DOCSLIB.ORG

55154 FSPLT2 289480.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
55154 FSPLT2 289480.Pdf 2 Wildlife Biological Assessment for the Two Bit Vegetation Management Project 1. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this biological assessment/biological evaluation (BA) is to determine the effects of the TWO BIT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PROJECT (project) (alternative 2 in the DEIS) on wildlife species listed as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act; on designated Critical Habitat for those species; and on species listed as Sensitive by the Pacific Southwest Region, USDA Forest Service (FS). This BA is prepared in accordance with the legal requirements set forth under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended [16 U.S.C. 1536 (c) et seq. 50CFR 402] (ESA), and follows the standards established in the FS Manual direction (FSM 2672.42; USDA Forest Service 1991). The list of federally listed species was obtained online at http://arcata.fws.gov/specieslist (reference #7396278-111539, (February 26, 2010)). The FS, Region 5, Sensitive Species list was provided by the USDA Pacific Southwest Region (October 15, 2007). This BA addresses the following species from those lists: Endangered Shortnose sucker (Chamistes brevirostris) Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus) Tidewater goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi) Threatened Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmorata) Sensitive Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus leucocephalus) Northern goshawk (Accipter gentiles) Great gray owl (Strix nebulosa) Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni) Willow flycatcher (Empidonax trailii) Greater sandhill crane (Grus canadensis tabida) California wolverine (Gulo gulo luteus) Pacific fisher (Martes pennanti pacifica) American marten (Martes americana) Sierra Nevada red fox (Vulpes vulpes necator) Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus) Townsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii) Northwestern pond turtle (Emys marmorata marmorata) Foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) Cascade frog (Rana cascade) 3 Southern torrent salamander (Rhyacotriton variegates) Siskiyou Mountain salamander (Plethodon stormi) Blue-gray taildropper slug (Prophysaon coeruleum) Tehama chaparral snail (Trilobopsis tehamana) Critical Habitat Northern spotted owl, designated January 15, 1992. Marbled murrelet, designated May 24, 1996. Tidewater goby, designated Novemebr 20, 2000. Other Sensitive Species Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus anatum) Shortnose and Lost River suckers (lakes and their tributaries), and tide water goby (coastal lagoons, estuaries and streams a short distance from these habitats) does not occur in the project area. Critical habitat for the tidewater goby does not occur in the project area. The project is not within the range of the Sierra Nevada red fox (Cascades Mountains and Sierra Crest). Habitat for the Swainson’s hawk (perennial grassland, grassy shrub-steppe, or agricultural landscapes), greater sandhill crane (wetlands, marshes, grasslands, or irrigated fields), or pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus) (CDFG 1990) and does not include open, xeric forests suitable for roosting and foraging (S. Livingston et. al. 2002). This project is outside the range of the Tehama chaparral snail (Trilobopsis tehamana) and lacks suitable habitat (lakes elevation at or above 6000 feet) for Cascades Frog (Rana cascadae). The above mentioned species and designated critical habitat will not be addressed further in this document II. CONSULTATION TO DATE Field review conducted on 6/16/2009 by Timothy D. Burnett (USFS Happy Camp District Biologist), Karen West (USFS biologist) and Jan Johnson (USFWS biologist). Review of units post harvest from Happy Camp Phase II along Cade Creek and near Jackson peak was conducted to determine Northern Spotted Owl (NSO) habitat post harvest. Determined foraging habitat was maintained as foraging habitat post harvest. The following units were reviewed in the field: 99, 105, 106, 36, 71, 253, 234, 208, and 209. Field review determined that all plantations (that were reviewed during field trip), were unsuitable foraging habitat for NSO due to the small size class and density of crowns and trees (however further field review to other plantation by Timothy D. Burnett concluded some plantation were suitable NSO foraging habitat). FWS recommended a variable thinning approach for plantations within the LSR to foster stand diversity. All of the natural stands were not NSO nesting roosting habitat but