DOCSLIB.ORG

Built Environment Evaluation Report for Properties on Terminal Island, Port of Los Angeles, City and County of Los Angeles, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Built Environment Evaluation Report for Properties on Terminal Island, Port of Los Angeles, City and County of Los Angeles, California Built Environment Evaluation Report for Properties on Terminal Island, Port of Los Angeles, City and County of Los Angeles, California ADP No. 110518-060 Agreement No. 10-2922 PD No. 5 Prepared for: CDM Prepared by: SWCA Environmental Consultants December 2011 BUILT ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION REPORT FOR PROPERTIES ON TERMINAL ISLAND, PORT OF LOS ANGELES, CITY AND COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ADP No. 110518-060 Agreement No. 10-2922 PD No. 5 Prepared for CDM 111 Academy, Suite 150 Irvine, California 92617 Prepared by Samantha Murray, B.A., Steven Treffers, B.A., Mary Ringhoff, M.A., and Jan Ostashay, B.A. SWCA Environmental Consultants 150 South Arroyo Parkway, 2nd Floor Pasadena, California 91105 (626) 240-0587 www.swca.com USGS 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle San Pedro, California SWCA Project No. 021135.00 SWCA Cultural Resources Report Database No. 2011-379 Final December 2011 Keywords: CEQA, built environment evaluation, historic building evaluation, historic context, industrial properties, institutional properties, intensive survey, Terminal Island, Port of Los Angeles, positive results Built Environment Evaluation Report Terminal Island, Port of Los Angeles MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT Purpose and Scope: This report contains results of the built environment evaluation conducted for properties on Terminal Island, located at the Port of Los Angeles in the city and county of Los Angeles, California. Under contract to CDM, SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) prepared a built environment evaluation report to identify built environment resources on Terminal Island to assess whether properties are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), or as a City of Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) or Historic Preservation Overlay Zone (HPOZ). The scope of work for this project includes an initial windshield survey of the entire project area, including inspection of all buildings, structures, and associated features, followed by an intensive-level survey of properties on Terminal Island. Property research for the project includes a review of previous built environment studies conducted on Terminal Island, archival research, and completion of a draft and final report detailing the results of the intensive survey and subsequent property evaluations, as well as a historic context statement. Finally, data and maps collected through field surveys, research, and the significance evaluations will be submitted to the City of Los Angeles Office of Historic Resources (OHR) for review and approval. Dates of Investigation: SWCA conducted the initial windshield survey of Terminal Island on August 3, 2011, followed by intensive-level surveys on August 24 and October 4, 2011. SWCA conducted archival research and preparation of the historic context throughout the months of July, August, and September 2011. Finally, SWCA completed and submitted a draft report in November 2011 and a final report in December 2011. Summary of Findings: As a result of the built environment surveys, 48 properties were identified within the project area. Of these, 16 were recorded and evaluated for NRHP and CRHR eligibility, as well as local designation as a City of Los Angeles HCM or HPOZ. Of the 16 properties evaluated for historic significance, four appear to be eligible for listing in the NRHP as an individual property (status code 3S); one appears to be eligible for listing in the CRHR as an individual property (status code 3CS); one appears to be eligible for local listing or designation (status code 5S3); and 10 were found to be ineligible for the NRHP, CRHR, or for local designation (status code 6Z). The remaining 32 properties were exempt from further evaluation for one of two reasons: (1) the property was recently evaluated for historic significance (within the past five years); or (2) the property is of the recent past and not enough time has passed to adequately evaluate it for historic significance. Investigation Constraints: Some of the properties evaluated as part of this study required permission to access. While most of the intensive-level survey was completed on August 24, 2011, additional survey was required on October 4, 2011, to photograph and evaluate those properties that could not be accessed in August. These constraints did not affect adequacy or completion of this evaluation report. Management Recommendations: SWCA recommends that the results of this study be used to guide future planning efforts that may impact Port of Los Angeles–owned properties on Terminal Island. It is further recommended that Port of Los Angeles-owned properties on Terminal Island be subject to updated survey and evaluation overtime, and that more recently constructed