DOCSLIB.ORG

National Security and the Australian Communications Sector

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Security and the Australian Communications Sector The unfinished canvas: national security and the Australian communications sector Susanne Louise Lloyd-Jones A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Law January 2018 UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES THESIS/DISSERTATION SHEET Surname or Family name: LLOYD-JONES First name: SUSANNE Other name/s: LOUISE Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD School: LAW Faculty: LAW Title: The unfinished canvas: national security and the Australian communications sector Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) After 11 September 2001, the protection of national security became a high-stakes issue in Australia and internationally. The Australian Government commenced a far-reaching legislative agenda to update its national security laws. Described by a former attorney-general as ‘an unfinished canvas’, the national security legislative framework included communications–sector specific legislation, directed at the national interest obligations of communications industry stakeholders. This thesis examines the governance of national security in the Australian communications sector, with the aim of contributing to legal knowledge by examining the entrenched governance networks, structures and processes for coordinating national security law and policy in the Australian communications sector and accurately characterising the compact—some might call it the ‘accord’—between industry and government. A normative concern relating to the fate of democratic scrutiny in the specified context is investigated. The thesis draws on a governance theory perspective and uses a multiple case study approach. The thesis concludes that the coordination of national security law and policy in the Australian communications sector is best understood as corporatist governance. The research reimagines the Australian industrial relations Accord of the 1990s by framing the relationship between the state and industry as corporatist. The implications, both practical and abstract, of this relationship for liberal democratic institutions and democratic scrutiny are considered. The thesis concludes that, whereas co-regulatory and self-regulatory mechanisms may be efficient and effective, corporatist governance poses a threat to democratic scrutiny when the accord between industry and government is wholly functional and operating in its natural state of exclusivity, confidentiality and secrecy, under the cloak of national security. Corporatist governance is least risky to democratic scrutiny when the accord is not fully formed, or is easily broken—then, the strong democratic traditions of the ‘fourth estate’, the rule of law, parliamentary scrutiny and judicial oversight, may play a role in the coordination of national security law and policy in the Australian communications sector. Declaration relating to disposition of project thesis/dissertation I hereby grant to the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all property rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350-word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstracts International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only). ………………………………………………… ……………………………………..…… ……….……………………...… Signature Witness Signature Date The University recognises that there may be exceptional circumstances requiring restrictions on copying or conditions on use. Requests for restriction for a period of up to 2 years must be made in writing. Requests for a longer period of restriction may be considered in exceptional circumstances and require the approval of the Dean of Graduate Research. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of completion of requirements for Award: ORIGINALITY STATEMENT ‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project’s design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged’. Signed....................................... Date.......................................... i COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ‘I hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350-word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstract International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only). I have either used no substantial portions of copyright material in my thesis or I have obtained permission to use copyright material; where permission has not been granted I have applied/will apply for a partial restriction of the digital copy of my thesis or dissertation.’ Signed....................................... Date.......................................... AUTHENTICITY STATEMENT ‘I certify that the Library deposit digital copy is a direct equivalent of the final officially approved version of my thesis. No emendation of content has occurred and if there are any minor variations in formatting, they are the result of the conversion to digital format.’ Signed....................................... Date.......................................... ii For Michael and Loïc— ‘Petit à petit, l’oiseau fait son nid.’ In memory of Daryl Eirene Lawrence 1947–2013 iii ABSTRACT After 11 September 2001, the protection of national security became a high-stakes issue in Australia and internationally. The Australian Government commenced a far-reaching legislative agenda to update its national security laws. Described by a former attorney- general as ‘an unfinished canvas’, the national security legislative framework included communications–sector specific legislation, directed at the national interest obligations of communications industry stakeholders. This thesis examines the governance of national security in the Australian communications sector, with the aim of contributing to legal knowledge by examining the entrenched governance networks, structures and processes for coordinating national security law and policy in the Australian communications sector and accurately characterising the compact—some might call it the ‘accord’—between industry and government. A normative concern relating to the fate of democratic scrutiny in the specified context