DOCSLIB.ORG

Analytical Table of Coins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANALYTICAL TABLE OF COINS The following analysis of 10,479 coins from the Agora Excavations, that had been identified and catalogued by July 1, 1935, has been compiled from the work of various members of the Coin Department. Special acknowledgment is made to Miss Katharine Edwards for suggestions and assistance in the accumulation of the data. ATHENIAN COINAGE' Sixth Century-" Wappenmunzen " ....................................... 3 ;R Didrachma. Short-horned bull's head 1 A4 Obol. Alcmaeonid wheel 2 Fifth Century ................................................................. 19 tR Tetradrachma (431-421 B.C.) P1. 12, no. 13, 16 1 iR Drachma (to 431 B.C.) P1. 10, no. 19-27 1 iR Triobol (Periclean Age to 415 B.C.) 4 ,R Trihemiobol (429-415 B.C.) P1. 13, no. 39-41 1 E; Obol (431-421 B.C.) 2 Ar Hemiobol (to 431 B.C.) P1. 10, no.48-56 2 At-plated tetradrachma (407-393 B.C.) P1. 15, no. 12-18 1 AE Kolluboi 5 iZE 0AH Owl facing, pellet on either side P1. 22, no.93-96 2 Fourth Century ........................................................... 208 AS Tetradrachma (393-365 B.C.) P1. 16, no. 1-2 1 AR-plated tetradrachma (3rd quarter of 4th Cent.) Ancient forgeries? 14 A (330-307 .c.) Triple-crested Corinthian helmet;c2 f. ATAlexander. 110AO Owl 1., in wreath P1.22, no. 85-88 23l H Owl r., in wreath P1. 22, no. 80-84 9 The chronological arrangemeent of the Athenian bronze coins up to the period of the- New Style is based oni a careful stuidy of the style and peculiarities of the coins themselves combined with valluable evidence from closed deposits of coins which the excavations have furnished. I am especially iiidebted to Mr. E. S. G. ]Robinson of the British Mtuseumnfor his valuable assistance in the sttudy of the particular chronology. All referenices are to Svoronos, Tresor des Mllonnaiesd'Athenes, unless otherwise stated. 2 Loose die positions. American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve, and extend access to Hesperia ® www.jstor.org 124 JOSEPHINE P. SHEAR /B (330-300 B.C. or later) Attichelmet.' OAE double bodied owl. No symbol P1.22, no.41-45 38 Kalathos symbol P1.22, no.35-40 (1 Symbol uncertain 62 Third Century.......... 0. 486 AR Tetradrachma (339-297 B.C.) P1.20, no.31-37 1 AR Tetrobol (255-229 B.C.?) P1. 23 no.45; P1. 24, no.18 2 AR Triobol (297-255 B.C.) P1.21 no.49 t AE (307-283 B.C.) Crested Corinthian helmet; 2 cf. AE Demetrios Poliorketes. A0 Owl r., in wheat wreath P1.22, no. 64-70 41 A( Owl r., field r., branch P1.22, no.71-72 8 4 AE Owl r., in field r., various symbols. Cornucopiae P1.22, no. 73-74 7 Kalathos P1.22, no.75 6 Wreath P1.22, no. 76-77 18 Spear of wheat P1.22, no. 78-79 5 Illegible' 39 Type uncertain 123 /EB (307-283 B.C.) Crested Corinthian helmet. 2 owls in wreath. A( between legs of owls P. 24, no.58-59 6 A (307-283 B.C.) Crested Attic helmet.' 2 owls in wreath. A0 between legs of owls P1.24, no.51-57 43 A0 between legs of owls; symnbolkerchnos P1.24, no.34-39 9 A0E beneath owls; symbol kalathos P1. 24, no. 42-50 7 Type uncertain 34 EB (307-283 B.C.) CrestedAttic helmet. Owl facing P1.24, no.28 2 B (283-261 B.C.) 03AEOwl spread wing-r. amphora2 (Restruck over coins of Antigonos Gonatas) P1.24, no.10-16 8 /E (after 261 B.C.) cf. coins of Antigonos Gonatas.3 Zeus head-Athena Polias P1.22, nio.53-58 17 Zeus head-Eagle P1.22, no. 59-61 3 AOE r. large owl, symllbolsboukranion and amphora. Unpublished 1 I Loose die positions. 2 Toward the end this series has a tendency to fixed die positions. Fixed die positions. ANALYTICAL TABLE OF COINS 125 LE Triple-crested Attic helmet.1 Owl 1., amphora P1. 22, no. 89-92 3 AO Ai Attic helmet.1 E Owl r., on thunderbolt P1. 23, no. 47-49 39 /E Attic helmet. Same (smaller (lenomination). Unpublished 1 IE Corinthian helmet. Same as above. Unpuiblished 6 A/ Corinthian helmet. AE Owl r., on rudder P1. 23, no. 50-52 11 A1' Type uncertain 6 YE Unclassifiedl 39 New Style1 (229-30 B.C.) .................................................... 