properties continue to be identified and considered in the planning process. If a survey is more than five years old, it should be updated to determine if any historical resources have become eligible or ineligible due to changing circumstances or new documentation. Because the Port of Los Angeles Land Use Plan is anticipated to be in effect until the year 2030, any associated projects that have the potential to impact historical resources should be identified and considered early on in the planning process. i Built Environment Evaluation Report Terminal Island, Port of Los Angeles Disposition of Data: This report and any subsequent related reports will be filed with CDM; the Port of Los Angeles Environmental Management Division; the City of Los Angeles OHR; the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton; and SWCA’s Pasadena office. All field notes, photographs, and records related to the current study are on file at the SWCA Pasadena, California, office. ii Built Environment Evaluation Report Terminal Island, Port of Los Angeles CONTENTS Management Summary/Abstract ............................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Location and Description .............................................................................................................. 1 Regulatory Setting ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Federal ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 State ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Local ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monuments .......................................................................................... 7 Historic Preservation Overlay Zones .................................................................................................... 8 Substantial Adverse Change ..................................................................................................................... 9 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Developing the Historic Context ............................................................................................................. 10 Background Research ............................................................................................................................. 10 Built Environment Surveys ..................................................................................................................... 11 Property Significance Evaluations .......................................................................................................... 11 Historic Context ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Early Harbor Development, –1897 ......................................................................................................... 12 Development and Occupation of the Harbor and Terminal Island, 1897–1918 ..................................... 13 World War I – World War II .................................................................................................................. 14 Wartime Changes, 1941–1945 ................................................................................................................ 18 Containerization and Other Postwar Developments ............................................................................... 18 Results ........................................................................................................................................................ 21 Background Research ............................................................................................................................. 21 Built Environment Survey ...................................................................................................................... 22 Property Significance Evaluations .......................................................................................................... 22 Properties
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aesthetics and Visual Resources
    1 Section 3.1 2 Aesthetics and Visual Resources 3 SECTION SUMMARY 4 This section characterizes the existing aesthetic conditions in the proposed Project area and assesses how 5 the construction and operation of the proposed Project or an alternative would alter them. The aesthetics 6 and visual resources impact analysis evaluates and identifies potential impacts associated with 7 implementation of the proposed Project or an alternative on locally-designated scenic highways, scenic 8 resources, light and glare, and visual character of the proposed Project area. 9 The primary features of the proposed Project and alternatives that could affect aesthetic resources include 10 the addition of up to 12 new cranes, additional berthed ships, and additional terminal lighting. Additional 11 features and activities such as redeveloped buildings and stored containers are also considered in this 12 analysis. 