MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT PREPARED FOR BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND APRIL 2015

INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

This Page Left Intentionally Blank

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTIONS EXHIBITS

1.0………….Preface A………….Providence Market Profile

2.0………….Executive Summary B……….....Comparable Market Profiles

3.0………….Market Analysis C……….....Fiscal Benefit Summary

4.0………….Economic & Fiscal Benefit D………….Economic Benefit Case Studies Analysis

This Page Left Intentionally Blank

PREFACE

1.0 - PREFACE

In March of 2015, the PBC Associates, LLC engaged Brailsford & Dunlavey (“B&D”) to analyze the market potential for an AAA baseball stadium in downtown Providence, create a market-responsive facility program and associated development budget, and develop associated economic and fiscal benefit projections, which can also be referred to interchangeably as “economic and fiscal impacts”. To complete this assignment, B&D conducted a detailed market study to inform potential demand levels and quantify fiscal and economic benefits generated by the project on an annual and net present value basis.

QUALIFICATIONS

The findings of this study constitute the professional opinions of B&D personnel based on the assumptions and conditions detailed throughout. B&D conducted each analysis under several conditions and assumptions, outlined below:

 The analyses, recommendations, observations, and conclusions contained in this study represent the professional opinions of the B&D project team with such opinions based on original research conducted using primary, secondary, and tertiary sources and the project team’s professional experience

 The project team performed its work using industry and public information that is deemed reliable, but whose accuracy cannot be guaranteed. B&D makes no recommendation and provides no warranty as to such information’s accuracy or completeness.

 B&D makes no assurance and provides no guarantee that results identified in this study will be achieved. Economic and market conditions, management action or inaction, and implementation timing, as well as other important circumstances, often do not occur as planned and such deviations can be material.

THE PROJECT TEAM WAS COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS:

 Bill Mykins, Vice President, RA, LEED AP

 Rich Neumann, Vice President – Major Accounts

 Jason Thompson, Regional Vice President

 Bryan Slater, Project Manager

April 2015

This Page Left Intentionally Blank

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

APPROACH

The objectives of this report are to identify market demand for a MiLB stadium in downtown Providence, develop an appropriate facility program and corresponding budget, and quantify economic and fiscal benefits from the project. To accomplish these objectives, B&D completed a detailed market analysis that culminates in a set of annual attendance projections. The projections serve as the basis for quantifying quantify economic and fiscal benefits to the state of Rhode Island. A summary of the key findings is outlined below while various detailed analyses are included in the report’s sections and exhibits.

MARKET ANALYSIS

The project site is located immediately south of downtown Providence, which is the economic hub and central business district for the Providence Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The MSA has over 1.6 million people and is projected to grow slowly from 2014 to 2019. The area has elevated median age levels and household income measurements in comparison to national averages. While an evaluation of the MSA demographics provides required context to understand underlying market conditions, B&D relies upon drive time radii to develop projected attendance levels, which affect the vast majority of economic and fiscal benefits. According to data provided by the team, roughly 85% of all attendees in the previous year came from within a 30-minute drive time of the project site; therefore, B&D utilized this drive time area to evaluate the market in the context of comparable peers.

Comparable Market Analysis

B&D ranked Providence against all 30 AAA markets in terms of 30-minute drive time population (market size), retail sales (economic activity), and household income (market wealth). The project team selected nine of the 30 as comparable markets that possess a modern MiLB ballpark and most closely resemble Providence in terms of demographic characteristics. Within this set, Providence ranks seventh in terms of population, eighth in household size, and fifth in household income. When each market’s income figure is normalized for the cost of living index, Providence ranks last in the set. This apparent wealth disparity is less problematic for MiLB since franchises provide a wide variety of ticket price points and generally hold appeal across a wide cross section of income demographics. Providence also ranks solidly in terms of retail sales (6th), which provide a macro-level view of economic activity in a marketplace.

April 2015 2-1

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Total Total Household Average HH Normalized HH Market Population Households Size Income Income Charlotte, North Carolina 1,594,727 615,835 2.59 $79,306 $85,092 Columbus, Ohio 1,525,226 609,151 2.50 $75,683 $82,264 Gwinnett, Georgia 1,557,315 697,932 2.23 $84,078 $87,948

Indianapolis, Indiana 1,563,166 533,725 2.93 $74,249 $85,148 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 1,129,392 315,894 3.58 $68,959 $75,201 Round Rock, Texas 1,118,509 431,266 2.59 $79,157 $82,887 Sacramento, California 1,706,897 618,430 2.76 $74,733 $66,953 Salt Lake City, Utah 1,295,498 426,333 3.04 $78,684 $74,230 Tacoma, Washington 1,392,223 522,851 2.66 $73,609 $67,223

Average 1,431,439 530,157 2.70 $76,495 $76,922 Providence, RI 1,387,276 546,001 2.54 $76,846 $62,274 Comparable Rank 7th / 10 5th / 10 8th / 10 5th/10 10th/10 NOTES: All data is w ithin 30-minute driv e-time of AAA Ballpark. Source: www.sitesusa.com; C2ER FIGURE 2.1: Comparable Market Demographic Characteristics

Attendance Review & Projections

The Pawtucket Red Sox ranked in the top five of MiLB in terms of reported paid attendance in every year from 2005 to 2009. However, attendance declined sharply from its 2005 peak of over 9,500 per game to the 2014 average of 7,400 per game. The table below contrasts Pawtucket’s attendance levels with that of the International League (IL) and Pacific Coast League (PCL). Pawtucket’s attendance has fallen by 23% since 2005 while the two AAA leagues remained relatively stable. The attendance peak in 2005 is representative of the Providence region’s ability to effectively support a franchise while the consistent league average figures demonstrates the stability of MiLB.

Paid Attendance 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

PCL 6,581 6,606 6,607 6,479 6,356 6,306 6,152 6,033 6,036 6,270 IL 6,652 6,495 6,857 7,161 7,207 6,946 6,761 6,629 6,961 7,241 Pawtucket 9,561 9,289 8,861 9,097 8,937 8,343 8,270 7,551 7,827 7,367 PCL 100% 100% 98% 97% 96% 93% 92% 92% 95% IL 98% 103% 108% 108% 104% 102% 100% 105% 109% Pawtucket 97% 93% 95% 93% 87% 86% 79% 82% 77%

Source: MiLB FIGURE 2.2: Paid Attendance Levels for PCL, IL, Pawtucket (2005 to 2014)

2-2 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Market population is the primary factor influencing attendance levels at MiLB games. B&D evaluated Pawtucket’s average attendance levels as a function of market size against comparable markets from 2010 to 2014. During that time span, Pawtucket had an attendee capture ratio of 39% while comparable markets had a capture ratio of 36%, meaning that for every 100 people in the local market 39 people attended a game. This comparatively high percentage in spite of an aging ballpark speaks to the team’s popularity in the region and the local market’s solid demographic profile. The table below shows market capture ratios for each comparable market, with the red bar representing total reported paid attendance levels from 2010 to 2014 and the blue bar representing 30-minute drive time population.

Market Capture Analysis

Sacramento Charlotte Indianapolis 2010-2014 Avg. Gwinnett Attendance Columbus Market Pawtucket 549,596 Population Tacoma Salt Lake City Oklahoma City 1,425,444 Round Rock 0 400000 800000 1200000 1600000

FIGURE 2. 3: Market Capture Graph

Though Pawtucket has a strong attendance history, new ballparks generally spur meaningful attendance increases. B&D analyzed seven new ballpark projects and found they increased average attendance by 19% from the average five years prior to opening. In consideration of attendance histories, peer market attendance levels, and the effect that a new ballpark can have on attendance levels, B&D developed three attendance scenarios for an AAA franchise in a downtown Providence ballpark assuming a total capacity of 10,000.

Paid Attendance Actual Paid Attendance Actual Events (2017) Attendance (2021) Attendance AAA Baseball Conservative 70 8,600 6,794 7,740 5,805

Moderate 70 9,250 7,308 8,325 6,244 Aggressive 70 9,900 7,821 9,158 6,868

Conservative 70 602,000 475,580 541,800 406,350 Moderate 70 647,500 511,560 582,750 437,080 Aggressive 70 693,000 547,470 641,060 480,760

FIGURE 2. 4: AAA Attendance Scenarios

April 2015 2-3

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

First-year paid attendance projections range from 9,900 (aggressive scenario) to 8,600 (conservative scenario). Fifth-year projections range from under 9,160 (aggressive) to 7,740 (conservative). The moderate scenario, which B&D considers most likely, projects 9,250 paid attendees in the first year and 8,325 in the fifth year. In each scenario, attendance stabilizes in the fifth year at a level ranging from 90% to 92.5% of first-year levels. The actual attendance figure takes into account a “no-show” factor, which is 21% of paid attendance in year one and escalates to 25% by year five.

ECONOMIC & FISCAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS

This benefit analysis is designed to evaluate and quantify the economic and fiscal benefits generated by the construction and operation of the project. In this analysis, an emphasis is placed on evaluating and quantifying the direct benefits to the state of Rhode Island. All economic benefits quantified in this analysis are specific to the state and do not represent incremental benefits over those generated by the franchise in Pawtucket. Benefits in this analysis are classified in the following manner:

 One-Time Economic Benefits: Projections of construction spending on employment, earnings, and industrial output, including the spin-off economic activity created by the new construction expenditures.

 One-Time Fiscal Benefits: Projections of the public tax revenue impacts generated by the project during the construction period.

 Annual Economic Benefits: Projections of recurring impacts during operation of the project, including visitor and local spending, job creation, and earnings.

 Annual Fiscal Benefits: Projection of the public tax revenue impacts generated by the operation of the project, including owner, user, and patron spending.

One-Time Economic and Fiscal Benefits

The project cost for the development is approximately $85 million, inclusive of a $10 million investment in a parking structure. The budget consists of $17 million in soft costs and $68 million in hard costs, allocated between labor (37.5%) and materials (62.5%). The local market retains 80% of wages ($20.4 million) and just 26% of demand for goods and services ($15.3 million), which includes purchases of soft cost services and materials. Wages paid directly to state workers supports 405 jobs at an average wage of over $50,000. In terms of fiscal impacts, the construction period generates $1.64 million in cumulative taxes to the state.

Annual Economic and Fiscal Benefits

On an annual basis, the project will generate $14.9 million in direct economic activity and supports $7.8 million in direct wages and 215 associated full-time equivalent jobs in the state. Figure 2.5 below depicts direct impacts for both the construction period and recurring operations and the extent to which the state

2-4 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

retains total expenditures; for instance, during construction 80% of wages are paid to laborers living in the state of Rhode Island. Indirect and induced economic benefits are also quantified in Section 4.0.

Construction Recurring Operations

Direct Benefits Direct Benefits Estimated Output$ 15,300,000 26% Estimated Output$ 14,898,519 64% Estimated Wages$ 20,400,000 80% Estimated Wages$ 7,816,044 74% Estimated Employment 405 Estimated Employment 215

FIGURE 2. 5: Direct Economic Benefits

Estimated annual fiscal benefits for the construction period and the first five years of operation are shown in Figure 2.6 below. As mentioned above, the construction period supports $1.64 million in fiscal benefits to the state. In the first year of operations, fiscal benefits total $2.37 million to the state and $199,000 to the city. Fiscal benefits to the state and city fall to $2.33 million and $197,000, respectively, in 2021 due to declines in attendance from the first to fifth (stabilized) year.

Construction 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

City of Providence$ - $ 198,690 $ 204,651 $ 198,126 $ 204,070 $ 197,214 State of Rhode Island$ 1,636,930 $ 2,366,423 $ 2,435,912 $ 2,352,452 $ 2,421,532 $ 2,333,063

Total Benefit$ 1,636,930 $ 2,565,113 $ 2,640,563 $ 2,550,579 $ 2,625,602 $ 2,530,278

Note: Fiscal benefit may v ary depending on final lease and ow nership structures FIGURE 2. 6: Fiscal Benefits (2017 to 2021)

When fiscal benefits are measured on a 30-year net present value basis, the project generates $45.3 million in benefits to the state and $3.78 million in benefits to the city across all tax categories. As shown in Figure 2.7, the vast majority of state benefits are attributable to sales tax (65%) and personal income tax (27%). The project also supports $2.97 million in transient occupancy taxes at the state level and $1.52 million at the city level from over 35,000 total room nights of demand. Sales tax on admissions to public assembly events is not collected by the state. Further, indirect and induced tax revenues are not included in fiscal benefit calculations for the state or city.

April 2015 2-5

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

State Fiscal Benefits 30-Year NPV City Fiscal Benefits 30-Year NPV Business Corporation Tax$ 76,980 Food and Beverage Tax$ 2,130,230 Materials Sales Tax$ 534,583 Tangible Business Tax$ 125,515 Personal Income Tax$ 12,282,616 Transient Occupancy Tax$ 1,524,298 Sales Tax$ 29,438,974 Transient Occupancy Tax$ 2,966,082

Total$ 45,299,236 Total $ 3,780,044

Note: Assumes 3% inflation after y ear 10 of operations; Discount rate of 5.25% is utilized from y ear 1 to 30 Note: Indirect and induced tax benefits are not included in calculations FIGURE 2. 7: NPV of Fiscal Benefits (2017 to 2046)

On a 30-year net present value basis, the project generates total economic activity of $322 million and $180 million in total associated wages, which supports an estimated 215 direct jobs on an annual basis. These figures do not include indirect and induced economic activity or wages.

Intangible Benefits

Development of the ballpark will present several non-quantifiable, “quality of life” benefits to the Providence MSA and state of Rhode Island. While the benefits are not measurable, many of them are highlighted in six economic benefit “case studies” completed by B&D that are attached to this document. The common theme among the case studies selected, which include Dayton, Tulsa, Toledo, Memphis, and Durham, and Louisville, is that the ballparks coincided with a meaningful investment and revitalization of the central business district. Additional intangible benefits often include:

 Often entails new private sector investment  Affordable family entertainment option

 Enhanced sense of community pride  Business recruitment and retention tool

 Additional exposure for regions/downtowns  Franchise charitable contributions/

 Serves as additional civic gathering venue foundation

2-6 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

3.0 - MARKET ANALYSIS

APPROACH

The market analysis measures the comparative market strength of the Providence, Rhode Island market and serves as the basis for developing attendance projections for the Pawtucket Red Sox Class AAA franchise. The analysis also serves as the framework for development of fiscal and economic benefit projections to the state of Rhode Island.

METHODOLOGY

Utilizing primary and secondary sources, B&D completed numerous analyses to gain an understanding of the demographic and economic environments of Providence. For the purposes of this exercise, B&D utilized a drive time analysis to measure and evaluate the Providence local market with a focus on demographic and economic conditions. Most essential to this exercise was establishing a set of comparable markets that have an AAA franchise and then evaluating the Providence market’s position within that framework. Along with the comparable market analysis, additional tasks included:

 A review and overview of the proposed site;

 Development of a premium seating share analysis to inform premium seating offerings;

 Analysis of attendance capture ratios to understand attendance as a function of market size; and

 Development of attendance levels at a new downtown Providence ballpark.

SITE CONTEXT AND ACCESS

The proposed site is located to south of downtown Providence along the Providence River. The site offers strong visibility from I-95 and is located immediately northeast of the Warren Alpert Medical School. Today, the site is surrounded primarily by light industrial, surface parking, and under-developed lots. Figure 3.1 shows the proposed site in relation to downtown Providence. Radius rings of .25 (red), .5 (blue), and 1 (green) mile are placed at the site and highlight the convenience of the site to much of downtown Providence and Brown University.

April 2015 3-1

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

FIGURE 3.1: .25, .5, and 1 mile radius rings

The site has strong vehicular access via I-95 and Rhode Island Routes 10 and 1A. The site is easily walkable from both the Providence central business district and much of Brown University. Additionally, the Providence train station is located within a one mile distance from the site. The station is served by Acela Express and the Amtrak Northeast Regional Routes, which combine to provide hourly low- and high- speed service to Boston. Collectively, the site exhibits a number of traits that are key ingredients to successful ballpark developments, including:

 Strong access to transportation arteries  Views of the downtown skyline

 Ample parking opportunities  Walkable from various neighborhoods

 Located contiguous to a body of water  High degree of visibility

 Allows for and promotes ancillary uses  Proximity to nearby areas targeted for outside the building footprint improvement

 Availability of under-utilized land

3-2 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

The City of Providence is located in Providence County in the state of Rhode Island. The county, city, and adjacent counties of Bristol (MA & RI), Kent, Newport, and Washington form the Providence-New Bedford- Fall River Metropolitan Statistical Area, shaded in yellow in Figure 3.1 below. Defined by the Office of Management and Budget, a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) is a densely populated area having a high degree of social and economic integration. Demographic characteristics of the MSA are compared against those of drive time radii from the state of Rhode Island and the United States, as shown in Figure 3.2 below.

FIGURE 3.2: Providence MSA Map

Rhode United Characteristic MSA 30 Minutes 45 Minutes 60 Minutes Island States Population (2014) 1,610,784 1,058,877 1,387,276 2,674,850 5,229,875 - Population (2019) 1,623,411 1,060,633 1,400,156 2,733,125 5,381,210 - Growth Rate 0.16% 0.03% 0.19% 0.44% 0.58% 0.80% Households (2014) 639,043 422,036 546,001 1,031,777 2,034,063 - Median Age 39.3 39.1 39.5 39.8 38.6 36.5 [1] Average HH Income $75,565 $76,240 $76,846 $85,028 $90,922 $73,097

[1] Does not account for cost of liv ing adjustment Source: www.sitesusa.com FIGURE 3.3: Demographic Comparisons

April 2015 3-3

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

The Providence MSA has over 1.6 million people and is projected to grow by just 13,000 people from 2014 to 2019. The projected growth rate for all local geographic areas is limited in comparison to the national level over the same time period. In contrast, local median age levels (38.6 to 39.8 years) are higher than the national average of 36.5 years. Consistent with an older population demographic, average household income for all local geographic areas exceed the national average of $73,100 by 3.4%.

The physical configuration of the Providence MSA presents several limitations for evaluating the marketplace. First, the MSA boundaries appear arbitrary and primarily influenced by state boundaries. Secondly, Charlestown, RI, located in the 60-minute drive time area, is included within the MSA, but cities such as Franklin and Milford, MA, within a 30-mintue drive time from the site, are not. To compensate for this skewing, B&D utilizes 30-, 45-, and 60-minute drive time populations when making all comparative market evaluations.

FIGURE 3.4: Drive Time Map In B&D’s previous experience planning ballparks, the 30-minute market area surrounding the park typically represents the primary catchment area for Minor League Baseball. In this instance, 86% of all patrons from 2013/2014 resided within a town in the 30-minute market area. As such, B&D utilizes the 30-minute drive time area from the ballpark to make comparative evaluations against other markets. For contextual

3-4 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

purposes, B&D has also included three radius rings showing 5- (red), 10- (blue), and 20-mile (green) radius rings from the site in Figure 3.5. While the site does offer less access to suburbs to the south of the Boston MSA, greater access is provided to portions of southern Rhode Island such as Kingstown and Portsmouth.

FIGURE 3.5: Drive Time Map

April 2015 3-5

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Market Composition

It is imperative to understand the demographic makeup of the area within the primary catchment area. An examination of wealth, age, and growth is required to understand the impacts of project siting and identify any patterns of growth and change that may affect the project. One of the most important characteristics is wealth. Higher levels of average household income, indicated by the green shading in the map below, are located east, west, and north of the site. The urban core, which includes downtown Providence, exhibits comparatively lower levels of household income.

FIGURE 3.6: Market Wealth Distribution

3-6 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

Median age levels are consistent throughout the 30-minute market area. The only exception is within the City of Providence, which has a high concentration of lower median age levels (35 and under). The distribution of wealth and age within the market is consistent with most urban markets in which the urban core is comparatively younger and less wealthy.

FIGURE 3.7: Median Age Distribution

April 2015 3-7

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Population growth is limited throughout the region, as shown in Figure 3.8. The lighter shading indicates the slowest projected growth while shades of green is indicative of areas that are projected to grow more quickly. Areas located to the northeast of downtown Providence show the slowest growth rate, while areas such as Foxborough, Franklin, and Bellingham have the highest growth projections.

FIGURE 3.8: Population Growth Distribution

3-8 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

COMPARABLE MARKET ANALYSIS

This market analysis relies on the comparative study of Providence with AAA markets in both the International and Pacific Coast Leagues (“IL” and “PCL”). The selection of nine comparable markets ultimately guides the process by which attendance is projected. Further, comparable markets must have, in B&D’s professional opinion, a “modern” MiLB ballpark that functions in a manner similar to the most recently completed ballparks that are focused on providing affordable family entertainment.

Market Selection

All 30 AAA markets were ranked by 30-minute drive time populations, retail expenditures, and unadjusted average household incomes. Population is the most appropriate indicator of market size, retail sales measures economic activity in a market, while average household income measures market wealth. Providence ranks in the top 10 of AAA markets in all measurements, ranking eighth in population, seventh in annual retail sales, and eighth in unadjusted average household income.

Retail Average Total Market Market Expenditures Market Household Population (Millions) Income 1 Las Vegas, Nevada 1,975,707 Las Vegas, Nevada$ 17,500 Durham, North Carolina$ 85,529 2 Sacramento, California 1,706,897 Charlotte, North Carolina$ 15,500 Gwinnett, Georgia$ 84,078 3 Charlotte, North Carolina 1,594,727 Sacramento, California$ 15,000 Des Moines, Iowa$ 79,361 4 Indianapolis, Indiana 1,563,166 Columbus, Ohio$ 14,800 Charlotte, North Carolina$ 79,306 5 Gwinnett, Georgia 1,557,315 Indianapolis, Indiana$ 14,800 Round Rock, Texas$ 79,157 6 Columbus, Ohio 1,525,226 Gwinnett, Georgia$ 14,000 Salt Lake City, Utah$ 78,684 7 Tacoma, Washington 1,392,223 Providence$ 13,500 Nashville, Tennessee$ 78,125 8 Providence 1,387,276 Norfolk, Virginia$ 12,600 Providence$ 76,846 9 Norfolk, Virginia 1,341,957 Tacoma, Washington$ 12,600 Allentown, Pennsylvania$ 76,077 10 Salt Lake City, Utah 1,295,498 Durham, North Carolina$ 11,200 Norfolk, Virginia$ 75,898 11 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 1.129.392 Round Rock, Texas$ 10,800 Columbus, Ohio$ 75,683

12 Round Rock, Texas 1,118,509 Salt Lake City, Utah$ 10,700 Reno, Nevada$ 75,370

13 Memphis, Tennessee 1,108,357 Nashville, Tennessee$ 10,500 Omaha, Nebraska$ 74,923

14 Louisville, Kentucky 1,089,068 Omaha, Nebraska$ 10,400 Sacramento, California$ 74,733

15 Durham, North Carolina 1,055,181 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma$ 10,300 Indianapolis, Indiana$ 74,249

NOTES: All data is w ithin 30-minute driv e-time of AAA Ballpark; retail ex penditures are presented in millions Source: www.sitesusa.com FIGURE 3.9: Comparable Market s

Comparable markets are selected primarily based on the 30-mintue drive time population. However, for each similar market in terms of population, the respective franchise must play in a modern AAA ballpark.

April 2015 3-9

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Figure 3.8 shows the top 15 most populous AAA markets Total Ballpark and the corresponding year in which the ballpark was built Market Population Opened or renovated to modern day standards. Based on these criteria, comparable markets are shaded in gray in Figure 1 Las Vegas, Nevada 1,975,707 1983 3.10 and include Sacramento, CA; Charlotte, NC; 2 Sacramento, California 1,706,897 2000 Indianapolis, IN; Gwinnett, GA (Atlanta); Columbus, OH; 3 Charlotte, North Carolina 1,594,727 2014 Tacoma, WA; Salt Lake City, UT; Oklahoma City, OK; and 4 Indianapolis, Indiana 1,563,166 1996 Round Rock, TX (Austin). 5 Gwinnett, Georgia 1,557,315 2009 6 Columbus, Ohio 1,525,226 2009 There are two notable omissions from the comparable 7 Tacoma, Washington 1,392,223 2011 R 8 Providence 1,387,276 - market selection. First, Las Vegas is discarded as a 9 Norfolk, Virginia 1,341,957 1993 potential comparable market due to the current ballpark’s 10 Salt Lake City, Utah 1,295,498 1994 age and configuration. Norfolk is also not included due to 11 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 1.129.392 1998 the market’s unique topography; it is bisected by a large 12 Round Rock, Texas 1,118,509 2000 body of water and served by only one primary 13 Memphis, Tennessee 1,108,357 2000 transportation artery, which makes drive time profiles 14 Louisville, Kentucky 1,089,068 2000 unreliable. 15 Durham, North Carolina 1,055,181 1993

NOTES: Population and Growth All data is w ithin 30-minute driv e-time of AAA Ballpark. Source: www.sitesusa.com

FIGURE 3.10: Comparable Market Selection Providence is the seventh largest market in the comparable set. The largest market, Sacramento, has over 1.7 million people, while Round Rock (Austin) is smallest with slightly over 1.1 million people. Providence has the fifth highest number of households in the set (546,001), despite being only the seventh largest market. The relationship between households and population suggests Providence has, on average, comparatively smaller households than peer markets. The local market ranks last in terms of projected population growth over the next five years; it is expected to add only 13,000 residents, or slightly under 1.0% of its present population.

3-10 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

Total Population Total Households Market 2019 2019 2014 % Change 2014 % Change (Projected) (Projected)

Charlotte, North Carolina 1,594,727 1,696,465 6.4% 615,835 656,018 6.5%

Columbus, Ohio 1,525,226 1,604,761 5.2% 609,151 641,201 5.3% Gwinnett, Georgia 1,557,315 1,670,788 7.3% 533,725 559,266 4.8% Indianapolis, Indiana 1,563,166 1,631,577 4.4% 617,709 652,104 5.6% Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 1,129,392 1,181,863 4.6% 449,406 474,722 5.6% Round Rock, Texas 1,118,509 1,245,819 11.4% 431,266 471,582 9.3% Sacramento, California 1,706,897 1,775,842 4.0% 618,430 639,655 3.4%

Salt Lake City, Utah 1,295,498 1,381,904 6.7% 426,333 456,023 7.0%

Tacoma, Washington 1,392,223 1,464,502 5.2% 522,851 552,399 5.7%

Average 1,427,023 1,505,368 5.6% 537,071 566,317 5.6%

Providence, Rhode Island 1,387,276 1,400,156 0.9% 546,001 560,202 2.6% Comparable Rank 7th / 10 7th / 10 10th / 10 5th / 10 5th / 10 10th / 10 NOTES: All data is w ithin 30-minute driv e-time of AAA Ballpark.

Source: www.sitesusa.com

FIGURE 3.11 Population and Growth Measurements

Age

The target market age group for MiLB normally falls between the ages of 20 to 44. Providence ranks 9th out of 10 in terms of target market population age despite being the seventh largest market. The low ranking is attributable to the comparatively high number of residents 45 and older. An estimated 44% of the local market population is above the age of 45; the next closest market is Tacoma, WA, at nearly 39%. In contrast, just 31% of Round Rock’s residents are above the age of 45.

April 2015 3-11

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Target Market Market 0 - 19 20 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65+ 20 - 44 Population (20 - 44)

Charlotte, North Carolina 28.1% 20.6% 15.1% 14.2% 10.9% 11.1% 35.7% 569,318 Columbus, Ohio 27.4% 22.7% 13.9% 13.6% 11.4% 11.0% 36.6% 558,233

Gwinnett, Georgia 27.8% 21.3% 14.9% 14.5% 11.2% 10.3% 36.2% 563,748 Indianapolis, Indiana 28.6% 20.7% 13.6% 13.9% 11.5% 11.7% 34.3% 536,166 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 27.9% 23.0% 12.7% 12.5% 11.5% 12.4% 35.7% 403,193 Round Rock, Texas 27.6% 25.8% 15.6% 12.6% 9.5% 8.9% 41.4% 463,063 Sacramento, California 27.3% 22.5% 12.8% 13.2% 11.6% 12.6% 35.3% 602,535 Salt Lake City, Utah 32.2% 23.2% 13.8% 11.3% 9.7% 9.8% 37.0% 479,334

Tacoma, Washington 26.7% 21.5% 13.2% 13.9% 12.1% 12.6% 34.7% 483,101 Pawtucket Rhode Island 24 3% 19 4% 12 7% 15 2% 13 1% 15 3% 32 1% 458 993 Average 27.8% 22.1% 13.8% 13.5% 11.3% 11.6% 35.9% 511,768 Providence, Rhode Island 24.3% 19.4% 12.7% 15.2% 13.1% 15.3% 32.1% 445,316 Comparable Rank 10th / 10 10th / 10 9th / 10 1st / 10 1st / 10 1st / 10 10th/10 9th / 10

NOTES: All data is w ithin 30-minute driv e-time of AAA Ballpark. Source: www.sitesusa.com FIGURE 3.12: Age Distribution

Wealth

Average Normalized Average household income is indicative of market Market Household Household wealth and the likelihood that residents will have Income Income discretionary income for entertainment expenditures. Charlotte, North Carolina$ 79,306 $ 85,092 When compared to peer markets, Providence ranks 5th Columbus, Ohio$ 75,683 $ 82,264 out of 10 markets in terms of unadjusted household Gwinnett, Georgia$ 84,078 $ 87,948 income; however, Providence’s cost of living is 23% Indianapolis, Indiana$ 74,249 $ 85,148 more expensive than the average U.S. city. When Oklahoma City, Oklahoma$ 68,959 $ 75,201 household income is adjusted for this factor, Round Rock, Texas$ 79,157 $ 82,887 Providence ranks last in the set at $62,300. Sacramento, California$ 74,733 $ 66,953 Conversely, Indianapolis is 13% cheaper to live in than Salt Lake City, Utah$ 78,684 $ 74,230 the average city, and normalized household income is Tacoma, Washington$ 73,609 $ 67,223 boosted to $85,100 from $74,200. Providence, Rhode Island$ 76,846 $ 62,274

Average$ 76,530 $ 76,922

Providence, Rhode Island$ 76,846 $ 62,274 Comparable Rank 5th / 10 10th / 10 NOTES: All data is w ithin 30-minute driv e-time of AAA Ballpark. Source: www.sitesusa.com; C2ER FIGURE 3.13: Wealth Statistics

3-12 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

Households in each comparable market are divided into four income brackets: $24,999 and less, $25,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $99,999, and $100,000 and above. As shown in Figure 3.14 below, Providence ranks second in terms of percentage of households with income of $24,999 and less and by percentage of households with income of $100,000 and greater. This table does not account for the cost of living adjustment, but shows that Providence has a comparatively smaller middle class. This analysis suggests a comparatively low average general admission ticket price will be required.

Household Income Distribution Providence, Rhode Island 22.6% 26.4% Tacoma, Washington 17.4% 24.6% Salt Lake City, Utah 16.6% 25.5% $24,999 and Under Sacramento, California 19.3% 24.7% Round Rock, Texas 18.3% 26.3% $25,000 - $49,999 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 22.7% 19.4% $50,000 - $99,999 Indianapolis, Indiana 21.1% 22.5% Gwinnett, Georgia 19.7% 28.1% $100,000 +

Columbus, Ohio 21.7% 24.4%

Charlotte, North Carolina 19.7% 24.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

FIGURE 3.14: Household Income Distribution

Economic Activity

Retail sales are a broad yet instructive measure of economic activity in a market. In 2014, Providence had total retail sales of $13.5 billion, ranking 6th in the set. Charlotte and Sacramento each had over $15 billion in retail sales, while Oklahoma City had the fewest at $10.3 billion. Entertainment expenditures in Providence measured $1.78 billion, or roughly 13% of all retail sales. Comparable markets on average had $13.2 billion in retail sales with 13% spent on entertainment.

April 2015 3-13

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Expenditures Market Total Retail Entertainment

Charlotte, North Carolina$ 36,500 $ 15,500 $ 2,050 Columbus, Ohio$ 34,900 $ 14,800 $ 1,960 Gwinnett, Georgia$ 33,100 $ 14,000 $ 1,860 Indianapolis, Indiana$ 34,900 $ 14,800 $ 1,960 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma$ 24,200 $ 10,300 $ 1,350

Round Rock, Texas$ 25,500 $ 10,800 $ 1,430 Sacramento, California$ 35,300 $ 15,000 $ 1,980 Salt Lake City, Utah$ 25,300 $ 10,700 $ 1,420 Tacoma, Washington$ 29,700 $ 12,600 $ 1,660

Average$ 31,044 $ 13,167 $ 1,741

Providence, Rhode Island$ 31,800 $ 13,500 $ 1,780

Comparable Rank 6th / 10 6th / 10 6th / 10

NOTES: All data is w ithin 30-minute driv e-time of AAA Ballpark. Source: www.sitesusa.com FIGURE 3.15: Retail Sales Analysis

Business Climate & Share Analysis

B&D also collected business establishment data for each MSA. While drive time influences an individual’s propensity to attend games, it has little to no influence on a business’s decision to pursue a corporate partnership. For this analysis, Providence is evaluated against only seven of the nine comparable markets because Gwinnett (Atlanta) and Tacoma (Seattle) are part of extremely large metropolitan areas that are considered outliers. Providence ranks 5th among these seven markets in terms of the total number of business establishments and 4th in businesses with over 1,000 employees. Figure 3.16 below shows the corporate inventory for all nine comparable markets, but averages are calculated using only the seven most relevant ones.

3-14 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

Business Establishments by Employment Total Market 100 - 250 - 500 - Establishments < 50 50 - 99 1,000 + 100+ 250+ 249 499 999

Charlotte, North Carolina 54,647 51,390 1,883 969 251 102 52 1,374 405 Columbus, Ohio 40,151 37,284 1,521 956 246 87 57 1,346 390 Gwinnett, Georgia 130,389 122,979 4,055 2,421 601 212 121 3,355 934 Indianapolis, Indiana 44,798 41,869 1,583 965 254 77 50 1,346 381 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 33,734 32,016 998 528 131 41 20 720 192 Round Rock, Texas 43,746 41,373 1,363 740 170 67 33 1,010 270 Sacramento, California 45,134 42,895 1,274 741 148 45 31 965 224 Salt Lake City, Utah 30,228 28,462 971 540 157 64 34 795 255 Tacoma, Washington 97,180 92,477 2,666 1,438 390 131 78 2,037 599

[1] Adjusted Average 41,777 39,327 1,370 777 194 69 40 1,079 302

Providence, Rhode Island 40,534 38,469 1,145 702 135 47 36 920 218 Comparable Rank 5th/ 8 5th/ 8 6th / 8 6th / 8 7th / 8 6th/ 8 4th / 8 6th / 8 7th / 8

[1] Adjusted av erage does not include Gw innett, GA or Tacoma, WA NOTES: Source: 2012 MSA Business Patterns (NAICS) by Metropolitan or Micropolitan Statistical Areas

FIGURE 3.16: Business Establishments

The inventory of businesses in each comparable market serves as the basis for completing a premium seating share analysis. The analysis measures capacity for additional premium seating in the Providence market in consideration of existing premium products and the inventory of businesses. B&D conducted a systematic and comprehensive review of sports facilities in the local market and each of the nine comparable markets. The review examined premium seating offerings in every professional and collegiate arena, stadium, and ballpark.

The share analysis examines two relationships: the number of large businesses (250 employees or more) for each luxury suite and the number of club/loge seats for each high income household (income in excess of $150,000) in a market. For each suite in comparable markets, there are approximately 1.7 large businesses while Providence has 1.79 large businesses per suite. When the 1.7 ratio is applied to Providence, there is a net shortage of six suites in the market. A similar analysis was completed for club/loge seats. There are approximately seven high wealth households per club seat in comparable markets, while Providence has 10.65 high wealth households per club seat. This analysis suggests the facility program should contain comparatively fewer suites and a variety of premium options suited for high wealth households.

April 2015 3-15

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Luxury Suites Club/Loge Seats Market Businesses with Share High Income Share Quantity Quantity 250+ Employees Ratio Households ($150k Plus) Ratio

Charlotte, North Carolina 247 405 1.64 14,844 71,437 4.81 Columbus, Ohio 242 390 1.61 9,981 67,007 6.71 Gwinnett, Georgia 236 934 3.96 9,500 76,323 8.03 Indianapolis, Indiana 503 381 0.76 16,398 60,535 3.69 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 118 192 1.63 3,380 36,851 10.90 Round Rock, Texas 195 270 1.38 3,495 51,321 14.68 Sacramento, California 195 224 1.15 4,286 66,790 15.58 Salt Lake City, Utah 131 255 1.95 2,022 43,060 21.30 Tacoma, Washington 245 599 2.44 13,441 49,671 3.70 [1] Adjusted Average 196 334 1.70 8,418 59,914 7.12 Providence, Rhode Island 122 218 1.79 6,000 63,882 10.65 Market Capacity 128 1.70 8,976 7.12 Surplus / (Shortage) (6) (2,976) NOTES: Adjusted av erage does not include Gw innett or Indianapolis Source: 2012 NAICS Business patterns, Internet research, v enue w ebsites.

FIGURE 3.17: Premium Seating Share Analysis

3-16 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

ATTENDANCE PROJECTIONS

Ballpark attendance is the primary factor influencing financial performance and corresponding economic benefits. Future attendance levels for an AAA franchise playing in a downtown ballpark were developed by relying on a number of exercises, including:

 A review of the Pawtucket Red Sox, PCL, and IL attendance from 2005 to 2014;

 Examination of reported paid attendance levels seen in the nine comparable markets;

 Development of capture ratio analyses to examine the corollary between annual AAA franchise attendance and market size;

 Analysis of attendance trends and “before and after” attendance levels at new ballparks;

 Review of the attendance stabilization period after opening a ballpark; and

 Development of attendance projections for an AAA franchise in a new ballpark.

All attendance data quoted in this analysis is paid reported attendance unless otherwise noted.

Attendance Trends (2005 to 2014)

The Pawtucket Red Sox’s paid attendance ranked in the top five of MiLB from 2005 to 2009; however, attendance has been in steep decline from its peak level of 9,550 per game in 2005. In 2014, attendance was under 7,400, which is a 2,200 patron decrease (23%) from 2005.

Attendance History (2005 to 2014)

10,000 9,561 9,500 9,000 8,500 PCL 8,000 7,367 7,500 IL 7,000 6,500 Pawtucket 6,000 5,500 5,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

PCL 6,581 6,606 6,607 6,479 6,356 6,306 6,152 6,033 6,036 6,270 IL 6,652 6,495 6,857 7,161 7,207 6,946 6,761 6,629 6,961 7,241 Pawtucket 9,561 9,289 8,861 9,097 8,937 8,343 8,270 7,551 7,827 7,367

Source: MiLB FIGURE 3.18: Attendance Trends

April 2015 3-17

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Pacific Coast League and International League have contrasting attendance trends from 2005 to 2014. In 2005, PCL average attendance was 6,581, which decreased to 6,270 in 2014. In contrast, the average attendance in the IL increased from 6,652 in 2005 to 7,241 in 2014. Lehigh Valley, introduced as a franchise in 2008, is the primary contributing factor for the IL increase. The Ottawa Lynx, Lehigh Valley’s predecessor, averaged under 2,000 fans per game while Lehigh Valley averaged over 9,000 each year after 2008. The lack of meaningful attendance growth in each league reflects the maturity of MiLB and stability of its business model.