do contain foraging habitat. No proposed units were considered RA 32 habitat that are described in the 2008 recovery plan (USDI Fish and Wildlife Service 2008a). No suitable nesting habitat for marbled 4 murrelet was found during the field review and it is not expected to be in or within ¼ mile of the project area. It was agreed by the group that the new USFS 2008 NSO habitat layer was not accurate in estimating habitat quality and quantity at the NSO activity center scale. It was decided that Tim Burnett will habitat type all home ranges of historic NSO activity centers home range (1.3 miles) using ortho photos, aerial photos, and ground verification. Three proposed units are natural stands located within 0.5 mile of an NSO activity center (AC). On July 9, 2009 Tim Burnett presented the Project Information Form (PIF) and gave a brief overview of the Two Bit Project: o Although the project is within the range for MAMU, there is no habitat within treatment units or within ¼ mile of treatment units. o The majority of thinning units are within plantations; Approximately 1900 acres of thinning are proposed within plantations and 300 acres are within natural stands. Approximately 8600 acres are proposed for Rx fire(acres have since been adjusted due to field review by specialsit and IDT). o NSO surveys will be conducted annually through implementation provided funding was available. If surveys are not conducted then limited operating perios would be implmented. o The majority of plantations are not suitable NSO nesting/roosting (N/R) or foraging (F) (too thick) o The majority of the 300 acres of natural stands proposed for thinning are suitable NSO F habitat except Unit 301(further field reviews determined that other natural stands did not constitute foraging habitat for NSO. The proposal is to maintain majority of F habitat by retaining 50% canopy closure post project. The group reviewed treatment in natural stands (F habitat) that overlap NSO core areas – discussions were as follows: o KL-0236 has 12 acres proposed for thinning within the core. The survey history shows only one detection within the AC – the site does not meet the criteria for an AC but did not have full protocol surveys. Tim will continue with protocol surveys to determine status of the site. If after 3 years of protocol surveys no NSOs are detected, the site will be reviewed for AC status. The 12 acres of thinning within the core will continue to be F habitat post project. o KL-0286 has 2 acres of thinning w/in the core (Unit 254). Located on a ridge in a switchback – no concerns. o There is an NSO site at Jackson Peak – the AC needs to be added to the map o PDSs will be included as described on the PIF. Standard smoke minimizing PDSs as described in Forestwide Prescribed Fire Programmatic Biological Assessment and limiting % AC burned will be applied. 5 After discussion about the Project, the Level 1 team agreed that, based on the information presented, the determination is a MANLAA for NSO. On July 9, 2009 Tim Burnett ) had a phone conversation with Dave Clayton (USFS Biologist, Rogue-Siskiyou District) to discuss Northern Spotted Owls surveys associated with the Two Bit Vegetation Management Project. Dave stated that no recent surveys have been conducted in the last ten years in the vicinity o f the Two Bit project area by the Rogue-Siskiyou National Forest. On April 15, 2010 a level one meeting with USFWS biologist Jan Johnson and USFS biologist Timothy D. Burnett and Sue Stresser, reviewed draft BE/BA and agreed upon changes that were needed. Tim will update the BE/BA with the changes suggested and submit them to Jan in approximately one week. The Level 1 Team agreed upon the BA on May 13, 2010. III. CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION Programmatic management direction for the Forest is provided by the Klamath Land and Resource Management Plan (KLRMP) (USDA Forest Service 1994). The KLRMP incorporates direction in the Record of Decision for Amendments to the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl – also known as the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) (USDA Forest Service & USDI Bureau of Land Management 1994a). The KLRMP was developed utilizing the guidelines provided by the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resource Planning Act of 1974, as amended by the National Forest Management Act of 1976, and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1976. The Project occurs within the following Management Areas from the KLRMP: MA-5, MA-6, MA-7, MA-10, MA-15, and MA-17 (Table 1). All Standards and Guidelines in the KLRMP will be met by project design. Table 1: Management Areas with proposed