13 Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, provides the following: 14 A description of existing visual characteristics in the Port area (including photographs); 15 A description of key areas from which the proposed Project or alternatives would be visible; 16 A description of existing night lighting conditions; 17 A description of applicable local, state, and federal regulations and policies regarding visual 18 resources and scenic highway designations in the proposed Project area; 19 A discussion of the methodology used to determine whether the proposed Project or alternatives 20 would result in an impact to aesthetic and visual resources; 21 An impact analysis of the proposed Project and six alternatives, which includes simulated photos 22 of the proposed future build-out conditions; and, 23 A description of proposed mitigation measures intended to reduce potential impacts, as applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • W Is D Determined Eligible for the National Register D See Continuation Sheet
    JPS Form 10-9CO CM3 No. 10024-OOiB (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior RECEIVED 2280 National Park Service JAM '• 8 ^:H National Register of Historic Places MAR 1 1 1996 Registration Form NAT. REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for indtvidu ns in How to Complete tfie National Register of Historic Places Registration Perm {National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not appry to tne property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architecture classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from (he instructions. Place additional entnes and narrative items on.continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete aJI items. 1. Name of Property____________________________________________________ historic name San Pedro Municipal Ferry Building_________________________ other names/site number LOS Angeles Maritime Museum__________________ 2. Location street & number Berth 84. Foot of 6th Street not for publication city or town San- Pedrn t) vicinity state California code county LOS Angeles code Q37 zip code SQ731 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that tnisO nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the proceduraJ and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property Q- meets D does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX E Hazards and Hazardous Materials Information
    APPENDIX E Hazards and Hazardous Materials Information PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 12761 Schabarum Avenue Irwindale, CA 91706 Assessor’s Identification Number (AIN): 8546-031-090 Prepared for: Teresa Wolfe Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. 393 Walnut Street, 4th Floor Pasadena, CA 91188 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 290 Conejo Ridge Avenue Thousand Oaks, CA 91361 Project No.: 185803384.200.0001 January 29,2015 Sign-off Sheet and Signatures of Environmental Professionals This document entitled PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) for the account of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. The material in it reflects Stantec’s best judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions made based on it, are the responsibilities of such third parties. Stantec accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. All information, conclusions, and recommendations provided by Stantec in this document regarding the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) have been prepared under the supervision of and reviewed by the professionals whose signatures appear below. Prepared by (signature) Kai Pavel Geologic Associate I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional (EP) as defined in § 312.10 of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Property.
    [Show full text]
  • W • 32°38'47.76”N 117°8'52.44”
    public access 32°32’4”N 117°7’22”W • 32°38’47.76”N 117°8’52.44”W • 33°6’14”N 117°19’10”W • 33°22’45”N 117°34’21”W • 33°45’25.07”N 118°14’53.26”W • 33°45’31.13”N 118°20’45.04”W • 33°53’38”N 118°25’0”W • 33°55’17”N 118°24’22”W • 34°23’57”N 119°30’59”W • 34°27’38”N 120°1’27”W • 34°29’24.65”N 120°13’44.56”W • 34°58’1.2”N 120°39’0”W • 35°8’54”N 120°38’53”W • 35°20’50.42”N 120°49’33.31”W • 35°35’1”N 121°7’18”W • 36°18’22.68”N 121°54’5.76”W • 36°22’16.9”N 121°54’6.05”W • 36°31’1.56”N 121°56’33.36”W • 36°58’20”N 121°54’50”W • 36°33’59”N 121°56’48”W • 36°35’5.42”N 121°57’54.36”W • 37°0’42”N 122°11’27”W • 37°10’54”N 122°23’38”W • 37°41’48”N 122°29’57”W • 37°45’34”N 122°30’39”W • 37°46’48”N 122°30’49”W • 37°47’0”N 122°28’0”W • 37°49’30”N 122°19’03”W • 37°49’40”N 122°30’22”W • 37°54’2”N 122°38’40”W • 37°54’34”N 122°41’11”W • 38°3’59.73”N 122°53’3.98”W • 38°18’39.6”N 123°3’57.6”W • 38°22’8.39”N 123°4’25.28”W • 38°23’34.8”N 123°5’40.92”W • 39°13’25”N 123°46’7”W • 39°16’30”N 123°46’0”W • 39°25’48”N 123°25’48”W • 39°29’36”N 123°47’37”W • 39°33’10”N 123°46’1”W • 39°49’57”N 123°51’7”W • 39°55’12”N 123°56’24”W • 40°1’50”N 124°4’23”W • 40°39’29”N 124°12’59”W • 40°45’13.53”N 124°12’54.73”W 41°18’0”N 124°0’0”W • 41°45’21”N 124°12’6”W • 41°52’0”N 124°12’0”W • 41°59’33”N 124°12’36”W Public Access David Horvitz & Ed Steck In late December of 2010 and early Janu- Some articles already had images, in which ary of 2011, I drove the entire California I added mine to them.