is investigated. The thesis draws on a governance theory perspective and uses a multiple case study approach. The thesis concludes that the coordination of national security law and policy in the Australian communications sector is best understood as corporatist governance. The research reimagines the Australian industrial relations Accord of the 1990s by framing the relationship between the state and industry as corporatist. The implications, both practical and abstract, of this relationship for liberal democratic institutions and democratic scrutiny are considered. The thesis concludes that, whereas co-regulatory and self-regulatory mechanisms may be efficient and effective, corporatist governance poses a threat to democratic scrutiny when the accord between industry and government is wholly functional and operating in its natural state of exclusivity, confidentiality and secrecy, under the cloak of national security. Corporatist governance is least risky to iv democratic scrutiny when the accord is not fully formed, or is easily broken—then, the strong democratic traditions of the ‘fourth estate’, the rule of law, parliamentary scrutiny and judicial oversight, may play a role in the coordination of national security law and policy in the Australian communications sector. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many generous souls have helped, encouraged, inspired and motivated me during my candidature. First and foremost, I wish to express my gratitude to my supervisors, Kathy Bowrey and Derek Wilding, for everything they have done for me as supervisors, mentors and friends. This project would not have been possible without their vision, patience, enthusiasm, tenacity, intellect and good humour. I wish to thank my colleagues in the Faculty of Law at the University of New South Wales. Ben Golder and Michael Handler, members of my review panel, were helpful and fair. Theunis Roux, chair of my review panel, appraised my work with honesty and rigour. Mark Aronson, from whose guidance I benefitted, read and commented on an early draft of Chapter Three. George Williams invited me to a Gilbert & Tobin Centre of Public Law lunch. Andrew Lynch kindly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Media Activity in the Context of Free-To-Air Broadcast Television
    FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Beatrice Züll SOCIAL MEDIA ACTIVITY IN THE CONTEXT OF FREE-TO-AIR BROADCAST TELEVISION DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Zagreb, 2017 FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Beatrice Züll SOCIAL MEDIA ACTIVITY IN THE CONTEXT OF FREE-TO-AIR BROADCAST TELEVISION DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Zagreb, 2017 FILOSOFSKI FAKULTET Beatrice Züll ULOGA DRUŠTVENIH MEDIJA U MJERENJU TV GLEDANOSTI DOKTORSKI RAD Zagreb, 2017. FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Beatrice Züll SOCIAL MEDIA ACTIVITY IN THE CONTEXT OF FREE-TO-AIR BROADCAST TELEVISION DOCTORAL DISSERTATION Mentor: MiHaela Banek Zorica, PH.D. Zagreb, 2017 FILOSOFSKI FAKULTET Beatrice Züll ULOGA DRUŠTVENIH MEDIJA U MJERENJU TV GLEDANOSTI DOKTORSKI RAD Mentor: izv. prof. dr. sc. MiHaela Banek Zorica Zagreb, 2017. Acknowledgements This doctoral thesis was supported by the members and colleagues of the Faculty of Information and Communication Sciences of the University of Zagreb who provided insight and expertise and greatly assisted the research. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Mihaela Banek Zorica, Ph.D., for her guidance, encouragement and expertise. Thanks to my advisor Stephan Malović, Ph.D., for his encouragement and great support. Alida Zorz Miketek from Nielsen supported this research work as an expert in television audience research. Guillaume Antoine Rabi and his team at RTL Televizija Hrvatska endured the challenges of the empirical part of this project by giving advice and insights into empirical data. Poslovna Inteligencija, Dražen Oreščanin and his team supported this project with staff and server capacity. Fremantle Production and Ana Habajec provided insights into the strategic approach of television production companies to integrating social media in their daily work and building up social media audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Independent Inquiry Into the Media and Media Regulation Is Protected by Copyright
    REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT INQUIRY INTO THE MEDIA AND MEDIA REGULATION BY THE HON R FINKELSTEIN QC ASSISTED BY PROF M RICKETSON REPORT TO THE MINISTER FOR BROADBAND, COMMUNICATIONS AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY 28 FEBRUARY 2012 © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 ISBN: 978-0-642-75424-0 (PDF version) 978-0-642-75425-7 (DOC version 978-0-642-75426-4 (printed version) The Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Media and Media Regulation is protected by copyright. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms and where otherwise noted, all material included this report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/). The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website, as is the full legal code for CC BY 3.0 AU licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode). The document must be attributed as the ‘Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Media and Media Regulation’. Using the Commonwealth Coat of Arms The terms of use for the Coat of Arms are available from www.itsanhonour.gov.au Other use The use of any material in this report in a way not permitted or otherwise allowed under the Copyright Act 1968 may be an infringement of copyright. Where you wish to use the material on this in a way that is beyond the scope of the terms of use that apply to it, you must lodge a request for further authorisation with the department. Authorisation Please address requests and enquiries concerning further authorisation to: The Media Inquiry Secretariat Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy PO Box 2154 CANBERRA ACT 2601 [email protected] Letter of transmittal Contents Executive summary—conclusions and recommendations 7 Media codes of ethics and accountability 7 Changing business models and quality journalism 10 1.
