000 A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations bus requires less than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that does not meet any criteria of a major amendment

Major amendment - Required when there is: A project requested to be added to the Work Plan A project requested to be removed from the Work Plan Significant changes in scope of funded project A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects greater than $500,000 A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that requires a change in budgeted reserves or fund balance

New/Amended Project Name Requesting Agency Project Contact Estimated Operating Cost Mila Vega Base Year $ - Wake BRT: Southern Corridor City of Raleigh [email protected] Recurring $ - Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Notes Estimated Capital Cost Base Year $ 6,539,515 Apr-20 Dec-25 Cumulative $ - Project Description Enter below a summary of the project amendment and impact on approved plan.

Advance design for Wake Bus Rapid Transit (Wake BRT) Southern Corridor project identified in Wake Transit Plan and to enter the project into Project Development for FTA Small Strats Grant

1. Enter Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Increase Recurring Project ID Project Appropriation Amount Notes Category Amount

Wake BRT: TC005-A2 $ 6,539,515 Southern Corridor

TOTAL$ 6,539,515 -$

2. Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Reduce Appropriation Recurring Project ID Project Amount Notes Category Amount TC005-A Bus Rapid Transit $ 20,368,545 Alternatives Refinement & Project TOTAL$ 20,368,545 -$

3. Impact on Transit Plan Project Costs From above, indicate whether amounts impact operating or capital budgets in Wake Current Year $ - Estimated Operating Cost Transit Plan. Recurring $ - Base Year $ 6,539,515 Estimated Capital Cost Cumulative $ -

Provide responses to EACH of the questions below. Answer the questions as fully as possible. Enter Project Justification / Business Case Non-Applicable (N/A) as appropriate.

4. Is this New/Amended project Operating, Capital or Both? Operatingg Capitall Bothh

5. What is the timeframe for the request? Are you requesting a full year of funds or a partial year to be annualized in future fiscal years?

Full year of funding

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 1 of 2 Amendment Form Page 22 of 123 6. What is the expected outcome(s) if this request is funded? What is the alternative if the request is not funded?

The City of Raleigh will advance design for Wake BRT: Southern Corridor and enter project into Project Development for FTA Small Starts Grant

7. List below the Key Performance Indicators (deliverables) while this project is in progress. These performance measures will be reported quarterly. Are these the same measures as currently being reported?

a) Date of Locally Preferred Alternative Selction (LPA)

b) Date for entrance into Project Development (PD) for FTA Small Starts Grant

c) Date of completion of final design for Wake BRT: Southern Corridor

8. List any other relevant information not addressed.

N/A

9. Please enter estimated appropriations to support expenses identified above. Enter FY 2020 and the estimated annualized cost in FY 2021 using the 2.5% growth factor, if applicable. The spreadsheet will calculate 2021 and beyond by 2.5%. If your project is not expected to have recurring costs in FY 2021 and/or beyond, delete the calculation(s) in columns E-H.

Cost Break Down of Project Request OPERATING COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Growth Factors 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Salary & Fringes - - - - - Contracts - - - - - Bus Operations: Estimated Hours - - - - - Cost per Hour - - - - - Estimated Operating Cost ------Bus Leases - - - - - Park & Ride Lease - - - - - Other - - - - - Other - - - - - Subtotal: Bus Operations ------Other: Administrative Other: Database Hosting - - - - - Other: Supplies and Materials - - - - - TOTAL OPERATING COSTS ------

10. Please enter estimated appropriations to support contractual commitments and other expenses related to proposed capital projects identified above.

CAPITAL COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Design/NEPA $ 6,539,515 ------Equipment ------Land - Right of Way ------TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS 6,539,515 ------

Assumptions for Costs and Revenues Above:

11. Please state any assumption(s) used to calculate the capital and operating dollars and revenues shown above.

Based on assumptions from Wake Transit Plan MIS process and Wake BRT: New Bern Avenue design contract

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 2 of 2 Amendment Form Page 23 of 123 Wake Transit Project ID # FY 2020 FY START DATE Wake Transit Work Plan 7/1/2019 TC005-A3 Project Amendment Request Form 6/30/2018 Operating and/or Capital

Type of Amendment Minor Major

Minor amendment – Required when there is: A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations but requires less than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects equal to or greater than $500,000 A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations bus requires less than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that does not meet any criteria of a major amendment

Major amendment - Required when there is: A project requested to be added to the Work Plan A project requested to be removed from the Work Plan Significant changes in scope of funded project A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects greater than $500,000 A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that requires a change in budgeted reserves or fund balance

New/Amended Project Name Requesting Agency Project Contact Estimated Operating Cost Mila Vega Base Year $ - Wake BRT: Western Corridor City of Raleigh [email protected] Recurring $ - Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Notes Estimated Capital Cost Base Year $ 8,289,515 Apr-20 Dec-25 Cumulative $ - Project Description Enter below a summary of the project amendment and impact on approved plan.

Advance design for Wake Bus Rapid Transit (Wake BRT) Western Corridor project identified in Wake Transit Plan and to enter the project into Project Development for FTA Small Strats Grant

Full year of funding Recurring Project ID Project Appropriation Amount Notes Category Amount

Wake BRT: Western TC005-A3 $ 8,289,515 Corridor

TOTAL$ 8,289,515 -$

2. Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Reduce Appropriation Recurring Project ID Project Amount Notes Category Amount TC005-A Bus Rapid Transit $ 20,368,545 Alternatives Refinement & Project TOTAL$ 20,368,545 -$

3. Impact on Transit Plan Project Costs From above, indicate whether amounts impact operating or capital budgets in Wake Current Year $ - Estimated Operating Cost Transit Plan. Recurring $ - Base Year $ 8,289,515 Estimated Capital Cost Cumulative $ -

Provide responses to EACH of the questions below. Answer the questions as fully as possible. Enter Project Justification / Business Case Non-Applicable (N/A) as appropriate.

4. Is this New/Amended project Operating, Capital or Both? Operatingg Capitall Bothh

5. What is the timeframe for the request? Are you requesting a full year of funds or a partial year to be annualized in future fiscal years?

Full year of funding

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 1 of 3 Amendment Form Page 24 of 123 6. What is the expected outcome(s) if this request is funded? What is the alternative if the request is not funded?

The City of Raleigh will advance design for Wake BRT: Western Corridor and enter project into Project Development for FTA Small Starts Grant

7. List below the Key Performance Indicators (deliverables) while this project is in progress. These performance measures will be reported quarterly. Are these the same measures as currently being reported?

a) Date of Locally Preferred Alternative Selction (LPA)

b) Date for entrance into Project Development (PD) for FTA Small Starts Grant

c) Date of completion of final design for Wake BRT: Western Corridor

8. List any other relevant information not addressed.

N/A

9. Please enter estimated appropriations to support expenses identified above. Enter FY 2020 and the estimated annualized cost in FY 2021 using the 2.5% growth factor, if applicable. The spreadsheet will calculate 2021 and beyond by 2.5%. If your project is not expected to have recurring costs in FY 2021 and/or beyond, delete the calculation(s) in columns E-H.

Cost Break Down of Project Request OPERATING COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Growth Factors 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Salary & Fringes - - - - - Contracts - - - - - Bus Operations: Estimated Hours - - - - - Cost per Hour - - - - - Estimated Operating Cost ------Bus Leases - - - - - Park & Ride Lease - - - - - Other - - - - - Other - - - - - Subtotal: Bus Operations ------Other: Administrative Other: Database Hosting - - - - - Other: Supplies and Materials - - - - - TOTAL OPERATING COSTS ------

10. Please enter estimated appropriations to support contractual commitments and other expenses related to proposed capital projects identified above.

CAPITAL COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Design/NEPA $ 8,289,515 ------Equipment ------Land - Right of Way ------TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS 8,289,515 ------

Assumptions for Costs and Revenues Above:

11. Please state any assumption(s) used to calculate the capital and operating dollars and revenues shown above.

Based on assumptions from Wake Transit Plan MIS process and Wake BRT: New Bern Avenue design contract

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 3 of 3 Amendment Form Page 25 of 123 Wake Transit Project ID # FY 2020 FY START DATE Wake Transit Work Plan 7/1/2019 TC005-A4 Project Amendment Request Form 6/30/2018 Operating and/or Capital

Type of Amendment Minor Major

Minor amendment – Required when there is: A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations but requires less than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects equal to or greater than $500,000 A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations bus requires less than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that does not meet any criteria of a major amendment

Major amendment - Required when there is: A project requested to be added to the Work Plan A project requested to be removed from the Work Plan Significant changes in scope of funded project A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects greater than $500,000 A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that requires a change in budgeted reserves or fund balance

New/Amended Project Name Requesting Agency Project Contact Estimated Operating Cost Mila Vega Base Year $ - Wake BRT: Northern Corridor City of Raleigh [email protected] Recurring $ - Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Notes Estimated Capital Cost Base Year $ 5,539,515 Apr-20 Dec-27 Cumulative $ - Project Description Enter below a summary of the project amendment and impact on approved plan.

Advance design for Wake Bus Rapid Transit (Wake BRT) Northern Corridor project identified in Wake Transit Plan and to enter the project into Project Development for FTA Small Strats Grant

1. Enter Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Increase Recurring Project ID Project Appropriation Amount Notes Category Amount

Wake BRT: TC005-A4 $ 5,539,515 Northern Corridor

TOTAL$ 5,539,515 -$

2. Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Reduce Appropriation Recurring Project ID Project Amount Notes Category Amount TC005-A Bus Rapid Transit $ 20,368,545 Alternatives Refinement & Project TOTAL$ 20,368,545 -$

3. Impact on Transit Plan Project Costs From above, indicate whether amounts impact operating or capital budgets in Wake Current Year $ - Estimated Operating Cost Transit Plan. Recurring $ - Base Year $ 5,539,515 Estimated Capital Cost Cumulative $ -

Provide responses to EACH of the questions below. Answer the questions as fully as possible. Enter Project Justification / Business Case Non-Applicable (N/A) as appropriate.

4. Is this New/Amended project Operating, Capital or Both? Operatingg Capitall Bothh

5. What is the timeframe for the request? Are you requesting a full year of funds or a partial year to be annualized in future fiscal years?

Full year of funding

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 1 of 2 Amendment Form Page 26 of 123 6. What is the expected outcome(s) if this request is funded? What is the alternative if the request is not funded?

The City of Raleigh will advance design for Wake BRT: Northern Corridor and enter project into Project Development for FTA Small Starts Grant

7. List below the Key Performance Indicators (deliverables) while this project is in progress. These performance measures will be reported quarterly. Are these the same measures as currently being reported?

a) Date of Locally Preferred Alternative Selction (LPA)

b) Date for entrance into Project Development (PD) for FTA Small Starts Grant

c) Date of completion of final design for Wake BRT: Southern Corridor

8. List any other relevant information not addressed.

N/A

9. Please enter estimated appropriations to support expenses identified above. Enter FY 2020 and the estimated annualized cost in FY 2021 using the 2.5% growth factor, if applicable. The spreadsheet will calculate 2021 and beyond by 2.5%. If your project is not expected to have recurring costs in FY 2021 and/or beyond, delete the calculation(s) in columns E-H.

Cost Break Down of Project Request OPERATING COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Growth Factors 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Salary & Fringes - - - - - Contracts - - - - - Bus Operations: Estimated Hours - - - - - Cost per Hour - - - - - Estimated Operating Cost ------Bus Leases - - - - - Park & Ride Lease - - - - - Other - - - - - Other - - - - - Subtotal: Bus Operations ------Other: Administrative Other: Database Hosting - - - - - Other: Supplies and Materials - - - - - TOTAL OPERATING COSTS ------

10. Please enter estimated appropriations to support contractual commitments and other expenses related to proposed capital projects identified above.

CAPITAL COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Design/NEPA $ 5,539,515 ------Equipment ------Land - Right of Way ------TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS 5,539,515 ------

Assumptions for Costs and Revenues Above:

11. Please state any assumption(s) used to calculate the capital and operating dollars and revenues shown above.

Based on assumptions from Wake Transit Plan MIS process and Wake BRT: New Bern Avenue design contract

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 2 of 2 Amendment Form Page 27 of 123 Wake Transit Project ID # FY 2020 FY START DATE Wake Transit Work Plan 7/1/2019 TO005-R Project Amendment Request Form 6/30/2018 Operating and/or Capital

Type of Amendment Minor Major

Minor amendment – Required when there is: A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations but requires less than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects equal to or greater than $500,000 A transfer of funds between budget ordinance appropriations bus requires less than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that does not meet any criteria of a major amendment

Major amendment - Required when there is: A project requested to be added to the Work Plan A project requested to be removed from the Work Plan Significant changes in scope of funded project A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a 20% change to a project appropriation for projects greater than $500,000 A transfer between budget ordinance appropriations that requires equal to or greater than a $100,000 change to a project appropriation for projects less than $500,000 Any change that requires a change in budgeted reserves or fund balance

New/Amended Project Name Requesting Agency Project Contact Estimated Operating Cost David Walker Base Year $ 1,977,573 20 Garner Service City of Raleigh [email protected] Recurring $ 2,027,012 Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Notes Estimated Capital Cost Base Year $ - May-September 2020 Cumulative $ - Project Description Enter below a summary of the project amendment and impact on approved plan. Current Scope: 20-Garner/20L- Garner South: This route will replace the current existing 102 Garner-Raleigh route with a route alignment on Garner Road and all day service. The current route will be split into 2 routes: 20 will will serve the inner portion of the area and 20L will serve the outer portion of the area. By August 2019, hourly weekday service will begin. In the future (FY 2023), weekday frequency will increase and weekend service will be added. The major destination for this route includes Forest Hills Shopping Center, , and Downtown Raleigh (where GoRaleigh Station will serve as a connection point).

Modified Scope: It is proposed to add additional trips to increase frequencies to every 30 minutes on the Garner Route. This will also create a bi-directional service along the loop portion of the route in addition to the added frequencies along Garner Road. Based on current demand and customer feedback with the execution of the new route, staff believes this modification will address current needs to expedite service to downtown. Staff is only modifying the scope and can accommodate this with the current budget. The existing service has frequencies of every 60 minutes. The new service will depart every 30 minutes all day Monday - Friday until 7 PM and then hourly until midnight. The weekend service that is proposed to start in FY24 will occur at that time. Estimated operating costs on this submission were already programmed in the final FY20 adopted work plan.

1. Enter Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Increase Recurring Project ID Project Appropriation Amount Notes Category Amount

TOTAL$ - -$

2. Wake Transit Project ID(s) to Reduce Appropriation Recurring Project ID Project Amount Notes Category Amount

TOTAL$ - -$

3. Impact on Transit Plan Project Costs From above, indicate whether amounts impact operating or capital budgets in Wake Current Year $ - Estimated Operating Cost Transit Plan. Recurring $ - Base Year $ - Estimated Capital Cost Cumulative $ -

Provide responses to EACH of the questions below. Answer the questions as fully as possible. Enter Non- Project Justification / Business Case Applicable (N/A) as appropriate.

4. Is this New/Amended project Operating, Capital or Both? Operatingg Capitall Bothh

5. What is the timeframe for the request? Are you requesting a full year of funds or a partial year to be annualized in future fiscal years?

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 1 of 3 Amendment Form Page 28 of 123

No Additional Funds are being requested

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 2 of 3 Amendment Form Page 29 of 123 6. What is the expected outcome(s) if this request is funded? What is the alternative if the request is not funded?

Service Frequencies will be increased providing citizens with an enhanced level of service.

7. List below the Key Performance Indicators (deliverables) while this project is in progress. These performance measures will be reported quarterly. Are these the same measures as currently being reported?

a) Using the key ideas identified in the Wake Transit Plan to measure success, the performance measures include: Ridership, ensuring service is fitting demand. (Metrics: Ridership during all times of day; number of jobs and people are near the service network) b) Using the key ideas identified in the Wake Transit Plan to measure success, the performance measures include: Coverage, providing essential links and support for local initiatives. (Metrics: Distance of the current network) c) Using the key ideas identified in the Wake Transit Plan to measure success, the performance measures include: Enhanced Customer Service (Metrics: Number of customer service complaints and issues regarding the new services and GoRaleigh's ability to resolve)

8. List any other relevant information not addressed.

9. Please enter estimated appropriations to support expenses identified above. Enter FY 2020 and the estimated annualized cost in FY 2021 using the 2.5% growth factor, if applicable. The spreadsheet will calculate 2021 and beyond by 2.5%. If your project is not expected to have recurring costs in FY 2021 and/or beyond, delete the calculation(s) in columns E-H.

Cost Break Down of Project Request OPERATING COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Growth Factors 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Salary & Fringes - - - - - Contracts - - - - - Bus Operations: Estimated Hours - - - - - Cost per Hour - - - - - Estimated Operating Cost 1,977,573 2,027,012 - - - - - Bus Leases - - - - - Park & Ride Lease - - - - - Other - - - - - Other - - - - - Subtotal: Bus Operations 1,977,573 2,027,012 - - - - - Other: Administrative Other: Database Hosting - - - - - Other: Supplies and Materials - - - - - TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 1,977,573 2,027,012 - - - - -

10. Please enter estimated appropriations to support contractual commitments and other expenses related to proposed capital projects identified above.

CAPITAL COSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Design/NEPA $ ------Equipment ------Land - Right of Way ------TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS ------

Assumptions for Costs and Revenues Above:

11. Please state any assumption(s) used to calculate the capital and operating dollars and revenues shown above.

Wake Transit Work Plan Page 3 of 3 Amendment Form (;+,%,7$ Page 30 of 123

From: Don Berryann To: Martin, Bret Subject: Public Comment on Wake Transit Plan amendments Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 11:24:46 AM

Dear Sir,

I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Wake Transit Plan Amendments for 2020.

Specifically regarding the funding commitments for BRT corridors, these projects should clearly articulate that the project includes “Access Sheds” around BRT stops. Pedestrian (1 mile) and Bicycle (3 mile) Access Sheds are considered by the Federal Highway Administration as an inherent part of a Transit System.

BRT is a large, complex project. It would be easy to neglect this important detail, that Wake County is lacking, in many places, sidewalks, bike lanes, street lights and other details which make access to transit stops safe and convenient. The funding and staff to implement these Access Sheds should be specifically described with this funding request.

Sincerely,

Don Berryann (919) 656-6856 Page 31 of 123 WAKE COUNTY TRANSIT PLAN

Transit Planning Advisory Committee

Joint Disposition and Voting Record from the Joint Meeting of the Budget & Finance and Planning & Prioritization Subcommittees January 2nd, 2020 · CAMPO, 1:00-3:00pm

Per the Wake Transit Plan Amendment Policy, The TPAC Budget & Finance and Planning & Prioritization Subcommittees are tasked with jointly reviewing the quarterly Work Plan draft amendment list and amendment request forms when a Major Amendment requests are submitted. The subcommittees consider appropriateness of changes in scope and, if applicable, financial choices and tradeoffs associated with the proposed amendments, creating a disposition for TPAC consideration. Upon review of the disposition and related amendment request, the TPAC will make recommendations to the GoTriangle Board of Trustees and CAMPO Executive Board for approval or disapproval of requested amendments to the Work Plan. Following is the voting record and review disposition from the joint meeting of the Budget & Finance and Planning & Prioritization Subcommittees held on January 2nd, where the 3rd quarter requested amendments to the FY20 Work Plan were reviewed.

Voting Members for Budget & Finance CAMPO, Bret Martin Wake County, Nicole Kreiser Raleigh, Shavon Tucker Cary, Michelle Brooks Wake Forest, Suzette Morales GoTriangle, Steven Schlossberg Fuquay-Varina, Allyssa Stafford

Voting Members for Planning & Prioritization CAMPO, Bret Martin Wake County, Nicole Kreiser Cary, Kevin Wyrauch Raleigh, David Walker Garner, Gaby Lontos-Lawlor GoTriangle, Andrea Neri Wake Forest, Suzette Morales Fuquay-Varina, Allyssa Stafford

Other Attendees TPAC, Stephanie Plancich Raleigh, Megan Finnegan Raleigh, Het Patel Raleigh, Mila Vega TJCOG, John Hodges-Copple Wake County, Anita Davis Cary, Antony Wambui CAMPO, Evan Koff

There were six (6) 3rd quarter Major Amendment requests to the FY2020 Wake Transit Work Plan submitted for consideration.

1. I-540 Bus on Shoulder Improvements (GoTriangle)

Brief Description: This amendment request is to move the project from FY 22 to FY 20 and to provide $156,000 to cover design of a signage plan, fabrication and installation of signage, and traffic management along I-540. The current programmed amount for the project in FY 2022 is $43,264. This project supports the existing NRX route by providing a mechanism to improve on-time performance and reliability for users.

Recommendation to the TPAC is to recommend approval to the Wake Transit governing boards of the amendment request for FY20 and the full $156,000 being requested.

Discussion: Additional discussion noted that this project has been identified as a potential LAPP-funded project. Until funding is approved by the CAMPO Executive Board, the subcommittees will continue planning as if there are no additional funds allocated to the project. However, should the project be funded, it is expected that the Wake Transit funds attributed to the project would be reduced to cover the 20% federal match requirement. It was also noted that there is still some question as to whether awarding and expending Wake Transit funds now and receiving LAPP funds in October would cause any unforeseen challenges. Staff is looking into any potential issues and will advise the subcommittees as needed.

It was noted that there is a one-time financial impact from transferring $156,000 in funds held by the tax district in capital fund balance to the project sponsor. No scope issues were identified with this amendment request, as it is expected that Page 32 of 123 WAKE COUNTY TRANSIT PLAN

Transit Planning Advisory Committee

Joint Disposition and Voting Record from the Joint Meeting of the Budget & Finance and Planning & Prioritization Subcommittees January 2nd, 2020 · CAMPO, 1:00-3:00pm allowing the project to proceed earlier than originally programmed would more immediately support travel time and reliability improvements to the NRX Route, which was initiated earlier in FY 2020.

2. Early Project Development Activities for Commuter Rail from Garner to Western Durham (Wake County Share) (GoTriangle)

Brief Description: Preliminary results of the Commuter Rail Alternatives Analysis provide guidance for needed next steps to further study feasibility and options for a regional rail line. This amendment request is to move previously allocated commuter rail funds from reserves and allocate them to GoTriangle for early project development activities including, but not limited to, the following: land survey; utility investigation; preliminary engineering and environmental study for key risk areas; assessment of land availability for park-and-rides; identification of site options for maintenance facility; railroad coordination; community engagement planning and initiating community engagement; stakeholder engagement planning and advancing stakeholder engagement activities; additional assessment of project feasibility for the FTA Capital Investment Grant program; development of a project management plan; and preparation to engage project development consultants.

Recommendation to the TPAC is to recommend approval to the Wake Transit governing boards of the amendment request to allocate $6 million of Commuter Rail reserve funds to GoTriangle for early project development work, with the condition that no funds may be expended until a cost-share MOU with all necessary project partners is approved by the applicable Boards.

Discussion: Preliminary results of the Commuter Rail Alternatives Analysis study were discussed at the CAMPO TCC meeting on January 2nd and will be presented to the TPAC at its meeting on January 15th. It was shown that additional study is needed before entering the federal project development process and to continue the feasibility discussion. This $6 million will fund an additional phase of study and feasibility determination, including preliminary engineering and environmental study for key risk areas and community engagement planning.

It was noted that there is a one-time financial impact from transferring $6 million from previously approved reserves for commuter rail project development, which reduces the remaining reserves allocated in FY 2020 to $36,724,000. No scope issues were identified with this amendment request, except that it may be premature to authorize spending from an approved $6 million allocation until a cost-share agreement is approved by the applicable boards that details the share of early project development costs for which the Wake fund of the Triangle Tax District will take responsibility. The funds for commuter ail project development were allocated in the FY 2020 Wake Transit Work Plan under the assumption that project development activities would begin following the conclusion of the alternatives analysis.

3. Project Development for Bus Rapid Transit – Southern Corridor (City of Raleigh) 4. Project Development for Bus Rapid Transit – Western Corridor (City of Raleigh) 5. Project Development for Bus Rapid Transit – Northern Corridor (City of Raleigh)

Brief Description: The current work plan combines the three remaining planned Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridors into a single line item within the Wake Transit budget. Amendments 3, 4 & 5 reflect the disaggregation of that project/budget line into individual projects/budget lines within the work plan. This allows project development to progress and associated tracking and reporting to move forward for each corridor independently of the others. This amendment was listed as a condition that must be satisfied for project development to move forward on the remaining BRT corridors.

Recommendation to the TPAC is to recommend approval to the Wake Transit governing boards of the three (3) amendment requests to create separate projects and budgets for the Southern, Western and Northern BRT corridors. Page 33 of 123 WAKE COUNTY TRANSIT PLAN

Transit Planning Advisory Committee

Joint Disposition and Voting Record from the Joint Meeting of the Budget & Finance and Planning & Prioritization Subcommittees January 2nd, 2020 · CAMPO, 1:00-3:00pm

Discussion: It was clarified that the funds included for the corridors came from already allocated BRT funds. They were dispersed in accordance with known project scopes. Consequently, there is no financial impact associated with the amendment request. No scope issues were identified with the amendment request. However, refinement of specific scope information to tie to these implementation elements is needed before board approval of the amendment requests.

6. New Route/Realignment – 20/20L Garner (City of Raleigh)

Brief Description: There is not a financial impact to the FY 2020 operating budget associated with this amendment request. However, it involves a scope change and shift in implementation year. GoRaleigh, within the existing budget for the work plan project, is requesting to increase frequency from 60 to 30 minutes on Route 20 in Garner. This implementation element is currently programmed in the FY 2020 Work Plan to occur in FY 2024.

Recommendation to the TPAC is to recommend approval to the Wake Transit governing boards of the amendment request to implement the proposed service improvements on Route 20/20L in FY20.

Discussion: Route 20 was launched in FY 2020. However, users have provided feedback about the lack of convenience associated with the current frequency of the route and the current unidirectional service design in Garner. GoRaleigh is able to add a bus providing reverse circulation on the route. These frequency enhancements were not planned until FY 2024, so this implementation element of the Work Plan is proposed to be shifted forward as part of this amendment request.

SUMMARY Both the Budget & Finance and Planning & Prioritization Subcommittees voted unanimously to recommend that the TPAC accept the six (6) 3rd quarter FY20 Work Plan Major Amendment requests. All amendments are being recommended to the TPAC as submitted, with the exception of a condition added to the Early Project Development Activities for Commuter Rail request that requires a cost-share MOU with all necessary project partners to be approved by the applicable boards prior to any of the allocated funds being expended. The recommendations from the joint subcommittee meeting will be presented to the TPAC at its regular meeting on January 15th, 2020. Page 34 of 123

ϮϬϮϬϬϬϬϱ  'KdZ/E'> &/^>zZϮϬϮϬ dZ/E'>dy/^dZ/dͲt<W/d>&hEh'dKZ/EEDEDEd  /dKZ/EďLJƚŚĞZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚdƌŝĂŶŐůĞZĞŐŝŽŶĂůWƵďůŝĐdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJŽĂƌĚŽĨ dƌƵƐƚĞĞƐ͕ƚŚĂƚƉƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϯ͘ϮŽĨŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϱϵŽĨƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂů^ƚĂƚƵƚĞƐŽĨEŽƌƚŚĂƌŽůŝŶĂ͕ ƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞŝƐŚĞƌĞďLJĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͗  ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭ͘/ƚŝƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƌĞǀĞŶƵĞƐǁŝůůďĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŝŶƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ͲtĂŬĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ:ƵůLJϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶĚĞŶĚŝŶŐ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ϮϬϮϬ͗   KƌŝŐŝŶĂů ŵĞŶĚĞĚ ůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĨƌŽŵtĂŬĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚĂůĂŶĐĞ ΨϯϬ͕ϳϱϳ͕ϯϯϭ Ψϯϭ͕Ϯϵϯ͕ϯϯϭ dƌĂŶƐĨĞƌĨƌŽŵtĂŬĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ ϴϮ͕ϭϭϰ͕ϱϮϱ ϴϮ͕ϭϭϰ͕ϱϮϱ dŽƚĂů ΨϭϭϮ͕ϴϳϭ͕ϴϱϲ Ψϭϭϯ͕ϰϬϳ͕ϴϱϲ   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĂŵŽƵŶƚƐŚĞƌĞďLJĂƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͲtĂŬĞ ĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ:ƵůLJϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶĚĞŶĚŝŶŐ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ϮϬϮϬ͗   KƌŝŐŝŶĂů ŵĞŶĚĞĚ ĂƉŝƚĂůWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ Ψϰϱϴ͕ϯϯϯ Ψϰϱϴ͕ϯϯϯ DWK ϯϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϯϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ&ƵŶĚŝŶŐƌĞĂ Ϭ Ϭ 'ĂƌŶĞƌ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ &ƵƋƵĂLJͲsĂƌŝŶĂ ϭϯ͕ϳϱϬ ϭϯ͕ϳϱϬ ZŽůĞƐǀŝůůĞ ϭϲ͕ϱϬϬ ϭϲ͕ϱϬϬ ŽŵŵƵƚĞƌZĂŝůdƌĂŶƐŝƚ Ϭ Ϭ ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ϰϮ͕ϳϮϰ͕ϬϬϬ ϰϮ͕ϳϮϰ͕ϬϬϬ ƵƐZĂƉŝĚdƌĂŶƐŝƚ Ϭ Ϭ ŝƚLJŽĨZĂůĞŝŐŚ Ϯϭ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ Ϯϭ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ ƵƐ/ŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ Ϭ Ϭ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ ϵ͕ϳϯϳ͕ϬϬϬ ϵ͕ϴϵϯ͕ϬϬϬ ŝƚLJŽĨZĂůĞŝŐŚ ϳ͕ϴϮϴ͕ϭϭϵ ϳ͕ϴϮϴ͕ϭϭϵ dŽǁŶŽĨĂƌLJ Ϯ͕ϰϱϰ͕ϭϭϬ Ϯ͕ϰϱϰ͕ϭϭϬ ƵƐĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶ Ϭ Ϭ ŝƚLJŽĨZĂůĞŝŐŚ ϴ͕ϯϲϰ͕ϴϬϴ ϴ͕ϳϰϰ͕ϴϬϴ ůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƚŽtĂŬĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚĂůĂŶĐĞ ϭϵ͕ϴϴϱ͕Ϯϯϲ ϭϵ͕ϴϴϱ͕Ϯϯϲ dŽƚĂů ΨϭϭϮ͕ϴϳϭ͕ϴϱϲ Ψϭϭϯ͕ϰϬϳ͕ϴϱϲ 

  Page 35 of 123

^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϯ͘dŚĞ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞWƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚͬK͕ŽƌŚŝƐŽƌŚĞƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĞ͕ŝƐŚĞƌĞďLJĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞĚƚŽƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌ ĨƵŶĚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚŝŽŶƐƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͗  Ϳ EŽƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌŵĂLJďĞŵĂĚĞƚŚĂƚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚŚĞĂĚŽƉƚĞĚĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŽĨƵŶĚďĂůĂŶĐĞ͘ Ϳ ůůďƵĚŐĞƚƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌƐǁŝůůďĞƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ͘ Ϳ ůůŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐƚŽĂŶĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚĂůůƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŵƵƐƚďĞ ƌĞǀŝĞǁĞĚďLJƚŚĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚďLJƚŚĞDWK ĂŶĚ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŐŽǀĞƌŶŝŶŐďŽĂƌĚƐ͘   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϰ͗dƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚʹtĂŬĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚƐĂƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĚƉƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϯ͘ϮŽĨ ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϱϵŽĨƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂů^ƚĂƚƵƚĞƐŽĨEŽƌƚŚĂƌŽůŝŶĂ͖ƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚŝŽŶƐĚŽŶŽƚůĂƉƐĞĂƚ ƚŚĞ ĞŶĚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĨŝƐĐĂů LJĞĂƌ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ ĨŽƌ ĚƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ƵŶůĞƐƐ ƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚůLJ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚĨŽƌƌĞĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶďLJƚŚĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚďLJƚŚĞ DWKĂŶĚ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŐŽǀĞƌŶŝŶŐďŽĂƌĚƐ͕ŽƌĂƐƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚŝŶ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϱ͘   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϱ͗'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚŚĂƐĂƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJƚŽĐůŽƐĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŶĚͬŽƌƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚ ƌĞĚƵĐĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚŝŽŶƐƵƉŽŶŶŽƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶďLJƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƉŽŶƐŽƌ͘tŚĞŶ ĂĐƚƵĂů ƌĞǀĞŶƵĞƐ ĂƌĞ ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ ŝŶ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ƚŽ ďĞ ĐůŽƐĞĚ Žƌ ǁŚŝĐŚ ĂƌĞ ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƚŝĂůůLJ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ͕ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ &ŝŶĂŶĐĞ ŵĂLJ ƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌ ƐĂǀŝŶŐƐ ƚŽ dƌŝĂŶŐůĞ dĂdž ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ tĂŬĞ ĂƉŝƚĂů ĨƵŶĚ ďĂůĂŶĐĞ͘ dŚĞƐĞĨƵŶĚƐǁŝůůďĞƚŚĞŶĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĨŽƌĨƵƚƵƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŚŝĐŚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶďLJ ƚŚĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůďLJƚŚĞDWKĂŶĚ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŐŽǀĞƌŶŝŶŐ ďŽĂƌĚƐ͘dŚŝƐƐĞĐƚŝŽŶĂƉƉůŝĞƐƚŽĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĂŶĚƉƌŝŽƌLJĞĂƌĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ůŝƐƚŽĨƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐůŽƐĞŽƵƚƐ ƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƋƵĂƌƚĞƌůLJƚŽƚŚĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ͘   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ ϲ͘ŽƉŝĞƐŽĨƚŚĞƵĚŐĞƚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐŚĂůůďĞĨƵƌŶŝƐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞůĞƌŬ͕ƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨ dƌƵƐƚĞĞƐ͕ƚŽƚŚĞ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞKĨĨŝĐĞƌ͕ĂŶĚƚŽƚŚĞƵĚŐĞƚKĨĨŝĐĞƌŽĨƚŚŝƐƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJƚŽďĞŬĞƉƚŽŶĨŝůĞĨŽƌ ƚŚĞŝƌĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞĚŝƐďƵƌƐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĨƵŶĚƐ͘ŽƉŝĞƐƐŚĂůůĂůƐŽďĞĨƵƌŶŝƐŚĞĚƚŽƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞƐŽĨ ƚŚĞŐĞŶĐŝĞƐƵŶĚĞƌ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘dŚĞƵĚŐĞƚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐŚĂůůďĞĞŶƚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͘   KWdd,/^Ϯϲd,zK&&ZhZzϮϬϮϬ͘    ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ  DŝĐŚĂĞůWĂƌŬĞƌ͕ŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐŚĂŝƌ dd^d͗   ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DŝĐŚĞůůĞ͘ĂǁƐŽŶ͕ůĞƌŬƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚ

&zϮϬdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͲtĂŬĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚƵĚŐĞƚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ;KϮϬϮϬϬϬϬϱͿ Ϯ Page 36 of 123

MEMORANDUM

TO: GoTriangle Operations & Finance Committee FROM: Finance & Administrative Services DATE: February 26, 2020 SUBJECT: Durham Transit FY 2020 Q3 Proposed Amendment

Strategic Objective or Initiative Supported This item supports initiative 1.2, “Pursue service improvements and expansion opportunities.”