902 AR Tetradrachma. A2z1tEOE-XAP1A1 1 AR Drachma. TIWIAPIXOY-NIKAlO 1 AJ Parthenos head. AOE 2 owls in wreath (Fractional issue) P1.24, no.60-68 62 A, Zeus standing-thunderbolt in lowered hand. Owl symbol r. P1.81, no. 4 1 Prow symbol r. P1. 81, no. 9-16 5 Uncertain symbol 2 A,' Zeus hurling thunderbolt, various symbols. Spear of wheat 1., and eagle r. P1. 81, no. 28-29 9 Star above eagle r. P1. 81, no. 17-18 2 Cornucopiae and eagle r. B.M. C.(Attica), p. 80, no. 543 1 Kerchnos 1., eagle and cornucopiae r. P1.81, no.22-24 13 Amphora 1., eagle and cornucopiae r. P1. 81, no. 20-21 3 Amphora 1., eagle r. P1.81, no.25-27 4 1 pileus 1., ea(rle r. P1.81, no. 30-31 2 Pilei of Dioscuri, above stars r. and 1. P1. 81, no. 33-39 24 Star between crescents r. P1. 81, no. 45-48 29 Filleted Thyrsos 1. P1. 81, no. 40-44 3 Spear of wheat 1. P1. 80, no. 25-28 7 Bakehos 1. P1. 81, no. 49-52 5 Uncertain symbol 46 IFE Owl r., on prostrate amphora, various symbols r. Tripod P1. 79, no. 32-33 8 Pilei of Dioscuri P1. 79, no. 8-14 5 No symbol P1. 79, no. 1-7 23 2 spears of wheat P1. 79, no. 22-24 5 Serpent P1. 79, no. 36-37 9 Fixed die positions. 126 JOSEPHINE P. SHEAR Poppylhead between wheat spears P1. 79, no. 15-17 8 Bakehos P1. 79, no. 18-21 6 Filleted thyrsos P1. 70, no. 25 4 Cicade P1. 79, no. 38-42 38 Caduceus P1. 79, no. 25-28 23 Uncertain symbol 92 /IE Nike flying r., with wreath P1. 80, no. 15-17 10 IE Tripod, symbols poppyhead 1., thunderbolt r. PI. 80, no. 1-7 23 ,E Delian Apollo with 3 Graces and strUng bow P1. 80, no. 8-14 19 A, Artemis with torches PI. 81, no. 53-56 1 .E Sphinx seated wearing, modius P1. 80, no. 18-21 41 1E Athena armed advancing r.-symbols r. Owl P1. 80, no. 29-32 63 Serpent P1. 80, no. 33-34 19 Uncertain symbol 12 IE Owl r., on prow; all in wreath P1. 80, no. 37-40 102 A 2 owls in wreath P1. 80, no. 45-47 4 IE Owl r. in wreath (type uncertain) either P1. 79 group or P1. 80, no. 37-43 20 /L Unclassified, New Style 147 .F, Unclassified Athenian 146 Athenian Imperial Copies of Statues .207 Athena Parthenos P1. 82 and 83, no. 1-19 76 Athena Nicephorus P1. 83, no. 20-28 2 Athena fighting P1. 84, no. 36 2 Athena standing armed P1. 84, no. 24 1 Athena Archegetis P1. 83, no. 39-42; P1. 84, no. 1-14 6 Athena from E. pediment of Parthenon P1. 85, no. 8-37 19 Athena Promiachos P1. 86, no. 1-39 53 Athena Medicis? P1. 86, no. 41 1 Athena Velletri P1. 83, no.29-34 4 Demeter Chloe P1. 89, no. 35-40 4 Zeus Olympios P1. 92, no. 1-2 1 Zeus standing P1.92, no. 5-7 1 Dionysos of Alcamenes P1. 92, no. 19 3 Herakles Farnese P1. 95, no. 1-5 4 ANALYTICAL TABLE OF COINS 127 Asklepios P1.98, no. 1-10 6 Praxitelean group: Demeter seated Pl. 93, no. 36-42 7 Kore P1. 93, no. 43-47 4 Iakehos P1. 93, no. 32-35 3 Apollo with Lyre P1. 93, no. 1-4 3 Apollo with Bow P1. 93, no. 8 1 Hermes P1.92, no.27-29 and 35; P1. 95, no. 10 4 Unclassified 2 Ancient Monuments ....................... 7 Altar of Zetus Polias P1. 87, no. 42-43 1 Fountain of the Erechtheuim P1. 87, no. 38-41 2 Acropolis P1. 98, no. 19-36 3 Polygonal structure (possibly altar) Unpublished 1 Mythological Subjects .32 Contest of Athena and Poseidon P1. 89, no. 1-18 4 Athena and Marsyas P1. 89, no.34 1 Demeter in chariot between Kore avid Hecate P1.94, no. 2-6 1 Demeter in chariot P1. 94, no. 19-26, 28-29, 37-43 10 Triptolemos in chariot P1.94, no. 27, 30, 31 1 Thesetus and Minotaur P1. 96, no. 8-14 4 Theseus alone wielding club P1. 96, no. 20-29 10 Theseus withi club and serpent P1. 95, no. 38-40 1 Historical Events ...................................................... 27 Agonistic table P1.88, no.55-61, and P1.91 17 Themistokles on galley P1.97, no. 1-31 10 Symnbolical Representations . .......................................... 91 Athena and Olive Tree P1. 87, no. 15-32 7 Athena seated P1.87, no.33-37 2 Athena in chariot P1. 88, no. 8-22 8 Apollo Lykios P1.93, no.27 1 Herakles (or Theseus) with patera P1.95, no. 8-15 3 Olive tree between owl and amphora P1.90, no. 1-31 15 Owl in olive tree, larg,e amphora r. P. 90, no. 32-34 2 Owl on upright amphora PI. 90, no. 35-40 8 Uprighit amphora P1.
Recommended publications