    [Show full text]
  • VOTES and PROCEEDINGS No
    1993 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS No. 1 FIRST SESSION OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTH PARLIAMENT TUESDAY, 4 MAY 1993 The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia begun and held in Parliament House, Canberra, on Tuesday, the fourth day of May, in the forty-second year of the Reign of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, and in the year of our Lord One thousand nine hundred and ninety-three. 1 On which day, being the first day of the meeting of the Parliament for the despatch of business pursuant to a Proclamation (which follows), Lyndal McAlpin Barlin, Clerk of the House of Representatives, Ian Charles Harris, Acting Deputy Clerk, Bernard Clive Wright, Acting First Clerk Assistant and Philip Francis Bergin, Serjeant-at-Arms, attending in the House according to their duty, the said Proclamation was read at the Table by the Clerk: PROCLAMATION I, WILLIAM GEORGE HAYDEN, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting in accordance with section 5 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia which provides, among other things, that the Governor-General may appoint such times for holding the sessions of the Parliament as he thinks fit, by this Proclamation: " appoint Tuesday, 4 May 1993 at 10.30 a.m. as the day and time for all Senators and Members of the House of Representatives to assemble at Parliament House; and * summon all Senators and Members of the House of Representatives to attend accordingly. Signed and sealed with the Great Seal of Australia on 21 April 1993 BILL HAYDEN Governor-General By His Excellency's Command PAUL KEATING Prime Minister No.
    [Show full text]
  • Must-Carry Rules, and Access to Free-DTT
    Access to TV platforms: must-carry rules, and access to free-DTT European Audiovisual Observatory for the European Commission - DG COMM Deirdre Kevin and Agnes Schneeberger European Audiovisual Observatory December 2015 1 | Page Table of Contents Introduction and context of study 7 Executive Summary 9 1 Must-carry 14 1.1 Universal Services Directive 14 1.2 Platforms referred to in must-carry rules 16 1.3 Must-carry channels and services 19 1.4 Other content access rules 28 1.5 Issues of cost in relation to must-carry 30 2 Digital Terrestrial Television 34 2.1 DTT licensing and obstacles to access 34 2.2 Public service broadcasters MUXs 37 2.3 Must-carry rules and digital terrestrial television 37 2.4 DTT across Europe 38 2.5 Channels on Free DTT services 45 Recent legal developments 50 Country Reports 52 3 AL - ALBANIA 53 3.1 Must-carry rules 53 3.2 Other access rules 54 3.3 DTT networks and platform operators 54 3.4 Summary and conclusion 54 4 AT – AUSTRIA 55 4.1 Must-carry rules 55 4.2 Other access rules 58 4.3 Access to free DTT 59 4.4 Conclusion and summary 60 5 BA – BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 61 5.1 Must-carry rules 61 5.2 Other access rules 62 5.3 DTT development 62 5.4 Summary and conclusion 62 6 BE – BELGIUM 63 6.1 Must-carry rules 63 6.2 Other access rules 70 6.3 Access to free DTT 72 6.4 Conclusion and summary 73 7 BG – BULGARIA 75 2 | Page 7.1 Must-carry rules 75 7.2 Must offer 75 7.3 Access to free DTT 76 7.4 Summary and conclusion 76 8 CH – SWITZERLAND 77 8.1 Must-carry rules 77 8.2 Other access rules 79 8.3 Access to free DTT
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One: Introduction 1 Part One: Background and Research Questions 1
    The Media and John Howard P.M.: The Canberra Press Gallery 1996-2007 Author Ester, Helen Published 2009 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith Business School DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/1072 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367561 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au The Media and John Howard P.M: The Canberra Press Gallery 1996-2007 Helen Ester BA (Australian National University) DipEd (University of Sydney) MA (Journalism) University of Wollongong Department of Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2009 ii Abstract This thesis examines the impact of the Howard government’s media management strategies on the Federal Parliamentary Press Gallery (FPPG) and its capacity to fulfil the quasi-institutional fourth estate role of independent over-sight of the parliament and the executive government. Although the relationship between politician and