treatments Acres within Management Proposed Forest Plan Goals, Standards and Guides, and Desired Area Thinning Future Conditions Units Goals: Protect and enhance conditions of late-successional and “old growth” forest ecosystems. Silvicultural activities aimed at reducing risk of large-scale disturbance and accelerate development of late-successional conditions shall generally focus on treatment in younger stands. MA 5 - Late DFC: Varies by dominant vegetative species site class, successional 126 topography and other site factors. Generally multi-layered forest Reserve common on suitable sites with overstory trees that are large diameter, tall and have obvious signs of decadence. Where hardwoods occur, mid-seral stage forested areas provide suitable habitat with less dense stands and smaller trees. south slopes and drier areas are more open due to frequent fires. MA 6 - Managed 1 Wildlife Area Goals: Manage to provide late-successional habitat, to provide 6 Acres within Management Proposed Forest Plan Goals, Standards and Guides, and Desired Area Thinning Future Conditions Units moderate to high quality habitat for fisher, to test and demonstrate the effectiveness or treatment for use in LSR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation Assessment of Marbled Murrelets in British Columbia, a Review of the Biology, Populations, Habitat Associations and Conservation
    Conservation Assessment of Marbled Murrelets in British Columbia, A Review of the Biology, Populations, Habitat Associations and Conservation Alan E. Burger Pacific and Yukon Region 2002 Canadian Wildlife Service Environmental Conservation Branch Technical Report Series Number 387 Environment Environnement Canada Canada Canadian Wildlife Service Canadien qwewrt Service de la faune TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES CANADIAN WILDLIFE SERVICE This series of reports, established in 1986, contains technical and scientific information from projects of the Canadian Wildlife Service. The reports are intended to make available material that either is of interest to a limited audience or is too extensive to be accommodated in scientific journals or in existing CWS series. Demand for these Technical Reports is usually confined to specialists in the fields concerned. Consequently, they are produced regionally and in small quantities; they can be obtained only from the address given on the back of the title page. However, they are numbered nationally. The recommended citation appears on the title page. Technical Reports are available in CWS libraries and are listed in the catalogue of the National Library of Canada in scientific libraries across Canada. They are printed in the official language chosen by the author to meet the language preference of the likely audience, with a résumé in the second official language. To determine whether there is significant demand for making the reports available in the second official language, CWS invites users to specify their official language preference. Requests for Technical Reports in the second official language should be sent to the address on the back of the title page. SÉRIE DE RAPPORTS TECHNIQUES DU SERVICE CANADIEN DE LA FAUNE Cette série de rapports donnant des informations scientifiques et techniques sur les projets du Service canadien de la faune (SCF) a démarré en 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Spring Newsletter
    Friends of Ecological Reserves Newsletter Victoria, B.C. Spring 1996 Getting to know our Grasslands hile one can't help but In the Cariboo-Chilcotin, the noticeable, and after 40 years the Wnotice a forest of 700-year- grasslands complex may be sepa• grassland is still improving in old trees or the bouquest of flow• rated into three zones, based on diversity and vigour. ers that greets summer, the Big Sky the plants that are dominant at the country we call grassland seems time of climax vegetation. Lower unvegetated and urunhabited, and grasslands (BGxh3, in the NOTE POST 7 appears to go on forever. Not so. biogeoclimatic scheme) occur on The Friends Annual There is great diversity of both benches along the Fraser and General Meeting fauna (scorpions, bats, owls) and Chilcotin rivers and climax to big flora — bitterroot, Mariposa lilies sage. Middle grasslands (BGxw2) 3 pm., Saturday, June 15,1996 and porcupine grass, to name a are characterized by bluebunch Mary Rannie's home: few. Study of the host of lichens wheat grass. Upper grassland 6 Woodville Place, View Royal and invertebrates has only begun. (IDFxm), dominated by porcupine Sooke FTills field trip 10 am. Different grassland communities grass, are more extensive. Pot-luck supper 5 pm — appear in four regions of British Until recently, very little grass• Columbia: the Southern Interior land in the Interior Douglas Fir see the Calendar section. (Nicola, Okanagan and Thompson zone was protected. And it's no valleys), East Kootenay, Cariboo- surprise that, given the history of Many of us are beginning to Chilcotin and Peace River.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Harbour Spiel November 2018