  • A Synopsis of Byzantine History, –

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-40474-8 - John Skylitzes: A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811–1057 John Wortley Frontmatter More information JOHN SKYLITZES: A synopsis of Byzantine history, – John Skylitzes’ extraordinary Middle Byzantine chronicle covers the reigns of the Byzantine emperors from the death of Nicephorus I in to the deposition of Michael VI in , and provides the only surviving continuous narrative of the late tenth and early eleventh centuries. A high offi cial living in the late eleventh century, Skylitzes used a number of existing Greek histories (some of them no longer extant) to create a digest of the previous three centuries. It is with- out question the major historical source for the period, cited con- stantly in modern scholarship, and has never before been available in English. Th is edition features introductions by Jean-Claude Cheynet and Bernard Flusin, along with extensive notes by Cheynet. It will be an essential and exciting addition to the libraries of all historians of the Byzantine age. is Professor of History Emeritus at the University of Manitoba. He has published widely on the Byzantine era, and completed several translations to date, including Les Récits édifi - ants de Paul, évêque de Monembasie, et d’autres auteurs (), Th e ‘Spiritual Meadow’ of John Moschos, including the additional tales edited by Nissen and Mioni (), Th e spiritually benefi cial tales of Paul, Bishop of Monembasia and of other authors () and John Skylitzes: A Synopsis of Histories (AD –) , a provisional transla- tion published
  • Hadrian and the Greek East

    Hadrian and the Greek East

    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
  • Byzantine Conquests in the East in the 10 Century