Comparable Market Attendance

Along with Pawtucket’s historic attendance levels, annual attendance levels for AAA franchises in comparable markets are utilized to inform attendance projections. On average, comparable franchises drew fewer attendees per game from 20120 to 2013 than Pawtucket despite being located in similar markets. In all but one year (2014), Columbus or Sacramento had the highest attendance levels in the set. In no year did any franchise eclipse 10,000 attendees per game; the highest attendance figure (9,686) was in 2014 at Charlotte, the first year of operations for BB&T ballpark.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2010 - 2014 Market Population Average Average Average Average Average Average

[1] Charlotte, North Carolina 1,594,727 - - - - 9,686 9,686 Columbus, Ohio 1,525,226 8,946 8,704 8,732 9,212 8,945 8,908

Gwinnett, Georgia 1,557,315 4,818 5,095 4,680 4,762 4,281 4,727

Indianapolis, Indiana 1,563,166 8,028 8,170 8,501 8,980 9,433 8,622 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 1,129,392 5,479 5,262 5,633 5,797 6,045 5,643 Round Rock, Texas 1,118,509 8,408 8,587 8,389 8,181 8,390 8,391 Sacramento, California 1,706,897 9,138 8,455 8,140 8,435 8,561 8,546 Salt Lake City, Utah 1,295,498 7,293 6,438 7,162 7,482 6,722 7,019 Tacoma, Washington 1,392,223 5,163 4,331 4,889 4,446 4,699 4,706

Average 1,431,439 7,159 6,880 7,016 7,162 7,418 7,361 [2] Pawtucket, Rhode Island 1,425,444 8,343 8,270 7,551 7,827 7,367 7,872

[1] Charlotte Knights opened new ballpark in 2014; prev ious attendance lev els are discarded [2] Paw tucket's 30-minute driv e time population is utilized in place of Prov idence

Source: MiLB.com

FIGURE 3.19: Comparable Market Attendance

Using demographic and attendance data for each comparable market, B&D completed a market capture analysis to inform attendance levels for an AAA franchise in downtown Providence. Each team’s annual attendance from 2010 to 2014 was translated into a percentage of the 30-minute drive time population. Comparable markets on average captured 36 attendees for every 100 people within a 30 minute drive time, while Pawtucket captured 39 attendees. Given McCoy Stadium’s age and configuration, the comparatively strong capture ratio almost certainly speaks to the Red Sox appeal in the region.

3-18 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

Attendance Per Game Capture Population (2010 - 2014) Average Ratio

[1] Charlotte, North Carolina 1,594,727 687,715 9,686 0.43

Columbus, Ohio 1,525,226 620,568 8,908 0.41 Gwinnett, Georgia 1,557,315 328,829 4,727 0.21 Indianapolis, Indiana 1,563,166 608,592 8,622 0.39 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 1,129,392 395,028 5,643 0.35 Round Rock, Texas 1,118,509 599,114 8,391 0.54

Sacramento, California 1,706,897 611,895 8,546 0.36 Salt Lake City, Utah 1,295,498 493,134 7,019 0.38 Tacoma, Washington 1,392,223 341,434 4,706 0.25 Pawtucket, Rhode Island 1,425,444 549,596 7,872 0.39

Providence, RI (Current) 1,387,276 534,880 7,866 0.39 Providence, RI (Average) 1,387,276 509,960 7,499 0.36 Providence, RI (Max) 1,387,276 743,076 10,928 0.54 [1] Av erage capture ratio does not include Charlotte NOTES: All data is w ithin 30-minute driv e-time of AAA Ballpark. Source: www.sitesusa.com; MiLB.com FIGURE 3.20: Capture Analysis - Population

B&D also completed a similar capture analysis for households with children, which represent a key target market for MiLB franchises. Similar to Figure 3.20, Pawtucket drew a comparatively high number of attendees as a function of households with children against peer markets. When the average capture ratio for comparable markets of 2.68 is applied, the analysis suggests an attendance level of under 7,000. When Round Rock’s 4.13 capture ratio is applied, projected attendance is slightly over 10,600 annually.

Families With Attendance Per Game Capture Children (2010 - 2014) Average Ratio [1] Charlotte, North Carolina 224,780 687,715 9,686 3.06 Columbus, Ohio 201,020 620,568 8,908 3.09

Gwinnett, Georgia 228,968 328,829 4,727 1.44 Indianapolis, Indiana 219,904 608,592 8,622 2.77 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 151,000 395,028 5,643 2.62 Round Rock, Texas 144,905 599,114 8,391 4.13 Sacramento, California 222,635 611,895 8,546 2.75

Salt Lake City, Utah 177,355 493,134 7,019 2.78 Tacoma, Washington 184,044 341,434 4,706 1.86

Pawtucket, Rhode Island 180,006 549,596 7,872 3.05

Providence, RI (Current) 174,720 549,596 8,082 3.15

Providence, RI (Average) 174,720 467,933 6,881 2.68 Providence, RI (Max) 174,720 722,385 10,623 4.13 [1] Average capture ratio does not include Char0lotte NOTES: All data is w ithin 30-minute driv e-time of AAA Ballpark. Source: www.sitesusa.com; MiLB.com FIGURE 3.21: Capture Analysis – Households with Children

April 2015 3-19

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Incremental Attendance Analysis

New ballpark projects often generate meaningful attendance increases from previous parks. B&D examined the relationship between attendance levels five years before and after projects were completed within the same market. Figure 3.22 shows the attendance increase or decreases after a new ballpark opened. Columbus represents an important comparable to Pawtucket in terms of market size and attendance levels prior to a new ballpark project. If Columbus’s 21% increase in attendance were applied to a new Providence park, paid attendance would average 9,525 over the first five years. Interestingly, Tacoma did not benefit from the same increase in attendance as a result of a renovation project, while Scranton/Wilkes-Barre saw a 15% increase.

Ballpark Before After Net Increase/ Team Level Variance Opening Average Average Decrease

Birmingham Barons 2013 AA 3,981 5,961 1,980 50%

Charlotte Knights 2014 AAA 4,140 9,686 5,546 134%

Columbus Clippers 2009 AAA 7,472 9,024 1,552 21% Omaha Storm Chasers 2011 AAA 5,225 5,795 570 11% SWB Yankees 2013 R AAA 5,369 6,158 788 15% Tacoma Rainiers 2011 R AAA 4,857 4,591 -265 -5% Tulsa Drillers 2010 AA 4,669 5,762 1,093 23%

Source: MiLB.com FIGURE 3.22: Incremental Attendance Analysis

Attendance Trend Analysis

In most cases, ballpark attendance levels are subject to a “honeymoon” period whereby the ballpark and team receive elevated interest upon opening of a ballpark. B&D completed a detailed attendance trend analysis that indicates ballparks typically reach a stabilized attendance level at 90% of first-year attendance in year 6 of operations. B&D acknowledges this is a conceptual exercise but nonetheless useful for predicting stabilized and first year attendance levels.

3-20 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

MARKET ANALYSIS

Team Level 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Birmingham Barons AA ------110%

Columbus Clippers AAA - - 94% 97% 100% 105% 98%

NW Arkansas Naturals AA - 100% 93% 93% 92% 90% 89%

Omaha Storm Chasers AAA - - - - 100% 95% 95%

Reno Aces AAA - - 96% 94% 84% 76% 81% SWB Yankees AAA ------92% Tacoma Rainiers AAA - - - - 113% 103% 108% Tulsa Drillers AA - - 87% 86% 92% 100%

Percent of Year 1 (Year 2) 99%

Percent of Year 1 (Year 3) 95%

Percent of Year 1 (Year 4) 95%

Percent of Year 1 (Year 5) 93% Percent of Year 1 (Year 6) 89%

Source: MiLB.com

FIGURE 3.23: Attendance Stabilization Analysis

PAID ATTENDANCE PROJECTIONS

B&D developed three attendance scenarios for the franchise in a downtown Providence ballpark: aggressive, moderate, and conservative. This analysis assumes the project will have a total capacity of 10,000. In the aggressive scenario B&D projects first-year attendance levels of 9,900, settling in at 9,158 in year 2021. In the moderate scenario, which B&D considers most likely, first-year attendance is projected at 9,250 attendees per opening and 8,325 in year five. In all scenarios B&D assumes that actual attendance will be reduced by the no-show factor, which increases from 21% in year one to 25% in year five.

Paid Attendance Actual Paid Attendance Actual Events (2017) Attendance (2021) Attendance AAA Baseball Conservative 70 8,600 6,794 7,740 5,805

Moderate 70 9,250 7,308 8,325 6,244 Aggressive 70 9,900 7,821 9,158 6,868

Conservative 70 602,000 475,580 541,800 406,350 Moderate 70 647,500 511,560 582,750 437,080 Aggressive 70 693,000 547,470 641,060 480,760

FIGURE 3.24: Attendance Projections

April 2015 3-21

This Page Left Intentionally Blank

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS

4.0 – ECONOMIC & FISCAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS

APPROACH

This benefit analysis is designed to evaluate and quantify the economic and fiscal benefits generated by the construction and operation of the proposed ballpark project. In this analysis, an emphasis is placed on evaluating and quantifying the direct benefits to the state of Rhode Island. All economic benefits quantified in this analysis are specific to the state and do not represent incremental benefits over those generated by the franchise in Pawtucket. In addition to measurable benefits, the project also presents several intangible benefits, each of which are listed at the conclusion of this section and highlighted in six ballpark case studies, attached to this document as Exhibit D.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the economic benefit analysis is to quantify the total effect the new spending generated through the construction and operations of the project will have on the Rhode Island economy. Effects are measured in terms of economic output, employment, and earnings, which are further divided into direct and indirect impacts. The direct impacts represent the economic activity created by the expenditure of dollars on construction and operations. The indirect impacts represent the value of additional economic demands that the project places on supplying industries in the local market economy for goods and services. The sum of the direct and indirect impacts includes all transactions attributable to the project and, as such, represents the total economic impact of the project.

Using the impact categories described above, the study will quantify the potential impacts of the construction and operation of the entire project as follows:

 One-Time Economic Benefits: Projections of construction spending on employment, earnings, and industrial output, including the spin-off economic activity created by the new construction expenditures.

 One-Time Fiscal Benefits: Projections of the public tax revenue impacts generated by the project during the construction period.

 Annual Economic Benefits: Projections of recurring impacts during operation of the project, including visitor and local spending, job creation, and earnings.

 Annual Fiscal Benefits: Projection of the public tax revenue impacts generated by the operation of the project, including owner, user, and patron spending.

April 2015 4-1

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

METHODOLOGY

The economic benefit analysis relies on Minnesota Implan Group (MIG), Inc.’s I-RIMS input-output multipliers to model the direct and indirect quantitative impacts of a capital project. This approach allows for the analysis of the relationships between industries and households within a specified region. All spending associated with the stadium will create a demand for goods and services in the market and multipliers provide the basis for estimating what portion of the demand is satisfied locally.

FIGURE 4.1: Economic Benefit Flow Chart

All money spent on the ballpark’s construction and operation and by building patrons is considered a direct impact. To analyze the benefits specific to the state, the direct impacts are discounted to account for out- of-market leakage. For example, a direct impact would include purchase of catering services for premium seating areas. The fee paid to the catering company represents a direct impact. Some purchases may be provided by out-of-market companies and some supported jobs may be filled by out-of-market residents. Consequently, all direct impacts in the analysis are discounted to account for the leakage on a case-by- case basis.

4-2 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS

Direct impacts provide the basis for calculating indirect and induced benefits. For example, the same catering company may need to purchase meat to produce concession items at an event. This spending creates business for a food distributor, which, in turn, creates new employment opportunities and additional earnings for the distributor. Further, induced economic activity, which measures new spending patterns generated as a result of the project, are also quantified.

The benefit analysis is conducted on the basis of operating expenditures and cost components generated within the ballpark. This approach offers more reliable results in terms of accurately estimating “net new” impacts within the local economy. Direct impact in this analysis includes operational expenditures, cost of sales for concessions and novelties, and off-site team and visitor spending at hotels, retail stores, restaurants, and on transportation items. Ticket sales and in-stadium spending are not considered direct impacts for in-market visitors; in B&D’s experience, much of this spending is displacement or “substitution” spending and would have taken place without the presence of the project.

The SAM-type (Social Accounting Matrix) multipliers shown in Figure 4.2 are utilized in the analysis and are specific to the state of Rhode Island. Multipliers are classified as final demand and direct-effect multipliers. Final demand multipliers reflect the increase in demand for a particular product in a market (e.g., catering). Direct-effect multipliers are considered a “jobs to job” multiplier, which relies on estimates of changes in initial jobs and associated wages in a final demand industry.

Final Demand Direct-Effect Type SAM Multipliers (2013) Output Earnings Employment Earnings Employment

Construction 1.79 0.66 11.65 1.80 2.12

Apparel Manufacturing 1.78 0.61 13.43 1.89 1.65

Food Manufacturing 1.45 0.30 6.40 2.16 1.92 Ground Transportation 1.88 0.83 18.67 1.64 1.50 Professional, Scientific, and Technical 1.97 0.87 14.79 1.70 1.95 Management of Companies 1.95 0.89 10.91 1.65 2.69 Administrative and Support Services 1.76 0.57 9.95 1.91 2.16 Accomodation 1.67 0.59 14.04 1.72 1.56 Food Services and Drinking Places 1.75 0.65 21.58 1.69 1.31

Source: MIG, Inc. FIGURE 4.2: Final Demand and Direct-Effect Multipliers

April 2015 4-3

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

ONE-TIME BENEFITS

During the construction period, the project will have an immediate, one-time impact on the Rhode Island economy (“local market”). Direct, one-time impacts stem from the procurement of labor, purchase of materials, and contracting of soft cost services inside the state.

One-Time Economic & Fiscal Benefits

The total project cost for the development is approximately $85 million, inclusive of a $10 million investment in a parking structure. The budget consists of $17 million in soft costs and $68 million in hard costs allocated between labor (37.5%) and materials (62.5%). The local market retains 80% of wages ($20.4 million) and just 26% of demand for goods and services ($15.3 million), which includes soft cost services and materials. Direct wages paid to state workers supports 405 jobs at an average wage of over $50,000. When direct- effect and final demand multipliers are applied to wage and spending assumptions, the construction period supports $28.1 million in economic activity, $47.3 million in wages, and 1,036 jobs.

2015 2016 2017 Total Expenditure Distribution 10% 70% 20% Hard Costs Spent$ 6,800,000 $ 47,600,000 $ 13,600,000 $ 68,000,000

Margin 3%$ 204,000 $ 1,428,000 $ 408,000 $ 2,040,000 Less out-of-Market Leakage 40% 81,600 571,200 163,200 $ 816,000 Net Business Tax Basis$ 122,400 $ 856,800 $ 244,800 $ 1,224,000

Business Tax 7.00% $ 8,568 $ 59,976 $ 17,136 $ 85,680

Est. Construction Payroll (% Hard Costs) 37.5%$ 2,550,000 $ 17,850,000 $ 5,100,000 $ 25,500,000 [1] Less out-of-Market Leakage 20%$ 510,000 $ 3,570,000 $ 1,020,000 $ 5,100,000 Net Construction Payroll Basis$ 2,040,000 $ 14,280,000 $ 4,080,000 $ 20,400,000

Income Tax 3.75% $ 95,625 $ 669,375 $ 191,250 $ 956,250

Est. Spending on Materials (% Hard Costs) 62.5%$ 4,250,000 $ 29,750,000 $ 8,500,000 $ 42,500,000 [1] Less out-of-Market Leakage 80%$ 3,400,000 $ 23,800,000 $ 6,800,000 $ 34,000,000 Net Construction Materials in Market$ 850,000 $ 5,950,000 $ 1,700,000 $ 8,500,000

Construction Material Sales Tax 7.0% $ 59,500 $ 416,500 $ 119,000 $ 595,000

Tax Capture From Construction$ 163,693 $ 1,145,851 $ 327,386 $ 1,636,930

[1] Per Gilbane Construction Co.; Leakage factors can be impacted by project labor agreements or other employ ment requirements

[2] Av erage 2014 w age for construction and ex traction occupations and inflated to 2016 figures Source: MIG, Inc.; US Bureau of Labor Statistics

FIGURE 4.3: Construction Period Assumptions

4-4 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS

In terms of fiscal benefits, the project generates business corporation taxes of $86,000, personal income taxes of $956,000, and sales tax on materials purchases of $595,000. Collectively, the construction period taxes to the state totals $1.64 million. The state will also benefit from use tax on of materials purchased out of state, though the amount is not quantifiable without information on where the materials are sourced.

RECURRING BENEFITS

Economic Benefits

While construction of the ballpark will generate significant benefits for the region, they are limited to the length of the estimated construction period. Upon opening the facility, visitor spending and ballpark operating expenditures will create both economic and fiscal impacts that are more significant when considered over the life of the ballpark. Economic benefit projections contain both AAA games and a series of potential outside events and functions with a total attendance of 208,000 annually.

VISITOR SPENDING

Data provided by the team indicates that 48% of all 2014 attendees originated from outside of the state of Rhode Island. B&D assumes that approximately 525,000 attendees will attend a new ballpark annually with 48% of them from within the market, 44% from another state, and 8% requiring hotel stays. The increase in apportionment for non-local visitors is attributable to improved access afforded by the site over the existing ballpark. Attendance for outside events is distributed into the same categories at 85%, 10%, and 5%, respectively. After factoring in leakage, the project will drive an estimated $11.2 million in net direct activity and support nearly $4.2 million in direct wages during its first year of operation, which is presumed to be 2017.

VISITING TEAM & PERSONNEL SPENDING

Visiting teams average 37 persons in a traveling party per MiLB competition. This figure includes players, coaches, staff, administrative personnel, umpires, and local media. The traveling parties generate an estimated 2,900 total days within the local market and slightly under 1,300 room nights annually. After factoring in leakage to nearby states, B&D projects $148,000 in net direct activity and nearly $57,000 in direct wages.

TEAM & BALLPARK OPERATIONS

Franchise and ballpark operations will support an estimated $4.7 million in total wages and $7.6 million in gross purchases for goods and services and cost components. After factoring in leakage, the local market will benefit from over $7 million in net combined wages and activity.

April 2015 4-5

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Direct economic activity to the state totals an estimated $14.9 million in economic activity and $7.8 million in wages, and supports 215 full-time equivalent jobs. Indirect and induced benefits total $11.7 million in economic activity and $15.5 million in wages, and supports 386 full-time equivalent jobs. Collectively, the project will generate $26.6 million in economic activity and support $23.3 million in wages and 601 associated full-time equivalent jobs in the state. Both one-time and recurring economic benefits are shown in Figure 4.4.

Construction Recurring Operations

Labor$ 25,500,000 Gross Activity$ 23,188,337 Materials$ 42,500,000 Gross Wages$ 10,544,285 Soft Costs$ 17,000,000 Total$ 85,000,000 Total$ 33,732,622

Direct Benefits Direct Benefits Estimated Output$ 15,300,000 26% Estimated Output$ 14,898,519 64% Estimated Wages$ 20,400,000 80% Estimated Wages$ 7,816,044 74% Estimated Employment 405 Estimated Employment 215

Indirect & Induced Benefits Indirect & Induced Benefits Estimated Output$ 12,804,570 Estimated Output$ 11,702,295 Estimated Wages$ 26,851,840 Estimated Wages$ 15,517,457 Estimated Employment 631 Estimated Employment 386

Total Benefits Total Benefits Estimated Output $ 28,104,570 Estimated Output $ 26,600,814 Estimated Wages $ 47,251,840 Estimated Wages $ 23,333,501 Estimated Employment 1036 Estimated Employment 601

FIGURE 4.4: Economic Benefit Summary

Fiscal Benefits

In addition to the direct and indirect economic benefits, the project will generate significant tax revenues for the state of Rhode Island and city of Providence. As shown in Figure 4.5, the state collects five taxes applicable to the analysis, including a personal income tax ranging from 3.75% to 5.99%, a 3.75% share of the existing 6% statewide transient occupancy tax, and a 7% sales tax. The state does not collect the 7% sales tax on admissions to public assembly events. The city collects a 1% food and beverage tax on prepared foods, a tangible business tax, and a 2.25% share of the transient occupancy tax.

State Tax Rate Local Tax Levy/Rate Business Corporation Tax 7.0% Food and Beverage Tax 1.0%

Construction Materials Sales Tax 7.0% Tanigble Business Tax 0.0558 Personal Income Tax 3.75% to 5.99% Transient Occupancy Tax (7%) +(2.25%) Sales Tax 7.0% Transient Occupancy Tax (7%) + (3.75%)

FIGURE 4.5: Applicable Tax Rates

4-6 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS

Estimated annual fiscal benefits for the construction period and the first five years of operation are shown in Figure 4.6 below. As mentioned above, the construction period supports $1.64 million in fiscal benefits to the state. In the first year of operations, fiscal benefits total $2.37 million to the state and $199,000 to the city. Fiscal benefits to the state and city fall to $2.33 million and $197,000, respectively, in 2021 due to declines in attendance from the first to fifth (stabilized) year.

Level Construction 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Business Corporation Tax State$ 85,680 - - - - - Construction Materials Tax State$ 595,000 ----- Food and Beverage Tax City$ 113,014 $ 116,404 $ 112,113 $ 115,476 $ 110,963

State Income Tax State$ 956,250 $ 661,147 $ 679,478 $ 653,115 $ 671,215 $ 642,743

Sales Tax State$ 1,550,092 $ 1,596,595 $ 1,544,192 $ 1,590,517 $ 1,535,451

Tangible Business Tax City$ 5,920 $ 6,097 $ 6,280 $ 6,469 $ 6,663

Transient Occupancy Tax State$ 155,185 $ 159,840 $ 155,145 $ 159,800 $ 154,870

Transient Occupancy Tax City$ 79,757 $ 82,149 $ 79,733 $ 82,125 $ 79,588

Annual Tax Benefit

City of Providence$ - $ 198,690 $ 204,651 $ 198,126 $ 204,070 $ 197,214 State of Rhode Island$ 1,636,930 $ 2,366,423 $ 2,435,912 $ 2,352,452 $ 2,421,532 $ 2,333,063 Total Benefit$ 1,636,930 $ 2,565,113 $ 2,640,563 $ 2,550,579 $ 2,625,602 $ 2,530,278

Note: Fiscal benefit may v ary depending on final lease and ow nership structures

FIGURE 4.6: Fiscal Benefits (2017 to 2021)

When fiscal benefits are measured on a 30-year net present value basis, the project generates $45.3 million in benefits to the state and $3.78 million in benefits to the city across all tax categories. As shown in Figure 4.7, the vast majority of state benefits are attributable to sales tax (65%) and personal income tax (27%). The project also supports $2.97 million in transient occupancy taxes at the state level and $1.52 million at the city level from over 35,000 total room nights of demand. Sales tax on admissions to public assembly events is not collected by the state.

State Fiscal Benefits 30-Year NPV City Fiscal Benefits 30-Year NPV Business Corporation Tax$ 76,980 Food and Beverage Tax$ 2,130,230 Materials Sales Tax$ 534,583 Tangible Business Tax$ 125,515 Personal Income Tax$ 12,282,616 Transient Occupancy Tax$ 1,524,298 Sales Tax$ 29,438,974 Transient Occupancy Tax$ 2,966,082 Total$ 45,299,236 Total $ 3,780,044

Note: Assumes 3% inflation after y ear 10 of operations; Discount rate of 5.25% is utilized from y ear 1 to 30 Note: Indirect and induced tax benefits are not included in calculations FIGURE 4.7 NPV of Fiscal Benefits (2017 to 2046)

April 2015 4-7

BASEBALL RHODE ISLAND | MARKET ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

On a 30-year net present value basis, the project generates total economic activity of $322 million and $180 million in total associated wages, which supports an estimated 215 direct jobs on an annual basis. These figures do not include indirect and induced economic activity or wages.

Intangible Benefits

Development of the ballpark will present several non-quantifiable, “quality of life” benefits to the Providence MSA and state of Rhode Island. While the benefits are not measurable, many of them are highlighted in six economic benefit “case studies” completed by B&D; each case study and accompanying photos are attached to this document as Exhibit D. The common theme among the case studies selected, which include Dayton, Tulsa, Toledo, Memphis, and Durham, and Louisville, is that the ballparks coincided with a meaningful investment and revitalization of the central business district. Along with serving as a catalyst for future development, additional intangible benefits often include:

 Often entails new private sector investment  Affordable family entertainment option

 Enhanced sense of community pride  Business recruitment and retention tool

 Additional exposure for regions/downtowns  Franchise charitable contributions/

 Serves as additional civic gathering venue foundation

4-8 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INSPIRE. EMPOWER. ADVANCE.

EXHIBIT A

COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8193/-71.4082 RFULL9 Eddy Street & Dyer Street 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime 60 min drivetime Prov, RI 02903

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,387,276 2,674,850 5,229,875 Projected Population (2019) 1,400,156 2,733,125 5,381,210 Census Population (2010) 1,375,626 2,642,366 5,133,503 Census Population (2000) 1,354,622 2,574,690 4,964,152

Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 12,880 0.2% 58,275 0.4% 151,335 0.6% Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 11,649 0.2% 32,484 0.3% 96,372 0.5% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 21,004 0.2% 67,676 0.3% 169,351 0.3%

Estimated Population Density (2014) 1,100 psm 813 psm 1,014 psm Trade Area Size 1,260.9 sq mi 3,288.8 sq mi 5,158.7 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 546,001 1,031,777 2,034,063 Projected Households (2019) 560,202 1,062,301 2,097,445 Census Households (2010) 535,551 1,011,531 1,994,605 Census Households (2000) 521,578 976,635 1,917,498

Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 14,201 0.5% 30,524 0.6% 63,382 0.6% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 24,423 0.3% 55,142 0.4% 116,565 0.4%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $76,846 $85,028 $90,922 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $83,632 $92,569 $99,042 Census Average Household Income (2010) $70,664 $77,926 $83,046 Census Average Household Income (2000) $55,532 $61,419 $65,527

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $6,786 1.8% $7,541 1.8% $8,120 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $21,314 2.7% $23,610 2.7% $25,396 2.8%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $63,278 $70,748 $73,510 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $68,707 $76,936 $79,899 Census Median Household Income (2010) $58,713 $64,600 $66,618 Census Median Household Income (2000) $46,315 $51,116 $53,163

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $5,429 1.7% $6,188 1.7% $6,389 1.7% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $16,963 2.6% $19,632 2.7% $20,347 2.7%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $30,465 $33,048 $35,651 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $33,700 $36,248 $38,909 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $27,511 $29,831 $32,267 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $21,311 $23,209 $25,218

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $3,235 2.1% $3,200 1.9% $3,257 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $9,154 3.1% $9,839 3.0% $10,434 3.0% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $533,668 $609,154 $653,889

©2015, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 9 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8193/-71.4082 RFULL9 Eddy Street & Dyer Street 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime 60 min drivetime Prov, RI 02903

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,387,276 2,674,850 5,229,875 White (2014) 1,161,608 83.7% 2,215,777 82.8% 4,121,352 78.8% Black or African American (2014) 68,937 5.0% 172,311 6.4% 401,027 7.7% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 5,886 0.4% 10,694 0.4% 18,850 0.4% Asian (2014) 39,585 2.9% 81,610 3.1% 290,795 5.6% Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 637 - 1,051 - 1,991 - Other Race (2014) 70,225 5.1% 117,310 4.4% 242,910 4.6% Two or More Races (2014) 40,397 2.9% 76,096 2.8% 152,951 2.9%

Population < 18 (2014) 290,348 20.9% 569,673 21.3% 1,050,216 20.1% White 220,890 76.1% 432,304 75.9% 751,554 71.6% Black or African American 19,572 6.7% 47,399 8.3% 105,207 10.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 1,684 0.6% 2,880 0.5% 5,065 0.5% Asian 9,343 3.2% 20,042 3.5% 57,979 5.5% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 171 0.1% 243 - 429 - Other Race 38,688 13.3% 66,803 11.7% 129,981 12.4%

Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 55,915 4.0% 85,208 3.2% 173,106 3.3%

Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 1,231,038 88.7% 2,435,082 91.0% 4,704,690 90.0% Not Hispanic White 1,094,568 88.9% 2,108,238 86.6% 3,880,021 82.5% Not Hispanic Black or African American 57,666 4.7% 153,863 6.3% 360,898 7.7% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 3,579 0.3% 6,731 0.3% 11,871 0.3% Not Hispanic Asian 38,489 3.1% 80,237 3.3% 287,571 6.1% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 353 - 624 - 1,311 - Not Hispanic Other Race 9,249 0.8% 29,859 1.2% 53,510 1.1% Not Hispanic Two or More Races 27,134 2.2% 55,529 2.3% 109,508 2.3%

Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 156,238 11.3% 239,768 9.0% 525,185 10.0% Hispanic White 67,040 42.9% 107,540 44.9% 241,331 46.0% Hispanic Black or African American 11,271 7.2% 18,448 7.7% 40,129 7.6% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 2,307 1.5% 3,962 1.7% 6,979 1.3% Hispanic Asian 1,096 0.7% 1,374 0.6% 3,223 0.6% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 284 0.2% 427 0.2% 681 0.1%

Hispanic Other Race 60,977 39.0% 87,450 36.5% 189,400 36.1% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. Hispanic Two or More Races 13,263 8.5% 20,568 8.6% 43,443 8.3%

Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 1,232,225 89.6% 2,423,848 91.7% 4,655,288 90.7% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 143,401 10.4% 218,517 8.3% 478,215 9.3% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 1,257,118 92.8% 2,429,118 94.3% 4,633,028 93.3% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 97,504 7.2% 145,572 5.7% 331,124 6.7% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 1,235,469 88.2% 2,476,035 90.6% 4,816,871 89.5% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 164,687 11.8% 257,089 9.4% 564,339 10.5% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 8,449 1.1% 17,321 1.4% 39,154 1.5% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 45,897 4.7% 72,946 5.0% 147,091 4.4%

©2015, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 9 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8193/-71.4082 RFULL9 Eddy Street & Dyer Street 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime 60 min drivetime Prov, RI 02903

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,387,276 2,674,850 5,229,875 Age Under 5 Years 75,963 5.5% 146,367 5.5% 286,361 5.5% Age 5 to 9 Years 80,712 5.8% 157,214 5.9% 290,014 5.5% Age 10 to 14 Years 85,063 6.1% 168,099 6.3% 301,494 5.8% Age 15 to 19 Years 95,904 6.9% 188,493 7.0% 368,855 7.1% Age 20 to 24 Years 96,250 6.9% 178,034 6.7% 398,611 7.6% Age 25 to 29 Years 87,558 6.3% 158,584 5.9% 375,545 7.2% Age 30 to 34 Years 85,941 6.2% 160,008 6.0% 358,583 6.9% Age 35 to 39 Years 83,559 6.0% 159,529 6.0% 323,179 6.2% Age 40 to 44 Years 93,364 6.7% 181,139 6.8% 341,860 6.5% Age 45 to 49 Years 103,521 7.5% 202,944 7.6% 372,229 7.1% Age 50 to 54 Years 106,903 7.7% 209,163 7.8% 382,939 7.3% Age 55 to 59 Years 98,900 7.1% 193,601 7.2% 357,749 6.8% Age 60 to 64 Years 83,122 6.0% 163,003 6.1% 305,584 5.8% Age 65 to 69 Years 66,163 4.8% 129,552 4.8% 242,040 4.6% Age 70 to 74 Years 46,496 3.4% 91,383 3.4% 171,377 3.3% Age 75 to 79 Years 34,092 2.5% 66,442 2.5% 125,818 2.4% Age 80 to 84 Years 27,973 2.0% 53,664 2.0% 101,247 1.9% Age 85 Years or Over 35,793 2.6% 67,634 2.5% 126,391 2.4% Median Age 39.5 39.8 38.6 Age 19 Years or Less 337,642 24.3% 660,173 24.7% 1,246,723 23.8% Age 20 to 64 Years 839,117 60.5% 1,606,003 60.0% 3,216,279 61.5% Age 65 Years or Over 210,517 15.2% 408,673 15.3% 766,873 14.7% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 716,054 51.6% 1,377,764 51.5% 2,698,391 51.6% Age Under 5 Years 37,086 5.2% 71,424 5.2% 140,209 5.2% Age 5 to 9 Years 39,409 5.5% 77,021 5.6% 142,005 5.3% Age 10 to 14 Years 41,643 5.8% 82,114 6.0% 147,579 5.5% Age 15 to 19 Years 47,456 6.6% 93,196 6.8% 184,226 6.8% Age 20 to 24 Years 47,372 6.6% 86,987 6.3% 198,535 7.4% Age 25 to 29 Years 43,740 6.1% 78,794 5.7% 188,846 7.0% Age 30 to 34 Years 43,472 6.1% 81,113 5.9% 181,383 6.7% Age 35 to 39 Years 42,793 6.0% 81,698 5.9% 164,425 6.1% Age 40 to 44 Years 47,962 6.7% 92,988 6.7% 174,726 6.5% Age 45 to 49 Years 53,137 7.4% 104,189 7.6% 190,572 7.1% 7.7% 7.8% 7.3% Age 50 to 54 Years 55,165 107,748 197,100 This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. Age 55 to 59 Years 51,238 7.2% 100,106 7.3% 185,749 6.9% Age 60 to 64 Years 43,429 6.1% 84,834 6.2% 160,455 5.9% Age 65 to 69 Years 35,078 4.9% 68,353 5.0% 128,687 4.8% Age 70 to 74 Years 25,400 3.5% 49,932 3.6% 93,913 3.5% Age 75 to 79 Years 19,678 2.7% 38,138 2.8% 71,956 2.7% Age 80 to 84 Years 17,249 2.4% 32,797 2.4% 61,692 2.3% Age 85 Years or Over 24,748 3.5% 46,332 3.4% 86,333 3.2% Female Median Age 40.9 41.2 39.8 Age 19 Years or Less 165,594 23.1% 323,755 23.5% 614,019 22.8% Age 20 to 64 Years 428,307 59.8% 818,457 59.4% 1,641,792 60.8% Age 65 Years or Over 122,153 17.1% 235,553 17.1% 442,581 16.4%

©2015, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 9 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8193/-71.4082 RFULL9 Eddy Street & Dyer Street 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime 60 min drivetime Prov, RI 02903

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 671,222 48.4% 1,297,086 48.5% 2,531,484 48.4% Age Under 5 Years 38,877 5.8% 74,944 5.8% 146,152 5.8% Age 5 to 9 Years 41,303 6.2% 80,193 6.2% 148,009 5.8% Age 10 to 14 Years 43,420 6.5% 85,985 6.6% 153,915 6.1% Age 15 to 19 Years 48,448 7.2% 95,297 7.3% 184,629 7.3% Age 20 to 24 Years 48,878 7.3% 91,047 7.0% 200,075 7.9% Age 25 to 29 Years 43,818 6.5% 79,790 6.2% 186,698 7.4% Age 30 to 34 Years 42,469 6.3% 78,895 6.1% 177,201 7.0% Age 35 to 39 Years 40,766 6.1% 77,830 6.0% 158,754 6.3% Age 40 to 44 Years 45,402 6.8% 88,150 6.8% 167,134 6.6% Age 45 to 49 Years 50,384 7.5% 98,754 7.6% 181,657 7.2% Age 50 to 54 Years 51,737 7.7% 101,415 7.8% 185,839 7.3% Age 55 to 59 Years 47,662 7.1% 93,495 7.2% 172,000 6.8% Age 60 to 64 Years 39,693 5.9% 78,169 6.0% 145,128 5.7% Age 65 to 69 Years 31,085 4.6% 61,199 4.7% 113,353 4.5% Age 70 to 74 Years 21,096 3.1% 41,451 3.2% 77,463 3.1% Age 75 to 79 Years 14,414 2.1% 28,303 2.2% 53,862 2.1% Age 80 to 84 Years 10,724 1.6% 20,866 1.6% 39,555 1.6% Age 85 Years or Over 11,045 1.6% 21,302 1.6% 40,058 1.6% Male Median Age 38.0 38.4 37.3 Age 19 Years or Less 172,048 25.6% 336,419 25.9% 632,704 25.0% Age 20 to 64 Years 410,810 61.2% 787,546 60.7% 1,574,487 62.2% Age 65 Years or Over 88,364 13.2% 173,121 13.3% 324,292 12.8% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 94 94 94 Age Under 5 Years 105 51.2% 105 51.2% 104 51.0% Age 5 to 9 Years 105 51.2% 104 51.0% 104 51.0% Age 10 to 14 Years 104 51.0% 105 51.2% 104 51.1% Age 15 to 19 Years 102 50.5% 102 50.6% 100 50.1% Age 20 to 24 Years 103 50.8% 105 51.1% 101 50.2% Age 25 to 29 Years 100 50.0% 101 50.3% 99 49.7% Age 30 to 34 Years 98 49.4% 97 49.3% 98 49.4% Age 35 to 39 Years 95 48.8% 95 48.8% 97 49.1% Age 40 to 44 Years 95 48.6% 95 48.7% 96 48.9% Age 45 to 49 Years 95 48.7% 95 48.7% 95 48.8% 48.4% 48.5% 48.5% Age 50 to 54 Years 94 94 94 This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. Age 55 to 59 Years 93 48.2% 93 48.3% 93 48.1% Age 60 to 64 Years 91 47.8% 92 48.0% 90 47.5% Age 65 to 69 Years 89 47.0% 90 47.2% 88 46.8% Age 70 to 74 Years 83 45.4% 83 45.4% 82 45.2% Age 75 to 79 Years 73 42.3% 74 42.6% 75 42.8% Age 80 to 84 Years 62 38.3% 64 38.9% 64 39.1% Age 85 Years or Over 45 30.9% 46 31.5% 46 31.7% Age 19 Years or Less 104 51.0% 104 51.0% 103 50.7% Age 20 to 39 Years 99 49.8% 100 49.9% 99 49.6% Age 40 to 64 Years 94 48.3% 94 48.4% 94 48.4% Age 65 Years or Over 72 42.0% 73 42.4% 73 42.3%

©2015, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 9 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8193/-71.4082 RFULL9 Eddy Street & Dyer Street 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime 60 min drivetime Prov, RI 02903

