The Human Chin Revisited: What Is It and Who Has

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Human Chin Revisited: What Is It and Who Has Jeffrey H. Schwartz The human chin revisited: what is it and Department of Anthropology, who has it? University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, Although the presence of a ‘‘chin’’ has long been recognized as U.S.A. E-mail: unique to Homo sapiens among mammals, both the ontogeny and the [email protected] morphological details of this structure have been largely overlooked. Here we point out the essential features of symphyseal morphology in Ian Tattersall H. sapiens, which are present and well-defined in the fetus at least as Department of Anthropology, early as the fifth gestational month. Differences among adults in American Museum of Natural expression of these structures, particularly in the prominence of the History, Central Park West at mental tuberosity, are developmental epiphenomena and serve to 79th Street, New York, emphasize the importance of studying this region in juveniles when- NY 10024, U.S.A. ever possible. A survey of various middle to late Pleistocene fossil E-mail: [email protected] hominids for which juveniles are known reveals that these features are present in some late Pleistocene specimens assigned to H. sapiens, but Received 7 May 1998 not in all of the presumed anatomically modern H. sapiens (i.e., Revision received 28 April Qafzeh 8, 9, and 11). The adult specimens from Skhu¯l, as well as the 1999 and accepted 26 May adult Qafzeh 7 specimen, are similarly distinctive in symphyseal 1999 morphology. Neanderthals are quite variable in their own right, and they as well as other middle to late Pleistocene fossils lack the Keywords: chin, Homo sapiens, symphyseal features of H. sapiens. Some of the latter are, however, Neanderthals, Skhu¯l, seen in the Tighenif (Ternifine) mandibles. Qafzeh. 2000 Academic Press Journal of Human Evolution (2000) 38, 367–409 doi: 10.1006/jhev.1999.0339 Available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Introduction characteristics became incorporated into scenarios of evolution. With regard to the More than two centuries ago, Blumenbach chin, which essentially became synonymous (1775) identified the ‘‘chin’’ as being among with ‘‘a prominence at the front of the the most fundamental of the features that he mandible,’’ the general concern among considered uniquely human. Of course, paleoanthropologists was with how an ape- when Blumenbach presented his discussion like jaw could be converted to that of Homo of ‘‘what distinguished humans,’’ it was in sapiens (Hrdlicˇka, 1911; Robinson, 1913; the context of ‘‘compared to other extant Wallis, 1917; Gregory, 1922; Howells, primates.’’ But with the acceptance in the 1959; Enlow, 1982; Stringer et al., 1984; nineteenth century of hominid fossils as real Daegling, 1993). entities, and the subsequent documentation Discussion of the human chin has been of a well-represented and diverse human approached from several different perspec- fossil record, features such as the chin, tives. Anatomical descriptions have focused which had a specific kind of significance on the protrusiveness of the symphyseal when the primary goal of the taxonomist region, with the mounded structure being was to distinguish between humans and identified in extant humans as the ‘‘mental other extant primates, became cast in a protuberance’’ (Johnston & Willis, 1954), different light. Rather than being static enti- the ‘‘mental eminence’’ (Lieberman, 1995), ties, as would be expected of organisms that the ‘‘mental osseum’’ (Bra¨uer, 1984; Rosas, had been specially created, morphological 1995), or the ‘‘tuber symphyseos’’ (Hublin 0047–2484/00/030367+43$35.00/0 2000 Academic Press 368 . . & Tillier, 1981; Inke, 1967). Thus defined, It is the basal protrusion which has, of the mental protuberance may continue course, been the primary criterion for laterally on each side to some extent as a identifying the mental protuberance; and thickening of the inferior margin of the this, in turn, has become the primary ele- corpus. In some individuals, each lateral ment in the identification of a chin. From extremity of the mental protuberance may this perspective, it is perfectly reasonable to bear a blunt ‘‘corner,’’ which has been conclude that ‘‘chins are a notoriously vari- referred to as a ‘‘mental tubercle’’ (Johnston able character, as many modern humans & Willis, 1954; Rak, 1998)or‘‘tubercula lack them’’ (Lieberman, 1995:174). And lateralia’’ (Hublin & Tillier, 1981; Inke, when the focus of attention in this region 1967). Above each lateral extremity and to is the degree of symphyseal protrusion each side of the mental protuberance, lies a anteriorly—which is often judged against the depression, or ‘‘mental fossa’’ (Wolpoff, vertical plane of the lips or incisors (see 1996), which would appear to exist as a Enlow, 1982)—there might, indeed, appear default of the midline field of bone being to be ‘‘chinless’’ and ‘‘almost chinless’’ elevated or protrusive. Collectively, the human beings. mental protuberance and lateral extremities, The evolution of the human chin has been especially