    Byzantine Conquests in the East in the 10 Century

    th Byzantine conquests in the East in the 10 century Campaigns of Nikephoros II Phocas and John Tzimiskes as were seen in the Byzantine sources Master thesis Filip Schneider s1006649 15. 6. 2018 Eternal Rome Supervisor: Prof. dr. Maaike van Berkel Master's programme in History Radboud Univerity Front page: Emperor Nikephoros II Phocas entering Constantinople in 963, an illustration from the Madrid Skylitzes. The illuminated manuscript of the work of John Skylitzes was created in the 12th century Sicily. Today it is located in the National Library of Spain in Madrid. Table of contents Introduction 5 Chapter 1 - Byzantine-Arab relations until 963 7 Byzantine-Arab relations in the pre-Islamic era 7 The advance of Islam 8 The Abbasid Caliphate 9 Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty 10 The development of Byzantine Empire under Macedonian dynasty 11 The land aristocracy 12 The Muslim world in the 9th and 10th century 14 The Hamdamids 15 The Fatimid Caliphate 16 Chapter 2 - Historiography 17 Leo the Deacon 18 Historiography in the Macedonian period 18 Leo the Deacon - biography 19 The History 21 John Skylitzes 24 11th century Byzantium 24 Historiography after Basil II 25 John Skylitzes - biography 26 Synopsis of Histories 27 Chapter 3 - Nikephoros II Phocas 29 Domestikos Nikephoros Phocas and the conquest of Crete 29 Conquest of Aleppo 31 Emperor Nikephoros II Phocas and conquest of Cilicia 33 Conquest of Cyprus 34 Bulgarian question 36 Campaign in Syria 37 Conquest of Antioch 39 Conclusion 40 Chapter 4 - John Tzimiskes 42 Bulgarian problem 42 Campaign in the East 43 A Crusade in the Holy Land? 45 The reasons behind Tzimiskes' eastern campaign 47 Conclusion 49 Conclusion 49 Bibliography 51 Introduction In the 10th century, the Byzantine Empire was ruled by emperors coming from the Macedonian dynasty.
  • A Journey in Pictures Through Roman Religion

    A Journey in Pictures Through Roman Religion

    A Journey in Pictures through Roman Religion By Ursula Kampmann, © MoneyMuseum What is god? As far as the Romans are concerned we think we know that all too well from our unloved Latin lessons: Jupiter, Juno, Minerva, the Roman Triad as well as the usual gods of the ancient world, the same as the Greek gods in name and effect. In fact, however, the roots of Roman religion lie much earlier, much deeper, in dark, prehistoric times ... 1 von 20 www.sunflower.ch How is god experienced? – In the way nature works A bust of the goddess Flora (= flowering), behind it blossom. A denarius of the Roman mint master C. Clodius Vestalis, 41 BC Roman religion emerged from the magical world of the simple farmer, who was speechless when faced with the miracles of nature. Who gave the seemingly withered trees new blossom after the winter? Which power made the grain of corn in the earth grow up to produce new grain every year? Which god prevented the black rust and ensured that the weather was fine just in time for the harvest? Who guaranteed safe storage? And which power was responsible for making it possible to divide up the corn so that it sufficed until the following year? Each individual procedure in a farmer's life was broken down into many small constituent parts whose success was influenced by a divine power. This divine power had to be invoked by a magic ritual in order to grant its help for the action. Thus as late as the imperial period, i.e.
  • Heads Or Tails

    Heads Or Tails

    Heads or Tails Representation and Acceptance in Hadrian’s Imperial Coinage Name: Thomas van Erp Student number: S4501268 Course: Master’s Thesis Course code: (LET-GESM4300-2018-SCRSEM2-V) Supervisor: Mw. dr. E.E.J. Manders (Erika) 2 Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1: Proportions of Coin Types Hadrian ........................................................................ 5 Figure 2: Dynastic Representation in Comparison ................................................................ 5 Figure 3: Euergesia in Comparison ....................................................................................... 5 Figure 4: Virtues ..................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 5: Liberalitas in Comparison ...................................................................................... 5 Figure 6: Iustitias in Comparison ........................................................................................... 5 Figure 7: Military Representation in Comparison .................................................................. 5 Figure 8: Divine Association in Comparison ......................................................................... 5 Figure 9: Proportions of Coin Types Domitian ...................................................................... 5 Figure 10: Proportions of Coin Types Trajan .......................................................................
  • Exiling Bishops: the Policy of Constantius II

    Exiling Bishops: the Policy of Constantius II

    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Classical Studies Faculty Publications Classical Studies 2014 Exiling Bishops: The olicP y of Constantius II Walter Stevenson University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/classicalstudies-faculty- publications Part of the History of Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Stevenson, Walt. "Exiling Bishops: The oP licy of Canstantius II." Dumbarton Oaks Papers 68 (2014): 7-27. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classical Studies at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Exiling Bishops: The Policy of Constantius II Walt Stevenson onstantius II was forced by circumstances to all instances in which Constantius II exiled bishops Cmake innovations in the policy that his father and focus on a sympathetic reading of his strategy.2 Constantine had followed in exiling bishops. While Though the sources for this period are muddled and ancient tradition has made the father into a sagacious require extensive sorting, a panoramic view of exile saint and the son into a fanatical demon, recent schol- incidents reveals a pattern in which Constantius moved arship has tended to stress continuity between the two past his father’s precedents to mold a new, intelligent regimes.1 This article will attempt to gather
  • Roman Cities