Household Type (2014) Total Households 546,001 1,031,777 2,034,063 Households with Children 174,724 32.0% 338,914 32.8% 620,298 30.5% Average Household Size 2.5 2.5 2.5 Household Density per Square Mile 433 314 394 Population Family 1,076,872 77.6% 2,101,590 78.6% 3,874,560 74.1% Population Non-Family 268,822 19.4% 489,449 18.3% 1,135,055 21.7% Population Group Quarters 41,582 3.0% 83,811 3.1% 220,261 4.2% Family Households 354,777 65.0% 684,898 66.4% 1,261,630 62.0% Married Couple Households 254,042 71.6% 502,014 73.3% 918,203 72.8% Other Family Households 100,735 28.4% 182,884 26.7% 343,427 27.2% Family Households with Children 173,174 48.8% 336,088 49.1% 615,488 48.8% Married Couple with Children 111,598 64.4% 226,264 67.3% 413,221 67.1% Other Family Households with Children 61,575 35.6% 109,824 32.7% 202,267 32.9% Family Households No Children 181,603 51.2% 348,810 50.9% 646,142 51.2% Married Couple No Children 142,444 78.4% 275,750 79.1% 504,982 78.2% Other Family Households No Children 39,159 21.6% 73,060 20.9% 141,160 21.8% Non-Family Households 191,224 35.0% 346,879 33.6% 772,432 38.0% Non-Family Households with Children 1,550 0.8% 2,825 0.8% 4,809 0.6% Non-Family Households No Children 189,674 99.2% 344,054 99.2% 767,623 99.4% Lone Person No Children ------2 or More Persons No Children 189,674 99.2% 344,054 99.2% 767,623 99.4% Household Lone Male ------Household Lone Female ------Average Family Household Size 3.0 3.1 3.1 Average Family Income $92,585 $102,217 $110,498 Median Family Income $79,423 $88,515 $93,083 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.4 1.4 1.5 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 1,145,538 2,203,169 4,352,007 Never Married 394,607 34.4% 739,057 33.5% 1,632,928 37.5% Currently Married 496,096 43.3% 994,630 45.1% 1,851,684 42.5% Previously Married 254,836 22.2% 469,482 21.3% 867,395 19.9% Separated 46,616 18.3% 90,303 19.2% 186,038 21.4% Widowed 78,416 30.8% 143,337 30.5% 258,290 29.8% Divorced 129,804 50.9% 235,841 50.2% 423,066 48.8% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 935,028 1,798,929 3,509,911 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 70,601 7.6% 110,762 6.2% 199,290 5.7% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 84,210 9.0% 137,885 7.7% 231,280 6.6% High School Graduate 265,296 28.4% 502,423 27.9% 906,553 25.8% Some College 169,888 18.2% 315,945 17.6% 566,405 16.1% Associate Degree Only 75,052 8.0% 144,142 8.0% 247,282 7.0% Bachelor Degree Only 170,613 18.2% 359,795 20.0% 766,053 21.8% Graduate Degree 99,368 10.6% 227,977 12.7% 593,048 16.9% Any College (Some College or Higher) 514,921 55.1% 1,047,860 58.2% 2,172,789 61.9% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 269,981 28.9% 587,772 32.7% 1,359,101 38.7%

©2015, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 9 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8193/-71.4082 RFULL9 Eddy Street & Dyer Street 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime 60 min drivetime Prov, RI 02903

Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 578,805 1,098,747 2,159,015 Total Housing Units (2010) 579,618 1,097,688 2,155,533 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) -813 - 1,059 - 3,482 - Housing Units Occupied (2014) 546,001 94.3% 1,031,777 93.9% 2,034,063 94.2% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 338,821 62.1% 673,054 65.2% 1,213,822 59.7% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 207,180 37.9% 358,723 34.8% 820,241 40.3% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 32,805 5.7% 66,970 6.1% 124,952 5.8% Household Size (2014) Total Households 546,001 1,031,777 2,034,063 1 Person Households 154,433 28.3% 279,831 27.1% 591,963 29.1% 2 Person Households 173,012 31.7% 326,706 31.7% 647,437 31.8% 3 Person Households 92,047 16.9% 175,472 17.0% 334,852 16.5% 4 Person Households 76,917 14.1% 151,619 14.7% 278,026 13.7% 5 Person Households 32,422 5.9% 64,666 6.3% 118,500 5.8% 6 Person Households 11,124 2.0% 21,865 2.1% 40,650 2.0% 7 or More Person Households 6,046 1.1% 11,618 1.1% 22,636 1.1% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 28,366 5.2% 72,337 7.0% 172,414 8.5% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 35,392 6.5% 79,038 7.7% 162,661 8.0% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 31,242 5.7% 65,609 6.4% 129,937 6.4% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 49,076 9.0% 98,497 9.5% 191,972 9.4% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 70,898 13.0% 137,489 13.3% 263,140 12.9% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 93,484 17.1% 173,982 16.9% 334,061 16.4% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 65,278 12.0% 113,682 11.0% 217,726 10.7% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 49,095 9.0% 84,788 8.2% 156,302 7.7% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 57,560 10.5% 98,856 9.6% 182,990 9.0% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 26,009 4.8% 43,192 4.2% 82,007 4.0% HH Income Under $10,000 39,600 7.3% 64,308 6.2% 140,853 6.9% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 54,094 9.9% 95,357 9.2% 275,630 13.6% Households 1 Vehicle Available 192,821 35.3% 350,373 34.0% 738,090 36.3% Households 2 Vehicles Available 203,416 37.3% 401,137 38.9% 719,547 35.4% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 95,669 17.5% 184,910 17.9% 300,796 14.8% Total Vehicles Available 922,159 1,776,772 3,193,096 Average Vehicles per Household 1.7 1.7 1.6 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 684,946 74.3% 1,361,408 76.6% 2,338,695 73.2% Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.0 2.0 1.9 This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 237,212 25.7% 415,364 23.4% 854,401 26.8% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.1 1.2 1.0 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 634,568 1,242,721 2,472,257 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 180,424 28.4% 333,998 26.9% 610,525 24.7% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 227,815 35.9% 404,822 32.6% 795,984 32.2% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 156,757 24.7% 341,957 27.5% 741,004 30.0% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 50,136 7.9% 118,424 9.5% 228,711 9.3% Work at Home 19,435 3.1% 43,520 3.5% 96,033 3.9% Average Minutes Travel to Work 21.5 23.1 24.1

©2015, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 9 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8193/-71.4082 RFULL9 Eddy Street & Dyer Street 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime 60 min drivetime Prov, RI 02903

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 634,568 1,242,721 2,472,257 Drive to Work Alone 516,988 81.5% 993,699 80.0% 1,761,606 71.3% Drive to Work in Carpool 52,042 8.2% 103,170 8.3% 195,182 7.9% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 20,435 3.2% 54,360 4.4% 253,381 10.2% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 458 0.1% 901 0.1% 1,996 0.1% Bicycle to Work 3,355 0.5% 4,785 0.4% 18,802 0.8% Walk to Work 17,711 2.8% 34,522 2.8% 130,029 5.3% Other Means 4,142 0.7% 7,763 0.6% 15,228 0.6% Work at Home 19,435 3.1% 43,520 3.5% 96,033 3.9% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 61,770 118,775 254,851 Total Employees 719,317 1,354,646 3,047,153 Company Headquarter Businesses 413 0.7% 768 0.6% 1,958 0.8% Company Headquarter Employees 64,754 9.0% 122,269 9.0% 334,812 11.0% Employee Population per Business 11.6 to 1 11.4 to 1 12.0 to 1 Residential Population per Business 22.5 to 1 22.5 to 1 20.5 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 1,148,692 2,143,887 4,543,236 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 1,088,654 2,088,742 4,078,312 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 519,237 47.7% 998,068 47.8% 1,947,281 47.7% Male Civilian Employed 334,797 64.5% 661,920 66.3% 1,315,433 67.6% Male Civilian Unemployed 32,799 6.3% 56,876 5.7% 97,455 5.0% Males in Armed Forces 1,172 0.2% 3,436 0.3% 7,374 0.4% Males Not in Labor Force 150,469 29.0% 275,836 27.6% 527,019 27.1% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 569,418 52.3% 1,090,674 52.2% 2,131,031 52.3% Female Civilian Employed 323,142 56.7% 633,616 58.1% 1,258,430 59.1% Female Civilian Unemployed 31,966 5.6% 55,388 5.1% 95,046 4.5% Females in Armed Forces 168 - 529 - 991 - Females Not in Labor Force 214,141 37.6% 401,141 36.8% 776,563 36.4% Unemployment Rate 519,237 5.9% 998,068 5.4% 1,947,281 4.7% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 5,891 0.9% 21,833 1.7% 43,901 1.7% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 10,572 3.3% 23,240 3.6% 40,184 3.2% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) -4,681 -1.4% -1,407 -0.2% 3,717 0.3% Occupation (2010)

Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 652,047 1,273,703 2,529,962 This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. Occupation Total Males 324,224 49.7% 638,680 50.1% 1,275,249 50.4% Occupation Total Females 327,823 50.3% 635,023 49.9% 1,254,713 49.6% Management, Business, Financial Operations 93,767 14.4% 196,324 15.4% 416,012 16.4% Professional, Related 144,421 22.1% 299,067 23.5% 669,413 26.5% Service 121,847 18.7% 230,940 18.1% 453,805 17.9% Sales, Office 164,441 25.2% 313,669 24.6% 594,983 23.5% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 914 0.1% 2,266 0.2% 4,408 0.2% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 46,016 7.1% 91,728 7.2% 161,747 6.4% Production, Transport, Material Moving 80,642 12.4% 139,708 11.0% 229,593 9.1% White Collar Workers 402,629 61.7% 809,061 63.5% 1,680,408 66.4% Blue Collar Workers 249,418 38.3% 464,642 36.5% 849,554 33.6%

©2015, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 9 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8193/-71.4082 RFULL9 Eddy Street & Dyer Street 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime 60 min drivetime Prov, RI 02903

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 535,551 1,011,531 1,994,605 1 Detached Unit 298,284 55.7% 590,945 58.4% 986,771 49.5% 1 Attached Unit 20,306 3.8% 44,324 4.4% 98,637 4.9% 2 Units 54,696 10.2% 95,716 9.5% 210,240 10.5% 3 to 4 Units 64,542 12.1% 106,372 10.5% 248,509 12.5% 5 to 9 Units 32,062 6.0% 54,667 5.4% 125,002 6.3% 10 to 19 Units 21,508 4.0% 39,386 3.9% 93,179 4.7% 20 to 49 Units 13,558 2.5% 26,889 2.7% 82,627 4.1% 50 or More Units 25,068 4.7% 43,705 4.3% 133,198 6.7% Mobile Home or Trailer 5,456 1.0% 9,404 0.9% 16,201 0.8% Other Structure 71 - 124 - 239 - Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 16,570 3.1% 33,652 3.3% 70,176 3.5% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 19,573 3.7% 40,239 4.0% 75,383 3.8% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 42,854 8.0% 83,585 8.3% 144,626 7.3% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 57,591 10.8% 112,657 11.1% 203,721 10.2% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 65,830 12.3% 125,803 12.4% 229,581 11.5% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 57,049 10.7% 113,097 11.2% 208,414 10.4% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 66,473 12.4% 125,912 12.4% 231,902 11.6% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 35,914 6.7% 62,858 6.2% 124,762 6.3% Homes Built Before 1939 173,696 32.4% 313,728 31.0% 706,041 35.4% Median Age of Homes 53.7 yrs 52.8 yrs 54.6 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 332,503 659,529 1,187,449 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 4,727 1.4% 14,108 2.1% 42,466 3.6% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 4,810 1.4% 15,621 2.4% 42,724 3.6% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 23,931 7.2% 64,164 9.7% 146,012 12.3% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 31,287 9.4% 74,915 11.4% 148,977 12.5% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 70,066 21.1% 154,447 23.4% 276,476 23.3% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 56,805 17.1% 105,745 16.0% 171,914 14.5% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 62,443 18.8% 106,672 16.2% 166,766 14.0% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 28,320 8.5% 42,699 6.5% 62,447 5.3% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 21,024 6.3% 32,662 5.0% 49,550 4.2% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 8,816 2.7% 14,531 2.2% 22,374 1.9% 2.4% 1.9% 1.6%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 7,959 12,323 19,468 This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 1,373 0.4% 2,443 0.4% 4,173 0.4% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 675 0.2% 1,438 0.2% 2,720 0.2% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 966 0.3% 1,571 0.2% 2,808 0.2% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 979 0.3% 1,668 0.3% 2,965 0.2% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 1,145 0.3% 1,868 0.3% 3,433 0.3% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 1,451 0.4% 3,034 0.5% 5,815 0.5% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 2,003 0.6% 3,433 0.5% 6,166 0.5% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 2,898 0.9% 4,751 0.7% 7,866 0.7% Home Values Under $10,000 827 0.2% 1,437 0.2% 2,327 0.2% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $281,664 $315,240 $354,157 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $742 $795 $940

©2015, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 9 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8193/-71.4082 RFULL9 Eddy Street & Dyer Street 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime 60 min drivetime Prov, RI 02903

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $31.8 B $64.4 B $133.0 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $18.3 B $37.2 B $76.8 B Total Retail Expenditure $13.5 B $27.3 B $56.3 B Apparel $1.53 B $3.11 B $6.45 B Contributions $1.26 B $2.65 B $5.60 B Education $820 M $1.72 B $3.65 B Entertainment $1.78 B $3.63 B $7.49 B Food and Beverages $4.80 B $9.64 B $19.8 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.41 B $2.90 B $6.01 B Gifts $883 M $1.84 B $3.86 B Health Care $1.89 B $3.78 B $7.73 B Household Operations $1.18 B $2.45 B $5.13 B Miscellaneous Expenses $523 M $1.05 B $2.16 B Personal Care $459 M $926 M $1.91 B Personal Insurance $340 M $708 M $1.49 B Reading $105 M $213 M $440 M Shelter $6.17 B $12.6 B $26.0 B Tobacco $194 M $378 M $763 M Transportation $6.25 B $12.6 B $25.7 B Utilities $2.16 B $4.31 B $8.83 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $4,849 $5,203 $5,450 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,793 57.6% $3,002 57.7% $3,145 57.7% Total Retail Expenditures $2,056 42.4% $2,201 42.3% $2,306 42.3%

Apparel $234 4.8% $251 4.8% $264 4.8% Contributions $192 4.0% $214 4.1% $230 4.2% Education $125 2.6% $139 2.7% $150 2.7% Entertainment $272 5.6% $293 5.6% $307 5.6% Food and Beverages $733 15.1% $779 15.0% $812 14.9% Furnishings and Equipment $216 4.4% $234 4.5% $246 4.5% Gifts $135 2.8% $148 2.9% $158 2.9% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. Health Care $289 6.0% $305 5.9% $317 5.8% Household Operations $181 3.7% $198 3.8% $210 3.9% Miscellaneous Expenses $80 1.6% $85 1.6% $88 1.6% Personal Care $70 1.4% $75 1.4% $78 1.4% Personal Insurance $52 1.1% $57 1.1% $61 1.1% Reading $16 0.3% $17 0.3% $18 0.3% Shelter $942 19.4% $1,014 19.5% $1,064 19.5% Tobacco $30 0.6% $31 0.6% $31 0.6% Transportation $954 19.7% $1,016 19.5% $1,054 19.3% Utilities $330 6.8% $348 6.7% $362 6.6%

©2015, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 9 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography

EXHIBIT B

COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.2275/-80.8487 RFULL9 324 S Mint St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Charlotte, NC 28202

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,594,727 2,140,292 Projected Population (2019) 1,696,465 2,263,925 Census Population (2010) 1,514,162 2,046,284 Census Population (2000) 1,116,248 1,555,184 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 101,738 1.3% 123,633 1.2%

Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 80,566 1.3% 94,008 1.1% warranty. or representation ed without Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 397,913 3.6% 491,100 3.2% Estimated Population Density (2014) 1,233 psm 637 psm Trade Area Size 1,293.2 sq mi 3,358.5 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 615,835 823,915 Projected Households (2019) 656,018 874,360 Census Households (2010) 584,101 784,183 Census Households (2000) 433,638 597,571 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 40,183 1.3% 50,445 1.2% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 182,197 3.0% 226,344 2.7%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $79,306 $75,396 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $86,113 $81,919 Census Average Household Income (2010) $73,278 $69,382 Census Average Household Income (2000) $64,207 $60,534 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $6,806 1.7% $6,523 1.7% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $15,099 1.7% $14,861 1.8%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $63,486 $60,729 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $68,956 $65,951 Census Median Household Income (2010) $58,031 $55,429 Census Median Household Income (2000) $52,624 $49,874

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $5,470 1.7% $5,222 1.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $10,862 1.5% $10,856 1.6%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $30,734 $29,134 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $33,409 $31,750 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $28,268 $26,589 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $24,893 $23,203 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $2,675 1.7% $2,616 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $5,841 1.7% $5,931 1.8% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $513,537 $490,160

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.2275/-80.8487 RFULL9 324 S Mint St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Charlotte, NC 28202

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,594,727 2,140,292 White (2014) 1,017,924 63.8% 1,457,963 68.1% Black or African American (2014) 393,886 24.7% 462,754 21.6% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 7,204 0.5% 10,025 0.5% Asian (2014) 56,395 3.5% 61,428 2.9%

Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 978 0.1% 1,150 0.1% warranty. or representation ed without Other Race (2014) 81,417 5.1% 100,694 4.7% Two or More Races (2014) 36,923 2.3% 46,278 2.2% Population < 18 (2014) 402,715 25.3% 532,191 24.9% White 226,521 56.2% 322,928 60.7% Black or African American 111,889 27.8% 130,382 24.5% American Indian or Alaska Native 1,956 0.5% 2,770 0.5% Asian 14,689 3.6% 16,130 3.0% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 277 0.1% 332 0.1% Other Race 47,383 11.8% 59,649 11.2% Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 62,579 3.9% 78,708 3.7% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 1,422,582 89.2% 1,927,989 90.1% Not Hispanic White 947,186 66.6% 1,370,230 71.1% Not Hispanic Black or African American 385,210 27.1% 452,833 23.5% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 5,133 0.4% 7,531 0.4% Not Hispanic Asian 55,779 3.9% 60,717 3.1% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 731 0.1% 846 - Not Hispanic Other Race 2,071 0.1% 2,321 0.1% Not Hispanic Two or More Races 26,471 1.9% 33,511 1.7% Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 172,145 10.8% 212,304 9.9% Hispanic White 70,738 41.1% 87,733 41.3% Hispanic Black or African American 8,676 5.0% 9,921 4.7% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 2,071 1.2% 2,495 1.2% Hispanic Asian 616 0.4% 711 0.3% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 247 0.1% 303 0.1%

Hispanic Other Race 79,345 46.1% 98,373 46.3% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Hispanic Two or More Races 10,452 6.1% 12,768 6.0% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 1,358,817 89.7% 1,854,082 90.6% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 155,344 10.3% 192,203 9.4% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 1,056,667 94.7% 1,477,210 95.0% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 59,581 5.3% 77,974 5.0% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 1,503,874 88.6% 2,026,482 89.5% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 192,591 11.4% 237,443 10.5% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 20,446 2.4% 25,140 2.4% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 95,764 16.1% 114,229 14.6%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.2275/-80.8487 RFULL9 324 S Mint St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Charlotte, NC 28202

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,594,727 2,140,292 Age Under 5 Years 111,062 7.0% 143,008 6.7% Age 5 to 9 Years 114,115 7.2% 149,475 7.0% Age 10 to 14 Years 113,889 7.1% 152,577 7.1% Age 15 to 19 Years 108,275 6.8% 146,535 6.8% Age 20 to 24 Years 102,044 6.4% 134,929 6.3% Age 25 to 29 Years 109,137 6.8% 138,175 6.5% Age 30 to 34 Years 117,441 7.4% 147,942 6.9% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 118,052 7.4% 151,390 7.1% Age 40 to 44 Years 122,838 7.7% 162,666 7.6% Age 45 to 49 Years 117,236 7.4% 159,310 7.4% Age 50 to 54 Years 108,487 6.8% 149,965 7.0% Age 55 to 59 Years 94,719 5.9% 132,138 6.2% Age 60 to 64 Years 80,086 5.0% 113,702 5.3% Age 65 to 69 Years 62,605 3.9% 90,903 4.2% Age 70 to 74 Years 42,931 2.7% 63,609 3.0% Age 75 to 79 Years 29,419 1.8% 43,558 2.0% Age 80 to 84 Years 20,784 1.3% 30,159 1.4% Age 85 Years or Over 21,609 1.4% 30,251 1.4% Median Age 35.8 36.7 Age 19 Years or Less 447,341 28.1% 591,595 27.6% Age 20 to 64 Years 970,039 60.8% 1,290,218 60.3% Age 65 Years or Over 177,348 11.1% 258,480 12.1% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 823,112 51.6% 1,099,639 51.4% Age Under 5 Years 54,253 6.6% 69,916 6.4% Age 5 to 9 Years 55,780 6.8% 72,980 6.6% Age 10 to 14 Years 55,909 6.8% 74,687 6.8% Age 15 to 19 Years 53,310 6.5% 71,753 6.5% Age 20 to 24 Years 51,404 6.2% 66,937 6.1% Age 25 to 29 Years 55,736 6.8% 70,106 6.4% Age 30 to 34 Years 60,662 7.4% 76,241 6.9% Age 35 to 39 Years 61,234 7.4% 78,350 7.1% Age 40 to 44 Years 63,201 7.7% 83,327 7.6% Age 45 to 49 Years 60,318 7.3% 81,262 7.4%

Age 50 to 54 Years 55,917 6.8% 76,813 7.0% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 49,714 6.0% 68,835 6.3% Age 60 to 64 Years 42,934 5.2% 60,317 5.5% Age 65 to 69 Years 34,013 4.1% 48,796 4.4% Age 70 to 74 Years 23,738 2.9% 34,820 3.2% Age 75 to 79 Years 17,105 2.1% 25,060 2.3% Age 80 to 84 Years 12,855 1.6% 18,506 1.7% Age 85 Years or Over 15,029 1.8% 20,934 1.9% Female Median Age 36.9 37.8 Age 19 Years or Less 219,252 26.6% 289,336 26.3% Age 20 to 64 Years 501,121 60.9% 662,188 60.2% Age 65 Years or Over 102,739 12.5% 148,115 13.5%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.2275/-80.8487 RFULL9 324 S Mint St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Charlotte, NC 28202

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 771,615 48.4% 1,040,653 48.6% Age Under 5 Years 56,810 7.4% 73,092 7.0% Age 5 to 9 Years 58,334 7.6% 76,495 7.4% Age 10 to 14 Years 57,980 7.5% 77,889 7.5% Age 15 to 19 Years 54,965 7.1% 74,782 7.2% Age 20 to 24 Years 50,640 6.6% 67,992 6.5% Age 25 to 29 Years 53,401 6.9% 68,069 6.5% Age 30 to 34 Years 56,779 7.4% 71,700 6.9% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 56,818 7.4% 73,040 7.0% Age 40 to 44 Years 59,637 7.7% 79,339 7.6% Age 45 to 49 Years 56,918 7.4% 78,048 7.5% Age 50 to 54 Years 52,570 6.8% 73,153 7.0% Age 55 to 59 Years 45,004 5.8% 63,303 6.1% Age 60 to 64 Years 37,152 4.8% 53,385 5.1% Age 65 to 69 Years 28,592 3.7% 42,107 4.0% Age 70 to 74 Years 19,193 2.5% 28,789 2.8% Age 75 to 79 Years 12,314 1.6% 18,498 1.8% Age 80 to 84 Years 7,929 1.0% 11,653 1.1% Age 85 Years or Over 6,581 0.9% 9,317 0.9% Male Median Age 34.6 35.6 Age 19 Years or Less 228,089 29.6% 302,259 29.0% Age 20 to 64 Years 468,918 60.8% 628,030 60.3% Age 65 Years or Over 74,609 9.7% 110,364 10.6% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 94 95 Age Under 5 Years 105 51.2% 105 51.1% Age 5 to 9 Years 105 51.1% 105 51.2% Age 10 to 14 Years 104 50.9% 104 51.0% Age 15 to 19 Years 103 50.8% 104 51.0% Age 20 to 24 Years 99 49.6% 102 50.4% Age 25 to 29 Years 96 48.9% 97 49.3% Age 30 to 34 Years 94 48.3% 94 48.5% Age 35 to 39 Years 93 48.1% 93 48.2% Age 40 to 44 Years 94 48.5% 95 48.8% Age 45 to 49 Years 94 48.5% 96 49.0%

Age 50 to 54 Years 94 48.5% 95 48.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 91 47.5% 92 47.9% Age 60 to 64 Years 87 46.4% 89 47.0% Age 65 to 69 Years 84 45.7% 86 46.3% Age 70 to 74 Years 81 44.7% 83 45.3% Age 75 to 79 Years 72 41.9% 74 42.5% Age 80 to 84 Years 62 38.2% 63 38.6% Age 85 Years or Over 44 30.5% 45 30.8% Age 19 Years or Less 104 51.0% 104 51.1% Age 20 to 39 Years 95 48.7% 96 49.1% Age 40 to 64 Years 92 48.0% 94 48.4% Age 65 Years or Over 73 42.1% 75 42.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.2275/-80.8487 RFULL9 324 S Mint St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Charlotte, NC 28202

Household Type (2014) Total Households 615,835 823,915 Households with Children 224,855 36.5% 300,336 36.5% Average Household Size 2.6 2.6 Household Density per Square Mile 476 245 Population Family 1,266,173 79.4% 1,728,075 80.7% Population Non-Family 304,627 19.1% 381,858 17.8% Population Group Quarters 23,927 1.5% 30,359 1.4% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Family Households 407,824 66.2% 561,281 68.1% Married Couple Households 293,330 71.9% 409,729 73.0% Other Family Households 114,494 28.1% 151,551 27.0% Family Households with Children 222,822 54.6% 297,554 53.0% Married Couple with Children 146,089 65.6% 196,957 66.2% Other Family Households with Children 76,733 34.4% 100,597 33.8% Family Households No Children 185,002 45.4% 263,726 47.0% Married Couple No Children 147,241 79.6% 212,772 80.7% Other Family Households No Children 37,761 20.4% 50,954 19.3% Non-Family Households 208,012 33.8% 262,635 31.9% Non-Family Households with Children 2,033 1.0% 2,781 1.1% Non-Family Households No Children 205,979 99.0% 259,854 98.9% Lone Person No Children - - - - 2 or More Persons No Children 205,979 99.0% 259,854 98.9% Household Lone Male - - - - Household Lone Female - - - - Average Family Household Size 3.1 3.1 Average Family Income $93,937 $88,248 Median Family Income $76,753 $72,799 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.5 1.5 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 1,255,662 1,695,233 Never Married 408,454 32.5% 520,567 30.7% Currently Married 587,286 46.8% 818,169 48.3% Previously Married 259,921 20.7% 356,496 21.0% Separated 67,245 25.9% 89,038 25.0% Widowed 61,388 23.6% 90,167 25.3% Divorced 131,288 50.5% 177,292 49.7% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 1,033,680 1,397,141 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 46,503 4.5% 67,311 4.8% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 76,539 7.4% 117,992 8.4% High School Graduate 230,604 22.3% 346,971 24.8% Some College 227,012 22.0% 310,491 22.2% Associate Degree Only 87,198 8.4% 119,902 8.6% Bachelor Degree Only 255,578 24.7% 303,996 21.8% Graduate Degree 110,246 10.7% 130,479 9.3% Any College (Some College or Higher) 680,034 65.8% 864,868 61.9% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 365,824 35.4% 434,474 31.1%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.2275/-80.8487 RFULL9 324 S Mint St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Charlotte, NC 28202 Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 656,355 881,439 Total Housing Units (2010) 641,629 863,629 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 14,726 0.6% 17,810 0.5% Housing Units Occupied (2014) 615,835 93.8% 823,915 93.5% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 403,371 65.5% 560,741 68.1% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 212,465 34.5% 263,174 31.9% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 40,519 6.2% 57,524 6.5% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Household Size (2014) Total Households 615,835 823,915 1 Person Households 164,604 26.7% 210,273 25.5% 2 Person Households 196,612 31.9% 269,392 32.7% 3 Person Households 103,825 16.9% 141,029 17.1% 4 Person Households 89,086 14.5% 120,122 14.6% 5 Person Households 39,270 6.4% 52,939 6.4% 6 Person Households 14,062 2.3% 18,854 2.3% 7 or More Person Households 8,376 1.4% 11,306 1.4% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 37,404 6.1% 43,362 5.3% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 33,727 5.5% 41,552 5.0% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 29,140 4.7% 37,045 4.5% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 48,284 7.8% 62,681 7.6% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 77,457 12.6% 104,483 12.7% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 120,602 19.6% 162,263 19.7% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 86,381 14.0% 117,010 14.2% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 61,276 10.0% 83,963 10.2% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 60,618 9.8% 85,417 10.4% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 23,939 3.9% 34,500 4.2% HH Income Under $10,000 37,008 6.0% 51,639 6.3% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 37,350 6.1% 47,764 5.8% Households 1 Vehicle Available 215,191 34.9% 272,120 33.0% Households 2 Vehicles Available 251,848 40.9% 334,705 40.6% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 111,446 18.1% 169,326 20.6% Total Vehicles Available 1,093,496 1,514,597 Average Vehicles per Household 1.8 1.8 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 814,797 74.5% 1,162,833 76.8% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.0 2.1 Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 278,699 25.5% 351,764 23.2% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.3 1.3 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 703,461 931,108 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 154,541 22.0% 209,367 22.5% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 272,875 38.8% 352,611 37.9% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 210,334 29.9% 278,643 29.9% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 31,739 4.5% 48,099 5.2% Work at Home 33,972 4.8% 42,388 4.6% Average Minutes Travel to Work 23.0 23.0

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.2275/-80.8487 RFULL9 324 S Mint St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Charlotte, NC 28202

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 703,461 931,108 Drive to Work Alone 566,621 80.5% 758,830 81.5% Drive to Work in Carpool 69,081 9.8% 91,169 9.8% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 15,840 2.3% 16,759 1.8% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 626 0.1% 995 0.1% Bicycle to Work 1,184 0.2% 1,521 0.2% Walk to Work 11,255 1.6% 13,300 1.4%

Other Means 4,881 0.7% 6,146 0.7% warranty. or representation ed without Work at Home 33,972 4.8% 42,388 4.6% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 75,412 93,338 Total Employees 841,848 1,022,184 Company Headquarter Businesses 468 0.6% 526 0.6% Company Headquarter Employees 61,663 7.3% 69,731 6.8% Employee Population per Business 11.2 to 1 11.0 to 1 Residential Population per Business 21.1 to 1 22.9 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 1,252,596 1,600,973 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 1,211,047 1,636,564 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 576,202 47.6% 783,217 47.9% Male Civilian Employed 417,552 72.5% 554,438 70.8% Male Civilian Unemployed 28,001 4.9% 37,836 4.8% Males in Armed Forces 858 0.1% 1,223 0.2% Males Not in Labor Force 129,791 22.5% 189,721 24.2% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 634,845 52.4% 853,347 52.1% Female Civilian Employed 381,608 60.1% 501,789 58.8% Female Civilian Unemployed 25,864 4.1% 34,519 4.0% Females in Armed Forces 282 - 326 - Females Not in Labor Force 227,092 35.8% 316,713 37.1% Unemployment Rate 576,202 4.4% 783,217 4.4% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 83,028 11.6% 107,927 11.4% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 45,898 12.3% 60,467 12.2% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 37,130 10.8% 47,460 10.4% Occupation (2010) Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 716,131 948,299 provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Occupation Total Males 371,653 51.9% 493,971 52.1% Occupation Total Females 344,478 48.1% 454,329 47.9% Management, Business, Financial Operations 123,411 17.2% 151,884 16.0% Professional, Related 153,289 21.4% 195,114 20.6% Service 111,127 15.5% 148,996 15.7% Sales, Office 191,952 26.8% 250,268 26.4% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 2,058 0.3% 3,456 0.4% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 55,720 7.8% 80,716 8.5% Production, Transport, Material Moving 78,574 11.0% 117,866 12.4% White Collar Workers 468,652 65.4% 597,265 63.0% Blue Collar Workers 247,479 34.6% 351,034 37.0%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.2275/-80.8487 RFULL9 324 S Mint St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Charlotte, NC 28202

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 584,101 784,183 1 Detached Unit 388,200 66.5% 535,948 68.3% 1 Attached Unit 32,487 5.6% 36,104 4.6% 2 Units 10,215 1.7% 13,617 1.7% 3 to 4 Units 15,008 2.6% 18,161 2.3% 5 to 9 Units 30,942 5.3% 35,485 4.5% 10 to 19 Units 36,883 6.3% 39,966 5.1% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without 20 to 49 Units 22,749 3.9% 24,497 3.1% 50 or More Units 13,870 2.4% 14,841 1.9% Mobile Home or Trailer 33,504 5.7% 65,209 8.3% Other Structure 243 - 355 - Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 79,184 13.6% 100,367 12.8% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 81,036 13.9% 105,385 13.4% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 122,071 20.9% 165,615 21.1% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 91,695 15.7% 122,545 15.6% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 74,231 12.7% 102,338 13.1% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 51,586 8.8% 70,381 9.0% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 40,979 7.0% 55,930 7.1% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 19,478 3.3% 27,089 3.5% Homes Built Before 1939 23,841 4.1% 34,533 4.4% Median Age of Homes 30.3 yrs 30.8 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 379,238 529,774 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 6,272 1.7% 8,010 1.5% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 6,201 1.6% 8,094 1.5% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 18,335 4.8% 23,290 4.4% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 18,234 4.8% 22,748 4.3% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 37,167 9.8% 47,136 8.9% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 32,794 8.6% 42,900 8.1% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 45,218 11.9% 60,594 11.4% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 29,118 7.7% 39,260 7.4% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 43,910 11.6% 60,634 11.4% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 41,666 11.0% 56,933 10.7%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 37,482 9.9% 55,649 10.5% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 13,595 3.6% 20,894 3.9% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 11,317 3.0% 18,097 3.4% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 8,659 2.3% 14,652 2.8% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 6,266 1.7% 10,216 1.9% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 5,534 1.5% 9,248 1.7% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 4,445 1.2% 7,968 1.5% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 2,726 0.7% 5,343 1.0% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 6,126 1.6% 10,891 2.1% Home Values Under $10,000 4,173 1.1% 7,218 1.4% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $214,864 $201,033 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $681 $654

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.2275/-80.8487 RFULL9 324 S Mint St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Charlotte, NC 28202

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $36.5 B $47.2 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $21.0 B $27.2 B Total Retail Expenditure $15.5 B $20.0 B Apparel $1.76 B $2.27 B Contributions $1.46 B $1.85 B

Education $934 M $1.18 B warranty. or representation ed without Entertainment $2.05 B $2.65 B Food and Beverages $5.51 B $7.15 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.62 B $2.09 B Gifts $1.01 B $1.30 B Health Care $2.17 B $2.83 B Household Operations $1.36 B $1.74 B Miscellaneous Expenses $600 M $778 M Personal Care $526 M $680 M Personal Insurance $392 M $501 M Reading $120 M $155 M Shelter $7.08 B $9.14 B Tobacco $224 M $294 M Transportation $7.19 B $9.33 B Utilities $2.49 B $3.23 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $4,939 $4,771 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,848 57.7% $2,749 57.6% Total Retail Expenditures $2,091 42.3% $2,022 42.4% Apparel $238 4.8% $230 4.8% Contributions $197 4.0% $187 3.9% Education $126 2.6% $120 2.5% Entertainment $277 5.6% $268 5.6% Food and Beverages $746 15.1% $723 15.2% Furnishings and Equipment $219 4.4% $211 4.4%

Gifts $137 2.8% $131 2.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Health Care $294 5.9% $286 6.0% Household Operations $184 3.7% $176 3.7% Miscellaneous Expenses $81 1.6% $79 1.6% Personal Care $71 1.4% $69 1.4% Personal Insurance $53 1.1% $51 1.1% Reading $16 0.3% $16 0.3% Shelter $958 19.4% $924 19.4% Tobacco $30 0.6% $30 0.6% Transportation $973 19.7% $944 19.8% Utilities $336 6.8% $327 6.9%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.9687/-83.0110 RFULL9 330 Huntington Park Ln 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Columbus, OH 43215

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,525,226 1,932,104 Projected Population (2019) 1,604,761 2,023,484 Census Population (2010) 1,464,506 1,867,465 Census Population (2000) 1,280,801 1,649,349 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 79,535 1.0% 91,379 0.9%

Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 60,720 1.0% 64,639 0.9% warranty. or representation ed without Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 183,705 1.4% 218,116 1.3% Estimated Population Density (2014) 1,084 psm 495 psm Trade Area Size 1,406.6 sq mi 3,907.1 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 609,151 765,461 Projected Households (2019) 641,201 803,379 Census Households (2010) 583,745 736,014 Census Households (2000) 512,172 651,250 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 32,050 1.1% 37,918 1.0% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 96,979 1.4% 114,211 1.3%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $75,683 $73,324 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $82,368 $79,818 Census Average Household Income (2010) $68,020 $66,061 Census Average Household Income (2000) $58,726 $56,962 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $6,685 1.8% $6,494 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $16,957 2.1% $16,362 2.1%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $63,751 $62,034 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $69,494 $67,605 Census Median Household Income (2010) $56,483 $55,129 Census Median Household Income (2000) $49,489 $48,190

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $5,743 1.8% $5,571 1.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $14,262 2.1% $13,844 2.1%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $30,397 $29,279 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $33,082 $31,922 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $27,113 $26,036 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $23,421 $22,426 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $2,685 1.8% $2,644 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $6,976 2.1% $6,853 2.2% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $504,672 $494,516

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.9687/-83.0110 RFULL9 330 Huntington Park Ln 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Columbus, OH 43215

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,525,226 1,932,104 White (2014) 1,113,633 73.0% 1,493,893 77.3% Black or African American (2014) 277,621 18.2% 291,321 15.1% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 3,589 0.2% 4,546 0.2% Asian (2014) 56,920 3.7% 59,331 3.1%

Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 855 0.1% 972 0.1% warranty. or representation ed without Other Race (2014) 30,302 2.0% 32,336 1.7% Two or More Races (2014) 42,306 2.8% 49,706 2.6% Population < 18 (2014) 369,771 24.2% 462,917 24.0% White 236,958 64.1% 321,531 69.5% Black or African American 84,586 22.9% 87,595 18.9% American Indian or Alaska Native 833 0.2% 1,041 0.2% Asian 13,535 3.7% 14,083 3.0% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 321 0.1% 354 0.1% Other Race 33,538 9.1% 38,313 8.3% Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 25,970 1.7% 28,635 1.5% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 1,456,191 95.5% 1,856,674 96.1% Not Hispanic White 1,083,552 74.4% 1,460,168 78.6% Not Hispanic Black or African American 273,706 18.8% 287,230 15.5% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 2,907 0.2% 3,758 0.2% Not Hispanic Asian 56,542 3.9% 58,915 3.2% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 773 0.1% 873 - Not Hispanic Other Race 2,259 0.2% 2,635 0.1% Not Hispanic Two or More Races 36,453 2.5% 43,095 2.3% Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 69,035 4.5% 75,431 3.9% Hispanic White 30,081 43.6% 33,725 44.7% Hispanic Black or African American 3,915 5.7% 4,091 5.4% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 682 1.0% 787 1.0% Hispanic Asian 378 0.5% 417 0.6% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 82 0.1% 98 0.1%

Hispanic Other Race 28,043 40.6% 29,701 39.4% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Hispanic Two or More Races 5,853 8.5% 6,611 8.8% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 1,402,597 95.8% 1,799,884 96.4% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 61,909 4.2% 67,581 3.6% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 1,254,463 97.9% 1,620,208 98.2% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 26,338 2.1% 29,141 1.8% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 1,526,688 95.1% 1,937,957 95.8% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 78,073 4.9% 85,527 4.2% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 9,038 2.6% 10,096 2.7% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 35,571 13.5% 38,441 13.2%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.9687/-83.0110 RFULL9 330 Huntington Park Ln 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Columbus, OH 43215