Action Requested The Operations and Finance Committee are requested to recommend approval of the fiscal year 2020 budget amendment to the GoTriangle Board of Trustees at the February 26, 2020 meeting.

All amendments that were submitted in the third quarter and were recommended by Durham County Staff Working Group on January 29, 2020

Background and Purpose Durham Operating Ordinance Amendments listed below have been submitted for approval: 1. GoTriangle i. Route DRX ii. Bus Service Performance Data Processing and Visualization Tool 2. City of Durham / GoDurham i. GoDurham Transport Alternatives ii. Food Access for Seniors Pilot 3. Update on Increased Cost of Existing Services (ICES) based on FY19 actuals 4. Miscellaneous adjustment from Original budget

Durham Capital Ordinance Amendments listed below have been submitted for approval: 5. GoTriangle a. GoDurham Bus Stop Improvements – Construction and Equipment b. Mobile Ticket Validators – Durham Share 6. City of Durham / GoDurham i. Village Transit Center ii. Chapel Hill Road Transit Emphasis Corridor iii. Holloway Street Transit Emphasis Corridor iv. Fayetteville Street Transit Emphasis Corridor v. GoDurham Bus Stop Improvement Access vi. Southpoint Transit Center Pavement Markings vii. Bus Speed and Reliability Improvements

Page 37 of 123

As a part of the packet presented with this memorandum, the committee will find: x Proposed FY 2020 Amendment List x Detailed Individual Project Amendment Request

Financial Impact The proposed amendments, if recommended by this committee and approved by the Board of Trustees, will increase the FY20 Durham Transit Work Plan by $1,038,570. The Operating ordinance increase of $111,318 and capital ordinance increase of $927,252 compared to the FY20 Adopted Amended Budget. The capital ordinance excludes the amendment request for Durham share of Commuter Rail of $2,350,000, which will be brought to the board in March for approval.

Staff Contact(s) x Jennifer Hayden, Assistant Director Finance and Administrative Services, [email protected], (919) 485-7418 x Saundra Freeman, CFO/Director of Finance and Administrative Services, [email protected], (919) 485-7415

Page 38 of 123

FY20 - Durham Transit Workplan - Operating Transit Tax District Transit Tax District Programmed Programmed Budget - Amended FY2020 Workplan Transit Service Provider Project ID Services Budget - Amended (Q2) Comments (Q1) Amendments [01/29/20]

Durham County Access 19DCO_TS1 Durham County ACCESS POS 187,329 187,329

GoDurham 18DCI_TS1 Route 5 - Frequent Service Corridor 680,049 680,049

GoDurham 18DCI_TS2 Route 10 - Frequent Service Corridor 490,582 490,582

GoDurham 18DCI_TS3 Route 3 - Tripper for Crowding Relief 65,280 65,280

GoDurham 18DCI_TS4 Route 12 & 14 - Frequency Improvements 267,495 267,495

GoDurham 18DCI_TS5 Route 15 - Span Improvements 324,445 324,445

GoDurham 18DCI_TS6 Route 20 - New Commuter Service 299,285 299,285

GoDurham 18DCI_TS7 System-Wide - Later Sunday Service 170,510 170,510

GoDurham 18DCI_TS8 System-Wide - New Year's Eve Service 7,480 7,480

GoDurham 18DCI_TS9 Increasing Cost of Existing Services 850,800 (35,583) 815,217 ICES calculation based on FY19 actuals (∆-$35,583)

GoDurham 20DCI_TS10 Food access for Seniors - Pilot Route 18,870 18,870

GoDurham 20DCI_TS11 Transportation Alternatives for Durham County 66,960 66,960 Re-Assigned consolidation of Northern Durham Vanpool

GoTriangle 18GOT_TS1 Route 700 Improvements 365,577 365,577

GoTriangle 18GOT_TS2 Route 800 Improvements 422,915 422,915

GoTriangle 18GOT_TS3 Route 400 Improvements 349,452 349,452

GoTriangle 18GOT_TS5 Route ODX - Orange-Durham Express 157,210 157,210

GoTriangle 18GOT_TS7 Route DRX Improvements 128,222 52,895 181,117

GoTriangle 18GOT_TS9 Route 405 Improvements** 27,472 27,472

GoTriangle 19GOT_TS8 Paratransit costs associated with span increases 33,675 33,675

GoTriangle 20GOT_TS1 Northern Durham Vanpool Service 66,960 (66,960) - Re-Assigned to Transportation Alternatives

Transit Services Total Transit Services 4,894,739 36,182 4,930,921

GoTriangle 19GOT_OO2 Customer Surveys 74,235 74,235 Other Operating Total Other Operating 74,235 - 74,235

DCHC MPO 19MPO_AD1 .5 FTE for SWG Admin 55,364 55,364 GoTriangle 19GOT_AD1 .25 FTE for Tax District Admin 22,350 22,350 GoTriangle 20GOT_AD1 .5 FTE for Sr. Financial Analyst 62,950 62,950 GoTriangle 20GOT_AD2 Support Services 1,556,762 1,556,762 GoTriangle 20GOT_AD3 Support - Consultant 111,250 111,250 GoTriangle 20GOT_AD3 Bus Service Performance Data Processing and Visualization Tool 75,000 75,000 New - Software for GoTriangle and GoDurham Durham County 20DCO_AD1 1 FTE - oversight / management of the Durham transit plan 196,000 196,000

Admin Total Admin 2,004,676 75,000 2,079,676

Operating Summary TS Total Transit Services 4,894,739 36,182 4,930,921 Other Operating Total Other Operating 74,235 - 74,235 Admin Total Admin 2,004,676 75,000 2,079,676

Capital Summary Vehicles Total Vehicles 614,183 - 614,183 Capital Improvements Total Capital Improvements 9,615,678 927,252 10,542,930

Total Durham County Approved Work Plan 17,203,511 1,038,434 18,241,945 Page 39 of 123

FY20 - Durham Transit Workplan - Capital Transit Tax District Transit Tax District Programmed Programmed Budget - FY2020 Workplan Sponsor Project ID Project Budget - Amended (Q2) Comments Amended (Q1) Amendments [01/29/20]

GoDurham 20DCI_VP1 GoDurham Vehicle Purchases 72,850 72,850 Durham County Access 19DCO_VP1 Durham County Access Vehicle Purchases 191,333 191,333 Durham County Access 20DCO_VP2 Durham County Access Vehicle Purchases 350,000 350,000

Vehicles Total Vehicles 614,183 - 614,183

City of Durham/GoDurham 18DCI_CD5 Village Transit Center 470,000 (268,498) 201,502 Re-Prioritization to FY21 City of Durham 20DCI_CD1 Chapel Hill TEC 886,450 (790,250) 96,200 Re-Prioritization to FY21 City of Durham 18DCI_CD2 Holloway St Transit Emphasis Corridor 700,000 (630,000) 70,000 Re-Prioritization to FY21 City of Durham 18DCI_CD1 Fayetteville St Transit Emphasis Corridor 280,000 700,000 980,000 Re-Prioritization to FY20 City of Durham 20DCI_CD2 GoD (Better) Bus stop access improvement - 125,000 125,000 New-Request - additional scope City of Durham 20DCI_CD4 Southpoint Transit Center -1 (City Share) - 200,000 200,000 New-Request - additional scope City of Durham 20DCI_CD5 Bus Speed Reliability Improvement 500,000 500,000 New-Request

GoDurham 18DCI_CD4 GoD (Better) Bus Stop Improvements 783,570 783,570 GoDurham 20DCI_CD3 Mobile Ticketing Validators 235,000 235,000 - GoTriangle 18GOT_CD2 Southpoint Transit Center -1 426,376 426,376 GoTriangle 18GOT_CD4 Patterson Place Improvements - 1 183,000 183,000 GoTriangle 18GOT_CD7 GoT Bus Stop Improvements (Durham County) 257,000 257,000 GoTriangle 19GOT_CO2 Durham-Wake Commuter Rail 715,373 715,373 GoTriangle 19GOT_CD1 RTC Feasibility Study 125,000 125,000 GoTriangle 19GOT_CO1 ERP - Phase 1 / Phase 2 / Phase 3 implementation 906,438 906,438 GoTriangle 20GOT_CD1 DO LRT Wind Down 2,347,472 2,347,472 GoTriangle (GoD) 20GOT_CD2 GoD (Better) Bus Stop Improvements (GoTriangle Share) 500,000 1,029,000 1,529,000 Construction and equipment GoTriangle 20GOT_CD3 Tactical Transit Amenities 50,000 50,000 GoTriangle 20GOT_CD4 Mobile Ticket Validators - Durham share 62,000 62,000 New-Request Durham county share

DCHC MPO 20MPO_AD2 Planning for new Transit Plan 750,000 750,000

Capital Improvements Total Capital Improvements 9,615,678 927,252 10,542,930

Capital Summary Vehicles Total Vehicle Purchases 614,183 - 614,183 Capital Improvements Total Capital Improvements 9,615,678 927,252 10,542,930

Operating Summary TS Total Transit Services 4,894,739 36,182 4,930,921 Other Operating Total Other Operating 74,235 - 74,235 Admin Total Admin 2,004,676 75,000 2,079,676

Total Durham County Approved Work Plan 17,203,511 1,038,434 18,241,945 Page 40 of 123

January 29, 2020

To: Durham - SWG From: GoTriangle Subject: FY20 Workplan Amendments

1. Background

This memo covers proposed FY20 Workplan amendments with a brief introduction and financial impact of each.

1.1 GoTriangle

i. Amendment for GoTriangle Route DRX

20GOT_TS7 - GoTriangle Transit Services combined the project ID’s and descriptions to ensure Bus operations were able to calculate the reimbursements by route (adopting a similar approach to Wake). Specific tasks include: x Creation of a Bridge Document A “bridge” document was prepared to calculate between what was submitted in the approved FY20 Workplan requests to revised project ID’s. This was done to ensure there was a record of bridge between the old project ID’s and the new project ID’s, which are by route. x Refinements to the cost estimates During the re-calculations, Transit planning refined estimates on specific routes that resulted in relevant corrections. Part of the costs associated with the route were equally split between Durham and Wake, but the remainder share for Durham County was divided in half one more time by mistake. The cost per hour of service was also corrected from $125/h to $127/h.

Durham From To Impact 18GOT_TS7 Route DRX Improvements $61,306 19GOT_TS2 Durham-Raleigh Express, Additional Frequency $66,674 19GOT_TS3 Additional Holiday Service (DRX component) $242 20GOT_TS7 Route DRX Improvements (New combined project ID) $181,117 TOTAL $128,222 $181,117 $52,895

Durham County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $52,895

PO Box 13787, Park, NC 27709 Page 1 of 5 Phone: 919-485-7415 | Fax: 919-485-7491

Page 41 of 123

Action That the Durham County Staff Working Group recommend approval of request for funding 20GOT_TS7.

ii. Bus Performance Data Processing and Visualization Tool

20GOT_AD4 - GoTriangle and GoTriangle on behalf of GoDurham proposes to purchase and implement a bus service performance date processing and visualization tool that will enable staff to efficiently and effectively understand the bus performance data listed below that will aid ongoing transit plan funded studies, work plan requests, and the transit plan update itself. This tool would enable the following types of analysis: x Bus speeds by route segment in addition to dwell times, allowing identification and prioritization of capital projects to improve bus speed and reliability x Bus run times by route segment and timepoint, enabling Service Planners and schedulers to more precisely schedule to adapt to travel conditions throughout different service windows throughout the day x Bus on-time performance by route and trip, enabling deeper transparency into GoTriangle and GoDurham's operating performance for staff and the public

All three analysis tools would be useful for both internal staff functions in addition to public-facing engagement. All three types of analysis tools would also be useful in evaluating the operating time and cost benefits of future potential major transit projects such as Bus Rapid Transit, Access improvements to Durham Station, and the Regional Transit Center Study. All three analysis tools would also be useful in producing and visualizing data for the Durham Transit Plan update. This type of tool allows unlimited seats, allowing access to transit provider, municipality, county, metropolitan planning organization, and other partner agency staff.

Durham County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $75,000

Action That the Durham County Staff Working Group recommend approval of request for funding 20GOT_AD4.

PO Box 13787, , NC 27709 Page 2 of 5 Phone: 919-485-7415 | Fax: 919-485-7491

Page 42 of 123

iii. Mobile Ticketing Validators - Durham 20GOT_CD3 – Installation of mobile ticketing validators on GoTriangle buses split by counties based on the fleet operated in each county. Installation of mobile ticketing validators on 20 GoTriangle buses which is the Durham share of GoTriangle regional operating routes. The new request aligns with Transit Plan priorities of capital projects to improve the transit passengers' experience.

Durham County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $62,000

Action That the Durham County Staff Working Group recommend approval of request for funding 20GOT_CD2.

iv. Mobile Ticketing Validators - Orange 20GOT_CD2 – Installation of mobile ticketing validators on GoTriangle buses split by counties based on the fleet operated in each county. Installation of mobile ticketing validators on 16 GoTriangle buses which is the Orange share of GoTriangle regional operating routes and includes 6 buses routes 420 operated by Chapel Hill Transit on behalf of GoTriangle. The new request aligns with Transit Plan priorities of capital projects to improve the transit passengers' experience.

Orange County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $74,000

v. Amendment for GoDurham better bus stop budget

20GOT_CD2 - In the FY20 Durham Transit Tax Annual Work Plan, $500,000 is programmed for design of 50 bus stop improvements for GoDurham. Progress on this work was at a pace that construction can be scheduled to begin on 10 stops in FY20 rather than FY21 as previously planned. In addition, GoTriangle recommends proceeding with procurement of amenities for all 50 stops up front, to access better prices and ensure amenities are in stock for installation as construction on each stop is completed. Therefore, GoTriangle, on behalf of GoDurham, is requesting an additional $1,029,000 of funding from the Durham Transit Tax Fund to be pulled forward from the future funding pipeline into FY20.

The amended request is considered a material change to the plan per the existing Interlocal Agreement (ILA) because the request is for more than $500,000 towards bus service. Therefore, the request must be approved by the governing boards of three

PO Box 13787, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Page 3 of 5 Phone: 919-485-7415 | Fax: 919-485-7491

Page 43 of 123

parties to the ILA: GoTriangle, DCHC MPO, and the Durham Board of County Commissioners.

Action That the Durham County Staff Working Group recommend that the GoTriangle Board of Trustees, the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO Board, and the Durham County Board of Commissioners approve amending the FY20 Durham Transit Tax Annual Work Plan to add $1,029,000 for construction of bus stop improvements for GoDurham.

Durham County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $1,029,000

vi. Amendment for Commuter Rail Early Project Development Activities

18GOT_C02 - The Durham to Garner Commuter Rail project is presently funded at $850,000 from FY18-20. Work funded to date includes the Commuter Rail Major Investment Study, completed in May 2019 and the ongoing Alternatives Analysis update, which is refreshing planning-level infrastructure assumptions, cost estimates, and ridership projections for alternatives between Durham and Garner and evaluating those same elements for alternatives between Mebane and Selma. Preliminary results from this study, due to be finalized later this spring, identify the need to evaluate key project risks through additional study, public engagement, and coordination prior to a decision on whether to proceed with project implementation and design. This additional study effort, referred to as "early project development activities" has an estimated cost $9,000,000, of which $3,000,000 or 33% would be Durham County's expected share. $465,000 is available from the original FY20 budgeted amount of $715,373; the amended FY20 Budget request is $3,417,373; an increase of $2,702,000.

As a part of this Transit Plan Amendment, elected officials have a decision on whether or not to proceed with these "early project development activities" to evaluate and address key project risks and prepare the project for design and implementation activities. Upon completion of "early project development activities, including reaching preliminary agreements with funding partners, railroads, and municipalities, elected officials would have a future decision of whether or not to proceed with project design and implementation, including requesting entry into the Federal New Starts process, the first step in applying for federal funding. Related to the this current Transit Plan Amendment is a separate decision by elected officials to authorize a Memorandum of Understanding to govern the project management partner's roles and responsibilities during "early project development activities."

PO Box 13787, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Page 4 of 5 Phone: 919-485-7415 | Fax: 919-485-7491

Page 44 of 123

GoTriangle is the presumptive Project Sponsor in DCHC MPO and will use the funds to pursue additional study to resolve key items prior to elected officials being presented with a decision on whether to proceed with project and design and implementation and whether to request entry into the Federal Transit Administration's New Starts process within the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program. Activities may include but are not limited to the following: land survey; utility investigation; preliminary engineering and environmental study for key risk areas; assessment of land availability for park-and-rides; identification of site options for maintenance facility; railroad coordination; community engagement planning and initiating community engagement; stakeholder engagement planning and advancing stakeholder engagement activities; additional assessment of project feasibility for CIG; development of a project management plan; and preparation to engage project development consultants. These activities are necessary to evaluate key project risks

The amended request is considered a material change to the plan per the existing Interlocal Agreement (ILA) because the request is for more than $500,000 towards planning and feasibility studies; and because this requests require authorization of an additional $2,702,000 in FY20, above and beyond what is included in the current Durham County Transit Plan. Therefore, the request must be approved by the governing boards of three parties to the ILA: GoTriangle, DCHC MPO, and the Durham Board of County Commissioners.

Action That the Durham County Staff Working Group recommend that the GoTriangle Board of Trustees, the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO Board, and the Durham County Board of Commissioners approve amending the FY20 Durham Transit Tax Annual Work Plan to add $2,702,000 for early project development activities to evaluate and address key project risks for the Greater Triangle Commuter Rail project to prepare elected officials for a future decision on whether to proceed with project design and implementation in addition to a future decision on whether to request entry of the project into the federal New Starts process.

Durham County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $$2,702,000

PO Box 13787, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Page 5 of 5 Phone: 919-485-7415 | Fax: 919-485-7491

Page 45 of 123

UniqueProjectID# TriangleTaxDistrict FYSTARTDATE 7/1/2019 20GOT_TS7 DurhamTransitWorkPlan FY2020 Unique Request ID: 18 [FY Project Start year] ProjectRequestForm 6/30/2018 [Three letter Agency] GOT TransitServices [Project Type] TS [Unique Number] 007 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost RouteDRXImprovements GoTriangle AndreaNeri $181,117 CurrentYear EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost Alreadyimplemented N/A CurrentYear $Ͳ ProjectDescription EnterbelowasummaryoftheprojectthatmaylaterbeusedfortheFY2020DurhamͲOrangeTransitWorkPlan.

RouteDRXprovidesexpressbusservicebetweenDurhamandRaleigh.Thisprojectsheetcombinespreviouslyimplementedprojectsintoasinglesheetandcorrects acostcalculationmistakeintheFY20workplan.

ProjectProfile P.1 Whereisthisprojectlocated,whowillthisprojectserveandwhatarethekeybenefits?(Ex.ImproveTransitefficiency,levelsofservice,etc.) ProjectLocation? WhowillthisProjectserve? Whatarethekeybenefits?

NCͲ147andI Ͳ40betweenDuke&VA PeopletravelingbetweenDurhamandRaleighat Moreoptionsfortriptimes,andlesscrowding MedicalCentersanddowntownRaleigh peaktimes ProjectMonitoringDetails OperatingProjects OP.2 Forbusoperatingprojects,pleaseprovide: a)TargetStartDate Alreadyimplemented

b)Span Weekday:5:50AMͲ9:50d AMan 3:10PMͲ8:10PM

c)Frequency Every20minutes

d)AssetsUsed GoTrianglevehicles

e)GeographicTermini Duke&VAMedicalCentersͲGoRaleighStation

f)MajorMarketDestinationsServed DowntownDurham,NCStateUniversity,DowntownRaleigh

g)RevenueHours Weekday:42.67(project:23.87untilAugustservicechanges2019,27.47after) FinanceEstimates Revenue TaxRevenue FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total DurhamͲOrangeCountyTaxRevenue 181,117 185,838 253,978 260,328 266,836 1,148,096 OtherRevenue Federal Ͳ State 24,149 24,778 48,927 Farebox/State 36,223 37,168 73,391 SubtotalOther 60,372 61,946 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 122,318 TOTALREVENUE 301,862 247,783 253,978 260,328 266,836 1,270,414 F.2 TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest OPERATINGCOSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total GrowthFactors 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Contracts $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ BusOperations: Estimated Hours 1,901.49 1,901.49 1,901.49 1,901.49 1,901.49 CostperHour $127.00 $130.31 $133.57 $136.91 $140.33 EstimatedOperatingCost $241,489.55 $247,783.49 $253,978.07 $260,327.53 $266,835.71 $1,270,414.35 BusLeases $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Park&RideLease $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ OtherͲBus(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ OtherͲBus(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Subtotal:BusOperations $241,489.55 $247,783.49 $253,978.07 $260,327.53 $266,835.71 $1,270,414.35 Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $241,489.55 $247,783.49 $253,978.07 $260,327.53 $266,835.71 $1,270,414.35 F.4 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. Serviceisprojectedtooperateon250weekdaysinFY2019,andon253weekdaysinFY2020. Page 46 of 123

UniqueProjectID# TriangleTaxDistrict FYSTARTDATE 7/1/2019 20GOT_AD4 DurhamTransitWorkPlan FY2020 Unique Request ID: 20 [FY Project Start year] ProjectRequestForm 6/30/2018 [Three letter Agency] GOT AdministrativeSupportͲSoftware [Project Type] AD [Unique Number] 004 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost PerformanceDataProcessingand GoTriangle JayHeikes CurrentYear$ 75,000 VisualizationTool EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost March1,2020 June30,2021 CurrentYear $Ͳ ProjectDescription EnterbelowasummaryoftheprojectthatmaylaterbeusedfortheFY2020DurhamͲOrangeTransitWorkPlan.

GoTriangleandGoTrianlgeonbehalfofGoDurhamproposestopurchaseandimplementabusserviceperformancedateprocessingandvisualizationtoolthatwillenable stafftoefficientlyandeffectivelyunderstandthebusperformancedatalistedbelowthatwillaidongoingtransitplanfundedstudies,workplanrequests,andthe transit planupdateitself.Thistoolwouldenablethefollowingtypesofanalysis: ͲBusspeedsbyroutesegmentinadditiontodwelltimes,allowingidentificationandprioritizationofcapitalprojectstoimprovebusspeedandreliability ͲBusruntimesbyroutesegmentandtimepoint,enablingServicePlannersandschedulersto morepreciselyschedulebusestoadapttotravelconditionsthroughout differentservicewindowsthroughouttheday ͲBusonͲtimeperformancebyrouteandtrip,enablingdeepertransparencyintoGoTriangleandGoDurham'soperatingperformanceforstaffandthepublic Allthreeanalysistoolswouldbeusefulforbothinternalstafffunctionsin additiontopublicͲfacingengagement.Allthreetypesofanalysistoolswouldalsobeusefulin evaluatingtheoperatingtimeandcostbenefitsoffuturepotentialmajortransitprojectssuchasBusRapidTransit,AccessimprovementstoDurhamStation,andthe RegionalTransitCenterStudy.Allthreeanalysistoolswould alsobeusefulinproducingandvisualizingdatafortheDurhamTransitPlanupdate.

ProjectProfile P.1 Whereisthisprojectlocated,whowillthisprojectserveandwhatarethekeybenefits?(Ex.ImproveTransitefficiency,levelsofservice,etc.) ProjectLocation? WhowillthisProjectserve? Whatarethekeybenefits?

Enablegreaterprecisionindevelopingbusschedules,enabledataͲdriven NA currentandfuturetransitriders decisionsoncapitalinfrastructureprojects,allowgreatertransparency intotransitserviceprovideroperationsperformancedata. ProjectMonitoringDetails OperatingProjects OP.2 Forbusoperatingprojects,pleaseprovide: a) TargetStartDate

b)Span

c)Frequency

d)AssetsUsed

e)GeographicTermini

f)MajorMarketDestinationsServed

g)RevenueHours FinanceEstimates Revenue TaxRevenue FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total DurhamͲOrangeCountyTaxRevenue 75,000 75,000 OtherRevenue Federal Ͳ State Ͳ Farebox/State Ͳ SubtotalOther Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE 75,000  Ͳ 75,000 F.2 TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest OPERATINGCOSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total GrowthFactors 2.50% Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Contracts $Ͳ $Ͳ Bus Operations: EstimatedHours CostperHour EstimatedOperatingCost $Ͳ $ Ͳ $Ͳ BusLeases $Ͳ Park&RideLease $Ͳ OtherͲBus(Describe) $Ͳ OtherͲBus(Describe) $Ͳ Subtotal:BusOperations $Ͳ $ Ͳ $Ͳ Other(SoftwareImplementationand1year $75,000.00 $ Ͳ $75,000.00 Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $75,000.00 $ Ͳ $75,000.00 F.4 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. EstimatedcostforGoDurhamandGoTrianglebuses,basedoncurrentfleetsize.Costestimateincludessoftwareimplementation,configuration,dan 1yearlicense.This typeoftoolallowsunlimitedseats,allowingaccesstotransitprovider,municipality,county,metropolitanplanningorganization,andotherpartneragencystaff. Page 47 of 123 FY2020DurhamTransitWorkPlan CAPͲGoTriangleSouthpoint

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20GOT_CD3 Capital FY2020 ProjectBusinessCase ProvideresponsestoEACH ofthequestionsbelow.Answerthequestionsasfullyaspossible.EnterNonͲApplicable(N/A)asappropriate.

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedCapitalCost MobileTicketing GoTriangle EricBergstraesser FY20$ 62,000 EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes November1,2019 June28,2020  ProjectDescription  Installationofmobileticketingvalidatorson20GoTrianglebuseswhichistheDurhamshareofGoTriangleregionaloperatingroutes.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries MapofArea (TransitPlan) Section *ASetofcapitalprojectsto RegionalͲDurhamShare Durham,OrangeandWakeCounty improvethetransitpassengers' 1.2 experience. ProjectInfo Whichfundisthisprojectbeingproposedfor? DurhamCountyͲCapital

WasthisprojectevaluatedintheAdoptedDurhamorOrangeTransitPlans? No.TheprojectwassubmittedtotheGoTriangleafteradoptionoftheDurhamTransitPlan. Whatisyourplaniftherequestisnotfunded? Iftheplanisnotfunded,GoTrianglewillnotmoveforwardwithimplementingmobileticketinginFY20,andwillbeunabletointegratewithGoTriangle, GoRaleigh,GoCary,andChapelHillTransitmobileticketing.TheprojectwillbesubmittedasahighpriorityprojectinFY2021. ListbelowtheKeyPerformanceIndicators(deliverables)whilethisprojectisinprogress.Theseperformancemeasures willbereportedquarterly. ADͲContractStart ADͲSpecify

ProjectMonitoringDetails

CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative Improvecustomer OnͲtimeperformanceimprovementson Numberofpassespurchasedvia satisfactionbyproviding routeswithcurrentlyhighinstancesofonͲ FareboxRecoveryRate Qualitative mobileticketingapp moreconvenientwaysto boardpasspurchases. purchase/use fare media.

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.