if they bear tubercles, have been discussed in various ways. Hrdlicˇka (1911) identified as the ‘‘mental trigon’’ (Rak, ventured the suggestion that this structure 1998), the ‘‘mental trigone’’ (Smith, 1984), evolved as a result not of the specific devel- or, if the structure is restricted quite opment of a protrusion, but of the reduction inferiorly along the corpus, the ‘‘trigonum of the dental arch (which essentially left the basale’’ (Bra¨uer, 1984). Just below the protrusion behind as the anterior margin alveolar margin, the bone may be curved retreated). This idea was elaborated upon by inward, presenting a shallow depression that Robinson (1913), who proposed that it was has been referred to as the ‘‘incurvatio the demands of the tongue and laryngeal mandibularis’’ (Hublin & Tillier, 1981), the musculature that maintained mandible ‘‘incurvatio mandibulae’’ (Rosas, 1995), or length inferiorly as the region above it the ‘‘impressio subincisiva externa’’ (Inke, supposedly retreated posteriorly. Gregory 1967). Although there is obviously much (1922) added to these notions the possibility morphological detail to be recognized in the that the chin provides space at the front of symphyseal region of H. sapiens, the human the jaw that is necessary for the enlarging chin has frequently been identified solely crowns and roots of incisors and canines. on the basis of the general protrusiveness of Howells (1959) reiterated Robinson’s the symphyseal region (Lieberman, 1995; (1913) proposition and suggested further Smith, 1984; Wolpoff, 1980; Lam et al., that bone thickening, which ultimately pro- 1996). duced the chin, must have evolved in order The development of the human chin is to reinforce the front of the jaw against typically described as a postnatal phenom- masticatory stresses (which, in apes, were enon, a simple matter of bone resorption absorbed by the internal buttress known as near the alveolar margin, with concomitant the ‘‘simian shelf’’). Reisenfeld (1969) deposition of bone more inferiorly (Enlow, thought that he had refuted this kind of 1982; see also Aiello & Dean, 1990; functional explanation by inducing in mice Daegling, 1993; Lieberman, 1995). Individ- what he believed to be a chin by extracting ual differences or variations in chin develop- the continually growing anterior teeth and ment result essentially from differential rates severing the muscles of mastication (which of resorption vs. deposition (Enlow, 1982). did, of course, have the effect of eliminating ‘‘’’ 369 masticatory stress at the symphyseal region). a conspicuous incurvatio mandibulae’’ Wolpoff (1980) adopted a different stance (Rosas, 1995:550). on the subject by speculating that the The impetus for the present review came appearance of the chin was correlated with from two different and unexpected sources. expansion of the neurocranium and a con- First, in the course of conducting a twenty- comitant shift of the temporal muscles to a year analysis of the skeletal remains of peri- more medial angulation. Most recently, natal individuals from the Punic site of Daegling (1993) surveyed the various func- Carthage (n>650 individuals; Schwartz & tional interpretations put forth to explain the Houghton, in preparation), one of us (JHS, presence of the chin, and concluded that the unpublished data) discovered that it was best was ‘‘the hypothesis that the human possible to identify very small fragments chin represents a structural response to of the symphyseally unfused mandibles of resist vertical bending in the coronal plane.’’ these highly immature individuals on the Regardless of the proposed mechanisms basis of specific features of this region: behind the appearance of the chin as a namely, a continuous everted margin that structure, the language of the literature is proceeds along the edge of the symphysis invested with the notion of an evolutionary and laterally around along the inferior edge trend, in which a perceived increase in swell- and that, consequently, subtends a deep ing of the symphyseal region ultimately leads fossa. Second, as a result of realizing that the to the formation of the typical human chin. configuration of the brow in some of the Thus, it is common to read of the supposed most familiar of the supposed early ‘‘ana- existence of incipient chins in various tomically modern’’ H. sapiens (i.e., from Neanderthals (themselves considered Skhu¯l and Qafzeh) was not bipartite (cf. merely an archaic, primitive version of H. Stringer et al., 1984), as it is in late sapiens). These include adult specimens Pleistocene and extant representatives of from Guattari, S{ipka, and Vindija (Lam this species (Schwartz & Tattersall, 1999b), et al., 1996; Lieberman, 1995; Smith, 1984; we came to realize that these same fos- Wolpoff, 1980; Wolpoff et al., 1981) and the sils were also not H. sapiens-like in Archi Neanderthal child (Ascenzi & Sergi, mandibular symphyseal morphology. For 1971a,b; Mallegni & Trinkaus, 1997; the record, we must admit that when we first Stringer et al., 1984). Hence, because dis- studied the Skhu¯l specimens, we were not cussions of later human evolution are often initially struck by these disparities.
Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Digital Panoramic Radiograph Magnification on Vertical Measurement Accuracy in Posterior Mandibular Regions
    International Journal of Medical and Health Research Original Research Article International Journal of Medical and Health Research ISSN: 2454-9142; Impact Factor: RJIF 5.54 Received: 26-10-2018; Accepted: 28-11-2018 www.medicalsciencejournal.com Volume 4; Issue 12; December 2018; Page No. 184-186 Assessment of digital panoramic radiograph magnification on vertical measurement accuracy in posterior mandibular regions Dr. Kumar Gaurav Dubey1, Dr. Richa Dubey2 1 Senior Resident, Department of Dentistry, Anugrah Narayan Magadh Medical College and Hospital, Gaya, Bihar, India 2 Senior Resident, Department of Dentistry, Sri Krishna Medical College and Hospital, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India * Corresponding Author: Dr. Richa Dubey Abstract Panoramic radiography is often the first choice method for the placement of implants because it provides information on the overall shape of the jaws, the position of the maxillary sinus floor and the nasal cavity floor, and the proximal distal as well as vertical position of the mandibular canal and the mental foramen. The measurements on digital radiography are quite acceptable and reliable for clinical use as long as the structures do not traverse the midline. Repeated measurements lead to a reduction in the systematic error and magnification to a loss of accuracy. The study was planned on the Department of Dentistry Anugrah Narayan Magadh Medical College and Hospital, Gaya.on 30 implants in the posterior mandibular regions. The digital panoramic radiographic images were taken using implants in the posterior mandibular regions. The digital panoramic radiographic equipment used. All digital panoramic radiographs were taken by technicians according to standard protocol provided by the manufacturer. This study is aimed to determine the accuracy of the vertical and horizontal measurements on digital panoramic radiographic images using implants in the posterior mandibular regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Numb Tongue, Numb Lip, Numb Chin: What to Do When?