    LOCALLY OWNED & OPERATED The independent voice of HARBOUR Pender Harbour & Egmont November 2018 since 1990. SPIEL Issue 335 Denise Brynelsen 604.740.1219 Joel O’Reilly 604.741.1837 Personal Real Estate Corporations Sussex www.brynelsenoreilly.com We encourage everyone to come out on “We have the tools to market your home and we are willing to November 11 to support our veterans invest the time, the money and the resources to do so.” and honour their sacrifice. The day’s ceremonies begin at 10:30 a.m. NEW PRICE with a solemn parade through Madeira Park. Super cute 2 bdrm Craftsman style cot- Build your dream home on one of the It will continue to the Royal Canadian Legion tage with view on 1/2 acre property. largest lots at Whittakers. No. 112 where Remembrance Day services Garden Bay $515,000 Garden Bay $398,000 will begin at 11 a.m. NEW PRICE Lest we forget . Waterfront home with 180 degree views & 6 bed/5 bath home w/ 2 bdrm suite is a boat slip at the private marina. currently running as a successful VRBO. Garden Bay $1,190,000 Madeira Park $750,000 SOLD 2.8 acres of low-bank lakefront with rus- Unique 2.5 acre waterfront property with tic cottage, large dock & 2 building sites. 3 separate living spaces. Sakinaw Lake $1,798,000 Halfmoon Bay $1,540,000 SOLD 883-9100 OPEN DAILY • 8:30 am - 7 pm (Open Friday until 8 p.m.) 2.5 acres of SW facing ocean front prop- 5 private & beautiful acres with a custom Like us on erty with sunsets all year long.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology, Exploration and Mining Inbritish Columbia 1974
    Geology, Exploration and Mining inBritish Columbia 1974 British Columbia Department of Mines and Petroleum Resources DECEMBER, 1975. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION ....... 5 2 METALMINES ............................................ 11 Contents ........................................... 11 General Review of Exploration and Metal Mining ............ 14 Reports on Metal Mines ................................ 27 3 PLACER .................................................. 357 Contents ........................................... 357 General Review of Placer Mining ......................... 357 Reportson Placer Operations ............................ 358 4 STRUCTURALMATERIALS AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS ...... 369 Contents ........................................... 369 General Review of Structural Materials and Industrial Minerals . 370 Reworts on Commodities ............................... 370 5 COAL .................................................... 405 Contents ........................................... 405 General Review of Coal Mining and Exploration ............. 406 Reportson Coal Mines ................................. 411 3 INTRODUCTION PREFACE The first Minister of Mines of the Province of British Columbia was appointed in 1874. One of his responsibilities was “the duty of collecting information on the subject of the mining industries of the Province.” This material, which consisted of reports by the Gold Commissioners and Mining Recorders ofthe Province, was published inthe Annual Report of the Minister of Mines. A Bureau of
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Methods for Surveying Marbled Murrelets
    METHODS FOR SURVEYING MARBLED MURRELETS IN FORESTS: A REVISED PROTOCOL FOR LAND MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH Compiled and edited by: Diane Evans Mack William P. Ritchie S. Kim Nelson Elena Kuo-Harrison Peter Harrison Thomas E. Hamer For the Pacific Seabird Group Marbled Murrelet Technical Committee 6 January 2003 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS......................................................................................................... ii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................. 2 PLANNING AND CONDUCTING SURVEYS......................................................................... 2 Definitions........................................................................................................................ 2 Inland Limit for Surveys.................................................................................................. 3 Habitat Assessment.......................................................................................................... 4 Survey Types ................................................................................................................... 5 Defining Survey Area and Sites .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Penn, Stefanie, Craig Beneville, Jim Flynn, Nicole Gasparik, and Whaley Mander, Eds., Earth First! Journal 14, No