FinanceEstimates EstimatedProjectRevenues: Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $Ͳ $62,000 $62,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 62,000 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ State $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ OtherͲ $Ͳ $193,000 $193,000 $Ͳ 193,000 SubtotalOther $Ͳ $193,000 $193,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 193,000 TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $255,000 $255,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 255,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2020 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $255,000 Expenses FY18andPriorYearReimbursements $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted $Ͳ Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $255,000 ProjectRequest $255,000 Balance $Ͳ  CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Design&Engineering $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ ConstructionͲImplementation $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Equipment $Ͳ $255,000 $255,000 Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $255,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $255,000 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculateeth capitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. Thecapitaldollarsshownabovewerecalculatedbyusingtheexacthardwarecostsarebasedonregionaltechnologyprocurementselectedvendor recommendedtotheGoTriangleBoardofTrusteesonOctober23,2019.DurhamrequestisproportionateshareoffleetthatoperatesinDurhamand constitutes24%oftotalestimatedcost.

  Page 48 of 123 FY2020DurhamTransitWorkPlan CAPͲGoTriangleSouthpoint

ProjectID# OrangeTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20GOT_CD2 Capital FY2020

ProjectBusinessCase ProvideresponsestoEACH ofthequestionsbelow.Answerthequestionsasfullyaspossible.EnterNonͲApplicable(N/A)asappropriate.

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedCapitalCost MobileTicketing GoTriangle EricBergstraesser FY20$ 74,000 EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes November1,2019 June28,2020  ProjectDescription  Installationofmobileticketingvalidatorson20GoTrianglebuseswhichistheOrangeshareofGoTriangle regionaloperatingroutesandincludesroute420 operatedbyChapelHillTransitonbehalfofGoTriangle.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries MapofArea (TransitPlan) Section *ASetofcapitalprojectsto RegionalͲOrangeShare Durham,OrangeandWakeCounty improvethetransitpassengers' 1.2 experience. ProjectInfo Whichfundisthisprojectbeingproposedfor? OrangeCountyͲCapital

WasthisprojectevaluatedintheAdoptedDurhamorOrangeTransitPlans?

Iftheplanisnotfunded,GoTrianglewillnotmoveforwardwithimplementingmobileticketinginFY20,andwillbeunabletointegratewithGoTriangle, GoRaleigh,GoCary,andChapelHillTransitmobileticketing.TheprojectwillbesubmittedasahighpriorityprojectinFY2021.

Whatisyourplaniftherequestisnotfunded?

n/a

ListbelowtheKeyPerformanceIndicators(deliverables)whilethisprojectisinprogress.Theseperformancemeasureswillbereportedquarterly. ADͲContractStart ADͲSpecify

ProjectMonitoringDetails

CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3 Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative Improvecustomer OnͲtimeperformanceimprovementson Numberofpassespurchasedvia satisfactionbyproviding routeswithcurrentlyhighinstancesofonͲ FareboxRecoveryRate Qualitative mobileticketingapp moreconvenientwaysto boardpasspurchases. purchase/use fare media.

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.

FinanceEstimates EstimatedProjectRevenues: Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total OrangeCountyTaxRevenue $Ͳ $74,000 $74,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 74,000 Other Revenue Federal $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ State $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ OtherͲ $Ͳ $181,000 $181,000 $Ͳ 181,000 SubtotalOther $Ͳ $181,000 $181,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 181,000 TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $255,000 $255,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 255,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2020

Revenue OrangeCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $255,000 Expenses FY18andPriorYearReimbursements $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted $Ͳ Net DurhamCountyTax RevenueAvailable $255,000 ProjectRequest $255,000 Balance $Ͳ  CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Design&Engineering $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ ConstructionͲImplementation $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Equipment $Ͳ $255,000 $255,000 Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $255,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $255,000 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculateeth capitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove.

Thecapitaldollarsshownabovewerecalculatedbyusingtheexacthardwarecostsarebasedonregionaltechnologyprocurementselectedvendor recommendedtotheGoTriangleBoardofTrusteesonOctober23,2019.OrangerequestisproportionateshareofGoTrianglefleetthatoperatesinOrange andconstitutes19%oftotalestimatedcostandRoute420ChapellHillfleetoperatedonbehalfGoTrianglethatconstitutes10%oftotalcapitalcost.

  Page 49 of 123 FY2020DurhamTransitWorkPlan CAPͲBetterBusStopsinDurham,byGoTriangle

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20GOT_CD2 Capital FY2020 Unique Request 20 ID: TransitService 6/30/2018 ProjectBusinessCase

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost BusStopImprovements GoTriangleforGoDurham JayHeikes CurrentYear $Ͳ EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2018 ongoing  CurrentYear $1,528,800 ProjectDescription 

TheGoDurhambetterbusstopprogramatotalof$6.7MprogrammedfromFY18toFY22.Fundingforaninitialgroupofbusstopimprovementswasauthorizedin FY18(ProjectID18DCI_CD4),for$783,570withaCityofDurhammatchof$736,328;constructionofthatinitialgroupofstopsisunderwaydan isscheduledtobe completebytheendofFY20.

IntheFY20DurhamTransitTaxAnnualWorkPlan,$500,000wasprogrammedfordesignof50additionalbusstopimprovementsforGoDurham,withthe expectationthatconstructionfundingwouldbemadeavailableinfutureyears.Progressonthisworkhas proceededatapacethatconstructioncanbescheduled beginon10ofthestopsinFY20ratherthanFY21aspreviouslyplanned.Inaddition,GoTrianglerecommendsproceedingwithprocurementofamenitiesforall50 stopsupfront,toaccessbetterpricesandensureamenitiesareinstockforinstallation asconstructiononeachstopiscompleted.Therefore,GoTriangle,onbehalf ofGoDurham,isrequestinganadditional$1,029,000offundingfromtheDurhamTransitTaxFundtobepulledforwardfromthefuturefundingpipelineintoFY20.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries (TransitPlan) Section MapofArea

CityofDurham DurhamResidentsdan Visitors ImprovedBusStopAmenities 4.3.3

  ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

1.IncreasedRidership 2.ImprovedMobilityinArea 3.IncreasedPedestrianActivityQualitative ImprovedCustomerSatisfaction

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed. ProjectCostsmayincreaseduetoincreasingconstructioncosts.Projectcancompletedesign/engineeringwithrequestedfunds FinanceEstimates Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $783,569.50 $1,528,800.00 $2,312,370 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 2,312,370 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ Ͳ State Ͳ OtherͲCityofDurhamfunds $736,328 $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $736,328 $Ͳ $736,328 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 736,328 TOTALREVENUE $1,519,898 $1,528,800 $3,048,698 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 3,048,698  MultiͲYearCapitalͲRevenueFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $6,722,031 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted $783,570 Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $5,938,461 ProjectRequest $500,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $5,438,461

CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&Engineering $580,000 $500,000 $ Ͳ $1,080,000 ConstructionͲImplementation$366,000 $318,500 $684,500 Equipment $522,500 $710,300 $1,232,800 Other(Describe) $51,398 $51,398 TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $1,519,898 $1,528,800 $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $3,048,698 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. $500,000isrequestedinFY2020todesign50busstopsaspartofthePhase2oftheGoDurhambetterbusstopprogram.The$783,570 budgetedinFY2019isexpectedtocarryovertoFY2020andbeusedforconstructionofofthefirstgroupbusstopssponsoredunderthesame GoDurhambetterbusstopprogram(originallyauthorizedinFY18).Detailsofamendedbudgetrequestof$1,029,00fortheDurhamFY20 workplanare: •TotalEquipment(shelters,benchesandSimmeseats)Costforthefirst10(ofthe next50)Ͳ$118,700 •TotalConstructionCostforthefirst10(ofthenext50)Ͳ$318,500 •TotalEquipment(shelters,benchesandSimmeseats)Costforanadvancedorder(fortheremaining40)Ͳ$399,400 •Spares/AdditionalEquipment(shelters)Cost(3/10)Ͳ$192,400(13shelters@$14,800/shelter) GrandTotalAmendment Request($118,500+$318,500+$399,400+$192,400)=$1,029,000

  Page 50 of 123 FY2020DurhamTransitWorkPlan CAPͲBetterBusStopsinDurham,byGoTriangle

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 19GoT_C02 Capital FY2020 Unique Request 20 PlanningandFeasibilityStudies ID: 6/30/2018 ProjectBusinessCase

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost CommuterRailfromGarner GoTriangleforGoDurham JayHeikes CurrentYear $Ͳ EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2018 ongoing  CurrentYear $2,702,000 ProjectDescription 

TheDurhamtoGarnerCommuterRailprojectispresentlyfundedat$850,000fromFY18Ͳ20.WorkfundedtodateincludestheCommuterRailMajorInvestment Study,completedinMay2019andtheongoingAlternativesAnalysisupdatewhichisrefreshingplanningͲlevelinfrastructureassumptions,costestimates, ridershipprojectionsforalternativesbetweenDurhamandGarnerandevaluatingthosesameelementsforalternativesbetweenMebaneandSelma.Preliminary resultsfromthisstudy,duetobefinalizedlaterthisspring,identifytheneedtoevaluatekeyprojectrisksthroughadditionalstudy,publicengagement,and coordinationpriortoadecisiononwhethertoproceedwithproject implementationanddesign.Thisadditionalstudyeffort,referredtoas"earlyproject developmentactivities"hasanestimatedcost$9,000,000,ofwhich$3,000,000or33%wouldbeDurhamCounty'sexpectedshare.$465,000isavailablefrom theoriginalFY20budgetedamountof$715,373;theamendedFY20Budgetrequestis$3,417,373;anincreaseof$2,702,000. AsapartofthisTransitPlanAmendment,electedofficialshaveadecisiononwhetherornottoproceedwiththese"earlyprojectdevelopmentactivities"to evaluateandaddresskeyprojectrisksandpreparetheprojectfordesignandimplementationactivities.Uponcompletionof"earlyprojectdevelopment activities,including reachingpreliminaryagreementswithfundingpartners,railroads,andmunicipalities,electedofficialswouldhaveafuturedecisionof whetherornottoproceedwithprojectdesignandimplementation,includingrequestingentryintotheFederalNewStartsprocess,thefirststepinapplyingfor federalfunding.RelatedtothethiscurrentTransit PlanAmendmentisaseparatedecisionbyelectedofficialstoauthorizeaMemorandumofUnderstandingto governtheprojectmanagementpartner'srolesandresponsibilitiesduring"earlyprojectdevelopmentactivities." GoTriangleisthepresumptiveProjectSponsorinDCHCMPOandwillusethefundstopursueadditionalstudytoresolvekey itemspriortoelectedofficialsbeing presentedwithadecisiononwhethertoproceedwithprojectanddesignandimplementationandwhethertorequestentryintotheFederalTransit Administration'sNewStartsprocesswithintheCapitalInvestmentGrants(CIG)program.Activitiesmayincludebutarenotlimitedtothefollowing: landsurvey; utilityinvestigation;preliminaryengineeringandenvironmentalstudyforkeyriskareas;assessmentoflandavailabilityforparkͲandͲrides;identificationofsite optionsformaintenancefacility;railroadcoordination;communityengagementplanningandinitiatingcommunityengagement;stakeholderengagement planningandadvancingstakeholderengagementactivities;additionalassessmentofprojectfeasibilityforCIG;developmentofaprojectmanagementplan;and preparationtoengageprojectdevelopmentconsultants.Theseactivitiesarenecessarytoevaluatekeyprojectrisks.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries (TransitPlan) Section MapofArea DurhamResidents,Visitors,and ProvidingConnectionstoother DurhamCounty employeesofcompanieslocatedin 4.5 RegionalCities Durham   ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

ImprovedCustomerSatisfaction 1.IncreasedAccesstoJobs 2.ImprovedMobilityinArea 3.IncreasedRidership Qualitative throughincreasedreliability

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed. Projectcancompleteearlyprojectdevelopmentactivities,ascurrentlydefined,withrequestedfunds FinanceEstimates Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $850,000 $2,702,000 $3,552,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 3,552,000 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ Ͳ State Ͳ OtherͲCityofDurhamfunds $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $850,000 $2,702,000 $3,552,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 3,552,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲRevenueFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $850,000 Expenses FY19Reimbursement: $134,627 Expenses FY20Budgeted $715,373 Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $850,000 ProjectRequest $2,702,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest

CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $134,627 $3,417,373 $Ͳ $3,552,000 LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&Engineering TBD TBD TDB TBD TBD ConstructionͲImplementatio $Ͳ Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $134,627 $3,417,373 $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $3,552,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. Anadditional$2,702,000isrequestedinFY2020toinitiateandcompleteearlyprojectdevelopmentactivitiesforCommuterRailTransit betweenWestDurhamandGarner,withapossibleinclusionofascenariothatextendstoClayton.$465,000oftheoriginalFY20budgetis availableandtheadditional$2,702,000isrequestedforatotalFY20Amendedrequestof3,417,373.FY20originallyincludedacarryoverof $715,737fromFY19;thecurrentfeasibilitystudy,titled"TheGreaterTriangleCommuterRailStudy"ishasanestimatedbudgetat completion(DurhamCountyshareonly)of$250,373.Thisleaves$465,000availablefromFY19thenextphaseofstudy.Additionalfunding, beyondthe$465,000isnecessarytoconductadditionalplanningͲlevelstudytoevaluatekeyprojectrisks,begindevelopingagreements withcriticalprojectpartnersandstakeholders,andpreparetheprojectandelectedofficialsforadecisiononwhethertoproceedwith projectdesignand implementation.DetailsofamendedbudgetrequestforDurhamCountyshareof"earlyprojectdevelopmentactivities" toevaluatekeyprojectrisksareasfollows: •RailTrafficControllerModel •Preliminaryengineeringtoevaluatecriticaldesignrisksonly(e.g.DowntownDurhamgradecrossings) •Additionalridershipmodeling •Publicengagement,integratedwithlocalplanupdates •Agreementswithfundingpartners,municipalities,andrailroads.

 

Page 51 of 123

Date: January 29, 2020

To: Aaron Cain, DCHC MPO From: Ellen Beckmann, City of Durham Transportation Subject: FY20 Work Plan Amendments

The Department of Transportation is submitting the following FY20 Work Plan Amendments. The overall change from the existing FY20 Work Plan is a decrease of $ϱϴ,ϰϮϴ from the existing FY20 Work Plan.

1. Village Transit Center

a. The Village Transit Center is a current project managed by the City of Durham. It is proposed to be split into two phases to reflect the separate design processes and make it more easy to track and report expenditures. The North phase is in design by Public Works as part of a federally funded sidewalk project on Raynor Street. The South phase will begin design in FY20 with the procurement of a design contract.

b. The total funding is unchanged.

c. The funding schedule is:

i. $151,502 in FY20 for the North Phase

ii. $50,000 in FY20 for design of the South Phase

iii. $268,498 in FY21 for right-of-way and construction of the South Phase

2. Chapel Hill Road Transit Emphasis Corridor

a. The Chapel Hill Road Transit Emphasis Corridor currently consists of sidewalk, bus stop, and crosswalk construction from Morehead to Bivins. This project is currently in design through a contract managed by General Services.

b. The total funding is unchanged, but it is split into design, right-of-way, and construction phases in different years.

c. $96,200 in FY20 for design and right-of-way

d. $790,250 in FY21 for construction

e. The City of Durham will request an expansion of the limits and scope of this project to include the entire high frequency Route 10/10B, include infrastructure and signal improvements to increase bus reliability, and include additional access to transit improvements in a future funding request.

Page 52 of 123

3. Holloway Street Transit Emphasis Corridor

a. The Holloway Street Transit Emphasis Corridor currently consists of sidewalk, bus stop, crosswalk, and improved curb radius construction from Guthrie to Miami. This project is currently in design by Public Works and right-of-way acquisition by General Services is expected in FY20.

b. The total funding is unchanged, but it is split into design, right-of-way, and construction phases in different years.

c. $70,000 in FY20 for right-of-way

d. $630,000 in FY21 for construction

e. The City of Durham will request an expansion of the limits and scope of this project to include the entire high frequency Route 3/3B/3C, include infrastructure and signal improvements to increase bus reliability, and include additional access to transit improvements in a future funding request. The 2014 Access to Transit Plan proposed improvements from Dillard to Chandler.

4. Fayetteville Street Transit Emphasis Corridor

a. The Fayetteville Street Transit Emphasis Corridor is currently defined as access to transit and bus stop improvements from Umstead to Lawson. Design has not commenced, but the City of Durham expects to enter into a design contract in FY20.

b. The City of Durham is requesting that the limits be expanded to include the entire limits as defined in the 2014 Access to Transit Plan from Lakewood to Riddle. This also corresponds with the high frequency Route 5/7 and avoids the widening projects underway south of Riddle Road.

c. The City of Durham also is requesting an increase in funding to reflect the expanded limits and to allow for the design of infrastructure and signal improvements to increase bus reliability. This is a potential opportunity to demonstrate the benefits of transit signal priority, bus lanes, queue jump lanes, bus stop consolidation, boarding/fare collection strategies, etc. on an existing high frequency route on the GoDurham system to improve reliability and the rider experience on a high use and congested corridor.

d. $980,000 in FY20 for design. This is not all expected to be spent, but is needed to advertise and encumber a contract.

e. $9,800,000 will be requested as part of the FY21 Workplan development for future right-of-way and construction

5. GoDurham Bus Stop Improvement Access

a. GoDurham Bus Stop Improvements is a current project managed by GoTriangle. The City of Durham is requesting a complementary sub-project to design and construct sidewalk gaps, pedestrian crosswalks, and signals at the proposed bus stop improvement locations. The City routinely constructs projects like this, has the staff expertise and resources to manage these projects, and can more easily coordinate this

Page 53 of 123

with other traffic signal, curb ramp, and sidewalk projects.

b. The City of Durham is requesting an increase in funding to design and then construct approximately 25 locations per year with an average construction cost of $50,000 per location. GoTriangle is managing the improvement of more than 100 bus stops, but all locations may not require improvements.

c. $125,000 in FY20 for design of 25 locations.

d. $1,250,000 in FY21 for construction of 25 locations and $125,000 in FY21 for design of the next 25 locations.

e. Future year funding will be requested.

6. Southpoint Transit Center Pavement Markings

a. Southpoint Transit Center is a current project managed by GoTriangle. The City of Durham is requesting a complementary sub-project to construct bus only lane pavement markings at the transit center. The City routinely designs and installs pavement markings, has the staff expertise and resources to manage this project, and can efficiently incorporate this into an existing contract to resurface and install pavement markings.

b. The City of Durham is requesting an increase in funding to construct bus only pavement markings as part of the Southpoint Transit Center project.

c. $200,000 in FY20 for construction

7. Bus Speed and Reliability Improvements

a. The County Transit Plan is currently funding increased frequencies on many GoDurham routes. However, the reliability of the bus is still often affected by congestion, difficult turns caused by small curb radii, stop bar locations, poles, impediments in the roadway, illegal parking, difficulty merging into traffic, etc. The City is requesting a complementary sub-project to identify, design, and construct projects to address these hot spots on various routes to complement the increased frequencies funded by the Plan. Example projects include curb radius improvements, moving stop bars and signal re-design, installation of pavement markings, signage, and flexible delineator posts, and bus boarding islands.

b. The City of Durham is requesting an increase in funding to establish a funding program to design and construct bus speed and reliability improvements. Many projects could be designed with existing staff resources.

c. $500,000 in FY20 for construction.

d. Future year funding will be requested

8. Transportation Alternatives for Durham County

a. Northern Durham Vanpool Services is a current project managed by GoTriangle. The City of Durham is requesting that this project be expanded to specifically target

Page 54 of 123

emerging employment centers in unincorporated Durham County and to include the promotion of transportation demand management strategies.

b. The City of Durham is requesting to utilize the funding previously programmed for the Northern Durham Vanpool project (20GOT_TS1) to include the expanded scope.

c. The $66,960 assigned for Northern Durham Vanpool will be used in FY20 for implementation of this project.

d. Future year funding will be requested

9. Food Access for Seniors Pilot

a. Thousands of seniors in Durham are at risk of food insecurity. End Hunger Durham has surveyed several low income senior housing complexes and reported that up to 44 percent of the residents skip meals for lack of adequate transportation to get to a grocery store of food pantry. This pilot would provide approximately 4 hours of fare-free service per weekday connecting selected senior housing complexes (Morning Glory, Hosiery Mill, Oldham Towers, J.J. Henderson and Forest Hill Heights) to grocery stores and food pantries. This request is for four months of funding in FY20 and a full year of funding in FY21. Final details of the pilot are still being developed, including the exact start date, evaluation criteria, etc., but the current assumption is that the shuttle would be operated by GoDurham ACCESS.

b. The City of Durham is requesting an increase in funding to include this pilot program in the FY20 workplan. Future funding will be requested as part of the FY21 Workplan development.

c. Cost for this service is $18,870

Page 55 of 123

FYSTART ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm DATE 7/1/2019 18DCI_CD5  FY2020 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ VillageTransitCenter CityofDurham ProjectCost $Ͳ

EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2019 FY2021 DesignFY20,ConstructionFY20Ͳ21 CurrentYear $470,000 ProjectDescription  ConstructionofatransitcenterattheVillageTransitCenter,includingtheconstructionofsidewalks,busstopimprovements,andcrossing improvementsonRaynorStreetfromN.MiamiBlvd.toHardeeSt. ProjectProfile DirectorIndirect ProjectArea KeybeneĮts Beneficiaries TransitPlan MapofArea Increasedsafety VillageShoppingCenterareaand GoDurhamRoute2and3 Designplanforsidewalk andcomfortfor Yes RaynorStreet riders available. busriders. ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

IncreasedtransitIncreasedsafetyfor Increasedpassenger  Qualitative ridership pedestrians satisfaction. 

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.  FinanceEstimates Revenue FY19and FundingAvailable TaxRevenue Earlier FY20 toDate FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $470,000 $470,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 470,000 OtherRevenue Ͳ Federal $Ͳ $617,192 $617,192 617,192 State $Ͳ Ͳ Other $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $617,192 $617,192 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 617,192 TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $1,087,192 $1,087,192 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 1,087,192  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $470,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $470,000 ProjectRequest $470,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $Ͳ TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDown FY19and OPERATINGCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Contracts 00Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ

  TransitCapitalDevelopment:Estimatedappropriationstosupportcontractualcommitmentsandotherexpensesrelatedtoproposed capitalprojects. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest FY19and CAPITALCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $33,866 $33,866 Design&Engineering $68,461 $68,461 Construction $99,175 $268,498 $367,673 Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $201,502 $268,498 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $470,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. ProjectFundingfollowsDurhamCounty2017TransitPlanͲTheCityofDurhamreceivedafederalgranttoconstructasidewalkand associatedbusstopimprovementsonthenorthͲsideofRaynorStreetfromN.MiamiBlvd.toHardeeSt.Thissidewalkisnecessaryto constructatransitcenterattheVillageShoppingCenterandwillbethefirstphaseoftheVillageTransitCenterproject. Page 56 of 123 FY2020OrangeTransitWorkPlan CAPͲCHTransitBusStopSigns

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTARTDATE 7/1/2019 20DCIͲCD1  FY2020 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ ChapelHillTransitEmphasisCorridor CityofDurham ProjectCost $Ͳ

EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2019 FY2021 Design FY19,R/WFY20,ConstructionFY20Ͳ21 CurrentYear $886,450 ProjectDescription 

Constructionofsidewalks,busstopimprovements,andcrossingimprovementsonChapelHillRoadfromMoreheadAvenuetoLakewoodAvenue.

ProjectProfile DirectorIndirect ProjectArea KeybeneĮts Beneficiaries TransitPlan MapofArea Increasedsafety ChapelHillRoadͲMoreheadAvenue GoDurhamRoute10 andcomfortfor Yes ConceptPlanavailable toLakewoodAvenue riders busriders. ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

IncreasedtransitIncreasedsafetyfor Increasedpassenger  Qualitative ridership pedestrians satisfaction. 

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.  FinanceEstimates Revenue FundingAvailable TaxRevenue Y19andEarlie FY20 toDate FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $86,450 $800,000 $886,450 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 886,450 OtherRevenue Ͳ Federal $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ State $Ͳ Ͳ Other $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $86,450 $800,000 $886,450 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 886,450  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $886,450 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted

Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $886,450 ProjectRequest $886,450  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $Ͳ TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDown FY19and OPERATINGCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Contracts 00Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ

  TransitCapitalDevelopment:Estimatedappropriationstosupportcontractualcommitmentsandotherexpensesrelatedtoproposedcapital CostBreakDownofProjectRequest FY19and CAPITALCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $35,200 $35,200 Design&EngineeringͲFY20 $61,000 $61,000 ConstructionͲImplementationFY21 $790,250 $790,250 Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $96,200 $790,250 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $886,450 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. ProjectFundingfollowsDurhamCounty2017TransitPlanͲProjectisunderway,andadesigncontractiscurrentlybeingfinalized.ExpectrightͲofͲ waytobegininFY20,andconstructiontoimmediatelyfollow.Thereare additionalsegmentsofChapelHillRoadthatdonothavesidewalksonboth sidesofthestreet,arealsoinneedofbusstopimprovements,andcouldincludebusspeedandreliabilityimprovements.TheCityanticipatesthat therewillbeafuturephaseoftheprojecttoextendthesidewalk furtheralongRoute10.

  Page 57 of 123

FYSTART ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm DATE 7/1/2019 18DCI_CD2  FY2020 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ HollowayTransitEmphasisCorridor CityofDurham ProjectCost $Ͳ

EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2019 FY2021 DesignFY19,R/WFY20,ConstructionFY20Ͳ21 CurrentYear $700,000 ProjectDescription  Constructionofsidewalks,busstopimprovements,andcrossingimprovementsonHollowayStreetfromN.MiamiBlvd.toN.GuthrieSt.,andon RaynorStreetandN.MiamiBlvd. ProjectProfile DirectorIndirect ProjectArea KeybeneĮts Beneficiaries TransitPlan MapofArea Increasedsafety HollowayStreetͲN.MiamiBlvd.toN. GoDurhamRoute2and3 andcomfortfor Yes Designplansavailable GuthrieSt. riders busriders. ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

IncreasedtransitIncreased safety for Increasedpassenger  Qualitative ridership pedestrians satisfaction. 

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.

FinanceEstimates Revenue FY19and FundingAvailable TaxRevenue Earlier FY20 toDate FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $700,000 $700,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 700,000 OtherRevenue Ͳ Federal $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ State $Ͳ Ͳ Other $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $700,000 $700,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 700,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $700,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $700,000 ProjectRequest $700,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $Ͳ TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDown FY19and OPERATINGCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Contracts 00Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ

  TransitCapitalDevelopment:Estimatedappropriationstosupportcontractualcommitmentsandotherexpensesrelatedtoproposedcapital projects. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest FY19and CAPITALCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $70,000 $70,000 Design&EngineeringͲFY20 $Ͳ ConstructionͲImplementationFY21 $630,000 $630,000 Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $70,000 $630,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $700,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. ProjectFundingfollowsDurhamCounty2017TransitPlanͲProjectisunderway.DesignwasdoneinͲhouseandisnear100%.ExpectrightͲofͲ waytobegininFY20,andconstructiontoimmediatelyfollow.Thereareadditionalbusstopneedson Hollowayandweexpectthattherewillbe futurefundingrequesttoenhancemoresegmentsofHolloway.ThecorridorwillberecommendedforasafetyimprovementprojectintheMove DurhamStudy.Futurefundingshownwillbeneededtoimplementfurtherimprovementsonadditionalsegmentsofthestreet. Page 58 of 123

FYSTART ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm DATE 7/1/2019 18DCI_CD1  FY2020 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ FayettevilleTransitEmphasisCorridor CityofDurham ProjectCost $Ͳ

EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2019 FY2021 DesignFY20,R/WFY21,ConstructionFY21 CurrentYear $980,000 ProjectDescription  Constructionofsidewalks,busstopimprovements,crossingimprovements,andinfrastructuretosupportincreasedspeedandreliabilityon Fayetteville StreetfromLakewoodAvenuetoRiddleRoad ProjectProfile DirectorIndirect ProjectArea KeybeneĮts Beneficiaries TransitPlan MapofArea Increasedsafety FayettevilleStreetͲLakewood MoveDurhamStudywillbe GoDurhamRoute5riders andcomfortforbus Yes AvenuetoRiddleRoad developingaconceptualplan. riders. ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

Increasedtransit Increasedsafetyfor Increasedpassenger  Qualitative ridership pedestrians satisfaction. 