journalist in any parliamentary democracy is neither easy nor harmonious, tenets of open governance demand that, at the very least, this relationship is functional. The evidence in this thesis shows that this functionality was tested to its limits under the Howard government. Chapter 1 begins with the development of questions about the Howard government’s media strategies, their impact on the Canberra fourth estate and the role of more intense government media management, new technologies and the co-location of executive government and press gallery in Parliament House. Answers are sought with multi-method research including historical research, documentary analysis, case studies and elite interview techniques*.
    [Show full text]
  • Drama Directory 2014
    2014 UPDATE CONTENTS Acknowlegements ..................................................... 2 Latvia .......................................................................... 122 Introduction ................................................................. 3 Lithuania ................................................................... 125 Luxembourg ............................................................ 131 Austria .......................................................................... 4 Malta .......................................................................... 133 Belgium ...................................................................... 10 Netherlands ............................................................. 135 Bulgaria ....................................................................... 21 Norway ..................................................................... 145 Cyprus ......................................................................... 26 Poland ........................................................................ 151 Czech Republic ......................................................... 31 Portugal .................................................................... 157 Denmark .................................................................... 36 Romania ................................................................... 160 Estonia ........................................................................ 42 Slovakia ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Convergence 2011: Australian Content State of Play
    Screen Australia AUSTRALIAN CONTENT STATE OF PLAY informing debate AUGUST 2011 CONVERGENCE 2011: AUSTRALIAN CONTENT STATE OF PLAY © Screen Australia 2011 ISBN 978-1-920998-15-8 This report draws from a number of sources. Screen Australia has undertaken all reasonable measures to ensure its accuracy and therefore cannot accept responsibility for inaccuracies and omissions. First released 25 August 2011; this edition 26 August 2011 www.screenaustralia.gov.au/research Screen Australia – August 2011 2 CONVERGENCE 2011: AUSTRALIAN CONTENT STATE OF PLAY CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Executive summary ............................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Mapping the media environment ................................................................................ 11 2 CREATING AUSTRALIAN CONTENT ................................................................... 20 2.1 The economics of screen content production ...................................................... 20 2.2 How Australian narrative content gets made ....................................................... 27 2.3 Value to the economy of narrative content production .................................... 39 3 DELIVERING AUSTRALIAN CONTENT .............................................................. 41 3.1 Commercial free-to-air television .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on Market Structure, Dynamics and Developments in Irish Media