    Full citation: Penn, Stefanie, Craig Beneville, Jim Flynn, Nicole Gasparik, and Whaley Mander, eds., Earth First! Journal 14, no. 7 (1 August 1994). Digitized in cooperation with the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/6998 Copyright: All rights reserved. The user may download, preserve and print this material only for private, research or nonprofit educational purposes. The user may not alter, transform, or build upon this material. Lughnasadh 1994 Vol. XIV, No. VII - August 1 THE RADICAL ENVIRONMENTAL JOURNAL ·$3.50 AT WATISBARNUKE PlANT Laguna plant. Between the accident and the '" mechanical difficulties, it was impos­ sible for anyone to drive into the facility for about 15 minutes. R. eva1t. The road blockade crew moved in. BY NICOLE GASPARIK As they moved in to set up, three unidentified cars pUlled up. "Who the A dty coundlwoman standing in front. hell are they?" someone yelled. ofa bulldozer; the president ora maih- "Media, II someone else replied. A stream environmental group c/osing·a television station, a newspaper, and a meeting with. an EFI-style hOwl; alu!.1oe private film documentary crew had andRme Citizen ready to lockdown on been notified about the actioh by our bulldozers with KryptOnites. Yes,.June 14- people. They didn't know what the 21 was an exdting and inspiring week in action was gonna be until the moment southern California... - they showed up. I would not recom- Most Orange Countyites kriow mend this tactic when carrying out a Laguna Canyon. Atone time or high security action unless you have a another they've:gotten off the 405 very strong sense of trust with the Freeway and headed d?wn the curva- media you are setting it up with.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet 1995
    State of the Science United States Department of Agriculture Ecology and Conservation of the Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station Marbled Murrelet http://www.psw.fs.fed.us/ General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152 Abstract: Ralph, C. John; Hunt, George L., Jr.; Raphael, Martin G.; Piatt, John F., Technical Editors. 1995. Ecology and conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-152. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 420 p. This report on the Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) was compiled and editied by the interagency Marbled Murrelet Conservation Assessment Core Team. The 37 chapters cover both original studies and literature reviews of many aspects of the species’ biology, ecology, and conservation needs. It includes new information on the forest habitat used for nesting, marine distribution, and demographic analyses; and describes past and potential effects of humans on the species’ habitats. Future research needs and possible management strategies for both marine and forest habitats are suggested. Retrieval Terms: Brachyramphus marmoratus, Marbled Murrelet, old-growth forests, habitat use, marine distribution, seabird. About This Report: Technical Editors: • C. John Ralph, research wildlife biologist, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1700 Bayview Drive, Arcata, CA 95521 • George L. Hunt Jr., professor, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 321 Steinhus Hall, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA 92717 • Martin G. Raphael, chief research wildlife biologist, Pacific Northwest Resesrch Station, USDA Forest Service, 3625-93rd Ave. S.W., Olympia, WA 98512 • John F. Piatt, research biologist, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK 99503 Cover: Late-winter-plumaged Marbled Murrelet, Auke Bay, Alaska —Photograph by Gus van Vliet Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California (Mailing address: P.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCOVERY Index 2 / Volumes 23 to 39 / 1994 to 2010