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.  FinanceEstimates Revenue FY19and FundingAvailable TaxRevenue Earlier FY20 toDate FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $280,000 $280,000 50,000 1,000,000 Ͳ 1,330,000 OtherRevenue Ͳ Federal $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ  State $Ͳ Ͳ Other $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $280,000 $280,000 50,000 1,000,000 Ͳ 1,330,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $280,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $280,000 ProjectRequest $280,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $Ͳ TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDown FY19and OPERATINGCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Contracts 00Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ

  TransitCapitalDevelopment:Estimatedappropriationstosupportcontractualcommitmentsandotherexpensesrelatedtoproposedcapital projects. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest FY19and CAPITALCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&EngineeringͲFY20 $980,000 $980,000 ConstructionͲImplementationFY21 $Ͳ $Ͳ Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $980,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $980,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. ProjectFundingfollowsDurhamCounty2017TransitPlanͲTheCityofDurhamintendstoinitiateadesigninFY20withrightͲofͲwayand constructiontofollow. Page 59 of 123

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20GoT_CD2 Capital FY2020 Unique Request 20 ID: TransitService 6/30/2018 ProjectBusinessCase

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost BusStopAccess CityofDurham EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2018 ongoing  CurrentYear $125,000 ProjectDescription  GoDurhamBusStopImprovementsisacurrentprojectmanagedbyGoTriangle.TheCityofDurhamisrequestingacomplementarysubͲprojecttodesignand constructsidewalkgaps,pedestriancrosswalks,andsignalsattheproposedbusstopimprovementlocations.TheCityroutinelyconstructsprojectslikethis,hasthe staffexpertiseandresourcestomanagetheseprojects,andcanmoreeasilycoordinatethiswithothertrafficsignal,curbramp,andsidewalkprojects.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries (TransitPlan) Section MapofArea CityofDurham DurhamResidentsandVisitors ImprovedBusStopAmenities 4.3.3   ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

1.Increased Ridership 2.ImprovedMobilityinArea 3.IncreasedPedestrianActivity Qualitative ImprovedCustomerSatisfaction

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed. ProjectCostsmayincreaseduetoincreasingconstructioncosts.Projectcancompletedesign/engineeringwithrequestedfunds FinanceEstimates Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total

DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $Ͳ $125,000.00 $125,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 125,000 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ Ͳ State Ͳ OtherͲCityofDurham $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $125,000 $125,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 125,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲRevenueFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $125,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted $Ͳ Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $125,000 ProjectRequest $125,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $Ͳ

CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&Engineering $125,000 $125,000 ConstructionͲImplementatio $Ͳ Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $125,000 $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $125,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. TheCityofDurhamisrequestinganincreaseinfundingtodesignandthenconstructapproximately25locationsperyearwithanaverage constructioncostof$50,000perlocationand10%designcosts. Page 60 of 123

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20DCI_CD2 Capital FY2020 Unique Request 20 ID: TransitService 6/30/2018 ProjectBusinessCase

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost SouthpointTransitCenter CityofDurham EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2018 ongoing  CurrentYear $200,000 ProjectDescription  SouthpointTransitCenterisacurrentprojectmanagedbyGoTriangle.TheCityofDurhamisrequestingacomplementarysubͲprojecttoconstructbusonlylane pavementmarkingsatthetransitcenter.TheCityroutinelydesignsandinstallspavementmarkings,hasthestaffexpertiseandresourcestomanagethisproject, andcanefficientlyincorporatethisintoanexistingcontracttoresurfaceandinstallpavementmarkings.The$200,000usedforthisprojectwouldbereassigned fromproject19GOT_CD2. ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries (TransitPlan) Section MapofArea CityofDurham DurhamResidentsandVisitors   ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

1.IncreasedRidership 2.ImprovedMobilityinArea 3.IncreasedPedestrianActivity Qualitative ImprovedCustomerSatisfaction

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed. ProjectCostsmayincreaseduetoincreasingconstructioncosts.Projectcancompletedesign/engineeringwithrequestedfunds

FinanceEstimates Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $Ͳ $200,000.00 $200,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 200,000 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ Ͳ State Ͳ OtherͲCityofDurham $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $200,000 $200,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 200,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲRevenueFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $200,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted $Ͳ Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $200,000 ProjectRequest $Ͳ  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $200,000

CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&Engineering $Ͳ ConstructionͲImplementatio $200,000 $200,000 Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $200,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $200,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. Thecostestimatewaspreparedbyacontractor. Page 61 of 123

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20DCI_CD4 Capital FY2020 Unique Request 20 ID: TransitService 6/30/2018 ProjectBusinessCase

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost BusSpeedandReliability CityofDurham EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2018 ongoing  CurrentYear $500,000 ProjectDescription  TheCityofDurhamisrequesting$500,000inFY2020forbusspeedandreliabilityoperationalimprovements.Thisfundingwillbeusedtoidentifylocationswhere busesexperiencedelays,slowtravelspeeds,safetyconcerns,conflictswithothervehiclesorinfrastructure,etc.andresearchpotentialtreatmentstoenable improvedbusspeedandreliability.Fundswouldbeusedtodesignimprovements,conductreviews,payforinstallation(laborandmaterials)suchassignage, pavementmarkings,flexibledelineatorposts,orequipmentneededforvehicles,trafficsignals,orotherinfrastructuretoenableimprovedbusperformance.Efforts willbecoordinatedwithotherprojectssuchastransitemphasiscorridorplanning,roadwayresurfacing,transitcenterimprovements,accesstotransitfor pedestriansandotherusers,andothervehicleandroadwayprojectsrelatedtobusserviceinDurhamandforrelatedprojectmanagementandadministration expenses.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries (TransitPlan) Section MapofArea CityofDurham   ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

1.IncreasedRidership 2.ImprovedMobilityinArea Qualitative ImprovedCustomerSatisfaction

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed. ProjectCostsmayincreaseduetoincreasingconstructioncosts.Projectcancompletedesign/engineeringwithrequestedfunds FinanceEstimates Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $Ͳ $500,000.00 $500,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 500,000 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ Ͳ State Ͳ OtherͲCityofDurham $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $500,000 $500,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 500,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲRevenueFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $500,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $500,000 ProjectRequest $Ͳ  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $500,000

CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&Engineering $Ͳ ConstructionͲImplementatio $500,000 $500,000 Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $500,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $500,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. TheCityofDurhamisrequestinganincreaseinfundingtoestablishafundingprogramtodesignandconstructbusspeedandreliability improvements.Manyprojectscouldbedesignedwithexistingstaffresources.

$500,000inFY20forconstruction.

Futureyearfundingwillberequested Page 62 of 123

UniqueProjectID# TriangleTaxDistrict FYSTARTDATE 7/1/2019 20DCI_TS11 DurhamTransitWorkPlan FY2020 Unique Request ID: 20 [FY Project Start year] ProjectRequestForm 6/30/2018 [Three letter Agency] DCI TransitServices [Project Type] TS [Unique Number] 011 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost Durham TransportAlternatives CityofDurham TomDevlin CurrentYear $66,960 EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2019 N/A (Addnotesasappropriate) CurrentYear $Ͳ ProjectDescription EnterbelowasummaryoftheprojectthatmaylaterbeusedfortheFY2020DurhamͲOrangeTransitWorkPlan. InordertoservetheneedsofemergingemploymentcentersinunincorporatedareasofDurhamCountyaswellasemployersidentifiedforprioritybytheDurham CountyBoardofCountyCommissioners,additionalfundingisrequestedtoadministerpilotprogramstoencouragetheuseoftransit,carpool,vanpool,andothernonͲ singleͲoccupantvehiclemodesreferencedcollectivelyastransportationalternatives(TA).Theseprogramsmayincludeoutreachtoemployers,marketingofTA, subsidiestoencourageuseofTA,technicalassistancetoidentifiedemployersandemployeesforcommuteplanning,traveltraining,transportationdemand management,andotherpurposes. Thisprojectwillalsotakeovertheresponsibilitiesandexpandthescopeof20GOT_TS1,"NorthernDurhamVanpoolServices".Increasedvanpoolsubsidieswillbe offeredtoanycustomerwhoworksinDurham countyandconnectsthroughoutDurham,Orange,andWakecounties.

ProjectProfile P.1 Whereisthisprojectlocated,whowillthisprojectserveandwhatarethekeybenefits?(Ex.ImproveTransitefficiency,levelsofservice,etc.) ProjectLocation? WhowillthisProjectserve? Whatarethekeybenefits? TransportationAlternatives,includingvanpoolservices,areamore DurhamCountyemployersandthecounties costͲeffectiveoptionforservinglessdensepopulationsandthose thattheiremployeescommutefrom, DurhamCountyemployersandemployees withoutadequatetransitservice.Additionalbenefitsinclude includingWake,Durham,andOrange. decreasingtrafficcongestion,reducingparkingdemand,aswellas beingmoreenvironmentallyfriendly. ProjectMonitoringDetails OperatingProjects OP.2 Forbusoperatingprojects,pleaseprovide: a)TargetStartDate 2/1/2020

b)Span

c)Frequency

d)AssetsUsed Enterprisevanpoolvehiclesandexistingtransit. Durham,Orange,andWakecounties. e)GeographicTermini DukeUniversity,downtownDurham,NCStateUniversity,downtownRaleigh,UNC,RTP, f)MajorMarketDestinationsServed Treyburn,andotheremploymentcenters.

g)RevenueHours FinanceEstimates Revenue TaxRevenue FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total DurhamͲOrangeCountyTaxRevenue Ͳ $66,960.00 $66,960.00 OtherRevenue Federal State Farebox/State WakeCounty(incl.farebox&state) SubtotalOther

EnterFY2019andtheestimatedannualizedcostinFY2020usingthe2.5%growthfactor,ifapplicable.Thespreadsheetwillcalculate2021andbeyondby2.5%.Ifyourprojectis notexpectedtohaverecurringcostsinFY2021and/orbeyond,deletethecalculation(s)incolumnsEͲH. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest OPERATINGCOSTS FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total GrowthFactors 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Salary&Fringes Contracts $Ͳ BusOperations: EstimatedHours CostperHour EstimatedOperatingCost BusLeases Park&RideLease OtherͲBus(Describe) OtherͲBus(Describe)(Subsidizedservice $66,960.00 $66,960.00 Subtotal:BusOperations $Ͳ $66,960.00 $66,960.00 Other(Describe) Other(Describe) Other(Describe) TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $Ͳ $66,960.00 $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $66,960.00 F.4 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. ThefirstyearoftheTransportationAlternativesprojectwillusethe$66,960allocatedtotheNorthernDurhamVanpoolProjecttoprovidevanpoolsubsidies (approximately$930permonthpervan),offercarpoolincentivesthroughSTRNC.org,obtainmarketingandcommunicationsservices,conductoutreachtoemployers, andmore. Thesecondyearandbeyondwillkeepthevanpoolsubsidiesinplace,andwillincludeadditionalfundsthatwillbededicatedtotheadministration,marketing,and incentivesforexistingTransportationDemandManagementservicesandnewpilotprogramsthatwillreducedrivealonebehavior. Page 63 of 123

UniqueProjectID# TriangleTaxDistrict FYSTARTDATE 7/1/2019 20DCI_TS10 DurhamTransitWorkPlan FY2020 Unique Request ID: 20 [FY Project Start year] ProjectRequestForm 6/30/2018 [Three letter Agency] DCI TransitServices [Project Type] TS [Unique Number] 010 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost FoodaccessforSeniorsͲPilotRoute CityofDurham PierreOseiͲOwusu CurrentYear$ 18,870 EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost March2,2020 June30,2021 CurrentYear $Ͳ ProjectDescription EnterbelowasummaryoftheprojectthatmaylaterbeusedfortheFY2020DurhamͲOrangeTransitWorkPlan.

Thousands ofseniorsinDurhamareatriskoffoodinsecurity.EndHungerDurhamhavesurveyedseverallowincomeseniorhousingcomplexesandreportedthatupto 44percentoftheresidentsskipmealsforlackofadequatetransportationtogettoagrocerystoreoffoodpantry.Thispilotwouldprovide approximately4hoursof fareͲfreeserviceconnectingselectedseniorhousingcomplexes(MorningGlory,HosieryMill,OldhamTowers,J.J.HendersonandForestHillHeights)togrocerystores andfoodpantries.ThisrequestisforfourmonthsoffundinginFY20,withtheintenttoaskforawholeyearof fundinginFY21.Finaldetailsofthepilotarestillbeing developed,includingtheexactstartdate,evaluationcriteria,etc.

ProjectProfile P.1 Whereisthisprojectlocated,whowillthisprojectserveandwhatarethekeybenefits?(Ex.ImproveTransitefficiency,levelsofservice,etc.) ProjectLocation? WhowillthisProjectserve? Whatarethekeybenefits? SeniorslivingatMorningGlory,HosieryMill, Durham,differentlocations OldhamTowers,J.J.HendersonandForestHill Fightinghungerthroughconnectivity Heightshousingcomplexes ProjectMonitoringDetails OperatingProjects OP.2 Forbusoperatingprojects,pleaseprovide: a)TargetStartDate MarͲ20

b)Span Weekdays:~9:30AMͲ1:30PM

c)Frequency Every60minutes

d)AssetsUsed ACCESSvans

e)GeographicTermini Within2.5mradiousaroundDowntown

f)MajorMarketDestinationsServed SeniorhousingcomplexesSWandEofDowntown,grocerystoresandfoodpantries

g)RevenueHours Weekday(average):~4hr/day FinanceEstimates Revenue TaxRevenue FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total DurhamͲOrangeCountyTaxRevenue 18,870  Ͳ 18,870 OtherRevenue Federal Ͳ State Ͳ Farebox/State Ͳ SubtotalOther Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE 18,870  Ͳ 18,870 F.2 TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest OPERATINGCOSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total GrowthFactors 2.50% Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Contracts $Ͳ $Ͳ BusOperations: EstimatedHours 340.00 CostperHour $55.50 EstimatedOperatingCost $18,870.00 $18,870.00 BusLeases Park&RideLease OtherͲBus(Describe) OtherͲBus(Describe) Subtotal:BusOperations $18,870.00 $18,870.00 Other(Describe) $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $18,870.00 $ Ͳ $18,870.00 F.4 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. Serviceisprojectedtooperateon87weekdaysinFY2020.ForFY21theassumptionistooperateaboutthreetimesasmuch. Page 64 of 123

Durham Chapel-Hill Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Member Organizations: Town of Carrboro, Town of Chapel Hill, Chatham County, City of Durham, Durham County, Town of Hillsborough, NC Department of Transportation, Orange County, GoTriangle

January 29, 2020

To: Durham-Orange Staff Working Group From: Aaron Cain, Staff Working Group Administrator, DCHC MPO Re: Reassignment of Planning for New Transit Plan in Orange County

Background

Project 20MPO_AD2, Planning for New Transit Plan, is a project that was approved in the FY20 Work Plan to develop a new transit plan for Orange County. At the time the FY20 Work Plan was developed, it was anticipated that the DCHC MPO staff would be the project sponsor for this project. Since then, it has been determined that Orange County will instead be the project sponsor. An email confirming this change was sent to GoTriangle finance staff on December 2, 2019. This item is before the Staff Working Group to memorialize the change in project sponsorship.

There is no change in funding for this project; it remains funded at $500,000 for FY20.

Action

That the Orange County Staff Working Group recommend approval of the change in project sponsorship for 20MPO_AD2, Planning for New Transit Plan, from DCHC MPO to Orange County.

City of Durham • Department of Transportation • 101 City Hall Plaza • Durham, NC 27701 • Phone (919) 560-4366 • Facsimile (919) 560-4561 Page 65 of 123

ϮϬϮϬϬϬϬϭ  'KdZ/E'> &/^>zZϮϬϮϬ dZ/E'>dy/^dZ/dʹhZ,DKWZd/E'&hE h'dKZ/EEDEDEd  /dKZ/EďLJƚŚĞZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚdƌŝĂŶŐůĞZĞŐŝŽŶĂůWƵďůŝĐdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJŽĂƌĚŽĨ dƌƵƐƚĞĞƐ͗  ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭ͘/ƚŝƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƌĞǀĞŶƵĞƐǁŝůůďĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŝŶƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ƵƌŚĂŵKƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ:ƵůLJϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶĚĞŶĚŝŶŐ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ϮϬϮϬ͗   KƌŝŐŝŶĂů ŵĞŶĚĞĚ ƌƚŝĐůĞϰϯЪĞŶƚ^ĂůĞƐdĂdž Ψϯϭ͕ϳϭϬ͕Ϯϭϵ Ψϯϭ͕ϳϭϬ͕Ϯϭϵ sĞŚŝĐůĞZĞŶƚĂůdĂdž ϭ͕ϯϵϯ͕Ϭϵϭ ϭ͕ϯϵϯ͕Ϭϵϭ ΨϳŽƵŶƚLJsĞŚŝĐůĞZĞŐŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶdĂdž ϭ͕ϳϮϳ͕ϭϮϰ ϭ͕ϳϮϳ͕ϭϮϰ ΨϯsĞŚŝĐůĞZĞŐŝƐƚƌdƌĂŶƐĨĞƌĨƌŽŵƵƌͬKƌĂŶŐĞ ^ƉĞĐŝĂůdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ϳϰϬ͕ϭϱϲ ϳϰϬ͕ϭϱϲ dŽƚĂů Ψϯϱ͕ϱϳϬ͕ϱϵϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϱϳϬ͕ϱϵϬ   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĂŵŽƵŶƚƐŚĞƌĞďLJĂƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƵƌŚĂŵ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ:ƵůLJϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶĚĞŶĚŝŶŐ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ϮϬϮϬ͗   KƌŝŐŝŶĂů ŵĞŶĚĞĚ dƌĂŶƐŝƚĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ Ψϭ͕ϵϯϱ͕ϬϬϲ Ψϭ͕ϵϬϮ͕ϱϰϳ ,DWK ϴϬϱ͕ϯϲϰ ϱϱ͕ϯϲϰ ƵƌŚĂŵŽƵŶƚLJ Ϭ ϭϵϲ͕ϬϬϬ ƵƐKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ ƵƌŚĂŵŽƵŶƚLJĐĐĞƐƐ ϭϴϳ͕ϯϮϵ ϭϴϳ͕ϯϮϵ 'ŽƵƌŚĂŵ Ϯ͕ϵϯϯ͕ϳϮϱ ϯ͕ϯϯϴ͕ϲϯϳ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ ϭ͕ϱϯϱ͕ϱϬϬ ϭ͕ϱϱϴ͕ϬϬϳ dƌĂŶƐĨĞƌƚŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͲƵƌŚĂŵ ĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚ ϱ͕ϵϰϲ͕ϲϵϴ ϳ͕ϵϯϵ͕ϯϮϮ ůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƵƌŚĂŵKƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚĂůĂŶĐĞ ϮϮ͕ϮϮϲ͕ϵϲϴ ϮϬ͕ϯϵϯ͕ϯϴϰ dŽƚĂů Ψϯϱ͕ϱϳϬ͕ϱϵϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϱϳϬ͕ϱϵϬ   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ ϯ͘'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞƐƚĂĨĨŝƐĚŝƌĞĐƚĞĚƚŽŵĞĞƚǁŝƚŚƐƚĂĨĨĨƌŽŵKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ ĂŶĚ ƵƌŚĂŵ ŽƵŶƚLJ͕ŝŶĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŚĂƉĞů,ŝůůĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨƵƌŚĂŵ͕ ƚŽ͗ Page 66 of 123

x ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂŶLJƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽĚŝƌĞĐƚĂŶĚŝŶĚŝƌĞĐƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌƵƌŚĂŵĂŶĚKƌĂŶŐĞ ĐŽƵŶƚŝĞƐ͖ x ŝƐĐƵƐƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŝŽŶŽĨƐŵĂůůĐĂƉŝƚĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŽůŽĐĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƉŽŶƐŽƌƐ͖ x ŝƐĐƵƐƐĐŽƐƚĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ͖ĂŶĚ x WƌĞƐĞŶƚĂďƵĚŐĞƚĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƌĞĨůĞĐƚŝŶŐĂŶLJƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďLJƵƌŚĂŵĂŶĚ KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJƐƚĂĨĨƐďLJEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͘   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ ϰ͘  ŽƉŝĞƐ ŽĨ ƚŚŝƐ ƵĚŐĞƚ KƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ ƐŚĂůů ďĞ ĨƵƌŶŝƐŚĞĚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ůĞƌŬ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ŽĂƌĚ ŽĨ dƌƵƐƚĞĞƐĂŶĚƚŽƚŚĞƵĚŐĞƚKĨĨŝĐĞƌŽĨƚŚŝƐƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJƚŽďĞŬĞƉƚŽŶĨŝůĞĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƌĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞ ĚŝƐďƵƌƐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĨƵŶĚƐ͘   KWdd,/^Ϯϲd,zK&&ZhZzϮϬϮϬ͘   ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ  DŝĐŚĂĞůWĂƌŬĞƌ͕ŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐŚĂŝƌ dd^d͗  ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DŝĐŚĞůůĞ͘ĂǁƐŽŶ͕ůĞƌŬƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚ

&zϮϬdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚʹƵƌŚĂŵKƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚƵĚŐĞƚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ;KϮϬϮϬϬϬϬϭͿ Ϯ Page 67 of 123

ϮϬϮϬϬϬϬϮ  'KdZ/E'> &/^>zZϮϬϮϬ dZ/E'>dy/^dZ/dʹhZ,DW/d>&hE h'dKZ/EEDEDEd  /dKZ/EďLJƚŚĞZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚdƌŝĂŶŐůĞZĞŐŝŽŶĂůWƵďůŝĐdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJŽĂƌĚŽĨ dƌƵƐƚĞĞƐ͗  ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭ͘/ƚŝƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƌĞǀĞŶƵĞƐǁŝůůďĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŝŶƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdž ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚʹƵƌŚĂŵĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ:ƵůLJϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶĚĞŶĚŝŶŐ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ ϮϬϮϬ͗   KƌŝŐŝŶĂů ŵĞŶĚĞĚ ůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĨƌŽŵƵƌŚĂŵĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚĂůĂŶĐĞ Ψϯ͕Ϯϭϳ͕ϳϵϭ Ψϯ͕Ϯϭϳ͕ϳϵϭ dƌĂŶƐĨĞƌĨƌŽŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚʹ ƵƌŚĂŵͬKƌĂŶŐĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚ ϱ͕ϵϰϲ͕ϲϵϴ ϳ͕ϵϯϵ͕ϯϮϯ dŽƚĂů Ψϵ͕ϭϲϰ͕ϰϴϵ Ψϭϭ͕ϭϱϳ͕ϭϭϰ   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĂŵŽƵŶƚƐŚĞƌĞďLJĂƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚʹ ƵƌŚĂŵĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ:ƵůLJϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶĚĞŶĚŝŶŐ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ϮϬϮϬ͗   KƌŝŐŝŶĂů ŵĞŶĚĞĚ sĞŚŝĐůĞWƵƌĐŚĂƐĞ 'ŽƵƌŚĂŵ ΨϳϮ͕ϴϱϬ ΨϳϮ͕ϴϱϬ ƵƌŚĂŵŽƵŶƚLJĐĐĞƐƐ ϱϰϭ͕ϯϯϯ ϱϰϭ͕ϯϯϯ dƌĂŶƐŝƚ/ŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ Ϭ Ϭ ŝƚLJŽĨƵƌŚĂŵͬ'ŽƵƌŚĂŵ ϯ͕ϲϮϬ͕ϬϮϬ ϯ͕ϭϵϭ͕ϮϳϮ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ ϴϲϲ͕ϯϳϲ Ϯ͕ϲϯϮ͕ϯϳϲ ƵƌŚĂŵͲtĂŬĞŽŵŵƵƚĞƌZĂŝů ϴϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ ϳϭϱ͕ϯϳϯ ĂƉŝƚĂůʹKƚŚĞƌ Ϭ Ϭ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ ϵϬϲ͕ϰϯϴ ϵϬϲ͕ϰϯϴ ,DWK Ϭ ϳϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ ͲK>ZdtŝŶĚͲŽǁŶ Ϯ͕ϯϰϳ͕ϰϳϮ Ϯ͕ϯϰϳ͕ϰϳϮ dŽƚĂů Ψϵ͕ϭϲϰ͕ϰϴϵ Ψϭϭ͕ϭϱϳ͕ϭϭϰ   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ ϯ͘'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞƐƚĂĨĨŝƐĚŝƌĞĐƚĞĚƚŽŵĞĞƚǁŝƚŚƐƚĂĨĨĨƌŽŵKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ ĂŶĚ ƵƌŚĂŵ ŽƵŶƚLJ͕ŝŶĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŚĂƉĞů,ŝůůĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨƵƌŚĂŵ͕ ƚŽ͗ x ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂŶLJƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽĚŝƌĞĐƚĂŶĚŝŶĚŝƌĞĐƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌƵƌŚĂŵĂŶĚKƌĂŶŐĞ ĐŽƵŶƚŝĞƐ͖ Page 68 of 123

x ŝƐĐƵƐƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŝŽŶŽĨƐŵĂůůĐĂƉŝƚĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŽůŽĐĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƉŽŶƐŽƌƐ͖ x ŝƐĐƵƐƐĐŽƐƚĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ͖ĂŶĚ x WƌĞƐĞŶƚĂďƵĚŐĞƚĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƌĞĨůĞĐƚŝŶŐĂŶLJƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďLJƵƌŚĂŵĂŶĚ KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJƐƚĂĨĨƐďLJEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͘  ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϰ͘ŽƉŝĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐƵĚŐĞƚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐŚĂůůďĞĨƵƌŶŝƐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞůĞƌŬƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨ dƌƵƐƚĞĞƐĂŶĚƚŽƚŚĞƵĚŐĞƚKĨĨŝĐĞƌŽĨƚŚŝƐƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJƚŽďĞŬĞƉƚŽŶĨŝůĞĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƌĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞ ĚŝƐďƵƌƐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĨƵŶĚƐ͘   KWdd,/^Ϯϲd,zK&&ZhZzϮϬϮϬ͘    ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ  DŝĐŚĂĞůWĂƌŬĞƌ͕ŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐŚĂŝƌ  dd^d͗   ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DŝĐŚĞůůĞ͘ĂǁƐŽŶ͕ůĞƌŬƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚ   

&zϮϬdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚʹƵƌŚĂŵĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚƵĚŐĞƚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ;KϮϬϮϬϬϬϬϮͿ Ϯ Page 69 of 123

MEMORANDUM

TO: GoTriangle Operations & Finance Committee FROM: Finance & Administrative Services DATE: February 26, 2020 SUBJECT: Orange Transit FY 2020 Q3 Proposed Amendment

Strategic Objective or Initiative Supported This item supports initiative 1.2, “Pursue service improvements and expansion opportunities.”

Action Requested The Operations and Finance Committee are requested to recommend approval of the fiscal year 2020 budget amendment to the GoTriangle Board of Trustees at the February 26, 2020 meeting.

All amendments that were submitted in the third quarter and were recommended by Durham County Staff Working Group on January 29, 2020

Background and Purpose Orange Operating Ordinance Amendments listed below have been submitted for approval: 1. Update on Increased Cost of Existing Services (ICES) based on FY19 actuals

Orange Capital Ordinance Amendments listed below have been submitted for approval: 2. GoTriangle i. Mobile Ticket Validators – Orange Share

3. Orange County / Orange County Public Transit ii. Re-assignment of Transit Plan Development

As a part of the packet presented with this memorandum, the committee will find: x Proposed FY 2020 Amendment List x Detailed Individual Project Amendment Request

Financial Impact The proposed amendments, if recommended by this committee and approved by the Board of Trustees, will reduce the FY20 Orange Transit Work Plan by $2,380 due to the operating ordinance reduction of $76,380 and capital ordinance increase of $74,000 compared to the FY20 Adopted Amended Budget.

Page 70 of 123

Staff Contact(s) x Jennifer Hayden, Assistant Director Finance and Administrative Services, [email protected], (919) 485-7418 x Saundra Freeman, CFO/Director of Finance and Administrative Services, [email protected], (919) 485-7415

Page 71 of 123

FY20 - Orange Transit Workplan - Operating Transit Tax District Transit Tax District FY2020 Workplan Programmed Budget - Amended Programmed Budget - Amended Transit Service Provider Project ID Services Amendments Comments (Q1) (Q2) [01/29/20]

Chapel Hill Transit 19CHT_TS1 Service Expansion FY19 350,300 350,300 Chapel Hill Transit 19CHT_TS3 Existing Service Expansion FY13-FY18 1,001,191 1,001,191

Chapel Hill Transit 19CHT_TS2 Increasing Cost of Existing Services 632,416 (43,755) 588,661 ICES calculation based on FY19 actuals (∆-$43,755)

Orange Public Transit 19OPT_TS1 Continuation of Transit Services 275,061 275,061 Orange Public Transit 20OPT_TS2 Alamance Health Connector 120,640 120,640 Orange Public Transit 20OPT_TS3 Cedar Grove-Durham Express 60,320 60,320 Orange Public Transit 20OPT_TS4 Hillsborough Circular Expansion 30,160 30,160 Orange Public Transit 20OPT_TS5 Hillsborough Circular II 94,656 94,656 Orange Public Transit 20OPT_TS6 Mobility on Demand 36,192 36,192

Orange Public Transit 19OPT_TS2 Increasing Cost of Existing Services 125,989 (32,625) 93,364 ICES calculation based on FY19 actuals (∆-$32,625)

GoTriangle 18GOT_TS2 Route 800 Improvements 375,985 375,985 GoTriangle 18GOT_TS3 Route 400 Improvements 310,653 310,653 GoTriangle 18GOT_TS5 Route ODX - Orange-Durham Express 139,777 139,777 GoTriangle 18GOT_TS6 Route CRX Improvements 49,302 49,302 GoTriangle 19GOT_TS8 Paratransit costs associated with span increases 17,890 17,890 GoTriangle 18GOT_TS9 Route 405 Improvements** 24,426 24,426

TS Total Transit Services 3,644,957 (76,380) 3,568,577

- - Other Operating Total Other Operating

DCHC MPO 19MPO_AD1 .5 FTE for SWG Admin 55,364 55,364

GoTriangle 19GOT_AD1 .25 FTE for Tax District Admin 22,350 22,350

GoTriangle 20GOT_AD1 .5 FTE for Sr. Financial Analyst 62,950 62,950

GoTriangle 20GOT_AD2 Support Services 617,752 617,752

GoTriangle 20GOT_AD3 Support - Consultant 111,250 111,250

Admin Total Admin 869,666 - 869,666

Operating Summary TS Total Transit Services 3,644,957 (76,380) 3,568,577 Other Operating Total Other Operating - - - Admin Total Admin 869,666 - 869,666

Capital Summary Vehicles Total Vehicle Purchases 1,772,849 - 1,772,849 Capital Improvements Total Capital Improvements 7,453,221 74,000 7,527,221

Total Orange County Approved Work Plan 13,740,694 (2,380) 13,738,314 Page 72 of 123

FY20 - Orange Transit Workplan - Capital Transit Tax District Transit Tax District Programmed Budget - FY2020 Workplan Programmed Budget - Sponsor Project ID Project Comments Amended (Q1) Amendments [01/29/20] Amended (Q2)

Chapel Hill Transit 19CHT_VP1 CHT-Vehicle Purchases 1,541,192 1,541,192

Chapel Hill Transit 20CHT_VP2 ICES towards VP 152,000 152,000

Orange Public Transit 19OPT_VP1 OPT-VP 35,731 35,731

Orange Public Transit 20OPT_VP2 OPT-VP 43,926 43,926

Vehicles Total Vehicle Purchases 1,772,849 - 1,772,849

Carrboro 18TOC_CD1 Estes Drive Bike-Ped Improvements 47,373 47,373

Carrboro 18TOC_CD2 Estes Drive Transit Access/Corridor Study 106,296 106,296

Carrboro 18TOC_CD3 Bus Stop improvements (Rogers Road) 120,889 120,889

Carrboro 18TOC_CD4 Morgan Creek Greenway 199,837 199,837

Carrboro 19TOC_CD1 South Greensboro St. Sidewalk 552,340 552,340

Chapel Hill Transit 20CHT_CD1 Lighting in bus shelters 53,148 53,148

Chapel Hill Transit 19CHT_CD2 ADA Bus Stop Upgrades 448,815 448,815

Chapel Hill Transit 20CHT_CD2 Bus Stop Sign Design and Replacement 84,741 84,741

Chapel Hill Transit 19CHT_CD1 CHT-NSBRT 1,513,215 1,513,215

Chapel Hill Transit 20CHT_CD3 CHT-NSBRT - NEW Request 1,000,000 1,000,000

GoTriangle 18GOT_CD8 Hillsborough Park-and-Ride - 3 145,723 145,723

GoTriangle 18GOT_CD10 GoT Bus Stop Improvement in Carrboro 26,574 26,574

GoTriangle 18GOT_CD11 Mebane Bus Stop Improvement 10,630 10,630

GoTriangle 18GOT_CD12 GoT Bus Stop Improvements in Orange 331,100 331,100

GoTriangle 20GOT_CD1 Commuter Rail Feasibility Study 75,000 75,000

GoTriangle 19GOT_CO1 ERP - Phase 1 / Phase 2 / Phase 3 implementation 239,152 239,152

GoTriangle 20GOT_CD2 DO LRT Wind Down Costs 518,460 518,460

GoTriangle 19GOT_CD1 RTC Feasibility Study 62,500 62,500

GoTriangle 20GOT_CD3 Mobile Ticket Validators - Orange share (includes Route 420) 74,000 74,000 New-Request Orange county share

Town of Hillsborough 18TOH_CD1 Hillsborough Train Station 401,000 401,000

Town of Hillsborough 20TOH_CD1 Hillsborough Train Station Bus Stop Improvements 33,897 33,897

Orange Public Transit 20OPT_CD1 OPT 15 OPT Bus Stop Signs 1,594 1,594

Orange Public Transit 19OPT_CD1 OPT Bus stop improvement (5 OPT stops) 137,864 137,864 Orange Public Transit 19OPT_AD1 OPT - AVL 43,073 43,073

Orange Public Transit 20OPT_CD2 Hillsborough Park-and-Ride - 3 (Orange County -Construction) 800,000 800,000

DCHC MPO 20MPO_AD2 Planning for new Transit Plan 500,000 (500,000) - Re-allocation of sponsor to OC

Orange County 20OPT_AD2 Planning for new Transit Plan 500,000 500,000

Capital Improvements Total Capital Improvements 7,453,221 74,000 7,527,221

Capital Summary

Vehicles Total Vehicle Purchases 1,772,849 - 1,772,849

Capital Improvements Total Capital Improvements 7,453,221 74,000 7,527,221

Operating Summary

TS Total Transit Services 3,644,957 (76,380) 3,568,577

Other Operating Total Other Operating - - -

Admin Total Admin 869,666 - 869,666

Total Orange County Approved Work Plan 13,740,694 (2,380) 13,738,314 Page 73 of 123

January 29, 2020

To: Durham - SWG From: GoTriangle Subject: FY20 Workplan Amendments

1. Background

This memo covers proposed FY20 Workplan amendments with a brief introduction and financial impact of each.