    Broadcasting Authority of Ireland A report on market structure, dynamics and developments in Irish media Supplied in support of the BAI’s consultation on its Broadcasting Services Strategy December 2017 Mediatique Limited 65 Chandos Place London WC2N 4HG United Kingdom www.mediatique.co.uk BAI – Market structure, dynamics and developments Executive summary Introduction ° The Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (‘BAI’) is the regulator of the Irish broadcasting market. ° Among other statutory duties under the Broadcasting Act (2009), the BAI is required to prepare a Broadcasting Services Strategy (‘BSS’) covering the provision of broadcasting services in Ireland. The BAI's current BSS was agreed in 2011. The new BSS will reflect the current Strategy Statement in force (2017-19) covering the BAI’s key objectives around plurality, diversity, support for indigenous content and promotion of content in the Irish language. ° Mediatique was commissioned to provide a detailed overview of current and future developments in the Irish broadcasting landscape, and to consider the likely trajectory over the next five years. This work is aimed at informing the new BSS and, in particular, helping the BAI define its approach to regulation in the light of market dynamics over time. ° Our brief included consideration of consumer behaviour, platform and distribution developments, changes in technology and evolving business models associated with broadcasting. ° We were asked specifically to analyse the sustainability of revenues that underpin expenditure on audio and visual content, particularly Irish content, and to consider whether the current regulatory framework needs to evolve in line with market dynamics. ° Within our wider work, the BAI has asked for analysis on two specific topics – prospects for the launch of commercial digital terrestrial multiplexes carrying TV channels to supplement those already available on Saorview; and whether the BAI, working with industry and Government, should seek to promote digital audio broadcasting (‘DAB’).
    [Show full text]
  • For Personal Use Only Use Personal For
    West Australian Newspapers Holdings Limited ACN 053 480 845 PROPOSAL TO ACQUIRE SEVEN MEDIA GROUP EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM INDEPENDENT EXPERT’S REPORT NOTICE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING Notice is given that an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders will be held at the Hyatt Regency Hotel, 99 Adelaide Terrace, Perth, Western Australia on 11 April 2011, commencingFor personal use only at 10am (Perth time). LEGAL ADVISER FINANCIAL ADVISER Important notices This Explanatory Memorandum is important other information made available by or on Such risks, uncertainties and other important and requires immediate attention. It should behalf of SGH during the due diligence factors include, among other things, the risks be read in its entirety before making a process conducted by WAN in connection in associated with the Proposed Transaction decision on how to vote on the Resolutions. with the Proposed Transaction. There is as set out in Section 6. Shareholders are In particular, it is important that you consider no assurance that this due diligence was cautioned not to place undue reliance on the disadvantages and potential risks conclusive and that all material issues and such forward looking statements. Deviations of the Proposed Transaction set out in risks in relation to the Proposed Transaction as to future results, performance and Section 1.3 and Section 6 and the views and SMG have been identifi ed. To the extent achievement are both normal and expected. of the Independent Expert set out in the that this information is incomplete, incorrect, Any discrepancies between totals and sums Independent Expert’s Report contained inaccurate or misleading, there is a risk of components in tables and fi gures contained in Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Marijuana Australiana
    Marijuana Australiana Marijuana Australiana: Cannabis Use, Popular Culture, and the Americanisation of Drugs Policy in Australia, 1938 - 1988 John Lawrence Jiggens, BA Centre for Social Change Research Carseldine Campus QUT Submitted in requirement for the degree, Doctor of Philosophy, April 2004 1 Marijuana Australiana KEY WORDS: Narcotics, Control of—Australia, Narcotics and crime—Australia, Cannabis use— Australia, Popular Culture—Australia, Drugs policy—Australia, Organised crime— Queensland, New South Wales, Cannabis prohibition—Australia, Police corruption—Queensland, New South Wales, the counter-culture—Australia, Reefer Madness—Australia, the War on Drugs—Australia, Woodward Royal Commission (the Royal Commission into Drug Trafficking), the Williams Royal Commission (Australian Royal Commission into Drugs), the Fitzgerald Inquiry, the Stewart Royal Commission (Royal Commission into Nugan Hand), Chlorodyne, Cannabis— medical use, cannabis indica, cannabis sativa, Gough Whitlam, Richard Nixon, Donald Mackay, Johannes Bjelke- Petersen, Terry Lewis, Ray Whitrod, Fast Buck$, Chris Masters, John Wesley Egan, the Corset Gang, Murray Stewart Riley, Bela Csidei, Maurice Bernard 'Bernie' Houghton, Frank Nugan, Michael Jon Hand, Sir Peter Abeles, Merv Wood, Sir Robert Askin, Theodore (Ted) Shackley, Fred Krahe, James (Jimmy) Bazley, Gianfranco Tizzoni, Ken Nugan, Brian Alexander. 