    DISCOVERY Index 2 / Volumes 23 to 39 / 1994 to 2010 Nature Vancouver Discovery Index 2 Volumes 23 to 39 1994 to 2010 Discovery Index 2: Volumes 23 to 39, 1994 to 2010 © 2013 Vancouver Natural History Society ISSN: 0319-8480 Published by: Vancouver Natural History Society P.O. Box 3021, Vancouver, BC V6B 3X5 www.naturevancouver.ca Printed by: RR Donnelley 901 Great Northern Way, Vancouver, BC V5T 1E1 Publication Committee: Marian Coope (Editor), Margaret Coutts, Cynthia Crampton (Chair), Daphne Nagorsen, and Daphne Solecki Front cover photo: Joffre Lakes by Bill Kinkaid. Back cover photo: Snowy Owl by Mark Habdas. Opposite page: Chickweed Monkeyflower on Horth Hill, Vancouver Island, by Rosemary Taylor. Book Design: Laura Fauth Discovery Index Vol. 23, No. 1 (March 1994) to Vol. 39 (2010) Compiled and edited by Marian Coope, Roland V. Wahlgren, and Melanie Marchand Introduction and Acknowledgements .......................... 1 Discovery: A History of Nature Vancouver’s Journal ....5 Discovery Editors .........................................................13 Top Contributors of Articles to Discovery ............... 17 What’s in the Index? Start Here .................................21 Author Index ................................................................ 25 Subject Index ................................................................ 79 List of Subjects ............................................................193 Introduction and Acknowledgements Marian Coope his book is the sequel to Discovery Index, Volumes 1 to 22 T(1972–1993). The earlier publication celebrated the Vancouver Natural History Society’s 75th anniversary; the present one celebrates 90 years of Nature Vancouver’s existence. It covers volumes 23 to 39 and the years 1994 to 2010. It is also a companion volume to Nature Vancouver, A Portrait: 1994–2010, just as the earlier Index accompanied The Vancouver Natural History Society, 1918–1993 by Jim Peacock.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Jervis Inlet British Columbia
    BRITISHCOLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES HON.W. K.KIERNAN, Minister JOHN F. WALKER,Deputy Minister BULLETINNo. 39 Geology of Lower Jervis Inlet British Columbia By W. R. Bacon VICTORIA, B.C. Printed by DONMCDIARMID, Printer 10 the Queen3 Most Excellent Majesty 1957 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 5 6 6 6 8 9 9 9 9 10 12 15 15 15 16 17 18 20 25 26 27 31 32 34 34 35 36 36 36 37 37 37 38 38 39 40 41 41 42 ILLUSTRATIONS PHOTOGRAPHS P*OE East face of Diadem Mountain following 46 (A) Northern part of map-area." ..............~~ .........-..~...~ ......-......... ~ Following 46 (B) Southern part of map-area ..............-..~~..~ ......-...~ Following 46 3 PLaTB PAOE I11 . (A) West flank of Caren Range- ..................................................... Following 46 (B) Gneiss, west end of Captain Island.............................................. Following 46 IV. (A) Pillow lava, Foley Head .. ............... Following 46 (B) Agglomerate, south of Perketts Creek....................................... Following 46 V . (A) Quartz-feldspar porphyry intruded by basaltic dykes, north shore of Princess Royal Reach........................................................ following 46 (B) Inclusionsbatholithicmain in the mass 46 VI. (A) Dark oriented clotsin specimen of the main batholithic mass..... Following 46 (B) Jointing in biotite granodiorite, Nelson Island .............. Following 46 VI1. (A) Photomicrograph of granite rock, east end of Captain Island following 46 (B) Photomicrograph showing twinned sphene enclosing magnetiteand apatite Following 46 VI11. (A) Photomicrograph showing myrmekitic intergrowths................. Following 46 (B) Photomicrograph showing zoned plagioclase.............................. Following 46 DRAWINGS Fm. 1. Index map 5 2. GeoIogicaI map.. of Iower Jervis Inlet ..... pocket 3 . Modes of gramtlc rocks...................................................... .. 21 4. Zoning in plagioclase of grmtlc.. rocks . ........... 22 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Minister of Mines and Petroleum Resources PROVINCE of BRITISH COLUMBIA
    Minister of Mines and Petroleum Resources PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ANNUAL REPORT for the Year Ended December 31 1961 BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES VICTORIA, B.C. HON. W. K. KIERNAN, Minister. P. J. MULCAHY, Deputy Minister. J. W. PECK, Chief Inspector of Mines. S. METCALFE, Chief Analyst and Assayer. HARTLEY SARGENT, Chief, Mineralogical Branch. K. B. BLAKEY, Chief Gold Commissioner and Chief Commissioner, Petroleum and Natural Gas. J. D. LINEHAM, Chief, Petroleum and Natural Gas Conservation Branch. Major-General the Honourable GEORGE RANDOLPH PEARKES, V.C., PC., C.B., D.S.O., MC., Lieutenant-Governor of the Province of British Columbia. M AY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUK: The Annual Report of the Mineral Industry of the Province for the year 1961 is herewith respectfully submitted. W. K. KIERNAN, Minister of Mines and Petroleum Resources. Minister of Mines and Petroleum Resources