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,525,226 1,932,104 Age Under 5 Years 107,006 7.0% 130,777 6.8% Age 5 to 9 Years 105,098 6.9% 130,498 6.8% Age 10 to 14 Years 102,580 6.7% 130,075 6.7% Age 15 to 19 Years 103,512 6.8% 132,296 6.8% Age 20 to 24 Years 109,622 7.2% 137,369 7.1% Age 25 to 29 Years 118,645 7.8% 142,123 7.4% Age 30 to 34 Years 117,535 7.7% 141,343 7.3% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 106,441 7.0% 130,845 6.8% Age 40 to 44 Years 105,650 6.9% 133,039 6.9% Age 45 to 49 Years 103,067 6.8% 132,074 6.8% Age 50 to 54 Years 102,984 6.8% 133,434 6.9% Age 55 to 59 Years 94,723 6.2% 123,216 6.4% Age 60 to 64 Years 79,781 5.2% 104,377 5.4% Age 65 to 69 Years 58,676 3.8% 78,804 4.1% Age 70 to 74 Years 40,128 2.6% 55,567 2.9% Age 75 to 79 Years 28,041 1.8% 38,986 2.0% Age 80 to 84 Years 20,410 1.3% 28,227 1.5% Age 85 Years or Over 21,327 1.4% 29,054 1.5% Median Age 35.3 36.1 Age 19 Years or Less 418,197 27.4% 523,646 27.1% Age 20 to 64 Years 938,448 61.5% 1,177,821 61.0% Age 65 Years or Over 168,582 11.1% 230,638 11.9% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 778,028 51.0% 983,617 50.9% Age Under 5 Years 52,249 6.7% 63,892 6.5% Age 5 to 9 Years 51,399 6.6% 63,784 6.5% Age 10 to 14 Years 50,436 6.5% 63,798 6.5% Age 15 to 19 Years 50,368 6.5% 64,291 6.5% Age 20 to 24 Years 54,311 7.0% 67,849 6.9% Age 25 to 29 Years 59,977 7.7% 71,530 7.3% Age 30 to 34 Years 59,474 7.6% 71,182 7.2% Age 35 to 39 Years 53,545 6.9% 65,700 6.7% Age 40 to 44 Years 53,042 6.8% 66,609 6.8% Age 45 to 49 Years 51,828 6.7% 66,278 6.7%

Age 50 to 54 Years 52,712 6.8% 67,959 6.9% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 49,341 6.3% 63,771 6.5% Age 60 to 64 Years 42,209 5.4% 55,028 5.6% Age 65 to 69 Years 31,800 4.1% 42,439 4.3% Age 70 to 74 Years 22,329 2.9% 30,633 3.1% Age 75 to 79 Years 16,127 2.1% 22,214 2.3% Age 80 to 84 Years 12,374 1.6% 17,027 1.7% Age 85 Years or Over 14,507 1.9% 19,635 2.0% Female Median Age 36.4 37.2 Age 19 Years or Less 204,452 26.3% 255,764 26.0% Age 20 to 64 Years 476,440 61.2% 595,906 60.6% Age 65 Years or Over 97,136 12.5% 131,947 13.4%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.9687/-83.0110 RFULL9 330 Huntington Park Ln 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Columbus, OH 43215

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 747,198 49.0% 948,488 49.1% Age Under 5 Years 54,757 7.3% 66,885 7.1% Age 5 to 9 Years 53,699 7.2% 66,714 7.0% Age 10 to 14 Years 52,145 7.0% 66,277 7.0% Age 15 to 19 Years 53,144 7.1% 68,005 7.2% Age 20 to 24 Years 55,311 7.4% 69,520 7.3% Age 25 to 29 Years 58,668 7.9% 70,593 7.4% Age 30 to 34 Years 58,061 7.8% 70,162 7.4% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 52,896 7.1% 65,145 6.9% Age 40 to 44 Years 52,607 7.0% 66,431 7.0% Age 45 to 49 Years 51,239 6.9% 65,796 6.9% Age 50 to 54 Years 50,271 6.7% 65,476 6.9% Age 55 to 59 Years 45,382 6.1% 59,445 6.3% Age 60 to 64 Years 37,571 5.0% 49,349 5.2% Age 65 to 69 Years 26,877 3.6% 36,365 3.8% Age 70 to 74 Years 17,799 2.4% 24,933 2.6% Age 75 to 79 Years 11,915 1.6% 16,772 1.8% Age 80 to 84 Years 8,036 1.1% 11,201 1.2% Age 85 Years or Over 6,820 0.9% 9,420 1.0% Male Median Age 34.3 35.0 Age 19 Years or Less 213,745 28.6% 267,882 28.2% Age 20 to 64 Years 462,007 61.8% 581,915 61.4% Age 65 Years or Over 71,446 9.6% 98,691 10.4% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 96 96 Age Under 5 Years 105 51.2% 105 51.1% Age 5 to 9 Years 104 51.1% 105 51.1% Age 10 to 14 Years 103 50.8% 104 51.0% Age 15 to 19 Years 106 51.3% 106 51.4% Age 20 to 24 Years 102 50.5% 102 50.6% Age 25 to 29 Years 98 49.4% 99 49.7% Age 30 to 34 Years 98 49.4% 99 49.6% Age 35 to 39 Years 99 49.7% 99 49.8% Age 40 to 44 Years 99 49.8% 100 49.9% Age 45 to 49 Years 99 49.7% 99 49.8%

Age 50 to 54 Years 95 48.8% 96 49.1% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 92 47.9% 93 48.2% Age 60 to 64 Years 89 47.1% 90 47.3% Age 65 to 69 Years 85 45.8% 86 46.1% Age 70 to 74 Years 80 44.4% 81 44.9% Age 75 to 79 Years 74 42.5% 76 43.0% Age 80 to 84 Years 65 39.4% 66 39.7% Age 85 Years or Over 47 32.0% 48 32.4% Age 19 Years or Less 105 51.1% 105 51.2% Age 20 to 39 Years 99 49.7% 100 49.9% Age 40 to 64 Years 95 48.8% 96 49.0% Age 65 Years or Over 74 42.4% 75 42.8%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.9687/-83.0110 RFULL9 330 Huntington Park Ln 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Columbus, OH 43215

Household Type (2014) Total Households 609,151 765,461 Households with Children 200,779 33.0% 253,748 33.1% Average Household Size 2.4 2.5 Household Density per Square Mile 433 196 Population Family 1,152,216 75.5% 1,474,445 76.3% Population Non-Family 339,852 22.3% 407,834 21.1% Population Group Quarters 33,158 2.2% 49,826 2.6% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Family Households 375,971 61.7% 484,822 63.3% Married Couple Households 265,768 70.7% 348,366 71.9% Other Family Households 110,204 29.3% 136,456 28.1% Family Households with Children 198,800 52.9% 251,033 51.8% Married Couple with Children 125,560 63.2% 160,036 63.8% Other Family Households with Children 73,239 36.8% 90,997 36.2% Family Households No Children 177,172 47.1% 233,789 48.2% Married Couple No Children 140,207 79.1% 188,331 80.6% Other Family Households No Children 36,964 20.9% 45,458 19.4% Non-Family Households 233,180 38.3% 280,639 36.7% Non-Family Households with Children 1,979 0.8% 2,715 1.0% Non-Family Households No Children 231,201 99.2% 277,924 99.0% Lone Person No Children - - - - 2 or More Persons No Children 231,201 99.2% 277,924 99.0% Household Lone Male - - - - Household Lone Female - - - - Average Family Household Size 3.1 3.0 Average Family Income $92,755 $88,857 Median Family Income $80,090 $77,109 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.5 1.5 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 1,210,541 1,540,755 Never Married 426,363 35.2% 513,705 33.3% Currently Married 537,879 44.4% 705,541 45.8% Previously Married 246,300 20.3% 321,508 20.9% Separated 47,709 19.4% 60,845 18.9% Widowed 59,086 24.0% 79,216 24.6% Divorced 139,505 56.6% 181,448 56.4% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 982,383 1,245,472 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 29,318 3.0% 36,514 2.9% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 67,427 6.9% 91,229 7.3% High School Graduate 257,263 26.2% 364,489 29.3% Some College 203,095 20.7% 256,433 20.6% Associate Degree Only 68,712 7.0% 90,020 7.2% Bachelor Degree Only 234,112 23.8% 268,196 21.5% Graduate Degree 122,456 12.5% 138,592 11.1% Any College (Some College or Higher) 628,375 64.0% 753,241 60.5% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 356,568 36.3% 406,787 32.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.9687/-83.0110 RFULL9 330 Huntington Park Ln 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Columbus, OH 43215 Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 650,377 818,158 Total Housing Units (2010) 640,199 806,839 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 10,178 0.4% 11,319 0.4% Housing Units Occupied (2014) 609,151 93.7% 765,461 93.6% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 368,961 60.6% 478,716 62.5% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 240,190 39.4% 286,744 37.5% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 41,226 6.3% 52,697 6.4% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Household Size (2014) Total Households 609,151 765,461 1 Person Households 179,613 29.5% 218,347 28.5% 2 Person Households 198,003 32.5% 253,565 33.1% 3 Person Households 96,572 15.9% 122,349 16.0% 4 Person Households 79,417 13.0% 100,608 13.1% 5 Person Households 35,301 5.8% 44,968 5.9% 6 Person Households 12,807 2.1% 16,310 2.1% 7 or More Person Households 7,438 1.2% 9,313 1.2% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 32,352 5.3% 35,725 4.7% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 34,728 5.7% 41,387 5.4% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 30,944 5.1% 38,122 5.0% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 50,404 8.3% 62,685 8.2% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 76,676 12.6% 97,986 12.8% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 113,098 18.6% 144,519 18.9% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 79,878 13.1% 101,656 13.3% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 58,429 9.6% 75,224 9.8% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 62,249 10.2% 80,454 10.5% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 23,186 3.8% 30,160 3.9% HH Income Under $10,000 47,208 7.7% 57,542 7.5% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 46,552 7.6% 56,684 7.4% Households 1 Vehicle Available 216,249 35.5% 260,535 34.0% Households 2 Vehicles Available 245,551 40.3% 308,975 40.4% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 100,800 16.5% 139,266 18.2% Total Vehicles Available 1,048,802 1,352,093 Average Vehicles per Household 1.7 1.8 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 736,642 70.2% 976,383 72.2% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.0 2.0 Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 312,160 29.8% 375,710 27.8% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.3 1.3 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 692,030 866,496 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 167,366 24.2% 218,998 25.3% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 318,749 46.1% 368,949 42.6% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 156,006 22.5% 210,903 24.3% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 19,770 2.9% 30,805 3.6% Work at Home 30,139 4.4% 36,841 4.3% Average Minutes Travel to Work 20.9 21.2

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.9687/-83.0110 RFULL9 330 Huntington Park Ln 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Columbus, OH 43215

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 692,030 866,496 Drive to Work Alone 575,306 83.1% 720,414 83.1% Drive to Work in Carpool 50,879 7.4% 66,653 7.7% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 13,354 1.9% 14,360 1.7% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 660 0.1% 912 0.1% Bicycle to Work 3,310 0.5% 3,710 0.4% Walk to Work 15,062 2.2% 19,551 2.3%

Other Means 3,320 0.5% 4,055 0.5% warranty. or representation ed without Work at Home 30,139 4.4% 36,841 4.3% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 64,058 78,867 Total Employees 1,011,532 1,188,555 Company Headquarter Businesses 505 0.8% 562 0.7% Company Headquarter Employees 143,172 14.2% 153,741 12.9% Employee Population per Business 15.8 to 1 15.1 to 1 Residential Population per Business 23.8 to 1 24.5 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 1,394,562 1,694,693 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 1,159,731 1,467,933 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 558,215 48.1% 707,626 48.2% Male Civilian Employed 400,044 71.7% 497,220 70.3% Male Civilian Unemployed 20,120 3.6% 26,030 3.7% Males in Armed Forces 797 0.1% 1,020 0.1% Males Not in Labor Force 137,255 24.6% 183,356 25.9% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 601,516 51.9% 760,308 51.8% Female Civilian Employed 375,627 62.4% 463,197 60.9% Female Civilian Unemployed 18,785 3.1% 24,361 3.2% Females in Armed Forces 234 - 358 - Females Not in Labor Force 206,869 34.4% 272,392 35.8% Unemployment Rate 558,215 3.4% 707,626 3.4% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 68,250 9.6% 74,401 8.4% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 39,451 10.9% 43,801 9.7% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 28,798 8.3% 30,600 7.1% Occupation (2010) Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 707,422 886,017 provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Occupation Total Males 360,593 51.0% 453,420 51.2% Occupation Total Females 346,829 49.0% 432,597 48.8% Management, Business, Financial Operations 118,829 16.8% 141,821 16.0% Professional, Related 166,188 23.5% 198,648 22.4% Service 118,163 16.7% 151,343 17.1% Sales, Office 187,816 26.5% 232,602 26.3% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 1,216 0.2% 2,004 0.2% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 40,150 5.7% 55,900 6.3% Production, Transport, Material Moving 75,059 10.6% 103,699 11.7% White Collar Workers 472,834 66.8% 573,071 64.7% Blue Collar Workers 234,588 33.2% 312,946 35.3%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.9687/-83.0110 RFULL9 330 Huntington Park Ln 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Columbus, OH 43215

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 583,745 736,014 1 Detached Unit 357,637 61.3% 474,918 64.5% 1 Attached Unit 49,570 8.5% 53,168 7.2% 2 Units 16,348 2.8% 21,273 2.9% 3 to 4 Units 39,511 6.8% 47,173 6.4% 5 to 9 Units 46,185 7.9% 52,471 7.1% 10 to 19 Units 30,302 5.2% 32,445 4.4% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without 20 to 49 Units 17,585 3.0% 19,504 2.6% 50 or More Units 17,742 3.0% 19,695 2.7% Mobile Home or Trailer 8,739 1.5% 15,219 2.1% Other Structure 125 - 148 - Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 30,436 5.2% 37,785 5.1% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 54,215 9.3% 66,462 9.0% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 95,799 16.4% 118,172 16.1% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 68,297 11.7% 81,316 11.0% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 84,189 14.4% 105,618 14.4% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 71,267 12.2% 87,826 11.9% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 72,076 12.3% 90,507 12.3% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 31,520 5.4% 40,113 5.5% Homes Built Before 1939 75,946 13.0% 108,215 14.7% Median Age of Homes 41.5 yrs 42.3 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 351,033 457,537 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 2,176 0.6% 2,644 0.6% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 2,256 0.6% 2,672 0.6% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 8,373 2.4% 9,715 2.1% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 11,328 3.2% 13,348 2.9% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 26,393 7.5% 31,546 6.9% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 27,046 7.7% 32,812 7.2% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 43,917 12.5% 55,515 12.1% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 31,352 8.9% 40,344 8.8% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 43,779 12.5% 56,857 12.4% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 40,377 11.5% 53,031 11.6%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 40,170 11.4% 54,126 11.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 15,904 4.5% 21,779 4.8% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 15,479 4.4% 21,424 4.7% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 11,087 3.2% 16,027 3.5% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 8,133 2.3% 12,024 2.6% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 6,227 1.8% 8,495 1.9% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 5,194 1.5% 7,548 1.6% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 2,822 0.8% 4,268 0.9% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 5,554 1.6% 8,376 1.8% Home Values Under $10,000 3,467 1.0% 4,984 1.1% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $183,062 $174,486 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $630 $614

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.9687/-83.0110 RFULL9 330 Huntington Park Ln 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Columbus, OH 43215

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $34.9 B $42.9 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $20.1 B $24.7 B Total Retail Expenditure $14.8 B $18.2 B Apparel $1.68 B $2.07 B Contributions $1.38 B $1.68 B

Education $897 M $1.09 B warranty. or representation ed without Entertainment $1.96 B $2.41 B Food and Beverages $5.27 B $6.51 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.55 B $1.90 B Gifts $968 M $1.18 B Health Care $2.08 B $2.57 B Household Operations $1.30 B $1.58 B Miscellaneous Expenses $574 M $709 M Personal Care $503 M $620 M Personal Insurance $373 M $455 M Reading $115 M $141 M Shelter $6.76 B $8.32 B Tobacco $213 M $266 M Transportation $6.87 B $8.49 B Utilities $2.38 B $2.94 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $4,770 $4,673 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,749 57.6% $2,692 57.6% Total Retail Expenditures $2,021 42.4% $1,981 42.4% Apparel $230 4.8% $225 4.8% Contributions $189 4.0% $183 3.9% Education $123 2.6% $118 2.5% Entertainment $268 5.6% $262 5.6% Food and Beverages $721 15.1% $708 15.2% Furnishings and Equipment $212 4.4% $207 4.4%

Gifts $132 2.8% $129 2.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Health Care $284 6.0% $280 6.0% Household Operations $177 3.7% $172 3.7% Miscellaneous Expenses $79 1.6% $77 1.7% Personal Care $69 1.4% $67 1.4% Personal Insurance $51 1.1% $50 1.1% Reading $16 0.3% $15 0.3% Shelter $925 19.4% $906 19.4% Tobacco $29 0.6% $29 0.6% Transportation $940 19.7% $924 19.8% Utilities $325 6.8% $320 6.9%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.7655/-86.1690 RFULL9 501 Maryland St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Indianapolis, IN 46225

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,563,166 1,854,890 Projected Population (2019) 1,631,577 1,937,979 Census Population (2010) 1,511,888 1,796,061 Census Population (2000) 1,301,821 1,559,624 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 68,411 0.9% 83,089 0.9%

Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 51,278 0.8% 58,830 0.8% warranty. or representation ed without Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 210,067 1.6% 236,437 1.5% Estimated Population Density (2014) 1,070 psm 492 psm Trade Area Size 1,461.5 sq mi 3,771.7 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 617,709 729,674 Projected Households (2019) 652,104 771,263 Census Households (2010) 588,998 695,790 Census Households (2000) 512,464 609,045 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 34,394 1.1% 41,589 1.1% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 105,245 1.5% 120,628 1.4%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $74,249 $73,434 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $81,606 $80,607 Census Average Household Income (2010) $67,919 $67,142 Census Average Household Income (2000) $59,631 $59,043 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $7,357 2.0% $7,173 2.0% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $14,618 1.8% $14,392 1.7%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $60,229 $59,894 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $66,071 $65,628 Census Median Household Income (2010) $54,379 $54,129 Census Median Household Income (2000) $49,642 $49,261

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $5,842 1.9% $5,735 1.9% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $10,587 1.5% $10,633 1.5%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $29,473 $29,044 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $32,755 $32,244 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $26,460 $26,011 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $23,395 $22,982 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $3,283 2.2% $3,200 2.2% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $6,077 1.9% $6,063 1.9% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $497,133 $495,383

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.7655/-86.1690 RFULL9 501 Maryland St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Indianapolis, IN 46225

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,563,166 1,854,890 White (2014) 1,159,526 74.2% 1,435,566 77.4% Black or African American (2014) 266,956 17.1% 273,075 14.7% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 4,271 0.3% 4,966 0.3% Asian (2014) 38,954 2.5% 40,863 2.2%

Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 670 - 777 - warranty. or representation ed without Other Race (2014) 56,097 3.6% 59,431 3.2% Two or More Races (2014) 36,691 2.3% 40,213 2.2% Population < 18 (2014) 405,289 25.9% 474,694 25.6% White 269,066 66.4% 333,145 70.2% Black or African American 81,814 20.2% 83,235 17.5% American Indian or Alaska Native 1,100 0.3% 1,262 0.3% Asian 10,690 2.6% 11,239 2.4% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 166 - 202 - Other Race 42,453 10.5% 45,612 9.6% Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 44,259 2.8% 47,802 2.6% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 1,450,365 92.8% 1,733,308 93.4% Not Hispanic White 1,114,741 76.9% 1,386,049 80.0% Not Hispanic Black or African American 262,805 18.1% 268,787 15.5% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 3,036 0.2% 3,620 0.2% Not Hispanic Asian 38,563 2.7% 40,445 2.3% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 500 - 591 - Not Hispanic Other Race 1,820 0.1% 2,016 0.1% Not Hispanic Two or More Races 28,899 2.0% 31,800 1.8% Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 112,801 7.2% 121,582 6.6% Hispanic White 44,785 39.7% 49,516 40.7% Hispanic Black or African American 4,151 3.7% 4,289 3.5% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 1,234 1.1% 1,346 1.1% Hispanic Asian 391 0.3% 417 0.3% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 170 0.2% 186 0.2%

Hispanic Other Race 54,277 48.1% 57,415 47.2% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Hispanic Two or More Races 7,792 6.9% 8,414 6.9% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 1,409,410 93.2% 1,685,755 93.9% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 102,478 6.8% 110,306 6.1% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 1,262,566 97.0% 1,517,745 97.3% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 39,255 3.0% 41,878 2.7% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 1,507,700 92.4% 1,803,961 93.1% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 123,877 7.6% 134,018 6.9% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 11,076 2.0% 12,436 2.0% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 63,223 16.1% 68,427 16.3%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.7655/-86.1690 RFULL9 501 Maryland St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Indianapolis, IN 46225

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,563,166 1,854,890 Age Under 5 Years 114,283 7.3% 131,784 7.1% Age 5 to 9 Years 113,740 7.3% 132,603 7.1% Age 10 to 14 Years 112,734 7.2% 132,990 7.2% Age 15 to 19 Years 105,710 6.8% 126,504 6.8% Age 20 to 24 Years 100,382 6.4% 118,666 6.4% Age 25 to 29 Years 109,185 7.0% 125,296 6.8% Age 30 to 34 Years 113,614 7.3% 131,117 7.1% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 106,673 6.8% 124,624 6.7% Age 40 to 44 Years 106,739 6.8% 126,451 6.8% Age 45 to 49 Years 108,276 6.9% 129,526 7.0% Age 50 to 54 Years 109,029 7.0% 131,026 7.1% Age 55 to 59 Years 99,165 6.3% 119,721 6.5% Age 60 to 64 Years 81,975 5.2% 99,839 5.4% Age 65 to 69 Years 61,034 3.9% 75,628 4.1% Age 70 to 74 Years 42,675 2.7% 53,443 2.9% Age 75 to 79 Years 30,549 2.0% 37,950 2.0% Age 80 to 84 Years 22,634 1.4% 27,737 1.5% Age 85 Years or Over 24,768 1.6% 29,985 1.6% Median Age 35.6 36.1 Age 19 Years or Less 446,467 28.6% 523,881 28.2% Age 20 to 64 Years 935,039 59.8% 1,106,266 59.6% Age 65 Years or Over 181,659 11.6% 224,744 12.1% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 803,861 51.4% 949,449 51.2% Age Under 5 Years 55,904 7.0% 64,409 6.8% Age 5 to 9 Years 55,409 6.9% 64,551 6.8% Age 10 to 14 Years 55,250 6.9% 64,894 6.8% Age 15 to 19 Years 51,940 6.5% 61,933 6.5% Age 20 to 24 Years 50,804 6.3% 59,560 6.3% Age 25 to 29 Years 56,477 7.0% 64,320 6.8% Age 30 to 34 Years 58,276 7.2% 66,760 7.0% Age 35 to 39 Years 54,551 6.8% 63,279 6.7% Age 40 to 44 Years 54,148 6.7% 63,916 6.7% Age 45 to 49 Years 55,109 6.9% 65,655 6.9%

Age 50 to 54 Years 56,109 7.0% 67,007 7.1% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 51,575 6.4% 61,864 6.5% Age 60 to 64 Years 43,402 5.4% 52,490 5.5% Age 65 to 69 Years 32,844 4.1% 40,481 4.3% Age 70 to 74 Years 23,721 3.0% 29,442 3.1% Age 75 to 79 Years 17,653 2.2% 21,757 2.3% Age 80 to 84 Years 13,819 1.7% 16,791 1.8% Age 85 Years or Over 16,871 2.1% 20,340 2.1% Female Median Age 36.7 37.2 Age 19 Years or Less 218,503 27.2% 255,788 26.9% Age 20 to 64 Years 480,450 59.8% 564,851 59.5% Age 65 Years or Over 104,908 13.1% 128,810 13.6%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.7655/-86.1690 RFULL9 501 Maryland St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Indianapolis, IN 46225

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 759,305 48.6% 905,442 48.8% Age Under 5 Years 58,380 7.7% 67,374 7.4% Age 5 to 9 Years 58,331 7.7% 68,052 7.5% Age 10 to 14 Years 57,484 7.6% 68,095 7.5% Age 15 to 19 Years 53,770 7.1% 64,571 7.1% Age 20 to 24 Years 49,579 6.5% 59,106 6.5% Age 25 to 29 Years 52,709 6.9% 60,976 6.7% Age 30 to 34 Years 55,338 7.3% 64,357 7.1% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 52,121 6.9% 61,346 6.8% Age 40 to 44 Years 52,591 6.9% 62,535 6.9% Age 45 to 49 Years 53,168 7.0% 63,870 7.1% Age 50 to 54 Years 52,920 7.0% 64,019 7.1% Age 55 to 59 Years 47,591 6.3% 57,857 6.4% Age 60 to 64 Years 38,573 5.1% 47,350 5.2% Age 65 to 69 Years 28,190 3.7% 35,147 3.9% Age 70 to 74 Years 18,954 2.5% 24,001 2.7% Age 75 to 79 Years 12,895 1.7% 16,193 1.8% Age 80 to 84 Years 8,815 1.2% 10,947 1.2% Age 85 Years or Over 7,896 1.0% 9,645 1.1% Male Median Age 34.4 35.0 Age 19 Years or Less 227,964 30.0% 268,093 29.6% Age 20 to 64 Years 454,589 59.9% 541,415 59.8% Age 65 Years or Over 76,751 10.1% 95,934 10.6% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 94 95 Age Under 5 Years 104 51.1% 105 51.1% Age 5 to 9 Years 105 51.3% 105 51.3% Age 10 to 14 Years 104 51.0% 105 51.2% Age 15 to 19 Years 104 50.9% 104 51.0% Age 20 to 24 Years 98 49.4% 99 49.8% Age 25 to 29 Years 93 48.3% 95 48.7% Age 30 to 34 Years 95 48.7% 96 49.1% Age 35 to 39 Years 96 48.9% 97 49.2% Age 40 to 44 Years 97 49.3% 98 49.5% Age 45 to 49 Years 96 49.1% 97 49.3%

Age 50 to 54 Years 94 48.5% 96 48.9% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 92 48.0% 94 48.3% Age 60 to 64 Years 89 47.1% 90 47.4% Age 65 to 69 Years 86 46.2% 87 46.5% Age 70 to 74 Years 80 44.4% 82 44.9% Age 75 to 79 Years 73 42.2% 74 42.7% Age 80 to 84 Years 64 38.9% 65 39.5% Age 85 Years or Over 47 31.9% 47 32.2% Age 19 Years or Less 104 51.1% 105 51.2% Age 20 to 39 Years 95 48.8% 97 49.2% Age 40 to 64 Years 94 48.5% 95 48.7% Age 65 Years or Over 73 42.3% 74 42.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.7655/-86.1690 RFULL9 501 Maryland St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Indianapolis, IN 46225

Household Type (2014) Total Households 617,709 729,674 Households with Children 220,097 35.6% 259,547 35.6% Average Household Size 2.5 2.5 Household Density per Square Mile 423 193 Population Family 1,234,832 79.0% 1,474,738 79.5% Population Non-Family 303,414 19.4% 346,319 18.7% Population Group Quarters 24,920 1.6% 33,833 1.8% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Family Households 404,546 65.5% 485,670 66.6% Married Couple Households 286,871 70.9% 351,360 72.3% Other Family Households 117,675 29.1% 134,310 27.7% Family Households with Children 217,686 53.8% 256,572 52.8% Married Couple with Children 137,562 63.2% 165,259 64.4% Other Family Households with Children 80,123 36.8% 91,312 35.6% Family Households No Children 186,861 46.2% 229,098 47.2% Married Couple No Children 149,309 79.9% 186,100 81.2% Other Family Households No Children 37,552 20.1% 42,998 18.8% Non-Family Households 213,163 34.5% 244,004 33.4% Non-Family Households with Children 2,411 1.1% 2,975 1.2% Non-Family Households No Children 210,752 98.9% 241,029 98.8% Lone Person No Children - - - - 2 or More Persons No Children 210,752 98.9% 241,029 98.8% Household Lone Male - - - - Household Lone Female - - - - Average Family Household Size 3.1 3.0 Average Family Income $88,551 $86,922 Median Family Income $73,983 $73,042 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.4 1.4 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 1,222,408 1,457,514 Never Married 388,137 31.8% 445,548 30.6% Currently Married 572,924 46.9% 702,595 48.2% Previously Married 261,347 21.4% 309,371 21.2% Separated 46,910 17.9% 54,316 17.6% Widowed 63,595 24.3% 76,764 24.8% Divorced 150,842 57.7% 178,291 57.6% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 1,000,743 1,191,231 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 35,518 3.5% 41,014 3.4% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 79,413 7.9% 95,242 8.0% High School Graduate 284,568 28.4% 357,785 30.0% Some College 206,342 20.6% 245,932 20.6% Associate Degree Only 70,216 7.0% 85,344 7.2% Bachelor Degree Only 215,313 21.5% 243,204 20.4% Graduate Degree 109,372 10.9% 122,709 10.3% Any College (Some College or Higher) 601,243 60.1% 697,189 58.5% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 324,685 32.4% 365,913 30.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.7655/-86.1690 RFULL9 501 Maryland St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Indianapolis, IN 46225 Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 667,613 788,438 Total Housing Units (2010) 655,590 773,441 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 12,023 0.5% 14,996 0.5% Housing Units Occupied (2014) 617,709 92.5% 729,674 92.5% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 403,269 65.3% 490,000 67.2% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 214,440 34.7% 239,674 32.8% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 49,904 7.5% 58,764 7.5% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Household Size (2014) Total Households 617,709 729,674 1 Person Households 171,028 27.7% 196,630 26.9% 2 Person Households 198,159 32.1% 238,607 32.7% 3 Person Households 100,409 16.3% 119,056 16.3% 4 Person Households 84,939 13.8% 101,148 13.9% 5 Person Households 39,965 6.5% 47,141 6.5% 6 Person Households 14,911 2.4% 17,481 2.4% 7 or More Person Households 8,299 1.3% 9,611 1.3% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 29,043 4.7% 32,572 4.5% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 31,689 5.1% 36,468 5.0% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 30,125 4.9% 35,244 4.8% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 48,141 7.8% 57,441 7.9% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 76,255 12.3% 92,281 12.6% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 113,576 18.4% 136,659 18.7% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 89,833 14.5% 106,517 14.6% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 69,422 11.2% 81,652 11.2% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 67,493 10.9% 78,976 10.8% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 24,228 3.9% 28,243 3.9% HH Income Under $10,000 37,904 6.1% 43,621 6.0% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 37,666 6.1% 42,206 5.8% Households 1 Vehicle Available 219,447 35.5% 249,613 34.2% Households 2 Vehicles Available 251,781 40.8% 299,325 41.0% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 108,815 17.6% 138,530 19.0% Total Vehicles Available 1,089,124 1,315,746 Average Vehicles per Household 1.8 1.8 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 815,948 74.9% 1,006,847 76.5% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.0 2.1 Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 273,176 25.1% 308,899 23.5% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.3 1.3 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 695,034 821,830 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 163,383 23.5% 197,001 24.0% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 282,869 40.7% 318,667 38.8% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 195,944 28.2% 237,993 29.0% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 27,209 3.9% 37,552 4.6% Work at Home 25,629 3.7% 30,617 3.7% Average Minutes Travel to Work 22.2 22.6

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.7655/-86.1690 RFULL9 501 Maryland St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Indianapolis, IN 46225

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 695,034 821,830 Drive to Work Alone 587,535 84.5% 693,874 84.4% Drive to Work in Carpool 56,737 8.2% 67,540 8.2% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 8,163 1.2% 8,584 1.0% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 714 0.1% 926 0.1% Bicycle to Work 1,838 0.3% 2,058 0.3% Walk to Work 10,766 1.5% 13,626 1.7%

Other Means 3,652 0.5% 4,605 0.6% warranty. or representation ed without Work at Home 25,629 3.7% 30,617 3.7% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 63,664 72,800 Total Employees 880,850 971,125 Company Headquarter Businesses 552 0.9% 579 0.8% Company Headquarter Employees 104,629 11.9% 107,615 11.1% Employee Population per Business 13.8 to 1 13.3 to 1 Residential Population per Business 24.6 to 1 25.5 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 1,297,454 1,472,773 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 1,176,467 1,398,556 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 561,195 47.7% 669,643 47.9% Male Civilian Employed 388,397 69.2% 460,349 68.7% Male Civilian Unemployed 22,958 4.1% 27,484 4.1% Males in Armed Forces 931 0.2% 1,191 0.2% Males Not in Labor Force 148,910 26.5% 180,619 27.0% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 615,272 52.3% 728,913 52.1% Female Civilian Employed 370,296 60.2% 435,046 59.7% Female Civilian Unemployed 21,999 3.6% 25,912 3.6% Females in Armed Forces 239 - 322 - Females Not in Labor Force 222,738 36.2% 267,633 36.7% Unemployment Rate 561,195 3.8% 669,643 3.8% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 51,612 7.3% 59,155 7.1% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 28,049 7.8% 31,806 7.4% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 23,564 6.8% 27,349 6.7% Occupation (2010) Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 707,080 836,241 provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Occupation Total Males 360,348 51.0% 428,543 51.2% Occupation Total Females 346,732 49.0% 407,697 48.8% Management, Business, Financial Operations 112,600 15.9% 130,396 15.6% Professional, Related 157,824 22.3% 181,406 21.7% Service 113,644 16.1% 135,875 16.2% Sales, Office 187,041 26.5% 218,129 26.1% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 1,146 0.2% 2,036 0.2% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 48,392 6.8% 61,275 7.3% Production, Transport, Material Moving 86,433 12.2% 107,123 12.8% White Collar Workers 457,465 64.7% 529,931 63.4% Blue Collar Workers 249,615 35.3% 306,309 36.6%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.7655/-86.1690 RFULL9 501 Maryland St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Indianapolis, IN 46225

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 588,998 695,790 1 Detached Unit 410,231 69.6% 497,346 71.5% 1 Attached Unit 32,255 5.5% 34,454 5.0% 2 Units 9,693 1.6% 11,541 1.7% 3 to 4 Units 22,526 3.8% 24,567 3.5% 5 to 9 Units 39,803 6.8% 42,493 6.1% 10 to 19 Units 31,302 5.3% 33,640 4.8% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without 20 to 49 Units 16,256 2.8% 17,508 2.5% 50 or More Units 16,183 2.7% 16,996 2.4% Mobile Home or Trailer 10,680 1.8% 17,163 2.5% Other Structure 69 - 83 - Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 41,797 7.1% 49,258 7.1% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 62,361 10.6% 71,766 10.3% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 96,801 16.4% 113,891 16.4% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 65,699 11.2% 75,594 10.9% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 80,593 13.7% 95,536 13.7% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 70,105 11.9% 81,660 11.7% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 64,990 11.0% 75,807 10.9% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 28,271 4.8% 33,667 4.8% Homes Built Before 1939 78,380 13.3% 98,611 14.2% Median Age of Homes 40.1 yrs 40.5 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 381,965 464,460 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 2,240 0.6% 2,623 0.6% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 2,529 0.7% 2,749 0.6% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 8,864 2.3% 10,201 2.2% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 9,760 2.6% 11,363 2.4% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 22,589 5.9% 26,619 5.7% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 23,017 6.0% 27,489 5.9% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 36,307 9.5% 43,127 9.3% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 27,203 7.1% 32,511 7.0% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 45,430 11.9% 54,855 11.8% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 49,102 12.9% 59,229 12.8%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 56,007 14.7% 68,696 14.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 22,017 5.8% 27,414 5.9% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 17,622 4.6% 22,715 4.9% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 14,258 3.7% 17,888 3.9% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 12,261 3.2% 15,341 3.3% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 8,680 2.3% 10,514 2.3% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 7,412 1.9% 9,287 2.0% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 4,579 1.2% 5,642 1.2% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 7,521 2.0% 10,014 2.2% Home Values Under $10,000 4,569 1.2% 6,184 1.3% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $159,653 $155,445 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $618 $612

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 39.7655/-86.1690 RFULL9 501 Maryland St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Indianapolis, IN 46225

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $34.9 B $41.0 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $20.1 B $23.6 B Total Retail Expenditure $14.8 B $17.4 B Apparel $1.68 B $1.97 B Contributions $1.36 B $1.59 B

Education $873 M $1.02 B warranty. or representation ed without Entertainment $1.96 B $2.30 B Food and Beverages $5.30 B $6.23 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.54 B $1.81 B Gifts $955 M $1.12 B Health Care $2.10 B $2.47 B Household Operations $1.28 B $1.50 B Miscellaneous Expenses $577 M $678 M Personal Care $504 M $591 M Personal Insurance $368 M $431 M Reading $115 M $135 M Shelter $6.76 B $7.93 B Tobacco $219 M $258 M Transportation $6.91 B $8.13 B Utilities $2.40 B $2.82 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $4,708 $4,679 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,712 57.6% $2,695 57.6% Total Retail Expenditures $1,996 42.4% $1,984 42.4% Apparel $226 4.8% $225 4.8% Contributions $183 3.9% $181 3.9% Education $118 2.5% $116 2.5% Entertainment $264 5.6% $262 5.6% Food and Beverages $715 15.2% $711 15.2% Furnishings and Equipment $208 4.4% $207 4.4%

Gifts $129 2.7% $127 2.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Health Care $283 6.0% $282 6.0% Household Operations $173 3.7% $171 3.7% Miscellaneous Expenses $78 1.7% $77 1.7% Personal Care $68 1.4% $68 1.4% Personal Insurance $50 1.1% $49 1.1% Reading $15 0.3% $15 0.3% Shelter $912 19.4% $906 19.4% Tobacco $30 0.6% $29 0.6% Transportation $933 19.8% $929 19.9% Utilities $324 6.9% $322 6.9%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 34.0402/-83.9913 RFULL9 2500 Buford Dr NE 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,557,315 3,427,118 Projected Population (2019) 1,670,788 3,667,904 Census Population (2010) 1,478,508 3,247,907 Census Population (2000) 1,115,462 2,696,131 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 113,473 1.5% 240,786 1.4%

Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 78,808 1.3% 179,211 1.4% warranty. or representation ed without Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 363,046 3.3% 551,776 2.0% Estimated Population Density (2014) 1,370 psm 1,100 psm Trade Area Size 1,136.4 sq mi 3,115.6 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 533,725 1,268,949 Projected Households (2019) 559,266 1,327,635 Census Households (2010) 512,283 1,214,886 Census Households (2000) 394,211 1,002,828 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 25,541 1.0% 58,686 0.9% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 139,514 2.5% 266,122 1.9%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $84,078 $84,427 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $91,600 $91,865 Census Average Household Income (2010) $78,053 $77,895 Census Average Household Income (2000) $73,308 $71,415 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $7,522 1.8% $7,438 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $10,771 1.0% $13,012 1.3%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $70,726 $67,351 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $77,055 $73,328 Census Median Household Income (2010) $64,360 $61,454 Census Median Household Income (2000) $62,764 $58,237

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $6,330 1.8% $5,977 1.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $7,961 0.9% $9,114 1.1%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $28,876 $31,380 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $30,721 $33,368 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $27,044 $29,137 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $25,884 $26,494 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $1,845 1.3% $1,988 1.3% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $2,992 0.8% $4,886 1.3% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $549,806 $535,493

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 34.0402/-83.9913 RFULL9 2500 Buford Dr NE 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,557,315 3,427,118 White (2014) 928,993 59.7% 1,948,530 56.9% Black or African American (2014) 298,467 19.2% 966,117 28.2% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 7,133 0.5% 12,100 0.4% Asian (2014) 147,787 9.5% 218,705 6.4%

Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 946 0.1% 1,763 0.1% warranty. or representation ed without Other Race (2014) 129,758 8.3% 195,152 5.7% Two or More Races (2014) 44,230 2.8% 84,751 2.5% Population < 18 (2014) 423,205 27.2% 855,843 25.0% White 224,220 53.0% 429,707 50.2% Black or African American 91,273 21.6% 263,547 30.8% American Indian or Alaska Native 2,439 0.6% 3,748 0.4% Asian 39,593 9.4% 54,425 6.4% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 295 0.1% 491 0.1% Other Race 65,385 15.4% 103,926 12.1% Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 108,659 7.0% 163,520 4.8% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 1,259,584 80.9% 2,969,964 86.7% Not Hispanic White 792,560 62.9% 1,736,070 58.5% Not Hispanic Black or African American 287,339 22.8% 944,650 31.8% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 2,777 0.2% 6,120 0.2% Not Hispanic Asian 146,209 11.6% 216,572 7.3% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 609 - 1,255 - Not Hispanic Other Race 3,004 0.2% 7,774 0.3% Not Hispanic Two or More Races 27,088 2.2% 57,523 1.9% Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 297,731 19.1% 457,155 13.3% Hispanic White 136,433 45.8% 212,459 46.5% Hispanic Black or African American 11,129 3.7% 21,467 4.7% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 4,356 1.5% 5,979 1.3% Hispanic Asian 1,579 0.5% 2,134 0.5% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 338 0.1% 509 0.1%

Hispanic Other Race 126,754 42.6% 187,378 41.0% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Hispanic Two or More Races 17,142 5.8% 27,229 6.0% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 1,204,815 81.5% 2,828,262 87.1% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 273,693 18.5% 419,645 12.9% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 981,878 88.0% 2,469,661 91.6% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 133,583 12.0% 226,471 8.4% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 1,338,892 80.1% 3,156,979 86.1% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 331,896 19.9% 510,925 13.9% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 34,165 2.3% 53,770 2.4% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 140,110 10.5% 193,175 8.5%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 34.0402/-83.9913 RFULL9 2500 Buford Dr NE 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,557,315 3,427,118 Age Under 5 Years 111,562 7.2% 235,519 6.9% Age 5 to 9 Years 119,076 7.6% 240,499 7.0% Age 10 to 14 Years 121,052 7.8% 240,398 7.0% Age 15 to 19 Years 110,838 7.1% 235,556 6.9% Age 20 to 24 Years 96,717 6.2% 231,684 6.8% Age 25 to 29 Years 101,148 6.5% 242,930 7.1% Age 30 to 34 Years 110,210 7.1% 254,042 7.4% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 115,575 7.4% 251,767 7.3% Age 40 to 44 Years 124,383 8.0% 261,803 7.6% Age 45 to 49 Years 122,023 7.8% 256,461 7.5% Age 50 to 54 Years 110,772 7.1% 238,943 7.0% Age 55 to 59 Years 91,508 5.9% 207,589 6.1% Age 60 to 64 Years 73,395 4.7% 173,935 5.1% Age 65 to 69 Years 54,878 3.5% 130,707 3.8% Age 70 to 74 Years 36,957 2.4% 87,111 2.5% Age 75 to 79 Years 24,691 1.6% 57,617 1.7% Age 80 to 84 Years 16,573 1.1% 39,657 1.2% Age 85 Years or Over 15,957 1.0% 40,900 1.2% Median Age 35.2 35.7 Age 19 Years or Less 462,528 29.7% 951,972 27.8% Age 20 to 64 Years 945,731 60.7% 2,119,154 61.8% Age 65 Years or Over 149,056 9.6% 355,992 10.4% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 786,758 50.5% 1,746,014 50.9% Age Under 5 Years 54,246 6.9% 114,793 6.6% Age 5 to 9 Years 58,102 7.4% 117,647 6.7% Age 10 to 14 Years 59,208 7.5% 117,736 6.7% Age 15 to 19 Years 53,320 6.8% 114,456 6.6% Age 20 to 24 Years 46,144 5.9% 112,671 6.5% Age 25 to 29 Years 49,360 6.3% 121,250 6.9% Age 30 to 34 Years 55,328 7.0% 128,733 7.4% Age 35 to 39 Years 59,210 7.5% 128,442 7.4% Age 40 to 44 Years 63,470 8.1% 133,121 7.6% Age 45 to 49 Years 61,898 7.9% 130,224 7.5%

Age 50 to 54 Years 56,074 7.1% 122,318 7.0% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 47,134 6.0% 108,064 6.2% Age 60 to 64 Years 38,711 4.9% 92,935 5.3% Age 65 to 69 Years 29,585 3.8% 70,413 4.0% Age 70 to 74 Years 20,215 2.6% 47,764 2.7% Age 75 to 79 Years 14,041 1.8% 32,992 1.9% Age 80 to 84 Years 9,973 1.3% 24,209 1.4% Age 85 Years or Over 10,739 1.4% 28,244 1.6% Female Median Age 36.2 36.7 Age 19 Years or Less 224,875 28.6% 464,632 26.6% Age 20 to 64 Years 477,330 60.7% 1,077,759 61.7% Age 65 Years or Over 84,553 10.7% 203,623 11.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 34.0402/-83.9913 RFULL9 2500 Buford Dr NE 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 770,557 49.5% 1,681,104 49.1% Age Under 5 Years 57,317 7.4% 120,726 7.2% Age 5 to 9 Years 60,974 7.9% 122,852 7.3% Age 10 to 14 Years 61,844 8.0% 122,662 7.3% Age 15 to 19 Years 57,518 7.5% 121,100 7.2% Age 20 to 24 Years 50,573 6.6% 119,013 7.1% Age 25 to 29 Years 51,788 6.7% 121,681 7.2% Age 30 to 34 Years 54,882 7.1% 125,309 7.5% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 56,365 7.3% 123,325 7.3% Age 40 to 44 Years 60,913 7.9% 128,681 7.7% Age 45 to 49 Years 60,125 7.8% 126,236 7.5% Age 50 to 54 Years 54,697 7.1% 116,624 6.9% Age 55 to 59 Years 44,374 5.8% 99,525 5.9% Age 60 to 64 Years 34,684 4.5% 81,000 4.8% Age 65 to 69 Years 25,293 3.3% 60,293 3.6% Age 70 to 74 Years 16,742 2.2% 39,347 2.3% Age 75 to 79 Years 10,650 1.4% 24,625 1.5% Age 80 to 84 Years 6,600 0.9% 15,447 0.9% Age 85 Years or Over 5,218 0.7% 12,656 0.8% Male Median Age 34.2 34.6 Age 19 Years or Less 237,652 30.8% 487,340 29.0% Age 20 to 64 Years 468,402 60.8% 1,041,395 61.9% Age 65 Years or Over 64,503 8.4% 152,369 9.1% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 98 96 Age Under 5 Years 106 51.4% 105 51.3% Age 5 to 9 Years 105 51.2% 104 51.1% Age 10 to 14 Years 104 51.1% 104 51.0% Age 15 to 19 Years 108 51.9% 106 51.4% Age 20 to 24 Years 110 52.3% 106 51.4% Age 25 to 29 Years 105 51.2% 100 50.1% Age 30 to 34 Years 99 49.8% 97 49.3% Age 35 to 39 Years 95 48.8% 96 49.0% Age 40 to 44 Years 96 49.0% 97 49.2% Age 45 to 49 Years 97 49.3% 97 49.2%

Age 50 to 54 Years 98 49.4% 95 48.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 94 48.5% 92 47.9% Age 60 to 64 Years 90 47.3% 87 46.6% Age 65 to 69 Years 85 46.1% 86 46.1% Age 70 to 74 Years 83 45.3% 82 45.2% Age 75 to 79 Years 76 43.1% 75 42.7% Age 80 to 84 Years 66 39.8% 64 39.0% Age 85 Years or Over 49 32.7% 45 30.9% Age 19 Years or Less 106 51.4% 105 51.2% Age 20 to 39 Years 102 50.4% 100 49.9% Age 40 to 64 Years 95 48.8% 94 48.5% Age 65 Years or Over 76 43.3% 75 42.8%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 34.0402/-83.9913 RFULL9 2500 Buford Dr NE 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Household Type (2014) Total Households 533,725 1,268,949 Households with Children 229,112 42.9% 464,782 36.6% Average Household Size 2.9 2.7 Household Density per Square Mile 470 407 Population Family 1,312,811 84.3% 2,706,553 79.0% Population Non-Family 233,871 15.0% 660,305 19.3% Population Group Quarters 10,633 0.7% 60,260 1.8% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Family Households 390,141 73.1% 832,905 65.6% Married Couple Households 294,768 75.6% 598,272 71.8% Other Family Households 95,373 24.4% 234,633 28.2% Family Households with Children 227,311 58.3% 461,056 55.4% Married Couple with Children 163,688 72.0% 308,694 67.0% Other Family Households with Children 63,624 28.0% 152,362 33.0% Family Households No Children 162,829 41.7% 371,849 44.6% Married Couple No Children 131,080 80.5% 289,578 77.9% Other Family Households No Children 31,749 19.5% 82,272 22.1% Non-Family Households 143,585 26.9% 436,045 34.4% Non-Family Households with Children 1,801 1.3% 3,727 0.9% Non-Family Households No Children 141,784 98.7% 432,318 99.1% Lone Person No Children - - - - 2 or More Persons No Children 141,784 98.7% 432,318 99.1% Household Lone Male - - - - Household Lone Female - - - - Average Family Household Size 3.4 3.2 Average Family Income $95,306 $100,002 Median Family Income $82,003 $82,009 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.6 1.5 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 1,205,625 2,710,702 Never Married 365,554 30.3% 937,814 34.6% Currently Married 607,619 50.4% 1,229,856 45.4% Previously Married 232,453 19.3% 543,032 20.0% Separated 66,804 28.7% 141,245 26.0% Widowed 48,245 20.8% 118,211 21.8% Divorced 117,404 50.5% 283,576 52.2% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 990,258 2,215,477 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 66,359 6.7% 118,899 5.4% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 63,297 6.4% 146,063 6.6% High School Graduate 220,380 22.3% 487,824 22.0% Some College 198,646 20.1% 437,426 19.7% Associate Degree Only 76,627 7.7% 151,727 6.8% Bachelor Degree Only 241,697 24.4% 563,193 25.4% Graduate Degree 123,252 12.4% 310,343 14.0% Any College (Some College or Higher) 640,222 64.7% 1,462,690 66.0% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 364,949 36.9% 873,537 39.4%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 34.0402/-83.9913 RFULL9 2500 Buford Dr NE 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Lawrenceville, GA 30043 Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 564,091 1,369,171 Total Housing Units (2010) 558,047 1,356,420 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 6,043 0.3% 12,751 0.2% Housing Units Occupied (2014) 533,725 94.6% 1,268,949 92.7% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 367,958 68.9% 811,239 63.9% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 165,767 31.1% 457,711 36.1% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 30,365 5.4% 100,222 7.3% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Household Size (2014) Total Households 533,725 1,268,949 1 Person Households 113,831 21.3% 344,803 27.2% 2 Person Households 153,886 28.8% 382,043 30.1% 3 Person Households 95,654 17.9% 209,249 16.5% 4 Person Households 92,591 17.3% 184,648 14.6% 5 Person Households 44,765 8.4% 86,543 6.8% 6 Person Households 18,786 3.5% 35,383 2.8% 7 or More Person Households 14,212 2.7% 26,280 2.1% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 35,553 6.7% 93,615 7.4% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 40,212 7.5% 87,483 6.9% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 31,889 6.0% 68,477 5.4% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 48,924 9.2% 106,219 8.4% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 72,613 13.6% 156,289 12.3% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 99,246 18.6% 226,360 17.8% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 67,554 12.7% 159,816 12.6% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 49,826 9.3% 120,206 9.5% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 46,269 8.7% 119,219 9.4% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 15,383 2.9% 45,483 3.6% HH Income Under $10,000 26,257 4.9% 85,785 6.8% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 21,440 4.0% 85,129 6.7% Households 1 Vehicle Available 166,665 31.2% 443,624 35.0% Households 2 Vehicles Available 235,370 44.1% 510,030 40.2% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 110,251 20.7% 230,167 18.1% Total Vehicles Available 1,009,424 2,241,135 Average Vehicles per Household 1.9 1.8 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 774,390 76.7% 1,652,549 73.7% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.1 2.0 Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 235,034 23.3% 588,586 26.3% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.4 1.3 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 674,388 1,488,950 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 114,696 17.0% 262,526 17.6% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 207,431 30.8% 494,300 33.2% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 232,339 34.5% 487,643 32.8% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 78,031 11.6% 148,267 10.0% Work at Home 41,890 6.2% 96,214 6.5% Average Minutes Travel to Work 27.7 26.4

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 34.0402/-83.9913 RFULL9 2500 Buford Dr NE 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 674,388 1,488,950 Drive to Work Alone 523,975 77.7% 1,143,106 76.8% Drive to Work in Carpool 71,887 10.7% 142,325 9.6% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 14,776 2.2% 57,556 3.9% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 1,078 0.2% 2,203 0.1% Bicycle to Work 609 0.1% 2,785 0.2% Walk to Work 7,232 1.1% 22,667 1.5%

Other Means 12,942 1.9% 22,095 1.5% warranty. or representation ed without Work at Home 41,890 6.2% 96,214 6.5% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 75,780 183,549 Total Employees 784,814 1,977,301 Company Headquarter Businesses 499 0.7% 1,334 0.7% Company Headquarter Employees 58,382 7.4% 194,801 9.9% Employee Population per Business 10.4 to 1 10.8 to 1 Residential Population per Business 20.6 to 1 18.7 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 1,175,121 2,882,787 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 1,171,170 2,604,987 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 571,269 48.8% 1,254,674 48.2% Male Civilian Employed 422,171 73.9% 895,934 71.4% Male Civilian Unemployed 24,962 4.4% 59,556 4.7% Males in Armed Forces 496 0.1% 1,721 0.1% Males Not in Labor Force 123,639 21.6% 297,462 23.7% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 599,901 51.2% 1,350,312 51.8% Female Civilian Employed 358,013 59.7% 801,412 59.4% Female Civilian Unemployed 22,453 3.7% 54,081 4.0% Females in Armed Forces 182 - 434 - Females Not in Labor Force 219,253 36.5% 494,386 36.6% Unemployment Rate 571,269 4.0% 1,254,674 4.4% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 92,262 13.4% 178,505 11.8% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 50,066 13.5% 95,177 11.9% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 42,196 13.4% 83,328 11.6% Occupation (2010) Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 687,922 1,518,840 provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Occupation Total Males 372,105 54.1% 800,756 52.7% Occupation Total Females 315,817 45.9% 718,083 47.3% Management, Business, Financial Operations 124,543 18.1% 283,243 18.6% Professional, Related 146,253 21.3% 344,990 22.7% Service 102,347 14.9% 230,942 15.2% Sales, Office 179,176 26.0% 390,528 25.7% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 1,503 0.2% 3,175 0.2% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 64,561 9.4% 120,464 7.9% Production, Transport, Material Moving 69,539 10.1% 145,499 9.6% White Collar Workers 449,972 65.4% 1,018,761 67.1% Blue Collar Workers 237,950 34.6% 500,079 32.9%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 34.0402/-83.9913 RFULL9 2500 Buford Dr NE 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 512,283 1,214,886 1 Detached Unit 356,357 69.6% 775,147 63.8% 1 Attached Unit 28,202 5.5% 69,109 5.7% 2 Units 6,208 1.2% 18,748 1.5% 3 to 4 Units 12,324 2.4% 34,234 2.8% 5 to 9 Units 25,317 4.9% 71,088 5.9% 10 to 19 Units 33,657 6.6% 91,570 7.5% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without 20 to 49 Units 20,163 3.9% 50,958 4.2% 50 or More Units 12,280 2.4% 62,521 5.1% Mobile Home or Trailer 17,637 3.4% 40,946 3.4% Other Structure 140 - 567 - Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 63,479 12.4% 136,692 11.3% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 82,837 16.2% 172,156 14.2% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 131,036 25.6% 264,181 21.7% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 98,399 19.2% 231,905 19.1% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 62,624 12.2% 166,836 13.7% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 35,519 6.9% 101,555 8.4% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 20,639 4.0% 68,948 5.7% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 7,878 1.5% 29,358 2.4% Homes Built Before 1939 9,872 1.9% 43,255 3.6% Median Age of Homes 26.5 yrs 29.7 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 350,069 769,157 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 3,340 1.0% 12,807 1.7% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 3,831 1.1% 12,798 1.7% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 16,714 4.8% 46,060 6.0% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 19,787 5.7% 46,351 6.0% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 43,644 12.5% 91,305 11.9% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 36,113 10.3% 72,152 9.4% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 50,969 14.6% 100,326 13.0% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 31,963 9.1% 62,474 8.1% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 47,814 13.7% 95,227 12.4% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 36,099 10.3% 75,942 9.9%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 24,909 7.1% 62,781 8.2% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 6,121 1.7% 16,946 2.2% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 5,720 1.6% 16,400 2.1% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 4,406 1.3% 12,062 1.6% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 3,077 0.9% 8,627 1.1% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 2,565 0.7% 6,781 0.9% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 2,904 0.8% 7,411 1.0% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 2,372 0.7% 5,791 0.8% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 5,329 1.5% 11,546 1.5% Home Values Under $10,000 2,391 0.7% 5,370 0.7% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $224,566 $233,788 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $788 $771

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 34.0402/-83.9913 RFULL9 2500 Buford Dr NE 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $33.1 B $78.6 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $19.1 B $45.4 B Total Retail Expenditure $14.0 B $33.3 B Apparel $1.60 B $3.81 B Contributions $1.34 B $3.23 B

Education $866 M $2.08 B warranty. or representation ed without Entertainment $1.86 B $4.42 B Food and Beverages $4.97 B $11.8 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.48 B $3.51 B Gifts $930 M $2.23 B Health Care $1.93 B $4.61 B Household Operations $1.26 B $2.98 B Miscellaneous Expenses $537 M $1.28 B Personal Care $476 M $1.13 B Personal Insurance $361 M $862 M Reading $108 M $259 M Shelter $6.43 B $15.3 B Tobacco $196 M $467 M Transportation $6.51 B $15.4 B Utilities $2.22 B $5.30 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $5,166 $5,164 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,985 57.8% $2,980 57.7% Total Retail Expenditures $2,181 42.2% $2,184 42.3% Apparel $250 4.8% $250 4.8% Contributions $210 4.1% $212 4.1% Education $135 2.6% $137 2.7% Entertainment $291 5.6% $291 5.6% Food and Beverages $776 15.0% $775 15.0% Furnishings and Equipment $231 4.5% $231 4.5%

Gifts $145 2.8% $146 2.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Health Care $302 5.8% $303 5.9% Household Operations $196 3.8% $196 3.8% Miscellaneous Expenses $84 1.6% $84 1.6% Personal Care $74 1.4% $74 1.4% Personal Insurance $56 1.1% $57 1.1% Reading $17 0.3% $17 0.3% Shelter $1,004 19.4% $1,004 19.4% Tobacco $31 0.6% $31 0.6% Transportation $1,017 19.7% $1,009 19.5% Utilities $347 6.7% $348 6.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.4654/-97.5078 RFULL9 2 S Mickey Mantle Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,129,392 1,284,527 Projected Population (2019) 1,181,863 1,343,040 Census Population (2010) 1,091,268 1,243,074 Census Population (2000) 950,017 1,085,766 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 52,471 0.9% 58,512 0.9%

Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 38,124 0.9% 41,453 0.8% warranty. or representation ed without Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 141,251 1.5% 157,309 1.4% Estimated Population Density (2014) 757 psm 342 psm Trade Area Size 1,492.4 sq mi 3,753.3 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 449,406 508,267 Projected Households (2019) 474,722 536,804 Census Households (2010) 429,501 485,943 Census Households (2000) 376,055 426,408 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 25,316 1.1% 28,537 1.1% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 73,351 1.4% 81,859 1.4%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $68,959 $68,109 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $74,954 $74,029 Census Average Household Income (2010) $63,404 $62,524 Census Average Household Income (2000) $49,199 $48,623 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $5,995 1.7% $5,920 1.7% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $19,759 2.9% $19,486 2.9%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $56,115 $55,492 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $60,889 $60,198 Census Median Household Income (2010) $51,548 $50,872 Census Median Household Income (2000) $40,388 $39,837

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $4,774 1.7% $4,706 1.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $15,727 2.8% $15,655 2.8%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $27,629 $27,148 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $30,302 $29,796 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $24,955 $24,442 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $19,458 $19,073 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $2,674 1.9% $2,647 2.0% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $8,171 3.0% $8,075 3.0% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $413,996 $410,895

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.4654/-97.5078 RFULL9 2 S Mickey Mantle Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,129,392 1,284,527 White (2014) 792,129 70.1% 917,790 71.4% Black or African American (2014) 128,015 11.3% 133,388 10.4% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 44,393 3.9% 57,223 4.5% Asian (2014) 35,337 3.1% 36,110 2.8%

Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 1,065 0.1% 1,148 0.1% warranty. or representation ed without Other Race (2014) 69,264 6.1% 71,573 5.6% Two or More Races (2014) 59,190 5.2% 67,295 5.2% Population < 18 (2014) 279,164 24.7% 316,765 24.7% White 165,637 59.3% 193,416 61.1% Black or African American 38,326 13.7% 39,440 12.5% American Indian or Alaska Native 13,012 4.7% 17,217 5.4% Asian 8,090 2.9% 8,247 2.6% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 279 0.1% 299 0.1% Other Race 53,819 19.3% 58,147 18.4% Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 59,712 5.3% 63,132 4.9% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 979,965 86.8% 1,126,906 87.7% Not Hispanic White 731,681 74.7% 853,066 75.7% Not Hispanic Black or African American 124,670 12.7% 129,927 11.5% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 40,130 4.1% 52,363 4.6% Not Hispanic Asian 34,763 3.5% 35,517 3.2% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 871 0.1% 950 0.1% Not Hispanic Other Race 512 0.1% 562 - Not Hispanic Two or More Races 47,338 4.8% 54,520 4.8% Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 149,427 13.2% 157,622 12.3% Hispanic White 60,448 40.5% 64,724 41.1% Hispanic Black or African American 3,345 2.2% 3,461 2.2% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 4,263 2.9% 4,860 3.1% Hispanic Asian 574 0.4% 592 0.4% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 193 0.1% 198 0.1%

Hispanic Other Race 68,752 46.0% 71,011 45.1% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Hispanic Two or More Races 11,852 7.9% 12,775 8.1% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 956,826 87.7% 1,101,319 88.6% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 134,442 12.3% 141,756 11.4% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 881,304 92.8% 1,012,826 93.3% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 68,713 7.2% 72,939 6.7% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 1,015,654 85.9% 1,167,575 86.9% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 166,209 14.1% 175,465 13.1% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 16,782 2.2% 17,843 2.3% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 65,729 9.6% 68,816 9.4%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.4654/-97.5078 RFULL9 2 S Mickey Mantle Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,129,392 1,284,527 Age Under 5 Years 82,628 7.3% 92,569 7.2% Age 5 to 9 Years 80,409 7.1% 90,918 7.1% Age 10 to 14 Years 76,389 6.8% 87,499 6.8% Age 15 to 19 Years 75,120 6.7% 86,666 6.7% Age 20 to 24 Years 85,742 7.6% 95,908 7.5% Age 25 to 29 Years 88,799 7.9% 97,742 7.6% Age 30 to 34 Years 84,886 7.5% 94,319 7.3% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 74,300 6.6% 83,646 6.5% Age 40 to 44 Years 69,452 6.1% 79,168 6.2% Age 45 to 49 Years 68,477 6.1% 78,735 6.1% Age 50 to 54 Years 72,679 6.4% 83,694 6.5% Age 55 to 59 Years 70,425 6.2% 81,026 6.3% Age 60 to 64 Years 60,314 5.3% 69,472 5.4% Age 65 to 69 Years 46,811 4.1% 54,600 4.3% Age 70 to 74 Years 33,444 3.0% 39,377 3.1% Age 75 to 79 Years 24,084 2.1% 28,379 2.2% Age 80 to 84 Years 17,402 1.5% 20,179 1.6% Age 85 Years or Over 18,031 1.6% 20,630 1.6% Median Age 34.7 35.1 Age 19 Years or Less 314,546 27.9% 357,652 27.8% Age 20 to 64 Years 675,075 59.8% 763,710 59.5% Age 65 Years or Over 139,772 12.4% 163,166 12.7% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 576,147 51.0% 654,245 50.9% Age Under 5 Years 40,481 7.0% 45,402 6.9% Age 5 to 9 Years 39,271 6.8% 44,362 6.8% Age 10 to 14 Years 37,418 6.5% 42,722 6.5% Age 15 to 19 Years 36,805 6.4% 42,334 6.5% Age 20 to 24 Years 42,468 7.4% 47,317 7.2% Age 25 to 29 Years 44,480 7.7% 48,947 7.5% Age 30 to 34 Years 42,233 7.3% 46,951 7.2% Age 35 to 39 Years 37,184 6.5% 41,869 6.4% Age 40 to 44 Years 35,057 6.1% 39,911 6.1% Age 45 to 49 Years 34,928 6.1% 40,038 6.1%

Age 50 to 54 Years 37,552 6.5% 43,057 6.6% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 36,664 6.4% 42,113 6.4% Age 60 to 64 Years 31,710 5.5% 36,411 5.6% Age 65 to 69 Years 25,065 4.4% 29,124 4.5% Age 70 to 74 Years 18,430 3.2% 21,600 3.3% Age 75 to 79 Years 13,796 2.4% 16,144 2.5% Age 80 to 84 Years 10,510 1.8% 12,113 1.9% Age 85 Years or Over 12,095 2.1% 13,830 2.1% Female Median Age 35.9 36.2 Age 19 Years or Less 153,975 26.7% 174,820 26.7% Age 20 to 64 Years 342,275 59.4% 386,614 59.1% Age 65 Years or Over 79,897 13.9% 92,811 14.2%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.4654/-97.5078 RFULL9 2 S Mickey Mantle Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 553,245 49.0% 630,282 49.1% Age Under 5 Years 42,147 7.6% 47,166 7.5% Age 5 to 9 Years 41,138 7.4% 46,557 7.4% Age 10 to 14 Years 38,971 7.0% 44,777 7.1% Age 15 to 19 Years 38,315 6.9% 44,332 7.0% Age 20 to 24 Years 43,275 7.8% 48,591 7.7% Age 25 to 29 Years 44,320 8.0% 48,794 7.7% Age 30 to 34 Years 42,653 7.7% 47,368 7.5% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 37,116 6.7% 41,777 6.6% Age 40 to 44 Years 34,395 6.2% 39,257 6.2% Age 45 to 49 Years 33,549 6.1% 38,697 6.1% Age 50 to 54 Years 35,127 6.3% 40,637 6.4% Age 55 to 59 Years 33,761 6.1% 38,913 6.2% Age 60 to 64 Years 28,605 5.2% 33,061 5.2% Age 65 to 69 Years 21,746 3.9% 25,476 4.0% Age 70 to 74 Years 15,014 2.7% 17,777 2.8% Age 75 to 79 Years 10,288 1.9% 12,235 1.9% Age 80 to 84 Years 6,892 1.2% 8,066 1.3% Age 85 Years or Over 5,935 1.1% 6,800 1.1% Male Median Age 33.6 33.9 Age 19 Years or Less 160,570 29.0% 182,832 29.0% Age 20 to 64 Years 332,800 60.2% 377,096 59.8% Age 65 Years or Over 59,875 10.8% 70,355 11.2% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 96 96 Age Under 5 Years 104 51.0% 104 51.0% Age 5 to 9 Years 105 51.2% 105 51.2% Age 10 to 14 Years 104 51.0% 105 51.2% Age 15 to 19 Years 104 51.0% 105 51.2% Age 20 to 24 Years 102 50.5% 103 50.7% Age 25 to 29 Years 100 49.9% 100 49.9% Age 30 to 34 Years 101 50.2% 101 50.2% Age 35 to 39 Years 100 50.0% 100 49.9% Age 40 to 44 Years 98 49.5% 98 49.6% Age 45 to 49 Years 96 49.0% 97 49.1%

Age 50 to 54 Years 94 48.3% 94 48.6% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 92 47.9% 92 48.0% Age 60 to 64 Years 90 47.4% 91 47.6% Age 65 to 69 Years 87 46.5% 87 46.7% Age 70 to 74 Years 81 44.9% 82 45.1% Age 75 to 79 Years 75 42.7% 76 43.1% Age 80 to 84 Years 66 39.6% 67 40.0% Age 85 Years or Over 49 32.9% 49 33.0% Age 19 Years or Less 104 51.0% 105 51.1% Age 20 to 39 Years 101 50.1% 101 50.2% Age 40 to 64 Years 94 48.5% 95 48.6% Age 65 Years or Over 75 42.8% 76 43.1%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.4654/-97.5078 RFULL9 2 S Mickey Mantle Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Household Type (2014) Total Households 449,406 508,267 Households with Children 151,192 33.6% 171,984 33.8% Average Household Size 2.5 2.5 Household Density per Square Mile 301 135 Population Family 879,456 77.9% 1,006,422 78.3% Population Non-Family 224,745 19.9% 247,670 19.3% Population Group Quarters 25,191 2.2% 30,435 2.4% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Family Households 291,617 64.9% 334,076 65.7% Married Couple Households 209,834 72.0% 242,731 72.7% Other Family Households 81,783 28.0% 91,345 27.3% Family Households with Children 149,737 51.3% 170,341 51.0% Married Couple with Children 95,457 63.8% 109,650 64.4% Other Family Households with Children 54,279 36.2% 60,690 35.6% Family Households No Children 141,880 48.7% 163,735 49.0% Married Couple No Children 114,377 80.6% 133,081 81.3% Other Family Households No Children 27,503 19.4% 30,655 18.7% Non-Family Households 157,789 35.1% 174,191 34.3% Non-Family Households with Children 1,456 0.9% 1,643 0.9% Non-Family Households No Children 156,333 99.1% 172,548 99.1% Lone Person No Children - - - - 2 or More Persons No Children 156,333 99.1% 172,548 99.1% Household Lone Male - - - - Household Lone Female - - - - Average Family Household Size 3.0 3.0 Average Family Income $81,891 $80,574 Median Family Income $68,466 $67,504 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.4 1.4 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 889,966 1,013,542 Never Married 266,473 29.9% 297,500 29.4% Currently Married 414,182 46.5% 478,785 47.2% Previously Married 209,312 23.5% 237,257 23.4% Separated 41,983 20.1% 46,891 19.8% Widowed 51,343 24.5% 58,892 24.8% Divorced 115,986 55.4% 131,473 55.4% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 716,401 815,700 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 31,912 4.5% 35,224 4.3% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 54,532 7.6% 64,586 7.9% High School Graduate 187,264 26.1% 223,348 27.4% Some College 188,957 26.4% 214,227 26.3% Associate Degree Only 46,063 6.4% 52,425 6.4% Bachelor Degree Only 136,705 19.1% 149,179 18.3% Graduate Degree 70,968 9.9% 76,711 9.4% Any College (Some College or Higher) 442,693 61.8% 492,542 60.4% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 207,674 29.0% 225,890 27.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.4654/-97.5078 RFULL9 2 S Mickey Mantle Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Oklahoma City, OK 73104 Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 479,514 543,542 Total Housing Units (2010) 470,875 533,791 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 8,639 0.5% 9,751 0.5% Housing Units Occupied (2014) 449,406 93.7% 508,267 93.5% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 285,572 63.5% 329,941 64.9% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 163,834 36.5% 178,326 35.1% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 30,108 6.3% 35,275 6.5% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Household Size (2014) Total Households 449,406 508,267 1 Person Households 127,852 28.4% 141,683 27.9% 2 Person Households 148,816 33.1% 169,883 33.4% 3 Person Households 71,952 16.0% 81,484 16.0% 4 Person Households 57,205 12.7% 65,210 12.8% 5 Person Households 26,997 6.0% 30,982 6.1% 6 Person Households 10,362 2.3% 11,891 2.3% 7 or More Person Households 6,221 1.4% 7,133 1.4% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 17,641 3.9% 18,972 3.7% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 19,138 4.3% 21,288 4.2% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 18,046 4.0% 20,277 4.0% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 32,260 7.2% 36,483 7.2% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 53,088 11.8% 60,238 11.9% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 88,646 19.7% 100,406 19.8% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 67,564 15.0% 75,801 14.9% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 51,293 11.4% 58,432 11.5% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 50,551 11.2% 58,104 11.4% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 20,137 4.5% 23,287 4.6% HH Income Under $10,000 31,043 6.9% 34,979 6.9% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 24,188 5.4% 26,896 5.3% Households 1 Vehicle Available 156,964 34.9% 173,883 34.2% Households 2 Vehicles Available 182,428 40.6% 205,740 40.5% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 85,825 19.1% 101,749 20.0% Total Vehicles Available 811,143 929,798 Average Vehicles per Household 1.8 1.8 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 587,519 72.4% 685,426 73.7% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.1 2.1 Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 223,624 27.6% 244,371 26.3% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.4 1.4 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 512,438 578,023 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 148,105 28.9% 166,570 28.8% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 224,397 43.8% 242,720 42.0% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 108,006 21.1% 129,213 22.4% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 12,597 2.5% 17,195 3.0% Work at Home 19,332 3.8% 22,325 3.9% Average Minutes Travel to Work 19.4 19.9

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.4654/-97.5078 RFULL9 2 S Mickey Mantle Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 512,438 578,023 Drive to Work Alone 422,558 82.5% 475,488 82.3% Drive to Work in Carpool 53,275 10.4% 60,781 10.5% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 3,455 0.7% 3,700 0.6% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 1,486 0.3% 1,679 0.3% Bicycle to Work 1,684 0.3% 1,761 0.3% Walk to Work 7,555 1.5% 8,600 1.5%

Other Means 3,092 0.6% 3,689 0.6% warranty. or representation ed without Work at Home 19,332 3.8% 22,325 3.9% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 51,103 56,343 Total Employees 597,345 644,952 Company Headquarter Businesses 403 0.8% 422 0.7% Company Headquarter Employees 54,221 9.1% 54,909 8.5% Employee Population per Business 11.7 to 1 11.4 to 1 Residential Population per Business 22.1 to 1 22.8 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 908,686 1,004,378 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 852,155 968,638 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 410,768 48.2% 467,571 48.3% Male Civilian Employed 280,243 68.2% 316,750 67.7% Male Civilian Unemployed 14,302 3.5% 16,088 3.4% Males in Armed Forces 4,804 1.2% 4,969 1.1% Males Not in Labor Force 111,419 27.1% 129,763 27.8% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 441,387 51.8% 501,068 51.7% Female Civilian Employed 254,630 57.7% 286,328 57.1% Female Civilian Unemployed 12,915 2.9% 14,619 2.9% Females in Armed Forces 1,137 0.3% 1,165 0.2% Females Not in Labor Force 172,704 39.1% 198,955 39.7% Unemployment Rate 410,768 3.2% 467,571 3.2% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 18,363 3.6% 19,868 3.4% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 9,425 3.5% 10,152 3.3% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 8,938 3.6% 9,716 3.5% Occupation (2010) Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 516,510 583,210 provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Occupation Total Males 270,818 52.4% 306,598 52.6% Occupation Total Females 245,692 47.6% 276,612 47.4% Management, Business, Financial Operations 70,822 13.7% 78,992 13.5% Professional, Related 112,348 21.8% 124,748 21.4% Service 90,569 17.5% 102,646 17.6% Sales, Office 138,480 26.8% 154,367 26.5% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 1,564 0.3% 2,245 0.4% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 51,273 9.9% 60,445 10.4% Production, Transport, Material Moving 51,453 10.0% 59,767 10.2% White Collar Workers 321,651 62.3% 358,107 61.4% Blue Collar Workers 194,859 37.7% 225,103 38.6%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.4654/-97.5078 RFULL9 2 S Mickey Mantle Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 429,501 485,943 1 Detached Unit 314,090 73.1% 356,625 73.4% 1 Attached Unit 12,979 3.0% 13,831 2.8% 2 Units 7,940 1.8% 8,955 1.8% 3 to 4 Units 14,265 3.3% 15,155 3.1% 5 to 9 Units 21,347 5.0% 22,210 4.6% 10 to 19 Units 19,359 4.5% 19,736 4.1% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without 20 to 49 Units 8,445 2.0% 8,688 1.8% 50 or More Units 11,962 2.8% 12,313 2.5% Mobile Home or Trailer 18,870 4.4% 28,126 5.8% Other Structure 245 0.1% 304 0.1% Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 36,652 8.5% 41,308 8.5% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 34,595 8.1% 39,696 8.2% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 49,015 11.4% 56,469 11.6% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 72,711 16.9% 81,914 16.9% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 79,227 18.4% 90,405 18.6% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 58,914 13.7% 64,711 13.3% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 47,594 11.1% 52,707 10.8% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 22,404 5.2% 25,077 5.2% Homes Built Before 1939 28,388 6.6% 33,656 6.9% Median Age of Homes 38.4 yrs 38.4 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 271,574 314,062 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 1,742 0.6% 1,944 0.6% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 1,038 0.4% 1,145 0.4% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 4,470 1.6% 4,805 1.5% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 4,679 1.7% 5,037 1.6% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 13,012 4.8% 14,560 4.6% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 13,099 4.8% 14,871 4.7% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 23,490 8.6% 26,486 8.4% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 18,014 6.6% 20,307 6.5% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 27,340 10.1% 31,344 10.0% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 35,034 12.9% 38,909 12.4%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 39,096 14.4% 44,744 14.2% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 14,734 5.4% 16,960 5.4% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 16,590 6.1% 19,527 6.2% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 14,691 5.4% 17,356 5.5% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 10,948 4.0% 13,012 4.1% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 8,750 3.2% 10,629 3.4% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 10,319 3.8% 12,892 4.1% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 5,139 1.9% 6,935 2.2% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 6,643 2.4% 8,833 2.8% Home Values Under $10,000 2,746 1.0% 3,767 1.2% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $143,407 $139,278 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $571 $563

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 35.4654/-97.5078 RFULL9 2 S Mickey Mantle Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $24.2 B $27.1 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $13.9 B $15.6 B Total Retail Expenditure $10.3 B $11.5 B Apparel $1.16 B $1.30 B Contributions $921 M $1.03 B

Education $590 M $658 M warranty. or representation ed without Entertainment $1.35 B $1.52 B Food and Beverages $3.69 B $4.15 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.06 B $1.19 B Gifts $651 M $728 M Health Care $1.47 B $1.65 B Household Operations $873 M $977 M Miscellaneous Expenses $402 M $452 M Personal Care $349 M $392 M Personal Insurance $251 M $281 M Reading $79.4 M $89.1 M Shelter $4.67 B $5.24 B Tobacco $156 M $175 M Transportation $4.81 B $5.40 B Utilities $1.68 B $1.89 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $4,480 $4,446 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,578 57.5% $2,558 57.5% Total Retail Expenditures $1,902 42.5% $1,888 42.5% Apparel $215 4.8% $213 4.8% Contributions $171 3.8% $169 3.8% Education $109 2.4% $108 2.4% Entertainment $250 5.6% $249 5.6% Food and Beverages $684 15.3% $680 15.3% Furnishings and Equipment $196 4.4% $195 4.4%