1.1 GoTriangle

i. Amendment for GoTriangle Route DRX

20GOT_TS7 - GoTriangle Transit Services combined the project ID’s and descriptions to ensure Bus operations were able to calculate the reimbursements by route (adopting a similar approach to Wake). Specific tasks include: x Creation of a Bridge Document A “bridge” document was prepared to calculate between what was submitted in the approved FY20 Workplan requests to revised project ID’s. This was done to ensure there was a record of bridge between the old project ID’s and the new project ID’s, which are by route. x Refinements to the cost estimates During the re-calculations, Transit planning refined estimates on specific routes that resulted in relevant corrections. Part of the costs associated with the route were equally split between Durham and Wake, but the remainder share for Durham County was divided in half one more time by mistake. The cost per hour of service was also corrected from $125/h to $127/h.

Durham From To Impact 18GOT_TS7 Route DRX Improvements $61,306 19GOT_TS2 Durham-Raleigh Express, Additional Frequency $66,674 19GOT_TS3 Additional Holiday Service (DRX component) $242 20GOT_TS7 Route DRX Improvements (New combined project ID) $181,117 TOTAL $128,222 $181,117 $52,895

Durham County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $52,895

PO Box 13787, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Page 1 of 5 Phone: 919-485-7415 | Fax: 919-485-7491

Page 74 of 123

Action That the Durham County Staff Working Group recommend approval of request for funding 20GOT_TS7.

ii. Bus Performance Data Processing and Visualization Tool

20GOT_AD4 - GoTriangle and GoTriangle on behalf of GoDurham proposes to purchase and implement a bus service performance date processing and visualization tool that will enable staff to efficiently and effectively understand the bus performance data listed below that will aid ongoing transit plan funded studies, work plan requests, and the transit plan update itself. This tool would enable the following types of analysis: x Bus speeds by route segment in addition to dwell times, allowing identification and prioritization of capital projects to improve bus speed and reliability x Bus run times by route segment and timepoint, enabling Service Planners and schedulers to more precisely schedule buses to adapt to travel conditions throughout different service windows throughout the day x Bus on-time performance by route and trip, enabling deeper transparency into GoTriangle and GoDurham's operating performance for staff and the public

All three analysis tools would be useful for both internal staff functions in addition to public-facing engagement. All three types of analysis tools would also be useful in evaluating the operating time and cost benefits of future potential major transit projects such as Bus Rapid Transit, Access improvements to Durham Station, and the Regional Transit Center Study. All three analysis tools would also be useful in producing and visualizing data for the Durham Transit Plan update. This type of tool allows unlimited seats, allowing access to transit provider, municipality, county, metropolitan planning organization, and other partner agency staff.

Durham County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $75,000

Action That the Durham County Staff Working Group recommend approval of request for funding 20GOT_AD4.

PO Box 13787, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Page 2 of 5 Phone: 919-485-7415 | Fax: 919-485-7491

Page 75 of 123

iii. Mobile Ticketing Validators - Durham 20GOT_CD3 – Installation of mobile ticketing validators on GoTriangle buses split by counties based on the fleet operated in each county. Installation of mobile ticketing validators on 20 GoTriangle buses which is the Durham share of GoTriangle regional operating routes. The new request aligns with Transit Plan priorities of capital projects to improve the transit passengers' experience.

Durham County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $62,000

Action That the Durham County Staff Working Group recommend approval of request for funding 20GOT_CD2.

iv. Mobile Ticketing Validators - Orange 20GOT_CD2 – Installation of mobile ticketing validators on GoTriangle buses split by counties based on the fleet operated in each county. Installation of mobile ticketing validators on 16 GoTriangle buses which is the Orange share of GoTriangle regional operating routes and includes 6 buses routes 420 operated by Chapel Hill Transit on behalf of GoTriangle. The new request aligns with Transit Plan priorities of capital projects to improve the transit passengers' experience.

Orange County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $74,000

v. Amendment for GoDurham better bus stop budget

20GOT_CD2 - In the FY20 Durham Transit Tax Annual Work Plan, $500,000 is programmed for design of 50 bus stop improvements for GoDurham. Progress on this work was at a pace that construction can be scheduled to begin on 10 stops in FY20 rather than FY21 as previously planned. In addition, GoTriangle recommends proceeding with procurement of amenities for all 50 stops up front, to access better prices and ensure amenities are in stock for installation as construction on each stop is completed. Therefore, GoTriangle, on behalf of GoDurham, is requesting an additional $1,029,000 of funding from the Durham Transit Tax Fund to be pulled forward from the future funding pipeline into FY20.

The amended request is considered a material change to the plan per the existing Interlocal Agreement (ILA) because the request is for more than $500,000 towards bus service. Therefore, the request must be approved by the governing boards of three

PO Box 13787, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Page 3 of 5 Phone: 919-485-7415 | Fax: 919-485-7491

Page 76 of 123

parties to the ILA: GoTriangle, DCHC MPO, and the Durham Board of County Commissioners.

Action That the Durham County Staff Working Group recommend that the GoTriangle Board of Trustees, the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO Board, and the Durham County Board of Commissioners approve amending the FY20 Durham Transit Tax Annual Work Plan to add $1,029,000 for construction of bus stop improvements for GoDurham.

Durham County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $1,029,000

vi. Amendment for Commuter Rail Early Project Development Activities

18GOT_C02 - The Durham to Garner Commuter Rail project is presently funded at $850,000 from FY18-20. Work funded to date includes the Commuter Rail Major Investment Study, completed in May 2019 and the ongoing Alternatives Analysis update, which is refreshing planning-level infrastructure assumptions, cost estimates, and ridership projections for alternatives between Durham and Garner and evaluating those same elements for alternatives between Mebane and Selma. Preliminary results from this study, due to be finalized later this spring, identify the need to evaluate key project risks through additional study, public engagement, and coordination prior to a decision on whether to proceed with project implementation and design. This additional study effort, referred to as "early project development activities" has an estimated cost $9,000,000, of which $3,000,000 or 33% would be Durham County's expected share. $465,000 is available from the original FY20 budgeted amount of $715,373; the amended FY20 Budget request is $3,417,373; an increase of $2,702,000.

As a part of this Transit Plan Amendment, elected officials have a decision on whether or not to proceed with these "early project development activities" to evaluate and address key project risks and prepare the project for design and implementation activities. Upon completion of "early project development activities, including reaching preliminary agreements with funding partners, railroads, and municipalities, elected officials would have a future decision of whether or not to proceed with project design and implementation, including requesting entry into the Federal New Starts process, the first step in applying for federal funding. Related to the this current Transit Plan Amendment is a separate decision by elected officials to authorize a Memorandum of Understanding to govern the project management partner's roles and responsibilities during "early project development activities."

PO Box 13787, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Page 4 of 5 Phone: 919-485-7415 | Fax: 919-485-7491

Page 77 of 123

GoTriangle is the presumptive Project Sponsor in DCHC MPO and will use the funds to pursue additional study to resolve key items prior to elected officials being presented with a decision on whether to proceed with project and design and implementation and whether to request entry into the Federal Transit Administration's New Starts process within the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program. Activities may include but are not limited to the following: land survey; utility investigation; preliminary engineering and environmental study for key risk areas; assessment of land availability for park-and-rides; identification of site options for maintenance facility; railroad coordination; community engagement planning and initiating community engagement; stakeholder engagement planning and advancing stakeholder engagement activities; additional assessment of project feasibility for CIG; development of a project management plan; and preparation to engage project development consultants. These activities are necessary to evaluate key project risks

The amended request is considered a material change to the plan per the existing Interlocal Agreement (ILA) because the request is for more than $500,000 towards planning and feasibility studies; and because this requests require authorization of an additional $2,702,000 in FY20, above and beyond what is included in the current Durham County Transit Plan. Therefore, the request must be approved by the governing boards of three parties to the ILA: GoTriangle, DCHC MPO, and the Durham Board of County Commissioners.

Action That the Durham County Staff Working Group recommend that the GoTriangle Board of Trustees, the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO Board, and the Durham County Board of Commissioners approve amending the FY20 Durham Transit Tax Annual Work Plan to add $2,702,000 for early project development activities to evaluate and address key project risks for the Greater Triangle Commuter Rail project to prepare elected officials for a future decision on whether to proceed with project design and implementation in addition to a future decision on whether to request entry of the project into the federal New Starts process.

Durham County FY20 Workplan budget impact = $$2,702,000

PO Box 13787, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Page 5 of 5 Phone: 919-485-7415 | Fax: 919-485-7491

Page 78 of 123

UniqueProjectID# TriangleTaxDistrict FYSTARTDATE 7/1/2019 20GOT_TS7 DurhamTransitWorkPlan FY2020 Unique Request ID: 18 [FY Project Start year] ProjectRequestForm 6/30/2018 [Three letter Agency] GOT TransitServices [Project Type] TS [Unique Number] 007 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost RouteDRXImprovements GoTriangle AndreaNeri $181,117 CurrentYear EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost Alreadyimplemented N/A CurrentYear $Ͳ ProjectDescription EnterbelowasummaryoftheprojectthatmaylaterbeusedfortheFY2020DurhamͲOrangeTransitWorkPlan.

RouteDRXprovidesexpressbusservicebetweenDurhamandRaleigh.Thisprojectsheetcombinespreviouslyimplementedprojectsintoasinglesheetandcorrects acostcalculationmistakeintheFY20workplan.

ProjectProfile P.1 Whereisthisprojectlocated,whowillthisprojectserveandwhatarethekeybenefits?(Ex.ImproveTransitefficiency,levelsofservice,etc.) ProjectLocation? WhowillthisProjectserve? Whatarethekeybenefits?

NCͲ147andI Ͳ40betweenDuke&VA PeopletravelingbetweenDurhamandRaleighat Moreoptionsfortriptimes,andlesscrowding MedicalCentersanddowntownRaleigh peaktimes ProjectMonitoringDetails OperatingProjects OP.2 Forbusoperatingprojects,pleaseprovide: a)TargetStartDate Alreadyimplemented

b)Span Weekday:5:50AMͲ9:50d AMan 3:10PMͲ8:10PM

c)Frequency Every20minutes

d)AssetsUsed GoTrianglevehicles

e)GeographicTermini Duke&VAMedicalCentersͲGoRaleighStation

f)MajorMarketDestinationsServed DowntownDurham,NCStateUniversity,DowntownRaleigh

g)RevenueHours Weekday:42.67(project:23.87untilAugustservicechanges2019,27.47after) FinanceEstimates Revenue TaxRevenue FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total DurhamͲOrangeCountyTaxRevenue 181,117 185,838 253,978 260,328 266,836 1,148,096 OtherRevenue Federal Ͳ State 24,149 24,778 48,927 Farebox/State 36,223 37,168 73,391 SubtotalOther 60,372 61,946 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 122,318 TOTALREVENUE 301,862 247,783 253,978 260,328 266,836 1,270,414 F.2 TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest OPERATINGCOSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total GrowthFactors 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Contracts $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ BusOperations: Estimated Hours 1,901.49 1,901.49 1,901.49 1,901.49 1,901.49 CostperHour $127.00 $130.31 $133.57 $136.91 $140.33 EstimatedOperatingCost $241,489.55 $247,783.49 $253,978.07 $260,327.53 $266,835.71 $1,270,414.35 BusLeases $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Park&RideLease $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ OtherͲBus(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ OtherͲBus(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Subtotal:BusOperations $241,489.55 $247,783.49 $253,978.07 $260,327.53 $266,835.71 $1,270,414.35 Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $241,489.55 $247,783.49 $253,978.07 $260,327.53 $266,835.71 $1,270,414.35 F.4 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. Serviceisprojectedtooperateon250weekdaysinFY2019,andon253weekdaysinFY2020. Page 79 of 123

UniqueProjectID# TriangleTaxDistrict FYSTARTDATE 7/1/2019 20GOT_AD4 DurhamTransitWorkPlan FY2020 Unique Request ID: 20 [FY Project Start year] ProjectRequestForm 6/30/2018 [Three letter Agency] GOT AdministrativeSupportͲSoftware [Project Type] AD [Unique Number] 004 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost PerformanceDataProcessingand GoTriangle JayHeikes CurrentYear$ 75,000 VisualizationTool EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost March1,2020 June30,2021 CurrentYear $Ͳ ProjectDescription EnterbelowasummaryoftheprojectthatmaylaterbeusedfortheFY2020DurhamͲOrangeTransitWorkPlan.

GoTriangleandGoTrianlgeonbehalfofGoDurhamproposestopurchaseandimplementabusserviceperformancedateprocessingandvisualizationtoolthatwillenable stafftoefficientlyandeffectivelyunderstandthebusperformancedatalistedbelowthatwillaidongoingtransitplanfundedstudies,workplanrequests,andthe transit planupdateitself.Thistoolwouldenablethefollowingtypesofanalysis: ͲBusspeedsbyroutesegmentinadditiontodwelltimes,allowingidentificationandprioritizationofcapitalprojectstoimprovebusspeedandreliability ͲBusruntimesbyroutesegmentandtimepoint,enablingServicePlannersandschedulersto morepreciselyschedulebusestoadapttotravelconditionsthroughout differentservicewindowsthroughouttheday ͲBusonͲtimeperformancebyrouteandtrip,enablingdeepertransparencyintoGoTriangleandGoDurham'soperatingperformanceforstaffandthepublic Allthreeanalysistoolswouldbeusefulforbothinternalstafffunctionsin additiontopublicͲfacingengagement.Allthreetypesofanalysistoolswouldalsobeusefulin evaluatingtheoperatingtimeandcostbenefitsoffuturepotentialmajortransitprojectssuchasBusRapidTransit,AccessimprovementstoDurhamStation,andthe RegionalTransitCenterStudy.Allthreeanalysistoolswould alsobeusefulinproducingandvisualizingdatafortheDurhamTransitPlanupdate.

ProjectProfile P.1 Whereisthisprojectlocated,whowillthisprojectserveandwhatarethekeybenefits?(Ex.ImproveTransitefficiency,levelsofservice,etc.) ProjectLocation? WhowillthisProjectserve? Whatarethekeybenefits?

Enablegreaterprecisionindevelopingbusschedules,enabledataͲdriven NA currentandfuturetransitriders decisionsoncapitalinfrastructureprojects,allowgreatertransparency intotransitserviceprovideroperationsperformancedata. ProjectMonitoringDetails OperatingProjects OP.2 Forbusoperatingprojects,pleaseprovide: a) TargetStartDate

b)Span

c)Frequency

d)AssetsUsed

e)GeographicTermini

f)MajorMarketDestinationsServed

g)RevenueHours FinanceEstimates Revenue TaxRevenue FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total DurhamͲOrangeCountyTaxRevenue 75,000 75,000 OtherRevenue Federal Ͳ State Ͳ Farebox/State Ͳ SubtotalOther Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE 75,000  Ͳ 75,000 F.2 TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest OPERATINGCOSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total GrowthFactors 2.50% Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Contracts $Ͳ $Ͳ Bus Operations: EstimatedHours CostperHour EstimatedOperatingCost $Ͳ $ Ͳ $Ͳ BusLeases $Ͳ Park&RideLease $Ͳ OtherͲBus(Describe) $Ͳ OtherͲBus(Describe) $Ͳ Subtotal:BusOperations $Ͳ $ Ͳ $Ͳ Other(SoftwareImplementationand1year $75,000.00 $ Ͳ $75,000.00 Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $75,000.00 $ Ͳ $75,000.00 F.4 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. EstimatedcostforGoDurhamandGoTrianglebuses,basedoncurrentfleetsize.Costestimateincludessoftwareimplementation,configuration,dan 1yearlicense.This typeoftoolallowsunlimitedseats,allowingaccesstotransitprovider,municipality,county,metropolitanplanningorganization,andotherpartneragencystaff. Page 80 of 123 FY2020DurhamTransitWorkPlan CAPͲGoTriangleSouthpoint

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20GOT_CD3 Capital FY2020 ProjectBusinessCase ProvideresponsestoEACH ofthequestionsbelow.Answerthequestionsasfullyaspossible.EnterNonͲApplicable(N/A)asappropriate.

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedCapitalCost MobileTicketing GoTriangle EricBergstraesser FY20$ 62,000 EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes November1,2019 June28,2020  ProjectDescription  Installationofmobileticketingvalidatorson20GoTrianglebuseswhichistheDurhamshareofGoTriangleregionaloperatingroutes.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries MapofArea (TransitPlan) Section *ASetofcapitalprojectsto RegionalͲDurhamShare Durham,OrangeandWakeCounty improvethetransitpassengers' 1.2 experience. ProjectInfo Whichfundisthisprojectbeingproposedfor? DurhamCountyͲCapital

WasthisprojectevaluatedintheAdoptedDurhamorOrangeTransitPlans? No.TheprojectwassubmittedtotheGoTriangleafteradoptionoftheDurhamTransitPlan. Whatisyourplaniftherequestisnotfunded? Iftheplanisnotfunded,GoTrianglewillnotmoveforwardwithimplementingmobileticketinginFY20,andwillbeunabletointegratewithGoTriangle, GoRaleigh,GoCary,andChapelHillTransitmobileticketing.TheprojectwillbesubmittedasahighpriorityprojectinFY2021. ListbelowtheKeyPerformanceIndicators(deliverables)whilethisprojectisinprogress.Theseperformancemeasures willbereportedquarterly. ADͲContractStart ADͲSpecify

ProjectMonitoringDetails

CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative Improvecustomer OnͲtimeperformanceimprovementson Numberofpassespurchasedvia satisfactionbyproviding routeswithcurrentlyhighinstancesofonͲ FareboxRecoveryRate Qualitative mobileticketingapp moreconvenientwaysto boardpasspurchases. purchase/use fare media.

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.

FinanceEstimates EstimatedProjectRevenues: Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $Ͳ $62,000 $62,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 62,000 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ State $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ OtherͲ $Ͳ $193,000 $193,000 $Ͳ 193,000 SubtotalOther $Ͳ $193,000 $193,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 193,000 TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $255,000 $255,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 255,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2020 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $255,000 Expenses FY18andPriorYearReimbursements $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted $Ͳ Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $255,000 ProjectRequest $255,000 Balance $Ͳ  CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Design&Engineering $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ ConstructionͲImplementation $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Equipment $Ͳ $255,000 $255,000 Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $255,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $255,000 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculateeth capitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. Thecapitaldollarsshownabovewerecalculatedbyusingtheexacthardwarecostsarebasedonregionaltechnologyprocurementselectedvendor recommendedtotheGoTriangleBoardofTrusteesonOctober23,2019.DurhamrequestisproportionateshareoffleetthatoperatesinDurhamand constitutes24%oftotalestimatedcost.

  Page 81 of 123 FY2020DurhamTransitWorkPlan CAPͲGoTriangleSouthpoint

ProjectID# OrangeTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20GOT_CD2 Capital FY2020

ProjectBusinessCase ProvideresponsestoEACH ofthequestionsbelow.Answerthequestionsasfullyaspossible.EnterNonͲApplicable(N/A)asappropriate.

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedCapitalCost MobileTicketing GoTriangle EricBergstraesser FY20$ 74,000 EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes November1,2019 June28,2020  ProjectDescription  Installationofmobileticketingvalidatorson20GoTrianglebuseswhichistheOrangeshareofGoTriangle regionaloperatingroutesandincludesroute420 operatedbyChapelHillTransitonbehalfofGoTriangle.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries MapofArea (TransitPlan) Section *ASetofcapitalprojectsto RegionalͲOrangeShare Durham,OrangeandWakeCounty improvethetransitpassengers' 1.2 experience. ProjectInfo Whichfundisthisprojectbeingproposedfor? OrangeCountyͲCapital

WasthisprojectevaluatedintheAdoptedDurhamorOrangeTransitPlans?

Iftheplanisnotfunded,GoTrianglewillnotmoveforwardwithimplementingmobileticketinginFY20,andwillbeunabletointegratewithGoTriangle, GoRaleigh,GoCary,andChapelHillTransitmobileticketing.TheprojectwillbesubmittedasahighpriorityprojectinFY2021.

Whatisyourplaniftherequestisnotfunded?

n/a

ListbelowtheKeyPerformanceIndicators(deliverables)whilethisprojectisinprogress.Theseperformancemeasureswillbereportedquarterly. ADͲContractStart ADͲSpecify

ProjectMonitoringDetails

CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3 Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative Improvecustomer OnͲtimeperformanceimprovementson Numberofpassespurchasedvia satisfactionbyproviding routeswithcurrentlyhighinstancesofonͲ FareboxRecoveryRate Qualitative mobileticketingapp moreconvenientwaysto boardpasspurchases. purchase/use fare media.

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.

FinanceEstimates EstimatedProjectRevenues: Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total OrangeCountyTaxRevenue $Ͳ $74,000 $74,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 74,000 Other Revenue Federal $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ State $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ OtherͲ $Ͳ $181,000 $181,000 $Ͳ 181,000 SubtotalOther $Ͳ $181,000 $181,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 181,000 TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $255,000 $255,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 255,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2020

Revenue OrangeCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $255,000 Expenses FY18andPriorYearReimbursements $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted $Ͳ Net DurhamCountyTax RevenueAvailable $255,000 ProjectRequest $255,000 Balance $Ͳ  CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Design&Engineering $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ ConstructionͲImplementation $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Equipment $Ͳ $255,000 $255,000 Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $255,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $255,000 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculateeth capitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove.

Thecapitaldollarsshownabovewerecalculatedbyusingtheexacthardwarecostsarebasedonregionaltechnologyprocurementselectedvendor recommendedtotheGoTriangleBoardofTrusteesonOctober23,2019.OrangerequestisproportionateshareofGoTrianglefleetthatoperatesinOrange andconstitutes19%oftotalestimatedcostandRoute420ChapellHillfleetoperatedonbehalfGoTrianglethatconstitutes10%oftotalcapitalcost.

  Page 82 of 123 FY2020DurhamTransitWorkPlan CAPͲBetterBusStopsinDurham,byGoTriangle

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20GOT_CD2 Capital FY2020 Unique Request 20 ID: TransitService 6/30/2018 ProjectBusinessCase

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost BusStopImprovements GoTriangleforGoDurham JayHeikes CurrentYear $Ͳ EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2018 ongoing  CurrentYear $1,528,800 ProjectDescription 

TheGoDurhambetterbusstopprogramatotalof$6.7MprogrammedfromFY18toFY22.Fundingforaninitialgroupofbusstopimprovementswasauthorizedin FY18(ProjectID18DCI_CD4),for$783,570withaCityofDurhammatchof$736,328;constructionofthatinitialgroupofstopsisunderwaydan isscheduledtobe completebytheendofFY20.

IntheFY20DurhamTransitTaxAnnualWorkPlan,$500,000wasprogrammedfordesignof50additionalbusstopimprovementsforGoDurham,withthe expectationthatconstructionfundingwouldbemadeavailableinfutureyears.Progressonthisworkhas proceededatapacethatconstructioncanbescheduled beginon10ofthestopsinFY20ratherthanFY21aspreviouslyplanned.Inaddition,GoTrianglerecommendsproceedingwithprocurementofamenitiesforall50 stopsupfront,toaccessbetterpricesandensureamenitiesareinstockforinstallation asconstructiononeachstopiscompleted.Therefore,GoTriangle,onbehalf ofGoDurham,isrequestinganadditional$1,029,000offundingfromtheDurhamTransitTaxFundtobepulledforwardfromthefuturefundingpipelineintoFY20.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries (TransitPlan) Section MapofArea

CityofDurham DurhamResidentsdan Visitors ImprovedBusStopAmenities 4.3.3

  ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

1.IncreasedRidership 2.ImprovedMobilityinArea 3.IncreasedPedestrianActivityQualitative ImprovedCustomerSatisfaction

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed. ProjectCostsmayincreaseduetoincreasingconstructioncosts.Projectcancompletedesign/engineeringwithrequestedfunds FinanceEstimates Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $783,569.50 $1,528,800.00 $2,312,370 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 2,312,370 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ Ͳ State Ͳ OtherͲCityofDurhamfunds $736,328 $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $736,328 $Ͳ $736,328 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 736,328 TOTALREVENUE $1,519,898 $1,528,800 $3,048,698 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 3,048,698  MultiͲYearCapitalͲRevenueFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $6,722,031 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted $783,570 Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $5,938,461 ProjectRequest $500,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $5,438,461

CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&Engineering $580,000 $500,000 $ Ͳ $1,080,000 ConstructionͲImplementation$366,000 $318,500 $684,500 Equipment $522,500 $710,300 $1,232,800 Other(Describe) $51,398 $51,398 TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $1,519,898 $1,528,800 $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $3,048,698 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. $500,000isrequestedinFY2020todesign50busstopsaspartofthePhase2oftheGoDurhambetterbusstopprogram.The$783,570 budgetedinFY2019isexpectedtocarryovertoFY2020andbeusedforconstructionofofthefirstgroupbusstopssponsoredunderthesame GoDurhambetterbusstopprogram(originallyauthorizedinFY18).Detailsofamendedbudgetrequestof$1,029,00fortheDurhamFY20 workplanare: •TotalEquipment(shelters,benchesandSimmeseats)Costforthefirst10(ofthe next50)Ͳ$118,700 •TotalConstructionCostforthefirst10(ofthenext50)Ͳ$318,500 •TotalEquipment(shelters,benchesandSimmeseats)Costforanadvancedorder(fortheremaining40)Ͳ$399,400 •Spares/AdditionalEquipment(shelters)Cost(3/10)Ͳ$192,400(13shelters@$14,800/shelter) GrandTotalAmendment Request($118,500+$318,500+$399,400+$192,400)=$1,029,000

  Page 83 of 123 FY2020DurhamTransitWorkPlan CAPͲBetterBusStopsinDurham,byGoTriangle

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 19GoT_C02 Capital FY2020 Unique Request 20 PlanningandFeasibilityStudies ID: 6/30/2018 ProjectBusinessCase

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost CommuterRailfromGarner GoTriangleforGoDurham JayHeikes CurrentYear $Ͳ EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2018 ongoing  CurrentYear $2,702,000 ProjectDescription 

TheDurhamtoGarnerCommuterRailprojectispresentlyfundedat$850,000fromFY18Ͳ20.WorkfundedtodateincludestheCommuterRailMajorInvestment Study,completedinMay2019andtheongoingAlternativesAnalysisupdatewhichisrefreshingplanningͲlevelinfrastructureassumptions,costestimates, ridershipprojectionsforalternativesbetweenDurhamandGarnerandevaluatingthosesameelementsforalternativesbetweenMebaneandSelma.Preliminary resultsfromthisstudy,duetobefinalizedlaterthisspring,identifytheneedtoevaluatekeyprojectrisksthroughadditionalstudy,publicengagement,and coordinationpriortoadecisiononwhethertoproceedwithproject implementationanddesign.Thisadditionalstudyeffort,referredtoas"earlyproject developmentactivities"hasanestimatedcost$9,000,000,ofwhich$3,000,000or33%wouldbeDurhamCounty'sexpectedshare.$465,000isavailablefrom theoriginalFY20budgetedamountof$715,373;theamendedFY20Budgetrequestis$3,417,373;anincreaseof$2,702,000. AsapartofthisTransitPlanAmendment,electedofficialshaveadecisiononwhetherornottoproceedwiththese"earlyprojectdevelopmentactivities"to evaluateandaddresskeyprojectrisksandpreparetheprojectfordesignandimplementationactivities.Uponcompletionof"earlyprojectdevelopment activities,including reachingpreliminaryagreementswithfundingpartners,railroads,andmunicipalities,electedofficialswouldhaveafuturedecisionof whetherornottoproceedwithprojectdesignandimplementation,includingrequestingentryintotheFederalNewStartsprocess,thefirststepinapplyingfor federalfunding.RelatedtothethiscurrentTransit PlanAmendmentisaseparatedecisionbyelectedofficialstoauthorizeaMemorandumofUnderstandingto governtheprojectmanagementpartner'srolesandresponsibilitiesduring"earlyprojectdevelopmentactivities." GoTriangleisthepresumptiveProjectSponsorinDCHCMPOandwillusethefundstopursueadditionalstudytoresolvekey itemspriortoelectedofficialsbeing presentedwithadecisiononwhethertoproceedwithprojectanddesignandimplementationandwhethertorequestentryintotheFederalTransit Administration'sNewStartsprocesswithintheCapitalInvestmentGrants(CIG)program.Activitiesmayincludebutarenotlimitedtothefollowing: landsurvey; utilityinvestigation;preliminaryengineeringandenvironmentalstudyforkeyriskareas;assessmentoflandavailabilityforparkͲandͲrides;identificationofsite optionsformaintenancefacility;railroadcoordination;communityengagementplanningandinitiatingcommunityengagement;stakeholderengagement planningandadvancingstakeholderengagementactivities;additionalassessmentofprojectfeasibilityforCIG;developmentofaprojectmanagementplan;and preparationtoengageprojectdevelopmentconsultants.Theseactivitiesarenecessarytoevaluatekeyprojectrisks.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries (TransitPlan) Section MapofArea DurhamResidents,Visitors,and ProvidingConnectionstoother DurhamCounty employeesofcompanieslocatedin 4.5 RegionalCities Durham   ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

ImprovedCustomerSatisfaction 1.IncreasedAccesstoJobs 2.ImprovedMobilityinArea 3.IncreasedRidership Qualitative throughincreasedreliability

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed. Projectcancompleteearlyprojectdevelopmentactivities,ascurrentlydefined,withrequestedfunds FinanceEstimates Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $850,000 $2,702,000 $3,552,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 3,552,000 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ Ͳ State Ͳ OtherͲCityofDurhamfunds $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $850,000 $2,702,000 $3,552,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 3,552,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲRevenueFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $850,000 Expenses FY19Reimbursement: $134,627 Expenses FY20Budgeted $715,373 Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $850,000 ProjectRequest $2,702,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest

CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $134,627 $3,417,373 $Ͳ $3,552,000 LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&Engineering TBD TBD TDB TBD TBD ConstructionͲImplementatio $Ͳ Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $134,627 $3,417,373 $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $3,552,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. Anadditional$2,702,000isrequestedinFY2020toinitiateandcompleteearlyprojectdevelopmentactivitiesforCommuterRailTransit betweenWestDurhamandGarner,withapossibleinclusionofascenariothatextendstoClayton.$465,000oftheoriginalFY20budgetis availableandtheadditional$2,702,000isrequestedforatotalFY20Amendedrequestof3,417,373.FY20originallyincludedacarryoverof $715,737fromFY19;thecurrentfeasibilitystudy,titled"TheGreaterTriangleCommuterRailStudy"ishasanestimatedbudgetat completion(DurhamCountyshareonly)of$250,373.Thisleaves$465,000availablefromFY19thenextphaseofstudy.Additionalfunding, beyondthe$465,000isnecessarytoconductadditionalplanningͲlevelstudytoevaluatekeyprojectrisks,begindevelopingagreements withcriticalprojectpartnersandstakeholders,andpreparetheprojectandelectedofficialsforadecisiononwhethertoproceedwith projectdesignand implementation.DetailsofamendedbudgetrequestforDurhamCountyshareof"earlyprojectdevelopmentactivities" toevaluatekeyprojectrisksareasfollows: •RailTrafficControllerModel •Preliminaryengineeringtoevaluatecriticaldesignrisksonly(e.g.DowntownDurhamgradecrossings) •Additionalridershipmodeling •Publicengagement,integratedwithlocalplanupdates •Agreementswithfundingpartners,municipalities,andrailroads.