Ofice, March 31,1962. Herbert Pearson, mining statistician from 1928 to 1961, died in Victoria on January 15, 1962. He was born in Cheshire, England, in 1896, and served in the Royal Navy from November, 1914, until he was invalided out in 1919. He joined the staff of the Department of Mines in 1921 and became mining statistician in 1928. In 1939 he was tram- ferred to the Bureau of Economics and Statistics and remained the officer responsible for collecting and compiling British Columbia mineral statis- tics until his retirement on August 31, 1961. He was Acting Director of the Bureau of Economics and Statistics during 1942-43, and thereafter until 1955 was Office Manager. In his capacity as mining statistician he had frequent contacts with many of the office men in mining companies, and with the stat? of the Department of Mines.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Seabird Group
    Pacific Seabird Group Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting 24-28 February 1999 The Inn at Semi-Ah-Moo, near Blaine, Washington Sponsors Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife United States Fish and Wildlife Service Washington Department of Natural Resources College of Forestry, University of Washington Zoology Department, University of Washington BOSIA--Bainbridge Omtepe Sister Islands Association Local Committee Lora Leschner Julia Parrish George Divoky Lee Robinson Danielle Prenzlow Escene Scott Richardson Todd Hass Bill Ritchie Chris Thompson Program Committee Ed Murphy Ed Melvin Bill Sydeman SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM This year’s meeting has 130 papers being presented — 103 oral presentations and 27 posters. To start the program PSG is honored to have Dr. John Warham here to present a plenary address "Petrel problems and puzzles." Dr. Warham is from the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand. PSG will be presenting Dr. Warham with this year’s PSG Lifetime Achievement Award. Oral presentations will be given in the Blakely and Cypress rooms of the Semi-Ah-Moo Ballroom. With the exception of our plenary session, there will be 2 concurrent sessions throughout the meeting. All presentations, except symposia presentations, will be 15 minutes long. PSG is pleased to present 2 symposia this year that address subjects of major concern to marine ornithologists, by-catch and climate change. Ed Melvin has organized "Seabird by-catch: trends, roadblocks and solutions," and Bill Sydeman has organized "Climate variability and seabird response." Both sessions feature a broad mixture of presentations from seabird biologists to fishermen, students to grand fromages, and locals to international attendees. We regret that time and scheduling constraints necessitated holding the symposia on the same day.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 2 USDA Forest Service Gen
    P A R T I Introduction 2 USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-152. 1995. Chapter 1 Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet in North America: an Overview C. John Ralph1 George L. Hunt, Jr.2 Martin G. Raphael3 John F. Piatt4 Abstract: Over the past decade, the Marbled Murrelet has become In 1990, the Marbled Murrelet was proposed as a a focus of much controversy. It was listed as threatened in Wash- threatened species by the British Columbia Ministry of ington, Oregon, and California by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Environment, Lands, and Parks to the Committee on the Service in February 1993. In order to aid the various agencies with Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. The species was management, the Marbled Murrelet Conservation Assessment was formed to bring together scientists, managers, and others to gather designated as nationally threatened in June 1990. A recovery all the available data on this small seabird. This volume of research team was established in September of that year and was is the culmination of that effort. In this chapter, we integrate the unique to Canada because it included representatives of both results of the investigations and summaries on the past history, the federal and provincial governments, the forest industry, present status, and possible future of the species, based on the data environmental non-governmental organizations, and presented in this volume and other published research. We also academia. The species was listed as threatened mainly because propose what we consider the most important research needs. of loss of nesting habitat, but also because of fishing-net Then, based on the findings of this volume, we suggest actions for mortality and the threat of oil spills.
    [Show full text]