    NUMB TONGUE, NUMB LIP, NUMB CHIN: WHAT TO DO WHEN? Ramzey Tursun, DDS, FACS Marshall Green, DDS Andre Ledoux, DMD Arshad Kaleem, DMD, MD Assistant Professor, Associate Fellowship Director of Oral, Head & Neck Oncologic and Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Division of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami INTRODUCTION MECHANISM OF NERVE Microneurosurgery of the trigeminal nerve INJURIES has been in the spotlight over the last few years. The introduction of cone-beam When attempting to classify the various scanning, three-dimensional imaging, mechanisms of nerve injury in the magnetic resonance neurography, maxillofacial region, it becomes clear that endoscopic-assisted surgery, and use of the overwhelming majority are iatrogenic allogenic nerve grafts have improved the in nature. The nerves that are most often techniques that can be used for affected in dento-alveolar procedures are assessment and treatment of patients with the branches of the mandibular division of nerve injuries. Injury to the terminal cranial nerve V, i.e., the trigeminal nerve. branches of the trigeminal nerve is a well- The lingual nerve and inferior alveolar known risk associated with a wide range of nerve are most often affected, and third dental and surgical procedures. These molar surgery is the most common cause 1 injuries often heal spontaneously without of injury. medical or surgical intervention. However, they sometimes can cause a variety of None of these nerves provide motor symptoms, including lost or altered innervation. However, damage to these sensation, pain, or a combination of these, nerves can cause a significant loss of and may have an impact on speech, sensation and/or taste in affected patients.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Years on Ice Age Europe Network Celebrates – Page 5
    network of heritage sites Magazine Issue 2 aPriL 2018 neanderthal rock art Latest research from spanish caves – page 6 Underground theatre British cave balances performances with conservation – page 16 Caves with ice age art get UnesCo Label germany’s swabian Jura awarded world heritage status – page 40 5 Years On ice age europe network celebrates – page 5 tewww.ice-age-europe.euLLING the STORY of iCe AGE PeoPLe in eUROPe anD eXPL ORING PLEISTOCene CULtURAL HERITAGE IntrOductIOn network of heritage sites welcome to the second edition of the ice age europe magazine! Ice Age europe Magazine – issue 2/2018 issn 2568­4353 after the successful launch last year we are happy to present editorial board the new issue, which is again brimming with exciting contri­ katrin hieke, gerd­Christian weniger, nick Powe butions. the magazine showcases the many activities taking Publication editing place in research and conservation, exhibition, education and katrin hieke communication at each of the ice age europe member sites. Layout and design Brightsea Creative, exeter, Uk; in addition, we are pleased to present two special guest Beate tebartz grafik Design, Düsseldorf, germany contributions: the first by Paul Pettitt, University of Durham, cover photo gives a brief overview of a groundbreaking discovery, which fashionable little sapiens © fumane Cave proved in february 2018 that the neanderthals were the first Inside front cover photo cave artists before modern humans. the second by nuria sanz, water bird – hohle fels © urmu, director of UnesCo in Mexico and general coor­­­di nator of the Photo: burkert ideenreich heaDs programme, reports on the new initiative for a serial transnational nomination of neanderthal sites as world heritage, for which this network laid the foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genetic Analysis of the Gibraltar Neanderthals
    A genetic analysis of the Gibraltar Neanderthals Lukas Bokelmanna,1, Mateja Hajdinjaka, Stéphane Peyrégnea, Selina Braceb, Elena Essela, Cesare de Filippoa, Isabelle Glockea, Steffi Grotea, Fabrizio Mafessonia, Sarah Nagela, Janet Kelsoa, Kay Prüfera, Benjamin Vernota, Ian Barnesb, Svante Pääboa,1,2, Matthias Meyera,2, and Chris Stringerb,1,2 aDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; and bCentre for Human Evolution Research, Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom Contributed by Svante Pääbo, June 14, 2019 (sent for review March 22, 2019; reviewed by Roberto Macchiarelli and Eva-Maria Geigl) The Forbes’ Quarry and Devil’s Tower partial crania from Gibraltar geographic range from western Europe to western Asia (for an are among the first Neanderthal remains ever found. Here, we overview of all specimens, see SI Appendix, Table S1). Thus, show that small amounts of ancient DNA are preserved in the there is currently no evidence for the existence of substantial petrous bones of the 2 individuals despite unfavorable climatic genetic substructure in the Neanderthal population after ∼90 ka conditions. However, the endogenous Neanderthal DNA is present ago (4), the time at which the “Altai-like” Neanderthals in the among an overwhelming excess of recent human DNA. Using im- Altai had presumably been replaced by more “Vindija 33.19- proved DNA library construction methods that enrich for DNA like” Neanderthals (17). fragments carrying deaminated cytosine residues, we were able The Neanderthal fossils of Gibraltar are among the most to sequence 70 and 0.4 megabase pairs (Mbp) nuclear DNA of the prominent finds in the history of paleoanthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology
    CALIFOR!:HA STATE UNIVERSI'fY, NO:R'l'HRIDGE 'l'HE EVOLUTIONARY SCHENES 0!.'' NEANDER.THAL A thesis su~nitted in partial satisfaction of tl:e requirements for the degree of Naste.r of A.rts Anthropology by Sharon Stacey Klein The Thesis of Sharon Stacey Klein is approved: Dr·,~ Nike West. - Dr. Bruce Gelvin, Chair California s·tate University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ·There are many people I would like to thank. Firs·t, the members of my corr.mi ttee who gave me their guidance and suggestions. Second, rny family and friends who supported me through this endea7cr and listened to my constant complaining. Third, the people in my office who allowed me to use my time to complete ·this project. Specifically, I appreciate the proof-reading done by my mother and the French translations done by Mary Riedel. ii.i TABLE OF' CONTENTS PAGE PRELIMINA:H.Y MATEIUALS : Al")stra-:-:t vi CHAP'I'ERS: I. Introduction 1 II. Methodology and Materials 4 III. Classification of Neanderthals 11 Species versus Subspecies Definitions of Neanderthals 16 V. The Pre-sapiens Hypothesis .i9 VI. The Unilinear Hypothesis 26 Horphological Evidence Transi tiona.l Sp.. ::;:cimens T'ool Complexes VII. The Pre-Neanderthal Hypothesis 58 Morphological Evidence Spectrum Hypothesis "Classic'1 Neanderthal's Adaptations Transitional Evidence Tool Complexes VIII. Sumnary and Conclusion 90 Heferences Cited 100 1. G~<ological and A.rchaeoloqical 5 Subdivisions of the P1eistoce!1e 2. The Polyphyletic Hypothesis 17 3. The Pre-sapiens Hypothesis 20 4. The UnilinPar Hypothesis 27 iv FIGUHES: P.Z\GE 5. Size Comparisons of Neanderthal 34 and Australian Aborigine Teeth 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoanthropology Society Meeting Abstracts, Memphis, Tn, 17-18 April 2012
    PALEOANTHROPOLOGY SOCIETY MEETING ABSTRACTS, MEMPHIS, TN, 17-18 APRIL 2012 Paleolithic Foragers of the Hrazdan Gorge, Armenia Daniel Adler, Anthropology, University of Connecticut, USA B. Yeritsyan, Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology & Ethnography, ARMENIA K. Wilkinson, Archaeology, Winchester University, UNITED KINGDOM R. Pinhasi, Archaeology, UC Cork, IRELAND B. Gasparyan, Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology & Ethnography, ARMENIA For more than a century numerous archaeological sites attributed to the Middle Paleolithic have been investigated in the Southern Caucasus, but to date few have been excavated, analyzed, or dated using modern techniques. Thus only a handful of sites provide the contextual data necessary to address evolutionary questions regarding regional hominin adaptations and life-ways. This talk will consider current archaeological research in the Southern Caucasus, specifically that being conducted in the Republic of Armenia. While the relative frequency of well-studied Middle Paleolithic sites in the Southern Caucasus is low, those considered in this talk, Nor Geghi 1 (late Middle Pleistocene) and Lusakert Cave 1 (Upper Pleistocene), span a variety of environmental, temporal, and cultural contexts that provide fragmentary glimpses into what were complex and evolving patterns of subsistence, settlement, and mobility over the last ~200,000 years. While a sample of two sites is too small to attempt a serious reconstruction of Middle Paleolithic life-ways across such a vast and environmentally diverse region, the sites
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Human Intelligence and the Coefficient of Additive Genetic Variance in Human Brain Size ⁎ Geoffrey F
    Intelligence 35 (2007) 97–114 The evolution of human intelligence and the coefficient of additive genetic variance in human brain size ⁎ Geoffrey F. Miller a, , Lars Penke b a University of New Mexico, USA b Institut für Psychologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany Received 3 November 2005; received in revised form 17 August 2006; accepted 18 August 2006 Available online 12 October 2006 Abstract Most theories of human mental evolution assume that selection favored higher intelligence and larger brains, which should have reduced genetic variance in both. However, adult human intelligence remains highly heritable, and is genetically correlated with brain size. This conflict might be resolved by estimating the coefficient of additive genetic variance (CVA) in human brain size, since CVAs are widely used in evolutionary genetics as indexes of recent selection. Here we calculate for the first time that this CVA is