 

Page 84 of 123

Date: January 29, 2020

To: Aaron Cain, DCHC MPO From: Ellen Beckmann, City of Durham Transportation Subject: FY20 Work Plan Amendments

The Department of Transportation is submitting the following FY20 Work Plan Amendments. The overall change from the existing FY20 Work Plan is a decrease of $ϱϴ,ϰϮϴ from the existing FY20 Work Plan.

1. Village Transit Center

a. The Village Transit Center is a current project managed by the City of Durham. It is proposed to be split into two phases to reflect the separate design processes and make it more easy to track and report expenditures. The North phase is in design by Public Works as part of a federally funded sidewalk project on Raynor Street. The South phase will begin design in FY20 with the procurement of a design contract.

b. The total funding is unchanged.

c. The funding schedule is:

i. $151,502 in FY20 for the North Phase

ii. $50,000 in FY20 for design of the South Phase

iii. $268,498 in FY21 for right-of-way and construction of the South Phase

2. Chapel Hill Road Transit Emphasis Corridor

a. The Chapel Hill Road Transit Emphasis Corridor currently consists of sidewalk, bus stop, and crosswalk construction from Morehead to Bivins. This project is currently in design through a contract managed by General Services.

b. The total funding is unchanged, but it is split into design, right-of-way, and construction phases in different years.

c. $96,200 in FY20 for design and right-of-way

d. $790,250 in FY21 for construction

e. The City of Durham will request an expansion of the limits and scope of this project to include the entire high frequency Route 10/10B, include infrastructure and signal improvements to increase bus reliability, and include additional access to transit improvements in a future funding request.

Page 85 of 123

3. Holloway Street Transit Emphasis Corridor

a. The Holloway Street Transit Emphasis Corridor currently consists of sidewalk, bus stop, crosswalk, and improved curb radius construction from Guthrie to Miami. This project is currently in design by Public Works and right-of-way acquisition by General Services is expected in FY20.

b. The total funding is unchanged, but it is split into design, right-of-way, and construction phases in different years.

c. $70,000 in FY20 for right-of-way

d. $630,000 in FY21 for construction

e. The City of Durham will request an expansion of the limits and scope of this project to include the entire high frequency Route 3/3B/3C, include infrastructure and signal improvements to increase bus reliability, and include additional access to transit improvements in a future funding request. The 2014 Access to Transit Plan proposed improvements from Dillard to Chandler.

4. Fayetteville Street Transit Emphasis Corridor

a. The Fayetteville Street Transit Emphasis Corridor is currently defined as access to transit and bus stop improvements from Umstead to Lawson. Design has not commenced, but the City of Durham expects to enter into a design contract in FY20.

b. The City of Durham is requesting that the limits be expanded to include the entire limits as defined in the 2014 Access to Transit Plan from Lakewood to Riddle. This also corresponds with the high frequency Route 5/7 and avoids the widening projects underway south of Riddle Road.

c. The City of Durham also is requesting an increase in funding to reflect the expanded limits and to allow for the design of infrastructure and signal improvements to increase bus reliability. This is a potential opportunity to demonstrate the benefits of transit signal priority, bus lanes, queue jump lanes, bus stop consolidation, boarding/fare collection strategies, etc. on an existing high frequency route on the GoDurham system to improve reliability and the rider experience on a high use and congested corridor.

d. $980,000 in FY20 for design. This is not all expected to be spent, but is needed to advertise and encumber a contract.

e. $9,800,000 will be requested as part of the FY21 Workplan development for future right-of-way and construction

5. GoDurham Bus Stop Improvement Access

a. GoDurham Bus Stop Improvements is a current project managed by GoTriangle. The City of Durham is requesting a complementary sub-project to design and construct sidewalk gaps, pedestrian crosswalks, and signals at the proposed bus stop improvement locations. The City routinely constructs projects like this, has the staff expertise and resources to manage these projects, and can more easily coordinate this

Page 86 of 123

with other traffic signal, curb ramp, and sidewalk projects.

b. The City of Durham is requesting an increase in funding to design and then construct approximately 25 locations per year with an average construction cost of $50,000 per location. GoTriangle is managing the improvement of more than 100 bus stops, but all locations may not require improvements.

c. $125,000 in FY20 for design of 25 locations.

d. $1,250,000 in FY21 for construction of 25 locations and $125,000 in FY21 for design of the next 25 locations.

e. Future year funding will be requested.

6. Southpoint Transit Center Pavement Markings

a. Southpoint Transit Center is a current project managed by GoTriangle. The City of Durham is requesting a complementary sub-project to construct bus only lane pavement markings at the transit center. The City routinely designs and installs pavement markings, has the staff expertise and resources to manage this project, and can efficiently incorporate this into an existing contract to resurface and install pavement markings.

b. The City of Durham is requesting an increase in funding to construct bus only pavement markings as part of the Southpoint Transit Center project.

c. $200,000 in FY20 for construction

7. Bus Speed and Reliability Improvements

a. The County Transit Plan is currently funding increased frequencies on many GoDurham routes. However, the reliability of the bus is still often affected by congestion, difficult turns caused by small curb radii, stop bar locations, poles, impediments in the roadway, illegal parking, difficulty merging into traffic, etc. The City is requesting a complementary sub-project to identify, design, and construct projects to address these hot spots on various routes to complement the increased frequencies funded by the Plan. Example projects include curb radius improvements, moving stop bars and signal re-design, installation of pavement markings, signage, and flexible delineator posts, and bus boarding islands.

b. The City of Durham is requesting an increase in funding to establish a funding program to design and construct bus speed and reliability improvements. Many projects could be designed with existing staff resources.

c. $500,000 in FY20 for construction.

d. Future year funding will be requested

8. Transportation Alternatives for Durham County

a. Northern Durham Vanpool Services is a current project managed by GoTriangle. The City of Durham is requesting that this project be expanded to specifically target

Page 87 of 123

emerging employment centers in unincorporated Durham County and to include the promotion of transportation demand management strategies.

b. The City of Durham is requesting to utilize the funding previously programmed for the Northern Durham Vanpool project (20GOT_TS1) to include the expanded scope.

c. The $66,960 assigned for Northern Durham Vanpool will be used in FY20 for implementation of this project.

d. Future year funding will be requested

9. Food Access for Seniors Pilot

a. Thousands of seniors in Durham are at risk of food insecurity. End Hunger Durham has surveyed several low income senior housing complexes and reported that up to 44 percent of the residents skip meals for lack of adequate transportation to get to a grocery store of food pantry. This pilot would provide approximately 4 hours of fare-free service per weekday connecting selected senior housing complexes (Morning Glory, Hosiery Mill, Oldham Towers, J.J. Henderson and Forest Hill Heights) to grocery stores and food pantries. This request is for four months of funding in FY20 and a full year of funding in FY21. Final details of the pilot are still being developed, including the exact start date, evaluation criteria, etc., but the current assumption is that the shuttle would be operated by GoDurham ACCESS.

b. The City of Durham is requesting an increase in funding to include this pilot program in the FY20 workplan. Future funding will be requested as part of the FY21 Workplan development.

c. Cost for this service is $18,870

Page 88 of 123

FYSTART ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm DATE 7/1/2019 18DCI_CD5  FY2020 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ VillageTransitCenter CityofDurham ProjectCost $Ͳ

EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2019 FY2021 DesignFY20,ConstructionFY20Ͳ21 CurrentYear $470,000 ProjectDescription  ConstructionofatransitcenterattheVillageTransitCenter,includingtheconstructionofsidewalks,busstopimprovements,andcrossing improvementsonRaynorStreetfromN.MiamiBlvd.toHardeeSt. ProjectProfile DirectorIndirect ProjectArea KeybeneĮts Beneficiaries TransitPlan MapofArea Increasedsafety VillageShoppingCenterareaand GoDurhamRoute2and3 Designplanforsidewalk andcomfortfor Yes RaynorStreet riders available. busriders. ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

IncreasedtransitIncreasedsafetyfor Increasedpassenger  Qualitative ridership pedestrians satisfaction. 

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.  FinanceEstimates Revenue FY19and FundingAvailable TaxRevenue Earlier FY20 toDate FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $470,000 $470,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 470,000 OtherRevenue Ͳ Federal $Ͳ $617,192 $617,192 617,192 State $Ͳ Ͳ Other $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $617,192 $617,192 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 617,192 TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $1,087,192 $1,087,192 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 1,087,192  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $470,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $470,000 ProjectRequest $470,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $Ͳ TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDown FY19and OPERATINGCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Contracts 00Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ

  TransitCapitalDevelopment:Estimatedappropriationstosupportcontractualcommitmentsandotherexpensesrelatedtoproposed capitalprojects. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest FY19and CAPITALCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $33,866 $33,866 Design&Engineering $68,461 $68,461 Construction $99,175 $268,498 $367,673 Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $201,502 $268,498 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $470,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. ProjectFundingfollowsDurhamCounty2017TransitPlanͲTheCityofDurhamreceivedafederalgranttoconstructasidewalkand associatedbusstopimprovementsonthenorthͲsideofRaynorStreetfromN.MiamiBlvd.toHardeeSt.Thissidewalkisnecessaryto constructatransitcenterattheVillageShoppingCenterandwillbethefirstphaseoftheVillageTransitCenterproject. Page 89 of 123 FY2020OrangeTransitWorkPlan CAPͲCHTransitBusStopSigns

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTARTDATE 7/1/2019 20DCIͲCD1  FY2020 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ ChapelHillTransitEmphasisCorridor CityofDurham ProjectCost $Ͳ

EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2019 FY2021 Design FY19,R/WFY20,ConstructionFY20Ͳ21 CurrentYear $886,450 ProjectDescription 

Constructionofsidewalks,busstopimprovements,andcrossingimprovementsonChapelHillRoadfromMoreheadAvenuetoLakewoodAvenue.

ProjectProfile DirectorIndirect ProjectArea KeybeneĮts Beneficiaries TransitPlan MapofArea Increasedsafety ChapelHillRoadͲMoreheadAvenue GoDurhamRoute10 andcomfortfor Yes ConceptPlanavailable toLakewoodAvenue riders busriders. ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

IncreasedtransitIncreasedsafetyfor Increasedpassenger  Qualitative ridership pedestrians satisfaction. 

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.  FinanceEstimates Revenue FundingAvailable TaxRevenue Y19andEarlie FY20 toDate FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $86,450 $800,000 $886,450 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 886,450 OtherRevenue Ͳ Federal $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ State $Ͳ Ͳ Other $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $86,450 $800,000 $886,450 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 886,450  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $886,450 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted

Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $886,450 ProjectRequest $886,450  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $Ͳ TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDown FY19and OPERATINGCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Contracts 00Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ

  TransitCapitalDevelopment:Estimatedappropriationstosupportcontractualcommitmentsandotherexpensesrelatedtoproposedcapital CostBreakDownofProjectRequest FY19and CAPITALCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $35,200 $35,200 Design&EngineeringͲFY20 $61,000 $61,000 ConstructionͲImplementationFY21 $790,250 $790,250 Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $96,200 $790,250 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $886,450 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. ProjectFundingfollowsDurhamCounty2017TransitPlanͲProjectisunderway,andadesigncontractiscurrentlybeingfinalized.ExpectrightͲofͲ waytobegininFY20,andconstructiontoimmediatelyfollow.Thereare additionalsegmentsofChapelHillRoadthatdonothavesidewalksonboth sidesofthestreet,arealsoinneedofbusstopimprovements,andcouldincludebusspeedandreliabilityimprovements.TheCityanticipatesthat therewillbeafuturephaseoftheprojecttoextendthesidewalk furtheralongRoute10.

  Page 90 of 123

FYSTART ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm DATE 7/1/2019 18DCI_CD2  FY2020 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ HollowayTransitEmphasisCorridor CityofDurham ProjectCost $Ͳ

EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2019 FY2021 DesignFY19,R/WFY20,ConstructionFY20Ͳ21 CurrentYear $700,000 ProjectDescription  Constructionofsidewalks,busstopimprovements,andcrossingimprovementsonHollowayStreetfromN.MiamiBlvd.toN.GuthrieSt.,andon RaynorStreetandN.MiamiBlvd. ProjectProfile DirectorIndirect ProjectArea KeybeneĮts Beneficiaries TransitPlan MapofArea Increasedsafety HollowayStreetͲN.MiamiBlvd.toN. GoDurhamRoute2and3 andcomfortfor Yes Designplansavailable GuthrieSt. riders busriders. ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

IncreasedtransitIncreased safety for Increasedpassenger  Qualitative ridership pedestrians satisfaction. 

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.

FinanceEstimates Revenue FY19and FundingAvailable TaxRevenue Earlier FY20 toDate FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $700,000 $700,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 700,000 OtherRevenue Ͳ Federal $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ State $Ͳ Ͳ Other $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $700,000 $700,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 700,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $700,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $700,000 ProjectRequest $700,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $Ͳ TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDown FY19and OPERATINGCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Contracts 00Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ

  TransitCapitalDevelopment:Estimatedappropriationstosupportcontractualcommitmentsandotherexpensesrelatedtoproposedcapital projects. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest FY19and CAPITALCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $70,000 $70,000 Design&EngineeringͲFY20 $Ͳ ConstructionͲImplementationFY21 $630,000 $630,000 Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $70,000 $630,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $700,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. ProjectFundingfollowsDurhamCounty2017TransitPlanͲProjectisunderway.DesignwasdoneinͲhouseandisnear100%.ExpectrightͲofͲ waytobegininFY20,andconstructiontoimmediatelyfollow.Thereareadditionalbusstopneedson Hollowayandweexpectthattherewillbe futurefundingrequesttoenhancemoresegmentsofHolloway.ThecorridorwillberecommendedforasafetyimprovementprojectintheMove DurhamStudy.Futurefundingshownwillbeneededtoimplementfurtherimprovementsonadditionalsegmentsofthestreet. Page 91 of 123

FYSTART ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm DATE 7/1/2019 18DCI_CD1  FY2020 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ FayettevilleTransitEmphasisCorridor CityofDurham ProjectCost $Ͳ

EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2019 FY2021 DesignFY20,R/WFY21,ConstructionFY21 CurrentYear $980,000 ProjectDescription  Constructionofsidewalks,busstopimprovements,crossingimprovements,andinfrastructuretosupportincreasedspeedandreliabilityon Fayetteville StreetfromLakewoodAvenuetoRiddleRoad ProjectProfile DirectorIndirect ProjectArea KeybeneĮts Beneficiaries TransitPlan MapofArea Increasedsafety FayettevilleStreetͲLakewood MoveDurhamStudywillbe GoDurhamRoute5riders andcomfortforbus Yes AvenuetoRiddleRoad developingaconceptualplan. riders. ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

Increasedtransit Increasedsafetyfor Increasedpassenger  Qualitative ridership pedestrians satisfaction. 

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed.  FinanceEstimates Revenue FY19and FundingAvailable TaxRevenue Earlier FY20 toDate FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $280,000 $280,000 50,000 1,000,000 Ͳ 1,330,000 OtherRevenue Ͳ Federal $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ  State $Ͳ Ͳ Other $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $280,000 $280,000 50,000 1,000,000 Ͳ 1,330,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $280,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $280,000 ProjectRequest $280,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $Ͳ TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDown FY19and OPERATINGCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Contracts 00Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ Other(Describe) Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $Ͳ $ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ $Ͳ

  TransitCapitalDevelopment:Estimatedappropriationstosupportcontractualcommitmentsandotherexpensesrelatedtoproposedcapital projects. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest FY19and CAPITALCOSTS Earlier FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&EngineeringͲFY20 $980,000 $980,000 ConstructionͲImplementationFY21 $Ͳ $Ͳ Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $980,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $980,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. ProjectFundingfollowsDurhamCounty2017TransitPlanͲTheCityofDurhamintendstoinitiateadesigninFY20withrightͲofͲwayand constructiontofollow. Page 92 of 123

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20GoT_CD2 Capital FY2020 Unique Request 20 ID: TransitService 6/30/2018 ProjectBusinessCase

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost BusStopAccess CityofDurham EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2018 ongoing  CurrentYear $125,000 ProjectDescription  GoDurhamBusStopImprovementsisacurrentprojectmanagedbyGoTriangle.TheCityofDurhamisrequestingacomplementarysubͲprojecttodesignand constructsidewalkgaps,pedestriancrosswalks,andsignalsattheproposedbusstopimprovementlocations.TheCityroutinelyconstructsprojectslikethis,hasthe staffexpertiseandresourcestomanagetheseprojects,andcanmoreeasilycoordinatethiswithothertrafficsignal,curbramp,andsidewalkprojects.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries (TransitPlan) Section MapofArea CityofDurham DurhamResidentsandVisitors ImprovedBusStopAmenities 4.3.3   ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

1.Increased Ridership 2.ImprovedMobilityinArea 3.IncreasedPedestrianActivity Qualitative ImprovedCustomerSatisfaction

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed. ProjectCostsmayincreaseduetoincreasingconstructioncosts.Projectcancompletedesign/engineeringwithrequestedfunds FinanceEstimates Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total

DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $Ͳ $125,000.00 $125,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 125,000 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ Ͳ State Ͳ OtherͲCityofDurham $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $125,000 $125,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 125,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲRevenueFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $125,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted $Ͳ Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $125,000 ProjectRequest $125,000  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $Ͳ

CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&Engineering $125,000 $125,000 ConstructionͲImplementatio $Ͳ Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $125,000 $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $125,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. TheCityofDurhamisrequestinganincreaseinfundingtodesignandthenconstructapproximately25locationsperyearwithanaverage constructioncostof$50,000perlocationand10%designcosts. Page 93 of 123

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20DCI_CD2 Capital FY2020 Unique Request 20 ID: TransitService 6/30/2018 ProjectBusinessCase

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost SouthpointTransitCenter CityofDurham EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2018 ongoing  CurrentYear $200,000 ProjectDescription  SouthpointTransitCenterisacurrentprojectmanagedbyGoTriangle.TheCityofDurhamisrequestingacomplementarysubͲprojecttoconstructbusonlylane pavementmarkingsatthetransitcenter.TheCityroutinelydesignsandinstallspavementmarkings,hasthestaffexpertiseandresourcestomanagethisproject, andcanefficientlyincorporatethisintoanexistingcontracttoresurfaceandinstallpavementmarkings.The$200,000usedforthisprojectwouldbereassigned fromproject19GOT_CD2. ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries (TransitPlan) Section MapofArea CityofDurham DurhamResidentsandVisitors   ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

1.IncreasedRidership 2.ImprovedMobilityinArea 3.IncreasedPedestrianActivity Qualitative ImprovedCustomerSatisfaction

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed. ProjectCostsmayincreaseduetoincreasingconstructioncosts.Projectcancompletedesign/engineeringwithrequestedfunds

FinanceEstimates Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $Ͳ $200,000.00 $200,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 200,000 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ Ͳ State Ͳ OtherͲCityofDurham $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $200,000 $200,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 200,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲRevenueFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $200,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted $Ͳ Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $200,000 ProjectRequest $Ͳ  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $200,000

CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&Engineering $Ͳ ConstructionͲImplementatio $200,000 $200,000 Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $200,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $200,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. Thecostestimatewaspreparedbyacontractor. Page 94 of 123

ProjectID# DurhamTransitPlanͲProjectRequestForm FYSTART 7/1/2019 20DCI_CD4 Capital FY2020 Unique Request 20 ID: TransitService 6/30/2018 ProjectBusinessCase

ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost BusSpeedandReliability CityofDurham EllenBeckmann CurrentYear $Ͳ EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2018 ongoing  CurrentYear $500,000 ProjectDescription  TheCityofDurhamisrequesting$500,000inFY2020forbusspeedandreliabilityoperationalimprovements.Thisfundingwillbeusedtoidentifylocationswhere busesexperiencedelays,slowtravelspeeds,safetyconcerns,conflictswithothervehiclesorinfrastructure,etc.andresearchpotentialtreatmentstoenable improvedbusspeedandreliability.Fundswouldbeusedtodesignimprovements,conductreviews,payforinstallation(laborandmaterials)suchassignage, pavementmarkings,flexibledelineatorposts,orequipmentneededforvehicles,trafficsignals,orotherinfrastructuretoenableimprovedbusperformance.Efforts willbecoordinatedwithotherprojectssuchastransitemphasiscorridorplanning,roadwayresurfacing,transitcenterimprovements,accesstotransitfor pedestriansandotherusers,andothervehicleandroadwayprojectsrelatedtobusserviceinDurhamandforrelatedprojectmanagementandadministration expenses.

ProjectProfile Keybenefits TransitPlan ProjectArea DirectorIndirectBeneficiaries (TransitPlan) Section MapofArea CityofDurham   ProjectMonitoringDetails CapitalProjects

QuantitativeOutcomes **Pleaselistupto3Quantitativemetricsand1Qualitative

1.IncreasedRidership 2.ImprovedMobilityinArea Qualitative ImprovedCustomerSatisfaction

Listanyotherrelevantinformationnotaddressed. ProjectCostsmayincreaseduetoincreasingconstructioncosts.Projectcancompletedesign/engineeringwithrequestedfunds FinanceEstimates Revenue Fundingto TaxRevenue FY19andPrior FY20 Date FY21 FY22 FY23 Total DurhamCountyTaxRevenue $Ͳ $500,000.00 $500,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 500,000 OtherRevenue Federal $Ͳ Ͳ State Ͳ OtherͲCityofDurham $Ͳ Ͳ SubtotalOther $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE $Ͳ $500,000 $500,000 Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ 500,000  MultiͲYearCapitalͲRevenueFundingthroughFY2021 Revenue DurhamCountyTaxRevenuethroughFY2020(FundingtoDate) $500,000 Expenses FY18Reimbursement: $Ͳ Expenses FY19Budgeted Net DurhamCountyTaxRevenueAvailable $500,000 ProjectRequest $Ͳ  BalanceAvailableforFutureRequest $500,000

CostBreakDownofProjectRequest CAPITALCOSTS FY19andPrior FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total FeasibilityorOtherStudies $Ͳ LandͲRightofWay $Ͳ Design&Engineering $Ͳ ConstructionͲImplementatio $500,000 $500,000 Equipment $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ TOTALCAPITALCOSTS $Ͳ $500,000 $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $Ͳ $500,000 AssumptionsforCostsandRevenuesAbove: Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. TheCityofDurhamisrequestinganincreaseinfundingtoestablishafundingprogramtodesignandconstructbusspeedandreliability improvements.Manyprojectscouldbedesignedwithexistingstaffresources.

$500,000inFY20forconstruction.

Futureyearfundingwillberequested Page 95 of 123

UniqueProjectID# TriangleTaxDistrict FYSTARTDATE 7/1/2019 20DCI_TS11 DurhamTransitWorkPlan FY2020 Unique Request ID: 20 [FY Project Start year] ProjectRequestForm 6/30/2018 [Three letter Agency] DCI TransitServices [Project Type] TS [Unique Number] 011 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost Durham TransportAlternatives CityofDurham TomDevlin CurrentYear $66,960 EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost July1,2019 N/A (Addnotesasappropriate) CurrentYear $Ͳ ProjectDescription EnterbelowasummaryoftheprojectthatmaylaterbeusedfortheFY2020DurhamͲOrangeTransitWorkPlan. InordertoservetheneedsofemergingemploymentcentersinunincorporatedareasofDurhamCountyaswellasemployersidentifiedforprioritybytheDurham CountyBoardofCountyCommissioners,additionalfundingisrequestedtoadministerpilotprogramstoencouragetheuseoftransit,carpool,vanpool,andothernonͲ singleͲoccupantvehiclemodesreferencedcollectivelyastransportationalternatives(TA).Theseprogramsmayincludeoutreachtoemployers,marketingofTA, subsidiestoencourageuseofTA,technicalassistancetoidentifiedemployersandemployeesforcommuteplanning,traveltraining,transportationdemand management,andotherpurposes. Thisprojectwillalsotakeovertheresponsibilitiesandexpandthescopeof20GOT_TS1,"NorthernDurhamVanpoolServices".Increasedvanpoolsubsidieswillbe offeredtoanycustomerwhoworksinDurham countyandconnectsthroughoutDurham,Orange,andWakecounties.

ProjectProfile P.1 Whereisthisprojectlocated,whowillthisprojectserveandwhatarethekeybenefits?(Ex.ImproveTransitefficiency,levelsofservice,etc.) ProjectLocation? WhowillthisProjectserve? Whatarethekeybenefits? TransportationAlternatives,includingvanpoolservices,areamore DurhamCountyemployersandthecounties costͲeffectiveoptionforservinglessdensepopulationsandthose thattheiremployeescommutefrom, DurhamCountyemployersandemployees withoutadequatetransitservice.Additionalbenefitsinclude includingWake,Durham,andOrange. decreasingtrafficcongestion,reducingparkingdemand,aswellas beingmoreenvironmentallyfriendly. ProjectMonitoringDetails OperatingProjects OP.2 Forbusoperatingprojects,pleaseprovide: a)TargetStartDate 2/1/2020

b)Span

c)Frequency

d)AssetsUsed Enterprisevanpoolvehiclesandexistingtransit. Durham,Orange,andWakecounties. e)GeographicTermini DukeUniversity,downtownDurham,NCStateUniversity,downtownRaleigh,UNC,RTP, f)MajorMarketDestinationsServed Treyburn,andotheremploymentcenters.

g)RevenueHours FinanceEstimates Revenue TaxRevenue FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total DurhamͲOrangeCountyTaxRevenue Ͳ $66,960.00 $66,960.00 OtherRevenue Federal State Farebox/State WakeCounty(incl.farebox&state) SubtotalOther

EnterFY2019andtheestimatedannualizedcostinFY2020usingthe2.5%growthfactor,ifapplicable.Thespreadsheetwillcalculate2021andbeyondby2.5%.Ifyourprojectis notexpectedtohaverecurringcostsinFY2021and/orbeyond,deletethecalculation(s)incolumnsEͲH. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest OPERATINGCOSTS FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total GrowthFactors 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% Salary&Fringes Contracts $Ͳ BusOperations: EstimatedHours CostperHour EstimatedOperatingCost BusLeases Park&RideLease OtherͲBus(Describe) OtherͲBus(Describe)(Subsidizedservice $66,960.00 $66,960.00 Subtotal:BusOperations $Ͳ $66,960.00 $66,960.00 Other(Describe) Other(Describe) Other(Describe) TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $Ͳ $66,960.00 $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $ Ͳ $66,960.00 F.4 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. ThefirstyearoftheTransportationAlternativesprojectwillusethe$66,960allocatedtotheNorthernDurhamVanpoolProjecttoprovidevanpoolsubsidies (approximately$930permonthpervan),offercarpoolincentivesthroughSTRNC.org,obtainmarketingandcommunicationsservices,conductoutreachtoemployers, andmore. Thesecondyearandbeyondwillkeepthevanpoolsubsidiesinplace,andwillincludeadditionalfundsthatwillbededicatedtotheadministration,marketing,and incentivesforexistingTransportationDemandManagementservicesandnewpilotprogramsthatwillreducedrivealonebehavior. Page 96 of 123

UniqueProjectID# TriangleTaxDistrict FYSTARTDATE 7/1/2019 20DCI_TS10 DurhamTransitWorkPlan FY2020 Unique Request ID: 20 [FY Project Start year] ProjectRequestForm 6/30/2018 [Three letter Agency] DCI TransitServices [Project Type] TS [Unique Number] 010 ProjectBusinessCase ProjectName RequestingAgency ProjectContact TTDEstimatedOperatingCost FoodaccessforSeniorsͲPilotRoute CityofDurham PierreOseiͲOwusu CurrentYear$ 18,870 EstimatedStartDate EstimatedCompletion Notes TTDEstimatedCapitalCost March2,2020 June30,2021 CurrentYear $Ͳ ProjectDescription EnterbelowasummaryoftheprojectthatmaylaterbeusedfortheFY2020DurhamͲOrangeTransitWorkPlan.

Thousands ofseniorsinDurhamareatriskoffoodinsecurity.EndHungerDurhamhavesurveyedseverallowincomeseniorhousingcomplexesandreportedthatupto 44percentoftheresidentsskipmealsforlackofadequatetransportationtogettoagrocerystoreoffoodpantry.Thispilotwouldprovide approximately4hoursof fareͲfreeserviceconnectingselectedseniorhousingcomplexes(MorningGlory,HosieryMill,OldhamTowers,J.J.HendersonandForestHillHeights)togrocerystores andfoodpantries.ThisrequestisforfourmonthsoffundinginFY20,withtheintenttoaskforawholeyearof fundinginFY21.Finaldetailsofthepilotarestillbeing developed,includingtheexactstartdate,evaluationcriteria,etc.