Gifts $121 2.7% $119 2.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Health Care $273 6.1% $271 6.1% Household Operations $162 3.6% $160 3.6% Miscellaneous Expenses $75 1.7% $74 1.7% Personal Care $65 1.4% $64 1.4% Personal Insurance $47 1.0% $46 1.0% Reading $15 0.3% $15 0.3% Shelter $865 19.3% $859 19.3% Tobacco $29 0.6% $29 0.6% Transportation $892 19.9% $886 19.9% Utilities $312 7.0% $310 7.0%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8729/-71.3716 RFULL9 1 Columbus Ave 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Pawtucket, RI 02860

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,425,444 3,436,116 Projected Population (2019) 1,442,339 3,525,582 Census Population (2010) 1,411,604 3,379,714 Census Population (2000) 1,391,225 3,297,723 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 16,894 0.2% 89,466 0.5%

Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 13,840 0.2% 56,402 0.4% warranty. or representation ed without Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 20,379 0.1% 81,991 0.2% Estimated Population Density (2014) 1,240 psm 1,045 psm Trade Area Size 1,149.2 sq mi 3,288.4 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 559,026 1,323,378 Projected Households (2019) 573,844 1,363,799 Census Households (2010) 548,339 1,297,609 Census Households (2000) 534,611 1,254,430 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 14,818 0.5% 40,421 0.6% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 24,415 0.3% 68,948 0.4%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $78,335 $88,529 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $85,205 $96,403 Census Average Household Income (2010) $71,859 $81,132 Census Average Household Income (2000) $56,864 $63,858 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $6,870 1.8% $7,875 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $21,470 2.7% $24,670 2.8%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $64,563 $72,579 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $70,127 $78,901 Census Median Household Income (2010) $59,742 $65,992 Census Median Household Income (2000) $47,316 $52,610

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $5,564 1.7% $6,322 1.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $17,247 2.6% $19,969 2.7%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $30,951 $34,346 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $34,147 $37,558 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $27,914 $31,150 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $21,775 $24,206 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $3,196 2.1% $3,212 1.9% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $9,176 3.0% $10,140 3.0% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $548,198 $636,587

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8729/-71.3716 RFULL9 1 Columbus Ave 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Pawtucket, RI 02860

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,425,444 3,436,116 White (2014) 1,192,483 83.7% 2,712,823 79.0% Black or African American (2014) 71,435 5.0% 296,709 8.6% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 5,865 0.4% 12,652 0.4% Asian (2014) 43,161 3.0% 155,393 4.5%

Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 635 - 1,330 - warranty. or representation ed without Other Race (2014) 70,850 5.0% 156,945 4.6% Two or More Races (2014) 41,014 2.9% 100,265 2.9% Population < 18 (2014) 300,788 21.1% 723,796 21.1% White 229,170 76.2% 518,924 71.7% Black or African American 20,186 6.7% 79,089 10.9% American Indian or Alaska Native 1,688 0.6% 3,444 0.5% Asian 10,450 3.5% 35,117 4.9% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 169 0.1% 298 - Other Race 39,125 13.0% 86,924 12.0% Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 56,396 4.0% 110,676 3.2% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 1,267,230 88.9% 3,115,172 90.7% Not Hispanic White 1,124,206 88.7% 2,572,908 82.6% Not Hispanic Black or African American 60,030 4.7% 267,816 8.6% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 3,550 0.3% 7,735 0.2% Not Hispanic Asian 42,051 3.3% 153,542 4.9% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 349 - 821 - Not Hispanic Other Race 9,421 0.7% 39,952 1.3% Not Hispanic Two or More Races 27,623 2.2% 72,398 2.3% Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 158,214 11.1% 320,945 9.3% Hispanic White 68,277 43.2% 139,915 43.6% Hispanic Black or African American 11,405 7.2% 28,894 9.0% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 2,315 1.5% 4,917 1.5% Hispanic Asian 1,110 0.7% 1,850 0.6% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 286 0.2% 509 0.2%

Hispanic Other Race 61,430 38.8% 116,993 36.5% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Hispanic Two or More Races 13,392 8.5% 27,867 8.7% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 1,266,460 89.7% 3,087,631 91.4% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 145,144 10.3% 292,083 8.6% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 1,292,880 92.9% 3,096,000 93.9% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 98,345 7.1% 201,723 6.1% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 1,275,394 88.4% 3,181,945 90.3% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 166,945 11.6% 343,637 9.7% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 8,731 1.1% 22,693 1.4% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 46,799 4.8% 90,360 4.5%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8729/-71.3716 RFULL9 1 Columbus Ave 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Pawtucket, RI 02860

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,425,444 3,436,116 Age Under 5 Years 78,478 5.5% 191,525 5.6% Age 5 to 9 Years 83,570 5.9% 200,536 5.8% Age 10 to 14 Years 88,096 6.2% 210,847 6.1% Age 15 to 19 Years 98,605 6.9% 239,999 7.0% Age 20 to 24 Years 97,696 6.9% 236,788 6.9% Age 25 to 29 Years 89,525 6.3% 219,330 6.4% Age 30 to 34 Years 88,406 6.2% 218,457 6.4% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 86,117 6.0% 209,645 6.1% Age 40 to 44 Years 96,308 6.8% 230,419 6.7% Age 45 to 49 Years 106,661 7.5% 254,146 7.4% Age 50 to 54 Years 110,090 7.7% 260,764 7.6% Age 55 to 59 Years 101,400 7.1% 242,373 7.1% Age 60 to 64 Years 84,934 6.0% 205,531 6.0% Age 65 to 69 Years 67,527 4.7% 162,627 4.7% Age 70 to 74 Years 47,582 3.3% 114,897 3.3% Age 75 to 79 Years 35,024 2.5% 83,941 2.4% Age 80 to 84 Years 28,728 2.0% 68,128 2.0% Age 85 Years or Over 36,697 2.6% 86,162 2.5% Median Age 39.4 39.2 Age 19 Years or Less 348,749 24.5% 842,908 24.5% Age 20 to 64 Years 861,137 60.4% 2,077,453 60.5% Age 65 Years or Over 215,558 15.1% 515,755 15.0% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 735,382 51.6% 1,780,559 51.8% Age Under 5 Years 38,330 5.2% 93,757 5.3% Age 5 to 9 Years 40,848 5.6% 98,278 5.5% Age 10 to 14 Years 43,104 5.9% 103,117 5.8% Age 15 to 19 Years 48,881 6.6% 119,392 6.7% Age 20 to 24 Years 48,009 6.5% 117,766 6.6% Age 25 to 29 Years 44,632 6.1% 110,504 6.2% Age 30 to 34 Years 44,697 6.1% 111,990 6.3% Age 35 to 39 Years 44,003 6.0% 107,871 6.1% Age 40 to 44 Years 49,409 6.7% 118,724 6.7% Age 45 to 49 Years 54,696 7.4% 130,981 7.4%

Age 50 to 54 Years 56,722 7.7% 134,910 7.6% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 52,531 7.1% 126,371 7.1% Age 60 to 64 Years 44,375 6.0% 107,896 6.1% Age 65 to 69 Years 35,874 4.9% 86,524 4.9% Age 70 to 74 Years 26,022 3.5% 63,228 3.6% Age 75 to 79 Years 20,203 2.7% 48,259 2.7% Age 80 to 84 Years 17,721 2.4% 41,823 2.3% Age 85 Years or Over 25,327 3.4% 59,168 3.3% Female Median Age 40.8 40.5 Age 19 Years or Less 171,162 23.3% 414,544 23.3% Age 20 to 64 Years 439,073 59.7% 1,067,013 59.9% Age 65 Years or Over 125,147 17.0% 299,003 16.8%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8729/-71.3716 RFULL9 1 Columbus Ave 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Pawtucket, RI 02860

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 690,062 48.4% 1,655,557 48.2% Age Under 5 Years 40,148 5.8% 97,769 5.9% Age 5 to 9 Years 42,722 6.2% 102,259 6.2% Age 10 to 14 Years 44,992 6.5% 107,730 6.5% Age 15 to 19 Years 49,724 7.2% 120,607 7.3% Age 20 to 24 Years 49,687 7.2% 119,022 7.2% Age 25 to 29 Years 44,893 6.5% 108,826 6.6% Age 30 to 34 Years 43,709 6.3% 106,466 6.4% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 42,114 6.1% 101,774 6.1% Age 40 to 44 Years 46,899 6.8% 111,695 6.7% Age 45 to 49 Years 51,966 7.5% 123,165 7.4% Age 50 to 54 Years 53,368 7.7% 125,854 7.6% Age 55 to 59 Years 48,869 7.1% 116,002 7.0% Age 60 to 64 Years 40,559 5.9% 97,635 5.9% Age 65 to 69 Years 31,653 4.6% 76,103 4.6% Age 70 to 74 Years 21,560 3.1% 51,669 3.1% Age 75 to 79 Years 14,821 2.1% 35,682 2.2% Age 80 to 84 Years 11,007 1.6% 26,305 1.6% Age 85 Years or Over 11,370 1.6% 26,994 1.6% Male Median Age 38.0 37.8 Age 19 Years or Less 177,587 25.7% 428,365 25.9% Age 20 to 64 Years 422,064 61.2% 1,010,440 61.0% Age 65 Years or Over 90,411 13.1% 216,752 13.1% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 94 93 Age Under 5 Years 105 51.2% 104 51.0% Age 5 to 9 Years 105 51.1% 104 51.0% Age 10 to 14 Years 104 51.1% 104 51.1% Age 15 to 19 Years 102 50.4% 101 50.3% Age 20 to 24 Years 103 50.9% 101 50.3% Age 25 to 29 Years 101 50.1% 98 49.6% Age 30 to 34 Years 98 49.4% 95 48.7% Age 35 to 39 Years 96 48.9% 94 48.5% Age 40 to 44 Years 95 48.7% 94 48.5% Age 45 to 49 Years 95 48.7% 94 48.5%

Age 50 to 54 Years 94 48.5% 93 48.3% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 93 48.2% 92 47.9% Age 60 to 64 Years 91 47.8% 90 47.5% Age 65 to 69 Years 88 46.9% 88 46.8% Age 70 to 74 Years 83 45.3% 82 45.0% Age 75 to 79 Years 73 42.3% 74 42.5% Age 80 to 84 Years 62 38.3% 63 38.6% Age 85 Years or Over 45 31.0% 46 31.3% Age 19 Years or Less 104 50.9% 103 50.8% Age 20 to 39 Years 99 49.9% 97 49.3% Age 40 to 64 Years 94 48.4% 93 48.1% Age 65 Years or Over 72 41.9% 72 42.0%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8729/-71.3716 RFULL9 1 Columbus Ave 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Pawtucket, RI 02860

Household Type (2014) Total Households 559,026 1,323,378 Households with Children 180,045 32.2% 427,415 32.3% Average Household Size 2.5 2.5 Household Density per Square Mile 486 402 Population Family 1,108,625 77.8% 2,647,583 77.1% Population Non-Family 273,727 19.2% 672,968 19.6% Population Group Quarters 43,093 3.0% 115,566 3.4% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Family Households 363,848 65.1% 857,351 64.8% Married Couple Households 261,650 71.9% 619,096 72.2% Other Family Households 102,198 28.1% 238,254 27.8% Family Households with Children 178,499 49.1% 424,049 49.5% Married Couple with Children 116,210 65.1% 281,972 66.5% Other Family Households with Children 62,289 34.9% 142,076 33.5% Family Households No Children 185,350 50.9% 433,302 50.5% Married Couple No Children 145,441 78.5% 337,124 77.8% Other Family Households No Children 39,909 21.5% 96,178 22.2% Non-Family Households 195,177 34.9% 466,027 35.2% Non-Family Households with Children 1,546 0.8% 3,367 0.7% Non-Family Households No Children 193,631 99.2% 462,661 99.3% Lone Person No Children - - - - 2 or More Persons No Children 193,631 99.2% 462,661 99.3% Household Lone Male - - - - Household Lone Female - - - - Average Family Household Size 3.0 3.1 Average Family Income $94,582 $107,199 Median Family Income $81,179 $91,255 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.4 1.4 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 1,175,300 2,833,207 Never Married 403,699 34.3% 1,009,031 35.6% Currently Married 512,042 43.6% 1,237,202 43.7% Previously Married 259,559 22.1% 586,974 20.7% Separated 48,165 18.6% 121,348 20.7% Widowed 80,297 30.9% 177,781 30.3% Divorced 131,097 50.5% 287,845 49.0% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 959,371 2,309,282 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 70,262 7.3% 136,433 5.9% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 83,708 8.7% 166,741 7.2% High School Graduate 268,242 28.0% 619,022 26.8% Some College 173,460 18.1% 390,867 16.9% Associate Degree Only 77,251 8.1% 175,246 7.6% Bachelor Degree Only 180,361 18.8% 480,722 20.8% Graduate Degree 106,087 11.1% 340,251 14.7% Any College (Some College or Higher) 537,158 56.0% 1,387,086 60.1% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 286,448 29.9% 820,973 35.6%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8729/-71.3716 RFULL9 1 Columbus Ave 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Pawtucket, RI 02860 Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 591,680 1,398,636 Total Housing Units (2010) 592,330 1,396,810 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) -650 - 1,827 - Housing Units Occupied (2014) 559,026 94.5% 1,323,378 94.6% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 347,881 62.2% 825,925 62.4% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 211,144 37.8% 497,453 37.6% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 32,655 5.5% 75,258 5.4% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Household Size (2014) Total Households 559,026 1,323,378 1 Person Households 157,888 28.2% 368,476 27.8% 2 Person Households 176,242 31.5% 414,832 31.3% 3 Person Households 94,310 16.9% 223,855 16.9% 4 Person Households 79,435 14.2% 190,616 14.4% 5 Person Households 33,576 6.0% 82,145 6.2% 6 Person Households 11,452 2.0% 28,092 2.1% 7 or More Person Households 6,122 1.1% 15,362 1.2% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 31,271 5.6% 104,207 7.9% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 37,573 6.7% 103,574 7.8% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 32,419 5.8% 84,405 6.4% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 50,480 9.0% 125,459 9.5% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 72,120 12.9% 171,733 13.0% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 95,407 17.1% 220,323 16.6% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 66,161 11.8% 142,467 10.8% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 49,255 8.8% 104,518 7.9% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 58,103 10.4% 123,293 9.3% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 26,181 4.7% 55,052 4.2% HH Income Under $10,000 40,055 7.2% 88,347 6.7% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 55,140 9.9% 149,134 11.3% Households 1 Vehicle Available 196,867 35.2% 468,515 35.4% Households 2 Vehicles Available 210,149 37.6% 493,344 37.3% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 96,869 17.3% 212,385 16.0% Total Vehicles Available 943,328 2,171,303 Average Vehicles per Household 1.7 1.6 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 701,777 74.4% 1,625,568 74.9% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.0 2.0 Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 241,552 25.6% 545,734 25.1% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.1 1.1 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 651,109 1,599,980 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 183,887 28.2% 399,122 24.9% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 228,075 35.0% 510,460 31.9% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 163,360 25.1% 476,055 29.8% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 55,116 8.5% 156,051 9.8% Work at Home 20,671 3.2% 58,291 3.6% Average Minutes Travel to Work 21.9 24.1

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8729/-71.3716 RFULL9 1 Columbus Ave 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Pawtucket, RI 02860

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 651,109 1,599,980 Drive to Work Alone 527,780 81.1% 1,208,725 75.5% Drive to Work in Carpool 52,669 8.1% 130,981 8.2% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 23,830 3.7% 130,337 8.1% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 424 0.1% 1,164 0.1% Bicycle to Work 3,360 0.5% 8,188 0.5% Walk to Work 18,168 2.8% 51,967 3.2%

Other Means 4,206 0.6% 10,328 0.6% warranty. or representation ed without Work at Home 20,671 3.2% 58,291 3.6% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 64,138 150,643 Total Employees 748,756 1,684,408 Company Headquarter Businesses 431 0.7% 982 0.7% Company Headquarter Employees 69,908 9.3% 147,412 8.8% Employee Population per Business 11.7 to 1 11.2 to 1 Residential Population per Business 22.2 to 1 22.8 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 1,186,551 2,679,969 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 1,116,187 2,680,122 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 532,067 47.7% 1,272,889 47.5% Male Civilian Employed 344,984 64.8% 854,333 67.1% Male Civilian Unemployed 32,986 6.2% 68,599 5.4% Males in Armed Forces 1,051 0.2% 3,518 0.3% Males Not in Labor Force 153,046 28.8% 346,438 27.2% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 584,119 52.3% 1,407,234 52.5% Female Civilian Employed 332,202 56.9% 826,171 58.7% Female Civilian Unemployed 32,199 5.5% 67,601 4.8% Females in Armed Forces 155 - 539 - Females Not in Labor Force 219,563 37.6% 512,922 36.4% Unemployment Rate 532,067 5.8% 1,272,889 5.1% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 8,289 1.2% 40,880 2.5% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 11,584 3.5% 35,900 4.4% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) -3,295 -1.0% 4,980 0.6% Occupation (2010) Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 668,897 1,639,624 provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Occupation Total Males 333,400 49.8% 818,432 49.9% Occupation Total Females 335,497 50.2% 821,191 50.1% Management, Business, Financial Operations 98,457 14.7% 262,161 16.0% Professional, Related 149,773 22.4% 409,400 25.0% Service 123,895 18.5% 294,698 18.0% Sales, Office 168,936 25.3% 397,417 24.2% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 817 0.1% 2,526 0.2% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 46,525 7.0% 110,570 6.7% Production, Transport, Material Moving 80,493 12.0% 162,852 9.9% White Collar Workers 417,166 62.4% 1,068,978 65.2% Blue Collar Workers 251,731 37.6% 570,646 34.8%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8729/-71.3716 RFULL9 1 Columbus Ave 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Pawtucket, RI 02860

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 548,339 1,297,609 1 Detached Unit 303,951 55.4% 697,523 53.8% 1 Attached Unit 21,834 4.0% 59,578 4.6% 2 Units 55,822 10.2% 131,886 10.2% 3 to 4 Units 65,695 12.0% 153,827 11.9% 5 to 9 Units 33,319 6.1% 73,915 5.7% 10 to 19 Units 22,694 4.1% 56,256 4.3% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without 20 to 49 Units 14,034 2.6% 44,011 3.4% 50 or More Units 25,630 4.7% 69,689 5.4% Mobile Home or Trailer 5,287 1.0% 10,762 0.8% Other Structure 71 - 162 - Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 17,029 3.1% 42,875 3.3% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 19,800 3.6% 49,125 3.8% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 43,427 7.9% 99,083 7.6% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 59,521 10.9% 135,763 10.5% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 67,299 12.3% 151,968 11.7% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 58,771 10.7% 139,802 10.8% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 68,643 12.5% 159,299 12.3% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 36,665 6.7% 84,315 6.5% Homes Built Before 1939 177,186 32.3% 435,380 33.6% Median Age of Homes 53.7 yrs 54.0 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 341,422 808,734 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 4,947 1.4% 24,001 3.0% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 5,374 1.6% 25,064 3.1% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 27,061 7.9% 88,708 11.0% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 34,143 10.0% 97,344 12.0% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 73,327 21.5% 193,075 23.9% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 56,915 16.7% 122,445 15.1% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 62,063 18.2% 119,449 14.8% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 28,090 8.2% 46,667 5.8% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 20,683 6.1% 36,243 4.5% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 8,739 2.6% 16,176 2.0%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 7,851 2.3% 13,933 1.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 1,370 0.4% 2,918 0.4% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 679 0.2% 1,660 0.2% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 957 0.3% 1,865 0.2% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 995 0.3% 1,920 0.2% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 1,091 0.3% 2,279 0.3% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 1,490 0.4% 4,010 0.5% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 1,931 0.6% 4,042 0.5% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 2,899 0.8% 5,246 0.6% Home Values Under $10,000 815 0.2% 1,688 0.2% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $288,310 $339,344 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $750 $862

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 41.8729/-71.3716 RFULL9 1 Columbus Ave 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Pawtucket, RI 02860

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $32.9 B $84.9 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $19.0 B $49.0 B Total Retail Expenditure $14.0 B $35.9 B Apparel $1.59 B $4.11 B Contributions $1.32 B $3.55 B

Education $857 M $2.30 B warranty. or representation ed without Entertainment $1.85 B $4.78 B Food and Beverages $4.97 B $12.7 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.47 B $3.83 B Gifts $921 M $2.45 B Health Care $1.96 B $4.95 B Household Operations $1.23 B $3.26 B Miscellaneous Expenses $541 M $1.38 B Personal Care $475 M $1.22 B Personal Insurance $355 M $943 M Reading $109 M $280 M Shelter $6.40 B $16.6 B Tobacco $200 M $491 M Transportation $6.47 B $16.5 B Utilities $2.24 B $5.65 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $4,911 $5,349 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,830 57.6% $3,086 57.7% Total Retail Expenditures $2,081 42.4% $2,262 42.3% Apparel $237 4.8% $259 4.8% Contributions $196 4.0% $223 4.2% Education $128 2.6% $145 2.7% Entertainment $276 5.6% $301 5.6% Food and Beverages $741 15.1% $798 14.9% Furnishings and Equipment $219 4.5% $241 4.5%

Gifts $137 2.8% $154 2.9% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Health Care $292 5.9% $312 5.8% Household Operations $184 3.7% $206 3.8% Miscellaneous Expenses $81 1.6% $87 1.6% Personal Care $71 1.4% $77 1.4% Personal Insurance $53 1.1% $59 1.1% Reading $16 0.3% $18 0.3% Shelter $955 19.4% $1,044 19.5% Tobacco $30 0.6% $31 0.6% Transportation $964 19.6% $1,038 19.4% Utilities $333 6.8% $356 6.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 30.5274/-97.6309 RFULL9 3400 E Palm Valley Blvd 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Round Rock, TX 78665

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,118,509 1,596,789 Projected Population (2019) 1,245,819 1,777,252 Census Population (2010) 1,032,324 1,474,275 Census Population (2000) 776,069 1,084,146 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 127,310 2.3% 180,463 2.3%

Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 86,185 2.1% 122,514 2.1% warranty. or representation ed without Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 256,255 3.3% 390,129 3.6% Estimated Population Density (2014) 1,237 psm 646 psm Trade Area Size 904.0 sq mi 2,470.2 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 431,266 605,531 Projected Households (2019) 471,582 661,862 Census Households (2010) 402,753 565,463 Census Households (2000) 304,434 414,764 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 40,316 1.9% 56,331 1.9% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 126,832 3.0% 190,767 3.3%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $79,157 $83,994 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $86,262 $91,561 Census Average Household Income (2010) $71,852 $76,012 Census Average Household Income (2000) $61,696 $65,211 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $7,104 1.8% $7,566 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $17,461 2.0% $18,783 2.1%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $66,688 $70,045 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $72,481 $76,213 Census Median Household Income (2010) $60,098 $63,307 Census Median Household Income (2000) $51,280 $54,034

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $5,793 1.7% $6,168 1.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $15,408 2.1% $16,012 2.1%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $30,648 $31,984 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $32,775 $34,223 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $28,033 $29,155 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $24,123 $24,874 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $2,127 1.4% $2,239 1.4% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $6,525 1.9% $7,109 2.0% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $497,123 $518,681

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 30.5274/-97.6309 RFULL9 3400 E Palm Valley Blvd 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Round Rock, TX 78665

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,118,509 1,596,789 White (2014) 782,022 69.9% 1,145,906 71.8% Black or African American (2014) 102,667 9.2% 126,021 7.9% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 8,489 0.8% 12,449 0.8% Asian (2014) 67,712 6.1% 85,039 5.3%

Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 892 0.1% 1,258 0.1% warranty. or representation ed without Other Race (2014) 119,047 10.6% 173,836 10.9% Two or More Races (2014) 37,679 3.4% 52,280 3.3% Population < 18 (2014) 270,086 24.1% 393,297 24.6% White 169,072 62.6% 254,820 64.8% Black or African American 28,546 10.6% 34,983 8.9% American Indian or Alaska Native 2,569 1.0% 3,770 1.0% Asian 14,946 5.5% 19,626 5.0% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 190 0.1% 288 0.1% Other Race 54,764 20.3% 79,809 20.3% Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 118,513 10.6% 175,075 11.0% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 772,315 69.0% 1,091,575 68.4% Not Hispanic White 584,392 75.7% 856,205 78.4% Not Hispanic Black or African American 96,408 12.5% 117,656 10.8% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 2,857 0.4% 4,248 0.4% Not Hispanic Asian 66,506 8.6% 83,379 7.6% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 700 0.1% 976 0.1% Not Hispanic Other Race 1,118 0.1% 1,558 0.1% Not Hispanic Two or More Races 20,335 2.6% 27,554 2.5% Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 346,194 31.0% 505,213 31.6% Hispanic White 197,631 57.1% 289,701 57.3% Hispanic Black or African American 6,259 1.8% 8,366 1.7% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 5,632 1.6% 8,201 1.6% Hispanic Asian 1,206 0.3% 1,660 0.3% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 192 0.1% 282 0.1%

Hispanic Other Race 117,930 34.1% 172,278 34.1% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Hispanic Two or More Races 17,344 5.0% 24,726 4.9% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 720,041 69.7% 1,018,317 69.1% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 312,283 30.3% 455,959 30.9% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 579,053 74.6% 803,834 74.1% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 197,016 25.4% 280,312 25.9% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 849,191 68.2% 1,199,167 67.5% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 396,628 31.8% 578,085 32.5% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 50,434 2.9% 72,872 2.9% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 115,267 5.9% 175,647 6.3%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 30.5274/-97.6309 RFULL9 3400 E Palm Valley Blvd 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Round Rock, TX 78665

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,118,509 1,596,789 Age Under 5 Years 80,724 7.2% 114,839 7.2% Age 5 to 9 Years 78,108 7.0% 114,150 7.1% Age 10 to 14 Years 73,270 6.6% 108,833 6.8% Age 15 to 19 Years 76,271 6.8% 105,630 6.6% Age 20 to 24 Years 89,038 8.0% 113,161 7.1% Age 25 to 29 Years 98,432 8.8% 133,591 8.4% Age 30 to 34 Years 100,174 9.0% 139,376 8.7% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 91,156 8.1% 129,631 8.1% Age 40 to 44 Years 84,240 7.5% 121,725 7.6% Age 45 to 49 Years 73,560 6.6% 108,435 6.8% Age 50 to 54 Years 66,929 6.0% 99,356 6.2% Age 55 to 59 Years 58,465 5.2% 88,382 5.5% Age 60 to 64 Years 47,938 4.3% 72,819 4.6% Age 65 to 69 Years 35,450 3.2% 53,587 3.4% Age 70 to 74 Years 23,997 2.1% 35,331 2.2% Age 75 to 79 Years 16,316 1.5% 23,656 1.5% Age 80 to 84 Years 11,590 1.0% 16,513 1.0% Age 85 Years or Over 12,854 1.1% 17,776 1.1% Median Age 33.4 34.1 Age 19 Years or Less 308,373 27.6% 443,452 27.8% Age 20 to 64 Years 709,931 63.5% 1,006,475 63.0% Age 65 Years or Over 100,205 9.0% 146,862 9.2% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 558,574 49.9% 797,520 49.9% Age Under 5 Years 39,581 7.1% 56,169 7.0% Age 5 to 9 Years 38,211 6.8% 55,940 7.0% Age 10 to 14 Years 35,857 6.4% 53,125 6.7% Age 15 to 19 Years 37,704 6.7% 51,812 6.5% Age 20 to 24 Years 43,893 7.9% 55,588 7.0% Age 25 to 29 Years 48,291 8.6% 65,682 8.2% Age 30 to 34 Years 48,874 8.7% 68,415 8.6% Age 35 to 39 Years 44,116 7.9% 63,276 7.9% Age 40 to 44 Years 40,716 7.3% 59,195 7.4% Age 45 to 49 Years 36,028 6.5% 53,314 6.7%

Age 50 to 54 Years 33,306 6.0% 49,731 6.2% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 30,127 5.4% 45,437 5.7% Age 60 to 64 Years 25,193 4.5% 37,928 4.8% Age 65 to 69 Years 18,940 3.4% 28,235 3.5% Age 70 to 74 Years 13,081 2.3% 19,018 2.4% Age 75 to 79 Years 9,191 1.6% 13,156 1.6% Age 80 to 84 Years 6,835 1.2% 9,670 1.2% Age 85 Years or Over 8,632 1.5% 11,832 1.5% Female Median Age 34.0 34.7 Age 19 Years or Less 151,353 27.1% 217,044 27.2% Age 20 to 64 Years 350,543 62.8% 498,565 62.5% Age 65 Years or Over 56,678 10.1% 81,911 10.3%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 30.5274/-97.6309 RFULL9 3400 E Palm Valley Blvd 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Round Rock, TX 78665

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 559,935 50.1% 799,269 50.1% Age Under 5 Years 41,144 7.3% 58,670 7.3% Age 5 to 9 Years 39,896 7.1% 58,210 7.3% Age 10 to 14 Years 37,413 6.7% 55,709 7.0% Age 15 to 19 Years 38,567 6.9% 53,819 6.7% Age 20 to 24 Years 45,144 8.1% 57,572 7.2% Age 25 to 29 Years 50,141 9.0% 67,909 8.5% Age 30 to 34 Years 51,300 9.2% 70,961 8.9% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 47,040 8.4% 66,356 8.3% Age 40 to 44 Years 43,524 7.8% 62,530 7.8% Age 45 to 49 Years 37,532 6.7% 55,121 6.9% Age 50 to 54 Years 33,623 6.0% 49,625 6.2% Age 55 to 59 Years 28,339 5.1% 42,945 5.4% Age 60 to 64 Years 22,745 4.1% 34,891 4.4% Age 65 to 69 Years 16,509 2.9% 25,352 3.2% Age 70 to 74 Years 10,916 1.9% 16,313 2.0% Age 75 to 79 Years 7,125 1.3% 10,500 1.3% Age 80 to 84 Years 4,755 0.8% 6,843 0.9% Age 85 Years or Over 4,222 0.8% 5,943 0.7% Male Median Age 32.8 33.5 Age 19 Years or Less 157,020 28.0% 226,408 28.3% Age 20 to 64 Years 359,387 64.2% 507,910 63.5% Age 65 Years or Over 43,527 7.8% 64,951 8.1% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 100 100 Age Under 5 Years 104 51.0% 104 51.1% Age 5 to 9 Years 104 51.1% 104 51.0% Age 10 to 14 Years 104 51.1% 105 51.2% Age 15 to 19 Years 102 50.6% 104 51.0% Age 20 to 24 Years 103 50.7% 104 50.9% Age 25 to 29 Years 104 50.9% 103 50.8% Age 30 to 34 Years 105 51.2% 104 50.9% Age 35 to 39 Years 107 51.6% 105 51.2% Age 40 to 44 Years 107 51.7% 106 51.4% Age 45 to 49 Years 104 51.0% 103 50.8%

Age 50 to 54 Years 101 50.2% 100 49.9% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 94 48.5% 95 48.6% Age 60 to 64 Years 90 47.4% 92 47.9% Age 65 to 69 Years 87 46.6% 90 47.3% Age 70 to 74 Years 83 45.5% 86 46.2% Age 75 to 79 Years 78 43.7% 80 44.4% Age 80 to 84 Years 70 41.0% 71 41.4% Age 85 Years or Over 49 32.8% 50 33.4% Age 19 Years or Less 104 50.9% 104 51.1% Age 20 to 39 Years 105 51.1% 104 51.0% Age 40 to 64 Years 100 50.1% 100 49.9% Age 65 Years or Over 77 43.4% 79 44.2%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 30.5274/-97.6309 RFULL9 3400 E Palm Valley Blvd 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Round Rock, TX 78665

Household Type (2014) Total Households 431,266 605,531 Households with Children 144,916 33.6% 210,567 34.8% Average Household Size 2.5 2.6 Household Density per Square Mile 477 245 Population Family 825,550 73.8% 1,211,118 75.8% Population Non-Family 270,346 24.2% 357,094 22.4% Population Group Quarters 22,612 2.0% 28,576 1.8% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Family Households 255,051 59.1% 373,800 61.7% Married Couple Households 186,801 73.2% 278,996 74.6% Other Family Households 68,250 26.8% 94,804 25.4% Family Households with Children 143,634 56.3% 208,833 55.9% Married Couple with Children 98,536 68.6% 146,223 70.0% Other Family Households with Children 45,098 31.4% 62,610 30.0% Family Households No Children 111,417 43.7% 164,967 44.1% Married Couple No Children 88,265 79.2% 132,773 80.5% Other Family Households No Children 23,152 20.8% 32,194 19.5% Non-Family Households 176,214 40.9% 231,731 38.3% Non-Family Households with Children 1,282 0.7% 1,734 0.7% Non-Family Households No Children 174,933 99.3% 229,997 99.3% Lone Person No Children - - - - 2 or More Persons No Children 174,933 99.3% 229,997 99.3% Household Lone Male - - - - Household Lone Female - - - - Average Family Household Size 3.2 3.2 Average Family Income $94,428 $99,616 Median Family Income $82,811 $86,077 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.5 1.5 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 886,406 1,258,967 Never Married 332,320 37.5% 447,106 35.5% Currently Married 379,172 42.8% 566,736 45.0% Previously Married 174,914 19.7% 245,125 19.5% Separated 45,508 26.0% 61,963 25.3% Widowed 31,744 18.1% 45,009 18.4% Divorced 97,663 55.8% 138,153 56.4% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 713,923 1,028,492 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 45,599 6.4% 64,235 6.2% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 40,332 5.6% 57,684 5.6% High School Graduate 130,551 18.3% 191,127 18.6% Some College 155,284 21.8% 223,668 21.7% Associate Degree Only 47,528 6.7% 67,663 6.6% Bachelor Degree Only 189,668 26.6% 273,445 26.6% Graduate Degree 104,961 14.7% 150,669 14.6% Any College (Some College or Higher) 497,441 69.7% 715,445 69.6% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 294,629 41.3% 424,115 41.2%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 30.5274/-97.6309 RFULL9 3400 E Palm Valley Blvd 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Round Rock, TX 78665 Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 455,260 638,062 Total Housing Units (2010) 437,015 612,531 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 18,244 1.0% 25,531 1.0% Housing Units Occupied (2014) 431,266 94.7% 605,531 94.9% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 233,056 54.0% 353,261 58.3% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 198,209 46.0% 252,270 41.7% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 23,994 5.3% 32,531 5.1% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Household Size (2014) Total Households 431,266 605,531 1 Person Households 128,303 29.8% 169,724 28.0% 2 Person Households 134,511 31.2% 191,754 31.7% 3 Person Households 67,242 15.6% 95,872 15.8% 4 Person Households 57,032 13.2% 82,919 13.7% 5 Person Households 25,858 6.0% 38,211 6.3% 6 Person Households 10,551 2.4% 15,510 2.6% 7 or More Person Households 7,768 1.8% 11,542 1.9% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 24,732 5.7% 40,283 6.7% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 26,849 6.2% 40,133 6.6% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 23,805 5.5% 34,253 5.7% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 38,240 8.9% 54,087 8.9% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 58,599 13.6% 83,309 13.8% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 82,443 19.1% 116,173 19.2% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 57,612 13.4% 80,094 13.2% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 40,228 9.3% 54,169 8.9% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 35,992 8.3% 48,370 8.0% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 15,611 3.6% 20,475 3.4% HH Income Under $10,000 27,154 6.3% 34,184 5.6% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 25,613 5.9% 32,042 5.3% Households 1 Vehicle Available 162,681 37.7% 216,316 35.7% Households 2 Vehicles Available 180,186 41.8% 260,659 43.0% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 62,785 14.6% 96,514 15.9% Total Vehicles Available 733,995 1,063,814 Average Vehicles per Household 1.7 1.8 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 462,778 63.0% 712,605 67.0% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.0 2.0 Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 271,217 37.0% 351,209 33.0% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.4 1.4 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 519,596 735,984 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 130,801 25.2% 168,575 22.9% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 203,608 39.2% 280,586 38.1% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 133,073 25.6% 206,591 28.1% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 22,570 4.3% 35,367 4.8% Work at Home 29,545 5.7% 44,864 6.1% Average Minutes Travel to Work 21.3 22.5

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 30.5274/-97.6309 RFULL9 3400 E Palm Valley Blvd 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Round Rock, TX 78665

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 519,596 735,984 Drive to Work Alone 391,864 75.4% 558,911 75.9% Drive to Work in Carpool 57,648 11.1% 81,808 11.1% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 16,217 3.1% 19,303 2.6% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 1,577 0.3% 1,995 0.3% Bicycle to Work 4,410 0.8% 4,896 0.7% Walk to Work 10,173 2.0% 12,032 1.6%

Other Means 8,163 1.6% 12,175 1.7% warranty. or representation ed without Work at Home 29,545 5.7% 44,864 6.1% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 52,777 69,414 Total Employees 624,916 786,296 Company Headquarter Businesses 435 0.8% 530 0.8% Company Headquarter Employees 66,796 10.7% 75,082 9.5% Employee Population per Business 11.8 to 1 11.3 to 1 Residential Population per Business 21.2 to 1 23.0 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 884,436 1,158,585 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 851,581 1,212,525 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 423,779 49.8% 601,751 49.6% Male Civilian Employed 321,168 75.8% 455,071 75.6% Male Civilian Unemployed 15,707 3.7% 20,990 3.5% Males in Armed Forces 1,470 0.3% 1,986 0.3% Males Not in Labor Force 85,434 20.2% 123,704 20.6% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 427,802 50.2% 610,773 50.4% Female Civilian Employed 268,955 62.9% 382,631 62.6% Female Civilian Unemployed 13,007 3.0% 17,508 2.9% Females in Armed Forces 468 0.1% 548 0.1% Females Not in Labor Force 145,373 34.0% 210,087 34.4% Unemployment Rate 423,779 3.4% 601,751 3.2% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 64,135 12.2% 91,767 12.3% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 36,778 12.9% 52,275 13.0% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 27,356 11.3% 39,492 11.5% Occupation (2010) Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 525,988 745,935 provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Occupation Total Males 284,390 54.1% 402,796 54.0% Occupation Total Females 241,598 45.9% 343,139 46.0% Management, Business, Financial Operations 89,278 17.0% 130,098 17.4% Professional, Related 138,063 26.2% 191,585 25.7% Service 85,353 16.2% 120,302 16.1% Sales, Office 128,110 24.4% 182,477 24.5% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 803 0.2% 1,246 0.2% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 46,452 8.8% 65,510 8.8% Production, Transport, Material Moving 37,929 7.2% 54,715 7.3% White Collar Workers 355,452 67.6% 504,161 67.6% Blue Collar Workers 170,537 32.4% 241,773 32.4%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 30.5274/-97.6309 RFULL9 3400 E Palm Valley Blvd 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Round Rock, TX 78665