    [Show full text]
  • WATSON 135,727 SF INDUSTRIAL CENTER Available for Lease
    WATSON 135,727 SF INDUSTRIAL CENTER Available For Lease Watson Building 139 720 WatsonCenter Road, Carson, CA 90745 VALUE ADVANTAGE SPECIFICATIONS Additional 2.48 Acres for BUILDING SIZE: 135,727 SF MINIMUM CLEARANCE: 27’ - 29’ Trailer Storage OFFICE SIZE: 8,462 SF DOCK HIGH TRUCK POSITIONS: 23 - 8’ x 8’ Potential merchandise processing fee savings with GROUND LEVEL RAMPS: 1 - 12’ x 15’ Foreign Trade Zone 202 LAND SIZE: 427,146 SF activation TRUCK TURNING RADIUS: 323’ POWER: 1,200 amps, 277/480 volts, Master Planned Center 3 phase, 4 wire Close to Ports of Los Angeles, WAREHOUSE LIGHTING: T5 Long Beach and Los Angeles International Airport SPRINKLER SYSTEM: .40 GPM/3,000 SF Convenient access to the San Diego (405), Harbor (110), PARKING SPACES: 113 Long Beach (710), Artesia (91) and Terminal Island (103) YEAR BUILT: 1991 Freeways. Near Intermodal Container Transfer Facility WATSON LAND COMPANY 310.952.6401 www.watsonlandcompany.comwatsonlandcompany.com WATSON 135,727 SF INDUSTRIAL CENTER Available For Lease WATSON BUILDING 139 SITE PLAN 139 OFFICE PLAN 8,462 SF WATSON CENTER ROAD Gate OPEN OFFICE AREA LOBBY Entry Main Break Oce Room Area W W M M OPEN OFFICE AREA 139’ OPEN OFFICE AREA 135,727 SF Storage Container Approx. 2.48 Acres for 2.48 Acres Approx. AVALON BLVD. 99’ 8” 23 DH POSITIONS WCC 139 OFFICE PLAN revised | StudioCanvas | 01.04.11 Chain Link Fence N 250’ 323’ The information on this brochure has been compiled for the internal administra- tive convenience of Watson Land Company. Watson Land Company makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy of this brochure.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc
    Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] Map of Terminal Island Showing portion of East San Pedro as recorded in Book 52, Page 13, Miscl Records. Stock#: 48538 Map Maker: Southern Pacific Railroad Company Date: 1910 circa Place: n.p. Color: Condition: VG- Size: 31 x 65 inches Price: SOLD Description: Fine early map of Terminal Island, in San Pedro California, drawn for the Southern Pacific Railroad. The map illustrates Terminal Island at the beginning of its modern history, before the island was substantially reshaped and modified by dredging and reclamation projects that created the modern harbors at San Pedro and Long Beach. The map show the City of San Pedro at the right, with the lines of the Southern Pacific. Below, a line identified as Los Angeles Terminal Railway traverses Terminal Island, with a railway station, Hotel Site, Mill, Lumber Yard and Coal Yard shown, along with several wharfs. The location of the Catalina Yacht club is also noted (constructed in 1898). The map shows Morman (Mormon) Island and Smith Island, both of which have also been dramatically reshaped by modern port projects. Mormon Island was the site of an short-lived settlement attempt by San Bernardino-based Mormon pioneers in the 1850s. Terminal Island The island was originally called Isla Raza de Buena Gente and later Rattlesnake Island. It was renamed Terminal Island in 1891. In 1891, the Terminal Land Company purchased the island and a railway was built on to its east side by the Los Angeles Terminal Railroad Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis in Pdf Format
    FURUSATO - The Lost Village of Terminal Island Those who came of age during World War II have been called “The Greatest Generation”. On Terminal Island, California this generation is known as the ‘Nisei’ – or second generation Japanese, the American-born sons and daughters of immigrant parents. On the southern edge of the Port of Los Angeles, this isolated village offered a unique childhood experience. More than 3000 residents lived in a very small area known as Fish Harbor in San Pedro, 99% of whom were Japanese or Japanese American. While their parents worked as fishermen or cannery workers, the Nisei’s memory of Terminal Island is as an idyllic place, where they were often allowed to roam free, share dinner at a friend’s house, or dive for abalone near the beach. The culture of Japan was everywhere, from the Shinto Shrine to the Japanese Fisherman’s Hall where Kendo and Judo were taught. Physically and culturally isolated, the residents developed a unique dialect which combined Japanese and English – often in ways that were confusing to outsiders who spoke one or the other. The Terminal Island ‘lingo’ was symbolic of their status in California, accepted by neither the majority culture nor by other Japanese, the Terminal Islanders came to refer to themselves as ‘Yogores’ – dark and dirty on the outside, but pure and clean of heart within. As the Nisei grew older, they attended San Pedro High School and began to share American traditions with their Issei parents. Baseball games became a weekly event, sponsored by village businesses and fishermen.