    Roman Cities

    MIT Press Open Architecture and Urban Studies • Orthogonal Town Planning in Antiquity Chapter 6: Roman Cities Ferdinando Castagnoli Published on: Apr 22, 2021 License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) MIT Press Open Architecture and Urban Studies • Orthogonal Town Planning in Antiquity Chapter 6: Roman Cities Hippodamean Type The Romans used more than one type of city plan, and it is thus not possible to contrast a Greek plan with a Roman one. We will consider first the type characterized by a rectangular grid derived directly from the Hippodamean city, Norba is the most ancient example of this type. Norba At the turn of the century Norba was thoroughly studied by L. Savignoni and R. Mengarelli.1 Their excavations along the perimeter walls and among the temples established these as dating from the fourth century B.C. The plan of the city which arose from this work clearly shows the location of the acropolis and the walls but disregards the rest. The perfect orthogonality of the system can be seen from the aerial photograph (Fig. 37). Norba was built up of terraces buttressed by a system of walls that were almost always parallel and perpendicular to each other. The city is an interesting example of an urbanism that exploits the difficulties of the terrain to obtain striking results. From the lower portions of the city one viewed the rising terraces, culminating with the Great Acropolis at the central peak. This was a vast terrace perfectly incorporated in the general scheme. On the axis of this terrace, in the center of the city, is a larger, more recent building with a cistern.
  • Constantine's Constantinople

    Constantine's Constantinople

    Ezra’s Archives | 55 Constantine’s Constantinople: A Christian Emperor, A Pagan City Mary Balzer On 11 May, 330 C.E., Emperor Constantine stood at the head of the ceremonial festivities that officially consecrated his new capital in the East.1 Constantinople, as the new city was called, heralded a new era of Constantine’s reign with him ruling as the sole emperor. His last co- emperor, Licinius, was defeated at the battle of Chrysopolis in 324.2 Following this, Constantine selected a site for his new capital and began building what he would later call the “New Rome.”3 Constantine had begun his rule as one of four co-emperors, but by 324 he was the one and only ruler. Although the historians of the time agree on the date of the ceremonies, each author gives a unique description of Constantine’s vision for his new capital. The Christian sources Eusebius, the Easter Chronicle, and Zonaras highlight Constantine’s Christian building program in his new capital. But the archaeological record does not corroborate their emphatically Christian accounts. Zosimus, one of the last pagan historians, has historically been overlooked because of his anti-Christian stance. Concerning Constantinople as his account does not describe any 1 Timothy Barnes, Eusebius and Constantine (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981), 222. 2 Averil Cameron and Stuart G. Hall, “Introduction” in Eusebius: Life of Constantine, translated by Averil Cameron and Stuart G. Hall (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999) 41. 3 Sozomen, History of the Church: From A.D. 324 to A.D. 440, trans. Edward Walford (London: Henry G.
  • Constantine: Unconquered Emperor, Christian Victor Free Download

    Constantine: Unconquered Emperor, Christian Victor Free Download

    CONSTANTINE: UNCONQUERED EMPEROR, CHRISTIAN VICTOR FREE DOWNLOAD Paul Stephenson | 352 pages | 04 Aug 2011 | Quercus Publishing | 9780857381668 | English | London, United Kingdom Constantine: Roman Emperor, Christian Victor A cross appeared to him in the sky with an exhortation, generally translated as 'By this sign conquer'. I was astonished to find myself reading a version of history that clashed with everything I had ever read about this period. Further, while Constantine may have seen a vision prior to the battle at Milvian Bridge inthe legend that he had a vision from the Christian god the night before Christian Victor battle was a later retelling Constantine: Unconquered Emperor what actually happened, as Constantine was reinterpreting his life in light of his faith. My library Help Advanced Book Search. Email to friends Share on Facebook - opens in a new window or tab Share on Twitter - opens in a new window or tab Share on Pinterest - opens in a new window or tab. Sellers declare the item's customs value and must comply with customs declaration laws. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. Stephenson, like other writers, caution that the sins of Constantine: Unconquered Emperor church and empire occurred alongside many humble or devoted and loving people who adhered more to the "love thy neighbor" and spiritual lessons drawn from Jesus' and his apostles' lives and teachings. More filters. Constantine: unconquered emperor, Christian victor. He cautions about the veracity and accuracy of much of the primary sources from the ancient world as they are definitely o This book pointed out to me that history is often written by the Constantine: Unconquered Emperor.
  • Dr. Emmanuel Ramírez Nieves