2 Marijuana Australiana ABSTRACT The word ‘marijuana’ was introduced to Australia by the US Bureau of Narcotics via the Diggers newspaper, Smith’s Weekly, in 1938. Marijuana was said to be ‘a new drug that maddens victims’ and it was sensationally described as an ‘evil sex drug’. The resulting tabloid furore saw the plant cannabis sativa banned in Australia, even though cannabis had been a well-known and widely used drug in Australia for many decades.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives Official Hansard No
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES House of Representatives Official Hansard No. 1, 2010 Wednesday, 29 September 2010 FORTY-THIRD PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—FIRST PERIOD BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INTERNET The Votes and Proceedings for the House of Representatives are available at http://www.aph.gov.au/house/info/votes Proof and Official Hansards for the House of Representatives, the Senate and committee hearings are available at http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard For searching purposes use http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au SITTING DAYS—2010 Month Date February 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 22, 23, 24, 25 March 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18 May 11, 12, 13, 24, 25, 26, 27, 31 June 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24 September 28, 29, 30 October 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28 November 15, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24, 25 RADIO BROADCASTS Broadcasts of proceedings of the Parliament can be heard on ABC NewsRadio in the capital cities on: ADELAIDE 972AM BRISBANE 936AM CANBERRA 103.9FM DARWIN 102.5FM HOBART 747AM MELBOURNE 1026AM PERTH 585AM SYDNEY 630AM For information regarding frequencies in other locations please visit http://www.abc.net.au/newsradio/listen/frequencies.htm FORTY-THIRD PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—FIRST PERIOD Governor-General Her Excellency Ms Quentin Bryce, Companion of the Order of Australia House of Representatives Officeholders Speaker—Mr Harry Alfred Jenkins MP Deputy Speaker— Hon. Peter Neil Slipper MP Second Deputy Speaker—Hon. Bruce Craig Scott MP Members of the Speaker’s Panel—Hon. Dick Godfrey Harry Adams MP, Ms Sharon Leah Bird MP, Mr Steven Georganas MP, Mr Peter Sid Sidebottom MP Leader of the House—Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Sourcebook with Marie's Help
    AIB Global Broadcasting Sourcebook THE WORLDWIDE ELECTRONIC MEDIA DIRECTORY | TV | RADIO | CABLE | SATELLITE | IPTV | MOBILE | 2009-10 EDITION WELCOME | SOURCEBOOK AIB Global WELCOME Broadcasting Sourcebook THE WORLDWIDE ELECTRONIC MEDIA DIRECTORY | TV | RADIO | CABLE | SATELLITE | IPTV | MOBILE | 2009 EDITION In the people-centric world of broadcasting, accurate information is one of the pillars that the industry is built on. Information on the information providers themselves – broadcasters as well as the myriad other delivery platforms – is to a certain extent available in the public domain. But it is disparate, not necessarily correct or complete, and the context is missing. The AIB Global Broadcasting Sourcebook fills this gap by providing an intelligent framework based on expert research. It is a tool that gets you quickly to what you are looking for. This media directory builds on the AIB's heritage of more than 16 years of close involvement in international broadcasting. As the global knowledge The Global Broadcasting MIDDLE EAST/AFRICA network on the international broadcasting Sourcebook is the Richie Ebrahim directory of T +971 4 391 4718 industry, the AIB has over the years international TV and M +971 50 849 0169 developed an extensive contacts database radio broadcasters, E [email protected] together with leading EUROPE and is regarded as a unique centre of cable, satellite, IPTV information on TV, radio and emerging and mobile operators, Emmanuel researched by AIB, the Archambeaud platforms. We are in constant contact
    [Show full text]