about 7.8, based on data from 19 recent MRI studies of adult human brain size in vivo: 11 studies on brain size means and standard deviations, and 8 studies on brain size heritabilities. This CVA appears lower than that for any other human organ volume or life-history trait, suggesting that the brain has been under strong stabilizing (average-is-better) selection. This result is hard to reconcile with most current theories of human mental evolution, which emphasize directional (more-is-better) selection for higher intelligence and larger brains. Either these theories are all wrong, or CVAs are not as evolutionarily informative as most evolutionary geneticists believe, or, as we suggest, brain size is not a very good index for understanding the evolutionary genetics of human intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • Morfofunctional Structure of the Skull
    N.L. Svintsytska V.H. Hryn Morfofunctional structure of the skull Study guide Poltava 2016 Ministry of Public Health of Ukraine Public Institution «Central Methodological Office for Higher Medical Education of MPH of Ukraine» Higher State Educational Establishment of Ukraine «Ukranian Medical Stomatological Academy» N.L. Svintsytska, V.H. Hryn Morfofunctional structure of the skull Study guide Poltava 2016 2 LBC 28.706 UDC 611.714/716 S 24 «Recommended by the Ministry of Health of Ukraine as textbook for English- speaking students of higher educational institutions of the MPH of Ukraine» (minutes of the meeting of the Commission for the organization of training and methodical literature for the persons enrolled in higher medical (pharmaceutical) educational establishments of postgraduate education MPH of Ukraine, from 02.06.2016 №2). Letter of the MPH of Ukraine of 11.07.2016 № 08.01-30/17321 Composed by: N.L. Svintsytska, Associate Professor at the Department of Human Anatomy of Higher State Educational Establishment of Ukraine «Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy», PhD in Medicine, Associate Professor V.H. Hryn, Associate Professor at the Department of Human Anatomy of Higher State Educational Establishment of Ukraine «Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy», PhD in Medicine, Associate Professor This textbook is intended for undergraduate, postgraduate students and continuing education of health care professionals in a variety of clinical disciplines (medicine, pediatrics, dentistry) as it includes the basic concepts of human anatomy of the skull in adults and newborns. Rewiewed by: O.M. Slobodian, Head of the Department of Anatomy, Topographic Anatomy and Operative Surgery of Higher State Educational Establishment of Ukraine «Bukovinian State Medical University», Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor M.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Foods and the Dietary Ecology of Neanderthals and Early Modern Humans
    Journal of Human Evolution xxx (2014) 1e11 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol Plant foods and the dietary ecology of Neanderthals and early modern humans Amanda G. Henry a,*, Alison S. Brooks b, Dolores R. Piperno c,d a Plant Foods in Hominin Dietary Ecology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany b Department of Anthropology, Center for Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology, The George Washington University, 2110 G St NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA c Program in Human Ecology and Archaeobiology, Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013- 7012, USA d Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancon, Panama article info abstract Article history: One of the most important challenges in anthropology is understanding the disappearance of Nean- Received 3 February 2012 derthals. Previous research suggests that Neanderthals had a narrower diet than early modern humans, Accepted 22 December 2013 in part because they lacked various social and technological advances that lead to greater dietary variety, Available online xxx such as a sexual division of labor and the use of complex projectile weapons. The wider diet of early modern humans would have provided more calories and nutrients, increasing fertility, decreasing Keywords: mortality and supporting large population sizes, allowing them to out-compete Neanderthals. However, Phytolith this model for Neanderthal dietary behavior is based on analysis of animal remains, stable isotopes, and Starch grain Microfossil other methods that provide evidence only of animal food in the diet.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Implants and Oral Anatomy