    Dr. Emmanuel Ramírez Nieves

    Universidad de Puerto Rico Recinto de Río Piedras Departamento de Literatura Comparada Literatura Clásica Latina, LITE 3052. Segundo semestre, año académico 2018-2019. Profesor: Dr. Emmanuel Ramírez Nieves Oficina: Janer 129 Horas de oficina: lunes 2:30-3:30 p.m., jueves 2:30-3:50 p.m., o por acuerdo e-mail: [email protected] Salón: LPM 122 3 créditos, 3 horas Sitio web del curso: https://sites.google.com/s/1fS2hDv2GpvcfzZMmonitG4zlNk8eDWl1/p/1p_hGp5 0pCqmNd6Wl6d8u6pifZmL3awmR/edit Descripción general del curso: En esta parte del curso de dos semestres, estudiaremos la literatura clásica romana (desde el siglo III a. C. hasta los siglos IV y V d. C.) en sus contextos culturales e históricos. Leeremos ejemplos de varios géneros literarios clásicos: dramas de Séneca (tragedia) y Plauto (comedia), poemas de la lírica clásica latina de Catulo y Horacio, ensayos filosóficos de Cicerón, la épica La Eneida de Virgilio y las Metamorfosis de Ovidio, entre otros. Consideraremos éstos en relación con los textos filosóficos, cosmogónicos, científicos e históricos de la cultura clásica romana. Preguntaremos ¿qué significaba la literatura en la época clásica y cómo interpretan otros tiempos posteriores esta literatura? ¿Cuál era su importancia en la legitimación y formación de la cultura occidental durante los siglos? ¿Qué significa la literatura clásica dentro de los estudios de la literatura comparada en la UPR? Además de los estilos y el contenido de la literatura consideraremos también asuntos teóricos de género, la sex ualidad, el placer, las emociones, la formación de comunidades y la ética. Objetivos: Al finalizar el curso el y la estudiante: 1.
  • Ancient Cyprus: Island of Conflict?

    Ancient Cyprus: Island of Conflict?

    Ancient Cyprus: Island of Conflict? Maria Natasha Ioannou Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy Discipline of Classics School of Humanities The University of Adelaide December 2012 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................ III Declaration........................................................................................................... IV Acknowledgements ............................................................................................. V Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1. Overview .......................................................................................................... 1 2. Background and Context ................................................................................. 1 3. Thesis Aims ..................................................................................................... 3 4. Thesis Summary .............................................................................................. 4 5. Literature Review ............................................................................................. 6 Chapter 1: Cyprus Considered .......................................................................... 14 1.1 Cyprus’ Internal Dynamics ........................................................................... 15 1.2 Cyprus, Phoenicia and Egypt .....................................................................
  • Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl Boise State University

    Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl Boise State University

    Boise State University ScholarWorks History Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of History 1-1-2007 Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl Boise State University Publication Information Odahl, Charles Matson. (2007). "Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy". Connections: European Studies Annual Review, 3, 89-113. This document was originally published in Connections: European Studies Annual Review by Rocky Mountain European Scholars Consortium. Copyright restrictions may apply. Coda: Recovering Constantine's European Legacy 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Constantine the Great and Christian Imperial Theocracy Charles Matson Odahl, Boise State University1 rom his Christian conversion under the influence of cept of imperial theocracy was conveyed in contemporary art Frevelatory experiences outside Rome in A.D. 312 until (Illustration I). his burial as the thirteenth Apostle at Constantinople in Although Constantine had been raised as a tolerant 337, Constantine the Great, pagan polytheist and had the first Christian emperor propagated several Olympian of the Roman world, initiated divinities, particularly Jupiter, the role of and set the model Hercules, Mars, and Sol, as for Christian imperial theoc­ di vine patrons during the early racy. Through his relationship years of his reign as emperor