ProjectProfile P.1 Whereisthisprojectlocated,whowillthisprojectserveandwhatarethekeybenefits?(Ex.ImproveTransitefficiency,levelsofservice,etc.) ProjectLocation? WhowillthisProjectserve? Whatarethekeybenefits? SeniorslivingatMorningGlory,HosieryMill, Durham,differentlocations OldhamTowers,J.J.HendersonandForestHill Fightinghungerthroughconnectivity Heightshousingcomplexes ProjectMonitoringDetails OperatingProjects OP.2 Forbusoperatingprojects,pleaseprovide: a)TargetStartDate MarͲ20

b)Span Weekdays:~9:30AMͲ1:30PM

c)Frequency Every60minutes

d)AssetsUsed ACCESSvans

e)GeographicTermini Within2.5mradiousaroundDowntown

f)MajorMarketDestinationsServed SeniorhousingcomplexesSWandEofDowntown,grocerystoresandfoodpantries

g)RevenueHours Weekday(average):~4hr/day FinanceEstimates Revenue TaxRevenue FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total DurhamͲOrangeCountyTaxRevenue 18,870  Ͳ 18,870 OtherRevenue Federal Ͳ State Ͳ Farebox/State Ͳ SubtotalOther Ͳ Ͳ TOTALREVENUE 18,870  Ͳ 18,870 F.2 TransitOperations:Estimatedappropriationstosupportexpenses. CostBreakDownofProjectRequest OPERATINGCOSTS FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Total GrowthFactors 2.50% Salary&Fringes $Ͳ $Ͳ Contracts $Ͳ $Ͳ BusOperations: EstimatedHours 340.00 CostperHour $55.50 EstimatedOperatingCost $18,870.00 $18,870.00 BusLeases Park&RideLease OtherͲBus(Describe) OtherͲBus(Describe) Subtotal:BusOperations $18,870.00 $18,870.00 Other(Describe) $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ Other(Describe) $Ͳ TOTALOPERATINGCOSTS $18,870.00 $ Ͳ $18,870.00 F.4 Pleasestateanyassumption(s)usedtocalculatethecapitalandoperatingdollarsandrevenuesshownabove. Serviceisprojectedtooperateon87weekdaysinFY2020.ForFY21theassumptionistooperateaboutthreetimesasmuch. Page 97 of 123

Durham Chapel-Hill Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Member Organizations: Town of Carrboro, Town of Chapel Hill, Chatham County, City of Durham, Durham County, Town of Hillsborough, NC Department of Transportation, Orange County, GoTriangle

January 29, 2020

To: Durham-Orange Staff Working Group From: Aaron Cain, Staff Working Group Administrator, DCHC MPO Re: Reassignment of Planning for New Transit Plan in Orange County

Background

Project 20MPO_AD2, Planning for New Transit Plan, is a project that was approved in the FY20 Work Plan to develop a new transit plan for Orange County. At the time the FY20 Work Plan was developed, it was anticipated that the DCHC MPO staff would be the project sponsor for this project. Since then, it has been determined that Orange County will instead be the project sponsor. An email confirming this change was sent to GoTriangle finance staff on December 2, 2019. This item is before the Staff Working Group to memorialize the change in project sponsorship.

There is no change in funding for this project; it remains funded at $500,000 for FY20.

Action

That the Orange County Staff Working Group recommend approval of the change in project sponsorship for 20MPO_AD2, Planning for New Transit Plan, from DCHC MPO to Orange County.

City of Durham • Department of Transportation • 101 City Hall Plaza • Durham, NC 27701 • Phone (919) 560-4366 • Facsimile (919) 560-4561 Page 98 of 123

ϮϬϮϬϬϬϬϯ  'KdZ/E'> &/^>zZϮϬϮϬ dZ/E'>dy/^dZ/dʹKZE'KWZd/E'&hE h'dKZ/EEDEDEd  /dKZ/EďLJƚŚĞZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚdƌŝĂŶŐůĞZĞŐŝŽŶĂůWƵďůŝĐdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJŽĂƌĚŽĨ dƌƵƐƚĞĞƐ͗  ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭ͘/ƚŝƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƌĞǀĞŶƵĞƐǁŝůůďĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŝŶƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ KƌĂŶŐĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ:ƵůLJϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶĚĞŶĚŝŶŐ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ϮϬϮϬ͗   KƌŝŐŝŶĂů ŵĞŶĚĞĚ ƌƚŝĐůĞϰϯЪĞŶƚ^ĂůĞƐdĂdž Ψϳ͕ϳϲϵ͕Ϯϵϱ Ψϳ͕ϳϲϵ͕Ϯϵϱ sĞŚŝĐůĞZĞŶƚĂůdĂdž ϲϴϬ͕ϯϰϳ ϲϴϬ͕ϯϰϳ ΨϳŽƵŶƚLJsĞŚŝĐůĞZĞŐŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶdĂdž ϴϲϯ͕ϴϬϭ ϴϲϯ͕ϴϬϭ ΨϯsĞŚŝĐůĞZĞŐŝƐƚƌdƌĂŶƐĨĞƌĨƌŽŵƵƌͬKƌĂŶŐĞ^ƉĞĐŝĂůdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ϯϳϬ͕ϮϮϯ ϯϳϬ͕ϮϮϯ 'ƌĂŶƚƐͬKƚŚĞƌƐ Ϯϯϭ͕ϲϲϬ Ϯϯϭ͕ϲϲϬ dŽƚĂů Ψϵ͕ϵϭϱ͕ϯϮϲ Ψϵ͕ϵϭϱ͕ϯϮϲ   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĂŵŽƵŶƚƐŚĞƌĞďLJĂƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚKƌĂŶŐĞ KƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ:ƵůLJϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶĚĞŶĚŝŶŐ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ϮϬϮϬ͗   KƌŝŐŝŶĂů ŵĞŶĚĞĚ dƌĂŶƐŝƚĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ  'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ ΨϵϲϮ͕ϱϭϬ Ψϴϭϰ͕ϯϬϮ ,DWK ϱϱϱ͕ϯϲϰ ϱϱ͕ϯϲϰ ƵƐKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ Ϭ Ϭ ŚĂƉĞů,ŝůůdƌĂŶƐŝƚ ϭ͕ϵϴϯ͕ϵϬϳ ϭ͕ϵϰϬ͕ϭϱϮ KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJWƵďůŝĐdƌĂŶƐŝƚ ϳϰϯ͕Ϭϭϴ ϳϭϬ͕ϯϵϯ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ ϵϬϵ͕ϯϬϳ ϵϭϴ͕ϬϯϮ dƌĂŶƐĨĞƌƚŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͲKƌĂŶŐĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚ ϯ͕ϯϬϱ͕Ϯϱϳ ϯ͕ϵϳϬ͕ϳϱϳ ůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƚŽKƌĂŶŐĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚĂůĂŶĐĞ ϭ͕ϰϱϱ͕ϵϲϯ ϭ͕ϱϬϲ͕ϯϮϲ dŽƚĂů Ψϵ͕ϵϭϱ͕ϯϮϲ Ψϵ͕ϵϭϱ͕ϯϮϲ   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ ϯ͘'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞƐƚĂĨĨŝƐĚŝƌĞĐƚĞĚƚŽŵĞĞƚǁŝƚŚƐƚĂĨĨĨƌŽŵKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ ĂŶĚ ƵƌŚĂŵ ŽƵŶƚLJ͕ŝŶĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŚĂƉĞů,ŝůůĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨƵƌŚĂŵ͕ ƚŽ͗ x ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂŶLJƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽĚŝƌĞĐƚĂŶĚŝŶĚŝƌĞĐƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌƵƌŚĂŵĂŶĚKƌĂŶŐĞ ĐŽƵŶƚŝĞƐ͖ x ŝƐĐƵƐƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŝŽŶŽĨƐŵĂůůĐĂƉŝƚĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŽůŽĐĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƉŽŶƐŽƌƐ͖ Page 99 of 123

x ŝƐĐƵƐƐĐŽƐƚĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ͖ĂŶĚ x WƌĞƐĞŶƚĂďƵĚŐĞƚĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƌĞĨůĞĐƚŝŶŐĂŶLJƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďLJƵƌŚĂŵĂŶĚ KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJƐƚĂĨĨƐďLJEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͘  ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϰ͘ŽƉŝĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐƵĚŐĞƚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐŚĂůůďĞĨƵƌŶŝƐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞůĞƌŬƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨ dƌƵƐƚĞĞƐĂŶĚƚŽƚŚĞƵĚŐĞƚKĨĨŝĐĞƌŽĨƚŚŝƐƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJƚŽďĞŬĞƉƚŽŶĨŝůĞĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƌĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞ ĚŝƐďƵƌƐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĨƵŶĚƐ͘  KWdd,/^Ϯϲd,zK&&ZhZzϮϬϮϬ͘    ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ  DŝĐŚĂĞůWĂƌŬĞƌ͕ŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐŚĂŝƌ  dd^d͗   ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DŝĐŚĞůůĞ͘ĂǁƐŽŶ͕ůĞƌŬƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚ 

&zϮϬdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚʹKƌĂŶŐĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚƵĚŐĞƚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ;KϮϬϮϬϬϬϬϯͿ Ϯ Page 100 of 123

ϮϬϮϬϬϬϬϰ  'KdZ/E'> &/^>zZϮϬϮϬ dZ/E'>dy/^dZ/dʹKZE'W/d>&hE h'dKZ/EEDEDEd  /dKZ/EďLJƚŚĞZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚdƌŝĂŶŐůĞZĞŐŝŽŶĂůWƵďůŝĐdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJŽĂƌĚŽĨ dƌƵƐƚĞĞƐ͗  ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭ͘/ƚŝƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƌĞǀĞŶƵĞƐǁŝůůďĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŝŶƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdž ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚʹKƌĂŶŐĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ:ƵůLJϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶĚĞŶĚŝŶŐ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ ϮϬϮϬ͗   KƌŝŐŝŶĂů ŵĞŶĚĞĚ ůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĨƌŽŵKƌĂŶŐĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚĂůĂŶĐĞ Ψϱ͕ϯϮϵ͕ϯϭϯ Ψϱ͕ϯϮϵ͕ϯϭϯ dƌĂŶƐĨĞƌĨƌŽŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚʹKƌĂŶŐĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ&ƵŶĚ ϯ͕ϯϬϱ͕Ϯϱϳ ϯ͕ϴϵϲ͕ϳϱϳ dŽƚĂů Ψϴ͕ϲϯϰ͕ϱϳϬ Ψϵ͕ϮϮϲ͕ϬϳϬ   ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĂŵŽƵŶƚƐŚĞƌĞďLJĂƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚʹ KƌĂŶŐĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐ:ƵůLJϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶĚĞŶĚŝŶŐ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ϮϬϮϬ͗   KƌŝŐŝŶĂů ŵĞŶĚĞĚ sĞŚŝĐůĞWƵƌĐŚĂƐĞ  ŚĂƉĞů,ŝůůdƌĂŶƐŝƚ Ψϭ͕ϲϵϯ͕ϭϵϮ Ψϭ͕ϲϵϯ͕ϭϵϮ KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJWƵďůŝĐdƌĂŶƐŝƚ ϳϵ͕ϲϱϳ ϳϵ͕ϲϱϳ dƌĂŶƐŝƚ/ŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ  dŽǁŶŽĨĂƌƌďŽƌŽ ϵϵϳ͕ϳϯϰ ϭ͕ϬϮϲ͕ϳϯϰ ŚĂƉĞů,ŝůůdƌĂŶƐŝƚͬdŽǁŶŽĨŚĂƉĞů,ŝůů ϱϴϲ͕ϳϬϱ ϱϴϲ͕ϳϬϱ ŚĂƉĞů,ŝůůdƌĂŶƐŝƚʹE^Zd Ϯ͕ϱϭϯ͕Ϯϭϱ Ϯ͕ϱϭϯ͕Ϯϭϱ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ ϭ͕ϯϴϵ͕ϬϮϳ ϳϮϱ͕ϱϮϳ dŽǁŶŽĨ,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ ϰϯϰ͕ϴϵϳ ϰϯϰ͕ϴϵϳ KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJWƵďůŝĐdƌĂŶƐŝƚ ϭϴϮ͕ϱϯϭ ϵϴϮ͕ϱϯϭ ĂƉŝƚĂůʹKƚŚĞƌ  'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ Ϯϯϵ͕ϭϱϮ Ϯϯϵ͕ϭϱϮ ,DWK Ϭ ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ ͲK>ZdtŝŶĚͲŽǁŶ ϱϭϴ͕ϰϲϬ ϱϭϴ͕ϰϲϬ dŽƚĂů Ψϴ͕ϲϯϰ͕ϱϳϬ Ψϵ͕ϯϬϬ͕ϬϳϬ    Page 101 of 123

^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ ϯ͘'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞƐƚĂĨĨŝƐĚŝƌĞĐƚĞĚƚŽŵĞĞƚǁŝƚŚƐƚĂĨĨĨƌŽŵKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ ĂŶĚ ƵƌŚĂŵ ŽƵŶƚLJ͕ŝŶĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŚĂƉĞů,ŝůůĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨƵƌŚĂŵ͕ ƚŽ͗ x ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂŶLJƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŽĚŝƌĞĐƚĂŶĚŝŶĚŝƌĞĐƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌƵƌŚĂŵĂŶĚKƌĂŶŐĞ ĐŽƵŶƚŝĞƐ͖ x ŝƐĐƵƐƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŝŽŶŽĨƐŵĂůůĐĂƉŝƚĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŽůŽĐĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƉŽŶƐŽƌƐ͖ x ŝƐĐƵƐƐĐŽƐƚĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ͖ĂŶĚ x WƌĞƐĞŶƚĂďƵĚŐĞƚĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƌĞĨůĞĐƚŝŶŐĂŶLJƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďLJƵƌŚĂŵĂŶĚ KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJƐƚĂĨĨƐďLJEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϭ͕ϮϬϭϵ͘  ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϰ͘ŽƉŝĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐƵĚŐĞƚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐŚĂůůďĞĨƵƌŶŝƐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞůĞƌŬƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚŽĨ dƌƵƐƚĞĞƐĂŶĚƚŽƚŚĞƵĚŐĞƚKĨĨŝĐĞƌŽĨƚŚŝƐƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJƚŽďĞŬĞƉƚŽŶĨŝůĞĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƌĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞ ĚŝƐďƵƌƐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĨƵŶĚƐ͘   KWdd,/^ϮϲƚŚzK&&ZhZzϮϬϮϬ͘    ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ  DŝĐŚĂĞůWĂƌŬĞƌ͕ŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐŚĂŝƌ  dd^d͗   ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DŝĐŚĞůůĞ͘ĂǁƐŽŶ͕ůĞƌŬƚŽƚŚĞŽĂƌĚ   

&zϮϬdƌŝĂŶŐůĞdĂdžŝƐƚƌŝĐƚʹKƌĂŶŐĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ƵŶĚƵĚŐĞƚKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚ;KϮϬϮϬϬϬϬϰͿ Ϯ Page 102 of 123

MEMORANDUM TO: GoTriangle Board of Trustees – Operations & Finance Committee FROM: Service Planning DATE: February 26, 2020 SUBJECT: FY 2019 Annual Bus Service Performance Report

Action Requested None.

Background and Purpose In September 2003, GoTriangle’s Board of Trustees adopted the Regional Bus Service Standards to establish performance expectations for the agency’s fixed-route services. This report provides a summary of GoTriangle’s regional bus service performance during fiscal year 2019, with comparisons to FY 2018 and prior years to illustrate changes and trends in performance.

Key Findings x Ridership on the GoTriangle system increased by 1% to 1,674,324 boardings in FY 2019, against the trend of ridership declines that began in FY 2015. x Routes 300 and DRX continue to have the greatest increases in ridership, partially thanks to service increases funded by the County Transit Plans. In FY 2019, Route 300’s ridership increased by over 23,000 annual boardings and Route DRX’s by over 13,000. Ridership is also up for the other core routes (100, 400, 700, and 800) on weekends, building on an earlier investment from the County Transit Plans. x In the first year of the Youth GoPass program, GoTriangle had 53,694 boardings with Youth GoPasses, which is 3% of total ridership. x Routes 400, 700, 805, and CRX had declines in weekday ridership. Identifying the specific causes will require additional research. Ridership also decreased for Go OnDemand, the pilot demand- response service in the Research Triangle Park. (GoTriangle discontinued Go OnDemand and replaced it with RTP Connect in FY 2020.) x Routes 405, 700, and DRX remain GoTriangle’s highest-productivity routes in terms of boardings per hour. Routes 311, KRX, and WRX remain the lowest. x On-time performance remained at 88%, which exceeds GoTriangle’s goal of 85%.

Financial Impact Not applicable.

Page 103 of 123

Attachments A. FY 2019 Annual Bus Service Performance Report B. FY 2019 Service Statistics C. FY 2019 Wake Transit Standards Evaluation D. FY 2019 Fare Program Statistics

Staff Contacts x Matthew Frazier, Data Specialist – [email protected], (919) 485-7528 x Erik Landfried, Transit Service Planning Supervisor – [email protected], (919) 485-7508

Page 104 of 123 Page 105 of 123

2

In September 2003, GoTriangle’s Board of Trustees adopted the Regional Bus Service Standards to establish performance expectations for the agency’s fixed-route services. The intent was to drive improvements in productivity by routinely and systematically evaluating bus service performance against quantifiable indicators. Since the adoption of the Standards, the annual performance reporting process has been incrementally adjusted to provide the most useful information about GoTriangle’s bus service.

The GoTriangle performance indicators presented in this report are:

x Daily Boardings – how many people are using the service provided? x Boardings per Revenue Hour – how cost-effective is this service compared to others? x On-Time Performance – how well is the service meeting the expectations set by the schedule?

This report provides a summary of GoTriangle’s regional bus service performance during fiscal year 2019, with comparisons to fiscal year 2018 and prior years in order to illustrate changes and trends in performance.

x Ridership on the GoTriangle system increased by 1% to 1,674,324 boardings in FY 2019, against the trend of ridership declines that began in FY 2015.

x Routes 300 and DRX continue to have the greatest increases in ridership, partially due to service increases funded by the County Transit Plans. In FY 2019, Route 300’s ridership increased by over 23,000 annual boardings and Route DRX’s by over 13,000. Ridership is also up for the other core routes (100, 400, 700, and 800) on weekends, building on an earlier investment from the County Transit Plans.

x In the first year of the Youth GoPass program, GoTriangle had 53,694 boardings with Youth GoPasses, which is 3% of total ridership.

x Routes 400, 700, 805, and CRX had declines in weekday ridership. Identifying the specific causes will require additional research. Ridership also decreased for Go OnDemand, the pilot demand- response service in the Research Triangle Park. (GoTriangle discontinued Go OnDemand and replaced it with RTP Connect in FY 2020.)

x Routes 405, 700, and DRX remain GoTriangle’s highest-productivity routes in terms of boardings per hour. Routes 311, KRX, and WRX remain the lowest.

x On-time performance remained at 88%, which exceeds GoTriangle’s goal of 85%.

Page 106 of 123

3

GoTriangle usually implements major service changes in August of each year. The August 2018 service changes affected only a few routes:

Route Service Change 100 (Raleigh – Airport – RTC) Extended Sunday service by two hours. 300 (Raleigh – Cary) Previously, service ended around 7:00 PM, 400 (Durham – Chapel Hill) but now service ends around 9:00 PM. 700 (Durham – RTC) 800 (Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC) DRX (Durham – Raleigh Express) Added ten trips per day and adjusted the schedule to account for traffic congestion. CRX (Chapel Hill – Raleigh Express) Adjusted the schedule to account for traffic congestion (but did not add trips).

GoTriangle also adopted a new holiday schedule, reducing the number of holidays with no transit service from seven to two (Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day) and improving consistency with the local systems. The Wake, Durham, and Orange County Transit Plans funded these improvements.

At the same time, GoTriangle and our partner agencies began the Youth GoPass program. Riders age 13 through 18 can obtain a free Youth GoPass and ride GoTriangle, GoRaleigh, GoCary, and GoDurham at no cost.

In January 2019, GoTriangle made another set of minor service changes:

Route Service Change Go OnDemand (RTP) Discontinued midday service, and increased peak service from three vehicles to four. 100 (Raleigh – Airport – RTC) Minor schedule changes. 300 (Raleigh – Cary) Minor schedule changes. 305 (Raleigh – Cary – Lake Pine) Minor schedule changes. 311 (Apex – Lake Pine – RTC – EPA) Minor schedule changes.

Two key changes implemented in FY 2018 continued to affect ridership in FY 2019: the expansion of off- peak service on Routes 100, 300, 700, and 800, and the replacement of the RTP Shuttles with Go OnDemand.

Page 107 of 123

4

Across the system and including contracted services, GoTriangle had 1,674,324 customer boardings in FY 2019. This represents a 1% increase from FY 2018 (1,656,150 boardings).

The creation of Youth GoPass contributed to the ridership increase. There were 53,694 Youth GoPass boardings on GoTriangle in FY 2019. Meanwhile, the number of reduced-fare boardings (which previously included youth) and high school student GoPass boardings decreased by only 25,850 from FY 2018 to FY 2019. Details about ridership for each fare program are included in Attachment D.

The following chart compares annual ridership (green) to the amount of service provided in revenue hours (purple).

GoTriangle Statistics by Fiscal Year 2,000,000 200,000

1,800,000 180,000

1,600,000 160,000

1,400,000 140,000

1,200,000 120,000

1,000,000 100,000

800,000 80,000

600,000 60,000 Boardings in Fiscal Fiscal Year Boardings in

400,000 40,000 Revenue inHours Fiscal Year

200,000 20,000

0 0

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 From FY 1992 to FY 2010, GoTriangle’s ridership increased more or less in proportion with the amount of service offered. In FY 2011 – 2013, ridership expanded dramatically, even as the amount of service offered remained stable. This expansion began to reverse in FY 2014: GoTriangle began adding more service each year, but the ridership growth moderated, and eventually turned into a decline. (These patterns correspond well with the price of gasoline, which increased rapidly in FY 2011 and 2012, and decreased rapidly in FY 2015 and 2016. GoTriangle also increased fares in FY 2015.)

It is important to note that despite the recent year-to-year decreases, GoTriangle is still on a long-term trend of increasing ridership. The future of ridership is always difficult to predict, but comparisons can be drawn to FY 2002 and 2003: GoTriangle increased service sharply, and ridership declined in the moment, but it caught back up to the service offered – and indeed, began to grow beyond the level of service offered – in FY 2008.

Page 108 of 123

5

The relatively minor 1% increase in ridership from FY 2018 to FY 2019 masks larger changes at the route level. Details about the ridership of each route are included in Attachment B. As an overview, this chart shows the absolute change in ridership for each route on the system:

Absolute Change in Ridership by Route, FY 2018 to FY 2019 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 -5,000 -10,000 300 DRX 100 ZWX 420 800 311 ODX 201 102 WRX 105 305 KRX 405 FRX 301 RSX 700 RTP CRX 805 400

Increase Decrease

Most of the significant increases in ridership can be linked to recent service changes.

Route 300 (Raleigh – Cary) continues to boast Route 300 FY '18 FY '19 Δ impressive year-over-year ridership gains. (The table Weekday 474 544 +15% to the right shows the average daily boardings for Peak (Ral.-Cary) 176 201 +14% each time period.) GoTriangle began Route 300 in its Peak (Cary-RTC) 122 123 +1% modern form in August 2015 – before, different Midday 148 180 +22% routes connected Raleigh and Cary during peak and Evening 29 40 +39% off-peak times. Route 301 ran during peak hours, Saturday 180 243 +35% with a winding course through southeast Cary, and Sunday 78 139 +78% the more direct Route 303 ran only midday and Saturday. Since August 2015, Route 300 has provided a direct link at all times of day.

GoTriangle added evening and Sunday service, and increased the frequency of midday and Saturday service, in August 2017, then extended Sunday service by a further two hours in August 2018. Ridership has increased on the core Raleigh-Cary segment, at all times of day, each year since August 2015. This shows the benefit of operating service consistently at all times of day.

Route DRX (Durham – Raleigh Express) has also experienced ridership growth in the years leading up to FY 2019, though unlike Route 300, it has not received increases in service. Rather, ridership has increased naturally thanks to greater employment in downtown Raleigh and downtown Durham and greater congestion on I-40 and NC-147.

GoTriangle added ten trips to Route DRX’s schedule at the beginning of FY 2019 to capitalize on the growth, and ridership increased from an average of 470 daily boardings in FY 2018 to 527 in FY 2019 – a 12% increase. Page 109 of 123

6

Ridership on GoTriangle’s weekend service on the core routes (Routes 100, 300, 400, 700, and 800) has also increased, thanks to improvements to Saturday service in August 2016/2017 and improvements to Sunday service in August 2018.

Saturday Sunday Route FY '18 FY '19 Δ FY '18 FY '19 Δ 100 (Raleigh – Airport – RTC) 431 451 +5% 238 283 +19% 300 (Raleigh – Cary) 180 243 +35% 78 139 +78% 400 (Durham – Chapel Hill) 340 370 +9% 184 214 +16% 700 (Durham – RTC) 258 268 +4% 151 167 +11% 800 (Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC) 252 257 +2% 117 122 +4% Total 1,461 1,589 +9% 767 925 +21%

However, several routes had noticeable declines in weekday ridership. (In the case of Routes 400 and 700, this canceled out the growth in weekend ridership.)

Route FY '18 FY '19 Δ Most affected direction 400 (Durham – Chapel Hill) 767 722 −6% Both ways, peak & midday 700 (Durham – RTC) 465 446 −4% From Durham to RTC 805 (Chapel Hill – Woodcroft – RTC) 380 352 −7% From RTC to Chapel Hill CRX (Chapel Hill – Raleigh Express) 394 370 −6% From Chapel Hill to Raleigh

Ridership and productivity remain healthy on these routes, but year-over-year ridership change has been negative for the past three years. Identifying the specific causes will require additional research.

Finally, the replacement of the RTP Shuttles with Go OnDemand has continued to decrease ridership in the Research Triangle Park. In calendar year 2017, the last full year of service for the RTP shuttles, they had an average of 116 daily boardings. In FY 2019, after eighteen months of service, Go OnDemand had an average of 83 daily boardings – a decrease of 28%. In addition, almost half of the boardings on Go OnDemand were direct trips within the RTP area, which did not connect to other GoTriangle routes at the Regional Transit Center. (This may be contributing to reduced ridership on Route 700 in particular.)

RTP Shuttles and OnDemand Ridership 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 past 12 months 40

Average Average boardings, daily 20 0 Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr '14 '14 '15 '15 '15 '15 '16 '16 '16 '16 '17 '17 '17 '17 '18 '18 '18 '18 '19 '19

Shuttles OnDemand (All trips) OnDemand (to/from RTC)

Page 110 of 123

7

GoTriangle’s Regional Bus Service Standards establish categories for routes, and compare routes to one another within each category. A route is considered “high performing” if its number of boardings per revenue hour is above 125% of the average for its service category, and “low performing” if its number of boardings per revenue hour is below 75% of the average for its service category. The Wake Transit Service Standards and Performance Measures set a different process for evaluating route performance, by comparing each route’s productivity to a fixed standard for the service category. Attachment C compares the performance of GoTriangle routes to the Wake Transit standards.

Peak services1 are divided into two categories: Regional and Express. Regional Routes Productivity Performance 405 (Durham – Chapel Hill/Carrboro) 20.4 High 700 (Durham – RTC) 17.5 High 800 (Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC) 16.8 High 400 (Durham – Chapel Hill) 13.6 Average 420 (Hillsborough – Chapel Hill) 13.5 Average 805 (Chapel Hill – Woodcroft – RTC) 12.8 Average 102 (Raleigh – Garner) 12.0 Average 300 (Raleigh – Cary – RTC) 11.7 Average 105 (Raleigh – RTC) 11.7 Average 100 (Raleigh – Airport – RTC) 8.3 Low 305 (Raleigh – Cary – Lake Pine) 8.2 Low 301 (Raleigh – Southeast Cary) 7.0 Low 201 (North Raleigh – RTC) 6.8 Low 311 (Apex – Lake Pine – RTC – EPA) 5.8 Low Go OnDemand 4.1 Low Category Average – FY 2019 12.5 Category Average – FY 2018 12.5

Routes 405, 700, and 800 have been consistently high performing by this measure for several years. Routes 201, 301, 305, and 311 have been consistently low performing, but the Wake Bus Plan includes proposals to address the productivity of each of these routes. GoTriangle implemented changes for Routes 201 and 311, as well as Go OnDemand, in FY 2020, and will address Routes 301 and 305 in future fiscal years – see the “What’s Next?” section on page 13 for more information. Route 100’s low performing status is challenging to solve. It performs well off-peak, but it overlaps with the faster Routes 105, CRX, and DRX during peak hours. The Wake Bus Plan and Short-Range Transit Plan do not include any proposals that address its relationship with these routes, but the Wake Transit Vision Plan update will examine it.

1 Because of constraints on the available data, all weekday service for Route RSX is included in the “Peak” category, as is the midday service for Go OnDemand (which ended in January 2019). Page 111 of 123

8

Express Routes Productivity Performance DRX (Durham – Raleigh Express) 14.7 High CRX (Chapel Hill – Raleigh Express) 12.0 Average ZWX (Zebulon – Wendell – Raleigh Express) 10.7 Average ODX (Orange – Durham Express) 10.2 Average FRX (Fuquay-Varina – Raleigh Express) 8.1 Low RSX (Robertson Scholars Express) 7.3 Low WRX (Wake Forest – Raleigh Express) 5.6 Low KRX (Knightdale – Raleigh Express) 5.5 Low Category Average – FY 2019 10.9 Category Average – FY 2018 11.4

Route DRX has always been the highest-performing express route due to its strong bidirectional demand. Its productivity was even higher (18.2 boardings per hour) in FY 2018, and decreased when GoTriangle added ten trips per day – ridership has increased, but has not yet caught up to the added service. Route DRX nevertheless remains the only express route classified as high performing.

GoTriangle discontinued Routes KRX and RSX in FY 2020. GoTriangle Routes 400 and 405 continue to provide service in the same corridor as Route RSX, and GoRaleigh introduced a new local route to Knightdale to replace Route KRX. In addition, work on new Park-and-Rides is underway for Routes FRX and WRX. More details about these changes are available in the “What’s Next?” section on page 13.

Attachment B section 2 shows the ridership and productivity of peak-hour service to each of the four key commute destinations (Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, and the Regional Transit Center/greater Research Triangle Park), with ridership split by direction for routes serving two destinations.2 This table summarizes the FY 2019 totals for each destination: Destination Boardings Rev. Hours Productivity Raleigh 308,000 31,827 9.7 Durham 209,955 15,732 13.3 Chapel Hill 395,543 22,664 17.5 RTC/Greater RTP 242,875 27,719 8.8

2 Example: On Route DRX, which serves Durham and Raleigh, ridership on trips from Raleigh to Durham in the morning and Durham to Raleigh in the afternoon is in the “Durham” category, and ridership on trips from Durham to Raleigh in the morning and Raleigh to Durham in the afternoon is in the “Raleigh” category. However, on Route ODX, all ridership is included in the “Durham” category.

Page 112 of 123

9

Off-peak services are split into categories based the time of day: Midday, Evening, Saturday, and Sunday. High performing routes are highlighted in blue, and low performing routes in orange.

Route Midday Evening Saturday Sunday 100 (Raleigh – Airport – RTC) 11.8 10.0 8.4 10.2 300 (Raleigh – Cary) 12.5 11.4 9.4 10.1 400 (Durham – Chapel Hill) 11.4 9.8 7.1 8.1 700 (Durham – RTC) 13.7 12.7 10.0 12.3 800 (Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC) 9.8 8.7 5.0 4.7 RSX (Robertson Scholars Express) 6.8 4.1 Category Average – FY 2019 11.6 10.2 7.6 8.4 Category Average – FY 2018 11.7 10.0 7.2 8.1

The core routes all operate at a similar level of productivity (Route 700 has higher productivity mainly because it is shorter). The exception is Route 800, which is slightly less productive than the other routes on weekdays and much less productive on weekends, despite its high peak-hour productivity. The probable cause is that it operates on NC-54 instead of I-40 during off-peak times, which makes the trip between Chapel Hill and points east much slower than driving. GoTriangle plans to realign Route 800 to use I-40 at all times shortly after this report’s publication, which will both reduce costs and attract customers who may not use the route today because of the slow trip.