    [Show full text]
  • Nor Th P a Cific Ocean C Alifornia
    204 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 4 Chapter 7, Pilot Coast U.S. 121° 120° 119° 118° 117° 18720 Point Arguello C ALIFORNIA Point Conception Santa Barbara 18725 T A B A R B A R A C H A Ventura S A N N N E L 18724 Port Hueneme Santa Miguel Island Santa Cruz Island 18740 18721 18744 18748 34° Santa Rosa Island 18729 18727 18728 Los Angeles SANTA MONICA BAY 18751 S A N T A P E D R 18749 Newport Beach O C H A N N 18756 E L 18754 18757 Santa Barbara Island 18774 Santa Catalina Island 18746 San Clemente San Nicolas Island 18746 E R S A N T A 18720 O U T B A R B A R A P A Oceanside S S A G E 18758 18755 18763 Encinitas 33° 18765 Del Mar GULF OF SANTA CATALINA San Clemente Island 18765 San Diego NORTH PA CIFIC OCEAN 18762 18773 18764 18772 Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 7—Chapter 4 18740 19 SEP2021 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 19 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 4 ¢ 205 San Diego to Point Arguello, California (14) METEOROLOGICAL TABLE – COASTAL AREA OFF SAN DIEGO, CA Between 31°N to 34°N and 116°W to 120°W YEARS OF WEATHER ELEMENTS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC RECORD Wind > 33 knots ¹ 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 48 Wave Height > 9 feet ¹ 0.8 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.2 48 Visibility < 2 nautical miles ¹ 4.4 4.5 2.8 2.4 1.5 3.2 2.9 2.2 3.0 4.7 3.3 4.0 48 Precipitation ¹ 3.6 3.6 2.4 1.7 1.2 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.9 2.1 3.1 1.8 Temperature > 69° F 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.9 3.0 9.2 14.7 14.8 9.0 4.4 1.7 5.4 Mean Temperature (°F) 58.3 58.4 58.5 59.3 60.4 62.1 64.7 66.4 66.5 65.2 62.7 59.9 61.9 Temperature < 33° F ¹ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mean RH (%) 77 79 78 79 81 83 84 84 83 81 77 76 80 Overcast or Obscured ¹ 19.4 21.4 22.2 25.7 37.9 48.1 45.7 38.8 31.4 26.3 15.4 16.7 29.3 Mean Cloud Cover (8ths) 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.2 5.0 5.5 5.6 5.3 4.6 4.2 3.4 3.5 4.4 Mean SLP (mbs) 1018 1018 1017 1015 1015 1013 1013 1013 1012 1014 1017 1018 1015 Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey Report
    F.2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT FOR THE SAN PEDRO WATERFRONT PROJECT LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Los Angeles Harbor Department Environmental Management Division 425 South Palos Verdes Street San Pedro, California 90733 Prepared by: ICF Jones & Stokes 811 West 7th Street, Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90017 213/627-5376 August 2008 Table of Contents SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 2 II. REGULATORY SETTING ................................................................................ 3 FEDERAL REGULATIONS ................................................................................ 3 STATE REGULATIONS ...................................................................................... 4 LOCAL REGULATIONS ..................................................................................... 6 III. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 7 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................. 7 PREHISTORIC CULTURAL SETTING .............................................................. 7 ETHNOGRAPHY ................................................................................................. 9 HISTORIC BACKGROUND .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of CARSON FINAL Initial Study/Negative Declaration for The