    Chapter 2 Implants and oral anatomy Associate Professor of Maxillofacial Anatomy Section, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tatsuo Terashima In recent years, the development of new materials and improvements in the operative methods used for implants have led to remarkable progress in the field of dental surgery. These methods have been applied widely in clinical practice. The development of computerized medical imaging technologies such as X-ray computed tomography have allowed detailed 3D-analysis of medical conditions, resulting in a dramatic improvement in the success rates of operative intervention. For treatment with a dental implant to be successful, it is however critical to have full knowledge and understanding of the fundamental anatomical structures of the oral and maxillofacial regions. In addition, it is necessary to understand variations in the topographic and anatomical structures among individuals, with age, and with pathological conditions. This chapter will discuss the basic structure of the oral cavity in relation to implant treatment. I. Osteology of the oral area The oral cavity is composed of the maxilla that is in contact with the cranial bone, palatine bone, the mobile mandible, and the hyoid bone. The maxilla and the palatine bones articulate with the cranial bone. The mandible articulates with the temporal bone through the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The hyoid bone is suspended from the cranium and the mandible by the suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles. The formation of the basis of the oral cavity by these bones and the associated muscles makes it possible for the oral cavity to perform its various functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab Manual Axial Skeleton Atla
    1 PRE-LAB EXERCISES When studying the skeletal system, the bones are often sorted into two broad categories: the axial skeleton and the appendicular skeleton. This lab focuses on the axial skeleton, which consists of the bones that form the axis of the body. The axial skeleton includes bones in the skull, vertebrae, and thoracic cage, as well as the auditory ossicles and hyoid bone. In addition to learning about all the bones of the axial skeleton, it is also important to identify some significant bone markings. Bone markings can have many shapes, including holes, round or sharp projections, and shallow or deep valleys, among others. These markings on the bones serve many purposes, including forming attachments to other bones or muscles and allowing passage of a blood vessel or nerve. It is helpful to understand the meanings of some of the more common bone marking terms. Before we get started, look up the definitions of these common bone marking terms: Canal: Condyle: Facet: Fissure: Foramen: (see Module 10.18 Foramina of Skull) Fossa: Margin: Process: Throughout this exercise, you will notice bold terms. This is meant to focus your attention on these important words. Make sure you pay attention to any bold words and know how to explain their definitions and/or where they are located. Use the following modules to guide your exploration of the axial skeleton. As you explore these bones in Visible Body’s app, also locate the bones and bone markings on any available charts, models, or specimens. You may also find it helpful to palpate bones on yourself or make drawings of the bones with the bone markings labeled.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Popolamento Dell'europa
    Laurea Magistrale in QUATERNARIO, PREISTORIA E ARCHEOLOGIA Master in QUATERNARIO e PREISTORIA Il Popolamento dell’Europa Julie Arnaud [email protected] Origine Origine : Prime testimonianze del popolamento europeo (Cohen & Cibbard, 2010) Origine : Il primo popolamento europeo Anteneandertaliani : non hanno acquisito nessuna delle apomorfie dei neandertaliani Ante-Neanderthals: they didn’t acquired none of Neanderthals apomophies Gran Dolina Sima del Elefante Homo antecessor 0,8 Homo sp. Myr (TD6) 1,3 Myr (Mandible ATE9-1) dm1 di Barranco Leon BL02-J54-100 ESR: 1.02 e 1.73 Ma Paleomagnetismo: 1.07 – 1.77 Ma Biocronologia: 1.4 Ma Questo ritrovamento associato ad un importante insieme litico conferma che l’Europe occidentale è stata colonizzata poco dopo la prima espansione out of Africa, documentata da Dmanisi This finding combined with the important lithic tool assemblage confirms that Western Europe was colonized soon after the first expansion out of Africa, currently documented at the Dmanisi site. Toro-Moyano, 2013. JHE 65 Sierra de Atapuerca – The goldmine of Paleoanthropologist… Sima del Elefante (Bermudez de Castro et al., 2013) Primitive traits for the genus Homo: - Anterior marginal tubercle below C/P3 - Weakly express mentum osseum - Distinct mental trigone - Presence of incisura submentalis - Morphology of the premolars Derived traits relative to African early Homo: - A minimal inclination of the planum alveolare - Absence of the superior transverse torus - Limited thickness of the mandibular body (Carbonell et al., 2008) ATE9-1 displays some morphological features that suggest a departure from the variability observed in the Dmanisi and African Pleistocene mandibles, suggesting the early appearance of a “European identity” in the hominin populations who settled this continent.
    [Show full text]