Page 113 of 123

10

GoTriangle considers a trip on time if it arrives at its end-of-line timepoint no more than five minutes later than the scheduled time. The defined goal is for 85% of trips to arrive on time. For FY 2019, GoTriangle met this goal with 88% of trips arriving on time – the same as FY 2018.

The following routes did not meet the 85% mark:

Route Time FY 2018 FY 2019 Δ 102 (Raleigh – Garner) Peak 77% 84% +7 pt 201 (North Raleigh – RTC) Peak 88% 83% −5 pt 305 (Raleigh – Cary – Lake Pine) Peak 80% 83% +3 pt 800 (Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC) Peak 81% 80% - WRX (Wake Forest – Raleigh Express) Peak 78% 80% +2 pt 300 (Raleigh – Cary – RTC) Midday 88% 83% −5 pt 300 (Raleigh – Cary – RTC) Saturday 72% 79% +7 pt 400 (Durham – Chapel Hill) Saturday 81% 84% +3 pt

The following routes failed to meet the standard last year, but did meet it this year:

Route Time FY 2018 FY 2019 Δ CRX (Chapel Hill – Raleigh Express) Peak 84% 86% +3 pt DRX (Durham – Raleigh Express) Peak 78% 85% +7 pt KRX (Knightdale – Raleigh Express) Peak 83% 86% +3 pt 300 (Raleigh – Cary – RTC) Sunday 79% 88% +9 pt

Route DRX’s increase in on-time performance can be attributed to schedule changes implemented in August 2018 – with the opportunity to add revenue hours and vehicles, GoTriangle could rebuild the schedule from scratch and add layover time to the trips that needed it. Most other routes do not have the same opportunity. GoTriangle adjusts schedules periodically (for example, Route 305 received schedule adjustments in January 2019), but without more revenue hours or vehicles, the resulting improvements in on-time performance are limited.

On-time performance data for each route is included with ridership data in Attachment B.

Page 114 of 123

11

Other transit systems in the United States have been experiencing a trend of decreasing ridership and productivity over the past few years. This chart shows productivity (in terms of boardings per revenue hour) for other transit agencies that have been identified as GoTriangle’s peers.

35.0 $4.00

30.0 $3.50

$3.00 25.0 $2.50 20.0 $2.00 15.0 $1.50 10.0 $1.00

5.0 $0.50 Cost Cost of 1 gallon regular gasoline (Lower Atlantic)

our, previous previous h our, 12 months revenue Boardings per 0.0 $0.00 Jun 2011 Jun 2012 Jun 2013 Jun 2014 Jun 2015 Jun 2016 Jun 2017 Jun 2018 Jun 2019

GoTriangle PART (Triad, N.C.) CATS Bus (Charlotte, N.C.) VCTC (Ventura Co., Ca.) Pace (Chicago, Ill.) Yolobus (Sacramento, Ca.) Community Transit (Wa.) Gas Price

From June 2018 to June 2019, GoTriangle’s productivity decreased by around 1.5%, but our peers had a sharper decrease: 4-5% for Community Transit, Pace, and Yolobus, 9% for VCTC, 12% for CATS, and 13% for PART.

GoTriangle’s relative position within the peer group has not changed. PART, VCTC, and Yolobus are our closest peers: they provide regional express bus as their basic service type, operate in regions without a single dominant city, coordinate with multiple municipal transit systems, and do not operate rail service. Accordingly, GoTriangle’s productivity is comparable to those systems. If we maintain and improve our system’s productivity, we are likely to overtake Yolobus.

While CATS, Community Transit, and Pace serve entire regions and operate express service, their basic service type is urban (or suburban) local bus service, which tends to have higher productivity on the basis of boardings per hour. Their regions have rapid transit rail service, and a single central business district on which express buses can focus. Accordingly, their productivity is much higher than GoTriangle’s. These systems are included as aspirational peers.

Page 115 of 123

12

It is worth noting that the price of gasoline was relatively stable during FY 2019, following two years of increase. Gas prices are one of the leading external factors that influence transit ridership, but if they were driving the national decline, one would expect the trend to be reversing for more agencies by this point. This suggests that other factors in the transportation market and the broader economy may ultimately be responsible.

GoTriangle’s partner agencies in the Triangle are also seeing fewer effects from the national decline. From June 2018 to 2019, GoRaleigh’s annual ridership increased by 4% (thanks in part to new service funded by the Wake County Transit Plan), Chapel Hill Transit’s has increased by 1%, and GoDurham’s decreased by only 2% after years of sharper declines.

9,000,000

8,000,000

7,000,000

6,000,000

5,000,000

4,000,000

3,000,000 Total boardings, previous boardings, previous Total 12 months 2,000,000

1,000,000

0 Jun 2011 Jun 2012 Jun 2013 Jun 2014 Jun 2015 Jun 2016 Jun 2017 Jun 2018 Jun 2019

GoTriangle GoRaleigh GoDurham Chapel Hill

Page 116 of 123

13

The Wake Bus Plan and the GoTriangle Short-Range Transit Plan recommended several service changes for FY 2020. GoTriangle has already implemented many of these changes:

x Created Route 310 (Wake Tech – RTC), an all-day shuttle route connecting the Wake Tech RTP campus and Perimeter Park to the Regional Transit Center. When the McCrimmon Parkway extension is completed, GoTriangle will extend Route 310 to the Cary Depot. x Converted Route 201 (North Raleigh – RTC) into Route NRX (North Raleigh – RTC Express), which provides express service via I-540 instead of running on local streets. Route NRX serves Park- and-Rides at Bent Tree Plaza (on Falls of Neuse Road) and Triangle Town Center. x Replaced Go OnDemand with the RTP Connect pilot program. Instead of providing on-demand trips in the RTP with GoTriangle vehicles, GoTriangle subsidizes the fare for Uber or Lyft trips. x Realigned Route 311 (Lake Pine – Apex – RTC) to serve the Kit Creek Road area (Cisco, Biogen, NetApp, and other employers) instead of EPA and NIEHS. Stops around Kit Creek Road had the highest ridership on Go OnDemand. x Discontinued Routes 102 (Garner – Raleigh) and KRX (Knightdale – Raleigh Express) so GoRaleigh could implement new routes in their place (Route 20 in Garner and Route 33 in Knightdale). The new routes provide all-day local service instead of peak-only express service. x Discontinued Route RSX (Robertson Scholars Express), since it duplicated GoTriangle Routes 400/405 (which still operate in the same corridor). The Robertson Scholars Foundation now contracts with Carolina Livery to operate an express service meeting their requirements. x Realigned Route 800 (Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC) to use I-40 at all times, instead of using I- 40 at peak and NC-54 off-peak. This will provide faster service from Chapel Hill to the Research Triangle Park, RDU Airport, and Raleigh at off-peak times.

The Wake Bus Plan and Short-Range Transit Plan recommend additional route changes for FY 2021 and the subsequent years. To support these changes, GoTriangle has planning studies underway for multiple facilities, including several new or improved Park-and-Rides (for Routes 305, 311, CRX, DRX, NRX, ODX, WRX, and ZWX), a bus facility at , and an improved Regional Transit Center.

The first new facility to open will be a Park-and-Ride at Wake Tech’s Southern Wake Campus for Route FRX, which will allow the route to serve trips to Wake Tech along with commutes to Raleigh. GoTriangle and NCDOT also plan to implement the Bus on Shoulder System (BOSS) on I-540 for Route NRX.

Durham, Orange, and Wake counties are updating their county transit plans in FY 2020. When complete, they may include recommendations for regional bus service beyond GoTriangle’s current plans.

Finally, GoTriangle, GoRaleigh, GoCary, and GoDurham plan to deploy the Delerrok TouchPass account- based fare collection system in 2020. TouchPass will allow riders to pay their fares using a mobile phone application or a smartcard, and automatically “cap” riders who pay for transit one ride at a time at the price of a 1-day, 7-day, or 31-day pass. This will save money for existing riders and reduce the barrier to entry for new riders, which the partners expect will lead to increased ridership. Page 117 of 123

14 Attachment B: FY 2019 Service Statistics Section 1: System and Route Totals (Details for specific destinations and times of day are on the following pages.)

Annual Annual Avg. Daily 5-Year Boardings On-Time Perf. Route Boardings Rev. Hours Boardings Trends per Hour (FY18) Whole System 1,674,324 150,610 11.1 88% 88% Weekday 1,534,369 132,806 6,162 11.6 87% 89% Peak 1,157,273 97,943 4,648 11.8 87% 87% Midday 274,674 23,686 1,103 11.6 89% 92% Night 74,298 7,301 298 10.2 92% 94% Saturday 84,960 11,232 1,634 7.6 89% 87% Sunday 54,995 6,572 948 8.4 94% 93% Core Routes (Seven-Day Service) 898,221 78,767 11.4 88% 90% 100 Raleigh – Airport – RTC 170,353 17,391 (see pg. 16) 9.8 91% 93% 300 Raleigh – Cary – RTC 156,171 13,468 (see pg. 16) 11.6 85% 87% 400 Durham – Chapel Hill 211,375 18,984 (see pg. 16) 11.1 87% 88% 700 Durham – RTC 134,775 9,501 (see pg. 16) 14.2 97% 97% 800 Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC 225,547 19,422 (see pg. 16) 11.6 83% 85% Peak-Only Routes 722,905 62,027 2,903 11.7 87% 86% 102 Raleigh – Garner 17,982 1,494 72 12.0 84% 77% 105 Raleigh – RTC 54,189 4,645 218 11.7 89% 90% 201 North Raleigh – RTC 13,853 2,039 56 6.8 83% 88% 301 Raleigh – Southeast Cary 29,639 4,264 119 7.0 91% 90% 305 Raleigh – Cary – Lake Pine 23,993 2,934 96 8.2 83% 80% 311 Apex – Lake Pine – RTC – EPA 21,252 3,675 85 5.8 89% 91% 405 Durham – Chapel Hill/Carrboro 122,833 6,020 493 20.4 88% 85% 420 Hillsborough – Chapel Hill 45,784 3,404 184 13.5 89% 92% 805 Chapel Hill – Woodcroft – RTC 87,726 6,841 352 12.8 87% 90% CRX Chapel Hill – Raleigh Exp. 92,010 7,698 370 12.0 86% 84% DRX Durham – Raleigh Exp. 131,119 8,890 527 14.7 85% 78% FRX Fuquay-Varina – Raleigh Exp. 14,702 1,805 59 8.1 89% 86% KRX Knightdale – Raleigh Exp. 7,689 1,399 31 5.5 86% 83% ODX Orange – Durham Exp. 27,436 2,686 110 10.2 89% 94% WRX Wake Forest – Raleigh Exp. 13,684 2,448 55 5.6 80% 78% ZWX Zebulon – Wendell – Raleigh Exp. 19,014 1,785 76 10.7 85% 88% Special Services RTP Go OnDemand 21,419 5,272 86 4.1 n/a n/a RSX Robertson Scholars Exp. 31,779 4,544 (see pg. 16) 7.0 89% 91%

High productivity – Exceeded 125% of the category average ………………… 20.0 Low productivity – Less than 75% of the category average ………………… 5.0 Did not meet on-time performance target (85%) ………………………………… 80% Did not meet on-time performance target (85%) in FY 2018 ……………………………………………… 80% Page 118 of 123

Attachment B: FY 2019 Service Statistics 15 Section 2: Peak Hour Commutes (Routes marked with ֎ are split in two based on commute flow. For example, "DRX To Raleigh / From Durham" has data for trips from Durham to Raleigh in the morning, and trips from Raleigh back to Durham in the afternoon.)

Annual Annual Avg. Daily 5-Year Boardings On-Time Perf. Route Boardings Rev. Hours Boardings Trends per Hour (FY18) Peak Commute to Raleigh 308,900 31,827 1,241 9.7 87% 86% 100 From RTC/Airport ֎ 21,231 2,709 85 7.8 92% 94% 102 From Garner 17,982 1,494 72 12.0 84% 77% 105 From RTC ֎ 23,580 2,124 95 11.1 91% 92% 300 From Cary (Raleigh-Cary section only) 50,013 3,806 201 13.1 86% 88% 301 From Southeast Cary 29,639 4,264 119 7.0 91% 90% 305 From Cary/Apex 23,993 2,934 96 8.2 83% 80% CRX From Chapel Hill ֎ 33,417 3,576 134 9.3 86% 83% DRX From Durham ֎ 53,956 3,482 217 15.5 88% 78% FRX From Fuquay-Varina 14,702 1,805 59 8.1 89% 86% KRX From Knightdale 7,689 1,399 31 5.5 86% 83% WRX From Wake Forest 13,684 2,448 55 5.6 80% 78% ZWX From Zebulon/Wendell 19,014 1,785 76 10.7 85% 88% Peak Commute to Durham 209,955 15,732 843 13.3 86% 87% 400 From Chapel Hill ֎ 32,709 3,084 131 10.6 79% 85% 405 From Chapel Hill/Carrboro ֎ 50,779 2,939 204 17.3 87% 84% 700 From RTC ֎ 21,868 1,616 88 13.5 93% 93% DRX From Raleigh ֎ 77,163 5,407 310 14.3 84% 79% ODX From Hillsborough/Mebane 27,436 2,686 110 10.2 89% 94% Peak Commute to Chapel Hill 395,543 22,664 1,589 17.5 87% 87% 400 From Durham/Patterson Place ֎ 59,251 3,667 238 16.2 91% 91% 405 From Durham ֎ 72,054 3,081 289 23.4 89% 86% 420 From Hillsborough 45,784 3,404 184 13.5 89% 92% 800 From RTC/Southpoint ֎ 96,167 4,476 386 21.5 82% 82% 805 From RTC/Woodcroft ֎ 63,694 3,915 256 16.3 90% 91% CRX From Raleigh 58,593 4,122 235 14.2 86% 84% Peak Commute to RTC 242,875 27,719 975 8.8 85% 88% 100 From Raleigh/Airport ֎ 25,109 2,877 101 8.7 87% 87% 105 From Raleigh ֎ 30,609 2,521 123 12.1 87% 89% 201 From North Raleigh 13,853 2,039 56 6.8 83% 88% 300 From Cary (Cary-RTC section only) 30,733 3,071 123 10.0 89% 93% 311 From Apex/Lake Pine 21,252 3,675 85 5.8 89% 91% 700 From Durham ֎ 34,221 1,596 137 21.4 93% 93% 800 From Chapel Hill/Southpoint ֎ 41,647 3,742 167 11.1 77% 79% 805 From Woodcroft ֎ 24,032 2,926 97 8.2 83% 90% RTP Go OnDemand 21,419 5,272 86 4.1 n/a n/a

High productivity – Exceeded 125% of the category average ………………… 20.0 Low productivity – Less than 75% of the category average ………………… 5.0 Did not meet on-time performance target (85%) ……………………..…………… 80% Did not meet on-time performance target (85%) in FY 2018 ……………………………………………… 80% Page 119 of 123

16 Attachment B: FY 2019 Service Statistics Section 3: Ridership by Time Period (for all-day routes)

Annual Annual Avg. Daily 5-Year Boardings On-Time Perf. Route Boardings Rev. Hours Boardings Trends per Hour (FY18) Core Routes – Weekday Peak Service 412,949 30,644 1,658 13.5 86% 88% 100 Raleigh – Airport – RTC 46,340 5,586 186 8.3 89% 91% 300 Raleigh – Cary – RTC 80,746 6,877 324 11.7 87% 90% 400 Durham – Chapel Hill 91,960 6,752 369 13.6 85% 88% 700 Durham – RTC 56,089 3,212 225 17.5 93% 93% 800 Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC 137,814 8,217 553 16.8 80% 81% Core Routes – Weekday Midday Service 274,674 23,686 1,103 11.6 89% 92% 100 Raleigh – Airport – RTC 66,126 5,622 266 11.8 85% 93% 300 Raleigh – Cary 44,810 3,585 180 12.5 83% 88% 400 Durham – Chapel Hill 68,536 6,017 275 11.4 90% 91% 700 Durham – RTC 42,468 3,107 171 13.7 98% 98% 800 Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC 52,734 5,354 212 9.8 88% 89% Core Routes – Weekday Evening Service 74,298 7,301 298 10.2 92% 94% 100 Raleigh – Airport – RTC 18,026 1,799 72 10.0 95% 99% 300 Raleigh – Cary 9,912 868 40 11.4 94% 96% 400 Durham – Chapel Hill 19,219 1,965 77 9.8 85% 86% 700 Durham – RTC 12,584 994 51 12.7 99% 99% 800 Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC 14,557 1,675 58 8.7 86% 92% Core Routes – Saturday Service 82,647 10,894 1,589 7.6 89% 87% 100 Raleigh – Airport – RTC 23,466 2,779 451 8.4 97% 96% 300 Raleigh – Cary 12,657 1,343 243 9.4 79% 72% 400 Durham – Chapel Hill 19,224 2,717 370 7.1 84% 81% 700 Durham – RTC 13,934 1,399 268 10.0 99% 99% 800 Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC 13,366 2,656 257 5.0 85% 87% Core Routes – Sunday Service 53,653 6,242 925 8.6 93% 92% 100 Raleigh – Airport – RTC 16,395 1,606 283 10.2 98% 97% 300 Raleigh – Cary 8,046 794 139 10.1 88% 79% 400 Durham – Chapel Hill 12,436 1,533 214 8.1 90% 91% 700 Durham – RTC 9,700 789 167 12.3 100% 100% 800 Chapel Hill – Southpoint – RTC 7,076 1,520 122 4.7 89% 93% Robertson Scholars Express 31,779 4,544 7.0 89% 91% RSX Weekday Service 28,124 3,876 175 7.3 88% 91% RSX Saturday Service 2,313 338 75 6.8 93% 87% RSX Sunday Service 1,342 330 43 4.1 99% 97%

High productivity – Exceeded 125% of the category average ………………… 20.0 Low productivity – Less than 75% of the category average ………………… 5.0 Did not meet on-time performance target (85%) ………………………………… 80% Did not meet on-time performance target (85%) in FY 2018 ……………………………………………… 80% Page 120 of 123

Attachment C: Wake Transit Standards Evaluation 17 The Wake Transit "Service Guidelines and Performance Measures" document sets standards for routes' performance on four measures. GoTriangle and other providers make this information available to TPAC, but each provider retains the primary responsibility for evaluating route performance and making changes. Routes which consistently underperform or overperform may be considered for changes in funding when the Wake Bus Plan is updated.

Performance for routes serving Wake County as of FY 2019 Q4 Project Boardings Cost per Farebox On-Time Route Began per Trip Boarding Recovery Performance Core Regional Routes Target 16.0 $7.20 16% 85% 100 Raleigh – Airport – RTC Aug. 2017 8.9 $12.98 7% 94% 300 Raleigh – Cary – RTC Aug. 2017 8.5 $10.01 9% 87% Express (Peak-Only) Routes Target 12.0 $12.00 12% 85% 102 Raleigh – Garner N/A 11.0 $8.69 8% 79% 105 Raleigh – RTC N/A 8.4 $10.67 9% 94% 201 North Raleigh – RTC N/A 8.0 $16.09 5% 85% 301 Raleigh – Southeast Cary N/A 5.8 $18.70 5% 94% 305 Raleigh – Cary – Lake Pine N/A 8.4 $15.95 6% 85% 311 Apex – Lake Pine – RTC – EPA N/A 7.1 $21.78 4% 89% CRX Chapel Hill – Raleigh Exp. Aug. 2018 13.6 $11.07 13% 89% DRX Durham – Raleigh Exp. Aug. 2018* 16.2 $8.42 16% 87% FRX Fuquay-Varina – Raleigh Exp. July 2017 8.7 $17.25 8% 96% KRX Knightdale – Raleigh Exp. July 2017 6.5 $17.74 6% 85% WRX Wake Forest – Raleigh Exp. N/A 7.0 $20.60 6% 85% ZWX Zebulon – Wendell – Raleigh Exp. N/A 14.7 $10.01 13% 87%

July 2017 ……………………………Route is being evaluated according to Wake Transit service standards Aug. 2018* ……………………………Route is in 18-month development period after major service change N/A ……………………………No Wake Transit funding ………………………Route is underperforming per standards (3 or more measures have missed standards for 3 or more quarters) ………………………Route would be underperforming if it was subject to standards ………………Meeting standard for measure ………………Missed standard for 1 or 2 quarters (does not apply to any route this quarter) ………………Missed standard for 3 or more quarters Page 121 of 123

18 Attachment D: FY 2019 Fare Program Statistics

FY 2019 FY 2018 Year over Year Fare Program Boardings % of Total Boardings % of Total Boardings % Change Generally Available 877,164 52.4% 841,951 50.8% 35,213 +4% Full Fare Cash/Passes 597,165 35.7% 624,699 37.7% −27,534 −4% Reduced Fare Cash/Passes* 165,925 9.9% 170,781 10.3% −4,856 −3% Free Fare 34,827 2.1% 28,461 1.7% 6,366 +22% Youth GoPass* 53,694 3.2% 53,694 new NC By Train Transit Pass 818 0.0% 556 0.0% 262 +47% Go OnDemand (No Fare)** 21,419 1.3% 12,700 0.8% 8,719 +69% Unknown 3,316 0.2% 4,754 0.3% −1,438 Employee/Student GoPass 797,160 47.6% 814,199 49.2% −17,039 −2% UNC Chapel Hill 379,056 22.6% 387,714 23.4% −8,658 −2% 184,888 11.0% 181,456 11.0% 3,432 +2% NC State University 97,486 5.8% 94,852 5.7% 2,634 +3% State Government 47,899 2.9% 45,463 2.7% 2,436 +5% Durham Tech 19,135 1.1% 23,646 1.4% −4,511 −19% Research Triangle HS* 20,994 1.3% −20,994 ended City of Raleigh 13,509 0.8% 11,838 0.7% 1,671 +14% American Tobacco 9,184 0.5% 9,067 0.5% 117 − City of Durham 7,509 0.4% 5,414 0.3% 2,095 +39% NC Central University 7,249 0.4% 3,618 0.2% 3,631 +100% Red Hat 7,069 0.4% 7,730 0.5% −661 −9% GoTriangle 6,719 0.4% 5,583 0.3% 1,136 +20% Other GoPasses (8) 17,457 1.0% 16,824 1.0% 633 +4% Total Boardings 1,674,324 1,656,150 18,174

FY 2019 Boardings:

Other 15 GoPasses: 5% State Gov't GoPass: 3% Full Fare: 36% NC State GoPass: 6% Reduced Fare: 10% Duke GoPass: 11% Free Fare: 2% UNC GoPass: 23% Youth GoPass: 3% Misc: 1%

* Before Youth GoPass, youth age 13-18 paid reduced fare. Many of GoTriangle's youth riders had a student GoPass from Research Triangle High School, which is no longer offered since Youth GoPass is available. ** FY 2018 includes only six months of Go OnDemand service. Page 122 of 123



   DDKZEhD

dK͗'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞKƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐΘ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ  &ZKD͗ ZĞŐŝŽŶĂů^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ d͗&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϭϮ͕ϮϬϮϬ  ^h:d͗ WƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌLJ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞŚĂŶŐĞƐĨŽƌ&ĂůůϮϬϮϬ

 ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐKďũĞĐƚŝǀĞ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚ dŚĞŝƚĞŵƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐWůĂŶ͗ ϭ͘ϮWƵƌƐƵĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚĞdžƉĂŶƐŝŽŶŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ Ϯ͘ϮĞůŝǀĞƌƌĞůŝĂďůĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ  ĐƚŝŽŶZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ ^ƚĂĨĨƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƌĞĐĞŝǀĞƚŚĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͘  ĂĐŬŐƌŽƵŶĚĂŶĚWƵƌƉŽƐĞ 'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞǁŝůůĐŽŶĚƵĐƚƉƵďůŝĐŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚŝŶDĂƌĐŚŽŶƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĐŚĂŶŐĞƐĨŽƌƵŐƵƐƚ ϮϬϮϬ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƚŚĞ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ^ŚŽƌƚZĂŶŐĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚWůĂŶƚŚĂƚǁĂƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ ďLJƚŚĞ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐŽŶEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϴ͕ϮϬϭϴ͘  dŚĞ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ^ŚŽƌƚZĂŶŐĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚWůĂŶŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚƚŚƌĞĞŐŽĂůƐ͗ x DĂŬĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĨĂƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŵŽƌĞƚŝŵĞͲĐŽŵƉĞƚŝƚŝǀĞ x WƌŽǀŝĚĞŵŽƌĞĨƌĞƋƵĞŶƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ x WƌŽǀŝĚĞŵŽƌĞĂůůͲĚĂLJƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ  dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞƐĞŐŽĂůƐǁŚŝůĞŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚŽĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĐƵƐƚŽŵĞƌƐ ĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐƌĞůŝĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽŵĞĞƚƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞĞdžƉĞĐƚĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJ͘  &ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂů/ŵƉĂĐƚ dŚĞƌĞŝƐŶŽĨŝŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƚŽƚŚĞ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂů&ƵŶĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƐĞĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ͘ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĨƵŶĚƐ ǁŽƵůĚďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞtĂŬĞƚĂdžĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĞdžƉĂŶƐŝŽŶ͘DŽƌĞĚĞƚĂŝůƐǁŝůůďĞ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŝůŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞŵĞĞƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ͘  ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ x KǀĞƌǀŝĞǁŽĨWƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌLJ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞŚĂŶŐĞƐĨŽƌ&ĂůůϮϬϮϬ  ^ƚĂĨĨŽŶƚĂĐƚ x :ĞŶŶŝĨĞƌ'ƌĞĞŶ͕ϵϭϵͲϰϴϱͲϳϱϮϵ͕ũŐƌĞĞŶΛŐŽƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘ŽƌŐ

 Page 123 of 123



KǀĞƌǀŝĞǁŽĨWƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌLJ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞŚĂŶŐĞƐĨŽƌ&ĂůůϮϬϮϬ &ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϭϵ͕ϮϬϮϬ

ĨĨĞĐƚŝǀĞĂƚĞ͗ƵŐƵƐƚϮϬϮϬ;ĞdžĂĐƚĚĂƚĞƚŽďĞĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚͿ dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚƌŽƵƚĞƐŚĂǀĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ͗

x ZŽƵƚĞϯϬϬʹKƉĞƌĂƚĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶĂƌLJĞƉŽƚĂŶĚ'ŽZĂůĞŝŐŚ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶŽŶůLJ͘ZŽƵƚĞϯϭϬǁŝůůďĞ ĞdžƉĂŶĚĞĚƚŽƐĞƌǀĞZĞŐŝŽŶĂůdƌĂŶƐŝƚĞŶƚĞƌƚŽĂƌLJĞƉŽƚŽŶǁĞĞŬĚĂLJƐĂůůĚĂLJ͘ůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƚŽ^ƚĂƚĞ'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŽŶƚŝŵĞƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞ͘ x ZŽƵƚĞϯϬϭʹůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚŽ^ƚĂƚĞ'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŽŶƚŝŵĞƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞ͘ x ZŽƵƚĞϯϬϱʹdžƉĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚŽƌƵŶĞǀĞƌLJϯϬͲŵŝŶƵƚĞƐĚƵƌŝŶŐǁĞĞŬĚĂLJƉĞĂŬŚŽƵƌƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶ,ŽůůLJ ^ƉƌŝŶŐƐĂŶĚƉĞdžƚŽZĂůĞŝŐŚĂŶĚĞǀĞƌLJϲϬͲŵŝŶƵƚĞƐĨƌŽŵƉĞdžƚŽZĂůĞŝŐŚĚƵƌŝŶŐǁĞĞŬĚĂLJ ŵŝĚĚĂLJƐ͕ǁĞĞŬĚĂLJĞǀĞŶŝŶŐƐ͕^ĂƚƵƌĚĂLJƐĂŶĚ^ƵŶĚĂLJƐ͘^ĞƌǀĞƐƚŽƉƐŝŶƉĞdžĂƚ>ĂŬĞWŝŶĞWůĂnjĂ͕ ŽŵƉĂƌĞ&ŽŽĚƐŽŶ,ƵŐŚĞƐ^ƚ͕ĂŶĚĂŵďƌŝĚŐĞsŝůůĂŐĞĂŶĚŝŶ,ŽůůLJ^ƉƌŝŶŐƐĂƚĂWĂƌŬͲĂŶĚͲZŝĚĞ͘ ůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚŽ^ƚĂƚĞ'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŽŶƚŝŵĞƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĨƌĞƋƵĞŶĐLJ͘ x ZŽƵƚĞϯϭϬʹdžƉĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĚŝƌĞĐƚĂůůĚĂLJǁĞĞŬĚĂLJƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞZĞŐŝŽŶĂůdƌĂŶƐŝƚ ĞŶƚĞƌƚŽĂƌLJĞƉŽƚǀŝĂWĞƌŝŵĞƚĞƌWĂƌŬ͕tĂŬĞdĞĐŚZdWĂŵƉƵƐ͕DĐƌŝŵŵŽŶWŬǁLJ͕ǀĂŶƐZĚ͕ tĞƐƚŽŶWŬǁLJ͕WĂƌŬtĞƐƚsŝůůĂŐĞŝŶDŽƌƌŝƐǀŝůůĞ͕ĂŶĚŚĂƉĞů,ŝůůZĚ͘ x ZŽƵƚĞϯϭϭʹWƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝƌĞĐƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĨƌŽŵƉĞdžƚŽZdWĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐ;<ŝƚƌĞĞŬZĚĂŶĚĂǀŝƐƌͿ ĂŶĚĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚŽ>ĂŬĞWŝŶĞWůĂnjĂ͘ZŽƵƚĞϯϬϱǁŝůůĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽƐĞƌǀĞ>ĂŬĞWŝŶĞWůĂnjĂ͘

KƚŚĞƌƌŽƵƚĞƐŵĂLJŚĂǀĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŽŶͲƚŝŵĞƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞ͕ďƵƚĚŽŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƉƵďůŝĐ ŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚŽƌŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů͘

/ŶƉƌŝůϮϬϭϵ͕ƚŚĞ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽĂƌĚŽĨdƌƵƐƚĞĞƐĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚƚŚĞƌĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂƉĂƌŬĂŶĚƌŝĚĞůŽƚŽŶƚŚĞ &ƵƋƵĂLJͲsĂƌŝŶĂdžƉƌĞƐƐ;&ZyͿĨƌŽŵ,ŝůůƚŽƉ&ŽŽĚ>ŝŽŶƚŽtĂŬĞdĞĐŚʹ^ŽƵƚŚĞƌŶtĂŬĞĂŵƉƵƐWĂƌŬͲĂŶĚͲ ZŝĚĞ͘ƵĞƚŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĚĞůĂLJƐƚŽƚŚĞƌŽĂĚƐƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƚŚĞƉĂƌŬĂŶĚƌŝĚĞůŽƚ͕'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŚĂƐ ŶŽƚLJĞƚƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚƚŚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ͘ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞŝŶƐƵŵŵĞƌϮϬϮϬĂŶĚ'ŽdƌŝĂŶŐůĞ ĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞƐŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐƚŚĞWĂƌŬͲĂŶĚͲZŝĚĞƌĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƵŐƵƐƚϮϬϮϬĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŽƚŚĞƌ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ͘