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 402,753 565,463 1 Detached Unit 231,209 57.4% 344,015 60.8% 1 Attached Unit 14,025 3.5% 18,019 3.2% 2 Units 13,597 3.4% 19,106 3.4% 3 to 4 Units 13,566 3.4% 17,700 3.1% 5 to 9 Units 22,211 5.5% 26,524 4.7% 10 to 19 Units 36,947 9.2% 45,927 8.1% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without 20 to 49 Units 28,567 7.1% 34,894 6.2% 50 or More Units 31,441 7.8% 36,604 6.5% Mobile Home or Trailer 10,905 2.7% 22,067 3.9% Other Structure 286 0.1% 606 0.1% Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 58,114 14.4% 84,601 15.0% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 53,189 13.2% 78,425 13.9% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 72,280 17.9% 105,044 18.6% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 75,298 18.7% 105,611 18.7% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 63,507 15.8% 89,268 15.8% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 32,067 8.0% 41,194 7.3% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 23,760 5.9% 30,544 5.4% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 11,871 2.9% 14,693 2.6% Homes Built Before 1939 12,668 3.1% 16,083 2.8% Median Age of Homes 29.6 yrs 28.7 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 211,893 321,619 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 2,474 1.2% 4,753 1.5% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 2,783 1.3% 5,146 1.6% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 7,721 3.6% 14,220 4.4% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 9,505 4.5% 15,212 4.7% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 20,460 9.7% 32,663 10.2% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 17,700 8.4% 27,672 8.6% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 27,971 13.2% 41,362 12.9% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 20,290 9.6% 28,407 8.8% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 30,094 14.2% 41,894 13.0% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 25,831 12.2% 35,604 11.1%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 21,039 9.9% 30,501 9.5% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 5,350 2.5% 8,285 2.6% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 4,631 2.2% 7,545 2.3% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 3,121 1.5% 5,613 1.7% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 2,745 1.3% 4,630 1.4% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 2,117 1.0% 3,704 1.2% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 2,438 1.2% 4,598 1.4% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 1,658 0.8% 2,956 0.9% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 2,696 1.3% 4,566 1.4% Home Values Under $10,000 1,270 0.6% 2,288 0.7% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $214,598 $221,006 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $785 $796

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 30.5274/-97.6309 RFULL9 3400 E Palm Valley Blvd 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Round Rock, TX 78665

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $25.5 B $37.4 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $14.7 B $21.6 B Total Retail Expenditure $10.8 B $15.8 B Apparel $1.23 B $1.81 B Contributions $1.02 B $1.52 B

Education $664 M $983 M warranty. or representation ed without Entertainment $1.43 B $2.10 B Food and Beverages $3.85 B $5.61 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.14 B $1.67 B Gifts $712 M $1.05 B Health Care $1.51 B $2.19 B Household Operations $953 M $1.41 B Miscellaneous Expenses $419 M $610 M Personal Care $369 M $538 M Personal Insurance $274 M $407 M Reading $84.3 M $123 M Shelter $4.95 B $7.25 B Tobacco $154 M $222 M Transportation $5.04 B $7.34 B Utilities $1.74 B $2.52 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $4,933 $5,141 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,846 57.7% $2,969 57.7% Total Retail Expenditures $2,086 42.3% $2,172 42.3% Apparel $238 4.8% $249 4.8% Contributions $196 4.0% $209 4.1% Education $128 2.6% $135 2.6% Entertainment $277 5.6% $289 5.6% Food and Beverages $744 15.1% $772 15.0% Furnishings and Equipment $220 4.5% $230 4.5%

Gifts $138 2.8% $145 2.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Health Care $291 5.9% $301 5.9% Household Operations $184 3.7% $194 3.8% Miscellaneous Expenses $81 1.6% $84 1.6% Personal Care $71 1.4% $74 1.4% Personal Insurance $53 1.1% $56 1.1% Reading $16 0.3% $17 0.3% Shelter $956 19.4% $998 19.4% Tobacco $30 0.6% $31 0.6% Transportation $973 19.7% $1,010 19.7% Utilities $336 6.8% $347 6.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 38.5804/-121.5135 RFULL9 400 Ballpark Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime West Sacramento, CA 95691

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,706,897 2,495,565 Projected Population (2019) 1,775,842 2,597,577 Census Population (2010) 1,655,585 2,423,694 Census Population (2000) 1,418,441 2,018,953 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 68,945 0.8% 102,012 0.8%

Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 51,311 0.8% 71,871 0.7% warranty. or representation ed without Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 237,144 1.7% 404,740 2.0% Estimated Population Density (2014) 1,513 psm 758 psm Trade Area Size 1,128.2 sq mi 3,291.1 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 618,430 893,148 Projected Households (2019) 639,655 924,853 Census Households (2010) 602,310 869,219 Census Households (2000) 526,682 731,658 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 21,225 0.7% 31,704 0.7% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 91,748 1.2% 161,490 1.6%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $74,733 $79,029 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $81,330 $86,089 Census Average Household Income (2010) $69,361 $73,313 Census Average Household Income (2000) $56,139 $58,917 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $6,597 1.8% $7,060 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $18,594 2.4% $20,112 2.4%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $62,585 $66,522 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $67,921 $72,238 Census Median Household Income (2010) $58,694 $62,003 Census Median Household Income (2000) $46,670 $48,968

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $5,336 1.7% $5,716 1.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $15,915 2.4% $17,553 2.6%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $27,212 $28,512 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $29,435 $30,884 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $25,234 $26,293 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $20,810 $21,311 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $2,223 1.6% $2,372 1.7% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $6,402 2.2% $7,201 2.4% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $523,285 $561,453

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 38.5804/-121.5135 RFULL9 400 Ballpark Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime West Sacramento, CA 95691

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,706,897 2,495,565 White (2014) 1,009,985 59.2% 1,558,295 62.4% Black or African American (2014) 154,864 9.1% 193,133 7.7% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 17,230 1.0% 25,328 1.0% Asian (2014) 237,522 13.9% 309,583 12.4%

Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 15,331 0.9% 18,348 0.7% warranty. or representation ed without Other Race (2014) 161,136 9.4% 235,752 9.4% Two or More Races (2014) 110,828 6.5% 155,126 6.2% Population < 18 (2014) 413,775 24.2% 608,055 24.4% White 204,287 49.4% 323,644 53.2% Black or African American 44,201 10.7% 52,422 8.6% American Indian or Alaska Native 4,315 1.0% 6,408 1.1% Asian 55,247 13.4% 73,068 12.0% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 4,017 1.0% 4,739 0.8% Other Race 101,709 24.6% 147,774 24.3% Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 140,455 8.2% 208,762 8.4% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 1,316,489 77.1% 1,923,026 77.1% Not Hispanic White 842,226 64.0% 1,306,679 67.9% Not Hispanic Black or African American 145,742 11.1% 181,771 9.5% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 9,296 0.7% 14,299 0.7% Not Hispanic Asian 231,231 17.6% 300,659 15.6% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 14,377 1.1% 17,047 0.9% Not Hispanic Other Race 1,672 0.1% 3,097 0.2% Not Hispanic Two or More Races 71,946 5.5% 99,474 5.2% Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 390,408 22.9% 572,539 22.9% Hispanic White 167,759 43.0% 251,616 43.9% Hispanic Black or African American 9,122 2.3% 11,362 2.0% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 7,934 2.0% 11,029 1.9% Hispanic Asian 6,291 1.6% 8,924 1.6% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 954 0.2% 1,301 0.2%

Hispanic Other Race 159,465 40.8% 232,655 40.6% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Hispanic Two or More Races 38,883 10.0% 55,652 9.7% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 1,289,614 77.9% 1,887,330 77.9% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 365,971 22.1% 536,364 22.1% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 1,181,354 83.3% 1,676,678 83.0% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 237,087 16.7% 342,275 17.0% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 1,353,246 76.2% 1,976,785 76.1% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 422,596 23.8% 620,792 23.9% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 32,188 1.6% 48,254 1.7% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 128,884 5.4% 194,089 5.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 38.5804/-121.5135 RFULL9 400 Ballpark Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime West Sacramento, CA 95691

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,706,897 2,495,565 Age Under 5 Years 115,687 6.8% 166,128 6.7% Age 5 to 9 Years 115,115 6.7% 169,632 6.8% Age 10 to 14 Years 114,832 6.7% 170,562 6.8% Age 15 to 19 Years 121,170 7.1% 175,031 7.0% Age 20 to 24 Years 133,962 7.8% 184,355 7.4% Age 25 to 29 Years 129,479 7.6% 178,665 7.2% Age 30 to 34 Years 121,138 7.1% 170,537 6.8% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 109,763 6.4% 158,839 6.4% Age 40 to 44 Years 109,433 6.4% 161,000 6.5% Age 45 to 49 Years 110,720 6.5% 165,577 6.6% Age 50 to 54 Years 113,702 6.7% 169,416 6.8% Age 55 to 59 Years 106,837 6.3% 158,568 6.4% Age 60 to 64 Years 90,376 5.3% 136,766 5.5% Age 65 to 69 Years 68,967 4.0% 107,118 4.3% Age 70 to 74 Years 49,031 2.9% 76,944 3.1% Age 75 to 79 Years 36,473 2.1% 56,374 2.3% Age 80 to 84 Years 27,860 1.6% 42,169 1.7% Age 85 Years or Over 32,353 1.9% 47,883 1.9% Median Age 35.2 36.0 Age 19 Years or Less 466,804 27.3% 681,352 27.3% Age 20 to 64 Years 1,025,409 60.1% 1,483,723 59.5% Age 65 Years or Over 214,684 12.6% 330,489 13.2% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 876,894 51.4% 1,270,558 50.9% Age Under 5 Years 56,483 6.4% 81,128 6.4% Age 5 to 9 Years 56,466 6.4% 83,010 6.5% Age 10 to 14 Years 56,098 6.4% 83,342 6.6% Age 15 to 19 Years 59,359 6.8% 85,567 6.7% Age 20 to 24 Years 67,076 7.6% 90,617 7.1% Age 25 to 29 Years 65,231 7.4% 88,515 7.0% Age 30 to 34 Years 61,153 7.0% 84,997 6.7% Age 35 to 39 Years 55,885 6.4% 79,673 6.3% Age 40 to 44 Years 55,728 6.4% 81,087 6.4% Age 45 to 49 Years 56,722 6.5% 83,655 6.6%

Age 50 to 54 Years 58,772 6.7% 86,539 6.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 56,224 6.4% 82,597 6.5% Age 60 to 64 Years 48,237 5.5% 72,376 5.7% Age 65 to 69 Years 37,471 4.3% 57,579 4.5% Age 70 to 74 Years 27,395 3.1% 42,342 3.3% Age 75 to 79 Years 20,979 2.4% 31,792 2.5% Age 80 to 84 Years 16,461 1.9% 24,650 1.9% Age 85 Years or Over 21,154 2.4% 31,091 2.4% Female Median Age 36.5 37.3 Age 19 Years or Less 228,407 26.0% 333,047 26.2% Age 20 to 64 Years 525,027 59.9% 750,056 59.0% Age 65 Years or Over 123,460 14.1% 187,455 14.8%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 38.5804/-121.5135 RFULL9 400 Ballpark Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime West Sacramento, CA 95691

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 830,003 48.6% 1,225,007 49.1% Age Under 5 Years 59,203 7.1% 84,999 6.9% Age 5 to 9 Years 58,649 7.1% 86,621 7.1% Age 10 to 14 Years 58,734 7.1% 87,220 7.1% Age 15 to 19 Years 61,811 7.4% 89,465 7.3% Age 20 to 24 Years 66,886 8.1% 93,737 7.7% Age 25 to 29 Years 64,248 7.7% 90,150 7.4% Age 30 to 34 Years 59,985 7.2% 85,540 7.0% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 53,878 6.5% 79,166 6.5% Age 40 to 44 Years 53,704 6.5% 79,913 6.5% Age 45 to 49 Years 53,998 6.5% 81,922 6.7% Age 50 to 54 Years 54,930 6.6% 82,877 6.8% Age 55 to 59 Years 50,613 6.1% 75,971 6.2% Age 60 to 64 Years 42,139 5.1% 64,390 5.3% Age 65 to 69 Years 31,496 3.8% 49,539 4.0% Age 70 to 74 Years 21,636 2.6% 34,602 2.8% Age 75 to 79 Years 15,494 1.9% 24,582 2.0% Age 80 to 84 Years 11,399 1.4% 17,519 1.4% Age 85 Years or Over 11,199 1.3% 16,792 1.4% Male Median Age 33.8 34.7 Age 19 Years or Less 238,397 28.7% 348,305 28.4% Age 20 to 64 Years 500,381 60.3% 733,667 59.9% Age 65 Years or Over 91,224 11.0% 143,035 11.7% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 95 96 Age Under 5 Years 105 51.2% 105 51.2% Age 5 to 9 Years 104 50.9% 104 51.1% Age 10 to 14 Years 105 51.1% 105 51.1% Age 15 to 19 Years 104 51.0% 105 51.1% Age 20 to 24 Years 100 49.9% 103 50.8% Age 25 to 29 Years 98 49.6% 102 50.5% Age 30 to 34 Years 98 49.5% 101 50.2% Age 35 to 39 Years 96 49.1% 99 49.8% Age 40 to 44 Years 96 49.1% 99 49.6% Age 45 to 49 Years 95 48.8% 98 49.5%

Age 50 to 54 Years 93 48.3% 96 48.9% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 90 47.4% 92 47.9% Age 60 to 64 Years 87 46.6% 89 47.1% Age 65 to 69 Years 84 45.7% 86 46.2% Age 70 to 74 Years 79 44.1% 82 45.0% Age 75 to 79 Years 74 42.5% 77 43.6% Age 80 to 84 Years 69 40.9% 71 41.5% Age 85 Years or Over 53 34.6% 54 35.1% Age 19 Years or Less 104 51.1% 105 51.1% Age 20 to 39 Years 98 49.6% 101 50.3% Age 40 to 64 Years 93 48.1% 95 48.7% Age 65 Years or Over 74 42.5% 76 43.3%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 38.5804/-121.5135 RFULL9 400 Ballpark Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime West Sacramento, CA 95691

Household Type (2014) Total Households 618,430 893,148 Households with Children 222,931 36.0% 328,634 36.8% Average Household Size 2.7 2.7 Household Density per Square Mile 548 271 Population Family 1,341,434 78.6% 1,991,650 79.8% Population Non-Family 341,942 20.0% 457,589 18.3% Population Group Quarters 23,521 1.4% 46,326 1.9% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Family Households 406,075 65.7% 608,147 68.1% Married Couple Households 279,927 68.9% 436,146 71.7% Other Family Households 126,148 31.1% 172,001 28.3% Family Households with Children 220,660 54.3% 325,448 53.5% Married Couple with Children 140,612 63.7% 215,712 66.3% Other Family Households with Children 80,048 36.3% 109,735 33.7% Family Households No Children 185,414 45.7% 282,699 46.5% Married Couple No Children 139,315 75.1% 220,434 78.0% Other Family Households No Children 46,100 24.9% 62,265 22.0% Non-Family Households 212,355 34.3% 285,002 31.9% Non-Family Households with Children 2,271 1.1% 3,186 1.1% Non-Family Households No Children 210,084 98.9% 281,815 98.9% Lone Person No Children - - - - 2 or More Persons No Children 210,084 98.9% 281,815 98.9% Household Lone Male - - - - Household Lone Female - - - - Average Family Household Size 3.3 3.3 Average Family Income $85,787 $90,608 Median Family Income $73,894 $78,355 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.6 1.6 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 1,361,263 1,989,244 Never Married 482,315 35.4% 659,642 33.2% Currently Married 580,293 42.6% 899,702 45.2% Previously Married 298,654 21.9% 429,899 21.6% Separated 69,007 23.1% 100,317 23.3% Widowed 73,060 24.5% 107,109 24.9% Divorced 156,587 52.4% 222,474 51.8% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 1,092,377 1,596,622 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 75,254 6.9% 105,194 6.6% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 82,061 7.5% 116,961 7.3% High School Graduate 232,970 21.3% 343,321 21.5% Some College 289,255 26.5% 427,432 26.8% Associate Degree Only 101,957 9.3% 152,652 9.6% Bachelor Degree Only 203,477 18.6% 298,295 18.7% Graduate Degree 107,403 9.8% 152,766 9.6% Any College (Some College or Higher) 702,092 64.3% 1,031,146 64.6% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 310,879 28.5% 451,061 28.3%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 38.5804/-121.5135 RFULL9 400 Ballpark Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime West Sacramento, CA 95691 Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 651,076 938,667 Total Housing Units (2010) 649,037 934,866 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 2,039 0.1% 3,801 0.1% Housing Units Occupied (2014) 618,430 95.0% 893,148 95.2% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 355,742 57.5% 543,451 60.8% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 262,688 42.5% 349,697 39.2% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 32,647 5.0% 45,518 4.8% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Household Size (2014) Total Households 618,430 893,148 1 Person Households 158,719 25.7% 217,038 24.3% 2 Person Households 188,602 30.5% 278,699 31.2% 3 Person Households 101,570 16.4% 146,777 16.4% 4 Person Households 86,918 14.1% 130,113 14.6% 5 Person Households 44,569 7.2% 66,308 7.4% 6 Person Households 20,456 3.3% 29,873 3.3% 7 or More Person Households 17,595 2.8% 24,341 2.7% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 27,753 4.5% 47,163 5.3% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 38,735 6.3% 62,849 7.0% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 32,394 5.2% 50,934 5.7% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 53,689 8.7% 82,375 9.2% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 83,869 13.6% 121,326 13.6% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 114,347 18.5% 162,731 18.2% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 85,439 13.8% 119,220 13.3% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 62,441 10.1% 85,010 9.5% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 62,614 10.1% 86,563 9.7% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 26,022 4.2% 34,245 3.8% HH Income Under $10,000 31,126 5.0% 40,731 4.6% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 44,686 7.2% 57,057 6.4% Households 1 Vehicle Available 222,384 36.0% 301,028 33.7% Households 2 Vehicles Available 230,122 37.2% 343,790 38.5% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 121,238 19.6% 191,273 21.4% Total Vehicles Available 1,096,498 1,644,912 Average Vehicles per Household 1.8 1.8 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 725,286 66.1% 1,137,591 69.2% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.0 2.1 Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 371,212 33.9% 507,321 30.8% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.4 1.5 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 701,563 1,014,812 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 171,441 24.4% 257,278 25.4% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 268,803 38.3% 363,459 35.8% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 186,365 26.6% 269,291 26.5% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 42,217 6.0% 73,253 7.2% Work at Home 32,738 4.7% 51,531 5.1% Average Minutes Travel to Work 21.8 22.0

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 38.5804/-121.5135 RFULL9 400 Ballpark Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime West Sacramento, CA 95691

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 701,563 1,014,812 Drive to Work Alone 524,430 74.8% 769,647 75.8% Drive to Work in Carpool 85,337 12.2% 120,025 11.8% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 22,989 3.3% 27,876 2.7% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 2,105 0.3% 3,144 0.3% Bicycle to Work 13,791 2.0% 15,215 1.5% Walk to Work 14,503 2.1% 19,399 1.9%

Other Means 5,672 0.8% 7,975 0.8% warranty. or representation ed without Work at Home 32,738 4.7% 51,531 5.1% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 67,444 94,238 Total Employees 718,553 970,036 Company Headquarter Businesses 353 0.5% 435 0.5% Company Headquarter Employees 68,440 9.5% 75,992 7.8% Employee Population per Business 10.7 to 1 10.3 to 1 Residential Population per Business 25.3 to 1 26.5 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 1,261,203 1,765,814 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 1,316,157 1,910,354 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 629,546 47.8% 916,948 48.0% Male Civilian Employed 388,399 61.7% 563,909 61.5% Male Civilian Unemployed 35,245 5.6% 53,526 5.8% Males in Armed Forces 1,513 0.2% 4,944 0.5% Males Not in Labor Force 204,388 32.5% 294,568 32.1% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 686,611 52.2% 993,406 52.0% Female Civilian Employed 383,417 55.8% 544,884 54.9% Female Civilian Unemployed 34,771 5.1% 50,849 5.1% Females in Armed Forces 177 - 839 0.1% Females Not in Labor Force 268,246 39.1% 396,835 39.9% Unemployment Rate 629,546 5.3% 916,948 5.5% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 50,463 7.0% 68,757 6.6% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 22,755 6.2% 31,106 5.8% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 27,708 7.8% 37,651 7.4% Occupation (2010) Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 721,354 1,040,036 provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Occupation Total Males 365,645 50.7% 532,803 51.2% Occupation Total Females 355,709 49.3% 507,233 48.8% Management, Business, Financial Operations 112,633 15.6% 164,771 15.8% Professional, Related 161,772 22.4% 228,842 22.0% Service 132,366 18.3% 186,700 18.0% Sales, Office 192,019 26.6% 274,322 26.4% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 4,919 0.7% 11,686 1.1% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 53,632 7.4% 79,342 7.6% Production, Transport, Material Moving 64,014 8.9% 94,372 9.1% White Collar Workers 466,424 64.7% 667,936 64.2% Blue Collar Workers 254,930 35.3% 372,100 35.8%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 38.5804/-121.5135 RFULL9 400 Ballpark Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime West Sacramento, CA 95691

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 602,310 869,219 1 Detached Unit 385,599 64.0% 584,944 67.3% 1 Attached Unit 39,680 6.6% 51,036 5.9% 2 Units 14,237 2.4% 18,605 2.1% 3 to 4 Units 33,133 5.5% 43,261 5.0% 5 to 9 Units 37,434 6.2% 48,387 5.6% 10 to 19 Units 29,393 4.9% 36,304 4.2% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without 20 to 49 Units 17,391 2.9% 22,612 2.6% 50 or More Units 30,603 5.1% 39,661 4.6% Mobile Home or Trailer 14,236 2.4% 23,327 2.7% Other Structure 603 0.1% 1,083 0.1% Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 38,811 6.4% 64,427 7.4% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 55,314 9.2% 90,560 10.4% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 75,067 12.5% 116,336 13.4% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 96,120 16.0% 140,080 16.1% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 114,654 19.0% 162,232 18.7% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 76,728 12.7% 103,131 11.9% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 77,809 12.9% 101,152 11.6% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 30,122 5.0% 39,809 4.6% Homes Built Before 1939 37,686 6.3% 51,492 5.9% Median Age of Homes 38.8 yrs 37.2 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 340,752 521,009 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 12,402 3.6% 20,846 4.0% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 15,725 4.6% 26,736 5.1% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 42,051 12.3% 71,121 13.7% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 37,891 11.1% 61,751 11.9% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 72,103 21.2% 106,102 20.4% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 38,781 11.4% 55,705 10.7% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 39,386 11.6% 56,283 10.8% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 15,806 4.6% 23,345 4.5% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 19,271 5.7% 27,962 5.4% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 11,643 3.4% 17,266 3.3%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 11,037 3.2% 16,185 3.1% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 3,127 0.9% 4,807 0.9% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 3,219 0.9% 4,832 0.9% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 2,631 0.8% 4,030 0.8% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 2,243 0.7% 3,349 0.6% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 1,915 0.6% 2,998 0.6% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 2,659 0.8% 4,240 0.8% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 2,518 0.7% 3,784 0.7% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 3,994 1.2% 6,178 1.2% Home Values Under $10,000 2,350 0.7% 3,488 0.7% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $320,269 $332,611 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $946 $962

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 38.5804/-121.5135 RFULL9 400 Ballpark Dr 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime West Sacramento, CA 95691

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $35.3 B $53.0 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $20.4 B $30.6 B Total Retail Expenditure $15.0 B $22.4 B Apparel $1.71 B $2.56 B Contributions $1.37 B $2.11 B

Education $894 M $1.36 B warranty. or representation ed without Entertainment $1.98 B $2.98 B Food and Beverages $5.36 B $8.00 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.57 B $2.36 B Gifts $968 M $1.47 B Health Care $2.11 B $3.14 B Household Operations $1.30 B $1.98 B Miscellaneous Expenses $582 M $869 M Personal Care $511 M $764 M Personal Insurance $374 M $570 M Reading $116 M $174 M Shelter $6.84 B $10.3 B Tobacco $219 M $322 M Transportation $7.00 B $10.5 B Utilities $2.43 B $3.60 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $4,761 $4,948 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,745 57.7% $2,855 57.7% Total Retail Expenditures $2,016 42.3% $2,093 42.3% Apparel $230 4.8% $239 4.8% Contributions $185 3.9% $196 4.0% Education $120 2.5% $127 2.6% Entertainment $267 5.6% $278 5.6% Food and Beverages $723 15.2% $747 15.1% Furnishings and Equipment $211 4.4% $221 4.5%

Gifts $130 2.7% $138 2.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Health Care $285 6.0% $293 5.9% Household Operations $176 3.7% $185 3.7% Miscellaneous Expenses $78 1.6% $81 1.6% Personal Care $69 1.4% $71 1.4% Personal Insurance $50 1.1% $53 1.1% Reading $16 0.3% $16 0.3% Shelter $922 19.4% $960 19.4% Tobacco $30 0.6% $30 0.6% Transportation $943 19.8% $977 19.7% Utilities $327 6.9% $336 6.8%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 40.7400/-111.8939 RFULL9 1365 S West Temple 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Salt Lake City, UT 84115

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,295,498 2,040,777 Projected Population (2019) 1,381,904 2,178,233 Census Population (2010) 1,240,224 1,949,275 Census Population (2000) 1,061,868 1,597,638 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 86,406 1.3% 137,456 1.3%

Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 55,273 1.1% 91,502 1.2% warranty. or representation ed without Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 178,356 1.7% 351,637 2.2% Estimated Population Density (2014) 2,054 psm 863 psm Trade Area Size 630.8 sq mi 2,364.8 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 426,333 650,196 Projected Households (2019) 456,023 697,149 Census Households (2010) 407,535 620,366 Census Households (2000) 344,194 505,477 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 29,690 1.4% 46,953 1.4% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 82,139 1.7% 144,719 2.0%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $78,684 $78,278 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $85,729 $85,291 Census Average Household Income (2010) $71,971 $71,463 Census Average Household Income (2000) $61,351 $60,616 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $7,046 1.8% $7,013 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $17,332 2.0% $17,662 2.1%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $66,337 $66,254 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $71,946 $71,889 Census Median Household Income (2010) $60,424 $60,135 Census Median Household Income (2000) $51,860 $51,255

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $5,609 1.7% $5,634 1.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $14,477 2.0% $14,999 2.1%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $26,040 $25,098 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $28,435 $27,457 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $23,649 $22,743 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $19,820 $19,120 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $2,395 1.8% $2,359 1.9% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $6,219 2.2% $5,978 2.2% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $543,952 $534,405

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 40.7400/-111.8939 RFULL9 1365 S West Temple 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Salt Lake City, UT 84115

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,295,498 2,040,777 White (2014) 1,075,604 83.0% 1,726,883 84.6% Black or African American (2014) 18,897 1.5% 26,598 1.3% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 10,554 0.8% 15,672 0.8% Asian (2014) 38,458 3.0% 49,956 2.4%

Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 17,877 1.4% 22,096 1.1% warranty. or representation ed without Other Race (2014) 95,215 7.3% 138,548 6.8% Two or More Races (2014) 38,894 3.0% 61,023 3.0% Population < 18 (2014) 380,373 29.4% 622,659 30.5% White 298,254 78.4% 504,073 81.0% Black or African American 6,963 1.8% 9,580 1.5% American Indian or Alaska Native 3,241 0.9% 4,762 0.8% Asian 8,881 2.3% 11,446 1.8% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 6,913 1.8% 8,407 1.4% Other Race 56,121 14.8% 84,391 13.6% Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 81,079 6.3% 122,571 6.0% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 1,088,703 84.0% 1,732,465 84.9% Not Hispanic White 984,743 90.5% 1,587,977 91.7% Not Hispanic Black or African American 16,736 1.5% 23,534 1.4% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 7,507 0.7% 11,154 0.6% Not Hispanic Asian 37,595 3.5% 48,744 2.8% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 17,285 1.6% 21,353 1.2% Not Hispanic Other Race 1,025 0.1% 1,416 0.1% Not Hispanic Two or More Races 23,811 2.2% 38,286 2.2% Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 206,794 16.0% 308,312 15.1% Hispanic White 90,861 43.9% 138,906 45.1% Hispanic Black or African American 2,160 1.0% 3,064 1.0% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 3,047 1.5% 4,518 1.5% Hispanic Asian 862 0.4% 1,212 0.4% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 591 0.3% 743 0.2%

Hispanic Other Race 94,189 45.5% 137,132 44.5% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Hispanic Two or More Races 15,083 7.3% 22,737 7.4% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 1,049,451 84.6% 1,665,655 85.4% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 190,774 15.4% 283,620 14.6% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 947,889 89.3% 1,432,518 89.7% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 113,979 10.7% 165,121 10.3% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 1,151,591 83.3% 1,834,079 84.2% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 230,313 16.7% 344,154 15.8% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 23,519 2.3% 35,841 2.3% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 76,795 6.7% 118,500 7.2%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 40.7400/-111.8939 RFULL9 1365 S West Temple 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Salt Lake City, UT 84115

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,295,498 2,040,777 Age Under 5 Years 111,304 8.6% 182,541 8.9% Age 5 to 9 Years 109,287 8.4% 179,965 8.8% Age 10 to 14 Years 103,633 8.0% 169,849 8.3% Age 15 to 19 Years 92,867 7.2% 156,914 7.7% Age 20 to 24 Years 92,243 7.1% 155,674 7.6% Age 25 to 29 Years 101,262 7.8% 159,530 7.8% Age 30 to 34 Years 106,896 8.3% 163,889 8.0% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 95,333 7.4% 147,219 7.2% Age 40 to 44 Years 82,800 6.4% 126,297 6.2% Age 45 to 49 Years 74,175 5.7% 112,214 5.5% Age 50 to 54 Years 72,923 5.6% 109,330 5.4% Age 55 to 59 Years 69,250 5.3% 103,161 5.1% Age 60 to 64 Years 57,645 4.4% 85,538 4.2% Age 65 to 69 Years 42,910 3.3% 64,115 3.1% Age 70 to 74 Years 29,833 2.3% 44,565 2.2% Age 75 to 79 Years 21,075 1.6% 31,736 1.6% Age 80 to 84 Years 15,390 1.2% 23,394 1.1% Age 85 Years or Over 16,672 1.3% 24,846 1.2% Median Age 31.5 30.3 Age 19 Years or Less 417,092 32.2% 689,270 33.8% Age 20 to 64 Years 752,527 58.1% 1,162,852 57.0% Age 65 Years or Over 125,879 9.7% 188,655 9.2% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 645,091 49.8% 1,015,520 49.8% Age Under 5 Years 54,431 8.4% 89,188 8.8% Age 5 to 9 Years 53,379 8.3% 87,758 8.6% Age 10 to 14 Years 50,422 7.8% 82,858 8.2% Age 15 to 19 Years 45,077 7.0% 76,469 7.5% Age 20 to 24 Years 45,122 7.0% 75,765 7.5% Age 25 to 29 Years 49,933 7.7% 78,903 7.8% Age 30 to 34 Years 52,261 8.1% 80,474 7.9% Age 35 to 39 Years 46,598 7.2% 72,156 7.1% Age 40 to 44 Years 40,354 6.3% 61,841 6.1% Age 45 to 49 Years 36,613 5.7% 55,378 5.5%

Age 50 to 54 Years 36,740 5.7% 54,874 5.4% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 34,976 5.4% 52,095 5.1% Age 60 to 64 Years 29,500 4.6% 43,766 4.3% Age 65 to 69 Years 22,444 3.5% 33,467 3.3% Age 70 to 74 Years 16,040 2.5% 23,833 2.3% Age 75 to 79 Years 11,787 1.8% 17,621 1.7% Age 80 to 84 Years 8,812 1.4% 13,379 1.3% Age 85 Years or Over 10,601 1.6% 15,694 1.5% Female Median Age 32.4 31.2 Age 19 Years or Less 203,309 31.5% 336,274 33.1% Age 20 to 64 Years 372,097 57.7% 575,253 56.6% Age 65 Years or Over 69,684 10.8% 103,994 10.2%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 40.7400/-111.8939 RFULL9 1365 S West Temple 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Salt Lake City, UT 84115

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 650,407 50.2% 1,025,257 50.2% Age Under 5 Years 56,873 8.7% 93,353 9.1% Age 5 to 9 Years 55,908 8.6% 92,207 9.0% Age 10 to 14 Years 53,211 8.2% 86,991 8.5% Age 15 to 19 Years 47,791 7.3% 80,445 7.8% Age 20 to 24 Years 47,121 7.2% 79,910 7.8% Age 25 to 29 Years 51,329 7.9% 80,627 7.9% Age 30 to 34 Years 54,635 8.4% 83,415 8.1% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 48,735 7.5% 75,063 7.3% Age 40 to 44 Years 42,446 6.5% 64,456 6.3% Age 45 to 49 Years 37,562 5.8% 56,836 5.5% Age 50 to 54 Years 36,183 5.6% 54,455 5.3% Age 55 to 59 Years 34,274 5.3% 51,066 5.0% Age 60 to 64 Years 28,145 4.3% 41,772 4.1% Age 65 to 69 Years 20,466 3.1% 30,648 3.0% Age 70 to 74 Years 13,792 2.1% 20,732 2.0% Age 75 to 79 Years 9,288 1.4% 14,114 1.4% Age 80 to 84 Years 6,577 1.0% 10,016 1.0% Age 85 Years or Over 6,072 0.9% 9,152 0.9% Male Median Age 30.7 29.5 Age 19 Years or Less 213,783 32.9% 352,996 34.4% Age 20 to 64 Years 380,429 58.5% 587,599 57.3% Age 65 Years or Over 56,195 8.6% 84,662 8.3% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 101 101 Age Under 5 Years 104 51.1% 105 51.1% Age 5 to 9 Years 105 51.2% 105 51.2% Age 10 to 14 Years 106 51.3% 105 51.2% Age 15 to 19 Years 106 51.5% 105 51.3% Age 20 to 24 Years 104 51.1% 105 51.3% Age 25 to 29 Years 103 50.7% 102 50.5% Age 30 to 34 Years 105 51.1% 104 50.9% Age 35 to 39 Years 105 51.1% 104 51.0% Age 40 to 44 Years 105 51.3% 104 51.0% Age 45 to 49 Years 103 50.6% 103 50.6%

Age 50 to 54 Years 98 49.6% 99 49.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 98 49.5% 98 49.5% Age 60 to 64 Years 95 48.8% 95 48.8% Age 65 to 69 Years 91 47.7% 92 47.8% Age 70 to 74 Years 86 46.2% 87 46.5% Age 75 to 79 Years 79 44.1% 80 44.5% Age 80 to 84 Years 75 42.7% 75 42.8% Age 85 Years or Over 57 36.4% 58 36.8% Age 19 Years or Less 105 51.3% 105 51.2% Age 20 to 39 Years 104 51.0% 104 50.9% Age 40 to 64 Years 100 50.1% 100 50.1% Age 65 Years or Over 81 44.6% 81 44.9%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 40.7400/-111.8939 RFULL9 1365 S West Temple 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Salt Lake City, UT 84115

Household Type (2014) Total Households 426,333 650,196 Households with Children 177,200 41.6% 284,202 43.7% Average Household Size 3.0 3.1 Household Density per Square Mile 676 275 Population Family 1,090,144 84.1% 1,734,000 85.0% Population Non-Family 190,362 14.7% 276,534 13.6% Population Group Quarters 14,992 1.2% 30,243 1.5% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Family Households 308,807 72.4% 484,014 74.4% Married Couple Households 242,561 78.5% 386,110 79.8% Other Family Households 66,246 21.5% 97,904 20.2% Family Households with Children 175,755 56.9% 282,002 58.3% Married Couple with Children 133,542 76.0% 218,765 77.6% Other Family Households with Children 42,213 24.0% 63,237 22.4% Family Households No Children 133,052 43.1% 202,012 41.7% Married Couple No Children 109,019 81.9% 167,345 82.8% Other Family Households No Children 24,033 18.1% 34,667 17.2% Non-Family Households 117,525 27.6% 166,182 25.6% Non-Family Households with Children 1,445 1.2% 2,200 1.3% Non-Family Households No Children 116,080 98.8% 163,982 98.7% Lone Person No Children - - - - 2 or More Persons No Children 116,080 98.8% 163,982 98.7% Household Lone Male - - - - Household Lone Female - - - - Average Family Household Size 3.5 3.6 Average Family Income $88,852 $87,686 Median Family Income $76,967 $75,980 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.6 1.7 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 971,273 1,508,421 Never Married 289,674 29.8% 442,344 29.3% Currently Married 507,039 52.2% 810,381 53.7% Previously Married 174,560 18.0% 255,696 17.0% Separated 38,847 22.3% 56,069 21.9% Widowed 38,068 21.8% 57,472 22.5% Divorced 97,645 55.9% 142,154 55.6% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 775,766 1,181,556 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 26,633 3.4% 37,291 3.2% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 51,461 6.6% 73,311 6.2% High School Graduate 182,566 23.5% 278,478 23.6% Some College 208,098 26.8% 324,434 27.5% Associate Degree Only 65,224 8.4% 104,334 8.8% Bachelor Degree Only 161,736 20.8% 246,366 20.9% Graduate Degree 80,048 10.3% 117,343 9.9% Any College (Some College or Higher) 515,106 66.4% 792,476 67.1% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 241,784 31.2% 363,708 30.8%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 40.7400/-111.8939 RFULL9 1365 S West Temple 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 443,038 685,943 Total Housing Units (2010) 431,507 667,086 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 11,532 0.7% 18,857 0.7% Housing Units Occupied (2014) 426,333 96.2% 650,196 94.8% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 296,616 69.6% 459,466 70.7% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 129,716 30.4% 190,730 29.3% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 16,706 3.8% 35,747 5.2% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Household Size (2014) Total Households 426,333 650,196 1 Person Households 89,225 20.9% 125,358 19.3% 2 Person Households 122,787 28.8% 183,499 28.2% 3 Person Households 68,956 16.2% 105,774 16.3% 4 Person Households 63,391 14.9% 100,084 15.4% 5 Person Households 40,651 9.5% 66,522 10.2% 6 Person Households 23,175 5.4% 39,190 6.0% 7 or More Person Households 18,147 4.3% 29,770 4.6% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 19,540 4.6% 28,857 4.4% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 23,262 5.5% 34,270 5.3% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 24,101 5.7% 36,603 5.6% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 41,255 9.7% 63,125 9.7% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 63,239 14.8% 97,460 15.0% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 89,280 20.9% 136,703 21.0% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 56,168 13.2% 87,262 13.4% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 38,362 9.0% 58,876 9.1% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 37,679 8.8% 56,756 8.7% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 13,543 3.2% 20,038 3.1% HH Income Under $10,000 19,904 4.7% 30,244 4.7% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 22,479 5.3% 31,221 4.8% Households 1 Vehicle Available 119,703 28.1% 171,400 26.4% Households 2 Vehicles Available 178,355 41.8% 277,054 42.6% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 105,795 24.8% 170,522 26.2% Total Vehicles Available 843,081 1,315,616 Average Vehicles per Household 2.0 2.0 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 654,239 77.6% 1,026,341 78.0% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.2 2.2 Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 188,842 22.4% 289,275 22.0% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.5 1.5 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 567,755 870,303 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 147,068 25.9% 249,198 28.6% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 250,864 44.2% 356,281 40.9% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 127,906 22.5% 193,515 22.2% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 18,798 3.3% 34,421 4.0% Work at Home 23,120 4.1% 36,888 4.2% Average Minutes Travel to Work 20.3 19.9

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 40.7400/-111.8939 RFULL9 1365 S West Temple 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Salt Lake City, UT 84115

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 567,755 870,303 Drive to Work Alone 445,205 78.4% 681,252 78.3% Drive to Work in Carpool 59,805 10.5% 94,204 10.8% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 16,741 2.9% 22,858 2.6% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 1,778 0.3% 2,953 0.3% Bicycle to Work 3,786 0.7% 5,540 0.6% Walk to Work 13,207 2.3% 20,557 2.4%