    CITY OF CARSON FINAL Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the Shippers Transport Express Container Storage Project City of Carson 701 E. Carson Street Carson, CA 90745 Contact: Max Castillo (310)-952-1761 ext. 1317 Prepared by: ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT, INC. 1000-A Ortega Way, Suite A Placentia, CA 92870 (714) 632-8521 November 2019 CHAPTER 1 –PROJECT DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SHIPPERS TRANSPORT EXPRESS RELOCATION PROJECT Page No. CHAPTER 1.0: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Agency Authority.................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Project Location ...................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Historic Site Uses .................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4.1 2149 East Sepulveda Boulevard ................................................................ 1-2 1.4.2 1150 East Sepulveda Boulevard ................................................................. 1-2 1.5 Project Description.................................................................................................. 1-4 CHAPTER 2.0: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 General Information
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County Law Enforcement Phone Numbers
    LOS ANGELES COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT PHONE NUMBERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S - STATIONS Altadena (07) ................................................ 780 E. Altadena Dr., Altadena 91001 .................................. 626-798-1131 Avalon (18) .................................................... 215 Summer Ave., P.O. Box 1551, Avalon 90704 .......... 310-510-0174 Carson (16) ..................................................... 21356 S. Avalon Blvd., Carson 90745 .................................. 310-830-1123 Century (21) .................................................. 11703 Alameda, Lynwood 90262 ........................................... 323-567-8121 Compton ........................................................... 301 S. Willowbrook Avenue, Compton 90220 ............................................................ Crescenta Valley (07) ................................. 4554 N. Briggs Ave., La Crescenta 91214 ............................. 818-248-3464 East Los Angeles (02) ................................. 5019 E. Third St., Los Angeles 90022 .................................... 323-264-4151 Industry (14) .................................................. 150 N. Hudson Ave., City of Industry ............................................ 626-330-3322 Lakewood (13)............................................... 5130 N. Clark Ave., Lakewood 90712 ................................... 562-866-9061 Lancaster (11) ............................................... 501W. Lancaster Blvd., Lancaster 93534.............................. 661-948-8466
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX C Aesthetics and Visual Resources: Sensitive Public Views of the PMPU Area
    APPENDIX C Aesthetics and Visual Resources: Sensitive Public Views of the PMPU Area 1 Critical views for impact evaluations conducted for aesthetics and visual resources, as addressed in 2 Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, are defined as those sensitive public views that would be 3 most affected by a proposed action, such as the greatest intensity of impact due to viewer proximity to a 4 project, the project’s visibility, and the duration of the affected view. The analyses are based on “worst- 5 case” circumstances of maximum proposed Program exposure to the most sensitive public views. It is a 6 premise of the technical approach that the range of critical public views potentially affected by the 7 proposed Program should be represented by the views chosen for analysis. This appendix presents an 8 initial consideration of sensitive public views of the PMPU area which are critical to the assessment of 9 impacts on aesthetics and visual resources within this area. 10 The region of influence for the aesthetics/visual resources impact analysis includes the Port, the Port of 11 Long Beach, and sensitive land uses near these ports (e.g., parks, beaches, tourist facilities, and residential 12 areas). Communities within the region include San Pedro, Rancho Palos Verdes, Wilmington, and Long 13 Beach. These points are located on all but the east side of the PMPU area. The sections below describe 14 views from all potentially critical view areas relative to the PMPU area, with the list of views most 15 relevant to impact evaluations for the PEIR representing a subset of all areas, as presented in Section 16 3.1.2.2, PMPU Area.
    [Show full text]