Other Means 4,114 0.7% 6,051 0.7% warranty. or representation ed without Work at Home 23,120 4.1% 36,888 4.2% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 53,282 76,553 Total Employees 681,024 963,462 Company Headquarter Businesses 574 1.1% 694 0.9% Company Headquarter Employees 62,558 9.2% 80,444 8.3% Employee Population per Business 12.8 to 1 12.6 to 1 Residential Population per Business 24.3 to 1 26.7 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 987,051 1,447,694 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 938,080 1,448,801 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 464,825 49.6% 718,509 49.6% Male Civilian Employed 347,336 74.7% 533,297 74.2% Male Civilian Unemployed 15,481 3.3% 24,430 3.4% Males in Armed Forces 1,103 0.2% 3,463 0.5% Males Not in Labor Force 100,905 21.7% 157,320 21.9% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 473,255 50.4% 730,291 50.4% Female Civilian Employed 283,438 59.9% 427,284 58.5% Female Civilian Unemployed 12,762 2.7% 19,642 2.7% Females in Armed Forces 176 - 524 0.1% Females Not in Labor Force 176,879 37.4% 282,841 38.7% Unemployment Rate 464,825 3.0% 718,509 3.0% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 53,392 9.2% 78,803 8.9% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 30,016 9.5% 44,888 9.2% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 23,376 9.0% 33,914 8.6% Occupation (2010) Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 577,382 881,779 provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Occupation Total Males 317,321 55.0% 488,409 55.4% Occupation Total Females 260,062 45.0% 393,370 44.6% Management, Business, Financial Operations 84,058 14.6% 125,727 14.3% Professional, Related 125,427 21.7% 191,851 21.8% Service 84,273 14.6% 131,717 14.9% Sales, Office 164,861 28.6% 247,830 28.1% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 979 0.2% 2,037 0.2% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 48,480 8.4% 76,154 8.6% Production, Transport, Material Moving 69,304 12.0% 106,463 12.1% White Collar Workers 374,346 64.8% 565,408 64.1% Blue Collar Workers 203,036 35.2% 316,371 35.9%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 40.7400/-111.8939 RFULL9 1365 S West Temple 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Salt Lake City, UT 84115

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 407,535 620,366 1 Detached Unit 277,690 68.1% 430,762 69.4% 1 Attached Unit 26,551 6.5% 39,993 6.4% 2 Units 13,896 3.4% 20,656 3.3% 3 to 4 Units 17,672 4.3% 26,789 4.3% 5 to 9 Units 15,763 3.9% 22,437 3.6% 10 to 19 Units 20,060 4.9% 28,390 4.6% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without 20 to 49 Units 15,571 3.8% 21,288 3.4% 50 or More Units 10,296 2.5% 13,661 2.2% Mobile Home or Trailer 9,703 2.4% 15,926 2.6% Other Structure 334 0.1% 464 0.1% Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 40,728 10.0% 68,360 11.0% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 42,684 10.5% 71,522 11.5% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 70,970 17.4% 113,106 18.2% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 57,195 14.0% 82,683 13.3% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 77,172 18.9% 112,116 18.1% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 35,451 8.7% 51,372 8.3% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 34,348 8.4% 49,943 8.1% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 16,289 4.0% 25,294 4.1% Homes Built Before 1939 32,698 8.0% 45,970 7.4% Median Age of Homes 35.4 yrs 34.3 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 280,491 433,796 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 2,596 0.9% 4,496 1.0% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 3,836 1.4% 6,161 1.4% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 14,335 5.1% 20,873 4.8% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 14,931 5.3% 21,583 5.0% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 43,078 15.4% 61,496 14.2% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 39,723 14.2% 57,532 13.3% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 57,336 20.4% 85,570 19.7% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 29,681 10.6% 46,179 10.6% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 30,392 10.8% 50,177 11.6% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 18,139 6.5% 32,032 7.4%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 10,994 3.9% 20,552 4.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 2,095 0.7% 4,128 1.0% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 1,601 0.6% 3,230 0.7% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 858 0.3% 1,662 0.4% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 778 0.3% 1,388 0.3% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 749 0.3% 1,384 0.3% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 1,324 0.5% 2,351 0.5% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 1,707 0.6% 2,731 0.6% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 4,740 1.7% 7,682 1.8% Home Values Under $10,000 1,597 0.6% 2,588 0.6% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $247,227 $240,211 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $761 $750

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 40.7400/-111.8939 RFULL9 1365 S West Temple 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Salt Lake City, UT 84115

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $25.3 B $38.4 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $14.6 B $22.2 B Total Retail Expenditure $10.7 B $16.2 B Apparel $1.22 B $1.86 B Contributions $971 M $1.47 B

Education $632 M $956 M warranty. or representation ed without Entertainment $1.42 B $2.16 B Food and Beverages $3.84 B $5.84 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.12 B $1.70 B Gifts $685 M $1.04 B Health Care $1.50 B $2.28 B Household Operations $932 M $1.41 B Miscellaneous Expenses $415 M $629 M Personal Care $365 M $554 M Personal Insurance $267 M $404 M Reading $82.4 M $125 M Shelter $4.90 B $7.44 B Tobacco $156 M $238 M Transportation $5.04 B $7.67 B Utilities $1.73 B $2.63 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $4,940 $4,922 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,853 57.7% $2,842 57.8% Total Retail Expenditures $2,088 42.3% $2,079 42.2% Apparel $239 4.8% $238 4.8% Contributions $190 3.8% $188 3.8% Education $123 2.5% $123 2.5% Entertainment $278 5.6% $277 5.6% Food and Beverages $751 15.2% $749 15.2% Furnishings and Equipment $219 4.4% $218 4.4%

Gifts $134 2.7% $133 2.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Health Care $293 5.9% $292 5.9% Household Operations $182 3.7% $181 3.7% Miscellaneous Expenses $81 1.6% $81 1.6% Personal Care $71 1.4% $71 1.4% Personal Insurance $52 1.1% $52 1.1% Reading $16 0.3% $16 0.3% Shelter $957 19.4% $953 19.4% Tobacco $30 0.6% $30 0.6% Transportation $986 20.0% $984 20.0% Utilities $338 6.8% $337 6.8%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 47.2381/-122.4967 RFULL9 2502 S Tyler St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Tacoma, WA 98405

Population Estimated Population (2014) 1,392,223 2,823,812 Projected Population (2019) 1,464,502 2,970,250 Census Population (2010) 1,334,798 2,705,964 Census Population (2000) 1,190,590 2,416,175 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 72,279 1.0% 146,438 1.0%

Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 57,425 1.1% 117,848 1.1% warranty. or representation ed without Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 144,209 1.2% 289,789 1.2% Estimated Population Density (2014) 1,800 psm 1,199 psm Trade Area Size 773.5 sq mi 2,354.5 sq mi

Households Estimated Households (2014) 522,851 1,126,159 Projected Households (2019) 552,399 1,189,946 Census Households (2010) 501,981 1,081,166 Census Households (2000) 449,449 962,689 Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 29,548 1.1% 63,787 1.1% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) 73,403 1.2% 163,470 1.2%

Average Household Income Estimated Average Household Income (2014) $73,609 $84,300 Projected Average Household Income (2019) $80,136 $91,953 Census Average Household Income (2010) $67,475 $77,129 Census Average Household Income (2000) $55,944 $62,890 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $6,527 1.8% $7,653 1.8% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $17,665 2.3% $21,410 2.4%

Median Household Income Estimated Median Household Income (2014) $64,049 $69,789 Projected Median Household Income (2019) $69,400 $75,830 Census Median Household Income (2010) $58,093 $63,116 Census Median Household Income (2000) $47,894 $51,218

Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $5,351 1.7% $6,041 1.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $16,155 2.4% $18,571 2.6%

Per Capita Income Estimated Per Capita Income (2014) $27,870 $33,891 Projected Per Capita Income (2019) $30,460 $37,119 Census Per Capita Income (2010) $25,375 $30,817 Census Per Capita Income (2000) $21,056 $24,978 Projected Annual Change (2014-2019) $2,590 1.9% $3,228 1.9% Historical Annual Change (2000-2014) $6,815 2.3% $8,914 2.5% Estimated Average Household Net Worth (2014) $531,162 $610,823

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 47.2381/-122.4967 RFULL9 2502 S Tyler St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Tacoma, WA 98405

Race and Ethnicity Total Population (2014) 1,392,223 2,823,812 White (2014) 952,299 68.4% 1,997,522 70.7% Black or African American (2014) 110,242 7.9% 182,678 6.5% American Indian or Alaska Native (2014) 19,044 1.4% 31,680 1.1% Asian (2014) 127,704 9.2% 311,757 11.0%

Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (2014) 22,405 1.6% 29,414 1.0% warranty. or representation ed without Other Race (2014) 68,727 4.9% 107,267 3.8% Two or More Races (2014) 91,803 6.6% 163,494 5.8% Population < 18 (2014) 332,869 23.9% 610,179 21.6% White 191,254 57.5% 368,639 60.4% Black or African American 30,787 9.2% 48,787 8.0% American Indian or Alaska Native 5,244 1.6% 7,973 1.3% Asian 27,856 8.4% 62,577 10.3% Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 7,377 2.2% 9,231 1.5% Other Race 70,351 21.1% 112,972 18.5% Hispanic Population < 18 (2014) 66,288 4.8% 100,905 3.6% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 1,225,888 88.1% 2,549,019 90.3% Not Hispanic White 885,054 72.2% 1,877,640 73.7% Not Hispanic Black or African American 105,129 8.6% 175,167 6.9% Not Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 15,441 1.3% 25,696 1.0% Not Hispanic Asian 125,217 10.2% 307,521 12.1% Not Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 21,558 1.8% 28,232 1.1% Not Hispanic Other Race 1,092 0.1% 3,255 0.1% Not Hispanic Two or More Races 72,397 5.9% 131,508 5.2% Hispanic or Latino Population (2014) 166,335 11.9% 274,793 9.7% Hispanic White 67,245 40.4% 119,882 43.6% Hispanic Black or African American 5,113 3.1% 7,511 2.7% Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native 3,603 2.2% 5,984 2.2% Hispanic Asian 2,486 1.5% 4,235 1.5% Hispanic Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 847 0.5% 1,182 0.4%

Hispanic Other Race 67,635 40.7% 104,012 37.9% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Hispanic Two or More Races 19,406 11.7% 31,987 11.6% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 1,185,006 88.8% 2,458,335 90.8% Hispanic or Latino Population (2010) 149,792 11.2% 247,629 9.2% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 1,116,128 93.7% 2,281,311 94.4% Hispanic or Latino Population (2000) 74,461 6.3% 134,864 5.6% Not Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 1,278,478 87.3% 2,663,475 89.7% Hispanic or Latino Population (2019) 186,024 12.7% 306,775 10.3% Projected Annual Growth (2014-2019) 19,688 2.4% 31,982 2.3% Historical Annual Growth (2000-2010) 75,331 10.1% 112,765 8.4%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 2 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 47.2381/-122.4967 RFULL9 2502 S Tyler St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Tacoma, WA 98405

Total Age Distribution (2014) Total Population 1,392,223 2,823,812 Age Under 5 Years 96,636 6.9% 179,126 6.3% Age 5 to 9 Years 91,836 6.6% 169,888 6.0% Age 10 to 14 Years 91,386 6.6% 165,632 5.9% Age 15 to 19 Years 91,438 6.6% 171,749 6.1% Age 20 to 24 Years 96,940 7.0% 200,135 7.1% Age 25 to 29 Years 101,975 7.3% 220,327 7.8% Age 30 to 34 Years 100,737 7.2% 220,088 7.8% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 91,071 6.5% 197,086 7.0% Age 40 to 44 Years 92,849 6.7% 196,279 7.0% Age 45 to 49 Years 96,330 6.9% 194,365 6.9% Age 50 to 54 Years 97,952 7.0% 195,850 6.9% Age 55 to 59 Years 91,266 6.6% 187,410 6.6% Age 60 to 64 Years 77,207 5.5% 161,687 5.7% Age 65 to 69 Years 59,986 4.3% 125,175 4.4% Age 70 to 74 Years 41,481 3.0% 85,460 3.0% Age 75 to 79 Years 28,567 2.1% 58,400 2.1% Age 80 to 84 Years 20,850 1.5% 42,985 1.5% Age 85 Years or Over 23,715 1.7% 52,169 1.8% Median Age 36.3 37.1 Age 19 Years or Less 371,296 26.7% 686,395 24.3% Age 20 to 64 Years 846,327 60.8% 1,773,227 62.8% Age 65 Years or Over 174,600 12.5% 364,190 12.9% Female Age Distribution (2014) Female Population 704,290 50.6% 1,420,456 50.3% Age Under 5 Years 47,402 6.7% 87,739 6.2% Age 5 to 9 Years 44,721 6.3% 83,116 5.9% Age 10 to 14 Years 44,662 6.3% 80,879 5.7% Age 15 to 19 Years 44,549 6.3% 84,079 5.9% Age 20 to 24 Years 47,069 6.7% 96,454 6.8% Age 25 to 29 Years 50,442 7.2% 107,878 7.6% Age 30 to 34 Years 50,314 7.1% 108,123 7.6% Age 35 to 39 Years 45,778 6.5% 97,168 6.8% Age 40 to 44 Years 46,454 6.6% 96,716 6.8% Age 45 to 49 Years 48,300 6.9% 96,275 6.8%

Age 50 to 54 Years 49,589 7.0% 98,582 6.9% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 46,742 6.6% 95,778 6.7% Age 60 to 64 Years 40,216 5.7% 84,117 5.9% Age 65 to 69 Years 31,641 4.5% 65,928 4.6% Age 70 to 74 Years 22,408 3.2% 45,742 3.2% Age 75 to 79 Years 15,861 2.3% 32,163 2.3% Age 80 to 84 Years 12,361 1.8% 25,272 1.8% Age 85 Years or Over 15,780 2.2% 34,446 2.4% Female Median Age 37.4 38.1 Age 19 Years or Less 181,335 25.7% 335,813 23.6% Age 20 to 64 Years 424,904 60.3% 881,092 62.0% Age 65 Years or Over 98,051 13.9% 203,551 14.3%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 3 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 47.2381/-122.4967 RFULL9 2502 S Tyler St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Tacoma, WA 98405

Male Age Distribution (2014) Male Population 687,933 49.4% 1,403,356 49.7% Age Under 5 Years 49,234 7.2% 91,387 6.5% Age 5 to 9 Years 47,115 6.8% 86,772 6.2% Age 10 to 14 Years 46,724 6.8% 84,753 6.0% Age 15 to 19 Years 46,888 6.8% 87,670 6.2% Age 20 to 24 Years 49,871 7.2% 103,680 7.4% Age 25 to 29 Years 51,533 7.5% 112,449 8.0% Age 30 to 34 Years 50,423 7.3% 111,965 8.0% warranty. or representation ed without Age 35 to 39 Years 45,293 6.6% 99,918 7.1% Age 40 to 44 Years 46,395 6.7% 99,563 7.1% Age 45 to 49 Years 48,030 7.0% 98,090 7.0% Age 50 to 54 Years 48,363 7.0% 97,268 6.9% Age 55 to 59 Years 44,524 6.5% 91,632 6.5% Age 60 to 64 Years 36,991 5.4% 77,570 5.5% Age 65 to 69 Years 28,346 4.1% 59,247 4.2% Age 70 to 74 Years 19,073 2.8% 39,718 2.8% Age 75 to 79 Years 12,706 1.8% 26,237 1.9% Age 80 to 84 Years 8,489 1.2% 17,713 1.3% Age 85 Years or Over 7,935 1.2% 17,724 1.3% Male Median Age 35.2 36.1 Age 19 Years or Less 189,961 27.6% 350,582 25.0% Age 20 to 64 Years 421,424 61.3% 892,135 63.6% Age 65 Years or Over 76,549 11.1% 160,638 11.4% Males per 100 Females (2014) Overall Comparison 98 99 Age Under 5 Years 104 50.9% 104 51.0% Age 5 to 9 Years 105 51.3% 104 51.1% Age 10 to 14 Years 105 51.1% 105 51.2% Age 15 to 19 Years 105 51.3% 104 51.0% Age 20 to 24 Years 106 51.4% 107 51.8% Age 25 to 29 Years 102 50.5% 104 51.0% Age 30 to 34 Years 100 50.1% 104 50.9% Age 35 to 39 Years 99 49.7% 103 50.7% Age 40 to 44 Years 100 50.0% 103 50.7% Age 45 to 49 Years 99 49.9% 102 50.5%

Age 50 to 54 Years 98 49.4% 99 49.7% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Age 55 to 59 Years 95 48.8% 96 48.9% Age 60 to 64 Years 92 47.9% 92 48.0% Age 65 to 69 Years 90 47.3% 90 47.3% Age 70 to 74 Years 85 46.0% 87 46.5% Age 75 to 79 Years 80 44.5% 82 44.9% Age 80 to 84 Years 69 40.7% 70 41.2% Age 85 Years or Over 50 33.5% 51 34.0% Age 19 Years or Less 105 51.2% 104 51.1% Age 20 to 39 Years 102 50.5% 104 51.1% Age 40 to 64 Years 97 49.2% 98 49.6% Age 65 Years or Over 78 43.8% 79 44.1%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 4 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 47.2381/-122.4967 RFULL9 2502 S Tyler St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Tacoma, WA 98405

Household Type (2014) Total Households 522,851 1,126,159 Households with Children 183,972 35.2% 344,518 30.6% Average Household Size 2.6 2.5 Household Density per Square Mile 676 478 Population Family 1,098,676 78.9% 2,096,800 74.3% Population Non-Family 271,327 19.5% 666,108 23.6% Population Group Quarters 22,220 1.6% 60,904 2.2% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Family Households 348,687 66.7% 685,958 60.9% Married Couple Households 249,659 71.6% 513,168 74.8% Other Family Households 99,029 28.4% 172,791 25.2% Family Households with Children 181,375 52.0% 340,122 49.6% Married Couple with Children 115,543 63.7% 229,804 67.6% Other Family Households with Children 65,833 36.3% 110,318 32.4% Family Households No Children 167,312 48.0% 345,836 50.4% Married Couple No Children 134,116 80.2% 283,364 81.9% Other Family Households No Children 33,196 19.8% 62,472 18.1% Non-Family Households 174,164 33.3% 440,201 39.1% Non-Family Households with Children 2,596 1.5% 4,396 1.0% Non-Family Households No Children 171,568 98.5% 435,805 99.0% Lone Person No Children - - - - 2 or More Persons No Children 171,568 98.5% 435,805 99.0% Household Lone Male - - - - Household Lone Female - - - - Average Family Household Size 3.2 3.1 Average Family Income $84,543 $100,016 Median Family Income $75,545 $85,719 Average Non-Family Household Size 1.6 1.5 Marital Status (2014) Population Age 15 Years or Over 1,112,365 2,309,166 Never Married 339,745 30.5% 760,372 32.9% Currently Married 522,803 47.0% 1,063,364 46.0% Previously Married 249,817 22.5% 485,431 21.0% Separated 54,683 21.9% 104,410 21.5% Widowed 55,573 22.2% 108,211 22.3% Divorced 139,561 55.9% 272,810 56.2% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Educational Attainment (2014) Adult Population Age 25 Years or Over 909,196 1,904,689 Elementary (Grade Level 0 to 8) 36,953 4.1% 67,752 3.6% Some High School (Grade Level 9 to 11) 63,050 6.9% 104,117 5.5% High School Graduate 255,279 28.1% 424,019 22.3% Some College 248,320 27.3% 463,553 24.3% Associate Degree Only 89,019 9.8% 169,296 8.9% Bachelor Degree Only 146,341 16.1% 429,969 22.6% Graduate Degree 70,234 7.7% 245,981 12.9% Any College (Some College or Higher) 553,913 60.9% 1,308,800 68.7% College Degree + (Bachelor Degree or Higher) 216,575 23.8% 675,950 35.5%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 5 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 47.2381/-122.4967 RFULL9 2502 S Tyler St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Tacoma, WA 98405 Housing Total Housing Units (2014) 549,226 1,191,280 Total Housing Units (2010) 539,486 1,170,194 Historical Annual Growth (2010-2014) 9,740 0.5% 21,086 0.5% Housing Units Occupied (2014) 522,851 95.2% 1,126,159 94.5% Housing Units Owner-Occupied 318,862 61.0% 670,352 59.5% Housing Units Renter-Occupied 203,990 39.0% 455,807 40.5% Housing Units Vacant (2014) 26,374 4.8% 65,121 5.5% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without Household Size (2014) Total Households 522,851 1,126,159 1 Person Households 134,845 25.8% 332,862 29.6% 2 Person Households 169,985 32.5% 376,880 33.5% 3 Person Households 87,186 16.7% 174,687 15.5% 4 Person Households 71,127 13.6% 139,950 12.4% 5 Person Households 33,969 6.5% 59,930 5.3% 6 Person Households 14,712 2.8% 24,319 2.2% 7 or More Person Households 11,029 2.1% 17,532 1.6% Household Income Distribution (2014) HH Income $200,000 or More 18,874 3.6% 70,117 6.2% HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 30,820 5.9% 79,741 7.1% HH Income $125,000 to $149,999 28,735 5.5% 67,869 6.0% HH Income $100,000 to $124,999 50,001 9.6% 109,502 9.7% HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 78,437 15.0% 161,919 14.4% HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 105,240 20.1% 210,350 18.7% HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 70,429 13.5% 140,215 12.5% HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 48,981 9.4% 95,432 8.5% HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 46,150 8.8% 91,181 8.1% HH Income $10,000 to $14,999 16,218 3.1% 34,707 3.1% HH Income Under $10,000 28,967 5.5% 65,125 5.8% Household Vehicles (2014) Households 0 Vehicles Available 32,614 6.2% 91,100 8.1% Households 1 Vehicle Available 167,254 32.0% 386,287 34.3% Households 2 Vehicles Available 197,889 37.8% 415,878 36.9% Households 3 or More Vehicles Available 125,094 23.9% 232,894 20.7% Total Vehicles Available 993,278 2,016,513 Average Vehicles per Household 1.9 1.8 Owner-Occupied Household Vehicles 704,309 70.9% 1,419,342 70.4% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Average Vehicles per Owner-Occupied Household 2.2 2.1 Renter-Occupied Household Vehicles 288,969 29.1% 597,171 29.6% Average Vehicles per Renter-Occupied Household 1.4 1.3 Travel Time (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 604,253 1,293,393 Travel to Work in 14 Minutes or Less 129,567 21.4% 286,591 22.2% Travel to Work in 15 to 29 Minutes 211,589 35.0% 471,346 36.4% Travel to Work in 30 to 59 Minutes 182,355 30.2% 372,592 28.8% Travel to Work in 60 Minutes or More 55,023 9.1% 97,967 7.6% Work at Home 25,719 4.3% 64,898 5.0% Average Minutes Travel to Work 24.3 23.6

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 6 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 47.2381/-122.4967 RFULL9 2502 S Tyler St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Tacoma, WA 98405

Transportation To Work (2010) Worker Base Age 16 years or Over 604,253 1,293,393 Drive to Work Alone 457,381 75.7% 904,436 69.9% Drive to Work in Carpool 67,096 11.1% 133,109 10.3% Travel to Work by Public Transportation 30,699 5.1% 106,111 8.2% Drive to Work on Motorcycle 1,582 0.3% 4,412 0.3% Bicycle to Work 2,467 0.4% 14,755 1.1% Walk to Work 13,863 2.3% 54,867 4.2%

Other Means 5,446 0.9% 10,805 0.8% warranty. or representation ed without Work at Home 25,719 4.3% 64,898 5.0% Daytime Demographics (2014) Total Businesses 59,008 144,095 Total Employees 629,761 1,535,973 Company Headquarter Businesses 232 0.4% 869 0.6% Company Headquarter Employees 25,400 4.0% 139,694 9.1% Employee Population per Business 10.7 to 1 10.7 to 1 Residential Population per Business 23.6 to 1 19.6 to 1 Adj. Daytime Demographics Age 16 Years or Over 1,036,321 2,341,067 Labor Force Labor Population Age 16 Years or Over (2014) 1,073,520 2,218,267 Labor Force Total Males (2014) 523,534 48.8% 1,089,305 49.1% Male Civilian Employed 335,940 64.2% 724,824 66.5% Male Civilian Unemployed 25,875 4.9% 48,095 4.4% Males in Armed Forces 17,815 3.4% 28,037 2.6% Males Not in Labor Force 143,903 27.5% 288,349 26.5% Labor Force Total Females (2014) 549,987 51.2% 1,128,962 50.9% Female Civilian Employed 310,317 56.4% 656,376 58.1% Female Civilian Unemployed 23,380 4.3% 42,962 3.8% Females in Armed Forces 2,887 0.5% 3,936 0.3% Females Not in Labor Force 213,403 38.8% 425,688 37.7% Unemployment Rate 523,534 4.6% 1,089,305 4.1% Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 46,689 7.8% 91,705 7.1% Male Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 25,367 8.2% 50,518 7.5% Female Labor Force Growth (2010-2014) 21,322 7.4% 41,187 6.7% Occupation (2010) Occupation Population Age 16 Years or Over 599,568 1,289,495 provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Occupation Total Males 310,573 51.8% 674,307 52.3% Occupation Total Females 288,995 48.2% 615,188 47.7% Management, Business, Financial Operations 83,252 13.9% 214,752 16.7% Professional, Related 113,103 18.9% 318,468 24.7% Service 112,275 18.7% 220,918 17.1% Sales, Office 152,604 25.5% 300,637 23.3% Farming, Fishing, Forestry 2,781 0.5% 5,747 0.4% Construction, Extraction, Maintenance 55,116 9.2% 95,671 7.4% Production, Transport, Material Moving 80,438 13.4% 133,301 10.3% White Collar Workers 348,958 58.2% 833,857 64.7% Blue Collar Workers 250,610 41.8% 455,638 35.3%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 7 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 47.2381/-122.4967 RFULL9 2502 S Tyler St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Tacoma, WA 98405

Units In Structure (2010) Total Units 501,981 1,081,166 1 Detached Unit 315,859 62.9% 646,460 59.8% 1 Attached Unit 20,662 4.1% 44,964 4.2% 2 Units 12,462 2.5% 25,671 2.4% 3 to 4 Units 23,379 4.7% 47,881 4.4% 5 to 9 Units 28,752 5.7% 62,420 5.8% 10 to 19 Units 31,509 6.3% 69,175 6.4% ed without representation or warranty. or representation ed without 20 to 49 Units 18,727 3.7% 60,055 5.6% 50 or More Units 22,592 4.5% 75,892 7.0% Mobile Home or Trailer 27,374 5.5% 47,057 4.4% Other Structure 665 0.1% 1,590 0.1% Homes Built By Year (2010) Homes Built 2005 or later 41,625 8.3% 88,200 8.2% Homes Built 2000 to 2004 41,100 8.2% 86,191 8.0% Homes Built 1990 to 1999 86,891 17.3% 175,731 16.3% Homes Built 1980 to 1989 77,669 15.5% 155,612 14.4% Homes Built 1970 to 1979 92,282 18.4% 185,012 17.1% Homes Built 1960 to 1969 57,181 11.4% 118,218 10.9% Homes Built 1950 to 1959 38,396 7.6% 87,450 8.1% Homes Built 1940 to 1949 23,136 4.6% 57,565 5.3% Homes Built Before 1939 43,699 8.7% 127,187 11.8% Median Age of Homes 37.2 yrs 39.1 yrs Home Values (2010) Owner Specified Housing Units 304,646 639,562 Home Values $1,000,000 or More 4,383 1.4% 19,110 3.0% Home Values $750,000 to $999,999 5,785 1.9% 22,696 3.5% Home Values $500,000 to $749,999 21,342 7.0% 72,240 11.3% Home Values $400,000 to $499,999 26,168 8.6% 70,353 11.0% Home Values $300,000 to $399,999 62,618 20.6% 129,161 20.2% Home Values $250,000 to $299,999 52,742 17.3% 93,018 14.5% Home Values $200,000 to $249,999 55,907 18.4% 97,039 15.2% Home Values $175,000 to $199,999 20,274 6.7% 35,230 5.5% Home Values $150,000 to $174,999 17,719 5.8% 31,368 4.9% Home Values $125,000 to $149,999 8,833 2.9% 16,461 2.6%

Home Values $100,000 to $124,999 7,679 2.5% 14,780 2.3% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Home Values $90,000 to $99,999 1,859 0.6% 3,516 0.5% Home Values $80,000 to $89,999 1,613 0.5% 3,083 0.5% Home Values $70,000 to $79,999 1,266 0.4% 2,562 0.4% Home Values $60,000 to $69,999 1,220 0.4% 2,514 0.4% Home Values $50,000 to $59,999 1,314 0.4% 2,530 0.4% Home Values $35,000 to $49,999 2,169 0.7% 3,982 0.6% Home Values $25,000 to $34,999 2,375 0.8% 4,146 0.6% Home Values $10,000 to $24,999 6,160 2.0% 10,330 1.6% Home Values Under $10,000 3,221 1.1% 5,443 0.9% Owner-Occupied Median Home Value $277,500 $328,387 Renter-Occupied Median Rent $849 $910

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 8 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography COMPLETE PROFILE 2000-2010 Census, 2014 Estimates with 2019 Projections Calculated using Proportional Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 47.2381/-122.4967 RFULL9 2502 S Tyler St 30 min drivetime 45 min drivetime Tacoma, WA 98405

Total Annual Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $29.7 B $70.0 B Total Non-Retail Expenditure $17.1 B $40.4 B Total Retail Expenditure $12.6 B $29.6 B Apparel $1.43 B $3.38 B Contributions $1.13 B $2.83 B

Education $737 M $1.84 B warranty. or representation ed without Entertainment $1.66 B $3.94 B Food and Beverages $4.51 B $10.5 B Furnishings and Equipment $1.32 B $3.14 B Gifts $805 M $1.98 B Health Care $1.78 B $4.12 B Household Operations $1.08 B $2.63 B Miscellaneous Expenses $491 M $1.15 B Personal Care $429 M $1.01 B Personal Insurance $311 M $760 M Reading $97.5 M $232 M Shelter $5.74 B $13.6 B Tobacco $185 M $416 M Transportation $5.92 B $13.8 B Utilities $2.04 B $4.72 B

Monthly Household Consumer Expenditure (2014) Total Household Expenditure $4,727 $5,182 Total Non-Retail Expenditure $2,726 57.7% $2,990 57.7% Total Retail Expenditures $2,001 42.3% $2,192 42.3% Apparel $227 4.8% $250 4.8% Contributions $180 3.8% $209 4.0% Education $118 2.5% $136 2.6% Entertainment $265 5.6% $291 5.6% Food and Beverages $718 15.2% $778 15.0% Furnishings and Equipment $210 4.4% $233 4.5%

Gifts $128 2.7% $146 2.8% provid is herein information The to be reliable. deemed sources and government private data from using produced was report This Health Care $283 6.0% $305 5.9% Household Operations $173 3.7% $195 3.8% Miscellaneous Expenses $78 1.7% $85 1.6% Personal Care $68 1.4% $75 1.4% Personal Insurance $49 1.0% $56 1.1% Reading $16 0.3% $17 0.3% Shelter $914 19.3% $1,007 19.4% Tobacco $29 0.6% $31 0.6% Transportation $944 20.0% $1,018 19.7% Utilities $325 6.9% $349 6.7%

©2014, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 9 of 90 Demographic Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 08/2014, TIGER Geography

This Page Left Intentionally Blank

EXHIBIT C

Baseball Rhode Island Market Analysis and Economic Impact Statement

Fiscal Benefit Summary

Level Construction 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Business Corporation Tax State$ 85,680 ------Construction Materials Tax State$ 595,000 ------Food and Beverage Tax City$ 113,014 $ 116,404 $ 112,113 $ 115,476 $ 110,963 $ 114,292 $ 117,721 $ 121,253 $ 124,890 $ 128,637 State Income Tax State$ 956,250 $ 661,147 $ 679,478 $ 653,115 $ 671,215 $ 642,743 $ 665,010 $ 683,331 $ 702,202 $ 721,633 $ 741,648 Sales Tax State$ 1,550,092 $ 1,596,595 $ 1,544,192 $ 1,590,517 $ 1,535,451 $ 1,581,514 $ 1,628,960 $ 1,677,82 9 $ 1,728,164 $ 1,780,00 8 Tangible Business Tax City$ 5,920 $ 6,097 $ 6,280 $ 6,469 $ 6,663 $ 6,863 $ 7,069 $ 7,281 $ 7,499 $ 7,724 Transient Occupancy Tax State$ 155,185 $ 159,840 $ 155,145 $ 159,800 $ 154,870 $ 159,516 $ 164,301 $ 169,230 $ 174,307 $ 179,536 Transient Occupancy Tax City$ 79,757 $ 82,149 $ 79,733 $ 82,125 $ 79,588 $ 81,976 $ 84,435 $ 86,968 $ 89,577 $ 92,264 Annual Tax Benefit City of Providence$ - $ 198,690 $ 204,651 $ 198,126 $ 204,070 $ 197,214 $ 203,131 $ 209,225 $ 215,501 $ 221,967 $ 228,625 State of Rhode Island$ 1,636,930 $ 2,366,423 $ 2,435,912 $ 2,352,452 $ 2,421,532 $ 2,333,063 $ 2,406,040 $ 2,476,592 $ 2,549,261 $ 2,624,104 $ 2,701,193

Total Benefit$ 1,636,930 $ 2,565,113 $ 2,640,563 $ 2,550,579 $ 2,625,602 $ 2,530,278 $ 2,609,171 $ 2,685,817 $ 2,764,762 $ 2,846,070 $ 2,929,818

Note: Fiscal benefit may vary depending on final lease and ownership structures

EXHIBIT D

Baseball Rhode Island Market Analysis and Economic Impact Statement Economic Benefit Case Studies

AUTOZONE PARK

Location Memphis, TN Team Memphis Redbirds Year Opened 2000 Capacity 14,200 Level of Play Class AAA, PCL Affiliation Cleveland Indians

Ancillary Development The construction of AutoZone Park established a 20-acre ballpark improvement district in downtown Memphis. Ancillary development included the $30 million rehabilitation of the Moore Dry Goods Building into the Toyota Center, which added 200,000 SF class A office space to the area, as well as the restoration of the 60,000-SF Toof Building to house the National Pastime Museum. The five-building Echelon at the Ballpark multi-family development added 385 high-density residential units, while a new 700-student elementary school was constructed for $15 million. Other projects that have opened in downtown Memphis due to the revitalization spurred by AutoZone Park include the repurposing of a YMCA building into lofts and a fitness center, as well as commercial investment. In January 2014, the City of Memphis acquired AutoZone Park from the investment firm Fundamental Advisors in a deal that comprised of the $19.5 million purchase price and $4.5 million in improvements to the park.

Source: Information above was gathered from local newspapers and business journals.. Baseball Rhode Island Market Analysis and Economic Impact Statement Economic Benefit Case Studies

FIFTH THIRD FIELD

Location Dayton, OH Team Dayton Dragons Year Opened 2000 Capacity 7,230 Level of Play Class A, MWL Affiliation Cincinnati Reds

Ancillary Development

Fifth Third Field served as a catalyst for spurring economic development downtown. Within three years of opening, retail activity had increased by 15% on game days, while $111 million in downtown investment has been tracked since the park opened. Relizon and Workflow One relocated corporate headquarters to properties proximate to the ballpark, while others such as CareSource Management Group have constructed new corporate offices in downtown Dayton. Fifth Third Field ultimately led to the development of RiverScape MetroPark, a $32,000,000 urban park project along the Great Miami River that provides year- round activities for the Dayton community.

Source: Information above was gathered from local newspapers and business journals.. Baseball Rhode Island Market Analysis and Economic Impact Statement Economic Benefit Case Studies

FIFTH THIRD FIELD Location Toledo, OH Team Toledo Mud Hens Year Opened 2002 Capacity 8,943 Level of Play Class AAA, IL Affiliation Detroit Tigers

Ancillary Development Fifth Third field has attracted a variety of businesses to the area immediately surrounding the ballpark, including architecture and legal firms, a spa, and restaurants. Residential and mixed use developments have also emerged with the addition of lofts and retail at St. Clair Village and the more recent $20 million renovation of the Standard-Simmons Building into luxury rental units; in 2012 the vacancy rate for Toledo's central business district had dropped to 3.9% versus 7.8% overall for Toledo's multi-family housing stock. Planning for the area surrounding the ballpark continues, as the Mud Hens organization has recently explored significant redevelopment opportunities in the range of $10-15 million in the adjacent Warehouse District; the plan, which is still being defined, would renovate adjacent vacant buildings for commercial and retail opportunities.

Source: Information above was gathered from local newspapers and business journals.. Baseball Rhode Island Market Analysis and Economic Impact Statement Economic Benefit Case Studies

LOUISVILLE SLUGGER FIELD

Location Louisville, KY Team Louisville Bats Year Opened 2000 Capacity 13,131 Level of Play Class AAA, IL Affiliation Cincinnati Reds

Ancillary Development

Within the first three years of construction of Louisville Slugger Field and the expansion of Waterfront Park, the area immediately surrounding the ballpark realized over $84 million in investment. In the fourth year, Fourth Street Live, a $70 million entertainment district, opened. Residential development has expanded in recent years with the renovation and expansion of existing buildings, as well as the addition of mixed use developments like Waterfront Park Place that adds 20,000 SF of retail space to the area along with 77 luxury condominiums.

Source: Information above was gathered from local newspapers and business journals.. Baseball Rhode Island Market Analysis and Economic Impact Statement Economic Benefit Case Studies

ONEOK FIELD

Location Tulsa, OK Team Tulsa Drillers Year Opened 2012 Capacity 7,833 Level of Play Class AA, TL Affiliation Colorado Rockies

Ancillary Development

ONEOK Field has served as a catalyst for several projects. According to an article published by the Journal Record in 2012, the area proximate to the ballpark has benefited from over $710 million in investment. Projects included in the figure includes three hotels, residential lofts, restaurants, a museum, and various commercial office properties. City officials have speculated development of ONEOK Field also provided necessary momentum for the completion of the BOK Center, Tulsa's new 19,000- seat arena.

Source: Information above was gathered from local newspapers and business journals.. Baseball Rhode Island Market Analysis and Economic Impact Statement Economic Benefit Case Studies

DURHAM ATHLETIC PARK

Location Durham, NC Team Durham Bulls Year Opened 1993/ 2014 R Capacity 10,000 Level of Play Class AAA, IL Affiliation Tampa Bay Rays

Ancillary Development

The Durham Bulls Athletic Park was strategically sited in downtown Durham to serve as the anchor tenant to the American Tobacco Historic District. In tandem with development of the historic district, the ballpark has been cited as a contributing factor for development of the Durham Performing Arts Center, the 130,000 SF Diamond View III building, and potentially, the ATC East Hotel development. Public sector investments include the $120 million Durham Justice Center, the $90.3 million Durham Human Services Complex, and the Durham Central Park. According to Colliers International, since 1993 there has been $1.3 billion in aggregate investment in downtown Durham. Further, in 1993, there was 3,000 downtown employees compared to 16,000 in 2014, a net increase of 900 residential units (100 to 1,000) and office space has quadrupled (700,000 to 3,000,000 SF).

Source: Information above was gathered from local newspapers and business journals..